HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - 2000-08-21 PM PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILE
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMISSION
AGENDA PACKET
AUGUST 21 , 2000
SA
pE FAKE pswECp City of Lake Oswego
Development Review Commission
• Monday, August 21, 2000
7 p.m.
OREGO$ City Hall Council Chambers
380 A Avenue
Lake Oswego, OR 97034
Members:
Doug Cushing,Chair For Information: 635-0290
Nan Binkley, Vice Chair
Douglas Kiersey, Bruce Miller
Julie Morales, Sheila Ostly Agenda
Dave Powers
This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location. For any special accommodations, please contact
Janice Bader at 635-0297,48 hours before the meeting.
Agenda Book *
I. CALL TO ORDER
IL ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
•
IV. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER
V. PUBLIC HEARING
LU 00-0043, an application by Beacon Homes, LLC, for approval of a development review
permit to construct a 23,000 square-foot commercial center. The proposal consists of two
buildings measuring approximately 15,500 square feet and 7,500 square feet in size, and parking
spaces for 96 vehicles. The applicant is also requesting approval to remove six trees along the
southerly property line of the abutting property to the north (Tax Lot 2300) in order to develop
the site. The trees range from 5" to 8" in diameter at breast height (dbh).
The site is located at: the SE Corner of Jean Way & Boones Ferry Rd., Tax Lot 2400 of Tax Map
21E 18BD. Staff coordinator is Elizabeth Jacob, Associate Planner. Continued from August 7,
2000.
LU 00-0061, an application by BC Kim Olympic Tae Kwon Do, for approval of a conditional
use permit to establish a martial arts school for the purpose of teaching Tae Kwon Do. The
applicant intends to occupy a 1,429 square foot tenant space in the Oswego Towne Square
Shopping Center. The site is located at: 3 Monroe Parkway., Tax Lots 101 and 200 of
• Clackamas County Tax Map 21E 5AA and Tax lot 6600 of Multnomah County Tax Map IS 1 E
32DD. Staff Coordinator is Elizabeth Jacob, Associate Planner.
LU 00-0070 lAP 00-121, an application by Richard Feinberg, for approval of a tree removal
permit to remove one 12.9 inch Big Leaf Maple tree located in the front yard. The site is located•
at: 701 G Avenue, Tax Lot 20 of Tax Map 21E 3AC. Staff Coordinator is Sandy Ingalls,
Planning Technician.
VI. GENERAL PLANNING & OTHER BUSINESS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
•
0
li
J��ELAKEOswtO
• ��
acco>a
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LU 00-0043 STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM
TO: Development Review Commission
FROM: Elizabeth Jacob, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: LU 00-0043; Jean Way Commercial Center; Property located at SE Corner of
Jean Way and Boones Ferry Road
DATE: August 18, 2000
• The applicant for the above-referenced proposal requested a continuance of the August 7, 2000,
public hearing in order to revise the building elevations and materials, signage and design details.
Exhibit 34 is a Memorandum from the architect, David Bissett, outlining the six changes requested
by the Commission.
Exhibit 35 illustrates the proposed revisions. The north and east walls of Building 1 and the south
wall of Building 2 have been revised to break up the original long blank wall. These elevations
illustrate that the brick column detail on the building fronts has been carried around as pilasters on
the walls facing the adjacent properties. The applicant proposes to replace the original split-face
CMU on these walls with standard CMU that is painted to compliment the brick color. Staff finds
that these changes enhance the aesthetics of the structures and reduce the scale of these walls.
Sheet A7 of Exhibit 35 illustrates revisions to the sign monument, sign band, and entry
monuments. The Commission considered that caps (hats) located on the entry monuments and
monument sign would complement the roof of the buildings and provide a consistent design
theme. In addition,the entry monument was reduced in height and,proportionally, in width.
Different letter styles are also illustrated on these drawings. Staff finds that the Alternate One sign
lettering on the monument sign relates better proportionally to the monument than the other two
examples. Staff also that finds the smaller entry monuments relate better to the adjacent
landscaping and streetscape.
Sheet A7 also illustrates material and size details for the metal finials and hanging planters that are
• used to provide definition to the entries to the buildings.
380 A Avenue • Post Office Box 369 • Lake Oswego,Oregon 97034
Planning Division: (503)635-0290 • Building Division:(503)635-0390 • Engineering Division:(503)635-0270 • FAX(503)635-0269
A
As illustrated on the Walkway Section of Sheet A6, the columns have been given more definition
by corbeling the brick at the upper courses and recessing the soldier courses. The sign band face
has been pulled back under the canopy to allow recessed lights in front of the signs. In addition, a •
recessed light is proposed to be provided in the canopy in front of each bay.
In pulling the band for signage back from the face of the canopy, signage will be more subtle and
lighting will be evenly cast. Although the applicant is reluctant to provide sign specifications, staff
recommends that to ensure the quality and aesthetics required for this property as an entry to the
City, the recommended condition D(2) regarding sign band signs be revised to specify that signage
shall consist of individual letters with indirect illumination only. In addition, the sign colors
should be limited to black, dark brown, dark green, white gold leaf, copper, maroon, dark blue and
silver.
The Commission requested the applicant to look for different brick samples to provide more
texture and color variation. Also, a lighter color was suggested. Exhibit 36 has been provided to
address these suggestions. The applicant has looked at additional samples, as well, but of all the
colors reviewed, he believes the original color provides the best relationship with the other
materials, such as the copper-colored roof, green-tinted glass and black window and storefront
frames. Staff finds that the sample illustrated by Exhibit 36 does not relate to the other buildings
forming the "entry"to the City and is too much of a contrast with the natural environment of the
site and adjacent properties.
Staff is providing another example (Exhibit 37) for consideration of the Commission, which we
believe provides the texture and color variation desired by the Commission. Although this sample •
is darker than either of the samples provided by the applicant, staff finds that it does complement
the other building materials. Even though the elevations on Exhibit 35 illustrate that the rear of the
two-story building sections and the band for the signage is proposed to be sand finish stucco, the
drawings do not indicate whether the color or texture, or both, is sand finish. Staff finds that the
brick color demonstrated by Exhibit 37 would be softened by the textured CMU column bases and
could be further softened by sand-colored bands for signage.
The following conditions have been revised to include the recommendations of the Commission.
Deletions are noted by strikethroughs, new verbiage is in bold format. Condition D(5) has been
added on the City Attorney's advice for all current and future development review applications.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of LU 00-0043, subject to the following conditions:
A. Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit, the Applicant/Owner shall:
1. Provide evidence of compliance with Conditions A(1) and (2) of LU 00-
0042 to record the final plat for the approved two-parcel minor partition.
2. Submit final plans for the review and approval of staff that illustrate the
following:
LU 00-0043 Staff Report Addendum
August 18,2000
Page 2
a. Final construction plans that illustrate conformance to the City's
• design standards and specifications and shall include the following
supplementary materials, design features, and notes:
i. A final design for the subsurface stormwater infiltration
systems based on the percolation rates of onsite soil
conditions. Provide a copy of the percolation tests.
ii. A maintenance plan for all stormwater quality facilities,
including a list of maintenance tasks, how often each task
should be performed, and a calendar schedule for each task.
iii. Fire hydrants at locations specified by the fire marshal.
Note: onsite hydrants shall be located at least five feet from
a curb to provide protection from backing movements.
iv. An eight-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the Jean Way
frontage.
v. Relocation of streetlights outside of the sidewalk area, with
mast arm extensions to achieve proper illumination on the
roadway.
• vi. Offsite grades at the southeast corner of the site to ensure
that the finish grade of the parking lot aisle at the southeast
corner will lend itself to a southerly extension without
extensive cutting or filling on the adjoining property.
vii. Underground utility services.
viii. Provide a note on the plans to clearly inform the site
contractors about the necessity of preventing damage to the
trees, including bark and root zone. The contractor shall be
subject to fines,penalties and mitigation for trees that are
damaged or destroyed during construction.
b. Building plans that illustrate substantial compliance with the plans
approved by Exhibits 10, 4-6 13, 14, 15-17, 35, and 37 with the
following additional information:
i. Final plans shall accurately illustrate the height of each
building component to an architectural scale.
ii. A fire suppression sprinkler plan for review and approval
• by the Fire Marshal.
LU 00-0043Staff Report Addendum
August 18,2000
Page 3
wall of-likfilding 2 by continue g the theme-vr+ems •
and old; .one o f b r ck alo g the front f t1. b '1d'
as-i-llostfatecl-en-E*141*-14,
All mechanical equipment located on a roof or on the
ground shall be structurally screened with materials and
colors to match adjacent building materials.
iv. The location and materials of the trash enclosures shall be
constructed of materials as illustrated on Exhibit 14 with
brick and CMU walls on three sides to match the building
materials. The gates shall be black vinyl-coated wire fabric
mesh with screening inserts.
(a) The large enclosure adjacent to Building 1 shall be
reduced in length by three to five feet and the brick
shall be wrapped around the front on each side for
three or four feet, thus reducing the size of the
doors.
(b) A black anodized aluminum arbor shall be
constructed over the large enclosure as support for •
climbing vines.
� The-entfy-ffiefitimentisign-ert-either-side-ef-the-ElFiveway
el-iminated.
vii. Exterior lighting shall include:
(a) Parking lot lighting shall be limited to a maximum
150-watt high pressure sodium (HPS) luminaires
with a maximum height of 20 feet from the ground
to the top of the fixture. The light poles shall be
painted dark brown or black to match existing
lighting at the Nature's site across Jean Way.
(b) All lighting shall be high pressure sodium and shall
be designed to ensure that glare is not cast off-site.
viii. Details for the decorative finials shall be as shown on
Exhibit 4-1-35.
•
LU 00-0043Staff Report Addendum
August 18,2000
Page 4
c. Final site plans submitted for building permit approval shall
illustrate the exact location of the monument sign, for the review
• and approval of staff.
d. A final landscape plan, which illustrates substantial compliance
with the plan approved by Exhibit 8, with the following additional
information:
i. The plan shall not locate significant trees or a monument
sign in the area of a potential street widening at the north
end of Jean Way. A new monument sign and critical root
zones of new large trees shall not be placed within ten feet
of the existing back edge of sidewalk.
ii. The design and landscaping for the bioswales shall conform
to the most current specifications approved by the Unified
Sewerage Agency for vegetated swales.
iii. Revise the enlarged landscaped areas that are created by
reducing the length of the enclosure to provide additional
dense plant materials for more effective screening of the
enclosure.
• iv. Additional trees on the property to the north (Tax Lot 2300)
to mitigate for the six trees being removed along the
property line. If mitigation is not approved by the
property owner of Tax Lot 2300, mitigation shall be
provided on the subject site.
v. The plant specie, size, location, and spacing. All deciduous
trees shall have a minimum caliper of two (2) inches.
Conifer trees shall be a minimum 8-to-10 feet high. Vine
maples shall have a minimum height of 6-to-8 feet. Shrubs
shall be a minimum three gallon size.
vi. Relocate blueberry shrubs away from the parking
areas. Replace the Incense Cedar at the southeast
corner of Building 2 with a specie that is more
appropriate for the narrow space.
e. A final tree preservation, maintenance and mitigation plan,
prepared by a certified arborist. This plan shall be attached to the
construction documents. The plan shall incorporate the
specifications described in the Arborist Report prepared by Walter
Knapp,dated May 1, 2000 (Exhibit 27).
•
LU 00-0043Staff Report Addendum
August 18,2000
Page 5
f. A final site plan which illustrates tree protection fencing for all
existing trees to be preserved, as recommended by the consulting
arborist. Tree protection fencing shall consist of six-foot chain- •
link fencing attached to steel fence posts as recommended by the
consulting arborist (Exhibit 27).
3. Complete the construction of all public improvements, or provide a
financial guarantee for their construction pursuant to LOC 49.58.1415.
Note: A financial guarantee for the water line/hydrant installation shall not
be substituted in lieu of actual construction if the Fire Marshal determines
that an onsite hydrant is required to satisfy the requirements of the Fire
Code before building construction begins.
4. Provide evidence that a certified arborist has been retained to be present
during demolition, clearing, grading and periodically during construction
to supervise implementation of the tree protection plan approved under
Condition A(2)(e), above. Site inspection reports shall be provided to staff
to ensure that on-site inspection continues throughout construction.
5. Obtain a tree cutting permit prior to cutting any tree which is over 5
caliper inches in diameter measured 4-1/2 feet above grade.
B. Prior to Demolition, Construction or Grading Activity on the Site, the
Applicant/Owner Shall:
1. Install tree protection fencing around the five Douglas firs that are being
preserved, as specified by Condition A(2)(e) and (f), above. The
consulting arborist and staff shall inspect the fences after installation to
ensure that it is appropriately installed.
C. Prior to a Final Building Inspection Approval, the Applicant/Owner Shall:
1. Complete all public and private infrastructure improvements, as required
by Condition A(2)(a),provide the City with certified "as-built" drawings
complying with the City's standards for record drawings, and receive a
certificate of completion and acceptance by the City.
2. Dedicate
public utility easements for all public improvements located
outside the public right-of-way. A title report shall be required to show
that the easement or license is not subject to any encumbrances.
3. Execute required onsite public utility easements, as required by Condition
C(2) above, and submit them to staff for recording.
•
LU 00-0043StaffReport Addendum
August 18,2000
Page 6
4. Install all landscaping, including all mitigation trees on and off-site, as
approved by Condition A(2)(d), above, and provide an irrigation plan to
staff. The applicant/owner shall also provide a one-year guarantee for all
• landscape materials (one twelve-month growing season from the date of
installation. Appropriate security in the amount of five percent of the total
landscaping cost shall be provided by the applicant/owner.
5. Install the bicycle rack for at least ten bicycles, located as illustrated on
Exhibit 10. The color of the racks shall be complementary to the
building.
6. Stripe all parking spaces and mark compact spaces as such.
7. Grant to the City an easement or license for ingress/egress for the benefit
of Tax Lots 2700 and 2701 to the south. A title report shall be required to
show that the easement or license is not subject to any encumbrances.
8. Submit a stamped survey (with final site contour elevations) to
demonstrate compliance with the final grading plan approved under
Condition A(2)(a)(vi), above, to the satisfaction of staff. The survey shall
certify that final grading complies with the grading illustrated on the
approved grading plan.
D. Miscellaneous:
1. The future sign permit application shall illustrate compliance with LOC
47.10.410 and LOC 48.10.315(14)(d). A monument sign shall be limited
to 5.5 feet high by 13 feet long. The monument shall be of a color and
material that complement the building design, as illustrated by Exhibit 4.8
35. If lighting is proposed, it shall be limited to ground-mounted up lights
only. A sign permit application shall be required for the review and
approval of staff prior to the manufacture and installation of any sign.
Final site plans submitted for building permit approval shall illustrate the
location of a monument sign.
2. All future sign bands shall be located as illustrated on Exhibit 35 en-a
1,aekgrm. rl th„ tiler at is somple e„t L.♦ t ildS 1w:i�v♦virc t
a � � c
Signage shall consist of individual letters,
with indirect illumination only. Lettering, including logos, shall not
exceed 18-inches in height. The sign colors shall be complementary to
the overall color scheme of the buildings and shall be limited to black,
dark brown, dark green,white, gold leaf, copper, maroon, dark blue
and silver.
3. Prior to approval of any tenant improvements or business licenses for uses
• with a higher parking requirement than 3.33/1,000 square feet GFA, the
LU 00-0043Staff Report Addendum
August 18,2000
Page 7
applicant shall submit an updated parking plan illustrating current tenant
occupancy by leased area in order to ensure the overall parking adequacy.
4. The land use approval of this project does not imply approval of a
particular design, product, material, size, method of work, or layout of
public infrastructure except where a condition of approval has been
devised to control a particular design element or material.
5. The Endangered Species Act will prohibit actions which result in a
"take" (kill, harm, etc) of protected salmon and steelhead. Salmon or
Steelhead, or their habitat, could be damaged due to construction or
development on property that is located either along a stream, river,
or Oswego Lake, or that drains into one of these. Since the entire City
can be said to drain in some manner into a stream, river or Oswego
Lake, development and construction activities anywhere in the City
could run afoul of the ESA.
Exhibits
Exhibit 33 Colored renderings submitted at the August 7, 2000 hearing
Exhibit 34 Memo from David Bissett, dated August 14, 2000
Exhibit 35 Revised Elevations, Signage, and Design Details (Dwgs. A6 and A7)
Exhibit 36 Brick Sample `Canyon Mist'
Exhibit 37 Brick Sample `Pacific Handmold' (provided by staff)
•
LU 00-0043StaffReport Addendum
August 18,2000
Page 8
L_
• DAVID BISSETT & ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS
MEMORANDUM
August 14,2000
To: Liz Jacobs/City of Lake Oswego
From: David Bissett/Project Architect
Re: JEAN WAY COMMERCIAL CENTER
Per the public hearing held on 8-7-00 in which it was decided to leave the record open for seven days,
please find enclosed the supplementary information requested for the following(6)items:
1. Monument Sign at corner of Jean Way& Boones Ferry Rd.
Revised to show end columns w/"hat"elements and new letter style.
2. Monuments at Driveway entrance
Revised to smaller dimensions(2'-6" sq. x 4'-0"H)
and no internal lighting or glass block
• 3. Brick
Reselect for lighter color, more texture and color variation.
4. North wall of Bldg.#1 and South wall of Bldg.#2.
Revised to continue brick/cmu details in columns and soldier coarse.
Change split face cmu to standard&paint to compliment brick color.
5. Building Sign Band
Revise to add lighting and further develop sign location&detail.
6. Decorative Finials
Provide additional detail for shape,finish&size(4'-0"max. ht.).
We respectfully submit this information for your review and approval at the next scheduled hearing on
August 21, 2000.
Thank you and please don't hesitate to call if there is anything else you need prior to next Monday.
Since - .
(3 .. Fes=
• yid /AI CARE
EXHIBIT 34
LU 00-0043
322 NW 5th Avenue • Portland, Oregon 97209 • (503) 226-6785 •
AUG-15-2000 13:29 VENERABLE - BISSETT 503 224 2311 P.02/03
i 1 ....,,,_________ _---.„- 1 a.a.i.N4•_..0 171--hei.144.4.1 AVIII NVall' 1 [
1 1
"areocarr1i3s—iiiiinTa VII I BSYHd/N414d013A3C1 Ni91930
i I •
<1 11 1 41411 111
0 co °
1- $ I E 0
li/II:1111 11 K 1 1 11 11 li 1 11 • '• . • 1'......::.'',11
0 alS1 - 11,,.w•
. Ai ow:• ?:.0.1.A.N•
-ill •illil,0 l'-ii 11131 1111 illiii II 11 4iip 0 Awl N, i.tqa ° 11 imii
7*.t- •NK.16
*ma.. P111 11 i! 4 ilili Mill ii/ • ' '! 1 7:'
,ftin 0" ° • • I-: Zi t..0 1. a __=____ c.5.. ,7.zotkw -• ta 11-1\N:
--`1- !I NM:
:I. ... .., NI -.44 4 00000 4 VAS dalf /14. AO g OA
--- rll.. -41‘1 •.. 41. 1.4
V.11 Alliti 0
=_-.....7 0 lin :leak <I
-.k. .
o0 0 ill:rot
-', 'IM •'''IV
Id4!4il;. I' ,oi
.'11111' Ir o A -.,,,,.........: . .
,..:
lir § Fa VoNzt•i-aig.M.:711
. ..„ A ..f. II L. • .h-- • -
1 1:1 my J91..1
-1. • li a' ..-:.74 FAS
IIE 0 ' ',.2N.Ii.
1,1. 111 Dal :':', a. 1, .
! ..1si • 1.
N' 1 •I III
_ 1111.1111
i
19 .40.:
,3 °AO -<---
--..r, TAtriPaillii.O. 0
o 0 . .,1,ak •,,- .1,
li 41
kli 11,0 . _
, I 1 . . ; .:•AlObli 9 i t
101 6_ i.,.......:., ,
.,, . „• . , -,,.. ..
1 •AL get.
., .. ).."
949
•, 1 0 i;IINLIIII\.. Qe
0 .11Emom. i k
11 r •14 i
0 illi11101 if
1ii.ii II
!..-i.::;TiilIir : inlIkell el CI\ Li-
am ,
_.. \..:, .,:l. i,• I
:.• . .. 0
.4 „14 ' , I )-
Ilii'l II r„,„ t.7.
.__.. ._. mbllii, P \ ii 9.1:
. Il& ,- ,..i1Ir -i,,,,h;• 0• 1
• : 1 .y
li i ---=.= RI . .:•-• ' .1 a;..
..,..L, ;: i..,-; ,i110: 1 .11. 1:! • 11113•
1,1::, .11:Emill i
tu
' . m "%ION
. 114' -, - -7 (11.--•='v QD
,.,,,..t.
—"- :
, . ,..........
___, . !, i
—.NI ..:';',;i1
. N.r2/11
0 1 !,1 !ii .
; 9
in
o- k
on
.4
I, ' .• IA
1 til,. 2 ' . le:. . .....!•Ino
— N , voi
.. _._ ,.. . ,.
:.:--,._ .1 , i.A, ,.
- -
--- mi• , Airl
Nti . .• ,
.... ,.:11:':IL 1!:!,;•11
i k il l't i ',! , t II I IIII,,G
. • ' ''',:;iims
Mi i;.
M •v
kNi!'"11.1....!II -
..-..Vr'-..:
fr•I ,1;7-0111 0
_)J1• •o.IA
0 —1., - '' •. . III
4
--;));
(1.()
101a5.4 IT
, a
,
,..... ..S.V
4111 111. R9 11
I.' - ''• , t I .
I 14 t• if I
1 kl 11 R II 1 2
i 11 M10. .ION
i1.1.11 II . i 1 1 II 4
1 ii q .i 1 1 ii .4 m%moms
NI& N-•.\\SV :Iiiiililifiliii1Pililillilliillill 0 VA w
A ill OM iiiiiiill N .-4.11111114111!1!1!!!iiill!IIIIIIII s -...,..; x'4
7,..s.;.• IMO
Ns; A
& . /
41111. illilii'
Nil 1
-----
-
• :
EXHIBIT 35
LU 00-0043
AUG-15-2000 13';29 UENERABLE - BISSETT 503 224 2311 P.03/03
sena Nemo vmuo. W.84.1 Mil rti tit e1311430 100'41314420 AVM NVEr It i
E,I, <E1--
.
.10,1
I i I
inIMIJA••alalinv,••••MIONICI.411.1.1••In=atilt
SIINLIOSSV If m ,
levria liow-io-inao woad
rt. i 111 ir
it
• 1 t
I i L i
11/ i 401 1 ii§ il 21
iiiiiiiiiill hail% 11 i 1 lliii 1
1
-0=4°11;/"" r!vigrlirrA5t4-:):::)
p lifilii!liVIIii;iiiiiiiIiIiiidiM
I
,
, . Arm 0
"4 4 41044d 21,11 ‘Se*g Lig gt CA,:0 J101111
1 „
_.4
1:1 I 11 (4 4-
1 gifg:721:111:11111411111g$110111 ti.1 ii !Lts , '3
1 ,
0 %rag
o , &
A Elltinaill!iiiiiit4iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiMiliallil c'cf ,. cjiii I, '—.,a 1
aii7:: bl
g I 1
If:
a
i
•PA. ..„,...
Z '11\-----k-7 7711 P Il -11 Q.9--oe
7 L Li__Iti,___E71 N ' 0, kl
f 1 1,341.4lil W\
1 111185212EgallirldRallE111111111 tI ..:4 ir 'FL11140 ' 7 111:01.4= ....' ..
1
0 ' ..--...,, i
t,,..., ,
,'--7:i i:i,
: 'i:::*'w „,
0 a ° . . 11.41 ., 1 -9 ''
,,,, . , • 'It 110 .-g ' ' Pl&\ "•
...?.'- ,
. v..
.. „, ,.. iiTA is iiiiiiiiiiiitrilill . '• ,,I*131 <
I' i,r4r011111111,1511 iklbillii11111 A
\111;11141:11111*..11111 111 ..i' A .., Mi
-7 1 ipplierlist,lis.. , '• 111
i oviki,*7--T.A.......7.-.......,•,.t.,., N .! 1. • 4.,..'
ricoliEllovii:oilionu _
,,,, g_......:.,
•
liv,,N,;,mid:g .; ...„.
...:EN,''II CV . a
"ii1;14YI!..'11,2 N '14111114 ,111:1:114.- ME Z I.
e 1
eo ,,—..:. 1 !,ix;:ii',.: 1 - t';',-.:*.Azi,
reill:1 :IIII!Iilizzal e
ik.,11111!1 1101114 111'1111:12=11-
,14,1,1i 14,1.1,1,111.1 t 1 .3
a \; ,i,-
titi Om E L 10.0,1 1,10,1:1:11t.----amilmi ,. ,:. , m
vet:v, , 1.,9,111 :olg..mom
!,•, .. _.
.,..,...1-5 a ilillh I if Yili'inliat'ITrriant tian
9.<1 __,=___=.-.-.,..:1/4:27 '::1-11161411k1h:MH7111::
0 ;1111:11:1:i!',88 S •Wii:;41,Y1064011111111401111111
ji ,E. low.At Lap .t.. ...
1111
Ili Ulf / 1 1 •
III
IIIII41111,1411 Vt.; 0------7 — -......•..m. ,
:4 ' illimi
.1.. fa —r,_":71, _El
4B199r
tiqii1.011 k II
til.!1.1.31-4 '''''• ill .,•-;'',Tiii1 •
Ail : 33 6 t.- 4 i
' i Li i:M1 2 'S II ts,‘WE f4 _.N.,, _ , ., 1111
, .
'‘.1111 1 U liklabli — 11 SEFoceiel
fl 9 It 71.,,,74. 02:17: 0, 1...:::::
11 11 illi 0 0 0 4S1 ,• . L'.... Ile
4 <11 litilli % it I* ,N, ..: wi .-.. ..c. i
_!4::, :
...,,- • ,;.,:.
vi kohl 1 a 11 "1 OW. ; o ..I
1'1 :
hi
,.'
- 0.1
,i' natio t ...
1_____111:41j 11, go
i -41Hiblillu !
I il \`
,1 .
—.......1111110 1.11
III lig
WWI
•
TOTAL P.03
STAFF REPORT
•
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
PLANNING DIVISION
APPLICANT: FILE NO:
B. C. Kim Olympic Tae kwon Do LU 00-0061
PROPERTY OWNER: STAFF:
HAC Real Estate Corp. D Elizabeth Jacob
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DATE OF REPORT:
Tax Lots 101 and 200 of August 11, 2000
Clackamas Cty. Tax Map 21E 5AA
and Block 10 of Multnomah County DATE OF HEARING:
Tax Map 1 S 1 E 32DD
August 21, 2000
LOCATION:
• NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION:
3 Monroe Parkway
Lake Oswego, Oregon Mountain Park
COMP. PLAN DESCRIPTION: ZONING DESIGNATION:
NC NC
I. APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to establish a martial arts
school for up to 20 students for the purpose of teaching Tae Kwon Do. The applicant intends
to occupy a 1,768 square-foot tenant space in the Oswego Towne Square, which is zoned NC
(Neighborhood Commercial).
II. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
A. City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan:
Goal 1: Citizen Involvement Policies
• Goal 2: Land Use Planning Policies
Goal 12: Transportation Land Use Policy Element; Sub-Goal 11: Parking
LU 00-0061
Page 1 of 8
L
B. City of Lake Oswego Zoning Code (LOC Chapter 48):
LOC 48.02.015 Definitions
LOC 48.10.300 - 48.10.315 NC Zone Descriptions •
LOC 48.22.550 - 48.22.575 Conditional Uses
C. City of Lake Oswego Development Code (LOC Chapter 49):
LOC 49.16.015 Definitions
LOC 49.16.020 - 49.16.030 Application of Code, Planning Director
Authority, Fees
LOC 49.16.035 Development Permit Required
LOC 49.16.040 Development Permits Restricted
LOC 49.20.115(2)(e) Major Development
LOC 49.22.200 Burden of Proof
LOC 49.22.205 Development Standards
LOC 49.22.220 Review Criteria for Major Developments
LOC 49.22.225 Conditions of Approval
LOC 49.30.500 - 49.30.510 Application Requirements
LOC 49.36.700 - 49.36.720 Application Procedures
LOC 49.44.900 -49.44.920 Review by Hearing Body/Notice of Public
Hearing
LOC 49.46.1000 - 49.46.1035 Hearings Before Hearings Body
LOC 49.58.1400 -49.58.1430 Compliance with Approved Permit
D. City of Lake Oswego Development Standards: •
2.005 - 2.040 Building Design
5.005 - 5.020 Street Lights
6.005 - 6.040 Transit System
7.005 - 7.040 Off-Street Parking, Loading and Bicycle Access
8.005 - 8.040 Park and Open Space
9.005 - 9.040 Landscaping, Screening and Buffering
11.005 - 11.040 Drainage Standard for Major Development
14.005 - 14.040 Utilities
18.005 - 18.040 Access
19.005 - 19.040 On-Site Circulation - Driveways and Fire Access
Roads
20.005 - 20.040 On-Site Circulation—Bikeways, Walkways and
Accessways
E. City of Lake Oswego Sign Ordinance:
LOC Chapter 47
F. Previous Actions:
111
DR 1-83
DR 1-83(Mod. 1-88)
LU 00-0061
Page 2 of 8
III. FINDINGS
A. Background/Existing Conditions:
1. The martial arts school is proposed to be located in a 1,768 square-foot
tenant space (1,429 lesson activity floor area) in the Oswego Towne
Square. The existing 116,535 square foot shopping center was approved
for office, service and retail commercial activities in 1983 (DR 1-83). A
modification of the development was approved by the Development
Review Commission in 1988 [(DR 1-83(Mod. 1-88)] to revise signage,
building colors, access, landscaping, and to implement a wetlands
enhancement plan (Exhibit 7).
2. The Towne Square is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of
Boones Ferry Road (a major arterial) and Monroe Parkway (a major
collector). The property is zoned neighborhood commercial and is part of
Phase IV of the overall Mountain Park Planned Unit Development. The
southerly part of the shopping center site lies in Clackamas County, but
the largest area lies in Multnomah County.
3. Adjacent land uses include condominiums to the west (zoned R-3), a NC
commercial area to the south, single-family residences and undeveloped
land to the north/northeast--outside the City limits, and R-3 zoned single-
• family homes across Boones Ferry Road to the east.
B. Compliance with Criteria for Approval:
As per LOC 49.22.200, the applicant for a development permit shall bear the
burden of proof that the application complies with all applicable review criteria or
can be made to comply with applicable criteria by imposition of conditions of
approval. The applicant has submitted the information required by LOC
49.30.500 - 49.30.510 and LOC 49.36.700 - 49.36.710. These documents are
listed as exhibits which accompany this report.
LOC 49.20.115 -Major Development
Amusement services, as described by LOC 48.10.305(11), are designated as
conditional uses in the NC zone. LOC 49.20.115(2)(e) describes conditional use
applications as major development. Per LOC 49.22.220, for any major development
application to be approved, it shall first be established that the proposal complies
with:
1. Any applicable regulatory policies of the Lake Oswego
Comprehensive Plan;
• Applicable Comprehensive Plan policies were addressed at the time of the
original development approval of the shopping center in 1983 (DR 1-83) and for
the modification in 1988 (Exhibit 7). Staff finds that the conditional use permit
LU 00-0061
Page 3 of 8
review of the proposed martial arts school use will ensure continued compliance
with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's narrative (Exhibit 4) addresses
currently applicable Comprehensive Plan policies--Citizen Involvement Policies,
Land Use Planning Policies, and the Parking Section of the Transportation Land •
Use Policies. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on April 14, 2000, to
which the Mountain Park Homeowners Association and the owners/residents of
property within 300 feet of the site were invited. The meeting minutes attached to
this report as Exhibit 6 indicate that no citizen or Homeowners Association
member attended the meeting. The public hearing process provides further
opportunity for citizen input. The mixed use parking analysis (Exhibit 5) has
been provided to determine if there is an inadequacy of on-site parking, which
could have negative impacts on the adjacent neighborhood. Compliance with the
applicable development standards will assure conformance to the Plan policies.
Conditions of approval will be imposed, if necessary, to assure compliance.
2. The requirements of the zone in which it is located;
a. NC'Neighborhood Commercial) Zone Description ILOC 48.10.300 -
48.10.315)
The site is zoned NC. The Zoning Code does not describe a specific use category
for martial arts studios (academies). The development standard for parking [LODS
7] does provide a specific parking requirement for martial arts studios. The Code
allows the Planning Director to determine the category that is most similar to the
proposed use. Staff finds that the proposed martial arts academy could be described
as fitting into at least two categories: Services - Educational, such as music schools,
or Services - Amusement, such as a dance studio or school [LOC 48.10.305(11)].
Both these categories are classified as conditional uses in the NC zone.
Compliance with NC setbacks, height and lot coverage were reviewed during the
development review for Oswego Town Center(DR 1-83). No additional
buildings or site changes are proposed as part of this application that would
impact setbacks or lot coverage.
b. Conditional Uses [LOC 48.22.550 - 48.22.6151
As described in the narrative (Exhibit 4),the proposal is to lease a 1,768 square-
foot tenant space in the Oswego Towne Center(Exhibits 2 and 3). The 1,429
square foot lesson activity area can accommodate up to twenty students. Classes
will be held Monday through Friday between 9:00 am and 9:00 pm. Some
Saturday classes may be held mid-mornings.
The applicant should note that the subject review is based upon a maximum
twenty-student occupancy. Should the applicant desire to expand the use in the
future, a modification to the subject application will be required per LOC
48.22.550(4). •
LU 00-0061
Page 4 of 8
• Per LOC 48.22.555, an application for a conditional use shall be allowed if:
(1) The requirements of the zone are met; and
• The zone requirements have been met, as described under Section 2(a), above.
(2) Special conditions found in LOC 48.22.605 are met; and,
The site will be designed so that ingress and egress will not cause
hazardous turning movements, traffic slow-downs or blockages
due to storage of vehicles waiting for services.
Ingress and egress to the site were approved as a part of DR 1-83
and DR 1-83(Mod. 88) (Exhibit 7). The proposed use will not alter
the existing access conditions on Boones Ferry Road or Monroe
Parkway, or create any additional hazardous turning movements or
traffic slow-downs or blockages than would normally occur at a
large shopping center.
2. Public services are or can be provided at the site.
The site is a developed commercial complex that is fully served by
existing public services. The proposed martial arts classes will not
require additional public services.
• 3. All outdoor lighting except security lighting shall be extinguished
at the close of business hours.
Since the proposed use is to be located in an existing shopping
center, lighting is controlled for the center, not individual businesses.
The proposed use will not require any additional lighting.
4. Any adverse impacts on adjoining residential uses such as noise,
lights, loss of privacy will be mitigated by landscaping, screening
or increased setbacks.
The proposed use, located in an existing commercial center, will
not create any additional impacts on adjoining residential uses than
what already occur from the existing businesses.
5. Parking shall meet the parking standards and may be increased if
additional spaces are shown to be necessary.
The parking analysis (Exhibit 5) illustrates that the site contains
475 parking spaces and the existing uses require 402 spaces,
leaving 73 parking spaces available. According to the narrative
• (Exhibit 4),the proposed use will require 16 parking spaces.
Development Standard 7, "Off-Street Parking,"will demonstrate
that the parking requirements can be met for the proposed use.
LU 00-0061
Page 5 of 8
6. For retail tire, batteries and accessory sales, the following criteria
also apply.
This standard is not applicable to the proposed use. •
(3) The site is physically capable of accommodating the proposed use;
As previously discussed under Item 5, above, the shopping center contains 475
parking spaces (Exhibits 2 and 5). Based upon the parking requirement to provide
one parking space per 100 square feet of lesson activity floor area, 14.29 spaces plus
.5 per employee are required for the martial arts academy [LODS 7.020 —Table 7.1].
Sixteen spaces will be necessary to accommodate the proposed use. According to
the parking analysis (Exhibit 5), based on current business usage, 73 excess spaces
are available to accommodate the 16 required spaces. The circulation in the parking
lot is adequate to provide safe ingress and egress.
(4) The functional characteristics of the proposed use are such that it can be
made to be reasonably compatible with uses in the vicinity.
As discussed in the narrative (Exhibit 4), the functional characteristics of the
proposed use are compatible with the existing commercial uses in the shopping
center and the NC zone to the south of Monroe Parkway. The size of the tenant
space limits the number of students at any one time. The applicant suggests 20
students are the optimal size based on the size of the tenant space (Exhibit 4). The •
narrative suggests that the proposed use is a family-oriented function in which
more than one family member at a time may participate. Whereas ingressing and
egressing traffic may be more concentrated at times than traffic from a typical
retail use, Engineering staff finds that potential increase in vehicle trips generated
by the proposed use is so minimal that it will not have a measurable effect on the
functioning of the street system.
Days and hours of operation are consistent with the business hours of the shopping
center. Therefore, this standard is met.
3. The Development Standards applicable to major developments;
The Development Standards applicable to major developments are listed on page
two of this report. These standards were adequately addressed during the original
development review for the shopping center(DR 1-83). The applicant's narrative
summarizes the standards applicable to the subject proposal (Exhibit 4). This report
will address only those standards that are affected by the proposed martial arts
school use.
Off-Street Parking, Loading and Bicycle Access - (7.005 - 7.040)
The parking lot layout design was reviewed during the original approval of the •
shopping center(DR 1-83). No changes are proposed to the parking lot layout or
aisle dimensions. As previously discussed under Criterion (3), above, there are
LU 00-0061
Page 6 of 8
• currently 475 parking spaces on site. Based upon the parking requirement to
provide one parking space per 1,000 square feet of lesson activity floor area
(1,429 square feet),plus .5 space per employee (one), sixteen spaces are required
• for the martial arts academy [LODS 7.020 —Table 7.1]. According to the parking
analysis based on current business usage, 73 excess spaces are available to
accommodate the 16 required spaces (Exhibit 5). This standard is met.
On-Site Circulation —Driveways and Fire Access Roads - (19.005 - 19.040)
This standard is applicable to all development proposing a new use or increased
use on a site when the development will result in the increased use of driveways
and parking lot aisles. This standard prescribes location and dimensional widths
and grades and standards of construction for driveways and fire access roads.
Compliance with these requirements was satisfied during the original
development review and construction of the shopping center (DR 1-83).
Vehicular activity associated with the martial arts academy will not impact the
existing circulation patterns. As discussed earlier, no changes to the site
circulation or access points are proposed as part of the subject request.
4. Any additional statutory, regulatory or Lake Oswego Code
provisions which may be applicable to the specific Major
development application;
Sign Ordinance [LOC Chapter 47]
S All signage shall comply with the provisions of the Sign Ordinance [LOC Chapter
47]. Additionally, any future signage for the academy shall be consistent in size
and location with the rest of the signage in the shopping center and shall be
complimentary to the building colors and adjacent signage. Proposed signage will
be reviewed for compliance with Chapter 47 at the time of a sign permit application.
5. Any conditions of approval imposed as part of an approved ODPS
or prior development permit affecting the subject property.
There are no conditions of the previous approvals that affect the proposed martial
arts academy usage.
IV. CONCLUSION
Based upon the materials submitted by the applicant and findings presented in this report,
staff concludes that LU 00-0061 complies with all applicable criteria.
V. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of LU 00-0061 for a maximum of 20 students, subject to the
following conditions:
• 1. All future signage shall be subject to a Sign Permit and shall be incorporated into
and complimentary to the existing Oswego Town Center sign band signage.
LU 00-0061
Page
2. Should the applicant desire to expand the use in the future, a modification to the
subject application shall be required per LOC 48. 22. 550(4).
•
EXHIBITS
1. Tax Map
2. Site Plan
3. Floor Plan of Tenant Space
4. Applicant's Narrative
5. Parking Study
6. Minutes of Neighborhood Meeting held April 14, 2000
7. Staff Report and Findings, Conclusion and Order for DR 1-83(Mod. 1-88)
Date of Application Submittal: June 19, 2000
Date Application Determined to be Completed: July 31, 2000
State Mandated 120-Day Rule: November 28, 2000
S
LU 00-0061
Page 8 of 8
• • •
E zE S �. . \_ / Nf�1 { l\ i ja,.% 2A0o p00 :71
Sal CS 20 +q I 6200 JO
+ems • rer 1E me 3T00 J" 4.� I
29 S 2 I 19 M% y' w '� 5700 Y 2 ' 15800�` `. 8
/
Ng. ...� : Ez>ai6 S.W. O'Rc ,1a0.04
+y� 5200 �j 0 MOO....
`R . _ d
` ► 31
2600 4i.3 noo 15 ,�, V'4400�',soo 12 +`r �0 id . •N.
5900 V" 2
'� 3 tom %d • 5 5100 A�,
va
p .. , '' f 6oao 3 i
7 6600 . 5000 S 4
+6300
c ...� mauiri
Mult. County Tax Map 1S1E 32DD
SEE SUPP.
MAP 2 g4 'AN,.
cQ� ij/;i v��P\�
`' • i 00*
SITE + 652,000
P pFZ ,gyp
41'
[
Y�? 10I. arN� .. ; . u. w. A' hra .,-. , m0SEE MAP IE 5AA \200 G c %AA `"o` Nary Mr. 1
EDSUPPLEMENTAL MAP Na.2 5 ; OviDUNTAihi FAR : r &INDEX
;i a PORZLANDrr � 'o = A , N a p U NW jo
.0 2
Tr
,Qb� 2r ! y_
Clackamas County Tax Map 21E 5AA
002
JRN.213.2000 1:38PM RREI.J. SEATTLE NO.E130 P.2/2
•
SITE PLAN
OSWEGO TOWNE SQUARE
LAKE OSWEGO,OR
Li.Illi.....A.u.,1%...w.. k_. TNIS getAc-6"
—.3.:tt:!......r. 71 ,v ,,,.......—;-- r.,"
c , -
alA1641 I-
• cL) U TIM= . v •._,
H• L. m N X y il. i'
, •j 0 P Q ZU
I GlieR0 , , ' 4"•••••"'"1 ..........r..1 . . winno, f•loomm 7 .-
xclnin
i 0-11-141Riiiii0 ----T , ''_
glliIllr---,
till-Rififit0 1 ' ', ::= I 1111 ...,: i
raw,
•..., . i
g :l'if
CtItioe Parking -
Iii 1ii Oinin-0 I ,_
PfH-R. ,
,.._.-
_
.
ril -
,
_
-
-
i'.--4 _
_ :
c.
.....
_
_
_
,
r , "
1 1 I !
!I i
\ %
Q5411,04tHi - - 1 -
k a I
f r 1
i wETLANDS \t\
)1 %
i)
............_—.•—••• -.. ....., - _,... -',.......,., i (
I ..,•-•'''s -'' ''',•%.,...,..,.,,,N,
I, ....
tip:0mm paRKWAY ----. 1\
• . EXHIBIT 2
Hi 00-0061
003
004
0c''8-00 1::31AM FpoW-'PANIE;I C3011 NW INC 1-303-320-0400 T-947 P 05/01 F-OlO
i 6 • • c _ y
2W-3' CLEAR-11 -
t0'-5' t-6 -0' I7'-1- t 6,-3"
„
-. of
ram_ --�
if-2' 1 6'-8'
1 FULL Ti'
Ls( I ova/a.•N.5
SUITE K 8
1,768 SF LEASABLE
919 I al
TEAcN1N4I
t-6WO1'4 p crlv11
AP-6A
I (' eARKitot
c. u E.
7 ZI
b
Q•1• 4' *_4* 7-Q' 12'-C 3'. 4'-3'
I � -
CX1s'tI rJG EXHIBIT 3
S f A E LU 00-0061
uro i
oswego sheet two
1 E tl R a towne °°N �. °
411 tw toxin •
DOrUZ0und•.,6oz, ofgo square dnV. n wn Oy r� K
g�
503.2273616 •
0U5
✓ Cover sheet
RE: PA-00-0009
We are requesting a conditional use
permit for the property known as Space
K -Oswego Towne Square. It is currently
zoned Neighborhood Commercial and
we are requesting a permit for a Private
Educational Institution( per LOC
49.20. 115(2)(e)).
• Inclusions:
- Pre-application.
- Pre-application conference instructions.
- Affidavit of Mailing.
- Affidavit of Posting.
- Minutes of Neighborhood Meeting.
- Comprehensive Plan.
- Zoning.
- Development Code.
- Development Standards.
- Other ordinances.
- Previous cases.
- Parking requirements
- County Assessor's Map
•
EXHIBIT 4
LU 00-0061
4- + 007
Comprehensive Plan:
On or about August 15th, 2000, we would like to
open a Martial Arts academy for the purpose of
teaching Tae Kwon Do. This institution will be
for adults, children, and family oriented. It will
be an asset to the community as a whole due to
the nature and quality of the instructors. We are
looking forward to being a positive and active
part of this community. We will be occupying
Space K Oswego Towne Square. The space will
be improved to complete the area in the rear to
accommodate a changing facility. Restroom
facilities exist and will be improved. Oswego
Towne Square is on a bus route and parking is
ample (see parking analysis).
i
• Zoning:
District R 7.5
A private educational institution is allowed under a
conditional use permit. We propose a martial arts
school for the purpose of teaching Tae Kwon Do.
There will be no outdoor activities. Parking is
plentiful (see parking analysis).Changing and
restroom facilities will be available for participants
and guests. Classes will be held Monday through
Friday between 9AM and 9PM. Some Saturday
• classes will be held mid mornings. These hours are
compatible with adjacent existing businesses. The
property owner has assessed this in accepting the
lease agreement between RREF Management and
Olympic Tae Kwon Do.
The zoning district standard requirements have been
met, Oswego Towne Square is an existing building
and business. The tenant space is an existing size and
configuration without recent modifications.
Per: LOC 48.10.310-LOC 48.10.315-
LOC 48.22.550-LOC 48.22.560-LOC 48.22.575
•
4 3
009
Development code. r
A conditional use permit is described in 49.20. 115
2e as a major development. The requirements for
Neighborhood Contact per LO.0 49.36.705 have
been met and documented. As a private educational
facility we meet the requirements to be located in a
Neighborhood Commercial zoning. There will be no
outdoor activities at this property. Parking is existing
and ample (see parking analysis). No applicable
regulatory policies of the Lake Oswego
Comprehensive Plan noted. Oswego Towne Square is
an existing business and development and the
modifications on site will not
property require further
development code review. Parking, setback, height,
traffic impact, etc., are existing and unchanged.
Per: LOC 49.22.220- LOC 49.20.115(2)(a)and (c)
•
010
411
Development Standards.
RE: PUD 1-67, DR25-79, DR1-83
No exterior modifications are proposed. There is Tri-
Met service via bus route 38 which has a stop at
Monroe Parkway and Boones Ferry Rd. This
space has 1429 sq. ft. of lesson activity area and one
full time employee/ owner. The required parking is
15 additional spaces (per 7.005-7.040). The parking
analysis provided by the owner demonstrates that
there are 73 extra spaces available.
Park and open space (8.005-8.040) is satisfied with
0 the existing development.
Landscaping, screening and buffering (9.005-9.040)
are presently satisfied with the existing development.
Drainage (11.005-11.040) is presently satisfied with
the existing development. .
All utilities (14.005-14.035) are existing and
operating.
Access (18.005-18040) is satisfied with existing
development.
On site circulation (19.005-19.040) and (20.005-
20.040) is presently satisfied with existing
development.
Per: LODS 2.005-2.040, 5.005-5.020, 6.005-6.040,
7.005-7.040, 8.005-8.040, 9.005-9.040, 11.005-11.040,
0 14.005-14.035, 18.005-18.040, 19.005-19.040, 20.005-20.040.
4_011
•
•
•
012
40
Response to request for additional information
July 19, 2000
RE: LU 00-0061
The zoning district standard requirements have been
met, Oswego Towne Square is an existing building
and business. The tenant space is an existing size and
configuration without recent modifications.
Access streets have capacity to handle projected
traffic, Oswego Towne Square has demonstrated
traffic impact with original development. This is an
• existing lease space and does not add additional
unforeseen traffic volume. The parking analysis
p g Y
shows adequate parking.
Per: LOC 48. 10.310-LOC 48. 10.315-
LOC 48.22.550-LOC 48.22.555 LOC 48.22.560-
LOC 48.22.575
This site is physically capable of accommodating an
average class size of 20 students. This has been taken
into account when realizing the floor space of 1768
square feet and other schools of martial arts
conducted by B.C.Kim.
This school will be very compatible with its
surroundings, as the Oswego Towne Square is quite
similar to other facilities B.C. Kim has conducted
classes. Such as Tanasbourne center and his existing
facility at Baseline and 185th Ave. We draw a family
oriented clientele, which will enhance the
neighborhood and shopping center.
Comprehensive Plan: revised 7-24-00
On or about August 15
to we would like to
2000,
open a Martial Arts academy for the purpose of
teaching Tae Kwon Do. This institution will be
for adults, children, and family oriented. It will
be an asset to the community as a whole due to
the nature and quality uali of the instructors. We are
q
looking forward to being a positive and active
part of this community. We will be occupying
tY pY g
Space K Oswego Towne Square. The space will
be improved to complete the area in the rear to
accommodate a changing facility. Restroom
facilities exist and will be improved. Oswego
Towne Square is on a bus route and parking is
ample (see parking analysis).
Goal 1 Citizen Involvement has been met
demonstrated by our documentation of a
community meeting held on April 14th, 2000.
Goal 2 Land Use Planning is being addressed
through the public review process (LU 00-0061).
Goals 11 and 12 have been met; please see
parking analysis attached to original application.
r
•
4 - 7 015
L
41)
016
AAR-13-00 05:28P11 FROM-TRAMELL CROW NW INC 1-503-520-D400 T-686 P.01/01 F-877
• Parking Requirements at Oswego Towne Square
To:Tim Tuiniaga
Fr:Dan Bozich
Daze: March 13,2000
RE: Parking requirement at Oswego Towne Square
The following is a tweak of the square footage and parking requirements for Oswego Towne Square
Parking Required Parking
Use Area Requirement Spaces
Office—except medical/dental 37,215 1/300 g.s.f. 124
Day Care 6,000 1/400 g.s.f. 15
Commercial Services 5,878 1/400 g.s.f. 15
Office—Medical/Dental 7,964 1/200 g.s.f. 44
Commercial: Retail 30,679 1/300 g.s.f. 102
Commercial:Restaurant 6000 1/75 g.s.f. 80
Commercial: Beauty** 2,129 1/250 g.s.f. 25
Commercial: Grocery 20,000 1/200 g.s.f. 100
Commercial: Grocery 3,068 1/500 g.s.f. 6
Misc.Retail Electrical Rnoms 2,991 N/A N/A
Storage 2,047 N/A 1
• TOTAL AREA 125,314 526
Total Parking Spaces Required 526
Size reduction @ 85%x 526 447
TA reduction @ 90%x 447 402
Net parking spaces required 402
Parking spaces available 475
Excess parking spaces available 73
•* Beauty spaces have a total of 16 stations.
O EXHIBIT
LU 00-0061
1017
•
•
S
018
RE: PA-00-0009
Meeting minutes for neighborhood
meeting April, 14,2000 :
No notes taken pro or con. No attendees
other than representatives of Olympic
Tae Kwon Do.
•
Tim Tuininga 4- 14-00
vilei
• EXHIBIT 6
LU 00-0061
6 1 019
Welcome - Thank you for coming.
Concerns or comments:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 •
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
oti► 1 Osi,
tco
oatt.oet
C3 . C , KcN1
Larne of Applicant bLy/+1P
iC TAC 6Cw° N 00 Pre App # PA - 00- 00o (51
Subject Property: Tax Lot(s) Z 1 E O S A A - I o ( 4- Zoo Tax Map (s) a I E
Address or General Location: S PAC L- K
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
I, 1 I n'] Tiit1 av U A , do swear or affirm that I am (represent)the party inflating interest
in a proposed G4 N O t Tt a N A c__ lA' SE PERM I T affecting the land
located at S PALE 1< OS W & C i d o o J NE S e uAR sand that pursuant to LOC 49.36.705.
did on the / 2.714 day of MA KC.H , 14 personally posted the notice indicating that the site may
posed for a C_0ND lTI0 NA L \AS E PERM r
, application.
The sign was posted at:
Rio NT 1paoR — Sp - Q Sw EAU Tow Sa (AA2.E
(state location on property)
Dated THIS 3. 6 day of 1/1V F p ('1-f
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to,or affirmed,before me this Y of f 1\`A p c': , i—
STATE OF OREGON 3-Pk 1VJAvi(Ir � J `
u C"Nn Af)li j Notary Public for the State of Oregon ="� NOR OFFICIAL
B.BOWLEN
411
r-- NOTARY PUBLIC-0OREGON
V; COMMISSION NO.063381
r7 MY COMMISSION MIRES APRIL 3.2001
My Commission Expires
021
0
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING .
STATE OF OREGON )
:�K . o NI ) SS
County offelaci )
I, l I/I -7-",., . N i n1 6 A , being duly sworn, depose and say that on
3 - j 3 - d 0 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the
attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at D $ L'"' 6 G a To vI 16.1 +
G?u A R C - S P AcC L< , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and
made a part of hereof.
I
I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were
deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office with postage prepaid thereon.
Si ature 1/L-741--
1n ?..o G
Subscribed and sworn to, or affirmed before me this-1o\k day of t v 10.v C C ,
•
IOFFICIAL L SEAL � v� f\ —I� -b�- .Lk__ :
�'4' DIANNE R. HEISLER
r`a'• NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Notary Public -
� COMMISSION NO.328984 My commission expires: < < • ( I U
MY COMMISSION F IRES NOV.11.2003
Pre-App. No.: PA 40 - d 0 a 9
III
022
• March 13, 2000
RE: Pre-Application No. PA 00-0009 (Kim Olympic
Tae Kwon Do.Mt. Park Town Square)
We Olympic Tae Kwon Do, a future tenant on behalf of the
owner of the property Oswego Towne Square; tax lots
21E05AA101 & 200, do propose a Conditional Use Permit for the
purpose of developing a Tae Kwon Do Martial Arts Academy.
This Academy would be located at Oswego Towne Square and
being the sixth space (K) west of Thriftway. Prior to applying to
the City of Lake Oswego for the necessary permits, we would like
to discuss the proposal in more detail with the members of the
neighborhood association and surrounding property owners and
residents. Per the requirements of LOC Chapter 49.36.705, you are
invited to attend a meeting on April 14, 2000, at 6PM
Space K (look for notice posted in window)
6 spaces west of Thriftway
Oswego Towne Square
Please note that this will be an informational meeting on
Preliminary development plans. These plans may be altered prior
to submittal of the application to the City.
I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with
you. Please call me at 503-591-0690 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, B.C. Kim/ Tim Tuininga
110
023
3c -f t. 1 t J t t , :`7r_ . ( t t t. ,•u •
Edward Ferrero Min Ho&Sun Ae Tan Min Ho&Sun Ae Tan
12740 Boones Ferry Rd 11501 NW 21St Ave 11501 NW 21St Ave
0
Lake Oswego.OR 97035 Vancouver,WA 98685 Vancouver. WA 98685
Min Ho&Sun Ae Tan Thomas Paul&Julie Eaton Timberg G W Paulson Co
11501 NW 21 St Ave 2441 Knaus Rd PO Box 23429
Vancouver, WA 98685 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Portland.OR 97281
Chevron Usa Inc Grove Water Dist Lake Joe&Joanne Scaii�ii
PO Box 285 16016 Boones Ferry Rd 54 Greenridge Ct
Houston,TX 77001 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego. OR Y70;5
Helen Sturgeon Gregory Raugi Ted Calouri
47 Greenridge Ct 11040 S Deer Dr 13097 NW Dumar St
Lake Oswego.OR 97035 Woodway,WA 98020 Portland. OR 97229
Schuman Family Llc Donald&Edythe Hudson Stanley& Diana Loop
1 185 Forest Meadows Way 62 Greenridge Ct 49 Greenridge Ct
Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego. OR 97035III
Waltraud Burgett Kenneth&Sandra Jernstedt James&Carrie Blasko
51 Greenridge Ct 12800 Goodall Rd 55 Greenridge Ct
Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Lake Oswego,OR 97035
Iris Miller Victoria English Michael Bonney
86 Greenridge Ct 84 Greenridge Ct 82 Greenridge Ct
Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego,OR 97035
Donna Selby Jean Donly James Gragert
SO Greenridge Ct 78 Greenridge Ct 76 Greenridge Ct
Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego.OR 97035
John Selander Masako Kvocka John Guthrie
74 Greenridge Ct 72 Greenridge Ct 70 Greenridge Ct
Lake Oswego_OR 97035 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego.OR 97035
•
IP
Melvin& Mary Olson Barry&Eileen Kaplan Family Mortgage Service Corporation
68 Greenridge Ct 66 Greenridge Ct 64 Greenridge Ct
Lake Oswego.OR 97035 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 0 2 4 Lake Oswego,OR 97035
•
Motet Park Hmowners Assn Mountain Park Hmowners Assn Greenridge Prop Ownrs Assoc
'_ Mount Jefferson Ter 2 Mount Jefferson Ter 3 I Greenridge Ct
_ake Oswego, OR 97035 Lake Oswego.OR 97035 Lake Oswego, OR 97035
411
025
6 - 7
I t c.I Ali-,Ifi t -
Hac Real Estate Corp D Greenridge Property Owners Assn
Edward Ferrero 55 Greenridge Ct#A
12740 Boones Ferry Rd 3 11 Monroe Pkwy
41111
Lake Oswe;o.OR 97035
Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Lake Oswego,OR 97035
Kenneth & Iris Miller
86 Greenridge Ct
Lake Oswego. OR 97035
I
026
It ,�• e _ I �' .+, Y �. Tt .. Y etMfr..."!•4.9`"
- .:�
••
1 REE'ORI•; THE DEVELOPMI WI' REVIEW BOARD •
OF T41)
•
2 • CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO •
5 A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF ) DR 1-83(Mod. ' 1-88)-589
MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE) (Towne Square at Mt. Park)
/';' b TOWNE SQUARE AT MP. PARK ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & OIDEF. 'i ,_ �r'`�'�-1,
! CHOPPING CENTER ) ifcg
gpii6c "r4 yc:
..,.. etc
a i j } I X'l ' 1.
' fS7• xI. *i, 8
, t 9 • Y y
f
e
"• `� 'i-v.44.* 10 NATURE OF APPLICATION =- r • 4"-
k :4'. 11 The applicant is requesting approval to moci:, are, existing ,� a.
yak t. i-4",tt� 12 t `04.'r '
shopping center by revising the building sl:?•��.ce, building �� �,. �f •,
4 '{ 13 colors, access and landscaping. The applicant also plans to It-- ,,,,4 ,(' s'
r !0P � ,00
'�' t�` r;:. 14 implement a wetland enhancement plan for the site located at the f. 1s ' f ,
Ji • 1c44 15 northwest intersection <if Booncs Ferry Roil and Monroe Parkway. ""! `Ar-o '
'�'�a 4:; 16 The changes affect Conditirn 02 (regarding access) of the 4Nk'b '' 'ter
Y}Y
ff
'^ 17 original approval for the shopping center located at tic ye`
6616' 18 northwest intersection of Boones Furry Roa3 and Monroe Parkway ~ { i��,
6*44giftial
•:/' 4* 19 (Block 10 of Multnomah County Maps (' 4226 and 4227) . ,
r 44t ir,Argtir 20 - •
,,�a,-irr-��pp�-y,�P••• 21 HEARINGS
' t"'� 22 The Develc•,•..•-n.T Review Board held a public hearing and considered
23 this r.ppli; ,:ion at its meeting of July 2 1900. f "`ar,w''. , i4.._
al # .
j� i c AA
24
" '; rt:
�+ ,Y,. r '`5 CRITERIA AN') S_I ANDARUS
Y ,
w
'aJ'ltr�i3 •l ,,.' L$.•.t'$ Lai
,, ,{y `6 A. City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan: a
• { i Z7
` •1-', rrY'� 28 Commercial Areas, VII-R, Monroe,Boones Ferry Site,
art',,.,:% - page 118
' a ;,1, 39 iaturnl Resources Policy Element , pages 27-58
. ,• ' '; l ;p Wildlife Habitat Policies, page 31
,.� t,' 30 Distinctive Natural Area Policies, pages 32-35
fir' , 31 Wetlands, pages 50-52
-,a sf ,,`:k' Open Space Land Use Policy Element, pages 126-138
) " 1' 1 DR1-03(Med. 1 PRI
Y"� �3t. ,,' PAGE
ii q , r;7
4 f!
:4 ttli.>~ - ,4� nR , , :- , ; _ - . EXHIBIT 7
-il���• ';IYZO'
4 a� r t � F,`E S ` LU 00-0061 •
r .ems jt
r r • • ,
•
`, 4 ° tr y -'-r•" . #,4c�. ' • , c ; +� y : r•: •t is �v s - 'f, -
• --
•
,-4 4 i at.C � . � - .4 4,.E , . ,: ?„ -r , ,- 1 ,4rd 'a > *f , t C,, , ♦'; ,}`s }j i,,43::k~C'fia 7 y , r4 {ti 2; a. rr r , +S l , e -�1 \
i , :. . s-w ,u a .5t 5: }1 _
„7,,,, . I ,,. _, ,. ..,, _,„ ....,:„. �- �-1. .
4 ,Y t a' •
;'1 y1'.�t!t,�,..1,,.�. N �•��.S�.'I. ka a£r !' fi 'afa +M
��.. ; t�*A?trY.r � 1, - ' ;4'
r' ly ,';',z t'i > _
;` i ; x54,,, r
,. ,3 `
r .,�s .$ r
`7, rT:i. w e 1
-4:s 4 F '
t 4 2 B. City of Like Oswego Zoning Cade: -
3 LOC 40.300-48.315 Commercial Districts
s LOC 48.530 Vision Clearance �..;
r_. x 4.
F 5 C. City of Lake Oswego Sign Code:
a 6, : Oapr Signs
�
�. i 5
D. City of Lake Oswego Development ordinance: ,
- ''..tr__ 8 J
' ; ";r '- g LOC 49.090(A,D) Applicability of Development
;,' ,a at t .vi, Standards �!>► s � `. ,_.
��• 10 LOC a9.300 49.315 Major Development. Procedures t, *�,,w• °,,
•fir r . '� ` LOC 49.61, Criteria for Apprcval t � „
11 +. �:
� �� � .• ;y, LOC 49.620 Conditional Approvalrs ,
12
•t`'' s• E. City of l.ak.� Oswego Development Standards: fin ° r
13I 4� Fi-
p ; r3
r i' 14 2.020 tiuildinG Design , 9 }
t• `-"x 4.020 Wetlands ;'
+K .� / ,#A. sf a `t£ 1' ,5-0:0 SI_'ee.t Lights i , mi
� -"'fil 9•U20 •Landsca :inc S� rf:enlnt� end ''i ' ;� i
• .> � Buffering ,
'� , i 17 11.020 Drainage Str•.ndard tor Major a.
t �''' - 18 Development _ t
= ;4'.4'•FYI 18.020 l.cces.3 Standard c'-
`� 19 19.0'20 Site Ci•culation - Private "�
-,
F ' zl yr �' StrEeCe/D! 1JE7wAy8 ¢ +
"` Fes' 20.020 Site Circulation - Bikeways, „ ,�, v `
'n• f �4•.Vita) 21 and Walkways - J t , q,.
sif• 'y�1 r 23 cotiCl.U$IOr1 %'`rr f7;Yl :
;st„ �; kj.e �' The Develootnent hev.iew Board concl.uJ��s that DR 1-83(Mod. ' 1- =�1 •bfpd {J
y }�r e�R.a. a'• rr
�`. fit., `y•'
`t 1,, 25 OH) can be made to comply with all applicable criteria by N, lzrr* s , ;
` 26 the application of certain conditions. �g, �
Kts tiwF+ { D�IIY
fir 'aa' J '.3fc�. 1 tn, �I�+RI
F E' JC a 27 -a,,' 7 a%, 'Y.'
T a als` �`c,�'- 28 FINDINGS AND REASONS L�sa,;'1 � `1
'� ---
,, Gila . 39 The Development Review Board incorporates the July 15, 19118• "ail ....,qr
3e * ���� ),� staff report un DR 1-O:i(ttod.' 1-801 as support for its � i'),��*4 ,,
1 a a
b •,ai ,.b:, , 31 decision, supplemented by the following: - +
•
31.
1 Al. the Board':; meeting of July 27, 1988, four citizensk "r `� • `�
'•s•..4:•''';/4 3:1 ' rained concerns about the applicant's orcoosal to make p,
j. K ' 34 modifications to the shopping center. The concerns are
d V. ... I , ''
ji'••� • ' a DU 1-03(ro:. 1-00) " . fi
• F y 1, r `yt ,1 r .•4w'4F +,r ' PACE
,
•
ttpnl''r-�I' 1 ♦ b
•
a'(?' i .1_ r z`z l t ,fir'' c- '�� 'fFY Y ,'" -y t;TF .# .�Y. :: t ?:Q.•:`*` '.N!;"#-K "s'j' 'l';" . 't ` "v., `'``., , ';r, i
r.i�f1�ii , ,i -FRS :d ..,:ii ti 'rd'F ., Z ,�13 i f' :7171 ;Agra,55 E ;g a 1.;• r 9 ' �.e}+[i
S?
-if:Ati' ..t `add BSc- -,;,. '�i �..4 ._:4"1' t:"'{"h� 1 .{ •••••. `:*.,,r� -• 4t i'1._ _'4, r5`�s •-�.L1,T�"~.i
--,r •.r t_. t 3' v •• r •iii-t.�3C' • .}r T., 1 cy 6;4 •e 7,a4 A .ra:.. f P.'-RhN�y.'r s kf- c417 a �,
- y a.- _ a r 1. t iA, : a—� ,� � ,•t - 3ti't,-c .F t',a,cn , -� ,+-^� •
- 4f •�s I #•R } ' -ppfry ) lt,,;'K`�S. •`{,�.a''�- �5�Y { >r'?WaX1 ` - •s
'f -.,, .a-. 'ft -. ,=Tom,. '' . n•af-a } 4C rrc" ,. t a YX , S. `f .Kir; } �'
��..I
�, ' xi.S���` ,4 } ��3� '7' C��F `ir. 1 ��+�,' �1' -r'^ 14 x ,t; �t �'.2'4'ti'sr ,� a*s '..t1 rr3, -4 -�C+lt{•. ,. F: ' �4 �+.ql,�,.,,�` t !v J dy.�..., 1 ,
;', ,;. . „nwc 'r .yam 4 i fa f ' - 4W 4.'i,_.'• N,rr } t r.-•.y.ay s'r'�:.-:rig. � .71_ 1.
- r.'!t•,..fir.7' ah d �!K r+••.y. ct 2,��zryy.�' ''�'!•�f +l �.: '.fKl! •Y� yx^�$- � C1 n� r
n.,�•1 '.
'P� �y��.r.t??r ,4 s� �,��,+�p"*i .•,i�'ss� 7 �'IK; ., yy1Qy L tip �•.,,, t 0 4 ,
rt,,,,--' -44.r... ,,-.. - - . )1., ..-fw 4.4 P.-f.4--6' "t•., 't- ,m7: c-',,,,-"e.- kktif:ck- ;,..;2 ,, _ ,-,„., .
-• �T c _ '4.1 4•1 I .'� Rx'tits3:i ti :. ', S 1 P'AWkt ' p'flr,• '� --
;._. +. .`�"Ft4t-.s-- 4 'hka' �• }.. " Alt :�....: .'+'1,vE�1��F . �.4e�::Ti.tb:: X...'t. !• r � �- ` •
t. t
°
1
addressed as follows: ' •-,- - . -
2
a. Three of the citizens questioned the cols proposed )
3 for the back (north elevation) of the shopping enter
`i n .`
since it would be visible from their homes. The ■' :. -
5 Board found that the applicant Lad demonstrated that '
6 the color palate (Exhibit 18) would not detract from
7 the existing complementary relationship, between the
4 8 shopping center's form and overall proportion, with
9 respect to adjacent structures of good design. No
10 changes to the structure were proposed. The Board
11 also found that the color proposed for the rear of. �=
j 12 the shopping center would not contrast with the i
13 earth-tone residences to the north. The applicant's
architect provided a larger color sample (Exhibit
15 29) which illustrated that the color proposed for y r
to the north c':levation was eel hviirht. or glaring. '' -o �, `n:
i 17 h. Two of the citizens state' that they did not believe r_<
18 the applicant had demonstrated that the shopping
• 14 center would function a5 a neighborhood facility and r , ' r r-
20 that it would ha•'e the appearance of serving a much rr '
larger geographic area. The Board found that the t,
1 22 applicant proposed no changes that would affect
23 compliance with the City's Toning Cede and that the , fF
74 :;ttoppit;g center remained in full compliance with LOC
r 18.315(7) which regulates the use and size of the 4; 5: +
,26 center.
27 c. Twn of the citizens raised question:, concerning the
rtiintenance of landscaping and the need to keep T,`f
?.(3 x
unwanted people from walking through the landscaping
3039
tetweert the residential area anu the shopping
i1 r-enter. The ,.,thiicant testified that landscaping
32 wo Id be maintained and enhanced and that with
ack.' tional tenants at the center, security would be
33
impr rvcd.
34 ya'
s
3 pp 1-t. .tt-roli.1-88) • •
PAGE
;
,,*"-s -, ---7'., .,a..r a 7+s r ^7*,4 ,'
_• C � E,t�`,-
..
` � . ,1 " w i r { a .t � * > �
' SrWrir�Ali F , rah J }i � T > rf, ;T'l # .-�iii�s • ; ' 'r -
' a 'WA.' ttia , - LY� .a k U ,1 . ,'Lyr' a*z .' 9 > :! t ' N
•
-
,i..:‘ N' +' '-*z 9 '.. i�=P„cr , c,�
• t t111-y. . f =_r i7- d(i;,- '.F ` • te- � M. Y .' . � '4 l _ y, h tiF i w
, >u rc • »
, 3..� '.. ���. �• .: . . .-.a �[ _ i"1 ,- �:•t ? A
3.T e . f"
uf, a ! tit5y {A , y ;A.,,,: S s•4S{, 4 4�a y .-Cr: st y_: a
✓- =t-.
� t J '+ 4f,4 i4 P �Ste sz,a i I.y ? .k to ,-- ." X i r. 1: °?i j
,tom ` 'ter • ,.f ' [ r,I „r !1 [ _ ,, •. , •.
r
0..� ti .l 1
-f y
A3 .K , ,
-,
x ne
d. One of the citizens believed that the realigd and
3 reconfigured access to Boones Ferry Road would cross
'r--,R 3
a portion of the wetland. The Board foun
• d that the,+3 4
c, driveway would cross an area that is presently lawn
alongwith the
�Ptrees they. wereplanted
with some
-I' ° development of the shopping center. The proposed
7 driveway would not encroach into or modify the
8 boundary of the protected area that contains both
d
; ! u, 9 wetland and upland features. ma , '.
40n 10 e. Ory citizen questioned whether new buildings would ':_
IA11 be constructed on the property. The Board stated •
1'4 12 that t)+ey were not approving any additional future
fq? 13
'^ development as part of this application.
xi,t Sys
74%." 14 Applications for additional buildings would be
'ea' 15 reviewed as separate items, if, and when they were , i.,
3s kfi
16 proposed. 1
17 2. The staff indicated that another citizen had called and ,
' £ V„ 18 asked the Board to insua'F that signing at the
•
19 interpretive stations around the wetland include •,4,
,", 20 information about the importance of staying out of the
,,▪ . 21 wetland. Based on the applicant's testimony and the
,-..a,4, 22 Wetland Enhancement Plan (Exhibit 5) , the Board found
t 23 that the combination of barrier plantings and signage al'.¢4"fr
'4., 24 would minimize any disturbance of the wetland.
. 25 3• The Board questioned the applicant :.bout the proposed ``ti tf. V, st; y ' 4
'1.' 26 circulation for trucks on the property. After testimony r* d*� L!,� tf1.
27 from the applicant's traffic engineer, the Board found a y �y►{3, ,
28 the api�licant's proposal Satisfactory and that no s�-ax ,s3., • c
additional conditions were necessary to control truck 'V+ aI fu 't � ' ,
4 33 access and circulation. `` �, ="" ','`
IT IS ORDERED II? TI{E DEVCLOPAtCN1' REVIEW BOARD of the City of. ,t ,+11,:ie-,i .-N,
Lake Oswego that: t5 �-riv,;14ry7.
3ar` ,
r� �µ
t `f: ADR 1-83(Mod.1-06) •
PACs. R `s'
41
h_ . ?`. 1. ..e.' .4.;Q. `( ”..-T} Zp 1.-_- 7, f�.. 1G}.:. s _'w ff `- _ t. •�' f`'[ l"i ..",
zy 'r•l'ir�ual fi 4 Fd l t 1.'1, .. , _ , ;C S. FI.Rv2' 7 4 xt.;, T1 '
j '" y:. t ,f ` ��.t -�„ G ! {�i yd�N !.'40...,'�iln t�� �jY} ' 7,' t ' '1 j'` . • _�
ss r f,, jtle4 .,,,.,- j nrY TKt -rR r [` . k,'-1• : is 3 l: [ut .o ., _ -.
'E.. P k++ l z - *1. c,t ►et tfi• r { rit''rl Ka ti gt '- t.F..',.. 'V'-@. . -
5 e . .:4& A , ,, . e..i,. t' t;r ,,tt yrF �t v(+`i'� o? xrt,.I.t yr.r�t 1,,s . .
t� ?'�xr,}„ t,,,r.s ': i ce ., , r ,,,� rfa;� fit' •klyt `
'� 44 f c t1 f. ,N ".. 5�, 1 t la T- ,:"" ,dr tif.3,:P '' , Y t 14-Ti'Il. t Srt1* 1• l'
ti'r � '� c"S �ii t t tl p7 �c,}f r � t�. , r;}`t`
i. �^.e.0 r a #ice �"*,i �4?6, r• X-}�+ ?j� F V:."1?f'�•ii•r ,u ��u , ;
41 i''7}°y •i -`4^5,t _)h ;:cli.,A�, tt-.'a' 7 p ,i' ` �K,.gi.-0t- 4!...i S t1 '^F�4
i�"lk�+�.���` �y�r�,�SAC j�YY� �5'`��. tJy`�dyr�t k TI �'�L�#.:.i1�t.`C' � � F h
t X�,.�, yF �,` si .,'N � p r*Pa.' t�::1�5,;,'y w.,f`x'5i ; 7 4:<,j,• �s �' � 1,!`
4` 4[l- +..'' 41"�,6,'le,.' « .. 1..� ) 't s•'7fr c.Ft i' VAIN?
i�3�1^r i "
`} .sW� g'`r^ _ Or,�s Ft�' *Y"i 4SlY �.,'1*r��/k'Fi�" �1�.#'; '��'.j+(1 i'? �+�-1 '�'1'fi :+r '. . .
-b
rr `t
1
A. DR 1•-83(Mod. '1-88) , eliminating original, condirion P2,
w:1 2 is approved subject to compliance with the conditions emu , .:
P;_• 3 of approval set forth in Subsection B of this Order.
4 r i
-,`i •- ' : B. The conditions for DR 1-83(Mod. '1-f8) are as follows: '
5 +
The following conditions shall be satisfied prior to
6
k`,• the issuance of permits:
7 •
8 1. .A Final develcpment schecule shall be submitted
c
9 for the review and approval of staff.
.a 4
� 10 2• Street lighting at the new ac;cesa from aoones -
11 Ferry Road shall be provided, as necessary, to
comply with the Street Lighting Standard.
12
2
3 3. A final landscape plan showing ::he additional ,
13 Crean to be planted and the revised plaza designo shall be submitted for the review and approval of
14 staff. . p
15
•
`4, 4. An irrigation plan shall be submitted for the
"a` 16 review and approval of staff.
4- 17
L Oaa. . 18 5. Final street improvement plans and access design
444:-.1;f`4frr T; '
shall be submitted for the review •and approval of 4:.
19 the City Engineer. µ`, ,
�• 20 h. The aopli:a,^.t shall demonstrate compliance withA.
'a $ t'• 71 any permit requirements of the Divis.iori of 'itate }�
gi.0 Lands. c
�d Y
£�`4t'k r"i 23
25
F t .ti
', •S s
:l'i, 39
3 , t.y
31
i ,,1 r i s 3 2
.
t .4r + f,i 33''5, 34
a .
-. 5 DR 1-83(Mod,1-88)
' PAGE •
, '-. •
r ',• K f ` `,' . !.. ••a r}+ .
1
® V • V �,1
' •
, ;
1
I CEFTIFV THAT THIS ORDER was presentee to and. APPROVED by r ' '
� ..
2 the Development Review Board of the City of Lake O }ra.
•
3 .swego. . �r�r'.,.
'
4 DATED thie _
let day of _August _, 1960.
James A. Miller, Chairman
�- 8 Development Review hoard .14
-' -r o (;\ 1/14,,LOP..0 ' .'-0`..' ',no
am, ;`• 5i4
t_' , $ 9 _ \1 '.'s
':t f 't "• i
10 r� . r v,t
11 r .,
/ c
12 Se et rY ,r---;4 v l' wl,.
Y13
14 ATTEST:
,• ',, 15 ORAL DECISION - July 27, 1980 '' .1 `
t ." 16
r
,..10' 17 AYES: Miller, Zin91i, Martindale, Swill.tnger, Grea-.res, • k 7r. kn.r.
liicjrim , •' x;f
s t�Ty 18 NOES: Nr,ne '; • '� -.r1
:; .1 19 , °, r441
"� 4 2C ABSTAIP': None 11
ABSENT: Foster %0
> K 21 a
114-4
WRITTEN FINDINGS - August 1, 1988 e..*
' r3 7
Eir
.tea a3 r %�`•1. n`
'' /-04, 2r{ MMFS: hiller, 7in_sli, Harrindale, Ini,r!'i, Grooves. Svillinger . •:P,
J r - 1rt1 s
NOES: Nine 'raj r k . ) 4
▪ 3 t ,! 26 A[iSTAIN: Foster • ; . f ,, '
ABSL•NT: None V : i` •
cl
• � 28
39 � .�> ,• f Ali
i
y t 7 {
► , a A30 V '} tf
,..? ,
r, 'k 31
4 , :tit s, 73
�;v. - 33s. RI{
t� 34 , 4 �►i
u - A
.� t
'_ 6 DR 1-83tMod.1-88) •
u PAGE ' ,
::.� „ ;mo f
,... } t k�..
Spy f4 �'
�' , .rP. • • ='1t ' 4: ''''re
I:''' 1. � r11.•ryJ •Atria# }rnt4^':s 1 ,_• r i ,
h� ;i. Y..Yi`r'4-,V4,0 rP1*.V. r y-Ai;
r4► al'k� ,, �1 .c. ~ t r le , -� 1' �^U �A r.v
it 'f
f -to
- - a - - t
J
•
'STAFF REPORT yr
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
- - ---. LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
APPLICANT: FILE NO.
• OTAK , Inc . DR 1-83 (Mod. ' 1 -88)
PROPERTY OWNER. STAFF:
I3irtcher Properties Robert Galante
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DATE OF REPORT:
Tax Lots 101 and 200 of July 15 . 1988
Tax Map 2 1E SAA, . .
(Clack . Cty . ) ; DATE OF HEARING:
Block 10 of. Mult: Ctl .
Tax Maps 4226 & 4227 July 27, 1988
LOCATION: NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION:
Northwest Intersection of Mt . Park
•
Hoones Ferry Rd. and
Monroe Parkway
COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION:
Neighborhood Commercial NC
(NC)
I . APPLICANT' S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval to modify an
existing shopping center by revising the building
signage, building colors, access and landscaping. The
applicant also plans to implement a wetland
enhancement plan for the site located at the northwest
intersection of T3oones Ferry Road and Monroe Parkway.
The changes affect condition #2 ( regarding access) of
•
the original approval ( DR 1-83 , Exhibit 17 ) .
Ilk
DR 1.-83 (Mod. 1-88)
0 3 3 Page 1 of 8
A. .i.•
- r,,...w..:.:x.w-:..sn..a.a:+i4i ++�.w.-:..:..i-...,.r..►..-fi..+:.u.vtl.es-...:...`:.r�xl:lWvii+:S,*:-w ...i..^.avorew,.. ,.n„:.,,.,..... :::SiNa...
11 . AP.PL1CA131.F:_-ULC1)LJT1ONS
A . City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan:
Commercial. Areas, VII-B, Monroe/13oones Ferry Site,
page 118
Natural Resources Policy Element, pages 27-58
Wildlife habitat Policies, page 31
Distinctive Natural Area Policies , pages 32-35
• wetlands, pages 50-52
• Open Space Land Use Policy Element , pages 126- 138
B . City of Lake Oswego Zoning Cede:
LOC 48 . 300-48 . 315 Commercial Districts
LOC 48-. 530 Vision Clearance
C . City of Lake Oswego Sign Code:
LOC Chapter 47 Signs
D. City of. Lake Oswego Development Ordinance:
LOC '19 . 090 (A, D) Applicability of Development
Standards
LOC 49 . 300-49 . 315 Major Development Procedures
LOC 49 . 615 • Criteria for Approv,l411
LOC 49 . 620 Conditional Approvals
1::. City of Lake Oswego Development Standards:
2 .020 Building Design
4 . 020 Wetlands
5 . 020 Street Lights
9 . 020 Landscaping , Screening and
Buffering
• 11 . 020 Drainage Standard for Major
Development
18 . 020 Access Standard
• 19 . 020 Site Circulation - Private
Streets/Driveways
20 . 020 Site Circulation - Bikeways
and Walkways
• I I I . i•'1 ND I NCS
A . I1 iiAground :
I . The Towns Square at Mt . Park SIloppiny Center
was approved by (he City in 1983 after
challenges hoard by the State Land Use Board
of Appeals ( LUBA) . The City ' s decision ,
410
DR 1 -83 (Mod. 1 -88 )
034 Page 2 of 8
regarding the center , is illustrated in the
41/ Findings for DR 1 --81, (Exhibit 17) which lists
seven conditions of approval . Condition #2
reads as follows :
That the access frcm Boones Ferry Road be
restricted to entrance only for customers,
that the driveway access to the parking
• lot he one lane and that service vehicles
•
existing on Boones Ferry Road be allowed a
right turn only.
2 . The center was approved to be constructed with
a total of 116 , 535 sq. ft. of floor urea to be
used for office, service and retail commercial •
activities.
3 . Parking is provided which exceeds Code
requirements. An existing wetland is
preserved at the southeast corner of the site.
The facility is currently accessed from Monroe
Parkway and also has a one-way outlet on
• Boones Perry Road .
4 . The site currently has all necessary public
facilities and services required by the City.
410 The proposed improvements will not require
expans'on of services to the site.
5}. The applicant will provide public easements
over the existing storm drainage system as
requested by City staff . This will occur
during the co►tstructi.on document phase
foilowin' a review of as-built drawings on
file with the City. These easements we not
obtained by the City after the initial
construction.
6 . The property included in this request is 13 . 30
acres in size and is located on the northwest
corner of the intersection of Boones Ferry
Road and Monroe Parkway in Lake Oswego. It is
zoned neighborhood commercial and is part of
Phase IV of the overall Mountain Park Planned
-Unit Development .
7 . Adjacent land uses include condominiums to the
west , condominiums and a commercial area to
the south , single family residences to the
north, undeveloped land to the northeast , and
single family homes across Boones Ferry to the
east . The property is partially in Clackamas
4 County and mostly in Multnomah County .
DR. 1-83 (Mod . 1-88 )
035 Page 3 of 8
$r?:2 i1s�s%•1:.ccMM r( rS•rl 4iilti {x:.�k.vi ..- .'�'•_•.1CY`. "-` `+�iNaaas:4"+.:•Yew `�►- G,ec.:r:.—. .-.,.. .. •..,
II) 411
tt .- • Additional es_i 1_c conditions are described in
the , appiicant ' s narrative (Exhibit 3 ) , the
.wetland reports ( Exhibits 1.4 and 15 ) and the
Transportation Impact Analysis (Exhibit 16 ) .
'11:ie existing buildings and site improvements
are illustrated on the site plan (Exhih ' t 4 )
and in the building elevations (Exhibits ' and
7) . The. entire record of DR 1-83 is also
adopted as support for the Board ' s decision.
I3 . Comp I iance wi.t:h_Cr i ter i.a for Approval :
I . City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan
C9mprehensive Plan Policies for natural
resources , wildlife habitat, distinctive
natural areas , wetlands, and open space that
r.re applicable to the proposed wetland •
enhancement are implemented by the Wetland
Development Standard . Compliance with that
s'Landard is addressed elsewhere in this
report . Commercial Land Use Policies for the
Monr_ oe/13oones Ferry site arc implemented by
LOC 48 . 315 (7 ) which is listed in the following
section of this report . S
2 . City of Lake Oswego Zoning Code
a . LOC 48 . 315 ( 7) - Monroe/Boones Ferry Site
No change to existing uses are proposed . The
project will continue to comply with the use
and intensity 'restrictions of this section.
b. LOC 48 . 530 - Vision Clearance
The applicant has demonstrated that adequate
• vision will exist at the new access location
on Roones Ferry Road (see Transportation
• Impact Analysis , Exhibit 16) .
3 . City of Lake Oswego Sign Code (Chapter 47)
The original design propcsed for the shopping
center Illustrated that. all tenant signage
would b.e located under the canopy (within the
arcade) of the building . This proposal for
exposed neon Lubo s i ynage under the canopy was
approved . The applicant. new proposes a 2 '
r; idn band on the hui lding facade (see Exhibits
+, , 7 and 10 ) . The proposed signage is allowed
411
036 DR 1-83 (Mod . 1-88 )
Page 4 of 8
411
•
•
411 Code find canbe approved. S i gnage is also
proposed under the canopy, there the ce i l ing
w i I l be raised, to allow pedestrians to locate
tenant spaces. This signage, where not
visible frc"n parking lot or off.-site areas, is
not regulated by the Sign Code. If it were
visible, it could comply with the "directional
.s i gal"' requirements of the Code. The staff
recommends that proposed signage will improve
the appearance of the shopping center and
should be approved.
4 . City of Lake Oswego Development Ordinance
a . LOC 49 . 090 (A, D) - Applicability of
Development Standards
The applicant 's plans only involve changes to
landscaping , access, pedestrian circulation,
building signage and the wetland . Only the
standards regulating those activities apply.
No exr-ansion is proposed. •
o. LOC 49. 315 - Application Completeness
The applicant has submitted a complete
110 application. Exhibits to support the
applicant ' s request are listed at the end of
this report . A development schedule has not
been submitted. A final schedule can be
required prior- to issuance of building
permits.
5. City of hake Oswego Development Standard�
• The applicable development standards have bee,:
addressed by the applicant' s narrative
. (Exhibit 3 ) . Only those areas where .
additional discussion or evidence is
necessary, or those areas where compliance
with the standards have not been demonstrated
are addressed below:
►3u i ld i ny Des i_an (2. 0201
•
The applicant has provided adequate evidence
to demonstrate compliance with this standard.
Revised building colors care shown in Exhibit
10 . The staff recommends that the Board can
adopt the findings listed by the applicant on
pages 5 and 6 of the narrative (Exhibit 3 ) as
410 support. for their decision.
037 im 1-83 (Mod . 1 -8G )
Page 5 of 8
•
o:.
3
E i
Wet l ;� id:J ( 4 . 020 ) .
Tho applicant. has provided a wetland III ti
enhancement plan which will increase diversity
and ultimately create a more valuable wetland.
The plan was conceived in order to open up •
:;ome view of the :;hopping center from the
intersection of 1'oones Ferry Road and Monroe
!Parkway (see Photos, Exhibit 13 ) . 'the
wetlands plan ( Exhibit 5) illustrates a ,
variety of emergent aid wetland compatible
plantings chosen to provide food, cover and
nesting opportunities for wildlife. In
addition, more standing water will be •
available to increase diversity. Viewpoints '
with interpretive signage is planned as well .
The applicant ha3 demonstrated compliance with
the Wetland Standard in the written narrative •
(Exhibit 3 ) . The applicant should comply with
any conditions of a permit which may be,
rr_vir. ed by the Division of State Lands (see
Exhibit 19) .
Street Li_ghts_ .( 5 . 020 ) 1
• The applicant has not listed Street Lights as •
an applicable standard because no changes to •
. street Lighting are proposed; however , the new
access Co 13oones Ferry Road may require a new
light at the driveway intersection with the
road. This should be provided if necessary to
. .meet City standards.
l.,andscaping 020 ) .
The applicant has demonstrated compliance with
this standard in the written narrative
(Exhibit 3 , pages 9-11 ) . Final plans
illustrating the additional trees to be
planted in planting areas near the buildings
and rev t sect plaza landscaping should be
submitted for review. Irrigation plans should
' he submitted prior to the issuance of building
permits. •
Irra i-nag(Z ( 1 1 , 020 )
The applicant has i i lustrated that. the
modifications will not affect the function or
the capacity of the drainage system.
Easements s fur maintenance access to public
f,rc.: i I i L i os will be provided to the City. •
DR 1 --03 (Mod: 1.-6O)
Page 6 of 0
038
r
•
Access 08 . 0291
The applicant proposes to construct a new
access from Boones Ferry Road to the site .
The access design illustrated in the site olt.rt
(Exhibit 4 ) is supported by a Transportation
Impact Analysis (Exhibit 16 ) . The plan
complies with the recommendations of: the
transportation analysis and complies with the
City Access Standard. Final strert
improvement and access design p_r-an9 should be
submitted to the City Engineer for review and
approval .
Site Circulation - Private Streets ( 19 . 020)
The applicant ' s narrative (Exhibit _ ) and
plans demonstrate compliance with this.
Standard.
Site Circulation - Bikeways and Walkways
( 20 . 020)
The applicant is proposing to provide a 5 '
wide concrete walkway along Boones Ferry Road
as originally anticipated for future
construction . In addition, a walkway will
allow viewing of the wetland and additional
pedestrian connection to the buildings. The
proposal complies with this Standard .
IV. CONCLUSION
The applicant has demonstrated that the project
complies with the applicable regulations to the extent
that approval can be granted with conditions .
V. RECOMMENDATION .
The staff recommends that DR 1-83 (Mod . l-88 ) ,
eliminating original condition #2, can be approved
with the following conditions which shall be satisfied
prior to the issuance of permits:
1 . A final development schedule shall be submitted
for the review and approval of staff.
SLre' t licnhtinor at the new access from Doones
Ferry, Rund shall be provided , as necessary , to
comply with the Street Lighting Standard .
• DR .1-83 (Moa . 1-'88 )
0 3 9 Page 7 of 8
•
411 •
0
3 . A final landscape plan showing the additional •
trees to be planted and the revised plaza design
shall be submitted for the review and approval of
staff .
4 . An irrigation plan shall, be submitted for the
review' nnd approval of staff .
5 . Final street improvement plans and access design
shall oe submitted for the review and approval of
the City Engineer .
6 . The applicant shall demonstrate compliance 'with
any permit requirements of the Division of State
• Lands .
- Exhibitsill
1 . Site Location Map
2 . Vicinity Map
3 . Applicant' s Narrative
4 . Site Plan
(.1e. lands Plan
• East Elevation •
7 . South Elevation
8 . Paint Legend , 2 i. _ges
9 . Arcade Perspective
.10 . Arcade Elevation
11 . Plaza Plan
12 . View Analysis Plan
13 . Vie!.. Analys Photos , 2 pages
14 . Wetland - 1981988
15 . We i.and Rep�f ,,
• 3
16 . Trtsr.seurtati.'u: impact Analysis
17 . Po''t ioP of- DR 1-83 Findings , Conclusions and Order
18 . Coln-
*
19 . Division of State Lands Letter of July 14 , 1988
Not. reproducible
•
(14 DR 1-83 (Mod. 1-88)
Page 8 of 8
• IP
•
• 0 . .
, •
•
..•
. .
•
• -
.
•
I
. •
, .
•
,... .
,.....
..-' ...
. ...
... .
—..
1 ---- . --I...! •-7-.:• ,...,•— .-:
.. .
, : ....)
.i {----.. .----......
.:_ . ;.,•: IL...:.::. ,uci,'!:-..-;IS7.-"! . ,---•'''': -I -',!' ' ',!---7-:. t.....+•••--.!, ' . '7,r.i;:ltst;stiir — , ' , '""'''''=' c--7...r-....: ,.. :•• ,..—.-•41r:-3'---'.-,1;.,t......".- •t!fr..,rt-a c;.••-1,
L ./La.‘v rtt:Lifil 1:-1-1-41::{i it::t'':1 ill.1 I LAW]L I.'12iti_____.i1 k.L.,_1, !- 4 Till:T.1i • 1 i V'it 4 I ,.: ..!1' iiiii.l .ti • 1 r,-.111,1U1 tn..1;• • .*:t •:i: I 11 L
•
toks•'''''.....
r'viNE SQUARE AT MOUNTAIN PARK
8 .
. .
•talMbismis.II.L .
• .
)
RH
X.
.. X
. .
iTA
•
•...
. •..II
i
>
.. .
. .,
. . .
• • . .
. ..- . . • ._.
- .
. . . .
, • .
1 I 1 I ! I I ! I I.! i 1 I • I. .
, ! i - • ; ! 1 I 1 1 . 1 , 1 •1 el ! 1 i I I ' ; ,
. 1 i i . ' . . i ;
1 1
i• I • i ' ' • , 1 i r 1
. I 1 . i 1
11 II : i, 1 I . 1 ..
. , • - I
; I • 1 : e I . I 1 ' 1 I .1 1 i
I
II .
I • I ; '
!
1 ci 1 1
: 1 i ;
1- 1 • 1 1111 11 I 1 ! :
, II 1 ,
I 1 1 I i ' 1 1 1 : 1 • I .....
; 1 I I ; ! 1 1 , . I i I 1 I 1 ; I ; . 1 1 11 I i LI I 1 1 I I I 1 : 1. • I i•
:,..
•: or..5.
i , 't,-•
I .._,......_.„____ _...... ......... ,________
i
,
P•4 I
.
1
1 ..._ . ---,-.-..
1 - I
. . . ..
: ! - . , , , ._....,.,. —
i .
. . , • . .
. . .
.-
,
- . I
—1 — 1
. . 1
;
, • ,
•. .irii4 1 1 , .- 11, 0 '
I •... ,,,,, „I ., j„ ,--, ....
.• 4 . .. _I
4-7''''..t,4 `%-r4 Lr,7A-1:
1
' '''4--- „ •
• ,-I--,.,<--.-- •
.„ .4.4"....,,„it 1.i, 1 '''' " • 1--11- --- ?' -,47;- -2-'-,. . --. . --/.. - '',,---`...:_-- -___:..-•ar,c--,..,_...._, __ c.,, ,,i-, _ ?-, ;•1 .
, ?•---'i na ''., I
, .
.,', ..'" '...,, k '..• ARCADE PL/...NTIN(3 & SIGNAGE 1 .
. .
... .
TOWNE SQUA1 '.... AT NIOITNTAIN PARK, ;
,......._
1 .
0 ,___ •
. lir , 7:. •
•
_ .
• STAFF REPORT
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
PLANNING DIVISION
APPLICANT: FILE NO:
Richard Feinberg LU 00-0070 [AP 00-12]
PROPERTY OWNER: STAFF:
Richard Feinberg Sandy Ingalls
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DATE OF REPORT:
Tax Lot 201 of July 28, 2000
Tax Map 21E 3AC
DATE OF HEARING:
• LOCATION:
August 21, 2000
701 G Ave.
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION:
COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION:
First Addition
R-7.5 and R-6
ZONING DESIGNATION:
R-7.5 and R-6
I. APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval to remove a 12.9-inch Big Leaf Maple tree (Acer
macrophyllum). The tree is proposed for removal because it is a danger to property and
house, Exhibit 3.
II. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
City of Lake Oswego Tree Code (Chapter LOC 55)
• LOC 55.02.080 Criteria for Issuance of Type II Tree Cutting Permits
LU 00-0070
Page 1 of 5
- -
LOC 55.02.085 Request for Public Hearing on a Type II Tree •
Cutting Permit
III. FINDINGS
A. Background/Existing Conditions:
1. The site is approximately 63,107 square feet in size, and zoned R-7.5 and
R-6. There is an existing 4,452 square foot single-family dwelling on the
site that was constructed in 1957. No historic designation exists.
2. The subject property is generally rectangular in shape (Exhibit 1). Access
to the property is from G Ave., Exhibit 2. Properties abutting the site are
zoned R-7.5, R-6, and R-10. Tryon Creek State Park borders the north
(rear) property line of the site. Single family dwellings surround the
remaining three sides of the site.
3. The front quarter of the site is relatively flat but the remainder of the
property slopes off from 250 feet down to 116 feet in elevation. The tree
is located in the flat portion of the site.
4. The rear two-thirds of the property is within a Resource Protection (RP)
area (Exhibit 2) with over 200 existing trees on site. The front section of •
the property had at least 20 trees on it until the removal of 19 of those
trees with Type I tree removal permit TX 207-97, in 1997, Exhibit 7. All
but one of the trees was located along the eastern property line. This was a
joint application with the neighbors that are now requesting a hearing for
the remaining Big Leaf Maple that is located along the eastern property
line, Exhibits 1 and 3.
5. Tree removal application, TC 00-0231 (Exhibit 3) is for the last Big Leaf
Maple tree located along the eastern property. The applicant applied for
removal of the tree as a hazard tree. The applicant submitted a
recommendation from an arborist with his tree removal application,
(Exhibit 5), that briefly discussed the health of the tree. Color
photographs (Exhibit 4) illustrating the very large split that runs along
most of the length of the tree, cracks in the bark and the lopsided canopy
that leans over the neighbors property were also submitted. The "Hazard
Evaluation Form"was submitted on July 31, 2000, Exhibit 9. The arborist
states that the tree "is in decline and the tree has severe trunk damage and
needs to be removed "
6. The property was posted with a public notice sign regarding the tree
removal and a letter was sent to the neighborhood association on June 21, •
LU 00-0070
Page 2 of 5
2000, Exhibit 3. The application notice period commenced on June 21,
• 2000, (Exhibit 3) and concluded on July 7, 2000, [LOC 55.02.082].
7. The neighbors at 695 G Ave. filed a request for a public hearing regarding
the applicant's proposal along with the applicable fee on June 29, 2000
(Exhibit 8). The letter is dated June 29, 2000, Exhibit 8. A few of the
concerns voiced by the neighbor in his letter against removal include
possible erosion problems due to past and future tree removal, and damage
to his garage.
7. The City's Plans Examiner reviewed the photographs taken by staff
(Exhibit 6) and submitted with the request for hearing letter, Exhibit 8.
Staff questioned if the uplifting of the Randalls' garage floor and cracks in
the wall were caused by removal of the trees in 1997. The Plans Examiner
stated that ground settling in a downward direction creates cracks of the
type the garage has, not by erosion from tree removal. If erosion had
caused the cracking in the floor, the cracks would have pulled away from
each other in at a sloping angle, not in an uplifting manner that has
occurred in the Randalls' garage. The photographs (Exhibits 8) illustrate
the location of existing older and a few newer cracks.
• B. Compliance with Criteria for Approval:
The property owner is requesting approval of a tree removal permit under the
Hazard Tree provisions of LOC 55.02.080(2). Tree removals under this standard
must meet the following criteria:
LOC 55.02.080(2)—Hazard Tree
"The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the
applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants
removal:
"(a) A hazard tree is a tree that is cracked, split, leaning or
physically damaged to the degree it is clear that it is likely
to fall and injure persons or property. The applicant must
demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree
presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger
of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard
or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or
pruning."
The property owner's reason for removing the tree is because the tree has become
• a "danger to (the) property and (the neighbors) house", Exhibit 3. The
application was submitted as a hazard tree without the required "Hazard
LU 00-0070
Page 3 of 5
Evaluation Form". However, the applicant supplied a recommendation from an
arborist briefly discussing the health of the tree. The arborist report states that the IP
tree has "severe trunk damage, and the tree needs to came down", Exhibit 5. See
also Exhibits 4 and 6. The applicant later submitted a Tree Hazard Evaluation
Form declaring the tree in decline with severe trunk damage and should be
removed, Exhibit 9.
The tree is a tall single-trunked Big Leaf Maple tree that has all of its branches
and foliage on the east (neighbors') side of the tree, Exhibits 4 and 6. Upon site
inspection staff found that the tree has a large split along the trunk and has some
smaller cracks in the bark, Exhibit 6. This tree looks as if it has competed for
light and growing room among a grove of trees. Evidence of this situation is the
tall slender built of the tree with all branches stretching outward on just one side
of the tree. The weight of the branches and heavy foliage bends the trunk
downward on the side of the branches. Trees that have grown up surrounded by
other similar trees share a communal root system. When the other trees are
eliminated, the lone tree no longer has the support system it needs to survive the
Pacific Northwest winters.
Staff does not believe pruning will alleviate the hazard, as the tree is tall, slender
and has few branches in the lopsided crown as seen in Exhibit 6. Removing
enough canopy branches to reduce the weight and lopsidedness would most likely •
require removal of over 50% of the canopy, therefore, the tree would be
considered removed, per LOC 55.02.030 (Removal)
The arborist report states that the tree has severe trunk damage and should be
removed, Exhibits 5 and 9. The Code requires that a tree show signs of
immediate danger of falling, is cracked, split or leaning to a degree that it may fall
or injure persons or property. These signs are evident in this Big Leaf Maple tree,
Exhibits 4, 5, 6 and 9.
"(b) The City may require the applicant to submit an arborist's
report confirming the hazard potential of the tree along with
an analysis of alternative methods to alleviate the hazard
without removal, and submit a completed hazard evaluation
form as provided by the City."
The applicant provided an arborist recommendation dated July 12, 2000, Exhibit
5. As stated above, the arborist declares that the Big Leaf Maple has severe trunk
damage. Vigor of the tree is poor, the soil around the tree is cracking, and there is
decay in the plane of lean, Exhibit 9. The photographs taken by staff(Exhibit 6)
and the applicant (Exhibit 4) illustrate the extent of the lean and damage sustained
by the trunk and the lopsided canopy coverage over the property line. The
arborist states that the tree should be removed. •
LU 00-0070
Page 4 of 5
Based on a site evaluation, staff finds that the tree should be removed for the
• safety of the neighboring property.
"(c) The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the
removal of each hazard tree pursuant to LOC 55.02.084.
Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of
approval the permit."
As per Code staff would require mitigation of one 2" caliper deciduous tree to be
planted if the tree were approved for removal.
IV. CONCLUSION
Based upon the information submitted by the applicant presented in this report, staff
would find that the application would meet the tree removal criteria in LOC 55.02.080
(2). Following receipt of additional evidence given before the Development Review
Commission, staff would present additional findings and recommendation for action on
this case.
EXHIBITS
1. Tax Map and Sit Plan
2. Sensitive Lands Atlas
3. Type II Tree Removal Application, TC 00-0231
4. Applicants Additional Submittal,dated July 27, 2000
5. Arborist Report, dated June 12,2000
6. Photographs
7. Type I Tree Removal Application,TX 207-97
8. Letter and photographs from Jerry and JoAnn Randall, dated June 29, 2000
9. Tree Hazard Evaluation Form, dated July 28, 2000
• :Sandy_UCases/LU 00-0070/LU 00-0070Report
LU 00-0070
Page 5 of 5
. • —CPI
•
•
A
vsp
INITIAL
POINT
Alli) .
1700 il,
SIT,..,,-
Or0w_0 .
0 .
--- . -
-..\.\•0 AkVC AI)M
lA lIiIimIIAoIlr mral llai_i
33,9
TRACT A
,,4,
.-
(2.87"-) !)
._.,...--,-_-
o ° n' c: s
.0/.20,.„\,/
•
N I
•
84C) 2 c 5 4qC.
51
a_ 0 �6 99. d�
9.
n°' 0 o4IabP ,o Q 6g� 34C /
1 `, P
q
^ 1 o c0 (0-7�FL
w
0 . 4,)
>w A o
/
co , ` o " Qs. o Q L4 ,,
-Cr 0) oQw l'i /
33 , .(c..- Amor I,. "-.... 4‘,"': A r„, i 0 ?
1\/
V.
yp �2, �z,i6 ' b 1MEW' Q. or
j��
�N I500 k N
n `0 t s
h S�.-o`s- , 753 •ry 76 o b6 Io i F s QQ r'.
yc
POC 9`, • �o
ro �2 F � � 4A aQ' zj, 79.7e'��E ;J�
5
5 I300 3s39 SouTH UNE q il ' j 4.' 'C•' 102 �\ �/
\797 Q CONSERVATpN q p 4 0 p.2T °
mppm 7 EA5EMENT / . ARCED N•' 4C 0%. EXHIBIT 1
N7. - V, (Q.27 'p 0 N ae
r — —— _ �� , 4C� h A��i Q ,7" LU 00-0070
IP1 011 j,` t�tee.. (p 2 a
ca 2 4 ,,.r•ti ' . 44 C)
733 7z.r J 7` y�Q r ' A. �q.79
11F ti' 43 siv,76,11:174.'.16—. .- s'?.a w.c, .• �'iy:� �5 / (�
Alit. �2.74'„ ,7,74 '� /y c / 0 O4
I • • • .
c R E . . .i
. . .
. ,
. • R . '..
.S. • III.
• � • ..-- * - • • • •
•
.•
......„ .
. •
.....-- 1 /
•
• • • • • • •• .
____„\•\\i,_
•
• . . •
•
. ....,
..._. ..,.:
(A, _.. i( , a__
,,,,,,,
0) • R p- /
�P�� �� tio • . AIM ~ SITE •
(z) . . ' ziW
01
N
/ a ir . . . .
938
.., OP c°
.... N
. ,w .
so [74-,,,.. co o,
937
'910 a, ~ rn�
07 CA
CO
CO � 0~
b 0\
CO
m 892 891 AVENUE b ceNT RI rr
8S1 884
860 885 882 893
841 883 t `
878 877 892 J}"
840 871 868 865
838 843 864 887 4?
84g 855
in co 841 848 857 870 , hh
1 `� m o 82a) N8 g42
E to 829 8 837 852 490 v-
793 34 827 844 g41 0
79 801 828 cU
7 2 cp 817 a-
85 G 8
16 827
763 768 783 M N A V ENElal 8
04 81 S 830
alli 761 d EXHIBIT 2
743 768 785 ° 795 LU 00-0070 el
27 734 769 784 792
7 730 768 769 780
749 `1
2) 720 77o Q U
o 7 748 12 /b 1 /791r 71-77D., 35754
04.01 Oat p,ktcc,
Tree Removal Permit No. 00 ..o 3/
Fee: 7--4q
• Application Receipt No. Id 5—.AA/
Date: _ n_
Applicant: 1\J r -1) e F% Phone: 'o ? -' --
Address of Tree Removal: 7 o / T fcc
Property Owner: c C�tlL Phone:
Address to Send Permit: ,S 2— -LQ
City: L State: e) Zip: `,' / J '/
Size, Number, and Type of Trees to be Removed: 4144 e/P < IL) " le3 f f
Reason for Removal: - - ,••,
I agree to comply with Lake Oswego Code, Chapter 55, regarding tree removal. I grant permission to the
City of Lake Oswego for employees to enter the above property to inspect the trees requested for removal
and investigate any trees that may appear to have been already unlawfully removed.
l� nature of Property Owner(re u5red) Signature of Applicant (if different)
P Y 9 g PP
The City must sign for trees located on public property including rights of way
Tie a ribbon around the tree(s) and restrain your dog on inspection day. Trees that are not marked
cannot be reviewed. Permit Type (Fill out with City Staff)
�� TYPE Submit: (1) Removal site plan
iJ TYPE II Submit: (1) Removal site plan, (2) Questionnaire or Hazard Evaluation, (3)Mitigation plan
To Do: (1)Mark trees with yellow ribbon, (2)Post sign, (3)File Certification Form
Wait: 14 days until the comment period is complete, if no hearing requests are filed, and
the City approves the permit, the permit will be sent to the address listed above.
You will be contacted if a hearing has been requested.
❑ EMERGENCY Submit: (1)Removal site plan, (2) Photograph of tree/or mark tree with yellow ribbon
❑ VERIFICATION Submit: (1)Removal plan, (2)Mitigation plan, if required
(Prior approval) To Do: (1)Mark trees with yellow ribbon, (2)Stake building envelope &driveways
❑ OTHER
City Staff to Fill Out:
Intake Staff 5 I— Zone < ''^Tax ID �� 1 Due Date .tr 7 000
e.g.(R2IEO8CB 2100).
Planning or Building File# t *Mitigation Plan'Approved/Denied ••
Removal Approved/Denied Decisio XHIBIT 3
Revised Marct�.2000 I:\for mlapplctns\Tree Permit Applicadon.doc = LEu �o-0o70
eole5
sr L (5(11— 5/31/00 - 03
4I � toy - o
TREE REMOVAL QUESTIONNAIRE
For a hazard tree,please use the "Hazard Evaluation Form" •S
The City's Tree Code discourages the removal of trees because they are a valuable community
resource that contribute significantly to Lake Oswego's quality of life.
The City's Tree Code requires a Type II permit for the following situations:
• Removal of a tree on a residential property (that is occupied by a single family dwelling) that is
larger than 10" in diameter or more than two trees in one year that are 5" or greater in diameter.
• Removal of any tree(s) that is 5" or greater in diameter on a non-single family residential property
or any vacant site.
A Type II permit may only be approved if you can demonstrate through the required application
materials that all of the following criteria are satisfied. Please be as thorough as possible with your
answers, as a simple yes or no response is not adequate.
Please answer the following questions:
1. Is the removal of the tree(s) for purposes of landscaping or constructing a development that is
approved or allowed by applicable development regulations?
•
li¢-w -14 4 -LLtirz et- Crr-c�
2. Will removal of the tree(s) have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stabiAi , ow o """ 5
surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks?
17,w, 470 ��f •t v Q,d Or. _ vj�lL
trel C=•-fro--• --arjkad_.
3. Will removal of th tree(s) have a significant negative impact on the character, aesthetics, or
property values of the neighborhood?
0/34
4. Is removal of the tree(s) for the sole purpose of providing or enhancing views?
The City may approve a tree removal request is demonstrated that no reasonable alternative exists
in order to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. In making this determination, the
City may require alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternative landscaping
designs that would lessen the impact on trees. Mitigation for the removal of each tree is required as •
a condition of approval of a permit, if approved.
004
o' �" City of Lake Oswego
Ai�
PUBLIC NOTICE
Pending Tree Cutting Permit
Name of applicant L /? ;t.t 6('•may Tree Permit No. i c— v 6 — (2-G� 3/
1
PUBLIC NOTICE TO OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF
PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL SITE
I, ,L\ i,, ,L,,,,,L,(/ to iti hog- G do certify that I am, or I represent, the party requesting a
print your
permit to cut / trees on property located at 7(ten (' 6 4 .
number address or location
Pursuant to LOC 55.02.082, this notice has been prepared to notify the neighborhood association and
0 property owners within 300 feet of the site of the pending removal. I will mark the proposed trees with
yellow tagging tape and post a public notice sign on the subject property prior to your receipt of
this notice. If you wish to request a public hearing on this proposed tree removal, you may do so by
submitting your request in writing, along with the applicable filing fee, to the City Recorder's Office
within 14 days of the date of this notice. I understand that I am responsible for maintaining the notice and
marking during the entire 14 day comment period.
�S-ignature
Notice Date: ( l.�/ /CC'
r / _ _
Neighborhood Association: 7� �� ( �! 4Map&Tax Lot: 'I i- _M C C/,
REMINDER: A tree cutting permit is required to remove trees larger than 5 inches in diameter.
• Topping trees is prohibited in the City of Lake Oswego.
Revised Feb.2000 l:\forms\appictns\tree permit apps\public notice letter.doc 0 0 5
TREE CUTTING PERMIT # : C O 0 — O ? 3
Site Plan
-sue Qo ` v / D
4 n TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES
:.1. l/
.0 z PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL:
v 4 }-h±i'
3J
*4,' r- r rWA R T / . op E
0o "
"�•.� °PQRr�ag ."' �� n ,, . TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES
r� /r/ 4�o ,Na �� ,.
a m /99�N PL o ro
�3_*.'2/_ti I` /98 Al n o,,r '.a• . •. M
'.1 TO BE REPLANTED:
Azo nr- Iv o -
• • -o" v n �o$g iup
•.. 7vSL
�1 n • i
T.
`��-,s a N� \ r0 P E
O X
cp
DEADLINE TO REQUEST A HEARING. Cie Cv 4012 06)0
• i C.,/ IF—
• July 24,2000
City of Lake Oswego
380 A Street
Lake Oswego,OR
Dear Sirs:
This letter is responding to the letter of 6-29-00,sent to you by Jerry and JoAnn Randall,concerning Tree
permit#TC 00-0231.
Regarding the statement that we intend to install a fence on our property, and the tree we are seeking to
remove is in our way, is incorrect. We have never given any considration to installing a fence in this
location.
In response to the trees that were removed in 1997 that bordered our properties. The"healthy"trees
referred to were very large Poplar trees. The numerous tree experts we consulted at that time all
concurred that these trees were very hazardous. Their roots had also severely cracked and crumbled the
concrete on our driveway, which must now be replaced. The Randalls signed an agreement giving
permission for these trees to be removed,which you have on file. We have a very different recollection of
our plans for the area where the trees were removed. We considered a number of options for this area,but
do not recall making any specific commitments to the Randalls about landscaping the area or building a
retaining wall. We did have some of the stumps ground in order to be able to plant in the area,but also left
two large stumps,at the Randall's request, which are covered with ivy,commonly thought to be an erosion
• control plant. We are unclear why the two last pictures are included in the Randalls information provided
to you. The bottom picture on page six is of our unfinished back yard,the last picture, on page seven, is
of our compost pile---both areas totally unrelated to the area of concern.
Given the strong concern the Randalls are expressing about this tree and feared erosion, it is puzzling to us
that they chose to cut down four trees on their property,about six feet away from the tree we're proposing
to cut,subsequent to our cutting down the trees in 1997. Gutters were not installed on their garage
adjoining our property until 1999,allowing water to spill on the area. We have seen no visable signs of
erosion on our property,which is a lower level than the Randalls. While the Randall's may want to give us
the responsibility for their garage floor cracking, it seems there are many possible explanations why this
may be occurring.
Enclosed is a copy of a recommendation from Jonathan Bakke,Certified Arborist,stating the tree is in
decline, has severe trunk damage, and needs to be cut down. We have also included pictures of the area in
concern,showing some of the 68 shrubs,plants,and trees we have planted in this area since 1997,as well
as the ivy covered stumps.
We request permission to cut this tree down as we see no evidence of damage by removing the tree. The
Arborist has recommended the tree be cut down,and we want to prevent any possible damage to people or
property.
Respectfully submitted,
Richard Feinberg &Nena Johnstone
• RECEIVED EXHIBIT4
LU 00-0070
.JUL_ ?MO 3 Po jes
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
Dept.of Planning&Development 0 0 7
I 3J ii �
Ii /'
II
� - - f ,4 saw-.I°ts'
L. -, f l• ei 'NT . i i
.r '.'. , ,_ram W i 'ff � /,
;i _
i` F'DSFl f C
fix=.+ 4 Jti� ` ...
i .r 'f {.--'✓ "r`'} .` s .gam �ttt i .' _ -
•-r
.., .. _t`. /• �.� �3 I
i
P,/marl-f r'( ( G r C-.A
•
r; .� -r • tat,r' ,. .try .>t
490115
tlir
✓ t x, r
0aima5 r4 -/ rec ht4/
e
JUL0
^Sl
2 - _
t;TY CI, L4!;,E OSWEGO Paget
008
[apt.of Plannir j Development
%,.U-•nvIvauvCWrlUtu t
-
:•4 — - - _ I F.fav S .FM 1Pv'i J,+f'i.I
rG c k t (B7? Y'�' -
4 r Gr /t e� eYJ C$- e f e r' C 7L
IDr,`v �hI Li C cc
•
f.- Th _ _ f4 C -try .L.. 't. — +�!!~I�� -
4;41Y;'-.G Leh.
¢' _�.
f;i.r•._& •� tf =err .<1 � , • "-• `
•
•
�•: _
is -
. (DU 't' r' er C.r cr c /C-la ( CO--77 C'r c' ,1 c
S+t.c-m p..5 Pr i v Z cv cc-ea_
• 1_7„,1 LY
- C . E
n r OFL�Aa4E O WCL:l: Page 1
0 0J
Dept.of Planning 6 Deva!opment
o : o
57/16/2000 20:02 5035984548 MUh I URA I k'EE SEkv 11:E PAUL Ul
0 F _ •s- .
•-mQir.mOrtGnde OLJ•d yunliro c4+n W `-- ..1,.•..e..� .�
•
•
TREE AND Www inregntyonitne.ComimorfunIree. ARDONI$T F4a ,w
• tnanits WORK SCHEMA-CO:
• LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE INC, THOMAS BROTHERS PAGE�56-�5
(503)636-7902• fax(503) 598-4548 rile DAv OF PROPOSAL. Ft' 7f1 droo
P.O.BOX 598-Lek.Oswego,OR 97034 'TIME OF APPOINTMENT; ' 1 OOPM
Licensed•Bonded.Insured CCB/S7428 10595 70 2/2000 f-
v "I F L s r;
-. rtl(-- P -
r awWt-L wAwrrEo*oRic hard Fe t9rg FAo.OSAL O vSM A• Don
"s r/315
SMUT noses' 701 GAVE Iruwo r-ce►l01 GAVE
cif P.CE awpr.E
ON STArSAN01.cow ake Oswego OR 4703e Lac Oswo c— OR G7034
O.AAGTM+.A tO E'TAIT.AOOnA!T _
XSTIS/TM }
wE HEREBY SUBMIT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATE$FL1p:
Remove Tree Leaning I owprd$iveignDors hoUsr =Migiri titae0 Airrritrbunst i•ie0oR
He WM Be There
Aeterred By John O'shea - w - i
Remove 1 Maple On Driveway• Cut Slump
•
—C4ip Debrla nnil Na/1I away. Lenath"
... c. 1 -- - Amp
ouw11- Ma
Jonalhan Bakke- e e r or s -
O
OOLtN.g,, 07-ide Pe--•"Fey;,.ied LIDucrmli
0Do►eo ❑RAyco O Mottos Obtains rl
O Small Truck 0 Clumsier Obu h u 0
❑Hsdgc Trlmrr.A; 0 U..ln y Locator, O ....
O C101hng G it 0 Power Pruner 0
❑Notify Power Co of 210 D.Op OCrane 0,.....
O Notify Poet Cu.to Cleat Ltne1 0 Fctuiizer O ........
--
0Hobbl Lnw.rtnr Devlte OAeg..Bit C -•..�CHANGE ORDER/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TOTAL
Mo.'10fi prov SIDS OS.;.AirVIC5S IA Tolima On Catom,ls rsprss*NoOO r:s tr;;IPla root s'ITT YosetatXtn Ott w!1^r:MOnO!,»rvKOs*I he
Irovided We Smiled CMCuStOm$r$reel properly sncilor Cuaomers own property CUSTOMER AGREES TO HMO HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFY
ISORTOM FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIM°ARMING IN ANV WAY FROM THE INACCURACY OF CUSTOMERS REPRESENTATION OF OWNERSI-P
•
r T t.O.00d crlits geneteted!.o'grndtng etumplsii is not•tne*Aniid wi Ina family al al aborts a}Or)cleanup uw.s.00crieaay nano
ti Its SAOer NOl
CHANCSA APPROVED gv DATE: REVISED TOTAL.
:0 III FAiO.RON COMPLETION�WAE1 pikesMtQ!{Peca:AO A#atT.UA.OA Awu...la Al r\rui A.--u...A.Nu.e..rY!-tf fffYYN.
T,.,•4A.4.d ..i. �(n.pitiq.r>,.Mp Co.)T.rvir,A IN CONIAAtr WON ACCL.r AMC!.
OVR WOPACAN API iv.lve C�vA*ib av uorna(M1 COUPE,.;AYIOA sW5ANCE
ay .0 TA�t'! „Noe.t va•lee mTi/t IAWII
a r ts.f0..n.., aA.1
%.e r00•E raZie Avo CONoinow11 AAA SAna.AO/00v AP APE / — — �1-�1�7 {L.q e�
-EAA1v ACCEPTED YOU Olt AuTn0ai1to TO 00 fwE tNOPA AS - 7�4 y� ' L�n
STIC4E.1:.-Li=K-.Niea.<ays.AAN Nu.IY..NV LFa:.JYEAV 'KIN.,:.Ai fig
GATE
• laraal. EXHIBIT 5 - -
LU 00-0070 iT`r0.c.i''.1VECtr—
Dept.Di Pianning&Otvbir.;men!
011
012
_,silltH4.1 S. .
_ tr. VI. ' • ‘fhet4
0 •
t' t 1 • ^Si S !fir- `
_ ....,-40likrit - /
.f
•
.r •.!' ,__ (r j.• ,' `i. • s _ • - - �. �i -
•
•
War
V• • :'1jr
A.sit• S . rr. zr,, •:tom• • -4.
. 0 ~• ,,� • . - •
,t • •� - Y.: L1li
�+ '-�,� �•�
,`"- •�'�t a. V '•• J� • • 'WI' . �.i ♦• • ' a
-•••••.. ., - . 14.v - ......) 0 1.1 -,,, _ Irllio, ' d• II I
r . .4 r 1. ;.:, ..,.,
Irv, ,: ,.; . , , ,
: ... . • •,.„,..,... .
. -4 - ,
, _, $ . ... -
e .5... •• . ,.._{. j
.711V • '-'1 ..... ;04 iii,4 ' .4144;11Pr •-..•
OIL - , . - As
•A+ '+ .fit. fl �" « �, • ■ :. .r . . -i#?• �•- 'v
a ' r} • i ;tom!?ti ,,.1.i !«Rz i
•
• .4.4i1" '1 F .. • •a • t ,,,,,,ir _
... , _at 1 - t• .'l• AO' IN,
•
•
• L •' • . ' • • • • _ • a.
allpi
- • N Nalb AL'INOlirrili.brP
•,
•-•.,., ...,
M.
O.
•
+, r .S. 'Jai # J • -• +��e . ' .f. _ j .,:.
ea l
,*
' i • • . j •.
■
l'" r ,� ' s •r{i " R,, EXHIBIT 6
__. '
r f• 9' - LU 00-0070
p0001723 (1200x1792x24b jpeg) 0
i 1
`jy a�
4kf Y. -.- ,,,../". ..,. *,,,, r ' Y,÷ it.-
..,.. . .4.'i:
-l. 4 4:10,1 I!` r!+ti � t
ge,.1 .,. . .„..,...44.
L' i.
•
.,✓••I i '•'i y ,_, �'
}, %...;
' ? ri yr' r
...
•
t
'a,' 'y 'fit '•."„Z ••, ,
A
•
11 9
Lc)
'•••••••4
C..)
• ,0„. '
i tf IIIP
- e
'A.i 41, r1tl1.':'i1•,4 4'•
4-... '..44•'.',.'. .-'i1'i..,A•„.8,.,.,„i%_k,-.Vv....i"P,.„•.0rAv-/,,i,".ii ie 4,.,L'0,„ 4...:,.. ••-!;,V.....v0k"..i
..
,4.1,.4".-.,.4•.0•-.‘,J.
. .1.0
41r,4
.
ir. 1 k, 1 . A , 4, " 4 i _ ,.
,4,.:
•
O•, ,
: l' • . -1. .(6...0,f
.,.. , , , .,,.,.. ,) , ,.,...• 4., : .,,, 1,i„ i.,40444,a,. ,.., .. ,j. :y • , .. ,
2.,,,,. .4...„....,, ....:.. .,_ ril pi 141,6,..i 4,,A6' •., -
,.:1441 y 7
V. '4. .•I i.:1.1.. ...4.1., .A =4,..f.. r7110.41:ca. ' ...A Atlqf'. ,,... e. .,..., I 1„;t •
s:::tlii411:1114•" ... :12: * .. 1. 4.4::
......
1'. 4" - . • ..^.4 4. .0),
It .'. - . . . -•
1A"Inx,'
•-A'••1 .••.:•..•....N.,.; i li ::'-of,#:).,4.-,-•.,•:.wi1ts.,,,_4.'..11...:.1:.,,,:7.44;4-1,1*l.1t..i.t-.:1.:.•, "7.!-I 1f1J:+_"A..o%••..-1
,.e,1.z..•11:'•-'1•$• s:4..'••. :..4-i,•i7 f.'1..1
'.••.;-t
r 4• •.1?:•.::..:•.'7‘i'.T.',k:t...,
*'
l,i:V•':f"i,t.•.
c...
. '. .. ' •i.•:•1•:.,:_'-‘.%.,:..'1 7
)I^kdiI 2 . -
.1, g
r- *. • . ., ,,-1
a
.•
C,1
11• '. ' t :
.1 11 :X '‘. V.1•"4.9;. • •) • ' ' .• . . r ' '-•-'C • s:.,. .' • 1 '1 tl•e .A.1.1. • .-: '•
..,'' •..1,• . .
NI .1 I t , 1 .V ,4\ • :11.% lt,V, .*. '
01 ‘,-.t..4..`..% li' i'y •kit4i, ,.1 ,
. -v. ; ill•
...,."
0
ir rl, k .
0
114,... .• . . . .
•1
fl,, / ... •. .. ... . ...,% ,.• -
••q IF f, .
". .
, • --t•Iv'.'• . . ,
••••• ... ,- • , ‘,.
...alli4,
'., .
. ,
•••N'.'"
;..
. • • •
• . •
,..c,
........i
......
. .,,'A t,,,i:Pia74:'.'''''.'47;-';
••nth ~ .".y.t 4 "'R' ! • ,`.;l�rr ti • A. `. J-
1>y, p. fete. 9�t ..�16 pk µ • y R(.� s�4 ' .�,• y p,�.. ,1-
f' i • ,t C 7! : A �� _ ,Sri,.'4�), .� Jet r' n+C `
y.s}' '- . •
/j _ 7 A??'.. i. 'Ire _ • r, _ -fiL
•
{n, a
/.� i•3 t 1 ISM' • • A '
tu
',.,.t.',I.. .:
i.
.u
.... .
, , - --'':'-.''
•
'iit • t. 'rT;a.• �.• vn"' p e`}i1..r•
ir •. . . y .„. - ,. � :'^>f`� • r 14
'3.,:' �1a
1 e 1`� !
•
•
•
o
' . t .e% , ,r4(6"‘ . '.
•
7 yz,1
•
1 . I [ ` p
•
•
r- gtr
®; lt�
�fi°`LAKE ON. TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION
co
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
01
IIIPermit No. - 7 -
v - _- Fee:
Receipt No. r / .r
O o$ +non + - JDate: ��, #
r ,/ /
Applicant: '(-I'd Fe ' °''' es" y Address: -7 0 / 6 s-t - C: 9 S � s-
Property Owner: .S0._4z Phone C 3 5 S 3 ( S
Address of Tree Removal Site: -7 63 / `:- 6 G 5- 6--
Tax Map J TC----, Tax Lot (Or)
Number of Trees to be Removed: / l- ( 1(I -p f - 2- ,
P
Please attach to this application a plot plan drawn to scale indicating the size, location
and species of all trees over 5" in diameter to be removed from the property in question.
Date of Removal:
(Permit valid for sixty days)
• Reason for Removal: ' z. ,;:-z Z- /44 ;;
State Future Landscaping Plans:
It shall be the responsibility of the undersigned to comply with Lake Oswego Code, Chapter 55,
governing tree removal and to comply with the terms of this permit.
Azic:---;---9 64-,,,,,,i--e-gfi :,
/z-ezi, A 414rfalt...7-
Signature of PrryjOwn
Signature of Applicant (If different)
Staff gC Date 6(17 5 7- Approved/Denied --c/(
Building Permit No. Planning File No.
Modification of required landscaping: Yor_N Prior tree conditions: lord
Trees in R-O-W: Lor_N Mitigation to be installed by
0 Conditions for Approval
EXHIBIT 7
Field Notes LU 00-0070
Revised 2/97
N ( C)eS
F:kommony\formi\uc cutdoc
017
6 //7A, 7
•
Jrr
,���
4G;le
cit
G c
,z;:4( L9.4-e-t)--e_errxece
, z1At": 5 C ,J. 0 -%t-rt7L
_.(A741-1 pA4A-- --4(15 d,x) _/-ed
c)--t."--p-a2716
7 a / 6
h •
91, Zwid;i4_
018
`. ....�`\ lf
0 .
.o. . .
T ti_ �
8 r H ST S E E -}--MAP 2 I E 3 B D
_
-71 i Q-... T.
, . ...,_
...
, ,..._
i J�o
......,
T„f-,s..O ter,
MSG
IA,
• -------_,,,,
-
-\
w
Ip. . / 'Y n O
t i�% - .
nb 10
.
Y- r r 0''W����• • i, , a 9
A iZ V ` /V gob C.. 73�sJ II
el ar ..- ",). /t•i '... t._ .
0 eu
� r...........,,........,„..,
�0�0M '',v.s2 j� 4 rfy�_ ` ath V 6.6- (n "o n '� �p Zia 'St9� T 1� n 0 0L!
\\ mt Aq�r Ky6 - i.e.''`tir'se.. 2a VP tut
•L/r
s� / �3Aa o
r/0
e..y /99 N ��ow r�
n ... u
4 � nn N
/g qT do
V to �p� 4
s. 00� 's. •\ �:
S
R F C El
C!TY OF !A;(E. a WEGO
Cept.of Nanning Drve!carnent
•
City of Lake Oswego
TREE CUTTING PERMIT
NO x 2O7-171 •
ISSUEDIN _ l7 1913"
LOCATION70( 6,F5g1
tI
OWNER ‘RICAINJI"A
1�
Number of Trees to be Removed r Ali Art.. re:111
City Hall
Telephone — 635-0290 i
•
By
THIS PERMIT MUST RE POSTED ALONG WITH BUIL 'G P' • "•.
020
o
DATE
• �TiME E'`n
i
June 29, 2000 a Oswego City Recorder , c-q I E
City of Lake Oswego:
This is regarding the proposed tree removal from 701 G Ave, Tree Permit# TC 00-0231.
We live next door and it is our house which is closest to the tree. We are against the
removal of this tree. Richard Feinberg has never expressed concern for us regarding this
tree, and he in fact wants to put in a fence and the tree is in his way.
In July 1997, shortly after he moved in, he removed approximately fifteen trees that were
bordering our properties. These trees were healthy. We expressed concern for possible
erosion problems, and he reassured us that he would replace the area with erosion
controlled plants. He never did. He then said he was going to cover the stumps with fill
taken from a building site nearby, and have a retaining wall built to protect the hillside.
He never took the fill, nor had a retaining wall built. His girlfriend built a rock wall, not
a retaining wall, and it is only a partial wall. He then had someone grind the stumps
down. I talked to three different people that were giving him a bid for that job, and they
all said it was inevitable that we would have erosion problems with the removal of the
trees and stumps. He never planted anything that would help control the erosion.
As you can see by the photos, they were correct. We have damage done to our garage
floor, and to the foundation. My husband has shown the damage to Mr. Feinberg. We
also had damage done to our driveway before they killed the stumps, by the roots trying
to start new trees. We still have sprouts in our backyard.
We do not want this tree removed. I am concerned for any future erosion by the tree
removal and by the damage a fence being built would cause in that unstable area. We
have had to spend approximately$3,000.00 to replant that area, and it will cost thousands
more to stabilize our home. We are not concerned for our safety regarding the tree, and
we would sign a letter absolving his responsibility should it fall. Also, our insurance
would be responsible for the damage, not his.
Again, for the protection of our home and garage, we ask that this tree not be removed.
Sincerely, RECEIVED
Jerry& JoAnn Randall jui
695 G Ave
Lake Oswego, Oregon CITY OF LA{c C��NE00
Dept.of planning&Development
• r G� hL[.l h +Q ( Z(��eSt (�zni
�.S, - lJ��.- ► e�u�t 5 IJ
-}-) Sze peso/I', i c_ OO Oa 3 I . EXHIBIT 8
LU 00-0070
- po9`s 0 2 l
• • •
y. 1 M M' - !1/f,. • -( T.` 1 Y t \ ., • - 4 •p,5'•C' 'Tl V_"•' !XI' G
` tiA •if ltiti .1 r'II' `� `. 'fA •v y � ,- :p.r., �a �'t• �'} .4`y1�j •... ,,4."#• ,�7 t' •-� ç• • ^,f t.V1 • ,
.• . ' t 0 fC'• 1 i • Frt,r t•iv,',':,4, ,t ''i � +• N a !r-� •y _. xt I •�.•�
.dJI4 ��� I.. 1 .r��r�rh�n' >i itp� ;vl• '� Y �}t `,.l!T. '."S'__•
:f�•�� _ r 4�,�v1.;Vl �14�f h, .5! �u +,p;W`y l,s 1 11 ro tr
fir,,,, �A„J % •, � • �Iyy t r. . � T {� r�•
'r 1 ht Sr/ � 7t
1 ''• 1,:i VA- .., • ": Y'',4g.11-'•1';".''••••;!...p.41.,'41';',
,?J'l � � •fi+S`'f, � ''d Ik.j. I�I ter. >��F wr ' ♦ 411 + '; ' r wtyr�. : - t •t' 'i
\ t 1�
�C ♦tf d /r{ { r"W �"�li+it� s i ' , �, r iV w,
,.,,A J ti r ';, 1 -',�''� !. :y t �' ` %x .� ,Itr• 1 Y �, r �t t4' 1 r • - Y
r.fLit, ,.Ilt•4, r .., ,4N, frail V i, y+ a- } • 1r L i., v�t!'y ; +t i�.'. °' .. ,•.+•.';•
� lP �, li ae h 1; fly as` • • :S,,. t'..� ','A. l 1 �• �_
"'" li '• fr�. t Sty art 1• r. J.-A.,. ;t, �,3y t Y r >[
Ch: .M . •! t��:, eY - t#r• e •f p y,y et- •T 1 Tl C•s'• - ,Y" • r t _
'41 ; i1C' .n,,,,t . r l4,I IS .' r•g -i 7, ? � �.� •. r� ; fb.
••i'i. MVP,• ' K . f a� ,/ V '• I rt'a.P` •� ?t 1 •7r, .•t-.'.^4r_ .r+, ' ..•t, I �;` .. ••�{,
j `1FY
y� 14
•
rrt.iYt nj' •-,`41{': tR' ,;N , � 1 x � yvie _.l'' fi• • s �. .r.. •
iI; r.. 4.TS 1 'iK A• A . 1!y1 �T1 .l. d r Ir.
i a r 'z�„w,,rr .f rtr,.� ';+5'�a + • J }. •_ " l .z'S�,r •. /' i r t .d•
��1 r 1'-f O.� y�iG"�t"� l S�• I 41F�' "•`t'.:� .q„0'ryti •'. 11C"'A r r°• l+t 1'..,,LL,,'R lire. 1V A
• p5 },A;4t"yl r � 1r r - ''1 !' J !liii "+{t i:"1:77.
lIr 1 , 1, tX' rnS� / t r+. i Try` • '.7 iv la4t 1 Q � .��.•
r • • ^t' t. • • , xAi� r I
.F Y r'j _ 1 �I ',',!U i • I Per f• .'x i�t ,i �, ty+lt t •�• f
a�'y ,. ., ffr t t` 4'•!• .1 t .o- i, - ' •5a'' y ktr`Ld;t •.W , '�
�j' ` 1 * +,6 r• I.- + p ,t 8 e` A'-'etYlb 'Or:r4 ,tom 4 1 ' `
1l • , {,,+ ,, of t ,,. 1y `'.'.,`4. i • r•r ,. fr . •4 jr +Jy,`..
t i v'f ' i t �rp_ , w • + �!' ,!''; -� vl ;�, ..•itt, ,��( r4 {tL 7 ••r+�1 .1n0. .
,):' A r r f t fiP• (r t'��••� 1`S 1'+ y ^4. \. f� "�• J,� rl R r.,
•rr"1 ..Gttt 1 - '�'� ' 1 , f rty {�• 4n 1t //, +• - f }�`` r •
,1,•' rt 1' y,./ :� 1% i, yll�tt+•t: �he,.l •1 +' t `'7A• I'. j '.� • I �'S-1
t,C.,. • ':1 , r'14 40 .,ti4' 11.•• «� .'~ k-. iT R�a ',i ,AA�b. vi, At) ..e1.,
:` fir
• .
—,..
• • :,.
• ..
,k, .,•-i.,, ,,
: •••„.
. • L.1., ., .
. e •
. .
'' • . .. -•.:, • •_ .:-..,`• .". :''..•'.. ', ,:.1)rs,,,. • , f •
t•-•4'•••;;I:-..1-7•"-'•:°'5;i•,'-'1 .'- •• • • •' ' •-•'-1 .-''.' .- '•••••r:',;k''•"'• • ' " , - , I
r.o•t,er ,i .„,' '`,,V:i';', ,;,,,,,',,,'::. :''.. . :,.If'.! '• ...''',..1'...,1,,,,.I , , . ; .
r.1,4*. ' ? ' ';1•';''-,:-.. .''.-i:i' ''' ..';''';'''. .'''''''':,:;.''''.',tr,...,1'. ;'''f..1 'il,:(407:41.,‘ . ,,, ,t.."'''''''':01,;-';',... -•,1,..'.',',...r.' ,t,',,'',I'',:..., ,';.,',''.''',;.;'';.0iii4:.,";0') . I . ;• - '
I , 1
F71- -- -. . 44. ':','',;:!.%'•!:i''':',:i•',ri;Y•t4;::'./-14/I..':'.' '''' ' - .
ii... •g.., ., .,,..„. .,„,,,,.,. ,,, ,.../ . ..,„s.1 r. .,,,,:, .., •
. .4.. ;,,, •L'S'''''. ' '':', .i'''' '4•"r')4.. • •.,,- •
ti.j.j '- .• .4. . . ..'"4!". :1'..1.-?.0 '''.45. '-.;.'. IT 4'.:.'
1 1 L--'' ' 4 1111 4,-.' .'''e. -''.',, ,../.',. ),•••• .;:,,t „ ..i,. .,.
,., .1.r.....t...2.. .. ,,.• • ,.: i".... ..'/$ '1,";,11:. '''., 'l'' :::,-. ,!1 .,:,,,'owe • i.„ ' q : ,*, ''',..o`,.',„.s4, ' ,
..',. ,. ' ' •i,=f?'i,:...;',4 ' ,' i...3 i-1 • -s• .
,,:.., ..).., .,4,Ic;,''''.4.:7 rr ,..,.':' #''1...f,'(11:.•;,• . . • ' .
..)
• - ..•' •t;,/-'.'! ,---: 041',-/
IP.'P. I' - , •.r.. : i?.. IP'.4? '.'• '
''''' ' '''f' 43 4,1...0, .•.1.'- / .,. . . .,,.,..,.i..
.".4.
;
' r , '• .r. ' .7.i.'-:-..',..,,••4?',.,...'.:Ir!,',. . f4'.'ir.,...,,',1;• ,?',...,:,i'l . ,,•
.•• A,' ' , . ..
, .'•.' nli, :1!-'... 1., ....., ., ',-. 4,-,-. :,,'-'-. r •,', • •-1,.'.f)i..0-. .,„1,,t„.,..•, , •
'.,' . ' .'...-'! ''.. ...''' ., ' '. aCe"'' ).4- 7, ',I.,,t., • ' ,ii.\' ' .• - • .. Q. . .-.•-*! 11, ,..,0 :,,,,,f .---;_.
• . •
,q%':...4, •.. ; .! ' r, : • ...' .i..i..,.. ,6 ' .
• • 'Ps'?
•.- • --" ,-- .'' • •-: .'-: ..: 4.1p.-..,''''.1..r.Y •
. '.4':"r'.. '.1 .f.',!.','!'' '... •1'./, • ,,„ , , , .
1
.. W.',1,.',' .''. ••,,....,,k.,-,1,..;•ir - .' 1 t ' •
.';':' ..'1,' ,'';:....,.,r.,,l',.'.,,..I:‘i'''''..!..,‘'v.:....tf, ''',!:,::l.13::.‘':,4:.4•11,t1,1:::1:".,:'''in"::.7::444:e.' '':1:'''''''''''::'4:.1';''''''..' ' .'''''''''. ' '''''''''
. ,=, .. ..1.. •
. • V" 1
r;,..,i;/'.,; •, YI.•i . ,.; :'...1.,,,.. .
..--,...---a.
____La•-_---_-1
..,. .:,,,,'1,..,. :: _ ..:, ,• il
.. ..
‘...,,..i =.•_-. . - , . e-! l• !...'..;,:- ,.:. ',,,, !' - -, **: .,.! '
ik ••:-,,,, A • .
....,:.4.-••••i .- —=-7''M •... • 1 ••,,-• ., '.1-•• • •••• •.- ; r;1•',. •-• - -
..- ....,•
:', '.-,•,....1,! ''•„-_••••••,-e,1, -•/",,, .0 !,•,i•••••,:1,0 •
.: ___-•-=----,a_.---
-.-..i•li-;"I ik.:, .. :
----=--------- ,
' ''''' ' '. '..'.' t•g*i Jim
. , •
. TY'rif-
. ., . . .
•,...4.
,t.,+PP '.• „,',. .
''.4: j
, ..) ,11.... . ..e.a..
.,, . .•.."A ...,. '1..',•-'• :...
• . - .. - - "• .
' 11 '..-. .• •il.
" ....;•4;V"! ....'
, ' 1
• '....•.....' "
i ...
\ -
\
\,_ '' . ,, r.,...,,,,:1,•:•4.,',...,*,._,.:,','.,-':. ,' '
.'.I.,.'.,'•.-- .-.
, .': ..,4:•;.,•,::......... ..,
,., . . .,..;
. \\'' .''''4::11:V::t.4:1:'::::I:'''":..".''..':.•,, '. 1 ' . .' It'' '
• .• •.•' .•
I. , • ' ' 4,
,t,......, ..c _ . ...•
. i
. ........„. 1
- .
.-. t...
i•-•
-----• Iy;
. ,--.. .,..,..,
--,,.
...
1)-....,„.,
- • . , •s•• -
. —0-<--4k
, .....nl, . _ ,... ‘ .,:„....... „. . .
.... . tt,.....,,,,.7.4._.. „,..,
., .„,....,,,,..;:,,. ...-. .... . ...
.:,i....i...,._.,,., ... ,
, ..:....,..._:,.„-.. .,, ... . ,
.:: r*.,,i_ii..: ,.1, ..
. •
. ... ,t3... ... ,
• , • ,.•,
..1,pl.'',...?:• P it-;:.•'. .
......., •
*-: ..4.74
' '., . r..._. ... . ., .. ..
._. ....,,i.„2....,... .,.,,,,,,v _.. .t.;., •\.; .4 . .' . :•..
1\..) . -f.'i.-4,$'',..tni4i,: ' • ..; ,
,,
. , . ., .
,. ,. ,..;,,.. „,.. •
„jr • .-. ,4,4)...i._..
- ,- ''''in v`'. • tw. ....'''.'1"W - -41,•,.,
c I • . -... . , . .
'4' '• .
. 1°rt ' , .• . -
.'-•,...sats•• ' 7.1.--,1.-1... ..••,.• .
. . .. ,
.. . . .
.,...
. .
4-,
. .....„,,,,.....:„/„:...„„.......,.., ,
u...,
. 4 • ' ' • ' •1,1•3^4: .... • .-•La i f.,,'',- :Si
, 4114.
•
•'.o:"i-:..j..- ,
i
/I'l1
1I,11
i f',',..: •,
•,.
' .:•:,•1114 -.. I . ,
•, 4 it-4"7: ' ' '
—
. .
I'Li i il,,,., , i t'1, -‘4`
11, 1
V‘V,'''' ' 1; 1.1
,r.
. ,
':.). . 11 LI h 11 .1 h • a '4Ir'4' .'*11 ..;•:."' i•
1.. ...: :,•' ...,,, . .
i:,,,'•-` 14,4.anc.. '1*-"''ii-1
.4 .
;•ii ) 1
'04
.
r-----
.... •, .
.,,,, , , ; !1! •1 _,...- -/
A . 'il . ,., I, I. ,
nil .• V" -1.4- . e\ + .,-,.:0)+,,i, r,,' ,,, ,,,,,li, + . .
•-..) , r
f .1
. ..-. N.
1 . s _... :.' ,‘:\it\ s ' \•t\'l '10',:•:'l '41)\'1'•• 't;' 11'' In'
0.:.• f i , 1.• 4.,,,y, . • • ,,,., t, , \,, , ,.t t.
r. ;
? ;
. , '••,/'' ..."1,, \Y,t\T,',', 1., l• i ,s I ,: , ,,
I'll,
0 r,•-• • / ' hir I'''i h r ., r .
, 1 . , Ih'%.\:, , .- ' , 3 .. - - ' . . .. - -••
he-. ,:.; '.\ ‘1'.. , ' ' '',.,‘,.!1'‘ tI,Oltt'• l",,,•1'1, ,",
''•
%..* '5'7' '\ ,. ' • j 1 11'1,V114,'t s " f 1
...
. • ......
. .• • ''' '' (4.. 3 .$,k ' ;•I,1.', :i i, IP
11
0t\I. ,,
,,.,a,- . . ..__ ,
_
„,, , i ... v • • it ..-- -I, -
•
. ., . 1 041' ti ' I Ilk 6,1.•‘• •
• ,e ' 1 41.6. . ',I. 't ;•• -,'t,,,, ,-4 JI I
1 ii l'i ' 1
-.• .' I. i ';it 'I'
. ....
,,r.,,.....,44 0, ,,, 0, t , 1
. , r., .. • -' '
4it.,t 4%—... -.01s001 - - . ,. • i ,1 I'',•. ; . t . •
•
It r.
' ••••.,4,1:r''r ' ..7' ...i ,. ' , •, ,,: , r
.... ; , I I
'i•1 .
I • d ,',...4,..,,,,, . i. ,1 .1 ..,. $01',, , 'it': ___......rt
oil
• •
.
• i'
, . ,! •• "
i
likbtr'''
t / _
' • 4't `.., '
•
,, , •
..- ,
• . • .
__
- . I••-.•1.t ' ' ', t • ,
\ , 1 ,!- t ) '31
, , 1, .
• ,"1‘ '
Y, ' • ,\*,1 4,0 ,', • . , - . , j.
.
.
„I-.-
1,r
- ..., 11'144
l'''4'?. 81 ... , .. •- . :
•
i'.-- ... . _ •
. - - r:7545,,, . . ,, -,
"a" • 4 6 ., '''h
I i ,
-1•'..71. tar„. 4:....... .... • • .
...Z.,,,,o' ......b''---17. 1.; •
• '' " '11 - -,,,
...'1.• *''''a..i''' '' 0 •
.a,. -
.-- z .- R .... •-•1
•'11 , -,_ -
.4 r-' '.„,-,,--,1,:e,:•-,,, :/..--'.?:i<.' '—`74171'
- . ._ ..4
,
,- •T - •jr-to-- _ , -
„4,4-ii. .: s.,,f , :4,-,..:
'... ".Y=t-,.: ,,,....._ z.,•-r, ,./r ,,,,,,ali 4,,-7 ,!
........,_ •
1
,,--
C..
•
•-• -• • . •.,..;:iA •
. , .
. .. ,. . 1 -
'..411,...'71,,••.). NI, ,• .. .,,, . -I ,... .• . .• • . . . ... 07,
-,r,..t m .• • i ,,-1 •4 •-t• •
4:4t!!.../•,'.."(i'"-•'' •-,fk,', 1' • ,..p... • ..,,..-
• ... . ., • , . . . ...
,•:.;•..',.-t-. • ii.,:)'•;; •'. .,,.. ... ,,•• •
.:,....e.,-.:..;•:•-•;.7 ... •,-- , • ... .... ' . .i ••
... . .
I ,.cgt • 1 ".C.:i.;''.',11.e.I.:' • •2Y.:)i•,.-
. ...., ', "
1-',.'..-J:i,,,t..?7,, . 1-,,,".-.,:e2"1*,''.,....•f.......-'i,,',.t; . "'• *.- • c
r..4.?:;',,i,',,•,•,..1'-,'.,,..,..,.1.r,.,..'''.. e''',.;.:::',,'•. ; .: • ' -
‘'..r'.••• .,....';
,,..,.1,.1!,, ... „1,..,..,, „/It':{ ,e.,
V
I s
• 1
_ ' .1,,. ,.,,..rr.0
',IT,:.''•.2'!'. f', '• 1,'1,.. .,..,—,:::,.'e4ti,i,•;,„,.,, ' i,,,...,.,,,,,,..4...,,,,. .,,,A A!,,A !•''.-..- i.,,,,,..1.',go 1,-,,kritt..-, . - .,,,.:.
, -_,....i,,Ac.,..4,'71'-,' .1''': '''''.i.4',;(i. ,''t .,;:nel. . •t ...L.--..-#
'i
1. '
• r. ,.• • • I ' ' '' ""t1'...''''4"'' .,
14.1i.
• t ' -.., ,, ..- , .. . . ,
4 .
••••••1'....):,'!„*. ..,,, ,''2',',.....1; '''-",.' '''.. '-',.. ;
• I 116;-----7---- . • ''..'i.,•-','-''',;,:a' .4f-'...;...,:'oil-.--•;41:!..;..4,,,•:.' k.
.- `,..,::.,;•:, •'-'''','''''.'..'.'s--i ..1'''1',;..r:..
4. '..,, l' '::,....::?•,.:..,.''..':4'1-::-:!,:,;!,,...1,...-7'.",,i.,i.:',.fk':i''.k,3\'..1*..'t.,'!,''..1':.I 4Af;.i.lf,s.',';,''',i',•,•,l•,'I,'i?rtJ;i,t.;'',l''fi,,i i'l.i•'.,;''•••-•-•:!':1,-;,'!,-:'kt'.',,i7i,'..v.,...i,1i';4.'..''„;.4'',',1'-'!.5„.,;,,`,'4'-t",...44',.,.-.:.-...,.i..,...,..,,.i1.•1.
''''..'1.t• •: ' 'i!..,,,.....,!..,".'-.,.,!,i'.,t,'••-,‘..,.v„1.......4 4,,,•,,,,,•,,•,•.r,-!p,.1!.w,..,.i.1•,,k-:,•,::(w iI,''.....0 7,-.-.::.,.•.. .•,-. ' ,!,,,...;.,,',.
-'
..,
•-
.2:41.,‘,. t.i.:.-.,1 ..... - • — , . .-..,-' r•!' I '., - • '1'.",.
•,'''kJ,' '•',' .-:',.••,..,.••.• ' .,••,,......T.•-..y .1,.....;-
. _
. :::?:, ...).-.. •4.4,', ..,.. •.,. :,4.....„.:
it
.... k.• • , ..; .,...,;. .i....n.:,....,..-,,..
( ---.......,, . _!. . .,;,,..;..,,..- ., ,.....-i,',"3.,/aii‘,•'9, ,,.. . .•••
. .. ,. .• . .....,.,.......,-1:,.,:,,,...,.(4.4‘.,.r.;•0,:44' : i'',.
7. • • '
' -• .. • ', , *- ' -
.....,.‘ .,.
- •
"..%. - .4. ..'t-', ''''''''. ' r-.,, ".4 1,-11,4-,, ,-..1 ,.., ' • , ,
..,.: ' ,,4., ... ,:-..., '.1 • - ,,..? • •
. ,..,.' ! "c. '.':‘1. .'il:'iv,.‘:i'i-..?..,Pi: '''... ...*' -.
•',4
.. . ... .
. ,
--- I,: , .....,,,,,.••• .: k•,4r.•'.It.(C ,...,. .•• ...
' '''., ';•i(;\'''1‘..-.1 rt.: ". .'"'‘.:. ;',. •.'
,..):1 . • ' . . , r
. • ,
'' l'.''; - i' !!,1';',./(?,1,''.' II•.1. r
,'I''',•;d1',.,(:•"‘'.1k'1,,,a.• -t., . ..• ,. .- ,-.1.:.
. . .. • 4... ,. .i,.... 41...,. .,0,, i, i •,.. .1.... ..' -
.,..,,,i.....:,,,!,,,,,,)•,,N..,.1,, ..,.,..,,...,
..6.,... .'..... •.:.':?".'.::',','..,'.':'';.'44'......,4.'i,...,.,ii.yr....'.i , '• §, .
,..' ;t•,,..1,,e,. ...;.,1',4.4,-. , ,.. . ....
....•' '. .),:_•44,;•4 ,:. ':'.',,i ',•,. •
7,4 •:.,, .. . -
.. ,.--.',...
.. •,_ ..•• n ; •,.1
,..,-... •,...., . ,0.. .
"' :
I '-',i'',"- -,''. '. ''' 1'.'•''' .. •-''''''''';,),''':''..ti' ..'' ' '' .F. ',' f.,.' ....
._ .
1- .',.1 .i, -. 1,
I
--$:''
,,,:,.",,:,..q.,-..?,,o, .,..,..i,...,.
• -..''•",,t,'.', ',,,,;',,,' 1,,,.'— '
'--'?..,,!•,'''..li '' ; '• 1 , 1, *:, ;•,-
'4';',',.,,..
...,.
-•, t'X' `,....';,.! . ' •.1.t ' '. 1::. •• '
- •
. ... ......, ''',;!:`:‘,...:,'!"..,;,!•!•,-;,:-;•-•'.,', • It-;',.•N ; ,. -.'....„„' ..,
•
•
-, A•'.: •.-AS. 11:;7' .. .• '' , .. . ` .I ! .
•
•' . ,, •;ii. n.....
) ..' '''.,..4';;..i',„ :- „.“-:''". . ‘11 ,.. ,•1 '
•
..:11-f:•:411,..-.''''.''''''.3....'.ft?..'1 '' 6,''''•i,,1 • . • • •
._..
. ''''''"*.kitt;.;,..• ',
•' i Vit.:TIqker . ..'', 4.'''frr+,,,',,',-••••,,',?..,f• `,"'i"g 1 ' •• '7, • ,
t.,
•,•,..i.d.'it•;;',7!,-„.; •!';',?•!•..• •$''i)..,',p,T.'•;; ' ;;,-•
.-._
,•'4.A.,kiX..,;(''''4'- -.
,.,:,,,,,,s.•'' ' '',u,,,,
- IP-^
. .,•I-
— . .
0 0
•
S
•
n9 (;
• 1:-:•74f: A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees ;n Urban Areas
15. TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM 2nd Edition
., . ___ . ..... \ •
Site:640 MMS. VO / - .-G'• -i9//P - '"r'` e -v11t1,D HAZARD RATING:
cation. ♦ a 'i
Failure & . !,-,or ♦ Target I, Huard
public_ private ✓ unknown other I.'otential of part Rating Rating
to
Date:T��y���Olnspector. Immediate action needed
Dale of last inspection: 7---/-d U Needs lurther Inspection
Dead tree •
TREE CHARACTERISTICS
Tree s: I 0 Species:_ Y` ‘Pl1L
DSH \4• of hunk*: J Height: tl0({ Spread: 40(
t
Form: cneerrally mmetric 0 minor asymmetry 0 maior asymmetry 0 stump sprout 0 stag•headed
Crown,dasx W�lor o t O co-dominant ❑Intermediat 0 Suppressed
Live crown ratio: % Age class: 0 young semi•niature 0 mature 0 over•rnature/senescent s 1
Pruning history: 0 crown cleaned 0 excessively thinned 0 topped 0 Crown raised 0 pollarded 0 crown reduced 0 flush cuts 0 cabled/braced
0 none 0 multiple pruning events Approx.dates:
bpectat Value: 0 specimen 0 heritage/historic 0 wildlife 0 unusual 0 street tree 0 screen 0 shade 0 indigenous 0 protected by gov.agency
TREE HEALTH) e"----e�_
Foliage color: tl normal 0 chlorotic 0 necrotic Eptcormics7 Y N Growth obstructions:
otiege density: 1 normal CI sparse Leaf a : 0 normal 0 small 0 stakes 0 wire/ties 0 signs 0 cables
Annual skeet growth: 0 excellent Outrage sr wig Dieback7 Y N 0 curb/pavement 0 guards
Woundwood development: C excellent D average C r•or 0 none 0 other _
Viper clan: 0 excellent O average O fair n •oor
r puts/diseases:lip
_ --
E CO N D IT I0 c—L_ S r ro l` T ''C' '�L'°c'`'� �1 r� ry /t
Site Character • esidence O commercial 0 industrial ❑p k O open space 0 natural 0 woodlanddorest .�, ' -�`
Landscape type: 0 parkway U raised bed 0 container sound 0 lawn 0 shrub border 0 wind break <a '-
Irrigation: .one 0 adequate 0 inadequate r excessive EJ trunk werued
Recent elle disturbance? Y() C construction 0 soil disturbance f7.,grade change 0 line e4:oarinp C site eunrinr
%dripilne paved: 0°i• to-25Ye 25.50% 50.75% 75.100% Pavement Iowa? N N 50-75% 75-1009
�• 1025Y 25 509.
me C
y1Ase�rr
; eHptina w;till son 10 25yo26�yssp-7axa,,.pO«•❑acidic Jsmell vow
°Is dtpling grade towered:
i .
I5opatterns: r drti halloo+ 0wmpacled Cdu9nry Unline Okatine ir
0 rotor/ctar
li:t
• RECEIVED
EXHIBIT 9
LU 00-0070 ;-;�i,;,
. CITY OF LAKE CSWE CC
Dept.of Planning 3 Deve'grrn�np
6 r'G -
Jul -20-00 07 : 57A P.01
TREE DEFECTS
ROOT DEFECTS: •
Suspect root rot: Y N Mushroom/conk/bracket present Y N ID: •
Exposed roots: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 row Undermined: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low
Root pruned: distance from trunk Root area effected: % Buttress wounded: Y N When:
Restricted root area: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low Potential I r root failure: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 tow
LEAN: deg.from vertical 0 natural 0 unnatural elf•corrected Soil heaving: Y N
Decay In plans of lean: N Roots broken Y Suii cracking: ()N
Compounding tactort_ Lean severity: 0 severe L�frtoderate 0 low
CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of Individual defects and rate their severity(s s severe,m-moderate,I:low)
DEFECT ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES
Poor taper
Baw,Sweep
Ccoorrinants/tarks
Multiple attachments � I
Included bark
Excessive end weight
Cracks/splits
Hangers I
Girdling f
Wounds/seem + t
Decay
Cavity I
—
Conksimushrooms/bracket
Bleeding/sap flow
loose/cracked bark 1 - •
Nesting hole/bee hive r
Deadwood/stubs
Borers/termites/ants 1
Cankers/gallsburls - r
Previous failure
HAZARD RATING
Iree part most kkety to fad: LC - Failure potential: I •low,2•medium;3-high;4•severe
Inspection period: annual biannual other Size of part: 1 •(6"(15 cm):2•6-18"(15.45 cm);
Failure Potential*Size of Part,Target Rating Hazard Rating 3 tt3 •30"(45 75 cmJ;4 >30 (75 cm)
f Target raring: 1 •occasional use:2 intermittent use;
* +_ ( 3-frequent use:4-constant use
HAZARD ABATEMENT O nk°"` cat( 7/31/e0) •
Prune: 0 remove Coteclive part 0 reduce ono weight 0 crown clean 0 thin 0 raise canopy 0 crown reduce 0 restructure 0 shape
Cable/Brace: Inspect further. 0 root crown 0 decay 0 aerial 0 monitor
Remove tree: O N Replace? Y N Move target Y N Other: __., �„�__ ___•
Ellett on adjacent trees: Bone 0 evaluate
T Notification: . er 0 manager 0 governing agency Dale: 7- 7—g' t.>
COMMENTS
pf, e . S eC/, Ne - Tne-e /4i5 5 ' 'Pe
m aJ 5S e eWS T`o h' Refry,
2 d 01 1— 5 r�c(e y + wvg. . s E E.
Ceoertji1-i`e-6/ nehog a2oiy e / yo
Dept.of Planning&Development
•
1.1 8