HomeMy WebLinkAboutApproved Minutes - 2003-06-09 0
e, LI � I.(n��of usw. AAi L LCL FL,J
City of Lake Oswego
1 _ in
} Planning Commission Mutes
OREGOO
.)
� =' June 9, 2003
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Daniel Vizzini called the Planning Commission meeting of Monday, June 9, 2003
to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 380 A Avenue, Lake
Oswego, Oregon.
II. ROLL CALL
Commission members present were Chair Daniel Vizzini, Vice Chair Frank Groznik,
and Commissioners James Johnson, Kenneth Sandblast, Mark Stayer and Alison
Webster.
Staff present were Dennis Egner, Long Range Planning Manager; Sidaro Sin, Associate
Planner; Susan Millhauser, Assistant Planner; Evan Boone, Deputy City Attorney; and
Iris Treinen, Senior Secretary.
III. CITIZEN COMMENT—Regarding issues not on the agenda.
None.
IV. GENERAL PLANNING—WORK SESSIONS
The Commissioners agreed to reverse the order of items on the published agenda.
P 01-0002 Lake Grove Town Center Plan—Planning Process
Staff coordinator is Susan Millhauser, Assistant Planner.
Dennis Egner, Long Range Planning Manager, and Susan Millhauser, Assistant
Planner, distributed a draft Lake Grove Town Center Plan Phase 2 Process Outline that
anticipated that the Phase 2 process would take a year and the City Council would
appoint a work group to assist staff with the development of code and plan amendments
to implement the town center plan. Mr. Egner confirmed that the City could start to
form an urban renewal district before the Phase 2 process was finished. Chair Vizzini
recommended that all interested parties review the consultant's report over the summer
to prepare for fall hearings.
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission Page 1 of 6
Minutes of June 9,2003
Public Comment
Jeff Gudman, 4088 SW Orchard Way, Lake Oswego, 97035-1871, applauded the
Commissioners for their public outreach effort. He stressed that the final town center
plan should discuss financing: what was to be done, what it would cost, and how it was
to be paid for. He encouraged the community to take advantage of current low interest
rates by passing a general obligation bond measure that would allow the City to realize
interest savings and make improvements within twenty years.
Michael Buck, 3155 Edgemont Road, Lake Oswego, 97035, reported that six of
eighteen local restaurant owners he had talked with so far had agreed that he and
Nathan Spaccarelli should represent food and beverage businesses on the work group
when it was created. He explained the two men could discuss issues that were unique to
that industry, including parking requirements, outside dining, and water usage.
R. F. "Vic" Keeler, Vic's Auto Center, 17781 Overlook Circle, Lake Oswego,
97034, volunteered to serve on the work group as a representative of retail businesses.
He reported there were over a hundred businesses in that business category. He said
they were concerned about issues that arose during the public workshops related to
ingress, egress, setback alternatives along Boones Ferry Road, street enhancements,
landscaping, new intersections and cross walks, and a common area. He recommended
that there be two representatives from retail businesses on the task force. He clarified
that he would represent retail service businesses and that he would personally contact
each of the business owners to solicit their input.
James Searles, Naomi's Lampshades, 15942 SW Boones Ferry Road, Lake
Oswego, 97035, indicated that he agreed that Mr. Keeler should be appointed to the
work group to represent retail businesses along Boones Ferry Road. He asked that
meeting minutes be made available more quickly. He questioned whether input from
the public workshops ever got back to the decision makers. Chair Vizzini related that
he had recently re-read minutes of meetings dating from April 2002 and found that
except for recent questions about the process, the issues of concern to the business
community had remained the same and all of them had been documented. He explained
that his concern was that the business community did not understand the legal
constraints and context in which the Commissioners had to work. He stressed such an
understanding was essential for the process to be successful. Mr. Searles explained that
the business community had begun to question the process after they attended a public
workshop and endorsed a particular concept plan and then observed that plan maps had
been changed in subsequent drafts. The Commissioners indicated they believed the
upcoming joint Planning Commission/City Council study session would be an
important opportunity for the Commissioners to convey the business community's
concerns to the decision-makers.
Chuck O'Leary, 1420 Morningside Ct., Lake Oswego, 97034, stated he owned the
Lake Grove Building at 16325 Boones Ferry Road. He said he was the appointed
representative of the Lake Oswego Chamber of Commerce and he felt he could also
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission Page 2 of 6
Minutes of June 9,2003
unofficially speak for local professional office building owners and tenants until they
selected their representative. He reported that those groups desired to be represented in
the work group when it was formed. He said they were concerned about "last minute"
changes in the plan, including the elimination or reduction of municipal area parking
lots in the latest revision of the plan, the shift of the burden of residential infill onto the
shoulders of commercial property owners, and expansion of the town center study area.
He clarified that he personally agreed with town center boundary the expansion because
it would increase the City's tax base. He also clarified that whoever represented the
interests of local professional office building owners and tenants would represent
150,000 to 200,000 square feet of Class B and C office space and several thousand
tenants. He explained that he had monitored the progress of the corridor plan and the
public workshops and reported back to Chamber members. Ms. Millhauser noted that
the plan had not changed in regard to municipal parking lots. Staff added that the
proposed project list includes two municipal parking lots.
George Pshihogios, 14021 Edenberry Ct., Lake Oswego, 97035, owner of the
Andrews Furniture Gallery, and Sid Smither, PO Box 1337, Lake Oswego, 97035,
owner of a commercial building at 15560 SW Boones Ferry Road, asked about the size
and composition of the future work group. Chair Vizzini suggested that it be a small
group of representatives who would work for the interest of the community as a whole
and be guided by applicable planning principles. He asked for their recommendations
regarding the work group. The two men volunteered to serve on the work group as
representatives of 45 owners of commercial property who owned 47 corridor area
buildings. They reasoned that since those owners had the most to gain or lose in the
process and provided significant tax revenue to the City they should comprise half of
the work group. They clarified that five of the owners could be considered both
property owners and business owners. They encouraged the City to keep the planning
process moving forward.
The Commissioners recalled that past work groups had both voting and nonvoting
participants and they stressed that consensus decision-making was important if the plan
was to move successfully from the work group through the Planning Commission and
be eventually adopted by the City Council. They recalled the Floodplain Work Group
had five voting members and three non-voting attendees who
had been able to
eventually reach a consensus recommendation. Chair Vizzini listed some important
attributes of the work group, including consensus based decision-making; a small group
that reflected diverse interests; participants who were willing to take the time to absorb
detailed information found in documents such as the consultant's report, the
neighborhood plans, the corridor plan, the Comprehensive Plan and the Metro
Functional Plan; and participants who were able to understand political realities when
preparing proposals to submit to public hearings. The Commissioners suggested that
there should be scheduled "check-in" points at which the group reported to the
Commission. They stressed the importance of good internal and external
communication and open work sessions to ensure that no one would be able to say later
that they had not heard about the process. They discussed the possible composition of
the work group and considered a group of approximately seven voting representatives
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission Page 3 of 6
Minutes of June 9,2003
•
[including voting representatives from business (2), property owners (1); general public
(1); neighborhood associations (2) and representatives from the school district, or those
with finance or development interests] and a non-voting Planning Commissioner chair.
Then they directed the staff to research and report to them how the West Lake Grove
Design District planning committee had been fashioned. They observed that an odd
number of voting participants would facilitate decisive voting results. Ms. Milihauser
related that the Hollyfield facility had indicated to her they desired to send a
representative. Vice Chair Groznik suggested the work group should regularly update
the Transportation Advisory Board and the Development Review Commission as well
as the Planning Commission. The Commissioners generally agreed that before
beginning their work the group should hold an orientation session with members having
already carefully reviewed the Lake Grove Town Center Report. Additionally, early in
their process, the group should consider and define what constitutes the unique
character of the Lake Grove Town Center. The work group should also examine
whether the existing zoning could accomplish the objective of the Lake Grove Town
Center Plan while accomplishing the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the Metro
Functional Plan.
The Commissioners recalled the business community had listed issues that the work
group could be asked to address. They acknowledged that the group's work might
show that a corridor plan change should be considered to more appropriately tie the land
use plan with the transportation plan. They called the Phase 1 report the planning
group's "toolbox." They directed the staff to take extra steps to ensure that
neighborhood association chairs (none were in attendance at the meeting) were kept
informed about the status of the planning process. They generally agreed the work
group should practice consensus driven decision-making. Commissioner Johnson
suggested that whenever the group was unable to make a decision they should present
the Planning Commission with options to resolve the issue. They generally agreed the
work group should be directed to "check in"with the Commission after they defined the
character of the Lake Grove Town Center, and after they fashioned zoning and design
standards.
The Commissioners agreed that the entities and organizations to be represented should
nominate their own representatives. They heard a suggestion that the representative
from the public at large could be someone from outside the planning area who
frequented the area. They differed on whether the nominees should be able to recount
actual experience in consensus decision-making and communication skills, or whether
an expressed intent was acceptable. The staff agreed to provide information on the
composition of the West Lake Grove planning committee. Chair Vizzini asked the staff
to distribute postcards and start an email contact list to communicate planning progress
with the public. He noted the Commissioners were scheduled to examine the planning
consultant's report and determine the planning process at their July 14 meeting and then
they would discuss the process at a joint study session with the City Council on
September 9, 2003.
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission Page 4 of 6
Minutes of June 9, 2003
Chair Vizzini then closed the work session on the Lake Grove Town Center planning
process, announced a five-minute break in the meeting, and subsequently reconvened
the meeting.
u7(03-0003 East End/Commercial Zone Changes
Staff coordinator is Dennis Egner, Long Range Planning Manager.
Dennis Egner, Long Range Planning Manager, advised that the staff had examined
the Community Development Code, the Comprehensive Plan, the Lake Oswego East
End Redevelopment Plan and the Lake Oswego Urban Design Plan to find the City's
stated vision for Downtown. He pointed out that Comprehensive Plan Policy 9-17
allowed mixed-use development Downtown except for "regional draw businesses"
other than those providing specialized services and unique goods. The Plan defines a
"regional draw business" as having floor area greater than 35,000 sq. ft. He noted that
the size limit had been established at a level that was under the size of most new
grocery stores. He confirmed that "main street" and "town center" had similar
definitions. He showed slides of pedestrian-oriented downtown areas in a number of
different cities and pointed out features such as rear parking, good pedestrian
connections, courtyards, street furniture, mixed use buildings and small-scale shops. He
also showed slides of auto-oriented uses, such as grocery and video stores, that were
configured and designed to reflect a pedestrian scale through side or rear parking, fake
pedestrian fronts to parking lots, public art and murals on blank walls. He explained to
the Commissioners that the staff had suggested a 3,000 sq. ft. limit for retail stores after
they observed that pedestrian-oriented businesses were typically small and that 3,000
sq. ft. was about one-half of the size of a typical 6,000 sq. ft. downtown lot. The
Commissioners observed the size limitation would encourage establishment of a lot of
small stores rather than a few large ones.
The Commissioners then discussed the questions of how or whether the staff-suggested
list of permitted uses in the EC Zone should be modified. Mr. Egner explained that the
City Council had asked the City Manager to specifically look at the issue of residential
care facility development Downtown, and the staff had also been asked to examine the
35,000 sq. ft. size limit (which was specified in the Comprehensive Plan, but not in the
Code) and auto sales along State Street. The Commissioners observed that a prohibition
against outdoor storage or fleet parking was inconsistent with equipment or auto service
and that it might be better to disallow a particular use instead of setting a limit on the
number of allowable vehicles for that use. They indicated it might be better to consider
appropriate uses along specific streets at a future time when the Downtown town center
was planned, instead of making piecemeal changes. They observed the (vintage 1988)
Lake Oswego Urban Design Plan segmented downtown into different sub-districts.
When they asked the staff if the list of proposed permitted uses reflected the staff's
interpretation of the Zoning Code and the East End Redevelopment Plan, Mr. Egner
related that the staff committee had created the list after they had identified whether a
use was pedestrian- or auto-focused. He also clarified that not all of the concepts
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission Page 5 of 6
Minutes of June 9,2003
described in the Urban Design Plan had been adopted into the Development Code. The
Commissioners recalled the intense interest of stakeholders in the Lake Grove Town
Center planning process and they anticipated a similar level of interest if they proposed
to limit uses downtown. They questioned their ability to address this issue and the
issues related to the Lake Grove Town Center planning process at the same time. They
also recalled they had already devoted a great deal of time and energy considering and
recommending appropriate siting characteristics for residential care housing. They
agreed to forward a memorandum to the City Council requesting authority to begin a
process to consider the issue of the 35,000 sq. ft. size limit. The memo was also to ask
the Council whether the Planning Commission should revisit the issue of siting of
residential care housing even though they had already made a recommendation related
to residential care housing that they did not feel should be changed. They generally
agreed to advise the Council that they believe that any other proposed changes should
be examined during the future process of planning a downtown town center.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
None.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no other business, Chair Vizzini adjourned the meeting at approximately
10:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Iris Treinen
Senior Secretary
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission Page 6 of 6
Minutes of June 9,2003