HomeMy WebLinkAboutApproved Minutes - 1986-10-06 APPROVED ;NOVEMflER 3, 1.913 Ci
CITY OP LAKE OSWEGO
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Ootobor 6, 1906
The Development Review board meeting of October 6, 1986 woo
called tO order by chairman rstick at 7t3$ p.m. board members
present were Chairman Richard rslick, Cu tie ?inch, Anthony
Wright, Kenneth `linsli, Vern Martindale and Robert Blackmer°.
State; present warn envelopment Review Planner Robert Galante)
deputy City AttorneYt and, secretary Marian Andersen.
APPROVAL (W Mrtqu'rt s - None
DET/TtONS ANh COMMUNICATIONS - Mr. Galante presented a letter
from Ralph Tehran of OTAK, Inc. representing Margo Wallick (VAR
44-66-O3) withdrawing their: request.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3
OR 02-06-03. A rnquoat by Raymond J. nrtrto.l f acting as_Agent Ear
Don and Ann Anderson for approval of a someraial romodarl and
expanelon to croato lutt3UU rag. t:t. ot:` spauu loaatod at the N.S.
lntnrauction oe Br ant Road. and the now 'eRoar Ancona Road' (Tax
hots t anc Je of Tax map 2 t:_ C
Mr. Galante briefly sumntarited the staff repot and listed the
S011owing items to be addressed:
1. Mathematical error which illustrates that there is still
to he a parking deficit in the number provided by the
applicant,
2. The applicant has to demonstrate that they will
construct parking spaces offsite and provide an approved
landscape plan, It must be demonstrated to the board
that they have the authority to develop on someone oleos
prcpertyt in addition to the recipracal parking
agreement which they already have.
3. Minor changen toed to be made in the site to accommodate
the kingineering Department's requirement to provide
proper vision clearance along their access driver That
would entail widening out the parking peninsula that is
in the curve on the applicant's property to accomplish
two spacesd rather than ono parking space. Other minor
modifications must be made to allow the pedestrian path
to function proporly end to allow proper accese to the
garbage storage and delivery area.
atat`u believes that the building now has been modified and
reduced in nine to a point where it can be approved: but,
recommend to the board that they give the applicant some
.1ce
•
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES October 6, 1956
direction to work with the staff to solve the three major
problems and return at a later meeting to complete this
application.
PROPON CNTs
Ray Bartel, 2515 S. R. 1larrison, Portland. He explained the
dieorapancy in the building size and explained the parking. Mr.
Bartel said that in combining the three tohey ts, 1l theelyparkinisumitl.t�rrl
complies with the zoning ordinance.
documentation that his client has the right to use the adjaoent
parking; but, it is a matter of whether he has the right to
construct the parking. He said they will do what the Board
directs thorn to do; either come back for another hearing with
that document or provide it to the staff at a later date.
DiscussiOn followed between the Hoard and Mr. Bartel regarding
who will construct the parking; and, whether the reciprocal
parking agreement has been recorded. Mr. Bartel stated that the
reciprocal parking agreement has boon recorded by the nndorson's
attorney and can be submitted. The Board feels that the
applicant should submit an exhibit showing the configuration of
tho parking and the landscaping before they can consider an
approval.
Mr. 13lackmore asked the staff to explain what is meant by "peak
ho"" s"'. Mr, Galante said that the applicant has provided a
"worst case" scenario; the worst case as Ear as parking intensity
for restaurants. They have provided the higshost intensity of
parking spaces for all, those uses, 'the restaurant and the
associated office and retail space; and, have provided the total
number that is required as the minimum by the standard. The
standard anticipates "Peak hour" use. Discussion followed.
Chairman Eslick asked for the Board's opinion on whether this
item should be pursued on the general layout and elevation; or,
should it be tabled until the applicant submit further
information. Discur;r3ion followed regarding the reciprocal
parking agreement. tt was suggested by Mr. l3lackmore to table
this request and to have legal staff review the reciprocal
agreement that has boon recorded; and then, to advise the Board
how binding it is and whether it is sufficient to protect the
City. it wan dotrrnined to hear further testimony before
considering a motion to tabled this item.
OPPONENTS
Glen Chilcote, 15964 S. W. boones Perry Road, Lake Oswego. He is
an architect representing the adjacent owner, Mr. Mike Nichols,
who owns the hard +,re store. Mr. Nichols' concern is the offsite
parking. iie etatt they hayed no problem with the devolopernnt of
the rabtaurant or ,+f the additional building required. Ho stared
that Mr. Nichols plans to develop the back end of the hardware
etto>e, which is now enclosed with a chainttnk fence, as a garden
.2..
D13VELOPMI* r REVIIW BoAfD MINUTES October 6, 1986
center whore he will have areas for podoetrian walks'. Ho will be
Adding some additional parking at the back end, which will front
on Mr. Usrtol's access road. Mr. Nichols' concern tam that his
parking will be taken up by people from the service center, the
offices or the restaurant. Ho also inquired what was meant by
service center.
Rl I3UTT'AL
Mr. Bartel oamo forward and explainod that the service center
referred to is "service" or "bulk merchandise", The Zoning
Ordinance allows for someone to provide certain a typo of repair
Shop in this district also bulk merchandise. tt is not a service
station or a mechanics shop. In regards to people parking in
Someone oleos parking lot, "hey feeel it is going to happen all
along this roar access road as Iuturo development occurs.
Discussion followed botwoon the board And Mr. Bartel regarding
the attsita and reciprocal parking. Mr. Bartel said that this
type of parking is allowed by the Zoning Ordinance, Mr. Galante
said that the intent of the roar access drive was to implomont
some plan policies that looked at semi) of the access to the
foonoh Worry problems that exist in that area And also
recognizing the difficulty in creating something other than strip
development in the take Grove area. The Plan addresses working
with the property owners to develop a roar access roadway that
would connect parking lots and allow reciprocal parking. This
would allow an increased opportunity for development in that
area. He said that it is the intent to have reciprocal parking
occur all along the rear acooss drive.
There being no further testimony, Chairman !;slick closed the
public portion of the meeting for i3oarddeliberation.
Mr. Finch made a motion to table this application until such time
as the applicant hats satisfied the staffs requiromanta regarding
the parking agreement and until an npprovad parking and
landscaping plan can bo Submitted. Mr. Wright stated that he
would like the applicant to submit a componire plan of all.
parking areas including the. Andersonproperty, hereciprocal..
nt
p g , n u g
parking properties, particularly the Nichols property and
sir
anyc�tftor parking spaces within ,,UO feet of. this development in
order to got a better perspective of the parking. Mr. Blackmer*
said that he concurred with Mr. Wright and would second the
motion. tsiscussion followed and a roll call vote was taken. The
motion carried unanimously.
DR 19-06-09. A roc uont b Gerald T. Hoffman, bVM, for approval
o e#xter or romo e nt on an ex sting votrinarian tacittty
located at 17t3o 8. W. sooners Ferry Road (Tax riot 38Of of Tax Mai,
2 -in lBl3A).
Mr. Galante gave a brief Summary of the staff report. Staff
recommends approval with three conditions. The applicant was not
present no Mr. Galante answered questions from the Board
-3..
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW t)OAItD MINUTES October $, 1906 r,
ap
regarding the landscape plan and the materials used for the
twemodel.
PROPONENTS - None
OPPONENTS - None
Since there were no proponents or opponents, Chairman Esltck
closed the public portion of the meeting for t)eard deliberation.
After A brief discussion of the remodel plan. Mr. Martindale
moved for approval of Dtt 19•06-09 with three conditions. The
motion wan seconded by M . '4insli and carried unanimously. The
conditions are as follows:
t. That the screening of mechanical, equipment be
demonstrated to the skattstaction of state,
2. That a development schedule be submitted to the
natisfection of stuffs
3 That a color and materials board or descriptions be
provided to the satistaation of stair.
DR 20-86-09. A request by J. M. Lackner Construction Co. for
approval of a 103 eq. it. concrete Klock addition to Bldg. 'F" at
the take nsworio Commerce Center located on the south side of
Lakeview nlvc . ('tax tots 201 and' 120U of 'Tax Map 2 lE l0uC.
Mr. Galante nave a brief summary rat the otart report And
explained the request. $tatf recommends approvel with three
conditions,
PROPONENTS
JofL'.M. Locknor, 21626 8. W. Columbian Dr. 'Tualatin, Mr.
t.ocknor explained the change in the roof; how the air condition
unit on roof will be hidden: and, answered questions from the
poard regarding elope of the metal roof; height of the air
condition unit; height of the existing building; and,
roquiremente for ceding height. Discussion followed.
OPPONENTS - None
Since there was no further teutimony or questions, Chairman
C;sltck closed the Public hearing iaartirn of the meeting for ooterd
delibgaratton.
IDiscubonion followed regarding lowering the reef structure to
hide the nit' conditioning unit and still make it functional
inside.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Pinch made a motion to
approve Ott 20-0G-09 with the exception of Condition No. 1 and
with the recommendation that the roof be lowered au much 00
possible, to stntf's satisfaction, to Accommodate the, screening
A
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. MTNUTES October G 1906 ru'I
of the air conditioning unit. The motion was seconded by Mr.
2insli and carriod unanimously. The conditions aro as follows:
1. That the roof be lowered to accommodate the screening
of the air conditioning unit to the satisfaction of
staff.
2. That material and color samples or descriptions be
provided to the satisfaction of staff.
3. That a development schedule be provided to the
satisfaction of staff.
GENERAL PLANNING'
Discussion between staff and Board followed as to whether a
workshop should be held to review and discuss the Findings,
Conclusions and Order format. The Board expressed their concerns
to staff► and after discussion, it was determined that instead of
a workshop staff coutd brtnu back the information regarding the
reasoning behind the Findings format at a later meeting,
FIND/NOS,- CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER
VAR 45-06-00/VAi( 49-06-O8 (13.arba.a Smith)
Mr. Finch moved for approval of Findings, Conclusions and Order
for VAR 45-06-00/VAR 49-86-OQ as written, The motion was
seconded by Mr. 0lackmoro and carried unanimously with Mr. Wright
abstaining.
PD 07-86-06/VAR 29-0G-07/VAR 37-86-07/VAR' 30-86-07 (DR
Maloki/OTAK, Inc.
Mr. P3lackmoro moved for approval of the Findingls. Conclusions and
Order for PD 07/06-07/VAR 20-0G-07/VAR 37-86-07/VAR 30-864-07 as
written. The motion wa.sa seconded by Mr. zinsli and carried
unanimously Mr. Finch and Mr. Wright abstaining, .
VAR 20-06-08/VAR 41-06-00/VAR 42-06-00 (Thomas & Susan Robinson)
Mr. Martindale moved for approval of the Findings. Conclusions
and Order for VAR 20-0G-00/VAR 41-86-00/V R 42-.06-00 as written.
The motion was oecondud by Mr. 2insli and oarried with Mr. Finch
and Mr. Wright abstaining.
DR 04-86-02/VAR 05-86-04 (Oil Can Henry's)
Mr. Martindale moved for approval of DR 04-0G-02/VARt 05-86-04 as
written. The motion was seconded by Mr* 2insli carried with a
vote of 3 - '1 c'ith Mr. h lackmore voting in opposition and Mr.
Wright and Mr. Pinch abs3taining,
-6-
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOA1W MINUTES Octobor 6, 1986
ADJOURNMENT
Theo being no further business to oonductr Chairman Ealick
adjourned the meeting at 9;42 p.m.
Respectfully submtttrd
r
Marian Andersen
r
ReeordintJ Secretary
{
4
i
i
f