HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - 2005-04-06 Combined
Neighborhood Meeting
on
Foothills District Planning
April 6, 2005
INTRODUCTIONS Warren Bacon
PRESENTATION OF ALTERNATIVES. . . .Denny Egner
CLARIFICATION QUESTIONS All
DISCUSSION TOPICS All
• Circulation patterns and access to Highway 43
• Mass Transit
• Land Uses/Activity
• Building Height
• Unique Features
SUMMARY AND WRAP-UP All
Citizen Advisory Committee Members (Neighborhood Reps)
First Addition, Bari Thompson
Evergreen, Warren Bacon
Foothills, Renee Carr
Lakewood, Bruce Freed
Old Town, Jeannie McGuire
FOOTHILLS DISTRICT REFINEMENT PLAN - ALTERNATIVES FOR AIJAI PSIS 'rcP
CAC WORKSHOP, APRII 7, 2005
Development Building Height Treatment Plant
Highway 43 Access Land Use Mix Unique Features
Scenarios Range Status
Foothills Road Collector High Potential for Main Street with Civic
Street to D Street Space at Willamette
Residential Units (1,000 Steps
app.)
1 3-10 stories Remains "Woonerf" Street
Riverfront Restaurant
Moderate Linear Open Space
Commercial/Retail/Office Along State Street
(70,000 square feet app.)
Civic and Park Space
Foothills Road Collector High Potential for Near Tryon Creek
Across Tryon Creek to Residential Units (1.200
2 Terwilliger with At-Grade app.) Large "Town Square"
Intersection 3-6 Stories Relocated
Near the Willamette
for Terwilliger Moderate Steps
CommerciallRetail/Office
j30.000 square feet app.)
Foothills Road Collector Lowest Potential for
Across Tryon Creek to Residential Units (700
Terwilliger with At-Grade app.) Civic and Park Space
3 9 Near Tryon Creek
Intersection 2-4 Stories Relocated
Low Amount of
Commercial/Retail/Office
(15,000 square feet app.)
Highway Couplet No land use scenario
(Northbound)Through Not Applicable
4 the District to Terwilliger. Transportation analysis Not applicable Remains
Other Access Points at A only
and D Streets
FOOTHILLS DISTRICT REFINEMENT PLAN - ALTERNATIVES FOR ANALYSIS •r'
CAC WORKSHOP, APRIL 7, 2005
Common Elements
Each scenario utilizes structured parking integral to the buildings and the potential on-street parking. No surface parking lots have been assumed. Roofs of
all structured parking could be developed as interior courtyard space for the buildings or with `green roof" treatments.
Each scenario illustrates the Willamette Steps at B Street. Additional steps and/or pedestrian entries into the district could be developed at A, C and U Streets.
Building envelopes are intended to provide assumptions about the approximate number or residential units and the approximate square footage of
commercial/office/retail space. These estimates will allow traffic and financial analysis of each scenario and will give us a conceptual measure of possible
density and intensity of uses. Exact shapes and designs of buildings, including exterior materials, are not addressed as part of this project.
Parking per unit/square footage, number of'snits per floor of building envelope and number of levels of parking is understood at this point. Financial and
traffic analysis in Task 5 may suggest further refinements.
Access to Highway 43, internal traffic and pedestrian circulation, the open space framework, building heights and view corridors will be discussed for each
scenario.
RA
Combirtece Ne114ZiorAcicaOff" "15 Pni t - ,Q 6 �7
Name Address Phone (503) Email •
Alokmizaki -755814ST- ‘54L
''`r4==. Nices=imerm,127)5 (034.0410
Tfroh4P-1,)4 (0 • fr 1‘641 619 05-01 _
r-7612-tA:14 -1-0M-AF514 " ,•
, /3A( Z= = /3•rals 4'‘Q e nG:t
,47145'
C4-6( pcJ42.,/1 P-• 1(0c4016414) .5s5 (2354,7
-7V;7
7/ fo„elp_e_c:2-.., G57 —6 z / 3
C) c/ tx-12-4-0/t-e__- cY // f
SC" 63 6 -is3.s-
A� k 0 Jvpiw 43i 7 C (03 6- l(7 C6 ro&aw:4- -&.C.a c i . ors,
Lfr 0-0-rcicil(, Li/ --7-ALkie
nL, 1-76,/ —14-0y Scc au O
Xl C 6-L L-i-VrN t 55 Fvr"(•c 53 � - g 6
1
1
Name Address Phone (503) Email
eatAit, St (. 4A qattvi1/5 h0--epiLt e.-40'CAVeumts"_GMt.
tAo:Ff/ F--Pf 2 ( O.l tatitoe i
N S l 534 -1_
.1 Al/N (o -5 Z/ Vl (14 P4 S t/-�
;,:t KcA6 4 • 2za A- � 2� 617-333
•
1
Name Address Phone (503) Email
a Lg7-33� G pc;rtlss re-
�� SKr ? I/�c 7.c c c
1) (&j Gr‘ A/\ Tb U e W C Cat- 6.3 Tr S 32 trokr-et.o. 5'a�'� Ol� Covv. ' s E' A2,k
9/C(AV 11( 414k
DaL4& Ftitaie}/ g 610 4?? 3g9
SL,9 W olc-C- 151 Be r w t be_ 1 (03b-b60h •conex
t'c? c gc_At , • _ 1(-14 0V • ! - op rt„ct i rl
L f AMA WS u L_74/ C95 A 4 -2 39 iM Psau wm c @ wsu ,S•
tax r tren 5cu 4-ate 42 - - 5 tc 7a _ / •el
A-rid a4r.ri5 6q3 G 636-51 4
Rom Ursa* 3k I l tin,3214
1
expanded foothills plan flow 6-24-04.jpg(6677x4354x24b jpeg)
FOOTHILLS DISTRICT PLANNING PROCESS OUTLINE(6.24.04)
7/02 7/03 7/04 9/04 1I/04 1/05 3/05 5/05 7/05 9/05 11/05 1/06 3/06 5/06 7/06 9/06 II/06 1/07 3/07 5/07 7/07 7/08 7/09
( CONCEPT ~ FRAMEWORK PLAN (-DEVELOPMENT PLAN �1 (IMPLEMENTATION
URBAN
1 TGM GRANT RENEWAL
Crondoll Arambula Plan R-line Concept: I Adopt Plan:
-Lonnstraints es Zoning(Land Use/Density) Comprehensive Urban Renewal Projects
FOOTHILLS Accept
REDEVELOPMENT VIw?rl F�
Transit Center Studyi FramewkMap
L Use rays: Plan Transportation and Other Infrastructure - Stanat rcl Initiate Development protuCtS
•Tiers/Au,t ps
'Foothills Park Planning' -Inhastluctue
-DersMlCharcc Accept/ R $xce
Approve
Project Feasibility: Urb.Ren.
-Products Plan,Fam Design Standards
-Financing Urb.Ren.
-Renewal District District ,
ilrban Renewal:
koundaries
ojects
-Financing
Policy Aavisory Committee.Tecnnicat Submit For Submit For
STREET CAR Street Car Committee Advisory Committee,Recommendation New Starts New Starts
I I I t
Alternatives Analysts:
-Development A ternollveS Referred Allernatee:
-Creation of Performance Measures -Adoption by Jurisdictions Environmental hi p•,u,t Statement/ EnglneeringlDesign Construction
-Land Use Assumptions flan
•Base Transportation on Region -Adoption by Metro Environmental Assessment
-Financing Options -Adoption by TilMet Board
-Cost Comparison
I II
Portland Streetcar Board,LO Committee.OHSU
II it
OTHER PROJECTS Urban Renewal Poiects 9/04.1/05:Headlee Walkway;9/04-9/05:2nd&B Redevelopment: 7/07-7/09:Oswego Lake Front:
7/05-7/06:Mirk nn+urn P]rk Plx�.c.-3&4 Ellr,k 137 9/07-9/09:Elks.48,49 1 sr Rr_rlail Rr-rnt.
Foothills Park I
Construction I I
Neighborhood Transportation I I I
Management Protect I I I
I
ITryon Creek Conceptual Plan I
PUBLIC • • I I • I It • • •
PARTICIPATION \
Steering Committee Citizen Advisory Convrvttees ✓/\
•Public Meetings I
IStreet COrCommittee I I I I Work Committees 11
. .
Transportation Growth Management Grant
Scope of Work Program
Form Existing Opportunities Alternatives Atl. Eval. & Final Pref.
CAC & Conditions & Constraints Development Refinement Plan & Report
TAC
June-July 04 Nov 04 Dec 04/Jan 05 Jan-Mar 05 April-June 05 July-Aug 05
Final Product:
Framework Plan that outlines:
• land use
•transportation
•infrastructure
•density
•character
•redevelopment financing
Name (Optional)
Neighborhood
FOOTHILLS SURVEY
FROM THE
Combined Neighborhood Meeting of Evergreen, First Addition,Old Town, Lakewood &
Foothills
April 6, 2005
Please rank the alternatives presented by the city tonight and are described in the handout you
received when you entered?Please comment on what you like and what do you not like?
ALTERNATIVE #1. Ranking. What do you like
What do you not like
Other comments
ALTERNATIVE # 2. Ranking. What do you like
What do you not like
Other comments
ALTERNATIVE#3. Ranking. What do you like
What do you not like
Other comments
ALTERNATIVE # 4. Ranking. What do you like
What do you not like
Other comments
Combined Neighborhood Meeting
Old Town, Lakewood, First Addition, Foothills & Evergreen NA
April 6, 2005
Bank of Oswego Atrium
7:00 PM— 8:30 PM
• There were approximately 36 people in attendance
• City Representative: Doug Schmitz, Jack Hoffman(for beginning of meeting),
Lynn Peterson, Denny Egner, Sidaro Sin&Eryn Deeming
• These are my notes,'Mike official notes taken from the tablets
Attendees:
Need to get sign-in sheet from Warren Bacon
Handouts:
• Overall timeline and TGM timeline and overview
• Agenda
• Warren's Questionnaire....what do you like, not like, etc...
• Alternatives Summary table
Questions &Comments Summary:
1) What is the City vision for this area? I don't know what it is.....Do we expect
businesses in the area? If so,then what will we do with the traffic that comes
with it?
2) Will there be pedestrian crossings across Highway 43 to Foothills?
3) Will the traffic study look at the north/south traffic on Highway 43? It is already
congested, seems like adding more development resulting in more cars will make
Highway 43 worse.
4) I'd like to see visual comparisons, what is the size(square footage) of Block 138,
area of the Foothills area and Oswego Pointe density?
5) There needs to be some visual comparisons:
a. Square footage of Block 138?
b. Square footage of Foothills Area?
c. Condo density
d. Etc....
6) I'm concerned about the D Street option because it seems as though traffic will go
straight up on D Street into the First Addition Neighborhood.
7) How much input does ODOT have into the Foothills Plan? Can they say"no"to
certain connections to Highway 43? How many pedestrian crossings would
ODOT allow across Highway 43?
8) How many driveway access point would ODOT allow on Highway 43? (Linda
McNulty)
9) January or February of 2006 we should know what the preferred alternative for
the street car. (Lynn Peterson)
10)It is really important to consider how the traffic to and from the Foothills area
impacts the surrounding neighborhoods. (First Add neighbor)
11)Could the Street Car study and decisions that come from that undo any design
plans that are developed through the Foothills Plan? (Renee Carr)
12)What is the value and significance of an urban renewal district in this area? (Ron
Smith)
13)Traffic affects the quality of life. (Ron Smith)
14)Why aren't we looking at river transportation to ferry people to PDX? It appears
to be the easiest and cheapest. (Will)
15)Vancouver BC has berry boats.
16)Are there going to be any concerns with hazardous waste from DEQ with
development in the area?
17)Is it in a flood plain?
18)Is the City in compliance with FEMA?
19)Concern expressed over development in floodplain.
20)Tacoma, WA...renewal along water way, has commuter dock.
21)Restaurant is a good idea in this area.
22)Community garden is a good idea in this area.
23)Jeannie and others in the Old Town area think a boutique hotel is a good idea.
24)Who owns the land?
25)Is the City going to impose this plan on developers?
26)What are the school impacts?
27)Treatment plant.... Is it feasible to move it? What is the timing and cost?
28)Is there a general preference on options, asked Chris from Evergreen NA?
29)You could consider relocating the plant; have more open space with some higher
buildings.
30)What do you want for density? Number of people and cars?
31)What do we want down there? Don't want a lot of office space.
32)Needs to have enough green space to feel comfortable.
33)Balance between open space and development.
34)Think there is already a lot of office pace capacity(not a demand).
35)If there are a lot of offices,there will be more traffic in surrounding
neighborhoods.
36)There isn't parking capacity now for Roher Park, during the concerts. Where will
additional cars park?
37)Preserve views of Mt. Hood. I don't know how tall 10 stories is.
38)Connect greenways with paths
39)Scenario 1, exit on"D" Street because of traffic on local streets.
The group would like to meet in two weeks to discuss the graphics that will be presented
to the CAC on 4/7/05.