HomeMy WebLinkAboutApproved Minutes - 2004-06-21 (03)•
•
•
City of Lake Oswego
Development Review Commission Minutes
June 21, 2004
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair William J. Tierney called the June 21, 2004, meeting ofthe Development Review
Commission to order at 7:00PM in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 380 A
Avenue, Lake Oswego, Oregon.
II. ROLL CALL
III.
Commissioners present were William J. Tierney, Sheila Ostly, Krystyiia Stadnik,
Hallidl~.Y Meisburger were present. Nan Bi!)kley, and Andrew Hill were excused.
I
Staff present were Ha.Iilid Pishvaie, Development Review Manager; Elizabeth Jl;lcob,
Associate Planner; Evan Boone, Assistant City Attorney; and Janice Bader,
Administrative Support III.
MINUTES
Ms. Ostly moved to approve the Minutes o(Apri/19, 2004. Mr. Tierney seconded
the motion and it passed with Commissioners Ostly, and Tierney voting yes.
Commissioners Stadnik and Meisburger abstained frorn the vote. Commissioners
Binkley and Hill were not present. There were no votes against.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING
LU 04-0026, a request by Oswego Lake Country Club for approval of a minor
modification of~ Co11ditlonal Use Permit, and a Development Review Permit to
demolish the existing 8,577 square-foot two-building complex for the P~o-shop and
cart/club storage to construct two new buildings with a total of 11,454 square feet to
accommodate the same uses. Six trees are proposed for removal.
The property is located at: Located at 20 Iron Mountain Blvd., Tax Lots 100 & 160 of
Tax Map 21E 4 and Tax Lot 170 of Tax Map 21E 9AA. Staff coordinator is Elizabeth
Jacob, Associate Planner
City of Lake Oswego Development Revi~w Col@1jssion
MiJ;t~tes of Jun~ 21, 2004
Page 1 of3
•
•
. '
•
Chair Tierney opened the public hearing and explained the applicable procedures and
time limits. He asked the Commissioners to report any ex parte contacts (including site
visits), biases and conflicts of interest, and to identify any knoWn present or anticipated
future business relationships with the project or the applicant. All of the
Commissioners present reported they were familiar with the site and none of them
reported a conflict of interest. No one present challenged any commissioner's right to
hear the application.
Ms. Jacob reviewed her staff report. She noted that the proposal would not have any
negative impa-cts to neighborhing properties, meets all the development standards and
should be approved.
Applicant
Dick Aanderud & Steve Lapp , Waterleaf Architecture, 621 SW Morrison, Suite 125,
Portland, OR 97205
Dick Aaildelild reviewed the proposed plan for the Commission. He noted they're
moving the club house back up the site, creatimg a tum atotitld and using the
topography of the site. He noted there are six trees that will be replaced on the site.
They will be enlarging the putting green so it becomes the focus as you approach the
site when you drive into the site.
Steve Lapp reviewed the buildings floor plans and where various parts of the club ate
located. He noted that the second story will be accessed through a stairway or it is on
grade near the first tee area. He reviewed the roof line with dormers and the use of
fiatutallight that they will provide for various areas. He explained that they wanted to
emulate the English arts & craft style of existing building.
Mr. Lapp continl;led that the current pro shop doesn't have much landscaping around it,
and they will be planting some additional trees and understory with planting around the
terrace to enhance the building.
Ms. Ostly asked if they brought co lot boards or material boards.
Mr. Lapp replied they did have some samples of the existing colors and they'll be
matching the colo9rs of the existing club house.
Mr. Meisbutget asked what are the paving materials?
Mr. Aanderud repiied they're concrete paving materials, and Mr. Lapp indicated there is
some asphalt as well .
Ms. Stadnik asked about tree #10 on the west side of the building.
City of Lake Oswego Development Review Commission
Minutes of June 21, 2004
Page 2 of3
•
•
•
Mr. Aanderud replied that they will bridge over roots with concrete rather than asphalt
to minimize a,ny damage to the roots.
Proponents
None.
Opponents.
None.
Neither for nor Against
None.
Rebuttal
None.
No one requested that the record be held open for submission of additional written
evidence of testimony. The applicants waived their right to additional time in which to
submit a final written argument. Chair Tierney then closed the public hearing and
opened deliberations.
Deliberations
It was the consensus of the Commission that every effort has been made to make this
building blend into the site.
Ms. Ostly moved to app~ove LU 04-0026 as presented. Ms. Stadnik seconded the
motion and it passed with Mr. Tierney, Ms. Ostly, Ms. Stadnik and Mr. Meisburget
voting yes. Mr. Hill and Ms. Binkley were not present. There were no votes against
VI. GENERAL PLANNING & OTHER BUSINESS
None.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjoutned at 7:30PM.
Respectfully submitted,
-~~
anice Bader
dministrative Support III
L:\drc\minutes\06-21-04
City of Lake Oswego Development Review Commission
Minutes of June 21,2004
Page3 of3