The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - 2014-05-19 (03) STAFF REPORT CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO PLANNING DIVISION APPLICANT/OWNER: FILE NOs: Steve Salta LU 14-0006 TAX LOT REFERENCE: STAFF: Tax Lot 400 of 21E 18BD Leslie Hamilton, AICP LOCATION: DATE OF REPORT: 5650 Rosewood Street May 9, 2014 COMP. PLAN DESCRIPTION: 120-DAY DECISION DATE: Industrial Park(IP) August 15, 2014 ZONING DESIGNATION: NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: Industrial Park(IP) None I. APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Development Review Permit to construct a three-story self storage facility, and the removal of 26 trees to accommodate the development. II. RECOMMENDATIONS Approval of LU 14-0006, with conditions. The complete listing of recommended conditions is provided on pages 22-25 of this report. III. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS A. City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan Goal 2: Land Use Planning Goal 6: Air,Water& Land Resource Quality Goal 9: Economic Development Goal 11: Public Facilities and Service Goal 12: Transportation Land Use Element and Parking LU 14-0006 Page 1 of 26 B. City of Lake Oswego Community Development Code [LOC Chapter 501: LOC 50.02.002.2.b.iii Specific Standards for Industrial Park Zone LOC 50.03.003.4.a Conditional Use Standards for Self Storage LOC 50.04.001.4 Dimensional Standards for Industrial Zones LOC 50.05.008.1-5 Industrial Park Overlay District LOC 50.06.001.5 Building Design for Industrial Development LOC 50.06.002 Parking LOC 50.06.003.1 Access/Access Lanes (Flag Lots) LOC 50.06.003.2 On-Site Circulation—Driveway and Fire Access Roads LOC 50.06.003.3 On-Site Circulation—Bikeways, Walkways and Accessways LOC 50.06.003.5 Transit LOC 50.06.004.1 Landscaping, Screening and Buffering LOC 50.06.004.2 Fences LOC 50.06.004.3 Lighting Standard LOC 50.06.005 Park and Open Space LOC 50.06.006.3.b Drainage for Major Development LOC 50.06.008 Utilities LOC 50.07.003.1 Application for Development, Burden of Proof LOC 50.07.003.5 Conditions of Approval LOC 50.07.003.7 Appeal of Minor and Major Development Decisions LOC 50.07.003.11 Modification of Development Permit LOC 50.07.003.14 Review Criteria for Minor Development LOC 50.07.003.15 Review Criteria for Major Development LOC 50.07.005 Conditional Use Permit C. City of Lake Oswego Streets and Sidewalks Code [LOC Chapter 421: LOC 42.03 Street Design Standards D. City of Lake Oswego Sign Code FLOC Chapter 471 LOC 47.10.420 Permanent Signage Requiring Permit Allowed in Industrial Zones I and IP E. City of Lake Oswego Tree Code [LOC Chapter 551: LOC 55.02.010-55.02.135 Tree Removal LOC 55.08.010-55.08.040 Tree Protection F. City Charter: Section 40 Major Road Expenditures IV. FINDINGS A. Background/Existing Conditions: 1. The property is approximately 39,639 square feet in area and abuts Rosewood Street (a local street)to the north (Exhibit El). As part of a separate request,the applicant will re-align Rosewood Street to intersect Boones Ferry Road, a major LU 14-0006 Page 2 of 26 arterial, as shown in Exhibit El. This will create new frontage for the site along Boones Ferry Road, and the resulting lot size will increase to 43,035 square feet. 2. The site is zoned Industrial Park (IP) and is also located within the Industrial Park Overlay District (IPO). The site is vacant. The abutting properties in all directions are also zoned IP and IPO, and are developed with commercial and industrial uses (Exhibit E2). 3. There are 36 trees on the site that are five inches in diameter or greater(Exhibit E3). V. PUBLIC NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND APPLICANT'S BURDEN OF PROOF A. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant has complied with all neighborhood notification and meeting requirements. The minutes of the meeting are included in this report as Exhibit F8. B. Public Notice to Surrounding Area: The City has provided adequate public notice and opportunity to comment on this application as required by LOC 50.07.003. No comments were received at the time this report was finalized. C. Burden of Proof: Per LOC 50.07.003.1.b, the applicant for a development permit shall bear the burden of proof that the application complies with all applicable review criteria or can be made to comply with applicable criteria by imposition of conditions of approval. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to enable staff to evaluate the proposal. These documents are listed as exhibits at the end of this report. VI. LOC 50.07.003.14—MINOR AND MAJOR DEVELOPMENT A. Classification of Application: LOC 50.07.003.14.a.ii(6) describes the construction of a new industrial building as minor development, and LOC 50.07.003.15.a.ii describes a CUP as a major development. B. Criteria for Review of Land Use Application: For the convenience of the reader, the minor and major developments are reviewed together but the review criteria are separately applied. The CUP portion of the application shall address the Major Development criteria of LOC 50.07.003.15.d.ii. The Development Review element shall address the Minor Development criteria of LOC 50.07.003.14.d. LU 14-0006 Page 3 of 26 1. Any applicable regulatory policies of the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan; Applicable regulatory Comprehensive Plan policies must be addressed as part of the request for a CUP for the subject site. Staff has reviewed the cited Comprehensive Plan policies, as well as the Comprehensive Plan policies generally, to determine if they are "regulatory" and has found that none of them are regulatory with regard to this application. However, even if the cited Comprehensive Plan policies are regulatory, the applicant has adequately addressed these policies in the narrative (Exhibit F1) and staff would find that the applicant has shown that they are met. 2. The requirements of the zone in which it is located; Site Specific Standards for Industrial Park Zone [LOC 50.02.002.2.b.ivl The site is located in the IP zone and within the IP Overlay District. The request is for a three-story self-storage facility, which is a conditional use in the IP Overlay [LOC 50.03.002]. There are four specific standards related to Industrial Park uses. The applicant's narrative (Exhibit F1) states that the proposed development complies as follows: 1. Each industrial area identified on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map also is described in LOC 50.11.002:Appendix 8. The specific conditions for each area are by this reference made a part of this Code and are conditions and limitations of each zone. These policies are addressed below under the Industrial Land Use Policy Element. 2. Manufacturing, repairing, compounding, processing or storage uses permitted in the I (Industrial)zone shall operate in continuing compliance with the requirements of Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 340 and City Codes and regulations. This site is located in the IP zone and within the IP Overlay; therefore,this standard is not applicable. 3. Research facilities, testing laboratories, manufacturing, processing or assembling of products, and incidental retail uses in the IP zone shall not emit noise, smoke, glare, vibration,fumes or other environmental effects which adversely affect people, property or uses beyond the property lines of the IP site. The proposed self-storage use does not include any manufacturing or processing uses, or incidental retail uses; therefore,this standard is not applicable. 4. Incidental retail uses in IP sites within 200 ft. of residentially zoned property may be open from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday. The proposed self-storage facility does not include incidental retail use; therefore,this standard is not applicable. LU 14-0006 Page 4 of 26 Industrial Land Use Policy Element [LOC 50.11.002:Appendix B1 The objective of these policies is to encourage industrial development that is compatible with the community in order to increase local employment opportunities and maintain a healthy economy. The following policies are those applicable to the Lake Grove Industrial Area and the proposed development. GENERAL POLICY I:Encourage environmental compatible industrial development. The City will: 1. Establish specific district policies for each industrial district to accommodate the unique conditions existing in each and use these specific district policies as conditions for actual development approval. These areas are: a. Lake Grove Industrial Park The City has adopted site specific standards for the Lake Grove Industrial Area per LOC 50.02.002.2.b. As discussed above, this policy is addressed. All other General Policies I-IV are either not applicable due to the scope of the proposal or have been incorporated into the Lake Gove Industrial Area specific standards (LOC 50.02.002.a) or Specific District Policies (General Policy V.1, below) and addressed there. GENERAL POLICY V: Encourage environmentally compatible industrial development. The following three sets of specific district policies will guide development in the existing and proposed industrial districts in the Lake Oswego Urban Service Area. Each district has unique conditions, thus individual policies are needed for each. 1. Lake Grove Industrial Park District Policies. a. Realign the Jean Road/Boones Ferry Road intersection as part of the Boones Ferry Road widening project to assure adequate truck turning radius. This is not a regulatory policy applicable to a site specific development proposal. b. Initiate measures to solve circulation and drainage problems, enhance the area's general appearance, and identify the southwestern entrance to the City. This is not a regulatory policy applicable to a site specific development proposal. c. Preserve major stands of trees where feasible. The property contains 36 trees, including Douglas fir, Bigleaf maple, cedars,fruit trees and some invasive trees (Exhibit E8) (Note: the tree survey includes four trees that are off-site: Trees 1, 4, 24 and 26. These trees are not included in the tree removal analysis for this project.) The trees are scattered throughout the site with clusters of no more than six in a group; no group is homogenous by species or relative size. Ten of the trees are proposed to be retained, including a cluster of four Douglas firs at the northeast corner of the site (Trees 31, 33-35,varying in size from seven to 20 inches in DBH), a 34" Douglas fir at the rear of the site (Tree 5), and five trees (Trees 12, 16, 20, 21 and 40) along the western property line LU 14-0006 Page 5 of 26 including a 22" fir that will be preserved through building articulation. The remaining trees are located within or in close proximity to the building footprint or access. As described in the specific standards for self-storage facilities,the use requires a minimum FAR of 1.5:1, and the applicant proposes 1:54:1. Reducing FAR to 1.5:1 will not result in the preservation of any additional trees. This standard is met. d. Encourage developments on small parcels to develop shared access with adjacent parcels wherever feasible. The proposal includes an access point on Rosewood Street. The abutting property to the west is accessed from Boones Ferry Road, while the abutting property to the east is accessed from Rosewood. It is not feasible to share access with either abutting property because self-storage facilities are fenced at the perimeter of the site for security reasons. e. Assure adjacent residential areas are protected from adverse effects of industrial activities and land use. There are no residential uses or zones adjacent to the proposed self-storage facility. This policy is not applicable. f. Revise the existing "IP zone"statutes in the Lake Oswego Code to require: • Compliance with the currently adopted noise performance standards and regulations of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. • Levels of maintenance of buildings and grounds. This is not a regulatory policy applicable to a site specific development proposal. Staff finds that, as applicable, the general and Lake Grove Industrial Park specific policies have been addressed and are met as proposed. IP Zone and IP Overlay Use Tables [LOC 50.03.002.3 and LOC 50.05.0081 The applicant proposes a self-storage facility on the site, which is a conditional use in the IP Overlay subject to the specific standards of LOC 50.05.008.5.c, Special Requirements. Compliance with these standards is addressed below. LU 14-0006 Page 6 of 26 IP/IP Overlay Zone Dimensional Standards [LOC 50.04.001.41 Development in the IP zone/IP Overlay is subject to site development limitations, as follows: IP/IP Overlay Site Limitations for Industrial and Commercial Uses Required Proposed Floor Area Ratio(FAR) Minimum 1.5:1* 1.54:1 Lot Coverage No maximum 21,392 sq.ft. or 49% Setbacks Front Yard 20 feet 20 feet Side Yards 10 feet 10 feet(west),35.5 feet(east) Rear 10 feet 10 feet Height 45 feet 43.9 feet *Minimum FAR is specific condition for self-storage facilities, LOC 50.05.008.5.c.i. As shown in the matrix above and in Exhibits E5 and E7, the proposed structure complies with the above IP zone and overlay dimensional standards. This standard is met. Special Requirements for Commercial Self-Storage [LOC 50.05.008.5.cl Commercial self-storage is allowed in the IP Overlay subject to the following standards: The minimum FAR shall be 1.5:1. As identified in the table above, the proposed FAR is 1.54:1. This standard is met. There shall be no roll-up or "overhead"doors on the ground level that are visible from an arterial or collector street. As shown in Exhibit E5, Boones Ferry Road, a major arterial, abuts the site to the northwest. The exterior access (overhead) doors for this building face east,which is away from Boones Ferry Road. This standard is met. Loading and docking areas shall be internal for the building and screened from street views. As shown in Exhibits E5 and E7, the loading and docking areas for the storage facility are located along the eastern building facade, at the interior of the site. The facility will be fenced by a 6-foot tall fence. This standard is met. The building exterior shall be articulated using a variety of materials and colors. At least 20%of a street facing façade shall be glass. As shown in the site plan (Exhibit E5),the north façade is broken into four separate planes, ranging from 14.5 feet to 35 feet in width. The CDC defines a "façade" as "all the wall planes of a structure as seen from one side or view." [LOC 50.10.003]. All four of these plans are therefore considered the street-facing facade, and together total 3,877 square feet in area. The fenestration provided on this facade measures 844 square feet, which is 21%of the street-facing facade. This standard is met. LU 14-0006 Page 7 of 26 The storage building will be constructed with a concrete block base (in natural grey and bronze) on the first floor, with a metal wall system on the second and third floors (in beige and copper). The tower element on the north facade will consist of concrete blocks in "dignity blue," with windows on the second and third floors and a silver coping at the top (Exhibit E7). The second and third floors are articulated with metal paneling with different colors, different groove widths, and both horizontal and vertical orientation. A blue CMU accent band further articulates the south, east and west elevations between the first and second floors at about nine feet in height. This accent band is not repeated on the front (north) elevation. In order to provide a consistent visual break between the first and second floors along all elevations,this accent band must be repeated on the north elevation. This will be made a condition of approval. As conditioned, this standard is met. Conditional Uses—General Standards [LOC 50.07.0051. A conditional use is an activity that is permitted in a zone but which, because of some characteristics that are not entirely compatible with other uses in the zone, cannot be permitted outright. In order for a CUP to be approved for a self-storage facility, it must be shown that: The requirements of the zone are met; The proposed self-storage facility meets the requirements of the IP zone and IP Overlay as self-storage facilities are a conditional use in the IP Overlay. As indicated in the discussion above,the proposed structure complies with the site dimensional and structure design standards. This standard is met. The site is physically capable of accommodating the proposed use; and, The site, more than 0.98 acres in size, is physically capable of accommodating the proposed improvements. The proposed self-storage facility meets or exceeds all setback requirements, and meets the zone's dimensional and applicable development standards. The functional characteristics of the proposed use are such that it can be made reasonably compatible with uses in the vicinity. Self-storage facilities are quiet activities with low traffic volumes. There is no noise, dust or odors generated from the use because there is no processing or manufacturing on the site. As shown in the floor plans (Exhibit E6), most of the storage units have access internal to the building through the enclosed loading area. This standard is met. Conditional Use Standards for Uses Not Covered by Other Specific Standards [LOC 50.03.003.4.al The proposal includes a new industrial building for a self-storage facility, which is a conditional use in the IP Overlay; therefore, the standards under LOC 50.03.003.4.a must be met as follows: a. The site will be designed so that ingress and egress will not cause hazardous turning movements, traffic slow-downs or blockages die to storage of vehicles waiting for services;and LU 14-0006 Page 8 of 26 As shown in the site plan (Exhibit E5),three parking spaces are provided at the front entrance of the building and in front of the security gate. Vehicles enter the site from Rosewood Street and can park in an area that does not impede access to the storage units, and does not require vehicles to queue in Rosewood Street. As described under Chapter 42 (Streets and Sidewalks),the driveway entrance meets all AASHTO standard for sight distance and vision clearance. This standard is met. b. Public services are or can be provided at the site;and As discussed under Utilities, below, all services are available at the site or can be made available. This criterion is met. c. All outdoor lighting except security lighting shall be extinguished at the close of business hours;and As shown in the Lighting Plan (Exhibit E12),the applicant proposes a combination of pole and building-mounted luminaires on the site. The applicant states that after business hours the lighting at the loading bays will be turned off but the wall packs and pole lights will remain on for security. This standard is met. d. Any adverse impacts on adjoining residential uses such as noise, lights, or loss of privacy will be mitigated by landscaping, screening or increased setbacks;and There are no residential uses that abut or adjoin the site. This standard is not applicable. e. Parking shall meet the parking standards and may be increased if additional spaces are shown to be necessary. As discussed under LOC 50.06.002, below, the proposed development meets the minimum parking requirement. This criterion is met. Conclusion: As conditioned,this standard can be met. 3. The Development Standards applicable to major developments; Building Design for Industrial Development (LOC 50.06.001.51 This standard is applicable to development involving industrial structures and prescribes standards for the design and orientation of buildings and associated elements and site features, preservation of natural land forms and vegetation, screening of mechanical equipment, and minimization of noise impacts. Design Standards [LOC 50.06.001.5.bl Buildings are required to be designed to be complementary in appearance to adjacent "buildings of good design" with regard to materials, setbacks, roof lines, height and overall proportions. Building elements and site features such as benches, awnings, lights, signs, windows, etc., are to be complementary in appearance to those buildings or structures with which they are associated. Mechanical equipment is required to be screened or placed in a location where they are not visible. LU 14-0006 Page 9 of 26 The storage building will be constructed with a concrete block base (in natural grey and bronze) on the first floor, with a metal wall system on the second and third floors (in beige and copper). The tower element on the north façade will consist of concrete block in "dignity blue," with windows on the second and third floors and a silver coping at the top (Exhibit E7). The second and third floors are articulated with metal paneling with different colors, different groove widths, and both horizontal and vertical orientation. A blue CMU accent band further articulates the south, east and west elevations between the first and second floors at about nine feet in height. The self-storage facility is designed with materials to match or complement industrial and commercial development in the near vicinity. As shown in the photos below, the properties immediately adjacent to the site, and visible from Boones Ferry Road/Rosewood, are older buildings, converted dwellings, or simple storage buildings and are not considered buildings "of good design" to which new development must be complementary. The TruGreen building, located on the abutting property to the south and accessed from Willow Lane, is a simple building of good design. It has a flat roof with a strong coping and numerous roll-up doors. .* N.‘ 7 ..;'[..7--. . :7'- b" rrw ..- 7. r4 tl_: • .1 _ IFS 17350 Boones Ferry 17280 Boones Ferry C,;" • - fir r•. .. 'ti," ••• P ` A x ♦:' .y`-4, 7 i. 1' T7' ' N - - ,=, -- '-r ----, v' V ; P :7 , , 'SIG A,.. imak.:* _ ter _ .. -�-, ►` al iiinia -- 5600 Rosewood Street Tru Green Building—5655 Lane ' .r* ' 'I+ '✓Tt. F l .-• r 1 Skf 4 D. t mac'j, se; �so ,�.`. . 5655 Willow Lane LU 14-0006 Page 10 of 26 The applicant correctly identifies other nearby buildings "of good design" as: • Lightspeed Aviation (6135 Jean Way) • Wal-Mart (1711 Jean Way) • Boones Ferry Crossing (17040 Pilkington Road) As shown in the applicant's narrative (Exhibit F1), these buildings use similar materials (metal siding and canopies, CMU block, storefront windows) as those proposed for the self- storage facility. These materials are common in the area for both commercial, office and industrial uses. Lightspeed Aviation includes both vertical and horizontal wall elements, and the flat roof is trimmed with a metal coping. Similarly, Wal-Mart employs metal paneling in a variety of widths and colors to articulate its facades. At Boones Ferry Crossing, a commercial/office development,the bottom floor is CMU block, and the flat roof has a slightly flared coping similar to the one provided on the tower element on the storage facility. The proposed colors on the self storage building—silver, brown, warm yellow, and blue—are present in the nearby developments as well. Wal-Mart and Boones Ferry Crossing employ a similar yellow tone, while the Light Speed Aviation building uses a cobalt blue as an accent at the entrance canopy and cornice level. The applicant proposes to locate a mechanical unit (condenser) on a pad on the north side of the building, and screen it with landscaping (Exhibits Fl and E9). This is a prominent location on the site, and not appropriate for mechanical unit placement due to visibility from the right-of-way. As a condition of approval, the applicant must submit revised a revised illustrating that this unit is moved to the rear of the building, outside of the required 10-foot setback. No other mechanical equipment, either ground-mounted or on the roof, is proposed. As conditioned, this standard can be met. Existing Land Forms,Trees, Shrubs and Other Natural Vegetation (LOC 50.06.001.5.b-cl Buildings shall be designed and located to complement and preserve existing natural land forms, trees, shrubs and other natural vegetation. Trees and other natural elements should be utilized to help define building proportion relationships and to provide scale. As shown in Exhibit E3, the site is flat with a slope of only 0.6%from north to south. Other than trees, there are no natural land forms on the site that could define building proportion and provide scale to the development. As addressed under the Tree Code (Chapter 55), there are 36 trees on the site, and the applicant proposes to remove 26 of them to construct the development. Of the trees proposed for removal, eight are mature Douglas firs in good condition, with DBH between 25 and 40 inches. Relative to the trees removed, the mitigation and landscaping trees proposed on the site are much smaller and do not provide adequate scale to the building. At the northwest corner of the building,the applicant proposes a vine maple,Japanese tree lilac and Adirondack crabapple. No other trees are proposed along the front building façade. As shown in the mitigation tree list in the applicant's narrative (Exhibit F1),the proposed trees are very small in stature and spread at maturity. Given that the proposed storage facility is 36-44 feet in height directly behind these trees,the building will dwarf the mitigation trees. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to submit a revised landscaping plan that includes a one tree at the northwest corner of the building that has a mature height of at least 50 feet, and three additional trees along the north façade that have a mature height of at least 50 feet. As conditioned,this standard can be met. LU 14-0006 Page 11 of 26 Reduce Noise Impacts [LOC 50.06.001.5.dl Buildings shall be designed and constructed to reduce noise impacts on interior occupied spaces and adjacent property. Self-storage facilities are a quiet use with no manufacturing or processing noise. As shown in the floor plans, most of the storage units are accessed internally. This standard is met. Protect Pedestrians from the Elements [LOC 50.06.001.5.11 Buildings shall incorporate features such as arcades, roofs, alcoves, porticoes and awnings to protect pedestrians from the elements. These projections shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet six inches where over fire lanes. The relatively flat roof slopes toward the east side of the building, directing rainwater to the downspouts on the east elevation. Two awnings are provided at the office entrance—one at 9.5 feet in height and one at 29 feet in height—to protect customers from the elements (Exhibit E7).These awnings are not located over a fire lane. Building Orientation [LOC 50.06.001.5.81 Buildings are required to be located within 30 feet of a public street, except where prevented by topographical constraints, natural resources, or where, in multi-building complexes, the configuration of the lot prevents locating all buildings within 30 feet of a public street. The storage facility will be located 20 feet from Rosewood Street, a public street (Exhibit E5). This standard is met. Off-Street Parking, Loading and Bicycle Access [LOC 50.06.0021 This standard is applicable to all development that generates a parking need. Parking requirements for self-storage facilities require 3.33 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross office floor area, plus one space for the resident manager. There is no resident manager proposed at this storage facility. The minimum required parking is four spaces, and four spaces are provided, as shown in Exhibit E5. Self-storage facilities are exempt from bicycle parking requirements. This standard is met. Access/Access Lanes (Flag Lots) [LOC 50.06.003.11 This standard is applicable to construction of an industrial structure and prescribes standards for the design of access points and lanes. The applicant proposes a new driveway approach onto the new Rosewood Street extension,to be constructed to City standards (Exhibit E5). This standard is met. On-Site Circulation—Driveways and Fire Access Roads [LOC 50.06.003.21 This standard is applicable to all development proposing a new or increased use on a site when development will result in the construction of or increased use of driveways or parking lot aisles. The standard also specifies the geometric design of proposed driveways, fire lanes and parking lot aisles that serve as emergency access routes. The maximum width of a driveway approach, measured where the edges of the driveway meet the right-of-way, is 24 feet, unless otherwise justified by the recommendations of a traffic study. Where the driveway meets the public street,the landing area shall be a minimum of 25 feet long and shall have a maximum grade of 5%. LU 14-0006 Page 12 of 26 The applicant has submitted a traffic impact study (Exhibit F4 and F5) and preliminary plans (Exhibit E13), both prepared by a registered engineer, addressing the requirements of this standard. The Rosewood Street access for the site is proposed to be constructed 118 feet east of the center of the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road. The traffic study indicates that based on American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) standards, 77 feet of stopping sight distance would be required looking west from the site driveway and 152 feet looking east. The Engineering staff notes the following items for compliance with this standard: • The location of the proposed driveway is acceptable and meets this standard. • The width of the driveway approach at the right-of-way line will not exceed 24- feet, and the proposed grade will be less than 5%. • Sight distance will be unobstructed by roadway geometry or vegetation looking east from the site access and will readily exceed the required stopping sight distance standard of 152 feet. Looking west from the site driveway,traffic turning from Boones Ferry Road will be visible from the driveway and approximately 112 feet of stopping sight distance will be available, which is in excess of the required 77 feet. Accordingly, sight distance is sufficient in both directions for the driveway to operate safely. As described in the memo from the Fire Marshal (Exhibit F7),the building footprint is too large to be able to reach all exterior points within 150 feet. A fire access lane is provided from Rosewood Street to the rear of the property along the eastern portion of the site, with a turn-around at the end. This fire lane will be required to be marked "No Parking," including in the turn-around area, and the gate will have to be equipped with a Knox key switch installed for access. Compliance with these standards will be assured during the Building permit review. As conditioned, this standard can be met. On-Site Circulation—Bikeways,Walkways and Accessways [LOC 50.06.003.31 This standard is applicable to the construction of a new industrial structure, and specifies standards for pedestrian circulation on site. A walkway is provided from the office entrance directly to the sidewalk abutting the site (Exhibit E5). This standard is met. This walkway will be required to meet the accessibility standards of the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). Compliance with this standard will be assured during the Building permit review. This standard is met. Transit [LOC 50.06.003.51 This section is applicable to new industrial development located on a transit street or within one-quarter mile of a transit street and requires that transit facilities and transit- oriented features be provided. The site abuts Boones Ferry Road, which is a bus route. The closest bus stop is located at the intersection of Boones Ferry Road and Pilkington Road, approximately 620 feet from the site. The proposed development will comply with this standard by constructing a sidewalk along the site frontage, which will provide connectivity to Boones Ferry road and the transit stop. This standard is met. Landscaping.Screening and Buffering [LOC 50.06.004.11 This standard requires industrial uses to provide a minimum of 15% of the net buildable area in landscaping and/or open space; 6,455 square feet of landscaping must be provided on the site. Screening and buffering is required to mitigate noise and lighting, to screen utility and storage areas and parking lots, and as a separation between LU 14-0006 Page 13 of 26 dissimilar uses. Development abutting streets shall provide street trees at the proper spacing for the species. As shown in Exhibit E9, the applicant proposes landscaping on 18.7%of the site, or approximately 8,060 square feet. The landscaping includes 45 new trees and a variety of shrubs and ground cover. All landscaping is provided at the perimeter of the site, providing buffering from abutting properties. Ten trees will be preserved—four on along the east property line (15-34" Douglas firs), one along the south property line (34" Douglas fir), and five along the west property line (four relatively small trees and one 22" Douglas fir for which the building is articulated in order to preserve the tree). The applicant proposes two paperbark maples as street trees, one at the northwest corner of the site along Boones Ferry, and one to the north of the driveway entrance on Rosewood Street. With one preserved tree at the northeast corner of the site (31" Douglas fir), the effective number of proposed street tree is three over a frontage of approximately 180 feet. Given the small stature of the paperbark maples at maturity(20-30 feet), staff finds that these trees do not provide sufficient buffering along the street frontages. Additionally, the applicant proposes a variety of shrubs between two and five gallons in size. For effective cover, all shrubs must be a minimum of three gallon at the time of planting. As a condition of approval,the applicant will be required to submit a revised landscape plan illustrating at least four paperbark maples along the combined Rosewood and Boones Ferry frontages, and that all shrubs are at least three gallons in size at the time of planting. A conditioned,this standard can be met. Fences [LOC 50.06.004.21 Fences, walls and retaining walls in the IP zone shall not exceed eight feet in height, and any fence over six feet in height would need a building permit and must be screened by an evergreen hedge. The applicant proposes a six-foot fence along the east and a portion of the south property line in order to secure the access areas (Exhibit E4). This standard is met. Lighting [LOC 50.06.004.31 This standard is applicable to all major developments which result in increased use of public and private streets, and includes lighting standards for public pathways and accessways, and open air parking lots. The Lighting Plan (Exhibit E12) submitted by the applicant shows that the lighting levels for the open air parking lot ranges from 0.4 to 3.3 foot-candles, which is within the acceptable range of 0.15—4.0. The applicant proposes four pole-mounted lights along the eastern and southern property lines, with mounting heights of 12 feet, which is less than the maximum mounting height of 22 feet. This standard is met. There is an existing street light at the northwest corner of the site. The applicant proposes a new street light along Rosewood Street which will be LED, following the current City LED retrofit project standards. This standard is met. Park and Open Space [LOC 50.06.0051 This standard applies to the construction or alteration of an industrial structure and requires that 15% of the gross land area be provided as open space. As discussed in the Landscaping analysis above, and shown in the Landscaping Plan (Exhibit E9), 18.7%of the site is devoted to open space and landscaping. This standard is met. LU 14-0006 Page 14 of 26 Drainage Standard for Major Development [LOC 50.06.006.31 This standard requires that drainage alterations, including new development, not adversely affect neighboring properties. In addition, this standard requires design features to minimize pollutants from entering the storm water runoff systems. The determination of whether or not the application complies with the requirements of this standard is under the review authority of the City Manager or City Engineer. The Engineer staff has made the following findings: The site is relatively flat; however, a portion of the site and Rosewood Street slope slightly to the west toward an existing catch basin located just north of the site within the public right-of-way. Drainage from this catch basin connects to a piped conveyance system along Boones Ferry Road. There is also an existing 24-inch diameter public storm line located to the south of the site across the abutting property. The applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage report dated January (Exhibit F6) prepared by a registered engineer. The storm water runoff from the roof areas and paved areas on site is proposed to be routed to an underground chamber detention system located along the east side of the site, shown on the preliminary utility plan (Exhibit E11). The detention facility is proposed to be constructed with a storm chamber system with impervious liner and will have a control structure to detain the design storm to the City standards. The required detention volume shall be the maximum change in run-off volume from the 50-year storm event on the proposed developed property and the 10-year storm event on the pre-developed property for all new impervious surface area. Water quality will be provided by installing a storm filter manhole immediately downstream from the detention facility. The treatment design for water quality is 0.36 inches of precipitation falling in four hours with an average return period of 96 hours. The preliminary drainage analysis indicates three filter cartridges will be needed in the manhole. Runoff from the detention facility will be routed to an existing public storm main located along the north property line of the abutting property to the south. All on-site storm water facilities will be private, and the owner will be required to submit an operations and maintenance plan and record a Declaration of Covenant for Operation and Maintenance of Surface Water Management Facilities. The applicant has also proposed an alternative design for managing on-site runoff by constructing an infiltration facility. Preliminary factored infiltration rates indicate a percolation rate of 20 inches per hour. The final design regarding the storm management facilities will be reviewed prior to building permit issuance. As part of this development, a public street connection of Rosewood Street to Boones Ferry Road will also be constructed. Rosewood Street will be extended approximately 117 feet across the site frontage and will consist of 30 feet of paving, curbs, and a sidewalk along the project frontage. The existing section of Rosewood Street is nearly flat, but slopes slightly down to the east toward Pilkington Road. The area of the new street extension sheds partially east and to an existing field inlet that drains west to an existing public storm conveyance system in Boones Ferry Road. This system is too shallow to be utilized for the runoff from the new street extension. Runoff from the new section of Rosewood Street will be collected in two new curb inlets near the east property line and conveyed with a new public storm main extending east to the existing public storm system in Pilkington Road. LU 14-0006 Page 15 of 26 The applicant will be required to submit a downstream analysis for the existing pipe capacity in Pilkington Road and for the 24-inch pipe connecting back to Boones Ferry Road, located south of the site. The Engineering staff finds the proposed storm management concept complies with the drainage standard. As conditioned, this standard is met. Utilities [LOC 50.06.008.1-61 This standard is applicable to all development requiring connection to utilities. Utilities are available or can be made available as follows: Sanitary Sewer: There is a 10" public sewer located in Rosewood Street. The applicant is proposing to construct a new 6" sanitary lateral west of the new driveway approach and tap the existing public sanitary main. A clean-out will be required at the right-of- way line. Water and Hydrants: The City has an 8" public water main located in Rosewood Street. The closest hydrant is located at the end of Rosewood Street just north of the site. This fire hydrant will need to be relocated with the new street alignment and may need to be replaced. An additional hydrant will have to be provided in an approved location on Rosewood Street,to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal (Exhibit F7). The applicant is proposing a new separate fire service to serve the building. Prior to building permit issuance, a utility plan will need to be submitted for review and approval of staff. All proposed utilities shall be constructed to City standards. As conditioned,this standard is met. Storm Drains and Approved Points of Disposal: Storm water management will be required for the impervious surface areas. Please see comments above regarding this issue. Streets: Boones Ferry Road is an improved major arterial street. Rosewood Street is classified as a local street. See additional comments, below, under LOC Chapter 42 for street frontage improvement requirements. Sidewalks: Sidewalks exist along Boones Ferry Road, but there are no sidewalks along Rosewood Street. A new sidewalk will be required along the site frontage on Rosewood, including new ADA ramps on both sides of the street at the new intersection with Boones Ferry Road. See additional comments, below, under LOC Chapter 42 for street frontage improvement requirements. Other utilities: The applicant proposes an above-ground transformer to be located in the required 20-foot front setback and 10-foot side setback at the northeast corner of the site (Exhibit E5). Transformers are required to be placed underground. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to submit a revised utility plan illustrating that the transformer is installed underground. All overhead utilities shall be installed underground. It is the applicant's responsibility to ascertain the availability of electric, gas,telecommunications and cable TV. Compliance with this standard will be assured at the time of building permit application. LU 14-0006 Page 16 of 26 4. Any additional statutory, regulatory or Lake Oswego Code provisions which may be applicable to the specific major development application; City of Lake Oswego Street and Sidewalks Code [LOC Chapter 421 This Chapter authorizes the City Engineer to make specific street and sidewalk improvement recommendations after taking a variety of policy and site specific factors into consideration.' The City Engineer's comments are included for the review of the overall understanding of the project. The City Engineer's conditions of approval are included, as they must be included in the decision, to find that the application will comply with this Article. The Engineering staff has reviewed the development proposal and field conditions in the context of the City's codes, improvement policies and Transportation System Plan (TSP), and provides the following observations and recommendations. The proposed development is estimated to generate approximately 11 trips during both the morning and evening peak hours.2 Additional pedestrian and bicycle trips can be expected as well. The cumulative effect of new trips (all modes), imposes an additional burden and concomitant concerns for preserving street capacity and public safety, particularly for bicycles and pedestrians. The City has a governmental interest in assuring that new development does not contribute to a degradation of adequate, safe and efficient public transportation facilities. New development should mitigate the negative impacts (increased noise, and the degradation of aesthetics, safety, system capacity, and bicycle and pedestrian mobility) resulting from new development.The City has adopted a broad palette of policies, plans, regulations, and fees that have been designed to offset the adverse impacts of development on the natural and built environment. In this regard, the following regulations, standards and site specific characteristics have a direct bearing on the governmental interest in preserving the functionality and safety of the public infrastructure, and are particularly relevant to this development proposal: • Rosewood Street is designated as a local street, and as such should be designed to safely accommodate bike and pedestrian traffic. • Boones Ferry Road is designated as a major arterial, and as such should be designed to safely accommodate bike and pedestrian traffic. • The site is located within walking and biking distance of the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses. • The site is located within a quarter of mile of a transit system. • LOC Chapter 42 directs the City Engineer to recommend to the decision making authority the appropriate width of public rights of way, and the width and character of the improvements contained therein. 'To meet the review criteria for a major development, the applicant must comply with "any additional... Lake Oswego Code provisions which may be applicable to the specific major development application,such as... the Streets and Sidewalks Ordinance." LOC 50.07.003.15(d)(ii)(d). The determination of whether or not the application meets the requirements of LOC Chapter 42,Streets and Sidewalks, is under the review authority of the City Manager or City Engineer;the requirements of this Chapter are not under the review authority of a hearing body, other than to find whether or not the City Engineer or City Manager has found that the application complies with LOC Chapter 42, or whether conditions of approval are required for compliance with this Chapter. 2West Coast Self Storaae—Rosewood Street Traffic Impact Study. Lake Oswego Oreaon.prepared by Lancaster Engineering August 23, 2013. LU 14-0006 Page 17 of 26 • LOC Chapter 42 requires frontage improvements, including pedestrian improvements, to be constructed when property is developed. The implementation of the City's plans, policies, and regulations will offset to some degree the negative impacts of development on the public infrastructure. LOC 50.07.003.5 allows the reviewing authority to impose conditions of approval on a development permit when the condition is reasonably related to alleviation of a need for public services or facilities created or contributed to by the proposed development. In addition, the US Supreme Court has rule (Dolan v. City of Tigard) that, in order to require exactions, the local government must apply a test of"rough proportionality" between the impacts of the proposed development and the need for the exaction. Rosewood Street along the site frontage is substandard in that the pavement is in poor condition and the width is approximately 16-18 feet. There are no existing sidewalks along Rosewood Street between Pilkington and Boones Ferry Roads. For exaction purposes,this development will be required to reconstruct Rosewood Street out to the centerline of the right-of-way, including a minimum 7-foot wide sidewalk along the site frontage. The applicant has proposed to voluntarily construct full street improvements along the site frontage in order to connect Rosewood Street to Boones Ferry Road.3 A public utility easement will be retained over the existing public utilities along the site frontage that will be located within the vacated right-of-way and outside of the dedicated right-of-way area. The applicant has provided a preliminary plan (Exhibit E13) indicating that a 30-foot pavement width will be provided within a new 50-foot right-of-way. Sufficient dedication will be provided in order to connect Rosewood Street to Boones Ferry Road at a right angle. Although a minimum 7-foot wide sidewalk is required, an 8-foot sidewalk is proposed to be constructed along the site frontage in order to match the sidewalk width along Boones Ferry Road. A painted crosswalk will be constructed between the new curb returns along the south side of Boones Ferry Road. The Engineering staff also notes there are existing overhead utilities along the site frontage of Rosewood Street. Per LOC 50.06.008.4.d, utilities shall be installed underground. This development will be required to underground the existing overhead utility lines along the site frontage from the existing utility pole located at Boones Ferry Road to the site's east property line. The applicant's utility plan (Exhibit E11) indicates that the existing overhead utilities will be placed underground. As a condition of approval of the proposed development, the City will require the following exactions: Along the site frontage of Rosewood Street: • Construct half street improvements along the entire site frontage, including new pavement, storm collection and conveyance system, curb and gutter and a minimum 7-foot wide sidewalk. The face of the new curb shall be located 15 feet from the right-of-way centerline. 3Resolution 13-59:A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego Declaring the intent of the City Council to Vacate a Portion of Rosewood Street and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Other Documents as Necessary to Implement the Street Vacation and to Accept Right-of-way Dedication to Connect Rosewood Street to Boones Ferry Road. LU 14-0006 Page 18 of 26 • Provide adequate right-of-way dedication to construct the entire frontage improvements within the public right-of-way. • Construct a painted crosswalk in between the new curb returns along the south side of Boones Ferry Road. • Underground the existing overhead utilities along the site frontage on Rosewood Street. • Install a street light at the intersection of Rosewood Street and Boones Ferry Road. Note: Adding additional pavement to Rosewood Street is technically a "street widening" as defined in Section 40 of the City Charter, and is subject to public notice and vote in a general election unless the election requirements are waived. The provisions of City Charter Section 40 must be adhered to before any street widening work may commence.This provision was met on March 13, 2014, the deadline for petitioning for an election. The above exactions are directly related to mitigating the adverse impacts created by the development, as follows: • The provision of the right-of-way dedication will allow construction of the required street frontage improvements and connection to Boones Ferry Road. • The above described improvements will address the increased vehicle traffic because, with a separation between vehicle, bicyclists and pedestrians,the traffic capacity of the street will be preserved. • The above described improvements will encourage use of the sidewalks and bike lanes, and use of transit,thus reducing the demand that would otherwise arise for vehicle travel on the street. • The above described improvements will address the safety of the pedestrians and bicyclists by providing separation of modes of travel. • The above described improvements will address the safety of ingress into the site and egress from the site. • The City finds that exacting the improvements on Rosewood Street is therefore directly related to the increased traffic, bike, and pedestrian trips that will be created by this development. The City finds that the exaction of the required improvements is roughly proportional to the adverse impacts created by the development because: • The proposed development can be expected to generate approximately 11 trips during both the morning and evening peak hours.The required frontage improvements along Rosewood Street will result in a greater use of alternative modes of travel (pedestrian, bicycle,transit), both today and in the future, as traffic congestion increases in the area. These additional alternative mode travel trips will help offset additional vehicle trips generated by the development. • Similar exactions for site frontage improvements have been required for similar developments in the area, with the result being that such exactions have mitigated the increased traffic (vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle) by preserving the functionality and public safety features of the public street system. In light of the above facts and Code requirements, staff finds that the development of this site will place sufficient additional demand on the surrounding street system to LU 14-0006 Page 19 of 26 justify the associated improvements above, and that these exactions are roughly proportional to the degree of impact imposed by the new development. Sign Code [LOC Chapter 471 Signs are reviewed for compliance with the specific sign standards relating to the zone where the sign is to be placed and design standards applicable to all permanent signs per the Sign Code. No sign permit applications are included as part of this application, although the applicant has illustrated some signage opportunities in the elevations and renderings (Exhibits E5 and E9). Approval of plans that contain depiction of signage location and general size should not be considered approval of the signage. All signage shall comply with the provisions of the Sign Code to be compatible with those in the surrounding area [LOC 47.06.200(4)]. Sign permits will be required and each proposed sign will be reviewed for compliance when the sign permit application is received. For compatibility with the design of the structure, plastic-faced signs are prohibited. This standard can be met at the time of sign application. City of Lake Oswego Tree Code [LOC Chapter 551 This Code is intended to preserve trees and requires a tree removal permit for removal of any tree in excess of five inches in diameter, and prescribes protection measures for trees to remain during construction. Only those trees that must be removed in order to site proposed improvements will be granted tree removal permits. There are 36 regulated trees on the property and 26 trees are proposed for removal with the construction of the proposed improvements (Exhibit E7). Trees 5, 12, 16, 20, 21, 31, 34, 35 and 40 are proposed to be preserved. Tree Removal As shown on Exhibit E8, there are approximately 36 trees greater than 5" on or near the site. The applicant is requesting to remove 26 trees in order to construct the proposed development. Trees proposed for removal in conjunction with major or minor development can be granted tree removal permits if the following four criteria are met: (1) The removal is for development purposes pursuant to the City Code; The removal of these trees is necessary for development because they are located within or near the building footprint or construction impact area of the proposed self- storage facility and circulation area. This standard is met. (2) The removal will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; The removal will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, or flow of surface waters because the site is relatively flat with a grade of less than one percent, and there are no streams or wetlands on or near the site. The removal will also not have a significant negative impact on protection of adjacent trees and windbreaks for the following reasons: Tree 5, a 38" Douglas fir to be retained at the rear of the property, is not located in or near a cluster of trees that provide protection from windbreaks. Similarly,the Douglas firs retained at the northeast corner of the site are LU 14-0006 Page 20 of 26 isolated from the nearest trees to the southwest, from which direction the prevailing wind blows. This standard is met. (3) The removal will not have a significant negative impact on the character, aesthetics, or property values of the neighborhood, except where alternatives to tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone;and The proposed tree removal will not have a significant negative impact on the character, aesthetics or property values of the neighborhood. Most of the trees to be retained are on the north and west sides of the site, which are the most visible from the abutting public streets. The footprint of the storage building has been articulated along the west facade to protect one of the larger trees on the property,Tree 16, a 22" Douglas fir. A cluster of firs will be retained at the northeast corner of the site, and a 24" Douglas fir will be retained at the rear of the building. (4) The removal is not for the sole purpose of providing or enhancing views. The trees are not being removed for view enhancement because their removal will not improve any views. For the reasons outlined above, staff concludes that the tree removal request for the fifteen trees complies with the applicable criteria and may be approved. This standard can be met. Mitigation Any tree approved for removal under the Type II analysis shall be mitigated at a minimum 1:1 ratio. Mitigation trees shall have a minimum 2-inch caliper diameter for deciduous trees and a minimum 6-8 foot height (excluding leader) for evergreen trees. As shown in the Tree Removal application (Exhibit E9), the applicant proposes 1:1 mitigation for the 26 trees to be removed. However, as discussed under the Building Design standard (LOC 50.06.001.5), the proposed mitigation trees are too small to provide sufficient scale to the building. As conditioned under the Building Design standard, larger mitigation trees will be required along the north facade. This standard is met. Tree Protection The Code requires tree protection measures when a tree protection zone or drip line of a tree is within the construction zone, whether on or off-site [LOC 55.08.030(1)].There are several trees in the vicinity of work areas that will need protection during site development. In general, the protective fencing shall be placed at the tree protection zone, which is the zone required to protect the critical root area necessary for the continued health of the trees.The applicant should propose the tree protection zone for each tree, for review and approval by City staff, on site. As required by LOC 55.08.030(7), no construction, excavation, root pruning or other activity shall occur within the tree protection zone unless directed by an arborist present on site and approved by the City. LU 14-0006 Page 21 of 26 5. Any applicable condition of approval imposed pursuant to an approved ODPS or prior development permit affecting the subject property. There are not outstanding conditions of approval that affect the subject property. VII. CONCLUSION Based upon the materials submitted by the applicant and findings presented in this report, staff concludes that LU 14-0006 complies with all applicable criteria and standards or can be made to comply through the imposition of conditions. VIII. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of LU 14-0006, subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to Issuance of any Grading or Building Permits,the Applicant/Owner Shall: 1. Submit final site and building plans for review and approval of staff that are the same or substantially similar to the site plan and elevations as illustrated on Exhibits E5-E7, with the following modifications: a. Repeat the blue accent band between the first floor and second floor on the north elevation. b. Relocate the mechanical unit (condenser) at the rear of the building outside of the required 10-foot setback. c. Underground the proposed transformer, placed outside of any tree protection zone. 2. Provide a report for all required stormwater improvements, prepared by a registered engineer. The drainage report shall include a downstream analysis for the existing pipe capacity in Pilkington Road and for the 24-inch pipe located south of the site, connecting back to Boones Ferry Road. 3. Submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for the private on-site storm facilities and record a Declaration of Covenant for Operation and Management of Surface Water Management Facilities,to the satisfaction of staff. 4. Submit engineered construction drawings for the public and site improvements for review and approval by the City Engineer. Drawings shall conform to the City's current designs standards and the drafting specifications.The plans shall include the following design elements: a. Design of the Rosewood Street improvements along the entire site frontage, including new pavement, storm collection and conveyance system, curb and gutter and a minimum 7-foot wide sidewalk. b. Design of the full street connection of Rosewood Street to Boones Ferry Road. LU 14-0006 Page 22 of 26 c. Adequate right-of-way dedication on Rosewood Street to construct the street frontage improvements and full street connection to Boones Ferry Road. All public improvements shall be constructed within the public right-of-way. d. Design of a painted crosswalk along the south side of Boones Ferry Road in between the new curb returns (and ADA ramps) of the Rosewood Street connection to Boones Ferry Road. e. Underground the existing overhead utilities along the site frontage on Rosewood Street. f. Design of a street light at the intersection of Rosewood Street and Boones Ferry Road. LED lighting will be required for any new street lights. g. Design of the final on-site storm water quality and detention system, prepared by a registered engineer. h. Design of the private sanitary service lateral to serve the new structure. The existing service lateral shall be abandoned per City standards. i. Design of the private water service and fire line, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Fire Marshall.The water meter shall be located behind the sidewalk. Fire hydrant requirements shall be to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. j. A sewer clean-out at the site frontage along Rosewood at right-of way line. 5. Complete the public improvements or provide a financial guarantee to ensure their construction, per LOC 50.07.003.9. The financial guarantee shall be based on an itemized engineer's estimate that is in turn based on plans that are far enough advanced to support the estimate, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. Submit a final landscape/mitigation plan substantially similar to Exhibit E9, except modified to show the following, to the satisfaction of staff: a. One tree at the northwest corner of the building that has a mature height of at least 50 feet, and three additional trees along the north facade that have a mature height of at least 50 feet. b. A minimum of four paperbark maple street trees along the combined Rosewood and Boones Ferry frontages of the site. c. All shrubs must be a minimum of three gallons. d. A note on the plans requiring all burlap and wire cages to be removed from trees and shrubs prior to planting. 7. Per LOC Chapter 52, submit evidence of DEQ 1200-C compliance, and apply for and obtain an erosion prevention and sediment control permit issued through the City of Lake Oswego, and install and maintain all BMPs as indicated in the permit. These measures shall remain in place throughout the development period. LU 14-0006 Page 23 of 26 8. Apply for and obtain a verification tree removal permit for the 26 trees approved for removal to construct the improvements.The verification permit submittal shall include an 81/2" x 11" copy of the tree removal plan and a mitigation plan showing replacement trees on a 1:1 basis. Replacement trees shall not be dwarf or ornamental varieties and shall be at least two inches in caliper if deciduous or at least 6-8 feet tall (excluding the leader) if evergreens. 9. Pay all applicable System Development Charges. B. Prior to Commencing the Street Widening Work in Rosewood Street,the Applicant/Owner Shall: 1. Complete the public notice and election requirements prescribed in Section 40 of the City Charter. The applicant/owner shall coordinate with the Engineering staff to complete this process. A permit for road construction will not be issued until the Charter requirements have been satisfied. C. Prior to Final Building Inspection or Occupancy of the Structure,the Applicant/Owner Shall: 1. Complete all public improvements, as required by Condition A(4), above. Submit certified "as-built" drawings of the public improvements conforming to the City's standards for record drawings, and receive a certificate of completion and acceptance from the City of Lake Oswego. 2. Complete construction of all private utility service, including water, storm, sanitary and franchise utilities. 3. Record the Declaration of Covenant for Operations and Maintenance of Surface Water Management Facilities for the private onsite storm water facilities. 4. Install "No Parking" signs along the fire lanes, including in the turn-around area, and provide a Knox key switch for gate access,to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. 5. Install all landscaping and mitigation plantings as illustrated on Exhibit E8, and modified by Condition A(6), above. 6. Provide a one-year guarantee (one 12-month growing season from the date of installation)for all landscape materials, pursuant to LOC 50.06.010.2. The guarantee shall consist of a security in the amount of five percent of the total landscaping cost (including materials and labor). The applicant/owner shall also submit a landscape maintenance plan for review and approval of City staff. D. Prior to Installation of any Signs,the Applicant/Owner Shall: 1. Obtain all necessary sign permits. The applicant/owner shall submit sign plans and elevations in accordance with the Sign Code for review and approval of staff. Colors and materials shall be compatible with the architectural details and colors of the approved building. Plastic-faced signs shall be prohibited. [Note: The Conditions of Approval regarding sign limitations is not exclusive to the requirements and standards that will be reviewed when a sign permit LU 14-0006 Page 24 of 26 application is submitted; there are additional compatibility standards in the Sign Code [LOC Chapter 47] for signs relating not only to the building itself but to the surrounding area.] Code Requirements: 1. Expiration of Development Permit: Per LOC 50.07.003.17,the development approved by this decision shall expire three years following the effective date of the development permit, and can be extended by the City Manager pursuant to the provisions of this section. 2. Tree Protection: Submit a tree protection plan and application prepared by a certified arborist as required by LOC 50.08.020 and 55.08.030 for review and approval by staff, including off-site trees that are within the construction zone. The plan shall include: a. The location of temporary tree protection fencing, consisting of a minimum 6-foot high cyclone fence secured by steel posts, around the tree protection zone, or as recommended by the project arborist and approved by the City. b. A note stating that no fill or compaction shall occur within the critical root zones of any of the trees, or that if fill or compaction is unavoidable, measures will be taken as recommended by a certified arborist to reduce or mitigate the impact of the fill or compaction. Such measures shall be clearly outlined in the tree protection plan. The note shall also inform contractors that the project arborist shall be on site and oversee all construction activities within the tree protection zone. c. A note that clearly informs all site contractors about the necessity of preventing damage to the trees, including bark and root zone. The applicant and contractor(s) shall be subject to fines, penalties and mitigation for trees that are damaged or destroyed during construction. d. A sign shall be attached to the tree protection fencing, which states that inside the fencing is a tree protection zone, not to be disturbed unless prior approval has been obtained from the City Manager and project arborist. Note: 1. Development plans review, permit approval, and inspections by the City of Lake Oswego Development Review Section are limited to compliance with the Lake Oswego Community Development Code, and related code provisions. The applicant is advised to review plans for compliance with applicable state and federal laws and regulations that could relate to the development, i.e., Americans with Disabilities Act, Endangered Species Act. City staff may advise the applicant of issues regarding state and federal laws that the City staff member believes would be helpful to the applicant, but any such advice or comment is not a determination or interpretation of federal or state law or regulation. EXHIBITS A-D. [No current exhibits; reserved for hearing use] LU 14-0006 Page 25 of 26 E. GRAPHICS/PLANS El. Tax Map E2. Vicinity Map E3. Existing Conditions E4. Rosewood Street Re-alignment E5. Site Plan E6. Floor Plans E7. Elevations E8. Tree Removal Plan E9. Landscaping Plan E10. Grading Plan E11. Utility Plans E12. Lighting Plans E13. Public Improvement Plans F. WRITTEN MATERIALS Fl. Applicant's Narrative, dated January 27, 2014 F2. Applicant's Supplemental Narrative, dated March 25, 2014 F3 Tree Removal and Protection Plan, dated January 27, 2014 F4. Traffic Report from Lancaster Engineering, dated January 27, 2014 F5 Traffic Report Addendum, dated March 28, 2014 F6. Storm Drainage Analysis from TM Rippey Engineers, dated January 27, 2014 F7. Fire Marshal Memorandum F8. Neighborhood Meeting documentation G. LETTERS Neither for nor Against (G1-99) None Support (G100-199) None Opposition (G200+) None Date of Application Submittal: January 3, 2014 Date Application Determined to be Complete: April 17, 2014 State Mandated 120-Day Rule: August 15, 2014 LU 14-0006 Page 26 of 26 (This was aredI farSE V4 NW1/4 SEC. 18 T.2S. R.1E. W.M 2 IE 18BD !!® r+mtps, seon:y. CLACKAMIAS COUNTY LAKE OSWEGO CANCELLED 1'r=100' 1301 2401 2994 00 1302 2491 2103 0 4 3601 803 T3a2 m I MAP 2 I E 1063 ' 22001 1500 1901 0 61 601 1501 1201 6I I 601 2301 2p, 1401 M 3602 2490 z001 +9 ., 11315 502 2x90 2702 1 �,' ..- /:;.,.._11.23 355 •4 1f1 1304 3490 2000A. 3 L—, P'l�I .—L5 /`- 3790 3090 f f i v. 3290 3092 T 41 -��o I vACFVEo c-a. a0-1120 z2IBY —— 4�. ;" �r / •: dOSEWOOD R ° -A- �"STREET -%..---...''- Lr .".`moo ASSE55E 'rk ",.• sSs m. '1'"yoi'F'/ gdsa s �!1300 ,i•�! s• 200 '" 1 1 IDD�.. • a-RI,•';DEPT. OFVENUE 1VI r"Sw.. J/ 54ea 1 5550hI,sa.s ,rq. --�. PARCEL 1 ��QPM 0 .1 - 1 ii i �. /vs"$/ 7001.t449 - DkA1NAGE ��// / I]l01-1x119:• i ]qJ pyLILME3T //' �0•°0 ::, 604 \ EASEME91 /"kb / % r.I,IZ00 I �}0r .aa'I �,� .s.�U 4 3s4A • / /fl p-;4/• �1Ye 5x0 1300 150054 5 a ,..., I , /5Fp [lies 10 I'� I• 561e - h1Csa ` , 200 — 3a a`' >.$.s,Y i le &„sas =11 i I PA2EL 2 0 p.9j� �a�g ""� y° (�/" ! �y I I ' .r 1 L „�//J S_,\A' -AI 994 .✓ ",. •.ir '`{l�Q T/ y/... e4, • 53100 LLf 17••• 4 cv rr 1 •fD❑ F- ', ' `lr eR.�.57.-' .--YYI-- ''7 ' L- w - -1.3 ° ;.',i,• ,t, 4J ii ^ d I /S. ...4' y [[u0 -� TC > LANE ,..' l ' 4 F 5950 1 .f900 ro 1800 1• i `° ~ } q °a ..o fi 5 00 i FO 119 25040 Sxss € 1700 4.1515 LL j �_.2QQOoA2 TI 3' r - -- - _ + _ _L. — _-18l�I an . -t Vj / ars.,F - 2 400 200011132 32 p I X33/1-I 11.4 /d, / 1 - 1.3244. i F { � " 170x/ 4 1 1 I a,I 4 §g 7" P. P �.1 7-21 i 1 1 1 f PT � • I I i 1 1 , 3 1 /. F''^, P 1 . PARCEL 1 ' 1 f 91 „ N } d!- 240E 1 n r5 1 31 I �y 1 3 -tr. 2�i4 Ac. Y GO03-.J4 y "'^"^i,'°^`^3 ."r+..-. .kms` .132 - TM- 33 I 3 p `.6 2,.'"'� ,a .`:- ,5 • 12@00 2900 ..4 , ,..-'."-17;7.77"4-• 0.:Y7 f s.1_- ,�-. ro .,.,,,,..r'�" r a ZQ PARCEL 2 3 '41d „ +J' R ` -Sai5 3002 ' 700 R r 3 - bnn�w : 1140 3002EI 3200 31400 3500 ,,. ".z 5795 .o a� 4Q-.m.nw,. ;t Z� °S 2403 : ., a $ p 1 II, Q 9934 CJ 'IA �` 2 OQO m 7 a PARCEL 2 i v 7 y i 2'", Sefr " liCCc° m.. / 1..-> E' _ I_ wr•i.•rr wN,v.c• 1 6 its 3000 1.,r1 • p ti 3561 S . r H J6 tT"° 2700 r o carr } 1 1 I^ ,3501E1+✓ : M' C x x11,94Ysw.x7117 Sir] n r t 35[71 EV2 / 1 2500IyX •... " 5001 9.7 '30017 9 / 34 F -L 025 • Fit w4r•srov4r.9cy I r� h 5105 $ ; Sirs ( �Y /`I rye/,,,,,,,,A�i •. , _ 'o'2600 1 I a Ham' ° a fl g I , _- 44' . ` sass ©�S,' i .o.-f sr, / , tp M I i , f ,. 3 I Iwo •• �I �;/3600 flfl ..° " „29 30 j�' }.5111 7 ,t/ /p i7�l0 ,., _ o'a -.,_v, „31) d 6wz ,a- ••;S� 1 /d' � EATER JEAN - '-^.c« ax. - _-- ,y-- ♦•` _ 7...r... -7 ---.s:5 — 4 3 :':. d /34 �' ��a :r- co. Rtk.w NO I! $ -' —.,r—— . -. r7! 4 ....ROAD ---------...° SEE MAP 2 IF 100.4V- ^ ';. AKE OSWEGO LU H L j `ate ' ! o� a s' :L.. N ` tRpc a rr 7"' , m r --;;\--A . „„ ..„ , 4 ,o,43c,„ ,-„„,,,,, nt�� v�\\\ __ ._—, �j3$' , h'� - cyns t x _ "�- j 5469 U S\-;\i"----".----. - naj ‘r.--7() i.c-131-W\\\ 44 40 : Ill , 547, o `� ,t, �\\ \11111\ ---t---- .4. U-I d 7 'J 5497 3 L,_� \\\\\\\\%,,,,' \\\\\. \\\\\\\\ \ ,\i4kz:,, !.- Ni, ',:, xx., : ,, , 1....,i\ Na\,,,, ,,,. ,,,\t 's, '\\\i'. .. . ; t:6 \,, �i ,� i K N; 'acs-____ 1\ !_ 0.4.\\41 . kiiAla \ IL - \sk \ ''\. \\''''\:, ! 3:, :1\\\ .\' x 1 Vsk \\\\ ' N\\i .;\-66\IX: \\N 'Nkt ‘\'''\,Nil \\‘':.509 se'r. (,__ \ A4 \\'.''' \\ \\\NNI:A \ \:SiN \\\\\'''sil , \\.\\:\ \. \\\ : ,::\, I: 't 1. .sys\\\I.\\\N \%\\ 6644 ,,\\ \,:'' ' \ ' \> \\„\ ... N' 1.. .‘ \ \ \ \ , :, \Ili\ \ , ,;\.'. ' , ,e,,,\ \ . ,,,,, ,,,, , . ,\\.\\\\ ,, ‘ ,::,1 \ ' '':. ,OP'.01' .\,,g'` '‘\\I\ § ' \,, . \\ '-„ "C.,,,, ', \ g 4 \ y, .\ � NAI - . 5700 : � � \ �\ y\,,, .\''ts _ i rV ,`\`� \ 5950 0 \ \ `\\�\��\ \\\\\2. \\. •::'''' CT KO \ .:-, <\'' \ ' , I 43\ 110 ": ‘ EXHIBIT E-2 2 LU 14-0006 EKIsi1NG TREEDESG. SURVEY LEGENG-FASTING FEATURES ``\ \ \\ —N_x_ eWWI p[vN \ �N I4 \ sunnnnrr MP x� srtl L. \ nip 1W.9ereVrd,SvNe R m — — Rw Tdt.*Or r V.A. # Nix, — — \ \ • \ zM5113.2.0.11.7 N,.. Oxrm —A— . mC.I.011 4C 0.I.11 M r \ \ \ \ N. 1 00.0011, _ ° .N�P� N0.. I, ..W. a„ a_,�a ma idi,t.,oxo Meer rwP.rb,wnx a rr u,cxrrywr me \ o E IN(514-11yosp• Nao,i MATO KI nwt y— E WRSSa,G' as.MR/RM.Rea sax'f�,p M. m T \ \ \ \ NwuX WWI.MR. ® Prone x.v.PM. "\' \ \ P PIP Tr.Ps \ \ \ \ a P ,r N a� �woR \ \ , \ \ \ RA ELA15.2.83' \ \ 'EW'G E.WT 1'RrN 1 'N \ ( \ rt' °\\ IMPSAIlleill \. s� RENN� �-- — — — — -- — — =\:----- \ I L . II1 meq IN 1 I • • y� Owned: ys I Ilikdy • • 99 CrAladnNq I1 ` \ rm ®�[�s aM'Y ! 1TV \ West Coast ,r ca+cIE ouT Iw-r«Ps• • taSelf Storage ffI 1...... ' ` 1• ` \ Lake Oswego . \ 1 NM RuxwPE meet I \MCA Tx. x \.. IAA.Orwp..ORid . • • • : • 1 iii f',. , Conditions • j" I J Plan I f • • / 1 1 1 X4'U14UNE p2 iv r,As mu -PONe ofXr,xYS 1rII Kevawns. 2 1.,.1 mHEN. TERLY I -A W �w CD • o [T1 -- —_____ _...,._..._--_____.--_--____-___ CD W �R. I I • m.. T� nn NR m,4d .. O LA e�.m�'^nei�h2( El I 1n bre IX.ttFeE 4 ,_�/ I N J..1._ ]NNumGI4' r: I; I � ,.�. ., t . 1 W - • Design Review Submittal-March 2014_ C 1 LEGEND P.M= o$cNR i..r.... 00.1E07 KappY —_-- ---- R`xQDP.2N DID NGkIRR 7650 53/Ben.I.l5woe I: Tla.,kOrtnm97233-9%: '7'7 '1""r""` PtPa,@ fta NEN 90{10 Oi NRr V..503-20-0102 O NSR, nl iTO LOT xx 1£,®.04100 Rv.503-239{411 Oax en,7.06..N nem m rhz.S tE tee000400 .: 1 eE.E��r L 111,E AZ�t1PP r2� AVIA Q uu 3 m� wawaaln amm xR 1E,ENR owoa O „ ;1.1m AAA 10 PE/ERT TO TRX our as,f 1®10 45100 T.M.RIPPEY CONSULTING h GINUE 1...1161;51NU 11 UWM0.99A 7 .`„, N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • WPM 030451 gr.,B�Ng.SA0 RUN fRA MEP, ..4 PIPE ••'� `\ a9 N�3,�IP. Pr ,.1 \ if 5r s, a \ \ `\ PPE ERrt1„ \ �6 416 PN-mxxax ,. o,=ta E \ I NP aWPP,,�P \ 1 `. ' `` \ rserr�Yorag `\ � 1 :%, 1 - Cc;Iam .774 uta:77 rN 17' t:�`a.•�" 4 ii f yy / 1 E1 \ I \ RmOecx . I� '../..3,,, Pux� \\ WeSt Coast ; %54 RGSE'No[PN . \ .,�`.� Self Storage: 5r1Ec 1 i I • )' x570,III Oww I • .I \ Lake Oswego I PAPPPsp P1WPfsih BQtlN-WA' I INmarrnm0 sr acro eE W15Y' fYtI ww( SAY'/ YAwON Plio¢wWo qvl / Y. 60Rwewaotl Sam / li Yf�Nftlir I / 110%44074'115:71719N A. 00—P2xx9 \ f 0 f f`a 41', Property Line yF4 PSP.50,E,t 51 r ; \ Adjustment ! j \\ Plan I / P5�-N PP : / •• I— rn , i 4440110 HNT « co t1 4 rn � _ Doh. 23Ma.na RI.XI I I 0(.660: 0101,14 I 1 1 no, ,n,eRr ilk lir Sart Orcumee erc 1 F rue r.1N I Design Review submittal-March 2014_ C2 Site Information Keynotes O----- CRIMPED SPEAR TA. L 001 DUI[Dlrvc ATE AREA, TO NE AWNED-Sr CML SPAWNS SHUT SI FOR ADDIno 4INFUxM4TION MON.DE51(MGROUZ PL ABOVETO EXTEND 1' PARKING F E.D0 S 1 0111 3.AREA OF PROF.,.I4)0MICR.-s2 ISM DRAWING SHEET La FOR AMNTIpN01 INPSIMATION _• ___ ABOVE RAIL ANO NAVE 4._0.1_ 1 S" NO RSPEICKETS ON T CF (19000010 CEJ'NOSCAFE ` (R9rOR i 04010)00011 COkB SC.. 6"10(01_&+++14500:5IA, R SJOlHM GTI. a NSW ORi4f001 I1000N1AANDE NIM CITY STANDARDS-SEF el.l DVAMN43 FM 104!1)010,INFORMATION Tt'202.OISSSC 97229-281-2 Ilr ewILENC AR. 7 my0R,r LSE w 90>s14GW] 10'-D"SLUR 91.393 SF 4 I Esc!11-149-0117 --- ri 5/@'S0.iLDE STE[t l l'CAT6W Pf6T W/TO" l ,'Wi#POST 10010 !EEL OS 21.[62 9 PHUT c.LRETE PAW. 1-"N#EARS.0GUR€b aPR4,.. FNE LANE/FIRE MAX MINA9OLEQ PROMS"H M 4x0 SDMAES-WDRONATE MTN FORE -- METAL Posts/I/2'D �,: r>�CATM PIATC AFS9 T LOCATES.ARO TM>E AE. A0 POP AND ea1T II -4:.,--74,141,1,1,1.1 1127.GSE. 00.316 SF 90011 cEs5 a @WLDINC MTN 6 m GMS P.M. OF.FAS,RAIL, U clue. „. 1) 441)541111 ROW -La ON WADE CONCRETE Dm0 AF r.1! ISL (. 04111)@11 CKM C0 II a(lfjs 1 lla ( 0 tt MER OR PPD D:m PAR a IS ACCESS LL 2100.( )MIX AD00010 ACCESS MS.(SFE REMOTE 12)AND 01.11_1011.01 • II I a i } 1 2 LKK 1115 3(010#-ROEC 0000.4410 N 110011£2 FT.O.N41G AT 10011/11 • .' YK FT.)- TAN,LENSTT!INCLUDES 2 Pr.m4NNANG AT SE0219 LK. II I r i 6 tA,gb (OCTt_,-T, D.wooPANAUEN suL MR it. L 3/46 II.STEEL PICKETS I M 1 T F S C.D.LW".AREA d > AT 0.0 II 1313 ,3 g l,j l - WT i0 PREY KEYPAD ETA)AFT MEN 1 20 FT.MDE ROLLD10 GA POSERFO G TE 11(14,111 AND MU CO.._gE METAL 4 1 - corm,YO ERT RIt? 110v 010 111 TENS 1001 NOSE AMca 0)411*10 KEY SW/1990 Wmilx FIRM -----I-9 Imo'METAL 90014 AT -- LP'xtsv.OY 110120 STOP 1`.. I �._\\ 02sF� P 1101P01141 MONOCRATS LOC440)4111 FM 0000101) E FT O.C.MAP,ENISEODED . MPW INT C.ATF, 1 t ARE DAP 8 E"A0. T CAT 1X13 99-9.191 I@CLLApD FgLrKTEL-PAvuFD 70110 3'INTO id'DIAMETER Tiro FORS 4y P0� E OR ONHfA f AA GATE ERASE 11 MEAL 0 NIGH PICKET.01/12 MTN 20 FT.ME ROLLING GATE AND 4'-A'ERi CATE-4E gFWPWAit 4.000 M IPP 0010 G CATS 10 521).A5 tarn, D42 110 MEET `� ArSWARE METAL POSTS a._O.PUDE WpdT c1-Y4- 10.FAC WAVES 11110FmuEA-SE LANDSCAPE PUN Fon M0RT4N0 DATES 01014 £SUS 20 FM W0F Alt LENT-SEE L4lDS0002 ALAR FOR S�t¢WNO .0000.10111 awDl1l10 DATE 9E1'ATIr,$� al,1.0.0001 OF PR 1100101(X0 S.-.0E0 1001010 PERMS _._f•-NOP OF GRADE ,E TRTlIXI, az 001!0!G/caro .000 MIS 901015 MSNO jytD+q mm PROM P@ANCE0 MET /01.SUMO OATS PANEL ASO el. !•0101 F'C`C �, L. / 1a NT TE PAN FOR ME LENCM MLupAi S5 WALL/cuLEN 0000 00011 Clef LM.(TYPICAL CW 151-SEE 11.iW0 0.1.1 c F ..9.9.4700 w�M 0,11,..0 c1-111 c..EE PANES INTO caws.PAY. a..PET. VT" '/r////I //Y/ii//, aS RETAIN.° ALL(TPON 0 To7APPROx.M'Nrp97-INT Ore,PRAWN.FDR ADDED..usre.MATRVI H.MAIM es K MD Pf(LDSEC TRAM ARU NOTE;M21071-.3112 010 LICHr ITw012 D'41-SEE LKWhxc 110x1009 FLAT ADDITION.RY.M1T00 IFT MATER/AL SHIES W/FENCE FULLY EG4iMn0 40 ERONH ME FOR GwOElMES ONLY. 20.APPRO MAT 1 4711101 OF rA1150201-use_AE 1110400 ORAMN.FOR ADWD0OAL 0010011. ALL.WJMTE OF METAL FENCE TO BE FULLY MEILED AND O0000.00111. 1-0 FIRE NNaRANT-SEE PAM 11101000110x0MN2s FOR 000111.1)01010110 11 COLOR.ILA. W NEWMa.FIRE 0)07110 ft30 FEET FROM EDGE OF 5910012411-SEE PUBLIC 0.101001100 aMARNHC£111 (Th Metal Fence -Typical �Rollins Gate Elevation 01.4405500 A040100 NS.REAR/SCE T0110.-51015 PAWN SEF P4001 I0)0091191T WUM1DS 111 ADDICONAL 9.091.0.1101) b.l 0 ll I • I \ \a///)'''>\\\\4" \ �P\ � • ,P •\ 99 CulleSs.n Petit C/ P191An090 CA 9E66 �A p • , • Pm \ VVV > West Coast ® Self Storage j Lake Oswego 70_,,,. R� / 4 . ; f/ 0 Il '.RM..Stra1 Own.OR. L __ ink �' I 0 EVA_ @ � \ sIRNTMP `�_'-Ar 121-0012 2R� ___�000101 �- -_- - - 111117111•77.7. 1 p Site Plan � , -- DD,� - - Jam ®, ' l I -"' _--- II 0 , _ dYaYxpd F 1� MG / PP t'�J a \\-5��.r�..---;.f 1.__ o_ .. � � ' Qc) T3 11-��_ _ 'r I- M ` 0-7 01 -0-- 494, IS /I p Prom R b C19 ") \ / CD . rt -- �1 _1 o CD "' < a e'en' , Tt ..,........:,, es: . 0 x H Pato 2S MANT 2111 Dims.. G.ckcd Nx Plan I SEM OAY hte Plan Jab NMm9vr. 119166 S 1 I'O ]'0 SA5I. 2 UI Design Review Submittal-March 2014. Al.l a) M4DEN DESIGN CAMP.PJC %so s,Y eevea{$.er 120 'Fwd.Oren waa 9642 V T 2519254°:62 ELL i692l4-O]t ]N-5 9o, K-+- Jo.-it. ia_C a ICJ, 1W— ,,y_e• +L° m-• II H.".l'"' rwel"we N".1'.. 1 EI [ E *III* Fii iIEEa EE . EEFi EF E. g g g g011100, E. E E $ [ g III [ 1[ } �S � I I *III*I I I I. 11 ! I t�.t�p 1 1 1 1 1 I I �-1- i I . J— 4'19 4'4 ., 0111111011111111111111111' 111101 iIEIEI01111EIFl11`1110111Ef=li rl "' „a; r°� °w� = ,�.f"".I�'I�I�� ° ° 6 III t E �,.� �1 € IE1g181 [ 1 [ [� ��»Ig � [ 1EI.� tE1_[ :1 [ Ig1iI� ° ° � �.. s H � I11111111 Illil1111 H I �;� I* 'I,�.'!� glglg14.1a1. I:� , EEFFiEiFEEEEE [,iiE.EgiE ! I 1 ! l5.. F1gIFIgIIgIE cIEIEIgI � Iglgl �..I.E1 $.I`1= i 4 OF °:.. ..I ri"I'"" ,1,'I v*I^,. 1'-° , Taw. T i ��se°w . °, 0E E E E E E0 W E g g E ° c ° :IE3T� ilg ° mlglglEg.1�.I,,:.�, .(�".I9". I g1 g l :, ® l91I # !! 1.....1,,,...1,-.1.,..1.1T. I . g f ! g 1 i gig E ,.m.1,-1„,.Irw�w.l � ! ! _. ° . EiEiE3 _ E 41� i E E E i I ►l ti ! g ! g g E>1E3E1 E b )G7�illm 2 i 9 1 .! .....,_. - noun I 77 g E E g E a`1 ��VJ E E E E E1E7 g E: ��-,,,,,I,9..Iw..-",w.I„d.i.,m �. ,a".I .(,9.I,d. _ '. au 1—_ �� gi r9..'I.".E"ee.j,�. t.,.,..:ll[ Ig I E I [ e. ��niniE �� til —I""eIe�.I .E,�,i".I.. I 1�-E = E�Iaa ; ;.JT G [ T.-1.1.1.1. I t I ¢ I l UK �r, z e y +e-r -ad ,"o-”- 1 a-r w-o _o w )ur MP — 2111)SWd.di I u e •\ Third Floor Plan 10 Second Floor Plan West Coast Self Storage le=_� rr_+• 3v-e• ld_m• Lake Oswego �1 1 --. 26k"915enr AS,mv I EEL6kr Onmpx. [ I [ 3 [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ f $ E E E1E g Et[ i [ g 8 E ‘1. `i IIIIII ff EE II ill ! E7,. —___�_— E d sb Tlk E E E g [ [ [ [ g. ... [ gig g I# [ E g E v Floor Plans si g — 6iIIII � DDA �=- . Iti a — 574 imp iV1e r W.. °° ,°—o•! .C—o' \ 1 e6—G o FTI a r AMC /Ilk First Floor Plan "' cs., ilr 7,171 . mise«. ®a: T Dv.. M.. 201+ Down by F.. .4 9CM DAY Je4Nwryer: 119168 Design Review Submittal-March 2014. A2.I 41111 .' Wipord Mails .. '4. .aa•.a „. n( STOREFNOPTS ®7i ta2(+w r.s2aac KVh9eynoEee �f� Tesr.111 Data Tvmmuvhma N ,./,,O.Vitt mmu vtcvwEi fm[aep0.lrxrwl.._ i10r molts '/ 7 071211272 1 - S+ '�M I IfYf 4t NCSI "SESEAL'�" or. U 112171.IM tt"Sr 41c PANT- •••••�� ![W 2227122 iYtdN rei1 �)-72217 x. ' C cl. /AXE( OR)-..I . t _I,. 4 - flo (IOW Mg, ,,tt.,rrw.t 1� v uE k .COLORS(. ".MOND 4 Dory,..(BO F.V.. .N.kosionMM.., \ IE.».-.. .... ; , i E 'f fREYMot 1.2.07r � 6 MESH.NFL(NO I.EI..12111 c NCMPdrr*tx i4 I N. `�'� .._ .. « 'OM 146.1E0 7,2772.' Krn.MEC(PREStf[d),PiMM.4 ERhCutr ...-.•. �.j. _ a -.105 srtCIWC S6'W a uCr4 NRWtt:oin. • 14771. L P. . i .. • ..-... cor MORSO(W¢ry .0 1.1 1. uy IS kr fir, MIYO 1,..,./.....MM..' " "11 u.UM 11(7,11[Y.f.fR FRAT TO 21217.21.'4L MOO v I •.. f 1.1.r..." nv es1i� , t -''._-..1,. .70. l AC.O-1.M t0. w vnl'i 1 I J ..jr.- 1�d, 01 00/61 Door.,.cwt TO 02727.a.cri.•t.ru m ul Stt..r SKIN Wali OM I [LOA"xWrzfa NJ11161sv ALL.uu s1Oxr[x,.lle.{AI(N2t&SIC 1 27521721110 Cd 43. I' ~•.�. la ur,MICE DM,,'OMR.irt,24111E 6W.£T.IC WORM"f. i o.e,rwtsa+ii 11.°"=.r.f�...; IZti-I •i t MEI E cottne I ▪.0 PORTrn of oon •fs re.Owl 7,E FNIk+.G Sal In.¢"^.1a.e.lc v"Irrr ^9 STOREFRONT CUT SHEETS O K"I2"IQ 7,w m .x4 I1212 MATO S.ilf./rlt a¢oa _ > DC7 I11' ! !hl --- a .c�:. �-- _ I r _ I w ._ 1 -fl 0G.'Sdii-SitVage C CY' 0 m m `gid ~I _ ,� a.:,:, FRONT ELEVATION(NORTH) REAR ELEVATION(SOUTH) C)Ci' d b w I ".,,V,Elu[v1�i�.w'47,"rR.0:N£"xi6�.(_1eV k4[:•�X'- ^ rO m • : t T r 1,2,.,o 0-..., West Coast , '1 iii .▪ v.7,.�'• Self Storage: ll! iI!III111111I!f1!i1111111111111111iiE9111111 Illflti 1ll1, 11111111111111411l(IWI}11IIIIIII iIIIIII!IIIIi11!!fll!i!116IilllflV!II! 1111i1Iff _ — a ~:L p Lake Oswego — l..- - !n.,_111.01!€lllul!I!!i!!I!iIIIl11!F B!I111.. !111! - lffl �E i! f11i11!pl !1!!, IINI ld1�II VIII I uIi,�!a,1! , I!( ' _ .......m..... �tw_ o- .,,,,I.,0.- .7-------1,,,A,44,7.,..1-41.----1yts •1. � ., :z . �r,�: ;c ,r. .AV,V:s �� ()rw ;,� 4 T,k ls�. a a li y ° u x Ian. �� Elevations Co r,,.m ® . .,, o ®r,7, O._---" --G 0 on, `.0 �"rw (:),,,, m m m, '"--Gr' SIDE ELEVATION(EAST) 071 771 ...76 11 919 _. .....,.... 1 , , 1z Cy) ll NATION(WEST)...... . --4Design Review Submittal-March 2014. -''s3.; 03 I 4 AIL 11- ile 1 �� • d ... SI c„etrmw.ao,e lir 4 View kookinq Southweal West Coast Self Storage: Lake Oswego lAsAIN.,A,NI Y. i'. y INye TItic i iyyi.1 - - ?'. Artist Renderings 111111 ; i IN r • 8 , .,.IllimiiIllIlliIll.: ____-- i Onym by CIA.A.A1 by Yew looking Southeast m.> DAV Ute: I»,. SNyc Design Review Submittal-May 2014- AR 1 TREE INVENTORY(SEE PROJECT ARBORIST REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION) TREE PROTECTION MEASURES LEGEND �j,_ _ MM.11.1.WERE MONAD FOR rtEnnux we SVC AND WORN 15 Pu:or DE SPE osz,ao I f'(r••, 'wa NM:MI LAC.s,wi.HE FSK..es A=MEE Or a rEEr DOH Ars OPINEDOPIRE wP UM WINO PIMA oGRERVA ONE WOE IN auu PROW eauwem Dream i__— MEn2T+UEICN GROUP, Nda,-w .. AN0 E 3Fi4R Wa F1507025 2MIR57..Al NYME PO MEAL PAOWMIi U1A rwxai, " wxlPri.a.... a.w H NOPREEP 100.TRE ESHPIIo.s m,145 511.0254 25E EOR 11EE PAMPER 13-A TREE lxlmEORON RNC[ -0 _—V—_ ]659 S.W.Bcrclard Sv'1 1: .r....re flog PHU MO TEL HAMA P,- DMA CEDAR.9PESE 2 iNEE5 PECNARE PINOxO I ° MCI ne 2755 EON RIE MDE eir5ci N SPIE PMwHO 51.1)51 0 DE ID -- Twd 0.755 244]9-9N5. SEEM oUO3YED IN EYE 5057]PNO50I015 Nivwe.s,["IPC[ 1)m4102M�1 —a,— - VSI.509244-0.512 ARYL 115 1X555 MPG 5 WI.5 rem NI.CIWN-1345 reiCF PLUSH S'COMA —55U -- niE EDGE OF rxE-1,1 m.. m ..A..- . .. - DPN'5PAOClArr mNA>M - B ED w s Tar Aar we PAROEL FlP€oE>T.m1:.EGIIM at WW1 LNCISTIMPED GRAPE NM MEI_Ross ND FARYER THAN ID FEU APART AI 510101 owl ONE —NM— Ewa ME TAM leo FENLIC SW,BE 4-0Nol OR EWSw1CTOro RPM ID PHC MI[R INE __ v.77:—, —..-„,--,,.,,t-:—.:,----.:7,..-: OREM X Er k1 fCES'10 A MN PK WAE LLNE 1.E_ _. _ PPP ME rEN xc - Pk'IOFNE 59 .._. PRANI S MN OM.BY IPE COY human ROW ,T •�. - • .•� A if OP TYE EEXW�MA oN Mi Eves -C 1200 nor UK n.�,.r..._. N61N[ ops UNE mumve WILD DE WARTED ON MC M KW OF NPeDonON PAPMED EA APPum YAm,C1NNRN.CONOAJTA eic. • ''"� ' ..` DATUM llwa aisN-Si 5 N MEM INAPF ME FENCED f.6�e VYtns � RIPPEY .._ „255 w 9255+MA 1PDAlitiV 0],11E cm Em,FE.4w5 1441 YiliY3 MITTS ...__..-.+..w .. '_ C502000S B 44714&Ali TNM. `.. .. . w .... - ........ 551F0 W]+E arv. NNAIR6 ANS a MIXING A'C/PO Md.P£ASIY 00 4525 ��INMATES RFL 1 • Pu45 0..g)Tm .ACENTF5,ECM ALE4e4N DR MIME _ CONIECA U R 00110ATA MIXIECIE. D awsRPM ,11E MPTION e ONE ISOV MI PaORCNN .vwnnE r r EN.61 )mxaAx.39m .sic '. • ud _. 9E adlASp / � m - - ._— .�.....:`.L ..�_. �__ ]AII L0.xuNlOIX Y -f • wk.11115 SEEPEox MECWPFS r---- 125 \_7-.-?p�-F`EW�'-. ` �,..,,y E' 1,.42 \ 11 •1• { ' r ?C+ yR- ,. / 45511: - - ,... ./vv ____• --- T„ 1, �"�J . • �g• �°` t �� I ( I Rc1 • Nmm i 3� 3`� r �� a8 7� �, c,. �srg •• t34 • E , I '°\ sIEEfFIAEM TEE..' I _ 3,el� ' \ Pt \ 33 W[kO4wn Ppb ,'�;t �iz .�, a\`•. � vxE Mx ` �\ "'"'.2 r.Eq 5azE 7r ti wuEm ac laa5r orAS . ` \ • a 4 FRCSIED ELOOR:152.02 `� - _. i 2'. r ' �: . West Coast 4 }� - (TiSelf Storage: - =� 2 3 �`t. 1 . ♦ Lake Oswego II Z7jt- _ — l.r.w,..s.ae. [1 / I; r / /i e N s TIYa / Tree :I I 01 ; '''' I ——1[ i / 'i: ZC. Protection ri• x1 I l , j ,n� Plan AN, ma y u La - u . QI . Z8)k i 1, I . y �4 rP • • 57 rI nevalaps ')\3 o)K1 , --r----7— ....."-"-''.--- 'L ! � i '�- ( j/ Eu N9 I Dil X 4+' 1 l co Design Review Submittal-March 2014_ C3 PLANT LIST LEGEND wwi EVAN BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZEOMAN BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENT COMMENT SHRUBS TREES xav�.404.1EFer adv. AZ WNW t.ZS crSP1,'1FZM"FLrZ r,',..vx +E x'''uarovxnvaa'''"'ivux )..f +.�c+wwlw vueuwvc ..ccww xunsaNxsn ® r eawFxolMwa�ieivx�weuww�auaau rrary aw, usuwx snxo>,�eeao aauuv MnDveanuP, +crwwvzwsanwi eam+uaasrurtg E.03,31.1. AS swoxm+ae.v F rurow ruwnreweoo �'r�� emu Faenxo leuv,oaers�ovrn q'uuewf rr4'rm 7650SW.Re efu�c,Sm..e.4 WIA1 T 2 Omw.91Y36� ` :f.aP © wNm4.mWmluu A§WRm'x 6,6.6.50.1-2,9SA5] �lyYy �fV' 222 222, 22 ... Y tax BM 211 6111 4 Nun MI9mxNsx YruPW 4a PxmRN Iax IY ' L �I®1.31r. Moo,oyyq�ry,.rrvp v a.. A6 Ma. ,�� amr.avR,nsaaswnF O n new 6021.121.1.2.1 Pm.nm J2.2.26PµT we, Ne 6IM .BARS JACKSON , a ssss 2662 xcxm9,laaraie•6xww vgwxouxax9x�aw nv.rw As onyx lox lox xas4nv,Pwv4 xlm.Rr6aaxuxio69nr aeu 4aaxnwx NOTES lemnnweraaxmcxemwuF Rlmxo.P,P Tv9x,mE.,oE. 0 39 262661/42.6.06r20-692 f�� 650 e N m ax 6x6.vim» 2.CAP.1w w w .x. ; MAK.OMNI 411»oeoe6vET .nNve VOIJRNLIII 3031. u. WAY 31431.1.116 a 266ASMr Nv��e .911-1,901 v�v, v✓ 0 Q} .1n Fxwnnwsnxag u¢r mV Enrz umF�fawie ammrgouwueow e g 11110.1 6.1.162666.626.6.n, eua'n4.1x C.O. 4911V .vr,Ne al f 6.62. _ DRAW,R�aw. 4yyi ,nx.r GROV�NOCOeM.YER 06 GROSSES i, v,nerv. I.6u Pa MOM a u o vf, rp II.Y.1....04....5 AIIII,PIE AXE 00a THERE WILL/IE ANET11.4 or-is TREES velli11.111 IMOVE9.4 //s \ a auaum190N11u3301,....1.1.1 miMunnxrina. 1,13.3 363 .3Nwm evxir © n weren6222-2662,22,2222 rang iau m6fewN Mmeor MAME!.ENE WE sc.,I uu6ew«wisxm ��raa19T 11 33.113611.61110•134913063,10110r, _ xi4' 38l8r''` 411. axnxFt eaorEat Plv6 sw 4e9x nxi6.Naruu ew6reWUF , 1. .reC 42‘6 016,011.119.1.rxEegEµp.ENEPx.euwTva,TNvaE a.NGixWv 9renElEm '`�"'�/"'"1 * ti 1xix P,4NnxaPEm9. _ _ IIS�-�*I ll1141WN�T 3 P9,IIxwR9..ENTI+AI.R,N438 raxueuxvaurrmcEnRv ewPw ..9.0.4.9.33611, II a,o �RSCSN s v.,EecuaRUlErwea�9x Nlux rnFlxe�.N axe..m„ 6....,066 uaxm6x,Pxry rigi nuoE6334eexr.xawxa ,4RPr�7em4Tn®wnmlwwTP4NvlxLKES I xc�DOPnrsvnmAUAT4 rrr96aueRPaexwE PM AA 31 `a• 363• ar6w.9aR�A . ,PEwem9maa6mho nR4waxr Offer o-eR +wuEaercrrew OP) e mxoP. 0TAM wIMO .30.10 IMCA% Yrxwu..2XIX WSW' a. av4Nd.IuxwNa ,ewwaxPoxm4Pe ,u use 45 NEW TREES SHOWN-44 FOR MITIGATION •TYPICAL IA/MIRE TREE IIEE IN FEET ZIL I...RHYME SO MA 1411X1.13 .6E 6A69a Rol Nrs,xo 71.0119ss oR3, ®r10 41 f�N X 0�3,�,� 301...I7 N 4 rli9 .40�p ° Orr D }Oha�+i;y�.d.�tR+ , f� •I,---'lad w. L • r *. q'��.. i`' F`\ d'{4p .;`v :$v� fb e/e.It" .!� 'oodq�,s; l',Y) r� 'O�er. �,m1l, z�00�� .�' .� � 'f`r.l� .lea r. rte` ,p\ r:Sell,Sferap p +r i3 _tt`.lit.x xK , ,s ';OJ Ism.. �•.'' �+ ti 4\. -7\ O \ ai lan12aRRoad ad 1 Fo + Plea..CT,91556 xw ! o Proprct 'L 5 West Coast I� Ot f �n� �� i"�4 y�: o% �� Self Storage: �I P L o M�� i� 9,9 Lake Oswego �a iia O +ogS1.64.6 06,66 OR / f v or* Ed- 4 - 56621.Tale L c / • I`I� LANDSCAPE o,,f': - _I / PLAN De • . ) / /s G � mi r i. 16 CIU rnCD - _ 45': 4 o:r.�' 0••e i, .ev F - t .. F dvi,N ,� s 3z ..b..it \ Q' 94 �r +ICil �' Y + +'e ' t �].tia�7e.te+e7e� sAvQ.o,o'r o!o„,mo9,t'v c S°:.c. a oo4 ipsaiiiiktikO O� -01.61%,—",-2:111.;040,0 '�/ �: _ *w 4ae ,1• t<' ,.-erega-N M, r.•e: M.;<:Av„I�1 fffl .A.,- 4DSCAPE PLAN - —! �� rJ Job on,'oer l III Design Review Submittal-March 2014- N L 1 GENERAL GRADING NOTES LEGEND 1. KL 107,0001 N THE 2EW2[1EM1'15 W lftE J117E07110N MO THE 19/LEO, P2OP1FmipeIIRO 1550x1171s11 :OR 4 111U.71MN.4: SET OF THE N.APP20RY CC,6ROCTd dPMRdn —_-—— NEOTECHOGL 071117,100051. DJELT 00..7 maMNTINCIu PRF 00 13MALT 507E 31 ML 11.010x FENCE y--(7 _—— Ms _ MmEmJ UEi1C,3GR2]uv. 3 PTPg9 dui rid1f1 P/1 in IOF 0 III NILES 331 ICN9:DYba cpRP i 15.71755 Mai _ _ 5-E,{ISi133 OOxGIANs 5230 Ox TORGWPMC,MOM,WI MUM SBPMY PREMED 7, _ %5d3W Bego31*LIH I SLIME VNO 11345Tn.RN d MO MATEO OMNI.20,1. 50211 OEM LIIF 'f5E00001 -4i41.S32 FRIER VNE m' 00Nxo.-zuass2 A NEM MOIES ANE,O 5F 11051WN7 Pa VP.xd.R IN 10 R OF ME 25.8 FIRE ceR.W MKOIION LK —F00— 5.503.295-0112 _plan AT CF 10 R.AT P./..DE WwwROR ID `-E,M,— Alin FOB G. 015/2010 ,eJ+s N5 71350,OW ORMINO INLws AE FlNI0503 WE/MHtx 1,71.L s GAS011 or R00.70 MAW.3 RAC.F.Rum.GROOM LAE PRE % WE —�— xM�x.Hue.or OP-Tcrsm„mu A11Fxwvm,PwMm,55x1.4.7 [N 7, :41,r X501 d.�x m 7,.0,.4®u 11sa2irM INS Wx 22d. H ORLIN�MMPR � Fl � A wAL5S5 0 MNLXIS FOR fMN6 Mg ELM..TWMES45. B P02PAMAxON ryP G P.,1 OE BASE Rxx COxP+rnw,O No.,,MI PFaARnwts uMm 0 aumova., T.M.RIPPEY IL e.P.6000P.6000MEIN NM IW1013313*VMS 2X1,810 ON 00011.1E PUN 0 BE SURD1D IIR N 0.01E CONULTINO 001135@ mH Hall 1311x0. ro A 0 110 a ANAL DNF£. 7690S07/117.01.51. RCA Of]NEA T 201401X] Cwxx,F WHC Anne:20.13.37:A \\ \ \ I \\ \ �,,,- �' \ \ emu \ 150 1 vim"° ...,-/-----4155 J . Is. \\ > \ / - -- 551,35 SAWL, Il,. \ `N. 1 11x02. fr :..,1),\1111:‘,, \N. Sent-srorag f - R:40:".F'S{I, ,uxp[pORw� .I , . I :111 300.51001.,1 0.0.10 I , i.At.Io. ,4 F CA B4%6 • . ` Fl1$HEU 51012 152.00 .4 6 4.,,`-':.. Aux IVV X410 \ West Coast '. ..._'_ ` I i /!� Self Storage: g .. \N Lake Oswego Rialur dw' , ]➢L@d J - ' WRrIca. , aArm rTir If ,"A `.Ipllllll r�j�4 . �f /' jlt " 20.f ' Grading Plan 7.,SISSe %ILe 134 !/ .,, r ---f 165.540 : t 7 - ff / f 15�5 } I 1155,�.SaMMN Ea 1510,4, 1 / IS i I / IFI € f - -- - - • - - - - ".° \I/ N,SOiO-IUIaI E , ' f 1: , Krvemns / 2 s , 777 r.,r�1 r— f 1 MOB INK I i;al, r s;� � ' 1. /11L W /011. 1 0 l �� O ---I 1rn ��u NN a-' F� rr -e- G---71 t " - - - -- - — ' C3 214 15060 MN.5s-55,510.1, . ,; „NPr�F �I 0) m AnuerEOPTIAL PNS ..._ � : CZ �� - �f .'I• 0 25 0..0630 r I Ornm h. EMckd IrI �I ;F.�'.� ! �� AS I --I ' I. 11E1 Joh Numhm. 14 I Design Review Submittal-March 2014. C4 12 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES LEGEND • T. all TTNA SHAOns. a ilE S m!1E PEMA oIV Tek PROW w 110 BIrw51LL mai e[K DUMBED IN PA00Cl LE9RCR41x I LINE WE mo Ertiows,w sPECIEIW coo,MDT.F155 COL irr OF M PL.. i I' �szL>I Ho. A. own M. Mu el MOW.WEE➢x M1 nuz w4CP!BOB.. 1.101•03E6 91x➢ BADIK coo,MDT.Nee C➢C[.NONN FIT OF Cp..fi ML rt.SEWER Hrt1HC5 ARE m 9E EORD 10. IX VW[wJ115 SY3d oRvlm [atY llxC 90190,9112 or 1x0 arr OF IN:E 05.0 1R c U9.ON SWARM %PC PfT1EEx 44A!AND.mo To K OPYa6[o w _ _ ---- Ill 411003ONO N 40011 iF PFPui MU 1FLAN00 4000RUFY UI A4AIA4TC N DOES xDi 2X040 FM.J➢ert,6ENq NTiP%,.OR a 3.1019 1131 5141014. _---- 2 1HE IXn1 o.eHNLL ROM ME MC.IRM'Imam new[EFF.3 SU211.9 mrs ➢,AGCESxRY REOUAE➢!DN C9xsRaclwN z N., ream x 1 ,, - MBnaY ESESKNGBCIIJP. 9105 TO NET Ou In'4LWW C90 331154. I CLC.w➢U s AT 0.u40 a MOE 102UTS K Rm2Nm Nr THE 31010! OE20E 0,N.2 m.a okra rt.. 1Lg00 W.B 4454110,3 4 3. xC c0 00333 45m ON 1110 33 2 0 3 3 Wm.. 00 Lmt11 4010.11 PREPARED 6I �'4N ..01400411 CDP N..isFloeli FlI N.a1NIUW 12 Nairn WANE BAC4124 PRES£N•ER'MCKC c 4e m 01 00 -1'a- •. TIzlC 9112201 A6% SLAW10145 swoons,MTEP 41 0 3015 Mo 101 0O 1FGY.R 2013. I,1x -M- c.. HOIf 4W MSER DLV.Isw uwHtAE As..4m Ta eE OPNRMO BT Mill,.....0403 B15m uT FIRE AND 3TORl1 Oft UNE --Slu- 141...59-244-11.521 I'......."....'0104* NCX®�GPA➢VBI T1f AYO Oovfsw Wl1W NNNtl. 0Ophrlic 10 9En120 wSU 0ENR¶541400 Br MS sniu1 P4 K UM.MOMS 31414 411. P.O 569-2U-0YIT { ME COMMON ASNL NA1ax AW COW.E915rtw Cob40R1%.LOUR.AxO HAM 6u. REtawxm 1®1•IEYENIS:UL uSR9 ANO 4xbtlgf W ORI OF 1.41(0504. Fi9Rx LK -f W- 19.171011 To UISIIr6 umnns NIP LorAT0H2 11.51 015 inulin YxA cROSs 15 sr.senna gm w WK cox OF VIE 9GIK00,.ffim 10 NR NaP Fin NOM 12.fME➢P!,rLxN -fly- • MTNG WLTES 1..i.RE NEaPELI R INC COrNALT.IIt roma Paps R Mar POLnTMFxF 9x64].MWIR N 14V 9R PPLy 1 E K INTIMA sumuY SMA LM RNID 41114[5.R*11-1E 040400140 403 0�T➢ PVC M 240 aok®E 41*4403 911 OF or IFPRMN. CS. TSCWRE DOWN SULK SW E 95,UCPS 6WA BUPF10Exl Ur(NETS L.OW64 Mk 4YN5 00 IMO.WARE E IE55 NAN Te FICHES. /{� A SO 156414E McanEU hes NNNE - RPTO SI ME SRM TO BE APS ST.TECN SC Yw NIA,PEN 1051,CT0RER5 01440.E-TNHA GwxECT4N'W1M IITIPad 1:19.5150 T➢NRf 0404 40 run,oa COUNIION IE, ... iMi 41 0555.79.1 4211104! PRC! .2. Y PEOIGR0,09. �E NFU.).14045912 BS.ROce ASO ALONG SMS OFGURHO 5 SCF of NPTER FIN,ALN SWUNG SEN,ICE IS ASS.. N�1<, cgRl re FIR.BwPu9 fR[WOO E6101NT PRm fi • 14 lcmmaG. RPI E!NE BEPANONINf APPMED S.A5..ORS AT ALL CO45511016 lop a ie R sls141E�UIPWIC OA. =KENT w RCM ORNN f0 sTGg1 _ _ _womn11.55101 TO caw nwt.1,z s.11.11_,1117949111.5 ro 404 NSA4En e®DE A WWI 20414 PRL Saara OW ➢ Ynrw cD T.M.RIPPEY a rt.. e. NEW.,WNW.KTY 0 202.say ss. 15 tY NA1. 5[:61.f0ENGFNMEI S. 565 9v II*10405.0 40441 80 10 P 0.44*SW5Cn1 10*04ER..9 5 OF PPF,.02 x O[OI.01 BELL EW WE. R NT wnw Ov WNl 1414 SW Bm1V➢G.2WW 01 u4264 K INPG1s0 0x utas. Fa RTygi,Urcmw9T123 P1ErtacR 1S Nsg,WEp.9WTR•CEON 116➢STUN i2ut s2W MY eJl1w0 RDTRg`a 41x0 ` Me.WaC 49117APE 113919 MIMEO 5195,12 N. 101113 4OLIO!5.100011 0 014 '1Sp5Yuh]90P 11610011M 116 00602 FIFE 6 9�U.l0 0033 0033 INpAiEA P 4 PROM I. 0.1 20 cue.KILT B 2501. B01t 0!INA PSENFMER Is I09UaSn 39 NE WALED 1B➢PE➢404 awn.a ie PROM KA1W D5f Wc1CF Nut 51.115 w NHFAE CMR IS If55 flvI IB KM. Cow P.�.U0.+is2Y.3JW ExWf IR6 NC1,wSe15TEo 1,51,,41,,..,OG!FW•A[O 01,X0 IS.DORM rAIEN NANO ox SITE re BE Tin N COPT&LIR vsc scNE➢UIE NO,971 9F MOAT Amo 0p ENc emu. To Pw�OE 1.1 Of OeNFl@tlN BY COM..aFFfn ox RPv ROU 1¢YN11R .11101E ACM WWI F PAIS m M.O.N1[}f11s.Y BER.rPE COVEN MAN 116 N55Ea m BE K DESCRe®N • \ \ PREWREA Nr..4gN TIWYX O crr OF um cr,WErn POW W9 415 wNSTPUC11.slANnans \ i WI 6 FlIIPcS 113 Amw[Q NI42T„'A!D DBWN!Nu �` \ A. 5101 0 FA.Kum RUN NR sYswN OESN94 PRcR m COrnr5 110,OR PROMO ` \\\ , \1 \ \ \ \ \ \ `*\ 1714014:5/]P/151 \ r -- -- __- ----- - -�- - ------ - -w -- - - _ - --- - N 1 40 .r- - * `. . • \ I • l • +:'2511 srurag ••I� 1.5193410L1 nE k9EtlRrYt PIAU' ♦\ ``\ ` � wfanlct➢Nn PdE • - Zig s- Pkwomn EA 9NY6 PU9W/La 01WAYe • �� 'y \ PLbWCNi weu0 Lamy...Nem 111 - 1lM5HEB BOON 152.00 f :I GntcL. / 1 \ / West Coast E• Self Storage: L.._, 11‘. i I \` f Lake Oswego .,,,, \\,.. 4r. _„.___ • •• , . g ,, . . ,• • . • .,, .,,, 1 aS if - 1' q . �. I E 154051((S / 4. i 5 194 DA • �� -w �W r f " � , Utility Plan it ,E L'''am 1 ,YIng; _ ;l •t OF �s +•Gs, �� E -lil nv x 1s 11 F N Mill •2N'u LF 1s 1� Icm a l±afE\ I DS 309N 11 1 • /� V 1 - .. .: - f wwWTap NluA 0 4 T♦ ! 1 405 S"N.5 1.55 a Ts YAM N NWLI ~.1 \� f/5` 1/ { (� L1 u T Fa H . 1 15 OLIDIT x ` gar)) K diuePTS E1w 13 941 IE 0..m " IU O ISS GH 5.94 ,cNWBEAS 1-00.12 v ! I 15 ! 1 N ewn lu,rs( I ..�➢Sr xoRTlp reN us Es US➢ N' ens mU" ] E I i 111 !. y ��/ I I ) arulms Bor.law SOPS,0540 Ba m ii25a or 5➢ulN) - 23 LFT. ^-J E"UM R SNI (yBrri J1 1 _-_ ` %N 1.55[qB6 BT.YI + :I 1 1�• .f] `+ �.n. 1 , _ t -- •;a0nw1.2.40 s(1 IDIrnO� [,'/ - , -. pICO \ [3- i-7- 9�.+-�^�--tom 4 r' , �' � 1 ;. e;_ • IS 1189 FIN s 1 IN4S 1!0 00 )...0 \ 1 1 1 '� 0 • ICa0) 142.(11'' 3IY'30InM 141 Rim tAii'mf0 �'c'X1rz G i 1f T. V• y' 1 m�vmveen Nn., II I 1 x m ,-,.,.lFIx ,I .. Mfr. ss •rcF SY I I I' mIw 0.11111 RO MLA 2145 N ;r �'� II Oak\I 4 ANS 51Er5 -.b NumB1r: ]N W Design Review Submittal-March 2014- C5 ST1.1.10 P.M xO DOM Miuml DE.11GPM.. GPM .ER XS dRP,S E.I..xma Expinwospo.PPP.stun 5WxWlrzm m 6OSw.0025.21.SArl:El..Ad WO TO gN Mail, Vn[OO4N MM. ® WV.J RD.OR 12'PM. Volm53-a44632 Ra uO}2H-0111 7I�If�'' /vi]m"a XL. 1J-' /. MEeRRx. - a. :dee. USE a],RIPE u[]R '.p 'IMA Y...IX COVER MO PIPOR ar Minos, EAST Ren PI 11225 ry'' T.M.RIPPEY WA•/Lame CONSQLT]RO MPH Mom.PI MP ies�usn Low 165115.1.1.5.IL .0552 00 255 MO qEW 011Fm...1)M]MOD FOR PM P. ir R.RL - \� RN 00 .502 ♦.—. Axxaf]m cp.. so1FCROOMENT 31103.1.IN 3111FE w Asn o-sa un A.S.o-,e. NONtiw20,,At x ouT Cx RAx L ALL cddflE P141 HIVE A Ye Mi WfiwL SPUME OF 10Ro.R I fRPIREE.tl/SO/IS OtLL STIESP. sA4pALL pWg PA�[�Ci BSA¢51..RHIR4E5 05E51'[Ffp,Si vwwolF 51FP CE.iw. 1.DE MIER 210411 ArPttA rtaRAAARa2n toms_ P-r PM.OR PPM M.12.2 12'41X r DD.. A0.3ANIES 1.11113S MM..elSrum{4EAg]9CE AY WOX E]SN-UiPRY AS PEpwR[u P ODD. WHOLE OP vw Vww'I4NR[R']REWULFxRAnex. �eO crWo� P.Will ABROV EWSEN M9OE AIARLES SHALL PE RPE-5/.101 OR CORE oRLLE➢.10. PP PAR MI m DE 10 cA ® an%foEw31121� E a Puues arn61E 5.....2.20.5.. .Piri 19.OF MOH.PERNEIER.APPIEGASSPOgMFe. °"E`M® r13 " sAkebT ® CC TCH BASIN SECTION (J 48"FLAT TOP STORM MANHOLE • - .' " -.:'kx trgi1 " g1#'"` .K?"r .,, m PARE er..n.raLv E rr,' IrrwtnAV''" 3111-7.11131.112C, 17"'APATTEEDV3In3=1.73017131.3''' r IN. U4:.'Self-Haag 1r 1.-. ' i 3,33333,33.3. map AREA AX M.5 WPM ]%IRUM�MeCBnN.su6nrt6wmANOWE3WMe Mrr iCOWIWOM.AMN FrnAuP 343131ImE.34.MFeeES f GM'JsJPC A4G LKP �---^ a ��T f� uL W99yQp1W"A 1HXM.PER \ �'"'^ fi`e 100-+H..,o, 3Y Grlkdmra Raetlrsar, Paarassm G M9S6 DETENTION SYSTEM CROSS SECTION ,eT Y — --- MX SO sc1G o 1Ev) \ .� faRlPAnml k -�' 1 P.ti,R i z RRA West Coast dilai Self Storage: EENeru NOTES PPR ' .,4'ili I Lake Oswego 1.3113.11111113 ,�".e.aP0Ar.e,A6„�R�MR"A.R«m El umswA I _ S. i r- PWASIFSLE R� ARA �,r* ..5020 MDR �ac xertMuwaatir Mos ��!!!!!! rpE ioxe iAluau° tl IA.Cm,.CR. 7l R .:1 . ill Ill ♦JF. /MP>IrUR NI 4321110"`"°"M"w Lv "NM V v e]sv,NAe.e � arv.�MAaA]o fes} TRENCH BACKFILL DETAIL •�w/VAE EPP3 s w+RR NO1 P:.SUE Its.....a •mum. ....¢w..>.r.Tmua-ers.,nv�,m.w.....savaram/warm.. TO AMA i-a]e -_ .25155.- a Too a.14123 Details 31.1.11101.E9Td]MFLTER "'I 1. I PRECAST MANHOLE 1R RRSg :�J uemm RTf]I DATA _ _e i. r,RR Fa"" ]Ef 1ET°NLm1f e: 5.02.2srnpml mn� c•IA65rre� 1=17 1 iwn Ts �_Y_� /PNNOLE ST[fRMFRIER-TDA VIEW!1 ,.. 4N1HOEE 51.52121g�(M r PIP e^ ran 1 `P,/•[L,•'°' '"7N7RA." z m ' r wlrR1411 SH R age IA= WO ¢ p�..`'¢-�"^�''`�`'' i'<'..------a-3>- /"////jJ�CLFAItlYr HOBPlASSI CM. RCO fiRpEeRptvfvA� JillY � w� ��,'� ¢.w> -- Fr Y I SUIT. 10L R .-i0"A Names. �� .11A, 1113333313-PE-tb Co..la. 1R¢ EL 11050 L1/4 F-I- ""� as ,a P MIIIIII? 1.-r I r.1 .....m 01...01. L•Alilt- / ACTIX A ROOM w 1MM11IXE STrRRGm T..SECT1.VIEW l\ """ CR y"_e'O.K.Guam "1 MumOnn STORA]RLTER.9r]RETDETAIL/Rl o le 1E 6A��Y F/rEp EOPOC ox Pe�Who �' PREGASTRrW1LS0LE 9TORCFELTEF 7 COPEIJ�LP PRECASTa9-RWIMIXESTORMFLTER � 1 1 ma¢RUED m TxEIm11w[A Si MM.cmAv Mr.rrcer4on 1.1119 SPOON Or 411011 PS. $•-•�•„Au AWV M]a SEcnON MSWS 1 VYA�6Yf7 TOP AND SECTION MEWS.NOTES MD DATA a m f 3. W Igoe QC evAovr/rt ¢ STAXANAD OEM STANMRQQEYwL ,r RRE WORM 3.Alt MIME s1Lt PPM 3114.L A- 4,131-WI+a ori13 3311.3 OFFS@ 301 ' ®.. ....s.dv w.-��a'. ....`....oma '..�.w.e. ....."-..R.w i=.�.®� / Shia Wif 12.1w'11 PI..2PaxKY 1r�.3r A-A-5 Ss.IAramsao¢T A 14 U u ma n 1 a R sue rw-em-Au]P11623 03111E . MINILL.m[P01•11111131�aX vmn s*151 w,r wr n x vEHxEiu 1 OF tkaanbs Clacked 48"STORMFILTER MANHOLE TYPICAL CLEANOUT SECTION P.M MANHOLEAN R , ro...,s �1 Te„., 96"'DIA.STORM OUTLET CONTROLA #1 'A`1+ m Tsai.Numb lo: .24 Design Review Submittal-March 2014- C6 6 WORN DOWN GROW 0.0 0.0 k.s 3Xf 0 ,....w.,/ �1 Vf CI) rsms.W.e.,x*,.Suite 1 1:' Tiw.....ww,STZW459 Vox,30.244-45S2 +0.0 +C.0 e.t 543144-0417 x 711 +0.0 +C.0 4.,' \ +0.0 4.0 OK 0 3 o.0 +d.o 1 I:: a.4 + S ►I ►.� ,5 . :.t.; ' pa::/4 +0.0 +1.0 - .'18,6 +0.7 T'- TYPE v g� �. 745 HT, �IIIIIIII IIIIIIII '. ,r, F-; .- _X_ " 0.0 1.4 r� 0 1.2 2.8 +1.2 - + '' r 17 Self sforag 3.0 2.5\1.6 €) 1.6 +'.5 +15 -1.1 I7 +1.9 '1. +0.0 +1.4 -- TYPE TYPE SIP 12.-NW xr4 xr. x + - ' rz a aT. +i.1 '1.3 +0.0 :::p ::: + TYP[ + 2.1 5 1 f 2.32 2.1 +?.7i 0 1.2 2.3 4,7 y v . a y l.lI..,4.4 TYPE 2NG /',-� ",YPE 28M f ESI '/I ` 12.-0.wr re, 17'10.'1"xrs wr. \ TYPE iA3 rt. 1 NrG.xc it r Pgra i r. / Wes[Coast + y�r + + + + + + + + + + + + + r Self Storage: 0.� : 1 3 •' .2 2. 1.8 1.6 1.7 2.4 +4.2 9 3.6 '3.7 +1 2.8 3.2 1.: 2.8 +4.1 9 3.8 3.5 .9 4.1 3 3 1.6 1. 2. I.', • Lake Oswego `0.0 1 0' +1.avc 4q? 2 +0.7 0. 1.5 $ 1.8 2.0 2.0 1. 3.4 4.�+1.6 1.7 .1 1.8 2.0 1.8 1 1 G/*0.9 5.3 �, °""° �P r' N. / / �_ _ +0.0 0.0 '0.4 t1, M+0.7 +0.3 0.3 4.5 +0.6 +0.6 +0.7 0.6 +0.5 `+, • 0.6 0.5 +0.6 +0.6 +0.7 +0.7 0.6 .6 -titj ...NW LIGHTING SITE PLAN 0.0 +0,0 +0.0 +0.1 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 X0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 '0.1 +0.1 +0.0 LIIMMIIPEM .. ( \SITE PLAN - LIGHTING CALCULATION "-' ""' °` """"� "" "' '"'^ "' . I1r1 LCI V.-..-.- ❑ .o w. q x Remora 5 C un unm..n �...m.anw 'm"a'� u W o w. .m IEYAn6PC6 -----1 ...�,m.... ..., Jab M.mhc H3 Sheet ClJDesign Review SubmAla1-March 2014 - LCI 1 CD Cw.R tdrrne \ .�x[usrEca 1.10111 '6' 2 `` ,— 3011,C MR Pe[ S ji.Po�'iLDCATw OR MOO.f� 1009 . \ \ ,. • \\\ tl eA a]/le•e[a[oean[e 1 \ �e11 RRA[e 1WMC POC,G,C/rtLAM 1111 . Air; . r ' FU.I2 2 �� o u.a `o. /-A0,L..ue SUM MIMI 1,01„,11.,.11 %g i Igfllll „„-.OW OLu 001.01 O MU LIM EO �r 81IIIIIIII r; — ' g e�PP ..[,[[,�I I- 1.2 0 5 0.2 0 � v)Lk g -,--- I , l • , ,�,6 Pe. .P Amex Uj g 1, 11 I 0.9 #0.3 0. it 1 —1 ' /�1.0 `6¢ '0.2 IFI.0°R W ` 1/E *0./1 1. w g l Arc WE 01.1.11:LOC WIN ML EWEN u�c p O K O LI WA 110,00001, CL Ali ..LOoLAe�r unIL RM. no. DMill 1 1 STREET LIGHTING FIXTURE DETAIL �L� EI =LC,ILLS. LUMINAIRE: AAL-PROVIDENCE STYLE FIXTURE ON VISCO POLE of A"' .vwrr,Peulxe STREET LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN r`1111, f ler w erx.x m ..iweW.17 lo�[m.u,nR.[<[[P u, �',la�R_xP.u_vr._, 311.1.0 ,ea,R�[o,1.m11."PintL .,M CP.i� o ._,n...1-,/[• _ IMEx000031,M l0x$eeelllMe ortdy0p(910.00,e[wnemxereui awwKPRWu ev CITY EHeiI.PFn- }SNROLIII STATISTICS Designed Target, """ I ems„ . I M. ,�'"e11.., estrn ober- .PIPs � , 0.410 ,=e Dile .1 401 1 e,a «M, .e, 7ill LC1.1 00.4.0c 010.0.0.01.04.TADLC9,..r.., Design Review Submittal-March 2014 ---10309 •16vro9 nutiesoor va,I•,-- mexc.r.:9 sr.,.jr1[IfJYOWIlJtroNnvc F.--,,,..4,.__._ D .^kid rol xa R rs..no IS - Mar••I.mlMmw. I a'+ .r.[5,4+1.4- I nn•u•snoIIUR� I'zsz l tit fien0•11.11,14111110 wt M� • �� w,.n. � " `!ri,. es�wor Ir, � /j_ Ii' SSF eras «�.■ r it= I"5ct I r,wwn®w[yau KAD ® 111, -� .m _ _ w� .mm...r.� _o.� _>r `sem w �.... r,...' ,e= t—•-.r�i rl-.. I s c --- ommo , . J_ .� ti .....:,4„.... _ li -~ = - - I _ 17:11:: ,4,4,4,4 I:. : -: _ r-- L:._ m. M-�.. - ..1 - �' a rr. .. r. __- - _.__ — DA MMal■it..+•rls.lsM.ln.. me sM..a aw...w.PoM,I _.___ W....- - _ r _.- eOYe..�II M. em mtr ms, �■■o' • ■■■ii I_._ '�'� 1E ■ mr■ �■■■ _ T �_ _ ,man..%•, ` ��; '' - �r■ �rr l _ .-: : -r.- ,.. �I air illr ■ .1....1"'-'1 rill**t Ail J . _ — «..m••� 34 N al _ - ,. etfoorag kif 1�4 . I■. ■ CI • ii■■i rrr rp. 1'49: .-.)-111:1111 IUM113 or- .' i 1 `1.,- 1._701 �I • y .r_....'�rer+ar_ —•—+..-w. II I ';I - P.,....Ln 5..„4,4...-.-.. -*.r Y14.111p - r"r.sww, rMwT��n ••• ' � _ _...... -,may.. West Coast .1.=...-14,1-...-- Oily .t=isr---- .......:—.-2...-....=..”'r Self Storage: .7*— .. Lake Omego .. se .--. ,4,4,4__,4 __-._ _x lJliSfO/IN.iL�5elE50' _.-_..sw.r.+a... __-_ - -._.._ r �R.n nom rt[/)M,M•.GI t/adH.Nl6' .�...a,. �d d.)f gM�M fIA.'.relVO' _ N L/QMA1Wf!' a ......r....._..._..... .w....w....r.....• ... ._ ..-�_.,,� 'ri•-"i'�'• I —....u._.__,4,4,4,4_..* �..r.+.,..........w �A.'.^^_' .,-..---=-."----- ,4,4,4,4 em.rcww..w.r..w..er+.w.a�� .w�wn.w...... 1.5e?.n•.Oft. Fig I IPk LIGHTING CUT SHEETS mt Z.M..n x,. m.,..a <r.u. x•I o. Al..,.,St CU 2 s Design Review Submittal-March 2014 - LC2 18 / / / .� ' LEGEND Q ;./ V ' 1TN 10+53»n LT f _ - �� aRorosm ENV. / :I, 20051RDCi INLET CE ./ ./A WE/SF WAY UDPROTECT E -----— —--— I $$ // / / / RGR ` PRCGERIT ENE __—__ A 8 aEi i i / ICE t- / 4F PxMEMEM sr3 tOWO AOSEW04D f /� / A .. - 9CONTOUR 155— f/ / Y ,A' 3 CONTOUR —555 £ 0Ls'Y KELE SUM SEWER UNE M _ ... _/1� i �/ 9 tt 5 fs m. ". .../. / A / TER UNE - J� 55 \ 0431.6 LT / / 5wNNm 3ElYER UNE �-E--P 2 / � • r/ OYFAfEAR MUTT LINE C} /` ! I CURB RETURN TABLE / ! REMOVE E / �/ 9/ I E A SI�EWMJ(156. TGIXMSTRUGRWI. BCR 7,,'=6,„,:,.2,3 'Nt ET.t51 epG-NNiCX(E} N NAND EDGE COJYtINUC AVRB ODIKIAUCIINL 1Y.36 ( wwQ / / F(E)CURER,B �,AS ' \ - -._�(F7 FPNrr m RFNyN, - LI 153E C / PW]4ECr pNdNG ECR.SYN 1.52,15'F4 E. 153Ae6 j / A 10E26 5,,,35; s Nr % CANSTkacrlGN, �,4.V PMb'�i xEl«rve 5N u f 4 .SO `` A=ate. W"s�*`ssw°.`'. ,t x c sroN.smurnau. te5a' , A E.�'. r nor 'ADYFO. L-31.47 ' COORWUIET MRN 07,5,2!AN¢0+35.32 NT EL ts+5es-yNiCX I) � m` /J/ ♦ - 5 LT - 154.61E REMOVE UR@,kn.¢serums // ,-' INE �� 32.13 Rt d.154.10E ENPIkES.a/30/t3 f C t0 SF4 9D413.BE4H CUR& / ~ ES YI .5 5Y ///'/ COW.B:SIGEMN.Y CANSf¢UC13N, 15 RT • 15 LT \ 10]If t 1510 GAS IPi(5,SEE BCR ECR ECR ` RENEWED N 09025541E 0024052.NNE SHPT EL. R=20 RH CNNER. 4 9E'51'31" {E�FEN.,TO RENN11 L m 35,43' /// I 4 coksTRucnaN, ,708' ,,,,pee,`� A. \• . 151 . ♦ ♦ WNSfAVLfI[NLT CO y~- ---�_--~�-�_- --�•- -- _. [.0 ›-0 0` mlNpls[ununEs / - \ Wlb�muUCTON� ' �--I 0Q w jJ UNDERGMb E 5EE - - slre ELEOiwcu Pwl- r - ccATE E„�W �. ..; '''.11Y-!..I'' sy rim \ _ I U NL ---_ _ 4�l wiiEk exrEls Bir o - X� - ♦ _ .. 1-LL g Q _ e\ aRca�m saienNuc I ' RELOCATE E.WRIER.MEIEAS ``` --. - 9THEEET sIN,7f09 _ r : rEWDAG 1 // /rPER44NENrPPUBIlEkU11LiIY EASEOF M.IT {E7 SIIE SSEanEWNNECI ' 9' ♦ f ... -�-t �7 A1]Se 90 E ;Y _ J CITY E OS4'EGO i0 Afl.IL: 30 NSRH SIOE DF NEM Rwa ®. \ IA! - 7 ��_ � O.Oi :' ,137�TNooNx I - '_ _ WEN PAG CURING COFIGTNUGRu5 3 II �� ` LRsd 11.01-'ecowssrurr d STY MX — — — "I _ I- ./.1. ; ”^'-�. ^_ -� -^--^-rG P3LEUN.WROTE. - i o i€or x4 cR 19 311 �r�N` n ¢ 1,\\ I (Ej'�PNv€werm Euviilonn c"� — - — CI) - — »RNUMY.5(E`�Nl R. .sem yt --Pgli \SlA,41f5 ' F" 1L-1F- ff 2/CLE k RFMO4E 21 2.5. ENT f, \ ;NNEWN DDNSFllTDN w W rlI—LLI `� qEl eIORY CBII 5T5 P.:74 Er 111 • I f,V 11f 3e YSINL�R CE PAVEMENT NORM151PA WCU1 UNE mC�F' re 2 � .. _,_ Q O / N 151.53 -- 'IEi Ej tram Ma RELOCAIf y O Z IE CUT X149 113' 1 { -Nom 9 toTE FENNO WRB. PAVEE10.T ElEVA11AN5. J' W C I - r .4 : - r I: URLIlY PkDY10ER.FMMCMS£ i- , a ,� 1 - 1 I SET mrE r ¢rMNN.PkmPry i L' 0 , I. NNW m SmucTGN. Cr)_. O r LU I I ® . O om . � rnw �p MARCH 25,2Q14-DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL WNL oaos N I 1 LEGEND a IPRNPNS O T-E Sltltl— ANNU HWN5NY1 I I DE NAY NNE ---- ------— - w 0i ORaRFAh tbvE FENCE UNE M PAYENENt ICONTOUR ,"'S1— 5 GOM M _.,15551— I RUNIC SIMI SEWER LINE loz41=1==11y..,w, AMTER UNE dA Li SENN OE WS UNE ll NhNNFM OWN LINE 4 II I S 9' t I I I: I I �EINREf 6/]0/15.1 I I I I I LUR I-10 T O II Q ri CO ~ r �_ I I I IO w II = Av[it wrin e:X sruc e••rAPPiNe �- �__ __�_ LL .I V VALVE.EXTEND SoLoN To wdowur. .- -' — - _ I `.f (� 0)' Ii STA i3tOC I - .. - STA I � _ STA �SAwX CO I� — — _ — /-� _= -— _ _ ___ 5U,(toe s3A R55[e00�, 1 }T'..vxnn,.. — ti `I /1 01.RIA it NS PwIF Np8EN000 SiREEj- --- --_ IIS,Z If wNSNw„6-H W — _ S N eN ! —"� — 4 — _ NCT w CIO� w GTA I9+HR.]3 AF ❑ y IXST L A.VBIIC FNE NYNRFM _----__ `-—`-—- - rx �. o a PLY Nell BLAINIEDS, — __ _ I IA 1203.21 Wr 0 fll 'f 0J m I'll 8 0 II II Es I rI r I 1 Rum..IlalgainFaut a I 1 e4EF ' I (ID PW2 MARCH 25,2014.DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL X1030N , S „ & 5 w S u { s g i I 6Z iso 6 ROSEWOOD SIA 1INO0= S8 .. .. MO4SES I£)PRd ETA 9x+00 5 A 7 srA n1w56 Auaxuvl f .. 651,96451 a.RT= SQA,w.u.M.T ...............••"... _.__. CONSTRICT INLET CS TC 15662 YOM 15256(1210 S10 566 1.633,Y T ooRSTRUCT N•FW Ef.SIM MH NW 151.15-NATC1 M ' TEM 150.90 Or NE) 'our 16,]a°2' lx sq . _ moi,€ MRlEL 19S16,M FL ER COO,Ll SS PN CROPS TO 0+440 SrM£T SLOPE. FL 15382 CROSS E 1 r ' , 1 1 ipir '11, - _ Y STA luae]_15'Lr 1PAN51RCCR 05 SLr0 SML''MO OPE w FL 152. c p� vs,LioNaa CIITiER EE.142.77 Cmaw. 1A' 1s .J PID GUTTTER TRAM5NION, COMMIE STAJOARC355+02.CANTER CROSS.412 EAST. EL 151.510 1 S:m STA 11.47.LT LussisuE mut E. — - .. E o3u11080 M(I NOM) SNB TO ROW.M IS 1E aur 1u.6(1x0•SOMI)Cr STA 11+17.M 50 [1C 11141. ars 11.66 Or NomN)M c T STA 13a1] a0N5112 NA SM NH M E I 156 5.03.TCN FG EL 156.6] Y IN 145.96 12"WO 1gYib°: 10•)•4 TNIWeaw IE W 145.90 12"SOUTH) 01i, RI(E)PAMIEM IY I 1]BC.(tx" 11 4 v.' i M. 85 2 gg M® SIA 12 4C7 .CS(11 TEANONs. MA M7 :ii 2 VA INILLSO n SES sA•_LIAM1FRAA lw p k IN/CUT 137 1a•'Wf51/EAl) n SEE OpJE1V1 MITE t ON SHEET L1. 01 h1 TTI ED Z M G 171 TAP lel WM T :9N6CHL e"SWIM VOL4E OREM SOUTH m MEANT. L16 C mmm mmm MMM AMM MATCHLINE-SEE SHEETPW4 CO K . e 3 Hp"o'sip a ---- i a x i;1 WEST COAST $ R°sem r [ 1' slil ; ROSEWOOD STREET SELF STORAGE P 's 1 iao �y$' TSTERMSN,s,Sm&IW N PNS.-M PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SW BOONES FERRY RD 4t; 2.q T.M.R1PPEY T lp PROFILE VIEW LAKE OSWEGO,OR ` �' 0691$1.1LENCYeMaweexs e..00,11.1 6666 ;Z T o F. i S m K ., Sp 14.1.911 ,w El e 11141 5-lorrwe FE,EM�S0.UI'0]a NYl)RR:f.- A s ••• 5555 •MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET PW3• • 001 FW 10 0.0- 01 F6 IE IX/qR Ilea(11"EAST/11E51) 4 E� CC ui A sA3 IA i i N 1 > X 0 S N W N O A a nmT Z VF STA,s+ra. Err su S . a,5 o - F6 X C� �aus ease(x<^ -swap EXIST JJ rai▪aiwe,al' CII -. E3111(( C .. i81 IS3E v5� ... .__._ _ ,_. - E 0111 138 81 m'• efi UEET 04 w Ecu 7m.n1..."11 As511NIEM P ¢STA 15-1-54oo ea Amnro F S ., i m i A v A g Nigali l WEST COAST -,(,)‘144`, R ��s�$ ROSEWOOD STREET SELF STORAGE a � /`- 745uswE,.,iw.suiclw T.M.RIPPEY r,""°"�°°"n' n 11,aoa� PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS S4N BCMNES FERRY RD W; �`;4 clmlarrlea '� r g4 PROFILE VIEW LAKE OSWEGO.OR W ga Il CONSULT-MO Faa15011b1T190 a i M N s_y W W R/a' 101 N e'1 93' 15' e'� �Ed� .41, o.5 25 P,PPIRIPPRP OX N•GINONNINP 6• 12 7:t —11-05 GORIER.SEE 6EPIL PFA CRY REpJR:ENEMS,lf.1 52-61. IiNCKtw55•PER CT!REOUREVEENTS.e_ F.6 rv'SHLG RGGRFGAWF RGICNIES5PER GRT TECUIREIIENPS. I.NOM EE SRECEIGTON SECTION MECO FOR COMP.CR%REOUIREIRERIG. � `O,FaruE S e 111 QTYPICAL STREET SECTION(ROSEWOOD) Not ID KE [EXPIRES:6/36/151 IW^ Q Vtt ) O CD Z ▪ O W m W co H W z W E-W Cl)> (1]3 G7 ❑O 0 1— p0, LII 0, ❑ W 0 Q CO 0- d NM M▪S Wri,r1,1IT le WV MAT IRMO PRI PW5 ' MARCH 25.,2014-DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 10309 24 NARRATIVE IN SUPPORT OF LAND USE APPROVALS Conditional Use Design Review Tree Plan Lot Line Adjustment and Consolidation January 24, 2014 Site Location: 5650 SW Rosewood Street I, ; Applicant: .SAN 2 7 2014 West Coast Self Storage C,� Steve Tangney, Vice President '`Y "�` +, Ea L. eft t rt rant. 39 Castledown Road Pleasanton CA 94566 stananevawcselfstorage.com Architect: Mildren Design Group Dan Vasquez, Project Architect 7650 SW Beveland Street #120 Tigard OR 97223 dan@mdgnc.corn Landscape Architect: Joyce Jackson, LA 1940 Sylvan'Way West Linn OR 97068 ji@i ovicei ackson-LA.com 1 EXHIBIT F-1 LU 14-0006 3 `L pav_.-3 25 Arborist: Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. Don Richai ds, Arborist PO Box 2355 Lake Oswego OR 97035 don@appliedhortc onsulting.com Civil Engineer: TM Rippey Consulting Engineers Karl Koroch, PE 7650 SW Beveland Street #100 Tigard OR 97223 kkoroch rr,tmrippev.com Lighting Engineer: MKE and Associates, Inc. Hank Barleen 6915 SW Macadam Ave. Suite 200 Portland, OR 97219 hankb@,mke-inc.com Traffic Engineer: Lancaster Engineering Todd Mobley, PE 321 SW Fourth Ave. #400 Portland OR97204 toddna.lancasterenaineering.com, Planning Consultant: Lans Stout 33883 SW Firdale Road Cornelius OR 97113 lstout2@frontier.com 2 26 CONTENTS 1. Introduction and project description 2. Comprehensive PIan Goals and Policies 3. IPO Zone Standards 4. Conditional Use Standards 5. Dimensional Standards 6. Development Standards 7. Tree Removal Standards 8. Lot Line Adjustment and Consolidation Standards Accompanying Documents: Application Form Proof of Ownership Mailing Labels Neighbor Meeting Documents Architectural and Site Development Design Package Arborist Report Traffic Study Drainage Report 3 27 1. Introduction and Project Description This application includes a number of elements related to the development of the subject site as a self storage facility. In order to achieve this goal, the property owner and applicant have worked with the community and the City for several years through the process of amending the Lake Oswego Code to add the Lake Grove IP Overlay Zone, and with respect to the process required to reconnect SW Rosewood Street to SW Boones Ferry Road. Both of these are critical aspects of a viable development of the site. The IP Overlay zone includes Conditional Use approval for self storage, subject to certain standards. These are addressed in a following section, as are other standards of the Code. The reconnection of SW Rosewood Street to SW Boones Ferry Road requires a dedication of right of way to create a standard street intersection, and vacation of some right of.way which will no longer be necessary. The vacation and dedication are being addressed in a separate but parallel process apart from the land use approvals addressed in this application. However, in order to adjust the property lines resulting from the vacation and dedication a Lot Line Adjustment and Consolidation is part of this application. Similarly, improvement of the street connection and site frontage are indicated in the accompanying design package. West Coast Self Storage has developed a number of projects similar to this proposal. These are an application of traditional self storage design to a new, more modern and urban concept which provides the service in a three-story building with predominantly interior access to storage units. The building shows a sophisticated design that is consistent with current architecture in areas such as the Lake Grove IP area, using a variety of materials and colors as well as a prominent storefront and large glass exposure facing the street. These design elements were incorporated in the IPO Zone at the suggestion of the applicant, and are successfully brought forth in the project design. Specific details related to the project, such as areas and parking data, are provided in the accompanying plan set. The site has some large trees, as well as a number of trees that are either in poor condition, invasive, or both. The applicant has worked diligently with the project arborist to identify trees worthy of retention, and the building design has been adjusted as required to allow many to be saved. 4 28 The following narrative addresses the standards for approval of the applications in the order outlined by Planning Staff in the pre-application conference notes. These notes are included for reference as an attachment to this document. 2. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies The pre-app notes indicate that Goals 2, 6, 9, 11, and 12 are applicable to this application. The notes go on to say that "all regulatory policies" should be addressed for these goals. It is normally the case that Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies are implemented by development regulations and ordinances which have been found to be compliant with the jurisdictional intent contained in the Comprehensive Plan, and consequently if an application is found to meet the standards of the implementing ordinances it is implicitly consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Applying this logic would mean that addressing the Comprehensive Plan Goals and policies separately is redundant and unnecessary. However, the following will identify and address the policies for each goal that in the opinion of the applicant have some relevance to the application. Policies which are clearly generic or directive to actions of the City itself will not be included. The following section cites the Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies as summarized in a handout provided by staff at the pre-application meeting. There may be some discrepancies between the citations below based on this handout, and the actual text of the Comprehensive Plan. Goal 2 Land Use Planning Section 1 Land Use Policies and Regulations 1. "Adequate public Services" The accompanying design documents show that appropriate services are available to the site, and that all can be provided consistent with City standards. The review process including the pre-app meeting has indicated that all services are adequate for development of this site, subject to certain related improvements as shown on the plans. 5 29 2. "Concurrent construction of services" The permit process will ensure that services are extended as required at the time of site development. 3. "Development to conform to City regulations" The design review and permit process includes reviews to apply regulations as required. 19. "Review to ensure the quality of design" While this policy is directed to the City process, it is assumed that the term "quality" is intended to imply a subjectively determined level of "good" or "high" quality. The City's Design Review process, which is applicable to this application allows this review and determination to occur. 25. "Developers to bear the burden ofproof" This also is a directive to the city but worthy of addressing since the materials included in this application are intended to allow compliance with this policy. Section 2 Community Design and Aesthetics The five policies within this section are all directives to the City with respect to actions the City should take in accepting and reviewing land use applications. Goal 6 Air, Water and Land Resources Quality Section 1 Air The policies related to air quality are all general statements of intent with respect to City actions. However, it is relevant to note with respect to this application that the City does have a specific opportunity to implement Policy 7 related reducing congestion on major streets through the reconnection of SW Rosewood Street to SW Boones Ferry Road. This action will implement a number of other policies regarding connectivity and reducing localized pollution related to automobile traffic. 6 30 Section 2 Water Resources Quality Similarly to Section 1, these policies all indicate the intent of the City to take various,steps to improve surface water quality. This application complies with the implementing ordinances for these policies, as shown by the accompanying documentation related to stormwater treatment. Section 3 Land Resources (Solid Waste Management) This section directs the City to take certain actions related to solid waste and recycling. The application documents show the on-site location of trash and recycling areas, which is the only relevant aspect of the project to these policies. Section 4 Sound These policies direct the City to take steps to address noise generating activities which could impact adjacent properties. The proposed self storage business is not a noise generating activity. Goal 9 Economic Development 1. Designate adequate commercial and industrial land. It is assumed that the city's actions have addressed this policy. However, it is relevant to this application to note the recent city approval of Code revisions to address the Lake Grove IPO area, which facilitates and supports this application. 3. Require new commercial and industrial development to... (eight items). The items listed under this policy relate to development standards which have been embodied into the Zoning Code. These will be addressed in the applicable following section. 6. Support redevelopment of existing vacant or underutilized industrial and commercial land. ibis policy indicates that the general City positions hind U4 to support the development of this vacant industrial property. 7 31 7. Ensure access to commercial and industrial development is taken from the major collector or arterial street system. This policy indicates that support of the street vacation/dedication to create a direct connection of Rosewood Street to Boones Ferry Road would be appropriate. Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services Section 1 Public Safety Police and Fire Protection This section contains policies directing the City to achieve certain levels of service and arrangements with other service agencies. Section 2 Stormwater Management This section indicates the City's intent to develop and maintain stormwater systems as well as to require that developments provide appropriate systems. These are implemented through application of the stormwater design standards to the project. Section 3 Water Treatment and Delivery This section directs the City to take certain steps in providing and protecting the water system. Section 4 Wastewater Collection and Treatment This section directs certain city actions regarding waste systems. Section 5 Government Services This section is directed toward government services. Goal 12 Transportation The pre-app notes indicate that only the land use and parking sections may apply to this application. However, the summary of policies provided by 8 32 staff is not organized in this manner, so for this section the full text of the Comprehensive Plan was reviewed. Goal 4 within this general category is titled "Land Use and Transportation Relationships", but the text of the goal clearly states that it is applicable to amendments following policy statements to indicate the City's intent to create and apply standards to ensure that development is supported by and adequate transportation system. Since the City has created such standards, the relationship of the application to them will be addressed in subsequent parts of this narrative. Goal 11 within this category is titled "Parking", and the goal is stated to be that all development provides adequate parking. This goal is to be achieved by the City's adoption of appropriate development standards, which has been done and will be applied to this project. This is addressed in a subsequent section of this narrative. 3. IPO Zone (50.05.008) The Industrial Park Overlay District was modified in order to enhance the opportunity for redevelopment in the area inclusive of the subject site. To achieve this goal, the list of potential land use was expanded and commercial self storage was added as a Conditional Use. This section relies upon policies contained in 50.02, as follows with commentary inserted: 50.02.002.2.b.iv (1) and 50.11.002 Lake Grove Industrial Park District Policies. a. Realign the Jean Road/Boones Ferry Road intersection as part of the Boones Ferry Road widening project to assure adequate truck turning radius. Not applicable b. Initiate measures to solve circulation and drainage problems, enhance the area's general appearance, and identify the southwestern entrance to the City. Directive to the City; implemented by standards 9 33 c. Preserve major stands of trees where feasible. Directive to the City; implemented by application of the Tree section of the Code d. Encourage developments on small parcels to develop shared access with adjacent parcels wherever feasible. Not applicable to this site. e. Assure adjacent residential areas are protected from adverse effects of industrial activities and land use. Not applicable to this site. f Revise the existing "IP zone"statutes in the Lake Oswego Code to require: • Compliance with the currently adopted noise performance standards and regulations of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. • Levels of maintenance of buildings and grounds. Directive to the City. The specific standards for commercial self storage I the IPO zone are cited below with commentary inserted. 50.05.008.5.c Specific Standards for Commercial Self Storage Commercial self storage is allowed subject to the following standards: I. The minimum FAR shall be 1.5:.1. The data block shown in the design drawings accompanying this narrative document that this standard is met. i% There shall be no roll up or "overhead"doors on the ground level that are visible from an arterial or collector street. The exterior access doors for this building face east, which is away from the only nearby arterial or collector street (Booties Ferry Road) and consequently they are not visible from this street. 10 34 iii. Loading and docking areas shall be internal to the building and screened from street views. The loading area also faces east, and is set into the building so it cannot be seen from the street. iv. The building exterior shall be articulated using a variety of materials and colors. At least 20% of a street-facing facade shall be glass. The building elevations included with this application show that this standards is met through the use of a CMU base element, several patterns of metal siding, and articulation. These plans also show documentation that the glass area standard is met. 4. Conditional Use Standards (50.007.005) The Conditional Use section of the Code cites specific standards which if met will allow approval of the Conditional Use. These are cited below with commentary inserted. a. An application for a conditional use shall be allowed if: The requirements of the zone are met; and It has been shown above that the requirements of the IPO zone are met by this application. ii. Special conditions found in LOC 50.03.003.1.b. 50.03.003.2.a through 50.03.003.2.c, 50.03.003.3.a through 50.03.003.3.d 50.03.003.3.f and 50.03.003.4.a and 50.03.003.4.d. if applicable, are met; and These standards apply to other types of land uses and therefore are not applicable to this application. However, the pre-app notes indicate that subsection 4a is applicable notwithstanding that it only applies in cases not covered by other specific standards, so it is addressed below with commentary inserted. 35 "a. Conditional Uses Listed in Commercial or Industrial Zones and Not Covered by Other Specific Standards... " i. The site will be designed so that ingress and egress will not cause hazardous turning movements, traffic slow-downs or blockages due to storage of vehicles waiting for services. The site plan shows a code compliant driveway leading into a compliant parking area with appropriate turning and maneuvering area. The loading area is within the site distant from the street. ii. Public services are or can be provided at the site. City staff has provided the location of public services as shown on the accompanying plans, which provide adequate service for the development. iii. All outdoor lighting except security lighting shall be extinguished at the close of business hours. This will be addressed through business operations. iv. Any adverse impacts on adjoining residential uses such as noise, lights, or loss of privacy will be mitigated by landscaping, screening or increased setbacks. There are no nearby residential areas. v. Parking shall meet the parking standards and may be increased if additional spaces are shown to be necessary. The plans show Code-compliant parking. iii. The site is physically capable of accommodating the proposed use; and The accompanying plan set includes a site plan and other site development plans which show that the site can be developed with the proposed use while meeting all applicable Code standards. This confirms that the site is capable of accommodating the proposed use. 12 36 iv. The functional characteristics of the proposed use are such that it can be made to be reasonably compatible with uses in its vicinity. Self storage is a quiet activity and a low traffic generator. In the case of this particular application these characteristics are particularly evident given that most of the storage units have access internal to the building by way of the enclosed loading area. Therefore, by comparison to most activities in the area, which are predominantly commercial and industrial as allowed by the IPO zone, this use will have less impact than any of its surrounding uses. 5. Dimensional Standards (50.04) The standards of the IP zone are applicable except where superseded by the . IPO zone. FAR: 1.5:1 minimum as provided by the IPO zone... data indicated in the plan set accompanying this narrative show that the development provided over 1.5:1 FAR. Front Yard: 20 feet... the building is set back at least 20 feet from the right of way of SW Rosewood Street and the setback line is shown on the site plan. Side and Rear Yard: 10 feet... the building is set back at least 10 feet from the side and real lot lines, and the setback line is shown on the site plan. Maximum Building Height: 45 feet... The building is less than 45 feet in height to the top of the parapet, as shown on the accompanying building elevation sheet. 6. Development Standards (50.06) Industrial Building Design Standards (50.06.001.5): This section of the Code provides standards by which "good design" is to be judged. These are cited below with commentary inserted. Sections that are not applicable to this application have been deleted from the citations. 13 37 "b. Design Standards Buildings shall be designed and located to complement and preserve existing buildings, streets and paths, bridges and other elements of the built environment, and to assure accessibility for bicyclists, pedestrians, and users of other transportation modes. L Design buildings to be complementary in appearance to adjacent structures of good design with regard to: (1) Materials; (2) Setbacks (for retail/commercial part specifically); (3) Rooflines; (4) Height; and (5) Overall proportions. " The storage building will be constructed with a concrete block base (first floor) and metal wall system (at the second and third floors) above. The office area is identified with a façade including three levels of storefront glazing, articulated metal siding and a series of metal awning elements. A tower element consisting of CMU construction is located adjacent to the office area providing a visual anchor to the building. The single main roof area slopes slightly for drainage but is generally "flat". The entire area is secured, with customer access by keypad. Parking/loading areas are provided at grade level, with all access to the second and third floors occurring within the building. In developing the design of this building, the following adjacent structures were identified as "good design", as identified in the initial conversations with city planning staff. It should be noted that although the proposed self-storage building type is not a "directly compatible" building use with two of the structures identified below, several characteristics and building elements have been favorably identified and incorporated into the design: 14 38 - Lightsneed Aviation (6135 Jean Road): • Light Industrial building; metal two story building with flat roof and storefront windows, includes predominant metal wall panels and metal entry canopy/awning. • Design Elements: Use of different metal panel systems, incorporation of both horizontal and vertical panels. • Color: Gray main body color with silver coping, storefront and vertical elements; rustic red accent panels at entry and blue horizontal accent band around building. - Wal Mart (17711 Jean Way): • "Big box" retail building, two story building with flat roof, combination of metal panels, wood siding, and cmu walls, includes wood accent features and large sculptural wood and metal roof entry canopy. • Design Elements: Use of varying metal panel and wood siding with metal and wood accent elements to break up the large wall mass. • Colors: Predominant colors of cream-yellow, walnut brown (wood) and silver (metal) with"zones" of color separated at floor lines and broken up by use of vertical elements. - Boones Ferry Crossing (17040 Pilkington Road): • Two and three story office building complex with flat roofs, storefront windows, balconies and horizontal awning elements. The three story building (focus of our investigation) includes vertical "pilaster" elements and exterior light fixtures • Design Elements: Natural color emu first floor ("base") and stucco type wall finish at second and third floors, with a 15 39 • large coping/cornice element at roofline; pilaster elements in conjunction with storefront windows used to break up overall building mass. • Predominant ochre-yellow wall color with creme-yellow and light gray pilaster accent colors. Darker gray cmu base and coping anchor the building. The following sheets locate these buildings and provide photos of the designs. • 16 40 PROXIMITY MAP (Buildings within proximity identified as "good design") ; s .1 _ _ Lightspeed Aviation , 1 -.- - ,- (&135 Jean Road) o , Si TE:5fi5Q S W Rosewood Street T' 1, t �k = a _ Vic _ .::J - ^ rs • .' -% " 'e ' ' , a' g y -� -i10 K.4 F. , Boones Ferry Crossing = j , `x- (17040 Riikington Road) R !' ' ti _-.r- - -4.," 1 ,,a �E • -e . '7 . i-✓F'0•. - '.' 717 o:El +IraiY.� + rt. - ' ¢�iia-�.t,}� �f II -. _ L 7 1 711 Jean Way) 41 LightsReed Aviation (6135 Jean Road) '-~_ _ Y; �i 1 �a k;_ v � _ LIGHTSFEED t�- - � i Er ri' ' --in _ _ _ _,,,, . _ __ __, _ _ ,..4,4 .... • _ / ,- • .. L_ d"� _. (/ l i Y • Mir . . , :::::_____,___________„_. 4 { ...,„ IL,' ...� - ot . a j t ,'ter 42 Walfnart(17711 Jean Way) 11 i .f`_ 9.. 1 . n� s _- 47611:-.., "„,_,. a .; _I4 a '-sem` �.;7. --- -- ..4, -- if pInn Walmart' i ii_i : I . 1....... - - _________ _ `„ .� rr ...,________„,____7...:, .,_ __ . . , _________ , . '� r -- �.1 _ , ..._ i„,-7---.._..---Q.: _._._r...z,.5,,__ r{ a 4 _ I - r TM Pi j-�" } , - .fir -_- �. s 1 1 .. -- t • i1r: r -Aril ie J 43 Boones Ferry Crossing (17040 Pilkington Road) 11 -T-T-- 111111111M 1 I ' JILK,201111111, ; *.11' t ' 4M4*6414 MIMI * - v - 11"-- 100011:01.'". ..;0•1°"` - AANWAINIte4 - ' I I 51-1115 • • I J 4111111 \ k 111 11-4 in lithut • t4.441411AN • • -- - • 44 The following materials are included in the proposed design for this building: - Concrete Masonry Units — at building base, the "tower" element and the partial second floor areas. Split face finish is used to provide textured appearance. Metal panel siding— at upper floor areas and office area. Three panel styles are proposed of various panel widths and textures; panel styles are also rotated 90 degrees to run vertically in areas and horizontally in others. A metal panel "vocabulary" has been developed to identify different building zones and to break up the building mass. - Storefront/glazing— at office area and tower. Fulfilling the glazing requirements at the street façade and providing natural light into the spaces while adding interest and visible activity when viewing from the exterior. Setbacks. The building has been placed on the site per the required setback distances. Site access, circulation and use are focused on the East side of the site; the South and West sides of the building are at the minimum setback distances in order to obtain the maximum area possible on the East side, while maintaining the required Floor Area Ratio. Rooflines. The large roof area of this building type dictates a flat roof design. As with the building examples provided above, the roof is hidden behind a series of parapet walls. The parapets terminate with a large cornice "band", providing a substantial quality to the walls around the entire building perimeter. Height. The parapet walls vary in height which helps to break up the overall mass of the building. The tower element of the building is the most pronounced element and is less than 44 feet above grade, within the height limit requirements. Overall proportions. As with the three building examples, the large mass of the building has been broken up by the use of finish materials, accent elements and colors. - Varying the Civu wail heights and incorporating three color variations - Varying the metal panel styles and configurations 21 45 • - Using accent elements: Metal detailing at the cornice and at the building corners and awnings at the office area - The use of color within various zones of the building, at the accent elements, and as accent banding around the building perimeter. A design vocabulary has been created where different materials and colors have been grouped to form different building "zones". Each of these zones creates a clear separate identity while maintaining a common building theme with the use of similar accent elements (cornice band, corner metal, etc.). In conjunction with this vocabulary, similar building proportions and rectilinear elements have been developed and can be found throughout the building facades. Color plays an important role in this vocabulary. In a style similar to the Walmart and Boones Ferry Crossing (the three story building), the use of a - sand-yellow color was chosen for the main field color, with a natural CMU gray color at the base of the building. The parapet "cornice" elements are a darker gray color, and the linear "accent" corner elements are a silver-gray to highlight the building edges - in a style similar to the vertical elements of the Lightspeed Aviation building. The secondary wall colors are a contrasting dark bronze color (both the secondary metal panel style and the CMU walls below) to provide a visual break in the building mass. The silver-gray color is applied to the parapet area above the office providing a unique characteristic to the office area in addition to providing a visual connection to the clear anodized aluminum storefront system below. The trademark West Coast Self-Storage blue color provides an 12"high accent band around roughly 60% of the building perimeter (at/near the second floor elevation), is the color of the metal awnings, the exterior metal doors, frames and roll up doors, and culminates at the CMU tower, where the blue color ties all of the elevations together and contributes to the grandness of anchor element of the building. 22 46 • "iv. Design those elements listed below to be complementary in appearance to those buildings or structures upon which they are associated: Awnings Signs Chimneys Stairs Decks and Utility connections and meters railings Doors Vents Downspouts Windows Foundations Weather vanes, aerials, and other Lights appendages attached to the roof or Mailboxes projecting above the roofline Mechanical equipment" Awnings have been incorporated within the Office area zone, identifying the retail-activity aspect of the building. These metal "flat" awnings are painted the accent blue of the building to tie these elements back to the overall design. Other wall mounted exterior elements of note (downspouts, lights and vents) will be complimentary by being painted to match the adjacent wall color, thereby by blending into the building facades. (Note: Mechanical equipment will be addressed below) v. Design awnings, signs, and lights to define the first floor or retail cornice height. " The entry awning and all building mounted lights are at first floor elevations (below 13 feet above grade), maintaining a pedestrian scale along the publicly active sides of the building. 23 47 "vi. Use trees and other natural elements to help define building proportion relationships and to provide scale to the structure as a whole. " Trees are selected for installation along the west and south elevations of the building to help break up the view of the building wall and soften the appearance of the structure. "vii. Limit the variety of styles of building elements. " Using similar methods to the building examples mentioned above, several building elements have been incorporated to address the challenge of visually reducing the overall mass of the building. Although these elements differ by use of color and orientation, the style of elements has been limited while maintaining a level of consistency and interest. "viii. Screen mechanical equipment from view, or place in locations where they will generally not be visible. " A small residential size mechanical (condenser) unit is proposed and would be mounted on a concrete pad (on grade) on the North side of the building. This unit has been adequately screened with the use of landscaping. No other mechanical equipment--rooftop or otherwise — is proposed for this building. "c. Buildings shall be designed and located to complement and preserve existing natural land forms, trees, shrubs and other natural vegetation. L Consider land forms and trees as design elements which must relate to building elevations to determine scale and proportion. ii. Design foundations to match the scale of the building being supported. Berrying, resiting, or sheathing the foundation structure with wall siding are examples of methods which accomplish this purpose. iii. Use decks, railings, and stairs to relate a building to the contours of the land. " The building footprint has been developed to accommodate the existing natural land forms and vegetation. The building perimeter has been 24 48 "notched" along the north and west sides to incorporate existing trees within the overall building design. The building sits on a relatively flat site, with the change in grade along the west side of the building varying by approximately 0.2 feet(2 to 3 inches). The south edge (the rear side) of the building drops approximately two feet moving west to east. A small series of retaining walls will be provided where needed to maintain the proposed vehicular circulation and parking along the east portion of the southern property line. "d. Building shall be designed and constructed to reduce noise impacts on interior occupied spaces and adjacent property. 1. Use solid barriers such as fences, berms, natural land forms and structures to reduce sound levels. The effectiveness of the barrier increases as barrier height increases and as it is moved closer to either the source or the receiver. ii. Minimize the window surface on sides facing adverse sound sources, where possible. iii. Mechanical equipment, including heat pumps and air conditioning equipment, shall meet the required setbacks of the zone and be located so that operating noise does not affect use of living areas such as bedrooms, outdoor decks or patio areas and adjacent property. " The building has been designed to maintain all activity internally within the site and along the east property line. As noted above, the self storage business is not a noise generating activity. Mechanical equipment has been addressed in 6.b.viii. "e. Buildings shall be designed and constructed with roof angles, overhangs,flashings, and gutters to direct water away from the structure. " The relatively flat roof of the building slopes toward the east side of the building, water flows east and is directed into downspouts along the east elevation. The downspouts (painted to match the adjacent wall material) flow into below grade piping. 25 49 `f Buildings shall incorporate features such as arcades, roofs, alcoves, porticos and awnings to protect pedestrians from the elements. These projections shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of.13 ft. six in. where over fire lanes. " A flat metal awning is provided along the pedestrian pathway at the main building entrance. There are no overhangs or projections where the fire lane occurs. "g. Building orientation shall be designed to encourage pedestrian access from public streets and make the street pedestrian friendly. ii. Building orientation shall include: (1) Locating buildings within 30 ft of a public street except where prevented by topographic constraints, existing natural resources, or where, in multi-building complexes, the configuration of the lot prevents locating all buildings within 30 ft. of a public street. (2) Buildings located on sites with multiple frontages on public and/or transit streets shall provide at least one public entrance within 30 ft. of the transit street. (3) Buildings located on sites adjacent to a transit street shall have at least one public entrance within 30 fft of the transit street. (4) Buildings that are within 30 ft. of a public street shall have a public entrance directly from the street. " The building has been designed locating the office area adjacent to the vehicular access drive and the public parking— at the northeast corner of the site, along the 20 ft. building setback. A concrete walkway extends directly from the office entrance to the public sidewalk. Parking Standards (50.06.002): Minimum number of vehicular spaces... 3.3/1000sf office (no resident manager); four provided based on approximately 1000sf of office space. Design of spaces and aisles... dimensions are noted on the site plan and all -meet the code standards. Bicycle Parking... exempted by subsection b.i 26 50 Access (50.06.003.1) This section requires that a development parcel has at least 25 feet of public street frontage, which is met by the site. On-site Circulation— Driveways (50.06.003.2) The site plan has been designed to meet all of the relevant sections of this chapter, including a driveway with a width of 24 feet and slope less than 15%. A compliant fire access route is provided, with a hammerhead turnaround. The civil design documents demonstrate compliance with the construction standards, including stormwater disposal. On-site Circulation—Walkways (50.06.003.3) The site plan indicates an accessible pedestrian route directly from the office entry to the new public sidewalk, and the civil design plans provide construction in compliance with the code standards. Transit (50.06.003.5) The site development provides a pedestrian connection from the office entry to the public sidewalk, which will connect to the sidewalk on SW Boones Ferry Road. Landscaping (50.06.004.1) The site plan provides over 15% landscaping as required. "Screening" as defined by this section is not required. Fences (50.06.004.2) The security fence indicated on the site plan is under six feet in height. Lighting (50.06.0043) The plan set includes a lighting plan design to meet the lighting standards. The lighting consultant (MKE and Associates, Inc.), has confirmed that the "exterior lighting utilizes metal halide and LED luminaire lamp sources. Lighting meets the criteria outlined in City of Lake Oswego Development standards for open air parking lots. Photometrics outline uniform lighting and eliminates light trespass to adjacent property. Luminaires have full lighting cutoff and meet all standards for dark sky compliant. All luminaires will be building mounted and installed below 16 ft above grade. Luminaires will have factory applied paint that will match building finish." 27 51 Drainage (50.06.003.b) The submittal package includes a preliminary drainage report which addresses stormwater quantity, detention, and treatment. Utilities (50.06.008.1-6) The civil design documents indicate existing utilities and proposed connections as required by this section. With the exception of the stormwater connection which occurs to the south, all utilities are available in SW rosewood Street as shown on the plans. Vision Clearance (50.06.0011.1-3) This section of the Code is cited in the pre-app notes but the current Code document indicates that it has been repealed. 7. Tree Removal (55.02) This section of the Code applies since trees as defined are proposed for removal as part of a major development. A tree inventory and report accompanies this application, and contains a detailed description of all the 40 trees surveyed including their condition. It is noted that while there are trees worthy of retention, there are also 5 trees that are invasive, 3 trees that are dead, and 5 trees that are er in poor condition. Consequently, tree removal permits will be required separately based on the nature of the trees in question. The tree plan in the plan set includes the inventory and a listing of the trees to be retained. A total of 12 trees are scheduled for retention on site or just off site. After deduction of the invasive or dead trees included in the tree survey, this is a 31% total retention rate. The criteria for removal are described in section .080 and are addressed as follows with commentary inserted in response to the Code language. 1. The tree is proposed for removal for landscaping purposes or in order to construct development approved or allowed pursuant to the Lake Oswego Code or other applicable development regulations. The City Manager may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application; 28 52 The tree removal proposed with this application is required in order to construct a land use which is allowed by the Zoning Code. The site design is code-compliant in all respects, and the building configuration has been adjusted to save trees which initially were thought to require removal. Of note in this regard is the code requirement that self storage must have an FAR of at least 1.5:1, which dictates a relatively large building footprint and consequently limits the flexibility to further adjust the site plan around existing trees. 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability,flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and Since the site is relatively flat, long term erosion and soils stability is not a concern. The arborist report and tree plan address the protection and long term viability of the trees to be retained. 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the character, aesthetics, or property values of the neighborhood. The City may grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Lake Oswego Code. While this criterion is subjective in nature, it is clear as described above that the tree removal proposed is necessary to allow site development, and that the plan has been adjusted to increase the number of trees to be retained. It is also relevant to note that the area is zoned industrial, and the predominant uses are industrial and commercial, rather than residential, which in itself implies a different potential for tree retention. Finally, the trees to be retained are on the north and west sides of the site, which are the most prominent to public streets, which addresses the community character issue. 4. Removal of the tree is not for the sole purpose of providing or enhancing views. Not applicable since no views will be enhanced. 29 53 S. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree pursuant to LOC 55.02.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Mitigation for the trees to be removed is provided based on the Code standard, and is documented on the landscape plan. In addition, street trees along the new Rosewood Street frontage are shown on the landscape plan and street plans. The landscape plan proposes installation of 44 new trees. Twelve of the new trees are conifers and 32 are deciduous. The plan shows a diverse variety of tree types to create a healthy eco-system. Four types of conifers shall be installed as six feet tall, balled and burlapped trees. The ten types of deciduous trees shall all be installed as 2" caliper balled and burlapped trees. Two of the new trees are the street trees, which are located to avoid the utilities that pass through the north end of the property. The other trees are located on the west and south sides of the building and between the drive aisle and the east property line. Additionally there will be shrubs and groundcover plants between and underneath the new trees. The proposed tree planting exceeds the mitigation for the 20 non-invasive living trees proposed for removal by more than two to one, or more than twice the required tree mitigation. The mitigation tree list is provided on the following sheet. 30 54 PLANT LIST AND IMAGES � QUAN BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENT ,--, TREES J4 f I. 2 ACER GRISEUM PAPERBARK MAPLE 2'CALP B&9 AS SHOWN 25 X 20 d t Cali 4 ACER RUBRUM'BOWHALL' BOWHALL RED MAPLE 2"CALP B&B AS SHOWN 40 X 15 — T�.T .4 • fil vil - o ,... ii' 5 PARS NOOTKATENSIS WEEPING ALASKAN CEDAR 6'CALP B&B AS SHOWN 30 X 7 - 'PE MALA' I _ .}r �� 1 cll., ARPINUS BETULUS'FRANS FONTAINE' FRANS FONTAINE HORNBEAM 2"CALP B&B AS SHOWN 35 X 15 . - 0 6 CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS'GLAUCA' BLUE ITALIAN CYPRESS 6'B59 AS SHOWN 40 X 5 r - 1 I FAGUS SYLVATICA'DAWICK PURPLE' DAWYCK PURPLE BEACH 2"CALP B&B AS SHOWN 40 X 12—. 't r 1J. — 2 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA'FASTIGIATUM'COLUMNAR TULIP TREE 2"CALP B&B AS SHOWN 50 X 15 0 4 MALUS ADIRONDACK ADIRONDACK CRABAPPLE 2'CALP B&B AS SHOWN 18 X 10 — 5 PINUS SYLVESTRIS'FASTTGIATA' SENTINEL SCOTCH PINE 6'B&B AS SHOWN 30 X 8 _- _. .. .- .. fi PRUNUS SARGENTII'COLUMNARIS' COLUMNAR SRAGENTS CHERRY 2"CALP EBB AS SHOWN 35 X 15—(1:3 ''--•' f t ri i;_ ,,•ti i. el 2 QUERCUS PALUSTRIS'GREEN PILLAR' COLUMNAR PIN OAK OAK 2"CALP B&B AS SHOWN 49 X 15 • r r. O. 1 SCIADOPITYS VERTICILLATA JAPANESE UMBRELLA PINE 6'BBB AS SHOWN 30+X 0 ft 4 .4.--::: " 3 SYRINGA RETICULATA JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2"CALF B&B AS SHOWN 20 X15 ii Ilk( J 2 ZELKOVA SERRATA'MUBASHiNO' MUSASHIND COLUMNAR ZELKOVA 2"CALP B&B AS SHOWN 45 X 15 — MITIGATION TREE LIST Joyce Jackson,Landscape Architect 194QSYLVAN WAY WEST COAST SELF STORAGE WEST LINN,OR 97068 5060 ROSEWOOD STREET-LAKE OSWEGO,OREGON 503 703.8607 JJ@JOYCEJACKSON-L4.COM JANUARY 24,2014 55 8. Lot Line Adjustment and Consolidation (50.07.003.a.ii(4)) The vacation of a part of the existing right of way of SW Rosewood Street and the accompanying dedication of right of way are being processed separately but in conjunction with this application. After the vacation and dedication are completed, a part of the vacated area will be transferred to the subject site and included in the site development as shown on the accompanying plans. Even though the lot line adjustment and consolidation application is a ministerial decision and could be processed separately, it is included with this application in order to present a complete package for review. The criteria for approval of a lot line adjustment are given in the Code section noted above, which references other sections of the Code that provide development standards. The sections related to parking, on-site circulation and building design are addressed in previous sections of the narrative. The sections related to hillside protection, manufactured homes, foundation soils, and flood management are not applicable to this application. The existing and proposed lot lines resulting from this adjustment and consolidation are shown on an accompanying sheet in the plan set. 32 56 SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVE IN SUPPORT OF LAND USE APPROVALS FOR WEST COAST SELF STORAGE Original Submittal Dated January 20, 2014 March 25, 2014 Site Location: 5650 SW Rosewood Street Applicant: West Coast Self Storage MAP, 2 2014 Steve Tangney, vice President 39 Castledown Road corf.piunty Deveopmen1Dapt. Pleasanton CA 94566925-462-0739 stan nev @ wcselfstorage.com This narrative will supplement the original application based on an "Incomplete Letter" by city staff dated February26, 2014. Each of the points raised in this letter are summarized below along with the applicant's explanation and/or additional information. 1. Lot Line Adiustment This point correctly notes that the street vacation and dedication will result in a portion of the vacated right of way which would revert to the Duyn property being on the south side of the new right of way. The comment in this section continues on to request that the submitted drawings and narrative be revised to address the lot line adjustment criteria. The applicant's original narrative on page 32 addresses the lot line adjustment section and criteria. It is noted that the criteria either refer to other development standards which are addressed elsewhere in the narrative, or that are not applicable. In addition, Sheet C2 in the drawing package provided the areas affected by the proposed consolidation of the part of the Duyn property south of Rosewood with the Salta property. In response to this comment, Sheet C2 has been updated with additional information to explain the changes in site areas in more detail. The incomplete letter goes on to require a showing that the Duyn property can meet the IP zone standards as revised after the dedication/vacation and lot line adjustment. However, in further discussions with staff, it was agreed that the EXHIBIT F-2 LU 14-0006 57 subject land use application does not need to address this issue since all of the land to be transferred to the Salta property is currently right of way. It is further understood that the Duyn property will need to be brought into conformance with the standards of the IP zone upon redevelopment. This resolution was confirmed in an e-mail from Leslie Hamilton dated 3-23-14. 2. Underground Utilities Notes have been added accordingly on the site plan and utility plan. 3. Building Design The east elevation façade has been modified to include additional articulation in response to the request by city staff. Accent areas have been incorporated within the two main metal panel "fields" above the exterior overhead roll-up doors along this east elevation. These accent areas consist of metal panel of varying style, orientation and color; the size of these zones has been developed to provide a rhythm of alternating widths that coordinate with both the overhead doors and wall mounted light fixtures below. The color of these areas match the existing accent color of the building, and both of the existing (main and secondary) metal panel styles have been used to articulate these accent areas. The tower element has been modified with a smaller trim cap matching the adjacent parapet cap size, material and color. In addition, the revised tower includes a wall surface on the back (south) side; the updated "trim" coping along this back wall provides a continuous cap element. The elevation sheet has been updated to reflect these modifications. 4. Street Light Design A streetlight has been added —in a location determined by city engineering staff— to the site plan and public utility plan; an additional lighting plan (Sheet LC 1.1 — Rosewood Street Photometric Site Plan) has been included to provide additional information. 5. Driveway Refer to the attached memo by Todd Mobley, PE. 6. Fire Access The Fire Marshal has been consulted on this issue and the resulting agreement is described in the attached memo by Karl Koroch, PE. Additional information has been incorporated on the Site Plan (Keynotes 10 and 16 on Sheet A1.1) to address items identified in the 2-5-14 Fire Marshal memorandum. 58 7. Traffic Report Refer to the attached memo by Todd Mobley, PE. Other Non-completeness Issues: • The utility plan is revised to indicate a 6-inch sewer lateral. • The public utility plan is revised to relocate the public storm sewer as noted. • The exact location of the monument sign will be discussed further, but it has been confirmed that it can be located in the public utility easement subject to certain terms. • Based on additional information provided by the project geotechnical engineer, an option for infiltration of storm runoff from the building and site paving on-site may be pursued as an alternative to the storm configuration shown on the submitted drawings. Infiltration testing will be performed as part of the engineering analysis associated with the building permit process. The design will comply with the requirements of the City of Lake Oswego and comply with Oregon DEQ Underground Injection Control system requirements. End of Supplemental Narrative information 59 7650 SW Beveland Street IlvIK TM RIPPEY Suite ,Oregon Oregon 97223 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Phone: 503 443 3900 Fax: 503 443 3700 email:kkoroch@tmrippey.com Project Memorandum March 3, 2014 West Coast Self Storage Lake Oswego Project Number: 10309 Response to memorandum dated February 5, 2014 from Lake Oswego Fire Marshal LU 14 0006, 5650 Rosewood Street We discussed this project with Gert Zoutendijk and agree that access to the building for fire protection is limited due to building size and placement on the site. It was agreed that the design team would continue to work with the fire marshal's office to achieve an alternative solution that meets the code requirements. This will occur as part of the permit approval process. P:12010 Projects110309 WCSS Lake Oswego\Fire12014-3-3 Incomplete Notofication Fire Response Memorandum.doc 60 7650 SW Beveland Street TM RIPPEY suite l,0 Tigard,Oregon 97223 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Phone: 503 443 3900 Fax: 503 443 3700 email:kkoroch@tmrippey.com Project Memorandum March 24, 2014 West Coast Self Storage—Lake Grove Civil Engineering Project Number 10309 Supplementary Storm Drainage Information This memorandum is a supplement to the drainage analysis prepared for this project and dated January 2014. Based on additional information provided by the project geotechnical engineer, an option for infiltration of storm runoff from the building and site paving on-site may be pursued as an alternative to the storm configuration shown on the submitted drawings. Infiltration testing will be performed as part of the engineering analysis associated with the building permit process. The design will comply with the requirements of the City of Lake Oswego and comply with Oregon DEQ Underground Injection Control system requirements. The geotechnical engineer provided a preliminary factored infiltration rate of 20 inches per hour. The peak runoff from the roof and paved areas of the site,based on a 50 year 24 hour event is 0.79 cubic feet per second. Based on this a percolation surface area of 1,706 square feet is required. This can be accommodated by three 6 inch perforated pipes laid parallel on a bed with a base surface of 220 ft. by 8 ft. Runoff from the paved areas would be treated with a Contech Stormf 1terTM cartridge treatment system similar to what is shown in the previously provided calculations. T roof runoff does not require treatment per current DEQ UIC requirements. ..PROF ia 1550 d4 v 4/4 P:12010 Projects\I0309 WCSS Lake OswegolStor I\Drainage Analysis12014-3-24 Supplementary Drainage Memorandum.doc Q �� EXP1Rt5: 0.'a0�s J 62 c it-22' 6 tif JAN 272014 • TREE STUDY AND PROTECTION PLAN West Coast Self Storage (WCSS) Development Site at 2S I E 18BD Located Between Boones Ferry Road and Rosewood Street Lake Oswego, Clackamas County, Oregon • PREPARED FOR T. M. Rippey Consulting Engineers 7650 S. W. Beveland Road Suite 100 Portland, Oregon 97223 • PREPARED BY Don Richards, President Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 2355 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 ♦ TREE STUDY DATES Tree Study Dates: July 2 and 3, 2013 • REPORT DATES July 3, 2013 (Updated) November 27, 2013 Copywrite@ Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 EXHIBIT F-3 LU 14-0006 63 z� pCt Table of Contents 1.0 Scope and Limitation of Work 1.1 General 1.2 Timetable 1.3 Engineering Requirements 2.0 Standards 2.1 General 2.2 Reference Standards and Guidelines 3.0 Existing Tree Inventory 3.1 Identification of Existing Trees 4.0 Existing Tree Conditions 4.1 Healthy Trees 4.2 Unhealthy Trees 4.3 Dead Trees 5.0 Tree Protection Plan 5.1 TPZ- "Tree Protection Zone" 5.0 Qualifications, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 5.1 Qualification 5.2 Assumptions 5.3 Limiting Conditions Certification of Tree Study Photographic Exhibits 1 - 9 Proposed Development - Tree Overlay Exhibit Appendix A- Tree Inventory Appendix B - Tree Mature Canopy Spread Specifications 64 Existing Conditions Tree Study and Tree Protection Plan for West Coast Self Storage (WCSS) Lake Oswego, Oregon Prepared For: T. M. Rippey Consulting Engineers 7650 S. W. Beveland Road Suite 100 Portland, Oregon 97223 Prepared By: Don Richards Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 2355 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Certified Arborist Consulting Arborist,ASCA Certified Arborist,ISA#PN-5536A Certified Professional Horticulturist,ASHS Reg.#25543 OCCB#143325 METRO License#6409 July 3, 2013 (Updated) November 27, 2013 Copywrite©Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 65 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27,2013 1.0 Scope and Limitation of Work 1.1 General 1.1.1 A request was made by T. M. Rippey Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Rippey), the design engineers for this project, on behalf of West Coast Self Storage (WCSS), for a consulting arborist's existing conditions tree study/tree protection plan containing a preliminary analysis of the trees on the site utilizing drawings provided by the project engineers to identify each tree 5" DBH' and larger by type and existing condition. Any Heritage trees, dead trees or invasive tree species will be reported as part of this tree study/tree protection plan. The existing conditions study will be used by the project engineers in preparing their initial development plan(s) to explore construction options that may retain the greatest number of trees on the site. The tree protection plan will be used as a guideline for adequate tree protection and mitigation. WCSS plans to develop this site in to a self storage facility. This scope of work shall include reporting of all applicable tree-related requirements for the site as outlined by the City of Lake Oswego's Tree Code Section 55 inclusive and other applicable titles in the City's Municipal Code. 1.1.2 The arborist's activities will take place in two phases. As Phase 1, a pre-construction tree inventory was conducted on July 2 and 3, 2013 and includes the location of each tree (5" DBH or larger) on the entire site and just off-site. The tree inventory includes the genus of each tree, the current size of each tree measured in DBH, and all other pertinent or special tree information associated with this project. As Phase 2, a pre-construction tree protection plan has been completed as of November 27, 2013. 1.1.3 The trees that were inventoried on the site or just off-site were found to be in varying degrees of health. Seventeen on-site, non-invasive trees are in good condition. Nine on-site, non-invasive trees are in fair condition. Four on-site, non-invasive trees are in poor condition. One non-invasive tree just off-site was in fair condition. One non- invasive tree just off-site was in poor condition. Five trees on-site are invasive species. Three trees on-site are already dead. All trees are tagged with metal tree tags. See Appendix A. 1 DBH=Diameter at breast height measured at approximately 4.5' above mean ground level. , WCSS-Lake Oswego,Oregon 1 66 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27,2013 1.0 Scope and Limitation of Work (continued) 1.1 General (continued) 1.1.4 There are a total of 40 trees of assorted species and sizes identified on the entire site or just off-site. Placement of the structure and utilities was examined in an effort to retain trees on the site. After review, it was determined that 10 trees on-site and 2 trees just off- site will be proposed for retention. This is a 25% retention rate on- site plus another 5% just off-site. Twenty of these trees 40 will be proposed for removal to construct a development approved and allowed pursuant to Lake Oswego Code under a Type II permit application. Three additional trees are already dead and are proposed for removal pursuant to Lake Oswego Code under a separate Dead Tree permit application. Five additional trees are invasive species and are proposed for removal pursuant to Lake Oswego Code under a separate Invasive Species Tree permit application. All 40 of these trees are 5"DBH or larger. 1.2 Timetable 1.2.1 A timetable for completion of our part of Phase 1 for the project was confirmed as the week of July 1, 2013 and Phase 2 the week of November 25, 2013. 1.3 Engineering Requirements 1.3.1 The project engineers will need to provide a tree dripline plan to scale for all existing trees 5" DBH or larger using the spread specifications for each tree's current size as described on Appendix A. 1.3.2 The project engineers will need to provide a tree canopy plan to scale for all existing trees 5" DBH or larger using the spread specifications for each tree's mature size as described on Appendix B. 1.3.3 The project engineers will need to provide a tree removal plan to scale for all existing live and non-invasive species trees 5" DBH or larger (20 trees total) within the construction zone or within 10 feet of the construction zone. 1.3.4 The project engineers will need to provide a tree protection fencing plan to scale for all existing trees 5" DBH or larger that will remain within 10 feet of the construction zone, WCSS-Lake Oswego, Oregon 2 67 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27,2013 2.0 Standards 2.1 General 2.1.1 Research and documentation for this tree study and tree protection plan and the attachments consists of: 1) An identification of trees on the site or just off-site by common and botanical genus names; 2)A measurement of trees identified on the site or just off-site by size in DBH; 3)A visual inspection of trees on the site or just off-site for quality and general health prior to construction, including photographic exhibits representing the types and sizes of trees identified in the tree inventory; 5)A numeric rating (0-3) for condition; 6)A numeric rating (0-3) for preservation; 7)A drawing indicating the trees that were studied by numeric key. 2.2 Reference Standards and Guidelines 2.2.1 Measurements for this study are based on the American Standard for Nursery Stock, revision ANSI Z60.1-2004 and the National Arborist Association Standards for Tree Measurements, ninth edition. 2.2.2 Common and botanical genus names referred to in this study are based on vernacular currently used to describe similar goods or products in the national nursery industry and correspond to plant names and listings found in Hortus III,Fourth Edition, 2004. 2.2.3 The reporting format used,to present the findings in this document follows the current guidelines found in Guide To Report Writing For ConsultingArborists, 1995. 3.0 Existing Tree Inventory 3.1 Identification of existing trees 3.1.1 The existing tree inventory with current sizes in DBH and ratings is as follows... 1) See the attached Tree Inventory data identified as Appendix A. 2) See the attached Tree Mature Canopy Specifications data identified as Appendix B. WCSS-Lake Oswego,Oregon 3 68 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27, 2013 4.0 Existing Tree Conditions 4.1 Healthy Trees 4.1.1 There are 17 non-invasive live trees in good condition located on the site. 4.1.2 The live tree canopy currently in fair to good condition consists of both coniferous, broadleaved evergreen and deciduous tree types made up from native, naturalized and invasive species. There are 9 live, non-invasive, deciduous trees greater than 5" DBH and 4 live, invasive species, deciduous trees greater than 5" DBH on the site. There are 17 live, coniferous trees greater than 5" DBH on the site and 1 other just off-site. These trees have developed reasonable canopies dependant on their location, availability of light/nutrients, competition with each other and with invasive plant species (i.e. English ivy-Hedera.helix). 4.2 Unhealthy Trees 4.2.1 The unhealthy tree canopy is somewhat depressed and consists of coniferous, deciduous and broadleaf evergreen tree types in poor condition made up from native, naturalized and invasive species. There are 4 live, but relatively unhealthy deciduous trees greater than 5" DBH on the site. There is I live, but relatively unhealthy invasive species, broadleaf evergreen tree greater than 5" DBH on the site. There is I live, but relatively unhealthy coniferous trees greater than 5" DBH just off-site. 4.2.2 These trees have developed poor canopies dependant on their location, availability of light/nutrients, competition with each other and with invasive plant species (i.e. English ivy -- Hedera helix). Some trees appear to be diseased (i.e. leaf spot and scab). 4.3 Dead Trees 4.3.1 There are 3 dead trees located on the site. 4.3.2 The dead tree canopy consists of both coniferous and deciduous tree types made up from native and invasive species. There is 1 existing, but dead deciduous tree greater than 5" DBH and 2 existing, but dead coniferous trees greater than 5" DBH on the site. These trees have died from unknown causes well before consideration of development occurred. WCSS-Lake Oswego, Oregon 4 69 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27, 2013 5.0 Tree Protection and Mitigation 5.1 Delineation of a "Tree Protection Zone" 5.1.1 Protect the 10 trees designated for retention during excavation and construction. Delineation of a "tree protection zone" shall be established as a distance of 5 feet from each tree as defined by the drip line during initial observations made in July 2013 and from observations made after minor excavation with an air knife in November 2013. This "tree protection zone" shall be marked using 6 foot tall, chain-link fencing around all trees to remain and shall be installed prior to commencement of excavation or construction. 5.1.2 A sign clearly identifying this area as a "tree protection zone" should be placed on the fencing and on all construction drawings. This sign should contain the phone number of the certified arborist or owner's representative. 5.1.3 The "tree protection zone" shall be protected at all times from chemicals and contaminants, which may be injurious to the root systems of trees. 5.1.4 The "tree protection zone" shall be protected at all times from excess water, mud or debris as a result of excavation and construction. 5.1.5 The "tree protection zone" shall be protected at all times from erosion or sediment depositing as a result of excavation and construction. 5.1.6 The "tree protection zone" shall be protected at all times from compaction and mechanical tamping as a result of excavation and construction. 5.1.7 No machinery will be allowed in the "tree protection zone" of the trees to be retained during excavation or construction, unless approved by the consulting arborist. Soil excavation outside the "tree protection zone" is expected to be accomplished mechanically. Any soil excavation allowed inside the "tree protection zone" is expected to be accomplished manually. 5.1.8 Any roots greater than 3 inches in diameter that may be encountered outside the "tree protection zone" should be pruned with a hand saw and should be severed cleanly without ripping the bark. WCSS-Lake Oswego,Oregon S 70 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27,2013 5.0 Tree Protection and Mitigation (continued) 5.1 Delineation of a "Tree Protection Zone" (continued) 5.1.9 The consulting arborist is required to be on call/on site during the excavation and construction phase of the project to insure compliance with the specifications outlined in this report. 5.1,10 Pre-excavation and construction care of the trees to be retained shall include; but not limited to; pruning of limbs and branches that may be impacted as a result of excavation or construction activities. 5.2 Mitigation 5.2.1 Mitigation of trees removed for construction will be required at a 1:1 ratio. Trees should be selected from the list of approved species available from the City of Lake Oswego planning department. Trees used for mitigation must be a minimum of 2" caliper if deciduous trees and 6-7 feet tall if coniferous trees and a landscape plan delineating which specific trees are for being used as mitigation must be submitted with the construction drawings. 6.0 Qualifications, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 6.1 Qualifications 6,1.1 Mr. Richards is a consulting arborist under certification with ASCA, American Society of Consulting Arborists and the ISA, International Society of Arboriculture with certification number PN5536-A, and a Certified Professional Horticulturist under certification with the American Society for Horticultural Science with License number 25543, he is licensed by the State of Oregon as a contractor under license number 143325, by METRO under license number 6409 and by the City of Lake Oswego, OR license number. Mr. Richards is a member in good standing with all of these organizations and is therefore qualified to perform this consultation. 6.2 Assumptions 6.2.1 Any legal descriptions provided to the consultant are assumed to be correct.Any titles and/or ownerships to any property or services are assumed to be true and accurate. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. WCSS-Lake Oswego,Oregon 6 71 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27,2013 6.0 Qualifications, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions (continued) 6.2 Assumptions (continued) 6.2.2 It is assumed that the property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations. 6.2.3 Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable and up to date sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, as the consultant, Mr. Richards can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. Information provided by the client in association with this consultation is assumed to be correct and accurate to the best of their knowledge. 6.3 Limiting Conditions 6.3.1 The limited use of this tree study/tree protection plan is to offer an existing conditions analysis in regards to the trees on the site and best management practices for existing tree retention and removal by the client in performing their tasks when they are developing this property under all codes and requirements. 6.3.2 As the consultant, Mr. Richards has not been asked to render any opinions legal in character. 6.3.3 Mr. Richards is not an attorney. This tree study/tree protection plan is not intended as, and does not represent legal advice and should not be relied upon to take the place of such advice. Although every effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the information included in this tree study/tree protection plan as of the date which it was issued, laws, court, and arbitration decisions and governmental regulations in the United States and Oregon are all subject to frequent change. 6.3.4 Current information is to be included in all the standards and duties of evaluation, investigations, interpretations, methodology and contradictions in determining the failure for claims and litigation. 6.3.5 As the consultant, Mr. Richards may be asked to give testimony or to attend pre-application meetings with City Staff and/or with the City's Development Review Commission by reason of this tree study. WCSS-Lake Oswego, Oregon 7 72 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27,2013 6.0 Qualifications, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions (continued) 6.3 Limiting Conditions (continued) 6.3.6 Loss or alteration of any part of this tree study/tree protection plan or its attachments may invalidate the entire report. 6.3.7 Possession of this tree study/tree protection plan or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed without prior written or verbal consent from the consultant. 6.3.8 Neither all nor part of the contents of this tree study/tree protection plan, nor copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without the prior, expressed, written or verbal consent of the consultant - particularly as to conclusions, identity of the consultant, or any reference to a professional society or institute or to any initialed designation conferred upon the consultant as stated in the qualifications listed. 6.3.9 This tree study and any information expressed herein represents the opinion of the consultant, and is in no way contingent upon a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. WCSS--Lake Oswego, Oregon 8 73 Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc. November 27, 2013 CERTIFICATION OF TREE STUDY/TREE PROTECTION PLAN I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: • The statements of facts contained in this tree study/tree protection plan are true and correct. • The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. • I have no undisclosed interest in the trees that are the subject of this tree study/tree protection plan. • I have no bias with respect to the trees that are the subject of this tree study/tree protection plan or to the parties involved with this assignment. e My engagement in this assignment is not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. • The compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined direction that favors the cause of the client, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this tree study/tree protection plan. • The analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this tree study/tree protection plan has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and it is subject to review by their duly authorized representatives. e Don Richards. President-AHC. Inc. • PN-5536-A Arborist's Name and Title Arborist's Signature and ISA Cert.Number • Tully 2 and 3. 2013 e November 27, 2013 As-Of Date for Inspection Date of Final Tree Study-Protection Plan P_.� �I Itl:i-71 WCSS—Lake Oswego, Oregon 9 74 PH It TOGLZEPTEEC I XEMICTS 75 Photographic Exhibits West Coast Self Storage Proposed Site Lake Oswego, Oregon • 4 S yy f `� ` 11'1 l'J4 �V T `spSp �� L i� 1 �t' � �it, RLQ r 4 , > � I s `, ''.• ✓%r, A. _ is .. tie. . i.i k { . ."" t •*r•' ".7',..:••-7-4-;,:'',','e_ +. s t 6 ' ";`}F LK - 'ru-. r yi- Trees 1, 2, 3 and 6 Exhibit 1 76 Photographic Exhibits I --,T.-. („ . . , • ..,-. , 1 ... , L ,L, ). lip . ' 41,,,,it, • .4„ , , •'--\:4 t'. f. •- —' - •Ia.-', At -• 1.,,-4-.7.r..4; 1, . • •.... '1. l' '. '" ..• ,t• - :4:' '' *• %le••••:•^'Ai'',---\ , , k ' '? t' , :I. •1 '-'"71.t4e7., "-...."".'..,. _.,..__ . . , '.' •.,4\: rr. ,- ..., . 4.; "et—•._.--... • / '!‘•:• i.;.-,7= 4* ''''' • •:' t 1 .", • I ' .•I_ • ...t. r ,. . . litt ' iii0:t''. • • i,4'4...!..e itt‘,, sk"'N "`-••••': , ....„ . .4 . ,-,, •'. . " \. ._ ,•:r1.•;.: , 9 1 iL , , , il L'..4r. ,..s' ) -c \ • r :. ')W..e1.1. ...:44; 1' Z=.,-14. . _-\,_,._.! ":,,,.," :. i• •'.4 • •" l'".. ' .., 9 . ... 11.,,t. :•:.,'..\ -'‘,..).z.v.‘43k%t„.. ...1 ..' t.;, • \\.,\ te:Or. „1?4,,,,,,, t,4. , .... .- ',.'.'e..•: i .:'k:..,•,;;;?7:4 - 7,.-):::‘,:irt.4...'. i ' \ , .• • r:k... It I, ,,,... ., iy -• ..,.,1,..1'4 ',;..4.• .'"7...4•••• ='" ,t.''• a...• ''''.;•. ..Y4'' ..:q,..".,,'''''tik,s, ' ', : .---. '' „r''''• Le're-, ' - ..,.-, . ' ?,,Viirk.-\N., ... -...\ .• , 1:.le, . -• , . ' ' ---i.•. 4, v • ... .-. '-\\,, " -',.4'Z"..N•t. - ''.'t 4k. \ .., " ••Ir. ",:;''• ...1‘.‘./k Tree 6 Dead -,- '4 . 4 A ..• • •.)kat ..sr:f4.,....‘...,. .7.-* ,0. ,.. 4 .• . . g, .;.' '. . .1' '-• .A 2,' ,....- r',,...trit.se'--It",340.,..-,r 1;.-.- :tt yr" .,-1:r'loki"e4S.A1 .:4'. ''.•* --..:,•••--0 ....,-'''‘:-.' .....,0*-.5.-,..„- '•'. --:'lt.47,,t.-.*:*`",,,.,:**,!*1; 4.,. '.....1.-'4„.VVc".2, ,*-* .'''r.'11,-:* ''-:-.. *V a--*.-..4.:= '*:.--. **1; 7*-t 4- ,.:-.'-'''.-W,:- .7"-..0"- "IF 5,).14?*,-1'';•62 '*. K.:.„ ,,. i,' i.,--A•-"*41- ., 'A'-314 ...,-,'' . %, . \' ,- 'A',iv.V„,, ,, ....•:•,--ir. --11, .c.?..._C:• --..... • : . - '7' '''-1::" -.• ','^"-., ..- ,,.-,r•--"•' , .W'::.'I:,.;7) ..,' • 4 T':. . ''''''...:17'..r',;.<.,'..';')i'. ' 4' P .r;',. '',.."-,..-,74,,, '''':... .' A , ;• '`,i' ' 447t- --,.`,:kr : '6 re§, ,•:',' .,..:,'"'t' ''s-i. '''''-"' %',"71):'/•-•.- .-°•': '5'''';•' .,;,f1'.:" '',.,L . .,„ j-'-'4\I•, ....- , .,'.-,,. . ."._-„'O.-•.,;,?i. ;,.. Ir..t." ,:`,„•-". 1.,ZA .;''+- ,,'L ,,TY- „,..•...MS.,...'"col 1 :,.1-r . , • ,...,..-, ... ,.„ . *.46". ' " ,41.;":..,,,_=•,:.-5-''''.:41.::ik-. •:iii,gj'. It. ..,,,r,,i•"_:,,,'•4,...',... ,.,,..4L, , 1.- '..k,1---4..,. - • 4..-j ' ':. .r. ‘.'''.• -,..',.:, . r e*'Iti4v--.* .,.ie-• `',.' : 1°'-',''',....'', ,..7--.c.!.. ,'4"-;t,f,''''. -- • ..,1:,;.., ...4./.,,,A, -,-.11, i-r.: - -,,,- ,I,•ri:-.-..f,---°-,.,.'0:::::,7:,-,4,',1 0,,.,... ..- -"1t,.-1, ..,..,1o .:.,.. ,,i1..,,..,#,.'.4.;-. i,„t.',,e,1,4,!L°,-.1-...,.„;'..,-.0•.,.-3_.'...0.,-),",\..,,,7„,,,,4..-,'.,....:,N.....t.i-,t.,,A,-, ,-,7„,t,!....,•.,,...... .,...!.,1—.•,--.,'..7,i ,4 : • tq „ a „, .,1 -,•'-. L ,...,:,,,,.,s,„,......rr,?.k..;'•,P•-i•.•.-d•... 4-'.'..,. ,„; -..,_.,7`. i. -',,,,...,-. --i'..,-,', :•ip,,t tr,V.;. . L)- : ...r ''-•''' 770.47A1,,,jeA,;:,.' '`S'-„. *'4:' 'I.'Lti''' 'I. :4:,- - '11 '.' ' 1''''".' ' ' ''A ; '''"i. 0'4:r_ ••...a -1,4 --zT .'.1': -' .•7..— :-...-•IL., ..1 .. .-..;„:.....•.•.,,I N. ,,1 ;-••;1 , .,..,, • ” .. • ,,,.*..14....;.-e.-.. ..-i..L,., ,,.:.,...i . L.. ----2, ,... ...',-,,,, ..-,.:,...;.,,;. "4.-4,.-•'.‘,,,,,,,..,-, -71,1' i,) ,:',-.:73' " =.' 4"'•'''' ,'...•..'"4',....... :.-7- '•••• '' _•• %.:-,4".42"...— ' ' ..••••.' "="^,."•';-,."' , : : '4•t- ' ; '" ' -. •. ..',0:.1. Ar ..:-.... ,....- .•. " -" '"--" • Trees 4 and 5 Exhibit 2 77 Photographic Exhibits h ++ ys w ,, _.4.,....-A• _.„, • -• '� , ' hF �' si h • �. , s � ,' p,1¢ 1 .t, •' 'dre. - -1/41.-07.n.,, -.i'' ile ,1} + V r•-',-'-15yyuag: . . - '' a4. yx � 4 , „_,-....- -4.40,1„tc 7 1:44 t''''''" 4.,:714.• -4,... '' =7 '- ,i 4...A"- .;,.:;'''-=',-,.--.,,A4 , •,, :;,, ,— ,..',..-2,,,l-co,.1.;=,;.., - ..... ,:r ,,''' ,..„ , . _,;. , . . „4„.:,: ,:.„„.„ ..,.. ...,,,,, ,t, , ,,x . ,... . . t '-'. t Trees 7 and 8 • r ' , ., Oh , -'' e fi _f,,..., 1440,. bc= r � _ �.yy a�l.f tet ze` F 3 c ^` �. yp&:'•' - k.7 ; ,a`.. r ,Mit �' y. +ff� or p.� . 5 5• g .7.- rte' t'i"J f ,,yl K =7F' I. . te C - 4,3;'-':.• ,' .t .r - Z.. , ,,, 7 .ai A t. , ,.-, _,.....t • J rJr' .S � y ' 1 Sw : ,t ' *-i ,',' - ' •.11:e „ '.' ri, { ' ,y ---,Ott,— . i ! os-t7 • ,, ° W _ rd-sr ,a -;,!,„:1-,;:.,..c. , - '. _ y1 3w+ , 'Yip a rf ^ ' " " { " ` . - ; ��• ,�a ' ,1 I r� ` 45. - • r {a Tree 9 1 Exhibit 3 1 78 Photographic Exhibits "" +� a�1. • vs�a „ ..,::47-,' . t. -7.!:;•c."...5",.- . --.••(•-‘ mss' ' .0•••e ' � J. g. .t.,--.1.' ir- • 'SY` f t 7i k moi;.' �„ .a ra.4 ,•;;4:4. bg • -. *,' 4-14,..ro ti 4 -:' Trees 10, 11, 12 and 13 - ti . r '4 '. • _ ,x:. i;.--;:,..,!..-7 , .00 , +� "#, x� ,.. J • , 1y i.:,:-.,-',77:-• -?-`3,,V.,%_-4-' ''' aR Nike 7 I+- 4 i..• '.,'"- 1�.1, M' �1 Vv ,.�- ... 4' 4..{ y,;` 7� �� 4,ir Tree 2 Dead Exhibit 4 1 79 Photographic Exhibits i...41,4,---''''711'!„;•- A; Iv .Fys d7Y_ 14. A ♦x M z r asf, `' ' 5 — z - 4.s•- . s � •+Tt rG r w - _ # 3^ Xti - 'Se^f b ..69; q + 4' ;,,l'' '.41+1. ly ' r. C \S ' L. L'^. r R �.:4.4./,,,,,.,"...,_,t- 10„..,- I''§ :74,L, kE -'y r r Tree 23 .� k1 �; ' ?s 'ice�' � ; —�, - F ,4- ,-. ' $-, ":::: .fE yrY �y� :`1 , 't t1.-:!) ,iiT t [� L f. LS� i A }# ::,:.-.'',:.,.':,'..,..''t4'tH,:..,;':ji.i:F: y. sw. 3 i iit .7' • Trees 11 and 12 Exhibit 5 80 1 Photographic Exhibits 1 L '.1 Tin 3_ T" sc., : ,,t.& ,, , *4, f, Az. iRt -F + Axtlf J v _ '` r _ ." .- .f,s tam -_ 3t A i Trees 13, 14 and 15 ti' ,, lt.''ft:.4:::...:,,,:4::,'' '''''''KP:illi%;'?:1. r i .'M, f " `<` `;'•iw7kr .,rl a M q' A %S, d \ *'' ' rt/ , 4 ,F. I.'' •fit. "k ` �"I P. 45 s } • 4k lir, :, # ,. . L 7 ':. ' 3 9 :4'..;*., f s \\ ,�3.{ '''.°,p }, , r. /rye,,, ♦ , 1. ',y"I, H Y a� r. -, .e..4 T4 t 1 ,, - a .. ` � .....-i.: ,.f°Aa �" • moi, .. a E .„� . R +:fir s Tree 19 Dead 1 Exhibit 6 i 81 • Photographic Exhibits 1 .. _,,, ..,.. 'V • .. -- ,..,. 1,,''ci"'FT ..). • • • - ..-..,L. ,P,k-••.4.- r'''. , .''' t r '' 7''• . 2\ '..-.. :...'-kii' ',- -- '' '-'. ,•:•ii,-,.4 _ 1: ...„, .--:- : 1.1.•, - •.' .. . n. • ,0„.1.,,,•,,. • 7 '. k .V.',.,,..1,—....-,.-i're<.:4`• ..,. 4.,*- f.4, :. f!,..4.4.., .,,--;11$7,01...,. ':"' :..:-' ii.' 01-• A'. ,. ' ON - • ."" . .. •'• ....'N --"" N *,'"46.-,^ ..-'..... .... : ''; ".$' ri.i.,,,,. 'I. • s . 1 ' :If' .„• . . ,I,,-'Fs •‘ ' ,4,.. , ... `,44 ' '''..1.'''t,.::. "N,..ei•-• „. ' ." .. .Ct.,. l''' ' •:.t-:', ?„,/g-' 4 s'''.24i;‘ ... '''' , •'•;\ ' "i'':;*. .-14.''''..•'':IN.L4)'*'. ,,,';'''''',. • . 50.1.)v_x-.. .711,' 'f';''. - • - • • . .o,„i . ,,l - :. ',.',;-.1^ 7 ,!. 9:•-• - .:. ! 7 • 5i4!*:, ': ' -\ ' •."--?„ -.1•A:* '2•••"'"••'.' A4"',' • , ,'tc,t, 7-,;-7.„,!, • -.•.* ..., • 2 •.'•'-l!'••"• .- .- . ' . •;/:--" ' •..L.'',',. ' IC•••'..' ^,''-'i,. • :••'INIA..•i4 -. • . .•'r•c' - . ,-;"..*'4' ;r: . . 111.::'''''''''''2';‘,.,4 -- ' ' i . .„ . ‘1, „, ..ic. .,' " -'''''.4.1,,".' , 'y,„.: 1-.•,e,- -,..li .1"-:,....' ; ' ' --r- '? . . ' . . . '' ' '1 '': .-,.i' ',' ' ' • '''' ' ''',V .'/,'±''..'..;. ' -2,..,:i..Yt;,. -,/ .,,. •'r=,w.).-..1.- ., ,,-.-7,,!,_:-, ,h,t ,..... .,. : . . iiv ---,,--..,''' .. ' ' •-. ''..e,. il-6 '' .' ''' ..1,„,.^.5-"Cv J',41•1''' . — .-- ..' `+' '-'• . —-"-t-,,,,''. .,,' 1.3,'. "', ',,' : . .. . ''';' '''';.. '''7..*''*• -21''' • Tree 20 and Tree 21 -"- -— - . - v.,P ,,...1. ...,._.•,%,,:,•,, 1 t-I'-'1 '''' 7;°F 7'' ....., 1". ---,_.s"-.'• 2 ---?", ,• .- i..„,!5... • • IF .te b.. .. - - L.'-'''' . '•, 1'''.'rkk, ir .i" . • '-',...e"L'Vx--', . ^.P..'--:f, . 4 , •', .1''7°. '\':, ,... .„ ...• ..,,',,r,,k.,, •'', f, • ' , i..\.!,,l'- , . .. • . .v - ....1.1.• '''.4..\ , . .4 ,-• ' ,,,,,s7. .1.:,.: - ,• ,-., ', • . , . :-. ,: ,,,,,,, , . ....e 4; .".... . ....,. • •-. • ;.••. .-f-• •to.;... --,"-,..", 4: ; . - - -.--gs--.:.,-.. .!,-,,--1.::„..,,.. . , ._ ..-, ,,,-- •a , ,.. y.,....,„fid,4 ..,... I ., t 41-..t„ • 1 AI ' . ...g. T..., • ,...,.... .t.-0-L.., :".. .,,,,,..-.:i. ......, . •ttiii..4„,,e._ ...t , ' : ...I .r., ..4nr.fl p'.L-': , ,: ,-.' • .. 14-';:z.-r-..tr::?'-' .,.L;--1-i. g!, -'--": )1. ',',--:--' -:li.---,-'''...,,',..',.4re.-:2".1 . . - ": v4,,,,.... • A. " '''' . :-..''..-ft."--'04:- •.,. ....oke...z.. .k.--- 1. :,.,•-•.--:...,-.•••••••,i:•••,1,‘,• • . .. ... ., .• -10. • . -•,,, . . " '', 1•- .A4. 4_,_2.,%....,1...•4J_,.2,T,:.kzZ-.Il4k-....-tti..4• .7.-_• ‘t -•, -?. ..1, .' '..--•'–,,.,.. ._4.. ---.":..t. .----=--•.---:-,-.-:-": .:. ._e........::.,":"..',...„.-,';;;',,,...;,- . -..----- ;•,......1-,:::-&..si.: -----,., „-.,--:e.-:‘,.!„:::•.:: '-`:;:—.-4 ...A: ' ' - -. . - !-/.- - - ..,-.,:•'-.7-',.'.;;:5-":1:',-, •''''''' :",-.p'-i-s.'',. — • ,..' -•,'. '' -.r,' .r.,•,,•..--_- -:,•• -••L.LLt.t...t...3 .*',.,-4,.......,„,,.,-....,2- .tZ-- ,14- ;•,,,i,--2 At...,,,,i.n •4.1:0;..- ....: e;., sta...ft.... .-...,.27,,,..10- ,,...,.- ,,r,.1.• .• :.;:,...--,-1: 1 .• -:. -:'.1"' ''',-.--1^,-,5•--'--,4••' ,._‘',."-.`::,c,‘,41, _ ,- ZS ,7 4— •4- : ' ..:7.' -,'1'•''',W te13.Pt - -''.7-,:-..i.*-• .- '"->--vs".... ‘,7•7t-4„;1‘ .4ric....,'I-,- . Tree 24 Exhibit 7 i 1 . 82 Photographic Exhibits •zk.,, !..:.''`..,...t';'•:...:-..._•y 1,�`Y� I'FY's1. ,.`t � t Y°.,--. y } ''a �f - ;-• tier r. ,4„, f� ^,!`�.• •tS' , r. ,z ' • ,tom ,• 4, a,• ti 4r$ ` �'{}i :. f +*r` s �a ti` F , It Tree 25 ._,.,.,,,,,,.f .,..,.. . „.. , ,,, ..,„. „ ..c,... ,„ , ,.... .„,„ „ , {j , .-..� ,(k 4,--7,-. .:,,;.;.. 'R k y.'`'W',' .4 ems" F r �r µi,. �sF �: 1 C .r r " r s � ,y r~� T^v t : .,...„,,,,•: .„,-- f ,,, f .2 • ! '*t riS' -b. F lit •h . '..4•,,,F.... t r` � ♦� S?. .4 7 t7' •. • u s.7 to A.Iz .. _ _ • .,` P{.. _ Tree 26 Exhibit 81 83 Photographic Exhibits I ..„ ... . . • J,. ., .- Ilki- / . .‘. . .. L. _ • I • , ; . ‘ 1.4.44 , ,.-:' 'At- - -, 9r• . --moir. -----,,, 1•-• 5P.'''''l ` '- ' "' . 17 :l';', • ./ . , •, • • -., , -,-1-.. „01 • ' .t.• '• (( ‘,"r II :104•)te s:1-1 .:• ,• , -,-. .••. •• *4 f*,,,' W: 1-4.•' 114,k. „,..ep. fe k I . 1 ' • I? .. 1 .. , • if .,... .. r•V it.. 4 ' 7` '. - •" .;" i • • -• :, Tree 32 - Diseased and Included Bark t. ••'..,.....?t-- -`.4-1,1Lt,,-..t.,,;:,.#,,) I!. ‘,...,.,-• , :411.,i,.::.',.,-., ,'.i _147— .• , ,..u.i.iff,;W:.i.' '1...1-,Z',.I k..e...)-. .•._ .........,',.;1,z.-, r. . ...ci.,%.b.. '4 . ,: -Lt• ii..Sti'T v%.4. 1 •f • ,..,..1,... tQ.,,,,-.„ _ , e• , • • - i .- Niw- - - -•- • 1,1 --•,.- -.,-.24,. -v-,'--i '. ''' ''..,.,.:V4,;-.. 7-,...-;:r:-. -.I .t„, ---70'-.•, 4- ---, cc,..r-t''';'..-c'-iit..,,, -4,,: -..,:c. ,,- 6•' 6' ,•,-,;;Z.,.. ,,.. #, N ,.' ir,,,`, - .1, ..,r,•.1.: i.„*.4:ir;t„,...fi,''.4;i,„1:1;•,.•4 ,g 4 , - ,,,..:... ;.-,0,4rt,16 e.44Nrs.4.-- '-• , '' - * .44.:..,.i„ :':.t%...-. '''..\--.1-:- ..,,,...: •ccfc,,-: ' cAl,.... . , '......,- ,,c• , .. :v.:: 'lf..11- ' 1-1 7-•:'-'••• '?'';'q .•'''' -,.. .1.-- --' . . - .',. ' -i•---: v...- -... ;•1-''''.`Ar."'''14.4'''''''ff'-' ''••••"•V''.-1. • : '-'•"''' ''11:-'- ' . v ;,..., ••:.P.: .4'..-.!•.;,o.b,..;X•i'.." „.t..,,..:?.....'..j.,.j".?„ .i.,.4.44: ',,,-.....,..- :::44.-.. .... .4c7. ,, -,,,I..' k,' ,*.4-*,„:',.'5',,Y.'c, -,:'.it::'''.1"$-,,—W*-.-!":_fl Yr.'%.,..•..Ak-:$_-- *.'.4' ''''b.i. 41,4:et'. '' c . .. . iir' .'''''' '•IP'.1.1,,.:.,'' c.%.,,,..;71,,W7It.e:,0,...f!...,:tAt .„1'.''74,.',.' . -41-- i, -,,c.• 44. t. . I.l'...1.• V.44: -n"I'•t* '' ., ..t'.'''''• ' '41.4". q41'...1.''''' -#1.1.4'.... -.:.."5. ,4-V,4;:,- ''''''," =.:•'...t.."**.;:.....-`.-cr..' .6.-;;,... '-..-.... r.:*"..:, 1 11,..,.; --,..'. . f . .i.L.N...-'. . ..:.%...,—4 ;,'_....V.0',... P'''-'',-:' :"Iv ..,..K4.,?:• - .4;:li.. ' - .14, II I '''1- .1'; '':-'V' .'•'''':1 '.--7, : ...-.L4 .. '. , . ' , .".-..•..., . ...„,....!;....:::'..; :-._.•,,,, ...,',-,-.:4,..- -,i,44*--..\ :_.:-...! • ..,.,,„,..1,-.1‘ ,.., . _... , . _. g.'•' - `...', '''''',,-:—74.:!•,.....,-, --S';'' -.Pr'''.4. ,, —, - '... ....-- cr:. — -: - --..—..-_,;:;,....4',',., - ,-cc. -ri.-.,. ;,7,:.. '.-.... .., :.-..‘-..::::.• ,....;. r, ....,....."c -,.. -....-‘- -,' ,, - 4.,',..!.......,..--:.4d.'ic....-•••.......,-,...-c-c,---.- ,5'.." ,':•.,4,:r. ''''; l't '''.'"L. ' -•:.1''i `c.r.",;1'71..s,„..te,:„,-....<. ---,... e Tree 39 • Exhibit 9 1 84 TREE OVEMRY EXHIBXT 85 OF,12 " `� r l j AREA r CROS L1 CUP.ft It 421 ` :�.` F.Pif? PROPOSE Fes; _L � ! ♦ of-12 q " �DP-1J _ ir ---�`""�` I ,,,,- R("4 1 DE,r, , i.: ,,, ,. EL,„ ii . ,,,.. „33 y, ;q3„,• • ../ 0.7,2 WTI_, . . Or' ,E.-,.‘, 1 ,,. f r,_n.; y 11 I 7 I kII 1 , `ss , . I I 10' SEa.ACK i 4 q t. f � i ° PROPOS-0 CURB s,i£ EUILCIN z /,. zs,� 1 it s. . i - H:1E-15 11 `I II I Ii Pi DE-Z-13 _ � iii i 11 LiiEI7 ,..,,, Of Nj p 1' :I r � ,• .- _, 0 ••-; $ '- J, y • Ty _..�,�....-_ .,.Ili I ( 1 I� N i os S1Ml1 ,-• fry t = \ ,�28 :v;.r I;J :�f 86 L'' --�—''—a. / 3 1 I - ; sem.,f; 1 1,1 ?)V1\ )1%14. pip July 3,2013 • WCSS Tree Inventory AHC,Inc. Updated November 27,2013 TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION NUMBER (GENUS AND COMMON NAME) SIZE • AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING R=RETAIN (KEY) ( DBH) (0-3) (0-3) X=,REMOVE 1 I Pseudctsuga-Fir 27" SE Corner-Poor Condition-Covered With Ivy-(Actually Just Ott-Sitejl 1 1 R With Use of Pert.Pipe for Aeration-Just Off-Site 2 l Prunus-Sweet Cherry 14" SE Corner-Poor Condition-Covered With Ivy-Invasive Species I 1 0 I X Invasive Species 3 Alnus-Alder 8" SE Corner-Poor Condition-Covered With Ivy 1 j 1 X in Building Footprint 4 Pseudotsuga-Fir 20' pW-Fair Condition-Partially Covered With Ivy-(Actually Just Off-Site 2 I 2 R With Use of Perf.Pipe for Aeration-Just Off-Site 5 Pseudotsuga-Fir 34' SW-Good Condition 3 -I 3 i R With Enclosed Planter 6 Prunus-Sweet Cherry 24" SE-Dead Tree-Covered With Ivy-Invasive Species 0 0 X Dead Tree 7 Malus-Apple 13" W-Poor Condition-Diseased 1 1 X in Building Footprint 8 Ma/us-Apple 22" W-Poor Condition-Diseased-Many Broken Branches 1 1 X in Building Footprint 9 Malus-Apple 15" W-Fair Condition 2 3 X in Building Footprint 10 Pseudotsuga-Fir 33" W-Good Condition 3 3 X in Building Footprint 11 Pseudotsuga-Fir 13" W-Good Condition 3 I 3 •X in Building Footprint 12 Malus-Apple 20" W-Fair Condition-20 Degree Lean from Vertical to the South 2 3 R No Building Articulation Required 13 Pseudotsuga-Fir 34" W-Good Condition 3 3 X in Building Footprint 14 Pseudotsuga-Fir • 30" W-Good Condition i 3 3 X in Building Footprint 15 Acer-Norway Maple 13" W-Fair Condition-Partially Covered With Ivy-Invasive Species j 2 0 X Invasive Species 16 Pseudotsuga-Fir 22" W-Fair Condition-Partially Covered With Ivy ; 2 2 j R With Building Articulation 17 i Pseudotsuga-Fir 25" NW-Good Condition 3 3 I X in Building Footprint 18 Acer-Bigleaf Maple13" NW-Good Condition 3 l 3 R With Building Articulation 19 Thuja-Red Cedar g" NW-Dead Tree I 0 0 X Dead Tree 20 Acer-Bigleaf Maple 7" NW-Fair Condition I 3 I 3 R With Building Articulation 21 Cedrus-Deader Cedar 13" NW-Fair Condition-Partially Covered With Ivy I 2 2 l R With Building Articulation Appendix A Applied horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 1 July 3,2013 WCSS Tree Inventory AHC,Inc. Updated November 27,2013 TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION' NUMBER (GENUS AND COMMON NAME) SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING R=RETAIN (KEY) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) X=REMOVE 22 Pseudotsuga-Fir 14'' I Center-Dead Tree 0 0 X Dead Tree 23 Malus-Apple 12+7" Center-2 Stern-Poor Condition-Diseased I 1 1 X in Building Footprint 24 Aesculus-Horsechestnut 16" N-Good Condition I 3 i 3 X in Building Footprint 25 I Prunus-Purpleleaf Plum 14' I I Along Scones Ferry Rd.-Good Condition-In Vacated Road Easemer t 3 3 X In Vacated Road Easement 26 Crataegus-English Hawthorn 11" N Next To Boat Repair Co.-Good Condition-Invasive Species 3 0 X Invasive Species 27 Pseudotsuga-Fir 38" N-Good Condition 3 3 X in Building Footprint 28 Pseudotsuga-Fir i 31" I N-Good Condition 3 3 X in Building Footprint 29 Pseudotsuga-Fir 40" I N-Good Condition 3 3 I X in Building Footprint 30 Pseudotsuga-Fir _ 10" NE Corner-Good Condition 3 3 I X in Building Footprint 31 Pseudotsuga-Fir 15" NE Corner-Good Condition I 3 3 R With Use of Surface Curbing&Perf.Pipe for Aeration 32 Acer-Norway Maple 12" NE Corner-Poor Condition-Diseased-Invasive Species 1 0 X Invasive Species 33 Pseudotsuga-Fir . 7" NE-Good Condition ISurface CurbingPipe for Aeration 34. Pseudotsuga-Fir3 R With Use of 3 &Perf.22" E-Good Condition 3 I 3 R With Use of Surface Curbing&Perf.Pipe for Aeration 35 Pseudotsuga-Fir 20" E-Fair Condition-Partially Covered With Ivy 2 I 3 R With Use of Surface Curbing&Perf.Pipe for Aeration 36 Pseudotsuga-Fir 28" E-Good Condition 3 I 3 ! X in Building Footprint 37 Acer-Bigleaf Maple 9" W-Fair Condition 2 I 3 X in Building Footprint 38 Acer-Bigleaf Maple 7"' W-Fair Condition 2 ; 3 I X in Building Footprint 39 Ilox-English Holly i 8" W-Fair Condition-Invasive Species 20 ve S X Invasive 40 Acer-tiiglear Maple I 4+5+6" I W-3 Stem-Fair Condition pedes 40 Trees Total Were Included in the Tree StudI 2 3 I X in Building Footprint Y 17 Non-Invasive On-Site Trees are in Good Condition (2 of These 40 Trees Are Actually Just Off-Site) 9 Non-Invasive On-Site Trees are in Fair Condition I I I 1 Non-Invasive Tree Just Off-Site is in Fair Condition 10 Trees are Proposed for Retention On-Site(27%On-Site Retention) IAll Trees Noted are 5"DBH or Larger 4 Non-Invasive On-Site Trees are in Poor Condition ' 2 Trees are Proposed for Rentention Just Off-Site(+5%) I Tree Just Off-Site is in Poor Condition 20 Live Non-Invasive Trees are Proposed for Removal(47%Removal) I 5 Live On-Site Trees are Invasive Species S Additional Trees are Invasive Species(Remove ander separate Permit) 3 On-Site Trees are Already Dead i 3 Additional Trees are Dead(Remove undersep",ede Permit) Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 2 Co CO 90 SPECIES MATURE CANOPY SPREAD (In Alphabetical Order by Genus) DECIDUOUS TREES (Found On-Site or in the Vacated Road Easement) GENUS HEIGHT SPREAD Acer-Bigleaf Maple 40' Height 30' Spread' Acer-Norway Maple 40' Height 25' Spread Aesculus-H. Chestnut 35' Height 30' Spread Alnus-Alder 40' Height 20' Spread Crataegus-Hawthorn 30' Height 20' Spread Malus-Apple 20' Height 20' Spread Prunus-Sweet Cherry 30' Height 20' Spread Prunus-Plum 30' Height 20' Spread BROADLEAF EVERGREEN TREES (Found On-Site) GENUS HEIGHT SPREAD flex-E. Holly 30'Height 30'Spread CONIFEROUS TREES (Found On-Site or Just Off-Site) GENUS HEIGHT SPREAD Cedrus-Deodar Cedar 90' Height 40'Spread Pseudotsuga-Fir 100' Height 40' Spread Thuja-Red Cedar 100' Height 30' Spread • Mature Canopy= (Average Mature Canopy Spread/2)2 x rt. Appendix B 1 Source-Manual of Woody Landscape Plants,Dirr. 91 92 WEST COAST SELF STORAGE—ROSEWOOD STREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON DATE: August 23,2013 PREPARED FOR: WEST COAST SELF STO1tAcE Steve Tangney,Vice President T�17 PiQ�rFS 39 Castledown Road Pleasanton CA 94566 1 e*lNN4D PREPARED BY William Farley,.P Todd Mobley,PE,PTOl '* E. l�fQ 13 EXPIRES Is 03,. °.... LANCASTER ENGINEERING 331SW411 A+v..SuJte40o l p4111ar,0,OR97204 50$,2413,0313 ianlasterengineenrrg.eon' EXHIBIT F-4 LU 14-0006 93 105- P6?ieD TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS Project Description Location Description 3 Public Transit 5 Traffic Counts 5 Trip Generation &Distribution Trip Generation 7 Trip Distribution 8 Safety Considerations Warrant Analysis 9 Sight Distance Analysis 10 Crash Data Analysis 10 Operational Considerations Background Traffic 12 Neighborhood Cut-Through Traffic 12 Capacity Analysis 18 Pavement Conditions 19 Parking Considerations 20 POLICY ANALYSIS Transportation Planning Goals &Policies Transportation System Plan 21 Comprehensive Plan 21 City Charter 22 City Code 22 Conclusions Technical Considerations 24 Policy Considerations 24 Appendix 25 West Coast Self Storage-SW Rosewood Street 2 94 INTRODUCTION This study will examine the technical and policy issues related to the proposed development of a self-service storage facility to be located at 5650 SW Rosewood Street in the Lake Grove neighborhood of Lake Oswego, Oregon. The site is just east of SW Boones Ferry Road, and a connection of SW Rosewood Street to SW Boones Ferry Road is a critical aspect of the viability of the project. Therefore, this study will address the traffic related issues of the site development, predicated on this street connection. The following report is presented in two sections, first dealing with the technical aspects of the street connection and the proposed site development. The second section will address the policy issues related to the street connection. The technical issues are considered first since if there is any mitigation required,it will need to be also considered with respect to City policies which apply to the street connection. The area which includes the subject site and the effected street system is zoned "IP" Industrial Park. The Lake Oswego Code was amended recently to include an "Overlay" zone to expand certain allowed uses in this area in the interest of encouraging redevelopment of under-utilized properties. This included the conditional opportunity for self-service storage. The development supported by this study will therefore be subject to Conditional Use and Design Review applications and approvals. In the vicinity of the subject site there is a concentration of underutilized properties, particularly on Rosewood Street, which will benefit from improved access and this is taken into account in the analysis. SECTION 1: TECHNICAL ANALYSIS This section examines the traffic impacts of both the proposed street connection of Rosewood Street and the proposed self-storage facility on the transportation system in the vicinity of the site. The purpose of this part of the report is to provide an analysis that addresses the operations of the study area intersections to ensure safe and efficient performance. All supporting data and calculations are included in the appendix to this report. LOCATION DESCRIPTION In order to conduct a thorough traffic impact study, the intersections surrounding the site were selected for analysis. Based on scoping discussions and agreement with the City of Lake Oswego, the following intersections were identified for a full operational analysis: • Lower Boones Ferry Road at the proposed new Rosewood Street intersection • Lower Boones Ferry Road at Pilkington Road • Pilkington Road at Rosewood Street • Pilkington Road at Willow Lane • Lower Boones Ferry Road at Willow Lane West Coast Sell Storage—SW Rosewood Street 3 95 Lower Boones Ferry Road is under the jurisdiction of the City of Lake Oswego and is classified as a Major Arterial. It is generally a five-lane facility with a center two-way left-turn lane and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Curbs, sidewalks, and bike lanes are provided along both sides of the roadway and on-street parking is not permitted. Pilkington Road is under the jurisdiction of the City of Lake Oswego and is classified as a Major Collector. It is generally a two-lane facility with a statutory residential speed limit of 25 mph. Curbs and sidewalks are installed intermittently along each side of the roadway. Based on the low speeds of the street, bicycles can safely share the facility with motorized vehicles. On-street parking is permitted in locations where the roadway can accommodate the parked vehicle without encroaching on the travel lane. Willow Lane is under the jurisdiction of the City of Lake Oswego and is classified as a Local Street. It is a two-lane facility with a statutory residential speed limit of 25 mph. Curbs and sidewalks are installed and on-street parking is permitted on both sides of the roadway. Based on the low speeds and volumes of Willow Lane,bicycles can safely share the roadway with motorized vehicles. Rosewood Street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Lake Oswego and is classified as a Local Street. It is a two-lane facility with a statutory residential speed limit of 25 mph. The street is generally unimproved and lacking curbs and sidewalks along most of the street. On-street parking is permitted in locations where the roadway can accommodate the parked vehicle. Based on the low speeds and volumes of the street,bicycles can safely share the roadway with motorized vehicles. The intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road at Pilkington Road is a four-legged intersection controlled by a traffic signal. The north-eastbound and south-westbound approaches of the intersection both have dedicated left-turn lanes served by protected phasing, a through lane, and a shared through/right lane. The southbound approach of the intersection is an access to a business's parking lot. The northbound approach has a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared through/right lane. The intersection of Pilkington Road at Rosewood Street is a four-legged intersection controlled by a STOP sign on both of the Rosewood Street approaches. Each approach at the intersection has a single shared lane for all turning movements. The intersection of Pilkington Road at Willow Lane is a four-legged intersection controlled by a STOP sign on both of the Willow Lane approaches. Each approach at the intersection has a single shared lane for all turning movements. The intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road at Willow Lane is a three-legged intersection controlled by a STOP sign on the Willow Lane approach. The northbound approach on Willow Lane is not delineated but has enough right-of-way to separate left and right-turning traffic. The north- eastbound approach has a through lane and a shared through/right lane. The south-westbound approach has two through lanes. Left-turning vehicles from the westbound approach onto Willow Lane can utilize the center two-way left-turn lane. With this report, the extension of Rosewood Street to Lower Boones Ferry Road opposite the location of a driveway serving OTAK and Les Schwab Tire Center is being proposed in addition to West Coast Self Storage SW Rosewood Street 4 96 the self-storage facility. Currently, the intersection is a three-legged intersection with the southbound approach being the parking lot access for the two businesses. The north-eastbound approach has two through lanes and the south-westbound approach has a through lane and a shared through/right lane. The center two-way left-turn lane can be used as a refuge for north-eastbound traffic wanting to patronize the businesses. With the extension of Rosewood Street, the intersection is expected to become a four-legged intersection controlled by a STOP sign on the Rosewood Street approach. A vicinity map showing the project site and the study area intersections is shown in Figure 1 on page six. PUBLIC TRANSIT Tri-Met Bus Route 37, Lake Grove, serves stops at the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road at Pilkington Road. This bus line operates weekdays only from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM with typical headways ranging from 60 to over 90 minutes. TRAFFIC COUNTS Traffic counts were conducted at each of the study area intersections on May 9th, 2013, from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. Data was used from the system-wide morning peak of 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM and from the system-wide evening peak of 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM. Figure 2 on page seven shows the existing traffic volumes at the study area intersections. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 5 97 LEGEND dt ■ STUDY INTERSECTION /S�j/� li STOP SIGN _ �� Q L.-r.;] PROJECT SITE r,{ �o d07 TRAFFIC SIGNAL E� 00� g BIKE LANE �.s� �� W \,o Ce- CURRENT 1 PROPOSED Q it i / A ,,, ROSEWOOD ST ti ` `\\ \ ...". `1 �,. ,.,\ I k`\,PROJECT,.E E'y,.SlTE�v'-`I LLL . r::' "1-41 /./..-‘k., Z WILLOW LN I 0 FIGURE VICINITY MAP no scale 1 PAGE 6 98 0 fr o•a V z rn 0,,,,1_,) 5 Ln ----v 1 F 2 VinN <--05 TC,.,19ry$ 0\1,4 \V I Q O I L> ,r.3 Z 77-1 <11\14 „i SI I s 0 Lo,r2'D O "Ni. "0 i 4 N 4--4, cv ROSEWOOD ST N F\.-."\- - 7,1 i\\ '. \\;..1\ . ‘.,,•-`• '-':: ,``') 1` PROJECT.,.4 • �,,,: � SITt .v"4 h`.r v`.y Y i',,‘,,,,\••••,,) (,.....\_ ,....,..,) 0 ••19 m to— I po iF1Tr3 gQC] hbr�. . ) 16 �ry L WILLOW LN aiD 0 e wino -0 rt "t' 5- 4 ra �o0 0 01I 64 N z 5 4 • TRAFFIC VOLUMES / FIG2 RE Existing Conditions War AM & PM Peak Hours no scale PAGE 99 • TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION TRIP GENERATION To estimate the number of trips that will be generated by the proposed development, trip rates from TRIP GENERATION, Ninth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1TE), were used. The development plan proposes the construction of a 530 unit self-storage facility. To estimate the trip generation of the subject property, trip rates from land-use code 151,Mini-Warehouse, was used based on the number of storage units. The trip generation calculations show that the proposed development will generate 11 trips during the morning and evening peak hours. The following table offers a summary of the trip generation. Detailed trip generation calculations are included in the appendix to this report. Trip Generation Summary ITE Size Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Code In Out Total In Out Total Proposed Development Self-Storage Facility 151 530 units 6 5 11 5 6 11 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The distribution and assignment of site trips onto the nearby street network was determined based on the current traffic patterns observed around the site as well as nearby trip attractors. The site is a little over half a mile east of Interstate 5 and is situated along Lower Boones Ferry Road, a major connection between Lake Oswego and Portland. It is expected that a majority of the site trips will originate and terminate from the west at the Interstate 5 interchange with a significant number of trips traveling to and from the east in Lake Oswego. A minor amount of traffic is also expected to travel to and from the south on Pilkington Road to connect to SW Childs Road. The traffic patterns around the subject property are expected to change slightly with the proposed extension of Rosewood Street to connect to Lower Boones Ferry Road. Not only will patrons of the proposed development have an easier way to access the proposed self-storage facility, the residents of the neighborhood along Rosewood and Pilkington will have a shorter route to connect to south- westbound Lower Boones Ferry Road. However, due to the ease of turning left from the traffic signal at Lower Boones Ferry Road and Pilkington Road over waiting for a gap in traffic at Lower Boones Ferry Road and Rosewood Street, some residents of the neighborhood may still select Pilkington as their connection to Lower Boones Ferry Road,particularly during peak hours. The trip distribution and assignment for the proposed development is shown in Figure 3 on page 9. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 8 100 • I TOTAL SITE TRIPS I I I IN I OUT I TOTAL AM I 6 I 5 f 11 lip 0 el 0 10 I PM I S 1 6 I II 0�° o S° �7, o0 k"., o0 p X71 L'N p ' 50 iN 5 a e CP \,o ■ e 0 0ao� 0 "' 0 el ,C0 to 000 E-- 000 E-0 °0 E�J.y 0 E y �. 0 z 1. 0 l T f� 0,-_\ €1,J El i� 0. 5L/�o`er i 7 IC 0071/. \ ` \ L----- „ tyQ ROSEW000 ST r• -"•7 7:\T7� C:\, `N\' •,\•\,;,..„\\) " "`,, `). 11....,'..:,,,,,\`,,, ,`I .`SITEN�N sj . . .`I ti L,.. .\\``ti ‹Do° m m to 0--0 E-0 0--1‘ F"1 T i� -b D� 0 0 a /--- .. .,,,,, WILLOW LN 0 iì - v0 o -o ‹--0 0 0 '� FITS z 71 0^a o 'I-0 0 z a o SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT t FIGURE 3 Proposed Development Plan — Site Trips PAGE AM & PM Peak Hours no scale 9 101 SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS LEFT TURN LANE WARRANTS Left-turn lane warrants and traffic signal warrants were examined for each of the applicable study intersections. A left-turn refuge for traffic on Lower Boones Ferry Road is already provided with the center two- way left turn lane, so no further examination of left-turn lane warrants was performed for intersections along the roadway. Low traffic volumes are projected for travel along Pilkington Road. By examination, left-turn lane warrants are not projected to be met at the intersections along Pilkington Road under any of the analysis scenarios. Similarly,traffic signal warrants are not projected to be met under any of the analysis scenarios. No new left-turn lanes or traffic signals are recommended. SIGHT DISTANCE Intersection sight distance requirements were taken from A POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS,published in 2011 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO). Sight distance requirements are based on an approaching driver's eye height of 3.5 feet above the road and an eye height of 3.5 feet with the opposing driver's eye 15 feet behind the edge of the near-side travel lane. Sight distance for the proposed connection of Rosewood Street to Lower Boones Ferry Road was measured and found to be in excess of 800 feet to the south of the proposed intersection and 440 feet to the north. Based on Lower Boones Ferry Road's posted speed limit of 35 mph, a minimum of 390 feet of intersection sight distance is required for movements into the nearest lane and 440 feet of intersection sight distance is required for movements across three lanes(the two through lanes and the center two-way left-turn lane). Accordingly,the available sight distance for both approaches meets the minimum requirement for safe and efficient operation of the intersection. No mitigation is recommended. CRASH DATA Using data obtained from ODOT's Crash Data System, a review was performed for the most recent available five years of crash data(January of 2007 through December of 2011)for each of the study area intersections. A crash rate was calculated under the common assumption that traffic counted during the PM peak period represents 10 percent of the average daily traffic(ADT)at the intersection. Crash rates greater than 1.0 crashes per million vehicles (CMEV) are generally indicative of a need for further investigation and possible mitigation. West Coast Seli Storage—SW Rosewood Street 10 102 One crash was reported during the analysis period at the intersection of Booties Ferry Road at the location where Rosewood Street would connect giving a crash rate of 0.03 CMEV. The crash was a rear-end collision that resulted in only property damage. The intersection of Boones Ferry Road at Pilkington Road had a total of nine reported crashes during the analysis period giving a crash rate of 0.23 CMEV. Seven of these crashes were rear-end collisions, one crash was a turning type collision,and one crash involved a pedestrian. Of these crashes,four resulted in property damage only and five resulted in a possible injury or complaint of pain. The intersection of Pilkington Road at Rosewood Street had one crash reported during the analysis period giving a crash rate of 0.08 CMEV. The crash involved a vehicle hitting a fixed object and resulted in only property damage. No crashes were reported during the analysis period for the intersection of Pilkington Road at Willow Lane. The intersection of Boones Ferry Road at Willow Lane had one crash reported during the analysis period giving a crash rate of 0.03 CMEV. The crash was a rear-end collision that resulted in an incapacitating injury. The crash was reported to have occurred due to a vehicle following too closely and striking a stopped vehicle. Based on the detailed review of all of the collision data,no significant crash patterns and no significant design concerns were identified at any of the study intersections. Accordingly, no significant crash patterns and no specific design concerns were identified at any of the study intersections. No safety mitigations are recommended. West Coast Self Storage--SW Rosewood Street 11 103 OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Prior to assigning the site trips to the study intersections, existing volumes were adjusted to account for the anticipated growth in the study area that occurs during the construction of the development. Background traffic volumes were projected for year 2015 conditions, when the proposed street connection and development of the self-storage facility is assumed to be completed and in use. To estimate the future traffic volumes, a compounded growth rate of 2.0 percent per year was used. This growth rate was applied over the two-year period to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the expected year 2015 background traffic volumes. These volumes are shown in Figure 4 on page 15. The background traffic with the addition of site trips from the proposed development is shown in Figure 5 on page 16. NEIGHBORHOOD CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC In addition to accounting for growth in the area, the effect of the new street connection of Lower Boones Ferry Road at Rosewood Street on the traffic patterns on the nearby system was also taken in consideration. It is expected that a small portion of the traffic currently using the intersection of Pilkington Road at Rosewood Street to access the nearby neighborhood would instead use the Lower Boones Ferry Road intersection with Rosewood. The neighborhood traffic originating from the west would likely turn onto Rosewood and travel through the commercial area to enter the neighborhood. Traffic leaving the neighborhood for a destination to the west would likely split between traveling through the commercial area of Rosewood and traveling to the signalized intersection of Lower Boones Ferry and Pilkington,depending on the amount of delay incurred by left-turning traffic. Traffic from the commercial area of Rosewood is very unlikely to enter or exit the nearby neighborhood east of Pilkington to travel to another destination. The neighborhood around Rosewood Street does not have any connections to any major travel centers that would make cutting through the area an attractive option. Traffic patronizing the commercial area on the stretch of Rosewood between Lower Boones and Pilkington is likely going to travel along Lower Boones Ferry Road with a minor amount of traffic using Pilkington to travel south. Using the observed volume of traffic turning to and from Rosewood Street, a new distribution of trips entering the neighborhood was calculated and applied prior to the addition of site trips. The values of redistributed traffic are shown in Figure 6 on page 17. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 12 104 :6 y h #,': �/ "., ;'; ,h, yRosewood Route -, , . ---- - Ot '-' 'w'''1 - : - Rosewood St \ z ) 1 a ow Ln Rte Viltl i --yr.. r-m - willow-et —1 =aFP si c -;:f"--'"(c] ayr L,•'�' *j. ilif-- - Ili -.?� •'§ W.-. �r 4"" m E a313 , Jean Rd Route-osw �.:_t Jean Rd =� ��' - - - e Figure: Possible routes connecting Lower Boones Ferry Road to Lakeview Boulevard east. The issue of whether the connection of Rosewood Street to Boones Ferry Road would increase the potential for non-residential traffic using Rosewood east of Pilkington has been raised in discussion with City staff. Rosewood Street east of Pilkington Road is a residential street with a narrow improved width and no sidewalks. On-street parking, vegetation, and other objects that encroach into the roadway serve as a form of traffic calming that keeps roadways speeds low. These roadway characteristics in addition to the signage at the entrance to the Rosewood neighborhood stating "Local Traffic Only Please" make any through route using Rosewood less attractive to traffic. Traffic traveling south-westbound on Lower Boones Ferry Road is highly unlikely to pass Bryant Road if their destination lies along Lakeview Boulevard east. This route is would be out of direction and would not be expected to benefit at all from the new connection between Boones Ferry and Rosewood. Traffic traveling north-eastbound on Boones Ferry would more likely use Lakeview to reach an eastern destination. The best route to use when going to Lakeview from eastbound Boones Ferry is by using Jean Road to Pilkington before turning right onto Lakeview (route is highlighted green in the above figure). This is a fairly simple route that uses streets intended for the through traffic. If traffic using Jean Way and Jean Road experience higher delays, the route using Willow Lane to Pilkington and then turning left onto Lakeview is still an option (highlighted blue in the figure). Vehicles using this route would suffer little delay turning right onto Pilkington Road and then would have a left-turn refuge to wait for an opening to turn onto Lakeview. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 13 105 Both of the previously mentioned routes would be moreattractive to traffic than using the new connection to travel down Rosewood to Tualatin before turning onto Lakeview. Between the traffic calming mentioned previously, the delay incurred by waiting to make a through movement across two lanes of traffic, and then waiting to turn left from Tualatin Street onto Lakeview would make cutting through the Rosewood neighborhood unlikely. Therefore, it is unlikely that the connection of Rosewood to Boones Ferry would have any effect on the volume of through traffic using Rosewood Street east of Pilkington Road. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 14 106 GROWTH RATE: 2.0Z PER YEAR © C)1,$\b ® 1t��b a L/\tS�� 0 V! L"\%-i� fCy ',e5• S �y '-i O 0 ,,�5 i X00 0� . , 1 : I z m 0 ,a6, h a•'* 13 .hint 0s �1:11) ,��h J d.14 ,c-10 E-I. L c 3 e \ 1giTr� 11i' tIr) �0 ) 4 N� 4 ~rye b5/71 \ tk ROSEWOOD ST .` .',\ , N` \'...,', L.,...... ......„‘ . i•^``PROJECTs. . � ,v i\` . `�;♦ ��ti \\ ~`l `, \"\ "`` e 4 ® d .--,---,--\\\\ �� N-,-- 1 71 O,'O ___-12_ E)T 14 d/drie.:"'" ,\,:::.0 y1b 17 �ry WILLOW LN CDr .0 _ IZ \ 000 E-o � jS E y .Fi ° o 5� Tf z z 0t`h1"N 67 ry h x S 0. tif;: TRAFFIC VOLUMES „ FIGURE 2015 Background Conditions INF AM & PM Peak Hours n0 scale PAGE 15 • 107 OC N. �< p p �Vl l4WS Q� � �>0��° !' '� Q o 71 ,ti F' I COQ V e 14,3 S1" , <1 00 mor' --L._ <---t16...*c4„ 4--60 14'�� \ 18-T 6.--- `N "`I; aim 'N��' ,0 VI or' II5-1 N 5-, N - �� ` ROSEWOOD ST •"'::: k`\,PROJET\\,`I l ~L'._\`2. Y ■_%"l'/'/<Co ® 7L----; 4_T I' h6�/ 17-� N Z 7.-. _ \ ' 0 o- WILLOW LN o `L — , 4 1� Cono <-0 E-1`1. 4 .-"--° a `, p� Ern�o� o al . 7 `; z 0 gt 4 a j .,,:, TRAFFIC VOLUMES NI FIGURE5 2015 Background plus Site Trips " 1 AM & PM Peak Hours no scale PAGE 108 1 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC 1 1 IN I OUT I TOTAL I AM 1 10 I 33 I 43 ! CI 0 IZ 0 Opp'° PM 30 18 48 0� � cp �71 o \71!l IC\ op o C In p 5 a 00 40 ��R ,i, Fti X00 � 4,5 .- �� os I ii C ti4ik 'S �6 x /J4 o o l F--i-10 ® o ,O E-x.113 .F-1 E-F�.L} �° 0-T 4"11'1 ÷2°1-1 Ei1'e 00 VI ) �o y 5 o a ).1..\\xri",-,., >sa ROSEWOOD ST \. I; CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS To determine the capacity and level of service at the study intersections, a capacity analysis was conducted. The analysis was conducted according to the unsignalized intersection analysis methodology given in the HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL (HCM) published by the Transportation Research Board. Level of service(LOS)can range from A, which indicates very little or no delay,to level F, which indicates a high degree of congestion and delay. The City of Lake Oswego requires level of service E or better operation at signalized and unsignalized intersections. To examine the impacts of the proposed street connection and self-storage facility, an analysis was made for morning and evening peak hours for existing conditions, year 2015 background traffic conditions,and year 2015 background plus site trips. Currently, the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road at the driveway access (proposed Rosewood connection) operates at level of service C during both the morning and evening peak hours. The operation of the intersection is expected to remain unchanged with the anticipated growth over two years. With the construction of the proposed street connection and the development of the self- storage facility, the intersection is projected to operate at level of service C during the morning peak hour and level of service D during the evening peak hour. The intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road at Pilkington Road currently operates at level of service B during both the AM and PM peak hours. In two years, the operation of the intersection is projected to remain unchanged during both peak hours, regardless of the new street connection or additional traffic resulting from the proposed self-storage facility. Presently, the intersection of Pilkington Road at Rosewood Street operates at level of service C during the morning peak hour and level of service B during the evening peak hour. Under 2015 background conditions, the operation of the intersection is projected to reach level of service C during both peak hours, regardless of the new street connection or additional traffic resulting from the proposed self-storage facility. The intersection of Pilkington Road at Willow Lane currently operates at level of service B during both the morning and evening peak hours. The operation of the intersection is projected to remain unchanged under 2015 conditions regardless of the connection of Rosewood to Lower Boones Ferry or the additional traffic from the self-storage facility. Currently, the intersection of Lower Boones Ferry Road at Willow Lane operates at level of service C during the AM peak hour and level of service D during the PM peak hour. The operation of the intersection is projected to remain unchanged under 2015 conditions regardless of the new street connection or additional traffic from the proposed development. All study area intersections operate within the performance standards set by the City of Lake Oswego. Accordingly,no mitigations are recommended. The results of the capacity analysis, along with the levels of service, delay, and vie ratios are shown in the following table. Detailed calculations, as well as tables showing the relationships between delay and level of service are included in the appendix to this report. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 18 110 • • CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY AM PM LOS Delay(s) v/c LOS Delay(s) v/c Lower Boones Ferry Rd at Parking Entrance/Rosewood St Existing C 18 0.26 C 16 0.38 Background C 19 0.27 C 17 0.40 Background+Site C 21 0.26 D 27 0.39 Lower Boones Ferry Rd at Pilkington Rd Existing B 12 0.50 B 14 0.65 Background B 12 0.51 B 15 0.66 Background+Site B 12 0.50 B 14 0.65 Pilkington Rd at Rosewood St Existing C 16 0.09 B 15 0.04 Background C 16 0.09 C 15 0.04 Background+Site C 16 0.11 C 16 0.10 Pilkington Rd at Willow Ln Existing B 15 0.06 B 12 0.12 Background B 15 0.06 B 12 0.13 Background+Site B 15 0.05 B 12 0.13 Lower Boones Ferry Rd at Willow Ln Existing C 20 0.23 D 28 0.33 Background C 20 0.23 D 29 0.35 Background+Site C 20 0.23 D 29 0.35 PAVEMENT CONDITIONS The existing roadway in the Rosewood Street right-of-way is currently substandard and will need to be reconstructed to the City of Lake Oswego's standards through individual frontage improvements in conjunction with site redevelopment or through a larger cooperative project. The redevelopment of the subject site in conjunction with the property to the north across Rosewood will result in part of this street improvement, but only with the proposed intersection with Lower Boones Ferry Road. If this part of the street construction precedes improvement of the remaining part of Rosewood Street, there will need to be interim improvements or access restrictions based on the extent of actual improvement that is possible and at what time. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 19 111 PARKING CONSIDERATIONS Currently, the underdeveloped right-of-way on Rosewood Street is being utilized as employee parking by at least one of the nearby businesses which are on property fronting Rosewood Street. An issue has been raised that, with the proposed connection to Lower Boones Ferry Road and subsequent street improvements to Rosewood Street, parked vehicles currently using the public right-of-way will be displaced. The solution for this issue will be a function of redevelopment of the properties which front Rosewood Street, thereby creating code-compliant on-site parking. The City of Lake Oswego has no responsibility to provide surplus parking in the right-of-way for properties which are not code compliant. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 20 112 SECTION 2: POLICY ANALYSIS This section will consider the policy issues related to the connection of Rosewood to Boones Ferry. The attached memo dated October 18, 2012 from Todd Knepper to Leslie Hamilton will serve as the outline of topics. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Lake Oswego's Transportation System Plan sets forth several policies and guidelines regarding street connectivity. 3.2.2 Local Street Connections This section primarily addresses the connection of residential neighborhood streets to the larger street system. However, it does include a general statement of encouraging connections where they are shown to operate safely and shorten travel distances. The connection of Rosewood to Boones Ferry would meet both of these criteria. In addition, this section adopts the Metro title 6 criteria for local street connectivity, which provides for a minimum of eight intersections per mile of roadway. In this area, Boones Ferry has an intersection rate of about seven or eight per mile, depending on the location of the measurement. Therefore, the Rosewood connection would improve this section of road with respect to the intersection rate criteria. 3.2.4 Access Management This section addresses the spacing of access points on various street classifications. Table 3.2 indicates that major arterials should have at least 600 feet between intersections. The connection of Rosewood would be located 638 feet south of the existing intersection at Pilkington Road, and 652 feet north of the existing intersection at Willow Lane. Therefore this new intersection will meet the spacing standard. In addition, this section indicates a general premise that fewer driveways and intersections on arterials are better than more. However, it is important to recognize the operational differences between driveways and intersections in applying this premise. As noted,the proposed location of the Rosewood Street intersection does meet the spacing standards and with it there will be alternative access provided to properties which currently need to have direct access to Boones Ferry Road. By removing at least two existing driveways onto Boones Ferry and creating the new Rosewood Street intersection,the potential for traffic conflicts is reduced by consolidating the location of the accesses. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 21 113 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Goal 12 of the Comprehensive Plan addresses transportation, and has several sections relevant to the Rosewood connection. Policy 2 under Goal 1 of Goal 12 states that "Direct access onto major streets shall be controlled and consolidated over time..." If Rosewood is connected to Boones Ferry, this policy can be implemented through the eventual redevelopment of at least one property fronting Boones Ferry that currently has direct access since there will be an opportunity for good side street access with a convenient connection to Boones Ferry. Action Measures "i.a", "i.b" and "i.g" address this issue similarly and note the 600 foot recommended spacing for street intersections on a major street. Action Measure "i.a" states that "Direct access to the major and minor arterial system is restricted except from existing platted lots..." The connection of Rosewood Street to Lower Boones Ferry Road would implement this measure by providing alternative access for at least one property which currently has only direct access to Lower Boones Ferry Road. Action Measure "i.b" states that "Whenever possible, properties shall develop access to major and minor arterials from frontage roads or side streets..." As noted above, the connection of Rosewood Street to Lower Boones Ferry Road would implement this measure by providing alternative side street access that would otherwise not be available. Action Measure "i.e" states that "Direct access to major collectors is discouraged..." This goal is not applicable since Lower Boones Ferry Road is classified as an arterial. Action Measure "if' suggests that travel connections should be encouraged in order to reduce travel on major streets. While this is not really a "connection between adjacent developments", it would serve the save purpose as intended in this action measure since it would allow traffic an alternative route to Boones Ferry from Pilkington Road and thereby would reduce traffic in the PilkingtontBoones intersection. CITY CHARTER Chapter 40 of the City Charter provides certain procedural requirements related to a "major road expansion". The improvement and extension of Rosewood would meet the definition of a major road expansion, and so these provisions apply. While the Charter will require public notice and the opportunity for an election on the matter, there are no technical issues in this section of the charter that impact the decision to connect Rosewood to Boones Ferry nor the actual design. CITY CODE Chapter 42 includes design standards for the various street classifications, including arterials. The applicable provisions indicate that arterial streets should be designed to restrict access except from other streets. As noted above, the Rosewood connection would allow this to be implemented by West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 22 114 providing an alternative side street access for at least one of the properties near this intersection. This section also indicates that arterials should draw through traffic away from neighborhood streets, which this new connection also would do through providing another opportunity for traffic to move to the arterial rather than on the local street system. Chapter 50 addresses access to an arterial, and states that if there is an alternative access no development may have direct access to the arterial. As previously noted, the Rosewood connection would improve existing conditions in that an alternative side street access would be available. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 23 115 CONCLUSIONS TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS The extension of Rosewood Street to connect to Lower Boones Ferry Road and the traffic resulting from the proposed development of a self-storage facility on the property south of the new connection in Lake Oswego, Oregon, will not cause any significant negative impact to the transportation network in the surrounding area. The operation analysis of the study intersections shows adequate capacity through year 2015 regardless of the new street connection or additional trips resulting from the proposed development. An observation of the crash history at the study intersections show no trends that are indicative of safety issues that need to be addressed. Intersection sight distance was measured to be adequate at the proposed connection of Rosewood Street and Lower Boones Ferry Road. Traffic signal warrants and left-turn lane warrants were examined for each of the study intersections and, by examination, were found to not be met under any of the analysis scenarios. Based on the detailed analysis, no technical mitigation is required or recommended for the proposed extension of Rosewood Street and the development of a self-storage facility located at 5650 Rosewood Street in Lake Oswego, Oregon. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS All of the policy documents which are applicable to this street connection indicate the city's intent to provide greater connectivity in the street system, and to discourage direct access to arterial streets by individual properties. The connection of Rosewood to Boones Ferry would implement these intended results by providing both a new connection which would distribute traffic more efficiently from the neighborhood, and also provide the opportunity to reduce the existing private accesses onto Boones Ferry when one of the abutting properties is redeveloped. This analysis has found that all of the applicable standards for location of intersections are met and there are no safety or capacity issues that would result from the connection. West Coast Self Storage—SW Rosewood Street 24 116 APPENDIX A-TECHNICAL APPENDIX 117 LEVEL OF SERVICE Level of service is used to describe the quality of traffic flow. Levels of service A to C are considered good, and rural roads are usually designed for level of service C. Urban streets and signalized intersections are typically designed for level of service D. Level of service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. For unsignalized intersections, level of service E is generally considered acceptable. Here is a more complete description of levels of service: Level of service A: Very low delay at intersections, with all traffic signal cycles clearing and no vehicles waiting through more than one signal cycle. On highways, low volume and high speeds, with speeds not restricted by other vehicles. Level of service B: Operating speeds beginning to be affected by other traffic; short traffic delays at intersections. Higher average intersection delay than for level of service A resulting from more vehicles stopping. Level of service C: Operating speeds and maneuverability closely controlled by other traffic; higher delays at intersections than for level of service B due to a significant number of vehicles stopping. Not all signal cycles clear the waiting vehicles. This is the recommended design standard for rural highways. Level of service D: Tolerable operating speeds; long traffic delays occur at in- tersections. The influence of congestion is noticeable. At traffic signals many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. The number of signal cycle failures, for which vehicles must wait through more than one signal cycle, are noticeable. This is typically the design level for urban signalized intersections. Level of service E: Restricted speeds, very long traffic delays at traffic signals, and traffic volumes near capacity. Flow is unstable so that any interruption, no matter how minor, will cause queues to form and service to deteriorate to level of service F. Traffic signal cycle failures are frequent occurrences. For unsignalized intersections, level of service E or better is generally considered acceptable. Level of service F: Extreme delays, resulting in long queues which may interfere with other traffic movements. There may be stoppages of long duration, and speeds may drop to zero. There may be frequent signal cycle failures. Level of service F will typically result when vehicle arrival rates are greater than capacity. It is considered unacceptable by most drivers. 118 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL CONTROL DELAY OF PER VEHICLE SERVICE (Seconds) A I <10 B 10-20 C 20-35 D 35-55 E 55-80 F N >80 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL CONTROL DELAY OF PER VEHICLE SERVICE (Seconds) A <10 B 10-15 C 15-25 D 25-35 E 35-50 F >50 119 Whereas, the Oregon Department of Transportation,has been requested to perform an Speed Zone Order investigation pursuant to the provisions of ORS 810.180,has caused an engineering and traffic investigation to be made for the section(s)of state highway,county highway,city highway,or highway under the jurisdiction of a federal agency described below(highway means public way);and I Date October 16, 2006 'Order No J7776 Whereas,the State Traffic Engineer has been authorized to act on behalf of the Oregon Jurisdiction(s)Transportation Commission;and f Clackamas Co. I Washington Co. I Durham I Lake Oswego Whereas,the data,facts,and information obtained in connection with said engineering I Portland I Tualatin and traffic investigation are on file in the office of the Traffic Management Section of the Oregon Department of Transportation in Salem,Oregon;and Whereas,based upon said engineering and traffic investigation,the Traffic Engineer has found that the speed designated In ORS 811.105 or ORS 811.111 is greater than is reasonable under the conditions found to exist upon the section(s)of highway for which a lesser speed is herein designated or that the speed designated In said statute is less than is reasonable under the conditions found to exist upon the section(s)of highway for which a greater speed is herein designated;and Whereas,the provisions of ORS 810.180 respecting notice and hearing have been complied with: It is Therefore Ordered that the designated speed for the following section(s)of highway be as follows: Name SW Boones Ferry Road 1 Boones Ferry Road 1 SW Lower Boones Ferry Road ss LOCATION OF TERMINI IFrom I To IDesignated Speed Mies Per finin) On SW Bognes Ferry Road SW Terwilliger Boulevard 1300 feet north of Monroe Parkway I 40 n Ferrr.Road I I 300 feet north of Monroe Parkway I Country Club Road 35 Country Club Road 1 Kruse Way I 40 Kruse Way SW Washington Court 30 SW Washington Court 1 0.19 mile southwest of Willow Lane 35 ON SWJ..ower 1Boones Ferry Road 0.19 mile southwest of Willow Lane I SW Boones Ferry Road/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway 1 35 School speed zones may be posted within the tmfs of this order as determined to be sppropriste by the Row Authority,based an an engineering investigation as per the p ovlskns of ORS 8f f.f 17, Subsection f(e)and ORS 810.200. This rescinds SZRP Order 937D of 10f2211993,SZRP Order 3035 of 6/21/1978,SZRP Order 3036 of 6/21/1978,SZRP Resolution 1470 of 5110/1967,SZRP Order 4540 of 813111987,SZRP Order 803D 018/31/1992 s s Be It further ordered that the roadway authority or authorities responsible for the above section(s)of highway install appropriate signs giving notice of the designated speed(s)therefore as per ORS 810.180,Subsection 5(e). Be It further ordered that signs installed pursuant to this order comply with the provisions of ORS 810.210 and 810.220. Be It further ordered that any previous order made by the Department with respect to the designated speed for the above section(s)of highway which is in conflict with the provisions of this order is hereby rescinded. Be It further ordered that the Traffic Engineer of the Oregon Department of Transportation Is hereby delegated the authority to sign this order for and on behalf of the Department. Fischer,State Traffic Engineer 120 [r8 Bee. ReCla•cka]Has County. City Lake Oswego Resolution Datd°pril 4? 1973 WHEREAS, the Stats Speed Control Board, City of Lake Oswe o Foremast to the Motivated or Requested by) prowieieas of ORS 463.101, tree raised as en/imperial; and traffic iiyertigatioe to be made with respect to s tortilla county reed or city street, or sectiose thereof, more particularly d 'bed and defined hereinafter; end WHEREAS, the data, facts. sad isfersttios obtained is ceasectioa with meld eogiseerisg sad traffic inresti- ;sties are OR file is the office of the State Highway Commissies at Salse. Origami and WHEREAS. based epos said esgiaeering sad traffic isvestigeties, the Board has Posed thet the speed desle meted is OHS 463.104 i■ greater them is reasoseble aid safe seder the cosditioss fogad to exist epos the gooney read or city street, or testioes thereof, for which a Isomer speed is bowels designated tied thet the speed des. 'looted is acid outvote is less tikes is reasonable ender the coaditiesa found to exist epee the comity road or city street, or Pettifog thereof, for which a greeter speed is hotels designated; sad WHEREAS, the provssices of ORS 483.101 rerpestie, Reties sed hearing have hues complied with; NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDERED that the desigssted speed for the following described county road or city street, or eeeticss thereof, is es fellowst urge a cWt l SW Pilkington Road (City Street) Road Washer Highway Beate • LOCATION OF TERMINI I Desisatted Stiej From ! To I Miles Per Hoer SW Lower Boones Ferry Rd North side of SW Lakeview 35 BLVD BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that ��c�;.� ..#i d1�'r..4 .�rgQ erect appropriat, (Agency Responsible for Sigaieg) signs epos the shore described covety road or city street, or sections thereof, giving setice of the spited designated therefor, BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that rises erected puessast to t►i■ order comply with the prow.' f OAS 463.044, BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that say p der made by the Board with respect to the designated speed for the above described comity road or city , or sections thereof, which is is coeflict with the proclaims of mi this order is hereby reacieded. <2571 alISMOreg,•••YLVIA ei"(41(2.1/1 (Chsirsaa) (Masher) 4O Maker) (Meeker) 121 TR ! jMET 37-Lake'Grove Weekday To Tualatin Park&Ride . pzgo moO '- ma vasa mm 072 Sit mixes .N 7:17 7:26 7:33 8:53 9:02 9:09 10:23 10:32 10:39 12:03 12:12 12:20 1:33 1:42 1:50 2:49 2:58 3:06 4:25 4:34 4:42 Times in darker print are p.m. Please note:Schedules may change without notice by up to three minutes to relieve overcrowding or adjust to traffic conditions.Service can also be affected by construction, accidents and weather conditions.You can check for any current detours or service disruptions at trimet.org/alerts or call 503-238-RIDE(7433)for real-time arrival information from TransitTrackerTM.All buses,MAX trains and streetcars are accessible to people with disabilities. 1 ZB1age 1 ©2013 TriMet•Tri-county Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon•Portland,Oregon Effective:August 18,2013 TRI go MET 37-Lake Grove Weekday To Lake Oswego TC 9 O 1=2 Q'u baa o^ea .NL Usi mcg .1h 7:03 7:09 7:17 7:48 7:54 8:03 9:22 9:28 9:36 11:02 11:08 11:16 12:30 12:37 12:45 2:01 2:06 2:16 3:18 3:26 3:35 5:03 5:11 5:20 Times in darker print are p.m. Please note:Schedules may change without notice by up to three minutes to relieve overcrowding or adjust to traffic conditions.Service can also be affected by construction, accidents and weather conditions.You can check for any current detours or service disruptions at trimet.orglalerts or call 503-238-RIDE(7433)for real-time arrival information from TransitTrackerrM.All buses,MAX trains and streetcars are accessible to people with disabilities. • 123 Page 1 ©2013 TriMet•Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon•Portland,Oregon Effective:August 18,2013 Total Vehicle Summary o 5 Out • 00 T LL 5 0 a}4- HV 3.7% is , t rr;. -- -- - PHF 0.90 1 : .. 13J N _L5 Clay Camey OM 595595 In (503)833-2740 536-0. u' -hE O ♦590 536 Out In 549 1 z- S r HV 3.S% 4\ 0 �� Otak Access & Lower Boones Ferry Rd PHF 0.88 I41 t ('I o 0. Thursday, May 09, 2013 Out In =i 0 0 a 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour Summary I 7:35 AM to 8:35 AM 5-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Otak Access Otak Access Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Fe ry Rd Interval Crosswalk Time 1 Bikes L R 'Bikes L i T i 1 Bikes . T - R 'Bikes Total North'I soot-I-East I West 7'00 AM .._ .....1._._0- --0 -_ -__:_.,..? _0__..._1 . 23 � _- '--`0- _._----24 i_ 0 ; 0. 54___- ._.0 i.._.0_--1 0 ' 0 7:05 AM 0 0 '-`"-„.__0 0 2. 23 0 _. 38'_ 0 1 0 83 ._._00-� �I0...�. 7:10 AM 0 0 D_ 0 _ 0 'i_33 i 0 36 0 I 0 __. 69 0 1 0 8 0 _-- 1 ---__ 42 1 I 0 77 0 0 0 0 7:20 AM „-_ 0 0 34 1,--1 0 _--63 0 0 0 0 715 AM 0 Q i 0 0 t 3 1 1 7;25 AM 0 0 0 0 1 I 33 1 0 -.,.46 1 i 0 81 0 0 D i 0 7:30 AM _0 0 1 0,. ...1 43 1 ..0 - 48 2 0 95 0 0 o 0 735 ANI _ __.,0 ,0 1 2 0 1 39 0 -59 1 0 0 101 O l3 O. 9 7:40 AM 0 0 0 0 1 46 0 - 53 1 1 0 101 0 • Q 0 0 7:45 AM i 0 0 - 0 0 0 i 47_• E 4 • 48 0 - D 95 D 0 _ 0 Q 7-56 AM ..._. i .........0 0 L 1 0____1 55 1 fl -I._58 t L 0-_ __...116 5_...�0 0 -..._0._. 7:55 AM 0 0 1 : 0 1 0_...,_0 53 _ 0 :54 , 0_ 0 107 _0 l S i 0 ._._0.._.. 8:00 AM --- - 0 ' 9,02 ' _I .0 1f 00... ._.2 48 0 i 38 0 ... ...B0... 0 I 00 0 0 820 AM D 0J 10 _ 0__ 133.- _...-_.1 0 ......_m 42 1 0 _a 76 ...._0- 0 0 LD. . 8 OS AM 0 0 8:25 AM _.-! 0 0 i._ ....':...6--_` 0 3 i47 . r...0 __. =__.37, .0... 0 .... 87 0 0 0 1 -a 6:30 AM 0 0 L__.,-.: 0 . 0 2 54 j ' 0 49 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 8;35 AM L 0 0 _. _a_ 0 __1 44... 0 42 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 i E 8:40 AM ,j _ 0 0---� 0 0 1 47_-I - 0 x...A8 - 0 0 96. 0 0 0 0 --- ---- _- ,, --- 'r : .. - -. .---1 0 105 0 0--- 0 ' 9_.. SA6 AM 0 0 1 0 i 52 0 1 51 ' 0 8:50 AM 0 0 5 i� 1 0 . 0 58 o 49 : 0 ' 0 108 0 1 8:55 AM E 0 0 .. 1 I 0 1 51 • 0 60 0 . 0 113 0 I 0 0 I 0 Total • 0 D : 10 . 0 23 1,009 1, 0 1,108' 10 0 2,180 1 0 0 : 0 I Su a 15-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Otak Access _ _ Otak Access Lower Boones Fer on Rd Lower Brumes Ferry Rd Interval Crosswalk Time -• - i Bikes I. 1 1 R 1 Sikes Im L T I .Bikes T " R Sikes Total North''South 1 East I West 700 AM • 0 0 1 0 3 84 I 0 98 0 0 186 D 0 0 0 1 : 9--J -' --- I } 0 0 2 94 0 122 3 _I 0 221 0 Q 0 0 - 3 4 3 128 0 160 • 3 0 _ 297 0 D 0 0 715 A 730 AM 0 0 0 0 1 - 9 i 156 f L_...0.... - 1 E0 _7 D 318 0 ' 0 1 0 � 0 745 AM -_ - __ -_ _. r ___ - - �- 8�00AM _.. 0 0 1 1 0 2 - 121 ; 0 � h52��3 i 0 279 1 0 0 3 : : 1_._ 1.8:15 AM 0 0 1 0 6 121 , 0 117 0 0245 0 j 0 0 0 ; 8:30 AM 0 • •0 i 0 1 0 4 : 145 1 I 0 139 ' 0 I 0 288 0 0 b I 0 8:45 AM 5 0 1 . 3 0 2 1 161 I 0 ' 180 ' 0 I 0 326 0 I 0 1 0 : 0 TotaSurvey 0 I 0 10 • 0 I 23 1,009 1 tl1,108; i0 1 0 I 2,160 I 1 _ 0 1 0 0 Peak Hour Summary 7:35 AM to 8:35 AM Ely Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Otak Access___ _ _ Otak Access _ Lower_ Boones Ferry Rd 1.__Lower Rennes Ferry Rd_ Total Crosswalk Approach In Out "Total Bikes I In T Out 1 Total W Bikes I In Out ,Total • Sikes In ' Out Total 1.Bikes North i South I East :Well Volume 0 0 • 0 - 0 5 • 18 , 23 ' 0_ 549 i 595 i 1144 1 0 I 595 .-536 11;131: 0 -I .149 1 0 0 ' 5 IIF %HV 0.0k 0.0% 3.6% 3.7% 37% PHF 0.00 9-63 0.88 -_- 0.90 , By Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Movement .,.,.r_Otak Access_ __ Otak Access Lower Bcones Ferry Rd _ Lower Boones FenyrRd Total • _rTo.� R 'Total L T Notal T R lTotal Volume - 10 0 1 5 '5 13 536 1549 : 590 • 5 1595 1,149 %HVI NA : IVA NA O.D% 0.0%1 NA-1---0.0% 00% 90%I37% NA 3.6% NA 37%.0.0% 37°6 __ 3.7% I L p[ PHF 10 .90 0,001 0.63 '0.63 0.54 0.86 0.88 : 090 0.42 .0.90 I 0.90 Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound I Eastbound Westbound ( Pedestrians • Start 0150 Access Otak AccessIt Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval Crosswalk Time - 1 Sikes L I R 'Bikes L T I i Bikes 1 T . R 1 Bikes Total North:South I East I West 7:00 AM I ' 0 0 5 0 9 461 0 ' 540 7 1 0 1,022 0 : 0 0 c - __ ! 0 1,175 1 0..-,�.-.0 0�... 715 AM . .,0 01 ...,.5 0 _.. 8 498 0 _59A,___10_ T30 AM - 0 0 6 0 12 525 f 0 589 7 ! 0 1,139 1 0 1 5 0 7:45 AM 0 0 - ' 3 : 0 13 542 0 _ 568 4 L. 0 1,13_0 1 0 �_0 i 0 -_----T-- r__"._ 5:00 AM �0 _.,.O_�� 5 I � 14 548 0 568 3_3__0--- 1,138..__, 1 0 . 0 124 nI U., Heavy Vehicle Summary - 0 0 0 0 � � � ':�.1 r,tr ,,. rc tio.ata 4- t+L.. I <.ffilalsoin io . 01 N t.0 Clay Camey Out 22 (503)833-2740 In 20 20 +V-ter, >- 22 Z a r Otak Access & Lower Boones Ferry Rd ih t r'r Thursday,May 09,2013 out In 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour Summary 7:35 AM to 8:35 AM I Heavy Vehicle 5-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM I Interval ` Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound ' Start , Otak Access Otak Access Lower Boones Fer on Rd Lower Brumes Fe Rd Interval Time :-Total L ; R Total L 1 T 1 rnI Total ' T R 1 Total Total 7:00 AM .. - , .0-.- 0 1 0 0 1----_0 1 1 1 1 0 0.. 0 1 "--._..._ .. . 7:05 AM - - --- - --' 0 0 - 0 0 0 2 ... ..Z- 1 0 1 3 710AM 0__ 0 I t 0 0 0 IT 3 1 3 1 0 1 1 4 715 AM r 0 0 0 i 0 0 2 , _ 2 _ 0 --0 0 2_ --_ T20 AM _ 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 1_ 1 i 1 0 1 2 .___.. _ —__ 728 AM 0 0 ?'_0_ p:. _Q 1[ 3_.i 3 1 0..1 1_.. -..-4 730 AM 1 0 0 ` 0 i 0 0 1_ 1 _ - 2 • .0 i 2 .. 3 . 735 AM 0 0 y1 0 0 --,0 7 2 T T 2 4 0 4 J 6 _ 740 AM. .. — -0 0 �._._. _ OT-0 0 r .� ri ._.._r �.� l_-_ _ _... r 1 2 fl 2 3 745 AM 0 0 E : 0 0 0 ', 2 1 1 2 _0 0 1 0 2 7:50 AM.�... I 0 I 0 ; � 0 0 © � 0 1 � 0 : 2 OT 2 � 2 7:55 AM . 1 0 0 I : 0 . 0 0 3 i 1 3 2 0 1 2 _..._5 5:00 AM ! .I----o- 0 1 i. 0 ' 0 0_1__0 T—, O__. 1 4 1 0_.� 4 4 805 AM I `. 0 0 I = O 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 2 4 • 810 AM 0 0 1 €,.,,0 I 0 0 3 3 -2 P. 2 _.. 5 8:75_AM 0 0 -F,. 0 : 0 . .. 0 I �. _ I 1 _1 0. 1 2 820AM _-- 0 ❑ E j_ 0 0 0 r 0 i € 0 0 .6 :1 0 0 825 AM 3 0� 0.2, J 0_ 0 07 2 ._L 2_4_ 2 I 0 -I2 4 8:30 AM : ! - 0 0 , 0 0 0 I 4 14 X41 _. 0I 1�__..5.--- 835AM 0 0 1 ! OT 0 0 3 m--- € 3 1 0 0 T'--�_� ...840 AM -.—.I, 1 ' -.. - - 8:45 AM .._ __.I 0 0 ? :_._0. _. ._ _ �- 1- 3 0 3 4 0 0 I 2 _ 2 �_0 0 ; 0.. . ...-z---- 8:50 AM 1- 0 o 3 .i o. : 0 .-. 0 I ri . 1. 1 ..0 1 2 .... • 8'.55 AM .i 1 0 0 1 i 0 0 ❑ 1 3 3 f 0 0 1 0 3 SurveTotay I • - - 0 0 0 0 1 0 43 43 J 32 0 32 I 75 1 . Heavy Vehicle 15-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Access_ _ Otak Access Lower Boones Fe Rd Lower Boorres Ferry Rd_ interval Time , 1 Total L : ' R i Tolal€ L T Total i T R 1 Total Total 7:00 AM I , 0 Cl, 0 : 0 __0 1 5 6 __ 2 1 0 1 2 8 7 15 AM I 0 __-0 010 0 1 6�.I_ 6 LL2 0 2 .--- 8 730 AM 0 0 0 7 0 0 : 4 1 74 8 0 € 8 12 745 AM i 0 0-1:-- ". 0-1 6 .._,0_ € 5 1_ 1 5_ 4 i 0 T 4 5 8:00 AMi ... �0 - 0 ...._0 i 5 1 5 1 8 0 i 8 __ 13_..._ 1.. __._. 8'15 AM 1 _0 0 ILL I__-0 1 0 0 3 Y 3 3 0 3 6 • 8:30 AM _ 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 8 .. 18... 4 0 4 .12 8:45 AM 0 0 : 0 1 0 0 I 6 1 =: 6 . 1 : 0 1 1 7 Total 1 Survey 0 1 0 0 ',: 0 10 I 43 1i1 f 43 1 ' 32 . 0 I, 32 1 75 1 Heavy Vehicle Peak Hour Summary 7:35 AM to 8:35 AM By Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Westbound Approach _ Otak Access Otak Access Lower Boones Ferry Rd I Lower Boones Ferry Rd I Total In.-- Out Total -In Out : Told 1 In 1 Out I Total I In Out -Total Volume 0 ' 0 1 00 ' I 20 1 22 42 22 : 20 42 1E 42 PFIF ._.-000-._..--- ------ 1 i 0.00 . 0 i. 0 ----I0.83...,_ ..... ..........1 0.69 f 0.81 ...1 _ Otak Access Lower Boones FerryRd Lower_oanes Fet Rd Total By Otak 1 Movement __ NorthboundAccess _ ._ , ....__ _ --. _,._. _,_.. ' Total i L 1 00 0.00 01 20 1 I.Total0T 0 1 Total 42 i I Volume e 1 0.00 1000 1 1 0.00 l 0 0.001 .8 1 5.83 1 0.69 0,00 1 0.59 I 0.81 1 Heavy Vehicle Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound I Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Otak_Access fll Otak Access Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval Time Total L R i Total L T. i 1 Total T R Total Total 7:00 AM 1 0 0e 1 0 0 0 21 1 1 21 18 : 0 : 16 37 715 AM -- ' 0 0 I--- 0 r 0 0 20 € 20 I22I.. . .- 0 22 42� • 7:30 AM - _0_ 0 _-- 1 0 0 ....0 17 . -17 23 0 23 40 • 7:45 AM -• 0 0 - 0 0 0 1 21 y 21 19 0__..: 19 40 8:00 AM I : 0 0 1 1 0 - 0 0 1- 22 I 22 16 : 0 _'_'15 _.. 38_._. 125 Peak Hour Summary All,t /- ata I $ Clay Carney {503)833-2740 Otak Access & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 7:35 AM to 8:35 AM Thursday, May 09,2013 m v Q Bikes �C 0 O5 18 5 0 � y Lower Boones Ferry Rd Peds 1 Bikes 0 R 5 5951 € 590 595 o m a 13 S n. 549 536 4 536 Bikes 0 Peds o Lower Boones Ferry Rd Bikes 0 Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.88 3.6% 549 WB 0.90 3.7% 595 NB 0.00 0.0% 0 SB 0.63 0.0% 5 intersection 0.90 3.7% 1,149 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 126 Total Vehicle Summary e, ;6 °°t 7, 13 3 x i ��i t rata T a JI) + I* HV 1.6% ��..,� 0 PHF 0.95 °" 71 - .? N t 5 1 Clay Camey Cut 957 • 945 In 1503)833-2740 814 9 0 w 8 0 .4 944 In 819 817 Out z s r Otak Access & Lower Boones Ferry Rd PIF 094 )4 t (9 o 6 Thursday, May 09,2013 Out In 1 t 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 0 0 Peak Hour Summary ` , 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM +I 5-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound JIWestbound Pedestrians Start '-__: Otak Access , Otak Access Bikes Loweres ss oBoons Ferry RR Bikes Total North 5 dI Lower Boones Ferry Interval Cato{alk Time ,-Bikesast West 4:00 PM 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 - 69 . . 0 ' 69 : 0 1 0 139 0 0 0 . 0 405 PM - ... E 0 0 1. . ..0 1 73 _i _ 3 0 . .77 0....' 0• ......._752__ 0 D I 0 1 0. 410 PM - 0 0 _I_ �1 ' 0 3 60 0 - 72 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 2 0 _0 72 i 0 69 1 I 0 ---145 0 0 -I 0 0 420 PM _ 0 7 Im 1_1 0 0 - 65� o __77 0 1 0 144 0 I 0 � 010 0 4 15 PM 0 1 7 425 PM - 3-,-.0 1 I �' 1 tl -0 , 66 � 10 72 0 1 0 140 -.-. ...-D 0 U... 0 4:30 PM 0 D 1 0 0 -7 60. 5 1 82 0 0 .751 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 59 : 0 73 0 1 0 134 0 0 435 PM 0 0 2 - ` A40 PM ... -1 0 0 1I 1_ 1 0 �0 }j 65� 0 77 0 �..0 143 .....0 fl D 445PM vV� 1 0 0 0 0 T1 ! 75 - T-0 - 65 _ 0 0 141 0 - 0 0 0- 4:50 PM 0 31 1 0�� -1 r 62 i �i� 0 -F-61 0 0 145 0 0111 f 0 4:55 PM 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 70i __0 __..81 0__. 0- .__151 0 i 0. 1 0 1 0. ry - -_. 0 1 20 0 1 -- 1 70.- - 0 76 - 0 J 0 150 0 0 0 1i 0 1 0 0 j 77 i. l7 79 0 0 ..157 '0 { 0 '0 0. 5 05 PM 0 0 5:20 PM 0 I 0 0 61 1 82 D 0 147 0 0 1 5:15PM 11 0 0 J I,.2 t) 1 70 I .j. tl _-83 4 0 157 0 0 � 0 0 0 12 0 1 _ 62,_; 75 0 1 0 141 0 0 0 1 o 525 PM -a---- 0 1i- .- d ! 75 ....0_.- 90 ; Q.._I_ D 166 .._.-0 mL 0 �'.:_..0. 1Q_. 5 30 PM i I 0 1 � 0 0�.. 1 1 67 -1-0._. .. !, 73 0 _i. 0 142 0,6 0 ! 0 1 0 535 PM 1 1 0 1 1 1 - 0 0 1 69 1 0 67 ' 0 1 0 138 W_0 0 p i_-_0 5:40 PM 1 - --0 0�.L.. JE .0-.. 0..... .-0 t 63.,._ 1,._0_ _76 0-- 0 -..139 Q O . 0 ! -0 5.45 PM 0 1 ! ' 1 1 Q } 1 69 ..1_ 0 '...68 ! 0 € 0 140 Q 0 0 0 5:50 PM 0 0 .. -.2. 0 0 76 0 61 0 E 0 - 139 0 0 0 0_ 5:55 PM --. - .,_ 0 - _ 0. 1 00 : 65 .;. I O _._i -. .. ... � 82 0 0 127 0 4 ' 0 0 Suorveiv 1 I 0 9 : 24 ; 0 I 8 1,628 1 0 11,787 2 0 3,45$ I 0 0 j 0 0 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval L Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound I Pedestrians Start Otak Access Otak Access Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Bosses Ferry Rd Interval _Crosswalk _II[ Time -bikes L 1: R 1 Bikes I L 1 T-1 I Bikes T R 'Bikes I Total North-'South 1 East 1 West 4:00 PM [ ; 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 1 202 1 0 1 218 ! 0 E 0 424 0 1 0 ] 0 I 0 I 4:16 PM - _L_._0 0 J 3 I. 0 _2 1_208-1- _ _ 0_. • _... 1 227 __0...! 0 437 _0 r. 0 i 0 0 0 203 0 _I 218 1 _ 4 30 PM ! �-r 0 0 4- 0 428 0 0 1 0 1 0 A 45 PM 0 0 � 1 � 0 2 207 1 j! 0 437 0 �. 0 0 _D 500 PM _.. E 0 2 - - 5:15PM [ 0 1 i E 5 T 0 2 E 207 0 248 1 i -Q� � 464 -0 0 I 00 5.30 PM ... 0 2 199 0 216 , 0 1 0 419 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5:45 PM 0 1 I I 3 0 1 210 0 191 1 0 i 0 406 0 Q 1 0 0 Survey • D 9 1 24 0 8 1,628 1 0 '1,787 2 4 3,458 0 8 ��, 0 p Peak Hour Summary 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM By Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Approach -__- Bikes _ 879 957 17 776I 0 945 817 _1 762: 0 1,780 0 Ctak Access Otak Access Lower Boones FerryRd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Total Crosswalk In - Out Total Bikes In Out Total Bikes 1 In Out WTotal Bikes In - Out Total-Bikes I North South East 1 West Volume 0 Q 0 �. 0 766 22I .._.._.__ _.. 0% _.... ___.. 10 I 0 D I PHF 0.00 0.67 0.94 0.95 036 B Northbound Southbound I Eastbound Westbound Y (Mak Access Otak ACcess 11 Lower Boones FerryRd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Total Movement-- --- ------..�._... ..... .------ ...:._._.!^/--------- i (Total I` L R :Total L T 1 rTotal T R !Total %HV -A-- 10.00 1038 i '1 °4 -1.0% L-1.8 1 ._ I Volume 0 3 13 116 5 1 814 1819 944 1 1945 1,780 i %HV _NA NA NA 10.0% 04h� NA i0-0%.00% 0:0% 1.11% NA 11.0% NA 1.8% 0.0% 189'0 1.4h 1 0.65 0 67 1 5.63 0.94 10.94 : 0.95 : 5.25 10.95 0.56 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM I Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound j Westbound Pedestrians 11! Start Otak Access Otak Access Lower Boones Ferry Rd 1 Lower Bosses Ferry Rd Interval I Crosswalk Time Bikes L 1 R Bikes L II Bikes T R 1.Bikes Total North South+. East 1 West 4:00 PM4:15 PM _ I_ ---318041T 895 ! 1 f. 0 1,718 ..._0 ! 01 0 0 445 PM #_ 0 510 . 0 6 821. 1.._-- t g... 1 944 1 -..-0. 1..7$0 0 Q 0 0 __D 3 12 D o • 4 30 PM 0 3 -"- 12 D 3 610 0- 914 1 I 0 1,745 0 1 4 ...._... ... ._ _928 1 1 00 1,771 0 0 I 0 0._ 5:00 PM 0 6 12 0 5 824 1. 0 1 892 1 1 0 1,740 0 1 0 1 0 0 127 III VOL Heavy Vehicle Summary a a o 0 •.) ♦ 4L. All ra .rd.=:::®ata . MY Sa.811A3A31A 3 of N LD f, ....Clay Camey Out 17 a-Pr - tr 5 N 4-17 (503)833-2740 In 8 1 Z a r Otak Access & Lower Boones Ferry Rd Ili t 1 Thursday, May 09,2013 pt to 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM I Peak Hour Summary I 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM Heavy Vehicle 5-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM T.__k Ft Total L T Boones F Westbound _ Access _ Lower Ferry Rd_ __Lower Boones Ferry Rd _ Interval Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Start Otak Access Otak A Time I Total LTotal 1 T ; R !Total Total 4:00 PM ! 0 0 L ! 0 ' 0 0 2 2 2 0. ..1 2 ---- 4 ....,. 406 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 L 1_- - .i 1 _4 0 _ 4 5__ 4.10 PM 0 0 i 0 0 0 4 1 c 2 D1 2 3 4:15 PM I_.-0 0 1 0 f 0 0 I Q...1 r....0 1 0'_.4 __,... 1 4:20 PM -0 0 : 0 0-_, 0 1 1 _..! 1 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 35 PM --- 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 L_ 0 0 !�0 1 0 0 .?__i �_ 1 �2 0 2 3 4:25 PM .... 0 0 ,.1 0 1 ..0..._-0 0_._' 0 1 0 .. 1 1 4:40 PM ' _. ... q 0 0 i 0 10 D1 7 3 1 013 4 4,45 PM--- —__'_-T w _._.-._, _�, 1.-- -1-- ----'-_ D Q , 0 D 0 2 1 2 1 0 1 3 450 PM 1..._..._...._'. 0 "-'-0- - I 0 T4-----0.....1._...1 __.._ P i0--1- `--'-3----- 4:55 PM _ i 0 0 1 0 1 W0 1 F __ .. 0 , 0 0 ' 1 1 1_- ..___.- 0 5:OQ PM 0 0 0 0 0_... T1 1 1 - 0 1 1 • 2 . 5:05 PM.... i...,_..... -.-j 0 0 0 0 0 l 1..... ......... 1 i 0 0 : 0 ....._ 1 -_- 5:10 PM 0 _0 ? 0 ! 0 0 1 1 1 !- 2 ... 0 2 3 •• 5:15 PM • 0 0 0 ..0 0 1 0 _ _- 0 i. 2 0.... 1 2 2 5'20 PM -.._...J 1 - 0 0 ! I__.0 1 0 0 a --_L_Q 0 D ...,_ 0 5:25 PM ..._ 0 0 . ............0 0 1 0.. 1 0 - 2 D • 2 2 � o___,_ . .. 530 PM .__ r `--0 0J 0 4. 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 �535PM - 0 0 _ 0 i D ..0 L0 -.-I a -.-_0 0 -0 0 5:40 PM -__ _.0 o i ,__0 0 0 1 � 1 . 1 .d.,a. 1 --- 2 5:40 PM • D 0..._! . 0 . ..0_, ._0 .2._.. _ �2 ..._ 1 _ .,.._. 5:50 PM : �,I 0 . a 1 t o 0 0 1 1 !. .1 2 0 i 2 - 3- 0 S 3 5:55 PM 0 1 1 1 1 - 1 0 1 4 2 20 Survey '. 20 I 35 0 1 35 I 56 i 0 0 0 ! D 1D Heavy Vehicle 15-Minute interval Summary 4:00 PMI to 6:00 PM thbound Eastbound Westbound Start Interval F Otak Northbound Access _� Ottak Access Lower Scones Fend I Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval Time Total LR Total L� T I Prole!1 , T 1 R I Total I Total 0 0 I 4 4 0 0 8 12 _4:00 PM _7 0 0 1 : 0 1 _- - 4:15PM ---._._. 1 ... 0 0 1 DI0 4 2 2 4 0 - 4 ...� 6 4:6a PM ! 0 0. I 0 0 0 1 2• 1 2 6 4 6 0 4 45 PM -__-- _ 0 0 1 i_0 L _OT 0 _3 _ 3 4 Q, 4 7 500 PM ..._.. 0 0 I. 0 r..0 0 3_1 3 i-3 _ 0.7_ 3 6 5:30 PM � 0 0 I ---- -..._ ._ 5:15 PA 0 0 i 0 0 D 0, 1 {€{. 0 4 . 014 4 1 • 0 l !] D 2 i I 2 2 1 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 4 I 4 • 4 0 4 8 Survely I 0 I 0 j 0 : 0 1 8 20 1 20 35 : 0 1 35 ( 55 Heavy Vehicle Peak Hour Summary 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM B Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound y Otak Access Otak Access cess _ Lower Boones Fer Rd Lower Boones Fe Rd Total Approach -- '--- I. Tota In Out Total In I Out Total In ' out Total I In Out VoluI 25 me O0D '--0 - 0...-.. I 0.050 1 0- 0LQ SO.4_ 17. 1_25------- I.0171 8... 25..._.. 063 ..3 L TTotal l --- T....._. .R ITotal� B Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By Otak Access .. Otak Access Lower Boones Ferry.Rd Lower Boones Fe Rd Total Movement ...... -._. --- J �Total L - R Total 25 IVPIHFe I - ' 000 000.1 : 000 i 000 1 0.00 rO50 --- 050 I 0171 1 fl00 0.71I 0.63 Heavy Vehicle Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM • Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Otak Access Lower Boones Ferry Rd ' Lower Boones Ferry Rd interval Start Otak Access total L I. -- R :Total L T ! II Total T R I Total Total 4:00 PM 0 00 0_ 0 ,11 11 1 22 0___l_22 33 : 1 415 PM � 1 0 0. I ! 0 0 0 10 10 ., 17 0 1 17 27 4 30 PM • F 0 0 1 l0 0 0 8 I ---_--8 17 0 1 17 25 4:45 PM 'I 0 0 I : 04 0 0 8 I 8 1 13 i 0 13 21 5:00 PM _ _I..._0 0 I _ 0 0 0 1 9 , I 9 _._'....113 0 13 22 128 Peak Hour Summary AAll Traf ie ata �awm-:ire sc Yo G U', Clay Camey___ (503)833-2740 Otak Access & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM Thursday, May 09,2013 c4 Q Bikes 0 O 16 I 6 13 3 � y Lower Boones Ferry Rd Peds 0 1 Bikes 0 957 E 944 945 N •4 N 5 a S m 819 814 + 817 Bikes 0 Peds 0 Lower Boones Ferry Rd Bikes 0 Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.94 1.0% 819 WB "0.95 1.8% 945 NB 0.00 0.0% 0 SB 0.67 0.0% 16 Intersection 0.96 1.4% 1,780 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 129 In Out Total Vehicle Summary o 0 0 6 0 T a D o /��j� ''1 � �r � HV 3.7% n E.l Tr'a 3.0::::i w a, .;: PH7 0.117 " Y[r�YYO1Dl.l e` 1 PI,� 4 ii n' ' 1 Clay Camey 566 In (503)833-2740 Out 590 470♦ w T n E 0 ♦467 In 554 635 Out 80'In.. S 4-98 HV 3.8% 3 r Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd PHF 0.88 141 t r'9 a 123 1 165 Thursday, May 09,2013 Out In '_I- 178 289 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour Summary I 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM 5-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval ' Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Westbound I Pedestrians Start Pilkington Rd _ PiIkinyton Rd Low erBaones Ferry,Rd_ _I_Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval L __C_rosswalk _ Time L T R i Bikes L T R ;Bikes L i TT rt T Bikes f L •-T R 1 hikes Total I North South East West 7 06 AM 8 9 8 ! C 0._w1 0 ' 0 ' 0 0 20......._5 0 4 _26 , 0 -....._0 71 _ ....0 -j C •_ a 0_- 7:05 AM 10 1 0 30.___1_0 a 1 0 0 0 23.,I 6 ! 0 3 27_i_l _l__0 71 Or 0_ ! 0i 0 _ 710 AM 14 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 a I 17 1 5 ❑ 3 ' 31 1 0 1 0 78 0 1 1 0 1 0 _ 7:15 AM 17 1 0 1 12 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 21 5 1 0 3 26 1 1 1 88 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 7:20 AM -..8 1 0 1 15 0 0_I 0 1 0 -0 0 31 -1 4...1 0 3 29..y_-❑-_1 0 .. ._. 90 ...0 0 0 0 7:25 AM. 9 0 1 15 1. 0 010 0 1 0 0 1915.. 0 9 _26 ! 0 11 , 1 t33 0 0 II 0 0 3 730 AM 13 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 1 6 I`0 6 49 1 0 ,E 0 124 0 0 0 ' 0 7:35 AM _.�. _... ._. 1 . _ 3.1...1 0 8 44 0 0 122 0 0_... 0 0 740 AM 19 _ 0 10 J 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 34__ 8 1 0 9i_33 • 0 0 103 61 0 I 0 i a.__ 745AM 1410 1110 0 010 ' 0 0 39 8 T0 10 31 0I0 113 - 0 0 - 0 750 AM _17 .0..._-, 23 0 .,.,0.__ ❑ 0_.._.._0 0 Y46 12 0 16 - 47 i 0�_f_ 0 .__161__„_ 0 0 �. 0 1 0 7:55AM 9 0 2670 0 1 0 4 : 0 2 36 15 . 3 10 44 ; 01. 0 142 0 1 0 i_ 0 1 0__ $00 AM 13 - 0 18 0 0 ' 0 0 D 0 1rv27 4 0 le 36 0 0 108mT� 0 0 0 0. 8:05AM 13 - 1 1 14 0 01 0 0- ! Q 0 28 3 i 1 7 42 0 � 0 108 o 1 1 0 I 0 810 AM 3 : 0 i 15 - 0 0 1 0 0 Q 0 55 6 _.r _0 6 l_.49 _ .OI 0 134 0 • D 0 - 0 8:15 AM 6 0 13 0 0 o , 0, I 0 0 l 36 i 7 0 6 36 0 0 104 0 _ i 0 0_, 8_20 AM 12 0 10 : 0 0_J 0 1 0 0 1 __ 28 i 3 i _0 7 i 28 0 _ 1 89 - _ 0 L 1__I 0 0_, 6 1 0 9 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 0 39 5 0 5 23 0 1 87 1 I 0 0 1 8:25 30 AM, 8 0 9 0 0.... 0 1 0 0 1 34 ,1. 7 I--C 7 43 0 _ 0 109 0 0 _1 0 _I 6 8 96 AM .-.1 835 AM 13 0 10 r_-1 D- 0 0 0 0 50 5 0 4 - 34 1 0 117 0 0 0 0 _ 840 AM 9 0 7 _0 0 0 ;' 0 0 .�0 52-1 5 0 10 ��54 0_ 0 137 .__0 8 0 -W0 8:55 AM 12 1 0 212 0 0 I a '�i 0a1 I 0. _ 0 48 7 . 0 8 1 27 1 0 0 112 0 0 ....... T5ta M 11 0 15 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 48 1I 5 2,433 1 0 1 0 8:45 AM ' ' l 8:59AM 7 0 12 � 51 9 0 159 0 0 0 0 10 0 13 46 D 1 143 0 111' 0 0 Survey 261 1 317 ] 1 1 I 0 2 0 5 1 831 169 1 179 884 31 11 4 0 ',i 1 15-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Pilkinytan Rd Pilkington Rd Lower Boones Fera Rd Lower Boones Feny Rd I Interval Crosswalk Time L 1 T I R i Bikes L 1 T ; R ;Bikes L 1 T R !Bikes L I T R I Bikes Total North i South, East I West 7:00 AM 32..._i 0 : 19 0 0 ` 0 0 ' 0 C 58 i 16 : 0 10 1 84 : 1 I C 220 0 ' 1 ! 0 0___ 7:15 AM 34 , 0 42 i_0 0 , 0 1 1 I 0 C 71 - 14 0 15' 83 1 2 261 0 0 0 : 0 7:30 AM 37 0 39 1 0 0 1 0 0 i 0 0 1 104 - 20 ! 0 23 I 126 I 0 I 6 345 0 i 0 1 0 1 0 _ 7:45 AM 40 0 60 0 0 �' 0 ; 0 j 2 �- 123 I 35 1 I., 41e 0 0__ 0 � 0 8 00 AM 29 1 Y 47 - 0 0 1 0 j_ 0 - 0 0 L 110 l 13 1 _23 :_ 127 0_. 0_ __350 0 _ 1 _0., - 0 .._... ---- -- "- - --0- .. 6.115 AM 24 0 32 � 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 i 103-'� 15 0 18 ! 87 01 2 280-�-� ��1 2�� 0 - 1 8:30 AM 30 I 0 26 1 1 9 .1 0 ! 0 1 0 1 136 1 17 0 21 1 131 _ 1 1 1 0 363 0 o I a o 8:45 AM 35 0 52 ! 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 128 i 39 0 33 . 124 I 0 1 1 4140 1 0 1 0 i 0 5urvelV 261 1 317 1 1 1 0 ' 2 0 1 5 : 831 169 i 1 I 179 884 3 5 I 2,653 1 1 1 4 I 0 1 1 Peak Hour Summary 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM B Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians y Pilkln on Rd_ Pilkin ton Rd Lower Boones FerryR_d__ Lower Boones Ferry Rd Total Crosswalk Approach _In--Out 9t Total'Bikes I In Out 131 Total 1 Bikes In . Out Total Sikes In Out Total i Bikes North:South I East-l�West Volume %HV 289 178 0,6867 11..,0 6.0008 ...❑ 5541 3 5906.88144.E 1 } 586, ._6350.8720?i ...-_. ate I 1 3 ! 0 1 , P F .85 NOillh stbound Westbound By L Prkn9IonRdITotal � PTln9tonn RdLower Boones Ferry Rd_ Lower BOanes Fer RdTotal Movement -- --- • .----" '------r [ .... Fero,/ . L T R Total L I T R frOIaI Volume J 123 1 165 1289 0 0 . 0 lootal 4 1 470 1 80 -554 98 • 467 1 1566 1,405 %HV 4.1% 0.0% 42%14.2/a 00% OOY CO% 6.0% 0.0%r4.0%125%13-8% S1%' 3.4% 00% 33°! 3.6% PHF 1 0.77 1 0.25 0.62 0.68 1.00 1 0.00 0.00 10,00 0.50 ,0.86 . 0 57 10.68 0.68 ' 0.89 1 0.25 10,87 0.85 , Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians e_r Boones FerryRd Interval Crosswalk 1 9 I . 0... Is .. t,.. Start Pilkin ton Rd Pdkdn ion Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Low Time L � T 1 R Bikes L 1 T - R Bikes L 1 T 1 R Bikes L 1 T R 1 Bikes Total North I South East West 7 06 AM 143 . 0 160 . 0 0 0 1 0 2 354 85 1 0 84 t_415 12 __2__ 1248 0 11 0 1. .9 715 AM 140 - 1 188.1- 0 0 1 0 1 0 - 2 1.406 1 82 1__1 97 458 1 1 2 1,376 011 0 , 0 7:30 AM 130 1 178 ! 0 .0 l 0 0 0 3 438 83_.; 1 100 452 o , 2 1.395 1 ' 3 0 { 1 -- 7:45 AM 12_3_ :1 ! 165 1 1 0 1 0 - a , 0 , 4 I 470 80 1 1 88487 . 1121405 1 _I___3 0 1 8:00 AM 118 1 1571-1- 1 1 _ 0 1 1 1 0 3 1 477 84_r � --1 95 469 ! 1 -3 1.407 r 1 ! 3 0 1 1 130 Heavy Vehicle Summary 0 0 0 0 0 ..) ♦ 4 Al 7Traffic Data a�aaioiiio Scut T 1 N a t Q Clay Camey Out 21 (503)833-2740 In 21 19 rr' r 1-16 . 2 Z s r+5 .. Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 141 t �( Thursday,May 09,2013 Out In 7 12 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour Summary 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM Heavy Vehicle 5-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM - Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Lower Boones Ferty Rd Lower Boones Ferri Rd !JI Interval Time L T R Total L! T R-17 Total L T . R I Total L - T - R 1 Tota!I Total 700AM 010 - 0 1 0 0 1 -0 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 011 0 1 1 4 - ](iS AM 0 0 . 0 0 -0 10 0 0 0 1 _i_. 0__[ 1 070 D 1 ll- � 1----- 7:10 AM 1 • 0 1! 2 0 TI" 0 I 0 '6 02 I 0 1 2 0 : 0 0 0 4 715 AM_-_ 1 0 Q 1 --0 �, D .1._ D 0 0 i D 7 if-_0! 0 T_0 _' 0 1 f]- _—_L.._._- L 7.20 AM 0 : 0 p Q tl I 6 0 0 0 r 4 � 115 0 t 170 1 6 7:25 AM 0 , 0 2 1 2 0 ? D - 0 , 0 4 P 1 I O I 1 1 1 Q 12 5 7730 AM 0 0 1 1 0 7 Q �� 0 1 0 0 0 `�, 1 1i 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 5 735 AM p 0 D '__0 DhO 0 0 0 1 0� 1 2 2 0 4 5_ 740AM 2 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 �-'O j 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ' 0 0 1 0 2 745 AM ? 6 1 3 0 0 1 0 T O � v O f 0� OmmT 0 _r 2 Q 1 2 5 -- - ._ — ._,.r,_.�.� 750 AM 1.1._1. 0 7 - 1 0 D 0 0 4 - 4 0—I. 4 1 7i - 0 T 2 7�� _. 8 55 M 1 0, . 2 1 2 0 i 0 0 0 f 0 1 0 1. 1 0 1, 3 0.1 3 I __6 78:00 AM 00 AM 0 0 • 2 1 i 0 [ 0 1 0. 0 0 ] 2 01 2 1 0 0 1 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 ' 3 1 0 ! 4 7 810AM 0 0 0 I ----- I .. . 0 0 1 0 1 0 Q 01 3 013 0 ....0 O 0 -__3 -..-. I 815AM 7 0 0 - 1 ..0 ; 0 !._.0 1 -0 0 0 1 1 € 1 0- 72 0...l . 2 4 - -- t . .... ., 620 AM 0 �0 2 12 0 ! 0 0 1 0 - --0 0 - D 0 1 1 D : 01 3 825AM D _ 0 ' 0 1 00 ' 0 0 j 0 0 7 2 0 2 tl 1 0 1 1 3 8.30 AM 0 1 0 1 0 ...0 0 j 0 L__0 0 0 1 2_] 0 2 1 -1 i 0 01 LL 1 3 8:35 AM 0 - 0 Q d�0 0_J 0 1 0 D 0 1I 0 1 0 ! 1 1 0 1 1 2 840AM 0 D 0 i0 0 i 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 4 0 1 3 0 3 7--- --- 0 ..I 1 __.5_..W.. 8:45AM 010 070 010 3 07 0 ---.0 12._.. 2 E....41 ! 0 8:50AM 0 i 0 1 .1 - 1 0 0 ; ..0 . 0 0 i 0I 2 j-, 2 0 i 0 1 0- 1 0 .__.3 .. 8:55 AM Q 0 ! 0 ' 0 0 t 0 ! 010 0 . 0 i Q D Oi 0 ' 010 0 5 welt' 9 0 1 12 1 21 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 I 33 j 8 41 I 9 . 24 ',1 0 i 33 1 95 I Heavy Vehicle 15-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Pieking:ton Rd __ P€Eklnoton Rd _ Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd_.(I Interval Time L TT R Total L I T R :Total L T R 1 Total L '1 T i R i Total I Total I 7:00 AM 1 1 10 1 1,1 2 ._....Q 0 0.... 0 1 =0 1 6 1 0 1 8 0 ..._ 1 0 4_ 1 9 .....0_. 0 715 AM 1 0 2 i 3 0- I 0 1 Q 0 0 1 5 1 6 1 2 I 0 I 3 12 730 AM 2 0 1 = 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 5 0 7 12 7:40 AM 2 1 0 4 I 6 0 �1 0 1 0 0 �-5—i 0~ 5 116 : 0., .;i 7 18 800 AM 2 0 1 L 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 .._,,.4 6 i 0 6 2 1 3 1 0 ' 5 14' .._ 8 15 AM ..,. 1 0 1 2 1 3 0. 0 0 1 0 0 2 � 1 13 t 1 3 0' 1 4 10 8.30 AM 0 I 0 1 0 ] 0 0 ... .. . .. :� 0 0 0 0 1 6 I 1 7 1 4 0 5 12 8745 AM ! 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 ' 4 1 6 1 0 0 1 8 Totaelv f 9 • 0 - 12 1 21 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 11 33 1 8 : 41 19 24 1. 0 i 33 I 95 Heavy Vehicle Peak Hour Summary 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM B Northbound Southbound f Eastbound Westbound y ____Pilkington Rd _ Piikington Rd t Lower Boones Ferry Rd IJ_ Lower Boones Ferry Rd Total Approach In • Out 11 Total In I Out 'Total I In 1 Out I Total f In ; Out ; Total I Volo e 1PFIF012 ._7 _ 19 1000. O..1 107215 21 1 .42 Q.6621 26 47_ 1 --..0 5 II By ound Snuthbound East und nd Movement�-- L PIT 06 nR d I Total L'-... Tin�tortR d Total .. ower Boones-111 T 11 R rryr_RI Total`[ Lowe Boones FFery Rota Total VolumePH0 63 : 0 00 11 0 44 1 0.0 0.00 0 00 ' 000 T 0.00 0 00 1 0.68 ;9 I 0,50 1 0.75 I tl 63 ..0.8 D 216 .754 1 I -- � I � � .871O.OQ{� 6.66 A.75 Heavy Vehicle Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Westbound1I ound nd Eastbound Start Interval P}Ik goon Rd PikingtbonuRd Lower Boones Ferry Rd. ( Lowe Boon sFerry Rtl Interval Time L T- R 1 Total L T - R Total 3 : T I R •1 Total L T 1 R 1 Total` Total 7:00 AM -.-._6 --_0--+. 8 ... .. . . . 6 0 0 1 17 _ 2 1 19-._- -41• 14 1 0..-.1 15I_..51 • .... 7 15 AM 7 0 : 6 ,1 15 0 _ 0 04 0 0 I 17 2 - 19 6 ! 16 0 I 22 56 . -- -_--_ .-'--- 7:30 AM 7 08 ", 15 0 _ D ,0_ ,- _0 14 ; 2 78 6 � �7 Q j 23 54 745AM AM 5 0 i 7 7 6 OPO 1 0 0 1 19 1 2 21 5 : 16 1 0 ; 21 54 0 ' ----i ---7 ....r ---0 .. 1 l 15 0 0 0 �. 18 76 22 5 '- iD 0 15 44 • 131 Peak Hour Summary :911 otiotEta; Clay Camay (543)833-2740 Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM Thursday,May 09,2013 .. Bikes 0 0 16 LLL y Lower Boones Ferry Rd Peds 1 Bikes 2 R 1 590 F 467 566 rr 1L 98 -"FF. r 4 71 a s a 15541 ll 470 4 635 Bikes I 80 y Peds 3 ( Lower Boones Ferry Rd 123 1 1 165 b 178 289 Bikes im 1C Az Approach PHP HV% Volume EB 0.88 3.8% 554 WB 0.87 3.7% 566 NB 0.68 4.2% 289 SB 0.00 0.0% 0 Intersection 0.85 3.8% 1,409 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 132 Total Vehicle Summary ee. S oat >[i 3 0 2 1 i YOI W iii 1' 6tl111 1�Y a 1� 4- 4HV 1.3% C� C'. r G� --.2 ` PHF 0.91 -w......... x ..,3•...,.....,....4......,.:,..,. �„�,,,,,,,, Clay Carney Out 954 1068 In (50318333-2740 In 843 703 M w o o ♦821 , 833 Out 140- .r /1'246 HV 9.9% 3 ♦-- Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd PHF 0.95 I 4 t r ( •,1 130 0 128 N o Thursday,May 09,2013 Out In >; 386 258 0_ 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 1 Peak Hour Summary I 4:35 PM to 5:35 PM 5-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval ' Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Pilkington Rd Pilkir ton Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Booties Fairy Rd Interval Crosswalk Time L T R :Bikes L 1 7 1 R Bikes L T I R 1 Bikes I L - T! B Bikes Total North South! East West 4:OOPM 14 - 0 10 1 0 0 1 0 .,.,0- 10 0i 73 19 0 19 63 0 1 0 185 1 1 0 1 0 0 4:05 PM 13 0 16 0 0 : 0 1 0 0 0 41 ' 4 7 13 ,._.62 0 j 0 149__.. 0 I 1 ,._ 0 l o 410 PM 11 • 0 11 0 0 i 0 0_ . 0 _0 I_46 t-13 0 15 '_ 58 : 0 0 154 0 1 0 : 0 415 PM4 _J..., 01401 p 1_..-p 0 0 tl I 55 `: 10 TD 13 78 - 0_I o__._.. 1(14 .__0 0_.,� 0 {I_- 420PM 11 ID 11 0 D_ i_ o 1 0 0 0 67 7 4 0 10 60 0 1 0 163 0 0 1 0 1 0 -- _ 0_,.,..._ 1 _ 4:25 PM 13 0 i6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 L 55 15 I 4 76 - 63 0 -10 175 0 ;- 0 1 0 0 4:30 PM 9 0 17 0 0 1 0 1 0 i 0 0 1 58 l 6 . 1 0 18 46 0 i 0 153 0 0 , 0 1 "0 4:35 PM 22 10 11 0 0 j 0 0_I 0 -_0 i 48J 11 0 20 __86 0 0 198 D 6 I 0 0�__ 440 PM 11 0 15 0 0 : 0 0 0 0 i 61 1 9 1 0 14 - 70 1 0 181 0 0 1 0 . 0 4:55 PM 8 0, 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 44 1 14 0 18 75 0 1 0 158 0 rt 0 1 0 4:50 PM 6 - 0 . 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 11"J 0 17 57 0_I 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 173 .,.. �2-_^ o O1 0..., --r I -.I .._ 0 173 _ 0 0 a 5:D5 PM 14 - 0 9 i 0 1 i 0 0 !. 0 0 I 62 I 18 0 17 65 �0 0 186 0 1 0, I .0 5:10 PM 10 o 9 j 0 0 0 1 1 0 D I 63 E 0 1 0 29 _1 78 1 I 0 200 0 1 € 0' 1 0 5 15 PM 11 0 8 1 0 0 I 0 1 , 0 0 I 57 _I 12 0 26 1 72 0 1 0 187 0 1 0 0 I 0 5:20 PM 12 0 13_L 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 50 I 10 0 •• 21 1 66 . 0j 0 172 0o f 0 I 0 5.25 PM 6 D 1 8 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 78 12 11 1 16 59 - 0 : 0 170 - 0 - 0 1_ 0 I p ,530 PM _ 9 0 6 0 0 ,I o 1 1 0 -,0 59 9 0 27 73 0 i 0 184 0 ' t 0 1 0 5:35 PM 17 _-0___,13 0 Gil .............. 0 I. 27 � 57 IOJO 780 0 0 'T 0 4 540 PM 12 0 11 [__.0 0 E 0 0 0 D 57 14 ,,,1, 26 51 0 0 171 0 - 0 1 0 0 5: 0 50PM ., 6 0 1 2 0 0 ' 0 C., 0 0 1 60 O 1 14 z1 I 53 0 ' 00 147 147 0 1 2�.; 0 {� 0 545 PM 10 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 11 5.55 PM 5 0 1 0. Survey 266 1 0 275 : 1 2 0 4 1` 0 1 0 11,3591 256 I 6 1 466 ,1,517' 1 1 0 1 4,145 1 3 I 7 j 0 1, 3 1 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound t Pedestrians Start _ Plikingion Rd Pilkin fon Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Fer Rd Interval 1 _ Crosswalk Time L T R -i T Bikes L T R Bikes L T R 1 Bikes L I T ' R xI Bikes Total North I South I East !West 4:00 PM 38 - 0 370 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 160 26 1 47 : 183 - 0 0 491 1 2 1_ 0 I 0 4:35 PM 38 0 1 41 1 T 0 0 0 0 -1.' 0 0 1 177 29 0 39 I 0 1 0 525 0 0 i 0_1 0 430 PM 42 0 44 0 0 0 - -- 0 0 0 W1 767 26 0 52_1_201 207 0 E 0 532 0 0 = 0 1 0 I 4:45 PM 26 0 35 i 0 1 I 0 I 0 0 0 1 181 1 36 1 0 58 1 177 0 'i 0 514 2 0 0 1 3_ 5:00 PM 33 0 31 - 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1691. 41 0 64 218 1 1 Ii 0 1 559 0 2 i-_ 0 0 5:15 PM 29 10 29 i . 1 1 0 � 0 1 1 0 0 185 ; 34 1 63 1 197 0 I 0538 0 I0 1 0 0 ' 5:30 PM 38 0 30 0 0 i 0 2 1 0. 0 173 1 31 1 1 $0 , 181 0 0 D 535 0 .1 t �' 0 I 5:45 PM 21 , 0 . 26 0 0 0 ; 0 1. 0 0 t 147 33 I 0 63 I 159 r 0 1 0 451 ] 0 1 2 I 0 ' 0 Survey 265 0 275 1 12 I o I 4 0 1 0 11,3591 256 1 I 6 ! 466 1,517 1 I o I 4,145 ) 3 7 i 0 i 3 1 Peak Hour Summary i 4:35 PM to 5:35 PM By Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound [ Pedestrians Approach - Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd I Total f41-_ Crosswalk _ In - Out Total'Bikes In 1 Out TowBikes in 1 Out TTotal Bikes In Out Total'Bikes I North.South East West olum j...V%HF a-�-_25838f;.3 44=...__1 _$.-, 1 042&--- a_,. 843 95 0.95797' 1I 1,068- 8331.3% 091 1,901 0 3.3%5._._ I 2 3 0 i 3 I 11 Northbound Southbound Eastbound - "Westbound By Pilkin ion Rd Pilkin ton Rd Lower Boones Perry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Total Movement --'- ----� --...r_..L T - 12 :Total L 1 I O R :Total L 1 i R /Total L T : R iTotel Volume 130 1 0 128 .258 2 I 0 I 3 -5 _ 0 1 703 1 140 1843 246 , 021 1 _11,068 2,174_ %HV 3.1% '00%L1696 2.3% 0.0%100% 0.0%-00% 00% 06%129%I 0.9% Q9 17% 0.0%413% 1.3% PHF 1172 - 0.00 0.78 !0.75 0.25'0.00 038 1142 0.00_0,93 ' 0,80 10.95 0.81 1 0.93 1, 0.25 1091 0.95 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound ` Pedestrians Start Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd interval li Crosswalk . Bikes L T , R Bikes L - T I R I Bikes L 7 1 R 1 Bikes Total North 1 South I East 'West 4 00 PM 144 1 0 i 157 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 .0 1 685 117 1 1 196 762 0 : 0 2,062 3 2 0 _I 3 415 PM 139 , 94 I 132 i 4.30 PM 130 - 0 ...i 139 1.B 1 2 ! 0„ I 2 I 00 0 I 702 T 137 - 1- 237-.J .793 , 1---1 0 2,143 2 1 2. 0 1 3 1 0 ,,,.1 0 4_ 1 0 0 1 708 1 142 : 2 205 . 773 . 118 2,146 5:00 PM 121 : 0 118 i 1 1 0 .�7,,..4 0 0 I-674-1��139 ' 5 270 755 1 I 0 2,083 0 I $..i 0 - 0 133 Ili VUr Heavy Vehicle Summary 6 0 0 0 0 A11 Traffic Data , Je' j `. • �INraaxozoxan'- >eSvici I ,i N to Out 18 ,1111 Cloy Camey 4♦ W :o € 41".14 (503)833-2740 In 6 4Z3 r0 Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 1`1 ? r ! 4 0 2 Thursday,May 09, 2013 °o1 6 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM I Peak Hour Summary 4:35 PM to 5:35 PM Heavy Vehicle 5-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Lower Boones Few Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval Time L 1 T ' R i Total L I T R I Total L 1 T 1 R 1 Total L T R Total Total 4:00PM 0 I 0 1 0 I_ 0 0 j_ 0 0 I 0 0 1 i, 0 i 1 0 - 3 0 _I 3 4 4:05 PM _0 01 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 ,_� 4'10 PM 3 0 0 0 03 - __— 1 o I 0 0 0 I 0 12 2 0 0 0 li 0 2 415PM Chi 0 11 0 1 0 0 r 0 0 1 1 1 1 y 2 0 2 i 9t 2 5 4:20 PM 1 0 - 1 2-.. ....0 I 0 fir 0 0_.. ...0 0...4 0 ! 0 0 _.,2 1 0 2 4 4.25 PM 0 - 0 1 {_ 1 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 4 430 PM.__ 0 0 1 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 1 0 t 0 0 _L 1 0 1 1 2 435 PM 0 1 0 [ 11 _.. 0..._.I 0 0 I 0 0 f fl .I 2 2 0 ',..2 0 2 5 4:40 PM 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 i 0 0• 0 f of 0 i 0 0 1 2 0 - 2 4 .._.. 4 45 PM 0 0 1 1 Q 0 i0 0 1 0 - 0 0 0 i 0 i 0 0 0 �_ 2 0 � 2 2 4:50 PM 0 0 I 0 I___13 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 7 0 1 0 - 0 - 0 _�- 0 1 4 55 PFA0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 Q 1 2 4 M. _ 1. � 500PM 0 - 0 0 1 0 0 D I 0 1 0 0 ; 0 ' 1 1 0 l. 2 i0 12 3 5'05 PM 1 0 0 i 1 0 ll 0 0 I 0 0 I, 2 0 I 2 0 ' 2 0 2 5 ,,.. .... .... _ _. 5:10PM 1 , 0 0 ; 1 0 0 I 0 0 0 ...6... 0 I0 0 i 0 0. , 0 1 515PM 0 , tl D I 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 0 .1 0 0 I .00 5,26 PM 0 ' 0 1 11 0...__0 l_ 0 L 0 ...0L0 _I 0__..i,__0_. 0 1_1_�._0_I 2 _.._.3._- 525 PM .... 0 0 0i. .0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 I 0 '� 0 0 .1,_0 ; 0T 0 Q 5130PM 0 0 0 :• 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ; 0 0 5,35 PM 1 0 0 Y1 0 0 0 i 0 j 0 0 0-.__0 0 -„ 1 0 1 2 540 PM._..0....i 0 0 j.....0 0 l_ 0 ._._0 0 0 071 0 I__0 .. 0 I 1 0_.._{ '1 -_- 1 5:45 PM 0 0 1 1 0 ' 0 ; 0 0 0 I 2 2 4 0 : 1 0 5:50 PM 1 0 0 ' 1 0 : 0 0 0 0 1 .1 ... . ..1 0 : 0 'I 0 i 0 2 .. I .. k. �'� 0 I 1 1 5:55 PM 0 : 0 ', 0 0 0 0 '�, 0 � 0 0 ! 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 , Total7 0 8 i 15 0 , 0 0 j 0 0 3 9 I 10 1 19 2 l 30 ! 0 ',, 32 I 66 Survey Heavy Vehicle 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound EastboundII Westbound Start _ Pilkington Rd Pi€kin5Ion Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd__.1 Lower Boones Fera Rd Interval Time I L , T - R 7-Total L I T . R Total L T I R Total I L T . R I Total Total 4:00 PM 0 ; 0 ....1 1 0j 0 0 0 0 Il 1 = 3 j. 4 1 5 - 0 1 6 11 4:15 PM 1 , 0 - 3 , 4 0 [ 0 1_...0 0 _._0 }_.4 1 1 2 1 - 6 I 0 1 7 13 4_30 PM2 1 0 • 2 4 0 I Q 0 1 0 Ot n 1 2 1 2 0 . 5 3 5 11 T� .��0 9 . 6 0 0 0 2 1 1 i 3 0 : A � 4 7 4:45 PM 0 0 � SAO PM 2 0 0 2 0 Q 0 0 0 2 1 � 3 0 4 0 4 3 5:15 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 • 2 0 2 3 5:45PM1 0 01 � 12 0 1 0 _ 0 : 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 9 2 0 2 3 5:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 1 3 2 1 5 0 1 2 0 1 2 9 Total 7 0 8 : 15 10 l 0 1 O ' 0 I 0 : 9 I 10 i 19 12 I 30 , t) j 32 I 66 1 Survey 7777 Heavy Vehicle Peak Hour Summary 4:35 PM to 5:35 PM By Northbound SouthbOtind Eastbound Approaeh ”illartMOn In`fOut Total In POUt ilkinRd In owerBoones Ferry Rd _1 Lower Out Westbound os Ferry Rd f Total Volume Pu e050...�1.....4 10.... IO0 0 0. ut :Total 8 z...#8 26 - 14..... 6 29 26_.._ .... __... I_0.40 . ___.. 9.5$ .. ...,.-..I._0.58 By Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Movement Pilkington Rd. Pilkington Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Total L T R :Total L I T 1 R Total L T R ;Total L T R ,Total __Volume 4 0 2 , 6 0 ! 0 1 0 ' 0 0 4 4 8 0 14 0 14 28 J I 1 PHF_ 10.50 ! 0.00 0.50.'' 0.50 10.00 i 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0-33.1 0.50 1 0.40 0.00 0.58 0.00 : 0.58 0.58 Heavy Vehicle Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Pilkington Rd Pilkin9lon Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval Time L 1 T 1 R Total L 1 T. ; R I Total L I T I R 1 Total L I T ; R I Total Total 4:00PM 3 0 6 I9 0 I 0 - 0 1 0 _0 1 4 7 I 11 2 ..4_20 0_ 22 -_42 415 PM 5 0 - 5 [__10 04 0 0 0 0 i 5 � 510 1 19 1 0 20 40 4:30 PM 4 I 0 3 7 0 I 0 0 ; 0 0 1 4 4 8 0 : 15 ' 0 1 15 30_.. 4:45 PM 3 Q I 1 ; 4 Q 1 0 ! 0 0 0 -4 2 i 6 0L 12 0_LA2 22 5:00 PM 4._y_.._0_ l 2 = 6 0 _ 0 1 0 }_ 0......--0 I 5 -I 3 7- 8 0 1 10 0 1 10 24 , 134 Peak Hour Summary All Traffic Data Cay Carney (503)833-5740 Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 4:35 PM to 5:35 PM Thursday, May 09,2013 its 174 a Bikes C 0 5 1 Q 3 0 2 Lower Boones Ferry Rd Peds 2 Bikes 0 R 1 954 E 821 1068 N le 246 0/11t_ 0 71 am ! a 843 703 4 833 Bikes 1 140 % Peds 3 Lower Boones Ferry T Rd 130 0 128 fk 386 258 O Bikes 1 • ti a Approach PHP HV% Volume EB 0.95 0.9% 843 WB 0.91 1.3% 1,068 NB 0.75 2.3% 258 SB 0.42 0.0% 5 Intersection 0.95 1.3% 2,174 Count Period:4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 135 Total Vehicle Summary m In Out e. 154 322 0 z 1± J1qr � HV 06% 14 136 4 ..,..m All rfi a c 1 ata PHF 0.71 m1030130. f 0 "' zi�ce- 15 . `22 Clay Camey Out 22 L ' 34 In (503)833-2740 In 1 B 0♦ ry_ n _" v4-1 10 Out �3 S /"•11 HV 33.3% + Pilkington Rd & Rosewood St PHF 4 i 45 �I f r'l 7 285 6 d Thursday, May 09, 2013 Out In 1_ 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 150 298 0 Peak Hour Summary I 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM . 5-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Pikkington Rd Pitkin tg_on Rd Rosewood St Rosewood Si Interval Crosswalk _ Time L �.� I - R 'Bikes L i T 1 R :Bikes L I T I R ;Bikes L : T R I �Sikes Total Nonh South Easi Wast 7:00 AM l - 14 6 0 0 'f 9 _ 2 _ 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1 0 5 : 0 31 0 0 4 1 0 ---} . _-- f ._. • 7 2 0 0 0 0 L 0 ,,,,.0 0 2 i 0 23 0 0 1 Q TOS AM 0 i 12 0 I 0 0 �----'' - - --- - --AM ......__ - ___., 110 AM 1 � 13 - 0 0 1� ' _ _ _� 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 26 0 • 0 0 0 7:15 AM 1 i 22 - 0 1 0 0 - 2 ' 3 1 0 0 i 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 _. _ 30 0 1 1 0 0 AM 0 7 20 24 i 0 0 1 6 1. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 -0 _.. 34 0 ' 0 1 0 _. _ 0 ... 0 1 7:225 AM 0 24 0 0 1 7 1 0 ._-0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 34 0 0 1 ..i .0 7:30 AM 1 - 19 0 0 1 i 16 I 1 1 0 1 I 0 0 1„ 0. 3 ii l 1 3 0 46 0 1 0 0 0__ 7:35 AM 2 27 1 i..._0 0 i 4 1 1 0 2 ..t. 1 0 10 0, i 0 i 40 ---44 0 O ..W 2 .0 7'40 AM 0 17 1 1 _0 0 j 16 2 0 _ 4 0 L 0 1 0 ---0 i_0 1_I 0 -44 0 0 0 ..1 1 7:45 AM 11 23 i 0 0 0 11 _ 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 i 0 • 0 0 40 0 0 0 1 1 7:50 AM 1 33 3 1 0 1 1 20 1 2 [ 0 3 i 0i 110 2 1 0 1 1 ; 0 67 0 : 1 0 9 _I 0 7 S5 AM 1 33 0 i 0 Q j 2a 2 L 0 1 1 04 0 i-. 0 __- 1 t 0 : 3 ' 0 61 0 1 0 0 i 0_ 8'00 AM 0 � 29 1 � 0 1 i 9 1 0 2 0. ! 0 0 0 0 1 { 0.. 44 0 0 Q 0 605 AM 0 i. 77 0 L.,0 _.,0 14 1, U_, .. 0 0 0 -.-0 1, .. 0 2 I 0 35 0 1 a 1 0 I 0_ 810AM. 0 17 • 0 0 0 -, 11 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 31 0 0 I 0 0 ._ 815 AM 0 16 0 . . .. .. .1 7 1 0 1 0 11 1 I. 0 0 ', 0 2 9 29 0 I 00 0, 8.20 AM 0 17 0 0 0 i 9_± 2 �- 0 1 O J 1 0 0 0_�_ 1 0 31 Dia � 0 0 8:25AM 0 ; 15 0 I..._0. .. 8 1._.0 .;. 0 0 j._0 0---1 0 0 I, 0 2 L.9 25 0 t 0 r..0._. 0 8:30 AM 0 19 1 0 { 0 1 it 12 _i__. 0 1 0 0 _ _0 0 1 0_ 0 L 0 I 0 0_ 32 0 i 0 l 0 8:35 AM 0 38 0 `0 _._0_ 4 ; 0 Q I 00 , 0 0.._.:.-0_ --5 fl. .._,....._28 _._ .._.0 i 0 840AM 0 14 1 0 0 1 .; 8 30 0 0 0 0 ,� 0 1 0 2 ,E„ 0 26 0 0 0 0 A ._..._.. _.. 0 --- ---- 8 A5 AM 0 18 0 0 0 17 ' 2 0 1 ' 0 0 0 ', 0 _ 2 , 0 40 0 I y,.. 8:50 AM Q 26 . 0 1 0 0 •1 17 1 2 ' 0 0 0 • 0 1 0 2 - 0 1 0 48 0 1 0 0 0 8:55 AM 0 27 : 0 1 0 0 ! 28 1 I 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 . 0 5 1 6 60 0 0 Ii 0 - 0 Total 9 : 494 - 6 0 8 1 263 ' 30 1 0 20 0 5 0 15 •, 1 52 I 0 903 I 0 1 1 13 1I 2 Survey 15-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start P ilklrtston Rd P€Ikinoton Rd Rosewood St I#- Rosewood St_,_ Interval Crosswalk Time L T r R I Bikes L 's T : R 1 Bikes L 9 I 1J Bikes I L T R li Bikes o Total I North i South' East !West 7:00 AM__ 2 39 • 0 L 0 1 18 1 6 0 1 1 0 0._.10 0 __- 0 i 10H 0 60 0 i 0 2 0 _ 715AM 1 ' 70 0 I 0 1 15 - 4, ;1 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 0 5 I 0 98 0 1 2 0�_ 730 AM 3 63 2 0 1 1 36_1 4 1 0 7 0 i 0 0 3 I 1 1 8_1 0 128 0 i 0 2 1 7.45 AM 3 89 3 1_ 0 1 51 4 _T 0 5 0-1-2 0 6 ; 0 A 1 0 168 0 L 0_ 0 1 y._.. _ r.. - &00 AM 0 „ .53, _ 1 � 0 7 34 i 2 i 0 3 0 O i 0 1 .- 0 5 ,i 0 110 0 i 0 i 0 0 1 1 .'..'_y - -_- 815 AM 0 48 Q 0 1 24 i 3 1 0 2 0 2 1_ 0 0 '� 0 5 L._0 $5 4 0 0 � 0 8 30 AM 0 51 0 4 0 2 24 0 1., 0 1 01 0 1 0 1 1 0 • 7 1 0 86 0 t 0 � 2 0 8:45 AM 0 71 . 0 1 0 0 60 1 5 i 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 3 0 1 8 € 0 148 F 0 0 j 5 0 Survey I 0 494 ' 6 0 I 8 263 ; 30 ' 0 I 20 0 I 5 t 0 I 15 111 Total 1 52 i 0 I 903 !I 0 1 ' 13 i 2 I Peak Hour Summary 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM B Northbound Southbound Eastbound ( Westbound Pedestrians By Pilkington Rd PiEkin ion Rd Rosewood St Rosewood St Total Crosswalk Approach - .'� . - '-' - -- --' In In • Bikes I In Out Total I Bikes North�,South I. East ,West Volume 298 : 150 44.81 I Bikes 1154 13 2 4761 I Bikes0 18 22 1401 L 0 34 1 10 : 44 0 504_. I 0 1 4 2 I PHF • 0.74OB90.45 00.0% 073 .71 By Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Movement Pilkington Rd I Plikin tan Rd Rosewood St _Rosewood St Total 6 )298 Volume 7 3.2%25 98 .3 0%4 I 0 50 .4. 0.70 Q 5% 03.00_4 1 0 QO 0.38 13.3t 1006 0 25 0 69 104711 04% %HV 00%- �QO/ 30% 250%i 44% 0.0% 45k 333% -0.0%433.3%33.3% OQ%� 0.0% 0.0% 00°/ 4.4% PHF 0.58 0.75 0. Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound + Pedestrians Start Pilkington n Rd Pilkington Rd Rosewood St Rosewood SiInterval [I Crosswalk . . . .. West:Time L � T R !Bikes L ! T •� R 1 Bikes L i T R !Bikes L '; I R I Bikes Total North?South; East I West 7',00 AM 9_, 261 -__5_L0 ...4__1 145 i 121_ 20_-" 013 10 .11....3 1 0 10 1 7 0"" 474_._. ._..0_-_! 1 6 �. -2 7 ...._. 7:30 AM 5AM 7 6 ' 2 .m. 0 .._ 41 1A 73- 1 0 15 j 0 17 � 0 I 4 0 . _. .....11_. -- 22.._E 0 504........ ...0 1 4 d -2--- .65 6 263 8 6 _0 4 .1 136 -.. 3__I_ 0 0 . 1 10 , 1 22.. j 0 491 0 0 2 2 .7:45 AM 3 : 251 • 4 0 5 1 133 ' 9 1 0 11 F 0 4 1 0 8 0 21 0 449 0 1 '0 2 1 8:00 AM 0 - 233 • 1 '0 4 142 1 10 0 7 ''3_1 2 1 0 5 . 0 -1 25 0 429 0 : 0 7 T.0 136 ti M • ti • I . ..y..� 1o tl.0441 _ ny t b O ak.-�IMIO V Etl Vl1,.-Q.N€N�', N'Mko11�n m"9 1�1�.rf1'.N* C 3 N'.,, z 43tl i,--1 r op 3 5EF , I k �� V H 1 1 o NQ a N'o • y QNCNVN�N COS 0._p 'L�.YR `� ♦"'a wfl. -.....� I ...... it _. ,.. ..,, � • r __r o�,; 0 or ''�00oj0I oic�aaoa:00�,00;o IPar.p ry �ao�a,o 'ar N an Fpa---' n a ¢ 5 I �.•�1+1 t �I.-,... 02 ir) a ^ K a 01010y0,i0,,011n16 or= 30 050,5o-O O okn n tl' o �... !d' --rd. io 5.01.-,0. o r 1F 3 a'C n _K 11 • Ie- P•O 410 O 03o1n nI tl 4..........0i410,•000.0 O p� 11 ~ 1 ` i'41-0:,7; b m i' • F 0 E_ o�0,0100:C0-'0 r .3 n OEptn'' �,. 3�O P'0 J n'0 J I ,21.-O P P 0 O F n n o n m J 0 CI f01 poo€oda 0 0 0,0: 1h Flo o P .O .c.;n !0.0 -- - ' I 1 I {!I _ • ....,. I �I� O - h 010101030, _ l0 Nro;N 0-0i0 0-0110k01 0 0:0 0 O 01010 N'T-I050 0 co f 010 a r9 r9 k.D-MI` 'O fq 1 1,' 1 SIF 1, 1 • I l Ir rhi _— 1 • F,-. _� c O 1 1 lo'oo1oo 00'',0 . 'C 9� ptol.-1,10:0,00 94J W ay !h N.,�. w k OIOIn n!0 o I E I GCI.r01 C 9 -;n`. C �� -�I 'O C-e p'0a10 o1, p00 O O I] illIY 0€ 3 oil- 3 O ` a El-050 0 01I010 01010310/0 0 0I0.010 0{0 tl1G:0,o a .W�kF olp;p O'',0 o 0 W ok5 tr4,r0o'. SIF p q F-0 0-0 4EP `II 1 f 3 1 1 _1_ ...i -..�,f P , J 010 n Wil 0 x.0.50 p(010 0 0`0 0 _I o O1O -...• ... W- J O'0 off E I III 1 , �� Opo CO ...__ or 1, 1 1 €€ I I - 1a 1 5.00 13 V/ F 010101f�1q 10 N7 f-I �0y._0 .0. ''_�__I_-0-:---H-- .1.,-I0.N 0 0.. IA- k INTET allNaia �_ ; F556,ro Oorl�• , C�I nooi' E ,F-` .. -�- --'-'o' a€ 6W GgItl6 .o i O C{ty'O O n l o o 01,o I o 0-0 0 0.0 E p 0H,,10:..., [LOO 0 0,,tl o �'O ry K 01,10 n 0�n • 0 « 00 p~"r"1 ---,010, � E 1 �_`_ N N-N W N Q N fl.. • IA 4 3 �_. r i r .2-, a.. a • A Q 2 F 0000101, 10 0:.-::61-!-•6N F ' i r YS y 555 w e I - l - o. s-IF o F�n,mi«r c. ,M O _ 1,0 010 n n n�n©I P,*0,.0•0 0I.:0;00.0]. r J 0:101-10:90,0-0 1, .- �6 -n N - I • - 1 P. $ __ a E P E a F �1. o 05E0,01.-..-,N,50 0110 0 01 0.0 o k� Ni N1 (� O'optl a p 7 k :3 Aa v ��(a • 00010:0 ...o, 4 c�.0 E—_.I„1Npm E ornml A, m N ^q r�l� 1,0 01,0 0�o o_,o,o a n a, --- - y 9! .. O • o_ r�o mn Ur'+ � �` 1,' I 1 ? -1, - 1 .-. .._.. ¢ L =wool ioo p,00 o � = o ° z p�o e�,�Ooo,Pa TF.,”- N0 0'0 O •QxF 1� { 10 011,0 O�{{ k y] r:u ' 1 \ .- Ci ` " ,r-, , (.70 O ` � o0pr010''05050'0 lF0 oio 01040010'00 n^n,c> 0._c, V 0 [J 0 0` p r, ,_. >L� ZalUr z°Ii] :6 0 4 O - : -I-,I {C H O YtL i 1 • '- ' - • �•O zaF,-,!,...1c... -10:0O 2a yr y.. SO 41 E 0 0 0 ti (�Ci0 4 0 V PIP 0:0 > a h ,z - 7-m1m , 2 12''2 nl�m m m;m'�m ! 2'2',2_g m > - m;Mk2'M3.2 - - M21,2.2iM (p it C:. �.� ,rr daalaaaaaaaakaaaa,aaaaa¢.6«<a .� r m alakaa;a¢a , ' rc 00 T —E v. ID CL r 1�. ^ GniC 213.oolai.1rov,nO1.017r.von.Q 05o0n 0,0'0 OiErf_o01°- it,O Z2£ la4I0o,u>o0 oz h 0Q = mi �'_ zp 9Pp�_k?•0=.!a r r r, r:lr rlr r co da'm a,m c•.1,7....7_4:.,1.9..1?ol9 ro0 co rn d Q -0 h•15,15.-,15-1r-.10,02' I71'. co co , C .?.,IE. o 7•� N: -°�'��q'r. riim I� k rl i !� �. ,�A ....� fv Peak Hour Summary All Traffic Data;.•. _saai:oiniio- Clay Camey (503)833-2740 Pilkington Rd & Rosewood St 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Thursday, May 09,2013 a Et ▪ Bikes 0 ae 154 322 J 14 136 4 y Rosewood St Peds 0 Bikes 0 R 22 22 ( 1 34 A' ge 11 ,dam Wfir♦ L• on 15 A a S a 18 0 4 10 Bikes 0 3 y Peds 1 Rosewood St R 7 1285 1 6 ix 150 298 s: Bikes cri 0 C Approach PHF HV% Volume ER 0.45 33.3% 18 WB 0.71 0.0% 34 NB 0.74 3.0% 298 SB 0.69 4.5% 154 Intersection 0.73 4.4% 504 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 138 Total Vehicle Summary . In out M 419 230 c o s L,. 4 389 26 WIi = ra, jo' Data, _ 4 HV 5.9% 4 -" ` PHF 0.53 5S Y'6 if Ex0.1P 1O',::, 6 1. ... Clay • Came 12 d N t 14 Y Out 6 fd (503)833-2740 in 18 0♦ N' w �I E c ♦0 31 In 31 Out 6 Z 9 r3 Pilkington Rd & Rosewood St PHF Q-45Hv 045 1'1 f Ir'( (---- 22645ci Thursday, May 09, 2013 Out n �, - 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 396 211 0. Peak Hour Summary 1 4:55 PM to 5:55 PM 5-Minute interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound I Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd - Rosewood St Rosewood St Interval I Crosswalk Time L T - R i BikesL: T R 17 Bikes L 7 1 R i Bikes I L I T R Bikes Total North 1 South 1 East 1 West 4.00 PM 0 - 21 1 0 ' 0 3 17 1 00 - 0 1 1 0 0 - 0 - 0 1 0 43 0 0 0 0 4:05 PM 0 - 23 2 0 1 . 260 . . 1 0 ....._0 I 0.,.. 0 0 0 0 , 0i 0...1 46 0 ! 0 1 D_ J....0 4:10 PM 1 18 1 0 1 1 16 D 0 0 , 0 VI 2 Y o 0 0 ' 1 0 f_40 0 1 D 2 0 415 PM 1 26 6 � Q 5 . 20 1 6„_ 1 0 ' 0 7 0 1 6 _ 6 r p --55 0 0 0 � 0__ - 4 20 PM 0 14--'- 0 1 0 0 11 18�1 0 0 2 0 7 0 - 0 1 0 1 y 0 36 0 i 0-4_1 0 0 - 1 I 0 .... 7- ._. 4:25 PM 1 ,1 27 1 0 4 1 28 1 �t 0 2 - D -� p r-�0 0 0 : 1 7��0 66 0 0 3 0 4.30 PM 0 13 0 • 0 1 i 19 0 0 5 i 0 . 1 Jy_ 0 2 0 . 2 I 0 43 0 1 0 1 0 0. 4:35 PM 0 29_t 1_ 0 3 ' 22 - 2 9 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 11 0 63 0 ' 0 } 0 -I 0 4:40PM 0 1 17 2 0 3725 1 0 1 0 2 1 0I 07 0 0 1 02 : 0 1 510 o I 0-i_ 0 445PM 0 29 1 ! 0 2 1 26 10 0 6 i0 1 1 10 0 0 . 1 1 0 60 �LL0 0 0 0 450 PM. 0 - 16 01 0 4 27 10- 0 1 0 0 i U cJTo 1 1 I0 49 1 T 0 T 3 0 455PM 0 17 0 1 0 3 i 29 1 1'0 0 0 1 01 0 0 0 c . 0 ' o 10 50 p 0. : 0 1 0 5.00 PM 0 16 1 1 0 0 I28 ° 1 11 0 0 I 0 D 0 0-1-. .no 49 0 0 1 1 1 0 i 0 � 5:05 PM 0 20 i f._ 0 4 r i 29 D 0 3 0 � 0 0 1 0 3 0 61 0 6 0 � 0 5:10 PM 0 i 14 0 0 2 ..1. 31 ... �� 0 49 0 0 0 p 5:25 PM 0 17 } .. : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 5:15 PM 0 17 0 d 0 4 ��I' 40 0 �] 0 0 0 � 0 ;' 0 1 0 9 I. 0 65 0 11. 0 0- a 0 L 0 3 1 31 0 i 0 0 Q i D i 0 D �� 0 1. 1 1 0 53 p 0 0 1 1 151'.25 PM 1 __ m 16 : 0 Q 0_.e._25i`�_- U.-...__ ..i._1 � 6 0 0 0_1 0 43 _....0....�__l_1 2 0_. 1 0.._ 0 0 ^2 0 52 0 00 0 5:30 PM 0 14 ! p 0 0 35 0 -0 0 r D I ? ! � -i 5:35PM 0 19 0 I 0 2 1 34 0 0 1 ' 0 ! 1 0 0 - 0 Q I 0 570 0 0 i _ 540PM 0 • 15 1 I 0 ' 1 ,,1. 37 1 0 5 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I 3 I 0 64 0 0 1 1 0--- 545PM 1 2D_ 0 t_-0 4 38. 0 0... 1 0 I 1 ._0 0 I 0 1 I 0 66 0 I 0 i. 0 0 5.50 PM 0 I 17 1I 0 _3 1 32 i 0 • 0 1 1 0 2 ; D Q 0 1 0 1 0 ;p 0 1 0 ..... 56 ', 0 0100. .. 5:55 PM 0 1 10 0 0. . 0 i 26 0 1 0 1 ' 0 i 0 ' 0 0 , 0 I 0 ! 0 37 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Survey15 447 . 13 0 53 653 8 0 I 28 1 1 • 12 1I 0 I 7 - 0 27 . 0 ! 1,254 I1 1 ; 1 1 13 2 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM ' Interval , Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start _ _Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Rosewood St Rosewood St Interval Crosswalk Time L_ T - R I Bikes I L i T 1 R Bikes L ET 1� R Bikes YL i T R Bikes Total North'B'South ii EastTWest 4:W PM I 1 r 62 i 3 : 0 5 1 53 i 0 0 0 ; 1 I 21 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 129 I 0 ! 0 1 2 ' 0 1 4'15 pM 2 67 11 0 9 1 66 I 2 1 0 5 x 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 Q I 2, 0 r 7 0 0 157 5 I 0 � 3 0 4:30 PM 0 ' 59 r 3 0 7 66 2 0 9 r 0 t 0 2 -I _ T 0 157 1 D -I- 0 7-0�. 445PM 0 1 62 1 1 ,' 0 9 i82 1 1 0 ._,1 I Q 1 0 0 0 2 , 0 159 1 0 _ 3 1 0 500 PM 0 1 52 2 1 0 6 i 88 1 2 0 4 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 159 0 0 ` 1 0 - -.1_88 - �...._ .j. 5}5 PM 1 50 1 1 0 7 1! 96..... 0 0 0 1 D 1 0 1 r 0 l 4 0 161 0 1 1 2 1 1 5:30 PM 0 48 1 i 0 3 _ 1176 1 0 6 0 2 i 0 1 '0 i 5 1 0 173 0 1 0 1 1 1 • 5:45 PM 1 1 47 7 1 0 7 96 0 I 0 3 0 3 ' 0 0 0 1 I 0 159 0 1 0 I 1 ' 0 Survely 5 447 13 5 j 53 I, 653 i 8 j 0 I 28 1 �1 12 1 Q I 7 ; 0 27 ? 0 I 1,254 I 1 1 I 1 13 I 2 Peak Hour Summery 4:55 PM to 5:55 PM Pedestrians`[ North ound d E i In -I Out g6 To al i Bikes i In I Pilkinoton Tota''1 Bikes En 1 ROut"1 Total',I Bikes In I Out t Total 1 Bikes Tool f North-South wEast 1 West By JJ Approach Volume {{i]] 211 -: 398 509 - 0 419 ' 22.8% 30 649 - 0 14 0.5% _18 6 i 24x0 17 31 : 48. _l 0 .5.9% 665 0 • 1 I 4 2 1 1.4% PHF . I. .-tl93 090 --- i.-. ._..0'45 �. 0.531 089 j 3 %HV Northbound nd L ,PrT P Fid R '!Total-.... Plr l9 tooR Total-�-- -RosewoodRSt lTotal L __Rosewao Rosewood Total By Movement Volume 02� 204 5 1211 26 - 389 - 4 1419 12 I 0 j 6 110 3 1 0 14 117 665 00%42.8% 00% 05% 0.0%:05% 0.0%10.0%,00% 00% 100/:0.0% 71% 15.9% 14% ._.08. . 8 5.90 04 _r._� .....,..10.38--- -" r___ - ---- PHF 0.50 0.93 1 0.63 :0.93 0.65 4.89 0,50 0 90 S 0,43 10.00 i 5.50 0.45 • 0.00 • 0.58 10.53 0.89 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Westbound Pedestrians 9, 1 Rosewood St Interval Crosswalk Start • PrYkinglon Rd Pilkington Rd Rosewood St Time L 1 T , R Sikes L I • R I Bikes L 1. T 1 R I Bikes L . T . R 1 Bikes Total North South.: East I West 4:00 PM 3 1 250 : 8 1 0 30 I 267 : 5 0 15 1 1 i 6 .,.,..0. 4 1 0 1 13 ..1 0 602 1 1 08 0 415 PM 2 240 7 1 0 31 1 302 7 0 19 _ 0 1 4 0 5 D 15 1 0 6321 0 1 7 0 4:30 PM 1 t 223 7 ' 0 29 1 332 1 5 1 0 14 7 0 i 4 0 4 0 1 17 . 0 • 636 1 1,, 1 i S 11 1 4 45 PM 1 : 212 5 0 25 r 372 4 11 0 11 I 0 1 4 _ 0 3 0 1 15 1 0_ 652 1 1 1 7 2-__ .._ _ __._.. - - o 3 _._.. ---- ..,' 5 .... 2 5 00 PM 2 197 5 r 0 23 386 3 0 13 0 60 3 ip 1411 0 652 0 1 139 m VIll Heavy Vehicle Summary 2 7 0 2 0 4) i L. ..::.:..:A11:.Ild raffic. �D ata _ .::..a!ate m Wit aia onto , :rvit ii 0 J A' L 1 . Out 0 till` 41-0 Clay Camey 0.-Ilee (503}833-2740 In 0 3 r4 c'3a r. Pilkington Rd & Rosewood St Ill t r'I 0 6 0 Thursday, May 09, 2013 Cut 6 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM I Peak Hour Summary 4:55 PM to 5:55 PM Heavy Vehicle 5-Minute interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Pdkinpton Rd r Pilkin on Rd Rosewood St Rosewood St Interval Time L 1 7 1 R-Plots! L T ' R .Total L 11T R r Total L�. 1 R :Total Total 4 00 PM 0 0_ i 0 0 01 0 1 0_ i 0 p 0- . _0 0 (It 0 • 0 0 0 _ 4 05 PM 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 L 0 0 11 0 1., () _p , 0 0 ' 0 • 0 1 0 2 .__ -- } 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 1 4:10PM: 50 0 0 0 1_..I .1 1-12- 0 _ ---- ...r .... 4:75 PM 1 � Q D � 1 0 1 � # 2 0 ! 0 i 0 i 0 0 0 -.0 0- ... ,3._..-- 420PM 0 1.__i 0 - _,.1 0......j. Q 1._ 0 0-_ 1 0_._I 0 r..1 - 0- 01 0 i 0 2 2 � 0 - 2 0 0.' i0 0 -0 0 1._ 1 5 425 PM- 0 2 0 j 2 Q - - 430I M 0 0 0 L_a _ ❑ l.. o 1._0 0 0 1 0 0 _ 6 6 L 0 0 0 0 4.35 PM 0 2 012 0 0- I-..0 0 0 i o.P0 L...0 0 0 0 0 .....2 .... 440 PM 0 00 0 0 1 0 r_ 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 4:45PM 6 0 - 0 ' 0 0- 11 0 I 0 0 l W0_T 0 ' 0 0 0 0 - . 0 0 4:50 PM 0 i 0 1 0 ..._0--- 0., 0 0 0----OI- 0 o i0 0 , 0 9 0 0 4:55 PM 0 i 1 i 0 1 00 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1_ 0 ,___1_ ___ 5:00 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5:05 PM... 0. 0 , 010 0 . 0 .0 0 0 0. . 0 l 0 0 ;- 0 0_ f 0 0 5:10 PM 0 0 I .0 .' 0 0 .. 0 0 ? 0._. _- 0 I. 0 1 0 .. 0 0.. 0 0....j 0 0 5;15 PM 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0... 0 ] 0 i ❑ 0. 0 01- 1- 1 1 5:20PM 0 2 - 0-_' 2 0 9 1 0 r 0 _._Q .0_� 0 � m _ 0 0 2 ..- 5:25 PM 0 : 0 0 0 1 _ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? 0 ( 0 0 0_ 0 0 -_--_ 0 5:30 PM 0_1 0 0 1 0 0 0_L0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 ; 0 - 0._I 0 0 5:35 PM 0 0 ' 0 I a 0 ' a 0 0 _ ❑ i 0_..._'_ 0 : o -_-0 L_ 0 _ 0 T 0 __--0 5A0 PM 0 0 1 0 _1� 0 0 1 ll _0 0 0 0 0 ; 0 0 0 0 0 --__ ❑ 5:45 PM 0 j 0 `0 0 0-__I l r 0 I 1__..__0__ 0 0 0_. 0 0 _ ...a..I...0 1 5:50 PM 0 3 1 0 ; 3 0.. 0 i 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 j_ 0 : 0 l 0 3 .. 5:55 PM 0 0 ❑ `: 0 u'' ! 6' 0 o o 10 0 0 0 1 0 o ; 0 0 Sunray Total v 1 12 0 ; 13 2 ! 5 1 8 1 0 0 I 1 0 ; 3 1 3 I 25 1 Heavy Vehicle 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Northbound SOUthbound Eastbound Westbo Time Interval E LStart PiTitt�loO14 1 Total L I PiTi9. nR d:Total T L LRosewood T I R t Total 1 L Rosewood711 R 1 Totel Interest Total 1 4:00 PM 0 - 1 • 0 1 2_1. 0 1 0 I 2 Q- 0_1_ 0 0 9 0 0 - 3 , 4:15 PM 1 -„_3 0 0 3 . 1 1 4 1I 0 0 1 1 9 0 1 1 1 10 -. 430PM 0 2 0 1 2 0 O 0 0 o ❑ o + 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 3 - 4:45 PM 0 _i 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 o 0 0 0 Q 0 I 0 1 I 500 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 i 1 . 0 ] 1 0 0 1 ❑ 0 _.,0 0 1 5.15 PM 0 2 0 2,... 0 1 0 0 '- 0 0 r 0 1 0 0 0 ' 0 1 1 --- 3 7 • 5:30 PM o.. 0 .0 0 0 ' 0 9 3, 0 0 1 o I. o I 0 0 :. 0 . 0 'j o _ 0 tt 5:45PM 0 3 1 .0 3 i o 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 ❑ 1 0 5101010 4 ISutvely 1 12 . 0 13 € 2 ' 5 1 6 I 1 0 'i 0 1 I o 0 3 3 25 - . Heavy Vehicle Peak Hour Summary 4:55 PM to 5:55 PMNorthbound SouthbOUnd Itj Approach f_-In P4k1 T Rd In Pout g on1 Rd tat fn j 00117-Tote'Ta dSI I #n • OuRosnw000t 1 St bound Westbound 1 By --) Total I Volume E 0.50 .2 1 8 ... L 0.50 7 9 0.001 0 _[ 0 10.25 ' 0 : 1 } 0.56 Nort nd nd und Westbound By Pilk nb oon Rd P krnh8bon_uRd__ _ _ RosawOod St- -_--,. __- Rosewood StTotal Movement L 1 T - R :Total L I T R :Total I L T T I R i Total L 1 T ' R 1 Total 1 1 vPHF e 10 00 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 1 050 ' 0.00 i 050 10 00 i 0_00 000 1 0.00 1 0.00 _ 00P 000 0.25 10.20 i 0 56 j Heavy Vehicle Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Rosewood St Rosewood St Interval Time L 1 1 1 R 1 Total L 1 T 1 R 1 Total L I T 1 R 1 Total L i T 1 R 1 Total Total 4:00 PM 1 : 7 : 0 " 8.... 2L31 3 1--1..,_ 2 2 17--- 6 1 O j Q l t 0 0 A 15 PM I 1_ 6 ., 0 1, 7 -_0 y 4 -_„1 5 _1 0 -1 0 F._t _ 0 0 2 .1_. 2 15_--- 430PM ltl 0 5 0 5 0 r 1 1 0 ' 1 0 0 0 i .0 0 0 2 1 2. 8 445PM 0 - 3 0 1 3 0_ 1 1_1 0 1 0 I 0_ 0 j 0 0 ; 0 1 1 1 5 5:00PM 0 1 5 1 0 5 0 i 2 I 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 -r 1�W- 8 140 Peak Hour Summary All Traffic Data r�ei �c Ya1v 4 � Clay Camey (503)833-2740 Pilkington Rd & Rosewood St 4:55 PM to 5:55 PM Thursday, May 09,2013 tt c l Bikes ,C 0 419 230 4 ( 389 26 g 44 11 Rosewood St Peds 0 R 14 Bikes 0 6 E 0 17 ie 3 a � 12 614- 18 18 0 ") 31 Bikes 0 6 Peds 1 Rosewood St R 2 204 5 CC 398 211 Bikes 01 0 C Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.45 0.0% 18 WB 0.53 5.9% 17 NB 0.93 2.8% 211 SB 0.90 0.5% 419 Intersection 0.89 1.4% 665 Count Period:4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 141 ram In Out Total Vehicle Summary e in 142 Out 0 2s. 3 130 1 lu 4) 4. t►� ��.:::.; l �I .I. • � HV 33.3% .CJ..a.l - rltl ars®�1'.ssS ...,..... SHF 0,38 II LI 0110 . 1 ,2J ^' t, Clay Camey Out 35 3 In (503)833-2740 0 �' w' f: a �.2 In 36 1 Out 24 1 S c0 HV 5.896 2 Pilkington Rd & Willow Ln PHF 0.53 141 f i 1 el 30 285 0 N o Thursday,May 09,2013 Out In =t, 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 162 315 5. Peak Hour Summary 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM 5-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start _Pilkin ton Rd PilK ton Rd _-- Willow Ln _ Willow Ln Interval Crosswalk .s.__I West Time L T R Bikes L I T R �Bikes L T T R j Bikes L T R 11 Bikes Total North i South-1-East I West 7:00 AM 7 13 ! 0 t 0 0 8 0_ 0 1 L 0, I 1 0 0 0 0 : 0_ 24 0 :_ 0 .1 1 0_ 7:05 AM 1 12 0 ! 0 0 6 - 0 0 ,0 _>. 0, ? 1 0 0 _0 0 0 20 _0 I 0_ 0 : 0 710 AM 0 19 0 I 0 0 � 2 0 0 1 0 ; 0 ' 0 0 0 1 0 23 0 0 I 1 i 1 7:15 AM3 24 0 1 0 0.--- 4 0 Ir 1 2 1 0-_7 5 0 0 _._ 0 i 0 0 38 0 ) 0 i 1 I 0 720 AM.._. 3 18 0 �.. 0 0 jj 5 0 0 1 I 0 4 i 0 0 ";... 0 0 0 31 _ 0 0 0 1 7'25 AM 3 II j 22 0 11 11 0 3 : 0 1 2 0 0 1 ..-0 0 43... 1 1 0 1 0 I 0 730 AM 2 28. 0. ...0 _ 0 15 _ 0 0-_._.2 0 1 1 1...0 0 ; 1 0_.1 0 39 _. 0 0 0 1 0_. 730 AM 2 1$ 1 0 0 0 ..._ .. ., 0 t 7 I 0. 0 0 0 I 0 j 0 0 ',,-.U 0..._ 0 ..- 37 __-- Q 2 ' 2 0 _ 7:40 AM 5 16 i 0 : 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 3 i 0 0 1 0 0 � s 12� 0 37 0 0 1 0 I 3 7:45 AM 2 30 1 5 1 5 0 19 1 0 0 ! 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 i 0 53 0 �._0 1 1 -- .750 AM 1 39 - 0 _0 1 1 18 I 0 ' 0 -._0.._,., 0 1 3 i0T 0 0 i 0 1 0 62 ) .0 I 0 ` 0 i 5 1- 1 ? 0 60 _- 0 I 0 0 : 0.,,, T55 AM I i 35 � 0 0 0 � 17 0 0 2 D ! 4 0 0 0 a._. _- 01-1 1 �_ _._" __"" '_ ..._ 1 8:00 AM 5 79 0 0 D 11 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 D 0 0 D 36 0 {! 0 1 D 0 8:05AM 2 ,1....15..! 0 1 0 0 i -10 I -1. 0. ....1.... 0 r 0 i 0 0 ... 0 0 0 _, 32 - 0 0 0 0 8:10AM.... 1 i. 18 i 0 1 0 ..0 9. I .0 .0-... 0 0- I 0--1_. 0 0 E 0 ...0.,.1 .0. 28 ... . 0 0 . 0 . ..0 8:15 AM 3 15 : 0 l . 0 0. 1 9 1 1 0 0.... 0...1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 29 -..0 j1 . 0 0 I-,-0. 8:20 AM 4 18__ 0 1 0 _.._0 I 9 i0 i_0..Y._.1_ .__.0 1-1_. _ 0 0 _-0 '__.._0_"_1L 0 33."_ 0 0 0 Aw.Q B:25AM . . .. .. 010_- --_0 8 0 1 0._.._._.0 1_0 1 j0 0 0. .._.9 i._0 ... 26____ _--01 0 _�1 i....0_,_ 8:30 AM 0 I 18 ! 0 ' 0 0 i 8 I_1 10 _-_0 , 0 1 0 j D -_ 0 0 01 0 27 0 , 0 1__LO_ 835 AM 3 18 0 I 0 0 � 8 0, 1 0 0 0x_ 1 0 0 0 010 28 0 0L 1 D 840 AM 2 15 0 . 0 0 ' 13 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 3 0 0..t 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 I_ Q-_- ... 1 845 AM 2 21 0 0 0 � 16 , I 0 1 I 0 1 r 0 0 0 0 1 0 .....42. 5 .. 0.... 0 r 0 8:50 AM 1 - 27 0 0 - 0 i 20 I 1 0 1 0 4 ) 0 0 1 0 _0 I 0 54 0 0 I 0 - 0 8:55 AM 3 . 19 0 0 0 1 24 ! 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 : 1 0 47 010 , 010 SurvTotey 51 494 ; 0 j 1 1 1209 ' 7 1 17 1 0 1 38 0 I 0 2 1 3 I 0 882 6 2 1 9 1 2 15-Minute interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval 1 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Pilkington Rd Pilklnyton Rd Willow Ln Willow Ln Interval Crosswalk_ Time 4 T " R Ski es L -1 T I R 1 Bikes 1-1-1- T 1 R I Bikes L T R Mikes Total North'South Soot I West 0 2 1.__O 0 0 7 0 67 0 0 2 _ ,__ 7'15 AM 9 64 0 0 0 20 1 1 1 6 1- - _1 0 11 I 0 0 � 1 b I 0 112 1 0 1 1 7'00 AM 2 44 3 0 0 1 r 7 30 AM 9 62 0 ' 1 0 1 34 3 0 3 : 0 4 0 0 I 1 I 021.20 113 0 2 2 0 7'49 AM 8 55 0_._'1.._0 0 ..._ _ .• m..- 54 , � 0 ---2 0 .,I 8 1 0 Q 0 1 1 0 ...175 0 1 0 1 0 _ 745 AM 4 104 0 0 1 -- I 30 1 0 1 ., 0 Ii 1 � D 0 , 0 '� 4 0 96 0 0 1. 0 0 49 ; 0 0 1 29 1 . 0 .:...2 0 f 5 0 0 0 ` 1 0 143 ............r ..... 6:15 AM 8 49 0 1 0 0 j 28 �! 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 r 0 0 0 88 0 1 0 1 i 0 8:30 AM 5; 1 ;49 0 0 ; 0 i 29 I , 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 i 0 ' ;0;1; 1) I 0 1 0 .. 08 0. 1 0 2 Q 8:45 AM 6 ' 67 u 5 1 0 1 0 1 0 TotalS rvev 51 . 494 0 ? 1 1 1 i 289 '11 7 1 I 17 0 1 38 , 0 f 0 ' 2 1 3 j 0 I 882 1 6 2 E 9 i 2 Peak Hour Summary 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM By Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Approach Plll gton Rd PilkinSlon Rd Willow Ln Willow Ln I Total Crosswalk_ In Out ' Total•Bikes I In 1 Out 'Total:Bikes In 1 Out Total1'Bikes In ! Out 'Total 1 Bikes II North,South I East 1 West i Volume 315 I 16.2 477 1. 1 142 j 298 ; 4401 1 36 : 35,1 .71 1 0 I .3 1 0.38 4-_ --o-.4....076 I 1 . 2 I 4 1 1 9'HV 22% _ - 48°h 5.696, 33-3% 3.4% PHF 073 0.63 0.53 By Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Movement ----- Pilkiri ton Rd P1!kin ton Rd _-_ _ __...Willow Ln Wiilow Ln Total L T R Notal 4 I T i R Total L i T I R ;Total L 1 T : R ITotal , Volume 0303 _285 0 1315 1 I 138 3 142 12 1 0 I 24 136 0 ' 2 • 1 3 496 PI-IF. _�003-1 069 ' 0.00 1-0.73 ��I 133.75 .063 050 : 0.00 10.559053 0.00 : 025 0.25*10.38A 071 Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound ' Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Willow Ln _ Willow Ln Interval Crosswalk Time L ' T R ?Bikes L T ' R Bikes, L I T 1 R j Bikes L T R I Bikes¢ Total . North South f East 1 West 7:00 AM 24 X274 0 - 1 1 124 1 2 1 1 ' 13 . 0 25 . 0 0 - 2 1 2 0 ,.. 467 1 2 6.4 2 715 AM 30 2851 0 _1 1 1_____' 138..1 _3 i 1 12 0 1 2410 0 2 1 I 0 496 1 2 4 I1__ 7'30 AM 29 ' 270 r -0 1 1 1 I 144 3 0 __ 7 0 I 16 1 0 0 _1 1 I 0 472 0 1 2, 4- 0 - 8:00 AM 27 220 �- ! 10- 44 7:45 AM O , 0 1� 139 : 4 I 0 4 0 16 0 0 0 1 7 0 I 0 I� 4 0 0 0 1 1451 5 !-O 4 1 0 13 T a 0 0 1 I 0 415 5 ! 0 1 3 ' 0 142 • --r- ....,__ — -- :4 2 - E > :4 2 ....4. N 2 7-4 Z :**$ 4 71 I 0ca..nt;•0 oloIotto 0.0:0.o]....1....1-..I.I-.1-4 0 .4.-4-4-4-.... oi•-..--.11-:4174 5' 6 co < o ...„4 .,.,0 4 tom T-I it 2•E'Llt:;:1;;Ii...I.j.lo-tug i'..-- 6 pc° --4 7,64114 W L61],:,i•5.1,].11O1 016 6 1c.i.W16-1.OK.,:::/1-1]0040g: _ < ci, C. . . e -±-1, a 0, - o o a,ch•o;o1p:.a g.g-.. 0 - ; o cno chic cm nit,'o'cn to,o a c.o<PE o I 1.n•o opp!.tr a'I"Er m - z .- CD KIM K,1MK a t co a 1 . ; ' : i [ . ! t • . ' I I I . : t I ; t I I I I : co : - ro 1 • -7--- 43 •-•-- • • • I . . > . R. a- m , 0, •,. ., ..?. i , , , , , , , . ,. z• ir : • • -...i.:.r b.0„.. ,....i,5 n H H 40400:0 0100 r-41 .r) - 0 0-•••,000!.0 00000, &alololo•o!o'Eplo'o;o r EuEE .7.3 !S MI 't o 1 0, , ,;.1 : I . f.i 4 . i to 4' 0.1. e... I--1 i - 2 i • , 40 It. .• 1. 0 0 p. 11 z ;a,213 g zit cb-o , , iii . , 11 1 .-2 g 0, gu = 010.,,,,H0_,--;_I 0 g3 .•,_,5,0 r. .01,4-1.,,o,.1...s.--1.5-,.o p ;-; -,,-.,-..1 o Iola,o 1•Ji,0 &0-'4-.L....t.o.olo.floi-im 0:0-15E a F" Q3... Ca.< i!;'• • --,, 0 co 5 a ro g: ! -2.i )1.git. t ; I . I I 1 1 ! i 3 )1. .. 1 I i C:$ C:1 Xi •,.,./i i,,,...11.,.....,- .1ttt itD-. ...,.-0.:*„.z.m 5 CQ i:',9:11g X 0 0-0],00lclo o 0 7317,1 m 0 0,0,0,01.010r0.0.00 000 0 01040.10011r0 L,:::::,7:11 k 5. 0..0 et. :,..2.,,g I..I,M•C) --g t • I ; " Z 8';'7:;1111 E- ... ot... to. 1 .r. -Irr.!,,. L'' ' ! I I I , !..."g.411---: C a - c t t . . I ; t I I ' ' 1 ; ' -1 = P] -1- • co S' • t Fa. .4. k:'',;.'.t 7s.': 3 ,10,01..„!„,2. -, F-4 .,,,:01....J.101,„._9.1 , 5; --.0,0 00 NJ 0'.0,...,0,-.1-..:-..0 0010„,101_,. 0 9,.. g'H F..; 0 1, I '' ''''I (..•.3 * • Co i : 1 , -T-- li •-.. • i 1 I ! : lil ! 1 : i : 1 - al-`;-•--.•:E-••:- iEu'-•r! 'oh-,F a - 0 0,010,-,01010 ri -, 00.0!.0:0sop 000.0 0...-.10 oloo•ce.,cd,ololc,c,r I 4) Co Col . ; i- . : ;. • i . .; . J .. 1 I ; c -f HI 'H , , • -I -F. f Iff ff-i I ' 1 a o , , ,,,,,ca . 0! III ra ' *: t?ca I! 1 ' -t?co . : 1 : 1 1 : I I: r.9.,...0, .8itri,[11,:=1:.11.-I A-'•f 0 br,‘.HIE F.° .23E"..2 tts. 0 H POI.44.4:H4,1,H.0 H'7-0 7i,. 0,A,..14.00 H410 H H.:0'40".44 Cl...!-•&o.p.t,01-,00 0,.,- I.., , f,P0 7 11: -)..2. g : : 1 • , , i , , 1 ' ; :--j, I-1 • - , H I 1 -1, : J ] i 1,' I— i ! g . tS 2 ! -02 0 tH .....03 .1 al It I i . t 'tg 0 Q -`::-.•-••-:-••:0 MI 7a= KI-•00••x,= :•Er'.a Im§ - 0001-,..H::..,,,L,s -• 0 I.00!00 010100 0,-•,010.0 0 010;Oioi0.10100,0 • 1 , 0.O. -LnI ...„tk, ' • :' 1 E':mi`i 6. a -1-.1!: i -Ir F,.;. ...,:1,1i 11I1 I1 , 8 ' 1 iI • 1 . 11 I.. ,.- ilL _i. n- . J0 0Ntolo .1. .o.- -oto,oloItt0- 010I0, . a 5 1 • , , I I . • , 0 : 0; j , 111 . • 1- 111 ,. 11 i 0:0.40',--..!-..r- i n.-•r 6.....5 -, a a!Oorolol-.:o r --.: 0.000 0100 0,0 oEa o o,oloo],olo•-•oo:o 000 r N 1 : 1 ! E I : ::. 4,1 . : I j,_ 1- . 1 ' : :I, ' • r, • TT- -I .-1 0o-1 .*:VI olotato ..! 9: g, ,.-k 0 0 0,,,..;0.c„_il LP 0 oio.oloololoo•a.m.o°c.0 01001O.010To.0,00-I.,*6111 -.1-±- U rt : : , 1 /f'-•H.-•-• .---n,1* 0 ••••-•"-1 g - 1 ., . .-J 1 I H -1-: i-H -. ' : 1 itir E o oEo011oil,a 731, a I I ', I_ _i ..I ..-,- o'torolo.iololo:o ct;o!o.oI-:oIololo!to.oloololo;:t0)13'.;1, ,o,..11N] al...] .o.,•-1 01 ; ; 1 N. o 000-..101-Ito Ed • • ' ilk IIII; -1 0 0 0:0,00!Olop 0 0,00.0-..10i010010 Haiala alo a 5 'o ,,,,.a: L.:__ 1 1 I " 1 , I I 1 • '1, , -] : _ to -.• : I I ' • — . . , • 1 E ! Hil E : I I 1 olo oo!or- oar, W'-]]'T 0 o ooIc]=Iola o oil . 0.0:010,0].1oo 01010'o o!olo:oplo co,o101.0i0 1-1 1 '' •I• : ] ] 1 I I ' ! 1 ! I I • ' o: i * 0 * 1 I * - ....., o o ;oio „, o oro,o10o ololo010:0 Oloo oIaIo 0olo o]o o, -i*. 0000clE-I*,f OeHI in ' E ! . i : E•E r. m. .10'6' : :u 5 If a . , , , 11 ', . ' i l[ A _1 ',. 1 1 : : ; * ° o' I,_* g :' 0 . i '', It-E I • : '. -1'--' ' • I ; 1 1 I :t oi-•-i-I,zi.g S ...3;-•A lb J .... o otolo....oto o 71,. 2 - o.oto.c.o ololo.o.olo o,-!olo o o o=to o 1730I0 a. . . e. : ! • i cm V* :6 -:-. 1- h.: ..•....- -I 1 I -'-' I r-t I, * I- -..-4-• :-,- i , i ] 1: I -- . 1 ] ] I ! 1 1 ] -I t Z ag S' t=1 ol-.•E-EEL i-E-E,I-1 a 1...1-`gl -. o:o:oioim a o o!aa.o a-L:oia a olo;ololololo!a 9. 0 ,... .......-.-c.— ......- — ' . ' 5 F1-I • I : 1 I ' L' I , I I '-a-- 1 I .1 1 I I :, • .1 : ... o'` . ...). -4..4.• tt, - tr .. .41 4.- z .. .... --,•Ln..i.010i-..i.f.,-.:0,...1:.:-..<al.,-..1011,0,(4-;-kN.,01I 0 a F? 45 0 lv _,-,1 a ai, g ' • '. ; 1 r g 3- ! ; -e:-' . , - 01 141 t (+I k 0 , 41.. C.4 Peak Hour Summary 1 i '-• Clay Carney (503)533-2740 Pilkington Rd & Willow Ln 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Thursday, May 09,2013 ec b1 Bikes C 1 142 298 3 138 1 g ti Willow Ln Peds 1 Bikes 0 R 35 E 2 3 le 0 04 �1,. E .. • N 12 a a • s a- 36 36 0 4 Bikes 0 24 y Peds 2 Willow Ln 30. 285 0 162 315 Bikes to 1 Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.53 5.6% 36 WB 0.38 33.3% 3 NB 0.73 2.2% 315 SB 0.63 4.9% 142 Intersection 0.71 3.4% 496 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 144 Total Vehicle Summary In out w 3fi9 209 O 6 >u. 5 364 All Traffic Data =° 1 4 41 HV 0.0% . xn7,oxaixo ------/-- 0 --` PHF 0.00 Clay Carney Out 23 0 In (503)833-2740 - In 69 "'I1. 2 ti m D Out 641 S t HV 1.4% ~ 0 r Pilkington Rd & Willow Ln PHF 0.69 lti f r#' rn rn 2D4 Thursday, May 09,2013 Out In >' 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 428 222 Peak Hour Summary 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM 5-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM ' interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start _77 _Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd _ Willow Ln WillowLn Interval I Crosswalk L Time T - 'Bikes T - R Bikes L 1 R 1 Bikes 1 Sikes Total North:South I East I West I 4:00 PM 2 1 15 10 -,,,1 24 1_._0... i 0 1 - 1 5 1 0 : 0 '47 0 0 0 I 0 4-05 PM 1 27 I.- 0 : #5 _1 0 0 1 I 4 0 - - -1 0 ---48 -�.0 0 I 0 0 410 PM 1 19 1 20 - 1 4 0 1 5 1 0 47 0 i_ 0 it 0 0 4:15 PM 3 , 22 t , 0 - - 1 12 3 i 0 2 J 4 -[ 1 0 46 0 0 1 0 4:20 PM 1 16 jt, r 0 1 16 - 'I - 0 0 1 0 _ T`FT 0 35 010 1 p 425 PM 3 23. 0 21 0 ( 0 7 A f - 1 0 52 0 0 3 0 r.4:30 PM 0 . 15 . 1 o I 2fi 0 0 __ 1 ! i 5 0 - : 0 48 0 i 0 ! 0 Q 4r35 PM i 27 U t 24 fl 2 _-,..+-_ .-...,.-" A - _ 3 1 P 0 51 0 0 0� 12 _1_._ _ ..,-_ 440 PM 1 19 H. p i 18 10 10 2 � 210 1 0 42 0 D { 0 7 p 4 45 PM 3 21 - p - 7. ._ r._._.._...,..._. ..� T _ 34 i �c 0 _ 1 1 11 0 1 0 70 0 1 0 T 1 0 455 PM 0 20 1 0 28 i 1 1 0 �^1 E . O 0 58� 0 0 3 0... 1 0 I 0 1101 4 55 PM 1 20 0 _26 1 0 1 7 0 1 0 -- 58 0 1 0 ! 1 0 500 PM 1 16 E e '" F 505 PM 1 21 10 [[ i 0 56 0 0 p 0 5:10 PM 1 13 i p ?6 1 0 1 0 0 I -1 4 0 ... .i 0 ... 44 0 0.. 0 ,, 0 575 PM 2 17 .p 36 , O 0 1 1 4 'fl - - ....I 0 ...58... ...-0 0 0 0. 520 PM 1 25 I 0 �. 32 1 0 - -2---' 1 4 00. ,__ 0 65 01 0 0 ' 1 5 25 PM 0 1 13 ! 0 28 0 r 0 _ 0 12 J 0 0 43 0 i 0 L 0 - 2- 530 PM 3 9 2 1 32 .01 p 0__. 8 p � 0 _. 50 0 1 4 027 535 PM 2 �21 I. fl � 33 1 1 0 ....1 ' _12... .1. 0 ! D-_.."80. 0 1 0.._1 p 0 540 PM 3 15 3 0 37 #- 1i 0 0 _ 4 0 ! ..1 0 SO ... __.0 0 2� 17_ 0 24 1 0 0 1 . 545 PM..._ 0 19 - 0 40 4 i 0 0 _ 3 I. 0 -- .._f 0. . ....62 0 a._� 0 .... i. 5:50 PM 00 1 3 1.. 0 1 0 _._45 0 0 0 1 -2 .. !_ - � 5:55 PM 0 B 0 24 0 0 0 6 ': Q I 0 38 0 I 0 0 7 Su elv 31 425 : 1 628 . 11 - 0 16 1 110 1 2 1 1 I 1,221 I I 0 i 0 i 11 47 1 15Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start _ P_iik1npton Rtl L Pilkin9ton Rd Willow Ln Willow Ln _ Interval Crosswalkt _ _ Time L J T . 'Bikes -1 T R I Bikes l_ . R Bikes : 1 Bikes Total North 1 South 1 Easi T Wes 400 PM I 4 61 , : 1 59 i 1 1 0 _I 3 1_ 14 j 1 10 142 0 0 I 0 i 0 _-40 _..., I .. 4:15 PM 7 ! 61 : i 0 49 A 0 3 9 3,'f ! I t _ 0 __133 0 0 I 5 ! tl 4 30 PM ' 2 55 1 1 0 68 i 0 0___5 i 11 0 0 141 0 1 0 1_ 0 12 4:45 PM 4 54 1 0 82 i Trr 0 2 7 23 1 0 1 166 0 0 3 0 5.45 PM.,.. 0 --5:15 PM 3 44 ._0 .I_88 1,..1... o 02 12 Q ._.... ° 0166_... 0 0 3 J 0 -, 102 2 ! 0 1 10 I 0 - 0 166 0 0 'I 0 3 5 00 PM 3 50 0 r 85 1 0 __ 0 _ 19 [ 0 5 30 PM 8 45 1 0i t 2 0 - 0 - 170 0 0 Ir 0 27 0 145 rr 0 i Q 1 4 J 5 I Tota Su elv 31 425 1 I 628 1 11 0 I 16 110 2 I 1 1,227 f D 0 11 47 Peak Hour Summary 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM By Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Westbound I Pedestrians Approach --- Pilkington Rd _ Pilkinton Rd Willow Ln_ ! Willow in Total Crosswalk In : Out Tot&'Bikes J In I Out ' Total:Bikes I in i Out 1 Total I Bikes I In ' Out _Total f Bikes I North South East I West I Volume 222 428 650 0 369 ' 209 578 0 66 ' 23 - 92i 0 0 0 0 1 7 1 660 10 0 6 30 %HV 0.9% 0.3%.. _ 1.4% 0.0% 0.6y PHF 0.93 0.89 0.69 0.00 0.86 6y Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Movement Pdkin0lon Rd __ ,Pilk:ngtan Rd _, -Willow Ln Willow Ln Total --L ' T ;Total T R Total -IL 1 R ,Total u ---- -- iTotai 1 6 I_.Volume%H25% 0 304 . :0.3 . I .O 1. I +000 `p96 %HV 5.6% OS% NA 10.9% NA ��0.0% 20_0%p3% 20.0%I NA 00% 1.4% IT NA _. NA NA i0 p°/ 0.6% - PHF 0 56 0.89 10 93 o.69 : 0.63 0.89- 0.63 1 0.70 '0,69 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Start PI kington Rd Poking on Rd Willow Ln Willowbd Pedestrians nInerval Crosswalk Time L 1 T ' !Bikes I T R Bikes L 1 1 R I Bikes - 1 Bikes Total J North J Soulh i East I West -4:OOPM_-_-17 -._231 :.._1. ....:1,..258 :_--6 I 0 13 1 57 4 2 1 1-.._..,...582 0 : 0 ! 8 ! 12, 4:15 PM 16 1 220 1 0 ! 284 : 6 0 10 1 _r 62 } 1 1 _ _ _1 598 0 - 0 i_,-11 i 12_ 430 PM 12 214 0 330 1 3 •0 9 63 - 0 1 631 0 0 6 i 15 4:45 PM 18 204 ! 0 364 5 0 5 64 p :_ 1, 660 0 0 1 6 30 . • 5:00 PM 14 194 0 . 370 1 5 0 3 : 1 1 0 639 0 1 0 ' 3 35 145 Irl vm Heavy Vehicle Summary 1 2 1 0 Al•.• Pa a.0 ®.ta.: amreaYr�g�aaoiaxio';.-. 1 1J t Clay Camey Out 2 (503)833-2740 -0,. W t-to In 1 0-� s r ( Pilkington Rd & Willow Ln 141 t r'I 1 , Thursday,May 09,2013 Out I 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM I Peak Hour Summary 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM Heavy Vehicle 5-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM ----- Eastbound Westbound TimeL T _ Interval Northbound Southbound Start PilkingWn Rd Pilkington Rd Willow Ln Willow Ln Interval 1 T Total T ' R Total L F I R 7 Total 1-Total Total 4:00 PM 0 : 0 1 .._0__... - 0 1 0 0 - 0 1 . 0 0 1.._°-----..._a__.__ • 0 I 1 0 1 AOS PM 0 0 --� ---I- 0 0 0 1, __ _-1- - - - ---- 4:10 PM 0 • 1 f I 1 0 11.... 1 0 - 0 1 0 0 2 4:15 PM 1 0... ! 1 ....... 1. 0 I 1.... 1.... 1 -_ --i s t. .1.._ r---_-__ --0 ......3 4'20 PM ... 0 0 _l 0 I_ 0 1 1 0 .. ..._ 0 0 .__. _... 4:25 PM 0 _,1 - 1 ! 1 0. I.. 1 0 _ 0 1 0 • 0_, 2 - 4:30 PM 0 1 1 _......i .0 I...0 0 - 0 0 0 _ o ._.-. 1 _ ° o ° ° J ° ° ° 1 435 PM 0 1 1 1 1 3 ! 440 PM 0 1 0 i 0_ -- 10 1 _0 0 0 1 _ I 0 0 _„TI_ 0_ 0 4:45 PM 0 1 0 �0 _ 0.-T 0 T 0 it 0 L 0 0 0 _. _.._i i .- 4:50PM 0 0-_.L._,.._...,;...-0------'�0 0 0__...-�0 ------�-Q-'-� 0 -- -,__.,.,!._.._..._.L__� __ 0 4:55 PM 0 1 1 1 0 , 1 0 ! 0 i�-6 i ___ 0 -�2_ 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 _ 5:05 PM 0 i. 0 1 .... i 0_ 0.... 500 PM o 0 .. - . 1 .I 0 o - •1 - I 0 ... o_. 5 20 PM 0 : 0 _ - L 0 .._.,L. 0 li, 0 0 0 1'11 0 ... .. .1 0. .. ._ 1- - 5:15PM 10 II 1 0_ 0. 4_ 0 0 IIS 1 �4� 1 5:25 PM 0 0 ; -' 0 1 0 0 0 0 1..-.-, _ 0 0 :._ _.r 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0_..1_ 00_ 0 0 0 o .._. I 0 0.— 5:35 PM .._0-.-1---0 --0 —I- 0 1 0 0 0 1 __ 1 0 10. _._._ "10- 0 5:40 PM_ 0 i .----0 0 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 -- --_ ......0 _.._.a......-.. 5'45 PM 0 . 2 '.,2 .._. 1 0 € 1 0 0 h.._.0.,. 0 3 5:50 PM 0 ; 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 • 1 •0 0 I. 0 . . 1 5:55 PM 0 -...0 . 1 1 0 - -.. 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 ° i 0 �. . 1H 1 n 0 Total2 81 10 1 2 4 6 3 0 1 3 1 ? 0 I 19 Survey Heavy Vehicle 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM ound und nterva Time rt Interval I L PiT piton Rd Natal TP ilklI �nR d{Total L r EW fTR Tota€ WRllow InW illow Ln 7 Total l Total I 4:00 PM 0 1 1 1 0 � 1 1 1 ..L__ _} I �._ 1 ' 0 _3 4:35 PM 0 1 _ L i_-- 1. 2 1 2 3 1. •.... 10 . 1 1 06 4:15 PM 1 -_1 ._ .2 ..I1 0 i 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 r -1 I 0 ___2- 4:45 PM 0 7� i 1 i 0 570 PM 1 ' „0 0 0 i. ......, 0 0 ._.._M 0 1 0 2 5:30 PM-.. 0 . 3 1 3 ---- 0 i..._0 1• 0 0 _ 0 .I 0 I i 0 0 530 PM • 4 0 0 0 0 ° 0 ! 0 1 0 0 4 SurveyTotal ( 2 8 j 10 1 2 4 6 1 3 0 X11 3 I • 0 19 Heavy Vehicle Peak Hour Summary 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM 6y Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Approach ---- Pilkington Rd Pilkinglon Rd Wilton-Ln - Willow Ln Total In mm nut •Total In 1 Out _ Total In 1 Out i Total In Out 1 Total I4 Volume 2 ' 0 2 2. ...._ ..._ 1 ..'. 3..---. 1 t...2 1 3 0 04 PHF 0.50- - - 10.25., .. --I 0.25 ... 0_00 0_ ..... 1. .050 _, BNorthbound Southbound Eastbound { Westbound y Pilkin ton Rd Pilkin ton Rd Willow Ln 11 _-__ Willow Ln Total Movement .-----�� ' ' -_.----- -g'_- ------._ -- - -; L - T I Tota, 1 T R Total L - R :Total 1 Total Volume._.f 1 1_ - ....1..-.2 1 0 __...1 : 1 1 1 PHF . 0.25 0.25 I O.0 ----� 0.000 25 0.25 1024 . 1 000I 0.25 I '--- � I 0.00 1 0.50 -� Heavy Vehicle Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Willow Ln Willow Ln Interval Time L '. T I Total • 1 T 1 R 1 Total L I R I Total • 'Total Total 400 PM 1 5 6 1 4 5 1 2 0 2 0 13 4:15 PM 1 4 I 5 1 1 1 34 1 ' 0 : 1 4 10 4:30 PM , {-3 4 0 1 +- - 1 _..... 1 0 _, -- _. i_ 0 6 ..__ 4:45 PM 4 1 2 0A ,1 1 -- 1 1 1• • 0 1 I 0_ 4 St00 PM 1...__._3 1 4--_—tel 1 i 0 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 - 0 e 6 146 Peak Hour Summary All Tra tic t a ig.�aan Clay Carney (803 833-2740 Pilkington Rd & Willow Ln 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM Thursday,May 09,2013 Et 12 Bikes fi 0 369 209 E]. 5 1 364 it Willow Ln Reds 0 Bikes t 23 N PAY 2 E 5 pi ate• s a 69 64 Bikes 0 y Peds 0 IC 14 18 204CCI 428 222 Bikes , 0 • a Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.69 1.4% 69 WB 0.00 0.0% 0 NB 0.93 0.9% 222 SB 0.89 0.3% 369 Intersection 0.96 0.6% 660 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 147 In Total Vehicle Summary out c o 6 0 0 .L'9».4 ra a 4) 4- 41 HV 2.8% is s. a ..--- HF 0.89 zo'a:oxxo • 0 I�II _.... - J N L • Clay Camey Out 603l1, 574 In 1503)833-2740 611 ♦ 0: is -••• 5 o 4..570 In 633 �a 615 Out 22'1 S ie.4 HV3.3% �� .-..W..a Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd PHF 0.84 t e r. < m 33 4 6 o Thursday, May 09,2013 Out h 7 u. 26 37 a. 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour Summary 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM 5-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM _ Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Willow Ln Wlllpw Ln Lower Boones Fer RdInterval Crosswalk_ Rd Lower Boones Far Time L R i Bikes Bikes 1 7 ' R Bikes L T 'Bikes Total North South; East'West 700 AM 1 • 1 � 0 ._. 1 0 21. 1 .._3 � P._,'__.28 0 54 0 0 0 705 AM 6 0 0 i 0 IW 31 0 1 0 0 37 0 74 0 ! 1 1 0 0 .._.__ -.— - - -8- ' '--- - -1 7 10 AM 6 0 0 0 28 F. 1 0 0 39 [ 0 70. 0 0 0 0 7 15 AM 2 1 I_-0 -- 0 T 27 5 0 0 37 ... 0 72 0 0...i 0 l 0 720AM 4 ...-, 40 f 4 0 0 50 2 99 ...0 1 0 1 0 1 0 - 7 25 AM 3 2 0 0 [ 22 7 1 0 0 - 29 1 0 .63 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 730AM 4 : 0 0 1 _ 0 42 I 3 1 0 0 1 50 5 99 0 0 1 0 1 0 735 AM 5 0 0 1 0 1 40 1 4 1 0 1 i 58 I 1 108-,__.. 0 1 _ 0 € 0 ..-. . . 107 740 AM 2 1 1 1 0 i 48 -`, 3 0 0 53 I 1 0 0 0 7:45 AM 5 - 1 0 +u i 0 _ - 45 i 3 0 0 44 _ Q 98 0 1 0_ Q �.�_..._. 0 0 __.---i 46 _ 4 1 0 1 50 1 0 103 0 0 0 1 (l 7:55AM 4 0 -' _ ......_ 7:50 AM 2 0i 7 55 AM 1 1 1 0 _ _T _ 0 L 43 6 54 0 107 D 0 I 0 0 1 i0 {� - 0 39 T 6 • o 0 ` 50 1 0 93 0 1- 6 T 0 1 0 8:05 AM 3 1 I _0 ` 0 46 ' 3 0 1 : 48 - 3 0 96 0 1 0 1 0 0 8:10 AM 3 0 [ 0 1 0 57 1 .1 0 56 ., 0 117 0 3 . 0 0 8:15 AM 2 1 1 0 1 I 0. 52 2- 0 2 44 i -_. 0 103 ,, .,, 0 2 0 0 8:20 AM 8 j 1 1 0 LO43 I 1 0 0 31 0 _04 0 1 _ 0 0 8 25 AM 1 ' ._.- 0 __0 __ ..._ 1 6 [ 57 I 1 -_^0 0 4'[ 1 100 0 0 0 - 0_. . 830 AM 0 1 _... __0 .._0 r 0 39_ 0 0 1.._.` 399 _L 0__....__79 0 0 ...?_0 _1_0_, 51 0 109 0 0 0 C 8 35 AM 3- —_ : 0 0 1_...._._ .r_0--._ 53 i._..2. I 0 0 : _ 1_, BAO AM 2 1 0 0 1 0 -__.�... 6 1 0 0_...-.AS 0 �--109 0 0 0 _ 0_ 8:45 AM 0 1 1 '_ 0 ....1 .1....... i -0 1 56 ) 2 i 0 0 1 45 : 0 104 0 0...,. ..0 0 8:50 AM 2. 0 ; 0 I 0 _ I 68 4 _ I t 6 0 i 63 ` 0 137 0 0 0 6 . _ 8:55 AM 5 t 0 II I 1 i 0 0 54 � { _ 0 I 0 .�.0 TotaQ � I 0 � 53 ] 1 0 113 0 I I Survey 74 12 1 0 1,044 1 65 . 1 I 8 '1,099' 5 2,302 1 0 10 0 !1 0 15-Minute Interval Summary 777 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundI Pedestrians Start Willow Ln Willow Ln Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval Crosswalk Time L : R ':Bikes It I Bikes 1 ':,._T 7 R I Bikes Li T I Bikes Total I North,South I East€West 7:00 AM 13 1 •__0 1 0 1 80y 4 ' 0 0 1 104 0 202 0 • } 0 0 7:15AM 9 4 0 0 It. 89I 16 10 0 116 ^1 2 234 -0 1 0 P 730 AM 11 _ 1 - 1 0 _ ,_,L 130 10 l 0 1 161 2 .__ 314 6 1 1 0 i- o _ 7:45 AM 8 1 1 2 1 0 , 0 i 134 1 13 0 3 148_1.. 0 308 0 r 1 0 3___ 800 AM i0 - 1 0 t _,, i 0 136� 4 Y 1 1 154 '- T O 306 0 3 0 1 3 150. 1...5 ..,._ 1 ---1 .,.- -- _ ': 1 815 AM 11 2 ' 0 i ,, 0 152 E 4 1 0 2 '' 116 1 287 0 i 3 i 0 � 0 . . 8:30 AM 5 0 0 0 146 i 7 f. 0 1 136 0 297 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 7 i 1 6 0 1 177 I 7 0 0• ' 162 I I 0 354 • 0 � D 0 1 0 Total I 7412 1 1 ISurvey 0 I 1,044 1 65 I 1 I 8 1,099 5 I 2,362 ;I 0 10 I 0 I 0 1 Peak Hour Summary 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM B Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians By Wi0OWLn Willow Ln Lower Boones Fe Rd Lower Boones Fe Rd Total Crosswalk 1 Approach en — -- l- L PP 1Total Bikes In I Out I Total 1 Bikes In : Out Total Bikes North South East West Volume 37.; 26 63 ! 0 0 i 0 ; 0 ! 0 633 I 603 11,236[ 1 ` 574 615 -1,189 1 1 244 0 6 0 . 0 5.4% 00°h...... _... 0.84 2-8% _3.1% in Out pial es In u PHF 0 62 0.69 0.84 0.89 E 0.88 - B Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By Willow Ln Willow Ln Lower Boones FerryRd Lower Boones Fe Rd Total Movement _ ._ -- _. .... ._.. - -- L R Total Total T T I R [Total L '11T 'Total • Volume 33 4 37 - 0 I 611 i 22 1633 4 ' 570 1574 1,244 %HV 6.1% NA 0.0%Ls ,_NA NA I NA ,00% NA 1 3.4%1 00%13,3% L00/n'28% NA_128h 31% PHF 0.63 0.50 T 10.62 I 7'0_00 1 0.86 1 0.56'16.84 10.33 ' 0.88 ,111.89 0.88 j! Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Boones Ferry Rd Interval Crosswalk _ Time L , Willow Willow Ln Lower R 'Bikes � -. 1 Bikes BoonI 1 Ferry Rd ILpwer Boon l Bakes Total North'South; East [West 7:00 AM 41 8 1 I 0 _I 4_3_3 43 __0 4 - _529 I 4 1,058 ___ 0 4__ 0 1 0 -1- 7:15 AM 38 8 1 t 0 489 43 1 1 5 1 579 i - : 4 1,162 0 fi0 1-_0 __..... I 1 1 I 7 30 AM 40 6 1 0 65Z 31 i 7 579 3 1215 0 8 0 0 7:45 AM 34 5 0 i I 1 0 568 28 1 7 556 1 1,198 (S F 7 0 0 8',00 AM 33 -r 4 0 �- t�__ 0 ----1 611 22 1 4 : 570 !��-;-1 —1,244 - 0 ! 6 0- ---0 148 Heavy Vehicle Summary o o` .All T a I IJ. # a ____ J j 4 1 0 0A II itle..,-_..,i_ •.s,. .. �' t -...Clay Camey Out 18 r� (503)833-2740 In 21 21..411. w.�`A L 16 0I s 4-0 Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd l~? t �(� Thursday,May 09,2013 Out In 0 2 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM IPeak Hour Summary 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM Heavy Vehicle 5-Minute interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM ' Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start Willow tri Willow Lower Boones Ferry Rd I tie Lower Boos Ferry Rd Interval Time L R Total —I` Total I T i - R Tplal I L 1 T 1- Total� Total 7:00 AM I 0 0 1 0 1 0 1_..I., 0 1 7 0 I 0 0 1 -_ _ - 0 --- 3 � 0 i 3 -1 0 ., -- — J. ._... 7:05 AM 2 � Q _...2 _..� 1 i 1 I 6 5 0 5 0 3 3 0 ` 7z0 AM 0 0 0 1 -- 0 - 1 -0 1T 1 0 ---1 _I 7 2 -- 40 AM • 7 15 AM 1 0 1 -- i 0 7 4 T-0 .._4 0 - 2 .,., I 2 7 725AM 0..y—.,._. . 1 r1 -..,...n 7 _._1.........-_ _ - .._.. - -- .. ., _ 0 - 1 0 7 o D h 0 2 7:30 AM 0 0 0 �- I 0 0 1 bio 0 3 3 3 7 -, --;- .i T..,,__� �_.. ' 0 �. co L I 5—._....,,_.._: 3 I 0 I 3 0 3 i 3 fi 7:40 AM 1 0 I 1 _ .w - 0 i 0 , 1 1 0 � 2 _ 2 4 _..�.�_ _ e 7 45 AM 0 -� 0 0 T�� 0 C 1 0 i 1 0 r� 2 � 3 7 50 AM 0 0 i 0 1 0 2 0 2 O T 2T 2 4 -� 755AM 0 0 0 "-- -0 _01 2 D z I z ..._,_4 8:00 AM 0 1 0 .�._0 ! I: 0 l 3 I- 0 . 3 0 W 3 j 3 —7-5-- S-� 805 AM 0 i 0 0 D 2 0 2 0 2 ] 2 4 8:10 AM 1 0 3 1 ..._. 0 ._ 2 --_. 0 2 0 2 2 - - --5 --- 8:15 AM 0 i I O. i .,0 3 � 1_ � 0 1 ? 0 1 0 I 3 3 4 • 820 AM 0 0 0 I .j 0 D Q i 0_ 0 _0 6 0 8:25 AM 0 t 1 0 : 0 0 ..' 1 0 1 0 0 0 __TO___ ,_830 AM 0 • I 0 0 — 0 1 -I0 1_ ._0 ' 2 _2__ 3 8 35 AM 0 1 _-..........10 --i 0 3.....I 0 ] 3 0 1 1 4 8:40 AM-_ 0 0 1 0 _., _ 1 ._..J. 1 . 0 2 0 1 ,2, D 2 I 2 4 . 8:45 AM 0 ? 0 1 0 I r 0 2 ! 0 �� 1 1 1 8:50 AM 1 . -. 0. ._ ..1 ...I „_. _ 0 4 �I. 2 0 3 :. 0 0 ... 8:55 AM 0..I 0 l0 : D 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Survg 11 1 11 12 ` ' 0 I 41 2 a 43 I 0 , 35 35 1 90 Heavy Vehicle 15-Minute Interval Summary LLLL 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM InStartal Nnd WIIowDLnd_ _-_I SWillowDLnd Eastbound Lower Boones Ferry Rd J- Lower oon Booms Rd Interval Time L , R `Total I I Total T 1 R 1 Total L T Total Total 7:00 AM t. 7 i i 8 : 7 ! 0 i 7 I 0 1 7 1 0 1 2 12 I 16 7:15 AM 1 I I 1 j 2. f�0 1 5 7 6 0 9 _ 3 11__ -,T _._ . T30 AM 1 -- 0 1 1 r !0 -—_— .; 3 1—14 0 8 8 13 7 4S RM 0 A 0 U T 0 - �5 0 5 0 6 6 11 830 AM 0 0 ' - - 800AM 1 0 i 1 I 0 7 0 1 7 0--- 7 "� 7 15 i � 0� 2 0 2 0 1 3 3 ¢ 0 0 16 . 0 3 6 0 i 5 5 - 11 0 0 i 8.45 AM 1 0 I 1 0 6 t 0 i 5 0 1 1 8 Survey {I y i 11 9 i 12 I 0 I 41 1 2 1 43 I 0 , 35 1 35 I 90 • Heavy Vehicle Peak Hour Summary 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM By I Northbound —I Southbound I Eastbound Westbound I Approach Willow Ln IF _Willow Ln Lower Borneo Ferry Rd Lowertout Boones Ferry Rd Total 111 __Volume I i OutDTotal In- Out Total 1 In - Out T Total In Total I OHS I.050 I 0 .0 0 '..-'0--- ___--I 0.66 21 I 18_.. 39. ._. j 01 7 _ 21 37 I -_- 55 39 I #3y Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound ` Movement ---- - Willow Ln WrItow Ln _LAwer Sooner Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Total 111 L R ;Total :Total T I R i Total L T !Total Volume 0 50 0-00 it 2 , 0 _1 21 1 0 ._121 0 .5 `r 15 38 4.50 I i - 0.00 {,,, - O.Sfi i 0.00 0,66 0.00 0.57 � 0,57 I 0.65 I Heavy Vehicle Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM StartInterval Northbound SouthboundWilowLnLower Boones Ferry RdWestboundund Lower Sooner_Ferry Rd 111 Interval Time L R Total - - I Tote/ T I R I Total L T . 1 Total 1 Total 7:00 AM 9 1 f_...10 I 1 ' 0 i 20 ! 2 1 22 0 I 19 19 51 7:15 AM 3 1 1 i 4 --- - 0 Y 20 t 2 LL 22 0 I 24 1 24 50 730 AM 2 1 ; 0 j 2 i 0 1 17 - 1 k 18 0 24 ! 24 44 7:45 AM 4 : 0 1 1 : 0 1 20 0 20 0 i 21 J 21 42 8:00 AM 2 • : 0 r 2 i 0 1 21 0 i 21 0 16 _.._......_ 16 39 149 Peak Hour Summary ch.; Al i I to StbEta MN...�...Clay Camey.... (503)833-2740 Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM Thursday, May 09,2013 Bikes 0 Lower Boones Ferry Rd Peds 0 Bikes 1 603 E 570 574 JN it 4 E y � a, O. s a 633 611 4 615 Bikes 1 22 y Peds 6 Lower Boones Ferry Rd R $ 331 4 26 37 fi Bikes +y 0 Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.84 3.3% 633 WB 0.89 2.8% 574 NB 0.62 5.4% 37 SB 0.00 0.0% 0 Intersection 0.88 3.1% 1,244 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM 150 Total Vehicle Summary e • o o °°t S LL nn� t D } a - y 14 HV 1.6% ..':.'..'.:All .L .'G� ��i' J1 a,l�a+ - - --- HF 0.93 �� orax.lo / __-.�,_,,....e.....�...- J .Nt. Clay Camay Out 959 945 In (503)833-2740 - E0 856 806♦ 0 if 1,1 E 0 4.4 927 821 Out 50 Z S 4-18 Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd HV .3 PHF 00.993 141 t r'1 32 15 oi O Thursday,May 09,2013 Out In z z 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 66 47 d Peak Hour Summary 4:40 PM to 5:40 PM 5-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPedestrians Start Willow Ln_ Willow Ln Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Fera Rd Interval {€ _ Crosswalk Time L ! R `Bikes —F Bikes 1 T 1 R 1 Bikes L T Bikes Total I North 1-South'East`West 4'.00 PM 7 1 0 i ' 0 1 76 1 2 1 0 0 78 ' : 0 164 0 0 I 0 ' 0 4:05 PM I...5�+_ z...-I,....9 1 L. .. I 0 ..._... t s0-1 --5-j-_1- -_1 TI_87 1 0 ..__-137 -.-0 -0 ' 0 0 _4 10 PM 3 • 4 i- 0 - - 0 - 62 f I 1 1 . 74 0 151 0 1 0 yr 0 ' 0 4 25 PM 3 1 0 1 t 0 56 ' 2 o 0169 ; 10131 D t 0 1 - 415P 4:20 PM 3 1 0 1 1 0 F 86 ? 1 1 0 1 r 85 ' —1 0 157 0 0 0 11 0 ...,.._ ._..._� - - 1 .... M 3 0 r #------'- __I ....__ '-`- 1350 0 1 0 -0 1 p I 0 i 60 i 2 0 21--sfi 1 0 430 PM 2 1 0 0 64 11 0 3 ' 70 - 0 941 0 i 0 : 0 t 0 435 PM S , 1 0 0 5$ 31 0 D 74 0 139 0 , 0 ! 0 0 4:40 PM 3 ' 2 r 0 1i 0 r 63 3 0 2 84 I c-0 _ 162 _..0��_0 D d._. _4:45 PM 1 - - o l 0 vW[ 0 81 1 5 f O 3 es 1 0 #79 D r 0 0 p :1:50 PM 2 . 2 7 07---T-77_ _ -_�_ ----- , , __ � . I 61 0 '138 0_ 0_ 0 �_�.D� 4:55 PM 4 : 3 0 _ f 0 - 69 5 0 l 64 ..- 0 146 _ 01010 ; 0 5.05 PM 2 o 0 - 0 89 yI ».76 Q 750 0 I 0i 0 5.00 PM 4 0 17 0 I� 0 I 58 12 0 2 1 84 3 0 165 6 1 0 E 0 _ _ i 0 I 74 3 ] 0 2 5110 PM 2 ' 0 1 0 , i D E 60 6 i 0 0 75 .1 0 143. 0 1 7 r1 0 1 0 5:15 PM 3 - 1 0 I 01 75 1 4 I 0 2 , 89 ; p_.. ._ 174. .. .._0 1 0 , 0 0--- 520 PM 3 7 1 '0 _IQ ._53 2 0 2 79 0 150 0 0 1 0 0 .T _ _—_ : 5:25 PM 2 2 1 — _ 0 _ 0 ..._ 66 . 2 5 3 78 fl 1. 153 _ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 530 PM 3 1 1 2 0 ` 0 176 5 0 0 59 ! 1 0 145 a 17-0 l-_0 i 5:35 PM ....3 ' 1 2 1 0 .. .' --1 0 --- ;,..521 1 o._. 1 _... �-_O 143 p p 0 Q.. ,..5:40 PM--_-3 1 1 00 4_69-__ 3 2 0 _84 10 160 O 1 0 --- 0 5:45 PM 4 0 _ 0 :._ 1 0 62 1 I- 1 0. '... 59 I __[ 0 ---_124 ....0 0 0 p. 5:50 PM.... 0 i......... 0 .... I 0 I 65....1 6 1 0 0 ! 66 0 ..... 128 0 0 �131110 Q. 0 0 60 3 1 0 63 I _ 5'65 PM 0 1 0 Total Su ev I 68 28 11 0 '1 0 f 1 1,542 1 87 I 7 1 26 1,784 j 0 I 3,535 I 0 ! 6 i 0 0 15-Minute Interval Summary .�.J 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound { Pedestrians Start Willow Ln LL Willow n_ __ower_Boones Ferry Rd __L_ower Boones Fara Rd IntervalCrosswalk Time L I[[R Ti Bikes - I Bikes T 1 R •Bikes L T ;Bikes Total North 1 South i East ;Weat� 4:00 PM 15 , 1 7 1 0 1 1 0 t 188_1_15 1 2 I 2 219 ' i' 0 I 446 I 0 : 0 1 0 0 1 ._.4;15 PM 9 2 E 0 _; _ 0 —r-"ii". 15 ' 0 3 222 ' _ 0 423 _0 ' 1 1 0 0 442 0 -1-0101 445 PM 7 5.00 PM 8 : _.,.10 1 5 i-0 J- 3...— 0......_._ .189 i102 _„7 I D 5 234 0 _ 463 _6 0 1W 0 I 0 445PM 7 5 1 4 1 0 f 219 12 D 6 '. 214 1 ,_,� o 21 5:30 PM 5:15 PM 9. ',.... 5 4 I,...0 ._. j a. .... .. I 197204_ 8 �._2 7. _1i 227 I 0 .. 448 0 477 0 ! 2..,I 1 0.. 5:45 PM 2 1 0 0 177 1 10 1 2 0 . 188 1 0 378 0 ': 1 0 0 Survey 68 • • 28 0 I W, E 0 I 1,542` 87 rI 26 1,784 1013,535 0 6 J D 0 I Peak Hour Summary 4:40 PM to 5:40 PM By Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundI I Pedestrians Approach Willow in _Willow Le _ Lower Boones Ferry Rd _Lower Boones Ferry Rd J Total t Crosswalk In Out Total I Bikes En Out i Total 1 Bikes to i Out 1 Total 1 Bikes I to ' Out I Total Bikes I I North:South I East 1 West 1 iII VPHI=e 47 68078115 _._.0.. D 0.00 6-----o- ...856 959 93 815 ._..7.. 1 945 821093 1,848 2.1% 096 766;- 0 1.6% - --- I 0 ': 3 ° 0 i 0 0.0% • By Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound s { Movement - - - - l V ~ _yes Ferfy Rd Lower Boones Fe Rd Total 1f{ ow n Willow in Lower Boon L R Total Total T r R ITotal L T ToffiI Volume 32 - 15 -47 I 1 10 806 50 1856 18 927 1945 1,848 %HV 31% NA 00% 21% I NA NA NA 00% NA 1 0.7% _6.0%17 1% 00% 1.6% - NA 1.6% 1.4% _I PUP 0.80 0.63 78 I :0.00 0.92 0 80 j0.93 0 54 0.93 -10.93 T( n a6 Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Willow_ Willow Ln Lower Saon R i Bikes BFkes T R 'Bikes LT es Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval Crosswalk Time L t _ I Bikes Total North'South 1 East 1 West 400 PM 41 1 16 ' 0 ' 0 ! 772 1 39 1 2 16 _ 888 0 1,774-__- 0 1 0 1 0 ,,.415 PM 34 4 , 11 0i 0 1 776 45 0 16 904 0 1,786 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 --- 4:30 PM 33 ' 13 It 0 1 798 48 1 20 928 1 0 1,840 0 2 1, 0 0 448 PM 32 1 14 0 !, _ 0 812 i 50 3 18 !x922 �- 0 1,846 , -0 1 4 0 0 5'00 PM 27 10 '... 0 1 i : 0 ' 770 - 48 5 10 1 896 1 1 0 1,767 0 - 5 P o �1 0 151 Ili vLo. Heavy Vehicle Summary D 0 4E ,Ni," 4„4 Ali raft B-ta io10110 x .t u11140YjlWd" _ "` Out 16 uil v Clay Camey6 9 wa E 1.....15 (593)833-2740 In 9 3 5 r 0 Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 1`-1 ? r'I 1 0 Thursday,May 09, 2013 03t Ij 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM I Peak Hour Summary I 4:40 PM to 5:40 PM Heavy Vehicle 5-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Start W illowLn WillowLn Lower Boones FerryRd _Lower Boones Fe Rd I Interval Time L R Total :Total T R 1 Total L T Total Total 4:00 PM-----0 ; 0 0 _- I —_---_ o-_ 2 .J_ 0- 2 0 ' 3 ___I 3 - --- 5 4:05 PM 0 0 I 0 _ .._...Y_ ..._ 1._.: 2 3 0 _ ; 4 _._IL. 4 7 _410 PM 0 0 I I _ 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 .._ 0 1 415 PM 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 1 3 � 0 3 0 0 ..1 0 3 .. . 420 PM 0 0 I._.0 0 j... p-._I 0 }.._0 0 3 3 . ...3----- _.,. 4:25 PM 0 i i 0..; 0 3 _ _ I 0 i, 0 I 9 0 0 ! t i_ 1 1 _. 4:30 PM 1 ! l_ 0 .,j.._t-.._.__ -; _..�.._ 0_--- 1 0 0. 1 0 0 1._.0 •......,I 0___ 1 _..._. 4:35 PM 0 1_.. _..... 0 : U ..�., ._ 1 0, _ _2__t_..0._ 2_ 0... ..._2. 1 2 4 4:40 PM 0 0 D I ' 0 0 i_ 0- i 0 9 3 - 3_ 3 445 PM _ 0 _ 0 0 1... ' 0 _ Si r 0 ` 0 0 3 I 3 _......_3 450 PM 0 - 0 l._.0. 0-- 1 0 1_ 1 0 --0 - ---I _0._ .1� 4:55 PM 0 0 0 1+ : ..ry l 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 i 1 2 500 PM 0 Q j 0 0 _ 2 1 13 0 - 0 , 0 3 505 PM 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 0 III! 4 0 : 2 s 2 3 .. ._... .. 516 PM 0 �, 1 0 1 0 I I 0 -. _ 1 0 1 9 t.- 1 .. ., 1 2 515 PM 1 j 0 1 1 --.i ., 0 0 I 1 11 0 1 1 1 1 3 5:20 PM 0 i__0,..1 0 , ._[ 0 I 0�_ 0_._ 0 i 1 _. 1 1 1 5:25 PM.. . 0 i...... 0_ 0 I..... 0.._ _ a__0. .L. 1 1 . .012 1 2 3 5:30 PM 0 _ 0 € 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:35 PAM1... 0 ,_ U ' 0 ...�__ '---- 1_a........ - --_ U "- 0 0 ` ? � 1 _--}- 540PM--- 0 ._... 0 _.. 0 ...,..---- 0 ... ; 0..._ 0, i0_ 0 , 1 .._._..._ i. I 5:45 PM 0 € I... ' 0 ; 0 _ 1...0... 2 i 0 2 0 2 2.... 4. 5:50 PM 0 - 0 ' 0 1 '_ 0 11 0 1 0 1 1 2 5:55PM• 0 . 0 ! 0 . . 1'�• 0 f 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 '- f 1 1 I Total Survey 2 • 0 I 2 0 11 18 5 i1 23 10 34 I 34 I 59 Heavy Vehicle 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound SOUthbound Eastbound ! Westbound Start Willow Ln Willow Ln Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferof__Rd Interval Time 1- L- ` R Total I - r Total I I T T R I Total I L T I Total Total 4:00 PM 0 : 0 0 ,-; 0 I i 4 2 1 6 0 8 _1 8 14 4:15 PM 0 - 430 PM_ 1 0 1 1 I _i_, 0 _—� 2 I 0 1 2 0 : 5 • ...._.I 5 -__ 8 4:45 PM _0 ._,_. 0-r-U Ii __. 0- __- 2__1_'_0 1 2 0 IA--__'I 4 6 500 PM 0 0 0 �. I 0' 4 I t 5 0 h_3 ..._3 -8---- 5:15PM 1 0 1 1 I 0 0I 2 r 2 0 x 44 7 5:30 QPM 0 I 0 0 [ 0- 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 I I 2 2 _. 5:45 PPM 0 0 I0 I -- 01 3 0 3 0 1 4 1 4 7 Survey 2 1 0 2 1 € 0 I 18 15 '1 23 10 34 I 34 I 53 Heavy Vehicle Peak Hour Summary 77 4:40 PM to 5:40 PM No hbound Southbound Eastbound Approach In Oa1 By Wtt wLn TotaE -----� In-1-11-Out owTota ...mower n�FteaI InowarOo Westbound Total Rd Total I Voume-_I 025..___3_._' 4 ( 0.00 0 ` 0 0___ ___ I..045..1... 16...X1,._25 01563 �' 6.._` 27. _.....,]]]I 25 078 6y Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Movement • Willow Ln Willow Ln_ _L_ow_er B_oo_nes Fe Rd Lower Boones Fer 12d Total .............._...._.._,_---r_,.._...._.._.........r---__._._. �._.ta .. ...._ ____.,__..._..__, L R ;Total Total T I R i Total L T I Total Volume_ _ 1....: 0 ...._1 __,-_' 0 6 3 i 9 fl _ 15 ..__..._I 15 1 25 PRF 0.125 25 0 120 19.25 I- 1 _ 0 00 -I 10.38 0.38 1 0 45 0.00 0.63 r 0.63 1- -0.78 Heavy Vehicle Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 8:00 PM IInterval Northbound I Southbound Eastbound ( Westbound Start Willow LnIii _ W illow Ln Lower Boones FerryRd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Interval Time L R I Total 1 i Total I T r t= 1 Total L i T . I Total[ Total 4:00 PM 1 . 0 1 U-_--- 11 - Z_--} 13 8 -1._21 ' -----21 29 35 415 PM 1 - ......_ 0 t 1'--"'-'--l--t I---- 1-.._0..._ 11 1 4:45 PM 1 ._ 0 1 1 _ .__y_ I 0 6..... 3 11 10 I 0 I 13 _1 131 13 24 4 30 PM 2 0 2 0 8 3 11 0 16 - 1 16 29 23 5:00 PM 1 0 11 -- 152 • Peak Hour Summary All ra fic D ata __..Cay Camey..�.. (503)833.2740 Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd 4:40 PM to 5:40 PM Thursday,May 09,2013 Bikes 0 Lower Boones Ferry Rd Peds D Bikes 0 959 E 927 945 N IC 18 04 0. 0 ii —Tr—A S y 856 806 4 821 1 Bikes i 50 y Peds 3 Lower Boones Ferry Rd X 32 15 68 47 -.I Bikes 0 O Approach PHF HV% Volume EB 0.93 1.1% 856 WB 0.93 1.6% 945 NB 0.78 2.1% 47 SB 0.00 0.0% 0 Intersection 0.96 1.4% 1,848 Count Period:4:00 PM to 6:00 PM 153 TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS Land Use: Mini-Warehouse Land Use Code: 151 Variable: Storage Units Variable Quantity: 530 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Trip Rate: 0.02 Trip Rate: 0.02 IEnter I Exit Total I Enter I Exit Total Directional 50% 50% Directional 48% 52% Distribution Distribution Trip Ends Trip Ends F..: . t.. WEEKDAY SATURDAY Trip Rate: 0.25 Trip Rate: 0.22 IEnter I Exit I Total I Enter I Exit 1 Total Directional 50% 50% Directional 50% 50% Distribution .Distribution Trip Ends I....64 : 6....,.1 I :;, Trip Ends . ... _uf ,:; Source:TRIP GENERATION,Ninth Edition 154 k // §! ,2 ( Ea ; i ° ° \ƒ I& ( $} [ [ ; Iv _ § \! 0 [ !| ƒf!§ ~ ` H . „ , . } \ \ \ � \ � {. 2! B { [§ / f) H 1 \ `^ %! / \ F. , , {! § ( ) #� !§ ; { ( § E ( \ (\ § ) | ; N8` ! 0 § ! E § . ' ) \ ( ) ( g / (/ / § ) } \ � . \k ,. ) m { 2 ° E\ . © 4 \ 77 \ ( \ ) \ / 2 / ) ! 2 q ) / § { ` ~ » § \\ / u � g E ; nr : ! }| M. U P. 1 t § r . = -Al R 0 It / E!\ / \ z ( � E « : � F| AT, (� ) / /ƒ !{ j \ { ( ,„ # {) \- § ) § ( 0 \. ( / ( E ( !t! § ) § § ! ) R ° § . ) ) ` )}{ . , ) d! • !!) \)® j . \ I_! U. 0 w in I: *{ E 0 0 !}! \ \ / . 0 \ . %; tFt \ ( ( \ ( )4 15 a 4 C S C 3 a 0 a G 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 22 a G o 22 .7,12 '01 0 0 ; 2 ; 0 0 20 t �b 2 C O Fo 0ti o o a 0 0 0 °o o a o o a o °0 0 0 0 o s.0. 0 0 r,,, ,.,' E. m .F a 4 a a t 0 0 0 a o 0 o 0 o a a 0 a 0 ui P@ P, a «� mfi `U.a ry O O O P o F- IX W C O O C K O IX aO K F-O C O 0 LI,O . . , w C w z w '� w a , x w z £ w N9 a ry 3331 n w to il0 0 N a 0 v b • u FyFr U W 1 Z U a t H reO k a O O Z O Z „ O '. 2 1 , 6. O W A 1 O A a " P o gZ a• EE' n o 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o e a m y ' iW rr ut : W 2 N [ N O N a NN . N E y O WN LVY Vii . tail f w m'A V £ oW. N 2 0 5 4. y y Z F-•'''' ''' z w z F Z N Z N X6 P 2. N Z Z m 0 qz Vq (�w R El y K tG �; '' [K h > 0 u o 2 41 F � N Yq P rWi� [-� e. [[--.� � 0 V o S o � 0 4 0 ¢ n G U � U o V N E .] W a L4 W '4, 2 m Y 2 Z > Z Z W ! W F al V w w tV' W F l7 W{+ [�9 W W V !C z ID > Z Z Z Z x Z �' 2 z 5 2 5 9 2 z Y z ',gEl o 2 u H P 2aG ZWo Pa2 °za ' zwa zwo zad °zaa ° aa zEa zaa zaa mI x u N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 q '0, °S.a O V cFr y� F I a. 04 'em` E" e„» k U trSK�j yO F wryw' F' {�t[f N "O i N x U C°l M 0. ,. . n . N a N a P e0 FY N N a t q y Qt 0 r ,. - °i i O aa4 W ' :10 aaa ais a 'A I o ti H AWO F 2 o 2 c zzz zzz zzz 1 zzx Zza zzF C' 2 0 R F m i y y3 R 9 1 p b K V O O &4 P N dz _ a2 F- zr z o wma u o • � z z z z °x :E °m _ �. 1-i a q w a �p as mo o . tozm myo vFiza wzo El nm a a 2.t.' I.E e F- 8 Q o .• ; E " F2zo F2 '8 : F2 a l' ''-';''xzF Er" 2,° LI o nro ° ' w2 wmF o1q..H z Za gd mu• x v n $ a ° a z . 1 ill owl 1" c G ! w w o m m 54 8x, N P 4 F o m o £ o W M Z N o f .i Qg. 2 o rc u z a z E A:', } N U O O . 5 V N Z z Z Z 5 z O-E .y a O z z ?. 5 :Z z W k g q F- z a .] En a w w A z z z 0 m N c P. U €$& 156 " w "eg E, F N N o .N, o o „ o z ozF.:,' ' QE't t, o v . . o z 9 u 0 CD$380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT'DIVISION Page: 2 07/08/2013 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT ARRAN NON-SYSTEM CEASE LISTING CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO, CLACKAMAS COUNTY BOOMS FERRY RD and FYLRINSTON RD, City of Lake Cawego, Clackamas County, 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2011 Total crash records: 9 S D P RSA IFiT-TYPE SPOIL USE E AUCO DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN} INT-REL OFTRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGYIRDAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAP- RNDET SURF COLL OWNER FROM PAST INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S 1, K TIME FROM VETOED STREET __ LOCTE fitsAmER1__CONTE. DRVWY STOAT SVRTY VO TYPE TO PN TYPE SVRTY E X RES Loc ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE OR,25 92976 Y N N N N 08/12/2019 17 PILKINGTON RD STRGHI' N N CLR S-1STOP 0I NONE 0 STRGHT 07,01 CITY WE 60 SCONES FERRY RD S (NONE} UNKNOWNN DRY REAR PRVTE N -5 000 00 10A 07N SAY TNJ PINTA CAR 01 DRVR NONE 17 F OR-Y 620,547 000 07,01 4021 00.2.5 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N -S 011 CO PSNGR CAR D1 DRVR INSC 69 M OR-Y 010 000 CO ..__..__....w 03050 N N N 09/11(2007 16 EOONES PERRY RD STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 5 STRGHI 07 CITY TV 100 PILKINOTON RD SW SWONEI UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE NE-SW 000 00 3P 07 _ N DAY PDD PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 40 M DR-Y 026 000 07 1021 0R<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PAVER NE-SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 40 P GR-Y ODE 000 DO OR.25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE-SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 12352 N N N N N 04/20/2409 14 BOONEE FERRY RD STRGHT N N CLR 5-15TOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY SU 500 PILKINGTON RD 5W (NONE} NONE N DRY REAR PRVTE SW-NE 004 DO iP OR N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR DI DRVR NONE 41 F OR-Y 043 000 07 152} ORQS 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW-NE 011 00 PRESS CAR Cl DRVR 1NJC 53 M OR-Y 000 000 00 DR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW-NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INSC 14 F 000 000 00 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW-NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJC 19 P 000 000 00 DlcRfairner.The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver end polka crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720.nue Crash Analysis end Reporting Unit is swam/tad to providing the highest quality crash data to customers.Navrever,because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual dnrer,the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can so)1501001000001 all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash ere accurate,Note,Legislatrre changes to OMS vehicle crash reporting requirement,effective 01/O1/2004,may result in fewerproparly damage only crashes being el+gib1e for inclusion in the Statewide Crash para File. 01 U' Co CD8380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1 • 07/08/2113 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLY5I5 AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF LAKE 05WEGO, CLACKAOIAS 0011100 PILtINGTON RD and ROSEWOOD ST, City of Lake'Oswego, Clackamas County, 01/01/2507 to 12/31/2011 Total crash records: 1 S. D P R 5 W TNT-TYPE SPCL USE E A U C U DAT£ CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR RTY MOVE A S SERF E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- 0301031 SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INS G E LIONS PED T tm9Y S 1' 5 r, S TIM, 0149M soccer).GTRF.ST 1nrrmC 149x9.505) CORM ORVWY LTHT VRTY VO 1v51 '9/ PO TYPO SVOYR R X RIO LOC F.RAOR ACT 07NT CAi1SE 04546 N N N N N 11/30/2010 19 ROSEWOOD ST STRGHTY Y RAIN FIX 011,1 DI NONE TVRN-L 013,092 10,26 CITY TU 33 PLLKINGTON RD NE (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET FIX ?ROTE N -NE 007 153,092 26 SP 05 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CP.0 01 DRVR NONE 58 F OR-Y 051 017 19 (52) OR<25 Discfaimec The infommtion contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720.The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit 0 committed to providing the highest quality crash dela to customers.However.because suhmFhal of crash report forms le the responsibiOly of the individual diner,thn Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that eh details pertaining to a single crash are accurate.Nater Legislative changes to DMIPs vehicle crash reporting requirement,effective 01/01/2004,may result in)ewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion 41194 Statewide Crash Data File, CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1 07/00/20I1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ARIAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OP LAKE OSWEGO, CLACKAMAS COUNTY SOONOS PERRY RD and WILLOW IN, City of Lake Oswego, Clackamas CevnEy, 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2011 • Total crash records: 7 S D P R $ W TNT-TYPE SPCL USE E A D C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD NTHR CRASH TALK STY MOVE A 5 SERO ELGPIRDAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAP- MIDST SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INS G E LICKS PED INVEST D C S L V TOME, FR/]M SE1ON0 STREET LO(`I'N raLDNFST CON'r'L ISVWY LJGHT SVRTY VA TYRE__ TO PN TVVE SVRTY F. X RFS Lc, ERROR ACT EVENT CAME 01330 N N N N N O4/21/2020 14 SCONES FERRY RD STRGHT N N CLD 5-1STOP Ti NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY WS 225 WILLOW IN NE (NONE) NONE N DRY REAR PRVIE SW-NE 000 OS 00 07 • N DAY INS PENGR CAR 01 DRVR /NJA 50 F OR-T) 043,026 040 07 (04) 05,25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW-NE oil 00 PENCE CAR Ti DRVR NONE 28 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR,15 A - • Disclaimer:The information contained?in this report is compiled from individual diner and policy crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720.Thu Crash Analysis and Reporting Lief is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers.However,because submittal of crash report farms is The responsibility of the individual driver,the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit yen not guarantee the!elf qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all&tells pertaining to a single crash am accurate.Nate:Legislative changes to Drifts vehicle crash reporting requirement,effective 01/01/2064,may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data Fite. 01 • CO ' �ov „ vo'-0o ,5571 0571 (0 . e65/ 1 511 5 �� o° ICY co 0 z\ o s 5a 6/1 C1.4. ,-- �6 � �9�16 <r�u7 �10 f �yy ,F9 F�.1/y NV3 0 V\ o ) I 4-1 N4� N ROSEW000 ST N .\ " ‘ I,.N NN I 4 \\PROJECT,. ^ \ 1TE\ ‘,A .‘.N V A.N N1 m 6n5 m0 L1 <-1J,4 ,G° Sr 4 NVTr) h��9 1°K..,. -______-> ,907:,ry WILLOW LN 3 ® gyp 0 C 0 — � /.\ <-1.1,1--> NG° O 'nCX es o FIT o JI 1,.,f0 ^J 67--d, •cv z y2 x Cl- TRAFFIC TRAFFIC VOLUMESFIGURE Year 2015 Background with Re—Routed Traffic ' PAGE AM & PM Peak Hours no scale 160 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - AM Peak 1: Parking & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS- Rosewood ,-if ) 13 oe Lane Configurations ve vi Sign Control Step..: ee .free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Pedestrians Lane Width ), Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent lockage .. Right turn flare (veh) Median type, '` , WLTi. Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal eft) X58 „ pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96 vC,ct nflicting volume 988 335 670 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 666 vC2,stage 2 cont.vel 322 vCu, unblocked vol 949 271 618 tC,single(s, 8 8 .9 2 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 p0 queue free% 98 100 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 274 703 916 . .. �. � • Volume"lotal 7 '13 295 295 441 X28 Volume Left 7 13 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 3 0 0 0 0 1� cSH 274 916 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volurno to Capacity . 0 0 1 fl I7 2 13 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 1 0 0 0 0 Control Lane LOS C A Approach belay(s) 18.1 11:2 .:.. ..: .0 ... Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.2 Intersection C pacity tiliza ion 2fi 5% ICU revel pf Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 1 161 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - AM Peak 2: Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS - Rosewood r / % i '`. Lane Configurations ( , vi 1 ) 4i 1 'F, Ideal Flovv(vp111)1) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 " 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UtilFactor 1.00 100 100 0,95 1,,00 0,95 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fipb,ped/bikes 1:00 1 00 1 00 1.00 100 1 00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0:95 1..00 0M5 1 00 0M5 1 00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1718 1539 1752 3409 1736 3471 Fit Permitted 0/6 ' 1 00 0.95 1.00 0..95 1 00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1369 1539 1752 3409 1736 3471 Volume(vph) 0 0 0 130 1 178 3" 438 83 100 462 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj.Flow(vph)' 0 ..' 0 0 155 1 212 4 521 99 119 550 >" 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 158 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 155 55 0 4 602 0 119 550 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 3 Confl Bikes(#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4%/� Turn Type ." Perm Perm Prot Prot • Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.9 10.9 0.8 14.9 4.9 19.0 Effective Green.g(s) 10M 10,9 0„8 14.9 49 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.02 0.35 0.11 0.44 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 `' 4.0 4,0' Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) ' ;349 393 33 1190 199 1544 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.00 c0.18 c0.07 0.16 vis Ratio Perm CO 11 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.14 0.12 0.51 0.60 0.36 Uniform Delay,dl 13A 12.3 20.6 :,11 0 18,0" 7 8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.o0 1.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 0.9 0.2 1 6 OS 4.8 01 Delay(s) 14.3 12.4 22.3 11.3 22.7 8.0 Level of Service S B C B C ' . A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 13.2 11.4 10.6 Approach LOS A B B B HCM`Average Control Delay 11.5 HClul Level of Service B HCM Actuated Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 eCycle Length(s) ;; 42.7 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(mire) 15 c Critical Lane Group 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 2 162 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - AM Peak 3: Rosewood St & Pilkington Rd WCSS - Rosewood Lane Configurations , 4+ 4+ Sign Co trot Stop . . latop free free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 7.. 0 4 10 1 22 263 . 6 4 145. 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Heti rly Toys+nate(vpll)' . 4 0 14 1 31 13 370 6, 2t1 . 1 Pedestrians 2 2 lane Width ) . 1 0 1 0 Walking Speed.(ftls) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None done Median storage veh) Upstrea 1 signal(#t) pX, platoon unblocked vC, nflicting olume 650 X24 215 624 629 377 225 =381 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 cont vQl vCu, unblocked vol 650 624 215 624 629 377 225 381 tC,2 stage (s) 93 100 99 96 100 95 99 100 0 queue free% cM ca aci (vs lh Volume°Total . 33 �6 387 ,228 Volume Left 24 14 8 6 Vc lu me RI ht 31 8 18 cSH 366 538 1336 1159 • Volume;to Capacity.. :° 1�68 f9 3 61 0` I Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 7 0 0 Control belay"(s) 1 7 12.3 2 3 Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay(s) 15.x' 12 3 3.2 3 Approach LOS C B Average Delay 1.7 Intersection Capacity,;lUtilization 27 0% ICf l Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 3 163 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - AM Peak 4: Willow Ln & Pilkington Rd WCSS- Rosewood °..t.7 max:' L�eConfigurations �- 4+ 4 4, .. Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free 0% 0% Grade 0% 0% Volume(vehlt) 7 0 16 0 1 1 29 270 0 1 144 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0 67 0.67 Hourly flow rate(vph) 10 0 24 0 1 1 43 403 0 1 ", 215 .` 4 Pedestrians 4 2 lane Width( ) 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare (veh) Media n type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 1118 pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 714 714 217 738 . " 716 409 .::215 407 vC1, stage 1 conf vol v02,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 714 714 217 738 716 409 219 407 tC,single(s) 7.1 6.5 62 7.6 7.0 6.7 41 41 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) 3.5 40 33 40" 45 .3.8 2.2 22" . p0 queue free% 97 100 97 100 99 100 97 100 chi,capacity(veh/h) 331 341 818 264 292 548 1350 1132 ft9 � Volume Total 34 3 446 221 Volume Left 10 0 43 1 Volume Right 24 1 0 4 cSH 565 381 1350 1132 Volume to Capacity 0,06 " 0..01 003 0,00 Queue Length 95th(ft) 5 1 2 0 Control Delay(s) 118 " 14.5 111I 1" Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 11.8 14 5 " "1.0 0.1 Approach LOS BB Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41,5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 4 164 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - AM Peak 5: Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCss- Rosewood 0-2k Lane Configurations , ' +1 Sign Control Slap.. free. . . prep... . Grade 0% 0% 0% Velure(veh/ ) 8 582 81 7. 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly flow rate.(vp> Pedestrians Lexie Width( ., Walking Speed (ft/s) : Percent t 3lockage • Right turn flare (veh) Mediad type TWL 't_ Median storage veh) 0 pstrea�m signal { ) 91a pX, platoon unblocked vC,co flicting volu ie 907 . .304 607 vCi, stage 1 conf vol 591 vC2,stage 2 coral vol vCu, unblocked vol 907 304 607 tC,single ) 6 3 7i tC, 2 stage(s) 5.9 tF 3 5 .3 p0 queue free% 86 99 99 cM.cal acity(veh/h) 288 86 .... Volume Total F2 6 ..... 83 224 7 ..,302 :;302 Volume Left 42 0 0 0 7 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 2 0. . 0 0 cSH 288 686 1700 1700 953 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity.. : 014 0 1 23 0: 3. ....0.131.... 0.1 tf t3 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 1 0 0 1 0 0 Delay(s) 19`6 1 t 3 8 d 0 8 0 0 0 0 Lane LOS C B A ►pproach belay(s) 8 4 0 1 ... Approach LOS C Average Delay • 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26 2% lC Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 5 165 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - PM Peak 1 : Parking & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS- Rosewood ,_%r / Lane Configurations ' ' 44 +1 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0%° 0% 0% Volume(vehi/h) 5 10 6 - °821 928 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate(vph) 5 11 6 . ';864 . 977" 1 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal(ft) 658 pX, platoon unblocked 0.92 0.92 0.92 vC,conflicting volume 1422 489 978 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 977 vC2,stage 2 cont vol 445 vCu,unblocked vol 1370 353 886 tC,single(s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF(s) 35' 3.3 : 2,2 p0 queue free% 97 98 99 cM capacity(vehfh) 185 " 593 703 Volume Total 16 6 432 432 651 327 Volume Left 5 6 0 0 0' 0 Volume Right 11 0 0 0 0, 1 cSH 342 703 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 055 0:01 0.25 0.25 058 0.19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 1 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 16.0 10.2 0,0 '0.0 " <0 0 0.0 • Lane LOS G B Approach Delay(s) 16.0 ' 0.1 :0.0 Approach LOS C Average belay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 357% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 1 166 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - PM Peak 2: Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd wcss- Rosewood t Lane Configurations 19 Vi to. vif +1' Ideal Flow y p Totl Lost times} 1 00 1900 1900 1900 1901;3.. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 00 ,1900. a4.0 4.0 4.0 • 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane 1til Factor 1 90 . .. - x:90 00 fl 9 1.30 _. 95 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fipb, ed/bikea. 1 . Frt 0.91 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 1.00 Fit P'r'otected x.98 5 ..1 00. 1 0 95 0 Satd. Flow(prot) 1667 1782 1578 3436 1787 3573 Fit Permitted 1 03 0 f 5. .'. 00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1572 1414 1578 3436 1787 3573 Volur e(vp ) 0 4 6 0 125 0 708 , `142 255, 773 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0:94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Ad1 i*low(vph 4 34 0 133 0 753 151 282 822. RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 106 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 ane Group Flow( f? :`3 ; 3 0 1 4 27 13 t 885 0 , 282. X23. 0 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 2 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% .::,.., 1% Tarp 'ype Per Perm Prgt f't t Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 3 8 .: Perm tted Actuated Green, G (s) 11.4 11.4 11.4 21.3 11.7 37.0 1fective reen.9 is 11.4 11 4 . 4 213 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.38 0.21 0.66 Clearance Time.(s) 4 0 0 0 , 0 . 4 4 0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(yph) 318 286. 319... . 129 371. . '2344 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 cO.26 c0.16 0.23 v/s Ratio Perri?' . 0 0 cO.09 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.47 0.08 0.68' 0.76 0.35 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ir cremental delay,,d? 1'0 2 1 . . 1, 8 9 tf91 Delay(s) 18.0 21.0 18.4 16.2 29.9 4.4 .eyel of Servic $ C B C A Approach Delay(s) 18.0 19.7 - 16.2 10.9 Approact .O;7` $ ICM Av:targe ontrol elay. '1 1 CM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 56:4 Sum of cosi time(s) I2 0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.5% ICU Level of Service B Ar alys�s Peno (mm ) c Critical Lane Group 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 2 167 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - PM Peak 3: Rosewood St & Pilkington Rd WCSS- Rosewood -► T 1 "� t /' • ./ Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehltr) 11 0 4 3 0 15 ;; 1 212 5 25 372 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate(vph) 12 '0 4 3 0 16 1 228 5 ."' 27 400 4 Pedestrians 2 7 1 1 Lane Width"O 12.0 12.0 ; 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 1 0 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type" None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 526 pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume " 708 700 405 701 700 .,239 406 240 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 708 700 405 701 700 239 406 240 tC single(s) 7.1 65 62 72 66 63 41 41 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) 35" 40 33 36 4:1 3:4 22 2.2" p0 queue free% 96 100 99 99 100 98 100 98 cM capacity;(veh/h) 335 354 646 336 348 785 1156 1324 Volume Total 16 14 234 431 Volume Left 12 3 1 27 Volume Right ;4 16 5 4 cSH 385 642 1156 1324 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0:03 000 002 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 2 0 2 Control Delay(s) 14.8 10.8 0 0 0.7 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 14.8 10.8 0.0 0.7 Approach LOS BB Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46:8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 3 168 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - PM Peak 4: Willow Ln & Pilkington Rd WCss - Rosewood Lane Configurations Sign,Control" sto>� stop. free . Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% volume(vehf >64 0 0 it 18. 204.. t7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly"flow rate(vph . . 67 0 0 19 .< 212 0 1 379 5 Pedestrians 30 6 Lane Wic th:(ft?. 12.4. Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockacge Right turn flare (veh) ( ) MediatflyiSeT. lore Mine Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 1111 " pX, platoon unblocked vC,"conflicting-volume 662 668 . . 412 704 70 218 " . 41+t 218 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2"nenf vol vCu, unblocked vol 662 668 412 704 670 218 414 218 tC,single(s) 7.1 6,5 6 2 1 5 5 2 4 1 " 41 tC, 2 stage(s) p0 queue free°/p 99 100 89 100 100 100 98 100 ciormi LAM cM capacity"(veh/h) ";; 354 .. 363 626 603 362. .,820 1,121 1550 Iclume Total 2 1 231 384 Volume Left 5 0 19 0 Volume light 57 0 cSH 593 1700 1121 1350 Volume to Capacity " 2 00 0.02 fl f}t Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 1 0 Control°Delay(s) 11:.9 0. 6. 6 t3 Lane LOS B A A �0 Approach LOS B A Average Delay 1.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36 % ICU evel of ervice A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 4 169 HCM Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions - PM Peak 5: Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS- Rosewood 41( Lane Configurations fir +I, ++ Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/lh) 32 14 812 50 16 922 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly flow rate(vph) 33 15 846 52 17 960 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal(ft) 1296 pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 1385 449 898 vCt,stage 1 conf vol 872 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 514 vCu,unblocked vol 1385 449 898 tC,single(s) 6S 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 83 97 98 chit capacity(veh/h) 193 " '557 758 _01 - FEN 334:564 Volume Total' ,33 15 480 :;:480 Volume Left 33 0 0 0 17 0 0 Volume Right 0 15 0 52 0 0 0 cSH 193 557 1700 1700 758 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0:17 0,03 033 0.20 ` 0.02 0.28 0.28 Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 2 0 0 2 0 0 Control Relay(s) 27.5 11,6 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS D B A Approach Delay(s) 22.7 0.0 02 Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.5% ICU Level of Service A. Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 5 170 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - AM Peak 1 : Parking & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS - Rosewood it Lane Configurations ) 14 +1, Sign Control Stop t=ree „free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly flow rete(vph);; 7 0 1 613 89.. Pedestrians Lane Iidth( ) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent dockage ;_ Right turn flare (veh) Mediad:typeILTL Median storage veh) • 0 Upstream signal(ft) X58 pX, platoon unblocked 0.95 0.95 0.95 vC,corflict�ng,volume 1126. X48 vC1 stage 1 cont vol 693 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 334 vCu, unblocked vol 979 267 633 tC,single(s) 8 99 2 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 p0 queue free% 97 100 98 . ... . cM capacity(vehlh).. 286. ... 999,.. .8s Volume Total t tf 307 .. 459 3? Volume Left 7 13 0 0 0 0 Volume Right ;: 0 0 0 8 cSH 266 895 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0 03 _ 6.02 0.18 0 18 9.27 0 1 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 1 0 0 0 0 Cor trol'Delay;(a). 18 �0 it f10, Lane LOS C A Approach Delay(s) . 18.9 0 2 0 Approach LOS C Average Dela 0 ' Y .2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27,2% ICU Level of Service # Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 1 171 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - AM Peak 2; Pilkington Rd & Lower Scones Ferry Rd wCss- Rosewood `% \ , Jl ' Lane Configurations ) 'fir ) +I I +I+ Ideal Flow(vpihpl) 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Utti Factor 1:00 °1 00 " 00 " °095 1 00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb,pedlbikes 1;00 "1:00 1 00 =;1 00 1 00 1 00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected< 0.95 " 1.00 0.95 1.00 095 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1718 1539 1752 3410 1736 3471 Fit Permitted 0:76 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 100 Satd. Flow(perm) 1369 1539 1752 3410 1736 3471 Volume(vph) 0 0 0 135 1 185 3 456 , 86 104 ' 481 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow(vph) 0 0 0 161 "" 1 220 4 543 102 124 ' 573 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 164 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 ' 0 0 161 58 0 4 628 0 124 '; 573 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 3 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% Turn Type • Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.3 11.3 0.8 15.7 5.0 19.9 Effective Green,g(s) • 11.3 11,3 0.8 15.7 5.0 19.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0 02 0 36 0.11 0.45 Clearance Time(s) t ., 40 x.40 40 40 " 40 40 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 352 395 32 '1217 " 197 1570 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.00 c0.18 c0.07 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.12 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.15 0.12 0.52 0.63 0.36 Uniform.Delay,dl 13.8 12.6 21 3 11.2 18.6 7.9. Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 0.9 ':0 2 1.8 0A 6,2 01 Delay(s) 14.7 12.8 23.0 11.5 24.8 8.0 Level of Service B B C B C A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 13.6 11.6 11.0 Approach LOS A B B :3,1. -rZf 0 �@ ..-.. A ;'-*.; - '-`' 7 '" r .rte HCM Average Control Delay 11 8 NCM Level,of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 44.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 . c Critical Lane Group 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 2 172 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - AM Peak 3: Rosewood St & Pilkington Rd WCSS - Rosewood ! mf TiTA Lane Configurations 4, Sign ontrc l stop.. ate . .. ' ree v e Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Hourly fJow rate( ph) 25 t 22 .:. X66 6. _ ., .. :..21 2i0 Pedestrians . 2 =1 2 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Block ge 0 Right turn flare(veh) Mediae type Median storage veh) Upstream signal(tt)..,; 626 pX, platoon unblocked vC con lictin volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC+2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 676 649 225 648 655 392 234 396 tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) p0 queue free% 92 100 99 96 100 95 99 100 cM capactty(vell/f).. , .. 312 651 751 374 379 663 „1 25 1 14 ...`: Vol r e: ec tal 31 8 403 231 Volume Left 25 14 8 6 Volume Right 32 <8 20 cSH 349 527 1325 1144 Volume t©Capacity 0 L 9 0{39 t3,X31 0 60 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 7 0 0 . .... ., Control f elay ) 16.3 12 3 2 .2 Lane LOS CB A A Approach Delay(s) .. 16.3 12 5.. fl.2 .. 2 . Approach LOS C B Average Delay 1.7 - Intersection Capacity Utilizati n 27 6�A ICU evel of Service A ... Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 3 173 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - AM Peak 4: Willow Ln & Pilkington Rd WCSS- Rosewood Lane Configurations 4 4 4 Sign Control ` Stop Stop FCee • Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/() 7 0 17 0 1 1 30 281 :: 0 1 150 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly flow rate(vph)` - 10 0 25 0 1 1 45 419 0 1 224 ; • 4 Pedestrians 4 2 Lane Width(ft) 12,0 12.0 Walking Speed (Ws) 4.0 40 Percent Blockage ;< 0 0: Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 1118 pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 742 742 226. '767 744 425 228 423 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol - vCu, unblocked vol 742 742 226 767 744 425 228 423 tC,.single(s) 7.1 65 6,2 :7 6 7,0 6.7 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tE(s) ' 3.5 4.0 3,3 4.0 4.5 3.8 2.2 2.2. p0 queue free% 97 100 97 100 99 100 97 100 cM capacity(vehlkt) 317 328 808 250 280 536 1340 1116:. l Volume Total `°36 3 464 230 Volume Left 10 0 45 1 Volume Right 25 1 0 4 cSH 556 368 1340 1116 Volume to Capacity ' 0.06 0:01 0.03 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 3 0 Control Delays) 11.9 - 14.9 1,1 01 Lane LOS B B A A Approach Delay(s) 11.9 14.9 '1.1 01 Approach LOS B B Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICED Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 4 174 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - AM Peak 5: Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCss- Rosewood Lane Configurations r t vi ft Sign Control Stop > , ee Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly flow gate(vph 4. s 593 .. 3 ... 7,... 6i7 , Pedestrians Walking Speed (ftls) Perces t Block cge Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLfit_ Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal(ft), '1296 pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting;volur e 943 316 631 vCi, stage 1 conf vol 615 vC2, stage 2 of vol .. .. vCu, unblocked vol 943 316 631 • tC, 2 stage(s) 5.9 p0 queue free% 84 99 99 cM capacity(vehlh) 27 73 Volume Total 399 233 1 314 Volume Left 44 0 0 0 7 0 0 cSH 279 674 1700 1700 934 1700 1700 Volumeto Capacity 0.16 0 1 23 X114 3 1 .... iii 1 Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 1 . 0 0 1 0 0 Control delay Vis) 20.3 10.4 fl 0 . . 6 9 tD 0 0 0 Lane LDS C B A Approach D.elay.(s) X3.0 Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.8 f ntersection Capacity f ltilization 26.9% IC ,Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 5 175 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - PM Peak 1: Parking & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCss- Rosewood 4 , /, if > Lane Configurations tr" f Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehilh) 5 10 6 854 965 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate(vph) 5 11 6 899 1016 1 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TW LTL" Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal(ft) 658 • pX, platoon unblocked 0.92 0.92 0.92 vG,":conflicting volume 1478 508 " 1017 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 1016 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 462 vCu,unblocked vol 1432 376 929 tG,single(s) 6.8 6.9 " '4 1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 Z2 p0 queue free% 97 98 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 176 574 678 • Volume Total 16 6 449 449 677 340 Volume Left 5 6 0 0 0 0 .. . . ............. Volume Right 11 0 0 0 . 0 1 cSH 327 678 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0,01 026 0.26 0,40 >0 20 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 1 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 16.6 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C B i' Approach Delay(s) ' 16.6 Q 1 00 Approach LOS C Average Delay elay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 1 176 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - PM Peak 2: Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd wCSs- Rosewood = M _ . Lane Configurations � ' +1 i t+ Ideal Flow(vphpl) 00...1900 19010 1900 .1900 1;900 1900 1900 1900, 1900. ::;1000 9c 0 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Utll f=actor. 1 00 1.00..." 100 0 95 .:: 1 00" 1 95. Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 FIpb,..f ed/bike 1X30 " 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Frt 0.91 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 1.00 Flt P'otected 0 98 0.95 1 00 . " 1.00 0 95 1,00" Satd. Flow(prat) 1667 1781 1578 3436 1787 3574 Fit ?emitted Satd. Flow(perm) 1567 1413 1578 3436 1787 3574 Volume(vph) 2 0 4 11 0 130 0 737 948 276 804 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj Flow(vph) . . . 2 0 4 x#:39 138 0 734 1 7 294 855. :' 1 RTOFR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 113 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 Lane `roup"stow(vp ) tl.. . " 3 0 X29 26 ;. 0 922 0 294 856 0 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 2 3 Conal Bikes(#/hr 9 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% " Tura Type Perin (?erg f�rot " ;"f?rot Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted phases 1� 2 Actuated Green, G(s) 11.1 11.1 11.1 22.6 - 15.3 41.9 Effective Green,9.(s)> 1'1. 11 1, 1 l ... .. 2 6 15 9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.37 0.25 0.69 Clearance Time(s) 4;z0 0 0 4 0 4 0 „ 4 0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap';(vph) 285 257. . " 287 .. . 1278 448 2455 , v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.27 c0.16 0.24 v/s Ratio Pearl; 0(l0 c0;10 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.54 0.09 0.72 0.66 0.35 Unify rm belay,d 1 X0`.4 �6 " 2 7 15 5 20 5 9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Incremental Delay,d20 �3 . 0 1 2 l 3 5 0"1". Delay(s) 20.5 25.0 20.9 18.6 23.9 4.0 Level of cervico Approach Delay(s) 20.522.9 18.6 9.1 Approach LOQ C C HCM Average-Control belay 14.5 HCM Level of service . HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 6 0 Sum of lost time(s a 12 0" Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C 15 Analysts F?er�a9( ln} ''" ; c Critical Lane Group 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 2 177 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - PM Peak 3: Rosewood St & Pilkington Rd WCSS - Rosewood ?i-1:014414-1 :TOW Lane Configurations 4i 4r Sign Control ; Stop Stop Free 'Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/ ) 11 0 4 3 0 • 16 1 221 . 5 " 26 „ 387 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flaw rate(vph) 12 . 0 4 3 0 17 1 238 5 28 416 4 Pedestrians 2 7 1 1 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.'0 12,0 12,r0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 1" 0 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 526 pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 737 728 421 729 728 248 ",422 250 vC1 stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vGu, unblocked vol 737 728 421 729 728 248 422 250 tC,single (s) ° 71 65 62 72 66 63 " ";, 41 41 tC, 2stage (s) tF(s) 3.5 40 33 ...:.:36 41 34 22 22 p0 queue free% 96 100 99 99 100 98 100 98 cry)capacity(vehlh) 320 341 633 321 335 775": 1140 1314 � ��7wa� �� ... ,�_4 � � �. ' - .�, "sem '>- �•�4� �� r °�^e VoCu nig Total 16 20 244 448 Volume Left 12 3 1 28 Volume Right 4 17 5 4 cSH 368 634 1140 1314 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.03 0:00 0.02 Queue Length 95th(ft) 3 2 0 2 Control Delay(s) 15.2 10.9 0.0 0.7 Lane LOS CB A A " Approach Delay(s) 15.2 10.9 0.0 0.7 Approach LOS C B Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity. Utilization 48.0% ICU Level of Service A " .. Analysis Period (min) 15 • 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 3 178 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - PM Peak 4: Willow Ln & Pilkington Rd WCSS- Rosewood Lane Configurations 4, ,. 4, Sizgn ontrol stop fop_ F+ .. trap Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Vol me(veh/h) ,67 1 0" " 9 21 0 0 87 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly low rate(vpl j 70 0 0". ". ..2 22 0" X95 Pedestrians 30 6 Lane width.(ftp". .. 1,2 0 12.8. Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percet t Blockage S 1 Right turn flare (veh) Iediar type -"i None one Median storage veh) Upstream sigt al.(ft) 118 pX, platoon unblocked vC,cor flicting':volume 688 694 427 734 f X96 227 :. '43(3 227 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 car,f vol vCu, unblocked vol 688 694 427 734 696 227 430 227 tC,single(s) 71 65 �2 1 6 6 41 41 tC, 2 stage (s) 98 100 89 100 100 100 98 100 p0 queue free% cM capacity(vel/h) 348 0 ", 614 287 349 ...:t i1'1,.. 1; 06 1841 f V iliume Total. 5 i3 241 400 Volume Left 5 0 20 0 1?lu e Ri 11t,:: 0 fl 0 cSH • 581 1700 1106 1341 • Volo nt to Capacity 0 0 tl 02 " 0 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) '11 0 1 0 Control belay.Vis) 1 ,1 Lane LOS B A A Approa�c1�# clay(s) 121 0 8 0 Approach LOS B A Average Delay •1.6 Inters ction Capacity Utilization 38 0% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 4 179 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background Conditions - PM Peak 5: Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSs- Rosewood r Lane Configurations r + tt Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0%° ° Vofume(rrehth) 33 15 845 52 17 `�59 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly,flow rate.(vph) 34 16 880 =54 18 993 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type" 'TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal(ft) 1296 pX, platoon unblocked vG,conflicting`volume 1442 -467 934 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 907 vC2,stage 2,conf vol. 535 • vCu,unblocked vol 1442 467 934 tC,single(s) 68 63 41 tC, 2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) ' 3.5 3.3 :22. p0 queue free% 81 97 98 cM capacity.(reh/h) 184 542 .735 Volume Total` 34 t6 587 348 15 499 499 Volume Left 34 0 0 0 18 0 0 Volume Right;. . 6 0 54 0 0 0 cSH 184 542 1700 1700 735 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity ,0:19 0=03 t 35 0 0 if 82 0.29 0.29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 2 0 0 2 0 0 Control Dellay.(s) 291 14 8 0.0 '0 0 10.0. 0.0 - 0.0 Lane LOS D B B Approach Delay(s)., 23.7.. „£3 0 0,2 . Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.7 Intersection'Capacity Utilization 36,5% lCU;Level Of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 5 180 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - AM Peak 1 : Rosewood St & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCss- Rosewood • \ ) 1tr Lane Configurations 4, . ft, j +1+ Sign Control Slop Stop free. Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% • •0 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Pedestrians 1 Large Width tt# 2 , Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 Percent$lockage t3 Right turn flare (veh) Mediad type, WITI_ . �LT�- Median storage veh) 0 0 l stream signal pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 13.96 vC, co flicting rolum 101 . 1330 340 984 1329 311 681 621 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 681 681 643 643 vC2, stage 2 conf vol;• X34 648 341 63'5 vCu, unblocked vol 971 1299 265 938 1298 311 621 621 tC,2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 p0 queue free% 97 100 100 92 100 100 99 100 cls capacity( 'e4/h) 236 247 r(4 242 15 687 08 341 V0141-00 "otal 7 1 13 407 213 Volume Left . 7 19 13 0 0 2 0 0 Volume Right t3 2 0 0 10 6 tl 8 cSH 236 259 908 1700 1700 941 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0(3 0 08 0.01 0 4 0.13 0.00 f 26 14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 Control;Delay Vis) 20 20 f d3 0 it 0 3 8 t3 0 0 0 . Lane LOS C C A A • Approa l Belay(s) 26.7 20.1 6 2 l3 6 Approach LOS C C Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26 8% l Gls1;)evel cif Service A Analysis Period.(min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 1 181 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - AM Peak 2: Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS- Rosewood -_ ' , 1r-' . y4-& , = e s x _ z®►.rh 9I -f lY:,_!?e,,---4►: < 'gr` `#, tir, Lane Configurations 11 T 11 +T " ft Ideal Pow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 00 1 00 0.95 1 00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb,ped/bikes 1:00 1.00 1 00 .. .1 00 100 1 00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 100 Satd. Flow(prot) 1718 1539 1752 3412 1736 3471 Fit Permitted 0:76 1,00 095 1.00 0.95 IMO Satd. Flow (perm) 1369 1539 1752 3412 1736 3471 Volume(vph) 0 0 0 121 1 185 3 458 83 104 483 ' 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 AdjFlow(vph) 0 0 0 144 1 220 4 545 99 124 575 0 FITOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 165 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 Lane c3roup Flow(vph) 0 0 0 144 56 0 4 628 0 124 575 0 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 3 Confi,Bikes(#/hr) 1 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% Turn Type. Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G(s) 10.7 10.7 0.8 15.5 4.9 19.6 Effective Green,g(s) 10.7 10J 0.8 15.5 4.9 19.6- Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.36 0.11 0.45 Clearance Time(s) 4M 4.0. 4.0 4.0 4M 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 340 382 33 ,;1227 197 1578 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.00 c0.18 c0.07 0.17 vts Ratio Perm c0.11 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.15 0.12 0.51 0.63 0.36 Uniform Delay,dl 136 12,6 20.8 10.8 18.2 7.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,cf2. .-0 9 0.2 1 6 6.4 6,2 01 Delay(s) 14.5 12.8 22.5 11.2 24.4 7.8 Level of Service B B C B C A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 13.5 11.3 10.8 Approach LOS A B B B HCM Average Control Delay. 11.5 NCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 43.1 Sum of,lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(mire) 15 c Critical Lane Group 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 2 182 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - AM Peak 3: Rosewood St & Pilkington Rd WCSS - Rosewood } -- ' t ::4 _ ., sn _ Lane Configurations 4, , Sign Contrtr) Stet? Stop .. : f= a ee Grade 0% 0% 0% ..: 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Houryflowrate(vph) . . 5 i 3 .. 23 1 1t "., 38 4 1. 1 0 Pedestrians 2 2 LaneWdth(f). .. f 413 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Perce it Blockage . . 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type "` None orae Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 526 pX, platoon unblocked vC,cor flicting volume.. . "659 639 22'5 6x46 647 X90 " 3� 392 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol;' vCu, unblocked vol 659 639 225 646 647 390 234 392 tC, 2 stage(s) p0 queue free% 92 98 99 97 94 98 99 100 cM,capacity(veh/h) 317 . .356 751. ""X69." .384 655 X335 f 148" ' olume 'ota1 41 48 400 23 4 • Volume Left 25 13 10 1 l�olume Right 7 f3" 4 " 23 cSH 361 426 1325 1148 Volume"1a Capacity p 1 1 0 t . 3 01 f3 33 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 9 10 Control Dlelay(s) 16.2 14. 0 3 X31 Lane LOS CB A A Approach Delay(s) .16 2 1 4 5 i3 3 f Approach LOS C B Average Delay 2.0 " Intersection"+Capacity-:(_Itil�zat on 29 5°7° ICU vel of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 3 183 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - AM Peak 4: Willow Ln & Pilkington Rd WCSS- Rosewood Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Free "; " Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) =4 0 17 0 1 1 30 282 "> 0 1 151"• 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hourly'flow rate(vph) 6 0 25 0 1 1 45 421 0 1 • 225 3 Pedestrians 4 2 Lane Width"O 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) 1118 Upstream signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC,conflicting volume 745 744 227 770 746 427 228 425 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 cent-vol vCu, unblocked vol 745 744 227 770 746 427 228 425 tC,single(s) 71 6.5 6.2 7.6 7.0 6.7 41 4:1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) 3.5 40 '33 40" 4Z 38 22 22 p0 queue free% 98 100 97 100 99 100 97 100 cM capacity(veh/hi) " 316 327 808 249 279 535 1340 1115 Volume Total 31 3 466 230 Volume Left 6 0 45 1 Volume Right 251 0 3 > cSH 623 367 1340 1115 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0;010.03 0<00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 1 3 0 Control Delays) 11.1 14.9 1.1 01 Lane LOS B B A A Approach Delay(a) 11.1 14.9 1,1 0.1 Approach LOS B B Average Delay 1.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 398% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 4 184 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - AM Peak 5: Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS - Rosewood . e-21, woolttgattill-1P7 jar titttij Lane Configurations r ... ... , . •. . . ..... . . . . Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 41 6 560 29 7 605 Peak 1-tour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly flow rate(vph) 43 6 583 30 7 630 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal (11) 1296 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 928 307 614 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 598 • vC2, stage 2 cant vol 330 vCu, unblocked vol 928 307 614 • • tC, 2 stage(s) 5.9 • • : p0 queue free% 85 99 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 284 653 948 !YY:441-72-1 JrtaR4C Volume Left Left 43 0 0 0 7 0 0 cSH 284 683 1700 1700 948 .1700 1700 VolurnetoCapacity 0.15 0.01 0.23 0.13 0.01 0.19 0.19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 1 0 0 1 0 0 Lane LOS C B - A • Approach Delay(s) 18.7 0.0 0.1 Approach LOS iM14111:2-ft40,11rgWritriiffittMil****A---S-Wit47**-1P-_1:1,141-t- i,witiitiOXV-AX*.ftk:p3-1,75!IIM*2.**-:Attt-t•S't.1".Pliti,litiW Average Delay 0.8 Intersection capacity Utilization 26.7% CU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 5 185 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - PM Peak 1 : Rosewood St & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS- Rosewood Lane Configurations 44 4 vi it441 Sign Control Stop Stop : Fre " t=ree Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 0 10 13 " 0 2 6 833 23 2 955 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate"(Vph) 5 • 0 11 14 0 2 6 877 '? 24 2 ';1005 1 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent.Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL" Median storage veh) 0 0 Upstream signal(ft) " s58" pX platoon unblocked 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 vC,conflictin g volume. 1463 1924 503 1419' :1912 • 451 1006 901 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1010 1010 902 902 vC2,stage 2;conf vol 453" 914 517 1011 vCu, unblocked vol 1414 1917 367 1366 1904 451 916 • 901 tC,single(s) 75 65 . . ""6.9' 7 5 6 5 6.9 41 41 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF(s) 3.5 4Q 3.3 <3.5 „ ''.4.0, 3 3 22 2.2: p0 queue free% 96 100 98 91 100 100 99 100 CM capacity(vehlh) 148 134 5811 ., '160 134 559 684 756 _: r r . g Volume Total' 16 16 6'. 585 316 2 670 . 336 Volume Left 5 14 6 0 0 2 0 0 Volume light` 11 2 0 24 0 0 1 cSH 294 177 684 1700 1700 756 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0;05 0:09 0:01 Q.34'.. 019 .'0 00 ". 039, "0.20 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) ' 17.9 273 • 10.3 ;0.0 0.0 9.8 • 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS CDB A Approach Delay(s) •. •-17 9. ' 27.3 01 " ' 0 0 Approach LOS C D tfjlr Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization," 36:4% ICU Level of Service • A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 1 186 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - PM Peak 2: Pilkington Rd & Lower Boones Ferry Rd wCSS - Rosewood Lane Configurations +1 +1 ideal F ls�w(vphpl) ,. 1900 1900 3900 1900 X900 1 66 .. 00 1 ©0 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util Factor 1 0l) 1;00 1:; 6 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, edrbike : 1,00 1.00 1.0 110 .10 1 0 Frt 0.91 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 Fit,Protecte l 98 Satd. Flow(prat) 1667 1764 1562 3483 1787 3574 Fit permitted Satd. Flow(perm) 1565 1400 1562 3483 1787 3574 Volume(vph) "2 0 4 122 } 130,, 0 739 ; 127 276 806 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Ada Flow(vpt 0 4. 180 0. 138 8 X86 ;135„ 294 87 1•. RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 112 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vl? ) 0 3 0 . 130 26 0 0 906 0 294 858 0 Confi. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 2 3 Cottfl ekes #/hr) 1 2 HeavyVehicles (%).. . . 1% 1% 1% 2% 2/ 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%..., .; 1% Turn f ype Perm Perm 'rot Prot Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 ._ 3 8 Permitted Phases 0.. Actuated Green, G (s) 10.9 10.9 10.9 21.2 14.6 39.8 Effective Gree : g(a ' 10 9 10 9 8, 1 2 , 14 6 39 8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.36 0.25 0.68 Clearance Tine(s) 0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.26 c0.16 0.24 vls Ratio Perris: 0 a . .... : ... .cD 09 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.50 0.09 0.72 0.66 0.35 Uniform ©elay 11 . 19 5 21 5 1 8 16 2 19 8 , 8, Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay d20 Delay(s) 19.5 23.0 19.9 18.2 23.5 4.1 Level of S rvice Approach Dela .A y(s) 19.5 21.4 18.2 9.1 1 ro , to LOS 3 HCM Aterage,Control,lelay 11.1 ; ,NCM Level of Servica HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated•Cycle Length v8;7 Sent:of 1o�1'time(s): 12 0 , Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.2% ICU Level of Service • B Analysts Period(r)iin) t5. c Critical Lane Group 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 2 187 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - PM Peak 3: Rosewood St & Pilkington Rd WCss- Rosewood )1' --► "ir 4\ t 1' 4' Lane Configurations 4 ( 4 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehfh) t 1 21 5 3 10 6 2 221 5 . .<' 5 387 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate(vph) 12 23 5 , 3 116 2 238 5 5...; 416 4 Pedestrians 2 7 11 Lane Width( ) '' 12.1) 12.0 120 120" Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 1 0 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal(ft) 526 pX, platoon unblocked vG,conflicting volume 688 685 421 698 685 248 422 250 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol . 688 685 421 698 685 248 422 250 tO,single(s) 71 65 62. 72 66 63 41 41 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) • 3.5 40 3.3 3.6 41 34 22 • 2.2 p0 queue free% 97 94 99 99 97 99 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 346 367 633 325 361 775 114E7 1314 Volume Total`'. 40 20 245 426 Volume Left 12 3 2 5 Volume Right 5 6 5 4 cSH 382 425 1140 1314 Volume to Capacity 010 0405 0:00 0.00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 4 0 0 . Control Delay(s) ;t 15.5 13.9 01 0 Lane LOS CB A A Approach Delay(s) - 15,5 13.9 01 .. '01 Approach LOS C B Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 343% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period(min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 3 188 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - PM Peak 4: Willow Ln & Pilkington Rd WCSS - Rosewood Lane Configurations 4+ 4 4. Sign Control. :' Stop top praa...: Pr1a .. Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly flow rate(yph) 5 0 it p „ 2b . 222 0, ... '9 '' . Pedestrians 30 6 I~ane Width(t) 1 f? `: Walking Speed (ftis) 4.0 4.0 - p:Ok.Opt,Blocl age „ 3 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal eft) 1118 pX, platoon unblocked vC eco flicting'volume 690 696 420 ..736 ;698 228 vC1, stage 1 coni vol •vC2,stale 2 cont vol ` vCu, unblocked vol 690 696 428 736 • 698 228 431 __.. 228 • tC, 2 stage(s) tF(s) p0 queue free% 98 100 89 100 100 100 981 .; cM capacity reh/h). 389 849 13 286. .. 348. .. 810 „ 1106 .. < . 1346. .: ttials Volume Total 5 0 X42 8 Volume Left 5 0 20 0 eSH 580 1700 1106 1340 glume:to Capacity....' 013 0 0 0 4 2 0 00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 0 1 0 Control Delay. e3. . . : 12..1 0.8 0 ... Lane LOS B A A • Approach Delay(s). 12.:1 fl 8 , 0 Approach LOS - B A ri„ Average Delay 1.5 Interse tion Capacity Utilization 38{% IC Lev;l cif:service A } (min Period Analysis 15 y 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 4 189 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - PM Peak 5: Willow Ln & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS - Rosewood Lane Configurations r f S + Sign Control tap Free f ree Grade 0% 0% 0% Volurne(veh/h) 33. 15 „847 5 17 962 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hcurlyflow rate(vph) 34 - 16 882 54 18 1002 Pedestrians t.ane Width�(It) . Walking Speed (ttls) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type ! 7W LTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal(ft) 1290 pX, platoon unblocked VG,conflicting volume. 14.40 468 936 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 909 vC2,stage 2 canf vol 536 vCu, unblocked vol 1446 468 936 tC,single(s) 8 s 9 41 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF(s) 3 5 :3.3": 2 2 p0 queue free% 81 97 98 cM capacity(reh/h) ' 183 541 2. 733 Volume Total 34 16 588 348 18 501 :501 Volume Left 34 0 0 0 18 0 0 Volume Right t) t6 54 0 0 . cSH 183 541 1700 1700 733 1700 1700 029 629 Volume tt►Capacity<' 0:19 003 0;35 :.'002- Queue "3 20 . 0q2 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 2 0 0 2 0 0 Control Delay(a) 29:1 .118 0:0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 Lane LOS D B B Approach Delay(s) 217 0 0 .-0.2,'''> Approach LOS C Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36:6% ICU Levellof Service A Analysis Period (min) . . 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 5 190 APPENDIX B -POLICY CITATIONS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN 3.2.2 Local Street Connections The City, along with the emergency services providers and the School District, will continue to work with the neighborhoods to consider the value of potential through connections. The Community Transportation Preferences Survey (see Resource Document) indicated substantial opposition to creating through connections for motor vehicles from existing cul-de-sacs. At the same time, concern was expressed about emergency access and about all streets sharing the load of neighborhood traffic. At least one neighborhood association (Forest Highlands) is asking for consideration of some new through connections,at least for bicycles and pedestrians. This plan, in general terms, endorses connections for bicycles and pedestrians to shorten trip lengths and so encourage alternate mode use. New street connections are appropriate where they will significantly improve safety. Any new through routes should also be evaluated for their impacts to the functioning of the existing street network-will the new street better feed the existing framework of collector and arterial streets or will it encourage cut-through traffic? It is recommended that new local street extensions - for vehicular and/or pedestrian/bicycle traffic, be derived through the local neighborhood transportation planning process, which is actively underway within several neighborhoods. This will ensure that these potential connections reflect specific neighborhood desires and public input. At this time, the Lake Oswego TSP adopts the Metro performance criteria for local street connectivity, as identified in Title 6 of the Regional Framework Plan. Approval of new development shall include local street designs "with street intersection spacing to occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile except where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways,or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers, prevent street extension. The number of street intersections should be greatest in the highest density 2040 Growth Concept design types. Local street designs for new development shall satisfy the following additional criteria: 1) Performance Criterion: minimize local traffic on the regional motor vehicle system by demonstrating that local vehicle trips on a given regional facility do not exceed the 1995 arithmetic median of regional trips for facilities of the same motor vehicle system classification by more than 25 percent. 2) Performance Criterion: everyday local travel needs are served by direct, connected local street systems where: (1) the shortest motor vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; and (2) the shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance." 191 3.2.4 Access Management Existing access standards for the various roadway functional classifications shall be enforced through the development permit process. Maintaining an appropriate balance of mobility and access is at the heart of a street network built on functional classifications. Lower type facilities, such as neighborhood collectors, emphasize access and limit mobility with lower speed and more frequent interruptions to through traffic. Higher type facilities, such as arterials, emphasize mobility by limiting local access. Maintaining high mobility on arterials is essential to keeping excessive traffic off of lower classification facilities. In addition to coordinated signal systems and roadway designs for higher speeds and volumes, limiting the frequency of driveways and street intersections is a major part of keeping an arterial functioning as an arterial. Table 3-2 presents recommended spacing distance for traffic signals, public intersections, private driveways, and for raised median openings. The minimum access spacing standards are to apply to new street construction and new or redeveloped land uses. Table 3-2 Proposed Access Spacing Guidelines Minimum Spacing Roadway Areal Traffic Public Private Median Functional Signals Intersections Driveways Opening Classification (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) Major Arterial Urban 1I2 600 300 600 CBD/RC 1/4 NA NA NA Major Collector All 1/4 [ 200 150 NA Neighborhood Collector All 1/4 1 150 100 NA Local Residential Street ( All NA 100 50 NA Local Commercial/Industrial Street [[[ All II NA I 100 I 50 I NA Notes:I "Urban refers to intersections inside the Lake Oswego urban growth boundary outside the central business district or designated regional centers. "CBD/RC"refers to intersections within the Lake Oswego central business district,within designated regional centers,and along designated regional"M ain Streets". "All"refers to all intersections inside the bike Oswego urban growth boundary. NA-Not applicable 192 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Goal 12: Transportation Goal 1: Major Streets System Lake Oswego shall develop a major street system consisting of major and minor arterials and major collectors, which will have minimal impact on the City's air quality, address the mobility needs of residents for all modes of travel and promote energy conservation. Policies 2. Direct access onto major streets shall be controlled and consolidated over time through the development review process and the implementation of major street projects. In particular, access to state highways shall be reviewed subject to the regulations of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the City of Lake Oswego. Where regulations conflict,the more restrictive requirements shall apply. Action Measures i) Develop access criteria for the major streets system which utilize the following principles: a. Direct access to the major and minor arterial system is restricted except from existing platted lots, which may be allowed access when there is no feasible alternative. Feasible alternatives may include easements through adjacent properties to existing Residential or Neighborhood Collector Streets or shared access to the Major Street System. b. Whenever possible,properties shall develop access to major and minor arterials from frontage roads or side streets as opposed to direct access to a major street. Major arterials may be allowed to intersect every 1,000 feet,and minor arterials every 600 feet, subject to an approved street plan. e. Direct access to major collectors is discouraged except when there is no practical access from local streets or neighborhood collectors. f. To reduce travel on major streets, encourage travel connections between adjacent developments. g. Require consolidation and closure of driveways onto the major streets system over time if access spacing guidelines in Figure 16 are exceeded when implementing major street capital projects. 193 CITY CHARTER Section 40. Major Road Expenditures. A. Pm-pose: The purpose of this section is to give the voters of Lake Oswego control over expenditures for, and the construction of,roads which may have a major impact upon character and livability of the City and its neighborhoods. This section shall be construed liberally to achieve this purpose. B. Definition. As used in this section: Agent includes any city, county, state or federal official, employee, board, commission, agency or institution and also any public or private association, district, agency or institution. Road includes any road, street, way, freeway highway, expressway, collector or arterial. "Road" also includes any bridge surface available for use by automobiles. The term "road" does not include any driveway or parking area constructed on a parcel of land to be used for residential purposes, including construction of any approach to such driveway or parking area that may be located in public right-of-way,provided that the driveway or parking area is intended to be privately owned and to be used primarily by the owner or owners and guests. The term "road" also does not include the circular portion of a cul-de-sac in a residential subdivision. Pavement means the paved surfaces of any road including,but not limited to,traveling lanes, parking lanes, turning lanes, shoulders, gutters, and paved median strips. "Pavement" does not include sidewalks available for use by pedestrians but not by automobile. "Pavement" also does not include bicycle trails which are physically separated from other paved areas and which are not available for use by automobiles. Maior road means any new road having pavement exceeding 32 feet in width. For purposes of this section, the pavement width of a road having areas of pavement which are separated by an unpaved median strip shall be measured by combining the widths of the areas of pavement. Major road expansion means any construction which would increase the width of the pavement of any existing road. However, "major road expansion" does not include (1) construction on a road which will not exceed 20 feet in pavement width after such construction or (2) road maintenance or repair which will not significantly increase the width of a road. C. Election Requirements: The city of Lake Oswego shall not directly, indirectly, or through any agency, construct, request, pay for in whole or in part, levy any assessment for, enter into any agreement approving or facilitating, or otherwise authorize or permit the construction of any "major roads" or "major road expansion" on land within the city limits of Lake Oswego until after either(1) a majority of the voting electors of the City of Lake Oswego shall have approved, in concept, the route, width, length, and general design of such "major road" or "major road expansion" in a city election properly commenced under the Charter and Code of the City of Lake Oswego and the laws of the State of Oregon or(2)the election is waived pursuant to paragraph E. D. Initial Notice: If the City Council decides that a "major road" or "major road expansion" should be constructed, then the City Recorder shall post a notice in the City Hall and the City Library. The City Recorder shall mail a copy of the notice (a) to at least one owner of each parcel of property which abuts the proposed construction, (b) to each person who has requested within the prior two years that his or her name be placed on a special mailing list to be maintained by the City Recorder for this purpose, and (c) to an officer of each officially recognized neighborhood association. The contents of the notice shall meet the requirements of paragraph F. A certificate signed in good faith by the City Recorder that notices were mailed to stated persons shall be 194 conclusive proof of actual mailing. If a notice is mailed to the name and address of the person authorized to receive tax statements regarding a parcel of land, the City Recorder shall be deemed to have given notice to all owners of that parcel. Notice given to an association of condominium unit owners or similar type association shall be deemed to be notice to all owners. Substantial compliance with the terms of this subsection is deemed adequate compliance. E. Waiver of Election: An election on a proposed "major road" or "major road expansion" is deemed waived unless the City Recorder receives on or before the 30th calendar day after the date of the certificate of mailing notice provided for in paragraph D; one or more documents bearing the signatures of at least 25 registered City voters indicating that they refuse to waive an election signatures by paragraph C. F. Election Notice and Hearing: Immediately prior to the election required by paragraph C,the City Recorder shall cause to be published once a month during the two calendar months immediately preceding or including the month in which the election is held, in a newspaper of general circulation in Lake Oswego, general plans and a map of the proposed road or road expansion showing the route, width, length, and general design of the proposed road and road expansion. If requested in writing by at least 20 registered City voters at least 28 days prior to an election, the City Council shall hold an informational public hearing on a proposed road construction not less than 10 days prior to the election. G. Severability: If a court holds invalid or unconstitutional any clause or part of this section, such holding shall not affect the remaining parts of this section which are not held invalid or unconstitutional. (Amended November 2, 1976 [Note: from November 2, 1976 until June 30, 1980, this Section was numbered Section 38a through f]; Amended November 4, 1980 Editorial correction, subsection E,deleted "validate signatures";01114/02.) • 195 CITY CODE Chapter 42 Streets and Sidewalks Section 42.03.030 Arterial Streets-General Standards. 1. Arterial streets shall be designed to carry through traffic to major regional arterials and freeways. 2. Arterial streets shall be designed to restrict access except from other public streets, with emphasis on collectors. 3. Arterial streets shall be designed to draw through traffic away from neighborhood streets. 4. Arterial streets shall be designed to minimize adverse social and environmental impacts on adjoining property. 5. The design width shall be based on the ultimate full development of the surrounding areas which will generate traffic on the particular arterial. 6. Arterial streets shall be designed for sidewalks on at least one side. (Ord.No. 1713, Sec. 7; 12-19-78.0rd. No. 2164,Renumbered, 01120198,44.08.377) Section 42.03.035 Arterial Streets-Specific Standards. 1. The width of any arterial street, both as to right-of-way and paved roadway, shall be recommended to the appropriate decision-making body by the City Engineer taking into account the following criteria: a. Need for protected turning lanes. b.Traffic generation based on Comprehensive Plan criteria. c. On-street parking requirements. d. Sidewalk and bikeway requirements. e. Placement of utilities. f. Street lighting. g. Slope and drainage management. 2. Arterials shall be designed and constructed with positive drainage control. 3. Arterials located within residential areas should include design elements to buffer sight and sound impacts on adjoining properties including, but not limited to, street trees, open spaces, and grade differentials. (Ord.No. 1713, Sec. 8; 12-19-78. Ord. No. 2164,Renumbered,01120/98,44.08.378) 196 Chapter 50 Community Development Code Section 50.06.003 Circulation and Connectivity I. Access/Access Lanes(Flag Lots) c. Standards for Approval iii. Direct permanent access from a development to an arterial street is prohibited where an alternate access is either available or is expected to be available. A temporary access may be allowed. f. Distance between Access and Nearest Intersection Access from a major development to a collector or an arterial shall not be less than 100 ft. from the nearest intersection of street centerlines. 197 198 RECEIVED MAR 2 8 2014 City of Loh a Com t.rl •:i1 r...��ls�'-4'??v¢9t Davi March 28, 2014 LANCASTER ENGINEERING Steve Tangey 321 SW 40 Ave.,Suite 400 g y Portland,OR 97204 West Coast Self Storage phone:503.248.0313 39 Cast] Road fax:503.248.9251 Pleasanton,CA 94566 tancaskerengineering.com RE: West Coast Self Storage Rosewood—LU 14-0006 Traffic Impact Study—Addendum Dear Steve, This letter is written in response to the general comments regarding the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Lancaster Engineering on August 23, 2013, which were provided by the City of Lake Oswego Planning and Building Services staff in the incompleteness notice dated February 26, 2014. Additional concerns raised by City staff subsequent to the February 26 incompleteness notice are also addressed. Redistribution of Traffic on Connection of Rosewood Street A concern was raised that the traffic impact study did not address the redistribution of trips accessing the existing businesses on Rosewood Street. The traffic impact relating to trips destined or originating from the businesses with access along Rosewood Street will be minimal compared to trips utilizing the new connection to reach Lower Boones Ferry Road or the nearby neighborhoods. This local traffic was discussed on page eight of the traffic impact study, but given the low volume and insignificant impact,the local redistribution was not specifically analyzed. Still, the trips generated by existing businesses along Rosewood Street were accounted for in the existing conditions analysis and were carried through into the year 2016 background and background plus site analysis without any redistribution. According to traffic counts at the Pilkington Road at Rosewood Street, businesses located along Rosewood Street generate a total of 41 trips during the AM peak hour and 20 trips during the PM peak hour. Under the analysis performed in the original August 2013 traffic study, all trips generated by the businesses on Rosewood are assumed to continue using Pilkington Road to arrive or depart towards either Lower Boones Ferry Road or destinations to the south. With the connection of Rosewood Street to Boones Ferry Road, it would be expected that a minor amount of the traffic using Pilkington Road to access Boones Ferry would instead divert to use the new intersection. Due to the inherent delay associated with left-turns across multiple lanes of traffic, the amount of traffic using this route during the peak hours would be expected to be minimal, as the signal at Boones Ferry Road at Pilkington would provide a more attractive route. EXHIBIT F-5 LU 14-0006 5- 1961 199 Steve Tangey March 28, 2014 Page 2 of 2 However, for an extreme worst-case analysis, all local traffic on Rosewood Street was assigned to the new intersection with Boones Ferry Road and the capacity analysis was updated_ Even with this unrealistic assumption, the operation of the intersection is projected to remain level of service C during the morning peak hour and level of service D during the evening peak hour. Detailed calculations of the intersection operation are provided in the attached technical appendix. This updated analysis confirms that the influence of any redistribution of local traffic from Rosewood Street will not alter the findings in the original traffic impact study. Sight Distance for WCSS Driveway on Rosewood The Rosewood Street access for the West Coast Self Storage property is proposed to be constructed 118 feet east of the center of the intersection with Lower Boones Ferry Road. Rosewood Street is a local service street with a statutory 25 mph. This speed would require 152 feet of stopping sight based on AASHTO standards. This is the necessary minimum sight distance looking to the east from the site access,toward oncoming westbound traffic on Rosewood Street. For vehicles traveling eastbound on Rosewood Street west of the site access, it is anticipated that traffic speeds would not be greater than 15 mph in order to navigate the turning movement from Boones Ferry Road onto Rosewood Street. Based on prior speed investigations for situations similar to this, turning movements from an arterial onto a perpendicular local street have an 85`h percentile speed of approximately 15 mph. A travel speed of 15 mph would require 77 feet of stopping sight distance based on AASHTO standards. Sight distance will be unobstructed by roadway geometry or vegetation looking east from the site access and will readily exceed the required stopping sight distance standard of 152 feet. Looking to the west from the site driveway, traffic turning from Boones Ferry Road will be visible from the driveway and approximately 112 feet of stopping sight distance will be available, which is well in excess of the required 77 feet. Accordingly, sight distance is sufficient in both direction for the driveway to operate safely. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns or if you need any further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us. With Best Regards, t'pPRDcFS � Fi�GIN `r>o William Farley, E Transportation Analyst OREGON v UC1,g,, Qo Q°OE. M0 0' 3/11/14. EXPIRES: t2 4, I-tor4- 200 TECHNICAL APPENDIX 201 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - AM Peak 1: Rosewood St & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS- Rosewood (Redirected) '-411 % \44 % , if ,-a4 ! ► Movement SEL SET SEA NET NER SWC SWT SWR ._ EFC NWL NWT NWfi NES. Lane Configurations 4 II fl 11 ft Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 6 0 0 26 0 10 12 543 16 8 599 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 0 0 29 0 11 13 610 18 9 673 8 Pedestrians 1 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 0 Upstream signal (ft) 658 pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 vC, conflicting volume 1038 1351 340 1002 1346 315 681 629 vC1, stage 1 cont vol 695 695 647 647 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 343 656 354 699 vCu, unblocked vol 994 1322 265 956 1316 315 621 629 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.2 4.2 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 97 100 100 88 100 98 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 227 202 704 238 201 683 908 935 birection, Lane# SE 1 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 NE 3 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total 7 40 13 407 221 9 449 232 Volume Left 7 29 13 0 0 9 0 0 Volume Right 0 11 0 0 18 0 0 8 cSH 227 290 908 1700 1700 935 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.14 0.01 0.24 0.13 0.01 0.26 0.14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 12 1 0 0 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) 21.3 19.4 9.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C C A A Approach Delay (s) 21.3 19.4 0.2 0.1 Approach LOS C C Jntersection Summ4ry Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 1 202 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2015 Background plus Site - PM Peak 1 : Rosewood St & Lower Boones Ferry Rd WCSS - Rosewood (Redirected) Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NE9 SWC. SWT SWR Lane Configurations 1 + ) 1$ Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 5 0 10 19 0 7 6 833 25 4 955 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 0 11 20 0 7 6 877 26 4 1005 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 0 Upstream signal (ft) 658 pX, platoon unblocked 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 vC, conflicting volume 1473 1930 503 1424 1917 452 1006 903 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1014 1014 903 903 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 458 916 522 1015 vCu, unblocked vol 1425 1924 368 1372 1910 452 916 903 IC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 96 100 98 87 100 99 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 146 133 580 159 133 558 684 755 Direction, Lane# SE 1 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 NE 3 511 1 SW 2, .SW 3 -- Volume Total 16 27 6 585 319 4 670 336 Volume Left 5 20 6 0 0 4 0 0 Volume Right 11 7 0 0 26 0 0 1 cSH 291 197 684 1700 1700 755 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.14 0.01 0.34 0.19 0.01 0.39 0.20 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 18.1 26.2 10.3 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C D B A Approach Delay (s) 18.1 26.2 0.1 0.0 Approach LOS C D Intersection Summary _ Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 5/20/2013 Synchro 6 Light Report Lancaster Engineering Page 1 203 204 Storm Drainage Analysis West Coast Self Storage Lake Oswego 5650 SW Rosewood Street Lake Oswego, Oregon January 2014 Project Number: 10309 JAN 2 7 2014 CjTY LA!;:r CiNK0 IN;':ei0;r1CrA VOrA, % . . ,4r,c0 PAW& G N -WO 1 15504 414 # , fretei‘-fQ-&- . y 25.1.34% 474 4y, 1"k FEXPIrws:Of30 EXHIBIT F-6 LU 14-0006 205 '39 Pa Storm Drainage Analysis West Coast Self Storage Lake Oswego 5650 SW Rosewood Street Lake Oswego, Oregon January 2014 Project Number: 12236 TM RIPPEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 7650 SW Beveland Street, Suite 100 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone: 503 443 3900 Fax: 503 443 3700 kkoroch@tmrippey.com 206 Table of Contents Project Summary 1 Flow Control 1 Water Quality Treatment 1 Conveyance Systems Analysis and Design 2 Public Street Drainage 2 Appendix Project Location and Area Maps Basin Key Map Pipe Conveyance Calculations HydroCad Analysis Output Operation and Maintenance Plan 207 PROJECT SUMMARY: This project is a new building with paved maneuvering and parking areas along Rosewood, east of Boones Ferry Road, on a commercial site in Lake Oswego, Oregon. This analysis also addresses runoff from a short public street extension. Development Site The site is presently grassed with several trees. The new development will consist of approximately 22,000 square feet of building and 10,500 square feet of paving and walks and the balance of the site will be landscaped Runoff from the roof will be collected in roof drains generally along the east side of the building. The roof drains will connect to an underground conveyance system. Runoff from the paved areas will be collected in catch basins connected to an underground conveyance system. The conveyance system will be directed to an underground detention system consisting of ADS StormTech detention chambers. Current City of Lake Oswego storm drainage requirements require runoff flow control and water quality treatment for new impervious surfaces. The requirement is that runoff for the developed site be limited to the predevelopment rates corresponding to a 10 year rainfall event. This detention system has been sized to provide detention (flow control) for runoff from the developed site through a 50 year storm event. Rainfall used in analysis is as provided in the City of Lake Oswego Drainage Design Manual. Modeling was performed using HydroCadTM software employing Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph methodology. As noted above, 10 and 50 year, 24 hour Type 1A events were modeled using the City's rainfall of 3.3 and 4.3 inches respectively. Based on discussions with City staff, a runoff curve number, CN of 79 was used to represent predevelopment conditions,with a time of concentration of 49.6 minutes. For the developed conditions, a CN of 98 and time of concentration of 5 minutes was used. Following detention, runoff is directed to a three cartridge Contech StormfilterTM manhole. The treatment manhole provides sediment and pollutant removal in conformance to the City and Clean Water Services standards, based in 0.36 inches of rainfall. The pond outflow structure was modeled as a 96 inch manhole conforming to City of Lake Oswego Drawing Number SD 8-01 with an internal riser, an orifice controls the outflow and runoff beyond the 50 year event overflows into the top of the riser. The orifice sizing, discharge, and associated detained volumes are listed below: Control Structure Discharge 10 Year Predevelopment Runoff, cfs 0.13 50 Year Post Development Runoff, cfs 0.79 Controlled Outflow, cfs 0.13 Orifice Elevation, ft. 143.00 • Orifice Diameter, in. 1.7 Maximum Water Surface Elevation, ft. 147.85 Detained Volume, cf. 4415 The required storage will be contained in one row of ADS StormTech SC 740 chambers with 28 chambers. Access for camera inspection and mechanical cleaning will be via access manholes at midway and the upstream end of the chambers. 208 Pipe sizing for the private on-site conveyance piping is based on runoff computed using the Rational Method with rainfall as provided in the City of Lake Oswego Drainage Design Manual. A 10 year 24 hour event (3.3 inches) was used for rainfall intensity. A runoff coefficient, C of 0.90 was used for roof and paved areas. Pipe capacity is based on Manning's equation with roughness coefficient, n,of 0.013. Design basins and pipes are identified on the attached Catchment Map and pipe sizing is shown on the attached Storm Sewer Design Form. Public Street As part of development of this site, a connection of SW Rosewood to SW Boones Ferry Road will be constructed. Presently, Rosewood extends to the site from the east at Pilkington Road but terminates prior to connecting with Boones. Rosewood will be extended approximately 117 ft across the site frontage and will consist of 30 ft of paving, curbs, and an 8 ft sidewalk along the project frontage. The existing section of Rosewood east of the site is nearly flat, but sloping slightly east. The area of the new extension sheds partially east and partially to an existing field inlet that drains west to an existing public storm system in Boones. This system is too shallow (1 to 2 ft below existing grades) to be utilized for Rosewood Runoff. Runoff from the new section of Rosewood will be collected in two new curb inlets near the east property boundary and conveyed with an new public storm main extended east to an existing public storm system in Pilkington Road. Boones Ferry Road slopes generally southerly across the new Rosewood connection so a new inlet will be constructed at the northern curb return to collect runoff prior to the new connection. Flow from this inlet will be conveyed to the new public system in Rosewood. An existing public water main along the Boones curb line, underground franchise utilities, and an existing gas main preclude connection of this inlet to the existing storm system in Boones, which is approximately 165 ft south of the new inlet. Manholes will be installed at appropriate locations along the new storm main. Runoff to the inlets and pipe systems was calculated utilizing HydroCAD modeling software as with the site detention sizing. Public street areas were determined and flow computed based on fully developed conditions, CN of 98 and time of concentration of 5 minutes was used. Two sites north of Rosewood presently slope toward the right of way so pipe capacity includes these. The sites were modeled presuming detention will occur with development. As no storm drainage presently exists in Rosewood, other than a single field inlet near Pilkington, no connections will be created with the Rosewood but a stub will be provided from the inlet at Station 11+47 north to lot 4100. Since lot 4200 also abuts Pilkington it's not obvious where connection would occur and as noted a field inlet exists at this frontage. It is presumed when that site develops frontage improvements to Rosewood would occur and with the improvements inlets and a site service would be constructed so the main will have capacity but no lateral will be constructed at this time. Lots south of Rosewood slope to the south and a public storm main exists along their south property line so no provision in the storm system in Rosewood is needed. The table below summarizes the runoff areas and flow rates based on a 10 year event. Area Runoff Area, 10 year Runoff(cfs) sf. TL 4100 f 36,847 I 0.14* TL 4200 28,764 l 0.12* 1 Inlet at Boones I 8,400 I 0.15 Inlet at Rosewood 3,381 0.06 Sta 11+47 Lt. (north) Inlet at Rosewood 5,520 0.10 Sta 11+47 Lt. (south) ` Eastern Extension to Pilkington *Site runoff presumes flow control and is based on predevelopment site conditions. 209 As the City's minimum pipe size is 12 inch and total combined flow is 0.57 cfs, minimum slope of 0.70% has capacity of 3 cfs and will be adequate for the runoff from the roadway areas and developed sites that are tributary to the roadway. P:12010 Projects110309 WCSS Lake OswegolStorm\Drainage Analysis12014-1-19 Drainage Analysis.doc 210 Project Location and Area Maps 211 //tet"' ,.....00° .--:•.,-s.'• s.' T—I .�r-' ! y,...,,,,,,,s.„2, ao,, 1 pr _...... (�5unse� `�_ 'I'�y �` o9s,69t T x E„Ya> 03 o • m • lMP � HyfL ''— N -n es ______---:-------r .„ ,p, 1 fi1:4-4. 1 i x. �" JS ` ast�in9tan C1 o ro K°` aeS V ExPte �� L°� �: tdaY"Ain South �' cn m 1,` e Osweg° c r $'v o° ..... atpenter - 1 <° y�astin9tan Ct o r '2? C n(es yo i te• �0 51l°°oma` Baa �� SOW !t. 3 Ct ;a .. Annas iridal fam°c ee i a 1300i1que • N. l-ennat N°Vi village es al * Frost Ln 4 g t � �" 1 • +�Ieyl Grove 4r"• O°a .n .1. y P 5�' west c �¢ p °° Self StoraS�o ,. 'r: oseviciod JC� �OCA�\�N �kepswe� SI ,.a i.� 0 Z nue �� X49�nOVNeg° �� d\ova�t a�a`� so co 2 �jIC1niVrt �aK �o wood'; v n �P cn `` s'2� `p�od�t is ° rauickn `z o ;y\\avt�` �rtP!�Ret s cE ma,�yy(� �. _ getvtces • GooGleo'r-cc s Y u^+ y r FAj $3tYanl jean �� Autotn°uve �, r a van9S ��vcg° • A dean Fld ro sz �a sa e • SW SradbutyCt Cussho�Wet Cosrttoptoi VtA°4Uat�utn °.. Dias SP°fling Ti �i� a q pick ° s c. a �" � . G' c�4 Jean VI° , -, . 1 z Jean Rd ' v ,. �� Cb • ;v r Ch ASM ,\ •' co �� V 1'` . 5. aye SYy\ems y tout Mt��gineetin9 free$ pe59 111A1"Ja .) V Q t ReV eW Subs teambuildet TCce SL 1neri°Cy as - Cat pate na\5 �Q� ViCgt\c e to d '!i: professor .Stgard l,Aple\ lapttla1V6 1 . Basin Key Map 2. Pipe Conveyance Calculations 3. HydroCadTM Analysis Output 213 IN.) 41b MEM DESIGNGROUP,PC. 1.650.1V.Ilemlartl.SulLe 120 . ..15.4 Mr, Wire:W(3 ZANISSZ r.D.245-6111 • 'IM1\ T.M.RIPREY CONS1.111.ENUMEERS /WSW Eleud.A.SO4. . rxx 41.1.1.13-3. \ la \\$'',\ \'''..\\, \*a.;•.* , \\\ .\••• N' \ \ 1 •5 , ,.., •‘. , ,, \ • V., '-''''\,. s:\ H .—. 1 __ ' , 1\ \ , . 1 ____.1 7\ „\1 , \„,,i \„„, \ 1.,..1 .,.. , \ . 't• ''' -' \ 1 ''''4i; -'\ 4:Vit.sterage "os\. '.. \ ,( -N.r..1 'i: • .N )\ AREA A: I 1-N,„ , %,, %.,,Z„;\!'\,,, „...., AREA E: AREA F: AREA B: 3,025 SF '1 '-..4-. \ \ • gi i ; I J AREA G: 2,400 SF AREA H: 3,525 SF 4,246 SF 5,239 SF 3,577 SF 1 , s' \ '' fil `05.6,9kkan ktud I I 1 I , 1 1 1 . •I I1..1,'\ ','.;::';I".,/iif, ]1i' 11-„.. i;.\I 7 \.' ,,N A\ ..›, " wt tS OCtoasrwaas; 1 1 / 0 ‘ / e ege;o , ,,. liP.I 130.11.1• .: 11 I ! rrl MIMI ,.. i __.1 /; : i .., I \ x \ 1 I _ li i , . .1111 I : ! ?/ / ' .-- Ir 1 s 1 , Z.'.. I -' ,__ .. . , SF j / 1 1 1 if '/./ / I/ / 7.I.,''\ BASIN r.L , 1 r.,. , . ..., . „r„,..,..,-;:i I MAP . i ._.... =.-_,,-._,.____ , .,/ ....._ r ( . 13 I • -... ' 4,'- ., . I I -41 / 44 / r 14671) • n 1 MI 1.00-1411.FC 12 2- . 3 ,/ ' / / g / i AREA C: , AREA 0: 9 4,394 SF 1,960 SF 10 .1... J 1 . . . • f I ,I , e., i . ', '0.'0 4. • •- l ' I 1 .1 1! 1 ' • • ' 'ti:1 \ . 111 I ' II 1 ' 1 yl LIV1 iv -. c ; 6 . .• ..-., .. , NI - - -- kiA man j ji I '' I I 1 I: a ,...•-2r=. .'=- ..-=..7 =.M7,- .... .........\It:,, ,". ' ... .-.. ........•......7— -L,... ..____ [ 1, • } NI 150.1.11 RP1 IYVA-11.k.IT R.15.110 't 1 :1 1; . -. . 1 1 1 i 1 " 1 eTilg:'—'41L-72'7.• 1 j i' r 'gl — • WM 2.11aite.....1 . , L _. ilk ' Du.6, Llsr.l.ed Int " I 1 , 1 1 1 NV TAW...Mr, MA -- BMDesign Review Submittal-January 2014. ____. 7650 SW Beveland St Suite 100 --,•:..7 %Ntk, Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone: 503 443 3900 STORM SEWER DESIGN FORM Unit Conversion(acre/ft) 2.30E-05 Project Number:10309 Runoff Coefficient: 0.9 WCSS Lake Grove Rainfall Intensity(in/hr): 3.3 10 Year Event January 20,2014 Manning's Coefficient(n)= 0.013 DESIGN o ns AINAGESA gsaiv.Amis 6616 A i90 - . 00t (WERT OEMON FULL PUYN vELOC. GQtrit 0NT$ AREA PIPE it AREAfor 100°/ 0RA9 AGE LEt40714 SIZE' SLOPE DISCHARGE; CAPACITY ®Q'Q ff2 acres Rtrnott AREA L y ,t4..� €;., I PRA) arc^ in Nit Oscfs 7 r Site AStorm 1 3025.00 G 0.0694 0.063 0.0694 1 30 6 0.0360 1 0.183 1.0741 � 5,86- 2.93 Roof I I I B 2 3577.50 I 0.0821 0.074 0.0821 1 5 6 0.0200 1 0.244 0.801 I 3.28 0.27 Roof 3 6602.50 0.1516 1 0.136 0.1516 28 6 0.1100 0.427 1.878 4.39 2.05 C 4 I 4394.00 0.1009 I 0.091 0.1009 14 6 0.2400 0.300 2.773 9.26 2.16 Catch Basin 5 10996.50 I 0.2524 0.227 0.2524 I 60 8 0.0150 1 0.727 1.493 2.05 2.05 To north section of I I I detention pipe I I I 0 6 1960.00 I 0.0450 0.040 0.0450 7 6 0.3000 0.134 3.101 23.20 I 2.71 Catch Basin E I 7 4246.00 0.0975 0.088 0.0975 22 I 6 0.0200 0.290 0.801 2.77 I 1.01 Roof I I F I 8 5320.00 0.1221 I 0.110 0.1221 I 18 I 6 0.0200 0.363 0.801 2.21 0.66 Roof 1 I I I I I - to Page 1 of 3 N to 7650 SW Beveland St \ i c . Suite 100 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone: 503 443 3900 STORM SEWER DESIGN FORM Unit Conversion(acre/ft) 2.30E-05 Project Number:10309 Runoff Coefficient: 0.9 WCSS Lake Grove Rainfall Intensity(in/hr): 3.3 10 Year Event January 20,2014 Manning's Coefficient(n)= 0.013 Vic*i "i+ rears °x•:t iK I'Iikiiit Equiv.Area °,G IMt: ltfritE' PIPE PIPE' JN VERT t3' `i 5t hLPOSkfNiW- p } -r-'-"'-''',4,:,=?, x r xl iAt1R to;1001 DRAINAGE LENGTH S W 5LPRE DSPHARG C1PF az acres Runoff AREA L.F k nr ;s rr I R4-7n </Y �a l,( k =x ' x.'x .-;. gamin ..,_ m#'s ,� iroxA) r7€1"@S Sg"�,...<s s. "' ssf ,'C'1 ,.•; _ ± i.�$ : sK�^''r' F«:« fS C;; ., ..� > ,< � 9 9566.00 0.2196 I 0.198 0.2196 17 6 0.1500 0.652 ' 2.193 3.36 I 0.95 I I I 10 122522.50 0.5170 I 0.465 0.5170 2.5 12 0.0200 1.513 5.083 3.36 I 0.14 To south section of I detention pipe i # I I I G 11 2400.00 0.0551 0.050 0.0551 45 6 0.0390 0.164 1.118 6.83 I 5.12 Roof I H 12 3525.00 0.0809 0.073 0.0809 19 6 0.0200 0.240 0.801 3.33 I 1.05 Roof I I 13 5925.00 I 0.1360 0.122 0.1360 27 6 0.0480 0.404 1.240 3.07 1.38 14 I 1000.00 0.0230 0.021 0.0230 15 6 0.0030 0.023 0.310 13.64 3.41 Field Inlet I I 15 I 5925.00 0.1360 I 0.122 0.1360 20 6 0.0100 0.404 0.566 1.40 0.47 I I 16 4103.50 0.0942 I 0.085 0.0942 13 .6 0.0200 0.280 0.801 2.86 0.62 Catch Basin 17 32551.00 0.7473 0.673 0.7473 5 8 0.0050 0.790 0.862 1.09 0.09 From Detention Chambers I 50 year discharge per I I Hydrocad I I I I I 18 32551.00 0.7473 I 0.673 I 0.7473 I 3 8 0.0050 0.790 0.862 I 1.09 I 0.05 I From Stormfilter I I I I I to Existing MH Page 2 of 3 ,w * 7650 SW Beveland St Suite 100 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone: 503 443 3900 STORM SEWER DESIGN FORM Unit Conversion(acrelft2) 2.30E-05 Proj ar.#Number:10309 Runoff Coefficient: 0.9 WCSS Lake Grove Rainfall Intensity(in/hr): 3.3 10 Year Event Jam.ary 20,2014 Manning's Coefficient(n)= 0.013 meg'" �r ? �, „f a . . .. x w " ; "AyERT p 51 ti U � :� `s� nP. ,�`':.C: "c a' sv "` e' k...."..,':1'..?"'3 r� . n a3l� L r 3,,a sfi' ;rz..x a, ' #y zs _ �- i'.. '. y �, " ° & 4 DISCHARGE CAPACITY . lA r , s,, f sn`4,EP` a c.� fyF"`n 1„ eA $ 77j :r v ,.;,_.,..v.77.7;1'- '`,..-':: � - *€•4z:*os z.-:;.,' .:libe ?`, nt n R • i,.Y kis a, �. Vis, t t # ..z .,, . A. 30. s . k . r r •r< � a �i".ig.; Rosewood Public Storm �"`� J 19 I 8400.00 0.1928 0.174 0.1928 29 12 ' 0.0530 I 0.150 8.275 55.17 126.66 Boones Inlet I I 20 8400.00 0.1928 0.174 0.1928 112 12 0.0460 0.150 7-709 51.40 95.94 Pipe to Sta 11+47 I I K 21 36847.00 0.8459 0.761 0.8459 10 12 0.0100 0.140 3.595 25.68 4.28 TL 4100 L I 3381.00 0.0776 0.070 0.0776 10 12 0.0100 0.060 . 3.595 59.91 9.98 Inlet at 11+47 It 22 40228.00 0.9235 0.831 0.9235 24 12 0.1080 0.200 11.813 59.06 23.63 Pipe to MH from northat11+47 M 23 5520.00 0.1267 0.114 0.1267 3 12 0.0100 0.100 3.595 35.95 1.80 Pipe to MH at 11+47 from south 24 54148.00 1.2431 1.119 I 1.2431 24 12 I 0.0070 0.450 I 3.007 6.68 2.67 Pipe to MH at14+34 I I I N 25 28764.00 0.6603 0.594 0.6603 10 12 0.0100 0.120 3,595 29.95 4.99 TL 4200 I I I 24 82912.00 1.9034 1.713 1.9034 I 24 12 0.0093 I 0.570 3.466 6.08 I 2.43 Pipe to MH at 15+74 I I I I Connect to existing I I I I I I I I in Pilkington I I I I I I I I N -4Page 3 of 3 < IS > < 3S> Existing Site Developed Site (Impe-vious) 3P StormTec RC 750 <23 > <4S > TL 4100 TL 4200 • Rosewood 11 +47 Rt ( 5S > < 6S ) inlet Boones Inlet Rosewood 11 +47 Lt inlet SubCat Reach onIV Routing Diagram for 2014-1-20 Full Site 491'c One Row Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD®10,00 sin 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 218 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 sin 02239 O 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchrnent-numbers) 2.284 79 Pasture/grassland/range, Poor, HSG B (1S, 2S, 4S) 0.250 98 Paved parking, HSG B (3S) 0.397 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers, HSG B (5S, 6S, 7S) • 0.528 98 Roofs, HSG B (38) 3.460 85 TOTAL AREA 219 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 O 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 6 Time span=0.00-90.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 9001 points Runoff by SBUH method Reach routing by Stor-Ind+-TTrans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Existing Site Runoff Area=33,900 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41" Flow Length=260' Tc=49.6 min CN=79 Runoff=0.13 cfs 0.092 af Subcatchment 2S: TL 4100 Runoff Area=36.847 sf 0.00% impervious Runoff depth=1.41" Flow Length=300' Tc-50.4 min CN=79 Runoff=0.14 cfs 0.100 af Subcatchment 3S: Developed Site Runoff Area=33.900 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.60 cfs 0:199 af Subcatchment 4S: TL 4200 Runoff Area=28.764 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41" Flow Length=225' Tc=38.7 min CN=79 Runoff=0.12 cfs 0.078 af Subcatchment 5S: Boones Inlet Runoff Area=8,400 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.15 cfs 0.049 af Subcatchment 6S: Rosewood 11+47 Lt Runoff Area=3,381 sf 100.00% impervious Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.06 cfs 0.020 af Subcatchment 7S: Rosewood 11+47 Rt Runoff Area=5,520 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.07" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.10 cfs 0.032 af Pond 3P: StormTec RC 750 Peak Elev=146.79' Storage=3,122 cf Inflow=0.60 cfs 0.199 af Outflow=0.11 cfs 0.192 af Total Runoff Area= 3.460 ac Runoff Volume= 0.569 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.97" 66.03% Pervious =2.284 ac 33.97% Impervious= 1.175 ac 220 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 sin 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Site Runoff = 0.13 cfs @ 8.25 hrs, Volume= 0.092 af, Depth= 1.4111 Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour RainfalC=3.30° Area (sf) CN Description 33,900 79 Pasture/grassland/range, Poor, HSG B 33,900 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 46.2 180 0.0130 0.06 Sheet Flow, Sheet Flow Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.5011 3.4 80 0.0063 0.40 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Shallow Concentrated Flow Woodland Ku= 5.0 fps 49.6 260 Total Subcatchment 1S: Existing Site Hydrograph 1 1 III Ii , I IT Ir I T €r 1 7 r 1- -1-- --- r---r I I I0.14 ' --- ®Runoff 0.13:-''' .f' 1II II II€r € I L I r II II II I I I I _ ` I I -P Ty0e-lA-241_ r - o.1z ' 1 P I i0_y0ar-24110urRaintallT3.411" _ 0.11:'' _ ,I I I I L unoff , reaI=33i9.00I�_sf_ I I i f I ` I i 0.1�' J_ -.i_Runoff Vo`h.tm-e-Le=0'Q92L a f_ _-f L I �i1 I o.os � I I € , r I I � -rt t R n9 fD pt]r141" �;,- -- -€- -, - r - 27 0.08= ' - T rFlow Lngtrh=2h0' 1- r- r '' rI Ir I I I0.07- J Td=49/6 lin. 1 J J I _ Ii I I I I I II I r I0.06'' I I V `/� 0.05 •` I , I , I I I I I 1 1 1 R I I I € I I € r ::: --- I I 1 1 I I I I LLL I I I r I I I I I I I I , I I I C I- I II I I I-1 1 L L { J L L I I I 1 1 1 I I I i € I I 0.02-'JI I I 1 1 1 I i r I I 0.01-' 1 I I I re, - 1 I I f- I I I I I 1 I I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 221 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 9 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Developed Site (Impervious) Runoff = 0.60 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.199 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.301' Area (sf) CN Description 23,000 98 Roofs, HSG B 10,900 98 Paved parking, HSG B 33,900 98 Weighted Average 33,900 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description • (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Subcatchment 3S: Developed Site (Impervious) Hydrograph I 11 Ili I I k I I ' 0.65 I 1 1 i Runoff .. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.6:', Ir I 1 9 I TMJ le 1l'� 4Thr 0.55 10 year 24 hour;Rainfall,=3.30" 0.5 j Runoff ►read=33908111 sf a.45 Runoff Vo`lumb=0 199 of ___ I LJ .J. I---orf , I 0, _" 4 ; Ftpnf-Depth; 07 -- :,-,h- ,_ .1 i L ,__-1_._ L __J _1 _I- I_... -I_ -'�" 5` ...L.-- 1 IIc-5.0 min V 0.35-_' I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 3 ,----- 1 1 L -1 1 L -' _1___L___L-_J_,,,,.1___^r_ _aQQ O 1 I i I I I I 9V - 0.3-' i_ I 1 1 I 1 1 I I _-- -;---a--__ ---1---4---a--._.---__---"x--- ---b'---I---1---','--- ---1---- 0.25"'= 1 I I I I I I i 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 0.2`' 1I ---r r -t---r---1-- -�_--_- ,- ri ._ 1 1 4 r It- 0.15- -- -_'l __., r i -.T---r-""-----I---7---T---r "'1 -- ---T---T---r 1 i I I I I I I 01 I I I I i I I I I I 4.05- / 1 1 I �. I I I 1 I 1 I I / I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 .. . ,•;., , ,-':, . '. ., %r��,..� ,,,. , rs ,��r?(f �'-/1 '?�fr iii/ii ��s 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) • 222 2014-1®20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 02239 ®2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 14 Summary for Pond 3P: StormTec RC 750 Inflow Area = 0.778 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.07" for 10 year 24 hour event Inflow = 0.60 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.199 af Outflow = 0.11 cfs @ 11.31 hrs, Volume= 0.192 af, Atten= 82%, Lag= 206.2 min Primary = 0.11 cfs @ 11.31 hrs, Volume= 0.192 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 146.79' @ 11.31 hrs Surf.Area= 3,477 sf Storage= 3,122 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 386.5 min calculated for 0.192 af(97% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 360.7 min ( 1,025.1 - 664.4) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 144.25' 3,380 cf 6.25'W x 201.801 x 3.50'H Field A Z=2.0 9,740 cf Overall - 1,289 cf Embedded = 8,451 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 144.75' 1,289 cf ADS_StormTech SC-740 x 28 Inside#1 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.12'L = 45.9 of Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44'x 6.45 sf x 1 rows 4,670 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 144.75' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 20.0' Ke= 0.200 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 144.75' 1144.65' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 142.75' 1.7" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.11 cfs @ 11.31 hrs HW=146.79' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Passes 0.11 cfs of 7.19 cfs potential flow) L2=OrificelGrate (Orifice Controls 0.11 cfs @ 6.88 fps) 223 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HvdroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 O 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 15 Pond 3P: StormTec RC 750 - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model =ADS_StormTech SC-740 Effective Size= 44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.12'L =45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 6.45 sf x 1 rows 51.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 28 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.44' Row Adjustment = 199.80' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 201.80' Base Length 1 Rows x 51.0" Wide + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 6.25' Base Width 6.0" Base + 30.0" Chamber Height+ 6.0" Cover= 3.50' Field Height 2.0 '1' Side-Z x Height = 84.0" Flare/Side Base Length + Flare x 2 = 215.80' Top Length Base Width + Flare x 2 = 20.25' Top Width 28 Chambers x 45.9 cf +0.44' Row Adjustment x 6.45 sf x 1 Rows = 1,289.1 cf Chamber Storage 9,740.2 cf Field - 1,289.1 cf Chambers = 8,451.0 cf Stone x 40.0%Voids = 3,380.4 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 4,669.6 cf= 0.107 of Overall Storage Efficiency =47.9% 28 Chambers 360.7 cy Field 313.0 cy Stone 224 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Pond 3P: StormTec RC 750 Hydrograph Z. I , 1 I I , I I I 4 I , / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ii Inflow I 4 I I I I I e 1 1 0 D,65-' �o.6ucts} rr r Ir rr 3-r 0/i 7Primary / 1 � '�7V TT7��- -{7✓i��l+fl—{ C- 0.s- I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I ] 0.55- I I Peak leo i 1146.-79 / I 1 I 1 I I I I I 0.5 ./ ,--- _,______,�__;_-_---;---�--,----;__w_Storage- 3� 122 cfi _ L I I I I Storage= 3,122 -- r — � r r r r -r I 1 I f I I I I I I I 0.4= ' ,/,—-- I I I I I I 1___ N I I I I 1 p '/ ___ _1 L J L I L 1 J 0.35 I n / I. I I 1 l I I r 0 0.3-'/ JI'— LT F/ I I [ I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 0.25-'f ,I---- rr -r r -----r--7---r rt I I 1 1 1 I I I I — .• I I I I I I I I 1 0.2-'� '--- r r r r 1 i` 1 II I I I I 1 1 L 1 L J 1I _ 4 L 1 0.15-' __ A.MEI I I I I 1 k I /l 1 I I I I I 1 r 1 I L AI L_ I — 0.1—'( L 1 J 1,/, I I I I I I II LJ I / I I I I I € I I I 0.05 / / I' I' i' I' I' I' ,• hr'ti 0 5 10 15 20 25„ 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 225 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 50 year 24 hour Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 18 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Site Runoff -- 0.22 cfs @ 8.20 hrs, Volume= 0.143 af, Depth= 2.21" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 50 year 24 hour Rainfall=4.30" Area (sf) CN Description 33,900 79 Pasture/grassland/range, Poor, HSG B 33,900 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 46.2 180 0.0130 0.06 Sheet Flow, Sheet Flow Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.50" 3.4 80 0.0063 0.40 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Shallow Concentrated Flow Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 49.6 260 Total Subcatchment 1S: Existing Site Hydrograph I I I I I I l I I I 1 I I I I - I 1 1 L J 1 1 L f J 1 1 L 4_,..-_L___L___L___ 1 I I I I t I I I I I I I I I 1 0.24=' r T r I 1 T r I -1 7 T I -r r r- II Runoff 0.23•" --10.22 cfs 1 I I I I I 1 ] I 1 I L 1 1 1 I I i" !. 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 S I ! I 022= , --- -r r r 1 -i r r i 'y -Y -r---r---I Type-1 . 241hr-- {1213" ,___-. I 1 L I 1 I 1- 0.24i' I 3 I I 0.2 ---- a -+- - - -- J + 1------ (_yiar_ 4��u Raltfal.l 4.i0" 0.19=`,, ; , ; ; ; I u f off Asea 33 9001`sf 0.184 -__- -I- I- -'I 1 I -I 1 L -I 1 0.17 , -- 7 r ;- II- , --i--- -Runoff Volume=0=1-43'1-af- 0.16_' -+ 1- I 4 1 1- - I -1 -4 -�l-__ 1 1 J. 1 1- 1 0.15 --- - T r T r T_Rnof Qepthp2.21"__ y ___J .�__1_--L_ 1 1 1 L J 11 W I_ 1 0.14-•,� I I I 1 I' F 1 I I D10tenth=2t 0'- 0.13',°,^---- r r -I-- t---r 3 0. 2-° ,_--- 1 I1 I I t I I iI I ---=49-.6.-M p I I I I I LL 0.11" '--- - -+ r -1---1t---r1 1 1 1 I 1 N= � - 0,1=',, -` _ - //�� 1 I I I I I I I 1 i I I I 0.09=' --- -I //j-,' I -I- -II -,1 -1- - - 1._ 1 -1 __4 -4. -1- 1 1 ir1 1Lr_-_J11 1 I I0.08 ---- --I-- *0l r T r 1 r r 1 1 r r 0.07- _1I___l_ , L_ _L L I 1 3 I I f 0.06:' ---T f',I 7 - IT 1,- 0.054' '41 _-- __I___1___L 1___1___1 L I I I L L J 1 L L , , I I 1 4 1 3 I i I 1 1 I 1 I i I I 0.04='`---- --".7"_-t....---r 41__-1---r r 1----I-----r---r1 -1 0.03 i 1 1 i I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1___1____I ' [ I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 0.02: 1 --+---I- 1 r- 1 -r *- -1 -{ --* r 1 I 0.01 e I I �/////1� _ 1 1 I I I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 226 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 50 year 24 hour Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 sin 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 20 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Developed Site (Impervious) Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.264 af, Depth= 4.061F Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 50 year 24 hour Rainfall=4.30" Area (sf) CN Description 23,000 98 Roofs, HSG B 10,900 98 Paved parking, HSG B 33,900 98 Weighted Average 33,900 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Subcatchment 3S: Developed Site (Impervious) Hydrograph I 1 t I L , 1 , i I 1 1 1 _, , L J 1 l L J 1 L 1-__ ��^^,, 1 1 1 1 1 1 f r 3 I 1 W Runoff 0.85: __ -___L___L______.dL_ I- -__1___L_ �_ _L - i J MEM 1 I I I 1 I I 0.8=" r I I I 1 I 3 �}/�I{} , 1 T�fPe I iT1 r 075_"/ 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I 0.7= , _ 50-year 4-hour,Ra r fall 4.30'1-- _yt _F__ 1___.,._,__,..- i ,,__._ _ y _f +____ 0.65 "1 Runoff -rea=331900 sf 0.6 .L Runoff Volume=0.264`af f I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ] 1 0.55_ I ;-Rynoff Depth;4.Q-6"-- .7 0,5-:' I I I I. I 1 - r r 1 Tc=!r.0- iin-- 0.45 1 r I 1 ! I /�� Y ._--- -1---.F_-- "__--------'--1----,--``---H-'--"'---I----1----r------"--N=�98-- O - I I I i I J 0.4-' ---�'---1- 4 L F'- -1---a'-- 1---44---A----L--- E i , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35-" ---- l I E I I J 1 1 J .1 1 L I I I I I i r I I I 0.3:'l I I 1 i I I 1 1 I I r E l I -_ I I 1 E 1� 0.25-"� I [ I I I r r T r l r r -1 T r _r__,___7___r___r___ 0.2:_r' I I , I I 1 1 A --- _-...,--._ ----1-"--'"1---'i,----1------- --- ___I'__-I---1----F---}----}---- 0.15:, _ a 1 -- I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 0.05L:' '`? Y I rI I I ] r I I I 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 227 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 50 year 24 hour Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 O 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 25 Summary for Pond 3P: StormTec RC 750 Inflow Area = 0.778 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth _ 4.06" for 50 year 24 hour event Inflow = 0.79 cfs cr? 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.264 of Outflow = 0.13 cfs @ 11.78 hrs, Volume= 0.257 af, Atten= 84%, Lag=234.4 min Primary = 0.13 cfs @ 11.78 hrs, Volume= 0.257 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 147.60' @ 11.78 hrs Surf.Area= 4,229 sf Storage=4,413 cf Plug-Flow detention time=457.2 min calculated for 0.257 af (97% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=437.4 min ( 1,095.2 - 657.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 144.25' 3,380 cf 6.25'W x 201.80'1-x 3.50'H Field A Z=2.0 9,740 cf Overall- 1,289 cf Embedded = 8,451 cf x 40.0%Voids #2A 144.75' 1,289 cf ADS_StormTech SC-740 x 28 Inside#1 Effective Size=44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.12'L = 45.9 cf Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 6.45 sf x 1 rows 4,670 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 144.75' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 20.0' Ke= 0.200 Inlet/Outlet Invert= 144.75' / 144.65' S= 0.0050 'I' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Device 1 142.75' 1.7" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.13 cfs @ 11.78 hrs HW=147.60' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 0.13 cfs of 9.95 cfs potential flow) t-2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.13 cfs @ 8.13 fps) 228 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 50 year 24 hour Rainfall=4.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 26 Pond 3P: StormTec RC 750 - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model =ADS_StormTech SC-740 Effective Size=44.6"W x 30.0"H => 6.45 sf x 7.12'L = 45.9 of Overall Size= 51.0"W x 30.0"H x 7.56'L with 0.44' Overlap Row Length Adjustment= +0.44' x 6.45 sf x 1 rows 51.0" Wide + 12.0" Spacing = 63.0" C-C Row Spacing 28 Chambers/Row x 7.12' Long +0.44' Row Adjustment = 199.80' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 201.80' Base Length 1 Rows x 51.0"Wide + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 6.25' Base Width 6.0" Base + 30.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Cover= 3.50' Field Height 2.0 'I' Side-Z x Height = 84.0" Flare/Side Base Length + Flare x 2 =215.80' Top Length Base Width + Flare x 2 = 20.25' Top Width 28 Chambers x 45.9 of +0.44' Row Adjustment x 6.45 sf x 1 Rows = 1,289.1 of Chamber Storage 9,740,2 cf Field - 1,289.1 cf Chambers = 8,451.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 3,380.4 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage =4,669.6 cf= 0.107 of Overall Storage Efficiency = 47.9% 28 Chambers 360.7 cy Field 313.0 cy Stone \1 r� 229 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 50 year 24 hour Rainfall=4.34" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 O 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 27 Pond 3P: StorrnTec RC 750 Hydrograph 1 I4- I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 ..I- -I'---I----1---I-___".--,1---1---1_---1- -1--�,F--_r 1 _ /' 1 I I I I i I I I € I I 1 Y€ I Inflow I ' • 1-_-1-_-d..--._.I__ 1 I- J 4. 1 1 I- I 1 1 -I ICI Prima 0.851'r --I 0.79 cis1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I F I I El Primary r' ___J _L S L 1 L J 1_ I___1_/► 1_ I_ 1 J___, 0 75=" r I I I I I I'L I I ,II 1 �* I 0.7- '',"/ v r � I : Peak E-1ev= X147.6©'-- I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I . r , -- r 1 r Z r 1 r 7 r 1 7 -1 0.65:" I Storage=4°541'-,3-cf- r I r r r 0.6 ,r E I I 0.55:' 1 tl E 1 I I I I 1 7) 0.5-' / I I 1 I I I E I 0.45-' ,• I I I I I O 0.4:'' •' 1 I 1 I I I I 1 IL .L_.. 1 L 1 L _1___1______1___L_....__._�._1_ J 0.35-' I 1 [ I I I I r I •r .-..- L 1 L 1 _L J 1 1 L 1 _ J___. • I I I 1 0.3_' I I I f 1 1 E 'r,,- 1 I I 1 E 1 E 0.25="' - r' / I I 1 1 I I I 0.2-' rr I I i 1 1 I 1 / r r - r r r r T -1- 0.15 /• •'1!i/ I I I I / - I r r r r 7 0.1-' ,' 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 0.05E V ,•r. r / r r /fff/ll/J. `f/II."/ 92 .. ... 0 I'B l/%✓/7._ 0-I ..;1. . ..1'.. ...... .1' k.. •.I= . . 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 80 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 230 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour RainfalI=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 sln 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae $ Summary for Subcatchment 2S: TL 4100 Runoff = 0.14 cfs @ 8.26 hrs, Volume= 0.100 af, Depth= 1.41" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Area (sf) CN Description 36,847 79 Pasture/grassland/range, Poor, HSG B 36,847 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) • 45.2 175 0.0130 0.06 Sheet Flow, Sheet Flow Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.50" 5.2 125 0.0063 0.40 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Shallow Concentrated Flow Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 50.4 300 Total Subcatchment 25: TL 4100 Hydrograph I I Y o I I I I I I I I I I 0.15 1 ! i 1 i 117Runof TTTT I I 1 0.14= 1-- - -- - .,� f- t r Type 1 2�'�hr . 10-year-24-heur-RaiifaH-3-. 0"- 0.12 '-- t- I- -t ----t--- r -, ; - unOff-lrrea=364474f- 0.1 1--'' 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 Runoff vo;Furrr'e=0�1-00;-af-- 0,1 I I I -i - -+---F -- ;- --- - 1 Rpnoff-Depth '1.41-111-- 4 a.0s_'' -- : 1 Flow Length0' o.oa: ' =3{t p - I I I I I I I TG-51 .4 n1itrt LT- 0.07_' ---- - I ..... 1--- '--- I I 1 I 0.06 1 4r4Ir/e I 1 1M- 7 1 1 ! 1 I 1 1 1 € 0.054' _- I I 1 � I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 .044, 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 7 I 1 1 I E 1 1 1 1 0.034'' 111111 1 ' 1 1 1 I I 3 1 1 , 27' ! 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I . I I I I I € I I 0.01 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 (1:1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 231 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 O 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 10 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: TL 4200 Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 8.16 hrs, Volume= 0.078 af, Depth= 1.41" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.3015 Area (sf) CN Description 28,764 79 Pasture/grassland/range, Poor, HSG B • 28,764 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) • 34.5 125 0.0130 0.06 Sheet Flow, Sheet Flow Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.50" 4.2 100 0.0063 0.40 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Shallow Concentrated Flow Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 38.7 225 Total Subcatchment 4S: TL 4200 Hydrograph / I , I I / II I 1 I I I I I 1 I'Runoff ll 0.13-' 1 I I 1 I 1 __10.2cfs I I L I I - 0.127'' ' ; ; ; Type IA 244hr 0.11 i0 year 24 hpur Rainfall;3, 0" o.,= ' Runoff ire;-21 ;764;sf -- �- - *- ' �- -' Rtinof'f Vdfum'e=01078 of- 0,09-- I I ..- ,,_--- - r T r RUnof f-Depth,IL ,I-.4r__ 0.08-' I 1 w ►ro L Fioength=25' c.) 0.07-'" I � T0=38,-.7-Min-- c _ ' I I, I I o.as- I I ! I 0.05 .1411"4.00,i' I 1 1 I f I I 0.04-'' I I 1 1 I I I 1 ' I 0.03- I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 0.02 , I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 -1 T -I 7 T _r_ 0-01--'' - K I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 01-�' . ...., ,. 7,.. . ,,_��/_ /./ 4l"� %/447,�`�17.//r/✓.t'/4,e'�*t'rz4e(ieet 6`I�i 01/ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) I 232 1 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCADO 10.00 sin 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 11 Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Boones Inlet Runoff = 0.15 cfs © 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.049 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Area (sf) CN Description 8,400 98 Paved roads wlcurbs & sewers, HSG B 8,400 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Subcatchment 5S: Boones Inlet Hydrograph I I I I I I I I / I 1 L J i L J _I L 1 L - I I I I I I I i I I ❑Runoff` 0.16-" ,---EMI I I I I I I I I ._._. i I I - 0,95:" I I I Type-IA 2-44h-r-- 0.14: ' ____IJ L L t L I fT~ydar4 hptrr RaifaFl1=�. r' ' 0.137'_' € I I I 1 i I r I I I 0.127.' Ru ioffllA a=8;400 sf- �--_t r 1, - - -' F UinOff Vollfri e=0fO491raf- 0.91 + a + 0.1 , _ ; Rpno f Dpth;3.q7�' 17) - I O 0.09 - - i I 1 1 € Tc=5.0 min r JI I I I I I I 1 I /+ nQ 0.087' ___ J 1 L J I. L _J___1,_,1. L I 1 Lr l =98 I 1 f I I 3 I I I I I ,' I I I 1 l I 0.06 I 1 I I 1 1 ____ -, T r - T r -IY -1 Y r 1- I I i I I I I 1 1 i 1 0.05- 1 L1 1 L J _1___L___L-- ___L___L___ I I I I I I I 1 I I 0.04-'' I? I I .1. T _ k Ir ._ I I 1 I Ir" 1 I I I l -T I- - I 0.03 ', :.1 . I I 1-- -- --i---Y---r---r 7 7 r a r r 0.02 1 �i, r4h-- ---f--- o •. I I 1 I 1 I1111111 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 233 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Rosewood 11+47 Lt inlet Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Area (sf) CN Description 3,381 98 Paved roads w/curbs &sewers, HSG B _ 3,381 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Subcatchment 6S: Rosewood 11+47 Lt inlet Hydrograph 1 K r , r 1- r I I ? r -1 z r 0.065-' I I 1 1 ! ti O Runoff - I I I I` i 1 1 I 1 -- OA5 cts -1 r r r r 7 r —I 7 r 0.06_' 1 1 I ITytie IA 244hr 1 I I I I I I 0.055: 19 year 24 hpur Rainfall=3.10" 0,05,-„ j Runoff'Area=33811 sf 0.045. Runoff Volume=0.�020ea1 0.a4=- J 1 Runoff-D 131 3.-6T” - U' 0.035'-' i I I 1 I I I I — �- Q ° . --.J --._- i i —1 1 a E 1 CN=98-- Li 003 i I I I I l I I I I I f I I 1 3 LT I I 0.025 I_ . ___ .-___-._. l r - r 0.02_,` I 1 I I I 1 1 l 1 /,, I t 1 I 1 d 1 1 /��' , Y 1 y t T r —1 1 r 0.0157 %fji 0.01 I , ��i�'—�Il I I I I I I I I I ` I I I I' I I I 0 0057 1 1 1 ' , -,. .. -. /11.�7rrrrf��r('��'r�' d!//fir.,i��r�rr�`r.././//:', �.i�.�./90,r 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 234 • 2014-1-20 Full Site 49 Tc One Row Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall-3.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/20/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 sin 02239 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Rosewood 11+47 Rt inlet Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 7.88 hrs, Volume= 0.032 af, Depth= 3.07" Runoff by SBUH method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type IA 24-hr 10 year 24 hour Rainfall=3.30" Area (sf) CN Description 5,520 98 Paved roads w/curbs &sewers, HSG B • 5,520 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Minimum Subcatchment 7S: Rosewood 11+47 Rt inlet Hydrograph 7 I I I I I I I I I I I E I f I 1 L L 1 i L I I I _LI _,,.._IL__J___J.___L___L 1 1 9 I I S I I 0 Runoff 0.105 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 + _ -- 0.095= ' --- 1 1 I 1 I _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type IA 24 r 1 1 I I I 1 I I I O.os --�U year4 hput ,'Rain#all;�.3D-" 0.085= .--- - k -- --- ---�- Ru Ho--I--ff!Are _- a5520sf m 0.08=' 4 I 3 I f I I I I I 0.075-' ,---- 4r r --1_-- ---1-R-unoffVolume=0FU32,af-- 0065 ', . LI 1 - 1- Runoff Pepth .Ci77- I I I I I 1 1 1 I I ! 0.06 --- - --- - /+ _• ,- "�-- �' 1----I---i -"1'---E'__-1---'a----F---�'--'_E'_---I Tc=6.0-mYh n-- I 30.055 --- . r i T 1 r 1 1 r 7 (�� O 0.05="f I I Ir i I I I I I I I r 1 I I I I 1 I I f I I I € I I I I I I / 0.045=.' --- ,-1 1 L I 1 L L I J 1 L i 1 Y [ E I 1 1 I I I 3 I 1 E 1 I 0.04' --- T---} I- I -- ---4'---F-_ I "1---4_.__3- I I 4-..-{..._--~--- - 3 I I I I I I I I i I I I I 11111111111111111 0.03_• --- I I r 1 1 r I 1 -i I II € T It - ' /f 1 I [ I I I I I 1 l 1 1 1 0.02- ,-- -- - L 1 J --4 L I -I 1 L I J 1 1 _L ? t I ,r I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0154' ,- -- 1P4P - - -+- r -r- 1-- 1--- I -- r -r r r r - i -11_---'1" r r i 7 r 0.0051 1 7 / 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 021 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Time (hours) 235 Operation and Maintenance Plan P:12010 Projects110309 WCSS Lake Oswego\Storm\Drainage Analysis12014-1-14 Appendix.doc 236 Stormwater Facility Maintenance and Operation Plan West Coast Self Storage January 2014 Project Owner: West Coast Self Storage, Inc. Facility Address: 5650 SW Rosewood Street Lake Oswego, Oregon Jurisdiction: City of Lake Oswego Case Files: Civil Engineer: TM Rippey Consulting Engineers Karl Koroch, PE 7650 SW Beveland Street Suite 100 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Responsibility: The storm drainage facilities will be maintained by the owner's maintenance staff. Description: This site is approximately 33,900 square feet of building and paving. Runoff is collected by roof drains and catch basins located in the paved areas. Flow is directed to an underground detention system. Outflow from this system is limited by a control manhole containing orifi. From the control manhole runoff is directed to a Contech StormfilterTM treatment manhole. From this manhole runoff flows to a public storm sewer located in a public easement on an adjacent property. Inspection and Maintenance Schedule: The system shall be visually inspected monthly and within 48 hours after each major storm event. For this 0 & M plan, a major storm event is defined as greater than 0.5 inches of rainfall in 24 hours. All components of storm system must be maintained frequently or they will cease to function effectively. The owner shall keep a log, recording inspection dates, observations, and maintenance activities. Receipts shall be saved when maintenance is x - 237 West Coast Self Storage—Lake Grove Stormwater Facility Maintenance and Operation Manual Inspection and Maintenance Schedule: The following items shall be inspected and maintained as stated: Detention System Control Structure and Piping: • Check condition of control structure, internal components, and detention piping biannually. Contact ADS StormTech Stormwater Solutions, Inc. for inspection and maintenance of detention chambers. • Sediment shall be removed from around overflow riser and from detention pipes biannually. • Quarterly inspection for clogging shall be performed. Source Control: Source control measures prevent pollutants form mixing with stormwater. Typical non- structural control measures include raking and removing leaves and limited and controlled application of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers. Spill Prevention: Spill prevention measures shall be exercised when handling substances that can contaminate stormwater. Virtually all sites present dangers from spills. If hazardous substances are spilled within the vicinity of the stormwater facilities, identify the spill and provide appropriate cleanup and notify appropriate authorities. Insects and Rodents: • Insects and rodents shall not be harbored in any part of the storm system. • Pest control measures shall be taken when insects or rodents are found to be present. Standing water and food sources shall be prevented. • If sprays are considered, a mosquito larvicide such as Bacillus thurendensis or Altoside formulations can be applied only if absolutely necessary and shall not be used where it will enter the groundwater or come into contact with any standing water, Sprays shall be applied only by licensed individuals or contractors. • Holes in the ground located in and around the storm system shall be filled. • Outfalls draining into vegetated swales shall be inspected and cleaned regularly to ensure no rodent activity, which can clog or decrease the efficiency of the storm system. Access: Access shall be maintained for all facilities so operation and maintenance can be performed as regularly scheduled. 2 P:\2010 Projects110309 MSS Lake OswegolStorm\Drainage AnalysislJanuary 0 and M.doc 238 Dtpi, Fire Marshals Office At Memorandum P.O. Box 369 � �o Lake Oswego, OR 97034 OS�N ' 503 635-0275 FS"I'.1910 Zoutendiik@ci.oswezo.or.us To: Leslie Hamilton, Senior Planner From: Gert Zoutendijk, Fire Marshal Date: February 5, 2014 Subject: LU 14-0006, 5650 Rosewood Street Plans Received Date: January 31, 2014 ACCESS After a closer review the buildings footprint is too large to be able to reach all exterior points within 150'. The applicant could propose to install a standpipe system as part of the sprinkler system as an alternate method. The fire lane will have to be marked "No Parking" including the turn-around. The gate will have to have a Knox key switch installed for access. WATER FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION We do not have any current water flows available to determine if there is adequate water flow for this project. We also will need to know the construction type which will help determine how much water is needed. Applicant should be advised that Lake Oswego has a restriction of 3,000 GPM water flow maximum, The FDC location is approved as proposed including the hydrant that is proposed to be moved. At minimum, one additional hydrant will have to be provided also in an approved location on Rosewood Street. April 10, 2014: The letter submitted by TM Rippey suffices for fire department comments that we will work on the alternate method instead of the access deficiency, EXHIBIT F-7 LU 14-0006 239