Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApproved Minutes - 1987-01-19 { CITY OF LAKE QSWECO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW noAnn MINUTES January 15, 1907 The levo3.opment Roviow Board me t:in9 wan oallod to order by Chairman Vern Martindale at 7e30 p.m. Board membara were Chairman Martindale, Richard Eslicsk, Anthony Wright, B. Daniel ingrim, Robert Ulaakmoro, Curtis Finch and Kenneth Zineli. Staff prosont were Assiatant City Manager, Planning and Development Karen Scobti Assistant City Attorney Sandra Duffy, Qovelopment Roviow Planner Uamid Pishvaiai and, recording eocrotary Marian Ahdoreen. APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 15, 1986 M . Ealiok moved for approval of the minutes. The motion wee seconded by Mr. Zineli and carried unanimously with Mr. Pinch, Mr. Slackmore end Chairman Martindale abstaining. 0anuary 5 y 1p87 r _ Correotion on page 3 4th paragraph ., delete 'to, . With the oorreotion, Mr, Zina'ii moved for approval of the minutes. The motion wee socondod by Mr. finch and carried unanimously. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICAr3ONS Karen Scott reminded the Board of the orientation erosion on Monday, January 16th. at 6;00 p.m, and of the workehop on Saturday, January 31ot at 8$.3Q a.m. A brief discuoo oh followed. She also introuood a now dtalff ;inomber, ()amid Piehvwie. Pti)RtIC NEARXNQ5 PD U.-06-12/V4R 56-06/vAf S7-06. A roqMoat: by Oerry Co. Reoven for approval oaf a ; 2-fel; planned development; and, for approval of a,variance to the .'ranait Standard requiring a hard surface pedestrian path to bo conetruoted to the nearest multiple passenger exchange facility (VAR 57M06); end, a variance docreaming the cul-do-mac turnings radius from SO' to 4$' (VAR SS-06) . The alto in located north of Childs Road and cant of Clnon Road (Clackamaa County Tax Map 2 1E 208A, T'ak Lot 2901)• DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD January 19, 1987 Mr. Pishvaie noted that the variance decreasing the oul-de ' sac turning radius (VAR 56-86) was not applicable to this case because it only applies to private streets. Mr. Pishvaie gave a brief summary of the staff report and addressed the variance criteria. He said that staff recommends approval with conditions and then proceeded to explain the conditions. Discussion and questions followed between the Board and Mr. Pishvaie regarding whether a tree survey had been suhmittted; existing utilities; underground utilities; full half street improvements on Childs Road and whether it is the intent to repair the asphaltic paving; how staff arrived at the area size; Condition C.5. of the staff report regarding the half street improvements; and whether a right of way had been obtained for it. Mr. Pishvaie explained that a tree surveyby applicant.had not boon submitted the a He feels that the Board should require that as a condition of approval. The use of underground utilities were explained and he further went on to state that the existing right of way will accommodate the proposed half street i improvement. Mr. Piehvaio distributed a letter received from Linda Simpson which stated that advance information was not available to the public. A brief discussion followed. PROPONENTS mr. Mike Henry, of KP IP k"?ortl_and_ O.R. Mr, Henry is representing J. C. Reeves. Ho explained the project and said that the applicant has presented a tree plan showing all trees that are 5" in diameter. tie explained that they will save as many trees as possible in the open space. Mr. Henry said that two concerns were the conditions regarding the underground utilities and the half street improvements. He presented two photographs as exhibits which show the development looking towards Olson Road; and, the undeveloped land all along the front of Childs Road, OPPONENTS None Since there was no further testimony, Chairman Martindale closed the public portion of the hearing for Board deliberation. Mr. Finch moved for approval of PD 11-86-12/VAR 56-86 with the delatien from the staff recommendations of the last sentence in C. 5., which is the half street improvements extending to Olson Road; the deletion of D.2., the -2- DEvELOPMCMP REVIEW BOARD January 19, 1987 underground utilities requirement. Who motion was seconded by Mr. yinsli Discussion regarding the submittal or tree survey. Staff agrees with the Board that the applicant should supply a tree survey. Mr. Finch amended motion at this time to include the applicant be required to submit a tree survey and that, if possible, the streets should be meandered to avoid the trees that are in the middle of Megan Place. He stated that the meandering of the troos is a recommendation not a requirement. Mr. Piahvaio explained that the staff has worked with the applicant to save the trees by creating an island around them but it is not feasible from a traffic safety standpoint because the City would be liable in case of an accident. At this time Mr. Wright stated that he would like to make an addition to G. Miscellaneous, Item 4. Be stated that even though there seems to be no instability on the site, the Code requires a soils investigation. Therefor©, he would like to add to O. 4 that, all testpits in the street shall be flagged for future excavation and replacement by engineered fills. Mr. Finch said that he accepted that as an amendment. Chairman Martindale inquired if there was any further discussion and Mr. tBlackmer° asked for clarification of the sidewatlka on Exhibit C. A brief discussion followed regarding curbline v.s. property line. Mr. Finch restated the motion as follows, approval of Pp 11- 86-12/VAR 56-06 with the deletion of the last sentence of Condition C. 5. , regarding the half street improvements extended to Olson Rd.). the deletion of' D.2. , the underground utilities raquirementi that the applicant bo required to submit a tree survey; and, that the wording "that all tostpits shall be flagged for future excavation and replacement by engineered fills" be added to Condition O. 4. There being no further discussion or amendments to the motion, a roll call vote was taken and the motion carried unanimously for approval. The conditions are as followat Jti Pgior ..to Any On Site mnrovetmente orGrading* 1. Submit a final grading plan. 2. Submit a final drainage plan. 3. Submit an erosion Oontrol plan. 4. Submit a soils report prepared by a registered professional pone. 'engineer or an engineering geologist. • 040 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD January 19, 1907 D. Prior to Final Plan Approval; 1. Submit a reproducible duplication of the, ftnal plat which clearly depicts: a) sidewalks: b) utility easements; o) setbacks as follows: front yard 201-, side yard 5' , and roar yard 25'7 and, d) condition E(1) as a notation. 2. Submit the final. CC & Ris, delineating the ownership use, liability and maintenance responsib�.lities for the proposed private open space. 3. Submit a revised street tree plan illustrating the size, type and location of all existing trees to remain, and the size, type and location of neW trees, both on Megan Place and Childs Road, 4, Dedicate 10 feet of right of way along the north side of Childs Road, 5. Show utility easements or adequate width on the final plat for those lots where public utilities are will be constructed. Where Utilities will be constructed on side or near lot lines, show adequate restrictions to prevent the erection of fences and/or wails over the utilities, 6. Provide plat restrictions against removal of future street trees (if they are planted outside the right of way). 7. Pay the appropriate open space fee at $2,952.67 (i.e. , $246.06 per lot) . C. Prior to Final, Construction Plans Approvai: 1, Provide for positive reef and foundation drains to all lots. 2. Submit a final street lighting plan and accompanying photometric data for both Megan Place and Childs Road, 3. Submit a utilities plan along with final construction plans showing theproposed sidewalks and their location relative to street lights, hydrant, etc. -4 I f& DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Januar 1• 1987 4. That final construction Plana for water, sanitary sewers and storm drainage and atreeta ahall comply with the City►n Coder standards and apocifications. 5. provide full half street :improvements on Childa 'Road fora 36 foot street, including vertical curb and gutters ;storm drainage, street lights, and aidowaiks. The half street improvements shall be extended Weaterly to the intersection of Childs Road and Olson Avenue. 6. Obtain and eubmit written approval from the Rivergrovo Water District concerning the final layout of tho proposed water system, D. Prior toAny Street xmproyemonto on Childs Roads 1. Obtain the Clackamas County approval for the half street improvement and accrue on Childs Road. 2. All the existing uti,litioa along Childs Road shall be placed underground. 3. Comply with tho Street Widening Election provisions of the City of Lake Oawogota City Charter, E. Prior to lnnuenco of Any Building Permits 1. Pay the apociol Canal Sower payback fee to the City ($640,00 per lot) . P. t,'ri,o toRemoval of An `1`r een E,Lvo inches o creator n , amo ter t 1. Obtain a tree cutting permit from the Department of Public Works and Development Serviette. q. Mincollarinouo # 1. The Arian Meadows) tone requirements shall be the R-16 District requirements as described in LOC 40.215-225. The two exceptiona shall be reduction in the aide yard setbacks from 10► to Sr, and reduction in the minimum lot _ , area front 15,000 square feat to 11,428 square feet. r5. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD aanuary19) 1907, 2. Xf fill is placed on any lot, the extent of the fill shall be shown on aa-builta, accompanied by a statement that the fill meets the minimum requirements for bearing soils adopted by the Uniform Building Code, 3. Any future entrance sign shall meet sign and vision clearance requirements. V. ►DDITIONAL INVORMATTONt 1. The final plat shall be submitted within one year of the date of the Order reflecting the Board's decision. 2. Xf the final plat is to be recorded prior to the Cityls acceptance of the public improvements, the applicant shall provide the City with an acceptable financial guarantee for the cost of those improvements (LOC 49,075). GENERAL PLANNING )riodings, Conc)umions and Order VAR 54-06-19 findings, Conclusions and Order VAR 54-06-11 419 were presented for approval. Mr. Finch moved for approval of VAR 54-06-11-419. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ingrim and carried unanimously, ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, Chairman Martindale adjourned the meeting at 8;36 p.m. ( Respectfully submitt d, Marian Andersen Recording Secretary .6.. ) APPROVED JANUARY 1p 1087 eQk cxTy OF LAKE osw4c0 p>rv>aLapMENT REvxEw 1aaARa MzNuMr>~s January 5., 1907 The Aevelo mont Review Board meeting Was called to order by Chairman Richard Ealiak at 7)33 p.m* Board mombere prodont were Chairman slick, Vice Chairman Vern Martindalef 4. Daniel Xngrim, Curtin Finch, Anthony Wrightr Kenneth xineli and Robert hlaakmoro, Staff prooant wore City Attorney Jim Coleman; Aemociatu Planner Michael Wheeler) and. recording secretary Mariam Andoraen. ARgA2ML OF MIt uTsg3,, since there were three note of minutes to be approved, the conaeneue of the foard was to consider them after the public hearing portion of the mooting. pu r.,IC HEARINcta , VAR64-04-1Q. A request by Ctre9orV L. ,Sobel for approval, of a 6k variance to the IOt Koski and Judith eIdeyard aetback required in garage zone forhe n w t -15 ory Tax Map 2 le 4AD) . Mr. Wheeler gave a history of the eubjoct property and briefly summarized the staff report. Ha reviewed the criteria for approval of a variance as it applied to thin request and stated that staff recommends denial, ,RoPONSNTS a o oak 02 ou tr Commons a a awe" o • Mr. on exp a no a r propposa an presence a topogre o map of the bite taken from an unidentified survey (exhibit 12�), 0e anaworod quoetiona from the Board regarding the acceneor building; the floor plant and, whether they etill planned to build a cellar nine* they propose a two car garage, tan o mo a Lake_ swa a 7 4. Mr,. are a a ne g or root y to a wee o o au act property. Ha said that he ie the neighbor that would be most affected by the applica,rt'b ropoaal. He stated that he did have an objection to the the sing© car garage as deaignod but eineo then hoe reached an agreement with the applicant+ that the length of the garage would be reduced from 36 foot to 30 foot. yf; -1 /i DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD January 5, 1961 Ralph Olson, Olson Group Architects 17150 S.W. Upper Boones Ferry. Durham, OR. Mr. Olson came forward and explain the requeat. He said that the roof of the two-story addition Would buffer the applicants' use of their property from their neighborla view. He also noted that the attic would provide wouldxprovide app0 roximatelyo f 200osq.eft,nod ftstot rageoot cellar Discussion followed between Mr. Olson and the Board regarding the slope of the subject property and Mr. Olson reviewed the topographic map Exhibit 12) with the Board. ,PEE pPONENTS - None Since there was no further testimony, Chairman Eslick closed the public portion of the hearing for Board deliberation. The Board discussed the variance criteria as it applied to this request and agreed that from the standpoint of function and design, the variance requested is not ezhe "minimum necessary to make reasonable use of the property". They found that an accessory structure to serve as a garage could be placed on the lot in a manner that conforms to all applicable zoning requirements. They also discussed different methods of reducing the severity of the variance request which included alternate methods of connecting the addition to the dwelling, noted the sensitivity of the side yard reduction and agreed that the criteria could not be met by the material presented by the applicants. There being no further discussion, Mr. Finch moved for denial without prejudice of VAl 54-86-11. The motion was seconded by Mr. Zinsli and carried unanimously. OCNEHALIn NNINC) election of Qftleppm Discussion followed regarding holding the elections at a later date when the new members were present. Mr. Coleman noted that according to code, voting always takes place the first meeting in january, After further discussion, Mr. ;pinch made a motion to hold the election of officers the second meeting in February. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Zinsli nominated Vorrt Martindale for Chairman of the Development Review Board. The motion was seconded by Mr. Finch. .2m 04,14t DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD January Si 1907 < Mr. Martindale nominated Richard Delick for Chairman of the Development Review Board . The motion was seconded by Mr. Ingrim. Mr. pinch moved that the nominations bo- closed. The motion was seconded and carried. A silent ballot wee taken with the tally of Martindale - 4 and Calick - 3. Mr. Zinsli made a motion to elect Mr. Martindale as Chairman of the Development Review Board. The motion was seconded by Mr. Pinch and a roll call vote we taken. The results of the roll call vote wan as follows, Mr. Martindale was unanimously elected as Chairman. The next item was nominations for Vice Chairman. Mr. Zinsli nominated Mr. Eslick and the motion was seconded by , Mr. 1ngrim. The nominations wore cloned at this time and a roll call vote was taken. Mr. Eslick was unanimously elected as Vice Chairman. Mr. Martindale, at this time, took over an chair of the meeting. At this time, Mr. Wheeler distributed a staff report for DA 2-06- ' 12 regarding a request for an amendment to the Development Standard, i`.00 19.010(g) which will be heard at the Planning Commission on Monday January 12, 1907. A brief discussion followed. He also distributed information regarding the Portland-Vancouver Metropolitan Area Solar Access Project which will be presented at the City ity Council onTuesday, January 6th. Mr. Wheeler noted that the City of bake Oswego will be hosting be an open house on Wednesday, January 14th between 4t00 p.m. and Ot00 p.m. at City Hall. He encouraged the Board to schedule a time between 4 and 0 to be present at City Hall to answer questions. He also reminded them of the joint meeting between the DRt3/Planning Commission and City Council orientation on Monday, January 26thf and, noted that there would also be a joint workshop on Saturday, Janttery 31st. ,OTHER DUSZNE$$. hnproval of Minutes The minutes for November 3, 1906 wore conaidored for approval. It was noted that there were corrections on page 2, 3 and 4. After taking note of this, Mr. Eslick moved for approval of the minutes of November 3rd as corrected. The motion was seconded by y Mr. Pinch and carried for approval. The November 17, 1906 minutes were presented for approval. Corrections and page 2 and 3 were noted and a motion was made by _3. } f DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD January 5, 1907 Mr. Finch for approval of the November 17th minutes as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Esliok and carried for approval With Mr. Wright abstaining, The minutes for December 11 1966 wore praaented for approval. After review, Mr. Zinsli moved for approval of the minutes for December 1st. The motion was seconded by Mr. Finch and carried with Mr. Wright, Mr. galick and Mr. Dlackmore abstaining, 'INDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER DR 21-46-11-417 Mr. Finch moved for approval of DR 21-06-11-417 as written. The motion was eeconded by Mr. Zinsli and carried unanimously for approval with Mr. Ealiok, Mr. Wright and Mr. plackmoro abbstaining. VAR 54-06-1141n " Mr. Ealick moved for approval of VAR 54-46-11-410 as written. The motion was seconded by Mr. Zinsli and carried unanimous y with Mr. Finch, Mr. Martindale and Mr alackmoro abstaining. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, Chairman Martindale adjourned the meeting at 8155 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ae-‘44t-04-%-s. Marian Anderson Recording Secretary ,-4 E