Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Item - 2009-07-20
• Lake Osweg6SustainabiIity Sustainability Plan Update Energy and Transportation Action Area July 20, 2009 Susan Millhauser, Sustainability Coordinator 4.„, . , Issues & Opportunities ,....-14 Strate Human Livabilit EconomyClimate Natural Species gY Health Y Change Resources Protection 1 . Sustainability Planning x x x x x x 2. Green Building x x x x x x 3. Energy Efficiency x x x x 4. Renewable Energy x x x 5. Green Fleet x x x 6. Transportation Options x x x 7. Sustainable Purchasing x x x x x Issues & Opportu n lies ,i.s Strate Human Livabilit EconomyClimate Natural Species gY Health Y Change Resources Protection 8. Waste Reduction x x x 9. Toxics Reduction x x x x 10. Water Quality x x x 11 . Water Conservation x x x 12. Land Preservation/ Greenspace x x x x x x 13. Greenhouse Gases Plans x x x x x x Background • Began coordinated efforts by first focusing on City operations • Established staff sustainability steering committee in 2006 to develop Plan • Committee evaluated current level of sustainability in City policies , programs, and practices • Created a "Sustainability Vision , " priority action areas , and milestones City Sustainability Plan A sustainable Lake Oswego is a community that meets the vital human needs of the present without compromising our ability to meet future needs. This requires 4r—dg consideration of both long-term and short-term effects on ecological, economic, and community systems. From: Lake Oswego Sustainability Plan adopted 11 /2007 City Sustainability P • Sustainability objectives inform decision- making cultural , sacred y public r radition- istoric places fields park access alit sites raditiona 4 airtenanc_ atershe. quality ' •uildin���G village '►'shoreline •rotecti• conservation ocation c�ofl • design atter/ �L•; paths •rotectio � �., easements sewer line locatio' power u) Q li tree ,� land - c u ' 6 III •ene rat ion � \ / o- •rotectio GAS �gricultura alternative Ge`1'recycling -p z p Lan. �,�. zoning eptic desi. <V •rograms i R�S est ���' CSAs�" k�4n 4b •ike paths -q�,� C.2 ;N:sit\-eplan • anageme . 5 \- y susses /e . fuel •Cj?j - G, r �u.0"-co-industria road 4821M110ah�, choice F illik; DEUEt Incentive o.S parks tandar ��ehicles ?RA 4 ORTATION rogram� loan cadsfinancing - y- review 1Cl©N •ro•rams Indus. zonin• rograms I- &i .GULA_ •evelopmen NW '1 �g HOtlSING m j LA�p USA �c's/, codes agreements tes o" andscape z P zoning �' , overlay S�N-e �• design 0 districts • •istricts vision orientation to •`� cmaterial egul�at ons water used Q ( eats Cpowe� it �`- - Y Source:The Natural Step for Communities,James& City Sustainability Plan Sustainability objectives : 1 . Reduce dependence upon fossil fuels, extracted underground metals and minerals. 2 . Reduce dependence on chemicals and other manufactured substances that _- can accumulate in Nature . 3 . Reduce dependence on activities that harm life-sustaining ecosystems. �= 4 . Meet the hierarchy of present and future human needs fairly and efficiently. City Sustainability Plan To establish Plan goals and actions , used sustainability objectives to help answer these questions : 1 . How sustainable are we now? 2 . How sustainable do we want to be in the future? 3. How do we get there? 4 . How do we measure progress? Action Areas for 2008 Energy Use & Water Procurement Waste Transportation Conservation Reduction 4 r •• • 11 r „ay 04 air? • • Milestones (targets) — By 2012 • Sustainable end point goals — By 2027 • Identified performance measures to track progress Energy & 2027 Goals • Zero net increase of GHG emissions • 100% renewable energy sources _ 1( 111 , " - r PGE/ N\44. Enerius1 77k)1*. of Oregon, Inc. Energy & Transportation 2012 Targets • GHG emissions 7% below 2000 levels Reduce energy consumption by 10% from 2006 levels • 100% of energy from renewable sources • 50% of fleet fueled by alternative fuels/technology •j •C 'L• E I Local Governments for Sustainability USA " .y - . ENERGY STAR Energy & Transportation 2012 Targets / - -1 ,, • 10% increase in overallzi*" t fleet vehicle MPG • All new construction & major remodels of City � 8 �,�Q �� facilities meet LEED 1L/ Gold/Silver • Increase by 50% number of City employees commuting by alternative T R Ia M E T' travel options See where it takes you. Energy & 2008 Actions ✓ Complete GHG emissions inventory for City operations 1_ ✓ Evaluate increased in use of Clean Wind power - =� Adopt green building policy for new construction & major remodels of City facilities yr Formalize deconstruction & --***‘ --411) -c2ftt - - construction debris recycling Y = policy for City projects i Energy 2008 Actions ✓ Switch from 5% biodiesel to 20% for summertime use , spot test use of B50 Conduct fleet assessment & develop green fleets plan „ , k. . .e` Ida` . 'i !' trr 3, . num • ( SeQuentiai BIOFUELS :; cleaner burning Fuels made from plants Energy & Transportation 2008 Actions ✓ Expand employee commute options programs & tracking : ✓ Set up tracking system for transit benefit ✓ Commute survey for all City staff _ Identify facility upgrades, including costs, to better support alternate commute options ✓ Conduct car sharing feasibility study in downtown MetroC4 I F���t� � . C����r s�c�e�s. zIp C�f Energy & Transportation 2008 Actions ✓ Adopt new lighting standards : Dark Sky compliance (partial ) ? Develop preferred list of trees and landscaping species for drought-tolerance , _ solar, carbon uptake (in conjunction with Community Forestry) ✓ Continue to automate City functions , e .g . payroll , digital recordings, and look for additional opportunities , e .g . Hello LO, LODown nerTransportation Year 2000 GHG Emissions by Sector Performance 7,000 • N 6,000 - — o Water/Sewage Measures 0 5,000 0 4,000 0 3,000 • Buildings • Facility & c 2,000 - cl,000 ❑ Streetlights infrastructure 0 nd Signals -1,000 a) cocs, a o Vehicle Fleet cv c -C c' a) Cl) use a) = .� - a a3 energy -. w m Cl) ❑ Waste E E • Fleet fuel use (3 • Employee commute data '1-) • Waste tonnage diverted from landfill • Number of new/remodeled City buildings that meet LEED Energy & Transportation 2008 Highlights • Supported increased employee commute programs to reduce single-occupancy vehicle trips to / from City facilities. For the City Hall site, employees reduced drive alone auto trips by more than 10 percent over the previous year's State Employee Commute Options survey, for a 77% auto trip rate . 2009 CAREFREE COMMUTER �.,��. � ._ _ . � CHALLENGE Energy & Transportation 2008 Accomplishments • Installed an electric vehicle charging station at A Ave. and 2nd St. Pilot with PGE to develop and test the transportation infrastructure needed to support plug-in electric vehicles. � - , r i EnergyTransportation& 2008 Highlights : • Completed a GHG emissions & criterion air pollutants inventory for City facilities / operations (Scopes I and II ) . • Buildings — Heating / Cooling & Lighting Clean Air and Climate Protection Software© File ,■ Year Record Report Settings Assistants Help Conununity Analysis Community Measures I Government Analysis • Ve h i c I e fleet v Government Analysis For Year 2000 am, BuildingsI Vehicle Fleet I Employee Commute,Streetlights Water/Sewage I Waste Other • Streetlights Jame of Built Traffic Total energy usage Fuel Type Units Energy Ilse (Ener gy Cos[I$}I 1 Electricity lGr id Aver agef {twill 5,939,465 0 Signals - .._.,.. — Cool {tonsl 0 0 Insert Select _11 te LinDa Fuel Oil {VS gall 0 0 III ■ 9- ■I Dele IL atur al Gas {thousand co al 3,569 0 Water / Sewage Treatment Propane US go1V 1690 0 • Report I Help Diomethane {thousand CO ftl 0 0 2ssistants I Categories I Indicators 1 Coefficients I Fuelwood{Air Dryl {torrid 0 0 & Delivery Solar MMBtrrl 0 0 Gr ten Electricity {twill 0 0 Forecast Builder1 J • Waste Notes Regarding eg or Group Data Buildings and otherr usage comes from hillings total of 11 968,122 Kwh less Water Treatment '8,258,305 Kwh)less streetlights(404,274 Kwh)leaving 5,939,865 Kwh Employee Commute-not Propaneaturalgas eomes from romfleet data • Natural gas comes fr NW Natural billings&summarized in Nat Gas 8 Electric Usage 2880 and 2006 xis included due to lack of ' il Energy Consumption I (MMB[u) Equivalent CO�Produc[ion I (tons) Cost ($) NC I 24,351 I 3,299 I 0 r data GHG Emissions Inventory • In 2000 , City operations emitted 11 ,245 tons of Equivalent Carbon Dioxide (eCO2) • Percentage of total emissions by sector: o Water / Sewage: 55% (or 6, 182 tons eCO2) o Buildings: 29% (or 3,299 tons eCO2) o Streetlights & Signals: 11 % (or 1 ,232 tons eCO2) o Vehicle Fleet: 8.9% (or 998 tons eCO2) o Waste: -4 . 1 % (or -465 tons eCO2) GHG Emissions Inventory • Other cities 2000 GHG emissions for City operations : o NYC = 3 .8 million tons o Seattle = 1 , 370,000 tons o Duluth , MN = 126, 370 tons o Bellingham , WA = 19 , 945 tons (w/employee commute ) o Arcata , CA = 2 , 064 tons GHG Emissions Inventory Year 2000 GHG Emissions by Sector Percent of Total Emissions 9% 11 % ❑ Water/Sew age ❑ Buildings 55% ❑ Streetlights and 29% Signals } "'- ❑ Vehicle Fleet GHG Emissions Inventory Year 2000 GHG Emissions by Sector 7,000 - N 6,000 ❑ Water/Sewage 0 5,000 0 4,000 0 `� I 3,000 • Buildings w 2,000 1 ,0000 - 1 1-1 ❑ Streetlights 1 I 1 and Signals ' a' 0' a �; ❑ Vehicle Fleet ca — •-g -' En (51; -T.') .c7) ,a) co 92 -0 ❑ Waste 'T) (7) 2 log to' GHG Emissions Inventory Year 2000 GHG Emissions by Source <1 % 7% Iv 0 Diesel 1111, ❑ Electricity O Gasoline ❑ Natural Gas sa°io • Paper Products O Propane GHG Emissions Inventory Year 2000 GHG Emissions by Source 12,000 10,000 � 0 Diesel 8,000 0 Electricity 0 Gasoline N OU 6,000 a) ❑ Natural Gas 46 N • Paper Products 0 4,000 ~ 0 Propane 2,000 ■ Plant Debris o I 1 -2,000 GHG Emissions Inventory • For 2006 , City operations emitted 11 , 938 tons of Equivalent Carbon Dioxide (eCO2) • Percentage of total emissions by sector: o Water / Sewage: 49% (or 5,881 tons eCO2) o Buildings: 30% (or 3,544 tons eCO2) o Streetlights & Signals: 16% (or 1 ,848 tons eCO2) o Vehicle Fleet: 9% (or 1 , 103 tons eCO2) o Waste: -4% (or -437 tons eCO2) i GHG Emissions Inventory „, , x Year 2000 & 2006 Emissions by Sector Comparison AI 7,000 6,000 N 5,000 OU 4,000 ❑ 2000 Tons of eCO2 p It 3,000 c 21,,000 ❑ 2006 Tons of eCO2 ~ 1000 - - -1 ,000 - a�0 — �g �\c \e� \� ,z, ����A4 Q��\ co a`, �.� \�'\0 *a 5 z. \\fir e Energy & Transportation On-going activities to reduce energy use and GHG emissions from City operations include: • Replacing street signal bulbs with light fig; ��;, emitting diode (LEDs), reducing energy ..., consumption by 80 to 90 percent and saving approximately $32,000 in electricity costs per year. ,. • Including seven hybrid electric/gas vehicles 'F � in the City fleet. • Using 5% biodiesel (B5) for all City diesel vehicles. • Making upgrades to the heating and cooling system controls at City Hall to increase the building's energy efficiency. Energy & On-going activities to reduce energy use and GHG emissions from City operations include : • Purchasing clean , renewable wind power through PGE equal to half of the City Water Treatment Plant's annual electricity use, with lighting and pump upgrades to increase energy efficiency. me ari of ww oweyo m,a,< yr,Fiirvibilibr el}orfy With mnnwb1 M'n. .' d 'k' . • 4Lake �wd n...y — r . Energy & 2012 Actions 7:70 . .„, ..- .,,vvie,—• tIstaiiii1,1e IntkisirimJournal li Apo. # "e; 0 TOP 10 . 4,4 r7/'_ GREEN _,, 4.. I -,;to. ,., S. i i:e 40, J 11PRODUCTS CREST y Testing Component: 2007 iiii, kO 4 WAY �t7 A . r w : Ecaroof yu x 36 m �y COOKS aw X ; WEsrr[upE WESTRIDGE .' BUTT E PARK oQ PARK El • Q. q :Or'. " BRYANT WOODS s PARK } z ,- Ai b 1 k❑A➢ RP AA i 1 CANAL ACRES SUNNYSLOPE ®I NATURAL AREA a OPEN SPACEr w w A ck LD.T 0I 1$aw, ROgD jr RIVER RUN PARK n .___ I. EECBG Next Steps? • The EECBG program assists state, local , and tribal governments in implementing strategies to: o Reduce fossil fuel emissions; o Reduce total energy use; and o Improve energy efficiency in the transportation , building, and other appropriate sectors. • Additional purposes of the EECBG �= program are to spur economic growth and create / retain jobs under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 . EECBG Next Steps? • $ 157, 000 direct allocation based on Lake Oswego's population • Must develop an energy efficiency and conservation strategy arm, • How to best use Energy Efficiency and 111, Conservation Block Grant (EECBG ) funds to further Plan goals , SAB goals, Council goals? EECBG Eligible Project Types • Development of an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy and Technical Consultant Services to assist in the development of such a strategy _.._ • Residential and Commercial Building Energy Audits • Financial Incentive Programs for energy r efficiency improvements EECBG Eligible Project Types • Grants to nonprofit organizations and governmental agencies for the purpose of performing Energy Efficiency Retrofits _ • Energy Efficiency and Conservation Programs for Buildings and Facilities • Development and Implementation of Transportation Programs to conserve energy • Building Codes and Inspections to promote building energy efficiency EECBG Eligible Project Types • Energy Distribution Technologies that significantly increase energy efficiency, including distributed generation , combined heat and power, and district heating and cooling systems • Material Conservation Programs including source reduction , recycling , and recycled content procurement programs that lead to increases in energy efficiency EECBG Eligible Project Types • Reduction and Capture of Methane and Greenhouse Gases excluding carbon capture or sequestration from power plants • Energy efficient Traffic Signals and Street Lighting ., • Renewable Energy Technologies on Government Buildings �.= • Any Other Appropriate Activity that meets the purposes of the program and is approved by DOE EECBG Project Ideas • Retrofit outdoor lighting adjacent some City facilities and parks (also meets recently adopted dark sky ordinance) • Match funds for AmeriCorps sustainability outreach specialist to support SAB's efforts ., & conduct 2008 GHG inventory Set up iienergy management tracking system for City facilities • Public facility audits / funding strategy for energy efficiency upgrades EECBG Project Ideas • Community energy efficiency and conservation projects and programs — Revolving loan fund for residences, small businesses — Climate Masters or similar education and outreach / training — Support for LOSD — Community renewable energy project EECBG Timeline/Next Steps • 120 days from award to develop required energy efficiency and conservation strategy (EEGs) • Award anticipated within 60 days of June 25 IMO application submittal • Coordinate with Clackamas County, where possible • Work with SAB , staff, and ultimately Council , to develop EECS and associated projects and programs for DOE approval Thank you ! Contact: Susan Millhauser, Sustainability Coordinator 503-635-0291 ; smillhauser(c(c�ci .oswego.or. us www.ci .oswego.or. us then click on Sustainability