Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - 2002-03-19 AMCity Councilors Judie Hammerstad, Mayor Ellie McPeak, Council President Jack Hoffman Karl Rohde Bill Schoen Gay Graham John Turchi CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MORNING MEETING Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:30 a.m. Council Chambers City Hall 380 A Avenue AGENDA Also published on the internet at: ci.oswego.or.us Contact: Robyn Christie, City Recorder E -Mail: public_affairs@ci.oswego.or.us Phone: (503)675-3984 This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location. For any special accommodations, please contact Public Affairs, (503) 635-0236, 48 hours before the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. REVIEW EVENING AGENDA 4. REVIEW FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 5. OTHER BUSINESS 5.1 Historic Resources Advisory Board Recommendation for Ilam Propert).....................I 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION If needed, pursuant to ORS 192.660(1) 7. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT City Council Morning Meeting March 19, 2002 Page 1 CITY COUNCIL / LORA TENTATIVE SCHEDULE ROLLING UPDATE DATE MORNING EVENING MEETINGS MEETINGS — 7:30 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, No Meeting March 26 Monday, Study Session 14-6 p.m) Main Fire Station April I . Comprehensive Plan: UGB Amendment LORA Meeting (following Council Meeting) • Presentation of Block 138 plans • Sale of LORA bonds Tuesday, Agenda Review Regular Session April 2 Future Agenda Schedule 5th Street and A Avenue Crossing • Vacating surplus right of way on Bryant Road (Res. 02-20) • Vacating surplus right of way on West Sunset Drive at Boones Ferry Road (Res. 02-21) Public Hearings Tem ora Si n Code Monday, kdy Session (4-6 p.m.) Courtroom -tentative April 8 • Board and Commission Discussion • TAB recommendation for the Carman/Meadows intersection Tuesday, Special Meeting - televised April 9 • Infill Task Force Report Field Usage Fees Monday, Budget Committee Meeting 6 p. in. Main Fire Station Anil 15 Tuesday, Agenda Review Regular Session April 16 Future Agenda Schedule . Presentation on George Rogers Park Master Plan Public Hearings Monday, Budget Committee Meeting 6 p.m. Main Fire Station April 22 Tuesday, Special Meeting April 23 Monday, Budget Committee Meeting 6 p.m. Main Fire Station April 29 Tuesday, No meeting scheduled April 30 Monday, Budget Cornntittee Meeting 6 p.m. Main Fire Station May 6 Tuesday, PSU Event - Council Meeting Cancelled May 7 Tuesday, Special Meeting May 14 Lakefront Zoning District Tuesday, Agenda Review Regular Session May 21 Future Agenda Schedule • Public Hearings BOLD ITEMS — New issues added to schedule Items known as of 3/13/02 N:\Ageiidas\Ageildafortiis\Scliedule.doc CITY COUNCIL / LORA TENTATIVE SCHEDULE ROLLING UPDATE DATE MORNING MEETINGS — 7:30 a.m. EVENING MEETINGS — 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, No meeting scheduled May 28 Tuesday, Agenda Review Regular Session June 5 Future Agenda Schedule • Supplemental Budget Resolution • State Revenue Sharing Resolution Public Hearings • State Revenue Sharing Uses • 2002-03 Budget Hearing AWAITING MEETING DATE NO SPECIFIC DATE AT THIS TIME STATUS • Joint Meeting with School Board....................................Quarterly • Council goal update......................................................... • Water Policies.................................................................Spring 2002 • Public Facilities..............................................................After March 15 • Willamette River Greenway Text Amendment ..............No specific date at this time • Infill Task Force.............................................................No specific date at this time • Sedoruk/Prince Zoning Map Amendments ....................No specific date at this time • Floodplain Standards (LU 00-0024)...............................No specific date at this time FUTURE STUDY SESSIONS • Affordable Housing ........................................................June 11, 2002 • East-West Shuttle...........................................................July 9, 2002 • Youth Activities..............................................................August 5, 2002 • Natural Resources...........................................................September 10, 2002 • Sustainability (pUblle forum) ..........................................November 12, 2002 BOLI) ITEMS — New issues added to schedule Items known as of 3/13/02 N: agendas\Agendaforms\Schedule.doe CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 5.1 AM o3/i9/o2 AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY MEETING DATE: March 19, 2002 SUBJECT: Historic Resources Advisory Board Recommendation for the Hart Property (16540 Pacific Highway) RECOMMENDED MOTION: This recommendation is provided pursuant to City Council request. EST. FISCAL IMPACT: i STAFF COST: BUDGETED: Y N _ I FUNDING SOURCE ATTACHMENTS: • March 13, 2002 Letter from the HRAB Chair • March 13, 2002 HRAB Recommendation Report 1) Site Map 2) City's Cultural Resource Inventory Form 3) Hartland Builder Estimate 4) Ken Hood Construction Estimate 5) Emmert International Relocation Estimate 6) Aurora Mills Salvage Estimate 7) Architectural Recovery Estimate 8) Alfred Staehli Assessment 9) Abutting Neighbors Letter 10) Additional Photographs 11) Preservation Easement Brochure DEPT. DIRECTOR ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 311141- C Z, Signoff/d a Signoff/date LA11rab\Sid's I IRAIAHart-Trueblood HouseW.'ouncilCoverlIart Recommendation.doc PUBLISHED NOTICES (Date): Ordinance No. Previous Council consideration: _ U It ClMANAGER Ae- ., 3// y /r2- Signoff/date .. 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT March 13, 2002 The Honorable Judie Hammerstad City of Lake Oswego City Council City Hall 380 "A" Avenue Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Dear Mayor Hammerstad and Members of the City Council: The attached packet contains materials in support of retaining the Trueblood House, 16540 SW Pacific Highway. Lake Oswego, as a viable addition to the City's Landmark Designation List (LDL). This structure has ample characteristics to merit its inclusion and subsequent restoration. Since 1990 when the Historic Resources Commission was formed, Lake Oswego has lost too many of its fine old homes. The original LDL of 93 properties has been reduced to 69. Of the 24 homes or commercial buildings which have been removed from the List, seven have been demolished or are slated for demolition. If such destruction continues at this pace, our distinctive historic homes and heritage will simply disappear in the not -too -distant future. We cannot bear to see the City become a partner in this destruction. Here is a chance to reverse that trend; the Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) will add the Trueblood House to its LDL in addition to facilitating National Register of Historic Places status. A number of options have been discussed as means to return the Trueblood House to a beautiful, beloved and distinctive historic home. The option chosen by the HRAB is discussed in the enclosed material. The City has invested in art, downtown renovation, open space and many other attributes that help make our City beautiful. The missing element has always been historic preservation. As City -owned property, this is a golden opportunity for the City Council to demonstrate to the citizens of Lake Oswego its commitment to historic preservation. If the City is unwilling to allow a historic home it owns to have another chance, then how, as a Board, are we to influence private citizens to do the same? The HRAB believes that this matter is of the highest importance, and in fact is the most important item ever brought before us. Here is a stewardship opportunity to present public service at its best, and future generations will thank you for it! Sincerely, - ?eannic McGuire, Chair Historic Resources Advisory Board Enc). FIRAB recommendation with attachments C: Douglas J. Schmitz, City Manager Bob Kincaid, Chief of Staff -Special Projects 380 A Avenue • Post Office Box 369 • Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 Planning Division: (5013) 635-0290 • Building 1)r, pion: (503) 635-0390 • Engint- i ing Division: (503) 635-0270 9 FAX (50.1) 635-0269 Historic Resources Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Douglas J. Schmitz, City Manager Bob Kincaid, Chief of Staff for Special Projects From: Jeannie McGuire, Historic Resources Advisory Board Chair Subject: Recommendation for the Hart Property Date: March 13, 2002 Backeround The City Council has requested the Historic Resources Advisory Board's (HRAB) recommendation on what to do with the house. The Trueblood house (historic name), also known as the Hart property (Attachment 1), was purchased by the City in May 2001. The remainder of the report will refer to the "Trueblood House" if referencing the house and the "Hart property" if referencing the house and the property. The Hart property (approximately 4.5 acres) was purchased for $750,000 with finds from open space bonds and consists of three tax lots: 500, 600 and 700. The Trueblood House sits on tax lot 600 (120 feet by 120 feet, 22,500 sq. ft.), which sits in the middle of the property. The Hart property is zoned R-15, which requires 15,000 sq. ft. per lot. The City purchased the property for the purposes of using it as open space. As open space, the uses are very limited, but could include pathways and benches. In addition, the deed restriction reads as follows: "With the exception of any use of the current structure or any replacement structures erected in approximately the same location, Buyer's use of the property shall be restricted to use as public open space." In January 2002, the Council toured the Hart property to see the open space grounds and to evaluate the condition of the Trueblood House. After the tour, there were still questions and concerns regarding the future disposition of the house. The Council decided to request the opinion of the Board in order to help them facilitate an answer as to what should be done with the house in light of all of the circumstances, especially regarding historic value. According to the City's inventory (Attachment 2) of the house done in 1989, the Trueblood House was constructed circa 1917 and is an example of the colonial revival style of architecture. The structure originally served as the carriage house for a large Victorian residence overlooking the river. The Victorian residence is no longer there. The Hart property is a long and narrow lot that stretches from Highway 43 to the right-of-way along the Willamette River. The house is not on the City's Landmark Designation List (LDL). It was at one time considered with the other 132-166 properties (depending on what list you refer to), but was never officially placed on the City's LDL. According to the Cultural Resource Evaluation that was done in 1989 by the consultants, HRAB Recommendation for the Trueblood House Page lr February 22, 2002 J the house was not considered because it scored low in historical association, medium in architectural relevance and was not rated in the environmental/contextual field. This is not to infer that it does not have any historical value or relevance. The intent of the 1989 assessment was to take a more refined look at all of the potential historical properties in the City and make a final recommendation for the LDL. Discussion At the February 13, 2002, HRAB meeting, the Board discussed several options for the Trueblood I -louse. City staff and two neighbors also attended this meeting and participated in the discussions. Several options that the Board was opposed to included demolition, salvaging materials or moving the house. Although the house is in current disrepair, the house maintains many of its original architectural details and historic charm and does not warrant demolition or salvaging. Attachments 4, 5, 6 and 7 are estimates for demolition, salvaging or relocating the house. Attachment 3 is an estimate to restore the house. The Board solicited the opinion of Alfred Staehli, an architectural conservator from the Historic Preservation League of Oregon, to give his own independent assessment (Attachment 8) of the Trueblood House. His report reaffirms the Board's opinion that the house is of historical significance and all attempts should be made to preserve it. In addition, a petition signed by 16 neighbors' provides support for the Board's recommendation (Attachment 9). Attachment 10 is included to illustrate the historic past that the Trueblood family had with this house. Recommendation The Board would like to recommend the following action to the City Council for the Trueblood House: Sell or lease the Trueblood House to a private owner. The recommended price should not exceed the cost of establishing the preservation easement and associated legal fees. Tile City could either sell the house with a portion of the land that has been created from a partition process or a lot -line adjustment OR sell the house only and not the land. The private property owner would agree to: A) commit through contract to the restoration and preservation of the house and immediate landscaping. Restoration shall include, but is not limited to, stabilizing the exterior of the house within three years of purchase or lease; B) apply certain easements to facilitate the open space use, and deed restrictions regarding historic preservation of the house. (The Board would investigate what restrictions would be appropriate to apply through a Preservation Easement, Attachment 11); and C) apply to place the property on the City's LDL and the National Register of Historic Places. The selection of the purchaser would include an open application period with a date certain to close and be based on a selection process administered by the HRAB. (The specifics of the selection criteria and process would need to be developed if Council accepts this recommendation.) This represents all eight properties which exist on Glenmorrie Terrace. 11RAB Recommendation for the Trueblood House February 22, 2002 Page 2 Attachments 1) Site and Tax Assessor's Map 2) City of Lake Oswego Cultural Resources Inventory Field Form for Trueblood House 3) Hartland Builders Estimate for Restoration 4) Ken Hood Construction Estimate for Demolition 5) Emmert International Letter for Relocation of the House 6) Aurora Mills Architectural Salvage Estimate for Salvaging Materials 7) Architectural Recovery, Inc. Estimate for Demolition and Salvaging Materials 8) Alfred Staehli Assessment 9) Letter from Abutting Neighbors 10) Additional Photographs 11) Preservation Easement Brochure from the Historic Preservation League of Oregon HRAB Reconunendation for the Trueblood House February 22, 2002 Page 3 2 . r , , U / I , \ 16540 Pacific Highway I aG0 Trueblood House (Hart Property) '2.1 E11 CC Tax Lot 500, 600 (house), 700 N 'Purchased with Open Space Funds , 2 -foot contours y;•232 1 -' jj� I L • I Ito r (. ' 2 5 N ?33 400 i14J s''F //1. :! x1118 o i'`� 9 u` " e^fs/ /, .r✓+,+ �w• �rp°I 3eoU 11 � L, �O• ,, 226 Nr@URNHAM RD. 2275 ily Nf229 I, 4� f.''' i,V\� ,,.ea � i 3flO1 "r' -•S S8S6 `1, 1886 �11 ,100 '� !f. - — 1- -ai '-.nom,-:;W !U ¢a. sr•s.. \ 1 CUMMOR AREA \ �.;.. 224 2 5 a w ,a aigrc 1 3 / L.1Ir0 ✓ ct o 204 '03 et'. �� 223 :S rif1FL`► , Tnncr .�„ o neo ; iaAM�ry222r O 1• +Yr �10y0 208 i • RE62uFn )q9v r \ �e 220 y° Islo °8209t _ 1' '1 9 M a 26 Y Aq A";`.• ,t ..t✓Y'. 211 X210 16 \, ��.. `,tin•✓rve' . t✓ 18110 b110180 1 4700 02 17 24 29 t y. '?16 \T. �9�<-�.'� ���,^,�1�• ^� �� fr 1 ,�' 'tr�� u 212 �f..a ✓t.t n ^: i1441 �L`\ 2 vInto 1 ^5 . '�"."�, ' 2 V 5 `Lei w rr ! ° \¢(:) v - I •may.. Yn•'A Ao. p py n , i - f� 10159 i a'/ e % •'..,y,•� 7% -ire+/ �r X214 20 (1 213 z 18100 ;. .N �!% r- "s\. ^ ` •`` r�'E fr 't� Lb ti a• q3� ' 1361 t u ''r -1, 2 i 0 ' , r. fi' �," �,.vr • i� 'C- (' 44 19 TRACT °A" '^• 2 - 0\e5 c "_\ ,% . rr 4"' �. \ !e r , i'r, i? ' N'�AegA00 ✓(^vat • /d OAL f 1 \ ,' ,� i -0 '� ; ,� • %rbb f•r•+ dt19b . •• h. t Fj / r , •" /' e! � Moa �, `�. t t Y J� . 6 �� 1 v� V � r g• l.;t eea �� _:. , ar >b�. ~.,u �:� \ f Qu, ti � '\ y 1 ofk lei• ; 1•- � �� y a �J.l Z Va 6 rf y '\v .�j' <Y �.,•%'�,�_n ••L • • '? 1t UO 1.1 e`' V o G T• 0 ° ��° •". `M''i�i ;/ \; / '1 ,r (.J°.\4i 1�•1� 1,110 - ,�� �� R� ��'' i� •y` K� 11,^(o`a, e 16( ►. ,f+ �• 1 .CI, � � b f t� I a �i". ��`\� :��`;,a�° �; •t✓ ? ?."1 3600 +� *t.•r z Cn zo g f `S1rta .. \Oj e� 'S " ?• !�O a _' `1 -� e•se1 d31 Y L +\" t. ,e. rN Q ; s, J t^ ,, �\e� •tJ► ,-„,'',a;-` � LSA Z Cod' �RY S4% 1 - 'j'•..`'�- r �� �,-Seise er ,r niie�, N -A— Vis- er.. ;� .P �re /// v ` \A/ �:.r arr,c•, y..•.a.. C i� ��1� f , r1 ��� r•^() / n.r• �`3_.•.-`-P- . o . a�✓� t �� fo .=f `�' /\L, a. vs 11= e..fr 5 •° I t i �y� ^Ld�ai •o .,��,h ...r.•./,..r �>(1 f.'��,C.f') /`f�\.,\�J �' ' �"" 2 � � w.. :'.ea ... Q ( 26 � ►nrd _„Yh' ..r . `S`, �E e ✓ "e � , ” O',- 00 h2100 �''; er �♦ }n r!a� t�!) 6 .. ,t19S r�'.ib'/ [ 1 t,l 0 .'it Yom.!/ ^, ,•rte<. td Od D �, • _`r•':.lc �/ t7-�r/'f � Y l �� '�•'� �� �' r_ y 'y na •..r. 1L ` Y �1t y `�lU , yt, n; asT 4• a'Ot9`• 1�0P r' ( ���I ' S •' r' Z •.��.m y c • � � r,w _. , , F, r1� .> seta `� "1 ° �r t ,. \\i � � Y - ��Tr• 8 12200 :� i1 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY FIELD FORM 1988-1989 HIST. NAME: Trueblood House DATE OF CONSTRUCTION: c. 1917 COMMON NAME: Trueblood House ORIGINAL USE: Carriage House ADDRESS: 16540 Pacific Highway OWNER: Hart, Edward B. and Joan D., PRESENT USE: Residence ARCH./BLDR.: Owen, Samuel F. (builder) T R S: 2S lE 11CC TAX LOT: 600 PLAN TYPE/SHAPE: Asymmetrical NO. OF STORIES: 2 FOUNDATION MATERIAL: Concrete BASEMENT: Yes ROOF FORM & MATERIALS: WALL CONSTRUCTION: Wood STRUCTURAL FRAME: Stud PRIMARY WINDOW TYPE: Six -over -one and sash w architrave molding EXTERIOR SURFACING MATERIALS: Shiplap siding w/corner boards, watertable DECORATIVE FEATURES: None STYLE: Colonial Revival RESOURCE TYPE: Building THEME: Architecture ADDI'T'ION: Glenmorrie Park BLOCK: LOT: 24 UAD: Lake Oswego LOT SIZE: ZONE: R-15 six -over -six double hung and tongue -and -groove OTHER: Endwal.l brick chimney CONDITION: Good _EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS/ADDITIONS: Porch enclosed, s. elevation, (n.d.) NOTEWORTHY LANDSCAPE FEATURES: Mature landscape materials including cedar, rhododendrons and other ornamental plantings ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES: Two single car garages w/gambrel parapet and gabled roofs, southwest corner of house SETTING: Located on narrow lot on west side of Glenmorrie Terrace, 1.0 block south of Highway 43, recently constructed subdivision adjacent to house NOTES: RECORDER(S): Koler/Morrison DATE: January 1989 SHPO #: 380 FIELD #: ATTACHMENT 2- fir AIN" • :ham STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Address: 16540 Pacific Highway Historic Name: Trueblood, Harrison, House This 1917 Colonial Revival style dwelling originally served as the carriage house for a large Victorian residence overlooking the river. Samuel F. Owen, a lumberman, converted the carriage house to a residence when 11is daughter Angie announced her engagement to Harrison Trueblood, who worked as an insurance broker for the Insurance Company of Oregon. According to Clara Owen, Angie's sister, the young couple also received a half acre of land as a wedding gift from her father. They lived in a tent while waiting for the carriage house to be finished. The Owen family was the first to build in Glenmorrie after Fred Morey divided and began to sell portions of his father's estate in 1910. Angie Trueblood was active in the Lake Oswego Women's Club, the Christ Episcopal Church, the American Legion Auxiliary and the Garden Club. Except for six years following World War I, the Owens lived in this house from 1917 until recently when Mrs. Owen sold the house and moved to California. The Glenmorrie area was first developed by Parker F. Morey who created a huge "country gentleman's" estate, complete with roads, orchards, elaborate gardens, electric lights and its own dock on the Willamette River. Morey's son Fred organized the Glenmorrie Company shortly after his father's death with F. T. Griffith as president_, for the purpose of breaking up the property for sale. The Trueblood house is important as a good example of the Colonial Revival style. Its most distinctive element is the intersecting gambrel roof. While it is not known how much of the carriage house was retained, it is possible that the shape was not altered in the conversion. Horizontal drop siding, such as the type seen on the Trueblood house was often used on turn -of - the -century houses and outbuildings. Colonial Revival houses -- typically constructed in the 20s or 30s --were clad in lap siding. The multi -light double -hung sash windows and the wide end -wall chimney are common early 20th century Colonial Revival features. The house has been modified on the south elevation where a porch has been enclosed and a garage has been attached. 11 Bibliography: Clackamas County Cultural Resource Inventory, Department of Transportation and Development, 1984. Clackamas County Directory, 1947-48. Lake Oswego Review, obit., 1967. Owen, Clara, and Yates, Herbert, Unrecorded Interviews with T. Buettner, 10/27/88. Ticor Title Company, Oregon City, OR. Yates, Herbert, Recorded Interview for "In Their Own words," oral history project for L.O. Library, 1974. 14 Building Evaluation for City of Lake Oswego Glenmorrie Terrace and Highway 43 Site visit on November 9, 2001. Exterior and Site Observations. The site is extremely overgrown with vegetation. Some vegetation has been removed around the rear and side of the house. The driveways are overgrown and covered with leaves, debris, and are only distinguishable from the rest of the site by the lack of trees along its path. The foundation around the rear of the garage has sunk about six inches causing damage to that end of the structure. The garage is a hazard and should be demolished. The roof has rotted and collapsed in one corner. The exterior retaining walls are leaning and cracked beyond repair. Walks and patios are covered with debris and small plants rendering them useless. There is evidence of dry rot on the left side of the house where the old porch has been framed in to make a bedroom and a bath. The exterior paint is peeling and chipped over the entire outside of the house. It would have to be entirely removed to bring it up to standard. It is unconfirmed but assumed that the paint on the outside and inside of the house is lead based paint and would require special mitigation procedures. Interior Observations: Although the main floor seems solid, inspection underneath shows that the joists and supporting beams are undersized and over spanned. Additional support would be required to carry the weight of the house. Below the old porch, the joists have rotted away at the ends and require removal and replacement. The floor in one of the baths might have asbestos tile flooring. There is water sitting on the kitchen floor, there is evidence of roof leaks in many places, most windows are swollen and there is mold and mildew throughout the house. The fireplace flue is clogged. ATTACHMENT 315 Major .Systems: Phtmbini : Several areas are in severe disrepair and leaking. All toilets have dry rot in the floors supporting them. Leaks are evident throughout the house. All the plumbing fixtures are outdated and it would be difficult finding parts for repairing. They all should be replaced. Water pipes are galvanized and should all be replaced. H in : The heating system is an oil burner furnace. The ductwork has been sealed at the joints with asbestos tape. The asbestos will have to be removed by a certified company. There is smoke residue around most of the heat registers indicating that the furnace is way past due for service and probably unserviceable. The condition of the oil tank is unknown. It will need an inspection and decertification by a licensed company. Electrical: There is knob and tube wiring in the basement. This is extremely hazardous. The electrical service is outdated and the receptacles are not grounded requiring total replacement. In general, the house would need new doors, windows, carpets, vinyl flooring, hardwood flooring, cabinets and light fixtures. Most of the plaster would have to be removed to facilitate new plumbing, heating and wiring and to repair loose and fallen pieces. The stair handrails and guardrails do not meet current code and would have to be upgraded. Stairwell headroom clearances are low and would have to be reframed. 16 ('onclusion Maybe ten years or so ago this house could have been salvageable. Due to the lack of care, upkeep and overall neglect of normal maintenance, this house has been pushed past the state of repair. The costs to abate and mitigate any asbestos found in the house along with the decommissioning of the oil tank and the replacement of all the major systems would drive the price of the project past any break even point, prohibiting any fair return on money invested. I estimate the cost to refurbish and rebuild this house would far exceed $300,000.00. With that in mind, the house should be demolished. If I can be of any further service, please do not hesitate to call. David Adelhart Hartland Builders 19345 Towercrest Drive Oregon City, OR 97045 503-504-9005 CCB # 118913 Licensed and Insured 1r 12-06-2001 09:41AM KEN HOOD CONSTRUCTION 503 6S4 5565 P.01 Ken Hood Construction Co. EXCAVA►TM • SEWER WMK CCBO"917 167 0 Sy E. VINEYARD AVE • MA.WAi,'gU OR 9'7267 • FHONE (503) 654-8584 FAX (503) 654-5565 December 6, 2pp1 City of Lake Oswego FAX #: (503)635-0269 Maintenance Services Department 380 "A" Avenue P.O. Box 369 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 ATTN: Rachael Fisher RE: Proposal for Demolition of two-story, wood frame single family dwelling with concrete basement @ 16540 Pacific Highway (Glenmorrie Terrace). 1.) Demolition / Haul -off/ Disposal of wooden $9,200.00 structure 2.) Compacted granular backfill of removed basement 4,350.00 250 cy X $17.40 cy 3.) Erosion control Silt Fence 100LF X $3.00 LF 300.00 PROPOSAL TOTAL $ 13,850.00 EXCLUSIONS: Permits, Bonds, Compaction Testing, Hazardous Material Removal. If there are any questions concerning this proposal, please contact me. Sincerely, 0� V Louis M. Bolinger Al"['A(I IM PAT 4 TOTAL P.01 EMMERT INTERNATIONAL Division of Emmert Industrial Corporation 11811 SE Hwy 212 — Clackamas, Oregon 97015 Phone(503)655-7191 Fax(503)655-3933 February 13, 2002 Rachael Fisher Facilities Manager City of Lake Oswego 380 A Avenue Post Office Box 369 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Dear Rachael Fisher: —F71 rrt 21 i (li n an w Rf i. V �� L ()Opt, of PWitunU 061/oilawnent Thank you for the opportunity to look at the possibility of removing the Rose Nouse located on Glen Morie Terrace in Lake Oswego. After visiting the site and looking at the surrounding area including the access road, it would be extremely difficult to remove the house from the premises. In order to remove the house from its existing 1ccation it would require an enormous amount of tree cutting, both on private property as well as the future park site. Due to the tight conditions, Emmert International would not be interested in removing the home. We would like to propose another solution. Emmert International would be willing to provide a bid to move the home on sight. By placing the home on one end of the open space you could maximize your area for the park and still maintain the h,storical structure, We would also be willing to provide a bid for demolition of the basement, removal of all material, and fill and compact the hole back to grade. If you have any other questions or the city would like to pursue these other options, please contact me anytime. Best regards, Tom Crino Emmert International Project Manager 503-655-7191 office tcrino@emmertintl.com ATTACHMENT 5 r- — �'srt. of flan �_ �- _ ' ` . •.., Aurora Mills Architectural Salvage 'Feb. 13, 2002 Aurora Mills arehitecnnl salvage agrees to pay 51250.00 for all salvage rights rt, the property a1 15540 Pacific hwy, Lake Oswego. rull dismantling and demolition services can he arranged. 14971 l 1: kst Street .aurora, Oregon SALVAGE AND DISMANTLING EXPERTS. Mike Byrnes • Matt Hurley • Jason Shults Jasoa Shults Aurum NEI Is Phanc; (503)078-608:1 FAX: (1103)2.14.1802 CC8 #135790 ATTACHMENT 6 Architectural Recovery, Inc. PROPOSAL 35 N. Greeley ._.__.�.__.. Portland, OA 97217 503-240-2684 "l r`1°E� 1 O C Fax 603-247-7636 L----- ---- PROOPOSAL PRESENTED TO: /'`T�QC�t Cie••• � �t;' .�- i `� . r 1`- L�i,�r• < �i'r'�.:( rim, C5 I LOCATION OF JOB I CONTACT vrCn+E A- . I ARC' -T='- _� G • � �-I�--IC=��.Sc_-_ -irais _ f7-- -d-f car `7Ce /`Gam' f • C [ � (n 4-_� n ._.__.�.__.. -•�+9`-+cc.�.._.L�t-G��'�( r 1 +- _. ,� � G:l. .� < /�,t. �C• r�'r;. S .f"�C `-C_-� �c' 7�_ fes...,- H. ' � I/ .. _ r., �_ � _O �• o�14il—Lf=-.c,r � �-_—����–u= V J i • far � {,.L•� ' S 111-' H J.1 � 1 [ < r' � C / J 7 m''Vf — l 7 J �i�w ✓c CJUS G' . or mob 1. !e QUprGnteetl to b0 as apeC Rod ebovl. wiN all work :o be complaletl m ai proloss,anat mm ,rt', according to erandard practicos. Any altoration Ot devlatlo i from Rre above spacRcatluna which Dring about autlieona! coals wpl only be done upon written order All greonlgnls aro conlingom upo Wakes. from Or tlerays beyond our control. Owner of property i3 tO cant' Nre, lornatlo, and all other nocossary insuranco Our crnployaas are full ca Juts. by Workrna"0 Compensanao r Conroe W? PROPOK To HEMP Fume MAIVUL AND IN ACCORDANCE Wrrm Ti eov4 �KCMCATioN9, Fo THE Amom Of. S PAYMENT TEAMS; Y r` AUTHOR -ZED SICUYATURE This proposal n1 r '�—' Ln� �' Kc � Cc µ,�, 7 DC m(ttlrnwn Gy us it not lctepted wlthnt The aDbvO SpeCdrealiUh;a. pnCC3, an4 'OMSil�;1A arc 3allelactory and hereby accepted Ynu are nbrCGy Whofn r2e0 to n foo work xe ADOCllloo Pxy" Will be IWO as Wallen 3-- rr Date of Acceptance: Signature, ATTACHMENT 7 l •1+ ..... �tA_ h..,. January 31, 2002 FEB 4LUUL CiTY Ur LAKE CSWEG© Dept. of Planning b Development City Council, City of Lake Oswego Post Office Box 369 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Dear Ms, and Sirs: ALFRED STAEHLI, FAIA ARCHITECT/PLANNER ARCHITECTURAL CONSERVATOR 317 SE 62ND AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97215 (503) 230-0807 FAX - PHONE FIRST Today I made a walk through inspection and condition assessment of the Trueblood House, 16540 SW Pacific Highway, Lake Oswego, accompanied by Mrs. Holwerda of the L.O. Historic Resource Committee, Mr. Sidaro Sin, Associate Planner, and other interested persons from the city. I was provided with copies of the L.O. Cultural Resource Inventory record for the house, planning/plat map, the Building Evaluation by a builder Mr. Adelhart, and the demolition proposal by Mr. Bollinger. As Secretary and Board Member of the Historic Preservation League of Oregon (HPLO) and Chairman of its Project Assistance Committee, I have been requested to comment on the significance of this landmark home and on its condition and possibilities for preservation and reuse. The documentation given by the Oswego Cultural Resources Inventory form for this property seems more than adequate to support this house and its site as a Lake Oswego and Clackamas County historic landmark As a retiring member of the Oregon State Advisory Committee to the State Historic Preservation Officer, the reviewing body for National Register Nominations in Oregon, I am confident that this property is National Register eligible; and I believe that Ms. Niedernhofer and Mr. Hamrick of the SHPO would agree. Remember that the National Register of Historic Places is intended to be a gross inventory of resources which at least minimally meet its standards; and it is not a list of just the rarest and finest landmarks, which list is that of National Historic Landmarks of whicli there are only seven in Oregon. Unless there is much more significance to the Trueblood House than is given in its inventory document, it would be classified as a local landmark or possibly of state significance. This means that the fate of the house as a landmark is primarily up to the L.0. community, the city and maybe county government and the people. At least, the city should consider options for preservation instead of proceeding hastily to demolish the house. The options include: Sell the house to an owner who commits to its restoration and preservation. Find a compatible public use for the house and restore and rehabilitate it for that purpose, retaining ownership. Place a conservation covenant or easement on the house and sell or lease it to a public or private owner. Sell the house but retain ownership of the land, land lease, with right of repurchase in the future, probably along with a conservation covenant or easement. As a last resort, if no beneficial use is found or is agreeable, do appropriate HABS documentation on the house in mitigation of its demolition, with SHPO agreement. There is a state law which requires all levels of State Government to pro -actively inventory and take appropriate conservation measures regarding all historic resources in public ownership. I understand ATTACHMENT 8 �, r tir that SHHPPO is currently drafting administrative niles to enforce this law, and I ur-;;e. you to contact ilio SHPO for more information. I found the Trueblood House to be in pretty good condition considering its recent neglect. It is a very well built house, possibly designed by an architect for the family, and to not present any unusual or difficult restoration and preservation problems. I am sure that you will find considerable interest among the L.O. public to purchase or otherwise be given the opportunity to rehabilitate and restore the house. The house sits on a very desirable site in one of the most attractive of neighborhoods. The house is architecturally distinguished, Dutch Colonial Revival Style, good materials and details on its exterior and interior. The rooms are large and well daylighted. There is a full concrete foundation and cellar. There are acceptable options for restoring or adapting the work rooms of the house, its bathrooms and kitchen. The house has an accessible roof space and the cellar which facilitates all necessary utilities upgrading while preserving the historic lighting fixtures with minimal disturbance of significant interior finishes. There would be acceptable options for reconfiguring some of the interior spaces if necessary for new occupants or adaptive uses. Preservation and restoration attention should be given to the original siding and exterior trim and possibly to the original paint colors for the house. The rain gutters are a unique detail to this house's design and should be respected when replaced, preferably in kind. The correct choice of new rooting and the method of its installation should be considered. The design of the original woodwork and trim, the pattens of the wood doors and the windows, are important qualities of the house. Tile original cabinets and counters in the house are significant and are restorable for less cost than for replacing them, but they might be changed or modified if necessary to make the house liveable for new occupants. The painted plaster on wood lath walls and ceilings are sound and suitable for refinishing. If the paint is stripped from the plaster, not difficult since it is mostly calcimine, the walls could be renewed by skim coating with veneer plaster. The wood floors might be renewed with the use of abrasive pad floor buffer machines, not sanded, and stripped with water base finish removers and wet vacuumed and dried, then given a suitable new finish, not a new floor appearance but a clean, well maintained near new appearance, like a clean rare oriental rug's "abrash." I am sympathetic to Hartland Builders' David Adelhart and his preference for new modern code complying houses in preference to the challenges of restoring a historic home. The two types of building require entirely different skills and objectives. The attached garage is a problem. I was unable to go into it and inspect it closely. As an attached part of the landmark house, my assessment is that it is of lesser historical importance and might be rebuilt and rehabilitated if needed or it can be demolished and replaced, either in kind in the same location or detached and located in another place on the site. However, I have had poorer structures restored and rebuilt quite readily when their preservation was the objective. It is a large and potentially very usefi►1 space. The flat roof between parapets, with the funny hipped near roof section, might be beneficially replaced with a hipped or gable roof for easier maintenance. Tile outside wall, north, probably needs to be rebuilt because of its settlement and probably inadequate footings. 2 Whatever the condition of the garage, the house's structure is sound except for the SW corner where the plate, sill, and ends of floor joists are clearly rotted and require rebuilding, not a difficult job in this location. The outside grade all around the house needs inspection and possibly correction, maybe with perimeter drainage added, to protect all framing from similar moisture damage, but I didn't see any other major problems with wood rot in this brief visit. There is no questioning of the observation that all grounds and ground improvements need replacement or maintenance, paving, walls, and plantings. Exterior finish and painting restoration is a normal procedure on all old buildings. I have been having very good results with a simple pressure washing supplemented with brush.scrubbing, rinsing, and a light scraping or hand wire brushing of the surfaces followed by two coats of exterior heavy pigmented oil house stain on siding and oil base primer and two coats of semi -gloss enamel on trim. By all means, do not use a water base acrylic primer or stain/paint on old weathered woodwork with old paint present. Lead paint, if present, is not a significant problem; collect any residue removed from the woodwork, bag it, and dispose of it in the normal garbage, according to my instructions from EPA. It is generally not desirable or necessary to remove all exterior paint to bare wood, although sometimes recommended. All floors felt very sound and solid as our group moved through the house, including jumping on them. It might be good practice to have the framing assessed by a structural engineer or architect, but at most, a few added joists or abeam and post or two might be recommended. It is very unlikely than any additional framing of the house would be required unless major alterations were being planned. I would recommend the addition of seismic hold-down ties, easily retrofitted in the cellar, if the plates do not have appropriate anchor bolts into the foundation walls. Likewise, ties should be added to the chimney to connect to the framing of the house. I strongly recommend against the replacement of the existing wood windows. They can be reconditioned and improved with weatherstripping as needed at much less cost than for their replacement with inferior new window systems regardless of brand, For additional energy conservation, traditional wood frame storm sash can be fitted in the existing frames with a very good cost -benefit shown. The original windows look poor now and are either swollen by moisture or paint stuck shut, but they are prime wood windows, good materials and well made, and in good condition, so it appears, except for the current dirt and water stains. Resilient flooring, the and sheet material, is easily removed and disposed of even if containing asbestos so long as the appropriate personal protection and abatement procedures are followed. There are many options for appropriate finishes in the small areas where these materials are located. There were signs of roof and other water leaks in the past, ceiling, floor, and wall finish stains; but there were no active leaks evident on this day when it was raining heavily outside; however, the roof does appear to need replacement and all gutters at least needed cleaning and other maintenance. Probably the fireplace and furnace flues in the chimney do need cleaning and possibly relining. I was N �� unable to see up them or whether or not the dampers were open or closed. The furnace was operating and its flue apparently was satisfactory. I am sure that any occupant of the house would want all utilities systems rehabilitated and modernized. All rooms need additional code complying utility outlets and some rewiring of the lighting, Knob and tube wiring, in a historic house, is still code complying except for grounding of fixtures. K&T wiring was used in new homes up through WW -II and is not all that antique. It is often left in use but limited to original lighting circuits and fused at not over 15 amperes. New wiring should be used for all utility wiring and outlets. The original circuit panel has been replaced by a circuit breaker panel which might remain as an original lighting branch panel; but the house should have a new modern, probably 200 amp., load center panel with a master breaker disconnect. As a landmark, the house is governed by the historic building provisions of the building code and is eligible for exemptions from strict compliance where there is no or little public safety hazard ill elements such as doors, stairs, handrails, and many other areas, subject to the judgement of the building officials—and ultimately the State Building Code Board and the SHPO. Ideally, substantial building code compliance is beneficial to historic preservation. No one wants anyone to be injured in a historic building any more than any other building, and no one wants to lose a landmark to fire or other disasters from which the codes are designed to protect them. Most occupants ofalandmark home appreciate the original materials and finishes and would not want to install carpet or any similar builders' material in them. Some occupants would want to retain the `50s plumbing fixtures and finishes. All the plumbing fixtures are modern enough so that maintenance is not a problem; and, possibly they are of a better quality than is usually found in most new homes, The question about the oil tank and its service lines to the old oil burner furnace (clearly obsolete) is something which should be inspected as soon as possible if an environmental pollution abatement condition is to be avoided. Replacement of the existing tank is probably overdue, In any event, more efficient furnaces are now common. The entire heating system appears to need cleaning. Oregon is too young to have any 200 year old buildings—at least of Euro -American origin. There are a few homes and buildings which are around 150 years old, and thousands about 100 years old. There are millions of homes and buildings which are nearly 100 years old, the Trueblood House and my house among them, Not every one must be preserved, but with good care and maintenance, occasional upgrading when needed, they can last indefinitely. There are wood frame buildings in Europe which are ninny hundreds of years old. Every standing building represents hours of labor and quantities of wood, metal, masonry, and other materials which are in place and do not need to be further extracted from nature or expended in labor and effort. The Trueblood House is worthy of a serious look for its preservation and reuse. It has a significant history. It has sufficient architectural distinction. It is and can remain a good house and home. I want to encourage Lake Oswego to see if there is a way that this landmark house can remain on a suitable portion of the acreage within the just purchased open space. It does not need to be �0 incompatible. The city does not have to remain its steward or to expand its house museum holdings. A new homeowner, a non-profit organization, or a compatible commercial occupant could be the steward subject to whatever conservation requirements that are necessary to protect the public interest in the landmark and the open space. Thank you. Sincerely, Alfred M. Staehli, FAIA Historic Preservation Architect and Architectural Conservator Secretary of HPLO cc: Sidaro Sin, L.O. Com. Dev. SHPO Dave Pinyerd, HPLO Pres. February 12, 2002 Kim Gruder and Historic Resources advisory Board Thank you for meeting with the neighbors of Glenmorrie Terrace on Saturday, February 9 at the greenspace. We are responding to your request for input from the neighborhood to offer an opinion regarding an HR -AB proposal to City Council about the existing structure in lieu of destroying the house at 16540 Pacific Highway. Our neighborhood agrees that: 1) we support pursuit of historic designation 2) we support an occupied residence (preferably by an owner/occupant willing to refurbish to historic guidelines) 3) we do not support a vacant house in the greenspace We further recommend by cope of this letter to Bob Kincaid, that no further action or decision be made on the property pursuing a pathway or other public use until there has been a decision on the use or demolition of the house. Nlanv thanks for your time and information. Sincerely Jav and N- ai , �e Lewis , s, 1704 Paul and Arun Schrager, 1710 Dennis and iza e b th Hartman, 1743 IaWndPam Fr ter, ] 843 -)�Pv 'K. aures a� JoAnn Thomas 18-------�- 56 Ric and Pau a V el, 1874 Brad anGeorge and Barbara Mackin, 1890 cc: Bob Kincaid, City of Lake Oswe John Handv orhood Association ATTACHMENT3,s 9 F -6 -4to CU -Al 'a r J 3 1 l-7 l'. iL .;t A y rt• In X111 W SFr _ pr' � ATTACHMENT 10 Aum _, ^ .� �w �: 1` i�r•�!►1��1"rte All- .♦ _'. f.«. it ' 1� ,'r I1 • ` spy` —.: .0 — I — — APw o" 1, ';x 7 a` Sa�m� T�cteb/c'zx 1 ��y r. ,o. ii49 �rer -Al - - �----- i gr � LJL 6z LAJ p0004852.jpg (1792x1200x24b jpeg) 1. 7',I Er.� uis �' l-kt�i`�c� F.-►�t'j"t� " p0004619.jpg (1792x1200x24b jpeg) 1 1-1 rr%-40"e- '- F, K-+Alc�� f P.Pot t -T--- t oc,� f7L-cwo ✓.- p , e,a ,-rt-t gl DG V F L -k vc v --QA 12."C" . p0004823.jpg (1792x1200x24b jpeg) u" -,t T::, p f-- " vs I-� geg.0ri . A W p0004836.jpg (1192xl200x24b 1peg) V�j•yj-nt to 5. ,.1-� t� r� (W -ti -t IAT-) 4r-1 tr> Cat-er. p0004828.jpg (1792x1200x24b jpeg) 14IT- r pRl�tiI S 1, o 111 l:R1:�1101 t t hi: Main S1rcel 1' 1N 11, 1, 1 h aui 1,114me: :di.f •?1:t VV1:f Well I chruary 25, 2002 Sidaro Sin Lake Oswego City Hall 380 A Avenue Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Dear Sidaro Sin: FEB 2 7 2002 (:11 Vt t. t1;.7f As a representative of an historic building, you are the keeper of an important treasure. Your residential building is a living legacy of Oregon's history and architectural development. However% your building is more than a cultural treasure. It represents a considerable financial investment on your part, and it can also be a financial treasure for you. The Historic Preservation League of Oregon (HPLO) Preservation Easement Program may be able to help you protect your historic property well into the future, and it may also generate short-term financial savings for you. A donation of a preservation easement to the I IPL.O may reduce the amount of property taxes assessed on an historic property and it may yield a sizabl,: ta% deduction for oc-on .: :c.But, fflObt importantly, a preservation easement will protect the historic integrity of the property in perpetuity — guaranteeing that future generations will enjoy the benefits of your investment. Simply stated, an easement is a partial interest or right in a property that results in the restriction of use of that property. Easements can include limitation on land development, on facade alteration, or on structural modification. A preservation easement is written in deed form, filed with the county recorder and will bind successive owners to its terms. Please take a few moments to learn more about the 11 PLO Preservation Easement Program from the enclosed information. When you have questions, please call Al Staehli (503-230-0807) at your convenience. Very truly yours, Martha Richards Development Coordinator 411' ATTACHMENT 1) t�-( ri 1STOR1( PRESERVATION Historic Preservation League of Oregon Preservation Easement Program Since 1981, the Historic Preservation League of Oregon has accepted preservation easements from across the state of Oregon. Recognized nationally, the league's easement program protects, in perpetuity, over 35 historic properties, both big (the Wells Fargo Building in Portland) and small (tile Gwen House in Jacksonville) and both commercial and residential, Under current Oregon law, the only way for an owner of a historic (architectural and/or culturally significant) property can insure the preservation and protection of their property in perpetuity is through the donation of a preservation easement. A preservation easement is a legally binding agreement that provides a higher level of protection for the special qualities of a historic property from neglect, demolition or insensitive alteration or other activities that may harm the historic integrity of the property. Many of Oregon's communities are growing at a staggering pace, leaving historic properties at risk. With a gift of a preservation easement to the Historic Preservation League of Oregon, the property owner makes an important and permanent contribution to the preservation of Oregon's cultural and historic sites and for the enjoyment of future generations of Oregonians to come. What is a Preservation Easensent" A preservation easement allows the owner of a historic property to retain title and use of a property and, at the same time, ensure its long-term preservation. An easement is a legal contract by which the owner agrees the property will not be changed in a way that would compromise its historic and architectural integrity. it is granted, usually into perpetuity and is filed in the county land records. The easement runs with the land and is binding on both the owner who grants it as well as on all subsequent owners. The owner retains a major interest in the property and can sell it or will it to whomever he or she wishes. Each property is unique and a preservation easement will define the special qualities of each property that are to be protected. Protected features may include the facade, the interior, the grounds, view sheds, or air rights. Many components may be incorporated. ]'his list is just some of the more common features listed for protection under easement. In order to secure the long term protection of a historic property, a preservation easement may include but is not limited to the following: • Protection against inappropriate alterations to the property or surrounding grounds. • Limitation on the alterations or additions that may be made to the property. • Requirement that the structure be properly maintained to preserve historic character and i . II"i° St 1.(4.1 • structural integrity. Porthuld, (hel'Jon Phone: "M-'� 13- 19'':) 4-111161: info(n)hpl(.org Wei): imm.hpio.org 4 �+ • Oversight of future development of the property to prevent adverse impacts on the integrity and character of the property including the development of open space. • Requirement that certain changes be made to restore a historic property to an appropriate condition. Why give a preservation easement? Reasons for giving a preservation easement may include: • Protect a donor's personal interest in preserving their family's heritage and home. • Ensure the preservation of a building on which an owner has spent considerable time and resources restoring. • Provide tax savings for the property owner. • Reduce estate, gift and capital gains taxes. • Benefit one's community through long-term preservation of a significant landmark. What restrictions are imposed on the property owner? Each easement agreement is unique. The terms of the agreement are negotiated between the Historic Preservation League of Oregon and the property owner. The owner of the property subject to a preservation easement assumes responsibility for securing the Historic Preservation League of Oregon's approval before undertaking significant changes to the property, such as: altering the building's historic elements or adding an addition. The property owner must submit a plan for the proposed change to the Historic Preservation League of Oregon, which will determine whether the alteration is compatible with the building's historic and architectural character. In the vVelit a request is not approved, the Histoiic Preservation i.cague of Oregon will present alternative solutions for the owner's consideration. The owner also agrees to repair and maintain the property to an agreed-upon level of care, and to obtain adequate fire and liability insurance, listing the Historic Preservation League of Oregon as an additional named insured. The owner is responsible for using the property in a manner consistent with the preservation of the property's historic character and in compliance with the terms of the easement. How Long Does an Easement Last? Most easements are given into perpetuity. A shorter duration may be negotiated but such terms are rare. According to the, if an easement is not granted into perpetuity the donor is not eligible for tax deductions. Who Can Donate an Easement? Any fee simple owner of a historic property may give an easement. This includes any public, private or nonprofit owner of historic property. Who Accepts Preservation Easements? The International Revenue Service allows charitable deductions for the donation of preservation casements to "qualified organizations.,, These are defined as governmental units or eligible charitable organizations which have a "commitment to protect the conservation purposes of the donation and have resources to enforce the restrictions." ']'he Historic Preservation League of Oregon, a private nonprofit 50t(c)(3) charitable organization, is a qualified recipient of preservation casements. Since 1981, the Historic Preservation League of Oregon has accepted and holds preservation easements on over thirty historic properties throughout Oregon. The League inspects each property annually, Q t., reviews proposed alterations, and arranges for arbitration, legal, or remedial action when necessary to guarantee the property's preservation. Tax Advantages of Preservation Easement Donations Federal Income Tax Benefits Because preservation easements serve a public benefit by protecting the nation's historic resources, the federal government has established income tax incentives available to qualified donors. Under the Internal Revenue Service Code, taxpayers may claim a tax deduction for preservation easement donations if the donation reduces the value of the property and the donation meets I.R.S. guidelines (See I.R.S. Code of 1954 as amended, Section 170 and I.R.S. Regulations Section 1.170A-14). The amount of the deduction is equal to the value of the preservation easement (see Easement Valuation, below). For income property, the donor's basis in the property subject to the easement can be reduced by the proportion that the value of the easement bears to the fair market value of the property before the donation. Estate and Property Taxes A preservation easement gift to the Historic Preservation League of Oregon may reduce federal estate taxes that would otherwise be payable at the donor's death. If the gift is made during the lifetime of the donor, the value of the gift will not be included in the value of the donor's estate. 1s local property tax assessments are based on ' the fair market value of.' property, the municipality when appraising the property for assessment purposes can consider the impact of the donation of a preservation easement on the property's value. Oregon law allows the donor of an easement to request a revaluation of the affected property. In Oregon, a preservation easement is legally referred to as a "Conservation Easement." Tile Oregon Revised Statutes, Section 271.715 (for ORS 271.715 — 271.795) is the enabling statute that recognizes the validity of such restrictions. The donor is encouraged to consult with an attorney and/or accountant familiar with I.R.S. regulations governing charitable contributions to determine the specific tax consequences of a preservation easement donation. Easement Valuation An independent real estate appraiser who is familiar with preservation easement appraisals determines the value of a preservation easement contribution. The donor is responsible for obtaining the appraisal. As a rule, the value of a preservation easement is equal to any reduction in value of the property that results from subjecting the property to the easement's restrictions. The appraiser determines this value by establishing the fair market value of the property before the preservation easement donation, then subtracting that amount the fair market value of the property as restricted, after the granting of the preservation easement. The difference between the two values is the value of the easement. Principal considerations in the appraisal process include the nature and extent of the restrictions imposed by the preservation easement, the type and location of the property, the property's development potential 5t4 and the likelihood of its development, and any existing restrictions on the property (e.g., zoning, local historic district regulations, other deed restrictions, etc.). Generally, the greater the restrictions in the preservation easement, the greater the easement value and tax benefit to the donor. The Historic Preservation League of Oregon cannot give tax, real estate or legal advice nor does it make appraisals. Mortgaged Properties When a preservation easement is donated on a mortgaged property, the mortgagee must subordinate its rights in the property to the right of the Historic Preservation League of Oregon to enforce the easement's provisions. The Donation Process Property Eligibility A property eligible for the donation of a preservation easement to the Historic Preservation League of Oregon has the following characteristics: Significance: A preservation easement can be donated to preserve a historic structure or a historically important land area such as cultural landscape, open space, view shed and are to display a distinct level of local, regional, or national historic and/or architectural significance. Significance is established when the property is either individually listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (this includes primary and secondary listings, not tersery properties); or contributes to a designated or eligible National Register Historic district. Preservation Easements may also be a culturally, archaeological or historically important land area as defined above. To qualify for federal tax benefits, the site must be a "certified historic structure," which are defined as those individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places or certified as contributing to a National Register historic district or to a certified local historic district. A building is considered a certified historic structure if it becomes certified either by the time of the preservation easement donation or by the due date for filing the donor's tax return for the year of the donation. The Historic Preservation League of Oregon also accepts easements on properties listed on local historic inventories. These properties may not be eligible for federal tax benefits. Physical Condition: The property has not suffered irreversible damage (example, by sandblasting) or has undergone irreversible and unsympathetic alterations, nor is it likely to develop serious or continuing maintenance problems over time. If the structure displays improper additions, alterations, or maintenance procedures inconsistent with the property's preservation, the Historic Preservation League of Oregon may require some restoration be undertaken by the donor as a condition of the League's acceptance of the preservation easement. A preservation easement may be accepted on a property in its present condition or on a property that the owner plans to rehabilitate, in which case the plans for rehabilitation become part of the preservation easement agreement. Ownership and Use: The donor holds fee simple title to the property. The current use is not incompatible with the preservation of the property. The Historic Preservation League of Oregon will evaluate each proposed preservation easement donation on its own merit regardless of other approvals or certifications on the property. 5� 'Timeline The time required to process a preservation easement donation varies depending on the complexity of the easement agreement. It is highly recommended to begin the donation process early in the year to ensure sufficient time for negotiations and time to process the document by year-end. Costs A non-refundable fee of $150 is required to cover the costs for application. The donor is responsible for other costs in excess of the fee, which may arise from the preparation of a complex casement document or one in which there are several changes made after its preparation (at the time of settlement). The owner is also responsible for the cost of the easement appraisal. Other costs inherent in the donation of a preservation easement, and which the donor pays directly, include fees for the appraisal and the property survey (if one is required), costs of the donor's legal and financial advisors. Many costs incident to making a charitable donation are deductible from state and federal income tax. The donor should check with his or her tax advisor concerning the deductibility of specific costs incurred in the donation of the preservation easement. Endowment The Historic Preservation League of Oregon maintains an endowment fund to pay for the ongoing costs of monitoring, inspecting, enforcing, and administering of its preservation easements into perpetuity. Donors of preservation easements are required to contribute to this fund at the time of settlement. The amount of the contribution is negotiated on an individual basis, but is generally calculated to be the lesser of the :oltowing two value,. a) 1% or the entire property's appraised value or b) iui0 of the easement's appraised value. In all cases, the minimum contribution for private properties is $5,000 per property, exclusive of other fees. Atter signing the preservation easement, the property owner can feel proud that by partnering with the Historic Preservation League, they are protecting Oregon's rich heritage. For more information about the Historic Preservation League of Oregon's preservation easement program, contact us: Historic Preservation League of Oregon 3534 SE Main Street Portland, Oregon 97214 (503)243-1923 info(a.)hplo.org The Historic Preservation League ref Oregon is a nonprofit, member -supported organization chartered in 1977. The Historic Preservation League of Oregon promotes the preservation of historic buildings, structures and sites thronghout the state and ~works to increase public mvareness ql the value of these resources. Its services include t elmic•al assistance, lectures, publications, advocacy and the preservation easement program. It is our firm belief that Oregon must preserve its heritage by the recognition and preservation of significant buildings, sites and neighborhoods for they are irreplaceable resources in our c•ilies, towns and c•orrntryside. 5 OMS OREGON MANAGEMENT GROUP Mayor Judy Hammerstead March 18"i, 2002 17330 Grand View Court Lake Oswego Oregon 97034 Dear Judy, �rTr7ED MAR 1 9 2002 CITY OF LAKE USWLGO As a follow-up to our discussion at lunch today, I am supplying the follow as objections to the proposal to restore the old Trueblood house for its historic significance to the community. I participated in the negotiations of the City's purchase of this property from Ed Hart with green space designated funds for the use as a pathway from Highway 43 to Old River Road. Any attempt to restore this site and rent out as a private residence places the City in jeopardy of utilizing public green space funds for private use not accessible to the public which has supplied these designated tax dollars. As President of the Green Homeowners Association, representing 29 homeowners adjacent to this site on the North, we object to the proposal of restoration and rental as an abridgement of the purchase agreement and use of public funds. Having lived adjacent to this property for over 35 years I have yet to hear of any historic significance. I participated in the restoration of two historically significant buildings, the Lakewood School & The Murphy Office Building, and own the building at 47 North State. I feel that for the City to benefit from historic restoration the site must have some future community benefit and be located for easy public access and visibility. The Trueblood home does neither but is a rundown family home isolated deep in a public green space. Personal experience restoring the Murphy Office Building for the Oswego Heritage Council leads me to believe that due to the condition and layout of home the cost to bring it up to current codes could not be recovered from residential rent. Other than structural replacement it would require new wiring & plumbing as well as a garage and paved drive from Highway 43. To assure some semblance of privacy for a tenant approximately one third of the six acre green space would have to be withdrawn. Vote no on this proposal and utilize the acreage as agreed. Srn� e_re 1 y, William A ad�ee Cc. City ounciI 47 North State Street, lake Oswego, Oregon 97034/15031636-5691 E1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL 2 OF THE CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 3 4 AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING ) AP 01-06 [LU 01-0026) - 1469 DIRECTOR'S DECISION APPROVING ) (Compass Engineering.) 5 REMOVAL OF LOT 10 FROM THE ) SKYLAND HEIGHTS PD ) ORDER 6 7 WHEREAS this matter comes before the City Council pursuant to a Stipulated Peremptory 8 Writ of Mandamus in Clackamas County Circuit Court Case No. CCV 0202-2410, directing that the g City of Lake Oswego approve the application for a minor modification to a planned development in 10 the captioned matter, subject to certain conditions of approval; and 11 WHEREAS the Stipulated Peremptory Writ of Mandamus recites that its terms are 12 contingent upon approval by the Lake Oswego City Council; and 13 14 WHEREAS the City Council approved the Stipulated Writ of Mandamus on March 19, 1S 2002; 16 ORDER 17 IT IS ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego that AP 01-06 [LU 01- 18 0026] requesting a minor modification to an earlier planned development (PD 1-96) in order to 19 remove Lot 10 from the Skyland Heights Planned Development is approved subject to the 20 following conditions of approval: 21 22 A. Prior to Issuance of Any Building Permits, the Applicants/Owners Shall: I. Submit a private pedestrian and driveway access easement on Lots 9 and 23 10 for review and approval by staff. The applicants shall also submit a preliminary title report for staff review and recordation to assure that: 24 1) the ownership of the lot at the time of recordation of the easement, and 2) all persons holding encumbrances on the property have consented to the 25 easement. If there are any encumbrances, i.e., mortgages on either parcel 26 1 - ORDER (LU 01-0026) Page oa*a o r, ,, Gty Anoma, • C" M Lau Cn—gu 120 "A" Aran- - P.O. Boa 109. La.• ClawOo. Chag— 97014 15031 455-0115 FAX 15051 600.7455 I as shown on the preliminary title report, subordination by the holders of these encumbrances in recordable format and recordation of the 2 subordination is necessary. 3 2. Submit a notice of development restrictions for review and approval by staff. The notice shall state that it shall not be amended without the 4 approval of the City. The applicants shall furnish to the City a preliminary title report to assure that the persons executing the notice may create a 5 valid restriction on the property. Within 30 days following the approval, a final title report shall be filed confirming that the notice was recorded 6 with, and is binding against, Lot 10. The notice shall contain the following: 7 a. An agreement in favor of the City of Lake Oswego, that in the g event the City elects to enforce its rights under the Skyland Heights Planned Development CC&Rs for the maintenance of the g Open Space Tract "A" and the storm water facility, the City may take such action against Lot 10 the same as if it were subject to the 10 Skyland Heights Planned Development CC&Rs. b. Site development limitations for Lot 10 shall be as (0Ilows; Required Setbacks After Con solid atint; Lot 10 if►lfli Lot 68: i. Setbacks as follows: Front Yard: 25 feet (measured along east property line (Along Skylands Circle)) Rear Yard: 50 feet (measured along west property line) Side yards: 20 feet (measured along north and south property lines) w 5 ii. Building Height: 35 feet (flat or sloped lot) iii. Lot Coverage: 25 percent (of combined lot) 20 Required Setbacks Without Consolidating I,ot 10 with Lot 68: i i. Setbacks as follows: 2Z Front Yard: 50 feet (measured from west property line) Z ; Rear Yard: 30 feet (measured from east property line) 24 Side yard: 20 feet (measured from north and south property lines) 25 ii. Building Height: 35 feet (flat or sloped lot) 26 2- ORDER (LU 01-0026) Page Oa via D P-1 city Attom9y • Clq of 4b 09vm90 590'A' A—uw • P.O. Boa 599. UM• Off—go, Ong- 97054 1505)5550775 FA%(9011099.745) I 2 iii. Lot Coverage: 25 percent 3 3. Notwithstanding the removal of Lot 10 from the Skyland Heights Planned Development, the open space requirement for the planned development 4 shall be determined as if Lot 10 remained a part of the planned development. 5 4. Submit a Tree Protection Plan pursuant to LOC 55.08.030. At' a 6 minimum, the applicants shall install tree protection fencing and signage around all trees that are being preserved that are located within 15 feet of 7 the construction zone. Staff shall inspect the fences after installation to ensure that it is appropriately installed. Any excavation within the root g zone shall occur under the supervision of the consulting arborist and/or staff. The tree protection fencing shall remain in place during the entire 9 course of street and housing construction and should not be moved unless authorized by the consulting arborist and staff. 10 5. Construct an asphalt pedestrian pathway meeting ADA standards five feet 11 in width in the relocated private pedestrian easement between Lots 9 and 10 to the satisfaction of staff. 12 6. Submit a final grading plan for review and approval of the Building 13 Division. 14 7• Provide a note on the final construction plans to clearly inform the site contractors about the necessity of preventing damage to the existing trees 15 on the site, including bark and root zones. The contractors shall be subject to fines, penalties, and mitigation for trees that are damaged or destroyed 16 during construction. 17 8. Obtain a tree cutting permit for all trees 5" or greater in diameter that will be removed. 18 9. Install tree protection measures as required by LOC 45 and Condition 19 A(4) above. These measures shall remain in place throughout construction period. The tree protection fencing shall be installed along 20 the common boundary with the open space Tract "A," and along all trees to remain. The protection fence shall consist of a 6' high chain link fence 21 with metal posts, and shall extend to the drip line of any trees within the 22 protected area. 23 Be Miscellaneous Provisions. 24 1. Any future partitioning of Lot 10 shall be prohibited without modification 25 of the Skyland Heights Planned Development. 26 3- ORDER (LU 01-0026) Page Q -W D F—tl Ciry Attofn., • C"V of Lit. O.w.po 150'A' Avenw • P.O tl0. 145. Like C—QU, Or.Oon 07024 (5011 455.0225 FAX 1701) 0094.51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Page 2. All remaining conditions of PD 1-96 along with all previously approved modifications shall continue to apply to the Skyland Heights Planned Development. 3. The permit or approval granted hereby, or any inspections conducted on the site hereafter, shall not be construed as authorizing any activity in violation of any applicable federal or state law or regulation, including but not limited to the federal Endangered Species Act and its regulations. DATED this 2nd day of April , 2002. iL o'- & 4 — Judie44w- merstttd,-Mayor- Ellie McPeak, Council President i// ATTEST: 2L�� Robyn Chridtie, City Recorder �^ AYES: McPeak, Schoen, Turchi, Graham, Hoffman NOES: none ABSTAIN: none ABSENT: Mayor Hammerstad, Rohde 4- ORDER (LU 0 1 -0026) -10 Po 11 City AttaZ - city of Lake 06.600 350 W Avenw • P.O. ba 166, Lab. 06"6o, Oregon 67034 (6031636-0116 FAX (4031689-7453