Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApproved Minutes - 1994-12-20 PMCITY OF LAKE OSvmGG December 20, 1994 CI!rY COmJCIL MINUTES Mayor Alice L. Schlenker called the study session of the City Council to order at 5:40 p.m. on December 20, 1994 in the Municipal Courtroom. Councilor Puskas, Mayor Schlenker, Anderson, Chrisman, and Klammer were present. Councilor Holstein was excused. Others present included Paul Haley, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT); Michael Ronkin, ODOT; Larry Olson, ODOT; Jerry Baker, Public Works Director; Jerry Pfeiffer, ODOT; Erin O'Rourke-Meaders and Ray Salisbury, Westlake Homeowners Association; Ron Bunch, Senior Planner; Joe Collins, Pathway Coordinator; Tom Coffee, Assistant City Manager; Doug Schmitz, City Manager; and Kris Hitchcock, City Recorder. III. STUDY SESSION A. Kruse Way signalization XV Raker. Public Works Drrectar I presented the staff report (written December 15, 1994). He said that Frank Charbonneau, the City's traffic consultant, has worked out a timing signal program to progress traffic on Kruse Way from Boones Ferry to Bangy Road and back in either direction without stopping. He stated that both Alternatives 2 and 5 (page 5) were adequate to achieve the goal. He explained that Alternative 5 would require widening Westlake Drive five or six feet on the east side to accommodate a turning lane with a left turn arrow signal; with Alternative 2, traffic turning left would have to wait for a gap in the oncoming traffic during the green light. Staff recommended the consultant's choice of Alternative 5. Mr. Baker noted that, though no one from the neighborhood showed up at the meeting held on this project, he later fcund out that the Westlake Homeowner's Association objected to widening Westlake. He stated that Alternative 2 was an equally acceptable solution (which would not require widening of Westlake Drive). In the ensuing question and answer session, the following issues were raised or comments made: City Council Minutes 3ecetier 20, 1994 . No medians on Kruse Way would be removed in any of the alternatives, and only a small median on Westlake would be removed in Alternative 5; . What would be the best alternative to choose to avoid investing significant money on major changes until the related I-S/217 process was completed?: . Alternative 2 would be best - it requires only work on the traffic signals and no widening of the road; . The City could not interface with the State's signals at the Bangy Road/Kruse Way intersection because of differing softwares, but staff could get the timing as approximate as possible to use as a baseline to set the rest of the signals on Kruse Way; . The changes can be made in approximately 30 days; l $50,000 was more than adequate to implement Alternative 2; . The City has a different software than the State because the software the State used wasn't available at the time the City needed it. The Council agreed on Aiternative 2. stated that they were in favor of enhancing the movemen; along Kruse Way but not at the expense of Westlake Drive. She asked for a multi-faceted approach, including using non-technological solutions (i.e., carpooling, park and rides, etc.). Mayor Schlenker commented that Kruse Way was identified in the 2040 concept, and that Ms. O'Rourke-Meaders' testimony that process regarding her concerns should be included in also. B. Highway 43/McVey pathway - Oregon Department Transportation (ODOT) of Bamch. Senior UZUUEIZ presented the staff report (written December 14, 199i): . Staff had been asked by the State to comment on the proposed bike path along Highway 43, and to set up a public meeting; . The comments at the November 17 public meeting focused on safety concerns; 0 The State has identified this area as a critical area for a pedestrian/bicycle path because of the traffic bottleneck on Highway 43 from West Linn to Lake Gswego; city Council Minutec December 20. 1494 ?OSC 2 Of i7 e Though gutting a bike trail on Old River Road is an option,, to plan the City had difficulty with a previous attempt a pathway along that road. u1 E.d~V- P=2i.e.c~, reviewed summarizing the information on this project ODOT 1). Ee explained that the purpose of r, to improve bicycle safety and to close the * in the bike path (from McVey to Burnham); ir, southbound because bicyclists climbing the hi keep up with traffic, and the sight distanccl was not sufficient for motorists to see the noted that this is the second attempt at thi that it is scheduled for construction in Fal a modernization project using bicycle funds. a handout (Attachment .~JC project was missing link" was a problem IJ.11 couldn't t at the curve bicyclists. He 6 project, and 1 1995. It is Mr. Haley reviewed the map that was presented at the November 17 public meeting, explaining what had been proposed. the cliff They intended to shove the barrier back towards -.<ithout cutting into the cliff too much, and without purchasing any right cf way. He r+Z,rJrted the comments received from the local people (Attachment ODOT l), noting that no one, the project- except one bicyclist, liked However, the State still liked it. el un, F?.iwcle/pedestrian prw ? * -?z, handed out a memo on why the State built highways with shoulders and how doin +.-g so would improve Highway 43 (Attachment ODOT 3), and a portion of the original Bike Ei.11 (Attachments ODGT 4 and 5). to the River He reviewed the pros and cons Road option (Attachment ODOT 1). that 85% of h'e noted bicycle accidents had nothing to do with vehicular traffic - people got hurt falling off their bikes or hitting trees, etc. Isolating bicycles from traffic wasn't always an advantage. He reviewed the improvements required for the River Road option (Attachment ODOT 1). He commented that people who wanted to access the facilities along Highway 43 would continue to use the highway, regardless of a bike path along River Road. Mr. Ronkin reviewed the memo on highway shoulders (Attachment ODOT 3), the key ones. noting that the bolded reasons were He commented that this was a situation in which improvements made for bicyclists actually improved conditions for motor vehicles also. In response to a question from Patt Thomas, resident, Mr. Ronkin stated that the geological people agreed with the neighbors that the cliff was too unstable to be cut into. PACk 3 of 17 Mayor Schlenker raised the question of a cantilever section for two lanes of bicycles. Mr. Ronkin explained that, if everything was moved over, a cantilever section would not support the motor vehicle traffic. He also stated that two lanes of bicycles on one side of the road was illegal because it forced one lane to travel against traffic; it was also considered unsafe from an engineering point of view (1973 Attorney General's Opinion). Mayor Schlenker asked about creating a "bike highway", separated from the motor traffic. Mr. Ronkin said that they could look into that but that bridge experts (in similar situations in the past) said it would cost less to build a new bridge than to retrofit a 45 to 50 year old inadequate structure. Councilor Puskas noted that real cyclists used the roadway, not a bike path. Mr. Ronkin concurred but felt that any improvements to the road would be of real benefit. Mr. Haley continued the presentation, reviewing the key considerations and the recommendation (Attachment ODOT 1). They believed that they could xove the barrier back tc,wards the cliff safely one or two feet to get the additional width, They could cut back the three or four foot high bank to widen four to six feet at the section with the worst sight distance. This would reduce the cost from $400,000 to $100,000. In the ensuing question and answer session, the following issues were raised or comments made: . The traffic count was about 1,300 vehicles southbound; . The State standard fo r lane width was 12 feet, though 11 feet with a shoulder was acceptable; . This connection would make the path continuous from Lake Oswego to the Cherry Lane path; 0 The difference between a shoulder and a bike path was an 8-inch stripe instead of a 4-inch one, and the legal prohibition of cars driving or parking on the bike path. C. Agenda Review ock. Cltv &corder noted that the wording on the last sentence of the titli of Resolution 94-66 has been changed at the request of the Boundary Commission; the lot would not be annexed until next week. Page 4 of 17 D. Scheduling Council workshop Mr. Schmitz reported the potential dates on which the speaker was available for the Council workshop. The Council discussed their preferences, setting the dates in priority order: February 1 and 2, or January G and 7. IV. ADJOURNMEST Mayor Schlenker adjourned the meeting. Mayor Alit City Count City Count Councilors e i i L. Schlenker called the regular meet. ing of the 1 to order at 7:00 p.m. on December 2 0, 1994 in 1 Chambers. Councilor Puskas, Mayor Schlenker, Anderson, Chrisman, Klammer, and Hols tein were the present. III. CONSENT AGENDA A. BUSINESS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL 1. Letter from Maureen L. Neher resigning from the Neighborhood Traffic Advisory Board. ACTION: Accept with regret. 2. Letter from Marilyn Lane resigning from the Commission for Citizen Involvement. ACTION: Accept with regret. B. REPORTS 1. 2. City of Tigard water agreement with Lake Oswego - extension beyond December 31, 1994. ACTION: Approve extension of agreement. Award contract for Waluga Park Phase II ACTION: Award contract to Brandt Construction for $284,950. city Council t4:nut*s December 20, 1494 Page 5 of 17 3. Recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Commission regarding the rowing agreement/excursion boat dock concession. (Coxttinu~2 to January 27, 1995). ACTION: Continue to January 17, 1995. 4. Bid award for Westlake Park support buildings and dugout roofs. ACTION: Award to Jim Miller Construction for $141,921.00. 5. Cooperative agreement with the Lake Osweqo Corporation regarding the Lakewood Bay easement. ACTION: Approve agreement. 6. Foothills Acceptance of a drainage easement on Road by the City Manager. ACTION: Approve acceptance of drainage easement. 7. LORA recommendation to the Citv Council that Council direct the City Attorney to initiate amendments to Development Standards and any other amendments that may apply in the Design Requirements chapter of the Design Guidelines. (Drop from agenda at this time! ACTION: Drop from agenda at this time. 8. Award of bid for construction of Adult Community Center storage shed. ACTION: Award bid to Glen Mar Construction for $34,576.00. C. ORDERS 1. PA 08-94-1093, adoption of the revisions to the Comprehensive Plan. ACTION: Adopt order. D. ORDINANCES 1. Second reao bv title onlv and enactmm a. 2110, a general ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego amending LOC Chapter 32 (Traffic Page 6 of 17 Code) to prohibit the storage of motor homes, trailers, boats or campers on public rights of way. ACTION: Enact ordinance. b. 2111, a general ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego amending provisions of LOC Chaster 34 (Korals and Conduct) to delete the registration requirements from the solicitation section. ACTION: Enact ordinance. E. RESOLUTIONS 1. 94-64, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego dedicating the Paul H. Johnson Open Space. ACTION: Adopt resolution. 2. 94-67, a resolution of the City Council of the Cit;l of Lake Oswego amending the master fee resolution to adopt new tree ordinance fees and clarify the business license fees. * ACTION: Adopt resolution. 3. 94-66, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego authorizing the Mayor to execute an intergovernmental agreement with the Citvy of West Linn and the Tri-City Service District to provide interim connection to the sanitary sewer system of the City of West Linn for a single lot located in the City of Lake Oswego. (Revised) ACTION: Adopt resolution. F. MINUTES 1. August 29, 1994 ACTION: Approve minutes. 2. December 3.3, 1994 ACTION: Approve minutes. Mayor Schlenke- y moved for tBe Consent Agenda with two modifications: 1) Item Cl to be adopted as modified by Attachment A; 2) Item E3 to be adopted as revised (one piece C::y Conncil Minucen Page. I 0: 17 sxe*r 20, 3954 :Kl oe property to be annexed in the future). seconded the motion. Councilor Holstein A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed with Councilor Puskas, Mayor Schlenker, Anderson, Chrisman, Klammer and Holstein voting in favor. Mayor Schlenker read Ordinances 2110 and 2111 for Second Reading by Title Only and Enactment. END COKSENT AGENDA IV. PRESENTATIONS/RECOGNITIOH A. Recognition of Alice L. Schlenker, Mayor, for her election to the National League of Cities Board of Directors. Councilor Chrisman recognized Mayor Schlenker for her election as vice-Chair of the League of Oregon Cities and election to the Board of the National League of Cities. B. AAA 55th Annual Pedestrian Protection Award Program Mayor Schlenker presented this award to Joe Collins, Pathway Coordinator, on behalf of the City. She noted that they were one of the six cities to win this award in Oregon, and thanked Mr. Collins for his work. Mr. Collins thanked the Mayor, and noted that he saw their biggest achievement as getting a pathway around the lake so people could see the lake. C. Government Finance Officers Association 1993-94 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. . . Prmt. Fimce Officers wl + presented the award to the Mayor and Council, comme the City and Bruce Griswold, Finance Director, for winning this significant award. Mr. Griswold thanked the City Council and City Manager for providing the resources to win the award. V. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA VI. CITIZEN COMMENT Svlvester. 199 E Avenue commented that she thought that the traffic circle at the end'of UPP~ -r Drive and Lower Drive would be nice when it was done but that right now motorists C::y Cosnci 1 Minutes Deccl?exr 20, 1934 needed lines and reflectors there to avoid running off the road. VII. BUSINESS FROM THE COUNCIL A. Councilor Klammer thanked Pam Peterson, volunteer camera person, and commented on the importance of these volunteers in televising this meeting. B. Councilor Puskas stated that she was proud of the City staff, and that Mr. Collins and Mr. Griswold exemplified the best of public service. C. Mayor Schlenker extended sympathy to Dallas Finn, &&e DFweao Rew City Beat reoorter, death of her father, Pat Finn. and her family on the B. Recognition of Bill Holstein, City Councilor Mayor Schlenker presented Councilor Holstein *tlith a Distinguished Service Award for his service as a Council President and as a City Councilor for the last six years. She expressed her appreciation for his honesty, faithfulness and hard work. She reviewed his contributions to the City, noting his work on density, redevelopment, budget, West End, and police service issues, the rail corridor, State Energy Committee, and as President of the Lake Oswego Sister Cities League. Councilor Holstein stated that he was proud to have served as a City Councilor for the last six years. He thanked his wife, Mary, and daughter, Tara, for their support. He thanked the City staff for their support, commenting that the City would not work without them. He thanked his fellow Councilors, both those serving now and previously, and welcomed the new Councilors. He challenged them to continue to serve the people without letting personal agendas dictate their attitudes. 9e thanked the citizens who served on the Boards, Commissions and Task Forces as well those who made their opinions known and the independent groups. He thanked the citizens of Lake Oswego for giving him the opportunity to serve them. He wished everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy "Moo" Year. Mayor Schlenker presented a sailboat plaque to Councilor Holstein in commemoration of his service on the City Council. Each Councilor expressed his or her appreciation to Councilor Holstein for his service, noting his knowledge of City Cocxrl .xinuces ?,~e 9 of 17 Deceziber 20, 1994 the background of issues, his integrity, honesty, openness, Councilors, and hard work. VIII. REPORTS balanced perspective, helpfulness to fellow A. Luscher Farm Opportunity EC Constraints Study ke HU&V. Parks & morea Directoy, p'rc<sented the staff report (written December 20, 1994). LIP reported that the meetings of the Parks and Recreation AdaJisory Board, the Natural Resources Advisory Board, and the Historic Review Commission on the study '\as requested by Council in October) were held in November and December; the meeting minutes, the recommendation, the financial dzrta on the development and operations of existing historic properties, and two letters from COUnty Planning Organizations (CPOs) were in the Council packet. He advised the Council to accept the consensus committee's concept for the uses of the 57-acre site as represented on Figure 8, to authorize staff to apply at Clackamas County for an historic designation on the 23-acre Fletcher Farm land claim, and to authorize staff to begin the master planning process and instruct them to return to Council with a proposed planning process- Mayor Schlenker asked if there had been any discussion of a different number of acres to be designated historic than the 23-acres recommended. e of Robert explained the three options discussed at the consensus committee meetings, using t-he map to demonstrate the acreage's considered: only the buildings and farm complex, the 23 acres, or the whoie site. They rejected only the buildings and farm complex as lacking the necessary historic setting, and compromised on the 23-acres to accommodate the differing needs of the historic and recreation interests. Councilor Klammer stated that he supported the proposed motion but asked that adequate thought be gi-Jen to parking facilities during the master planning process, commenting that he thought more parking would be needed than might be currently anticipated. Mr. Henley assured him that the transportation/circulation and onsite parking issues were seen as key factors. Councilor Anderson asked for a brief report on the current process. Mr. Henley explained that, if Council accepted Cr ty Council Minutes December 20, 1994 Page 10 of I.7 the report, staff would ask County staff to continue the January 1993 land use hearing at the Clackamas County Commission, and present the request for the 23-acre historic overlay. Once the Commissioners took action, the County would need to amend their Comprehensive Land Use Map to reflect the decision. He noted that the historic overlay designation placed the property under the purview or‘ the County Historic Review Commission who would scrutinize uses, changes and alterations to the historic integrity of the site according to a very specific criteria. Councilor Chrisman asked if the City would maintain the control over the property that they had wanted to get with the original 6.6 acre historic designation. Mr . Henley commented that the County, in fulfilling the State requirement to inventory ali historic resources, could apply any acreage designation they saw fit; the consensus committee negotiated the acreage down to the 23-acres. The State Historic Preservation Office felt that the 23-acres was the minimum allowable to obtain grant money in the future. Jeff , emphasized that the reason the study was done was to avoid the Clackamas County Commissioners' inclination to designate the entire site as historic. They had questioned the 6.6 acres requested by the City, but agreed to delay consideration to allow Lake Oswego to go through the- planning process. Councilor Holstein asked that the structural integrity of the barn be analyzed to determine the condition of the barn and estimated cost of repairs. Mr. Henley agreed with Mayor Schlenker's understanding that the recommendation represented the most solid position the City could take to the County to allow flexibility on the other acreage's. Violet. jaccr. 195 Rose-# West LUQ I reviewed the history of the houses and farms in the area. She expressed concern over the increase of traffic over the past 45 years, stating it would be a dangerous situation if the land were opened up to the public, and objected to putting a cemetery in on the property. Mayor Schlenker explained that the City has not proposed a cemetery; the land was for parks and recreation. es Kool, RoseMPnt. Ilower mdt n Vallev H-s and - i ctafford Tlower TI lesemtive, C::y Council Mrrxces 3s3mber 20, 1992 Page I1 0: 17 expressed the concerns of the groups as documented in the letters sent to Council: . 0 0 0 0 0 0 l Changing the zoning from EFU-20 to Open Space Management; They understood that the City would have to go through the public hearing process, county amendment process, and LCDC approval in order to make this change; He corrected a statement in the Homeowner's Association letter, stating that they understood that county parks outside of city boundaries and the Urban Growth Boundary were in the Open Space Management zoning designation; Directed attention to the eight items listed in the letter that they felt should be covered in a master plan (mainly traffic, parking, and security concerns); The letter from the CPO (written by Dr. Tom Moore) addressed the same concerns; They were also concerned about the obtrusiveness of night lighting; Dr. Moore requested that CPOs be formally recognized as a party to the planning process; The CPG objected, as standing policy, to providing functions and structures for urban residents - they should be provided within the urban area. Mayor Schlenker commented that these all these issues would be looked at. Mr. Condit clarified that ail the Council would decide tonight was whether or not to accept the plan as presented to allow further analysis before something was put in place; the master planning process itself would determine the specifics of parking, traffic, development, etc. He concurred that the City would have to go through the county's process in order to change the zoning to Open Space Management, a lengthy process with considerable opportunities for public input. leave the zoning at EFU-20, Another option was to have to go through which meant that the City would change to the park. the conditional use process for every Mayor Schlenker noted that the City has consistently stated that they would work closely with the county on the EFU land. . . . wj b L~WLS, D&G? as-t and -aretaker of c Luscher,JRosenant Ro& relayed Mr. Luscher's request that the farm be named "Luscher Farm." Mayor Schlenker stated that the Council would forward that request to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to begin the naming process. Cify Council Hinuces December 20, 1994 Pace 12 of 17 toric Review on regresaative Lo t& La.. c m stdv or 7-F commented that the thinking *behind the 23-acres included I considerations such as the concept that an historic farm included the environment as well as the structures, and the use of land delineation to keep the historic integrity (in hopes of achieving landmark status and grant money). She reported that the Comm;'- -*sion discussed the bbrn at length, being concerned that it not deteriorate during the master planning process. She noted that the exact use of the barn would determine the cost to renovate it - keeping it as a barn would cost less than to renovate it in t6 office space. She stated that she had available for viewing a slide presentation of an historic farm owned by a community in Pennsylvania, and noted a multi-use historic park nearby in Bellevue, Washington. Jack Hoffman. 567 SW Ninth, Tea SDorts warv c~mmi *C +-tee . d Presdent of the T,ake oswo Soccer Club, stated that his constituencies had wanied more acreage for the youth of the City but had accepted the compromise 23 acres as in the best interests of the community. * e ertOn. 1670 Fir Crest Drive, McVev/SolIth sh- ra . . -orhood As-on rwresemtive on c~ QX!IDittee expressed his association's concerns regarding Luscher Farm: They have expressed long standing concerns (since the original purchase of the Luscher Farm! about the potential detrimental effect on their neighborhood of any extensions outside the Urban Growth Boundary or urbanization in this area; 0 Most of the neighbors had thought that Luscher Par-m had been purchased for open space but grew concerned (when the Taylor and Farr properties were acquired) that some kind of urban use might be developed out there; This was a very highly constrained piece of properny to be developing a team sports complex on - the kids couldn't even walk to it safely; . The City has missed many opportunities to obtain better team sports faciiities sites than this one; . Park planning required a vision; . This property would be ideal for an inviting ent,y to the City; They liked the idea of dispersed parks to which children had access without being driven all over the place. City Council Minutes December 20, 1994 Page 13 of 17 Councilor -Anderson commented that, as a former Recreation Advisory Soard member, he knew that vision has gone into this project. He pointed intent has been to acquire as much land in the recreation or historic uses precisely to avoid kind of development. Parks and considerable out that the area for any other Mayor Schlenker pointed out that the City has consistently testified that they did not want the Urban Growth Boundarv moved, land. and that no one was proposing urbanization of that- She commented that a dilemma in the community was how to meet the kids' needs with the limited space available inside the city limits. The vision was trq'ing to balance the historic, recreation, traffic and aesthetic needs of the community while containing the houses within the urban growth boundary. Councilor Puskas concurred with Mr. Atherton's point about keeping park sites neighborhood specific, if possible. Xowever, availability and cost were considerations. . P&s and Recreation Advisory Baud Cw informed the Council that the Board had unanimously ' supported the recommendations and the process by which those recommendations were reached. FrUce Ew. Ttake Osweco Soccer Club co- commented that, as the Classic Soccer coordinator, he has seen the amount of field space diminishing as more people participated in team sport. to accommodate all the teams. It is difficult to find space This year they have recommended that teams use Delta Park because they could not guarantee space. He noted that it was difficult for his children (living in Mountain Park) to access the school fields. Councilor Puskas noted that both the Parks Department and the school district were looking at expanding the capacity of existing fields by upgrading fields. The Council requested staff to develop a generic timeline of the process to help the public understand what would be happening and who would be handling it. Councilor Holstein moved that the Council accept the concepts for the various uses as recommended in Figure 8 of the study, authorize the staff to prepare the necessary documentation for consideration by Clackanw County designsating the 23-acre Fletcher Farm Land Claiin as an historic resource and for the application of an historic 21ty Cauncll Mrnuces Page 14 Of i? 32cetier 20, 1994 landmark overlay zone, and authorize the comaencment of a master planning effort for the propesties and instruct the staff to return to the Council with a proposed process for this planning effort. Councilor Puskas seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion gassed with Councilor Puskas, Mayor Schlenker, Anderson, Chrisman, Klammer and Holstein voting in favor. IX. OEtDERS A. 1092, AP 94-03, Three appeals of a Planning Commission decision for approval of an ODPS and planned development and approval of a two-parcel minor land partition. The site is located at 3811 Car-man Drive (ODPS l-9O\PD6-92\ SD 2-92-1056) Councilor Anderson moved for adoption of Order 1092, AP 94-03 Three appeals of a Planning Commission decision for approval of an ODPS and plauned development and approval of a two-parcel minor land partition. located at 3811 Carman Drive (ODDS l-90\PD6-921 The site ia SD 2-92-1056). Councilor Chrisman seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed with Mayor Schlenker, Anderson, Chrisman, and Klammer and voting in favor of the motion; Councilor Puskas abstained and Councilor Holstein voted against the motion. X. ORDI~CES . ,Tecond reaa bv t’ ltle on1 3J and en- A. 2097, a general ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego amending the LOC Chapter 55 (Trees) to clarify sections of the Code. Councilor Holstein moved for adoption by Second reading by title only and enactment of 2097, a general ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego amending the LOC Chapter 55 (Trees) to clarify 8eCtiOnB of the Code. Councilor Puskas seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion gassed with Councilor Puskas, Mayor Schlenker, Anderson, Chrisman, Klammer and Holstein voting in favor. Mayor Schlenker read Ordinance 2097 for Second reading by title only and enactment. 3. 2109, a general ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego to amend LOC Chapter 12, Administration, and LOC Chapter 32, Traffic Code, to clarify sections of the neighborhood traffic management program. Councilor Anderson moved for adoption of 23.09, a general ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lake Qswego to amend LOC Chapter 12, Administration, and LOC Chapter 32, Traffic Code, to clarify sections of the neighborhood traffic management program. Councilor Holstein seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed with Councilor Puskas, Mayor Schlenker, Councilors Anderson, Chrisman, and Holstein voting in favor; Councilor Klammer voted against the motion. Mayor Schlenker read Ordinance 2109 for Second reading by title only and enactment, and the addition made on December 6 to Section 32.14.034(l) (B) as follows: "Percent of vehicles traveling at least 3 m.p.h. over the speed limit on the same segment of the project street used to determine traffic volume pursuant to subsection (1), divided by "3". at least 3 m.p.h. The phrase "traveling" was added to the proposed ordinance as drafted. XI. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS P 1. City Manager 1. Kruse Way signalization Councilor Anderson moved to direct staff to proceed with Option 2 of the Kruse Way signalizatfon report (from the study session). Councilor Chrisman seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion gassed with Councilor Puskas, Mayor Schlenker, Anderson, Chrisman, Klammer and Holstein voting in favor, 2. Status report on the Boones Ferry Gap. B. City Attorney XXI, EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Schlenker recessed the meeting to Executive Session at 8:40 p.m. pursuant to ORS 192.660(1)(e) Real Property Transactions, and to ORS 192.660(1)(d) Labor Relations, C-i:! Cocxil Minutes ~crfflber 20. 1994 Tage 16 of 17 XI. ADJO3JRBMMT Mayor Schlenker adjourned the meeting at 9:07 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, City Recorder APPROVED BY COUNCIL: Alice L. Schlenker, Mayor - CL:‘/ Council Minutes 2ccemScr 20, 1994