Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApproved Minutes - 1986-12-15 Oevelopoment t{eyiew poard Minutes 1986 December 15, 1986 December 1, 1986 November 17, 1986 /d November 3, 1986 October 6, 1986 September 15, 1986 August: 28,1986 Auguat 4, 194E July 21, 1906 July 19,1985 Juno 24, 1986 May 19, 1986 w May SS, 198E ,April 21, 1986 March 31, 198E March 3, 1986' E'ebruary 19, 1986 February 3, 1908 4anuary 20, 1986 APPROVER JANUARY 19, 1987 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES December 15, 1986 The Development Review Board meeting was called to order by Chairman Richard Eslick at 7:34 p.m. Board members present were Chairman Eslick, E. Daniel rngrim, Anthony Wright and Kenneth Zinsli. Vice Chairman Vern Martindale, Robert Blackmore and Curtis Finch were absent. Staff present were City Attorney Jim Coleman; Associate Planner Michael Wheeler; and, recording secretary Marian Andersen, APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes for November 3, November 11 and December 11, 1986 were presented for a proval. Since there was not a quorum of those who were in attendance at those meetings, it was the consensus of the Board to table these three sets of minutes until the January 5, 1987 meeting. Chairman Eslick asked that it be noted for the record that the sound system was not working properly. It is being recorded but may not be a clear record. PUBLIC HEARINGS VAR 55-86-11. A request by Dan and Sall Bernhardt for approval of +' . following six variances to enclose an Road, Tax Ma ax �ttin second storydeck )1060 Worth Shore , p l. g, 0001 2 ltr 10BB, Tax Lot 7 1, Approval of a variance to the restrictions placed on nonconforming structures; 2. Approval of a variance of 8' 7" to the 25' rearyard setback; 3. Approval of a variance to the 30% maximum lot coverage, 4. Approval of a variance to the required 25' setback from Oswego Lake, measured from the applicant's property line; 5. Approval of a variance to the code restriction requiring nonconforming structures, damaged or destroyed by any means to the extant that the cost of rebuilding the damaged portions would exceed 50%i of the current replacement cost, the rebuilding shall conform fully to City Codes and standards/ -1— gti DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SOARD December 15, 1906 6. Approval of a variance to the requirement that no yard or other open spaces, existing on or. after December 16 1982 shall be reduced in dimension or Stan below the minimum requested by Chapter 48. Mr, Wheeler atsted that two of the o1.x variances (Nos, 3 and 5) were withdrawn beeause they were no longer applicable, He gave a brief summary of the staff report and addressed the variance criteria as it applied to the four remaining veriencee. )te also noted that the development standards noted in the report were not applicable to the request, end their deletion should be noted. Staff reoommanda approval, pR0P0N8NTS D vid .Vonada0 .8965 s. W._,Cedarwood mane Portland, oP ,7p , arobltectt, representing the Bernhardts Came forward and prcaentod photographs of the Bernhardt property and Surrounding property (Exhibits '7 - 16), He eXpleinod the Photographs and the impact this proposal would have en the surrounding neighborhood. Queetiane followed from the Board regarding approximate square footage of the house and the whetherathey would the sexistming otr materials used and QPPOS ENT41 » None Since there was no further testimony, Chairman Ea1ick closed the public portion of the meeting for Board deliberation. Discussion followed regarding the impact the prepoaal will have on. the surrounding propertyy owners and the Board agreed that the impact would not be a detriment to the neighborhood and would upgrade the front of the building. They also felt that it would Make good usu of the apace and be more aesthetically desirable. There being no further diaounsion, Mr, Zinsli moved for approval 04 vA,M. 55-Odwil (1 through 4), The motion was seconded by Mr. Wright and carried unanimously, CENARO,_PJAANKNt None ,fig DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOARD December 15, zgg6 i T"INDINGSS ,CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER DR 19-86-709 (Voterinery Clink), Mr4 zineli moved gor ap roval of the Findings for bRR 19.06"09 as written. The motion was seconded by Mr4 WrSght and carriu0 unanimously, 'rhoro being no Eurther business to conduotr Chairman telJ,ok ac ourned the mooting at 6 t 20 p«Ρ►h. RoapeotEu1 .y submitted k....../ee,i;:/ 7 Mara Andersen Retarding Ssaretary' F. - X APPROVED JANUARY S, 1987 CITY OF LAKE OSWRGO DEVE1OPMENm REVIEW,BoARD1 MINUTE December 1, 1986 The Development Review Board meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Vern Martindale at 7131 p.m. Board members present Were Vice Chairman Curtis finch, N, Daniel thgrim, Vern Martindale and Kenneth Zlnsli. Anthony Wright, Chairman Richard >aslick and Robert Blackmer* Were absent. Staff present were Development Review planner and secretary Marian Andersen. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS - None PUBLIC HEARINGS ER 21-06-1l. A continuation,of a re uost b E Street Investors Ltd. for a roval of 'tKe remade o t o ace o o an o ce ocato at 5 I" st8 roe Tax Lo 0 0 Tax Map E. on) . Mr, Galante gave a brief tPdate, of what had transpired. No paid that the applicant has revised plans in response to the conoarne expressed by the Board at the November 17th meeting. Mr. Galante answered questions from the Board regarding the landscaping and said that the applicant hoe revised the letter that was submitted at the previous meeting, stating that existing planters will be removed and the new planter will be constructed as shown on the drawing, The area is not reduced over what wee originally on the nitre. PROPONENTS g.ena_Marteenv, 2 05 Eat 24th St. Vancouver WA Re said that has conferred riitb"h a o on a an cry eve Agreed With the Board's suggestions. ppPOS1`"i!ION - None Since there was no further testimony, Vice Chairman Vern Martindale closed the public portion of the meeting for Board deliberation. Vice Chairman Martindale reiterated the requirements for approval and asked Mr. Galante If the staff is still requesting a color board. Mr. Galante said that the description of the colors end materials was adequate and a color and materials board Web not. neceasary)hoWe.ver, the ward reviewed t rhe staff reccmmandat,ione and found their to be still in effect. A brief discuabion followed as to whether Condition No. 5 should be modified. Mr. ,/ Galante said that it can be changed to read that the elm tree be protected to the satisfaction of staff. DEVELOPMENT REVTBW BOARD , December 1, 1986 Since there wao no further diacuaaiQn, Mr, Pinch made a motion to approve DR 21-86-11 with the staff rocomnendatiena and with the addition to Condition No, 5 and in accordance with the revised drawinga that were Submitted. The motion was seconded by Mr, 2ine,.i and carried unanimously, ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Vice Chairman Martindale tsd journed the meeting at 7t40 p.nt, Roupeotiui y submitted ry� , Marian Andersen Recording Secretary