The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApproved Minutes - 2007-12-03I, C AUL 110 ORDER City of Laike Oswcglo Da Fdapment Review Commission Minu1es1 December 3, 3007 Chair Bill 'DiernieM cialkic the Deavalopmenit Reiview Commission meeatinag cafIMiciember 3, 3007 to order at approxim aitelly 7:00 p.mi. in ilho Cour. curl Chambers of Citi Hall at 38(l "A" A veariuea, flake Oswego, C raglan. K ROLA CALL Clamimiissioniers present basieeis Chair 3lierhey werea dice Chair Shaflaa Cstly and Commissioners Nan B:inklay, Bob Neeadham, A:Iby Hereadia and Krytsyria Stadnik. Staff) prusEanl were Hamid HisHvaii. a, Assistaril Blanning Dirci ator; Jlohlanna Hastay, Associale Pllann€ar, Elvan Boor.ia, Deaputy City Attcam ay, and Iris Treincin, Adminustrativea Suppcart. III. MINUTES Vice Chain C stly moored to appraye the Minutes cif Map 7, 2001 Ms, Binkley ® seciand ed the motion and it passEid 5:0:1. Mr. Heareadia abstained. Vice Chain Ostly moored to approve the Minutes ofMay.21, 2007. Mn. NlecadHam secaaindad the motions and it passed 4:01. Commissioners Binkley and Hered:iaa aibsil ainied. 11 V uea CHair Ostly moored to approve tHea_Minutes of_A ne_ 4.2001 Ms; Bin klciy secaandead the motion and it passed 4:0:2. C ommissioners Heredia and Needham absil ainied. Commissioner Binkley wuvcd to aippnovei tde Minutes of Jain a 18, 2007 Vlicati Chafe Ostly seconded thea motican and :i1 passed 4:0:2. Ccammiissil anears Henedia and Nu adhani absta ined. I`l. APHROVAL OA FlNDINC S, C CNC IJUSICNS AND ORDER (Nonfa) V. PUBBIC HEARING LUl 317-00.6.0, a reaqueast by 11reall D€oval opmenit & M anagern aril G roup, Inic. for approvall of a Devealopmierit Rleaview Aearmit to perform an Eaxilearioii reamicadal of an existing commearaial slrucatune and iiemoval of 18 Hewes to aecacammiodate thle riaw landscaape plan. The pnopearty i,a ]ooated at 4 U onroe Parldway (Twi Lot 3(1(I of Tax Map 21EO'IAA, . City of Lake Cswega Develormerit Review Commissiori Ha€1e l of 4 N imves of Decemten 3, 21001 Chair Tiarnay opened the public hlear:ing and explained lihe applicable proaedune and time limits. He a.slded the Commissioners to report any ex parla damlacts (including site visits), ® biases arrc conflicds oflintarasl, aric to identifly any kdown prasanl or anlicipated fullura business relationships with the pro'ect on the applicant. Ms. Binkley and Chain Tiernay eaah reported they k ad made a sile visil. Each of the Commissioners declared the it business ar occupation as follows: Ostly I1reial asilate appraiser); Hinkley (architecrt); Haredia (real estalla aganl;, Neadhami (retired lawyer); and Stadnik (Jaivil engineer; and Chair TiarnaN (utilities inspection business). No one praseint challenged any Comma ssi onan' s right 1 o hear the application. JloHanna Hastay, Associate Manner, presentac the stalff report Ile aced November 21, 2007). She advised tre site was subject to Mountdin Parld PUD requirements as well as the r CI Zone. Shle descnit ed the surrounding uses and hove the appliaants proposeid to modify the exislinig building and landscaping. Shle advisac thal the applicant shill neieded to clarify the proposed exposed width afllap siding, arrc thal somia axisiling signage was illegal. She recamimiended a more aonsistanl window design, signage that confcirmed to ilhe Code aqi was aomplemantary ila the building design, and a smaller manumenl sign. Sloe rapari ad a corn er aadan tree was s to be preserved, and that staff l could agrae 1 o the pnoposac removal of 181raes thal ware mostly not good condition, and 1Ihat would be mitigaled with miany 1a11€le evargruan trees. She said thaN recommended locating tl' a pathway where it would be aligned with existing pathway sagmients and the crasswalk. She reiaommended appraval of 11.1a aplp;licalion sut fact to 11.1a ciandilions recommended in 1Ihe staff raport. During the quastionin€I period,, she confirmed the praposed davalopment was not subjadt to a requirement to'insllall a sidewalk along tta site frontages or! public ® streets. She said staff f6und tt a proposac monument si pin was too large and should rafl ec11 padastri an seal a. A nplicanlI Drew Plnell, 4 Monncie Parkway, Lalde Oswego, Onegag, 9703!, staled that he and Bob sink owr ad the property. Ha .clarifiac they did not propose lla expand 1Ihe buillding and it would be usac as professional offrca space. Steven. Routan, ArcHillect LLC, ! 160 Tualata Ln., Latae Oliwego, Oregon, 9703!, prasanled 1Ihe design, He pointed out where the aipplicanls praposed lla use 4 -inch-, 8- inch- and 1Cl-iriah-axpasune lap siding. Dining thea questioning period, he described wherei the colors on the colon baard were to be applied. .He explaiined the was11 elevatian Windows were propased to be flush in order to create a ftiaridlier plaza area, and the appliciant prafl:irrad wood to concrete mullions. Ms. Hastay then agreed 1ha condition to recess the windows could be removed. Tfa applicant wanted conf rmallion thal onlytrle area afIthe sign componarit itself would be limited, not lrle antine sun our. dingy struiciture ofIthe monumietit sign. Howavar, Ms. Hastay advised 1Iha limit was F feed hligh and 6.5 fleet wide and applied to the entire struicture, . including the trellis.1Ihe appliaant strassed.lha proposed sigln was in scala with the building and ill had to be large ariough to be readable. When askk, Mi. Hoorne advised the Cam m iss`i onars 1 hay wave not acl uall y appraving the sign, but adding condill ions to City oft Lake Clswega Development Review Ccmmissioni Page I afl4 Mir u tes of Decerrit er 3, 210(171 ensum it was aomplemeanlaryl tea the deisign oflthei building lhat stafflwcauld con;lidear when they reiviewad the sign permit appl:ioation. Steiflflconfirmeid they alsca looked at ® aompatibilit)I with othtir signs, landscaping and struictuies in the surnoun ding areia during sign permiil remitm. They confirmed the staaffAecision vias not appealable to thea C cammiiss:ion. The app]caul explainied thea pnopcised chimney trellis helped idenat:ify thle t uilding, break up the mass, and it reaflecitead details on the rest of tHea building. ` lhey speacifiead thal thea Atlas Cedar tree to be saav�ead was approN imately 13 inahes diameiter and about :1fl feet frcimi thea monument sign. The Commissionieni examined thea phlotograph of thea true and street. SWfflanti aipatead it might have to be prunead a little bit so :il wauld not cabscwe the sign.. Clheiiii lerney observed a consensus to remove the cicand:ilion to reces:a windcaws. The Clommissionens calculaled that thea allowat le sign dimen:aional lim:il of 8 feet x 6.1 feet a:llawed a sign up to 52 square ftaat in areia. 111.1dre was no cathaii publics tostimiony. 11(i iHerations Clhair'llierney cilosead public testimony and tho appl;iciant waivck their rigHt to addilional time in wHiah to submit a finial writilen angor. ant. Thea Commissionems examinead the il:lustnalion of lhei pnoposead moniumenit sign. Ms. Hinkley saw a need ilea en:aurea a coni steanl sitylea typefacae thal ref lectad Ciiaft?aman sty] a. Mr. N eedH= anti aipatead thal some teananls wou.1d wanil to use thleir awn logcas. CHair Tierney neaalled that the levering had tea relate well to the style of the building. Ha said he could support the proposed size oflsigna beciause the exhiling signs seem�ead too small and the site as in a aommercial area. ® Ms. Bink ley said that shea could support thea omerall proposed ,size beicause it might bei neacessar)l to cifftar enough roomi foialhei leattoring component itself lllwhiah did not exceec the s:iae of sign there naw) plus thea sign's anchiteactural surround, including pasts and oveliflang, lhat helped lie it Ica the building. Stafllclarified lhea Code limiled the sign to 32 sq. ft., nal :inciluc ing the "surround," and it had to realatei well to the signage, buildings and landscaping in thea vicinity. Thay said they beliamed that lhei proposead sign was too :large for that :lociation. Mr. Neeadhama suggasUk the sign might nal Havo to tea so large beciaiuse it faced a s:lowen traffic stneet than Boones Harry RIciad. Ms. FlisHmmiea suggasiled modifying the nelated aondition of appiuval so it would still nequ:irea any mionunr ant sign to f6ature Clrefllsruan design elements ane be cionsistenl in aveuial:I side wiilh the existing monaumernt sign, to thle sail isfhation cif Ithe staff, t uil remove the next sentoncie that speciified sign area and dimensions and leaven the final deciisicin to staffl The applicant indicated they would agree to thal. Ms. Binkley said thay should aons:idor con:iisilent tyFefacea, and Mt. Needham suggested the sign should not be blluea, as tHene was adneady too mush blue allcang that street segirleant. Ms. B inkley n oved to appnave LU 07-0060 subjecit to the ciond itions necommend(id in the staff) report, except fbr the folllowing: Condition. B(2)lja), was to He eliminated Condition E(2)j1h) was to He modified sio only the filnst sEmtence remained. City of Lake Oswegc Developlmenit Review Cc mmissioni Pale 3 (f 4 Mir Utes of Deoember 3, 3007 Ms. SItadnik scicionded the motion and dimusls:ion ftilloweid in which the Clommlisslionem alariifi'ed shay simply wiantead Condit oni HIS:; (b) to eansime that any moniument sign was ® aorisisteant in sllyle and seize wilh the exis inig mionumearit sign and they would leave, other) deatail,i to sltaffIto duaide. The motion passed 6:0. Chair Tiernay announced thea nal vale would ba held an Decaemberl 17, 2007 9 VI. GHNHRAI P IANNING & OTHERI BUSINESS Staff disltributEad individual copies) oflrecent code updates lto the Clormvisslionierlsi. VII. AD.IOURNMIRN E Thede being not furtharl bwsinassl Chair Tieirr ay adj'caurb ad the ineetina at 8:115 p. m. Ruspecatfully submitlled, ]Iris Tte:inean Adm:1r strialive Support U du Uninul ea IDa c emt e r 3, 2007.doc Cit} cfLake Oswegc Dcive]cpmemlRkiviewCommission PagIci4 c f 4 Minuiles of Deccimbera, 2CCI7