Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet - 1991-08-19
T`k 'fix„ ° .i, it%�, • CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO DEVELOPMENT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS,C'Y'I'Y HALL,380 'A' AVER BOARDE ;:' 4 Monday,August 19, 1991 , ,'`• 7:30 P.M. E. CALL TO ORDER . a, ROLL CALL Agenda hook • APPROVAL OF MINUTES .:. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Request for Continuance of Agenda Items DR 5-91 and DR 6-91. PUBLIC HEARING DR 13-90, a request by Green Street Architecture for approval to construct a 35,000 square foot mixed use center comprised of the following uses: a) 11,000 square foot retail use; b) 17,800 square foot . office use; and c) ,200 square foot daycare use. The site is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Westlake Drive and Parkview Drive north of Kruse Way, otherwise described as Tax Lot 107 of Tax Map 2 1E 6. Staff coordinator is Robert *alante Sgn�r.r ian July 15, 1991,• 1aer. C��t�pu�d f R PLEASE NOTE: AGENDA ITEMS DR 5-91 AND DR 6-91 ARE CONTINUED TO t SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLI'CANT n DR 5-91, a request by David M. Norris for approval of a building permit and tree cutting ti r order to construct a single family dwelling on a 12, 153 s Y ftY deg permit in Comprehensive Plan as being a part of a Distinctive Natural Area (No. 201iSpecimenlfirs—Wdoif the �h4 1 r 1 ,.. Goodall Road). The site is located at 1625 Country Club Road (Tax Lot 3700 (portion) of Tax Map 2 lE 04CA)Y Staff coordinator is Michael R. Wheeler, Associate Planner,— 1991. Testimony will be limited to the Tree Cutting Ordinance Criteria, ontinued f'rortl,ittly 1S, DR 6-91, a request by David M. Norris for approval of a building permit and tree cuttingpermit in order to construct a single family dwelling on a 9,267 sq. ft. " •parcel which has b en identiid in the " ,a Comprehensive Plan as being a part of a Distinctive Natural Area (No. Goodall Road), The site is located at 14161 Goodall Road (Tax Lt 3700�(porti n) of Tax Mapofecimen firs—W. 2 04CA)Y Staff coordinator is Michael R. Wheeler, Associate Planner, lE • 1991, Testimony will be limited to the Tree CuttingOrdinance C Continued from July 5, Criteria.. PD 21-89(Mod. 7-91), a request by The Hollman Company for approval to modify the lot coverage from a lot by lot basis to an overall average for the single family planned development. The site is . located south of Carman Drive, west of Waluga and north of Oakridge Road (Tax Lot 2200, 2300, 2400; 1100, 1301, 2200, 2300 of Tax Map 2 lE 7AC; " 7bi1)Y Staff oornator is• Development Review Planner, di Hamid Pishyai , ' r • . • It ` n rY l Yr Fes•.. 1°` - }i. ,± ..1 .. . ;1:.a r` ... J _ ' r X•••r ti r• 'r: m• V1 GENERAL PLANNING V, OTHER BUSINESS—Findings, Conclusions and Order ;r. SD 6--91/VAR 9-91—Dimension Homes,Inc. SD 25-79(Mod.6-90)/HR 15-90(Revised)—Lula F.Simpson 107E. ADJOURNMENT The Lake Oswego Development Review Board welcomes your interest in these agenda items. Feel free to z mte and go as you please. , 1 embi;r laff. 3.chtert H.Foster,Chair Tom Coffee,PlanningDirector y S atr tanaway,Vice Chair Robert Galante,Senior Planner 1 " :writes A.Bloomer Ron Bunch,Senior Planner i. itataart D.Grerves Hamid Pishvaie,Dev.Review Planner r rz rRemy Catherine Clark,Associate Planner I s ', Harm N.Starr Jane Heisler,Associate Planner a " r, "�icrmnn J.Sievert Michael R.Wheeler,Associate Planner Barbara Stnolak,Associate Planner Cindy Phillips,Deputy City Attorney X `` Barbara Anderson, DRt3 Secretary Ya r `1 Kathy Avery,PC Secretary } • • �I. I • 1 , z +. Y, ® ° I 1 .. • • �, %'I/i., ° 't J, llyT- � t ✓ f :1 h o STAFF REPORT . ..,., .. . 4 o, CITY OF LAKE . •. . ,: ` —PLANNING DIVISION-----a— ! d APPLIcAmr: FILE NO.: Richard Eckar0 fir;J. Michael Moody DR 13-90 I' PRQ;ERTY C''': ELiF.�: STAFF: I 4 ' Nick Bunick Robert Galante ' LEA_ L ES BTTQki: DATE OF REPORT ,r+, ro: Tax Lot 107 of August 9, 1991 Tax Map 2 lE 6 LOCATION: DATE QF HEARING: t August 19, 1991 ' ' •,° Northeast corner of the intersection of Parkview and Westlake Drives NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: 1'( 0 Westla ke COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: R-5 ZONING DESIGNATION: R-5 , L APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant proposes to construct a 35,000 sq, ft. retail/office center in five buildings. Two are proposed to be two stories in height and three are proposed at one story in height. ' H. APPLICART.FJ R ITRBIA A. City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Km: a Impact Management Policies . , General Policy I, II, III Distinctive Natural Area Policies General Policy I Weak Foundation Soil Policies General Policy I. IV .' . 4 DR 13-90 Page 1 of 9 f ,. i. , f �1,,v w q. Social Resource Policies r, , General Policy£, V Commercial Lan d Use 1-�li�ies General Policy III, V `4 Commercial Land Use Policies Specific District Policies VI `"' Kruse-North Commercial District Transportation Land Use Policies k � . ., rl ', General Policy IV B. I . . n City_sgl ke Oswego Zath r Ordin I1 • LOC 48.120-48.155 R-5 Zone Description (setbacks, lot area, lot coverage) ,,. C. Cit ake Oswego De.,Ad.,,,.acm.C..o : LOC 49.090 Applicability of Development Standards �,. LOC 49.145 Major Development LOC 49.300-49.335 LOC 49.615 Major Development Procedures Criteria for Approval D. Sof Lake Oswego DevelonmpnLrmnnar '1` j{ 2.005-2.040 1 -4.0054.040 Building Design , y ' 5.005-5.040 Wetlands 0 6.005 -6.040 Street Lights 7.005-7040 Transitar Parking&Loading Standard 8.005-8.040 Park and Open Space 9.005-9.040 10.005 - 10.040 Landscaping Fences 11.005- 1 .040 13.005 - 11.040 Drainage Standard for Major Development Weak Foundation Soils 14.005- 14.040 • 16005 - 16.040 Utility Standard . Hillside Protection and Erosion Control 18,005- 18.040 Access 19.005- 19.040 • Site Circulation-Private Streets/Driveways 20.005 -20.040 • Site Circulation -Bikeways and Walkways E. _Cityys ., o r amn O 4 LOC 55.010--55,130 F. itYLnke Oswe n Sian ('nrlw• , LOC Chapter 49 ti• ti DR 13-90 y ' Page 2 of 9 • " . x • ' {A ,aAli i ' I 111,,.1 el yl� ., 1 .1 d . 4 \ qq yti� : , a7. l . -.j. 'FJ �".9L i • � HI. �1 A. Existing Conditions; 1. The site is about 2.6 acres in size,and contains a small wetland, 2. The site drains from the northeast to the southwest at an average slope of 3.5 ` y percent. 1 3. The west half of the site has mature oak and ash trees and a well vegetated native ' understory. 1 4. Additional site information is found in the following exhibits: I Exhibit 3,Applicant's Written Submittal Exhibit 13,Topographical and Tree Survey Exhibit 14,Wetlands Study and Delineation Exhibit 16, Preliminary Soils Investigation . Exhibit 22, ATEP Traffic Impact Study 5. The site borders two collector streets, Westlake and Parkview Drives. 6. A public storm drain line exists in Parkview Drive. Water lines exist in both • Parkview and Westlake Drives. However hydrants are not sufficiently located to " serve the site. Sanitary sewer connection is available at the southwest corner of the site. B. Hioly,'Back mud• (110 The site is part of the Westlake PUD which was approved by the City in 1980. The original approval and subsequent modifications are illustrated in Exhibits 24 througl,i 29. No changes were proposed to the 3 acre neighborhood commercial site (now 2.6 leres after dedication of right—of—way). The neighborhood commercial site is regulated by specific Plan policies (Plane page 116) and by the Final Plan and Program (Exhibit 27) which was adopted by Ordinance 1783. t The Final Plan and Program lists the uses allowed on the site and establishes other site criteria as follows: yl 1. Maximum size—35,000 sq. ft. 2. Height—30' or two stories, whichever is less 3. Setbacks—none required 4. Lot coverage—50 percent 5. Parking—current code 6. Lot area—minimum 5,000 sq. ft, 7. Lot width—50' minimum 8, Signage—up to 150 sq. ft, or current City code (32 sq. ft. maximum) .• C. Compliance with Criteria for Ap rovaL As per LOC 49.615, the following criteria must be considered when evaluating a'. development proposals: 410 1. The burden of proof in all cases is upon the applicant seeking approval, ' DR 13-90 `a Page 3 of 9 .� •.� i ' .. l • The applicant has submitted documents marked as exhibits,which accompany this report. • "' Substantial evidence has been submitted to support the application; however, , a \° �' some conflicting evidence has been submitted by opponents. The conflicts will be listed in 1.' r report. 2. For any development application to be approved, it shall first be established �{ , that the proposal conforms to: P' :1 i .'�.k a. The City's Comprehensive Plan; The applicant has adequately addressed the applicable Plan policies in Exhibits related to this specific commercial site. The applicants contend that compliance itiith d 88 these criteria is sufficient in light of the;previous approval of the Westlake ODPS which 1 incorporates substantial open space areas, trees and other natural resources; however, policies related to impact management require that the extent of tree preservation in conjunction with development be evaluated (see Impact Management Policies Specific ' Policy I for General Policy I). These policies further require that innovative site designs be employed to reduce potential impacts on natural features (see Impact Management Policies, Specific Policy II for General Policy `' r, 4 issues,please see Section 2.b.ii., below, �' For detailed staff analysis of these is b. The applicable statutory and Code requirements and regulations, ,� including: , i. Il c. ity of Lake Oswego Zoning Code (Chapter 43). The applicant has demonstrated compliance with the Zoning Code • (See Exhibit 3), `" r y r ii. The City of Lake Oswego Tree Cutting Ordinance (Chapter 55); The applicant has provided substantial information to demonstrate compliance with the ,, criteria listed in 55,080(1-5) of the Tree Cutting Ordinance, The evidence currently in ' the record includes: `'' "a' vP tt; , 7K � 5' Exhibit • F,41 Fib,` A •' ,'s,' 3. Applicant's Narrative, 7 9 and 11 F3 . 4. Site Plan pp. ' �`, "' ` Landscape Plan ' ` 13. Topographic and Tr�;p Survey 20. Consulting Arborist's Letter of January 28, 1991 y 71. Applicant's Letter of May 20, 1991 '� 80, Arborist's Memo of May 9, 1991 ' 81. Architect's Letter Re: Tree Preservation, May 15, 1991 82. Landscape Architect's Letter Re: Tree Preservation, May 15, 1991 ` 83. Landscape Architect's Letter Re: Proposed Landscape Trees, May 10, 1991 } 89, Alternate Site Plan, June 18, 1991 ti Evidence submitted in opposition to the proposal included a number of letters submitted F" ", by citizens concerned about the preservation of the trees. In addition, a review of the sit Plan was performed by Stephen Goetz, a consulting arborist. His report was submitted a opposition to the proposal (See Exhibit 91), . r i. ,! DR •13-90 ✓• Page 4 of 9 ' P. ,fir • 4'I - Q. , 4 .`j' 1. The applicant has submitted a response (Exhibit 1.11)prepared by their consulting i arbonst,Bob Mazany, to issues raised in the report Goetz, another consulting arborist. The letter om Bob Mazanyprepared da July y15, 1991 gti generally agrees with the issues originally raised in the Goetz report, but sas that a • on the of arboricultural techniques will be utilized to mitigate the impact of development `a '. The Mazany letter states that "it is difficult to provide detailed tree—by—thee rees. recommendations prior to knowing what will be the finalized construction approvals," As a result, the information found in the exhibits regarding tree preservation submitted by the applicants is very general in nature. The applicants have not demonstrated that the buildings have been designed to save the maximum number of trees possible, that those trees proposed to remain will preserve the neighborhood character and that, specifically, those trees proposed to remain are likely to survive construction or other impacts. The applicant's arborist indicates (Exhibit 80) that "some significant ous and individual tree; can be retained"provided that precautions arefi taken to minimize the impact of construction. The precautions that would be taken are illustrated in Exhibits Y 82, 82 and 83. In contrast to the applicant's submittal, the report by Steve Goetz (Exhibit 91) states that "if the site is developed as indicated in the drawings provided,A, g p d, there is little likelihood that many of the trees will survive (possibly twenty or less)". About 100 trees exist on the site. Staff concludes that the applicant has not resolved the conflict that n ; x currently appears to exist in the record. The Board should resolve the issues of the of tree preservation in conjunction with development and the protection of remaining extent trees. K a id. The City of Lake Oswego Sign Code (Chapter 471 The applicant has indicated that signs conforming to Code requirements will be submitted (See Exhibit 3, p. 11), iv. The itv of Ordinance (Chapter 421 The applicant has submitted a complete application and a development schedule (Exhibit 3). The Code also provides specific authority to complete the PUD as originally approved by the City [See LOC 48.090(2 c. The applicable Development Standards • The applicant has adequately addressed the City's standards regarding Building Design, -. " . • Street Lights, Transit, Parking and Loading, Park and Open Space, Landscaping, Fences, •r Drainage, Weak Foundation Soils, Utilities, Hillside Protection and Erosion Control, Site * Circulation—Driveways and Public Streets and Site Circulation Bikeways and r. Walkways. Conditions of approval will be recommended to insure the installation of cedar shingles for roofing as proposed by the applicant, to insure the installation of • %' signage as approved by the Board, and to insure compliance with technical requirements affecting utilities, foundation design and erosion control. There is no stream corridor or flood plain associated with the site. The Stream Conidor and Floodplain Standards are not applicable to this request. Opponents have submitted evidence that conflicts with the evidence submitted by the w applicant to address the Wetland Standard and the Access Standard. Compliance with DR 13-90 Page5of9 r ., r, . t • / / iiii�; NAnuiY. •r i pk n r y ti Section 9.020(5)of the Iandscape standard should,be discussed, as well, These standards and the evidence in the record are addressed below. Wetland Standard (4,005)/Landscape Standard (9.0051 I The applicant has submitted substantial evidence to address the presence of wetlands on • the site and to inventory the site to determine compliance ' Landscape Standard. The evidence includes: with Section 9.020(5) of the • � Exhibit 1 ' 3. Applicant's Narrative 14. Wetlands Study and Delineation,February 19, 1991 15. Wetland Mitigation Plan 18. Division of State Lands Letter,October 29, 1991 E.' 19. Division of State Lands Letter,February 1, 1991 71. Applicant's Letter, May 20, 1991 • 77. Wetland Consultant's Letter, December 3,1990 �, » 84. Engineer's Letter, February 6, 1991 ... ? , 86. Wetland Consultant's Letter, May 22, 1991 ,r ' Opponents have submitted a number of letters which question the extent of wetland on ,,ow the site and a "preliminary site inventory" prepared by Chis Thorns, a field naturalist and wetland consultant, has been submitted in opposition to the development proposal (See _ Exhibit 92). The evidence in support of the application, and the evidence opposed illustrate the i presence of Sessile Trillium which is required to be preserved [DS 9.020(5)]. The Ai applicant's wetland consultant sates that it would be possible, but no final proposal to IF insure preservation is currently proposed. JJ The applicant's wetland consultant illustrates a small, nonessential wetland on the south • side of the site (See Exhibit 14). The preliminarysite inventorysubmitted(Exhibit 92) submitted in opposition illustrates that the wetland would "likely" lie within a 30' strip that runs north—south through the site, The applicant should resolve this potential conflict; i, however, the Wetland Standard only regulates essential wetlands. Any nonessential wetland which is appropriately mitigated may be altered in conformance with the Division of State Lands or Army Corps of Engineers permit which may be necessary, Access Standard x • � Y Based on the ruling by the Land Use Board of Appeals in Hoffman v. City of Lake • Oswego, staff agrees with the applicants in their contention that the Comprehensive Plan • w' '' compliance issues with respect to traffic were fully resolved by the City Council in 1981 and need not be reconsidered in approving individual phases of the ODPS,Exhibit 108, Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the applicant's proposal with respect to traffic and access concerns, The evidence is listed as follows; Exhibit 3. Applicant's Narrative 21, ATEP Executive Summary of Traffic Impact, February 22, 1991 22. ATEP Traffic Impact Study, November 13, 1990 ,, . :,. 4444. Re DR 13-90 d.;. Page 6 of 9 • 4 vt . 23. Traffic Impact Study for Westlake, Carl Bunke, 1984 71. Applicant's Letter, May 20, 1991 �� •• ` 78. Architect's Letter Re: Vehicular Access l 87. Traffic Engineer's Letter,June 10, 1991 • i . A ' The initial traffic impact memorandum was reviewed by Robert Keech, a consulting • ` traffic engineer(See Exhibit 90). His review has been submitted in opposition to the T development proposal. Mr. Keech states that driveway volumes appear to be low, that trip generation should be incntased 50— 100%, that the site commercial uses and customer contact oriented office uses and that the estimate for to t convenience al traffic only included the "existing traffic volumes" and the `'site generated traffic volumes". He also states that the year • �' Corridor will probably be exceeded. Mangle traffic projections sitmilarfconcerns ror the egardie ng traffic volumes, access and safety, • • ' The City Engineer has reviewed the evidence in the record and has addressed the issues in his memorandum of August 9, 1991 which is attached as Exhibit 115, d. Any applicable future streets plan or ODPS • .1 •: • The applicant has demonstrated compliance with the Westlake ODPS (See Exhibit 71). The schedule for completion of the phases of the PUD/ODPS was modified in 1990 See Exhibit 85). No changes are currently ( proposed. •" • ` III. CONC'i USIQitir ..• Exhibit N The applicants have submitted substantial evidence to support the application. The material submitted addressed the applicable criteria and provides a basis for approval, with the " 140 exception of the tree preservation issue. With respect to the issl.,e of maximum tree preservation, the Board must determine whether the site design presented satisfies applicable criteria regarding tree preservation, With respect to neighborhood character, the Board must determine whether the trees that are proposed to remain will preserve and enhance the existing wooded character of the neighborhood. Finally, the Board must determine whether the trees proposed to remain will be adequately protected during ana after construction to ensure their ' IV. R�ECOMMND EATrON • Staff recommends approval of DR 13-90 subject to the resolution of the tree resery , a issues discussed above, subject to the following conditions: P anon • A. Eris/LW/hr.jsmancedglitillelinghnniw 1. The final exterior color selection shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 2. The roofing material on all buildings shall consist of cedar shingles. 3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary approvals from the Division of State Lands ;; and the U.S. Army Cops of Engineeis, prior to altering the nonessential wetlands on the site, 4. The final design of street furniture, bike racks and paving materials for the r' pedestrian plaza shall be reviewed and approved by staff, '' DR 13-90 K Page 7 of 9 • :` ,• I y� 1 1 5. The applicant shall submit a tree preservation program and a post construction maintenance program for review and approval of staff, after consultation with an r , • i arborist chosen by the applicant from a list of qualified arborists developed by stab The tree preservation plan shall include: - Protective measures to be taken during construction, such as temporary • ` fencing around the dripline of trees. at '" r ••ry - • Supervision of construction activities and any root cutting or pruning. " Y - Tree protection fencing along the north property lien in order to protect the existing open space Tract"B". 6. Submit a final landscape plan for review and approval of staff. This plan shall W x show: - Those Sessile Trillium which are located in the areas to be landscaped as ' " being preserved within the landscaped areas. And those Sessile Trillium that �. are not located in the areas to be landscaped as being transplanted to an appropriate location on the site specified by a qualified expert. 7. Submit irrigation specifications for review and approval of staff,per City standards. . :! 8. Submit a final drainage plan for review and approval of the City Engineer, per City a" • a , Standards. •' } 9. Submit a final erosion cv trol plan for review and approval of the City Engineer, 0 per Erosion Control Plans Technical Guidance Handbook, 10. submit a detailed geotechnical report for review and approval of the City Engineer, per City Standards. 11. The proposed lights shall have proper shielding in the parking area and on the buildings to prevent potential glare onto the adjacent residential areas, 12. Final construction plans shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Engineer. 13. Final site plan and construction plans shall incorporate all recommendations listed in Exhibit 22. 14. Any alteration of the existing island in Westlake Drive other than shown on Exhibits 4, 9 and 10 shall be subject to review and approval by the Board, B. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits: ' 1. Submit as-builts for the irrigation system. 2, Designate the proposed driveways as fire lanes in the deed or on a recorded map, ra_ry. . and post the roadway as such, per DS 19,020(1)(e). 3. Provide easements for public utilities for the review and approval of the City • y. Engineer. ` .« ;' DR 13-90 Page8of9 . �r r P ,, 1 19Ir • ;01'. t ,t ADDITIO • NAL_ INFp�MA°Crnrr• '` yr; °' '• t . 1. Staff review of preliminary cry utility plan only verified the location and rapacity of utilities " `� to serve the site. ` 1. 2. If fill is placed on any lot, the extent of the fill shall be shown on as—builts, accompanied by a statement that the fill meets the minimum requirements for bearing soils adopted by the Uniform Building Code. 3. A tree cutting permit shall be obtained prior to removal of any trees that are 5"or greeter in diameter. gre ESQ. For Exhibits 1-92,please see the staff reports dated April 26, 1991 and Jul 3, 1991. The following exhibits were received after the writing of the above staff reports: 4 " 93, Clackamas County Assessment Roll, submitted by Erin Mertdors w 94. Westlake Phase One, submitted by Erin Meadors 95. Letter by Gregory&Erin Meadors, 3 pp. 96. Final Development Plan &Program for Westlake, submitted by Erin Meadors 11 pp. 97. Excerpts from the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan submitted by Erin Meadors (Pages 16, 32, 35, 61, 97-99), 98, Excerpts from the Lake Oswego Development Standards (pages 3-5), submitted by Erin ; `' Meadors 99. Excerpts from DR 10-89/PD 14-89-792 Findings, Conclusions and Order(pages 1, $— 1 9), submitted by Erin Meadors • a= 100. Figure 5—Westlake PUD Traffic Impact, 1979, Buttke, submitted by Erin Meadors 101• Photos, submitted by Erin Meadors, 3pp. 102. Letter by Tim Ramis requesting continuance, dated July 15, 1991 103. Traffic Circulation and A transportation Management Program Kruse Way Corridor, ' • Carl H. Bunke,Inc,, dated January 7, 1983 b Y ,�'` 104. Kruse Way Corridor Study, by ATEP, dated July, 1982 105. West Kruse Way Corridor Land Use Plan, dated August, 1977 106, Initial Report on Street System Analysis Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan, by Carl H. Buttke, Inc.,dated July 19, 1977 107. Report on Traffic Impact Westlake Planned Unit Development, by Carl H. Buttke, Inc. dated May 4, 1979 108. Letter by Tim R,amis, dated July 19, 1991 109, Supplemental Traffic Report by ATEP, dated July 12, 1991 110. Supplemental Wetlands Report, by Shapiro and Associates, Inc., dated July 11, 1991 111. Supplemental Arborist's Report, by Robert Mazany and Associates, dated July 15, 1991 112. Final Opinion and Order by LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS (LUBA No. 90-067) on « Appeal of Westlake '89 (PD 6-89) 113. Letter by Jeff Miller and Connie Crow, dated July 9, 1991 114. Letter by Patricia M. Collmeyer, dated July 9, 1991 w 115, Memorandutn by the City Engineer, dated August 9, 1991 116, Letter from Erin O'Rourke—Meadors, dated April 24, 1991 117, Letter from Erin O'Rourke—Meadors, dated August 8, 1991 BG:HPtbatkaa 1 DR 13-90 �' Page9of9 " a n 11 10'• ',I • • • • • 11x' i • • • • ;1' • • 1 t • • • • • • I t. ' -i \ ' 9i: ORJ.g-90 , . y Jr 'C] j 1991 CLACKAMAS • CO ASSMT ROLL 07/01 /91r . , ----MAILING ADDRESS CTY ] LEV] 007062 EY] 1 „ + = AN CUSTOMDD HOMES PCA] 1004 MBL 00 ] YRj00 PARENT ` 1 G„� MYR]O.,/9O AREAjL077 )V]O30c^^2-a0 MTC] l1i�t�i� ; RMV-LND] RMV-BLDJ FPA ] RD #377 A---Y6;. r• ,...r`m uT2 j SQ FT i SW MEADOWS J OR 97035 LAND 131040 Bj BLD OB;, ] CFPLV ----LEGAL DESCRIPTION---- FFLv .r '— 'a / 67279 TRUE MKT 131040 REA T -_ ' 10D 000-00-04-g3-L1 ASD LND 131040 ASD BLD ,L_ ' 0D OO rf � rrr **" • +r• 4f +t+r DESCRIPTION` TAX YR CURRENT ASD FPV _ �,,,,..691, �_. E_ F i , in4li 131040EXEMPT TA`iA�� FIREFATnGL 1 1r., t ..., ........'•. . :.: • C6,5 {� / ` . C .EE C , AS 2=-7 =7WENT OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION wiime Rood • Oregon Clay,OR 97045-4098 I.., 42` • . Erin Meadors 5261 Coventry CC Lake Oswego, Or. 97035 ' 9 . • fhfiilililffffi,illi,lif 1l11liliiillliiilliiiiiif 11 • • • • • 0gr17 M ea.c -r'Z 1 • • il V„ ` ' d I • .. „ O0 i • r • �.'.rv•a .. , • • F• � • Single I • 9 family ./ + , :�� ' • maul family /�� • I _.._-.__�_d' � • Single .-. 11 J 1I -. - - - .",'F. , aRlny • • Single family '' l31 t I.1414 t • • \\1\1\‘, —:T."—=--..--...—.._,...... . ..., UleilbM• (onlir Sbg{�f.. (� ;I ) '. fw uorclol . 4. O. . 11 ,1 ...pall. ly<,.....i..)i\'-*-- -h.:L.4e 111 • '~+� . •.. PH A ss 1l co m 11 I:1 > -' mWU fondly• Pork t Schaal >,, • .1 Slit. - ... -...'...:.,:—.. .sa.\\\Hb., M�Ui. WAY 4.iw ..•G.J ....._,__ - ,-ii • J I. • LA(® USE ''i a= • � ': '"Y : tt : ; � - -- WES AKE • '- I f ` a :«e.. _ _� H hIRIMED �OmmU( • 1iY{ rt " 7. I ,,PIKAO-twlMet.7f.1. tr mSls:,.� r �. N • I w (%lusty '01, • 1U • 1'�J CO • xa .; ER � 1 ., . S281 COVENTRY COURT ,�P -90 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 APRIL 28, 1991 • r.+ . • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 380 A AVENUE ,!U L t 2 il'11 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 RE: OR 13-90 DEAR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS: IN REVIEWING THE KRUSE OAKS SUBMITTAL AND THE LAKE OSWEGO ZONING • ORDINANCE, THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE ARISE: J1 %• i,4 f .. 1 . �. S U f �' -- PERMITTED T t ` THE APPLICANT HAS NOT DISCLOS ED SPECIFIC PROPOSED USES ON THIS p SITE., THEREFORE, CLEAR COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PROVISION IS NOT ABLE TO BE DETERMINED. FURTHER, IT SHOULD BE NOTED ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS REGARDING PERMITTED USES ARE FOUND IN THE FINAL PLAN AND PROGRAM (EXHIBIT 27) , SECTIONS 3(E)( I ) & ( 5) . 2. 12.11.9.2 SITE QEMELQ.EglaI I 1, TATipN,. A. SETBACKS (48. 310. I ) IN THE FINAL PLAN AND PROGRAM, SECTION 8 ( 3)(8) DOES STATE p "THERE ARE NO REQUIRED YARDS". IT FURTHER STATES,HOWEVER, IN SECTION 8 ( 5) , "ANY PROVISION OF THIS SECTION MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE SPECIFIC PHASE APPROVAL OR THE SITE AND BUILDING APPROVAL." IT IS CLEAR, / IT IS WITHIN THE AUTHORITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT CREVIIEWREFORE� BOARD IN REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION TO DETERMINE THE ,u • APPROPRIATE SETBACKS BASED ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES • PRESENTED AND MODIFY THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT, , • 8. VEHICLE TRIP MAXIMUM (40.3I0.4) . A REQUIREMENT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY SHOWN FOR NEIGHBORHOOD '"USES. HOWEVER, THIS SECTION FURTHER STATES, " IF A DIMENSION OR REQUIREMENT IS NOT SHOWN IT MEANS THERE IS NO MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM, BUT THAT A REQUIREMENT MAY BE ESTABLISHED AT THE TIME OF D.R.O. REVIEW." THEREFORE.IT IS WITHIN THE AUTHORITY OF THE D.R.B. TO DETERMINE IF SUCH A REQUIREMENT IS APPROPRIATE. C. BUILDING HEIGHT ( 48. 310.5) 1HE FINAL PLAN AND PROGRAM DOL S STATE A "HEII Hr III LIMITATION•'30 FEE OR TWO tTORIES, WHICHEVER IS LESS. " Tr st EXHIBIT q aPP' O. Y - . FUR1,,eR STATES, HOWEVER, "ANY PROVIS1u,J OF THIS SECTION MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE SPECIFIC PHASE APPROVAL rORTHE • SITE AND BUILDING APPROVAL. " WITHIN THE AUTHORITY AGAIN, Ti IS CLEAR, IT ,I!; I'fY OF THE D.R.B. 'IN REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE BUILDING HEIGHTS BASED � � ASED ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES PRESENTED AND MODIFY THE BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIREMENT, D. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (48. 315) 1 . INITIALLY, IN REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT IS IMPORTANT TO REFLECT ON CODE SECTION 48. 7tO( 1 )(5),�., IT APPEARS A CLEAR POLICY THAT THE CLOSER A' NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL BUILDING IS TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONE, THE LOWER THE HEIGHT HAS TO BE—OR CONVERSELY THE TALLER A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL BUILDING NEXT ,TO H RESIDENTIAL ZONE, THE GREATER THE SETBACK HAS TO 1, BE. • FURTHER, SECTION 8 OF THE FINAL PLAN AND PROGRAM RELATES TO HEIGHT LIMITATION, SETBACKS, LOT SIZES, } PARKING AND LOADING, PROVIDES THE OPPORTUNITY AND AUTHORITY FOR THE D.R.B. TO REVIEW AND MODIFY ANY . PROVISION OF THIS SECTION, AS INITIALLY STATED. THE FINAL PLAN AND PROGRAM SUPERCEDES 48. 315. 1--- SECTION 3(E)(5)( , ) STATES, • , ALL BUSINESS,REPAIR, PROCESSING, STORAGE AND MERCHANDISE DISPLAYSHALL BE CONDUCTED WHOLLY WITHIN AN ENCLOSED BUILDING • EXCEPT FOR THE FOLLOWING: ( 1 ) OFF—STREET PARKING OR LOADING a ( 2) DRIVE- IN WINDOWS • ( 3) DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE ALONG WALL OF THE BUILDINGS NOT EXTENDING MORE THAN THREE FEET FROM THE WALL AND NOT '[N A REQUIRED YARD ( 4) DISPLAY OF PLF.'1'rS. " • , NO OTHER EXCEPTIONS ARE PROVIDED, THEREFORE ALL BUSINESS SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITHIN AN ENCLOSED rUI[.DING NO EXCEPTIONS OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED IN THE FINAL PLAN AND PROGRAM--BUFFER AREA OR NOT. 3. 40.530 VISION CLEARANCE IT APPEARS 40.ry3rh( ,; )( h)( I ) APPLIES TO THIS APPLICATION RATHER THAN 40,530( 2 )( b)( 4) ON WHICH THE APPLICANT IS SEEMINGLY RELYING. rHx.s SECTION REQUIRES ",' WHERE A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, , , OR F1 f • LOCATIONS r1RrErZTAI, OR r� ELOf MENT ACCCGSI..S AN OLLI C I HR STREET IS GENERATES tN EXCESS OF 100 ADT, THE VISION CLEARANCE TRAINGLE SHALL BE OFrE17MCNf U BY ON ( Nfi[NFERINt I. a fUt7Y USING REF1!IE!"� AURAL . AA SHO S rAN1)ctRI°) , " (THESE S'TANL)AH[)5 Wr.HL" HL V[!YL•;r IN 1',ItJri) 0.4 111 • • r \ 1 . • THROUGHOUT THIS Ai ICA TION QUESTIONS UESTIONS ARISE AS TO .oE COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN WITH SPECIFIC PROVISIONS AND INTENT OF THE FINAL PLAN AND PROGRAM AND OUR ZONING CODE. AS YOU CAREFULLY REVIEW THIS APPLICATION SEEK TO ASSURE MINIMAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS FROM THIS PROPOSAL ON THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION at OF THESE ISSUES AND CONCERNS. SINCERELY YOURS, d, . , GRE RY 3. MEADORS �� • • //172. .61-1241/./itik . • C IN O'ROURKE-MEADOAS . • • I • ` • • 1 , Y. • i. • 6Y • • • r y • • • • d • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •r • 90 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROGRAM.. FOR WESTLAKE Section 1 . Introduction • This final development plan and program is submitted under the terms of Chapter 53 of the Lake Oswego Code. It shall be the sole basis for evaluation of all phases of the West lake development on any issues that it addresses. The final developmentplan and P program includes certain documents required by Chapter 53 and a written text specifying the criteria evaluation of the various phases . for Section 2. Exhibits • The following exhibits are attached and incorporated herein b P fed y reference in order to meet the requirements of the Code sections indicated: 1 . Amended Exhibit K - Land Use Maps specifying densities and uses. 53 .320 ( 1) ( a) - (b) , (3) . 2 . Exhibit BA - Final Proposed Layout. 53 . 310 • 53 .320( 1) ( a) - ( b) . ' � ' 3 . Exhibit BB - Utility Plan. 53 .320 1 ( ) (b) 1 53 .350( e) , 4 . Exhibit BC - Open Space and Phase I. 53 .320 ( 1) (a-c) . 5 . Exhibit BD - Open Space . 53 . 320( 1) (c) . 6 . Exhibit BE - Open Space Easements . 53 . 320 1 b 53 .350 ( e) . 7 • Amended Exhibit K, BA - Westlake Land Use Density & Distribution . 53 ' 350( a) ' ( b) . - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM 2 FOR WESTLAKE ( DECEMBER 16 , 1980 ) , 110 Exhibit uAu Ordinance No. 1783 2 • EXHIBIT• 1 ♦ 0Wr •7 8 . Exhibit BJ, dated December 16 , 1980, Declaration of Restrictions . 53 .350 ( c) . 9 . Exhibit BG and Amended Application dated 10/24/80 - C4 • 33 .350 Cages for Development of Private and Public Facilities. (d) (e) . 10 . Exhibit H - Letter of Authorization from LDS Church . 53 .350 ( f) . 11. Exhibit M, 0, AE, and AF - Drainage reports . . 53 .320( 2) ( b) . Section 3 . Standards for Final Plan and Program 1. Uses. A. The type of uses allowed in any given phase and area of the development will be those indicated on amended Exhibit K. B . The only use allowed in those areas indicated for single-family uses is single-family dwellings , which may include t attached dwellings . C . The uses allowed in those areas indicated for .11ti-family uses are single-family dwellings , two-family dwell- • � ngs and multi-family dwellings . � . D. The use of the four acre site adjacent to Kruse N_y desigdiated as achurch site will be allowed only as a "`' I conditional' use , after approval has been obtained following the ,procedures and standards in effect at the time of application for ne use. The site is intended as a multi-purpose church center 17.d allowed uses include faciliti ;s for annual conferences of iembers within the Milwaukee to g area , ,a Tigard area a chapel for regular *eekly services , Bishops and stake Presidents and clerks ' 411 ' ' ttces , a combination recreational and cultural hall, including I? : FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM ; FOR WESTLAttE (DECSMBER 16 , 1980) , z �. • i • i K • {t • i1 . 0• ag e p V' • { 1 ♦ I • • tit „ f r , — 5 — 9 1 r•1 �:.JFa 1 1 . 1 OR e rs. c e O'DONNELL, RAMIS, CREW & CORRIGAN • ?.�. tiCH NITORNEYS AT LAW sRIGAN' BALIOW &WRIGHT BUILDING CLACKAMAS COUNTY OFFIC B �, _ ;�2� w ER MAN' 1727 N.W.Hoyt Street l81 N. Grunt, Suite 202 t�Lg _ Lr FF Portland, Oregon 97209 C.*nby, Oregon 97013 • (503) 266.1149 �5 � ��'Tvz- ”• • .2 TELEPHONE: (503) 2 .4402 ,� a�t rTiJh.�J1AN FAX: (503) 243-294$ a Wa RILkY JAM ES M. COL EMAN r q �? ' 'N:NEIl I ' _r CIS ALfiICE REPLY TO PORTt.i o OFFICE 1(TNNE I}1 M. ELLIOTT • ' _ ` *vial Counkl . "A a•ZYCWAY' I �" -3,= �+,,S;NSON" 1S -..Cat +NAXE R July r 19 91 L ` ^Z-==►a171t1 R.$1•11 01 WAS NINGV ....'�. az a....�,1.7 IN vitsawSIf 1 4 2ssign Revi w Board lace Oswego City Hall E- "A" Avenue :¢`:e Oswego OR 97034 %K?Cruse aks Commercial Center/File No. DR 13-90 • :sir Board Members: l ar, writing on behalf of BaycorpDevelopment to indicate their , c-currencel in the staff report recommendation for continuance of, `4...s hearing in this matter. } As you know (the staff report calls p for a hearing on the application a;`,_ proposed conditions. Unfortunately, the staff has not yet had t:ne opport{1,nity to prepare proposed conditions. Until the • ` cw-iitions re drafted, a meaningful hearing would not be ;;ossible. rti .,orp DevLlopment therefore agrees with the staff recommendation p, • anil suggests a continuance of two weeks in order to permit the stmff to f.eview the voluminous record and prepare proposed ci-ditions. • Verytrulyu rs, ,+ Y. Timot` y V. Ramis _7 W c== J. Michael Moody Mr, Rc?bert Galante ' d EXHIBIT '1 Ib2 • { k' �qo •I • • • • • • • • • ,r. • • • d. :a . • • r I.l 777 ' • • •t 1 •'•fir • • • • • ` x 1 • Y .1 •Zw • ik + • � � 1.. • • • •t .il • ' •I • .1 . • . • • • • • • • Rob Vt. 0 I r y N • /I / ) er 1.!� 1J i S Il(rn3I X1L�1 C 10/ Y ' ; � • 't 1 •'. ^ "f'' " r•-L r.r , f•'' . �r�' • .r '4.C'�'� ♦ 1 r'�'r• �r �i` • 1 r/ ',I.y t t{Y Jt u.. 1# 1 . .t t •1 .�' , • `''•e♦ ',1 f Y l? I•mod ,1.4,1 ,�. r v, F•• 1,01j,,•„is r R • .„1., 1.-t Pry 1 y. 'f ' yl,'..'1 1 '1. a •1••r, )}y'+ ''i�.?1'r;s, ' 1 '1 ' 1 i, +'x{' ti,� :i'.1114 .'' Y (jr• T�.��jj, 4'� 9+r., ,.}�s rj .;(,Z;. M�y.{�, T�,I,t�# �r�•y�,.� .a Iy.'� R L rl .tRi7,•,r`4�^.1`,' q:'�1. I :,1,� • "1 �� .. ' y. •'h 04,.,'k.4..f<ji.• tJ r. ��}{�.ltw4,e:k...'•.l' If •Y.1',•,., .:-;:t z '4;• r .12..•.,4.i , 'y1. ,1' .�s .1.., yn., 1 ; iti•,, '4, "1, � •14'. • _�j "'� '"Td 44 - 1. fi' t,, R ' .,''(cr'+ ,y. . 1 •rat ,1u . {. r1. i' f 1 r; {� rl 1 ,� .'7 �1�„F. -•�•iY' r., ��"� , •ry} A. rt'r S��`1T 'Il� `I'.: ' �'C�,� •I ,p. t ? '�tii ;r t� 'Sr " ,�, r r 'l,,'r r ! I r �•" •' 5 .:/ 11,l ,: ;C;..r 14 1!�♦.`} 4.1:.,;,t .44: ay, - ,.1 )id 0 r,i• 4., .. '1-,14 �}.: r 11 f 1. ���iy� -...) n,' C 5 1 e..�1;,1 •c ..,JI. r ✓1, ir��r�'t. 1. .4. • ,.1•t• YY' "� ' �. r • •yy l rEa r x1 =�1 p _,,,:.• "y�.r�1. t• mo �.t�'.{!,'F�,y.�:.: - '-M�JfJ/,t!'i.l R ,�j -•��♦(1��' +'l�J 'i � '��� �1 • � i." ..r�' !' t!"� r'�,11,• +�f' ll!"r',`r. � d'f'*�{ _'- 1:�.r �. ��+ - 'nr,. :+�(Rii':' • �•t1•1 rlM Y , .C.1'7 „ ir,.tit,'47 rfrr..• '4 .c ' i i{' 1y�'' . {+t�l r t r,l. di Lit .5i r\ , 1 1`! 't Vt: 1.Ol K .\ .• 'Z I r` . la, .rl~:d.1 Pi. 1,.,. N1 r / i I t� �:� ;,r,. Y�l, ~!?. .ir.. it,:�yc'11t..•+4J�'. 1•' V:•~r•. i‘,.r' "�'.-' ,..w� +1' .I. !'.. ', r'li fI IMI11j{{! � r! 6' I` I. I .• \, ,.'w fir M',.c..7^'r•. �f G':�' '�{.� 4 .. ...�,Ar 1'1 .4 V',,�y6.'%, ; (�•�{' 6 /�\� i0/ ' . i . �'r itI �I ''K• YII" ��wrr►� t •,t w.1 � •�... ► •..C,4�h/ MNn'c"` 1!4 flY. L f 1 �I 1 1 Il,j. •i�;� ��, t ' J yt w :1 t r> ,r . i fii, ,....�:., /ILf `. .r,ft1 i is 1,'� 1 ,Rt'.�9f �.�.. C,,•%ttl•�. ,i , f+r.",`(„" ��},� -.t ►r. 'aid +r .f,'^Y T1 Jt.11 !4! n) 4'''(i.. �/, 1 1 in `4' �.. '�� ;` `.• y'ii, .1`ti11J•v..-.(` -.i.e..'4. ,,Ki:a • ''� ► �. , N.1,• 1 i r7�LL 4, It,. Ie. ,,,k !��. ,�` 1� ,�F♦��.�'� 1 J•�,yyyy.+1• ,, j.- . \•r \•t,J\r r,. t': '• y A M api4 „ .,. `� . .'t• ( ••1''I•mF4 +7114..i tr' ,4;11 drli ' r,1tSr .,t . W 7 1%; ,. r . ,' I •fti.ai" ;o y.•.. .. ►. r.+ �� Z nV" ,i •• f f oft ;or h�ti7 c r , ' ,...• ,Nr ...°/,7, , 1t•;! ►'w1v�G� •;•711, 1,t'Qi.. ,;qt. .: n+ 41,.` •' 1 �. ,j.!/.;. i/ `'�I 1• �,4 r , i yy. +•...«G4.•'.' ji• r'. �, • ��7t8r 1 ;.. J ill r,.,h. �1 •1(,, t.y�� ` r,ts+�T ;V! `I2} ^ a, �i, .1,` .. • t :1, �w11..• ,wr 4 r '''f'v...._t~'�"•" , / . ,� + .,tt • 'LI A,6 n:11 +�rJl.`,{`Y ii}(rttlK ha"Nti C 41,�T v�,1�t1/'1'"�, �r+ � jrf►'•i�'ti �•5',1�1, - ,yfh•.r `� • x , • : 11''�n.�• • tCh«•sr••I= L{k:,i,^JjlY•�''*yi�a:Y'„*,y' J� .HI��'T••.•1 -+ '•''i.'' ''!.C 1.Ai..,',r+,Y!'I.;•,�'1.,it,4.4':4•' r'STyTA.�, � "�!,7'n4'?4rM'�.-_ •• 444 .^.,,re 1• %, `{-ii.1t.,,,�,•r••,,,r1„>�,,y j^,+, „,`t::fir- '•" ..,r `"if ,�r,;lr• ` fit• +i.n-�}.Y '11 , :'r' !',4y7, .Il' 44 ^' s. • • r • '�.'Si`:1f t�.: 1 I vJj •47.'..,t:'"l�t!!`L'I n,fr!' I{;t,wlL �.� , 1 ` , rl, y.4.rlucv ...__..,_._... , ,,... l .i.S''....r�.i_ .•s.lVgi ` •'Y'S 'ithJ41 •4 /1{t;:a� )Ir.174 ''t;'''',' •(,�".r.fr.'•'',II`N [y''4„1; r, yr 7•v.t';4, 1,!...1.., 'tti 1, • .. 1/)1 B 1/y�I (l/ , N �// }y,1./ I,A`y1I /1./y./j 1 • r / Ib ?. 1 C� 1... w •ly tit ?' � ' r LI , 'Y • 1 y ' _ tr. •'. '1• �,r I' .I�Yy . 1 1T ' rjt/,•,.'/ ) nt ly ,, 4','I •,,..�.•�i te}• E N• • :1'1. /" • ' ,• .k 1.1f G' y ♦•t r 4. v. , ..... A" ••�",i„/��►r .• f. hrs* �{ y 1 r 11�. , , Y 1 ,i• , •ttHy y r : '..V,�, ,y'. +••.�1. Y{ .,r 1,1 t•%4:' r • ".�,�,.-•^.N 1° `'ytem 1- i, y- ,. { s. ,rt ` ",•rh.:`f rei; tT t'i. 1 ..Y .n1 Ir r{•.1T•. ,o. ,1,, ' •,,1. l • ,rt i 'i.;' .. !. { r 1k .� 61w j, , ' N.,.r I. I. rI . � . • , _ r •� y . i d '♦ ,x (� �.�'.. 1,...r, l•-•,., l'�,4,1, t1•,� 'r�1•.1 * I.-r 1'r.. { .0..SS1 r r I ✓ I - ii' \ 1r r \1 '1I'1 I+ t� .�., iS �h ` ..' t'f • 1+ 7, ' �/r• ",r?'1 q'4qt� ' '�'` {,; r'it1;1'.4' pr ` ..i{h_..1U'1..... .•..4A11r R`,11 W iv1:}ri1yy�1` C '1 ' f.T 7. 'it. 1 r14.,1.i •�0 'rpc 14:,r .i •'01'••1,�*0.1 "' .•.• .1r.U..« 1 .r r •:,. . .u..•, ,.,1^.M"^^T. 'f'r{,n ter.. .�• • s �1 4Jr ,'.',I.,,, f , i'• 5;.4• ♦y •v.1Y• •". , .11 • ..1 ! ;y • .. �1, , t 4.1.I„i1..1rt •11 .,Y r*t,•, , a* 1 ,;;:w«tih "" /l fit'``°``` y l' .... �/,Iy1Ii Ay : ... .„1 1!i,,,, ,.,rir'rM bi, .�:•1•.,•TI,A,.•.$`+ ,''11 •1 '' _4 tl,. ,/.r• ' .,J.✓Pt'.� '•,!. M1"t' "ir4 I) rl:*.A. ,,,.L•g; Ir J1„ ,N,'.Mr\\N\i\N":`1,1•J�!•.';,i'{,-Y,Ia �h• 9t 'T Itt,. ,.1.,.'.� 1 ,,r l 1 4e '• 1` 11„ •�ti 1•'1v(t f i �,VG/ ,4�, I r 11 1 i.1.1.1 Y!. !r 1 f 1 .4.1 `rtr t.'.11� '11444 'r�'r...,0 4l�Iklw� e/Av� 't1,lfAl 1%,^';�►lri,i“,.A4yr"i ! 4i 4 �111. .�# ir'11� (,' 1 i j ,I .' ! i'I' ill 1' , �' 1 1 1, ikl" ,l,,II'1` eA %.{_'"tY,i `' ..el 1 '• 1,••,i1rf�:l• S`:.� r •• 1h•• ,,,JI ,.•�rf1 �; •kw.:` , � L /.. ,r,�,t i' ��� f !I', }�� fl' r t,t r .'1 a �> 1{ r 1 .r tt`yl 1., a`}J'}; �l1 ,'•\1 '(..r.'.N.:�' lT C♦1Y I l•1 :1f 1F'�y(`� ♦Y► 'r�l „�, '�jF 'r 1 /!?W I1 1� i 1 11.+. f.71� /111/ Ir,� ' ! / �,, 1 1'" trt. .'111� 1 irj• 1(r1�t •1/. Y. •� 4 t ,'I, 1, •' •'1 • / / I •11 '�. . t.+ ,b► t'' 11.tg '�y..4. rJ1' ' •wit �. a 'l! r �.1 II ►� ,. 1 .,,, ' i. •, ,'• R►'•'4 yli,44e. y41 • ii r '•I l e !li t I ,M •, t:,'I/•l,.I,`•li.,••{4'y11' � ,•I1"• I,r", ';j1 `' ,r ,1.' .:,3�' l ��� \ 1 �.i'• •`C'�r ^ i lil ' ,I�t('r1. ;•�4 � „�4 Y r��l 41'. yY �� r, `/ r� � tr`••.♦ ' {;r I r�� y,.. li {i�i4t 'Y� 1( ' r .,i 1 1 t�`F • «Al 1 " 11` 1.44�'r..,- ry /1 ..` 'It 1 1�� 1,�r,7% 7 y `AeJ• IL t r' ,j Q�' A, 1 i .4','1 .a r• `+,� '1..• 1. ,. t.l ill y�y^�, r« N r �,Z �� �l;C:.e•�u ' kV:11014v�x�k ,/ '! •11 " 0� .1A.'•' 1, 1,.. �:' /'j r�+r•,�f�� 'I' •y� �ti ,4 i r.41� f'' I.'��•!• `.�. r 'Iw 44 h ..6 iY,'TYr." ' A. '.�• :t!{l,l � ♦ }�, {l 1f1 LLL!, /�1 tC M'I n tv'IN 1. 1„ •• d• y,.�' •` 1-Pr'l�^r �ti'�!." Nrkit% ' !1 i`.r,� '11 1 r� • (1' '�l,%yt'�'!•,I 44 toI k �: tilY 14' '#I'1`II>f• i 1. ',Y♦^'« 4;1% 111lslA,1 ,•1l 1y •�.A tar•I a�• fw I + '• __ lif!N♦�li 1 »` i r Y' ► r/,' 1�j.�:. • Mr, , Y7.. .:..►i.1613'^dNr1.C.1•4.•. , . ,t ilyl;4 .'• r : } Y " .. '1�,�`�.';r 1•, ,$� W Nl+i"b9•1♦''f�a•,1.-Jfa"Iw.3.tT' K. h•q rINfF 1•- ♦ ,f r 1 Jf .--._fir;-• .• ♦t • • • tl i 10 • • • • • ' r • • 1 _taitisor,,f,;i',Q• .' ,,1• 2*Vt,,, )_,,ii ,'.I ;..i ;NI.,,,ii,f,t7,,/'A-t 0 L V" Y A�1f(w(1�14C. t,41 1 y r�y • �. r • i' �' A/11'M. +F �' 4 IIVe /1 ': , �I.,j. �� y , , t, ►y,11* 1 4(1 r . J ‘14, 1 1 C• M1r,fj l;1•��• Jc 1 Ably .fir t X ; l 4'it( a .1Ity.i • +, ' Q••, • "Q ,1 f q ` 1 I !� 1 • •� +'j '.,1. .,J11 �� 1 +� 4' 1r, +, .`:i 1,�, ,• , ,off+t ' 11jr', _' '.. t=' "•�,1 +1`.1'f ++ ' '' Cr ' ''f '. 1�� , • '11 h C 1 ,.R. �• // ••±ice` '�� '� �'.fN ,,. '. '. ��...-' y� '' '1. '� ' / 1 •,iji.'� �, K 1 x>'1" --LIU' Ier •' . ,4, 4Y .w �1\rtiYl 41 ', .. �,J'�1` .� d • , U� r;i I , , ' ,•9' ' Y !r 1•• ksi:4 • il it I Y,' '. /i ° btr ; '� • + 1 .'i1' 1+ 1 it. .�• \+lt J tx�j. . NYr+`", At y ' • 1 9�a.\1 �+c� .,r� i f .' " ", '. µ , kg ,N. ..7N 1"f 4 • �.t.1�-` ` r, 'yY i I " '•1,4r ';rl y '4 ''1 I ,' At '�1 • ,. '� \ r ; �.. 'Al} 4. V '.Y h- ' ' • -yp+" . J' �1 '�'24 i;;,iy '1• 1 , .y+10 1,.4 0 > ''hill, - v C. '.,/ :•.•• t< , x • • CI• • t. „W� ��r,JA� ',�� •1, ,{,,�;- 6 1 ✓ } lSyl '4 1111I • + P z��re1. •'• 'T`l �• IU'., 0. '_' t Gf ,1q1{�Iyt i1,4 ""a�+.f •1 �'y� ( xr i ;'7,.�'? (1 Cl '�r rr �'l ('n. Jt• ,• e >.. t P r J� t 14 r i•.. 1N,' j f,�, - ! i...ti,..N.,ri6YeLj �+1� .ru'.a' ��" a..': 'I'�'�rl ;10';� f' ;qq t �SSi1� i%1J MJ�>' !'I E�*; • • . C, {'i iper " .�' ( ( + �I �'�' f :h 1' -Ib'. f', I ,rjr �+, . r ,, ':,11:4,\t,1,..12 .'tv,rMg . 1 1 i.u�„N 'J fNe ..., .gi 1', I• �j)jp •. • ..r;, z1 A •M+ ``;� . l}ii } .�I•j ,'a` id, 1 t 1 l ' 1 y,I. •„wit,ti h',l�) .v .., , ,,r� 2 1 �: I/N' r41 %1'i .t , ,-.I.. - • i, sYh F4i:"')11,•,'� +•',- r i ' fi ':$i('{ r /1..k 1t,1 ''141 ' i .�' / At �; l..0144141' A'ihe QI ° • ,'..C! wa •,',". �'��, % i' rr/{ ,R.'• t,�y '� '.t �r1�,h�,Cr�► '%id�,• '1r r''� . ��'. /' fi,• l �',t, ,t • , 4 ,. •.»1 y,1 _+ 1 �,`,• ti. ` G,ARi �'711 , J'' 4,' �,r.;' 'r !/ri, t: ' I rY 11" ti.,. � � . ,,�', r.. r1' '7C,{ •`` Al~' 1.•"+L}`�1},ta' ,,. ! '•1 ��. 11 w�,�Idl'I Z `I r t'r'` if 1 w. II / II 1� 1 ,, . - ,11,,,A 4M'jq '1 ..+ ,,.w;. h.Ii1%, '(,' . r, yrt!4f+I, rwt' 'i..KRx*. %Q. ,r.i 11r. 1 it i '' • N*"4/ 4 lbh. t yl 11,41A„ .. . - ,,/.(, r Vy L,* 0 . w w.r , •1 '.• LW" .a•I••• ••,3' tvt •*,,TA. 141)111) ' Y .9.. Y' J �M • ,•• a•.rr r., 11 , If'2i f A� ,�•, f..i ;rn �7r i _,rttrr , 5�,¢ij 'l.l "t 1 • • f ( ram 1f�<,sy ; a !• e sfi1 " , u irk II i ,Jay t l rwr'*+ r 14iLi? •' ' , w 1 if i J Al �� f ' t'q1`�t�•flg+M M�rYf ow,it ii'tr"'''1r� r'4'rlN.:. �I �' I.{•'r?. �.I,' +; ''+ y'' '1.1 ' Ott y s �yf,✓ Ili v r�r ' rt, • ,_i�r,E1r.�.'P•Z7 "4 ► r'"i=4r, 1 r, fA. A M'r > 1�..�,'•;°CI, 1 4�, .. eh^jw �ty'i f�ir � "�'l l �i � i' rii '�4`• '' S , ,1�/�',.,1,.�� },x , )'r�l�' tr.,�,,''t,,, T ,,F°� ,i ; , 1i•j t,Q 1}'1y• - - • 41.0 Ir r f d.•11,�1 tA'r' 4110 • • • • vf. • 4 • • • r:• • • • . • • • • • • • • irt • • ^ • r.. • • A ' ` • • • • , Figampi.DrALt:16.a9271"'Put king . . ;tali I �" ilk r '� t} 1`MI 6,rh, ' •••AO rl a - % t •'11 g i At1Arta) V '4.4. j4 P. r 1 .� +"t iytiI' IM I _^M�k' 1 ! '� t ( !� ,.y iy.3#ilpi�i� • r '11 �J1 •trlh' 4.44. .. li i:;.e.,1 • , 1 1 '4 cio ' , `',.. , , It 1 ''' . .f i ,,.• 1., tk,' I, . f , u.,• 71` $''t/ __ , 1 , .i l `G j111, • �, •� 1, wll." +1. ii.^ c ;,+a t i . . ...�.+r 'y'�,t ,a{0 i, ,y i : v E4,{f:r' �, I 'al.;,1VrAl;pf,1 r Wit, , it \ •-•.. - . ii.,, . l� j!�',';t �(• ., i fq iv v l• N.is '" :;' Ill I 1,4 to1,�> 4,V y�}\ p ,ra, l� •.• A+V, 'T r..y. ..0 +.� o '.j.�: - -- - , yr! t�jp• + ' t se. Ir {a�j 7u, • , ".—.w,3'Sf1,tiS. t y?ji 3, - 1P�r`;:.;, 1 ( "�., ); r, . '�th1'016A: +,..a,•tiil•'I'h y 'M ., la•�iqr' • t � ��,� r��,�•'ifJ.1� ,, r. , A. �,,,1g ,,1, ryR.,.-1H r1 u 41 ty1 W! 1 """111 . • 1. t •l 1,114~' ��.1.." 1:{. A '`v` . •., 5. P,,41 .�t�t. �`,�,�+�, '1'1{ ,'4; ; a ,� L fr IY' a k ~ ` + '11�'.` , `- • L 1 :. � I 'ltawr1 wl °'�t1 � . ... j t i 4 „4. I: drt11',;'w J 1 l�l♦ :t y 'i 13,4 Az,i+{ k, 6r :1Y 41tiJJI\){".'d 4 G X II 18 I T . e ,�/F1 ',-4�;•' tl ltl� ,� {�1�1k A' 11 46.YJ , • i, ,,i. i, (///^/ 1 C Y .,�. • ,t• 1 1 ,1 ,1..? i., M+' ti r ti•,. +� + c, i</ .'1 ci7tr . , . ,,. T ~I'1�t`y'r`'•wdk.,,,k) !'4'il 1N,etJ`.4.! ?u;,,' , o �r 'j`'c b 11 {•M irk'1r"�,,,•' 41• -... , rrr{AMIY I6•...1 ,�yy,VT �YI•'�',,4 ,11 , /I ..- ' .. .. i . f c 1 , ! . ,. 1 • t . ® 90 ,. , . I 1 PJ. I • Des • • ,i�✓ ,boy o 34. �,, • a' °' I—s. 0o BI ts LEGE4lO t \i - (IC') ' WEEKDAY VolUMe '=%o • PM.PEAR HOUR VoL, ,p • i,w. Y `y '' ( •)O t r Old • asOr b Pk 4, �. • ryQ �te 4495. /, 1 • 8 f x ��j� v� s { `s. /k:'E Ices Leo y� a�s �;; r:y' rn. J 10 tits b7 e w kRUetY 3V o 1 ~ IF:: k. lees �`, ,.k 14 FIGURE. f URE. 5 M • , r;g,' Jl-V TOTAL YEAR 2000 .,�. . rr ------- WITRAFFS 8 IW , On s592 . ' 2 .005 Title. The title of this standard is "Building Deli. n, " 2.010 Applicability. This. standard is applicable to all Major Development involving a structure. pp pment 2.01 Definitions. None. ,, ,, 2 ^:. • • 2.020 *Standards for Approval. 1 . Buildings shall be designed and located to complement ; ' and preserve existing-hu'iTdl g,;wya re other elements of the built ens, r;�;,nment. ""'--- a. Design buildings to be complementary in appearance to adjacent structures of good design wren regAed too _ '' i. Materials ii. Setbacks ( for retail/commercial P specifically) part iii. Roof lines iv. Height v. Overall Proportions !lr b. Where existing buildings are to remain on site, new development shall be designed to: • i. Integrate the remaining buildings into the over- all design, or • i i. Provide separate landscaping, remodeling or other treatment which establishes a distinct ! ,I' ' ", character and function for the remaining buildings Where a residential building is to remain•, a,,lot meeting the zone requirements must be provided . a;: c. Design bus shelters, drinking fountains, benches �' mail boxes, etc. ,•Lto be complementary in appearance_ts2 11 [d nos , .• d . Design those elements listed below to be • =mplementary in appearance to those buildings or structures upon ,. - ich they are located . �', Windows Doors Mailboxes Mechanical Equi men 4 u�+s■�r r r EXHIBIT 3 . ,f:t . , I 9 9 (2 ' �Q • y ,4. • • Downspouts Vents Utility Connections and Meters' Stairs ' Chimneys Lights Decks and Railings Weather vanes, aerials , Signs and other appendages Awnings attached to the roof Foundations or projecting above 4 n the roofline. Design awnings, signs, and lights at a specific height to define the first floor or retail cornice height. ,47r f. Use trees and other natural elements to help define building proportion relationships and to provide scale to the structure as a whole. g. Limit the variety of styles of building elements. h. Screen .mechanical . equipment from view, or place in • locations where they will generally not be visible. i. Every attempt shall be made to design and locate buildings to provide access to desirable views, while not blocking the views of others unnecessarily (density reduction not required) ., • , 2 . Buildings shall be designed and located to complement �' and ,�� s rvp existing natural landforms, trees, " .' 1 natura"1e vegetation. shru er a . Consider landforms and trees as design elements which must • relate to building elevations to determine scale and proportion. • b. Design foundations to match the scale of the building being supported. Berming, resiting, or sheathing the foundation structure with wall siding are examples of methods " which accomplish this purpose. • • • c. Use decks , railings, and stairs to relate a building to the contours of the land. , 3 . Buildings shall be designed to minimize the personal • security risks of users and to minimize the opportunities for vandalism and `theft. Building hardware that discourages forced entry and provides approved egress capability shall be used. & 4 . Building shall be designed and constructed to reduce • noise impacts on interior occupied spaces and adjacent property> 4 . y • . a i a . Use solid barriers such as fences, berms, natural landfocuis and structures to reduce �- sound levels . The effectiveness of the barrier • increases as barrier height increases and as it411 is moved closer to either the source or the I, receiver . - b• Minimize the window surface on sides adverse our sources, where facing possible. c• Heat pumps, or similar mechanical e ' u 'p shall be located so that operating not affect use of living areas suchnoise does bedrooms, outdoor decks or patio areas and adjacent Property. 5. Buildings shall be designed and constructed angles, overhangs, shallfleshings, cted with roof from the structure. and gutters that direct water away • 6. Design and/or modifications to the structUres as group care homes will maintain neighborhood scale,c and sites appearance and function g rhood . . •, structure, width of driveway,rticularly regarding site of placement of noise signs, exterior lighting and' Res. R-84.20, See, generating47-8 equipment and parking facilities. 2; 4-17-84. ) ies. • •.025 Standards for Construction . f None. r. 4 %v. 2.030 Standards for Maintenance. None, 2.035 1 Procedures. None. 2. :40 Miscellaneous Information . i None. e • •. . : 1*.. ... • • 5 , • 1 ' y ' • 41 d.I •I • • • • • • • • • • • • • r,. • • • • • • • y! �' ilk,. k Y +F BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL 411 FOR THE CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO JUL i .5 iL1 CN` An Appeal of the Development )(DR 10-89/PD 14-89-792> Review Board Approval of a ) (Pointe South) • ",•` Request for Approval of a ) 360-Unit Multi-Family ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER Apartment Project ) Nature of Appeal - This appeal concerns the Development Review Board (DRB) ' approval of Dominion Development 's proposed 360-unit multifamily apartment project with accessory recreation facilities (Pointe South) . The appeal is taken by Greg Meadors and William Sorenson ' by their Notice of Intent to Appeal dated January 18 , 1990 . The yy notice contains five issues, and the Council 's consideration is ;` limited to the issues raised in the Notice of Appeal . • ` Hearings IP ' • u -. _ The DRB held public hearings and considered this application at its meetings of September 6, October 16, and November 6, 1989 . The appeal hearing was held before this Council on May 8 1990 , r _ and is based tin the record made before the DRB during its -7. proceedings. =`r Conclusion ti< We affirm the DRB on four of the five issues on appeal We have asked the DRB to reconsider only the issue of traffic impact . On all other issues , we agree with the DRB findings and , h conclusions . =4 Findings --- The appellants raised five issues in their appeal of the 110 `_ DRB "s order: soils, distinctive natural area%wetlands , he in age. 1 - FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER ' .1 EXHIBIT . 1 3 ' s � / , f`f. record for this appeal. The appellant provides no particulars to allege how the DRB erred, or how Pointe South fails to cont:Nrm Ax� Z • 3 with the Comprehensive Plan and Development Standards . It is 0 4 impossible to respond to such a broad-brushed allegation. We• ' ' conclude that the DRB, through extensive consideration,' did 5assure that the development would conform with the City 's Comprehensive Plan and Development Standards . V. TRAFFIC IMPACT Appellants claim that the DRB misconstrued the applicable • 10 standard and that its decision as to traffic impacts is not " 11 sapported by substantial evidence because the proposal nailed to provide streets adequate to accommodate the traffic impact ' 0 1 . 0 anticipated from the proposed development, in violation of the :4 Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan. We find that there is basis for substantial conflict on traffic impact issues n the record of _o to appeal and that it would be appropriate for the issue of traffic impacts to be remanded to the DRB to allow the 3 Introduction of new evidence on the traffic impact issues . We .a t_rect staff to conduct a traffic study, the focus of which shall y� re the intersections of Kruse/Westlake, Kruse/Carman and the f-ture Parkview/Garman/Fosberg/I-5 . The staff shall report to :1 t`e Development Review Board current and projected traffic counts, taking into account the impact of the Dominion _3 x� _v*elopment . Staff shall also relay information with respect to :4 t:ne traffic impact and its relationship to Service Level D. 26 • ?age E - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER dIr '' 'Order - IT IS ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego " that: 9 1 . The appeal of DR 10-89/PD 14-89, as that appeal pertains y to the issues of soils, distinctive natural areas - wetlands, hearing procedures, and the ODPS is denied and the decision of ,." the DRB is affirmed . / 2 . The issue as to whether the development pt �"aosal fails to provide streets adequate to accommodate traffic impacts anticipated from the proposed development in violation of the _y Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan is remanded to the • DRB for further +._ z,onsideration and evaluation ased upon information to he ,rovided by staff as a aresult of the traffic study referred to _ tn §V, supra. A. This order was presented to and approved / +_ by the City Council rf the City of Lake Oswego. 0 . Dated this 5th day of Sentembe r , 1990 . Alice L. chlenker, Mayor - /xES : Anderson, Holstein, Durham, Fawcett, :9ayor Schlenker ' `" nker "' 1,DZES: None ' A..SSTAIN : NOne =-^USED: Holman, Churchill . • 4 1. •A r. . 2.7., III . age FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER _ + f . • • t • Q• • 4 o' • y l � it Y • 4 ♦ 2. Provide incentives which encourage developers to renovate and expand existing buildings, compatible with community policies such as: a. decrease on-site parking requirements If equivalent public parking Is available. • •+ b. re-define landscaping requirement, to include street trees, bike paths, public benches, conversation spots or other publicly desired amenities c. allow waiver of height restrictions when appropriate d. encourage two level parking facilities where appropriate e. revise fire code standards to encourage commercial development In keeping with city w` revitalization policies as well as safety. 3. Establish a development corporation to encourage continuing vitality In the commercial area. The corporation could: a. enable cooperative planning, problem solving, and investment b. enlist community support c. encourage private investment d. seek public funds (federal, state and local) FOR GENERAL POLICY V: Assure minimum commercial intrusion on residential arena. The City will : I. Develop a major street network which minimizes thru traffic on neighborhood streets. A' 2. Locate commercial activity on collector and arterial streets only and consider traffic• Impacts prior to siting new commercial activities. • 3. Design and construct commercial development to minimize the impacts on residential areas from all treff1e. I Iphis, vI Sunl; nernArnnrct of rnrking. r,ad, 1nnrttns nrwns, hul Irllnro bulk and helrgh+• noise and drainage. Such means as Lends_ capinv, berms, fencjna, trees open ace. cuts-de-sac, f?uilding orientation, lower Intensity of commercial uses (e.g. offices) should ' ' be ut lize . • :, 4. Where feasible, pedestrian and bikeway paths should congest commercial development with adjacent residential areas. Specific Policies Specific Commercial District Policies • FOR GENERAL POLICY lilt Plan commercial districts scaled In size to the area served. in order to assure development of commercial districts In accord with policies set forth in this Plar, Commercial District Policies are defined as Specific Policies to implement the Comprehensive Plan. These specific Commercial District Policies will be implemented by Development Conditions attached to all commercial zone changes, and through Development Conditions attached to Development Review and building Permit approval . • Specific Commercial District Policies are outlined for the following Commercial Districts; I. East End Community Business District and Subarea A ' A. Existing East End Community Business District - - B. Riverfront Subarea (PA 06-86-02-383, 10/17/86) II. Grimm's Corner Neighborhood Commercial District Ili. Rosewood Neighborhood Commercial District Revised 10/86 .gq- Y • • • l ; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r 4 n r - `J •• • •V • • x • • • Y uu' " `• s., encourage development of the East End Commercla.l District and the West End Commercial District as centers of comme 'al and social activity and employment 'oortunities. 6. Encourage a mix of residential, commercial and service activities in commercial centers. 6. encourage the development of Intro-•city transportation alternatives (such as mass transit) to serve the commercial centers. FOR .MERAL PCI.I CY 111: Plan for the development of commercial districts scaled In size to the area; served. The C.i'ty will: I. Develop Commercial District Policies which outline the objectives, strategies which will guide development In each Commercial District, including:c policies and w eat End Business District • West End Business District Wit.. Park "Town Center" site Mionroe/Boones Ferry site • I)=5/Kruse Way Highway Commercial/Kruse Way Campus Research and Development Grimm's Corner Neighborhood Commercial Peesewood Neighborhood Commercial ?Cruse-North Neighborhood Commercial Other Commercial sites In Mt. Park l - 2. tntclude In Commercial District Policies: a.. identl4led service area, Where applicable. • • b.. gross leasable sq. ft., building coverage or Floor Area Ratio desirable c_ land area designated commercial for full development IPd'„ standards to apply to zone changes, include:-- necessary on-site circulation pattern site and building design criteria to fulfill community policies -- location criteria for access to streets and parking and public transportation ....e e-. type of activities desirable (e.g. comparison or convenience shopping) 3. Maine zone changes subject to conditions which meet the Commercial District Policies, tniciuding preservation of the capacity of streets and Intersections. FOR GENERAL POLICY IV: Encourage private investment in planned commercial centers. r The Claw, will: • 1. Prcwide public facilities plans and development policies which will encourage: a. revitalization of the east ena commercial area . b. -evitallzatlon of the west end commercial area • --.2,:›1 c. •neighborhood commercial centers which maximize the advantages and minimize the dlsaevantages of neighborhood living adjacent to commercial activity d. development of the "Town Center" site compatible with community goals and street system e. development of highway oriented commercial facilities at 1-5 end Kruse Way which are ccmpatible with community goals and street system f. -ivate investment in shared parking and access facilities 40 -9B- • �. ...0. Comps. 'n l an/1 13z/29 • . cp rrc, COPMERCiAL LAND USE POLICIES OBJECT I YE: TO ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPERC I AL FACILITIES ADEQUATE TO SAT I SF'y COtA4A91 N I TY NEEDS AND TO FOCUS SOCIAL INTERACTION AND COMMUNITY IDENTITY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THOSE COMMERCIAL 4110 FACILITIES. -- GENERAL POLICIES: t. The City will encourage development of commercial areas to meet the community's consumer needs. • H. The City will plan for a mix of social, cultural, commercial, and governmental activities within commercial centers, so that these centers are attractive community focal points. 111. The City will plan for the development of commwirciai districts scaled In size to the area to be served. IY. The City will assure provision of adequate streets, public facilities and conmistent governmental " 4 policies, which will encourage private Investment in the development of Lake Oswego's commercial centers. Y. The City will assure minimal negative Impacts of commercial development on adjacent residential rdr- , areas.• -' Specific Policies • FOR GENERAL POLICY I: Encourage development of commercial areas to meet the community's consumer needs. Tlhe City will: • 1. Limit the amount of commercial land to that needed to servo the expected population at full development, in an amount which will: - promote revitalization of existing business districts - provide for proportional increases in commercial space as population Increases - encourage investment in now commercial facilities - reduce length and number of vehicle shopping trips - create minimum intrusion into residentially developed neighborhoods 2. Maps for the planned commercial land areas appear on following pages. • 3. Encourage more Intense land coverage and pedestrian circulation within commercial areas. FOR GENERAL POLICY II: Plan for commercial centers as commUnity focal points. The City will: ' 1. Plan land use patterns which will guide commercial and service activities Into groups of establishments, which will be mutually supporting and convenient to the public. • ' . ' 2. Prevent additional strip development along arterials and make provision for parking, rear access and redevelopment, to minimize the negative impact of existing strip development. 3. Adopt design policies which encourage site plans which are in keeping with the general character of • the community, and which will make sound healthy business centers. -97- m .0, e'c eic plan/I I'S z • e - "1)acumente recording those f'ndfngs and recommendations are a part of this Comprehensive Plan, but !because Of the volume of materiel considered, those documents are available for public review and tr ruse at the City Hail In a separete volume: These supporting documents Include research reports and policy formulation papers, summaries of decisions reached, special Interest positions ,advocated and records of meetings held; Minutes and summaries of meetings held by the Lake Oswego Planning Commission and City Council to identify needs, analyze alternative solutions, resolve ,_, conflicts and make the policy decisions here outlined, are a part of this record. The following list Includes supporting documents related directly to the development of the Social Resources policies. - Lake Oswego Community Gals, December 1974: Comprehensive Plan Task Force Reports, particularly: Community identity, Design and r Ja"=e Aesthetics, Open Space and Natural Resources, Residential-Housing, Parks and Recreation. - Citizen involvement Program for Lake Oswego, December 1975. - Citizen Involvement Program for Lake Oswego, Part 11, August 1976. - Population Study, Lake Oswego Planning Dept., February 1977:' - Lake Oswego Physical Resources Inventory, particularly the Distinctive Area, History, Existing Land Use chapters! - General Policy Directions for Lake Oswegoes Comprehensive Plan, March 28, 1977: 4 .• - Neighborhood Association Recommendations, 1975-78. - Public testimony at Planning Commission and City Council hearings, November 1977 through June 1978. SOCIAL RESOURCES POLICIES OBJECT 1 VE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CCMMUN 1 T Y ENV I RODENT DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE CREAT 1 VE COh49UN I T Y LIVING AND SENSE OF IDENTITY:. 4 GENERAL Pot.ICIES: 11e The City will develop and protect features veluabl,) to community identity and preserve the natural one aesthetic qualities which are the pride of resldsnts7 ' thi, The City will support the preservation of historic sites and structures In order to preserve . a sense of continuity with the past: al: The City will encourage participation of citizens In the development of the future community, 1".• so residents can feel that they are members of the eommun i ty: • • A: The City will facilitate the revitalization of existing business districts, where civic, , social, cultural, amusement and business activities will form focal points of community activity? > it The City will strengthen n. ighbarhood identity, through public decisions which provide for ., meighborhood boundaries, s ciai centers, residential privacy, pedestrian circulation and a protection from disruptive land uses and traffic! TO: The City will facilitate social interaction to foster an interesting community, ttsrough the . rrovislon of public facilities and programs, and by planning for a choice of housing types and ., Sousing costs which make possible a six of ages, income levels and fife styles within the conmunityd g TOI! The City will plan for Industrial and commercial land to provide Neal Job opportunities and . private Investment, and will serve these employment centers with a transportation sperm that will +eke residents conveniently to their Jobs In the community and In the region: „ • " -61- Li'O. Comp plan/0479z/40 + , 1 . , _ is • c( ( Ci. 0 • Distinctive Natural Areas • .75 140 PARKLANDS WITH DISTINCTIVE VEGETATION 31. NW of Othello Cul-de-sac 58. Camperdown Elm- NE corner of McVey and • 1. Bryant Woods Park 32. S of Carman at Fosberg Oak near Grimms Corners 2, Cook's Butte Park 33, Between Tualata and Central E of Jean Road 59. Catalpa-NW of railroad at Bryant and Lower :. - •,. 3. Freepons Park 34. E of Redwood Court Drive 4. George Rogers Park 35. S of Junction of Westview and Southshore 60. Cherry Trees -100 years old 5. Roehr Park 36. Between Wembley Park Road and Egan Way 61. Chestnut-7th near 0 Avenue • 6. Springbrook Park 37, SE of Hallinan and Laurel Streets 62. Cutleaf maple-W side of 2nd and B, ,7. Tryon Creek Park 30. Between Botticelli and Touchstone Terrace 63. Norway Spruce-SW corner of 9th and F 8. Waluga Park 39. Between Washington and Quarry NW of 64. Dawn Redwood-near SW corner of 9th and B ttoones Ferry Road Avenue RIVER BANKS 40. NE Corner of Carman and Quarry 65. Elms-W side of 1st midway between 9th and 0 9. Tualatin River 41. N of Burma Road Between Bangy and Kimball Avenue • 10. Willamette River Court 66. Empress Tree-W side of Furnace near Church 42. N of Monticelli Street • CREEKS AND SPRINGS 43. S of Ambler Court 67. Douglas-fir, "Peg Tree", N of Leonard near 11, Iron Mt.Creak-Corner Atwater/Boca Ratan 44. S of Meadows Road N of Drainage Furnace Street sg I• 12. Mouth,Tryon Creek 45. On Knoll NE of Corner of Oak and Palisades 68. Douglas-firs-7th between 0 and C Avenue 0 • 13, Indian Springs- Bryant Woods Park Terrace Road 69. Large Grand Fir••NE of Intersection of McVey , 14. pringbrook Creek and Tributaries and Cornell • 15. Springs•W of Atwater Lane CEDAR GROVES 70. Katsura Tress- 355 9111 16. Streams/Gullies-W of Marylhurst 46. E of Blue Heron Way 71. Myrtle Trees- E tide of 6111 between B and C 17, Wooded Ravine - Iron Mt,Cr, 47, Near Mouth of Springbrook Creek Avenues • 18. Lost Dog Creek 72. Oak -W corner of Carman and Davis OAK GROVES 73. Oak -NE of McVey at Cornell intersection r PONDS 48. 5 of Fosberg at Carman 74, Palen Tree - trachycarpus fortunes, line 19. Frog Punts 49 E of McVey between Laurel and Oak Streets specimen at Lake Bay Court at 6111 20, Lake Garden Court SLOPES y5. Parkman Crabapple-Chandler at Iron Mt.on . , 21. Pond- North of Sewer Plant Donald Bates' property • 50• South Shore Oswego Lake between Cedar 76. Pine Tree-Waluga School near tennis court at SWAMPS AND MARSHES (ta•ka� a) Court and Terrace Drive Bryant and Jean Road �22. Kruse Oak/Ash Forest 51. Above Waluga park 77. Poplar-1st and B Street ' • r • 23, NW of Bonney Ferty/Monroe. Parkway 52, Mt. Sylvana 78. Red Cedar-SW corner of 0th and B Street 24. W of Waluga Drive 53. S face Iron Mt. 79. Rosa Banksiae-on stone wall of house at 495W ' • ;1OL1GLA5 FIR GROVES SPECIAL DISTINCTIVE AREAS Briarwood Road 25. Ravine• E of l Road 54. Oswego Lake 80. Sequoia-"Christmas Trec"on Safeway lot,NE 26, SW Corner Lakeview Blvd/Bryan! Road 55. Grotto-Ridgewood Road corner of 5th and A Avenue 56, Natural AmpItheather Waluga Park 81. Spruce-large specimen SW corner of sth and F "`27. E of Summit Drive on knoll Avenue 2e. Specimen Fir3• W of Goodall RoadINDIVIDUAL82, Sugar Maple-NE corner of 3rd and C Avenue, 51. Black a TREES AND PLANT SPECIMENSy • e3, Sweet Gum -SE corner of 9th and F Avenue 29, W of Peters Road 51, Black Walnut-E tide of 9th midway between D • • 30, Stream Hanks- N of Aspen Court and E Streets 84, Prune Orchard• N of F Avenue at gth Street • 85, Treewalk in First Addition ` - • • . h •1 -. .A 4 DISTINCTIVE NATURAL AREA POLICIES � `• foe —gees, Oswego Lake, intimate neighborhoods, distant views, rural farmland, Douglas fir woodlands, river a ,ranks, altogether define Lake Oswego's character, and can be lost one'by one as development occurs. • n B use Lake Oswego rasLdents value the natural beauty and character of their community, they nominated as 'sr'ictive Areas, those features they wish to preserve. '. M.JECTIVE: TO PRESERVE THE WOODED NATURAL CHARACTER OF LAKE OSWEGO, AND THE INDIVIDUAL DISTINCTIVE ~ FEATURES PRIZED BY RESIDENTS. GENERAL POLICIES: e., +a' ,, " The City Oil preserve the general wooded character of Lake Oswego end protect the natural functions r served by native tree stands, street and yard trees. The City will encourage the preservation of Distinctive Areas and endangered plant species Identified. ' t. The City will explore acquisition of Distinctive Natural Areas which are found to have a high :r7erlty, as Public Access Open Space. . Sy: iflc Policies =a •General Policy I: Preserve tree stands. . , The City will: F Develop policies and procedures to preserve tree stands and other natural vegetation. Encourage the use of trees and plants within residential, commercial and industrial areas as part of _. the management of air and noise quality and to provide natural beauty. 1=7- Peneral Policy II: Preserve Distinctive Areas. , -es elty will - Develop procedures to preserve Distinctive Natural Areas as part of development approval, including Impact of adjacent ,.leveiopment. Nam/ Z. Supplement the Distinctive Natural Areas" list, as additional distinctive features are brought to city attention, and as endangered species are identified. • Make public the location of Distinctive Areas In order to call attention to the need for public �e•~ • `, stewardship and protection. we. Determine the natural features which must be protected if the area Is to remain viable Cable to aerpetuate itself>. 'l ✓e� , I. Allow appropriate variances and/or clustering of structure to protect valued features. • • -32- . Comp Platt/112z/49 • :G • ; 4 7:' 0q0 9a .• 1 a r IMPACT MANAGEMENT POLICIES Growth causes concern in the community because of its many potentially adverse impacts. The Comprehensive Plan and its implementation meallures establish methods for minimizing adverse Impart, of •nrlw slily l nprnrinl and rolooroolog growth i nmpa l lh lr wills I hr rnmmun i f y''1 nh I f I I vo.. Il1 IMPAI l MANAr;I MINI IIE.MINI 1011'. yurii:ral pulli 1.on for m.rndging growth impacts; marry related policies are :contained in other Comprehensive Plan elements. • i• OBJECTIVES: TO ENSURE THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES RELATED TO THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, COMMUNITY CHARACTER, PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES, FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS, AND ENRICHES THE QUALITY OF LIFE. TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE EFFECTS OF GROWTH O;J . . - NATURAL RESOURCES OR PROCESSES - PHYSICAL FACILITIES - AESTHETIC CHARACTER �. c GENERAL POLICIES: • z The City will protect natural resources and processes from adverse impacts of development, within ; reasonable cost limitations. „._ The City will evaluate zoning and development proposals comprehensively for their impacts on the " community, requiring the developer to provide appropriate solutions before aporoval is granted. ` ' • . III. The City will require new development to pay an equitable share of the costs of publtt facilities, particularly sewer, water, drainage, parks, open space and streets or traffic /'.. improvements, TV.. The City will require new development to pay an equitable share of the cost of governmental administration, required by the development. F;, T. The City will plan and program for the provision of adequate public services and facilities. • • Specific Policies , ' For General Policy 1. Protect natural resources and processes ` —Ale City will: Assure that each development seeks to preserve and maintain natural features and processes • Mrnaised 4/fl7 , — G . EXH -16IBIT • - - 0 Comp plan / 112z / 28 9 ,_ • • , coil --q � . . , , : ' wr r i w < r 1 'tia t/ • . .onditions that are consistent with and intended to carry out the terms and intent of this plan and program, and applicable City 4110 ,ordinances and regulations which govern matters not controlled by this plan and program. • ;erection 11 . Declaration Of Restrictions for Future Phases • The applicant shall submit for City approval Declarations =:r Restrictions for each p .ase , which shall be consistent with this plan and program. 0• • ' r • • da • • • r r . r sy . 1.1 - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM FOR WESTLAKE ( DECEMBER 16 , 1980 ) • • ,ti 4J• Ur • • a • { 11 • • • i • 1 1 • • .• y • • I Ai: F 4 ` •1 a' • • • • • • • • n ,. '"a • If • • • • 1. J '� 0 Y r • • •• - - • • • will be built in six phases . Initial construction of the first phase will commence on approximately May 1 , .1981 . Phase I will 410 consist of entirely single-family units . rwN • The subdivision improvements necessary to meet City requirements and thus make lots saleable will take approximately cna year from the date of commencement of construction on each • C 4. '. phase. <Commencement of construction on each successive phase will begin within 18 months of the commencement of construction ran the previous phase. / The date of completion of the living units will be • dictated by the absorption rate in the market which will be • cc+ntrolled by the economic climate. } ' 2. This approval is subject to compliance with the sr schedule stated in subsection 1. above . A one year extension fo • r _ay deadline will be granted upon sixty days prior notice that -he deadline will not be met. In the event that no such notice " :s given, or in the event that a second extension is desired , the • applicant will be entitled to the extension upon a showing of one • cc more of the following : _Y+ `A. Circumstances beyond the control of the developer 6', causing delays; ,• 0.� B. Undue hardship caused by failure to grant the extension. :-*;? Z, Request for a subsequent extension shall be treated as a I ma jor or substantial am ndment to this final plan and program.> Section 10 . Conditioning of Phase Approvals The approval of any phase may be grafted subject to _ ., - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM FOR WESTLAKE ( DECEMBER 16 , 1980 ) • �� r• o - / 2 • The minimum lot width at the front building ` line shall be fifty w feet'. 3 . The minimum lot depth shall be one hundred feet. A D. Parking - Spaces equal to 1 .5 times the nu ' dwelling units . tuber of ; , 3 . Neighborhood commercial uses: A. Height limitation 30 feet or two stories, whichever is less. • ' B . Setbacks - there are no required bards 4 . C. Lot size. ° n aA � . 1 . The minimum lot area shall be five thousand •` ^ square feet. �' ,;;• r 2• The minimum width at the front building shall be fiftyg iine feet. D. Parking and loading As required by regulations in effect at time of request for build • #` ins and site approval . s, 4 . Church site - Subject to same requirements menu as r '.�,, . uses except parking and loading requirements subjectregulations in effectwill be �•• g at time of request rq for building P and ite approval . . 5 • ' Any provision of this section may be modified by u' . ; • • ° specific phase approval the �^ p or the site and building approval . • ° Section . I ' 9 . Completion Schedule , 1 ° The required subdivision improvements fo - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAMr Westlake?OR WESTL;AKE ( bECEMBER 16 ,r„ r'' • A • unreasonable or unduly burdensome with respect to specific property, hut in no event shall this exception provide for a site area of less than five thousand square feet. ape 1• ' ' 2 . The minimum lot width at the front building line shall be sixty feet. • 3. The minimum lot depth shall be one hundred feet. • d D. Lot Size , All Other Phases . 1 . Minimum lot area is 5 , 000 square feet per dwelling unit. 2. The minimum lot width at the front building line shall be 50 feet. 410 E . Parking - One space per dwelling unit . Y 2. Multi-gamily Uses and Church Uses . A. Height limitation - 45 feet. f B. Set backs . • •, 1 . The front yard shall be a minimum of ten feet. 2. The side yard sr.lall not be less than a . ` ` , distance equal I;o one-half the height of the principal building , C. Lot size . tib 1 . The minimum lot area shall be seven thousand • five hundred square feet for each principal • AY • • building and not be less, than two thousand square feet per dwelling unit. E - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM FOR WESTLAKE (DECEMBER 16 , 1980 ) • Section 7 . Lot Coverage In Phase I lot coverage will be 30%C All subsequent r single-family residential phases shall have a maximum lot coverage of 35% . �,, •,# Maximum lot coverage in all multi-family residential ' areas , the church site and the neighborhood commercial shall be 1• 50% . ,' Section 8 . Height Limitation, Setbacks, Lot Sizes, Parking an Loading• / 1 . Single family uses : A. Height limitation - 35 feet or two stories and an attic, whichever is less . B . Setbacks . 1 . The front yard shall be a minimum of twenty • - ti feet. : 2 . The side yard shall be a minimum of five feet ® and the sum of the two side yards shall be a minimum of twenty feet on the side abutting a street except that this yard may be reduced by the amount an existing lot is less than sixty feet in width but to not less than ten feet . . 3 . The rear yard shall be a minimum of twenty- five feet. C . Lot Size , Phase I . ` The mnimum lot area shall be seven thousand square: feet , except that the area may be reduced vaon approval of the Planning Commission tf this requirement is found to be - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5 PROGRAM FOR WESTLAKE ( hEC8M5ER 1 . I aPn t • The remaining balance of ap proximately S acres shall be 0 distributed equally between multi-family areas 2 and 4 and "\ single-family area 5 , and will take into account drainage ways . Section 6. Utility Easements The utility easements over the 41 acres of open space will be located as indicated on Exhibit BE. Through the 12 acre ': •,.. park site the easements will be located with the ap proval of the 'of the City Engineer. ' Easements located in the 20 acre open space area adjacent to Kruse Way will be subject to the following conditions : • • 1 . The development easements will be 10 feet in width . The temporary construction easements shall be 10 feet in width, five feet on each side of the permanent easement. When the 'improvements are completed to the satisfaction of the City of u, Lake Oswego, then temporary easements will be terminated . 2 . The easements are to be staked and all construction • shall occur within its limits . The construction shall be ac- complished in such a manner as to minimize the adverse affects ,r upon the existing vegetation. The City must approve all trees that are to be removed •prior to their removal. The placing of equipment and materials for storage shall not occur within the easement area, unless it is immediately being used for construction. y 3 . The site, after the improvements are_ completed , shall : n • ce graded to the surrounding ground level and soil prepared to • ,1permit revegetati ,n. • 410 4 . The site shall have all materials and equipment ' removed from the permanent and temporary easement area. a , FXNAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM 4 1 L' If p 1 A ' ' V ( 3) Display of merchandis along the wall of ' •a the building not extending more than three feet from the wall and not in a required yard. 410 ( 4 ) Display of plants . b. Items produced or wares and merchandise handled shall be limited to those sold at retail on the premises . c. Signs are subject to review and approval by the City pursuant to the regulatiors pertaining to signs as appli- cable at the time of application subject to the following additional requirements; signs shall not be larger than one square foot for every foot of lot frontage along streets other than alleys , or one hundred fifty square feet , whichever is less . Signs shall be limited to those identifying the commercial establishment. if illuminated, the signs shall not be of an intermittent flashing type and shall not create or reflect sub- stantial glare beyond the property line . Signs shall not project above the building containing the business which the sign idFnti- fies . 2 . Accessory Uses . A structure or use incidential and subordinate to the main use of the property are allowed . Section 4 . Density Th'e residential densities for each area within the development will be those specified on amended Exhibit K. The unit numbers identified for any given area are limited to that area and may not be transferred between areas . Section 5 . Open Space �. There will be a total of 46 acres of open space , The location of approximately 41 acres is indicated on Exhibit B . 5 - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM FOR WESTLAKE ( DECEMBER 16 , 19O ) • 4. • ( 5 ) Doctor or other practitioner of the healing arts . ( 6) Engineer or surveyor. ( 7) Insurance agent. ( 8 ) Real estate agent. o. Radio o;, television service shop with incidental sales . (2) Conditional uses permitted . a. Bowling alley or comparable commercial amuse- A: w• 'Went, or facilities related to the conduct of Lecreational a . • activity. b. Building supply outlet . c. Automobile service station . drive-in� d . Restaurant (excluding types) . 410 ( 3 ) Other similar uses which provide goods and services principally to the residents of the development and other residential neighborhoods in the vicinity may be allowed , ° ' after approval by the City staff. ( 4) Total building square footage for the neighbor- ood commercial site shall not exceed 35 , 000 square feet. ( 5 ) Limitations on use . Uses on the site shall be subject to the following :onditions ' and limitations: a. All business , service , repair, processing , storage and merchandise display shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed building except for the following': ( 1) Off-street parking or loading • ( 2) Drive-in windows , 4 - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM FOR WESTLARE ( DECEMBER 16 , 1980 ) • ` , 'j ,.a.! `• ICI • ' 1 . basketball court and stage, a kitchen, church classrooms and church leaders ' offices . All parking will be accommodated within the designated four acre site. 410 E. ( 1) The uses allowed on the three acre neighborhood commercial site include: ,;` a. Variety or dry goods store . � b. Bakery. Via' c. Barbershop. d. Beauty shop . e . Clothes cleaning pickup agency, including pressing . y, f . Confectionery. • g. Delicatessen. h . Drugstore, including fountain. i. Florist shop. j . Frozen food locker, excluding o- wholesale storage. k . Garden store . 1 . Grocery store , including meat market . m. Hardware store . Y n . Laundry pickup agency . d o. Office or clinic for the following : ( 1) Accountant . ( 2) Architect or designer . ( 3) Attorney at law. ( 4 ) Dentist , — FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM FOR WESTLALCE ( DECEM6ER 16 , 1980 ) Y 4: , RW • e / + /Ca f/ si • Report on Traffic Circulation • 1 and a Transportatio n Management Program Kruse Way Corr` id®r Clackamas County, Oregon r .. � ConsultingCarl H. Buttke, inc. • Transportation Engineer gbneer ,�. OM goo 1 0 —� i 4 • • t o • i r C REPORT ON ;Y , TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND A TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR •• n CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON i- n .13 • Prepared b 1 x,GINz4,vAf0. Y� Carl H. Bu��ke, P.E. �' a�lz !y , r �� w. January 7, 1983 GNICGOH O •�"� �pY I I �Q��� '� h av�� . r. • 0 CAHHL 1 TTKE,INC. + CONFU►INC 1IAilOHlNdNEip ' • • • r �. i r ` ;N II e • .1 . . . ... . . , . .. . . . . . . . . . • ...., . . . . CONTENTS .o PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 Study Area Boundaries 1 Purpose 1 . Previous Analyses 3 : Project Committee • DESCRIPTION OF CORRIDOR 5 ••- • Land Use 5 Roadway System Traffic Level of Service 13 • Bikeway System 17 Public Transportation Service 17 ITRAFFIC .•ORECASTS 20 . Trip Generation 20 Trip Distribution 25 Vehicle Trip Assignment 27 . Corridor Generated Traffic 27 Background Traffic With Corridor Vacant. 27 ..- Total Traffic 29 �4 4 . CARL H.8urnc(,INC, • I C * m NI • Ir ' . � t ' •r • . i i 3: r i Forecast Level of Service 32 Kruse Way & Boones Ferry Road 32 Kruse Way & Mercantile Village/Safeco Access 33 Kruse Way & Carman Drive 33 Kruse Way & Westlake Drive 33 Kruse Way & Liberty .Park/Westlake Access 34 Kruse Way & Bangy Road 34 Highway 217 & Southbound 1-5 Ramps 36 Carman Drive & Quarry/Meadows Road 36 Carman Drive & Bonita/Waluga Roads 37 Bangy Road & Meadows Road 37 Bangy Road & Bonita Road 38 ► ' Conclusions 38 VEHICULAR TRAVEL DEMAND REDUCTIONS 39 -j Increase Transit Usage 40 Transit Service 40 '• j Transit Incentive Program 42 •,� Conclusion 43 Rideshare Programs 43 Carpools 43 Vanpools 44 • Alternative Work Schedules 45 Staggered Work Hours 46 Flexible Work Hours 47 Compressed Work Weeks 48 n N. N , ,• CA KE,WC.HLfir coosis1W.G MASSMQNtAtiO4i gtNGfIIN a .5. ! S . -. . 41111 . ot . .. . ., l ` u a V Estimated Impact 9 Vehicle Trips Level of Service 50 RECOMMENDED PLAN 56 Transportation Management Program 56 � .Y , Purpose 56 Program Management 57 57 l Program Elements Public Tranmportation Service 660 0 . Traffic Operations + ;. 61 Traffic Signali�:ativn 63 l Kruse Way and Boones Ferry Road Kruse Way and Mercantile Village/ 63 ' Safeco Access 3 6 Kruse Way and Carman Drive 63 Kruse Way and Westlake Drive u ,: Kruse Way and Liberty Park/Westlake Access 665 • ; _ Kruse Way and Bangy Road 66 Bangy Road and Meadows Road Carman Drive and Meadows/Quarry Roads 66 ,. Carman Drive and Bonita/Waluga Roads 6967 Other Locations 69 Pedestrian Overpasses , . APPENDIX 71 CAM.H BL1TTK , HC. C'b otit1M1G rokin 0111Ahdi INGNI[11 . 4 1 1 » I '! ,r• I , rr- , Y .Y _ yr. M' • ` . �. . .. r r. '�N ♦ y 1` 1 4 �.. 'pr • iv TABLES ' !\ , PAGE , , 1 Assumed Future Land Use 7 2 Hourly Variation in Traffic Volume on Kruse Way 12 3 Current Level of Service Wi'in Corridor 16 ' 4 Assumed Employee Travel Characteristics 22 5 Estimate of Year 2000 Generated Traffic 24 P. 6 Estimated Employee Travel Characteristics With 50 A Transportation Management Program , k ,. 7 Estimate of Year 2000 Generated Traffic With 51 A Transportation Management Program ai40 8 Comparison of Level of Service With Transportation 54 �; Management Program a \. 1 9 Approximate Implementation Schedule 62 a 9 APPENDIX A-1 Generalized Trip Generation Rates 72 4 a CAfiLIUTTwE,NC , A. c . d ,. S v .. ...: . _ _ FIGURES .. . . .. . PAGE • • 1 Vicinity Map 2 ' 2 Political Jurisdictions 6 3 Corridor Roadway System 9 w® t 1. 4 Public Transportation Service 18 5 Directional Distribution of Work Trips 26 • ' Attracted to Corridor by Year 2000 r � 6 Assignment of Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour 28 Corridor Generated Traffic . 7 Reduction of Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Resulting From Fewer Workers Leaving the Lake 30 '" Oswego Planning Area 8 Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic With Corridor Fully Developed 31 „ r 9 Kruse Way and Bangy Rd./I-5 Alternatives 35 4 . + LL' it , • 10 Suggested Future Transit Service 41 1. 4 11 Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic With a 't " Transportation Management Program �d 12 Recommended Number of Approach Lanes to 68 w +, Intersections Throughout Corridor . C RL H. H1J'BTICE,NC. 'tip`. 1 kCWltlll►►ta rtwaf"OIItAt10t)tNGtlltll t..d r ity '' x ,. vi • ..L i APPENDIX 1 PAGE j c --'. A-1 1982 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 73 i A-2 Assignment of Corridor Generated P.M. Peak 74 Hour Traffic A-3 Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic 75 { With Corridor Vacant . { A--4 Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic With Corridor 76 ` 4 9 Fully Developed A-5 Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic With A 77 • . . Transportation Management Program 7 oowsuoad D sealeAnoN iwGodtNl o IT. Y - r - -, � M o 5. ly�' , rI• " u �« „ ...r � t r'. k 0 • 41) A A Y Y ' Introduction • •✓C. ♦ This report concerning traffic circulation and transportation �.� management in the Kruse Way Corridor is submitted in accordance : .with our agreement of November 4, 1982. ::::::/: .1::::. ' STUDY AREA BOUNDARIES Corridor, as shown on Figure 1, is bounded by • The Kruse Way , 1-5 on the west, Boones Ferry Road on the east, Bonita and t Quarry Roads on the south, and Melrose Street and Carman Drive on the north. s PURPOSE The purpose of this analysis is to define a circulation system plan for the Kruse Way Corridor which will accommodate the . '- desired land use development in accordance with the appropriate 1 City and County zoning regulations; will accommodate the passing and generated motor vehicle traffic, public transportation , ,r I service, bicycle traffic, and pedestrians; and to develop a . transportation management program for the Corridor which will assure that the transportation system will function properly. ., ' A .. I CML H. OUTTK ,NC. CoNl;Ut1PYG t* M'irO.IlAtlx1N tNGNttI A r r' .. ♦ ,r ♦ ♦ � , •. yew ' e h e' ♦ . �..`r , ' ' n r 1N � .. b I 1 t J 1 i lyr t I . ,. . Iemoew 1 i .1 \ / w. t S .• • i•: . • :i' '. U - _ COurlm CYb , ,..,,,'...,.. :.... *'''''' : t. • lire I r• •" ...._2 : • In •e lH Y• ••I OOOIr►wrOwe� 1 >I eels• CMe,M Sinn Mt. • = - J OwYOa�w•+ws•�wn Mirp� Ate All."1° .;1::°111. " ...j(7(41CY • \\sN\ w d 01•lMi'16f - �, .'. .L/ *J\ (I 1111.61:00A c^ r .\. .....%'\ ''' . lli,k t• '. : .. i 1 1 ....\ c , ,� �'U D$ Fig"A 1 , Vicinity Map .k„;' 1'YMlllrl IeYto~'- ��`,�. 0 * x• ... ,,. 3 PREVIOUS ANALYSES ..,..-::,',..',i;.:,.,:,....i Frevious analyses utilized as background data for this included the followin r Project ' ':::-...: g sports and work files: • Comprehensive Plan, Lake Oswego, Oregon, July 18, 1978. • Initial Report on Street System Analysis, Lake Oswego Com- prehensive Plan, Carl H. Buttke, July. 19, 1977. • Transportation Requirements, Kruse Way Corridor, Carl H. Buttke, Letter Report, September 30, 1977. • Phase II Transportation Analysis, Lake Oswego Comprehensive P ive Plan Analysis, Carl H. Buttke, Letter Report, May 15, 1978, :'• • Re ort on Traffic Im act West Lake Planned Unit Develo ment, L'rl H. Buttke, Inc. , May , 1979. • Mercantile Village - Traffic Generation, Carl H. Buttke, Inc. Letter Report, April 21, 1980. o Mercantile Village - Boones Ferry Road Access, Carl H. Buttke Inc. , Letter Report, August 3, 1981. • Recommended Regional Transportation Plan, METRO, March, 1982. • Report on Traffic Impact and Access: Kruse Way Plaza, Carl C H. Buttke, Inc . , May 14, 1982. • Report on Traffic Impact, Access and Circulation, Liberty , � : , Park, Carl H. Buttke, Inc . , June 14, 1982. 1 " w •'g e • CAL H. BUn•KC•We . .• ., :: , i tZ.$tjj MG t1NN5tpglAibM 001.,116 .e .. , , • e, w . • 1 1 II • ti Ii . PROJECT COMMITTEE A committee was established to these anal ;sea. provide input, review, and gUide County, y ` The committee consisted of staff from Clackamas Lake, Oswego, TRI-MET, and representatives or erty owners of must land parcels within the Corridor. Thisrcoommittee met with the consultant a the course of this approximately every two weeks throughout project. FEE ^ ' Al • • d. • r. : • • .r • • flfl , • CAfL H UTTKE,INC. COAs+IhINf1 hANfrOnMAtion INg1Nf111 40 • • n , , . . • • e „, ..... .. . . . . . ... . .,, • - , ,. _ . ,: .w: , I � I • Description of Corridor I. LAND USE The major portion of land within the Corridor is in the City • of Lake Oswego. As shown on Figure 2, the land in the vicinit of Carman :Drive and north of Kruse Wa Y south of Kruse Way and west of a Y, as well as the land approximately Carman Drive, is � ;` outside the City and within the County's jurisdiction. • The land in the northeast ICarmt,,. Drive portion of the Corridor (east of ,� I e and north of Kruse Way) is zoned office campus uses, some limited commercial use and dential use. Currently, there is approximately 155,000 gross square feet of office space developed in this area. Table indicates the assumed future land use for this area as • ` ' the other three , well as ' " quadrants of the Corridor. • The northwest quadrant (west of Carman Drive and north of Kruse Way) is zoned generally for residential uses, With office and 8 ., commercial uses at the west end of the nd marizes the assumed future land use. quadrant. Table 1 sum-. undeveloped, but plans for development of thehe West is property are underway. p p ty The southwest quadrant (west of Carman Drive and South of Kr • s +� y Way) is outside the City of Lake Oswego and under Countyuri ` diction. The area is zoned generally for campus industrial uses (Which permits office space) ,) , commercial uses, and resi-• CAM H MOUE.it C. , . f N • Y • • • • • • ° • • • e • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • e • r • • • • • • a • • e • • • •, •.•.�• •�e�•a•�• • • O • O • Y • • • • • • • • • Y • Y • • • • • • • • • • • • • • » ■ • • • e s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • • r • • • • • • • • • .. •••••e•••••o•••••••• • • • ••• • • • • • o • • e • • o • • • e • ••: • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••r•••••••••••o•• ••••e•e ••••• s•• ••••• ••• 1,• ' • •• •• •• • •• •• • o• •• e •• •• • • •• •• s••• • ••o• •• s • o •• •• o • • • • • o . T•n•••••••••••••••••• • • s . o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••e•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • o e • • • • • • • • • n • s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a • • • ••••••••sell••.e....••°•••e•e•••••o•••e•e•e•••e•••••r•e•• •leer•°°••••• ••v••••°••••.•••. ••••••••••••• ••••••• ••••o•••••••••••••••e•••••••••••••• •••••••s•••• •°•°•°r°leer.••°• r•e•••.•.•••.•.•.•.•O°••••e••°•° • rarer••.°•° / •Q•••e•••.•••.•O••••••,�e•••••••• •e•••e••e•r .•••••♦e•r••O.0•• 1 iri••°0•••••••••••••••t)'•••°••••O LEGEND: ° ° ° ° ° I:.:•:•`::::: isis e • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • •::::::::: •••.•r••••r•°e°•°.°e•::::::•°••• E.] LAKE OSNIEGO o ells°°••v°•••••°•I • • • e • • • • • + • r e • • a 'w CLACKAh7AS COUNTY ••e•••••• • • • • • r • • • • • . • • ° • • • iJ, • • r r �•�:.:.:.•�•�•�•�. ••••••+•••V•••.•••+•+••O.•Y•.•.i •+i.•.i+•• °••• a rer•°•r•r•°0r•°••• :1. • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • ••. a e'• • s • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • s • r e • • • • ,....... ..\ o•••••••••••••• ••o • • • • • • • • • • o • • ••• ••••• s e • e� • . • • • • • • • • • • e ��//���••� . . . e . . : . . . . . • . . . . . ••. .•.•••.•.•.•.• . . . . k: . . . . . . • . . . . •r • o • • • • • • • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • s • Y e • • • • • • • • • • • e • e;1: • o•••• ••••••• • • ° • • • • ••••s•e • s•• • • r • • • • e • • • • • r • • • e • •••••naard ••••••••••••••�•••.• •�•r•••••.•'^,apr0••••0••/•,•Oo••er 0•, • • • • • ° • • n • • • r • • •..4 ° Mekose I�:;: J +r••+ •r I•.••••• ri 1 ,, ?iy Lake Oswegoi i • r• 0••• a ••••• •••••• •• •••••• ••• •lose •••••• 6-++� ••••• •••••e• else •••• , ••••••••• 1••••e • w ' ••••e •..•Ile.... tel. • :.Isle.70J •••• ••••.••••••• •••• •••. •••••••••••• ••••••• •••••• ••••• i•••• ee••••••re►• •••.••••••••• • oe•• ••••••••••• •••••••••••••e•••••O••••••••••• tn.!? ••• • 1�1 •••.• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••..•••.e•• ••••.••••••�• ,� ••••• • ••• •••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••0•.`,1M•• ••••••••• ••••or •••• •r••••••.e••°•••°•°•°•••••••••••.•l5e••.•..•• ....•.••••••e•••r•..s.e•••r••• •veil) T• ••• •••••e•••••••••••••e•l•rre•.•••.+••e.•e•er.••• •••r..••l•.r•.•.••e.•.•••••.•l� vv•••• •• e e•• ••..•••.••.••••••e•O•..•••••••••••..••••••r•....••• •••.••••...•••.••.••.••••••••••• ••• • ••• •••••••••.•.••••••••r•••••••••••••••••••••••• .•••••••••••••••••••••••I••••••0 • •••• - , •••••••re.••••••• • •••••o.•o•••e•••r•s•s••••••.l.■• I• ' • I •••• ••••••••••••••••• - ••••••••• ••••• ••••••••.•••••e••••••••••••• - h dd ♦••• ••••••••••••••••••••••• ••♦•• •••••••••.•••• ••••••••••.•••••+•I••••• • I• •♦• •v••°••••••»•••••.•••••e• ••e.•••••o••.•.••.♦• • r•••••••••••.••••••• •••• ••.•••••••♦•••••••••••••••• •.e••••e•••••••I••••••♦••• ••• 1 •••••.••••••• ,••• •••••.•••••••••O••••••.•••••e•O.•••••••••••e••.••••••••.t�'FIVW I... y . •v•• ••••e•••.•••.••.•.•••••••••••IIIIII••••••°.••.r•.•..•••• e•••••••• p. AV •►.•v°•.••.•e°••••••••vr•••••••••.•••••••°r..v•v••••••••••e••i•••••i••••.••• . •a•r i°••°•e e•e•••°••••e r••••••.r•••r•°•°°••••°•••••••r e r••°•.•i.••I°•i°.e°• Lee • ••••••••••••••..s••..••.•..•.•.••.•••r.••...se•s•...•e•..•sle•.e.♦•••..• •••• j•.•°•.°•°•°.•••.°•♦•.••°v••.•v.sell•r•••••••.•••••.•.•e•l••e••er.••..•e• 1 ••• •• ••••••••••••••••••••e••••//•••e••••••••••••••O e•••••••r•O.r•••o•••••e••r• ••r•• •e••••••••••••••.�IA110•••••••••••••••••0••••••• •••••••• t . Y III - ••••••e••••••••n•• ••••••••.•••••••.•••••• ••••,• . ••••• •••• ••••.•n•••••••••••••••v••°••v•••••••••••••••••••••••°•• ••••••{, • - ••• •••••••N..••••••••••••••••••••••••••••f•••••••••••••.•-. .•••e•••• •0 •°°• •°••°••••••••••°•.o••e•er..•...•.••••••e••••e•••rr..•. •••••r•e•.•e. •e• I •••••••••••O••••••••I••••0•••• e N°°• •••i•••••••••••.••••i••••••••°•••i i•i•°...i e ••..• •.••••°••••°•••°• ••• -♦••••.•••.•••..•••••1•q,,,,�M••••••••••••.•••••••••••• - • •..••••••.••.••• Iles •r•eel•r•.•••••.•°•..°i•"••••.••••.e••e•••••••••••• l'••. •••••••••en•e• •°• •••°ISSI0•.•e.•.•.•••••••••••••e•••.•••se•••eee••••,II•.• •••••••v•••••••I '.., •eY•- ••••.•••••r•SSSS•••••••••••••••s••••e••v•••••••e• •••••• ••••••••eerr• �� + -• l • ••• •.•.•.•reo.•e•.•••••r.••e••..•e•r••r..e•.re•.e•.• •lees -•• Soo••• I••• •.••.•leeIv••I.••oe•••••.o••.•r•v•°••••.v»•••vv• •••.•e• j,.• • �•••••• - '•.• •°•.•••°••.••.••••Y•°•°r°•••••••••.e••..•°..•..• •r•e•••• '1••..• .• leer .oe••••r••sell•r••..•••rro•.••••.•••s•••e..♦.•• ••.ear.•. poll•. `•,�.... .•• •••••••••v•••I•••••o••••e••e°°••..••.e•••e••s•. •e••..•••l••• 4►wt► . Y ' •••e •••.•••••.cool•• ei0•••••e•••ies••.•••oo••••••• ••••••••O•••e• ,•'r •.• sell••e•.sera••lee..••e•e1••••r•••r•e•...•.r eelsI....Ire.• •••• •••••.•••.err•••••e••.••.••••r•••••••.•••••• ••••••r••.••••• ••• •.••v°°.e••a••••••••••°••r••••e.•»••••••••• ••••••or•e•r•ee.• '' '.': .:' •••. •••••see.••....••ee•eee•r•.••e••.r••••••Y.. ..•i•°•e•°•♦•Orese• I ••• •v.leer•e•••••••••••••..•r••e•e••••••er••. •°.••.•°•i•v♦•••.re• •' •.p •••r•r.I..•le•.•.•Ise•e•ee•••e••.lY.•Y.••le•r.. e.•ll••e.•••0e•0•.••• vs•e•°•vv.°••°••••••.e••.•••SSIes••o»••oe••.•••••••••se♦l•..•e•el••••• ty,...i*2 Political Jurisdictions • J 0 t 1 :., .. 0 111 11, . TABLE 1 ' ASSUMED FUTURE LAND USE - KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR . North North South South East West West East Total Office (T.G.S.F. ) 416 360 2355 153 3284 , Service/Commercial 39 10 193 95 337 (T.G.S.F. ) Hotel (Rms. ) - 300 3,00 - 600 ` Single Family Dwellings - 743 - - 743 Multi Family Dwellings 108 894 200 93 1295 ' Elderly Housing Units 180 - - - 180 T ,r 1 , Note: , T.G.S.F. $ Thousand Gross Square Feet of Building Rms. m Rooms Service/Commercial includes general retail, service : i retail, banks, and restaurants . Land use assumptions are as approved for development by January 7, 1982. . ,, . i CAAL N. BUTTkE,INC ' cONCUIIM6l M4Po$tAIC* iNG,d(N . . r y / P 1 I I q + 8 • dential uses , Table 1 indicates the assumed future land this area. The majority of the southwest use for esignated . in the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan as lightrindustrial, `° "I wouldh result in which .a much lower density development than under the County's Comprehensive Plan and zoning. The City of Lake Oswego " and the County, however, entered into a Dual Interest . ' fit. • went sub Area(subsequently approved by L.C.D.C. ), Agt ree' County's Comprehensive Plan and zoning shall tapply htog the aunine • porated portions of the Dual Interest Areas (including the south- I west quadrant) and the County shall retain authority and responsibility for all implementing regulations and landuse actions as long as the area remains unincorporated. is agreement, the City has an opportunity to viewand comment er hon planning actions in the Dual Interest Area. • This area is undeveloped, except for the original homestead and a few other dwellings. Plans are underway for development of quadrant. 1 .. Liberty Park at the west end of the . The southeast quadrant l''' i'''' j Way) is zoned generally(fo toffice of ruse man Dcomme rive end sauce of Kruse residential use. The easterly portion' commercial uses, and tile Village, is approximate) p n of the quadrant, Mercan-- mately 138,000 square feet ofy office 90 rand tcommercial spac developed withe. . The- we�aterly portionce. • of the quadrant has recentlybeen p The development as Kruse Way Plaza with office sace and psomeemulti- family residential units . Table,o 1 indicates the assumed future land use for this quadrant. r ROADWAY SYSTEM The roadway system serving the Corridor is shown on Figure 3. + A summary of the roadway inventory, indicating the number of • III . ' • • CAUL kE,INC + coaSWNG iMAatranlAtroq taciR/N • A Or . • • M.• ijib 9 . . 4 2/20/40 Malrose ...,(P • 0, 4? tt f (P � I' , lir , 07, 755roJ 2/21/t� Kruse Way 4 V / uo �o N p cit ro ry 1� a/z,,� �`� �b •' 140 a 2/60/90 40 2/30k0 �� �' fa 276 - 95 Bonito 10 ' . '�4 ‘144� b. # • A�' '�rh, I lb 9if ti LEGEND: Ayr 7 890 a LI NESIp W r WIDIIVROW 1982 P.M.PEN(HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME f BY DIRECT ION 0 •TRAFFIC SIGIIAL IL • ""t-•••• 0 FUTURE ROADWAY FIgUr 3 Conklor Roadway System Ut � Ir i , 10 " '''.: travel lanes; street width, and current traffic volume is• also 1 shown on Figure 3. . The only fully._improved roadways serving the Corridor include l 1-5, Kruse Way, and Boones Ferry Road. Roadways, including Carman Drive, Bonita Road, Bangy Road, Quarry Road, Fosberg Road, and Melrose Street are all two lanes, approximately 20 to 22 feet wide with variable shoulder widths and constructed of asphaltic concrete or an oiled base surface. Kruse Way and Boones Ferry are City of Lake Oswego Streets. I Bonita Road, Carman Drive, and Quarry Road are County Roads, • , • and Bangy Road and I-5 are under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) . ', 1 The City of Lake Oswego is planning to construct a traffic signal ' at the intersection of Kruse Way and the access to Mercantile Village and the northeast quadrant. This signal would provide • I for left turn phases on Kruse Way and one phase to be shared by I the north-south approaches to Kruse Way. The signal on Kruse : n . Way at Boones Ferry •Road would be inter-connected with this signal to provide a progressive traffic flow along Kruse Way. • - A condition to the Kruse Way Plaza development in the southeast , quadrant requires that Carman Drive be widened to include a left turn lane at Kruse Way and at Quarry Road and that a left turn lane also be included in Quarry Road at Carman Drive. Kruse Way Plaza has proposed a right turn in and out only access on ';` • Kruse Way and on Carman Drive. X Currently, two local improvement districts have been established in the southwest quadrant to construct Meadows Road between '; Bangy Road and Carman Drive and two connections to Kruse Way. , ` '` This construction is underway. t. • 41 CAO 0l/TfXE,INC. 1 consuttwC rnANsroni*tron'WHIM , 1 . • • ` 411• iq r i 1, i .. ' Meadows Road is being constructed as a two-lane roadway with left turn lanes throughout most of its length. An ad right turn lane will be provided at the intersection withoCarman Drive. I The easterl y connection between Meadows Road and Kruae Way Broadbent access road) will align ot tte d d • Drive. This connection has been rQposed tor site the future Westlake a lanes, a landscaped median, and two northboundtlanes,wo a left turn lane. y plus a l ; The westerly connection between Meadows Road and Kruse Way is bound lanes, a landscaped median, andt and itwoll cnorthbcundonsist of tla south- Kruse Wayoppositelanes aE the connection to the Westlake commercial • ':-A •' AI access. ii v y. Traffic signals would be installed at the two connecting roads o , to Kruse Way between Bangy Road and Carman Drive and would be • ( � interconnected with the other a progressive traffic flow on KruselWays n Kruse Way to provide The development of the Westlake 1project in the northwest quadrant will include construction of local roadways and two connections to Kruse Way. The easterly connection to Kruse Way would be Westlake Drive, a divided two-lane collector street with left turn lanes and landscaped medians between Melrose _ Street and Kruae Way. The westerly connection to Kruse Way • would be at least a two-lane roadway with a left turn lane at Kruse Way opposite the Liberty Park access, -� + ' , ,. • �. , p I V CAilL H. BUUKE,WC. aoac+xrerG rnewsromm Oedema . , .` a t . �.f. Y., t ," i 12' , Recent traffic volume measurements indicate Kruse Way carries nearly 950 vehicles in the eastbound direction and slightly 1 over 750 vehicles in the westbound direction during the P.M. ' peak hour between Carman Drive and Bangy Road. The P.M. peak hour on Kruse Way •occurs between 4:45 and 5: 45 p.m. and repro- , Dents approximately 9.3 percent of the 24-hour volume. Table 2 ' indicates the hourly variation in traffic volume on Kruse Way. As indicated, the morning peak hour is about 80 percent of the P.M. peak hour. Therefore, the P.M. peak hour is the most critical for analysis purposes, except, in some casedi, the A.M. peak hour demand is utilized for determination of turn lane requirements. ` i Bangy Road carries• approximately 185 vehicles southbound and 255 vehicles northbound during the P.M. peak hour, as shown on '" I Figure 3, page 9. �•. Carman Drive, south of Kruse Way, currently carries approxi- • mately 255 vehicles southbound and 200 vehicles northbound, I during the P.M. peak hour. . Figure A-1 in the Appendix indicates the 1982 P.M. peak hour Itraffic volumes at each of the intersections throughout the Corridor. • TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE Transportation engineers have established variou� standards for measuring capacity of a roadway or intersection. Each standard 1 1 65 Highway Research Board, Special Highway Capacity Manual, 9 5, g , Report 87 , National Academy of Sciences, National Research I Council. - • • I CAR`H ,W C. r L �_ I - . • • 03 ' TABLE 2 ...,* ‘-:°:' HOURLY VARIATION IN TRAFFIC V0L1mE ON KRUSE WAY aiiiiiiiim Percent of 24_ HOur Volume 12:00 to s 1:00 to 2:00 . 0.6% 2:00 to 3:00 0.3 0.3, 3:00 to 4:00 4:00 t0 5:00 0.2 5:00 to 6:00 6:00 to 0.2 7:007:00 0.5 , 8:a to 8:op 2.5 0 to 9:00 7.4 9:00 to 10:00 7,0 5,� 10:00 to 11:00 11:00 to 12:00 noon 5.1 12:00 to 1:00 p.m. 6.o 1:00 to 2:00 5.7 ,.4' 2:00 to 3:00 5.9 • 3:00 to 4:00 6.2 4:00 to 5:00 6.9 5:0o to 6:00 8.7 6:00 to '7:0o g,3 7:00 to 8:00 6 .7 8:00 to 9:00 4.8 9:00 to 10:00 3.4 10:00 to 11:00 3.7 6 11:00 to 12:00a.m. • 2.1 Total 1. 3 100,0 April 21-23, 1981 count , coml.H, oURkE,ir4c, • oo004.xir44 toi,wseoArAreoa beakEA • • S. • 14 d ; }f' is associated with a particular level of service one wishes to } provide. The level-of-service concept requires consideration -of factors which include travel speed, safety, frequency of interruptions in traffic flow, relative freedom of traffic • maneuvers, driving comfort and convenience, and el-DLit. Six e, . standards have been established ranging from level "A" where traffic flow is relatively free to level "F" where the street system is totally saturated or jammed with traffic. A descrip-tion of each service level is provided on the following page. Service level "D" is generally utilized as the standard for asses- ! sing urban traffic operations and design of urban roadways. It t is the policy of METRO and Lake Oswego to maintain a level of +�° ' service "Don its major roadways during the peak there periods of • operation. At level "D", generally is at least ten percent more capacity available for traffic. The borderline condition between levels "E" and "F" defines the capacity of a roadway. The capacity of street approaches to a stop sign controlled intersection was calculated on the ability of motorists to' cross or enter a passing stream of moving traffic on the main street. As the passing traffic increases in volume, the avail- able gaps between vehicles decrease, thus reducing thq capacity of the cross street or stop sign controlled a pproach.' j The current level of service of traffic operations within the Corridor was calculated and is summarized on Table 3. As ' . ' ._. indicated, nearly all the intersections within the Corridor \ are presently operating Within an "A" level of service. The . .. 'Transportation Research Circular No. 212, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Board, National • Academy of Sciences, 1980. � : • • i c . MIKE,INC • CO*11.00 ANIIONIATIM INOtNM . I 0 II IP SERVICE LEVELS FOR ARTERIAL ROADWAYS . TYPICAL TRAFFIC PLOW CONDITIONS • Relatively free flow of traffic with some atopo at signalized or stop sign A controlled intersections. Average speeds would be at least 30 miles per hour. The volume to capacity ratio would be equal or leas than 0.60. .,.'�, Stable traffic flow with alight s+elayo at signalized or atop sign con- a trolled intersections. Average speed Would vary between 25 and 10 miles per hour. The volume to capacity ratio Would be equal or leas than 0.70. Stable traffic flow, but with delays at signalized or atop sign controlled. intersectiona to be greater than at level U, but yet acceptable to the 7 , motorist. The average speeds would vary between 20 and 25 milea per hour. The volume to capacity ratio would be equal to or leas than 0.00. I Traffic flow would approach unatable operating conditions. Delays at 1 signulized,or atop siG;n controlled Intersections would be tolerable and • D could include waiting through several signal cycles for some motorists. The average speeds would vary between 15 and 20 miles per hour. The volume to capacity ratio would equal or be leas than 0.90. Traffic flow would be unatable With congestion and intolerable delays to E motorists. ' The average speed Wuuld be approximately 15 milea per hour. • 1 The volume to capacity ratio Would be lean than 1.00. : - Traffic flow Would be forced and Jammed with atop and go operating con- I F ditiona and intolerable delays. The average speed would be leas than 15 -.'i ,, I miles per hour. I Note: The average speeds are approximations observed at the various levels of service but could differ, depending on actual conditions. • • ' r . J Capacity at service level E/F or When volume to capacity ratio is equal to 1.00. •• '-,-....j• CARL H OUTTKE,INC. , , - A. wilt& bNOInA►.S O MIONINGINetn I ' P ,, 16 , • TABLE 3 CURRENT LEVEL OP SERVICE WITHIN CORRIDOR - 1982 s w I Intersection Percent of Capacity Level of 1 Utilized by Traffic Service . Kruse Way and Boone Ferry Rd. 0.50W.' 1 A a I Kruse Way and Carman Dr. 0.49 A :Kruse Way and Bangy Road 0.55 A Hwy. 217 and S.B. 1-5 Ramps 0.66 ` ( Mercantile Village/Rafeco Access Ito Kruse Way 0,65 D Quarry Rd. approach to Carman Dr. 0.66 A I - I Bonita/Waluga approach to Carman 0.53 A • Bangy Rd. approaches to Bonita Rd. 0.51 A , v.. J • ' '' ' 1! II k 1 ooaftKtceu in7ol�watAtiON INOWA lb, . , lk 410 Yr only exceptions are the intersection of Highway 217 and the J aouthbound ramps of I-5, which are currently operating at a "B" • level, and the Mercantile Village and Safeco access approaches to Kruae Way, which are operating at a "D" level during theP.M. peak hour. It is anticipated that after the intersection of Kruse Way and Mercantile Village and the Safeco access road-] is signalized, the P.M. s "B" level of service. peak hour operation will be within the • . ' BIKEWAY SYSTEM A bike path exists along the north side of Kruse Way between j Boonea Ferry Road and the access ts mercial area. point to the Westlake co - The Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan calls for • • additional bikeways within the Corridor along Carman Drive, Melrose Street, Fosberg Road between Carman Drive and Street, and alonga Melrse ' portion of Westlake Drive. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICE 1 0 . Transit service is currently provided to or near the Corridor by two TRI-MET linen. As shown on Figure 4, the No. comes to within about a quarter mile of the east end of thee Corridor along noones Perry Road southwest of Reese Road. This service is , provided at 30 minute intervals throughout the day with some increased service during peak 37 line operates between Tualatin, downtown Lakeo Oswe The No. downtown Portland. g , and • The No. 38 line ' pa°ses through the easterly half of the Corridor on KrUse Way and on Carman Drive, as shown on Figure 4 . This • Y CAM 14 uuna,MNC C Nslxtblo t11MNiroN,ARIDw Mwnwta . . : 1® )/ •• , • , i . . 41‘114 ' '"u' . ,,....---. . . a ' ..4., *000° t 0 s / IMMO .01/°° 1 41\ . • Op COMM WO . laille( . a : :j(' . , Z. Pe ere •e e►° 00 Pootoctiki I t . ... • ..,,,,........ . 411 . .'71 . , hillihr:r.'4111. 1 / i A . iiii,. . 1 BOOS 0111°0/1" • 4 Ii era a Public Transportation Service Heart 0 1 • ap , .. . . . 1 • -, l it .. 19 I .ti ute eriods between Wilsonville . 0 line operates only during comet p 1 and downtown Portland. ,! Y Other TRI-MET lines serving Lake Oswego are also shown on Figure 4. . isplanning to improve service in the southwest portion TRI-MET 1�8�b. This improvement of the Metropolitan area by January, ' plan includes TRI-MET transfer stations inn downt town Lakermswed nd Tigard. The exact roindicationsstructure from TRI-MET are that the . at this point. However, No. 37 line might be rerouted from BooneSererry Carman dowDrive ► to Kruse Way and Highway 217 to provide Lake Oswego and downtown Tigard. This service would be offered { :, initially during the commute hours. The No. 38 line could be rerouted from Boons Ferry Road north • of Kerr Road to Kerr Road and the Barbur Park : .' • The No. 37 line could be extended from its present western ''� terminous north to the Kruse Way Corridor. The exact route has • not been developed. i 77 to Kruse Way to TRY-MET plans to eventually reroute the No. ram. trunk line service between downtown Lake Oswego and provideAs a result of this Corridor analysis, TRI- downtown Tigard. , • MET has initiated plans for other service to the Corridor, which will be discussed later in this report. 1 CABL H UUTTBE,INC • (pNSUIIl1G 1Nm$S1'CiIAms[WNW i 20 1 • Traffic Forecasts . The future traffic pattern throughout the Corridor was defined by estimating the traffic which would be generated by the full • development of the Corridor, as indicated on Table 1, page 7, ' assigning this development generated traffic to the roadway system and then adding this assigned, traffic to the estimated .. •` future traffic passing through the Corridor. .. It was assumed for these analyses, that the assumed future land use within the Corridor would be fully developed by the year 2000. . This procedure utilized the trafcic' forecasts made for the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan, and more recent data developed by METRO for the regional transportation plan. • TRIP GENERATION The amount of traffic estimated to be generated by the individual developments throughout the Corridor was made on the basis of measurements of traffic at other similar types ypes of 6 I '• ; , cnn� tke,INC, ilii lo►4sUU.G MANsrammlioN n ciNtiq • d a 411 + « tl q land uses here in the Portland Metropolitan Area and throughout the U.S.1 and modified to reflect changes in travel character- istics expected within the next 17 years. As shown in Table '4, it is estimated that a v pproximately 86 to d • 91 percent of the employees, who currently work within the Corridor, drive to work and park their vehicles there. It is further estimated that the average occupancy of vehicles driven to work within the Corridor is 1.1 persons than three percent of the employees are estimated htoluse transit to and from work. By the year 2000, it is estimated that the vehicle occupancy will increase by approximately 15 percent to 1.25 vehicle driven to work, because of the increased cost ofper transportation, congestion on roadways throughout the region and minimal efforts to encourage carpooling. Transit riderahi is estimated to increase to where six to ten p employees within the Corridor would use TRI-METrtonandffrom work, because of the increased service. that up to ten � It is also estimated percent of the employees at any one location might walk or use a bicycle to and from work because of the • . t 1Tri Generation An Informational Re ors Institute portation Engineers, Second Edition 1 ' dst and off results of the 1962 revisions for the Third Edition. Carl H. Buttke, Inc. , Unpublished Trip Generation Measurements. 2Estimated from data developed by METRO. • • • ` CAA H. e117kE,INC, CONSUMING TM1NSPpf1TATION[NGI i - 1 • 22 I • • 1 t TABLE w . I ASSUMED EMPLOYEE TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS Sa Kruse Way Corridor ' 1982 Year 20001 Vehicle Driver 86-91% 66-70% • •5 Vehicle Passenger 8-9 15-19 • Transit Passenger 1-3 6-10 c\ Walk & Other 0-2 0-10 1 a *Without a transportation management program. t • • i ,' El) 0ft Volt.PiDUT!KE.INC, Cotodst do tnANsPontAtoN mean . .. 410 23 I :,::: : Iproximity of housing to the employment sites within the Cerri-. dor. The corresponding percent of employees actually driving vehicles to work is therefore estimated to decrease to a range between 66 and 70 percent by the year 2000, as shown on Table 4. However, these' work trip' characteristics could differ dependthE upon the . devela,�ar��;nt and hean parking other supply provided at each individual to reduce Vehicle trip making. For rograms ie ample, Libertyimplemented the Park,empl inc�ray _ its Master Plan, has indicated that it will,supplyparking a rate of 2.5 spaces per 1000e eet f at • building area and initiate a transportationfmanagement ipro ra - Therefore, travel characteristics for work trips to and from m. A Liberty Park would be different than those shown on Table 4 be- cause less people would drive to work and park at Generalized trip generation rates are on Table A-1,Liberty Park. , Appendix. Table 5 summarizes the estimate of dailyand P.M. ' 1 vehicle trips generated bythe peak hour Corridor. proposed uses within the These volumes indicate the amount of traffic expected to use the various access roads to each development. In many cases, the developments are multi-use; therefore, some internal trip making would be done by walking, thus reducing ' the driveway volumes. The effect of the internal trips hav already beei!a considered in Table 5. . '''::::::. : f I As indicated on Table 5 it is e generate nearly ' estimated that the Corridor will • ,: • 74,000 vehicle trips per weekday (37,000 vehicles enter and 37,000 vehicles leave each day) . During the P.M. peak hour, it is estimated that slightly over 3000 vehicles would be attracted to uses within the Corridor and nearly 6500 vehicles would leave the various uses.the trips, as will be discussed later, originate and end of within the Corridor (such as trips from home to a commercial A . 1 CAUL H. MOW, INC. coNMM$ piQ TRANSPOWATgy TNcwrn ^ k A 4 24 . • / A . TABLE 5 ESTIMATE OF YEAR 2000 GENERATED TRAFFIC • Kruse Way Corridor Without a Transportation Management Program 24-Hour P.M. Peak Hour Two-Way Quadrant Volume Enter Leave i Northeast 6,700 245 745 . Northwest 20,350 1,120 1,135 ' N Southwest 37,000 1,165 4,010 Southeast 9,800 505 695 Total 73,850 3,035 6,585 ra, . �! /. • • 0 CARL N.�1*E,WC. ooNslxrwa inANst'oarAtiou(11GMtll .• / r I a area or trips made at the end of the day by motorists leaving an office building, but stopping at a retail center on the way home from work) . • r, .d TRIP DISTRIBUTION �J The directional distribution of trips to and from the Corridor for the year 2000 was estimated on the basis of the distribution of trips developed for the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan and . on the basis of METRO's latest regional trip distribution information. This distribution made for work trips, shopping ' o trips, and all other trips indicates an estimate from where trips might originate when coming to the Corridor and con- versely where trips are destined when they start in the Corri- , .:, dor. Figure 5 summarizes the directional distribution of work trips ; attracted to the Corridor by the year 2000. It is estimated by the year 2000, that approximately 35 percent of the work ;•. force employed within the Corridor would live within the Lake • Oswego planning area. Therefore, approximately 65 percent of ""4 the people working to the Corridor by the year 2000 are esti- ' mated to commute from other areas of the region. - As indicated on Figure 5, approximately 32 percent of the workers would come • from the west, 19 percent from the south and southeast, and 1.4 ' percent from the north and northeast of Lake Oswego. • i 1 • . CARI H. BUTTKE,M. CONSOLING TiWisholitAtioN INGNMtN • dd n l' . SO St . . ,. ® neeoa� I ici\t"1" nmmon.noomme..........°.\..' • Ll I . IMAM 14 .� ' • 4 (76 • i_f/I w -•. Sul tlY Maa01. w ��� e.....;77.--. . Law ammo ".. .--I ) if 0 Old MI gt Ili ®. •�t 7 � gramwiwss� mie • 10 . 111111111, , Oa 1 L ' t ,,,� 1 \ • • ! •4 1 tii. e AAP OYCpDOa e• p . 1 '.40 ROWS a `r '' aara Directional ©lahibution of Work Trips Attracted to Corridor by Year WOO tuauripi - R, 41PI J ` n VEHICLE TRIP ASSIGNMENT Corridor Generated Traffic The P.M. peak hour Corridor generated vehicular traffic was assigned to the street system on the basis of this trip die- tribution, the configuration of the street system and site access points, and the most logical route to enter and leave • the area. This assignment is shown on Figure 6. As indicated on Figure 6, the Corridor would attract approxi- mately 485 vehicles to enter Kruse Way from Boones Ferry Road and 860 vehicles to enter Kruse Way from the west 86uringitthe es P.M. peak hour by the year 2000. Approximately, ®. , , . per hour are forecast to enter Boones Ferry Road from Kruse+ Way at the east and 1635 vehicles to leave Kruse Way at the • west during the P.M. peak hour by the year 2000. A detail r. , summary of this assignment,Fi dicatgure i2gin th inte ersection L • movements, is contain 1 a Background Traffic With Corridor Vacant An assignment was made by the year 2000 P.M, peak hour traffic , passing through the Corridor, if. the Corridor were vacant. • f u This assignment utilized assignments made for the Lake Oswego • Comprehensive Plan and recently measured peak hour character- , - : . . • istics on Kruse Way and the connecting streets. This assignment • is shown on Figure A-3 in the Appendix and represents a hypo- thetical situation as a base condition if the Corridor were vacant . It indicates that approximately 800 to 1000 vehicles �- • • OA H. BUTTKE,INC, • CbeiMUUNG 10N1,I0II/AiiON INGM A �,. 1. _ - 1 28 • ., . :. \\\\ . . . tie F .. , s • ei? . VP ' i III Fer a m I § lb .15 ( K►ne WaytrrA 1040 H , . 200 :1 1 s 4gilit 43,pt . 41)44 • . ,, 420 R so 105 °� .arm v �ao � A • fia ,� ' r• ft. la 00 { , , d 8 � t • is•. Assignment of Year 2000 P.M.Peak Hour .. Corridor Cenrc2ed Traffic ANL 0 ® Without Transportation Management Progra p y 5 o ;{' . • „ • , . . , • , , . e . . ! per hour would travel westbound on Kruse Way and 1100 to 1200 '; 1 vehicles per hour would travel eastbound on Kruse Way during the P.M. peak hour by the year 2000. .•'• This assignment of background traffic was based on assumptions ' made in the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan. It assumed that 7 { .` approximately 5000 people would be employed within the Corridor • whereas the assumed land use for this analysis, as indicated on • ' ' Table 1, would indicate that approximately 15,000 people °, would be employed within the Corridor. Therefore, 10,000 more •I` people would be employed within the Corridor than were origin- . • '. ally assumed in the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan and the related transportation analyses. Ten thousand more jobs in the Corridor means that more of the work force living in Lake Oswego, who were originally assumed to work outside of Lake Oswego, would actually remain in the area and be employed within the 4 - 1 • ^" Corridor. In other words, approximately 3500 workers living in • the Lake Oswego planning area by the year 2000 were originally - assumed for the Comprehensive Plan analyses to commute outside of the City to work, but none are estimated to work in the ' f Corridor. Therefore, the forecast background traffic through , the Corridor and throughout Lake Oswego would be reduced to reflect an additional 3500 people from the Lake Oswego planning ♦ l' area working in the Corridor. Figure 7 indicates the reductions ' "'" in P.M. peak traffic volume throughout Lake Oswego as a result of fewer, people commuting outside of the take Oswego planning ', area. J Total Traffic .. The total year 2000 P.M. peak hour traffic, with the Corridor lE assumed fully developed, is shown on Figure 8. This assignment •' -• p v� was developed by adding together the P.M. peak hour Corridor , h. 1 y n. W • CMIL H, BUIUE,ttiC. ' CW.WktIJG IAM.SMIIIAIK IHCMIfl 1 , - 1 it,,(:.(, 44144 00-0. '47** it. . , . I WHAM • I rroat�aan a lIli , 1 • . . .r. , 1 ' i 30 . ' !II, . ----N--,..._.,-- \,• • . • . ., . . , .2 . lIl.. . . oocntmr aw at• • 111*:gill("7. . — !�®U lam . aillopipri . . .R.�...twa eff 1*'•- ' .011199:11211111 RCIIMSTINI/.__ en ssmse •y •ovat erg 1 • ammarammorammuswases.`• . . l'.'n:';.'.:-‘...':**'• i �� iazamalr'. ' .,,4,4„ Ipk. .. . . . .. , • . . 4.0. , , MOOS iii 4/111101 • C:J' \ 1 / 1 Fititire 7 ., . , ' Reetudllon of Year 2000 P.M.Peak Hour Traffic • , ., . -.,: Resulting From Fewer Workers Leaving the s Planning • �1 • II 0 0 . 0 , , Melrose\.\\\‘ I A ion �` h .,� orris . e.. okt ti? 146 #4? 44.% . . ., . , ... mo.,,,,,„ 285 14e, et . . • • rx� T. •. 0.,E $ , AAA 275 tlardo /44 y� °`a Year 2000 P.M.r Peak Hour Tratfbc 1 With Corridor Fully Developed • • without Triu►aportatton ANanagam.nl Program • • ':. • „ • i ; • •D 32 Q• generated traffic to the background traffic and subtracting • .. out the traffic volume reduced by fewer workers commuting out aYy' of the Lake Oswego planning area. Figure A-4 in the Appendix indicates the detailed assignment with intersection volumes, FORECAST LEVEL OF SERVICE • The resulting level of service for a typical P.M. peak the year 2000 was calculated for various conditions of inter- , ' • section improvements. A do-nothing alternative was analyzed for intersections which already exist for comparison with the • current conditions. The following indicates the results of the level of service calculations for conditions without a transportation management . program in the Kruse Way Corridor, except for the conditions placed upon the Liberty Park Development. The results are expressed as the percent of level "D" service volume which is • expected to be utilized by the year 2000 P.M. ` peak hour traffic.For example, when the results are over 100 percent, it means that the traffic operation would have exceeded the "D" level of service or be into the "E" level. The 'traffic operations r - would be within the "D" level of service, when the traffic utilizes between 89 and 160% of the "D" service volume. • • Ar 11 Kruse Way & Boones Ferry Road , e Alternative 1 - Do nothing. 122% ► - :J • r • • Alternative 2 - Add optional northbound left l0lj� r turn to inside through lane on Boones Ferry Road. I i • } 411 CART H. AXE,INC, / I CON wltr/c taANSFOaIAroN tNGieFn1h . 1. u R 0 • IA . . • Alternative 3 Grade separate either left turn. rv; '82� Kruse Way & Mercantile Village/Safeco Access • Alternative 1 - Signalize.' 70% Kruse Way & Carman Drive • Alternative 1 - Do nothing. 144% r • Alternative 2 - Add let't turn lanes to Carman Dr. 132% • Alternative 3 - Add right turf lanes to Carman 100% Dr. plus Alternative 2. • Alternative 4 - Separate left turn signal phases 102% on Carman Dr. 1 w.. Kruse Way & Westlake Drive w • Alternative 1 - Two lanes on north-south approaches 123% and 5-phase signal 4, • Alternative 2 - Double left turn lane for north- 108% bound to westbound movement and • 6-phase signal • CML H IIUTTKC,INC, . colli4*l .G MANSPooltA10004 ING0[111 i a r 34 . • Alternative 3 - Maintain level D on Kruse Way 1'1d2%1 and Westlake Dr. , but reduce time on northbound approach with Alternative 2. r Kruse Way & Liberty Park/Westlake Access •r • Alternative 1 - Two lanes on north-south 108% , approaches and 5-phase signal • Alternative 2 - Three lane approaches and 6- 104% phase signal e Alternative 3 - Maintain level D on Kruse Way 111%1 and reduce time on north-south to approaches 150%2 :• 4 Hama Way & Han Road - See Figure 9 • Alternative 1 - Do nothing 18ox g ' el Alternative 2 - Add northbound to westbound double left turn lane 147� 4. .0 L 1Level of service on northbound approach. 2Level of service on, southbound approach. ® • coot 0.1.1triroq,INC, ij corritikvirki rnurs►Of A?IO mama r > . f , ( 31, 6,,,...... 5 I .. ,, .. ......., ____________ I a Om OM. 1111.10 OM . alli®®v.— �. — — T ._ e. _ — _ — Y _ _ • • NOM Waif i r 4 mi 004110 rot , e, dAiidW#TIVE0 it 1 i or • ROM wel !por. • • . . •.. — _ —awAa wr ... .. — — ,, I — _ 7lin _ ? II 1010141 wile J • 11 i ALTER +t►TOVE 2 ALT. aIi Iii • • • I • Figures • Kruse Way and flangy Road/I-5 Alternatives i b 36 •• Alternative 3 - Add eastbound to northbound 131% , double left turn lane with Alternative 2. e Alternative 4 •- Add loop for southbound to east- 127% ...Y.....- bound movement with Alternative 3 • Alternative 5 - Grade separate southbound move- 114% �a ' _ ment with Alternative 4. , • Alternative 6 - Grade separate northbound 100% i approach to Kruse Way with • i single left turn lanes and southbound to eastbound loop • Highway 217 & Southbound 1-5 Ramps • Alternative 1 - Do nothing 124% . • Alternative 2 - Add eastbound to southbound 124% •• . double left turn lane. " e Alternative 3 - Add southbound to eastbound 94% . loop ramp between I-5 and Hwy. 217 Carman Drive & Quarry/Meadows Roads • J o Alternative 1 - Signalize 160% , , • p • TI 4 CARL H BUKE,L1 C a mamma ta,vesro„►Atpee P etiosi a; • 4 r. • II �� .. s Alternative 2 - Add left turn lanes on all 126% approaches, 5-phase signal, and southbound right turn lane a in Carman Dr. ® Alternative 3 - Separate Meadows and traffic phases (6-phase)Quarry Rd. • 121�i e) wth , Alternative 2. ® Alternative N - Add right turn lane in Quarry 105% Rd. with Alternative 3. • r Carman Dr. & Bonita/Wal►�lSa Roads A • • Alternative 1 - Do nothing " 380% • Alternative 2 - Signalize and install left turn 86% lanes in Carmn. Dr. _ ` . Bangy Road &. Meadtt',a Road �' ® Alternative 1 - Bangy Road three lanes, Meadows 100 • Road three lanes, three-phase x M ��z ^ s ignal .. : ® Alternative 2 Add Northbound lane to Bangy Road 88% with Alternative 1 • , go • a + ' 41 1' CALL N. 6lri?K ,INC. coNaUxumc vak4troniA oil SNGimi ~ • • e. 38 is Bangy Road & Bonita Road • Alternative 1 - Four-way stop • o Alternative 2 - Two-phase signal 50% ':- '' ''. . -. Conclusions 1. • • J It is concluded from these analyses that operational improve- ,� ments, including traffic signal phase modifications and the addition of left or right turn lanes or even double turn lanes* • can improve the capacity within the Corridor to a point where a ' many of the intersections can be expected to function at a 1 • better than a "D" level of service during the P.M. peak hour • t by the year 2000. However, the intersections along Kruse Way, ' west of and including Carman Drive, are expected to function at an "E" or "F" level during the P.M. peak hour. As indica ted, the most heavily overloaded intersections, which are Kruse Way and Bangy Road and Highway 217 and the southbound 1-5 ramps, . '' grade can be made to function within a "D" level of service by separating some of the traffic movements. g r ' °' ' • • 1 The next step in this analysis to to develop and evaluate • methods to reduce travel demand generated within the Corridor / j especially during peak hours and ' future land use indicated onr"lableyl, accommodate the assumed •, k • I • �' • • .. •' y' COL H IUTTHE, MJC et041Ut91t1 01ANlrgbtMk>F"ii40041111 a e 1 y. • • C ,. • • • 1. 1, . Y' • • • . • � Vehicular Travel Demand nr. • Traditionally, congestion relief co demand withn Traditionally, is consisted of et ehvinc capacity highwayaccomlanes modating include theser concept system management approachesexpanded pt that travel demand can be managed as operational improvements to the system. anaged as well • '' The followingystem„ demand: are possible approaches to managing travel A ® Travel demand can be shifted to more efficient modes such as private rid sharing, public transit, bicycles. '; walking, or ® Vehicle traffic can be shafted to or restricted in congested zones r less congealed routes or both. to Travel demand can be shifted to less co daywhen surplus capacity p congested times of the p y is available. Total travel dem and can be reduced through: (a) Minimizing avoidable travel b , or multi use development; by better trip' planning • (b) Reducing need to travel by compressed work week or • substitution of communications for travel; • ....,: :-: ,,., CAN( H. aurncE,kvc. 5.•. UIiNG IAAMSPOMIMION INGtit(q / • r •r . • yo t; 1 ' (c>- Shortening trip lengths through better spatial airra ment of land-use activities. nge- The purpose of developing methods of reducing vehicular travel demand generated Within the Corridor is to maintain the roads. . way system within a "D" level of service without having to „�. make costly modifications to the roadway system, other than operational improvements, to increase capacity and to maximize the efficiency of the transportation system. INCREASE TRANSIT USAGE Transit usage by employees working within the Corridor can be ,,• increased from what was assumed in the initial analysis •(average of eight percent by the year 2000) by increasingy transit service and through use of a transit incentiver program. • Transit Service Transit service could be increased in the future by adding more lines to the Corridor and increasing the frequency of buses on each line. The new lines within the Corridor should consist of trunk lines operating between Lake Oswego, Tigard, and Tualatin and other cities, as well as local lines, which serve the surrounding neighborhoods and the City of Lake Oswego. ; . Also, lines connecting to various transit stations would be an improvement for the Corridor. .-, ....H, Figure 10 indicates a suggested routing of future bus lines serving the Corridor, Which has been developed by TRI- T and the committee. It also includes the project workingA Ter station on Kruse Way. possible location of a trans , 411 III N. CAnl PI. MIME, CONstioNG 1NANPOMAIION INGMM . .. r r . .rr ii) ' �� TRANSFER ER•OIN •• Melrose ' '• r. 0 OWSTOP • • • • li Iil yyy • • • •; • •• f • p • •l • y + 111 „ i 0 0 • • • 1 1 •p �• . ....14.1.4.244414 Air• ! AZn r • • ••. • • ° • ) , • ii) i ' i h gyp` a1 „ + Car, •' 0 • . '. •oo eta ` a. • • �`�',� • I . #: . i • • r • ' • I gyp f '/ . . Suggested Future Transit Secs . 42 .. jk Additional service could be provided either before the . service plan is implemented or together with the service plan by providing peak period and other transit stationshandlcirculatione buses Wthe uorr dor throughouth 'x ` Corridor. the .r • Transit Incentive Program A transit incentive would provide th program operated throughout the Corridor e following services to encourage and maintain • transit ridership: a, , 1 • Sell monthly pass;es and tickets. • Provide transit information, such as route maps and , schedules.• ® Possibly, subsidize the transit. fare through discounts on . sales of tickets or passes or b for riders. by holding periodic contests • Provide new employee orientation with transit information ` a and, possibly, a free ticket. • Provide passenger shelters at each bus atop and sidewalks between the stops and bu,!ldings. • • Research on the effectiveness of transit incentive programs is . . limited. It is believed that an Incentive to increase ridership, but the degree of effectivenessehasnnotl I been quantified. 0 ` . Si ' CARL Pi FTYK UE, INC. C $$INtiN4{t11ANSMhtAMN 1NR1e'M a• • ., -.. • I • Conclusion` It is concluded � . Corridor and maintconcluded, that by increasing : : gram, on the aggressive transit incentive ncevice to the average, ten percent of incentive 1 the Corridor could bee, expected to all the employees thin use transit byyLthees within the year 2000. . . RIDESHARE PROGRAMS A goal of the Regional Transportation of all individuals traveling to work by is that 35 rideahare mode by auto would bo percent vehicle ucy the year 2000,, This driven to work.occupancy of approximatelygoal translates vehicle a dr etoaverage It was assumed in the initial ersons analyses that theeaa vehicle occupancy could reach approximately 1.25 per vehicle driven to work byyear 20with o minor carpooling effort by the employers within 2 he Cotr some • b within the Corridor, Carpalla 4 the potential to increase the Experience with carpool pro ram$1 as indicated that there i ::',7::::::. .. , � average vehicle occupancy of all 1 e Transportation Research Boar Innovation- S Board, Urban mor Trat Service ecial Re ort 184 ortation S stem Mane ement and Ex d rams in Trsrtg.. Services TRR NChRP 1 andParatrait Academ of 50 and Paratransit 1 y Sciences, Washington D� 0, ZRR 7 , Nationbl • TRI-MET Marketing J 1979 and982, g Department, Tektronix Trans ortation Stud • • TRI-MET, Unpublished Results °f Car oil ; / P PrOrr 1975. p CAVIL N DUTTKE, INC, awct*4 tawsronrAlhoN 4M404111 • • • 44 vehicles driven to work to approximately 1.45 persona per 1 vehicle. The occupancy could possibly be increased even higher, , :,. if the parking supply Were controlled and market conditions t ` tolerated such a control or limit on parking supply. t It has been determined that a carpool program consisting of the provision of good information and a matching service to •` link people together in carpools has the potential to increase the average vehicle occupancy by approximately 15 percent. Other incentives, including preferential location for carpool t * ' parking, have the potential to increase the average vehicle 1 occupancy by another ten to 15 percent. tr i.. I Vanpoola Vanpoola have been very successful in cities larger than the Portland area. The minimum one-way commute distance for vanpool • operations appears to be about ten miles. The following results of theoretical analyses indicates the maximum vanpool potential, • if the commute distance are available: • One vanpool per 200 employees q -, i • 13 vanpools per 1000 employees • • 250 vanpools per 10,000 employoes .. . i : The largest vanpool program in the Portland area consists of 25 vans carrying 235 people. It is concluded that the potential • for successful vanpool operations in the Corridor is limited. There would be potential for vany+ool operations to serve people • living south of the Region in the Willamette yally, in the . Gresham area and east, in Clark County, and in the Hillsboro, Poreat Grove area. e • CARL►7�eUTTKIE,NC. • I CO0511004G inANSPOAtAfiKM tNGNttri . e tr e , 411 • p'. ALTERNATIVE WORK SCHEDULES ' • The primary objective of variable work hours programs, fro the urban transportation point of view, is to effect work �+ schedule changes that will reduce the degree of travel that occurs during the normal workday. 6 peaking . Alternative work schedules include the following: • Staggered work hours o • Flexible work hours • Compressed work weeks • Y Staggered and flexible work hours bring about substantial reductions (up to 50$ in the number of participating employees arriving and departing during the highest Peak periods. 15 minutes of the However, because of the large number of people, who do not participate in alternative work schedules, reductions in Evaluations ofplarge-scalelvariable workumes are lhourst programs as striking. • thatP grams show peak hour bus loads and automobile arrivals at parking . • 4 Source: Transportation Research Board, National Goo-pe g Nighwav Research Program , 73, Alternative Work Schedules: Im acts on Transportation, National Academy of Sciences, Washing ton D.0 • . , November, 1980: • CAR H. BUT ME,WC tbi utpt G 111ANS1 OIIIAt10M lerllit4hi t o 0 . •p • garages decrease ten to 20 traffic volumes on major a percent and peak hour vehicularpproaches to work centers are reduced by five to ten percent. There are conflicting hypotheses as to the effects of variable work hours on mode choice. Data are insufficient to draw firm conclusions, but it appears that flexible hours programs have a positive effect on transit and carpool use, whereas staggered work hours increase the risk of reducing transit and carpool use. There are insufficient data on the impacts of compressed workweek g pro rams. Theoretical analyses indicate that compressed workweeks can significantly reduce peak trips and congestion, although there may be negativeeeffectriod grk; on carpooling and transit ridership. Staggered Work Hours • � r; ':.:" * : ''. , "With this alternative work schedule, all employees in an organization Work the same days each week and the same number of hours each workday. Daily starting and stopping times of different p grow s of workers within. the organization are varied by the employer by assigning staggered starting times-.-7:00 a.m. , 7: 15 a.m. , 7. 30 a.m. , etc . Employees generally have no choice in their working hours; they are simply expected to be present each day their assigned times. during I ��t Staggered work hours exist, to some extent, in virtually all multiemployer Work locales by virtue of the fact that a • different employers impose different work schedules. Even Ib 1 • • 1• CAnL H. LLIJTTIfE,INC. • coieFuttwa rni++sronoArni rreG+N[Fw \. . ' 411 410• 4 7 � though no single gle employer :.. and may eta anted form of staggered hours, an The prevailing distribution ggered work unplanned of all workers ind1 muibutio oof starting hours exists. 4.. existence of such ad hoc ho rerl�locations time$ f r ' 1 Measure urs. reflects the � indicate that at suburban • work betweent approximately u50iemployer office 4.pp and percent of buildings 4. 0 5:30 p.m. , and era distr1bpld as leave • 3 to 4;45 p m uteri as follows: j: . - 13 percent leave work o ows: 5:00 to 5. 00 p.m. - 8 percent k to 5.a5 - Leave work ' p.m. 19 percent ° 5:15 to 5;30 p.m. - 10 leave work percent leave work Flexible 0.''; Work Houra Flexitime "Any system . i ontrol system that givir s individual employees allowing flexible own working hour some measure of , ,; J native, work hours is classified thiss ' may choose to range of Possible hours within With startingwork is extended within alter- be and quitting beyond the Which an employee designated u 6• g times. For example,limits of fixed seat of two :30 a.m. to 6:00 , the r different types of p.m. , which ange could • times. would con_ (a) core time l�rbid. , r 2Car] H. huttke Portland Metro,otitan A�'aa. Inc. , • Un ut�lished Tr1.' ; P Generation Measurements, GAL H WORE,INC. aowaxtiwc tnMr3P0,11.00.4 il4G lil[n . ,, ' .. . YA. '; ", 48 l ., during which all employees must be present (9: 30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. ) , except for a lunch break, and (b) flexible time, the periods during which employees may select variable starting and quitting times (flexible starting times between 6: 30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. and flexible: quitting times between 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. ) .i1 • Compressed Workweeks . "This schedule compresses t; -king hours into fewer than five ,• days per week or fewer than 1.0 days per 2-week period. 5� Employees are usually assigned fixed working hours on the ,;� days they are present. ' Numerous forms of the compressed ` ` workweek are possible, but the following are the most ,: ;,t' common: . "Four-day Week. Employees work 9 to 10 hr. per day (depend- ' ' ing on the total hours in the workweek) , 4 days per week. "Four-and-a-half week. Employees work 8 to 9 hr. per day, ' , 4 days per week, and a half day on the fifth day. "Three-day week. Employees work 12 to 13 hr per day, 3 days 1 ,. j per week. This scheme has been used in work settings that operate continuously throughout the 24-hr. day (e.g. data processing centers) . , J E a 2Transportation Research Board, NCHRP #73, November, 1980. y. b, IP I It CAfL N. MIME,INC s J C, • . e n I "The 5-4/9 plan. Employees work 9 hrs. s . during 1 week and 5 days the succeeding pweek er aon a 2-week cycle."' ESTIMATED IMPACT . Vehicle Trips An analysis of the potential of increased transit usage and ' l ridesharing through an aggressive.,� transportation management program for the Corridor indicates that the percent of employees expected to drive to work bythe crease from a range of 66 to p year 2000 may de- 7 percent to a range of 59 to 63 percent, as shown on Table 6. In ©ther words, the effect of an aggressive program could be a ten percent reduction in the number of vehicles driven to work by the year 2000. It appears reasonable that an alternative work schedule could attract approximatelyten program some type percent of the employees to of flexible work hours and another ten percent to some type of compressed work week. The net result could be an .., additional reduction of ten percent inthe P.M. generation. peak hour trip Table 7 summarizes the estimated year 2000 vehicle trip generation for I the Corridor with an aggressive transportation J management program. A comparison with Table 5 on page 24 ,: 1Ibid. • i t CARL H. (WM,INC. «r+su�rac V A i s►'ORIATION U+GNIIA • < / r, TABLE 6 I , . - ESTIMATED EMPLOYEE TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS WITH • TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM i Year 2000 . Without Program With Program l Vehicle Driver. 66-70% 59-63% I Vehicle Passenger 15-19 22-26 • .' Transit Passenger 6-10 8-12 • Walk and Other 0-10 0-10 i. I 4 i . 1 ti cAq ntrnrKE,*IC, + UJW5& , TRANSeetltAtmoN tNGNrih 1.. - • - - .1 41 t, P _ " f ♦ 1. ® 51 , N.. TABLE 7 ESTIMATE OF YEAR 2000 GENERATED TRAFFIC PROGRAM • WITH A TRANSPORTP1TION Kruse Way Corridor • nt •. 211-Hour P.M. Peak Hour Two-Way =nom . . . Quadrant Volume 6,400 245 615 • Northeast • •�»� 20,100 1,120 1,025 Northt+est 35�600 1,150 3,410 Southwest 645 505 . 9,70o t . Southeast , 71,13o0 3,020 5,695 Total .4 1 r. • »6 A• J ' I Gail H UUTIKE,tHC CONSUt1N6 piA 4tPOMtAtiQN INGtdI % • r 0 52 • indicates the potential of a management program on the P.M. Il peak hour tripk hour p generation. As indicated, the P.M. . exiting traffic from the Corridor could e reduced byanearly 900 vehicles or by approximately 14 percent an aggres- through'z aive transportation management program. g The assignment of the throughout the Corridor ewith 0a0 transportation P.M. peak rmanagefine n gram is illustrated on Figure 11 and in more detail on A-5 in the Ap pendix. 4 . ;, , . Level of Service ., • The resulting level of service of the Corridor street system during the P.M. peak hour in the year was. compared with the service level with 20a0mana emendated and See Table 8. The results of the transportation managemenprogramt program are estimated to decrease the P.M. peak hour traffic demand by about five percent at the east end and ten at the west end of the Corridor, percent As indicated on Table 8, nearly all intersections within trs Corridor could be maintained within a "D" level of service, except at the interchange, as a result of an aggressive transportation �'tr :p and operation improvements to the intersections. program ...-.., ..,1. j The intersection of Kruse Way and Bangy Road/I-5 northbo • �' •.' ramps and the intersection of Highwayand • 2l� and 1-5 southbound • ramps are estimated to operate at approximately 20 over level "D" or into an IIF" level of service. • percent The major cause of the overloading of the intersection of Highway 217 and the southbound 1-5 ramps is the heavy left S 41111, ICART H it INC oo►4$t ,j tiiuvsroatAnoei'Wawa U \ J b} • ..•\ . .. .. : \M' . .. .. • . .. ... . ...• e 0 so .. 53 „: IP ' LI‘ )112::356 \\\\\ '. • ANI.. '1411,1, 4t,dar \Ili , •. 6. ,o,� e 2025 y � Rfb 17/0 ,,,a Camp Kruse way tti ,V� 910 e S • •\ Leo °'►:4 ' ► v n g Mcodo„„ 1 f 1Q r ' • I 7044. a � ,a f. t 0 155 210 A „& 300 275 &Vito 2110 0, A ti. at til • nail*19 • Year 2000 P.M. Pelt Hour Traffic With a Transportation Management Program i r` I 54 ITABLE 8 • COMPARISON OF LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH TRANSPORTATION IMANAGEMENT PROGRAM �>� Without Program With Program ' Location Percent of Level Percent of Level and Level D of Level D of Inprovement Utilized Service Utilized Service i Kruse Way & Boones Ferry, Alt. 2 101% D/E 96% D I Kruse Way & Mercac.the Village/Safeco 70 B 67 A/8 . :- :::., i Kruse Way & Carman Dr. 160 D/E 95 D 1:, Alt. 3 Kruse Way & Westlake Dr. , Alt. 2 108 E 100 D Kruse Way & Liberty 108 E ; I Park, Alt. 1 100 D. Kruse Way & Bangy Rd. 13l F Alt. 3 122 F Hwy. 217 & 1-5 S.B. 1z4 F Ramps, Alt . 1 119 F Carman & Quarry, Alt. 4 105 D 100 D Carman & Bonita, Alt. 2 86 C 78 B/C ' Bangy &• Meadows, Alt. 2 88 C 79 B • 14 Bangy & Bonita, Alt. 1 92 C 79 C ` Y Ae 0 0 r COIL MI tHUTTKE,Wt. 1- fYw.YNI.4rt 1M.NkfM11f.f.W f/MMVfp ,-,...•,..: ..... :..:„, ,,.. 1 :.-..., ,.-.:.....,.: e • 55 , .., turn from the ramps to the east and the bound 1-5heavy flow from north.. to westbound Highway 217. This solved through vehicle trip reduction methods within be Corridor, but through either increasing capacitythe ` change or reducing vehicle trips elsewhere. of the inter- The major cause of the overloading at the intersection of p' Way (and Hwy. 217) and Bangy Road (and 1-5Kruse the heavy left turn from Ban northbound ramps) could be reduced by directingytrafficoaway west. r is This ter-movement ' " ' ' section. For example, westbould traffic on from this inter- Banr�y Road, could be directed south to Bonita Roads' ti approaching 72nd Avenue to the interchange at Carman Drive. A and then to would be to extend Bann alternative additional north-southgcapacityoeasttofCrman Drive to provide 9� also be made to direct traffic 1-5. Attempts might to use 72nd Avenue to Highway 2171versusgDonita Road Bangyand i', to Kruse way. nates east d • • } 1 i CARL N BUTTKC,INC. , a es4 le,G►iAttirOe11'At1UNCNOM[ff • • a" s: 56 ':w . ' Recommended Plan _ .. • " It is recommended that an a . program be developed and maintainedetorreducetnormalation peak hour ..... .. It vehicle trip making within the Kruse Way Corridor, that transit service increase within the Corridor, that opera tional improvements be made throughout the Corridor as itera- develops. The City and County staffs that of this report recommend that theagoverning in the development Oswego and Clackamas Countygoverning bodies of Lake adopt appropriate policies to implement the Kruse Way Corridor Traffic Circulation and Trans- , portation Management Program for the Kruse Way Corridor. t TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Pur ose y The purpose of the transportation management ro r '� maintain traffic volumes at or near level of service AD" I Within the Corridor during impact throughout the k and to minimize the traffic ` Corridor, permit the desired level �. of land use development, as indicated on Table 1. CAM.it BUTTKE,MVC. co►�t4Rtwa TutsroatAt�otr tt.ctwu� ` , . I IP S x ' 57 ° "'o-. Program Management It is recommended that the Kruse Way Corridor transportation ,' management g program be implemented by one central organization, such as a pri.vate .non-profit corporation. All affected pro- perty owners would be members of this organization and would • provide the financial support for its operation. The function of this Corridor Management Organization would be to administer and carry out the program lements, coordinate with the City of ;' Lake Oswego, Clackamas County, ODOT, TRI-MET, and other affected public agencies for the provision of the necessary tranaporta- tion program. This organization would become a transportation service broker for the Corridor by providing the rideshare pro- • gram, transit incentive program, transportation information, by organizing the alternative work schedule program, and by work- ing with the necessary public agencies for the implementation of service and capital improvements. It is not intended that i, this organization would engage in any land use decisions or • actions that are required by the City or County under ORS u Chapters 215, 227, and 197. • . ,, ' Program Elements (I It is recommended that the Central Management Organization be responsible for adminstering at least the following elements of a transportation management program: Rideshare Program: e Provide information to the employees throughout the Corridor about ridesharing and the advantages of such a program by use of transportation bulletin boards, new employee r '. CAA.H UUTTKC,WC. CoNstio.r,n►ANOvetAIiON tNCNun • w..- . . .. • • , _ ' P • } - • orientation, and periodic distribution of i .. dL. payroll. a newsletter with 46 Provide a ridesharin S matching service for employees within the Corridor. ' ® Provide , through organization membership, location of parking for all ridesharin vehicles. ® Investigate the developmenta vehicles. ' of a vanpool Purchase or lease of van low s orProgram through • to employees in the Corridor. interest loans for Vans • If and when feasible, charge for em la parkins and • • offer reduced rates for rideshare spa yes ) . P ces. Transit Incentive Pro ram: • Work with Tdil-MET to through the Corridor. increase transit service to and • ' a Provide transit information and ache . • lein boards, new employeeschedules at t periodic distribution of information orientation nformation with the , and periodic .. •` � ® Sale of monthlypayroll. transit passes and tickets, e. Consider and Consider providing discounts on the rate ' X providing other of transit passes • • with me bonuses for using transit. Coordinate stops Members that walkways are r and all buildings ,' • •, .:. provision ofan g and work with TRIVMETdfortthen Passenger shelters at each stop, • •III CAA H eliTTkE,InfoID 0304001119M4 iRAyfIOAtAtIAN INGN[/p W a• y 59 ... . . . . .. . Alternative Work Schedule Program: o Work with all employers to establish alternative work schedules throughout the Corridor with the goal of shifting '` the exiting times to hours before and after ►1 : 30 to 6:00 p.m. Parking Control Program: • It is recommended that the Corridor Management 0rganiza•� . . tion monitor parking needs rminleetherlevel ofridor dnewrparking ' j. k with the property owners to dete • necessary with each new development . • The purpose is to • provide a parking supply consistent with the achievement of the transportation management program so that a parking surplus does not encourage more people to drive to work. • Work with the membership to provide centralized and shared parking facilities among the various buildings on a site. In this manner, parking spaces per unit of development can be reduced in the future, as determined through the monitor- ing program, and each building would still have adequate ,. • r parking without an over-supply . • Work with the membership to determine if parking charges can be levied and are feasible and if these charges can n .,.• be used as incentives to the rideshare and transit inoen- five program. . • r a -_ • I y'' CML H BUTTKE,INC, C1$SU111N0 inikeispontmot4 iHGI I • e. .. • a '1 Other Transportation Modes Program: • Work with members to encourage employees to walls and ride • . ' � bicycles to and from work. This can be accomplished through the initial design and construction of the corridor by providing a network of y pedestrian and bicycle ways throughout the Corridor and convenient weather-protected bicycle parking areas at each building. Traffic Operational Improvements: • Work with the members and affected public agencies to " �': implement traffic operational improvements where and when necessary to relieve congestion and increase capacity. ( Monitoring Program: ' • • Develop a monitoring program to measure the effects of the transportation management monitoringg program. The result of the ` program would be input to program revisions, *. T transportation improvements, and traffic operations modifications. PUBLIC 'TRANSPORTATION SERVICE It is recommended that ' public transportation service to and , throughout the Corridor be improved as the Corridor develops. ,r Figure 10 on page 41 indicates the su ggested the Corridor. Additional service could be provided ueither prior ture to for i, • 4111 0 . cAnl arm,INC. • cONSult.G tnAHSPOf tAtnn►1[NGMIth Y �61 or during the implementation of the entire service plan by] providing peak period shuttle buses between the Corridor and other transit stations and for circulation throughout the Corridor. it is recommended that passenger shelters be pro_vided at each bus stop throughout the Corridor and that a °central transfer point be established on Kruse Way at Westlake . Drive. It is further recommended that the Corridor Management Organization work with TRI-MET for all service improvements to the Corridor. '1. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS The following indicates the recommended roadway and traffic 4 operational improvements required to accommodate the forecast year 2000 P.M. peak hour traffic with a Corridor transportation management program. Table 9 indicates the approximate 1 mentation schedule, imple- I . Traffic Signalization It is recommended that all the interseot ,ons along Kruse Way and Highway 217 between the 1-5 Ferry Road be signalized and oninterconnectedd rn a ps and dinated a coordinated • • system. Traffic signals will also be necessary at the inter 9 sections of Carman Drive at Meadows/quarry Roads and at Bonita/ Waluga Roads and at the intersection of Bangy Road and Meadows Road. This signal should also be interconnected to the system r along Kruse }lay, if possible . • A f, ' • 1 ,1- .. • • • • . CAR.II, OUTTKE,NC. • weatAv G iRAJ15MO11tArn. /1.Glltlll A . 7 62 • TABLE 9 APPROXIMATE IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE — - ' °. Immediate 1985 1990 or With to or When • Development ' 1990 LatOr Needed ,k . r1 A . ' Meadows Road * Kruse Way Bus Pullout Lanes * #. ' Kruse Way & Westlake Dr./Broadbent Access - Kruse Way & Liberty Park/Westlake * H ...--4 .-', .: I Access Carman Dr. left turn lanes at * `' Kruse Way and Meadows Quarry Rd. widening at Canaan Dr. * I Bangy Rd. left turn lane at Meadows , Bangy Rd. double left turn lane at Kruse Way & added N.B. lane _• Signalize Bangy Pd. & Meadows * . ( Signalize Carman Dr. & Meadows I • • Carman Dr. right turn lanes at a • Kruse Way Kruse Way & Boones Ferry Rd. * Hwy. 217 double left turn lane to * . 4 N.B. I-5 at Bangy Rd. Carman Dr. S.B. right turn lane * at Meadows • Carman Dr. and Bonita Rd. * ;. Pedestrian Overpasses a ,.•• ••• • • • , , • . . e,. CARL/ . nurTKE,INC. 1 tONSlktP46 flu PpntAtuoN IHMMHu .. . ., . . 1 • • e , . . , . . .. . . . . 63 . . ,.. i I Kruse Way ani Boones Ferr Road ,. II It is recommended that the northbound travel operation of Boonee Ferry Road through the intersection with Kruse Way be modified � Fe y • by converting the inside through lane tosaecombination through 1 and left turn lane . This modi.!_cation is esthtimated oatedtion ofd this � : , r approximately 20 percent more capacity intersection. It is also estimated that this modification may not be necessary until about 1990. Kruse Wa and Mercantile Ville co Access It is recommended that bus fulloutnla lanes sctioKruse n for Wbusay be ops developed on the far side at this location. Kri.____I!aP Way and Carriurive, k::, L.. .::,,'. . •. i itis recommended that Carman Drive be widened at the inter- one se section with Kruse Way to provide a �het turn north andesouthboundugh lane, and a right turn lane on both approaches to this intersection. It is anticipated tici atd d thgttthe I left turn lanes in Carman DriVe early stages of development within the Corridor and that the ' right turn lanes will be necessary when the Corridor is approxi- . mately 40 to 50 percent developed or by about 1988 to 1990. It is also recommended that far-side bus pullout lanes be added on Kruse Way for bus stops. j' CAAH. BUTTK(,WC . CONSUlit.G 17M/IS►OMAt W INGNUR • • - ti. Y ., ,. r` y 1 • Kruse Way and Westlake Drive It is recommended that right turn lanes be instal led on each approach of Kruse Way to the intersection with Westlake Drive. It is further recommended that far-side bus riv be provided on each side of Kruse Way at this intersection. also The bus pullout lanes must be of sufficient length to onm modate the proposed bus transfer activity at this location. It is recommended that the southbound approach of Drive to Kruse Way contain a left turn Westlake through and right turn lane. The no lane and a combination Broadbent northbound approach property access to Kruse Way will reuiretwo fleft turn lanes and a combination through and right turn lane. f The design of Westlake Drive indicatesay the intersection and the design for the accessnBroadbentr at indicates two inbound lanes, a ten-foot la dian, and three outbound lanes. road These designs satisfy yed the lane requirements, B at but do not match with each other. lane Therefore, coordination between these two road match the intersection design. projects is necessary to It is further recommended that a sic-phase traffic sef installed to control traffic at this intersection. Let be phases are recommended on Kruse Way and a separate the southbound movement and a separate phase for thehase for turn bound movement. north-� I These intersection improvements should be made with the initial development; of the • approach roadways. property or with the construction of the Kruse Way could be striped for one Initially, Northbound a . y left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. It is also recommended that a bus northbound Westlake Drive, Immediately north of Kruse Way. 1„ 411 • CAni,N. IjUTTKE, INC • W mkOsitiNct TnAiisPO Ar1(iry r►K;.� r x ,. • i•. • . 665 •:...:. : ,:.n.... ” .. . .,: ....., • • . . .. .. . : : • . , . . .,., ; .. 1 . . . .. . . . . . ,. . . . .:.... , , ,, . Kruse Way and Liberty Park/Westlake Access It is recommended that the north and sorthbound approaches from Liberty Park and Westlake to Kruse Way contain one left lturn t s lane and one combination right turn and through lane . further recommended that right turn lanes be installed on each approach of Kruse Way to this intersection and that far- • side bus pullout lanes also be provided on each side of Krusee Way. This intersection should be signalized with a five-phase traffic signal to provide left turn phases on Kruse Way and one phase to control the north-south approaches. These . improvements should be made with the initial development of the properties. • • j Kruse Way and Rangy Road It is recommended that the eastbound approach of Highway 217 to the intersection with Rangy Road/I-5 northbound ramps be widened by 12 feet to provide a double left turn lane (east- bound to northbound movement) . This modification would require ;' I widening the Highway 217 bridge over 1-5 by approximately ten ' feet at the east end and tapering back to to tbhewexistingnwidth at the west end. Kruse Way would h southside to form a taper east of the intersection. The taper would be approximately six feet wide at the intersection and �. extend easterly for approximately 200 to 300 feet . This double left turn lane would also require widening the northbound on- • ramp to 1-5 from one to two lanes for approximately 500 feet north of the intersection. It is estimated that this double left turn lane would be needed by approximately 1990• f I . • 1 CARL H BUITKE,WC ca+Cwlao IMN3roiIMllo$fNONitn '« i J r_ ». ::::: ..,.. 66 1 • y,. It is also recommended that the northbound approach of Bangy Road provide for two left turn lanes and a combination through ' and right turn lane. This modification to Bangy Road is ' estimated to be required by approximately 1986 or 1987. ' The existing signal phasing at the intersection with a separate phase for the northbound approach and a separate phase for the • southbound approach should remain as it is 'required to adequately control the intersection traffic. '� Bangy Road and Meadows Road IIt is recommended that Bangy Road be widened at the inter- ' section with Meadows Road to provide for a southbound left turn :' lane and two northbound lanes . Meadows Road is estimated to . .1 .-:, 1 function properly with two westbound approach lanes (one right �; turn lane and one left turn lane) . A three-phase traffic . .. < signal also will be required. • It is recommended that the southbound left turn lane be instal- t .. J led at the time Meadows Road is constructed. The additional � .• - northbound lane and traffic signal would not be necessary until • I the double left turn lane is installed in Bangy Road at Kruse Way or by about 1986 or 1987. The added northbound lane is recommended to begin approximately 300 feet south of Meadows '• ' load. Carman Drive and Meadows/Quarry Roads 2* (;:. It is recommended that Carman Drive be widened to provide left c turn lanes at the intersection with Meadows/Quarry Roads. ill CARL kurrotE.INC bootuMNa nowSP MMION octant r a „• ' n ' ,i, '�� fr y , 1. y I • f'' 6 7 • :,:::: ' Between Kruse Way and Meadows Road, the left turn lane be striped as a continuous left turn lane. ' T should recommended to occur with the initial development ofhe widening is evelo adjacent properties. p the A sotlthbound right turn lane in Carman Drive to Meadows Road will also be required by about 1990. i It is also recommended that Meadows Roa4 be constru provide a left turn lane, a through lane, and a ri hoed to at the intersection with Carman Drive. g turn lane • designed to accommodate these three lanes.Meadows Road has been It is further recommended that eastbound lane, a continuous left aturnRlanebbe designed with one • Drive and Galewood Street, a through lane, en Carman lane between Galewood Street and Carman Drived a right turn P (westbound . • This intersection with Carman Drive will require si nali ght phase traffic si B nation with either a six or ei and 1990. final between 1985 • • • Carman Drive' and Bonita/Walu a Roads It is estimated traffic signalization of the intersection between Carman Drive and Bonita/Waluga Roads will be required sometime after 1990. However, this intersection should be monitored to determine when traffic signal .warrants are met before installation of a signal. Figure 12 indicates the recommended number of lanes a :... -'._ .': each intersection throughout the Corridor. pproachi,ng • r CAL 11, UUTTki, INC. CONSUZTM$140,4 'Qp1AigN 114144,n ' ry • 68 .,,4 \\\\\ 41------ Melrose • oi • 1 ,,, 1::.? 7.As - 4 A ,t co'n,at, .4y t Kruse way 0<14 / , o • Carman ! I Dc u ,� 1 44, 4t • LEGEND: EECOMM LANES • RE-COMMENDED LANES lb at i Recommended Number of Approach Lanes to Intersections Throughout ` I V. .. 69 Other locations . It �.s recommended that efforts be made to redirect some traffic away from the intersections of Kruse Way/ Highway 217 and the I-5 interchange. . An alternate route could be developed by ° extending Bangy Road south to Carman Drive. This southerly • extension of Bangy Road is estimated to decrease the traffic demand on northbound Bangy Road to Kruse Way to the point where the level of service would be within the E level (108 percent of level D) . It is recommended that the southerly • extension of Bangy Road be investigated as a .future north- south route between Carman Drive and Kruse Way. Another alternative would be to direct westbound traffic ori 1 ' • ; Meadows Road bound for southbound I-5, south on Bangy Road, west on Bonita Road, and then south on 72nd Avenue to the inter- s .. change with Carman Drive. It is further recommended that some consideration be given to improving the capacity at the intersection of Highway 217 and -.LI., , the southbound I-5 ramps. An alternative to the southbound to eastbound left turn movement could increase the capacity on F , 7 f. .: Highway 217. i r Pedestrian Overpasses It is recommended that pedestrian overcrossings of Kruse Way be installed if and when conflicts between pedestrian and turning vehicles occur and require this separation to reduce accident • hazards or to increase street capacity. The monitoring pro- , gram would identify the need, schedule, and location for . CAM.H. UUTTKE,WC OUNSINING UuM?OIItAIdS3N go•GiNttai • 70 pedestrian overpasses. It is further recommended that site ; .:1 ..., plans be developed to accommodate future pedestrian overpasses of Kruse Way. • G R • ' ,-u•. • • •.� . •,1 ,. i, • ,, • • • • ` III II) .. CAn6 N®QUTTKE,WC• ar ' asJ wM MNG rnmsroe,AtioN twoe4ml J r v 0 i • Appendix ` • • �•j • • • i w 1 • • •rM1.. fir, i• • • ' t • • • • r* CARL N. BU17KE,INC. OOfdSUl1NG IRA dIgef1AlO1f[teC04111 • - . , •• li tl88 72 lw OP • TABLE A-1 t4 ti GENERALIZED TRIP GENERATION RATES Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Rates • Trips Without Trans. With Trans. . • Per Mgmt. Program Mgmt. Program Unit In Out In Out ,.....-, General Office T.G.S.F. 0.21 1.112 0.20 1.26 Retail T.G.S.F. 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Banks T.G.S.F. 10.00 11.00 10.00 11.00 Restaurant T.G.S,F. 3.75 2.25 3. 75 2.25 Hotel Rooms 0. 35 0.30 0. 35 0.30 Single Family Res. Units 0.64 0. 36 0.64 0.36 Multi-Family Res. Units 0.43 0.22 0.113 0.22 Elderly Housing Units 0.10 0.08 0.10 0.08 • C, T.G.S.F. Ix Thousand Gross Square Feet of Building Area Note: Specific buildings may have different rates because ' of proximity to other buildings. . , y • ID !! CARL H OUTTKE,WC. ao$su<ino tOrisrontAtaa taom', +, A y .' l . • • , .... . ., . . . I • . . . . . .."• .. . ... • . . •• . . . . ..... . • d e + I • • • . \ • • Melrose \\\ . . I ,..i . : i ,s a~ 4 • • • �a r ix' � • y" 9�o w��B Y 1-77I t 4 94o h s} , J4,^ Ito .,.• . 2 "1r rl' 443 • + o y C ti .'� • n d ,t. ret i FIB a-1 198:I P.IM,P Hour • Traffic Vo[umes , _. .. .. ... ill•. .. •. .r .. .. ,1.. ,. .. ... � .• f • i 7y Y • r: 1 • \\\\\ /...., moss • h4A,, `.ti 1 f Y "ti N��• I 1. • r� n`w4)� ��J�.,t rct) yd.' Y 'fio u00 iy`w +d r 3s , • "rill y q 1 y� t7bo 11%235 a kw� Kruse Way • �J`��'� �4 `aio rC a n Zoo t IS �C H� i II 4.41 Atrti J • .Ito.0 r�: a„ it,. rto • . y it! �J� 4C�». "� ,. . i ah trrta 4 ,$o � ya 10 aA n 44.411 lif • • in Figure• Assignment of Corridor Garnled P.M. Petit Hour Traffic , 4110 Without Transportation Martagarnaot Program 0 1 w • 75 it • Y • LEGEND: III- , Melrose %rya 4° 140 } V ` 9 �qPAS o • y °•a S' t. N 4 a Leo B•C I. yob; Kruse Way N1�� �o C°"�, 113 'a oiro Meadows irr B ��Pi lTA ey z 2S ti4ti 1 0 4 �� • ti4'Pb ° C 1� J` 4111 Bonita Im 1e4 i4,°.r• • 4. • 411) 1 • t r Year 2000 RAN. Peak Hour ` Background Traffic With Corridor • 76 _ VENOM 11).'"".".""'"' Melrose 1. i i . . . r. t 2/ y NL .Nil kiso.0 y U. 49 \,' . U N„9 ,t ti tt 1,O r r 110 N.0 h .,. i.e. i h t .1r*'hw t • 4t ~ tlyb �+Rxt. r a i i iipy, , �ly cISS �h�b `� a �p I 4 r 1110 + Kruse Way �'1 t ib , I 11$ i ,ho ~ t.O to ' l'� r•� a. i to .40 b y . !� +r Odows �w t�44' ir 1 t tlLte ' • 11/111) 4AN t.4- oo 4,J4„�q13 d44 r 1 ....�..... 1N i 7 0 j,w--+ htt• Borwla •u a ��rir k It Ib0 ga• SIP 4, c4 F 0. / Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic • I With Corridor Fully Developed Without Transportation Mansgem>ant Program ®I 4 • r is j . . . . . . . .. •. 0 0 77 I • • • Mekose • • • \ • .•• • 3, •. i 3i . )r� ° �`. . uti ,, c �i'�so d` • a 7,0 41 M ftsV =bts 53 o:' 1 i!-i .4f1� 14 635 �vtiy `1 �is r4wa Kruse way N J /► fd �^' � /js ..; 1 • yF -Cj,iiS ..ram? i d" kki • o Mew N•f7,, p *r a J!, J • ab` a 9s dy rN�b i 'y PO is e/ (1f`I U dOfNIO �J�MaCr C� �� N '74r,11.N\ Ite .T h t+ .'yi ) �4. ul�'' 113 y r� 6+,14 M� . 4 A h A-'S M year 2000 P.M. Peak Mont`Traffic• Wlih A Transportation • � ,Managefrnen1 Program • • • 1 1 �l • . L • ,f • 0 • • • 4 • ' T + • • • 4. I. / J7— • ,0 "e;'''. 1I ' KRUSE WAY b .. . .. • : CORRIDOR .•.. . ,. . .. .. . ., STUDY t . . 2 , , , .. . • : , . ...::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,*,:,:.:,:,:,*,*,:,:,,*,.,*,*,:,..,:,:,:,*,*,:,..,:,:,0,:,:,:,:,*„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„„:.,„„„„,,,„„„„,„,„„ , .,. . . , •aY ::::.::::.::::.:::..,..,*::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,*,*,*,*,*,,:,,*,..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: . :::...:::::„.::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: , .. . ::::::::::::::::,::::::::„.......„:::::::.::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::....................:::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::.:::::„:„.::::::::::::::::::::.::::::.:::::..::.:::„..,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::„..,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: . .• • :::::::.:::::::::.:::::::::.:::::::::.:::::::::.:::::.:::.:::.:::::.......:::.:.:::...::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:„......:....:„.:.:.::::::::::::::„.:.:.,.,.,.:.:,:.:.:.:. .. . ...................................:::..............................................„:....::.:.:.,..,.:...................:: ......::::::::::::...........................:::::....................:,......................:::::.::.:.:.:::::............: „::::::::::::.:„..:::„..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::......................„.....::::::::::::::.::::::::::::,..,::.:.:„.::::::::::::::::,:::::: 7.5 L.'ti ..V.tt. r 7 • r u !� 4.!it' wv tr y" .NYC rr.•.7. Y Q w rY 1 Ti': V :! f' n • . pill. ifT •A 1 j a4 , • ,., .::.:::..:.:.:.;.:.,...:,.:, 4 Y cr' ,r• r t , :41 A r � � s eu. •tiH' 1} �w ,a. �R ti. 1 Y :1 n, •� t �i yy r1'i'•.w �i' 91 { r �• 1 ti .. L •'.•IL r `i t .j J J \ 'Y }} ..vY 1' Y j L N Y.. tpp �3 t 1 r kl 4• i 1 1 ii Ib• 4 t liS. r X �� 'r A. �x w_R d.3 .•t. r \ Y t?•J Sn 'a• h•t _�• ♦ 1.IR r F:..r N. Y Y W H. J L. Ne:s !f M1� . J it r'I, N � r � x �' • fy • .TI:� 1 ' a c ! r t ti k 1• tAit j�. 1r .S7• 1r � • Q t P } t •R k .. �1 �.r V• +A •1M' 6 Jr .�' L yy t M'•r .t a Y : 'w�I TL ' ,y ) 1 t- N t i J.l+ ri� I • 1,� a -4 1ift S •w � wrt w [ y, 1 R 1[�� 1 \• ::i:::i:i:ii:i:i::i*::i:i*:,:i:i:i:i*I:i:i:i*i:isi:* ...;.,_:? . 4,,,, 1*-ii -Az ',� ' w V r rR' Y AC7id M YV•'' �t. k l7 1J.6Y IJ's • " ••h,. e4•Y � t� ,.� 6 .+ . i. • "mil,SOC1ATED • -ANSP®RTATION GINEER11ilG • �'1 r. Alill�l1 f!1 G, INC. EXHIBIT• • 6025 JEAN RD., LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 �o 503/63Er9232 •__ ,, r • • 44 §,f t r r 1 { Y 1`4 vI y p ' .\. Y• • Y 1 1 • • • • • • • • • • • T h `.. • • • ♦ - y: a 'u - rj KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR STUDY. July, 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS T N ,EN.T S :itroduction Yi ope of Services 2 M ,. 2 1as5 Umptions '•�i.e t I�Od of ogy 3 q =" ansit and Trip Generation 5 _rmprehensiv2 Plan C7 7 5tln8 g Traffic 7. =: ojcc•ted Traffic 8 { i. y F. 4,aaway Capacity 1 1 t ' =serve Capacity 13 `•;lc] us ions; Recommendations 15 • �:erences 17 . AM -pe11dix A Z. pr'ehensl.ve Plan Traffic ' p end i x 13 :::::.,sting Traffic • . ��Qnd i x C k _ r: ecteci Traffic V. •l • • _l_ O591P/SY/mw KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR STUDY July 1982 ,r ::ntroduction t4411 ' June 1982, Associated Transportation Engineering and Planning 1;~:.'..'`EP ) , Inc . was selected by the City of Lake Oswego, through a eempetitive process, to perform a transportation planning analysis of the "Kruse Way Corridor" . This report is the result of that analysis . r • Kruse Way forms the west gateway to the City of Lake Oswego. It forms the major connection between Lake Oswego and the Southwest Portland Metropolitan Area. it begins at the terminus of State Highway 217 and e:..,. s at Boones Ferry. The "Kruse Way Corridor" includes Kruse Way and all streets or properties abutting or taking direct access from Kruse .,ay, which are Bangy Road, Carman Drive, Boones Ferry, and to a lesser de=ree, Bonita Road, tfeadows Drive, Fosberg Road, and Quarry Road. The lands abutting Kruse Way have designated land uses as shown in the Zity ' s. Comprehensive Plan. All of these lands are within the City' s -::man Service Boundaries . The lands south of Kruse Way east of Bangy Read and west of Carman Drive are in Clackamas County but outside the ',-:::.-.:• City Limits and carry somewhat different land-use designations in the =nty' s Comprehensive Plan. v Element 12 of the City' s Comprehensive Plan addresses "Transportation" . The City ' s Plan was developed in 1977 . The Transportation element ` .d assumes designated land uses and shows year 2000 traffic volume =re ections. Hcever, since 1977 the designated land uses have been changed or are reposed to be changed; thereby superseding the previous traffic volume t;. : r ection. ,Y Sc .pe of Services The ultimate goal or the City of Lake Oswego is to allow development in ue:a a manner as to maintain a traffic system on Kruse Way, Carman t eve, Boones Ferry Road and Bangy Road that functions at Service Level �r better. i ."as been determined that the following information is required : ' ri•' Development of P.M. peak hour , year 2000 traffic on Kruse Way, from 1-5 to Boones Ferry Road . 1. Identification of P.M. peak hour percent of total A.W.D.T. and directional splits . Identification of P.M. peak transit assumption. • • • . . 1 ,i ""SI;THODOLoGy ='E ' ' S approach to the above scope of work and land-use assumptions ,was as follows : 1 . Review all data provided by the City and collected by ATOP . 2. Develop a computerized "Base Model" of the corridor using the original data from the 1977 Comprehensive Plan. 3 . Calibrate and update the "Base Model" using 1982 traffic volume Data and Developed Lands Trip Generation data . 4 . Project year 2000 traffic volumes assumingt . developed as approved or as designated byWands are Comprehensive Plan. Route selection was given restriction '',:. H". factors of each turn movement so that the most desirable routes were used by projected traffic. 5 . Calculate roadway capacities in a detail so "problem '. spots" can be identified. G . Change roadway data to show improvements assufied and re-run 3 and 4 above. 7 . Repeat item 5 for 3 iterations or until optimum conditions 410 are reached. • 8. Identify the "Reserves Capacity" or the difference between ,' the projected year 2000 traffic volumes and the Optimum Roadway Capacities. S, 9. Translate Reserve Capacity to increased traffic generation ,. ;A capabilities of "Coihprehensive Plan Land Uses" not yet developed. 10. Analyze impacts of: extending Quarry Road; Portland s policy affecting Boones changes which will increase traffic nover owhat owas r aassumed by the Comprehensive Plan. • 11 . Develop conclusions and recommendations based ` above analysis . : Upon the ,' i ed . -4- X. 1. • `, r . • Fable 1 summarizes that estimated 1977 and year 2000 vehicle trips produced and attracted within the Planning Area by basic trip purpose TABLE 1 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION FOR PLANNING AREA CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ( Buttke ) Two-Way Average Weekday Volume 1977 % 2000 % Trip Productions Home Connected Work 18,000 18.4% 28,000 16.6% •4 Home Connected Shopping 20,000 20 .4% 33 ,000 19 . 5% Zther 60, 000 61.2% 108,000 63 . 9% Total Productions 98 , 000 100 .0% 169 ,000 100.0% , Trip Attractions Home Connected Work 11,000 12 .5% 21 ,000 14 .6% Home Connected Shopping 32,000 36 .4% 58,000 40 .3% Other 45, 000 51 .1% 65,000 45 . 1% • dotal Attractions 88,000 100 .0% 144,000 100 .0% The Comprehensive Plan does anticipate a reduction in vehicular trip generation rates from year 1977 to year 2000. �"N. "Traffic volume forecasts were made for the year 2000 since it is estimated that full development may occur within that timeframe. The trip generation rates utilized for the year 2000 projections were modified to include the effe-zt of increased transit service and ridership as forecast fur the Regional •�' Interim Transportation Plan for 1990 and extrapolated to the , year 2000 . The effect of increased carpooling and trip combining Was also included. " These rates are indicated in Table 2 for most uses and represent a two-Way vehicular volume per weekday per unit of building measurement . • Table 2 indicates the City's Comprehensive Plan presently assures 12% to 32% reduction in vehicular trips by the year 2000 due to increased transit ridership, carpooling, and trip combining. However, the exact percent of transit ridership Was not able to be identified. 0 41 -6- 4111 4110 TABLE 2 VENICLt TRIP GENERATION RATES AND PERCENT City of Lake o wego Comprehensive Plan REDUCTION IN AUTO USE* x ' r Average Weekday Two-Way Vehicle Trip Rate $ Reduction In ' • . Vohlcle 'r1 Land Use/Building Type P Raiesw , 1977 ___ 2000 2000 • Single Family Residential 10.0-17.0 per O.U. ` r Multi-Family 8'4-I4°6 per D.U. y Residential 19% - 15$ 7.0 per O.U. General Office 5.75 per O.U. 22% 12.5 per 1,000 sq.ft, 10.2per 1'000 sq .ft.it. 23% Medical Office q 55.0 per 1,000 sq.ft. 49.3 per 1,000 sq.ft Banks/Sayings 6 Loans . 12;i 100.0 per 1,000 sq.(}, 160.0 per 1,000 sq.ft. 12% Retalf 50+ per 1,000 sq.ft. 39.6+ per 1,000 sq.ft. 26% 2.6 per 1,000 sq.ft. 2.3 per 1,000 sq.ft. i3$ Manufacturing Warehouse 4.1 per 1,000 sq.ft. 3.1 per 1,000 sq.ft. 32% w 'Effect of Increased; Transit Ridership; Carpooling; and Combinin g Trip Purposes in AUto Trips.-_ y' x :Tomprehensive Plan The present Comprehensive Plan for. the City was developed in 1977. ;' �. 410 The traffic volume projections shown in that Plan were based upon : misting traffic volumes (see Figure 1) and the ' g proposed land uses. The traffic generated by or attached to these proposed land uses were assigned to "traffic zones" . The City was divided into 37 "traffic 'ones" with the area outside the City divided into 3 "traffic :ones" . The traffic assigned to each zone was to travel on an assumed arterial street network forming "links" between each zone. Traffic could also be assigned within each zone as "interzonal trip" • end thus would never appear on the "link" system. The original raffic assignment zone" map, "assignment map" showing the "link nbers, " and the "Trip Distribution Table" are attached in Appendix '"A" . This traffic data resulted in a year 2000 traffic volume rejection (see Figure 2 ) . • This original data showed that the traffic in this corridor entered and exited in a proportion of 2/3 west and 1/3 east. Associated Transportation Engineering: Planning (ATmP) , Inc. , reviewed the above and other original data and placed it on their '" n-house" computer system. _tTEP ' s computer programs were able to build a "base transportation system" to approximately reproduce the traffic assignments used in 1977 within this project ' s study area. This "Base Transportation System" formed basic traffic distribution patterns and "Link Network" fir this study area, which had been divided into 7 traffic Study �` Subareas. Zxisting Traffic ^.':e City provided ATL'P with traffic volume data for Kruse Way and: Sz,_nes Ferry; Carman Drive; and Mangy Road. The turning movement studies were converted to Average Annual Weekly traffic volumes ( See 'a 4endix B) . • The 1982 P.M. peak hour volumes were analyzed and compared to the '9 ,:,6 movement data . It was found that at approaching Boonesr Ferry, ..ruse Way traffic moved at 58% to the north and 42% to the south. This 1982 movement is a reverse of the 1976 movements, which were , about 58% south and 42% north. • . However, traffic during the 1982 P .M. peak hour from the developed Kr^zse Way properties did move 2/3 west and 1/3 east, as was assumed • • _n the 1977 Comprehensive Plan. A'r? calibrated its "Base Model" to reflect 1982 travel patterns. • c • -8- ' n r. r 3. . - . . . (liPPø• • / • l 4•.,1 lu.t 'eq. .1 e (Iffrafilk s II •y N 41C •t1. SI .o,lt,t . . , t . o • 1/4..c ' 4 W.:. .t• . 4. ), /� 1 • ,�I r�I A� II , I \b 1r•d161Tt M • I b l ,�a 0910fK ,b ..•���� • ♦� Y tb•� ,r.l / r• . 5 m C^tip i iT i \\S\ , y.. 11•I IYt �e 41.1 IYt ) • 1 i . . . Ohl Ft C LEGEND FIGURE C — 1 BOUNDARIES TRAFFIC STUDY SUBAREAS i COPYRIGHT: ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. a. TABLE 3 ' ` TRIP GENERATION BY SUB AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS APPROVED BY 6/82 AS USED IN SUB-AREA LAND USE 24 HOUR P.M. PEAK 24 HOUR P.M. PEAK THIS REPORT • TRIP IN OUT LAND USE TRIP IN OUT P.M.PEAK HOUR GENERATION GENERATION IN OUT Commercial 150,000SF 4400 220 220 u Y • D. Retell 190,000SF 6700 335 335 Retail 25,000SF 500 25 25 Office 60,0(Y)SF 500 10 90 Office 60,000SF 500 I 90 tW st Lake Motel 150 Rooms 1440 50 50 Motel 150 Rooms 1500 50 50 Commercial) Bank 4,000SF 550 75 75 "Cinema 15,000SF 800 10 30 Restaurant 4,500SF 560 25 10 Restaurant 10,000SF 1200 60 20 :.:,:,.. :: 9750 495 560 8900 366 435 366 435 Single FM 552 Units 5520 306 168 Single FM 725 Units 7100 460 260 ' : 2 Multi FM 670 Units 3580 274 162 Multi FM 802 Units 4500 325 170 9 (list NEIG CTR 4,500SF 1800 90 90 NEIG COMML 3 Acres 1000 50 50 I Late) 100900 670 420 12,600 835 480 835 480 r i 46 25 Muse 3" Residential 83 Units 830 46 25 3 " PLAZA) 36 20 ('-5) 4 Residential 65 Units 650 36 20 4 100 700 6Etroad 5 Indust. Park 96 Acres 4400 100 700 5 C-��t/Liberty) : • 6 Retall 84,000SF 3500 175 175 Retell 107,023SF 4495 223 223 . 4�lercan- Restaurant 29,000SF 2450 110 40 Restaurant 16,223SF 1371 62 23 "` tile Oftice 14,500SF 150 5 25 Office 43,121SF 444 1 73 Village) Bank 2,900SF 400 50 50 Bank 5,400SF 745 9 93 Medical 14,500SF 600 15 45 Multi FM 124 Units 700 50 30 Multi FM 208 Units 1186 83 50 A . 7800 405 365 8241 378 462 378 462 7 Office 400,000SF 4100 75 735 Mice 194,000SF 1998 37 357 • tW. rtin Retail 39,000SF 1560 75 75 Re-tall 18,915SF 757 36 36 w'fnmar) Single FM 14 Unitt. 140 10 0 ' ' Multi FM 143 Units 1200 49 30 Multi FM 108 Units 907 37 23 7000 209 840 3662 110 416 209 840 ' 27993 1461 1495 1970 2962 . a change after this study is assumed It will 51111 generate ® • Tim7s S�oa was approved for a land-use tud y bea 9 traffic as shown. ' •I/ 1 1 •6.r 1.aadway Capacqx A roadway ' s ability to process vehicles is normally expressed in terms w its capacity. The capacity of any roadway length is governed by the „ point of least capacity. suburban areas, these points are at the intersections. The ^berating level of capacity of a roadway at any location is expressed as a Level oi Service. Exhibit "l" defines these various levels of service in terms of delay to the motorist. The capacity of Kruse Way, Boones Ferry, Carman Drive and Bangy Road were found by using the Northwestern University Nomograph method. This • tethod provides a detailed analysis of each traffic movement ' s capacity r ; r ' • al: signalized intersections , and is based on thy. 1965 Highway Capacity • mate l . :he roadway conditions assumed are: 1 . Boones Ferry at Kruse Way - 60-72 feet wide. No change from present conditions. 4-phase traffic signal t.' 2 . Kruse Way at Boones Ferry - 72 feet wide. No change from present conditions . 4-phase traffic signal 3 . Carman Drive at Kruse Way - 64 feet wide, 8-phase traffic signal. • 4. Kruse Way at Carman Drive - 72 feet wide. No change from 410 present, 8-phase traffic signal 5 . Kruse 'Jay at Bangy Road - 72 feet wide. No change from the present, 8-phase traffic signal . G. Bangy Road at Kruse Way - 76 feet with a double left-turn lane, 8-phase signal. 7 . Westlake Drive - 40 feet wide, one lane in and two lanes out with a three-phase signal. 8 . West Access - 40 feet wide, one lane in and two lanes out with a three-phase signal . f . a � 1 /. • • al j ' .. O 1 r 'r 11. 1 T • -11- A • ° °1'Nif f i. ° �•} 1 ^ yr. , I I EXHIBIT 1 ' LEVELS OF SERVICE ' (LOS) lr d. revel of Service is a qualitative measure of the effect of a number of factors which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and .operating costs . u o Level A (Free Flow - Relatively) No delay due to other vehicles. • o Level B (Stable Flow - Slight Delay) An occasional delay due to other vehicles . o Level C (Stable Flow - Acceptable Delay) " a wr Most drivers feel somewhat restricted, but not objectionably so. • • r o Level D (Approaching Unstable Flow - Tolerable Delay) Vehicles maybe delayed during /Y peaks within the peak 4 , o ,- , ., period, but a low demand to permit peL iodac clearance of excessive queues. , o Level E (Unstable Flow - Congestion - Intolerable Delay) There may be long queues of vehicles, and delays may be great . •' • o Level F (Forced Flow - Jammed) • The traffic system has basically broken down. • 411 -12- r • �=e. capacities at various levels of service of these road sections and '`• assumed signori operations are summarized in Table 4, page 18. . r A comparison of ATEP ' s year 2000 ='=vice "D" traffic volumes are shown onpeak-hour Tableffic 5 , pageeumes19. and Level of f `� a capacity of the Bangy Road and the Boones Ferry intersections on ',use Way are the most critical location. West access and Westlake pa ' 4 .' :_tersections are not shown on Table 5 due to their minor cross-traffic . r c1umes . Reserve Capacity t: 7-= difference between Level. of Service "D" and the "As Approved by l traffic volumes on Table 4 form the basis for the increase in y.. peak-hour traffic volumes that could be allowed, or "Reserve spa c i t y ���( • • analysis of the Reserve Capacities indicates that the Boones Ferry r " - Bangy Road intersections are the controlling elements for possible=zreases in traffic volumes being permitted on Kruse Way. Ir• was determined that the undeveloped land on Kruse Way c ,.d � . ctilectively be permitted an increase in inbound trips of 318 and :abound trips of 339 during the P.M. peak hour . ^ c:i these increases could be permitted to these undeveloped lands are esented in the following four scenarios: Scanario 1 =..I remaining trips assumed by the Comprehensive Plan for the " =rm-approved" undeveloped lands and the reserve capacity equally- zributed by size. Table S-1 summarizes this distribution. • ''',h' TABLE S-1 ALL TRIPS DISTRI1 eTED BY LAND SIZE -:sic Size Azuved Trips Reserve Trips Total Trips Tr_-s (Acres ) _ In S. area Out In Out In Out 23 46 166 44 47 90 213 • 7 14 51 13 14 27 65 5 96 191 695 184 196 375 81,S: 13 26 94 25 27 51 121 27 54 195 52 55 106 250 166 331 1201 318 339 649 1540 ' • i -13- , . . k Scenario 2 Similar to Scenario 1, but ALL trips distributed undeveloped land area . equally .•`• ' P Table S-2 summarizes this distribution. TABLE S-2 o`. ALL TRIPS DISTRIBUTED EQUALLY TO EACH i ,,, '�'RAFFI C SU$AREA Traffic Size AEved ro ^' (Acres) I - .rips R Out In meserve 7C :Subarea � iia8 Total.Trl S ` ya; Out In Out • 3 23 66 .20 4240 .20 63 .60 7 66. 20 240. 20 E�7 .8U 129 .80 308 ,00 0 . 5 96 66 .20 63.60 67.80 129 .80 6 13 • 240.20 63 .60 67 .80 308.00 'v•, 7 66 .20 240. 20 63 .60 129 .80 308 .00 27 66 .20 240 .20 67 .80 129.80. 308.00 63 .60 67 .80 129.80 308 .00 TOTAL 166 �;: .331 .00 1201 .00 318.00 339.00 � •• •�',� • i G49.00 1540.00 Szenario 3 Each land area shall retain its previous "approved" omprehensiv'e Plan and the "Reserve drips" ate distributed f by land size. from the C' : ' able S-3 summarizes this distribution. - TABLE S-3 PREVIOUS APPROVED TkIPS (PLUS RESERVE T RIPS DISaRI$UiED $Y LAND SITE Traffic Size improved ,ri ! • r., s Traps (Acres ) In P Reserve grips Total Subarea Out In Out Trips In Out = 23 46 4 7 25 96 1006 20 13 14 40 72 70034 E 13 23 50 30 18425 127 28496 896 ,� ,c 9 42G 52 75 57 �•. � TOTAL166 331 55 151 481 . ,74.L, 1201 318 339 649 1540 • 1 • 44,• ., -14- , • ••y , ,' ' r n , scenario 4 =`i1n�a: l ��r. to scenario 3 but I lmi "reserve trips" are distributed 4 area . Table S-4 summarizes this distribution. d equally to each TABLE S-4 PREVIOUS APPROVED TRIPS (PLUS RESERVE 'RIPS i' +'f , L l AREA) , i Traffic Side h • . { raf (Acres) • proved gips Reserve Trips Total out Tri s. b a In Out In Out �: 3 23 4 7 46 25 63 .60 67 .80 36 20109.609 92 .207 • 96 100 63.60 67.80 99.60 S 93 700 63 .60 67 .8087.80 6 50 30 63 .60 67.80 163 .60 767 .80 , 27 99 426 113 .60 97 .$0 63 .60 67 .80 162 .60 493 .80 331 1201 318.00 339.00 649.00 1540.00 Scenario 2 reduces the trips assigned to the larger -:r.^rease the trips assigned to the smaller land areasland compa edd trips assigned by the Comprehensive Plan.411 red to the . . . Conclusions and Recommendations Based upon the above analysis, the following ecommendaticns are made: conclusions and 4` 1 . It is concluded that the land Uses within the study have not yet been approved area which for changes in land use could collectively increase their P.M. pea}; hour traffic by 318 ' I . attracted vehicular trips and 339 produced Vehicular trips. However, increasing those trips would cause Kruse Way operate at Service Level ��D" without a "buffer" for increased traffic volumes created by other land-use changes Within �, '• � City or by transportation the • •. ' policy changes b ` Y other agencies .`.EC tMENDUD That: the land areas identified in this report that have not :e� � previousl approved y for lend-use changes may be developed up to a level of density or at a land use that would generate or attract Vehicular traffic at a rate equal to that shown by the Comprehensive Planplus la • c- the reserve trips distributed equally among those land areas, The trip ge.e ration would be equal to that shown in Table S-5 . "� ; -15- f. . 'ABLE S- P.M. PEAK HOUR VEHICULAR TR AFFIC 4; PREVIOUS APPROVED TRIPS r5 - (PLUS RESERVE TRIPS' I DI 'iRIBUTED EQUALLY TO EACH TRAFFIC SUBAREA) . Traffic Approved Tripst otal rips In 70% Reserve Trips Trips Subarea Out In Out In Out 3 46 ' 4 25 44.6 47 .5 90 .6 72 .5 36 20 44 .6 47. 5 80 .6 67 . 5 5 100 700 44.6 47 .5 144 .6 <1 , Ic. 50 30 44.6 47.5 94.6 747 .5 ur 7 99 426 44 .6 47 .5 77 . 5 TO :�31 1201 143 .6 473 .5 223.0 237 .5 554 . 0 1438. 5 ' l 2 . It is concluded that; The volume of traffic passing through the Kruse Way Corridor and traffic projection rates can f s fluctuate due to factors beyond the City of Lake Oswego's Control; land is often developed in stages after it has been approved for development. • RECOMMENDED That land areas abutting Kruse Way may increase their P.M. Deak hour traffic volumes, if a documented traffic analysis is submz�t,te` lo and approved by the City that justifies the increase. `' 3 . It is concluded that the City of Lake Oswego should no*encourage the improvement of roadways by either agencies that would increase P.M. south-bound traffic on Boones Ferry. , 4. It is concluded that the City of Lake Oswego' s Comprehensive . f Plan presently assumes 12% to 32% transit and other forms of transportation bythe year 2000 for various land uses. 1' 0 -16- i. REFERENCES Street System Analysis, Carl Buttke, P.E. , July 1977 .". ' Memorandum, August 9, 1977, from Jeanne Robinette to City Staff, "Transportation ✓^ ,ransportation Planning Phase II " . "Transportation Requirements - Kruse Way, " Carl Buttke, P.E. , September 1977 . "Traffic Impacts - Alternative Uses of area 7 Phase II, " Carl 3. . Buttke, P.E. , October 1977 . " - - Comprehensive Plan, Lake Oswego, July 1978. E . Westlake Traffic Impact, Carl Buttke, P.E. , May 1979 . City Ordinance # 1783. City Ordinance # 1742. a. City Ordinance * 1741. Kruse Way Plaza, Otak & Associates, Inc. , November 1981 (with revisions ) . =-- - Lake Oswego Signal Study, STRhAM, January 1982. 1r- "Towne Square Mountain Park, Traffic Impact Stud � Ma 1982. y" , Wilsey & Ham, y Staff Report, File # PA 2-82, June 1982. \; +►� 14- Liberty Park Development Study, Zimmer, Gunsul & Frasca • Partnership, July 1, 1982. • Y • ° 1 , 410 wl C - • • 1 -17.. TABLE 4 LOCATION DIRECTION MOVEMENT APPROACH SIGNAL CAPACITY IVPH) EXISTING "AS APPROVED 19820' ' WIDTH TIMING LEVEL OF SERVICE P.M.PEAK P.M.PEAK IN FEET G/C ABCDE VOLUMES VOLUMES Kruse .Way EB/WB LT 12 20 207 207 230 276 299 79/94 202/106 �. • ', '+ at Carman EB/WB RT 14 70 396 396 440 528 572 114/47 274/264 ' EB/WB THRU 24 50 1267 1325 1440 1642 1728 687/531 1067/987 EB/WB LT * 12 20 207 207 230 276 299 79/94 202/106 EB/WB RT * 14 70** 396 396 440 528 572 114/47 274/264 EB/WB THRU* 24 50 1267 1325 1440 1642 1728 687/531 1067/907 - Carman NB LT 30 153 153 170 204 221 52 44 - Drlve at NB THRU, RT 36 30 990 1012 1100 1276 1353 164 459 Kruse SB LT 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 112 • t SB THRU, RT 36 30 990 1012 1100 1276 1353 130 395 NB THRU, RT* 26 15 396 414 450 513 540 459 NB LT I 12 15 135 135 150 180 195 44 SB THRU, RT* 26 15 396 194 450 513 540 395 '; • SB LT * 12 15 135 135 150 180 195 112 • Kruse Way EB LT 24 40 968 I01: 1100 1254 1320 ' 448 1004 •' ')'-' •y at Boones EB RT 16 70** 619 655 720 821 864 325 354 ill 0 Ferry . Bones Ferry NB LT 12 30 288 288 320 384 416 213 376 at Kruse Way NB TURD 26 30 845 883 960 1094 1152 452 848 SB RT 14 70** 648 648 720 864 936 301 590 1 SB TURD 24 70** 1989 2079 2260 2576 2712 491 1075 • , Kruse Way WB LT* 12 15 135 135 150 180 195 27 54 • at Bangy Rd. WB THRU, RT* 26 45 1214 1270 1380 1573 1656 623 1346 �..` Bangy at NB LT* 24 25 510 534 580 661 696 153 474 Kruse Way NB THRU, RI* 26 15 458 47B 520 593 624 95 310 \• , 1-5 at SB LT* 12 25 234 234 260 312 338 32 266 Kruse Way SB THRU* 16 15 232 246 270 308 324 23 295 ' . Hwy 217 BB LT* 24 15 282 294 320 365 384 234 380 ® at Kruse Way EB THRU" 26 45 1214 1270 1380 1573 1656 974 1557 EB RT* 14 45 468 468 520 624 676 122 194 .- :.. ' 8-P so Signal r •" C4 0 Loft Turn and Cross Sireot Right Turns • -18- . • ! - 1` ,.. • ' r 4111 4111 TABLE 5 LOCATION DIRECTION MOVEMENT SIGNAL CAPACITY . • EXISTING "AS APPROVED 1982u TIMING (VPH) P.M.PEAK RESERVE , G/C U P.f•1.PEAK VOLUMES CAPACITY VOLUMES "AS APPROVEI)��ww* Kruse Way EB/WBU LT* 20 at Carman Dr. EB/WBRI* 276 79/94 2Q2/106 70«. 114/4774/170 , 50 1642 528 274l264 THRU 254/264 EB/WB 687/531 1067/987 575/655 Carman Drive at Kruse Way tB THRU, RP' 15 513 LT w 15 164 4449 I80 52 44 60 `' 136 • i30 SB THRU, RI' 15 513 SB LT " 15 180 30 112 118 395 Kruse Way EB 60 1 at Scones LT 35 10 EB RT 65ww 7 L.� 325 !004 79 2 cd 354 290 li�' ' Ferry So ones Ferry NB LT 35 � by . • at Kruse Way NB THRU b5w �� ��( 213 376 SB �Vi' 452 44 15 • RT 65"w 792 848 1546 L1(b S8 THRU 30 0.576 b 301 `o a 219 `f"� Kruse Way WB « 19 1,515t LT 15 • at bangy Rd. WO THRU, fiTw 45 180 27 54 fy73 623 1346 126 Baggy Rd. at NB w 227 Kruse WayLT 25 661 , 16 THRU, RT« (5 153 474 593 186 1-5 at SB 95 310 283 m Kruse Way SB TiIRUw 25 312 32 266 15 308 23 46 • 295 13 Hwy 217 at EB LT 15 Kruse Way EB w 365 234 I THRU 45 1573 380 -lo • 974 EB RT w 45 624 122 1194 f6 r 't 430 , 8-Phase Signal ;; •' Overlap Loft Turn and Cross Street Right Turns • `" Reserve capacity at each Intersection, not "system" Reserve ca acit . "� y " p Intee secflon of least Reserve capacity. P V 5 +tem Reserve ca achy Is governed by the . -19- 0591p/SY/mw Attachments • W r y II t �, I i I .. m +t _ 0 »•� .41.11S . . •• • Viii... ,..... . , , Are 11141 '1'.° - I 177 . .„. . 0 1 I I.,....., ' .../ ., 0 ill it (I Arai . Ilia. 111 ................. ,,,,„„' . N if • 11 fir dir HI r. . , . • ...! poundal., m .46, Ark**, d: sory 3 1 '19 too ,, �� wd.In IrA • [ 1104 'eager an Araiii..111 It ,01M170.04iir Allirtl.."11 kr de 7.N......„7,10„Aoin my' 'Ill II 6. V.,.. ail _ii„ Aft 40•.....e, Ir wu 1 Aii,„„_,• :........ 1#4, r,----rocuarileir ,, mirvecirto-----.,17,..- , 000. \ ........,,. .. ...,... . ,, ..., ,...... . pod 4;;,. irj,erg: . , . , , -NI: , , c;),.. i,,' . , •• ........ . 411 W(ior• 40 0-.. 1 i = Pik 1 . 1.4 MO : / gig 1 ., ---( IP --. lot ........,,,r,„-. -.0- 11 .P � wo ■ ; 111 ; � �._. ■3:► %mini. kiiii.1 kith rr=ARII,ut I.1li•'").Ai de.tm•qu1.#4....pt',in la4e Oswego Current Traffic Volumes -- Aveta a Wee t cif k. HOW I. Y, =IIditt Iris B y volume r ,, • _ • • • 01 33 . . . . . d .. l ? I:: 1 A li . ‘ ,,. . - ' tin .,.„..,,, . •••,.., ', I , I.,. .... hp tco wo IT g »� ,} ....tep, . . ,i"0. , 101/44, 41 . n1 WI 31 , stei A moo, -.11 1 i 000 04,7118118dalk GO 1 .`4. ,iwslk'iIt°00,. iI ‘ 4. a1,„• F . 0.,...._.4- -„.1.„,-.,.,1,11,1.. r I�nR IQG.:.=tNDeei °Mo fy Ar�'.4 y i ottec,or 1 r t/,4. 16:14 004w; s , 1- *M ,„/'"�►sllp Urban Service •rlr o r n N,i., t Boundary rzite .p, ..... to OP:14 _. pi 1l11 „dir koo, , ... 4 00,01111161 . . • OS 101_,...orpotilep 1 IllA00 Xr ' 41 mil eir,,,iff4 0111.04N4 AIL -dePP.,,../419"Ili II .40. ' goijrallivf1,-.10,L... .jp) ,, rrerwil verre,,io,„„I _ .1000 lfr. N\ ' • . , pod. ,„//iel(7. hp.4%.1 .. i i 1161 1 ,‘", Ai Will 6400 i.,,, • t/ / All ' t ) oe ?Soo \ . ,,....„0,trali Opp ri ‘4., , , ....." •••.,, 11 G) '...,..= mail 1 IT ..,, l *Timinisiti iv ' N Boo. , 1 g ! "�` 9 N•A Protected iAntl Use 14 hi At.litll, 1970 •. 4!n41 4ldrin i1..1,,, 1 d, i 1.n4„1 unl u1,1 , Year 2000 Traffic Assign Abera I Al 1 Fuour' i 0+41614 1 rllti 1 merit - ge Weekday Volunic Iny • Ar • , f f �a 1 • (Nir4414 J 3 f' .7? 4' • • ., is t rc 1 ,, 1 Z900 r 8• •' 800 � w 7 =ff �! 0 y� •Y ap tP 7 •[,In •o 80 c••••• E r 1 0 1 E ri ..\\____ k /y II I C i!L -J f , .1)'%N \i \ "°1".. .. 8200 .�,' Q . _•%tlt to O b` i \--------- O g 1 .; .• i O .. 'p .iM lit lib. lit , a li: . b • ' " "• LEGEND FIGURE 3 XXX AVERAGE WEEKDA`/ , YEAR 2000 ., c AS APPROVED BY a/82• TRAFFIC VOLUMES .,. , 1 •.. C COPYRIGHT, ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNIN , INC, 4,.„e .. /I: I. ° t 1 • • • n ' A • • • • • • • • • • • ' 1 4'1 APPENDIX A ��;,=SOCIATED ANSPORTATION GINEERING • ANNINO, INC, ; ', �• • • ' , ;•, • 1 .' , I ,„I.. _ _ ID , , 1 . + { • • I { S\1,��{I 1 { + I �y _��—r,. r� �w l.r I - I I t • r i'lY' • t�'�l. •"R I r ',t (, .w•i .I 11' C:' .Ir_= • .:` 1�f I rT .! 1 1. , • :II:. ,It 1�i(i •' .i• • '.. ' , , S P ~ '• F. 17 •`/. • ''•' '"."r r lf5,� S' r. ... .•i. �..; .. _•A''P \ l. /t 1 1•: /,1.1 •... ,0' I 1 ?! I. CITY OF v i� �:5. . ... �1.�_ la m...ft..., � •• _ ,...` • .' , - .a•. -- • 7 ^1 LAKE' C3WEG0 .!.',• e. la.e' d .y'' ..,. I1. 'r r .!. • • I Ri' JJ r�,, C' , I. , , • . 41• a w'7 7 1 '1,?. 1'�� 1 I 1 2-7 „w \ " ♦ � ,s )Ir • 13-9 7, • 1 I •i �! J i a•l f: .) O• R a. _1 ,• j `t '; I .. I• ; ....-_ , t 1�I ' nn' . .. �.1 )' 1 iL.,i45 : L : i :::::: I 3 ' . ,. • Vic;�1 f�; 1 I�,. .4.1.0 « ,'�3 I 1 • V•; r ',• ! _ 15,, 'I ,... ,1.;i.: r • mot` ` _ ' ' a • 0,....„),/ iYJ • uI d Y' I ., i r ��,A. r , ,,,r. I , • - 'R J I .............. . . v Z. • • 1 1: 1 . I 1 .• J. . , • • l.: ' 1 • j + • •Y , a � �,?' p , 1 ( •1. ♦` ..1ry•,1...,.. .n, h.o.�l.yY'♦l'I 1 in..'_ (+ •t'' :'•'IE.,JI.. Ii I l 1 . i (:\ t �..t \. I�, - ( 1 :A.. � a�. i �� 1'' 1 a r C • ~� ` ( «: I am! �l r `, 1 y- t - //' . —.n •. '' fl. .yr i. • ; \\�/,, ..� 25 -I J (+ fit;`• ' %+ ,1 .D- :Iz 17., 1c,. ' 1,` �*'' tl , '''YY P� 1. \� fi/1J, ` r•s• I .y -s'-.. ._ .. �' . - «I! 1 I1 th 6 It..• .rt +! t CC 'i`~I• ...�.. .7,•. i -t..w�.fr- �,r-•. t5t••' �y.�0 `c.. ^_,~r''0 'j•'t CITY OF CAKE :SWE00 �1.. t //-- _ 1 ,�., 1; , .r / -. 7 • AND n" 'yi LI•/'I • -' .�_�'i •, . ,Ylt.•:•..•1... •%, •.+. ..»."•`� . %..i et�:... •�_. , _ -..—. 1 • VICINITY lr.1' •. I 4 rI11' ... ��� .., IV .•�.. . µ 1 /, 16 1•`eAt7(1� • ' ,,, rip , ... .� ' r u I' '1� U. • • , •^ •' I9 1 ��� Truddl� A+/1 nt,tn4 Z..e,s ^'.;I I'i,p: 11 •, 1 I,' •1 ..r. •. '1 , •• ` t/ •• ,�•, < [. ` ,:1, I .""` al-• ,0i 1.1 �''' � 1 -7 .,,• • ( '. 1.• :1 u I 1A.75 I :�'s•i 1 st.1.i, t, I 1 1 I I! J •r�r.%S a::i.� ,.r-�*'� a✓��•Y«".r �0 (7.''� cj ; ' I'( ilij� - _. •` ► kts, 1. OM •�'.. I �1 I, j( 1 ."---:."-.1. • 'I, 1 1! ....t ', 9•"=i ems+ y... " / /te��I ( ri� !q 1 • sar • 4 rl p .. 1• f..•� • ,Y1 +v S11 ;d{i A. ' ' �•rt I 0 ' r • • i• p' • Y.i. .. 4•• r 1 I .. I -Y.:. '� ♦ •,`sq�1••y�;:{ �/.� '.. , ,•. �� ��I • ..• r �{{{QQQ 1 1 L______„..)1,...„�• .�a . \ '1 • • ♦ 1.•` a ` •,.7_ . f rT .c ..r r•.• t ..4$ f. /t.♦ ``u'3 • =ate•• • i i. • rl ¢�?� ,,, „ .,..1 , ..• ` \. ,1 y 1 V• %' el' 1 ,' � Gf . •`'w Y. i4 f•I,) • tl I •• II h..�u' Imo..., 0�+ �l \.. �`' i • 1'1.. r., . •�,I• ,. • .. .... 4b ..�•, • ' .' -!l I ,' 1 , . , 1 J ♦ ` tl ,1 •114.0 rl.i. i 1. . •.f '••. i, •+ A 1 .,yI' • ��f I Ir- - ..• :?•• ram. ,�, {• ,: , a 4 •= '..,•, 111, 11• I r, 1,.. ..,....iI,Iii c..., ..i., ,... ::..,....,z.I.;.. ......,..:11.71 •:.... •-11 ., ,, .;_ii___ ;Tv., ,, ,I w''',:,"1"111;;----' '1'7 l''''n " ''''4: "•'-l': 1...- 1.•• *,* ;•:, iI.V., ; ......:' ,.• •.. ,,,41; , ' :.• ,,.; ..•.1 ".,...... ""!(..:.,:l...:• 1.!._.;VI' .!1.:...:7'...!.!.".t...,r- dr.--,...----.-;0;• •••-"T• 1---. 1-1-1- --- 1121 I. =L 11.1 -‘lil I;it! :-.-1- ' ..1" 1 i'11•1i1:1,s.rift '7,,! 1.11'..t.ti'!1!.' 1:117,2 12 !qt."' ''.2.7.! -_FT i_ _ r,_ ..:...• ; • .., ......y. . 1 1,.t. 6 i .11.l , . ;6 16 ••I _.. 1.11. lot!"01 .0 11 41.. It ,. 1 .$ ( ii IT. • • .11 7 -:: % •... , • ilit • 4 1 -1111.411• .4_1 ..1.1. 1,•• ,141,.. lk - , 1 ; *S-4;I-' -* ' - .44.1 - * -(:1- I.41 1,4 Li. • 6 ,.., I Mal-- -4- -ii;IT • **,:r1,;"ii.ik 16'; ki 1.7 k6'.7 I 7 Ti.;, .1 , I I., ;1.• ts. 14.; , ... .. „., _ ., L.• sl ;.. I* -1- - -1.-• • • ; " *o I 1 1 1,11,f 1 .,., • 1 .1 ,I, : ••c. ,.. 4. t, ';. •: 16; I:.!, 1,!„. 1 Ill i I__ t E a -- a- . t;.1.-$....* -- -... ... ......L. ; ; ''''`.1• ;•j, - .. I .. I Ire 4 1 11161 4 r, I.:.1 - ,, ,..,.., 111,,„, I, I. ,. Iii .,4 I a 4 i . .1 4 1 ,I1 . 1.1 in. El I . --. , - - - .- " ' " l'. • ' -;, _ __• 11 .. 4. 411 • 17 I - - 11141111111 . 1111111111111. . • • all i i. - 4•1 -1:"471 I All 1 . 4.;--14 .- -1111, - 44.- - -41 ill 1 , 11. 11 1 6 4. AIN .1 I • • , „ 14 1 41 it 04.4.• I°4. 41:41 11 is 11 41 ii I, 1 11 it 1 • Is. , . ,.._ 1. • ;'-'" s • ' -,• - ..- 1 -Tr - --• 7 a . --,.• , . ,., ., .1 .. 1$ 1 1.$1 ls 1 1.!..1. * I '. :IA.711 I ' . t .1 :" ::: 41 I rk k• 44_ _ t I .k I .: . .. . . o.ii ::::' 116:I:, .......7-LI. IL-- __F, , 91. ...._ I .311 .1 0, il ‘I 14 1,1 it. 14 re ..,0,. , 61.kt .....el It li ra Is 11 .0.; 4 4 44 ts - .... O. li• .. • . . • I r**it*411-, •• -.. i 1*. 4 .4 r. 1 44rk i.• ... . ....e ., „ :: Os 11 la " ." ..- !.° !• t:--...- 1 I N ,.. ..4 40 . . U.:: ,..-1.....2r,rr. , : ••'• ,... . r .. .. AT . . k I, . a. .. ..'.... i i 4 11 .1 I If .1 0144,4 41 br III 11 11 2 4. I. 1 4 I al ,,I II. ... _.1 t.• . 4• ' ..- --L... • ..7,al II .4 1, • - • • • I . 1 I % ...„,r_. ....•. "".••:-: : -.._ - -. . . , . . . • • - li •I:1,1 - li -- ' - ---'i . , r 1 _I t .10: .i ;s 1 11 1 i il t,;7.• it 1 .......""_ ,L, Li 111 io 414 4.41 rk 1..1 41 II .ti,., I•I ..... .. „ „, ,, .._ .. I.'1... - ••-,-- --' ..... S.... .. ., , II II 11 •1 I. 16 41 St WI 41,11 10+11 /11 91 k, k, 9911. • 9 1. n it ti i n #. k, • . . . . ......... . ..- .... ..-..... ..... - . . , 11 1k I..ik. • 1 41..1 4. .1 ... i . It II to ... i 441 L.__wits it t”.6. ot 6-kk: *. .. . 2 ,. *i.,k.1 ik61*/ at ...tt rt. 11itt; I' •• • .* * '-- ' *4 * 144.-4 if .. . • , -- . ._ . .... .. • .1 - - t.It 111"..1.,..1.. '.! !.. • ii:11111 r", ill, '„".. t•,: _ - '1,, '„' " " '' tt-"'r 41111...t4i.". ..to .21..i!l: a 4, 1: I, . a. * !:-1-6k -k'.1 tk, kti to ,kk •1".•,• .2. ,.•'.'• ' I i 11 4 11 I 41 a al 1 17..itlitil•.•41:-I!,_..:. !.4. 1.AI,14.,414. t( I. T. n t .. •o, • - .• ilil i"; it' - 0 .., ... .. 0 .., ..... ..... . i 11 4 wiz .-. - a,I: a..... ,„ 01.,, DIA.), 11..It 9) 1.1.......1 .. 1 I 1 6. • • I 1 f ..... ... • , ,,,,,, .. ... •. al 1. 1 iii I. 12 I 14 IN ts EFL, a " „ , a, •71. If ,.t. L77•111! Nall in. ,.0 t,ci Ill " a NI I .11 1 ki 111 9.1171 Nal" /1 _ 1 .12.21'141.-!t.-..!!.,!!,1!'.'41:-. Ail': " " ' Mil It '' -4!' ._ ••, , . ..__ _.,..i. -1.- ii . .• 11 ../ -‘..,.. ... 4 Ill I. 11 In It 4. I 14°1,41141 64 444.. 14..e.il..1: 11Ift. • 1 _ ti_ II i 1 I 14 f Er113111111111111111011.1 .. - i •)41111....1.1.'4, t1 1. / 11 1/ •0 14 •..,1"1.:1 1• L.4.2...,... _IL L-T__••• al +4/ +.•., 19•1 • i _ t ti rt •I f Is.Ito sr .,1„ _..1.„,...,....,.:‘,„2_„,_ ..,Ini.., i. _iy,.!, ,13::124 . .., ! $ ,.. -I- .... ......._ ..... _...,1 : _...",..t......i.t. .,...,121=,7:- .. 1,41i...,...,L1:41:,,,r,--;771,..,t.17* . ,ii. ' i:**".*.I I rilt+,..'47 74-1.-:"-L-L, -"---7....- I- 4'II 6"iIII4.1111.1 a ,... ... . . I. ...;:•,..,,.';* ,,,,*:', .:,; _ - -,- , --,.. ....$ !I .. 11 I. 11 11 It 10 .;'.4•11hs -1-4-14.1.114iT ii..4 6.,..6 DI,: . . • 'II M7-1-_,_ ..1_,..k- =. - - t4' 4o,' . , . . . 6 14 I 1 40 I, il ::1: 1 ..... p. 11 1411.. . 91 1.. li 11 11 • 1... ' . i $* i* 111%47 ...14t .k. ..,... '''' . ‘ -1 --14 . t ..-... ...... ..«... ...n nn ... .. .. . _. .. .I .,,., . . . . . . 1. i to i I .....i...41 1... Fl 111 1... '''' k k ,. .... M, t _r___ , _ _ _. . _ ,_ !L NI 41 11 11..• I. 44. - - - -44-4 - 4.--11 lal f li -11 kk. 4 l'.,,..y..• ,.„ 1 t .S1'.`.!t!S.' ...t:t °• °. nt. s.'1- - 11117 kt 'it' rt-ii 4"; it kk 1.112:eLl /.4.11.1., , ..1 1.I 11..1.4 11 • .... ;7 as 1 • -I. - - 'I-, ,..-I I--r,- --iii -,, , -- :- II.: -1 "". 1 NI ..... • .._ :tr.' • • , ii-;z al I it I I. IS li li it I it .11 19,11. n 11 _.91.. 11 (1.it.1 .1 1 1 11 a t 1 pi . - ii - -I-•' - - - ' ' 4, . -.... . ..... , . ". !II•' .'. ' . . • .. ,,- . . --- . III 1. II I t 4. 14 _ .1 11 al* WWI Imo to 1.1 I% 16 A li r. ;,-1- i 9 11 9 ,.. */k 1 •-1-1,,trii-2-• , i '„",,,, ' :i 4 . 6 . . _....... 1 Ls .;_ .,,....n:_... _ ''',,, . ,• .. cli 7. .1 1 "- li s 7 -7.;pi it At••6 it *6 4 k II 11 t .1.-.- . , , . ' I . ,..., I.... ..........--......................-. . . ... .. ... ., ii, '.. '''''' “s . ''.... 4.' ''' '. ''.- Nu----r-" - -, ri _L__ __ , _._ __ _ __ _ _ L. , . , „ , 1 ,;...17 - ii ifii.ii.iii ii.ok 10;L.,. 1. _, __.I I, "1".Ili I if *I _... ... ,.. . ...... .. ._... _... _.. RA , .. .. iliiI i'••••II 341.!••...Y1t..10•-1.2.1.4_. . , . . ''. -.". '*. -' ---r-' -: --- s - ' . - , r • . ' ..* .. ..• ..• .., ' .' • a., .: 1'".” 1' ''-.4 ' ''. ' .' . r , . . , _t.i.. .. . ,. . _pt .... _ ,... __ 1.. .,._..__1..1,_ _ ._ _ . ....._ _ - - - i -41.p.-. ...-1.-...,... ..,,,.1", t; .-- .517i-i h; r '`-- -- - " l' 4 t 1 -. - , _. . .. . - .. - . . - -r-I - -1- -- -- _... .1., . . .i. II_ - . .1 . - ... ,i . . , . .L10....•••••romi...............t.,......, ,. _ ,,, _ . ., _,.._.._ . _ „ .., _ I, _,..I a 1...1.-.- ......, .,- ++ +,- • - . - / ` t,,, C.......,,. 91...11.4+4... •.- ' . + 1 1 ''' • '" 7- -7 '' 7 ::•-'4 -_-_ --- i' I*,-1: :7_ i_i-, -: 41 ----. ,....: ":::': --.. ---.- il .--: .:1_____„_,-. 17- i 't116,:1.1'4 e.0kca at-t ll 6 . . , " ."- -(11V.,...,..-,....-......-.--. ,. 1.1 PUTTIll I , Z ,. ._... . . • • -. •• •- . . • . - ....: . . . 4. , ,. - . ,.,„ • • ? . 4 4.;A h' • • * I. . ; . • . ' I- , i*., ; . . " ' ,* ,' *44 ' ' • , • * * • • '' •1; a . ' i ,• • 4 . * ,4* ; • •. ;. ., , *• ., • . ' * * , • S. • ' : * K, ... } • • �•: .c: aY < • tt� • • • PP t t l f ry^ ' r G V h A»5. • ENDI. 0 b s• -tCLAY= 1 r. • sear NU A IP �:+ `W` TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY DIAGRAM t • :; r Location ___QGro/V S �'�;e,�y �' Klee, bt/�t NORTH POINT I j PedestriansDay W EE'.t'42,1,//d u. Dais s�z l tL• v from V.'3'c+PM.to .5—.1./0 PM,` 4t ... Duration,.... haun. . ., , ... .., .:._ . . , .... „... ,:„ „. . . . , ._ V Peak Hour Starts y.'�o ,0M, Cm ti 111111 .ter . &,z� ) o " Peak hr ry • \ . . , ..,..,....'.,..'....,..?....--,.....,..,.,,,,.:',,...•... zloo ) O w • ` 9 • • a. le • y a \1 , 1 C'tQ ROAD CONDITIONS: r V•4+. counted by�._ ❑ Dry . i-. t� 1 n 0 Wet P•d. counted by ` 'gyp V 1..7 0 Other S WEATHER: 4:1 Su oriasd by, ,r CD v, CI deer .n Os grammed by_._.�.. pe e ` e� ® Reining ..._v ❑ Pop or Mist IPedestrians 0 Other REMARKS -. 4/4 D'T) . r n ;* IATe;Q 1 r • • SAIINKO a ',•..` TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT % . �� SUMMARY DIAGRAM � 1,Rt..- Location cJ 4 y / E ge.--E' 1 , NORTH POINT { Pedestrians Day A+,'E- _= ,'; 3 ` Date / 9 B2. • 1 ° ` t , ‘14 from M.to M. tiiit N1 Duration hours. ey. r Peak Hour Starts M, r \\*.'"..... • . HW 2/7 N 11r� h',C'U SE1---- . ``----i ;> — , 12G ' Peak lit „?/,ti,U --- •;,? �,�e-p Peak hr /r ) /s..5. I w a 3y w c C 7. /49/ 23 • Lcg�© J • S. x Ii • /2 2 ( d N as `\ (v ROAD CONDITIONS: k"eh, counted by ---r -7-- 0 Dr, 1 —" D Wet N lb1 O Slippery ?'wd. counted by N. 0 other • . O WEATHER: Mnlmorizod by .Y N 0 dear • 4 0 Raining ' Diagrammed by a in Fog or Mist 0 Othet Pedestrians � e I T.EMARKS 6 1 ` •° i1 1 . , [''"'"'"""""""""n".""""'"'"''.•"'"'"'"""'"'" "'"• •••••''"'•...""m"......... ....s.4444,4( •011101.111111•MOMMIIV , • M. • '- w d rap • ATOM I �,�+ ..Mwtiw,nw F ^ TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT Q . ., SUMMARY DIAGRAM Location llCRuse t A y E t?-'#14it4.4.4/ P NORTH POINT I Pedeatrions Day Week PA y * s •1 ,ts. b Data / 7$2 It<< from 0/0'3°PM,to 5-.'a7o P M. Ilk le) p tp Duration .1. hours. j t� h �.! „,,. Peak Hour Starts 4'....'t c P M. , n a )(reuse w.oy C9,93a) I li7 (8Zao Peak hr G�p • t 5 � 9./� � ` 7L Peak hr : A 9 471 g 2'-r . • / a \ e74/40 ) N • $ Sr , 487 f a ( g;js- . `w • (9,c7d � JJy yZ ao , e pal a y, a + • Ir7''�. 14 Th. N 41 (-- . . ... \ in ti) 0 ROAD CONDITIONS: V'dh. counted by —t- - — ❑ Dry ti ❑ Wet �' ❑ Slippery N V N N ` + Ped. counted by V et t Iv" ❑ Other r"... WEATHERS Summarized by 4a N. t tvvj ❑ Gear a • • � ❑ Raining t E Diagrammed by a' �% 0 Fog or Mist 4 0 Other ideetrians f REMARKS c.AA o ) • 4 p. ; 44 P •t/. 'i b, - IATeto r •I u ATrcry f r -•rnraannroar. ti TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT '�� SUMMARY DIAGRAM 1 Location /Pi ec.4.d ri 4 44,4,44,.14•44 .1. e 45'41/4"..c-' .7 i"..",.54.e), • NORTH POINT ��`''( ' ,,.; `•. Pedestrians Day 41/6 etJ,e.6eOiRt/ r,, i 2 Date /95?.2 ,rc o • from M , .to M. \ r—] , , ', - Duration 194$1 hk' hours. Peak Hour Starts M. r' D D G . ,. a • Peak hr 3 7 J O Py. Peak hr • I M • : ,. . 2 • S r.5'7 : I a SI , • aQ. 7 f. .�:.s F4,..ey '' I ROAD CONDITIONS: � lah. counted by ❑ Dry 0 Wet a ❑ Slippery �?eetl. counted by \ ♦ ❑ Other .'�, r -7G w n WEATHER: © Clear S'iummoritsod by .0 ..' • P Mrnitrarnmed by O. ❑ Raining , ❑ Fog or Mitt Ped.atrlans e 0 Other �k +• T MARKS 17.E''/tJ.�''l,•e...dFt.,!,/ mot,- e ,,,.rJ.G,JI sr, ,n ® �. 1 • ry 4. • ; q .t... ... .. mo ✓.. :t • ,Y; A ( '1 t '+.. • I!t !/' - Arlon' F g •a • ~` TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT •• SUMMARY DIAGRAM a, Location ".,llS6 e-✓l�y✓_ A- T . .,•. of "�,x 7? , ! 1,1-1-4 0— ! • NORTH POINT r Pedestrians Day 04//, 44-'110,4144>' i { 't N Date _ _ /S' * 2 o N r r 3 e 9 a' from M.to M, , :-., ..., . 1 ' \ ‘ 1 I / 11) Q :::: /'d✓t✓ /14% hour:, Starts M 4 v Ntr) i .......,..,,...i.,,,,,'...,,,.,...,.‘,.,',.,..,,,.,.,,.,‘,....'.,,,,,, 3• Peak ter zc cj I ZS' Peak ter r. 2 Po .��� i /O ; 111 • in 0 if,' ` Veh. counted by I� N N ROAD CONDITIONS: 0 Dry , • aj 0 Wet a , q V 0 Slippery Pod. counted b 111 ❑ Other by ` r .,. .1.111•1mol`- • WEATHER; Summarized b "t• .ir Y ❑ Gear o ❑ Raffling O•:eprammed by , a O Fog or Mitt • IPedestrians 0 Other .0 :4 F,te. 44/1 7'hA ,e .0041"I.,41_AF r.,t,. 00 olu .0.v dra FE��G 1/ G ,� t r .. i.t ► • s •:.'• ,.,• .• • • . . • • . • • . . , . • ': : :." .. . • • • . ' • ' • r, • . • • • .1 • . ...• • • „• .1... . • h't!'' • • • ;. , . ' • • ' • . _ 4, . • • APPENDIX C SOCIA 4114 _ • • 0-ANSPORTATION •rj GINEERING a 4 4 . ar, • ANRaiNG, INC4 • ci- t•-• • • • • • • • • • • QP I �' �4r, ) L •fit +• (*At "iitf 1 • ' R A' et1 f ia: r a Of . I � ' A ® .011116 K ® 1) \ i .�.JLI _ ., . .. . . ., ,..,.... .. . .. A E • 8 Ir11.1. IL a ......14 ,. I' \� . 041,4'CD M11M se /. Tr I / 7"'a ' A r a I \ .w0 M :.� + 5 r + -.gli 1 0 l,'I' its ro i 0 101111 a \---------- J. 2 A a ,--_.) • i .F1 1 \ . . . w A •::: '..': • 441 Irt . 1111111111i ` A • hr. if ••► ReliallE rt ' LEGEND ' • x ^- FIGURE C - 2 0 NODE POINT ' TRAFFIC STUDY SUBAREAS 0 LINK POINT . LINK-NODE MAP • r COPYRIGHT. ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, INC. .. / ,em• 1 I 1 + • 1: PM PEAK HOUR ATTRACTED (IN) 2: COBPREHENyiVE PLAN • 3: • 4: T'33.AL LINK NUMBERS • 5: TRIPS ZONE 1,;k11 11-53 10-23 23-61 23-21 21-2222-107 22-24 21-2524-106 24-25 25-30 30-61 61-41 61-60 60-7171-105 71-70 40-41 51-54 f...' ' ' '-' 6: 495 I 332 165 165 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 114 114 66 48 7: 620 2 173 173 133 306 158 143 15 56 24 19 37 37 31 139 139 81 58 r 8: 46 3 28 28 28 2 2 46 16 9: 36 4 18 18 18 16 9 7 27 9 9 5 4 36 ti 10: WO 5 54 42 26 4 30 1�0 18 12 7 - 11: 355 6 152 152 152 152 96 56 40 • 12: 209 7 54 54 54 • r : 13: 54 8 62 54 14: 6661 810 0 632 576 323 175 160 15 56 43 30 54 100 79 514 412 297 223 36 7 • 1: PM PEAK HOUR GENERATED (OUT) • 2: COFPREIE NSIVE PLAN ; • 3: 4:TOT L LINK NUMBERS 5: IMPS ZONE 10-11 11-53 10-23 23-61 23-21 21-2222-107 22-24 21-2524-106 24-25 25-30 30-61 61-41 61-60 60-7171-105 71-70 40-41 51-54 • 6: 560 I 364 II 196 186 10 4 2 2 4 19 19 19 19 19 148 148 86 62 • 7: 330 2 125 3 116 69 I 102 86 16 33 22 6 39 39 6 55 55 32 23 • 8: 25 3 I 4 4 5 20 2 18 18 10 8 9: 20 4 9 9 9 1 I I I 14 4 10: Tti3OD 5 378 294 182 14 14 14 46 46 46 46 4 2 12 18 46 146 146 85 61 77 • 11: 335 6 213 6 213 213 26 26 26 26 26 265 50 29 21 12: 840 7 89 3 89 89 10 10 10 10 10 109 118 328 210 °,.; 13 • 14: 28k0 1178 23 917 746 25 120 102 18 38 128 112 146 161 123 745 539 572 387 18 77 BASE SYSTEM MODEL • I • 4 • ' • • I:B:KRUSE22 PM PEAK HOUR ATTRACTED (IN) �v 2: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR "AS APPROVED" 4:APPRONTOTAL LINK NUMBERS 5: TRIPS TRIPS ZONE 10-11 11-53 10-23 23-61 23-21 21-2222-107 22-24 21-2524-106 24-25 25-30 30-61 61-41 61-60 60-7171-105 71-70 40-41 51-54 G:' 6:APPROT 366 I 287 148 148 1418 148 86 62 ' r 7:APPROY 835 2 73 242 147 325 175 195 45 70 50 30 90 90 5 I$2 182 106 76 • 8:COMP P 46 3 28 28 28 ' 2 2 46 16 16 9 7 9:CObP P 36 4 18 IN 18 27 9 9 5 4 36 • 10:COM4' P 100 5 54 42 26 4 10 30 18 12 7 II:APPROY 295 6 161 161 161 161 101 60 41 a 12:CCMP P 83 6 21 21 21 21 13 8 5 13:APFRON 110 7 28 28 28 28 5 33 28 ;4:CCMP P 99 7 26 26 26 26 3 29 26 15: 16:TOTAL 1970 696 0 714 503 325 175 195 45 70 52 32 90 136 36 621 507 354 261 36 7 I:B:KRUSEII PM PEAK HOUR GENERATED (OUT) . : b; 2: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR "AS APPROVED" ' 3: 4:APPRO'(TOTAL LINK NUMBERS 5: TRIPS TRIPS ZONE I0-11 11-53 10--23 23-61 23-21 21-11 22-10722-24 21-25 24-10624-25 25-30 30-61 61-41 61-60 60-71 71-10571-70 40-41 51-54 6:APPROV 435 1 291 144 130 14 14 12 2 2 106 106 62 44 7:APPROY 480 2 175 120 60 180 108 108 0 35 10 35 5 90 90 52 38 8:C0*4P P 25 3 1 4 4 5 20 2 18 10 10 0 • 9:CONP P 20 4 9 9 9 1 1 1 1 14 4 4 2 2 18 ' • I0:CcW P 700 5 378 294 182 14 14 14 46 46 46 46 46 146 146 85 61 77 11:APPROY 412 6 293 293 293 37 37 37 37 37 366 69 4I 27 12:COMP P 50 6 23 23 23 3 3 3 3 3 29 5 3 2 • 13:APPROY 416 7 44 44 44 4 4 4 4 4 54 59 162 104 • ,4:COMP P 426 7 45 3 45 45 6 6 6 6 6 55 59 166 106 15: : . 16:TOTAL 2962 1258 3 972 786 208 136 134 10 36 113 101 102 152 117 868 556 583 392 18 77 YEAR 2000 SYSTEM MODEL 40 II i V s . 1:8:KRUSE/C2 J 2: PM PEN( HOUR TRIPS 3: TOTAL LI3: K NUMBERS P TRIPS 10-II 11-53 10-23 23-61 23-21 21-2222-107 22N24 2524_106 24-25 5: 1RIPS IN 811 11 6: 281000MP OUT 1178 0 632 576 323 175 160 25-30 30-61 61-41 61"•60 Gb-71'f1-105 71-70 40-41 51-5423 917 748 25 15 56 43 38 54 100 6: 120 102 18 38 128 79 745 412 529772 287 8:5lBTOTAL4671 112 146 161 123 745 36 7 9: 1989 23 1549 1324 348 295 33 94 171 539 572 387 IB 77 262 150 ° iO:COi+f' P ADT2Q0 261 202 1259 39000 15000 35000 35000 931 869 610 54 04• • II:COPP P PK HR r • 12: 3510 1350 3150 3150 7500 11000 12000 12000 15000 15000 13000 28000 28000 38000 675 990 1080 1080 1350 !3:/�PPR04'ED TRIPS 1350 1170 2520 2900061g0 9081 �'' I;: 2520 3420 2610 360 810 ' 1585APPR 696 0 714 15: 15 5APPR INT 12589603 325 175 195 3 972 786 208 45 70 52 32 90 16: 136 134 10 36 113 13652 367 862168 507 17:SUBTOTAL 101 102 152 354 261 36 7 .•j 18: 3989 1954 117 868 556 583 392 IB 77 19: 3 1686 1389 533 311 329 55 106 \ i 21 ; 165 133 192 288 153 1470 1063 937 653 54 21. 84 t 22: 23:ICChP P PASS 110-11 11-53 10-23 23-61 LINK NUMBERS THRU ADJ 10-11 132723-21 21-2222-107 22-24 21-2524-106 24-25 25-30 °' 24:NPPR TRIP PK 1954 1342 1342 30-61 3 1686413 957 909 930 61-41 61-60 60-7171-105 71-70 40-41 51-54 25:APPR PK HR PLUS PASS THRU 1389 533 311 329 5g 930 930 968 1261 P921261 2580 2000 306 726 R 106 165 133 288 153 1470 3296 1330 3028 273) 533 3fi 1063 937 653 �:MT A'PR PLUS PASS THRU 742 1012 IOG 54 84 1074 1063 1122 1218 1121 2731 36622 14778 33644 30344 5922 3456 8244 11244 1178 11933 I 2324 3517 2653 360 810 �• � 1811 12467 13533 12456 30556 23022 39078 29478 4000 9000 C591P YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC VOLUME PROJECTIONS 1 • V -• - . _ \. I g 11' .e.C3erTATtOPV i fr. -•eveiecro*ria• c " ""°' TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY DIAGRAM '.• :• ( t Location 1.3,44'4_, / F &Rif51 1 1 NORTH POINT Pedestrians Day ii t. liik.CAttal_,�/ I a h Date ¶4 S A FP.o v, ,w Py " 4 ar y. 6/12" •', 0 d In from M,to M. .,.. ,,:,.', ...,:' M Duration p� hours, ... \ 't / ,... 's W tO Peak Hour Starts M. — "' J. 1/45 --C\ ‘6 ..."--1 ......----Z7,4 — NI • . • •:.'... .",,..":•••:,'... •, • Peak hr 3g / V .a /a Zcz /yc+et Peak hr ..5-19 • • 674.7.55 iI 32 9;1 .,,.--+' /• c� s 213/ s$7 • I i /3 q4 MMe e n. —L- a. '..N \ Ir M t\ N 1\ / ROAD CONDITIONS: Veit. counted by --G- -7•— 0 Dry • O Wet '' L7 Slippery e CI Other Pad. counted by ,ti WEATHER: • Summarized by o m f:'] Clear • e m O Raining Diagrammed by' �' 'r D Fog or Mist ' 0 Other ., . Pedestrians REMARKS a. . . • W. • ♦ I ' 1 �' , I 1 ,, ' . '.. ` •• � a • ' J , ♦�. • • • I4 ♦. ' 1 .. .,• -• a .. .. .. . ' ... r.. .. r. ._. r ,•�. k. '. Ji, w , , , . +wrsn .1 ATION , r ;:).... "� . . ,. TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT f----------- SUMMARY DIAGRAMk2415r 1Location 1A/A y ‘ GONEs FFP.,E'Y • NORTH POINT f Pedestrians Day 4Y,. sn/.CeSir•rJ.ly .rc A Date II A.OrCOvtD eyOft 4 • 11) from M. to M• . ti Duration7c.,e � hours, '' r .0 Peek Hour Starts M. 0. 0 kgpse At.m , \O Peak h► 4 0 C Peak hr D e c IIM e If a Irr w in I p T. 1 a ti ROAD CONDITIONS: t\)? it,j I i Vohs counted by 0 Dry • 0 Wet N 0 Slippery Peels counted by i 0 Other WEATHERS ' a,mmarixed by at 1_ ❑ Clear irprammed by Qe, N 0 Raining D Fog or Mist Pede strions ❑ Other \,., I REMARKS 11 • • • •I • • 3: I. VI • -• IATRD gip^- A'rtONp '"` TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SUMMARY DIAGRAM t ,� Location ',FUSE iti,4 y ' L r Q�A9,4A) Die NORTH POINT Pedestrians Day N.4wr Lad�:'EO.iy pi pr o : s o0 Date �l��iE'ria�L�(7 tYy 4/0i.' 1� 1,. o I from M.to M. ' \ / y IN Duration Duration hours, u y6,..4 Z ooa • •R Peak Hour Starts M. s • a'6 yr 1,, Peak hr /367 t ?87 1S.s'7 -s Peok hr /O Gr 127 613, 2TS r a ± • 2.aZ c"7. /Sy.� /06 7 ' I /373 e , Zi s e I tl '--.... i 1 1 . R .AD CONDITIONS: Veil. counted by ❑ Dry + ❑ Wet • ao a) ❑ Slippery N t0 ❑ Other Ped. counted by V `tl —r , WEATHER: -E N 0 Clear Summarised by : ` ❑ Raining •• Diagrammed by o' ❑ Fog or Mist ❑ Other • L Psde'Orions J T REMARKS • r , ...• .. .. ,. ...1 1,_ ,C•.r 4 of .. 11 • t-0• ri-I-- _ Ilr ,t4"0' !' .: lt 1, •:*: F a ,, .. .. , . , )11 ,.• AA NI „ u ,.... .., . t•v • . r ......... !, .. , . , L. .,-, .. , ,:. .. . „pi* t. . ,. . . .• ,, ,. , ! . ,,,,..,.. •, . .. . . A proposal by the West Kruse Way Corridor • Neighborhood Group, to amend the Northwest Portion Land Use Element map of Clackmas • County' s Comprehensive Plan. • Neighborhood Group Members sponsoring this plan : Clifford Dobson - Laison Director Robert B. Smith Herb V. Kruse Pearl P. Kruse Melvin C. Blevin Violet M. Bolz Georgia Taska Donald P. McGreevey Arthur L. Johnson Paul J. Thiess Kenneth E. Weaver Carl H. Johnson Lee R. Gensman Obinetta Erben Howard Saucy Nick Bunick Const . Inc. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints .l. 1 • ' Plan prepared by: STEFFANOFF, - • HORNING Other participating consultants: & ASSOCIATES on N.TpuANAmt ISLAND DRINK ►raNIw.ew1 Thompson , Hall , & 0' poherty PONIIANO ONAGON OM Graphics : Don Snell CH M/Hill R. J. Frank & Associates '. 0'2. vb-SCE • ,. .�' • •rh • • • • • lad 'r t N. IF 1 i , . 1 :.. .,, ` .. . . . . . . .. ,2A t' 0 , yam: I INT UCTION Status of Amendment Application 1-2 Plan Format :a 1-3 PLANNING " y A. Land Conservation & Development Commission II-1 General Description of Intent General Notes on Methodology II-1 rk Goal Analysis II-1 • Goal #1 Citizens Involvement - ,_,__-- 11-2 Goal #3 Agricultural Lands -�"-- 11-2 Goal #4 Forest Lands 1 1-3 ., 11-4 k Goal #5,6,7 - Natural Resources & Hazards II-5 ti. Goal #8 Parks & Open Space I1-5 Goal #9 Economics ° Goal #10 Housing 11-7 Goal #11 Public Facilities I1-8 411 Goal #12 Transportation Goal #13 Energy -. II-8 II-9 Goal #14 Urbanization --•--- II-10 B. Columbia Region Association of Government' s , Regional Framework Plan 11-12 's' Introduction - Methodology ' "` • CRAG policies _ 11-1212 ° . Article I Section 2 Land Use Framework Policies Article II Section 1 Boundary Interpretation 11-12 - Map _ Article IV Section 2 Urban Development II-13 • Policies 11-14 Article IV Section 3 Appropriate Land • • Uses in Urban Areas Conclusions 11-14 II-16 C, Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan II- 17 Introduction/Format II-17 Brief Plan History 11-17 • • r r A4tjrr • ,Hama ., Page no. • 1971 County Plan Map II-18 Plan Perspective Scenario of development limits 11-19 \ '; 1974 County Plan II-20 Plan limits - - I1..21 Clackamas County Plan policies II-21 1. Public facilities - II-21 •• 2. Regional plan conformance II-21 • 3. Surrounding development pattern --' II-21 ` • ' 4. Locational criteria II-21 , • •• 5. Open space II-21 • 6. Process oriented policies & guidelines 11-21 7. Design and density standards 11-22 8. Community service laud use policies 11-22 9. Convenience commercial policies - 1I-22 y r Y- Conclusion - 11-22. .k,1 111 PLAN DESCR1 -' TNC3N 1-III }+�A. Plan Elements -• 111-2 • 4 B. Plan Capacity ---- II1-2-3 b P` :: C. Study Area Mi-.ppings I1I-4 ' •: •; YY410 -- P. SFAIES A SERIES B :CO.': ` 1. 1975 Aerial Photograph 1. Current Comprehensive Plan(s) 2. Topography 2. 1971 Clackamas Co. Plan Draft , 3. Slope Analysis 3. Comprehensive General Plan of 4. Soil Classifications Lake Oswego, 5. Trees 4. Zoning ' 6. Site influences 5. Sewer lines 6. Water lines '; ' SERIES CD 1. WEST KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR LAND USE PLAN - a proposal, by the West Kruse Way Corridor Neighborhood Group, to amend the Northwest Portion Land Use Element,t map of Clackamas County's Comprehensive Plan. la. Area of Amendment and Ownership. • ry 1 %1 C CLU 1DN ,,.. . . . IV-1 , ' REFERENCES � ' . • • ,. 0 • • A �itEqFtFANOFF • d�AJ50 IATEs A . a ' f Y a a . ,' YP, . I • • • • . . - . • , , • ,. . • . • . • .• • • • ,• • • •-• • •. • ' . . • .• .• • • • . . , r • • 6 r . • • • 4 .• • • • • • • • • • • • ' 6 ' , • I• • • ••• • • • • • • INTRODUCTION • • • . ••, • • • .. • • • 4 _ 1 - -"�• . �. '1'�1. .. ' :�.� ��. ,� '•� fit itr ' y ' •. '.�a'�• t • , ry, i1 • • • • y: , . ;A • it, . • r• rt • V. �+ a •,.'` INTRODUCTION • BACKGROUND OF STUDY • This study was commissioned in March of 1977 by over 17 separate %' property owners in the affected area. The study area is in ex- '. toss of 400 acres in size, all of which is in unincorporated, Clackamas County. The boundaries of the study area are roughly described as Interstate 5 on the west , Bonita Road on the south, ", -1 Melrose Street on the north, and Carman and Fosberg Roads on the '• `„' eastmap (see sheet Cla. attached, for precise amendment applica- tion area) . This area constitutes a logical planning unit by virtue of its entity status, size, access, topography, drainage , degree of programmed public facilities, common degree of exist- ' ing improvements and common degree of impact by the region. This study is called the WEST KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR STUDY because of the Kruse Way' s primary role in the impact , regional exposure , and land use status of this area. For an association of this many land owners to jointly fund and participate in an application to amend the Clackamas County Com- a prehensive Plan map speaks strongly for this neighborhood assoc-` ` iation s concern for the development p pattern in their area and the current plan 's lack of relevance to today' s development po- tential and status. This application directs itself to updating i a portion of the current County Northwest Portion Land Use Ele- k. ment map due to a series of dramatic development facilitating changes in the area. An updating that contemplates an ultimate • land use pattern which will be significantly less of an impact on the area than was contemplated in the original draft Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan (see sheet B2 ) of August 1971. Th • e • existing Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan (see sheet B 1 ) was adopted in Aug ust 1974 and since that time significant changes `� have occurred in this area and in the planning for the area, The existing plan map designation was the result of Lake Oswego' s in-put in the County plan adoption sequence , At that time and today,Lake Oswego' s Comprehensive General Plan (see sheet B3) designates such of the area as public and semi-public use, obviously in anti- 4ipation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints ori- ginal interest to build a university on their land in the study ,!� ® area, Since the County adopted the current Comprehensive Plan map Q governing this area, the following have occurred: 4) The Land Conservation and Development Commission and statewide planning { f goals have become a reality, ! The Columbia Region Association of Governments L• .C,D,C. 's representa- tive for this region, has identified the study area as urban on their . adopted Land Use Framework Plan (1977), r ". "`E rtnNor•F -.,� $' L i��tlCIAT�9 I. 1 y r1, ® The Kruse Wav, °kn extension of Highway 217, has become a reality (opened Feb. 1977) instead of a contested proposed roadway plan. 411 • ® The study area is annexed to the Unified Sewerage Agency jurisdiction and soon a sewer trunk will be extended into the study area. 40 The City of Lake Oswego has unsuccessfully tried to annex a significant portion of the area. ® The City of Lake Oswego has developed a planning program that appears to be in substantial agreement with this study's land use reconinenda•- • tions for the area north of the Kruse WE;y. 04. .; ® A large portion of the study area has recently changed ownership in anticipation of development. . STATUS OF AMENDMENT APPLICATION x, This neighborhood association ' s amendment application is for the • express purpose of changing a portion of the Northwost Portion Land Use Element map of the Clackamas County Comprohensive Plan � only. No change to the text , or any goal, policy or standard is a part of this application, which is only a map updating. The area involved in the map amendment application is in excess of 375 acres and the neighborhood association seeking the change is comprised of over 17 separate ownerships directly involving more than 25 individuals. The existing geographic size of this area, the integrity of this planning unit , the future potential small city capacity of the area, and the size of the group request- 410 ing this change constitutes a leglislative amendment proceeding. , 4 • A legal memorandum supporting the legislative status of this application will be submitted prior to County hearings on the amendment. OTHER DOCUMENTS The following documents are incorporated into this amendment appli- • cation by reference and were used as part of the basis of the de- velopment of this plan amendment application ; • Exhibit 1. ''Westlake; a proposed planned cannanity" by Nick Bunick Construction, Inc. & Steffanoff, Horning & Associates. Exhibit 2. "Westlake Commercial Center" by Thompson, Hall & O'Doherty. Exhibit 3. "Westlake Traffic Analysis: by CH2M/Hill Exhibit 4. "Westlake Commercial Market Analysis" by R.J. Frank & Assoc. • For a complete bibliographical reference to the materials used in this plan process, see the documents referenced above and the end of this text . it.... --- HO RNING ^� 1-2 \I V ,o PLAN FORMAT t This planning effort directlyrelates to and draws on the studies referenced in the above section. This document summarizes these and other pertinent study data as it relates to this area. Through reliance on a limited text augmented with support exhibits and mappings, this plan amendment application is designed to re- Y. fleet the logical change in the plan map due to significant chan- ges in the developable status of the area. Further, the study is designed to reflect the neighborhood association ' s understanding and desires for the area. This plan amendment application uses the following text , maps and charts to draw specific conclusions , ' substantiating this legislative Comprehensive Plan map change pro- , posal . THE PLAN AMENDMENT This neighborhood association views the current state of Land Use Planning in Oregon to be a heirarchy of established agency relation- ships. The Land Conservation and Development Commission (estab- lished after the adoption of the current Clackamas County Plan) , ., has an overview function within the Land Use Planning arena, aug- mented by 14 recently adopted statewide goals, generally applicable to this region (other goals have been adopted for shorelines, 1 .',• 0 estauries, etc. ) The Columbia Region Association of Governments 410 is the state' s representative for Land Use Planning in this region, Clackamas County, as a member of CRAG, is the local jurisdiction - • having first and last decision authority (outside the Courts) over x all land use decisions within its jurisdiction, outside of corpor- ". ate city limits. ;'.e The following three sections, ( II Planning Framework) outline LCDC, CRAG, and County Plan influences on the planning study. These sec- tions analyze this plan map amendment relative to these land use planning frameworks and the existing environmental conditions in the area and provide substantial conclusions supporting this amendment / application. • M • • • • n ration A�A70,gGIATE5 n I-3 • ' • Y•• • • • • • • • • • y.. • � r • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11. ' • Y V Y• - v t • • • • • • • i' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • m • • • • • • • • II PLANNING • . • • • FRAMEWORK • • . ti ..• . . * • • • , • ., • .• • ,., • '7 I_ x;. • • • 4. • • • • • • • • ,.' , x.: ry • • • • • .f r •• • . • 1 . M. ,,-• .: .....� • .... • • FRAMEWORKo A. ._._._...______________ LAND CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INTE NT The Land Conservation and Development Commission has adopted planning a series of statewide land use e Way Corridor Study planningp g goals. The Kruse program has been established and structured on the basis of conformance to these guidelines as well as regionally and ColumbiaCounty-wide adopted goals. The Reg ion Association of Governments has the primary responsibility for coordinating and aiding in the implementa- tion of these statewide goals in the greater politan Area. CRAG' s recently adopted land useo framework tplan By this this planning unit area as urban. act, CRAG has established that within the goal framework provided I . by L.C.D. C. , this area of the region should be urbanized with- ' in the life of the framework plan, or i. e. the urbanization of this area is consistent on the regional level with all applicable statewide goals. Local urban development patterns • are left to the decision making authority of local jurisdic- tions, operating within the same following then is an overview of thetegoal framework. The proposed degree of compliance with the State landuse p lannin plangegdment ' s framework even though CRAG has a stated cg goal with CRAG' s plan and policies constitutes compliancewith L.C.D.C. ' s parallel guidelines. 0 GENERAL NOTES ON METHODOLOGY EMPLOYED The following analysis acknowledges that the L.CYD.CY � • orient primarily to agent goals � { and region-widey planning, drafting of City, County, Comprehensive Plans, and agency adoption of implementation measures and ordinances. This recognizes that agency roles , states the existing lconditionsysiS s, and draws conclusions about the degree of conformance for this plan amendment proposal to those state goals and guidelines. In an attempt to condense this analysis material and avoid unnecessary repetition of the foregoing indexed reports, studies and plans, the reader is referred to those documents in instances where there may be specific data desired to sup- port the summary of existing conditions or the conclusions drawn . The format has been standarized for each L.C.D.C. goal topic stating: the goal Y w. ' the basic objective the pertinent conditions regarding the property, and the conclusions reg arding the conformance to the stated goals and objectives • :ret 6 A950GIAiES �r w' II-1 { ' 6 �� tY Goal #2, Land Use Planning, has been omitted since this report material is essentially only one the Countyhas part of that total process and i primary responsibility for organizing, monitoring, '`, and scheduling the planning process' s essential components. Goal Topic : #1 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Basic Objective: To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the o pportunity for c: ,.izens to be involved ir, all phases of the planning process. • Existing Conditions : This amendment application is the result of efforts of the West Kruse Way Corridor Neighborhood Groupand as such inherently meets this Bonita Meadows Neighborhood gGroup niso active vin thee . area andde be submitting a Plan to the County will tion but for County Planninginput (not as an amendment applica- tk ., p purposes) which shows a slight- ` ` , ly more intense development pattern for this boyhood than is beingypart of their neigh- } Because this sub-grouphis Bonita �i group. members of the Meadows Neighborhood Group, continuity and coordination has been built in. Additionally, the city of Lake Oswego has several citizen groups active in the area. city' s g n had process has resulted in citizen The planning groups actually ma- jor portion of the city' s inventory base for the pon-going Cityaring the ma- • wide comprehensive plan revision ' inventory was heavily relied on inr the sdevelopment s tofethisepplan- ning program, consequently becoming a part of the Land Use Ma amendment . Map This planning program, attached plans, and LCDC goal analysis are all part of citizen input into the plannin property owners and are submitted as g process by the County to eventually make appropriate part of the record for the • component of the West KruseWayCorridorilLandsUsegPla this Plan. Conclusions summarizin how this report oal soal and obectaivneal, y_si— andattachedplan accommodate This material (report , • goal analysis, o'. State citizen involvement Y ' plans) conforms to the goal since: 40 They are based, in large part, on citizen prepared inventory data. 40 The City and County have adopted an LCDC approved citizens' involvement program that solicits the input contained herein. This neighborhood group is co and documenting their input tothe extent sed of iof the attached tizens who are fmaterial • formalizing submitted for the record of fact finding by the County regarding Cbmprehensive Plan map amendment. ' ® This citizen • group has been initially involved in all phases of the • preparation of this plan amendment ® «A+ F application, fORN ►ASSOCACJA I1-2 • This citizens group has coordinated their efforts with the Bonita Meadows neighborhood association active in this area. , • , , , .,.. . .. . . . ;`. Goal Topic : #3 AGRICULTURAL LANDS ' ,, , Basic Objective : To • y �b s preserve farmland, defined as SCS Class I-IV Existing Conditions: Most of the entire planning unit is Class 1 -III soils buthe tre are several factors that influence its value as farmland including: r •. • , Oa is well within the CRAG urban service boundary. (" The area is in the USA sewer district, is progrann»Xd to be served and `, will, this winter, have a sewer trunk traverse ia' •t resolve an adjoining failing sewer system. ° OP The area on the south side of the Kruse way is in Lhe Luke Grove water district and is served with water. The water district has indicated a willingness to annex and serve the remaining area in this .planning study. 0 It is on a full freeway interchange with a recently constructed major arterial bifurcating the area for which the right of way taking is current- A ly being contested in court. 11 The area has been designated for other than agricultural uses by both the • applicable County and the City of Lake Oswe 's et Clackamas County's Current go Comprehensive Plans. Use Areas Comprehensive Plan contains a General Land° map that identifies general land uses from "urban" to "ure" and this planning unit area is designatedagricult- II Clackamas County's current Comprehensive Plan identifies h for the County, and this planning unit area is designated asihav g non-ils agricultural soils G7ackaman ® The development pressureCounty Plan ; Map IV-D, Agricultural Soils). of newly created access, sewer service, water service and general urbanization of the surrounding area have increased the land value above farm values stimulating this amendment application and purchase of a portion of the area by a developer. • GO A �' current zoning pattern that permits a degree of parcelization that is incompatable with farm use. ® A lack of agricultural productivity on this site tensive drainage systems needed to su (partly due to the ex- 3b years. pport crops) foorr more than the past ' conclusions summarizin how the t ibis goal and objective, proposed land uses accommodate • The essential intent of the state goal is to a,, drawing regional urban service boundaries,pidentifingmg the ed farmland outside that boundary, and then adopting exclusive farm zt=ning (EFU) prohibiting it suburbanizing, Due to this area' s lo- • - •• cation inside the urban se;: =' •� ,, ice boundary, Proximity to urban trans- • portation and services, Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan desig-- nation current zoning,g, parcelization, and general development pattern in the surrounding area, the farmland is 411 or achievable in this study area. goal not applicable I •t rrANc')rF f '►V;SUWAtnS I— • Goal Topic: #4 FORESTLAND • ': I Basic Objective: To conserve forestlands includin commercial timber trees that protect water resources and runoff, and treed areas that provide animal habitat . Existing Conditions: Approximately 45% of the area is covered with forests and scattered trees with exceptionally well develop- ed perimeter growth which tends to form structural edges for man of the planning units. Due to soil and water characteristics Y the number and variety of specie, and past forest history, there is '"' little commercially valued timber in the area, nimalare cot%:Iromised by surrounding urbanization and theAcurrentagraa-s ing in parts of the teed area. Recent on-site inspection bytree experts indicate disease (phytosphera) is present in one forest a . community and water and age conditions will diminish the number and quality of trees in the central part of the Planning unit in comparatively few years. Any perched water table will likely be • lowered, as the area is developed, due to the storm drain systems attendant to urban development. There is that urban development of the site can be gaood evidence to suggest positive factor in , . moting preservation of some of the treed areas. Pro- The proposed land use plan designates an open space system for the area. This system is designed to insure fragile slopes and urban wildlife corridors and protection arear thateg tall within the open spacewill This open space system wil guidelines' mf the Clackamas County .plan df go a long way toward `ested character and forest. edges in this urban are serving the for- , .� a. Conclusions summarizin how the ro osed land uses accommodate this oat and ob i cove. e The State goal of conserving forest lands implies management of , � . servethis regenerative resource and was not adopted in attempt to r - , Y�. ni (to the extent of prohibiting development of areas with e sigficant stands of trees inside urban service boundaries. The s) proposed Land Use Pattern envisions the trees as an amenityto conserved, consistent with State a- '' tion of the well defined edges asgcommunitroidentificat rtual oneele- ments with the interior trees thinned only as needed to permit roads and buildings. The thinningP t 'a • went, is viewed as Process, as a result of develop- part of the judicious management, through in- f • creasing light and air and reducing negative water conditions, to r conserve many of these trees in their role as an amenity to the developed community and area. This control of the tree cutting during development is insured by land use designations as part of this amendment application (i. e. proposedp ily designation planned multiple cam- ' +' guarantees design review an assurance not prior to construction) ; Plan map present under the existing County Comprehensive designation. • This element of the land use plan and the open space system designation clearly demonstrates this urban are land useplan conformance to this stateass goal . $ I , K1 A : 340CIAT r-Y E9 n i ,t o 1 i 4:'ik Goal To ' Pic: #5,6, 7 NATURAL RESOURCES & HAZARDS 41 Basic Objective : To conserve open space, and protect natural 'resources, and '� ' protect life and property from disasters and haz- .., ards. P'.a�ExistinT Conditions : There are no unique natural resources in the 1 A • area that can be preserved except : g . ° Major J portions of the treed areas, which will be preserved through utilizing the "open space" and "planned" designations in the proposed land use plan. This plan envisions that the structural tree edges will become elements of community identity. Major changes in topography and stream beds being development setbacks constituting preserved through greenways. (see sheet C-1, open space) Significant portion of open space (13 acres) being preserved through a proposed dedication by the developer to the County as a County park. J. There are no unique or major natural hazards on the site s k wind, soil , etc. ) nor any man made hazards (noise, electrical transmission, aircraft over flight , air pollution, hibit or constrain development beyond thenormaletc` ) that precautions pro- taken in designing an urban area in light of existing safety standards and current construction practices. iYA'a Conclusions summarizing how the propoaed land uses accommodate 41, this goal and objective. , 0, The proposed development pattern for this area is consistent with 1 these state goals since the proposed uses are within the accepted ;, limits of the applicable "hazards" and this land use (noise, air pollution, etc. ) in the neighborhood is enhancing open space characteristics Proposing to dedicate a 13 acre park to the County. ;r Creatingextensive spaceangreenway through the use of tree edges (open ,,, designation) and the newly landscaped areas as the area develops. ` Providing land use designations that require design review, :n :.: % :- .Goal Topic: #8 PARKS & OPEN SPACE (RECREATION NEEDS) Basic Objective: To satisfy the recreational needs of the citi- zens of the State and visitors. Existing Conditions : Regional and local , requirements forecast that only neighborhoiod and ecommunity ptional ark nd needs be given consideration in this area. Regional and national guidelines, as currently formulated, indicate that 15-20 acres of neighborhood g park and open space area are an optimum standard , . to accommodate the approximate 6,000-8, 000 people h may _ E .ally re. '., •'‘ • • side in this area. The City of Lake Oswegothas indicated I :J•trrt,Nor, r ---- h450GUTp9 • . " . II-5 j' f • t• a desire for a ball and field game site in the area. Additionally, a 50 acre treed portion of the "Westlake" site has 411 been reserved by the developer until Sept .t . 1977 for " purchaseas a possible park area. This has been stimulated by a local ,„: group. This Lake Oswego communitypurchase will probably be subject to the • approving the necessary bond levy to fin- :. : ' ance same. Current plans proposed by the developer of Westlake (a portion of the study area) , also reserve a 13 acre open area 0• for the public park purposes and structural tree edges constitutingragmajorrams agreen 15+ acres in community, greenway through the The proposed Kruse Way Corridor Land Use Plan recognizes and1 . • enhances this proposed Westlake greenway system with an open space designation that will add + 10-12 more acres to this over- " al system. This -' 'potentially creates a 13 acre park and 25-30 acres open space system for this study area. 0 Conclusions summarizing how the proposed land uses accommodate this goal and objective. mmodate This proposed Land. Use Plan map amendment is consistent with State open space goals since: '''')„ { i A portion of the study area has a development park space for open field offering a 13 acre caYmanity i The Land Use Plan pmvidesga 25-0tual blie ownership. 411 the optimum ope acre n greenway system which exceeds :s p pe space needs forecasted for the study area population ,� at saturation. i The 13 acre coarnunit Y park, due to its location, will act as a neighbor- , hood park facility resulting in additional public park beyond CRAG's space available guidelines. , i The developer is reserving a 50 acre area for possible City subject to cormamity consensus regarding its need rre atede to the bythe method of financing. ® The Kruse Way Corridor Land Use Plan forecast an open ace system r commensurate with the character of the existing naturalenvironnme in this urban area and the land use intensity forecasted in the plan. . . ' Goal Topic: #9 ECONOMICS Basic Objective: To diversify and improve the economy of the State. s� e, Existing Conditions : Consistent with the State' s definition of { T diversify" , referring to increasing the variety, type, a y, scale, � ro, and location of business, industrial and commercial activities, 2i: plan amendment proposes adding + 50 acres to the existing cre higher intensity use land inventory in the area. By state definition "improve" refers to providing employment, ¢'{�tANpKF � . X 40 ATEs 1;' TI-6 • i JJI v' products and services. This proposal forecasts employee oriented uses as well as a range of other community services. These office and commercial activities are in response to the immediate area's • long term human and natural resources. Further, the size of the added commercial land use area is keyed to the regional demand for land uses of this character in the area (see Exhibit 4. ) . Recent city of Lake Oswego studies forecast that if the area were • to be annexed and developed, property tax revenues from the pro- posed "Westlake" project would exceed the cost of providing ser- vices (water, sewer, schools, etc. ) to the property. Current use and tax value of the property is demanding little in T the way of public services and is not making a significant con- '! tribution to the local tax base relative to the proposed land use k,' _ x pattern. • Conclusions summarizing how the proposed land uses accommodate � this goal and objective. • ,•,. ' The proposed land use plan is consistent with this state goal since: '., i 16 It will diversify the econa:,y via a variety of higher intensity uses. (Some of which are cited above. ) ® It will improve the economy via new and expanded employment opportun- ities cited above. • ® It will enhance the financing of public facilities and services through higher property tax revenue than the cost of providing these public facilities and services. Goal Topic : #10 HOUSING Basic Objective : To provide for the housing needs of the citizens of the State. ,Y " . Existing Conditions : The essential land use pattern proposed for this area is residential(2, 960 + dwellings) with a variety of life H " styles e y (single family, duplex, and apartment) and rental/purchase price options. Regionally and loyally there has been a shortage of close-in buildable sites in recent years, causing leap-frog de- • velopment further out. This area, slope and exposure, general location, proximity to downtown Portland and Oswego, and general level of urban services make it highly desirable for residential 4 uses. Vacancy rates and inquiries for dwelling purchases and rentals . G ' in the area indicate this site can help fill an existing housing need. The residential mix proposed responds to this area's ever- ' , gy efficient location, regional access and exposure characteri- • tics, as well as a number of other planning program elements next section) . , (see ` t 1 .,r4*,,oppNNG 1/3 At ES I1-7 ofr D • .. • ' • Q Conclusions summarizing how the proposed land uses accommodate this goal and objective. Since 80% of this area is proposed to be devoted to urban housing offering a variety of life styles, this land use plan is consis- tent with the State goal of providing housing in a close-it , de- sirable proximity to the most populous City and metropolitan area in tre state. Goal Topic : #11 PUBLIC FACILITIES Basic Objective: To develop public facilities as a framework for urban and rural development. '' , . ' Existing Conditions: The entire area is : • • * Inside the urban service boundary adopted regionally by CRAG. Inside the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) sewer district, ® Served by the Durham sewage treatment plant which was sized to accommo- date the density of development proposed. • ® Progranmed for sewer and water extension through and to the property. 41 0nP half the area is served 'by the Lake Grove water district. • Served by a developed school system with more than sufficient capacity to absorb the initial students generated by the proposed development pattern. , • ® The increased tax base provided by this land use pattern will signiciant- ly aid in the incremental provision of additional facilities needed during • the area's development. v .. • Designed to provide a high standard of public park and open space through a 30 + acre greenway and 13 acre park area dedication to the County. • �' ® The tax base ratio to services planned, will be proportionately better than that afforded by the current County plan Land Use pattern, designation. Conclusions summarizing how the proposed land uses accommodate this goal and objective. The proposed Kruse Way Corridor Land Use pattern is consistent • with these state goals since, as can be seen from the above , the area is inside the urban service boundary, has adequate services , and does not require a, deviation or unwarranted extension of ser- ° � " vices that would jeopardize public facilities planning acting as ; . a framework for urban and rural development. • Goal Topic : #12 TRANSPORTATION ` , Basic Objective: To provide a safe , efficient , convenient and . economical transportation system. • Existing Conditions: This planning area is tangent to Interstate Highway 5 , and the recently built "Kruse Way" expressway bifurcates the area. Highway 1-5 at this location, has a level of service '. r • ', C to D capacity in contrast to most othr similar facilities in • Y 1 +rrt*iorr 1' 1 A 2 CIA1E8 J 11-8 • . . H U.. 1 the region which suffer from level "E" and "F" operatinglevels, ''': and is programmed to have additional lanes (3 each wa n- structed all the way into Portland. Y) con- '' On-site generated traffic has been considered in developing the land use pattern in the area (see Exhibit 3, Westlake Traffic Analysis) resultingin a program• (prior to zone change application)orespectingr the ltheoavail lied uses Analysis of Exhibit B extrapolated to the south 1part of capa- city ;, study area and in light of Bangy Road, clearly indicates theotrans- Portational capacity being respected by this proposal. The Posed plan calls for creation of a new entrance off the Krusepro- * Way, one off Carman and the cul-de-sating of Meadows in o : ' places; all toward the goal of increasing the transportation effi- ciency in the area. The proposed land use plan does not however rely on these improvements, Conclusions summarizin how the ro osed land uses accommodate gd ob,iective. ate 1thsoal an • The proposed Kruse Way Corridor Land Use with the State transportationpattern is consistent • `ry' agoals since. * This close-in area will be utilizing some of the remaining capacity of an existing high capacity transportation corridor which is already programed for additional lane construction independent of development of this area. ® The proposed land use pattern has been established in light of a curreII traffic analysis for the area. nt ® proposed land uses, prior to any zone changes, will be balanced with the specific constraints of the local into-site access limitations and other traffic flow considerations. Goal Tonic: #13 ENERGY y Basic Obrective • To conserve energy through land management con ased on sound economic and principals. .r existing Conditions ; There are no non-renewable resources offl energy (gas, oil, geo-thermal) in the area. �' `'� Renewable resources of energy • 4,;� region and development or non-development ofe typical for the _ , effect orthis area will not ' .:. jeopardize their future extraction,extraction, via retro-fit systems, could possibly solar energy through conscious manipulation of roof slopes to4' energysolar collection orientation. Land use relationship to transportation system and result ant ener- .i '' sY consumption ?s highly favorable in this area for this land pattern, due to its close-in metropolitan location on use a hie ,h cannrit�• if ilR1YVJl3 . . if . AtO 7 YI-9 Y , • transportation corridor. The all-new construction characteristics of this future development will result in better thermal insula- 41) tion than the existing surrounding developed area, resulting in lower heating consumption per dwelling. ` ' ' Conclusions summarizing how the proposed land uses accommodate this goal and objective. ..__. The proposed land use pattern is consistent with this state goal since : 1,;, ® There are no resources of energy for which future extraction would be • i' jeopardized through development of this area. ® This area's location generates an economical energy to transportation consumption relationship due to its close-in metropolitan location on a high capacity transportation corridor. \ $ The all new construction characteristic, with higher than existing de- velopment thermal insulation, will reduce space heat consumption per �' •• person or per square foot of construction. Goal Topic : #14 URBANIZATION Basic Objective : To provide an orderly and efficient tr^.nsition r from urban to rural use. Existing Conditions : The entire study area is well within the regionally (CRAG) adopted urban boundary that distinguishes urban- izable land from rural and also is impacted by: * Sewer and water services sized and located or proposed to be sized and located to serve the property. The area has been annexed into the USA sewer jurisdiction and water is available from the Lake Grove water die- urict. The south portion of the study area is in the Lake Grove water • •• district and the north half is in the process of filing a Lake Grove annexation application. r 41 A history of a portion of area having been annexed into the corporate a limits of the City of Lake Oswego. ®A surrounding existing urban development pattern including industrial, • commercial, high rise office, and various density residential develop- ments. 3 Two programmed red and green light intersections fran the new Kruse Way _ I • • expressway bifurcating the study area and for which medians and curb cuts have already been built. The area is in an urban infill location. "- •resignation on Clackamas County general land use map as urban. Conclusions summarizing how the proposed land uses accommodate this goal and objective. ' • The proposed development of this study area is consistent with state urbanization goals since it is inside the regionally adopted .,, . . . pp I -ORf+ANO FK 1 1 r� Ars II-Io L Urban service boundary, has immediately available regional access, 410 water, sewer and progr xnmed sewer service, has been previously annexed into a City, and is surrounded b velopment pattern. Y an existing urban de- ,• CONCLUSION TO L, C.D.0 D.C. GOAL ANALYSIS The foregoing analysis clearly documents the Kruse Way Corridor Land Use Plan' s conformance with statewide land use planning goals, y.' Il 'e , 410 . • . 1 •.„ 4 t 'i, c_ e. y , } ; i. 4 i ' v RFAN�ClFF + A ASWCIATE9 II-11 • ' 1�'. •. A B. COLUMBIA REGION ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL -• FRAMEWORK p • PLAN AND THE NEST KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP •f.. AMENDMENT, gI INTRODUCTION - METHODOLOGY CRAG is the regional agency which by state law is charged with the responsibility of acting as the L.C.D.C,this region. CRAG has recently undergone a largedscale r lar- ning effort ; inventorying collecting, coordinating, .. • plan- �•, , zing LCDC goals and guidelines for the region. The fairrstnaly- phase result of this process is the development of the recent- ly adopted Land Use Framework Plan. This Plan designates urban, rural and natural resource areas for this region. The Land Use Framework Plan also incorporates policies for each of this basic land use classification ral a ,; • These CRAG • the extent thntenos are detai�edeexl and lanatbroad brush in scope , to • . f. ing them to the proposed uses in the explanation pihereun relan- sideration. Thise amendment under con- sideration.therefor confine iitself tto discussingproposed Comprehensive Plan relates to: how the proposal �► I® Article 1 Section 2 (Land Use Frametwrk e ® Article II Section 1 (BoundaryInterpretation); ® Article IV Section 2 (Urbaneloerprt polin); Y f., Article IV Section 3 Pn�nt polic,:�es); � of the CRAG LAND USE (Appropriate land uses in urban areas); ELEMENT effective Feb. 5, 1977. CRAG POLICIES Article 1. Section 2, Land Use Framework Policies , ,y There are nine ro. policies listed as a) through i) to which this proposal conforms. Particular attention is given to a few of these policies which are pertinent and demonstrate the conformance of this proposal. They are as follows: �'. • policy b) This policy refers to demand for urban residential land which is one of the factors that has caused this alliance of property owners to seek this map amendment so that they may develop their lands consistent with the current values, '; access, public services as programmed and ment pattern. Founding develop-- .• '. policy d) This policy suggests that new urban development in unincorpor- ated areas should be contiguous to existing communities to en- • e courage "filling in", This proposal., as can be • attached maps, is filling in within the• urban are en The poli r e continues by including policies on cost effectiveness of policy ,t'£rrANOFF ~W� ® o • ORNN x •F R H rstiaATE4 • ' ' .� �` II-12 t ; • ' y , }r utilization of existing services, streets and utilities, all of which are the very factor., that are promoting this Ilk amendment. While the soils (see soils map attached) are technically classed in large part as agricultural lands " ( see Farmland , „� goal,L.C.D.C, discussion preceeding),the prap •- ir ` erties are well within the urban area; are impacted by the freeway, related interchange and a recently built highway aM bifurcating the study area; are in the process of having municipal sewers extended through them;avid have had the yu • surrounding development pattern negativ^ly alter drainage for agricultural pursuits in the study area. Most of the • parcels are also too smell to be considered an economical ri farming unit. Article II .Section 1 . sub para a) Type I boundaries. The proposal is well within the Type I boundary being about 2•i .• ., north of the boundary on CRAG' s map. (See following map. ) 1 ' 1 "� r u//I u STUDY ,) II :U oh+ 1UY r - alAREA Pl ,•,. ., „. ; , „ i ....I I..04,... ... jt, . f NJ --- rr N r . .,.- ."fir A if .r • L_, -•7 __ ' •• ,''` AYE .. 1 ti 7hal�t r1; of �o� '> x> _ �v y i 1Uala ! �I� t� ��• 1;4_1, ° i'Clad on' , tg L, ifir rt, --ilk% ° / I ' ... h ypoH.5 .:. .•i d a V. r�WAslC00 °J ;: D �i, cc „Ew gib_ aTCN p STUD'd1F, i ,t . �._ / far Cit elfr AwyeYATtoN � , RA / r a., \ tt I `, COLUMBIA REGION ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 1 +•�',�' 0 Scala. � , U URBAN AREA ,� mm LAND USE FRAMEWORK ELEMENT , R RURAL AREA OF THE CRAG REGIONAL PLAN "MIL ES LAND USE �� _� MINDS) TYPE I TYPE 2 " SPECIFIED GENERALIZED ' FRAMEWORK MAP BOUNDARY smenemss URBAN GROWTH • ® BOUNDARY . EktMOO 4: INO %, a +sSaClAtg$ �" II-13 Y ,, • e . Y Mn ' 1t. • ' /, ,� Article IV Section 2. Urban Development Policies. Sub-paragraph a) essentially relates to utilizing public facilities efficiently and utilizing existing facilities before constructing new ones. The sewer plant, as an example, that serves this site was built to a capacity that anticipated this general intensity of uses , regardless of mix, and the sewer trunks programmed in , the area continue that capacity assumption. The development of this area also offers an opportunity to tie or loop two water district ' s lines together enhancing their service ability and `' reliability. f. Article IV Section 3. Appropriate Land Uses, Facilities & Services The two sub-paragraphs of this article cite that emeontially all • ,,; land uses are appropriate provided they are consistent with the • foregoing policies and are permitted by local Jurisdictions. This has the effect of leaving the detail of identifying and specific urban land uses to the localjurisdiction. i g Sub-paragraph b. ) and sub-paragraph b) of Article IVJSectiont2o define-Immediate Growth Area as land outside city limits which are: • • "served by water and sewer or fiscally committed to water and sewer installation by an adopted plan, contract, or administrative practice of a city or county; (the area has been annexed to the Unified Sewer , agency district and sewers are planned and financially programmed + for the area; one-half the study area is in and served by the Lake Grove Water°"District. ) or ; specifically identified by cities and counties as intended to be develop- ed for urban purposed within the immediate future." The current Clackamas • County Comprehensive Plan designates the study area as Urban within this • regional guideline. (see map - next page). \ .. • i ., . , TEFFANO�F t195p AtEB �" .+ • • ,r _ jp ° OOD'Op0 p°QC Y IlA000°r4* w1Le_►vctc OO v*Lt.cv00000•• • 0"OOD A�j( OCQpOA00p0��O' yr 0 8 0 Q�0 0 O A Q'o�'i000°O 0 o o o• _// SOOoo_doo` oo O '+ U a000,um*l 0 00 0 0 "� ° 000000°0° �•0 DAStA3CT o °0 Oo o0�oo c00000000- �" STUDY ,_�1� o �oo • aoo 00 0o aA00000ao. AREA lo5"or ,000 o° °° co o. • - -•%1 os■ica n0 000 .4yo ,�'O* • • ri Ado oa000 /" � •'• , IiMrhw.. 1':I:•:':' AO tii�'i�000. •'y at4.•�•.ti� .. .. .. rxrr Lir1 ^7 o A, •'y t 1°i��D i v.:,,, 0 0 0 0• •J1 •►- tip �.•+c.U 1,T .� 1 q u 3 I r yr •I N A•• F� '440 �6,I r • •': tC•Q» e1 aroma• h1a '. fit'rr , "w� ,,,_.r ..... .................. . ... :! , oh • • � • 01 Ora - la■°:T4.n'ilt •Q•:•6�P:"- '4..... .....tt ) / 1 :! C•-p•/01. .y .OygDDpi4 .. .1:.••.: ......... . ...I:Iva: ./ Wii .. •. •::: ii: / Of "j„ EdL a. aZ,j7 c '° d,sT�9A' V ?;0 J•.a-e:••u.0 wOLT• `a,.b.......,‘ r r V 44.p: ,ems' •:, • "2•••,.••34 ` \. 9 ?D O•.' O •4.. �•O• t O' t O� o.J•ot`•I•z*to t7°,s ° ao•:u ,,..V..,bcr•v /� ,• L {/.��, • ° ,asp y..g.•. a• '12 ., .L • S� p�^,a on C ,:d.3�t, 'ea7n nu•� "'i^ivJy,.,� �✓•' �,✓',. ( • . 3••4�.A•C 6 0.,;a`,2 •J.F.•2 fif,J..1.04.,.. t.c- •17•;. NL'AOOMITIOOR /" '•�•. 1 °.:.c kr , �. e� d.:040'1T. ° " )1,,,•4 as 2 - 0��•,, .f 7 e . Su �, f, V , ,4 :'a1�:, .f• 'V `� �� 4. S 47: no r,A47 _� ' COL'1 ., +8�iurC3••, •1 •;(..•aV"- g,� V ••P•,a ':� ,13?,• h ,i L @'IQ gj5 4 r. O,•0 •UT t:"r J J,,•`,c +W I.,fLI.A 1ze.t �5 pA�► •uy0 A.s r b l"f f •t!7 •'1•,.,* •7 • f• a .wApQ0Al1� f� • • ? • . URBAN •co°o `�• u SUBURBAN 1 RURAL I:. 1L., ;AGRICULTURE `•.;..;off 1 • FOREST -A \ SUBURBAN/RURAL CENTERS K ►• 1 ..../....: N OODLAND - Hos Adopted Plan \\\\\\� �-../ • ItilATIONAL FOREST • J { 1974 Clackamas County ./ Comprehensive Plan • II-15 '.� b ' A art � •- yf 1 .• I CONCLUSION IA' The foregoing discussion and related maps attached to this prop 410 posal illustrates why the necessity of demonstrating compliance with many natural and man made environmental features and factors is mitigated due to the regional decision to include the study area as an Immediate Growth Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. • Much of the overal soils, slope, forest, sewer, water, and related facilities mappings and inventories have been compiled by CRAG and Clackamas County, at their scales, in the preparation of their plans. This obviates the need to repeat those same considerations further • within this text , however, a level of detailed analysis and inven- • tory for the study area accompanies this proposal extending that data base and reaffirming the area' s regional urban status. (See related maps attached as part of this proposal . ) This CRAG urban line acknowledges the public facilities programming and capacit- ies to a large extent and Clackamas County' s Comprfhensive Plan '' - acts as a guide for specific urban land uses within this Urban Growth Boundary. • The CRAG plan and related policies support this amendment proposed and since this is a proposed map amendment only, the sponsors are relying on Clackamas County' s documented plan policies to form the basis for the changes in the map boundaries. The County' s policies +.� acted as a program, essentially, through which the current natural �•, and man made conditions in the area were analyzed. This process of • analyzing policies in light of the existing conditions has produced • the map amendment contained herein . 0 . • 440 • A ,r1 ' H • r ' •J i1 , • 111 :c r I4 AS50 ATES 11-16 4 • • ,u • C. CIACKAMAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ' INTRODUCTION This section describes the proposed map amendment ' s relation- ship and conformance to the Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives, and intent. As stated previously, it is the application of these goals and guidelines to the existing conditions that have banded the neighborhood togeth- er to form this application for a map change in the plan. • FORMAT OF THIS SECTION The format of this section is designed to eliminate: unnecessary repetition of previously prepared material, via the referenced reports; and reiteration of the actual plan document goal by goal , objective by objective. This other material will be re-ferred to periodically however so that the reader may verify statements and assertions made herein. , • BRIEF PLAN HISTORY ` Clackamas County, prior to the current adopted plan, had a 1971 edition of their Comprehensive Plan which forecasted urban land uses for the study proposal area with considerable specificity. The ` ' following photo cop 410 y of that plan map is reproduced below . see , ?`; also section III) to demonstrate the magnitude of uses anticipated at that time in relationship to the then known influences of the Kruse Way extension of Hwy 217 and surrounding land use patterns and related public facilities. While this plan is no longer the official guide for Clackamas County it is submitted here as evi- dence of the official land use policy in the area at that time. The change from this 1971 plan to the current 1974 adopted plan f was stimulated, in large g part , by the protectionistic concern •expressed by the City of Lake Oswego, at that time, over the re- • latively intense land uses, forecasted. This may have been the result of the city feeling the proposed pattern would potentially jeopardize the City' s central business district activity. We know Y ' ` from the hearing record that annexation, sewer and the lack of Lake Oswego' s planning for the area were key issues. Unfortunate- ly, this Clackamas County map does not show the Washington County/ City of Tigard plan or development west of the freeway in the vicinity of this interchange. Any familiarity with this area at an, reveals considerable commercial and industrial development , • and has been diagrammed on the sponsor' s base maps. 21I) . The area is now annexed to U.S.A. the (see Section • S.A sewer, majority of ' � the land uses on the proposed plan reflects Lae Oswego ' s task , .: force report findings and a major portion of the study area was annexed by the City of Lake Oswego in order to Wrest land use con- trol from the County but this city initiated annexation was • 411 ii1URNWQ «�RFRr fl 1I-17 . ' , R A5,QGIATEB «' ` , . successfully reversed by the affected property owners through the courts of appeals. These changes alone necessitate this . ` application. I m __ _ IN Ira r, :I sic) ... AREA rki �\\`.� ,.,... . • ' a� •, ,, URBAN AREA Fµ���1,-r.4.', ry LAND USE `"K,�16. - 5, :. rC IA RESIDENTIAL tPlir41)-~4:-."11 jI ..:,.r, Low Delsity Q : , Or s Medium DensitLy :'.' High Density ,.I�: 0 r Residential Redevelopment t -'"' `,. 41r• . PLANNED RESIDENTIAL - I y L- Low Density i ® , ' Medium Density T''-'711.11117 "�zi , COMMERCIAL + / r . Highway Commercial / , Planned Commercial -- - `y INDUSTRIAL ' Light Industrial C ` Heavy Industrial RIN FLOOD PLAIN DM / , 1971 CLACKAMAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN #' d To give a more understanding picture of what this 1971 plan would permit as translated on the ground, the following "scenario" of development is presented in chart form. These scenario figures are based on the density limitation cited in the 1971 plan as applied to the study area (using the density averages shown below) and project probable parking areas and commercial building areas • based on current market and construction practices. (i. e. a double r loaded parking aisle with landscaping should be accomplished with about 350 sq ft of site area per car, etc. ) ® # I'ontma KF • A ASSOWATE5 11-18 y, 'I • • 410 CLACKAMAS COUNTY 1971 r COMPREHENSIVE PLAN "SCENARIO" for study area only. V Area desig. Applied Area of Area of Acres Density/ bldg. or Parking Parking on comp. plan. Develop• no. d.u. (Asphalt) . Planned Commercial 80 Ave 40% 1,393,920 2.8 cars/ 31.3 AC of site sq ft 1000 sq ft (32 ac) High Density 235 20 du/AC 4,700 du li spaces 56.6 AC Residential p7er 0 0.u. Planned Med, Density 113 10 du/AC 1,130 du l Residential spaces 13.6 AC per d.u. 428 + acres 1,695 „. TOTALS 5,830 12,680 101.5 AC • 4 :. (16,907 pop) dwellings • • • 1,393,920 sq ft comm. space (32 ac) • These figures are "benchmark" , based on Clackamas County • Comprehensive Plan policies. R • The preceeding chart can be compared with the similar chart (see Sec. III ) summarizing similar limits of development as forecasted by this proposed map amendmen . Such comparison shows that the current application would yield considerable less density than the 1971 Clackamas CountyPlan Oswe o's prior to the City of Lake g protectionist influence. This lesser density and develop- 7nent limit can be expressed in terms of percentage as follows: Cbrnnerdial ----------- 1% Less H3 density molt. fam..-8 vial shown on Kruse Way Corridor fewer high density units (i.e. 3760 units less) Med, density residential- 1% fewer medium density units (i.e. 10 units less) All residential units----49% fewer total dwelling units µ • (i.e. 2870 fever dwellings or 411 8087 fewer people) +rctAhK)k� 1 � 49SOC�AiE5 o•: I I-19 • . • .., .• • d :J .r Vie. • e . !' •9 • ' • is The 1974 Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan (current plan) The current Comprehensive Plan for the northwest portion of Clackamas County designates the study area as being inside the a . urban boundary consistent with the CRAG regional Framework Plan 'E'.`.' ;� as previously cited. (See CRAG plan discussion section. ) This plan continues by describing the area as being suitable for low density residential (5 units per acre) with about 30 acres of planned commercial immediately west and contiguous to the western ; boundary of this study area and plan amendment request . This plan Y . (1974) is considerably more conservative than its 1971 predesessor due to the City of Lake Oswego' s influence, as previously mentioned. This 1974 plan designates an approximate 30 acre commercial area in only the southeast quadrant of the 1-5 and Highway change and, as is the typical a y 217 niot YP practice of such plans, does not •' ��, • show or reference the commercial/industrial designation and de- velopment of the northwest and southwest quadrants in Tigard. ... Visualizing Visualizing this existing Tigard area development and designation .. to the Clackamas County map suggests that the only reason for the northeast quadrant ' s being omitted as commercial and the south- ' west quadrant ' s shrinking from the 1971 plan was due to Lake Oswego' s influence. Interestingly, Tigard has historically not objected to the 1971 County plan, apparently recognizing that full commercial development of all four quadrants is to the best econo- mic interest of both countys and the City of Tigard. , Additionally, Countyregional g perspective is gained through in- spection of the 1974 plan map which shows a contraction of the 410 approximate 240 acres of commercial uses to approximately 60 acres and shrinking of medium and high density residential uses ° from 600 acres to zero for the entire 30 square mile portion of ` the plan north of the I-5 freeway and west of the Willamette River. While it is recognized that a large portion of this 30 square mile area is in the corporate limits of Lake Oswego, West Linn, and some is in rural designation , these commercial and high density residential acreages are extremely conservative in light of the typical distribution of such uses normally found existing ° or designated along freeways at full interchanges in the Portland metropolitan area. This ap proximate seven square miles of urban i`' area designation outside city corporate limits in Clackamas County, is served by only 13% of the area in commercial uses and 0% for high and medium density residential used. This minimum limit can hardly be considered reasonable or realistic for this large a portion of an urban area. Commercial and high to medium density residential uses usually account for more than 10% of the various land use• distributed throughout a community or region within an urban area. This 10% would project somewhere in the neighborhood of 450 acres of combined commercial-high density residential uses in this seven square mile area. Emphasis should be placed on the fact that this interchange is "up-stream"g p-stream into the urban area from others to the south, on 1-5, that are in the urban area. The recent construction of the Kruse Way (an extension of Highway 217 east of 1-5) has now brought market interest in the east half of the interchange. �, -,". dbFk 11-20 . n , e j . .• ,.�. �" c i �. • '- ' The foregoing regional pensive Plan supportsperspective of the Clackamas County Compre- the sponsor' s proposal to increase the amount of commercial land and designate considerable high and '� :'• City residential on the Clackamas County Plan map, medium dcn� r CL,ACKAMAS COUNTY PLAN POLICIES As mentioned initially in this section, there is no need to n } reiterate the County goals and objectives individually u'., '• their application to the existing conditons in the areal have caused the applicants to seek the mapg t char a in these County goals and objectives asprogram for developinga a • land use plan for the area results in viewing them in broader, more comprehendable categories that These groupings essentiallypromote the uses suggested. • and uses. (Note that many Countyofp the ote following conclusions policies aro development standard oriented requiring landscaping in areas designated "plan- ned" etc. ) to Public facilities, .,"' roads, sewer, water, etc. - These policies shall promote higher density and more intense uses along high capacity transportation corridors that have or are progrmnned • . " vices including sewer, water, etc. The proposed study area f urban ser- has all these program criteria in its favor. °bviously i Conformance with regional plans. - The proposal is in conformance with • the regional plans since it is in the urban area and the regional goals y- ® and guidelines for such specific uses reinforce the County', policies. *Surrounding development pattern. - These policies promote a stepping down • of uses from camnercial to high density residential to medium density residential and to low density residential in a pattern that produces + 'compatible uses and locates than appropriately in conjunction with high- . ways, arterials, and natural features. This is in large , of a well designed land use plan which this application function ` ®Locational criteria. - These �''" policies promote locating the more intense uses closer to the arterials and highways via direct access and discourage commercial strip• development along highways and arterials. The sponsor's _ plan depends on the circulation pattern to generate the land uses proposed • and essentially blocks,up the commercial area at the interchange and uses , the high and medium density residential uses as a stepping down buffer to the low density residential areas removed from the arterial and highway impacts. This desig n program is consistent with the County policies. , 40 Open Space. - These policies are mostly design oriented as regards the study area in question. The land use plan proposed has utilized the policy of allowing development while preservingtopography, strea � "' steepg open space in the form of ravines, � ` � • streams and treed areas through locating boundaries between different uses along such natural elements remainin in the area. (Much of the .- . , g policies in this open space section relate to process, ^ formation, encouraganont of committee , , standards, ) gifts and planned developments, and design • Process oriented policies and ' ''"� • , are applicable to this study guidelines. - Several of the policies that ` . process oriented suggesting that large 410 a .. tiw10414BFk R 44t 'IAtES a 11-21 `t 1 w • O , . ' , tracts of undeveloped land should be developed procedures. The , through planned development development • sponsors land use plan proposes tt such areas be Planned processed, including all of the commercial and high and medium 110 density residential uses. (Also all residential developments are required to be processed as planned developments which hick of or more lots the sponsor's plan. ) was Prroo grammed into '°fir' ® Design and density standards. - Considerable portions design and density oriented. Thes P° s of the policies are to fulfill the design standards in the course of eventual proposal spesecific tacet siteieedesi and review at the time of development. ins a design analyzed and programmed The density guidelines were closely P grammed relative to the specific slopes within the study area, See the slope map compiled expressly for the study area as a developing the proposed land use Program tool to �` Community service land use map Proposal„ policies. - The County policies state that churches should be allowed in residential areas when c surrounding ' development. With this program criteria them portion o study area is shown as low density residential between the 1-5y freewaY and ..tthhe high density residential to the east, in anticipation of the Mo, mo expressed plan to eventually construct a church facility on that sit Church The commercial area to the south is buffered by a treed ravine and the existing • • residential area to the north is topographically tered below with significant tree stands tha can enhhan the sitea which ss ingl- second church location is 'Identified elsewhere in the Westlalfacility pro osalsandng. A ;' its location is logically tiers to a neighborhood developmentP and circulation system. pattern and 40 Convenience commercial. 4, convenience commercial site hasIII - f. somewhat central, in the residential beens designed in compliance with the attendant County north of the Kruse Way (Hwy 217) • y policies ,4' a) use: this as follows: area is intended to be limited in services. b) location: along a Proposed collector'internal to the developed residen- ; ;4 • tial area, c) size: only t:Jo net acres of the area will be developed convenience ,. f ✓I d) other commercial with a small park and medium density residential buffe ;, commmercial facilities: since there are no existingadjacent. shopping facilities within the one rule commercialpro- posed Convenience area it was ro policy proximity of the• ned cam�ercial proposed at thepinte�d as an extension of the plan- rtinterchange. This relationship is mutually supporting and will not overdevelop such uses or threaten existing commercial facilities which is the intent of the policy. CONCLUSION f. to foregoing section demonstrates the consistency of the sponsor's amendment proposal to the Clackamas County Plan and Policies, The current County plan , while consistent wy • th CRAG s general urban � ` • boundary designation, is .n need o; " and use categories within the .+n land to specific urban orthwest portion light of current conditions. As outlinedyio of the County in /` AG and Clackamas County policies previously, both the essentially act as a program to .1, design a more specific land use plan for this study area. lI ,sus 10 I 1-22 • • m 4. This amendment proposal is submitted by the applicants, in recog- nition of the apparent lack of commercial and high to medium den- sity residential uses forecasted in this 30 square mile northwest portion of Clackamas County (see previous section) . The amounts of land uses p pro osed in this amendment only partially fulfill the need for additional commercial and higher density residential uses in this portion of the County. Other future similar proposals are certain to emerge to help satisfy the balance of these needs. �i � ' While not the intent or purpose of this study proposal , the spon- sors could forsee future applications for additional commercial , � and higher density residential locations several miles to they south ands southeast nations n ofa thos currente proposal area. ` ,. The 1971 County Comprehensive Plan, which was the essential frame- , n work for the now adopted 1974 plan, demonstrates the viability of this proposal without the unjustified political bias imposed by adjoining jurisdictions. This political controversy has been rF- solved (via the courts) through successful unincorporation of a major j portion of the study area previously annexed. Both the 197 1 and current 1974 Comprehensive Plan°•'p. this application, which policies support categoprie ,pli in this proposes only a detailing of land use Portion of the plan map. This detailing is a direct result of objectively applying these County land use poli- cies to the specific conditions in this area. The mappings found • `�' in the following section, which are considerably larger scale than the existing County plan map, aid i nations proposed in justifying the land use desig :,:: . ' - (see Plan Description) . The existing Comprehensive • Plan map is adequate for an overal Count be used as a general Y general plan and should • guide to more specific land use plan propo- M sals. The more specific proposals (as represented bythis provide a level of detailed area analysis that study) • planning guidelines and details specific land lannii,g beyond generalo . . ) the area. Slopes, public facilities P g factors for ' ,� and other natural features are all a(existing and pra�yosed) + trees, ' is affordeda by , part of this more detailed ana- this study' s larger scale mappings and concentra- ted study area. These and other detailed factors recognized delineators by County policy. land use • e 410 • • ►ti�pC1AT. 1I-23 . • or . ., .. .. . . . ., . . A l.. ., . . ,... . .... .. .... : .,. ..., . . . .. . ...... . • .• , ..... . . ,.. . . •,. . . . " . ...,,, .. .. . . . „ . . . _ .•,. . .. .. . • .• . . . . .,. , A . • ... '., . • • . . •. •••• • •• . . .. . f : ,..•, , .. .. . . . ... . . . .. ..„, , . ` y. •\ �'(Y• .... , ..... . • • . . . . . • . .. ,. . •.. . . . . .... . ..,.. .. . . ..... . +v 1 •.4 'S . '1'1 a ' 0 •vY 9 • l 5, .. • . .. , _ . .. . .• , • i . • .. ... .. • 1 a • • • ( • •r , • >r •t • • � ;to 1d 1 C • • • • • P LAN • • • • ••G it r 1 1.' • • p E • ti:' • • • • • • • • r• r • � ((, 1. � •h ;L r t A 4 � • HI PLAN +, r The proceeding text documents the application of state, re and county wide land useregional rt clearly demonstrates that the policies to the study area. }, land use plan is an outgrowth of the Kruse Way Corridor environ- mental conditions influencing thisharea�rent planning and The Kruse Way Corridor neighborhood with a land use base from which to dvelop a plan which group provided the consultants ' �Ultimately be acceptable to all applicants as Well as ovii�,d logical and sustainable urban development existingpattern inprovias a conditions. The P light of only the foregoing plan development procogs involved not g g planning framework (see section to the area, but also included a significant level II)detailedaldd • area analysis not d(' areal, usually provided at the Comprehensive Plan planning level . The attention procwas ess soincorporated this area analysis data. to define a study area that made aClogicaln at e beginning of this study • unit, •. The degree of existing improvements, topogrn hic planning and borders, and a degree of ralization pattern, vehicular circulation g exposure and impact from the Kruse Way :4. used as a basis for definition of the study area. Once Whes all elements were identified, the study area was established thane contracts for the amendment application costs were igne and ing this study area determination, existingimprovements (houses,Follow- . roads) , topography were d all mapped (slopes) , soils, trees, and site influences and field verified for the total •+• 400 acres in the study area. The process then identified pa'•amete rs by drawing on specific market and transpl development ses (see exhibits C & D) to formulate a land use and Gent�, pattern respecting this areas tannin 1 work,atThis planning po divelframe- g process also recognized the regional frame- on the area, accounted for physical development opportunities constraints and incorporated the 1 Impact t in ands an integral area's paxceli�ation part of the planningpatternu as area' s parcelization Process. In fact , because of the .0 pattern, topographic and vegetation charact- ei•istics, the location of the U. S.A. trey of industrially zoned land iiathiswer and the existing :,' area (S,E, of + 1 inven- real land use Tualatinwere eliminated, 00 acres) theeu prospectsant Portland of an Indust- ' the area; as being economically deleterious to 30 acres The current Count The with + Y plan designates that this study area could de- of the planned commercial and + 400 acres of �: single family low density, " The single family classification mitt (with sewer, � � • •, water, roads etc . ) up to 5 dwellingper That translates into 7, 000 s ft , units per pattern as is currently�foundoin 'anycu is as urbano a the region. Consistent with this land use plan (the part of west element ) , 'any urban 1974 north- ', . 411 . I tErrpNoPP El] the County on its General Land Use Areas map also A.kTROCIATE9 • r 6 tl i. designates this area as being urban. Whether this urbanization v' ; takes pine:- under the current plan (which lacks the environmental controls that are part of this application' s land use plan ) or with the benefit of a recognition of the changes in the area and a sensitivity to the future development a central issue of this amendment .P pattern for the area is •1 � PLAN ELEMENTS The proposed land use element map amendment involves the transfer of 188+acres of designated low density residential to planned residential low density. It also requests 112+acres of planned residential medium density and 45+ acres of high density residen- tial land. The current county land use plan contemplates 30-35 +acres of planned commercial on the south side of Kruse Way, both sides of Bangy Rd. , this application increases that planned Y' commercial area by about 50 + acres. A 3+ acre area of neighborhood commercial is contemplated north of Kruse Way and is a part this map amendment application. The plan also incorporates aof guide to providing an open space system for the area which spec: - fically addresses key environmental areas. while this plan re- ' presents an increase in intensity for the area, it also provides ' for an increase in sensitivity to the land and neighborhood de- • velopment process. This rise in the intensity of land use is part dictatedof bystudy the planning and environmental conditions in the area, further it is conservative in light of recent plans for the area contemplating more significant urban development levzls (i.e. t see Bonita Meadows Neighborhood Plan and current Lake Oswego efforts indicate industrial use to one degree or another, on the south area. ) These "other" this plan, but when viewed in light of athea1971oplanfandethisr application, add a dimension to the conservative yet appropriate level of urbanization contemplated by this ammendment application. Further, this plan updates the County' s land use control in the • area by providing for design review functions and standards over and above that which presently exists by virtue of the existing County plan map. <,.. • PROPOSED PLAN MAP CAPACITY The following "scenario" chart summarizes the resultant land use development efforts of the Kruse Way Corridor Comprehensive Plan map change proposal. Note that due to the existing. • •. Preliminary �: development plan for "Westlake" , there Would be 625 fewer dwell- ings in the area than would be permitted under the designations proposed in this amendment , This developer prepared relim• ' plan capacity has the effect of reducing the total dwellingsnary -, Identified below by those 625 fewer units lation than shown ) , The chart (i' e' 1890± less popu- below identifies absolute maximum • saturation without the mitigating effect of the specific ' • inary plan referenced above, prelim- . • III-2 r S A550pATEs • • a ' . KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR PLAN AMENDMENT "SCENARIO" for study area only. 411 Area Designation Applied Density/ Area of on proposed plan Acres Development bldg. or Parking Area of 4 no. d.u. Parking Planned coawrcial + 77 ave. 40% 1,341,648 2.8 includes 27 ac of sq ft of site3a.re Planned coma. shown cars/ acres on 1974 Clack. Co. (30,8ac) 1000 sq ft Cbnp. Plan 3,754 Neighborhood + 3 ave. 30% 40,000 sq 2,0 cars/ of site ft 1,000 sqft 80 .7 ac High density + 45 20 du ac / 900 du li spaces/ 10.8 ac (2.9/unit) du i 1,350 i « ^f Planned med. density + 112 10 du/ac 1,120 du 1 residential -' '� ��s/ (2.9/unit)/ ) du 13.5ac 5,858 1,680 Planned 7 � residential + 188 5 du/ac 940 du _� , how density — • (3,16/unit) V 1.�•w l +L .. • + 428 ac 2,960* 6,864 55,16 dwellings (8.820 pop) 1,381,648 sq ft of planned commercial ( ° space j *accounting for the proposed "Westlake" plan, this dwelling unit total would be reduced by 13 acres of church use; 13 acres of park use; an R-10 single family density; a 7 DU/A medium family density; and a 16 DU/A high density. . This would reduce the total units by r • 1 360 single family 210 medium density units , 55 high density units 625 fewer 2,960 - 625 = 2,335 x pop, factors= 6770 + total pop, in study area. ).i e. . ., : .. • ......._ • , ."Ir.sraiP0 t ASSOCIATES II1-3 . 1 } 0 C. STUDY AREA MAPPINGS The following 14 sheets, of drawivgs were initially v' 1" = 200; scale as part of the development of theKrusearedWay at S t • Corridor Land Use Plan. They have subsequently been reduced to 1" = 400' ( for which copies are available) and again reduced into• this Si" x 11" format . These detailed mappings and area analysis sheets provide an upto date resource base for the study area. The "cultural" type base map, showing improvements and topography as • ^well as lot lines, was specially designed for the study and accurately depicts the existing conditions in the area. The level of analysis provided by the detail and character of the following mappings': goes beyond that normally associated with Com- prehensive Plan analysis and development. These mappings result in a higher standard of analysis for the resultant proposed Kruse Way Corridor Plan map amendment than was used in formulating the current jurisdictional plans for this area. , A • • r • r • • •Y • • • y 1. I, 0 tKtANtSfF . A...4,ct)UAt@8 . III-4 % • • dyi .1. INS' .:• rAl `' �r a► y' r' �" . F + •. ` ' •,wMAt .•� �rfpl�ti•r �Q `R`w -M r'^, "" ~`r". /5 r• `� �.9 'r', two.J�'i%� ,�- _ j�. al�+'+ r.� tr: u 11 • 1 Trtg tits/ . I , • Air 1 + w • -. !• ` �L .4 . 4.. ` t• . �'\ 'I;�� 'p k 4,,t.. ...4.. .• • 6'' �+, .I , ,~ � �or b 1 —• .. .-., ?r" to 1l9 I+ '^� y: �y�, 'ri, •,.x .:- dt ►i• .*-t• �'i- �• - n " ..•"+: r'1� • Aw*..}. -i �`!',. %�.y,,�!", '.'('` �3'.1'�'+` �13 _1►T‘�1',•J,•r i s _r ` _..'. ,NIA ..._.• ..1 44 •t •� ,''A,,♦Wf^,j .fl!,H•..• "�, i S' •.,• .41 ,t� M. • +I "T •1•'""� .c. ,? .fAl�N 1 ~::*.:•• •• • w+ Iir!' .t 'k. 1:64! „..i -• -).J.... n. +► �r"bn � r. S+. •" 1•'�'1(��•j� �i� _`uv'•t~ +,£•IWi^rT;.'�5 xj�JS L=� .,�ti �' ��}l j'•'I ftt,! •P,j• . F• q /• K ,,.'. w. ..r.r• V f •'l• " 1�1 1• Rt Ji0 : '�i,• S, S-1•i .5+� r �'s -`q• rC: �a / - ••..•nl 0.1 r. I !t I I, M + ... , h ,7. ,r- l., 1r ..r Y1N i•1^ 4H attr 0j r »•''b 1° T'' _0 I �� 4 ti.., 1'•.V^+•b�-�••.* r y.sssr cfy,�l p;, r+.,f .. `r. �. , 1I,f 1 d im r y2l. A ) c1r 1��a1""11 S e r «^ .. ell IN 4��I fI. 1'� .+. y< t iY r rTi ,.,r.,� >a ;St,.. , .,-y v •7 ; ►�• - ill �t t • 4-' 1 4•wk'7` �,•1 e� •`;7,tks r.i,+'°` y1t'�y 1;.. 1�h�}" yz"` /Jfr.•.Ssi~ 1.r .'Ih KIC G' 1.' •I'S:7�: l 11"'�-'-» 0,, ��` „•„ v -N" ,.-7 •, •9!a"'1.!�';;41,15,,u, a 'F.<.,i:... y"r" 4, •;e''tir"".h3 1Ir! ti°-�;, f,,.- ,,ii� ,�,y t .y4.d +.,, r '�,�„'`1`s 1`� +?..,,wl�' r ea'.f�q.6faJ,.y�.,:, �N••N.•�r+�s'�1f,� flf�I�Ir�:.f�f.,"a+ , ' A ZI .u'''�•i•,;,„ `�+,C'ti 1 ;.rrJ' 1:Z c:.'4:.'4 ^1:t,.. 4. r 4.':4 1�v, , •.. �� r: �1�i1.111Iae;tlwllgrJk ir • 13 � J"+ '• ..ty, e 1 f •Y, ' :trIi� ; ..up, « r `A•1�+� ,R '.!�• " I :.:.:•...it � ♦.+ J pN ,� . � f`� w r ^ .i.. e r I. r .. !it „ o y ` �t' .Aypi' y ,, , 1CM ar •q.A-' •� '.y >< '+1,11rzJ e �` •.+t• , i ^wr�* +.w� ti M. 11aj{r .1t .r..14t �•, �: A„r-.t tr. r. I. tJ ..Atw4.. »7,♦ •!•P Y4 : • S1 r ya .►q v1�rO, ,Kr.� •r 1 f l• -,. ilt .e , , ,�1 p�•�y a qdkieil +'rq",-.t`yC Y11. ''.:?'...,,1 , . .t .1 • v .1. '� .. , S, ; - IY11 ;..,.�..-.w. ,�;,� ,w T., �,� ', ;,',„ 4 ;,,YI d''� •Y?+I,iy;�''„j1 1 '7'a .,M W i 4P 1r dam'• W '•4 .:.T� . . t,. .'. "t '. .«• • �r.„ �� "'t •1 +: ,�i:�,�J -` -1.., ,.I r• ♦ y4.. C: ti ♦�y•. . . M p•.f 114•Z 7.:J•1 ,: r �... -4 t . j. •4 arl 1 ,- ,1„t'"' 1 rtit•.,a.r},. 1 d •:rr.s; "a6.l': 11 iY"` t �, r a. -.SJ�,,.. t e 11 f. r .''..s•';t1 +,., Fri.+#a' t •,' i,r •55Y,�•�'':• fi+7,. %+ .'1 7 •.•..•la, . �r+ M� ., d F.,.,, i •�,' A ",d,.+�`' V� ,;y��,..+r �{ ,.-1, � a r., i �.r fw.S~� t!. .,. yyi••r�r�rf� n ti1 ;Taw.,�� � K;/ ! r•.'v,C''$+., y,v _ 1 r ,. r, r p,' ' ..R`b L ,i...,,, ,,, -1..�. . 1 ' ,;•4 ) f ,.C., c sb'�.ti 11 .r Ir N �11 V r rtl'r fi , ?+ • i r' 'fit f -K .♦ ( -' c d1�y'1 I l7,♦�� r, rt �,-. r� ,,, �. + :' 4r. , i'A 14N,. �. , ' eM. .. +w�, Q �.rt _� .;, 3 �'•s F (� T"ti• .y1 ,.1..,, •+,y �.i .♦ .fin -t. ' .�.• • w..:t -- Ty+•w . a'_', ,..•may 1r }`! i t, f�, .,, ,�:`ft {4'Rt•�y 1....,..,a+F .. 'M"'•t + ♦f ,i lna�,rrMr .r�M'++11•k`+I'M�•1} ,'t1.. n a�'r . „--». t :i. ; v 1tv..l 1 f 4 yr •, x.,. .r �'.•,. �.� I���•t t f` �• /N '_I�,•r' , 'rp hf. +tl�,I v, C• r/ a••e•.+!a+, Y • c�1 ',a.r�...• �. a .' 1 ?�"",,4t•, p r`'�rd'•1 ;1•9 ,1' , 4.1C 6A V}r N. Al,3 iy,r rr.'a-1, ,-'. '3T I M1hi�,y wr,,,4e1.V;S 1. ,-1. i34/m,,w�♦,,,,•.,,,,,'**, /�, r is,„.. * , kt ,'�� 1 7: Ii .• •. ;rt ',.1 j A 4 t., •9164. t,'Y i9 , 4 •)+,,.r •r4" i+�u,._l , +1 ,"t' N f'!` 4. ,.,•, h) ,'1.• A Q. I. :J +I1 '.) + , ..+F;,••w r•. �W�7• !1 .r I e"'_" �*• • t_ !1+�.. •� f flM H ISM" +4 �� ., h t r1 1,, •f'},'^,.MIl' , �( �_ S'�"C" ' r��Il •'�", •'f�}}i' �" y �/ ..S...: t b ' ,th f, 7 y µ� . a 1 mrc ems.. � • , 11.w«+• � 1w ..t•'+/ -1 -':�' , `f. 1, � L, .• '�.1��,'.�♦y,I,Xf J,4`lts , ..1 ,.,1i ,, f J J, . w ; ,+. :. / rp!`kM'1��is +, .x ' ''-,..ri,; «4,,., , „to, ,•Si•••••-1,,,,,c,-i�', ,v,•. tr.i1�i'�r' ^+ • YI'•�• %.�. .ti.."IrS'"IiWr�f� I /�.as ' * ; yr.*, r. + °+fit.4V1 4• ,A `''4''^1W�^a,,•ti? K .1T 7113 e4 '.'1 ''1 4. 'd tr,ytH ►. + .w.' =.M'`2'*}...i: 1 ,. ... ..M .1. dr ,, ,nl i A,Yt.f wa.!A jj 'S u h+� , '"'"�+i; a' t ^.n. 1 t �' , • yam.•.,_,N.^,"`.'✓12i,.c: ...f ,J•�` =4.5.v.,it ~..+ Civ,.,„• MILLS. A • ••�. ., t4,4411 •• '•+ •Al r. ...,•r. .'•N _�1.r.d1 • ,,..o.t f,,Y,,.a. + .,,- ,l .-' 'r. 1f1,+ u,r .. .,� /.+1t{. •Ar" • •'�= ...4 `....u�Z1�,t+1 JS,S,rJ�.y i•,\i 1 ,W . •,,,,y� 4 r ylr•� ir+ Y':. ? >; . p I.,d G 1wr?�d �t.1� Sit. I , �' .r.� i '�'•�',X�t.. 1' ♦w Wi..,'1:1..a ,t y+'i`•,��"i�•i!��51'y��Y `a •'l�y+ ,.,ltik e*i ,l�.Cf,•:i,`rl., �°" '+;.t,• �4,'• d "°°' n° 1975 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH • NOIIdN ......L� •• WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFF! HORNING & ASSOCIATES CORRIDOR STUDY 4 9 N t°AUNAWk OilANt) UNIVB 1•11tlNt :14.1'41+ 1• II I.ANTI Ilt,.C.N ,';•• Al wk AUGUST 1977 c Y N, Lt W j 11;5 r ' y a jti ::41R�1+ ;e7q P'N'0 •r n •�l'e �'? `� Y '� 1 <- y' �y1AT,9 tY'V +S,t1 r P . 41i - • ti_ �\ a ! •." r t ,+ .',J . 4''++y�� "fir.. !N ' N. r� \ !a �, I ,M `' (/] I, ] ate` �.` 4\\ NS .i \ :, , Tçp 1 d,` .'.++` w`\WTI .,,` ,. ' \\-----....,<.) \4. .-.:. .'.1,-,,,‘,,.,, iiT,, ''\ \ ---- N"N„ '`I --- --) --:4*-- -',,-„,,,‹ .-------- --\\\ N.._.,‘\-- .\:.k.,:''''''••N-'.''‘s • 7.7 / p y� \ \� t ti \ w� ~~ \• W. �', !� Li it ,.�--�__��` �\ ' • tL ` vat I _ sd i i�13 e ,..`Z r ` �t ,, 4 a 1. • • • o • TOPOGRAPHY yt • + oor ya . 10'CCNTOURS • • SOOM7ts LAMA,OSWEoQ-oELtA/ORR 1064 • • 1 ? n l • • n- `v wWEST KRUSE WAY ! STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES .___.__- F� • 1•CORRIDOR STUDY • Ibo N TotAANAW,t IitLaNb t7nly[ tv01H 10•4ee1 ronilANo oR[ooN oiaN • • • mug AUC3119'p fW7 ``e d ••' o a �• .1 ., `y. a n 1 I/r.�. .. ... .r ,'tl ... r > �' 9.•r >, .. r�S'`., .. j yA rr' ,t 3 0 * ,L, Y 13 r °jr ; VI u�� e a - p4gr.:p QQs�yyyypppp "� ""':_ f 1••r, �'c�_ x ti.�l J . q•!9 LS9p .f " J .b".j�• ...b, V —"4L"'"VQ8 ��� » • illl� J -iC a 6 0•n » "" f' v- i`- A .r ♦1/4i - `'• 4r Qq qQ. '>� • r ':f ~ ♦i.. 0 •_ ♦ r. ^t,.��, '.. "`_� •-.�..j..yr.. ���p' �}pyy •'ate„ o' -� , )i ,wy./T4 • r. ... ,. 2 •T. b o , it I >,ra ,{� rb ,eI '. • I(>1 - --. .,. .012.I'4)4f, ' ... .- I;I C5.1 ',?4•,y i -, it I •• _.. '`'. 3 '6 :::t .f-T' 1. a s�//// 'Z'��', .-..d "C( r ' TO ,r t• t�l 1 v♦ ` _ M f y 11� � 1 //s, p u CI t ti ..- .r "�- .. 1 ;,Irl1.In i';:r ,p,� :110+ 'I ' LSO:°,,, »SZ 4-�� 7,,-_.y +tl' •,' ,..,. �� .r.4?' a �:•• w�t r�',�- '+� 1S,Y v +,�tr_ '.' ��` r �; .. r .. . i _%,':...-.2.•, ma=l1 —}_:4/�S•�! ;�v ts, t ii.',• i?l=:r,�1:?`;'1 —'� •...�`v✓ � ET 2,: kw p 'i +;_ , Ira. try , ‘�I(IjXr/ ,.. •- j i- 4I 1 Ir iur \ tom• �,!%' 1 tia,' - r F- °r�.;1 yr =--- r 6 ,‘,k.:0)?....,:':;1..... *. fir 1 7 C�,SG q �,.-.-ru `^r�` y / I 4:, �.� f G -�OZS O W.V. �.V O rlMr"'•'•'y',.,../' .,M.., I r .(�n J . SLOPE ANALYSIS 0' coo' 2 • . , , . . . •. V. ... .. r-J 0-8% 110,Z.T11 0-12% Itt' ` P.77. 12-20% ,'. ,IIIii'i'}la 20%t• • le WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES s • CC)RRIDOR STUDY .lyr " 900 N TOMANAVM ISLAND WWI PHONE?67.61sI 6pNTLAHO OI.[OOH 1179 A 3 t'� •. V . • • P y! , a.P as = till ?ra .KI .'Y7,,, x /1��•._,p; ; , ,. , ii—l--1:- ,....,‘ 1 r Q �gSs$l Xr; +a y .:;:__I. • � -r 4 .I a o 'm 1 "lll$ec.R k , ,'�7pQ"F -Y'--"' ' "4c+i q" • Y 'j 72V- - 4,. ` �._.WLLYL T•Y\—I .. r' I..,�, �`.try ,IKTiC]v• r 1147 A.=, '' ,1 \\ �( ( iJ t '•'1 - . ♦ y, w •+� i ;N" 1 11 ' 411.7" ^" 1•,.. • • \Air tili . ,, ' ' - 4 •••••.. -• .. ,.,\ '""A''—'71:1:18131:4)2"1. I.r'' `' , • ;� two �. 12A aT 162C �-i P gMA '''''-.: ' Aii gag& . ___ _ - — 1 s s eli 1 _ t silt`„ 1 a-- _`.::-....) 111.11raki- ' 0.... ---3.ti__, , 'a-vo ; '- ` "sue ��5= '.rr I . ,+` _ • 1 /�./., :�''>..�p'r" e/� 47A .'. _. .n. i.• 1 , - i zr." y- _Kijtr 1../;•I ^r1Y► Cur"_"` � ni - 'i.. Ca �1� Z5 d f+ SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS °' ' °°' 14 10 A WAPATO SILTY CLAY LOAM , 12 A VERBOORT SILTY CLAY LOAM 18 A COVE SILTY CLAY LOAM,THICK SURFACE 31 B BRIEDWELL SILT LOAM 37A CLACKAMAS SILT LOAM 38 C WOODBURN SILT LOAM 43 A LATOURELL LOAM 47A ALOHA SILT LOAM / ' 171 C HELVETIA SILT LOAM 7'2 72C QUA QUATAMALOOALOM 02A HUBERLY SILT LOAM 100E XEROCHREPTS-ROCK OUTCROP COMPLEX 102C SAUM SIT LOAM 170 E LAURELWOOD SILT'LOAM 1 DM171 HELVETIALVTI SILT L sax A 18013 180C CORHEI US SI TUS SILT� ' 188 B CASCADE SILT LOAM 180C CASCADE SIT LOAM 1 Awry,Ali PI 6L WMMwyJM.E i ir.*7,. AMf►Wggjr warm*LAserrArevivira MNpa MM. 0 • WEST KRUSE SWAY STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES . . . .. CORRIDOR S • , DY MIN ICAlAHAWN ISLAND DIIVC vOORE 2I3. l 4ORTLANC OREGON 0/21Y A 4 • Y.. r : ..Y 1 tl ,� . •./ • 1, . -.is •R r • • ro a ` °rog tr c o '• fi' ,l a E t 411 y • S'O" 0 1,'f2 Fill "' u 4 N P I i �'R f 'fir `� `,• -'1 -"_ "' 5 ti I _,,r..e e 1.t j . l.0..... y — -'.r�f yY- ovy fl ^l ' Ate. ^ f. ♦ e ' It Ma - _• ,�15-- / ._ 4. • 0 •r•I . '• 4t.uk' ,'' it.• ' 5 1• 4.01 TREES 0 400+ 800, i • WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFFI HORNING & ASSOCIATES CORRIDOR STUDY A 5 i GOO N 104ANANM ISLAND WIVE N�WIE}y. , a pWIIAND OhEtlON EnIse* NJOUST'Kw/ t) r . of I, r '.., L • P. ,Q P ,,pp I 4` , •• " /•.. .....r••....ai •a p �. ^ra P '9 �ua®WOOD t ?,.i,� - ,�m�•�•�r"awe�Q i • ..µO KUJII el.". I ,rw'.o . e.1V a w''00SYUSUI011 ' , �� --"�. rre'.17 r _°9•or°oraaA'1 yffq?o G ,• • o+e a lCyP�p �� u ti a '..•%�ll r.., aosr9CaC '0.�?' 3 A p .. „. .. . .. 1 I 4 rP 0.p R.. ..9 '�,•.ayry,, I.(�i• /•" y"r rn •r'1� r� -•04'4 4'.0 Q\J A 110 C��Ma, 0 "• i k t "•�•iM1Yt ,1'I 111 I • 1 My 0-, l �'N....„ ..i air ,S �, ..}'st1 i1 1 e'''ti 1(.rrl /II r/� 0.s\Nirl YNf. rI� / + ' 4,0 ,14...... .. 'r ,4).t�111�1 11111�11►1<� Af'Ifp, �%N44 s'1 �' . .a111Jaar —__y 1tl 11�l 7t _ � O�1t`p q _ p r (t -•xa, �•���"wl.lr Nty' Vh1.y.:• tin "� 5111;�per.-,. s`-a ---- �.4 4 / '� .� .'M�� Y 1 4.../r _� �d to ' '' f/a I.�, r tA �t. .r` aY:4ti ��7\1•'•11• t`\1,�1•Ai�l'/1� .a. ��1 r�9/� .•11}��e/�.. ' r . • IH,.y3 •. N„4k " • • 1 ^ r 1 A `�' j 1 t 511/1 tli//�,1\\�\�``` P r �-4'S� �`� �e - /�iit ;..tr, 4 1 1 relit' '. ' 1 d !' .r Ir Q� t4i!A � N I rH. !i� \ , Err 7 n,�`:J a l \��` :�t�fi1�1�/1/11i,,,1 rizt .Sti i IIIUj►Irr7iiierfii, ►� __ ,1` C /' rr l!ptlLrw 11 •• w ,l .••.. ��/11 45di .-� ,, s� ,f llll' o + .._ 'rN•,` Real. WI `.:11�, =_E ( Q tk 1� d ,'%, �� + SSJD_ 6040 CI . 7 f t -,'SS' •' '. 71y'IrQS^'a y, -.,,a. -,N�� •� �_-yq• .�. ,py�i `,i . >;` " Sau..lyy=i'4.. .�, _„gyp w :•.. 11•' "�N Mu'H:r 70%. ".. T 71, *. rr11 ,gp: '0 ` ...., •,CY".s•�16.. 6 lT�7~!7D� i�IY. xr ."1 `' .Ip • � '9 i� w� ) / 4. �111 N '•trK.1/vr T L'�"L : / - f�--.... �?s i'�r1�1 ai_��tli1 J�y` to blti. ��.•7: 4 `M II r1s y 7j Tlrr tl n < •,.:�. l � /•/ ,•S Nam. a �! I 1 I ? a any r,rr 1." •1 \1 "......,A}/t !� 7 pWtMVK W.W • - • \1i A %10' eee o..�,.r= • . �Gf/•'.r1/./. L \\ p\FT A r., fi. I.nV MAVlP/AINfw•Y I1 + u I{ 9p {y My�ry \ °„ .�L.L •s,r.4,.r ,t� a\�1.,�\\I gglll r�l411 M'�rr` :'Mdl�'!/ `7MA rt.1 , '� �7. `emu �.« `*.� IV- p o 11 ,}$a G0 c g,�"r*b'H\\'6 III,,u' :47/IiN�r10 A, .- ' C O • � •1 f•� 11•/ 7 / � �'�\- 11 lllrl�i' /'a '\d\ :, ,w / -'� Aa•rw a rof ^ .�...�.r��� P P _ p Q .".•.. nr Oor'•p•.�y1. r _ L fOgMt . -revert �- 1 . s•M- , w -la M;'� • ^ $ '.'w. ,.;,:,. "4 _ Jh1tl - 0 rr�M ' M4Rc 1 11 d oe�b `{�@oyy -.� � +%1L4MIM1 /MuF7r• '• .o p w • kl _ A.R.LeRsi,S.R. p. ee.--"-94 -' — - ' - . ' ' ; tl Y•. '''ll'e:W&JI, L./ SITE. INFLUENCES w. r 00EN '1. u.U..UI' TREE EDGES • '1 I/IIIIIIIII� BANICS [,[`4 R .�I•L/ ��,.�� i \''O'N't„' 'rrt '�c'wTY�' a.t " HILLSIDES •�•y� ««s• :.: sun angles • -60J5-NOISE CONTOURS 4 READINGS I ' Norzg Nast'[Ov A -Cus 7:c...ys Atu rN •A WAY A&'6.fN.RAU prO r " tid FARM �� NXWVFRTY,/yLY/977RItAGNAS.ANPy Ny,Y ENS PR MVS$CC WitYAPS.s''TN.la'NAY.te N+/Y ANS Amur."Ciw.r(KYJ:7 0 , V•s•rrr.NRALWASMONls. ', NW Arne arr lr,....t0tsu rPrielY eb•MOWS JAW AMA 5,4 • , WEST n KRUSE WAY STEFFANO F, HORNING & ASSOCIATES ' i' CORRIDOR STUDY � N t04ANVM A 16L ANC)OgIV! b/K)llt„q• bM11UN0 OhIOON Elty ...• MOUNT IYi7 i sIw.. •... i.l • . ' % e . • J. , 1 # J w .J 7 41 li . NE{} # 1 Ni„,. c ` : iii I. ' __. SIN .,_ /,,„ r y_ �il n`--� i FYI/ /" .....i i11 e' \\;;N•1 i ' `I#. tin �•' A K LOW DENSITY REsm .. y"sIN 1 p -' N`'''''\,:." , v n '- 1 LID.W44.40'' DENSITY ' 44 — . ... I...., tie ♦ SINGLE FAMILY NI ._ IOMt�tNstfl�yR 7 rile,..-,.....1. .1 //.01,mcdoder .....- -''''' I• ..I-r`r y yy. ai- ,. Adi\;:, , '.•2\ . -.- ,iJ , .1_____J I._ _ ' , ":...,,,,,I.:..:.1•‘.,•• f �TAl F II 7 n �� , . •T %; ' ,° ���i�ii+'\ \ \ '''''' " 'op / ,U •►MULTI "" II a '''s\ ',4\ I c I 111 1111111.' I i.c.r..--"pr.. ,. ,,,,,,„,„/ .. ; , .. . . . a ,. . „ . ,..... . . ,,..\ 1 ���AttifNNA� ./ •. CURRENT O RENT , " ►+s�► COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AREA OF DIRECT JURISDICTION DATE OF ADOPTION " IZZZZ3 CmoF LAKE OSwceO 1564 r '+ i I� CITY OF TI6ARD © CLACkkAMAS COUNTY 19�74 ''•'` AM'TAW Anwelest�ISM AA7..7ie #Ny CCC4 A 4 i7erawAssoc/Art.3v cr&ovtrwmemrs(E.r.1.A)CAMP user if ureNtklr Ire s'MiNr Allro.Wtrrs 77V77 rtrAl AI WA A$Arm,* •' (dtwire77►5 ArMIM4.5,JD7 . 1 J r ,, 1 1•' W • • 1 KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES CORRIDOR STUDY twe N Tn►1AlIAVMt IeLAH)uhwtl hgMt 2e2•16e1 ►oNrLANn lSt#{tlnN snit mr .�I...7YTl x .•...MINI.. { N r r IL t .A0.L• MP •''' \ ..\\ : rt migitirmi,, *.\\.\ Ikt\ hsi.,_ X NI , . .1 \ \ \\ 4 7\8: ;=> :::::,: •... ..1, -\\:\, , D U . -.lib` .\\\1011' , , . .... .\-, Thl lith\i„ `,\\\ \ . N„, \ _ „..,,,,...\\.\\ .. .f' .: 4 ` , ,,.......:....'N,s\,N. N l's ), Nisi..., ., :. N.. '`'•'.... .),/, I, • 16,11 \"%‘ i orrilailve, r .i`' r-+•.tiu... r 0 ;r � 1 NO- D NSl9 Y RE DENTAL ° < ,�,�--. r, \ • 4, • ~/—*-.. !_:,..,/,.. ,, ,... `fit`\Idt,/,/<:", ://:-"5/:''17,71" li o il \,.\\_.:,..\ - \ rg !+"e9 cbfn -a- ® �" , ,. ..-. . ... . 1,,0 im s 0-', '. .,o'Ai' ' `�.�.NV Xis :— _ 4tipiC NV- -- • ,&\AN, \\Nt•-`,T4iNAII‘,,,,..: 0,k.' , . , . C. /".".. , . . : •\ammigemuumees 'a b CLACKAMAS COUNTY PLAN ' DRAFT -'•-- 1E77 LAKE OSWEGO WV UMIr r Ir. , • • • . . WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES CORRIDOR STUDY M ►M •N f01AANAW1t Ib4AN0 WIVt MgNr?07�/(101 ►01;•lANli OML'60N WI/ B 2 r • ...... wow tell' • 1. '": ...;.:1311e\S?tt:, . :. - \.,...t. r-t._ _::::--.. 1-' nt „ ... . - . 1 ,r...,i1,..... .:1,..'t'..±' c? PUDLIc AND SEMI-PUQUC ). i J!> ' 0;94''' A 1 I WI I 0 PA 0.'''''''- =cur; L. F �� � 111''/' ���"_ `` /�/ ���,�` •"...;.1....;:• 117.... ' Air #4;:i t . I-i..., ' . ///,;:ry.,.......... ...r,, Ar ,4011/,‘, , . . ." ''„4.1....,r,-/ //Y.'', R' *' r �f•cis ��,►�,J,� �. !111121./11111111�`� �'N '�1�1� EMI PUDL PUbLit�IGD •Ir"' I�I Y .,•:...,' SIEVAPIIir- ' 4r/7.'":" , . AMPallrOW.' .41r. iree. % - ' ' ‘.7•4r - fEl IM nu 1,41.,,,,din its / ,, , ,/ ` . PUbLIG AN/Hi' l.. t// r'.' �I SEMI PUDLI' OMMERLIAL MULTI FAMILY • `-•a " COMPREHENSIVE Otwo' I GENERAL PLAN Lake Oswego, Oregon ' 1, �•.••. CURRENT LAKE o5WE60 CRY LIMrr5 " • ® EXISTIN6 PARK " EXISTt16 SCHOOL El PROPOSED PARK =I PROPOSED SCHOOL + ` fib ` WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES �{. CORRIDORs rUD y NOS N tpuANAW�t 1eLAND drove PHOWI*1•Npt PO$tLAN0 OAMhbN iit=s B 3 • i IA* T TOT? M/ If '...# t 1 Kr, 1 , / ` •R7, r i r i iD «� , . ... .. .. • . �� RY ,,...?. m _. �Kk_. a, L il I i 4 • . ' \\C:.17 .1''.. !il 4. v , y tg i. N. �� R30N. �..--�--�•, , ` �� 01 ) �i rf AG• - F - 0 •I4 IQ'' - d \( " J f I • N. _ %NUS, *Ay • %�I R 20 '`, ,0,J , h .. \ .... 1 1 . ... • * •. / / 7/ 7// , .. ......., ., , V. le.# , )1" ✓ /SRfpf� ��� ► ; fit , dmi /� v n � ` R ` ' 4'A'%� ;%t ' NM 0 /X r'' ./ , " I 13r7ff ° , . .'.'.'4 !1:'1 .: r Syr✓/% J.' . "q ZONING o"oo' SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL JURISDICTtONS C= R 7 V=ZD CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO tw= R Z5 =i CITY OF TIGARD C= R 8.0 =I CLACKAMAS COUNTY a r-:,..7.= R 10 r. == SR 10 t7 r'.,..a' PUD C= R 20 C= 1,1 30 GENERAL COMMERCIAL Carl] GC • " CAMMERUAL PROFESSIONAL IlIS= CP 4\. C= C2 C= PCD i PC • LION'C INDUSTRIAL ESss9 M3 : ==1 M4 PID rf GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ES=59 M2 111) WEST KFRUSE rWpA�Y STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES 1 •" CORRIDOR SrU, ,Y Xi N ?O*AHAMM( ISLAND OI11VII rygN B V/ Q�.6061 h011YLANp 011[ppN OM 4 - • • • • • • • c''y_ ':u t .,, U t • ,.I • • • • L111 " Si f LL ! !K �� • , I 8" n ,i �� II II `���`�y _ Ilan ' \ „ /4" , M _ . II t I / t ice_ .-..+ ...,6--��� i': p� 1 jJ ' w ° \ , %1.... ., : ,:- : • ' rN41.„1' I I 4)C Li ilL174: et' - \ \\ \''..- —1 t SEVVER LINES G ' 0oo' "wm"aimeasin. I . .• ..,. . . _. . ., . . . .. .. ;... . .. , . , „ =.--........ EXISTING — --- = PROPOSED 6'DIAMETERS AOTIV THE PA0A1119 LOAM!AAY A JYMAtIa/!, /N. (rn7 M ARRAS,CM WYfUGT/AU JL1fy,pK7X1VAL ArA/t(s. • TN/p�• swear.nor Aq�orrAIIa'p RM"AINSPAYM1 IVIRAUSAMI• it '''°'.:.':'*.. { i-, " l�4� q • + WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES I " .*..":: OORRU)OR STUDY .- Om N TWIANAhK VIAND°N I WOK Zp. Mt B 5 ►DIAHG d MO 1lCDN ... Iil101JttY vier? • • Y • .. . .' 6ri '+ II s .yam—" "L L 1 Ll I.j I I ( w''`"`"\cil ;1;: \ JIIA '.: ',,: . p `� 1n• V r • \ __I'? '1,- 0''' rz:zegE:22=== ---7-_•.--:..--..........-:,'---1--..--t-_r-k„, - / , , , , 'r .+�• a`\,Qr `"_. ` rr,' 10 1 -•� , w_ ')Ii so I 7-- y �I '. 'TT 1 ,� G N AI Y /"--. .'. ,, , ..,,,v ..:,. .,„ WATER LINES � goo ITu =� EXISTING ::::: PROPOSED II L. 0"DIAMETERS M Mons: y7.01 Was rIs Nor POO nerllxro w f:' 11W'c/:>AdKyAN,AMIL/otatiNre .� I .F r e• i fr WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES /� ® IM 7e/■ ■ u� N tCYAHAM1t 18lAND WOVE MION*?gyp.1y1 POAtLANO 0111OON OMB 6 .'., Al1ptIET tET1 0 + •�1 S az J< 1 D v uC ... . ,r y a`p� 1)y a0 SST Vc hO.c> 11�Rtl r4 t I 0 Qp� & =r ah* P�7 . 0 a Ds' 0 . .A m gy . ra J►q• o q�.0, _ • GE A) ..-.'' ' '' '' • . ,,. ,.,..,,,,,own...53.....:,... 111.!...1r „oxer /47-,4„.• . , - , . ._ f•— :"' ,'•lia --4,-"' ,.'-' .,o •. pt„ fr'i . \N' .r• 1, .411,4'..11e 411111P.,6"!4#416.-.71:4" :°11. ' , dee i' ,111111k; 44., 4.,,,.7./71,, 1 - 1 . ' . ., -.......„ A l'<•,;;-://e,,,,,,,.1"Yt .a 4#r40ArAllir,i14"/ '. . - ----P- ,.. , - ; `,,‘.. — .,/ -1 ,,,u,„-,5;;?/ . .::(1 e pr - #'4,erociv; . m .-- .. „ !.."c';) ' '-' . - lq ,,,, .0 r Ca , , �� k�''���I1f� �. Nc. 'ti yr 1. :..... ..,.:. .....i, ' � Sri 'Nr,:. . r, L.. ��."�+C ��• I��AI�IR"�4� ,, �t�,.`. ,"No.__y�lr .h4.�._ r..0,7,...i: 'J.! ' \\A!\7 � �'b yr-. of , ...„. .. ,.....,,,....,.. , l. �» N rr' ..14, ..ylc Htl"Y"\ t 'r,.•i. "1 + N.r 4n +, ���t y1 `-h •�'/Ia 'GM e v p�l�d •tom.. w";r`` ' r� ;J 7 Z _ /�j� �yfi.. ,k 'h,0 `••-re '�='� o .rj a -_.,,,,,,mu...,,,,,,'s a • WEST KRUSE WAY CORRIDOR °ISO oo' I LAND USE PLAN A proposal,by the West Kruse Way Nalghbothood Group, • to amend the Northwest Portion Land Use Element Map of Clackamas County's Comprehensive Plan. a r t' I y �" ' RESIDENTIAL AREAS ® HIGH DENSITY • PLANNED RESIDENTIAL AREAS LOW DENSITY CZ= MEDIUM DENSITY ' l'' ' r- : ' COMMERCIAL r ; Tu"Xcl' PLANNED COMMERCIAL AREAS CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE AREAS 1 • WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFF, HORNING & ASSOCIATES ----__.-". CORRIDOR STUDY COY N tONANA W( IYLANO OGEE PRONG CO•bYr 1'W1'fLANp tlRYtlON i��ll' aw citiOUST MT? • - .._, a 'dd 'I. ,� µ j.........„ - .. -.1.1 w ri•('1r? ', , , \ i• �`.. �j;n e,,,,.. , , _ w. . ..m,«•. 'moo'. _ . •-� _ ,,,, ..s, ` .. `, ob `d, V t"' ® � �1`.� f 'rat! , LI11 i}_L. _ .1 o rA w . "A -: ‘4;^`' d S.0i0,,�; :.'' �.. 1 shy r' • N.1H .>1 S'",,.,.., 7:, , \,, 1 I ) ' '1 ''• ."‘.1 � j N ' `ltl` - -. . • 'tea+. .. �l �p �a N 4f �� I , _ .war I, o„s --� . . gin - _ ,., . _ 1-"ea , I �, a r.. 1 ♦ '1 L., . \ .. .I 10i ry �, �'-'-�. ,-,) , ,,,, 11110/1 A , ,olo,-*------ ( , , • 4. 94 .--wv.m da�`� 7..:-.;• a \� ~.-,....^ '"'"---""''7.0 ' I! L. I _♦ ° Y .' '�•tp, . ram- ..�..�.,61. ' c'..�" ...w.s p O n.-'��e - \w' a 1� IL .6 wirm I AREA OF AMENDMENT °1er•adw:00 00 1 '' & OWNERSHIP - AREA OFAMENDMENT --•« UNDER SI 1EI E OWNERSHIP ,. • PARGILZATION • WEST KRUSE WAY STEFFANOFFI HORNING & ASSOCIATES CORRIDOR STUDY 006 N TOMAHAWK IM.010 b11Vt WHO*meal ►O TLAND 0l 00N m it , _1' • ,.. AUOtJST ton STUDY C a y .. 4. • 4 • 1 r- • • • • t 1. `• • Y} ry i • • IV CONCLUSION . .. a 'a • t '1" 1I • • 1• w y • • 1• Y a { 11 • • .• . , ,.M IV CONCLUSION • s The preceeding analysis, report, charts, exhibits, and mappings substantiate this West Kruse Way Corridor Land Use Plan map amend- ment application. This foregoing material not only clearly demon- strates compliance with state (LCDC) and regional (CRAG) land use goals and plans but also demonstrates that the land use planning for this area is a product of applying Clackamas County' s Com re- "'� bensive Plan text policiesy o �4 - to this area in light of current social , �'t�o economic and environmental conditions . That is, the pioposed West Kruse Way land use plan map is a programmatic result of Clackamas County' s current plan policies applied to an area that has under- t gone dramatic development facilitating and clarifying changes since l' the adoption of the original map governing the application of County policies to the area. This West Kruse Way Corridor Neigh- borhood group land use plan map amendment application is clearly ' supported by its conformance to the planning framework for this area (see Sec. II) and its detailed and sensitive analysis of the existing conditions in the E.rea (see Sec. III) . Further, the • following facts substantially and conclusively document ed change and are presented for eventual fact-finding by the this Countyt during the amendment hearings 40 g proceedings: • ® Since adoption of the 1974 Clackamas County plan , the Land Conser- vation and Development Commission and statewide planning goals ° have become a reality and this amendment ' s land use complies with this state program goal framework. (See Section II A) . • The Columbia Region Association of Governments, (CRAG) , LCDC' s representative and local coordinator for this region, has • identified the study area as urban on their adopted land use - framework plan (effective Feb. 1977) . CRAG' s framework plan' s policies indicate that this area is an Urban Immediate Growth Area. This land use application is consistent with CRAG' s land use framework plan and applicable policies II B) . es (see Section ® The Clackamas County plan land use policies were used as a pro-gram (see Section II) for the development of this proposal ; • West Kruse Way Corridor land use plan. Consequently this pro- posed land use plan conforms to the county' s land use policies•' poli - .r and merely updates the northwest element land use map for this ' . area. kF' q . • '.° ® This general seven square mile unincorporated urban portion of the Northwest Element Land Use Map is conspicuously absent of sufficient commercial and high to medium density residential 41, uses in comparison to areas of similar access, I' r worF p public service ,. 14kri0f,IAtts IV-1 ' 1 s J ry4 • 3 \ capacity, and urban proximity in the County proposed land use plan plan . The �. satisfies only a portion of those more intense uses demanded by this seven square mile area (see text Section II Clackamas County Plan) . ® The seventeen ownerships represented in this proposal the encompassing land area constitute a legislativepland amendment to only the map portion of the County plan . ® In addition to the foregoing planning frame the following development facilitating and clarCifyingi , have occurred in the area since the adoption of the 1974 changes " Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan : • • • The Kruse Way, an extension of highway 217, has be(opened Feb. 1977) instea3 of a contested pro a reality plan. This has p posed roadway • exposed the study area to regional influences attendant to such a facility. (Note that the current Plan map is in error in that it shows Comprehensive C. ,� facility. ) "Kruse Way,, as a a future ® The City of Lake Oswego has unsuccessfully tried to annex a ,"; significant portion of the clearly establishes intent of this area to reversed annexation jurisdiction. under county f : 1 ® The stud y area is annexed to the Unified Sewerage jurisdiction and soon a sewer trunk will be d acre (USA) I-5 into the area. extended across • was contested at the timehaf�� e the l � this sewer service issue portion of the study area has changed ownershippinoanticip large of development, ® A petition to annex the north half of the study area to the Lake Grove water district (which presently serves the south study area) is underway. half o f the ,� xl ® The surrounding area has, Since 1974, continued to develop in • intensive urban pattern which includes the full range of urban land uses from industrial and commercial to multiple famil y and single family. • i. ® The area has been the focus of intensive land use planning as a • r result of the existing "out-of-date" status of the • . current plan map governing the area and the regional development 4. on by the foregoing conditions. pressures brought ® This land use planning effort has coo work operating in the area as rdinated with the planning frame- ' substantiated by the ' and exhibits, which clearly demonstrates a conclusive land use text P sensitivity to Clackamas County's 'in.arinxi�F -•--- Y goals and policies as well as the A ASSOGAtkS , IV-2 • t�' t •A. `1 et ry' ,I . Luke Oswego task force reports. A 9 �� ! The area west of I-5, in Tigard. and Washington County, has \• ,. developed into an intensive urban pattern and has Influenced �;P'` land values, stimulated distribution of sewer, water and publ-,c ;�' facilities, and fostered i "mproved highway and arterial access 9y in the study area. �• • ,ti • r t$, •• `, ,' .. S Y Yr r II • • • • • . . . , . . , 1i rtrrA • „ >:F Y • ` I.Asst.K ATES Y I`V- 3 1 1 , " 1x , w' 9 ® , REFERENCES . .• : 1 . KRUSEWAY E. I .S. , State of Oregon, Highway Dept . 1975 2 . LAKE OSWEGO PHYSICAL RESOURCE INVENTORY • 1976 Citizens Groups ' ' 3 . LAKE OSWEGO TASK FORCE REPORTS, Citizen Groups- 1976-77 4 . 1971 CLACKAMAS COUNTY COMPRI;FENSIVE PLAN, Clackamas County 5 . 1974 CLACKAMAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, Clackamas County 6. CRAG LAND USE FRAMEWORK ELEMENT published Dec 22 , 1976 Effective February 5 , 1977 7. THE URBAN OUTDOORS, Columbia Region Association of Governments June, 1971 8. CRAG - COLUMBIA-WILLAMETTE REGION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Discussion Draft December 9, 1974 9. LOWER TUALATIN FACILITIES PLAN Vol. One, Vol. Two STR/CH2M/Hi11 1976 ° ` 10. STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES, LCDC, January 1 , 1975 <• • 11. MARTIN WINMAR LAND USE STUDY, February 1977 12. 1970 CENCUS - POPULATION AND HOUSING, Co'.. Reg. Assoc. of Gov' ts July 1971 • ' 13. THE COMMUNITY BUILDERS HANDBOOK, Urban Land Institute January 1975 ql\.;�. 14. TRANSITION, State of Oregon January 1975 i! 15, LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN, City of Lake Oswego December 1 , 1964 16. LAKE OSWEGO COMMUNITY GOALS, City of Lake Oswego - November 1974 17. TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, City of Tigard 1971 l8. FISCAL IMPACTS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Lake Oswego Richard Hutchison November 1976 19. INVENTORY AND EVALUATION - SOIL AND WATER RESOURCES Soil Conservation Service USDA December 1975 q` , r 7• INSNNMK� d ASS()G1ATE�J 3. . d CARL H. BUTTKE CONSULTING ENGINEER P.O. BOX 636 ® PORTLAND, OREGON 97207 N 503 / 223.4728 • INITIAL REPORT ON • STREET SYSTEM ANALYSIS LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON • • For: City of Lake Oswego, Oregon Prepared by: Carl H. Buttke, P.E. 15���,Dttiz4,SJ�, ` 4, 8912 C4' l4 July 19, 1977ck, a.e /4146 ,...4,, . • �, oRcort 0 C'9,5,��?. t 1, `9 4 4.:.:EXHIBIT / • Oa 13-�i w r: • I. CARL H. BUTTKE • .. . CONSULTING ENGINEER e . , • . . .... .. P.O. BOX 636 N PORTLAND, OREGON 97207 a 503 / 223.472E July 19, 1977 • • �• . The Honorable William Gerber and Council Members City of Lake Oswego City Hall Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 Y 1 Dear Mayor and Council Members: t • This report concerning transportation within the City of ram' Lake Oswego is submitted in accordance with our agreement • of April 4, 1977. • This report contains an analysis of the existing and pro- posed street system to accommodate the resulting traffic volumes of fully developing the City within the next 20 to 25 years. . An analysis of the street system capacity was made together with recommendations in regard to the travel lane requirements , 1; • • .nd street classifications to satisfy the future land use. Recommendations ar also contained in this report concerning additional analyses required to develop the transportation ' element of the Comprehensive Plan. T appreciate the opportunity to have been of service to the City of Lake Oswego in your efforts to develop a Comprehensive 11 Plan. Sincerely, de. • Carl H. Buttke, P.B. • • .. • 0 411 t TABLE OF CONTENTS V , p. 2.2E1 INTRODUCTION 1 • Planning Area 1 u;' General Policies for Transportation Plan 3 • . R 3ENT AND FUTURE LAND USE 7 CURRENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 10 Street Inventory 10 • Planned Street Modifications 12 ` • Current Traffic Volumes 13 : .• Street Capacity 15 I � TRAFFIC FORECASTS 18 r• . Trip Generation 19 Trip Distribution 24 r Vehicle Trip Assignment 26 Street Capacity Deficiencies 30 RECOMMENDATIONS s 33 • Street Classification 33 Travel Lane Requirements 36 Similar Streets 36 ", Phase II Analyses 38 1 • • ® • , CARL H fUTTKE CPINRULTINO tNOINEER e . . ,rye ii ' I.J. LIST OF TABLES Nh• IJ NO. TITLE PAGE 1 Existing and Assumed Future Land Use 8 >• 2 Vehicle Trip Generation Rate Measurements 20 3 Vehicle Trip Generation Rates 21 4 Estimated Vehicle Trip Generation for Planning 23 Area 4 5 Comparison of Actual and Assigned 1977 Traffic 27 't` b LIST OF FIGURES 1 Planning Area 3 2 Street Inventory 11 °" `` 3 Current Traffic Volume 14 ,, 4 Existing Street Capacity 17 ti 5 Year 2000 Traffic Assignment 29 ~ 4r. 6 Street Capacity Deficiencies 31 7 Recommended Street Classification and Traffic Lanes 35 E • 1 ' i, . , y . CAra H bUTTKE • CON§ULTINO ENOfNEEh " + . , • . . • 6. INTRODZiCTION • • ' y This report concerning transportation within the City of Lake Oswego is submit tad in accordance with our agreement of• April 4, 1977 . The purpose of this report is to provide the City of Lake Oswego with an analysis of the existingand proposed street system to accommodate the resulting traffic volumes of fully developing the city in accordance with its anticipated land use t , 410 The analyses included assignment of future traffic to the proposed street system, analysis of the capacity of the streets under current and future traffic conditions and a determination of travel lane requirements to satisfy the assumed conditions proposed for these analyses . • • • a PLANNING AREA The planning area, as shown on Figure 1 , is bounded on the west of I-5 and Tualatin city limits, on the south by the Tualatin River, Stafford Road and West Linn city limits, on C . CARL H. BUTTKE t'tio,iti ►INH EHr,INEEP • • F 4 1./ C Y / .I I I F �I 2 Y°, w J 1 F n t W W gJ Yf • I j (7 . l ..1 o ' r F .—_:s.N n /.:73-------\Ni\N Noy ��u+TAly Y 0,� f Fll+ ANIIY N39b0 ✓ • ui v:-..\j r Y?\_.? JT s U y r> 113Huo3 a rroo a Nre / !' �,,.�'� Yu YDoa /�.'(,c_� W3 _ i. n S \\ . yI L. 7 snrNll v .i,.. .:,. e I aBolYres t) u �` °"` doe33uA /(, y 1 r,::,,, ,.., , rt . . lookiiiii‘AION 4.400., . . .. . . . i K [ J (/ I , ... I }1151 t , NW es3M '+ uU NIMI .1.1. / N. ' ' Sinci .. ..g..,.:S:\\*\*.".'"...-": 'j4te4k �' VN......c. �'�4' INYAup oudasoi Auurno '• i 1NtAUP `l( N fl W 1YJ Z I,e. N '3 }�i g 3 ~ 7U3asoe lJ \ 41\ 11 `VN �t 1 a10 Ar r` I / 0wee �� �'�+.., P • V� d I/ p )p is ) , }! t r r r r. r.C•.' 3 41) the east by the Willamette River and on the north by the Multnomah County Line and City Limits . y } I. GENERAL POLICIES FOR TRANSPORTATION PJAN ' The proposed major street system of arterials and collectors, as shown on Figure 1 , was developed by the Lake Oswego Plan-• ping Commission to be tested and analyzed for its capability 3 it A. A of serving the fully developed city. • Al‘s.) The following is the General Policies for the Transportation Plan as developed by the Planning Commission: A. The City of Lake Oswego will plan a transportation , •• system to serve the planned land use distribution, and to meet complex community needs and desires: social, economic, natural resource and, aesthetic. B. In development of this plan the following policies should guide choice of alternative designs: 1 . Comprehensive land use planning should be a determining factor in the capacity and design of the street system. 2. Major focus of development of the Major Streets Network should be the development of ways to draw throi.gh traffic off of neighborhood streets. This should be accomplished through design of a '-. Lake Oswego Arterial Loop to draw traffic out of neighborhoods toward existing freeways and loop arterials . • 3. Minimize vehicle traffic' s impact on the corn- " . munity' s character, by designing a street system adequate to handle expected volumes, but • at a "minimum-necessary-scale" . • a ' • CARL H QUTTKE ` CONSULTING ENGINSEH .i • ' 4 , 4. Plan for pedestrian, bikeway mass transit circu- '',+ lation and parking, in conjunction with plans for motor vehicle travel, so that the following , community desires can be met: . a bikeways system which integrates on street and off street routes • coordinated open space corridors and pedestrian :.. routes . encouragement of use of mass transit (include " use of shuttle buses . Keep light rail option open. ) j , ':' .? . discouragement of motor vehicle uae when some other mode is possible (i.e. human powered mode) , y ' . more flexible street designs to allow the most compatible and effective use of the public ! { rights of way ' . development of permeable alternatives for storm 1 n water runoff management " ' . integration of scenic corridors, street trees, alleys into the circulation system . reliance on on-street parking only when the le_nes are not needed as vehicle travel lanes 5 . Maintain existing quiet residential streets . Put a priority on neighborhood livability. ' '` . • 6. Provide a Lake Oswego recommended solution to ' ' the "State Street Problem" . This proposal can ,-". . include removal of parking at rush hour to allow an additional lane in the direction of major traffic flow, and the removal of all parking .''" from the existing right of way when that is necessary to provide for through traffic, while . a, preventing expansion of present width. ' 7 . Do not route through traffic into existing, neigh- borhoods . Where existing neighborhoods exist bisected by arterials or collectors, seek to minimize impact of the street. This should • include oonsiderai.;ion of the following: expected traffic generation of new proposed uses, design III r \ CAM. H GU'TTKF 4; .' CbNSuoti46 EHGINEER . J V u R to buffer sight and sound, new neighborhood :; orientation to park or bikeway or public W : facility, re-routing of traffic by construction „': of new street . 8. Anticipate land use problems and pressures which :� will develop as traffic increases along arterials and around commercial and industrial areas, and develop firm policies and design criteria to ' % avoid undesirable development in these areas . For example: . Study traffic prior to siting commercial , . Plan for centralized parking downtown = ' . Keep new commercial on collectors and arterials providing foil. access that does not unduly decrease the capacity of street to handle through traffic. ' . Improve streets to encourage development of • existing industrial sites. 411 C . Development of the vehicle travel lanes portion of ,., . the major streets system shall be done through the following process : 1 . Project (from densities and uses already planned . . ' and/or approved) the expected traffic and there- .- fore the scale of vehicle travel lanes needed at full development (taking into account a shift to .:- mass transit) . ' 2 . Determine what other uses should be planned for • the street right of way (biketrail, pedestrian, mass transit stops, etc. ) 3 . Determine planned level of service, and the , 4 general design needed to provide desired com- ' munity service. '; , . in keeping with performance standards for hazard prevention, resource preservation . congested travel during peak hours will be tolerated as a price of decreased street scale. 410 . flexible standards and innovative design to , .'n preserve the character of Lake Oswego.' o .l CARL H IUTTKE : 'a J`/ 6 I. v • • ,' 4 . Test the proposed street plan (Figure 1 ) to 41/ ''' .: ,,- determine its ability to handle the expected . traffic in a manner consistent with community policies here summarized. Should modifications ,i prove necessary, alternatives should be consistent ;. ; with those same policies . ' 5 . Consider if land use plans should be altered to relieve problem areas indicated by inadequate street capacity. 6 . Finalize a ?.ajor Streets Plan, and designate which streets can be scaled as local residential streets with minimal through traffic . 7 . Plan to require dedication of adequate (but not • excessive) rights of way to make planned design buildable , when it is established that street needs of the land development are reasonably related to the planned street. � ,. 8. Improve and/or widen streets as demand and funding require and/or allow. D. Street engineering and design standards should be developed which implement the policies and plans . , • =''cti '! These should allow for flexibility and innovative design to preserve the character of Lake Oswego . sy Strong consideration should be given to the recom- ' mended residential street standards outlined by ULI- ASCE-NAHB which are summarized in Residential Housing A: . Task Force Report. The Planning Commission, Street Standards Advisory Committee, Planning Department and Public Works 4 Department should participate in the development of • these standards . J. i , _i CAM, H UUTTKe CONnUCHNO ammo 7 411 PRESENT AND FUTURE LAND USE • A'� r It is estimated that some 27,000 people live in the Planning Area and that approximately 6500 people are employed there. a ,. : The assumed growth in the Planning Area is expected to result in some 55 ,000 people living there and some 18,000 people working there . }` It is estimated that full development may occur by the year 2000, plus or minus five years . The City Planning Department made an inventory of all buildings and land use within the , . Planning Area in 1976-77. This inventory is summarized on • Table 1 . The assumed future land use to exist upon full development of • the Planning Area was developed by the City Planning Department for analysis of the proposed street system. For purposes of this analysis , the land use is preliminary in nature since the results of testing the proposed street system with the •; assumed land use may indicate possible changes in the land use. As indicated in Table 1 , it is assumed that the number of • single family dwellings will increase from the current 7577 to slightly over 13,000 dwelling units. Multi-family residential is assumed to increase from approximately 1600 411 dwelling units to nearly 7300 units. CAM. H tiUTTKE • Y t fay r 7 TABLE 1 EXISTING AND ASSUMED FUTURE LAND USE Lake Oswego Planning Area Existing Assumed Future ' •;• Land Use Quantity Quantity Single Family Residential 7 , 577 D.U. 13,047 D.U. • Multi-Family Residential 1 ,646 D.U. 7 ,278 D.U. Total Residential 9, 223 D.U. 20,325 D.U. Retail-Commercial 830,000 Sq.Ft. 2,040,000 Sq.Ft. �k i Office 300,000 Sq.Ft. 1 ,000,000 Sq.Ft. Industrial 140 Acres 260 Acres Source: Lake Oswego Planning Department t` •, , • 6 a • M ' . ) , , J , _ tlC H CARL H BUTTKE ChNSULTINt1 ENGINEEn ... •. .`. a ,. _ . .. r .' .. . . .. .. ,. - �•' 1. \'( d 9 410 Retail commercial space is assumed for transportation testing purposes to increase from the current 830,000 square feet of building space to apprc1yimately 2,000,000 square feet of • space. General office space is assumed to increase from 300,000 square feet of space to 1 ,000,000 square feet of • building area. Industrial and warehousing acreage is • • estimated to increase from 140 to 260 developed acres . • • • y t. � 11 1 • k, ' ti 's 450 • • aay . .• CARL H. BUTTKE CONSULTING ENGINEEI • • _ , 1 1. .g x 10 411 CURRENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The traffic conditions on the major streets in and around • the Planning Area were measured and analyzed to determine the location and magnitude of current street capacity deficiencies . These analyses consisted of a detailed street inventory, traffic volume measurements and observations and a calculation of street capacity. r.' STREET INVENTORY • The inventrry of major streets indicating pavement width, number of travel lanes and right-of-way width is shown on Figure 2. Generally, all streets within the Planning Area • accommodate two travel lanes with the exception of Kruse Way, Country Club Road, A Avenue, State Street and portions of Boones Ferry Road which have four travel lanes plus left turn lanes at various locations . The major street system proposed for testing indicates the following streets to be classified as arterials : d CAflL H OUTTKE • / t.t 1 I It (RAINS • l .♦ AarA Ce 2 mD 1 t till; •E py� ``. 4f Sst9 3EI1EPSpN pk WY i�U a � 1fhp• • cyi •� f-Ib' " Y " �' iunaEnEaiE 'A i \ h bo • • 7 M MELROSE `R SO1•0:le° •• o C \_ 1I 1" ,._ y • Al.y F n ; 5 •14' r� 3 �` f +°o commit'CLUB 40 • (� h $$ q ` h LEGEND. A j f f s' n y �1 t +� r... 4o N • « Y Igo !,,„r (AOi - Pert emnAVE R14N1 QI WM uiutN f<: • �• KRUSE WAY Iro ♦;i i y.1� �t r y `� a..rJ N •r.o _ 150N11A W LAKE 09WE00 .�j �• i /t te' t r®fy ®tarws.p E !•�o N S'� : t �--4. MILES GKL N.OUT INE 0 V 4:.... ‘‘. ) ---72....."-\ y�° MGv` tt � • p pP 7.+4 td t UpaE o• �•yo out ~ ,` • fit • i o fff• ¢ + s� n'0 1t[CtlotK • (�'+� �'.' \,.._„,_, a tAEAuowa `, St co �/ 1 onEENinEE t4'' w (''-"•�\ ttt WEST aA'1 a/ n., a \ �� �u ; g 11.7� \ �dAl to.... r J.11 i-"'.....s.k... �/s ` \\., {{uu 1; ., bfR019 44 f•ft t•JA' t 41, r, ! OVERLOOK tb' • °O JEAN b• ea'� d Y si q' d e 4 Rose444t •K h ♦ ,. • �t \ a Haute 2 � ' i Street Inventory o. 1 ..�• • i CNIIU! L, �y,tn• b...'t♦ IUALAteN roYEn /! S • 12 • Riverside Drive • • State Street Pacific Highway McVey Avenue Stafford Road A Avenue Country Club Road Boones Ferry Road Kruse Way Childs Road 1 4 All other major streets on Figures 1 and 2 are proposed as collector streets. 410 PLANNED STREET MODIFICATIONS • The proposed major street system, shown on Figure 1 , includes • • some street modifications including development of Jefferson Parkwaybetween its present westerly terminus and lesser • Road, continued development of Royce Way between Bryant Road • and West View Road and continuaton of West View Road south- easterly to Stafford Road. It is also proposed that Boones Ferry Road be developed from the existing two lane road west r • of Bryant Road to 1-5 as a four lane roadway. Widening of Boones Ferry Road north of Country Club Road has also been proposed. The widening of Boones Ferry Road and development CARL H BUTTIC@ coNSuLL'IL ENOITNtEil y r " + . 't.,, ..''• . . . ..; •.,... \• •t ', . ••4, .„„. .._ .. - ,: :.. , ..„..,• 1 i €::: „../ . '''',.,4•• J.i . , . ... . . IIAINS . -•'N,,_____ *--.-''' \ • • I , , • , ., ,7S••... " . ''' • 144 I ,j 444 411th N .1., J.t... '. ,.• ',t't:Y'.",.. 1,.. ,, yr •,,,„ 4 1, I , . • .. -... . . • . ,,01.0°%4 "41' . . \1 . . . •,....,;),,..,.,.,..' ' , `r a 1 KNA115 g • \ r.;,, A E v TomitnutiE i 1 ‘ , n / . . . . , . •. . r... 1 / . • • .& , .. • ...• v,•;,, i N, „p . . .,. . . •,, $'. / „„,,,,.,,,, 1 .• — , IACIROSt V 41 1 \ C il. a' .•V,., 1 1 CI1 C0110110,CUM - • /1. \,......, (' • e• .".:..'" ••I f .i'te•..... n 1 i; t.' 44. 4,1 . It',.I,..!` ,•P . 3 ..0 10411St WAY .., 1 ,.I -„ • 0 .., .• • , „/„....-----------...„..s....._______,---. ._ -r ---' a i i.' , .• . • • .• ---,V.... A x . . , • , notetx .n'-''' -- , , rth JP( tt 1,- Last OSWE00 • , . -.' • 1-••'-'. if .11.............................w.....mwo..4t.r..............—.' ___.." 4.4 1 0 •'. • ' .. 0:•S OS 4 •04 ,..0 1 P _ ;z clPit'" CAPt.II Mt'Mt ,,,, ,,,,,....^'K,./.. ''' .• .410 'I 00 '''. , ?It .0, 0).....,.. . '....'—vv-• ' I v.,. IP r v .....',. f).,.. ''7.;'\'-N•s.,.‘ . . ub -" \.• ).46" 4 44 4 VP .7 ,..,: . t \ ,......,'"' 2 0 'a. .4. 1' ,,,, ,- I . \ .i/ , • •• / ( :1) .V16111004 • . • / , . // ' SP co 1°‘ , 1 r''.... . . .. '" • vast n° j\ ., 4 0/001110tE ..../ k1., , • . .• • . 0 . ., A. o 0 ‘,,x% • ' II.'r t u \.'. I % . Ipor i ,.4„Is ,k• .`... _ , i 1 5 1 . •,— i 1 (,,,,.9 „-,.• t Bt,,,,,,, 1 '' \ 4•00 " lett 44x 1 ', liii ,e ' 4 tee: dg. . , , . Jr/01 .,'„ OV011.001( i, • , . . • f .' ,,,/,f ' 8 r' e : • ,• ... , • • .. • .„ g i 44V?? . , . / ii I \ 4 I Otto 3 • r.••—' . • . J• Currant trallie Volume •. ... , trot twos ...s. . . • .• • -N.,.s. '' ' . •t% . ,..z.,_, ., .. . • '-** ::.-...**- - --.- ------..—"----z—.„_____.- tuAtAtot/0110-..•—•'.-."'"--*=--."-•"-- • `,, • 41# ‘...--.....:17.,',..< ...,, '''4.:....„ 0 -.., 0 .. 1) , . , .. . . .. . „ . . .. . . . • .. .. . • ' . . . . . . . . • . . , . . . ' . . . ' ' • > U a 13 r r, of Jefferson Parkway are included in the Interim Transportation Plan for the Portland—Vancouver Metropolitan Area. This plan , :, also contains a proposal to improve Stafford Road as a two lane roadway, to improve Kerr Road as a two lane roadway and to ` ` ' ' dE widen McVey Avenue to four lanes . rt CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 4 Traffic volumes on major streets within the Planning Area were measured in late 1976 and early 1977 by the City of Lake Oswego and by Clackamas County. The effect of the Kruse Way completion has been measured within these counts . The current 24—hour traffic volume measurements are shown on " 4' Figure I' 3 ..^ 4 m , Generally, the morning peak hour of traffic occurs between 7 : :..0 and 8:00 a.m. and varies between six and nine percent of the daily volume . The afternoon peak hour occurs generally between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m. and represents about ten percent of the daily volume. The heaviest travelled street is State Street with some 22,000 vehicles per day south of "A" Avenue. The next heaviest • travelled street is "A" Avenue immediately west of State Street with slightly over 16,000 vehicles per day. Boones . .q., r Ferry Road carries about 15 ,000 vehicles per day between i ' cAnt. H BUTTKE 4. 4 'l 15 11, Kruse Way and Bryant Road. Country Club Road carries approximately 13,000 vehicles per day. McVey Avenue, Kruse Way and the northerly portion of Bryant Road all carry approxi- • • mately 10,000 vehicles per day. STREET CAPACITY Highway and traffic engineers have established various standards for measuring traffic capacity of a roadway or intersection. 1 Each standard is associated with a particular • level of service one wishes to provide. The level-of-service concept requires consideration of factors which include travel speed, safety, frequency of interruptions in traffic �. flow, relative freedom for traffic maneuvers, driving comfort ti • and convenience and operating cost . Five standards have • • therefore been established ranging from level "A" where traffic flow is relatively free to level "E" where the street system is totally saturated or jammed with traffic. For this analysis , level-of-service "D" was utilized as a measure of capacity. This standard can be described as traffic conditions which include delays to vehicles for , • ® 1Highway Capacity Manual 1965 , Highway Research Board Special Report 87 , National Academy of Science, National Research • Council. x ':T CARL H BUTTKE CONSULTING ENGINEER s F s • 1 6 • short periods of time within the peak period. However, 111 enough traffic signal cycles of lower demand occur under these conditions to permit periodic clearance of developing queues to prevent excessive backups . Therefore, during peak hours some motorists may experience delays which include waiting through several signal cycles before passing through the intersection, but most motorists would pass through the intersection without waiting through more than one cycle . o . . , • The capacity of each street was calculated on the basis of , " level of service "D" and is shown for a 24-hour basis on Figure 4 • . ,, Only one street in the Planning Area is experiencing a � capacity deficiency and that is State Street where the ti volume has reached the capacity standard for level of • service "D. " Some congestion also occurs on some streets such as Boones Ferry Road northeast of Bryant Road where motorist must wait in a through travel lane to negotiate a left turn. • These situations are operational problems which occur anytime e- and are not of the magnitude of traffic conditions at level .ti of service "D. " • CAfL H BUTTKE • CONSULTING ENGINEER rt` .. a �•'. s' ./ .a F 't? -. • • • u rr, 7, d .+ • ti 1 +• r 5_r r'.; 1 IInIN� t er 4P1n cn_ /rw ,y I 1,./0.,( ,,,, . ,.,,., P Jk FSSfq' :an,,,„so„ „WV o ■calls coca • f' `yX 11MPENLINE _tit 1 \,,d winOSE �Ii1C LL V .lees :.. n Er 1 COIINTA'CLIAI 1• /` n n 1 -� MnUSL WAY : �o Jc i Art 9. '. ^4, tJ c ,�x r� o�' r v��Jr lCo[un fe-ec N nn rr EA.., r ii<l. GONNA r 1/...0.......... ' �,....r a/1_ ' Nti WG/Y `L,e, b ; r I LAIC °Itali f � "L_l' s�;r • r 4-.. P. 1'P�FII n ,/ r.. - I O nfs nS OIS 1 ' a 1 n C ac" I Mill s r""s��"�.�. r r. •' �•... { cent N aUr iltl x "0' t,•, f tbna fr • - -r�� ...wt.,...AI •f �, f. ^Inn f _.t 1 e Iltlb •, nA/- y y • Sf {LeY y ....-"'',�(,I) , ;yd�. 11 rp — \ - r '1 /r .''`'i' `' + I, r L 110nt urMLOCM f r \ i ., �/ sr COc>` 1- P Oa a I 1 Caen K • viol pd f1 rs' WitEN•nEE 1j 1Y a ut n(`wl ; ° f, i. • • (7/iv M Jennt a •4� • - f. neYe P,heet a.ab OEACIS €j `�{, �\`\ lJEAN '4! aOVEnLOENI Iii YI ei l '•„u 4OS c0,Y, 1 n tern,.8litt.t. 0 a 4a e.f'f ',--.�w 13fbc n Existing Street 9aunctly . CIIIIU3 ' J. r • 18 ` •ia,, w TRAFFIC FORECASTS �1! •.I The future traffic pattern in and around the Planning Area was defined by estimating the future traffic which would be . • ' generated by the full development of the area U8 indicated on Table 1 , page 8, by distributing these trips to destinations throughout the region and then by assigning z these trips to the street system. Traffic estimated to pass through the City was also added to the assignment. This procedure was developed first to recreate 1977 vehicle trips and compare with the actual volume counts to verify 410 the methodology. When the methodology was verified then • the same procedure was utilized in forecasting. . "• • The city and surrounding area were divided into 46 traffic analysis zones for the process of estimating trip generation and distributing and assigning trips . • • CAA!. H BUTTKE • CONSULTING{ENGINEER 19 411 TRIP GENERATION Vehicle trip generation estimates were made for each traffic analysis zone in the city on the basis of the type and • y quantity of land use inventoried and forecast in each zone. Vehicle trip generation rates were developed for each type ' of building or land use from measurements 'made in Lake . { Oswego , other parts of the Portland Metropolitan Area and from measurements of similar buildings and land uses '44;fi throughout the United States . Examples of trip generation measured at households in Lake Oswego are shown in Table 2. m= .. Traffic volume forecasts were made for the year 2000 since it is estimated that full development may occur within that • ``- time frame . The trip generation rates utilized for the year 2000 projections were modified to include the effect of increased transit service and ridership as forecast for the Regional Interim Transportation Plan for 1990 and extra- polated to the year 2000. The effect of increased carpooling • :.� and trip combining was also included. These rates are : ' :, indicated in Table 3 for most uses and represent a two-way vehicular volume per weekday per unit of building measure- meat . In some cases , rates were modified to reflect special situations, such as in the downtown area where more people • are likely to walk to buildings while having driven and • parked at other buildings for other purposes . . CARL H RUTTKr, CONSULTING ENGINEO :;? 20 • 1 - , .. . . . . . . . . . , . . . • . , .. ,. TABLE 2 VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE MEASUREMENTS A 24 Hour 24 Hr. Two- I Number of Tro-Way Way Volume/ Location I Dwellings Volume D.U. Royce Way 38 227 6 .0 . Hillside Way 37 680 18.4 Cherry Crest 31 518 t6.7 , y ' • • Kilkenny Rd. & Dr. 37 578 15 .6 r ` North Point 42 540 12 .9 • Hoodview Lane 20 260 13.0 Tanglewood 126 1 ,207 9. 6 Westridge 49+ 690 13.0 • j, t• G a1,1 , t Y • , • CARL H. BUTTKE .. ,L CONtULTING tNOINEEp t Y • ` i y M' e 'p •1 . • (10 • •el `i • TABLE 3 VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATES City of Lake Oswego Average Weekday Two-Way. Veh i,c l r, '11,I.4, Rate Land Use/Building Type 1977 0 1 ,,_. ..-. . • Single Family Residernti,nel. 10.0-17.0 per D.U. £ ,d. 14> , per D.U. • Multi-Family Residential. 7.0 per D.U. General Office 12.5 per 1 ,000 sq.ft . 11) .; pr.'' 1 ,000 sq.ft . Medical Office 55 .0 per 1 ,000 sq.ft. 4 ) pr 1' 1 .000 sq.ft. 00 sq, . Banks/Savings & Loans 180.0 per 1 ,000 sq.ft. 160. '1 p 1. 1 ,000 sq .ft . Retail 50+ per 1 ,000 sq.ft. 39.61 p ,v 1 ,000 sq .ft . Warehouse 2.6 per 1 ,000 sq.ft. 2 .3 pen 1 ,000 sq.ft . • : Manufacturing 4. 1 per 1 ,000 sq.ft . 3 . 1 peP 1 ,000 sq.ft. Note: Specific buildings may have different rates because of p1 sicd.mtty to other buildings . t r.rYN .�wrrM • • •w. 22 The vehicular trips were estimated for three basic trip ur oses: trips to and from work and connected to the home; p p trips to and from shopping and connected to the home; and trips made for all other reasons . The trips were further • categorized into trip productions--usually produced or generated at the home . trip a 'c etions--usutt•ll;y attracted N' ; to or generated at the ether land uses . Table 4 summarizes the estimated 1977 and year 2000 vehicle trips produced and attracted within the Planning Area by basic trip purpose. {• It is anticipated that because the population of the Lake `• ' ' Oswego Planning Area may increase from 27 ,000 to 55,000 people, the vehicle trips produced at home may increase from 1 . 98,000 to 169,000 vehicle trips per day. The trip ratio per person is expected to decline from 3 .62 vehicle trips per , .w person (two—way) to 3 .07 vehicle trips per person (two—way) per day. tF The attractions in Lake Oswego are expected to increase from 88,000 vehicle trips per day (two—way) to 144,000 vehicle • trips (two—way) . The trips produced in Lake Oswego are greater than the attractions which indicate that people are leaving • the city for work and services , except for shopping where the attractions are greater, thus attracting motorists to • ' d k shop in Lake Oswego. 411 r 23 ° . . . TABLE 4 ESTIMATED VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION FOR PLANNING AREA Two-Way Average Weekday Volume i 1 __ - Trip Productions Home Connected Work 18,000 28,000 •4 Home Connected Shopping 20,000 33,000 Other 60,000 108,000 410 ,• Total Productions 98,000 169,000 ,. Trip Attractions t, . ` Home Connected Work 11 ,000 21 ,000 - ' Home Connected Shopping 52,000 58,000 i ther 45 ,000 65 ,000 Total Attractions 88,000 144,000 • CARL H BUTIKE CONSULTING ENGINEER ... a ,1 ,- d< . - o , _ b, - ��• , ,, - .y , 24 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 411 The distribution of trip productions to the trip attractions • within_ each traffic analysis zone and streets and highways • reading into and out of Lake Oswego was made separately for '.` tr± r..%" •^:ti • • on f.11.c basis o: 5 locatea tnroughout the region a:A inversely proportional to travel time between home and hrcrk. This distribution model is referred to as the gravity model. • result of this distribution for 1977 verification 411 ' in;licated that approximately 30 percent of work trips originating in Lake Oswego stayed in the city to work while ::me 70 Ueroent of the workers were estimated to commute to • .i�:i outside the city for work. The 30 percent of work :e •h ' ; in; L:.�lLe Oswego u�ilized approximately :,ti percent of the estimated jobs . Therefore, some 45 percent additional workers are estimated to commute into Lake Oswego for work purposes . Distribution of work trips for the year 2000 resulted in an •J, estimate of some 50 percent of resident workers to be employed ...ithin the city and utilizing approximately two-thirds of the job opportunities , 411 COOL H BUTTKE CONLumNO l,NcUNall 25 i Shopping trips were distributed on the same basis as work trips for convenience type shopping trips which normally are made within about two miles of home and comparison type shopping trips which normally are made within a twenty minute drive from home. °. w- _ -,.,- : - - ,e:':e,•.�. t!it• ,--,s «g trip, ,,...ul d be satisfied 1:;: opportunities or attractions within the city. however, for 1977, approximately 50 percent of shopping attractions were estimated to be satisfied by Lake Oswego l'esidents, whereas by year 2000, only 40 percent of shopping attractions are estimated to be satisfied by residents thus `' 'a • requiring 60 percent of the shoppers to come from outside the ry city because of the large amount of retail space being year 2000 thepro- , , posed in the Plan. ;,t • y It is estimated that in 1977 some 2500 vehicles are driven `` a.,,.�o :_*.: city for work purposes and 9500 vehicles are driven m! j �; �' into the city for shopping purposes . By the , it is estimated that approximately 5500 vehicles would be driven 40 into the city for work purposes and 17,000 vehicles for r ,. shopping purposes . i`' t . Y.. Trips produced in Lake Oswego for reasons other than work and shopping were distributed on the basis of the trip distr,i-- 411 bution developed for the Planning Area for the Portland- CARL H BUTTKE CONSUL1 NG LNGINEEn a'er r f 26 Vancouver Interim Transportation Plan with some modifications to reflect trips made only within the city, such as school A trips for elementary through high school. VEHICLE TrIw t:JJ,.;i 17.IE:ii The vehicle trig aBs3.gnments to the street and highway system were made for 1977 to test methodology and for the proposed street system shown on Figure 1 . Assignments were made on the ` basis of previous vehicular distribution among all traffic analysis zones and roadways leading into and out of the city. Trips between zones were assigned to the street which offered the shortest and most logical routing. A comparison of actual 1977 measured daily traffic and assigned 1977 traffic was made at general locations around a .: . the city to test reliability of the procedure . As shown on Table 5 , all locations compared within about 19 percent of the actual volume . The greatest difference was measured on k • the lower volume roadways with smaller differences on higher • ~J • ,A.'• ` volume roadways . Minor modifications were made to the dis- tribution to obtain a closer fit at the actual volumes on •,� rP", ` { those with over a ten percent difference . Since the assign- '. " reasonably close to the meat after this modification was reasonably S, actual measured volumes it was determined that the forecasting i CARL H. ©UTTKE CONSULTING ENUINEER 27 • • 1 1 ` TABLE 5 COMPARISON OF ACTUAL AND ASSIGNED 1977 TRAFFIC • Actual ! Assigned T7 Percent 9 � 1 11,:�^.ition aluun I Volume Diff • :.Cu•"a -rr..) .iF_.;ific Hwy. , Roselicnt Stafford 1 E,,00,0 14,000 -12.5 (Southwest) �?oones Ferry Rd . 13,700 14,600 + 6.6 (West) Carmen, Bonita, 8R 217 , Haines 15 ,200 18, 100 +19.3 • • (North) 49th, Boones Ferry Terwilliger & iRiverside 34,800 37,600 + 8.1 • ��•t .1 79,700 84,300 + 5 .8 • • CARL H tlUTTKE AmpniiYWtl f�lhlNECq Y Zhs 28 Sa procedure was correct and could be utilized for testing the proposed street plan for the Planning Area. V �•' Assignment of year 2000 average weekday traffic (average of Monday through Friday) to the proposed street system is shown • on Figure 5 . Highest assigned traffic volume is on State Street south of "A" Avenue with some 45 ,000 vehicles per day. Next heaviest volume streets are estimated to be State Street north of "A" Avenue, Boones Ferry Road. between Bryant Road and Davis Lane, Kruse Way west of Carmen Drive, Country Club Road and "A" Avenue immediately west of State Street with assigned traffic 1 . volumes between 30,000 and 36,000 vehicles per day. 411 � , Third heaviest travelled group of streets forecast by year 2000 include Riverside Drive, Pacific Highway, McVey Avenue, Boones Ferry Road immediately south of Country Club Road, Kruse Way east of Carmen Drive, "A" Avenue west of 1st Street and Kerr Road south of McNary Parkway with assigned traffic volumes between 20,000 and 29,000 vehicles per uay. • • .+ 4 . • i CARL H BUTTKE CONSUL1INO ENGINEEn • •. . . --'." s1 / 1 f .: ,. • • N, . f:" . . .. ......__. o •` •. 1 Henn ` JN3 So o c.le4 Cs(9m'd P4gA C.. np14KKY : 4. - W 4 KNAl13 20eu .`11: _ . ^;1, •`•l ( TimoraitNE p `\•tiy 'tDp U rr�•��.- et,,LOtt !101 u CCpe '',./ MELWSE J2hp - 1I.y r /•, I H . - f•en i . },• 4o COIIIrtRY G111N •� . - tL I '9• 7J<Ic U°� ii b `' p 41 n .rl ,... 41.dno li':. . 21 wv . . . .a y KNUSE WAY �.` b°d,,Q� .e �I _r .... io. if OONITA 21 _ ,.?//, >• ` }• UKF •0Swtl'.O • p 4�o t. /ill 0 VS OS 0 43 1 o M 3� qi $ \' 1 M11F�.w��r.0�s�.rgA1olNeUllsr GP�M'd >..�.. .._ ;. ,'•:ram u np , yM,,j1° e� y fio P f •rIL V • 2�C•,yl u ✓�✓ !" f',4.! levee 1' OAK ', '� J) . \V� C `r i N p \ L u O :.... - 4a - MItOCk +o k or WE J� p iJ `� -1 ,` • /// . `\\ • r. • �'� go i (4/. f a3°° sEK�s ` fiAeu pia 73et � . 1) y,22ctt .cp^ OY[KIOOM , , .♦"JEAN Ao° n L b • 1 41 r 422t �i�"0v2 Fifly. "• d uln 5 0. E h Lil. Vest 2 0f)Irvine Assignment ii .....-:,.... .....,............z.....___:::: ...,_. .,............ 4:' \61‘ . R. F .i.) ... . . . ... . • ... • .. '11'' • •. ' ' 4. '11. • • • • • I. ,.. ��< a �.. •� / i 1/ +y i-' u • 30 • 1 • • 1 � r STREET CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES A. comparison of assigned year 2000 traffic volumes to the 4 capacity of the exists 3 street system including completion of Jefferson Parkway, Royce Way and West View was made to Y� assess the proposed street system in terms of traffic volume • capacity and determine system deficiencies requiring future analyses . The existing street capacity, shown on Figure 4, will change by year 2000 because some streets will experience heavier traffic on crossroads . Thus , capacity will be reduced either because there will not be as many gaps in the crossing traffic stream or because more traffic signal green time may 4 . be required for cross streets in the future. Y r ' Street capacity of existing streets as they exist today for year 2000 traffic was calculated on the basis of service level D as previously described. Figure 6 indicates those streets anticipated to operate at or lower than level of • AA.° service D. When assigned traffic volume exceeds capacity by a factor varying between 1 .0-1 .2, those streets are anticipated • to be congested during peak periods of the day, generally between 7 :00 and 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. However, g pmotorists, ;, •s,: this congestion is expected to be tolerable to but r, • none the less causing delays at times. For streets where assigned volume exceeds the capacity standard by greater than 1 .2 the resulting congestion is anticipated to be intolerable r. •, CARL rE BUTTKE • 1 ' `' ;., '• -.. '. ,:�. � 1. �,. ,, ` " , o- ' tl /h/ J/ • /J 'ilk' 1 ` 1 (I:I I i ! • I pa• .�1 . •�/ f71 �Uf9 ER5a1 PAA,V .. .� / 'a..`r • ----\\___ .,...../... F J Illir.:.- ANAUS 1 A I' h A - 11MSE4l WE \ I+ WI t�NfIWNNGmHNNNmI �tncclu n J' by f� ti,k,„ t�g �}/ •ki.. ., \ ,'?' ..:.� a /NBkM! 1' . 1 I, ..' ' .1', ., :- :'.'';.1,. COON irl/CI.Un �l2' \ • kIlU9G wA�"""".Ryl i •4 "'+v4lWW14!• .. °• I t:bin • " W hremmlmmm Ir ./ ' a . ,rt., 1 ,' f�Yl. t .r�� lleltlBk• .4l/ •u c lIeB161 ��Vtly // tIONIIA % Ij ..'.:"...'''':.' ..."":.*''...''''':'... '� S IANF OfIvt GU \ u . '054 f—__•-, .-. ra j 0 n�s l� \ i i .1.1, ... • �\.. M4t�"'y�+w"„����11 to • 1.1v I, JI ..+' .—•••• `j '' �,/\�r''''�J/. •� a ilia' 4�� •- ,1 ....... / Cn ty ~ I \- ._ �s/ tt/11 Slgnt. 14 AN IN .. ,, , 50 pAV r'SU `� `` 0 HUMERI tot Cir JEAN�'� SEAGM wS t,. OVEEILOON 1� `‘A,�A O 1 �,t. SS ......\ ".�i F rlgutn tt -�, t , 8ltaol CI pnr,Hy Deficiencies IAfIN tlYf:q -..�3 . a. e r • • • I. • i ''A s • AI • 1 I/- ry2 to motorists . For these situations, the street system would be fully saturated with traffic during peak periods causing excessive delays throughout most of the peak periods. Motorists would seek alternative routes or modes of transpor- tation when this situation occurs x. t ed .:. mhos., s t, e"•.- whi 1. are anticipated to be totally satura • e ith tr„_f o w..ir;:. _,ea , periods by year 2000 include the following (streets assumed at the existing configuration) : d State Street Portions of Pacific Highway • McVey Avenue Country Club Road Kerr Road Portions of McNary Parkway Portions of Jefferson Parkway Touchstone rt lesser Road Portions of Kruse Way x`' Portions of Carmen Drive Portions of Boones Ferry Road Portions of Bryant Road a"?' Portions of the interchange between 1-5 and Kruse Way CARL H 0UTTKE , CONSULTING ENGINEEfl 1. �►, 4 33 ! ! • el RECOMMENDATIONS STREET CLASSIFICATION The following lists she functional classification of urban ., roadways and defines each: Freeway - ThH highest form of roadway design. This type of facility i2 intended to provide for the expeditious ; '.; movement of large volumes of traffic between, across, around or through a city, region or state. The freeway is a divided highway with full control of access . It is not intended to provide access to abutting ' ', , land. Complete separation of conflicting traffic move- ments is provided. Traffic volumes generally are higher than 411 30,000 vehicles per weekday. rl Expressway - An expressway is intended to serve the same function as a freeway in areas where higher capacity and A costly freeway design are not feasible. The expressway r is a divided roadway with access provided only at signalized intersections or interchanges . It differs from a freeway in that it may have few or no grade se arations. Because of this lack of the expressway generally has more accessapointsa and lthus is more useful for shorter trips than the freeway. Traffic volumes generally range between 200000 to 40,000 vehicles per weekday. • Arterial Street - The primary function of an arterial street is to provide for the traffic movement between areas and across portions of a city or region, direct service to principal generators and connect to the free- :IM , way-expressway system. A subordinate function is the provision of direct access to abutting land. Since the primary function of this type street is movement of ' vehicles rather than access to abutting land or temporary storage of vehicles, arterial streets are subject to • , regulation and control of parking, turning movements, entrances , exits and curb uses . Control of access may also be required. Traffic volumes generally range •"' 411 between 5,000 and 35,000 vehicles per weekday. tt • • CARL H CUTTKE 4 . CONSULTING ENGINEEII , • .., ., Collector Street - Functions to conduct traffic between arterial streets , activity centers and neighborhoods. , It is a principal traffic carrier within a neighborhood , carries some through traffic from other neighborhoods and also provides access to abutting .land. The average u . weekday volume could range between 2,000 to 8,000 vehicles per day. • ;,rest .`. Local Street - Provides access to abutting land, These � street: serve Local traffic movements and are not intended to accommodate through traffic . The traffic volume `t•'1: ; less than 1 ,230 vehicles^ es �JI� weekday1weekdaydov r t_ .L 4 in residential :seas . ry ,, t• Cul-de- ac Street t - Functions as a local street providing ' access to abutting land. It is not a through street and contains a turn-around . Its volume' should be less than • R"'. 200 vehicles per weekday in residential areas . t4 Figure 7 indicates the recommended arterials and collector .. streets based on their function. All other streets inside the Planning Area would function as local streete. ' . Figure 7 differs from the proposed street system shown on Figure 1 because some streets will function differently than a ' ..` originally proposed. These are as follows: `+F .. . ,. . a Kerr Road will function as an arterial street serving much of S .W. Portland via 49th and Capital Highway. a Bryant Wayand Wal uga Drive are expected to be • utilized as collector streets rather than as local streets . • South Shore Road between West Bay and Lake View Blvd. will function as a collector rather than a local • • street. CARL H BUTTKE ... .... „ .. • • • , .. • ... . .4 J 1/f� • 1.1( r .IN D 1 A 1 h1 { 44)tr. A [ ! } 2 •1or v a KHAUO D h .7 . ! AT s - IIMetALETE / fr n n t • tfp4 IMPOSE EAt N. ` ! g y \14 h 3 N A I, ~ COON/KY CLUB COOO Y /al I h L!b[No'h ! .` a.S '! �, d t M1 .1 1 erg al .r COLLECTOR ^ KRUSE AV ' d rr` , f ' �I N Y N W[MellY Wm — I ti "—' r enwrtA ,..,/iAKt ammo ( am 7 0 oss as o.►i In `rr r�ra vie asses 11 1 y 1) I• �...�..- "1 Matt CAKL K.'WIRE , v a t.,1 0yG . .• . . , it Se f 111521, :400 ,..,'"'"'''''''''''11** . rf . t N OAK ''''.......'"..\........ O�A001110013(/J/l/�'.'' Ill , j11EE N 1 I SEC L✓/W r 2,1 h OII[[NfK[E N MIAM).�S y �` r r r ,wtst A_ • \ _ r g z I11911:. N i h 7 N 1 \Pk ,• h e t` �, rW; t.f I 1 WWI I.s s•1 if • Mil ?4� 1 OVERLOOK • i. '044., a y. i .i I `� 1 jjJj h �\ '. N t Figure 7 ,....,,, . , . . N \ IlecornmendoG Street Clesslllcatio d Milne LLanes Vui .. ,.. , Narrow// 1 1 CHILDS L c, ` O 11 1 ' ,6 • 1. m Childs Road , _il function as a collector street rather than an arterial street. • TRAVEL LATE R N 1-1" E: .:-I,:. Vl ..��.S;u• wNv a� �� •. .. .... .. 4�. r 1:' i ew IJ M� sorvice "I„:" 4 :. on .he city on Figure 7 'Tor each of ('1.. the arterials a'i- L., ;,or 7reets . SIMILAR STREETS d ' A comparison was made with other streets in the region to • indicate their respective current traffic volumes and the forecast volume on some of the streets within Lake Oswego. 1r;.D.t--li1i Blvd is the , ,trface street within the region rhich carries more than 4.0,300 vehicles per day. It carries • approximately 42 ,000 vehicles per day in the vicinity of • Tacoma Street on a four lane divided roadway with partial control of access and left turns Streets carrying between 30,000 and 40,000 vehicles per day are as follows Powell Blvd. - 35,000 vehicles per day east of Milvraukie Avenue with four lanes plus left turn lanes. CARL H BUTTkE • CnNfULI1NO ENGINEER 37 , •, Powell Blvd . - 30,000 vehicles per day between 17th Ave- nue and Foster with four travel lanes . 122nd Avenue - 30,000 to 35,000 vehicles per day between Stark and Halsey Streets with four lanes plus left turn lanes . • r..,:,,.e„_ e:_icles _ :4,r day between Hall Blvd . .._v,.i . =o,.r truvra lanes plus ti. lefttun, I,.laies Barbur Blvd . - 30,000 vehicles per day at Oregon S.R. 217 with four lanes plus left turn lanes . 82nd Avenue - 30,000 to 37,000 vehicles per day between <�'• Foster Road and Banfield Freeway with four l'anes 410 plus left turn lanes . , Streets carrying between 20,000 and 29,000 vehicles per day include the following: Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. - 20,000 to 25 ,000 vehicles per day east of Oregon S .R. 217 with four lanes plus left turn lanes , Macadam Avenue - 24,000 vehicles per day north of Taylors Ferry Road with four travel lanes . Terwillier Blvd . - 20,000 vehicles per day between • ti Barbur Blvd. and Taylors Perry Road with two to �I three lanes. 411+ o- CARL H. 9UTTKE . tIfINSULTINd ENCIINrth '. ,�4 t; 38 Tualatin Valley - z all Road25 ,000 vehicles per day west of Murray r Blvd. with four lanes plus left turn lane. Cedar Hills Blvd. - 20)000 vehicles per day north of Canyon Road with four lanes plus left turn lanes. • ,. Selected streets carrying 10,000 to 19,000 vehicles per day include the following: Alien Bs.": . - 10,000 to vehicles per day with two lanes plus left turn lanes . Hall Blvd. - 12,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day between Denney Road and Oregon S .R. 217 with two lanes . Farmington Road -- 12,000 vehicles per day west of 411 Murray Blvd. with two lanes . 7th Avenge - 19,000 vehicles per day in downtown Oregon City with two lanes plus some turning lanes and parking. t Y PHASE ZI ANALYSES It is recommended that the second phase of transportation analyses to develop the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan include the following: 1 . Analyze the areas identified as capacity deficient • (where the forecast volume exceeds the capacity standard) 411 CA/IL H DUTTKE • . �r v. .F 39 4*, to develop the optimum transportation solution as related rr to the land use plan by the following: a. Define operational improvements to increase capacity. b. Inves+,igate access to lands abutting the collector ,•i ara arterial streets to reduce possible traffic c. investi a:e land use alternatives to roduce trip generation where necessary and in accord with corn- • munity policies . d. Analyze other travel uses within the right of way • such as bicycles , pedestrians and public transpor- tation to determine methods to accommodate this 4IMtravel within these areas. • e. Estimate the traffic impact upon the adjacent .. � neighborhoods and properties within these areas. f. Analyze a combination of the above. 1 2. Develop public transportation service concepts and policies w to support the planned land use pattern and identify areas where land uses could be changed to support public transportation. • 3. Test alternative street system plans for the city includ- ir,i the option of not developing any new collector or arterial streets to determine the impact on the existing rp 410 system. i CARL H RUTTKE CONSULtING ENOINEfl ., a . . t V • 40 . 41, 4. Develop street standards for collectors and arterials . 5 . Develop an implementation plan indicating priorities for transportation system improvements .• r, • • • • • • • j ✓. S ,. • CARL H. nUTTKE • • CON3ULTINO ENOINEEII 1 • \j' - * 1 , r 1t ,„\ \` 3' n 4 'Y ;'_ ,' S • 1 • / • , •• U1 Y 1/ , CARL H, BUTTKE, INC. • t CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER r • P,0 BOX 636 M PORT'.',NO, OREGON 97207 N 503 / 223.4726 ;(P• ry a r b dr , , N .;i d, REPORT ON y TRAFFIC IIMMPACT • `` ' ., WESTLAKE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON .• 0 Q t i : a::: ::': : :;: ° PROFF�5 t>G1y ; w e912 % X_ • May 4 , 1979 ( /tJ�J . , 0REoort 0 • ; 1r' r1,Q�Ar' 11, ,. 4.� i v• r .4 EXHI' $ T 4 t o-1 h , I •` e ya r. , �` �` Il CARL H. BUTTKE, INC. • • CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER NA P.0. BOX 636 ■ PORTLAND, OREGON 97207 ■ 503 / 223-4728 May 7, 1979 i u Mr. Donald L. Lamb Vice President _` ' Homesite Development Corporatiyon 44 ,75 SW Scholls Ferry Road �' Portland, OR 97225 Dear Mr. Lamb . This report concerning the traffic 'Impact of the proposed Westlake Planned Unit Development is submitted in accordance with our discussion on April 11, 1979. I have estimated the amount of traffic which would be "�* generated bythedevelopment proposed and assigned it to the adjacent street system. Comparisons of capac.Lty utilization along Kruse Way were made for the year 2000 to indicate the impact of the development , the assumed impact of the land to the south of Kruse Way and the requirements of the traffic passing the site . I have also r ti. indicated the access requirements for the site , • I appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project and if you have any questions , please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, 4 CARL H. BUTTKB, INC . o , . J.,... ,ri A6,.. , ei Carl H. Buttke , P,E . President Mr , • 4 • i • ra TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 • DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT 1 Land Use t•'� 1 Access 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT 5 Site Generated Traffic 5 Assignment of Site Traffic 8 Year 2000 Traffic Passing Site 11 ,'• Total Year 2000 Traffic With Site 11 41/• Effect on Kruse Way Capacity 13 CONCLUSIONS 17 RECOMMENDATIONS 19 • .IV 4110 • A ' Y CARL M. HUTTKE, INC. CONSULTNG TRANSPORTATION r:NGNEER ti ii t ,1 • Z • IP LIST OF TABLES r r `+' Page ,.'• 1 Estimated Westlake Generated Traffic 7 2 Comparison of Year 2000 Traffic and Capacity 15 3 Capacity Requirements Along Kruse Way 18 r • I Y LIST OF FIGURES . ` M 1 e 1 Vicinity Map 2 2 Location of Land Uses 4 3 Assignment of Site Generated Traffic 10 4 Year 2000 Traffic Passing Site 12 ' 5 Total Year 2000 Traffic With site 14 i tls Y� `" y f.•.i `• Y . 4• xP •4 iyy ,M1 • x., CARL N BUTTKE,INC. CONSULTINd'TRANSh011TAYlON ENQINEER . P • . ` . „, ti •Y», at ' ` 4Y INTRODUCTION r This report concerning the traffic impact of the proposed Westlake Planned Unit Development (PUD) is submitted in a' accordance with our discussion on April. 11, 1979 . ~ The purpose of this report is to indicate the amount of • traffic which would be generated by this development after ,,Yt + it is fully occupied and to indicate its impact on the capacity of Kruse Way by the year 2000 , DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT Land Use As indicated on Figure 1, the site is located on the north , .. side of Kruse Way , east of 1-5 and south of Melrose . The } , .'� following indicates the amount and type of land uses pro- posed in the PUD. Commercial 200,000 G.S .F. -, General Office 60 ,000 G .S .F. •.y'� Motel 150 ,000 Rooms Single Family Residential 725 D.U. Multi-Family Residential 802 D.U. Neighborhood Commercial 3 Acres Note : G.S .F. = Gross Square Feet of Building Space ` . U. - D. Dwelling Unit • CARL H. HUTTKE, INC. cONSULTNG THANSPONTATlON ENJNEER a. a r l%I • • .iRAINS ,k\ ill �9 , aSO Pkw1' • :a` �9pF ,q �• 44. • CO x, fa- EELROSE{: -CI,G1.‘ a e+ ' Pr.. 'li • d O r y' , ...1, , L,....;,......,...,...,...,::::::::::::::................,..,...,:::::::::::::::::;;;:t1 Tr:::•:::•;•:::.:•::::::::::•:;;;;•:•:::.:•::::::::::::::::::':::::':':' 12 I _ o �• 1L Q t . , „,.........................•.,......"--""•—•••• 0.1 • Q Z • i- WEMBLEY F , BONITA •:•',,,..*.,*...k,::.,..,',.‘,'.,,,i,.,,,*.,,,..,,1 • �. GPPMcc P� • o • P , • ►• �� Upp°R d fi • AI. ' • . . • 1' 0�F .. .: ' P as• /-7 SoUTN sty . . . • .• •• „ ,. • SCBAY ,. . . ..,, 1111"9.- vt• te Ai FIGURE I • . ..11iiiiiiii I I i I F JEAN ` ,�` VICINITY MAP . • x f. • As indicated on Figure 2, the commercial, office and motel :' are to be located at the westerly portion of the site and connected to the west access point on Kruse Way . ry ':'' ---- The neighborhood commercial is to be located in the center of the site on a north-south collector street between Fosberg Road and the east access point on Kruse Way. , " The residential would be located throughout the site, but } w, generally east of the west access point on Kruse Way, as shown on Figure 2. Access 110 As indicated on Figure 2, vehicular access for the site is proposed at four major locations . Two access points are proposed along Kruse Way at the existing curb cuts originally • " constructed with Kruse Way . The westerlyaccess point would serve the commercial, office and motel plus some residential . ' uses . The easterly access point would serve the residential 7' uses . A third access point is proposed as an extension of Fosberg N ' Road south of Melrose and to connect directly to the easterly access point on Kruse Way . ss The fourth major access point is • proposed at the intersection with Fosber ; Road and Carman Drive at the east of the site. 0 , CARL H BUTTKE, INC. u. COWLING TNANBMOgTAfbN tuar ER .' 'r { " . . 1� r i 1 i r d F• IN (,.._.__.__________ __ 1V� �I ((14 il Il Y � • • ____)i �( MELnO{R J .i • N x. � � Shall FaM,I�. � J SIII'Il Family j� "x, u y r. Li ..„ly Sop. Famdy shell Formdl• r r Y O('free. r + '•c 51 k Family J Commercial ... �— 1•a�I MuNr. Mu1lI Family ''1 FaAlly i (3.E. ..J11 '' ' Nj \N.) ` ' OMM*rOal ...+."....T„.,/ C . •,T Model .. ,)Mot �rtr„ly T?atk Sllrool Slits :--' _______ _ \C(\."i. 'r‘,. '' } . ChurtN I C ^+ u y cRusE JAY r 't 4 FIGURE. 2 r-- ` .. . LOCATION OF LAME) USES .. • ICI 0 1.. , t A 5 Additional access is also planned along Melrose at two locations and at Rodgers Road to serve only the residential r , ?� immediately to the south of it . The two access pc'.nts on Kruse Way would be controlled with traffic signals . 9 ' TRAFFIC IMPACT • Site Generated Traffic • 40 The amount of traffic generated by the proposed PUD and '• ,; atria i,o the adjacent street system was estimated on the 'basis of measurements made at similar types., . of land uses t L throughout the United States and here in the Portland area • and from the transportation analyses2 prepared for the City of Lake Oswego for the development of its Comprehensive Plan. 1Institute of Transportation Engineers . 2 • Street System Analysis , Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan, Carl H. Buttke , Consulting Engineer, July 19, 1977 , • ' t a Transportation Requirements-Kruse Way Corridor, Carl , H. Buttke, Consulting Engineer, September 30 1 977 CARL H. UUTTKE, INC. CONSULTING TnANSMO TATYoN ENGINEER )'� 1 i 6 • Table 1 indicates the amount of traffic estimated to be generated by the PUD by the year 2000. Further assumptions concerning the makeup of the commercial site were made and are also included in Table 1. It is estimated that this PUD would add approximately 4 a r'. 21, 500 vehicle trips to the adjacent street syntem on a typical weekday . That is , 10, 750 vehicles would enter the site and 10,750 would leave the site daily . The commercial portions of the site are expected to add nearly 10,000 vehicle trips and the residential area is estimated to add 11,600 vehicle trips per day as shown on Table 1. The . , Ir P.M. peak hour (4 : 30 to 5 : 30 p .m. ) traffic is expected to be 411 approximately ten percent of the daily volume . During the P.M. peak hour, approximately 57 percent of the hourly volume is expected to enter the site while 43 percent of the traffic would leave the site . 4 For traffic analysis purposes , it was also assumed that the land al.ng the south side of Kruse Way between Eangy Road and Carman Drive would also be developed. It is my under-- standing that the westerly portion of that land is being planned for commercial uses . It appears that there are approximately 34 acres available for such uses . At this time, the type and makeup of this commercial is still unknown. ,� Since it is approximately the same land area as proposed in the PUD for commercial uses, the same vehicle trip Y . CARL H. BUTTKE, INC. CONSULtING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER I , 1 , • 7 'i • TABLE 1 ESTIMATED WESTLAKE GENERATED TRAFFIC Driveway Volumes at Adjacent Streets 0 r w 24-Hour P.M. Peak Hour Two-Way Assumed Land Use Volume Enter Exit • 150,000 S .F. 4 ,400 220 220 Commercial- �� s `' Home Furnishings- 25 ,000 S .F. 500 25 25 Cinema- 15,000 S.F. 800 10 30 Restaurants- 10,000 S.F. 1,200 60 20 Office- 60,000 S .F. 500 10 90 • Motel- 150 Rooms 1, 500 50 50 Subtotal 8,900 375 435 410 Single Family- 725 D.U. 7 ,100 460 260 y, Multi-Family- 802 D.U. 4 ,500 325 170 Subtotal 11,600 755 430 r.' Neighborhood Ctr. 3 Acres 1, 000 50 50 TOTAL 21,500 1,210 915 4 Notes S .F. = Gross Square Feet Bldg. Area D.U. - Dwelling Unit 0 y • CARL I. BUTTKE, INr CONSUL/Na'NANBPOR/A?ION hNGINEEp ti N. ,i ♦ i 4Y y:„ ' ,f 1 •t +t r s , pp it 6 w• generation was assumed. Therefore, it is assumed that the ;. commercial land south of Kruse Way would add approximately *_ 8500 vehicle trips to the street system on a typical weekday . The easterly portion of the land south of Kruse Way is 9 `.. planned as industrial. It appears that approximately 62 '�' T � r .. acres of raw land exist . After internal streets are con- structed, it is estimated that approximately 50 acres of * land could be developed into industrial uses . It is estimated that a 50 acre industrial park would add approximately 2600 vehicle trips to the adjacent street � ' system stem on a typical weekday . During the P .M. peak hour some 60 vehicles could enter the industrial park and 400 vehicles leave it . oA u• ;� Assignment of Site Traffic . 4. . The traffic volume generated by the proposed PUD was assigned '' ` to the adjacent street system on the basis of a trip distri- bution and assignment process developed for the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan for Lake Oswego. The internal trips distributed between residential and other uses within the PUD were reduced during the calculation of w s. the site generated traffic which would be added to the 4 . CARL H BUTTKE, INC. CONSULTING VAANSPOfTAT1ON ENGMNEEA .Yi 1. r. a a G 1 a •r 1 ^1 9 r'• adjacent street system. Therefore , the volumes sh own on Table 1 were distributed and assigned to the street system 4 • I d •,l outside the PUD. The assignment of site generated traffic added to the adjacent streets is shown on Figure 3. As indicated on Figure 3, it is anticipated that the site will add nearly 11,000 vehicles per day to Kruse Way immediately east of 1-5, nearly 6000 vehicles per day to Kruse Way east of s,1 Carman Drive , about 3000 vehicles per day to Focberg Road north of the site and approximately 1000 vehicles per day to Botticelli northeast of the site . 110 During the P .M. peak hour (4 : 30-5 : 30 p .m. ) which is expected to be the most critical time period for the adjacent street system, it is anticipated that 490 vehicles would leave the site at the westerly access point on Kruse Way and 540 vehicles would enter there . The anticipated peak hour turning volumes are also indicated on Figure 3. At the easterly access point for the site on Kruse Way, it is estimated that approximately 180 vehicles would leave the • site and 325 vehicles would enter the site during the P.M. peak hour. CARL H BUTTKE, INC. CONSUL9M0 T10N500111AflON ENOR+EE11 V itwebl , `'�?• Ilfil 11 ob..) ab �� .^y o • /� `b ( r to by M o Y LEGEIJDI , „ lo, o o) WEEKDAY VOIUME s fiaq PEAK Moot VOLPM r Y f • . IY . . 41* • s.y 0 e. 4 p a • • era ,r 41 `'�� "� �a) ,�"b i fliiP• 41,1 1 6P. 741 4,1>ti v \t • ,a iJoof Ifo L. aqi kRUSp WAY (6,Yo �° j' • 3da e� ��I7a LJo a FIGURE ` � J• • �� ra r$.0(,) t'b ASSIGKIMEJT : ., C SITE TRAFIc -�• a a f • • Y. • i. • 11 • Year 2000 Traffic Passing Site The year 2000 traffic passing the site consists of all other traffic expected to use the adjacent street system and not generated at the PUD. In other words, it is the year 2000 traffic with the site assumed to vacant . This year 2000 traffic was e + 'stima�ed from the results of, the Phase II analysis1 of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Modifications to the estimate of ° passing traffic were made because the land south of Kruse Way and the Mt. Park F ' Towncenter is assumed to be different than that utilized in the Phase II transportation analyses. Ilk The assignment of the year 2000 traffic passing the site and not oriented to the PUD is shown on Figure 4 . It is x ' estimated that approximately 3000 vehicles would pass through the site daily on the roadway connecting the easterly s' . access point on Kruse Way to Fosberg Road at the north. Total Year 2000 Traffic With Site The year 2000 site generated traffic shown on Figure 3 was added to the passing trai'fic shown on Figure 4 . This total d 1Phase II Transportation Analysis, Carl Be Buttke , Consulting Engineer, May 15, 1978, • CARL H. BUTTKE, INC. • ° CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENOWEER • .., . . .. ...., 1d p I MI M . " / I '•• (,000) MEleoe6 joo • V u . 1,^ LEGEMD I 9 . I0,'1o0) " WEEKDAY VOLUME S 570 . P.M.PEAK HOUR VOL, 1 a {, , M. " „, k• 441151,"�� ,a.� yr • s: O j 9. .-. ab4 4, �". �t 5 eoc) pi.li�i `� gbh • e ii7i A: �o it• r 67i If1•. iYSH „, ••l�'`"� f �l KRUSE. WAY (tcoeo) kit_4( h I* nrs 4 i�eb 4 lots' FIGURE 4 �.., , . , Ai ,..1 ,... • . YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC I 44 • t PASSIIJG SITE I. ..; • s , �'; 13 * traffic is shown on Figure 5 for the P.N. peak hour critical traffic movements and an average weekday . '°' Effect on Kruse Way Capacity s: ti The capacity of Kruse Way at each intersection between 1 r Bangy Road and Carman Drive was calculated on the basis of ' ; ' level of service D. For these calculations , it was assumed that Kruse Way would be four lanes with left turn lanes and that the site access roadway would he 40 feet wide, with one +.+: inbound lane and two outbound lanes . 411 The comparison of r p year 2000 P.M. peak hour traffic and the capacity of the intersections on Kruse Way is shown on N Table 2. This comparison indicates the percent of the inter- section capacity which would be utilized by the peak hour traffic, otherwise referred to as the volume to capacity ratio . . As indicated on Table 2, all intersections on Kruse Way • • would experience conditions where the peak hour traffic is t , ` : expected to be less than the capacity if the site were to • remain vacant and the remaining undeveloped areas of Lake S., Oswego were developed by the year 2000. With the PUD developed as proposed, the anticipated year 2000 peak hour , . 411 traffic at the westerly access point to Kruse Way and at the • • CARL H. BUTrKE, INC, • CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER .. . ;,. N r' • n.q i' v AI i . 1 ' ( .„• wis 100o) MELQoe! . 4 O C r. n • s LEGELID' 3 (10,700) • WEEKDAY VOLUMIL . 570 • PM.PEAK NoUR Vol. ,,' 4. • N +. J00) ` 9. 7 4. .aso �. .: f „ 9 ot ar ''gee / `f tJ i.i. i�rb Iles " !Lc ' �` K4usr. WAY (34;44 • 4 � • %. 1 an ro to. 2a Thar MSG ' `p , on91it FIGURE 5 tl ?: TOTAL YEAR 2000 • "TRAFFIC WITH SITE r. 15 • p ,, , .Mi.. TABLE 2 COMPARISON OF YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC AND CAPACITY ;,, P .M. Peak Hour Conditions M1 Percent of Capacity Utilized Intersection Site Vacant Site Developed r �._�_ - Kruse Way & Bangy Road 82% 100% ID Kruse Way & West Access Point 68 �07 ' Kruse Way & East Access Point 65 100 - ,, Kruse Way & Carman Drive 98 107 Note : Capacity at level of service D. • •s• y i. r I. I CARL H. BUTTKE, INC. CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER �. J. ' , • • 16 • 410 intersection of Carman Drive and Kruse Way would exceed the capacity by approximately seven percent . The capacity of the westerly access point at Kruse Way • could be increased with the installation of a double left turn lane for the eastbound to northbound traffic movement . If this were done , the traffic volume is expected to utilize approximately 94 percent of the intersection capacity . The double left turn lane probably would not be required until about 1990 or until the westbound Kruse Way traffic increases to require the double left turn movement . The above capacity analyses have been made assuming that ,.�;,•� the land south of Kruse Way would be fully developed. That 410 assumption could distort the impact implications of the PUD • • since that land is not developed. Therefore, an analysis • was made to indicate the traffic impact with the land vacant to the south. If the land to the south of Kruse Way were not developed, it • is calculated that the year 2000 P .M. peak hour traffic at the west access point to Kruse Way Would utilize 87 percent • of the intersection capacity . At the east access point, the traffic would be expected to utilize 77 percent of the intersection capacity . Therefore, the land to the south of KrUse Way when developed 4 is estimated to require 20 percent of the intersection • CARL H. BUTTKE, INC. cONSULTING TRANSPORTATON ENGINEER { _ ,. 15 • TABLE 2 COMPARISON OF YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC AND CAPACITY F .M. Peak Hour Conditions Percent of Capacity Utilized • Intersection Site Vacant Site Developed .•:. Kruse Way & Bangy Road 82% 100% 411 Kruse Way & West Access Point 68 107 Kruse Way & East Access Point 65 100• Kruse Way & Carman Drive 98 107 Note : Capacity at level of service D. • ,+ 41) CARL N. BUTTKE, INC. CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER , • • d °� 16 r'• . k intersection of Carman Drive and Kruse Waywould exceed the V} capacity by approximately seven percent . ^l7 ' The capacity of the westerly access point at Kruse Way could be increased with the installation of a double left turn lane for the eastbound to northbound traffic movement . If this were done , the traffic volume is expected to utilize , approximately 94 percent of the intersection capacity . The x,! , double left turn lane probably would not be required until about 1990 or until the westbound Kruse Way traffic increases to require the double left turn movement . '. • The above capacity analyses have been made assuming that , the land south of Kruse Way would be fully developed. That assumption could distort the impact implications of the PUD ,• since that land is not developed. Therefore, an analysis ? was made to indicate the traffic impact with the land vacant to the south. • . If the land to the south of Kruse Way were not developed, it is calculated that the year 2000 P.M. peak hour traffic at - 1 ; the west access point to Kruse Way would utilize 87 percent of the intersection capacity . At the east access point , the traffic would be expected to utilize 77 percent of the intersection capacity . Therefore, the land to the south of Kruse Way when developed is estimated to require 20 percent . f the intersection • • • CARL H BUTTKE.INC. CONSULTING ThANSPORTATION ENGINEER o 17 capacity at the west access point to Kruse Way and 23 percent of the capacity at the east access point to Kruse • • Way. A summary of the capacity requirements at the intersections :• of the east and west access points to Kruse Way is shown on Table 3 . As indicated, the year 2000 passing traffic on K:"use Way is expected to require 48 percent of the capacity , the proposed PUD is expected to require 29% of the capacity • at the east access point and 39 percent of the capacity at yp the west access point and the land to the south of Kruse Way would require 23 percent and 20 percent of the respective 4111, capacity . • 4. CONCLUSIONS • It is concluded from these analyses that the proposed PUD • i;6 expected to have a lower impact on the intersection with the west access point to Kruse Way and a higher impact at ' • the east access point than what was assumed for the trans- portation analyses prepared for the Comprehensive Plan . The • 1 development of a double left turn lane at the west access point by about 1990 is expected to increase the capacity to • f CARL H. BUTTKE, INC. CONSULTING TO ANSPORTATION ENGINEER .. e • 9 - y. • ` , , , ,e. 18 0 ul. „ 4 TABLE 3 ' CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS ALONG KRUSE WAY Year 2000 P .M. Peak Hour Traffic , .1 Percent of Intersection Capacity j 7.,, East Access Pt . West Access Pt . Proposed PUD Traffic 29%* 39% Land to South of Kruse 23 20 —... : .. : Way Traffic Passing Traffic 48 48 Total 100% 107% ....................... ..v. • • *Effect of through traffic at east access point reduced • 0 •: CARL H. BUTTKE, INC, t • CONSULtINO TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER `"�' r , 9 l ' I9 �u n 410 the point where both access points along Kruse Way would function at or below the capacity standard. • • ,a. RECOMMENDATIONS • 'et. It is recommended that the following traffic control measures be implemented to reduce the traffic impact along Kruse Way : Y, • A double left turn lane for eastbound to northbound traffic be installed in Kruse Way at the westerly access point . The double left turn lane should be approximately 110 200 feet long plus a taper at the west end. This double left turn will probably not be needed until about 1990 . : . In the meantime , a single left turn lane about 350 feet longshould be provided in the median area. • A 300 foot left turn lane for the eastbound to northbound '• , '`' Y y traffic be provided in the median of Kruse Way at the .' east access point . . a Both access points to Kruse Way be 40 feet wide to provide . two outbound lanes and one inbound lane . • Both access points on Kruse Way be signalized with pro- • , tected left turn phases. • hti • • CARL N. BUTTKE, INC. s CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER Y • • 1,*_ I -.a r. . a '�' ., • ' . . .i i" t,• 20 • An internal connection between the east and west access roadways be Y provided to accommodate internal traffic a:',: I` movements between the residential areas and the co mmercial area. This roadway is recommended to connect to the easterly access road north of the neighborhood hborhood commercial site and be aligned in the northwesterly direction to the west access road. It is expected that this conne would discourage through traffic movements but rov etion ,. p ide adequate internal circulation. • Access to the north on Melrose, Vosberg and Hod gets should be as originally proposed. Access to the east at the intersection with Fosber g Road ' and Carman Drive should be provided with a two lane roadway widened at the intersection to provide a left turn lane . The intersection Should be aligned as indi- cated in the City Comprehensive Plan. . • • • • CARL H. BUITKE, INC, CONSULTING fiANSPORTATgN ENGINEER ; ` J ' O'DONNELL, RAMIS, CREW & CORRIGAN +1 JEFF' J3l►CHRACH ATTORNEYS AT LAW . _L F.CORRIGAN* BALLOW WRIGHT BUILDING CLACKAMAS COUNTY OFFICE,W.CORR 1727 N Hoyt Street 181 N.Grant, Suite 202 GRF�F Portland, Oregon 97209 Canby, Oregon 97013 (503) 266-1149 MARX'E.—HERZOG*** TELEPHONE: (503) 222-4402 YIIISura7'd.A. MONAHAN FAX: (503) 243-2944 NANC.f 1.MURRAY JAMES M.COLEMAN MARX'W.O'DONNELL PLEASE REPLY TO PORTtAND OFFICE KENNETH M.ELLIOTT TIMC". 7 V. RAMIS SpesW Cou ral SH r.at C.JUDGWAY* ' WILII M a SfALNAIERROBINSON** July 19, 1991 u' " •ALSO AOMTR80 TO PRACTICE IN STATE Or WASNNGTON . ^A:S.1 AOMr=TO MAC11C6 IN W60CNSIN . . "—AOMrf7=TO Pucnce IN NSW YOAK ONLY 0 Mr. Robert Galante HAND DELIVERED ' ' Senior Planner City of Lake Oswego 380 "A" Avenue Lake Oswego, OR 97034 't Re: Kruse Oaks Commercial Center/File No. DR 13-907 .: . Dear Bob As x indicated at the recent DRB meeting we are submitting additional information from three expert members of the development team. The staff report indicated three areas of conflict within ; : the record which are addressed by the new submittals. We believe • `r this information will assist the staff in reaching conclusions with respect to the three disputed issues. We believe it is a reasonable expectation on the part of the applicant that the report will provide evaluation of the evidence on these issues for the benefit of the DRB in their considerations. ;. •. We are also willing to work with the staff in developing any ; conditions which are appropriate. The hearing process can be far. 4 . . more meaningf0 if proposed conditions are developed so that testimony by all participants can be focused on this critical aspect of the decision. TRAFFIC ISSUES: In explaining the criteria for the benefit of the DRB and the public we feel it is important that the staff report clearly • indicate the legal irrelevance of challenges to the year 2000 traffic projections. Clear precedent established for Westlake by the DRB, City Council and LUBA makes this issue outside the permissible scope of review. LUBA, the Council and the DRB have ruled in previous phases of development that applicants within the Westlake area may rely upon the traffic projections ' that were the basis of the original Plan and Program. As a legal matter these issues may not be retried during the development of an individual phase of the project. Y have . * . ; IT r P • u 4" ii J a. k .J v '73. NNELL, RAMIS, CRER' & CORRIGAN a r v . Mr. Robert Galante duly 19, 1991 Page 2 included a copy of the LUBA decision on this point. I believe that the staff report should also point out the results of staff review of the methodology and conclusions submitted by the applicant' s traffic expert. This information has been provided for previous Westlake phases. I also request that the staff conducting this review be present at the hearing in order to answer questions raised by the DRB. The su} mission by Mr. Woelk, traffic engineer for the project, addresses the issues of year 2000 traffic projections and site • generated trips. I believe his explanation to be persuasive and I request that the appropriate staff member provide an evaluation to the DRB. WETLANDS:: Mr. Schott has provided additional information addressing - ' questions raised regarding the extent of wetlands. Any ��. wetland that exists is a nonessential wetland, and therefore beyond the jurisdiction of the DRB, but Mr. Schott has responded to each point raised by Mr. Thorns. In doing so Mr. r, Schott reaffirms his previous findings and points out the I ` , numerous shortcomings in Mr. Thorns' analysis. Mr. Schott also addresses the matter of the preservation of Sessile Trillium. He suggests a specific proposal to ensure preservation: -. • • "Fortunately, the heart of the population is located • in an area that would not be developed, and can be left in native vegetation. The plants that would be impacted can be transplanted to the area propos 'd ,r µ' for wetland mitigation. " Y ' ` 6. The applicant agrees to this proposal as a condition. TREES: S. Bob Mazany, consulting arborist for the project, responds to each point raised by Mr. Goetz. I believe you will find that the differences between these two experts are not great. Mr. ` Mazany emphasizes the need for a continuing process of tree preservation. The applicant is quite willing to undertake 0 ,; . y such a program. After going to great lengths to save as many n 4" z - C C !a�!xx7ELL, RAMIS, CREW & CORRIGAN • • 410 Hr. Robert Galante Maly 19, 1991 Page 3 R • trees as possible it makes obvious sense for the property " owner to take the necessary steps to preserve the trees. • Mr. Mazany also points out that thr4 most recent plan expands • the size of the tree islands and rv_-duces and realigns parking spaces on the site in order to reduce impact on tree roots • zones. This action is further indication that the efforts of the applicant to develop a plan which is sensitive to the site. • :f you have any questions regarding information in this letter or the supplemental reports which we have provided, please feel free yo call me at 22-4402. Very truly,yours, 410 Timothy V. Ramis U 'VR/if Enclosures -x` reaTV+da .la ..c: Mr. J. Michael Moody • • yq A y • • • • • 't . • �• ® / • • • • • • • r • • • < Q; • • • • • • • { r I juiy 12, 1991 ii; tiSSO CI_4 TED Mr. Mike Moody 0.-A NSPO R TA T IO N Eaycorp Development �= ON.GINEERING &' ' P.O. Box 2222 `. " :14 A1V I!Y Cr Lake Oswego, OR 97035 ..: (� T�� �) NOV 636-3232 (603) 743-4497 r Keech Review Gear Mr. Moody: i am in receipt of the letter dated April 27, 1991 from Mr. Robert Keech, Consulting Traffic Engineer regarding the review of ATEP's Traffic Study of the Kruse Oaks Commercial Center, • from Keech In his review of the ATEP report makes several assumptions that are not correct and tend to mislead the non-traffic engineer. First Mr. Keech indicates that the driveway volumes appear to be low. The trip generation Mr rt .Trnbers used for the analysis were approved by the City of Lake Oswego Engineering staff and a-e consistent with the types of trip generation volumes assumed In the Kruse Way Corridor Sw:idy;Buttke 1983. • I agree with Mr. Keech on the approach to determining driveway volumes but must disagree on has assumptions that the volumes are low. Mc„ Keech also indicates that reasonable assumptions can be made about the use of the site, r= Generation rates used in the preparation of the ATEP review are the accepted standard for all; ,lands of developments. Mr.Keech's assumptions for the type of businesses that will come to this location are not based ire any fact and just because the trip generation categories used are general in nature does not mean that the trip generation is low. • The institute of Transportation Engineers publication "Trip Generation, 4th Edition" section 820, • • page 1150 is a compilation of over 500 studies of centers ranging from 6,900 square feet to over 1,66600,000 square feet and therefore is used to portray a center such asp the Kruse Oaks syx} • a°'` development. The Trip Generation Manual on page 17, describes the use of trip generation rates for what is t ' ` calL d Multi-use projects. The Kruse Oaks development should be considered as a Multi-Use prcilect since the project is broken down into retail, office and day care center. Page 17 indicates ....�� - - EXHIBIT 4040, .DOUGLAS WAY LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 (50 F,0. BOX 13185 SALEM, OR 97309 (5 I Q . OrLIb�gC 1 I n , ! : 9 1 THL+ 1 E. . .7 ATEP R' • 0 Kruse Oaks Commercial Center July 12, 1991 P e2 410 �:ra "I . appears reasonable to assume that multiuse projects would potentiallygenerate less • � t pp edema' vehicular trips, because of the Internal matching of trip ends within the project," a...ed on the land use designations approved by the City of Lake Oswego for this development, the volumes and trips estimated by the ATEP report are reasonable and prudent for this development. W ,. the need for any future traffic projects, the City of Lake Oswego in the early 1980's prepared several traffic impact studies for the area including Kruse Way and the Westlake area. Seth of these studies included this development in their report and at a much higher land use • • c'er•:sity than currently proposed. + li. Since this development and the additional 700 single family homes currently under construction .Nr;ers included in the Kruse Way and Westlake studies future traffic projections were not done as part of this report. They were already done by the previous area wide studies. 0. • Granted the current traffic volumes in the Westlake area a+e approaching 75% of the year 2000 rcn nes projected by the 1983 Buttke report. The entire Westlake area is approaching 75% of p the build out assumed in the 1983 Buttke report, so its natural to assume that those volumes will be met someday in the future. The Kruse Oaks Commercial Center review was conducted using methodology, trip generation rates and assumptions approved by the City of Lake Oswego Staff and the report is consistent t the other traffic impact report work done in the area during the past 10 years. Mr. Keech's review of ATEP's traffic report is not based in fact or in traffic engineering procedure. a.,5,c studies are conducted to identify traffic impacts of a development using "standard" and • acci oved methodology. The use of assumptions that are not part of any standard methodology • crloo, confuse the issues at hand and make the job of determining what will take place just that ~ h harder. • ntr,erL Iy, ;SS+OCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, (ATEP) iuthard L. Woelk P r.ropal . • • a v ' f12'I991 16:53 FROM SHQPIFO TO :432944 F,O /Oa • S A.PIao . ASS IA 1020 SA:Taylor .. , :...': Suite 610 Portland July 11, 1991 Oregon 9 205 Tel: 503/223.7490 Mathew Miller Via:SC'3/22Z3.4731 Gr'eenstreet Architecture 17685 SW 65th, Suite 200 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 :. Dear Ma►hew: i have reviewed Chris Thorns report on the Kruse Oaks site, and I found it interesting. `3e has • =viewed the literature pertinent to the oak and ash communities of the Willamette Valle;,and he has visited the site. However,I do not agree with several of his comments, and felt that I should • respond to them. } Comment: (Page 1, Paragraph 1)...Of special interest is the sighting of Marsh or Sessile Trillium'Trillium p.rviflorun,)which is currently on the States Review List. R.:esponse: The Oregon Natural Heritage Data Base was contacted concerning the current status of sessile trillium. Sessile trillium has been removed from the list because they found the plant was t more widely distributed, and had higher populations than first believed, However,Lake Oswego , =quires preser.adon IDS 9.020(5)1 of the trillium. Fortunantly, the heart of the population is k�+cated in an area that would not be developed, and can be left in native vegetation. The plants that ould be impacted can be transplanted to the area proposed for wetland mitigation. Comment: (Page 1, Paragraph 1) The site was visited on April 25, 1991. Because most of the getation is leafing or blooming this is the optimal season for preliminary identification of wetland 1 as by assessing plant communities. .response: While the end of April is near optimu,,: for plant species identification it is not the • .�^dmum season for assessing wetland hydrology, which occurs at the start of the growing season he Willamette Valley. Wetland determinations are based on three criteria and not just y: . we=Aeration: • • Y. • C cimment: Page 1 Paragraphs 2& 3 of the vegetation description. ' Response: These two arainteresting,graphs are but there is no data supporting this scenario for tele site, and it is based on supposition: I did not observe any indications of past fire events on the . • s and none were reported by Thorns, Additionally, 1 disagree with some of the conclusions t rat were made in the reports cited by Thorns, Ash is generally less tolerant to fire than oak, but • ±z ian areas are more resistent to fires than upland area. These areas have a higher water content, aro!are greener. The reason ash was restricted to riparian stringers is because these areas typically c: not burn during fires set by Indians or lighting. k d question is not if the areas developed under wetland conditions, but is the area currently a w mod? d EXHIBIT 1 t 0 OR t -gO A i • " , • 'f ^,�. .. y � r,1, f'�;d.. , ' .gip`� ,.'. • c 4" ✓1b91 1053 FRam SH2PIRO TO 24:12944 P.Ow/04 . u iY. R of •,-„ Y Comment: (Page 2,Paragraph 2) The occurrence of SCS mapping of a"poorly drained"and a , , p. somewhat poorly drained" soil coupled with the occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation introduces: the probability that wetland occur on the site, ,r, • (, • Response: First, the SCS does not list Aloha soils (somewhat poorly drained soils) as hydrie soils, and the Aloha soils on the site do not have indicators of hydric conditions. Second,the e reason the site was investigated in the first place was because the SCS mapped a finger of Cove soils in the middle of the site, and Cove soils are listed as hydric soils. The 30 foot band mapped by Chris Thorns appear to be primarily Cove soils, and have hydric indicators. However, it • ormally takes many ye•ns for soils to change if hydrological conditions change, and the sites hydrology has been significantly altered. Comment: (Page 2, Paragraph 3) Because hydrology is the driving force in creating wetlands it is the most important factor. Hydrology determines the development of hydric soils and the development of hydric soils and growth of hydric vegetation. It is sometimes the hardest feature(,.' .: a wetland to understand and interpret—The ditch on the west half of the site does not appear to carry any water and there is indication that the east/west ditch,north of the site diverts some runoff co the west, The medium strip of Oak/Ash forest is topographically higher than the west ditch and intercepts the east/west ditch to north. The Questions arises, "Is the medium snip of Oak/Aa'h , , forest collecting and transpiring some of the runoff from upslope before it reaches either ditch?" `• The installation of monitoring wells can answer that question, ` espouse: 1)Hydrology is the driving force of wetlands. Without water wetlands cannot develop. 2)Hydrology does not determine the growth of most hydrophytic species. Most k• hydrophytic species have the ability to grow under a wide range of conditions, but competition from other species restrict them distribution to wet areas. A more accurate statement would be that wetland hydrology restricts the distribution of species to those { v species that have a tolerance of wetland hydrology. • 3)Wetland hydrology is sometimes difficult to interpret if the delineation is done during ry • ,' ', periods where the ground water hydrology is not at or near maximum. Wetland hydrology is easy to interpret when the field work is performed when the hydrological conditions are at their maximum. In western Oregon maximum ground water hydrology occurs during late winter and early spring. SHAPIRO visited the site in late February when the hydrology should have been at its maximum. • 4) The ditch on the west p otion o,f the site has been dry during,all three of SHAPIRO's . M' site visits. The upper end of the ditch has been blocked off. Additionally, the east/west ti ditch was observed to carry water away from the site during all three site visits. ,�. 5) During the February site visit the oaks, ash, hazelnuts, spiraea. rose, and other shrubs A. were still dormant, and did not have any leaves for transpirauon. Very little, if any, transpiration occurs from tree and shrub stems (they do not have stomata). The comment . ,/ • , . _ ' about transpiration is not appropriate • or valid, However, if the area was dominated by ' coniferous species then the comment would be valid, 5, 6)If Chris Tnoms would have visited the site either after heavy rains,or during the late a .' 'AI � .' winter or early string he could have observed the hydrology at its maximum. All least two F • of SriAPIRO's r*isit occurred after heavy rains the previous day, and only the area • . • , • • r5 .` «P:941 :E Sr FROM SHpF:RO TO :4v::444 identified by SHAPIRO had wetland hydrology. 7)The wetland is not currently mapped as an essential wetland on the City's HydrologyMap. Comment: (Page 2,Paragraph 4, Conclusion section)...installation of monitoring wells... Response: If I felt that the hydrology was questionable I would have recommended monitoring wells, but in my professional opinion the hydrology was not a problem. The development around the area has diveted much of the water away from the site. Also, the east/west ditch effectively drains away water that used to flow through.the site. Historically much of the area identified Chris Thorns probably used to be a wetland. ilowev�;,r, thefled by years, and currently the site does not meet the three criteria drainager a pattern has been altered f� Comment: age 2. last ast para+trraph)...red legged frogs... Response: A red legged frog survey was conducted, and no frogs t i, . were observed, A , ! Comment: "the (rim�'e) ash and underlying vegetation is more of an index of wet conditions than the oak is of dry conditions. r ' Wetlands Response: Acconiing to the Federal Manual for Identification and Delineation of Jurisdi''ctio(Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1989)the National List of Plant Species Thar Occur in Wetlands; Oregon ^ies hydrophv-ac classification. While I know(Reed a1species et al, s8whshe e ob consultedould be for the :assification, until the classification is changed a their • =a-yang wetland delineations, Currently, Oregon we have to use its current ela.�sification when Oregon ash is a faculative wetland species. While I have ob is served as growing an d species, and in moist conditions, I have observed ash +owing in upland conditions more oftenthan I ay have ;vxak,S in wetland conditions. r Finally, unless the wetland is recognised as an essential •t or significant wetland the Cin aOrS not „7„-Ye jurisdiction. However. since over 50 cubic yards of fill would be placed in the wetland the Division of State Lands does have jurisdiction, and an appropriate :o construction, Also. since the wetland is less than an are n size and is t would iso ated,or aan•e the hcadwate�s it would fall under the Arrny Corps of Engineers (Corps) Nationwide 26 r alit. The Corps would be notified of any proposed activities, ?least call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ,� SHAPT ti ASSOCIATES, INC. . • : . M,arran Schott, Ph.D. ma,`S s � _ x ^ xy 1 • • • • C'. • • 9� V 7•` r1-Aj • • • 111 • E • ! • • • ei -,L7 —=2 -- 01 MON e : 44 P . 02 u• • C•�4 yf ..'_i 1,to ZCZ.17, '4212c1 G41,10.1“7L61 ec 4,-.,,,I 2,,,,,hrupt L 0n614tina csetvie,c C: Randy Tomic 4 Greenstreet Architecture ,1 ,. '4, Bob Mazany ASCA #133 4 , , , , , .. . Consulting Arborist - , ' uA E; July 15, 1991 t Q•: y RE: Kruse Oaks FT s .:omit the following as response to the "Kruse Oaks Site Plan Review reprt" of Stephen Goetz (no date) . I will address, in order, the questions posed by Mr. Goetz . It is important to note thac n.=yny , cf Mr . Goetz ' s issues were previously addressed, along with :e:zmmendations, in my Memorandum of May 9, 1991 . 4'1 _ : agree that it is inevitable that construction activities will mpact those trees designated to be retained. Hence, everything arboriculturally will be done to minimize this including fertilizing, aeration systems, pruning and other standard • 'a therapeutic measures as conditions require. Zontrary to Mr. Goetz ' s assertion, short of no development at all , =_ny type of development will impact the site . However, it is my :pinion the submitted design will have far less impact than even 4 - single family residences which would require incorporating a cul de s=lc and extensive exca ..ation for utilities, sewer and other site . :rprovements prior to the actual residential construction . The development west of Westlake Drive is a good case in point . . try memorandum of May 9, 1991 fully outlines my recommendations fOr tree preserva,.ion care and continuing therapeutic measures . ' • 2 . agree with Mr. Goetz that " . . . there would not be any signLficant tr.pact on the trees in the adjacent open space parcel as a result 1. , • :f� the normal off site construction activities associated with the w;oposed development of Kruse oaks . " *_ have recommended, and the developers have agreed, that tree Protection fencing will be installed before construction, including separating the open space to the north and remain in place 0 t,.hroughout the duration of construction. If there is a site n#erg which requires the penetration of the protective fencing, it wn,• e. done under the direction and with the approval of the a ' E X H`I a I T tLorist . • __ , D. %3•Sb ,. • ,. `' , l . . o . \•.�� ! . , w . sH, Randy Tomic July 15, 1991 �' P2oe Two J,, 3. I also agree with Mr. Goetz ' s assertion that numerous trees on the subject Site " . . . have already been impacted during previous construction (single family homes and Westlake Drive) by physical man made changes to their root zones . " Trees do tend to decline during construction . I want to reiterate , A that, based upon DRB approval and subsequent finalization of construction, grading and landscaping plans, all will be done ; ar.boriculturally to prolong the life of the trees . ,i,,' The developers have made further changes and modifications, as reflected in their Alternate Plan (dated June 18, 1991) , including } ' realignment and reduction of parking spaces so that tree root zones ,, 'Io would be less seriously impacted. Said plan also recommends ..removal of certain marginal trees that would otherwise be subject • to decline and replaced with new more suitable trees and shrubs s ' which will further improve the site, My goal, as is the developers, is to maintain the site ' s most viable and healthy trees and do what is necessary to minimize any construction impact . 410 F S., x. We all agree with Mr. Goetz that it is difficult to provide detailed tree-by-tree recommendations prior to knowing what will be the finalized construction approvals. However, all landscape plans and methods will be reviewed and approved �` by myself as consulting arborist . We will attempt, as much as is economically feasible, to minimize needless impact on trees . ra As previously stated, the Alternate Plan (June 18, 1991) , addresses the expansion of tree islands and reductions and alignment of r parking• spaces on the site. In addition, aeration and drainage systems will be designed based on circumstances present at that time where root zone intrusions may be required, ` ' A '' the tree preservation methods relative to the "plaza" area previously have been outlined in the Alternate Plan (June 18, 1991) . However, I fully agree with Mr. Goetz when he says, "It may turn out that the trees are not worth the expense and effort to do this , " Nevertheless the r goal will be to retain as many of the trees as feasible and I am recommending removal of the shorter life trees and incorporating an extensive tree preservation and ' '' e replanting plan. - conclusion, the intention and plan is to retain as many trees as Bible and each tree will be evaluated on an individual basis as ' = construction plans are finalized and as the development -ve been assured all economically feasible constructionpmethodsewill1,:.= utilized to minimize impact . In addition, as addressed in my '' -'orancium of May 9, 1991 , an extensive post-construction tree c-Mrtenance plan will be developed to sustain tree health. L aNr USE v ' R,t RD OF APPEALS ó BEFORE THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEkZ OF THE STATE OF OREGON Str 26 3 1 r FE 66 { lICHAEL HOFFMAN, ) ktCEIVED Petitioner, ) SEP 27 1990 4• and ) 5 ) O'DOWELL.PURs.CREW a Crlp?�'V „ : v' . KAREN BLAKE, LISA JACKSON and ) 5 GREG PEADORS, .) • ', ) LUBA No. 90-067 Intervenors-Petitioner, ) vs . ) FINAL OPINION g ) AND ORDER CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO, ) • c ) ' • 'C Respondent, ) y,; • ) ,and ) . ) JEF F REY FRANK and CAROLS FRANK, ) i' • • Intervenors-Respondent . ) 410 Appeal from City of Lake Oswego. .' < A. Richard Vial, Portland, filed the petition for re% _e: and argued on behalf of petitioner and intervenors-petitioner , r,,._ With him on the brief was Hagen, Dye, Vial & Hirschy, P .C . - John H . Hammond; Jr. , Lake Oswego, filed a response brief and argued on behalf of respondent . • Timothy V. Ramis, Portland, filed a response brief and • c argued on behalf of intervenors-respondent , Wi:h hi,;, on the zr P�_ was O'Donnell, Ramis, Crew & Corrigan . A. HOLSTUN, Referee; SHERTON, Chief Referee; KELLINGTON, ,. Refe.ree, participated in the decision . , AFFIRMED 09/26/90 r You are entitled to judicial review of this Order . Judicial review is governed by the provisions of ORS 197 , 850 . • .4 • k, AK i. Y I. EXHIBI1 , Dom ` 3 , I �._. w .., s `' Opinion by I3olstun. • ^,� ``zTT7RR OF `rR1",- D'..CTSToli 3 petitioners challenge an order adopted by the Lake Oswego ` City Council approving "Westlake ' 89, " the sixth phase of the 5. Vestlake Planned Unit Development (PUD) . The city council ' s 6 decision affirms a decision of 'the Lake Oswego Development o review Board which approves (1) a subdivision and minor land ' . ofJ S _artition, (2) a 204 lot planned development, and p r (3) several a modifications to the Residential High Density (R-5) zone setback ., requirements . vr...--rry zc Pro TvrrRtt�Ntr, o ' Karen Blake, Lisa Jackson and Greg Meadors move to .- intervene on the side of petitioner. Jeffrey Frank and Carole • 4 Frank move to intervene in this proceeding on the side of < respondent . There are no objections to the motions, and they y are allowed. -S D'( 2= . • Although the city ' s decision include's both .a, partition and "m4na`-y subdivision approval for a 204 lot PUD, nc party a estions our jurisdiction in this matter ,coo ORS 19 . O1S (1 0) (b) (B) Me nir 11u1.sa1 n��+1e v C; *v r Cn d5' l *Our review jurisdiction is limited to land use decisions. ORS 197.825. _. As amended by the 1985 leg islature, ORS 197.015 (10) (b) (9) provides that the s':atutory definition of "land use decision" does not include a decision " (w)hich approves, approves with conditions or denies a • — subdivision or paztition, as described in ORS chapter 92 , located within an urban growth boundary where the decision is consistent with land use standards ( , ) • r . I rtl .. . 11 r Or LUBA — (LUBA No. 90-060, September 18, 1990) ; pp -m.rttpr taa 1 1 nw _ Co +n v, Or LUBA (LUBA No. 90-034, June 11, • CB.90) . However, the city's decision does more than simply grant x• approvalof a partition and subdivision; it grants planned unit . evelopment.,_approval . In addition, the city's decis,:i,on grants • 6 :modifications of setbacks that would otherwise be required by' the Lake Oswego Code . For these reasons, the city ' s decision .rires not appear to fall within the exception provided by �: :5 197 .015 (10) (b) (B) . • the Westlake PUD is a "major development" under the Lake ;I:sweao Code (LOC) . LOC 49 . 140; 49 .145 . Major developments may developed in phases, with prior or concurrent approval of an :-retell Development Plan and Schedule z LOC9 . 15 r =3. 405 (2) . LOC 49 . 405 (1) provides : :According to LOC 49.410, the purpose of an ODPS is to: " (1) Assure that the proposed development, considered as a whole, will conform to the Comprehensive Plan and • Development Standards, " (2) Assure that individual phases will be properly coordinated with each other au,d can be designed to meet the Development Standards, " (3) Provide preliminary approval of the land uses, maximum potential intensities, arrangement of uses, open space ` > and resource conservation and provision of public "- services of the proposed development, and " (4) Provide the developer a reliable assurance of the City's expectations for the overall project as a basis for detailed planning and investment." y+,;` R 410 • 4 a r-. - • t "Development p permits for individual phases within a major development shall be approved and conditioned in accordance with the ODPS . Development permits for each phase shall assure that the development plans conform to the ODPS, as well as the Comprehensive Plan and Development Standards . " t • Under LOC 49 .420 (2) , an application for ODPS approval must S include: 5 • 11* * * * * "c. Maps and narrative indicating types and location r S of land uses to be provided including park and open space sites or other reserved land. 9 "d. General layout of streets, utilities and uu drainage management measures including areas reserved for water improvements . "e . General layout ' or siting of public transit, bicycle and pedestrian circulation. Maps and/or narrative showing "f. off-site improvements necessary to serve -the proposed development to occur in each phase . ' ` 1 C 11* * * * * it l'_"a t Under LOC 49 . 430, the planning commission may approve an CDP,; only if it finds the ODPS '* * * will sat=sfy the _ecuirements of LOC 49 , 615 (3) and, U 11* * * * * • M " (2) Provides for land uses and intensities that are consistent with the provisions of the • - Comprehensive Plan, * * * and with the planned capacities of public facilities, • .4 '2 a • ' 4 yMw ri ...! 3Among the approval criteria included in LOC 491615 are con!ormance with . :1) 5the city's comprehensive plane (2) statutory and code requirements, (3) applicable development standards, and (4) applicable future street plans, • ,.1 ".+re 4 ill ' II ' y;4 1, a An approved OAPS must consist of the following documents : " (1) A site plan showing location and type of all land uses proposed, approximate acreage and approximate number of units or square footage of uses . • r " (2) A general utility plan showing streets, } utilities, drainage management measures, hike . and pedestrian ways and transit locations . " (3) A statement acknowledging need for off-site r ; improvements as required. " (' ) A schedule of the overall phasing and development to occur within each phase . c "* * * * * " LOC 49. 435 . Xhe ODDS for the Westlake POD was approved in March, 1981.4 she ODPS was amended several times after 1981 . The record 1 a indicates the ODPS was last amended in 1985 . Record 1019-1023 . As noted above, the decision challenged in ' this proceeding - roves the sixth phase of the Westlake POD . The development , review board granted approval on October 6, 1989 . The • development review board' s decision was appealed to the city t. 4h1 trunci' , which denied the appeal and granted a ` ' pp_-oval on May 1, ;; ,- __90 , "The city douncil misconstrued the applicable law, and its decision is not supported by substantial evidence • ;The March, 1981 approval of the PUD used the term "Final Development • Plan and Program. " Apparently the LOC was amended sometime after March, • 24 19S1 to substitute the term "Overall Development Plan and Schedule" for the term "Final Development Plan and Program, " and to codify the procedures for �5 CCFS approval at LOC 49.400 to 49.440. Subsequent amendments to the 1981 "Final Development Plan and Program" for the Westlake PUD Use the • .i ter-•inolcgy "Overall Development Plan and Schedule." To avoid conf'.aion, we •:se the term ODPS throughout this opinion. 1 1 . • a in the whole record because the applicant 's proposal fails to identify or provide for adequate school capacity, as required by the applicable law. " Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan (LOCP) General Policy III, Specific Policy 4 provides in part : "New development shall be served by an urban level of service of the following: ` ,f - 1.. " (j) Schools . "Services shall be available or committed prior to approval of development . " In their first assignment of error, petitioner and Y interaenors-petitioner (petitioners) contend the city failed to demonstrate that approval of Westlake ' 89 is consistent with the abcve LOOP standard concerning school services Petitioners contend schools are inadequate to provide -an urban level of t ' service for Westlake s ke ' 89 . , ..�. The city found that existing and committed school a facilities would be adequate to provide an urban level of service for Westlake ' 89, relying on testimony from the school =Petitioners also contend the city' s decision violates statewide =' planning goal provisions requiringthat local governments plan for school A facilities. Le,e. Statewide' Planning Goal 11 (Public Facilities and Services) . Petitioners similarly cite statewide planning goal requirements rewiring that local governments plan for transportation facilities under their second assignment of error, discussed r. ;a, Lai.. Statewide Planning Goal 12 (Transportation) . However, as the city's plan and land use regulations have been acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development• Com fission, the statewide planning goals apply only to city decisions -,4a.mending the acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulations or adopting new comprehensive plan or land use regulation provisions, not to ' decisions that simply apply the comprehensive plan and land use , regulations. ORS _97. 835 (6) ; n1....i 5...:.,�.n-, Or 311, Y • - 295 313, 666 P2d :332 (1983) i ¢e" M+nod its-tiYC� n.jrin 21. Pt. Yr nF Dn 1 -� C5, 511-5:2 (1988) •`'—'•�' ••,'�� 16 or Lii3i� d. strict that short and long term plans could* be implemented to a•.zroid unacceptable crowding at the elementary school that would serve Westlake ,' 89 . However, the city also adopted the q d'©.lowing findings : ' 5 "The comprehensive plan policies and standards • regarding schools were applied and relevant findings 6 were adopted when the Westlake PUD Master Plan was .v ' approved in 1981 . The Master Plan allowed for the • development to occur in multiple phases, with a potential total density of 1, 527 residential units . In 1984, the Master Plan was modified and incorporated ` into an Overall Development Plat, and Schedule 9 ( 'ODPS ' ) , pursuant to LOC 49 . 400-440. The project is ' developing on schedule and in accordance with the ODPS . There are no significant changed circumstances .which affect the analysis of conformance with the • ` `' 'city' s law that occurred at the time of adoption and � ' • amendment of the overall master plan. ,1 f "Because all issues regarding school capacity and service availability and the rimpacts of the entire • Westlake PUD, including the phase covered• by Westlake ' • ' 89, were addressed and resolved at the time the ,r. ® Master Plan was approved, and there are no significant changed circumstances, the school issues do not need "` to be, and cannot be, revisited at this time . The ;r only essential finding regard:.„ng schools that needs to � •: be made in reviewing Westlake ' 89 is that the proposed 204 lots are within the density limitation provided for in the Westlake POD Master Ulan. " Record 30-31 , Petitioners do not challenge the city' s findings that, in a'. =_ _ _cv_ng the ODDS for the proposed Westlake PUD in 1981, the -:. y found that the proposed PUD complied with comprehensive plan policies and standards governing school services , Nether `. do petitioners challenge the city' s finding that the residential _3 density proposed for Westlake ' 89 is less than originally ap*zroved for this phase of the Westlake PUD and that development cf. the Westlake PUD is proceeding according to the schedule set I forth in the ODPS .6 Rather, petitioners contend the record does . of sup port the city finding, quoted above, that there have been 3 no significant changes in circumstances . Petitioners contend • circumstances have changed since the city' s 1981 decision and S schools are no longer adequate to provide the required urban • 6 level of service for Westlake ' 89 . LOC 49. 405 (1) requires that approval of each phase of a PUD S "conform to the ODDS, as well as the Comprehensive Plan and • 9 :evelopment Standards . " However, we do not believe that LOC' ' 10 49 . 405 (1) necessarily requires that Pii,• comprehensive plan I1 policies be reapplied each time a new phase of a PUD is ._ approved.+ _ We agree with the city that where comprehensive plan .3 compliance issues have been fully resolved for a PUD in '4 approving an ODDS under LOC 49 . 400 to 49 . 440 those _ comprehensive plan issues need not be reconsidered in approving � ` 9 __d_vidual phases of the PUD. ''A =Section 9 of the ODDS establishes a completion schedule for the west_eke PUD and states that construction will continence "on approximately ' o May :, 1981" and "commencement of construction on each successive phase ___ begin within 18 months of the commencement of construction on the :.. • 1.3 previous phase. " Section 9 also provides for up to two one year extensions + '4 of these deadlines. Record 1390. Any additional extensions to the Westlake PUD completion schedule would be treated as a major amendment to the C')PS, and would require a new ODPS application and approval. 154. 1 h LCC 49. 440. Although there appears to have been some question whether the pl Westlake PUD was developing according to the approved schedule during the .3 local proceedings regarding Westlake ' 89, the city ultimately found that it Las, and that finding is not challenged in this appeal. 'Section 1 of the Westlake ODPS provides the ODPS "shall be the sole basis for evaluation of all phases of the Westlake development on any .0 - issues that it addre3ses. " Record 1381 . Section 10 of the ODPS provides approval of development phases "may be granted subject to conditions that 2f, are consistent with and intended to carry out the terms and intent of this ?.,gc 3 .e. r ' .' r In =.dw _ dS Tnd 7S't�-;arc YTf^ ty Ro rA of Corn....• S+ a ., .r 1,UBA 91 (1980) , we reached the same conclusion interpreting a 1 similar Washington County PUD approval procedure . In v pr .initial approval of an "outline master plan" was P granted subject to a condition that development be phased to allow adjoining roadways to be improved to provide adequate capacity. The 7 decision approving the outline master plan was not appealed. J € Two years later, a request for subdivision plat approval for one A of the approved phases was turned down solely on the basis of :� concerns over impacts on the road system adjoining the PUD. We • y concluded that under the county' s PUD approval procedures, the submission of the preliminary plat in accordance with the �. k ^ :3 .outline master plan could not be used as a, vehicle to reopen the issue of impacts on external roadways which was decided in the theId. at96.8 == _ova_ of outline master plan . � , Westlake ' 89 will have less of an impact on the city ' s rr..' 0. school system than would development at the full density d y ti. 1l , ' an and program and the applicable city ordinances and regulations wh4 ,", ., :7.7^ n. -..,- ..,,n,--.,1 l ti i ^' .z"oc ." (Emphasis added. ) ' record _391 . ' 0Similarly, in rat y or Q_4".nn 4 V Cl.�f`4 a m ..,.. � tY_-- �..--.... Z , Or LUBF, _ 'LUBA No. 66-OS3. February 22, 1989) , slip op 11, we explained that under :the county's design review procedures, it was not necessary that the county __ .reconsider "issues of compliance with applicable plan. (land use regulation +' requiremets) or prior conditions of approval" in granting design review ., __ approval for a proposed development, "provided that compliance with the applicable requirements or conditions of approval was resolved in another �/ t'inal, appealable decision." cos ,14n, u...mr110y ."_ .7pr17.4011 Crtr`_`., Or (LUBA No. 69-144 —•'� ' --"-�^ �. , April 1 19, 1990) (under county zoning ordinance, ,< resolution of intent to rezone, rather than subsequent decision to amend - =he zoning map in accordance with the resolution of intent to rezone, is t;.:he stage at which the county applies statewide planning goals, -�` romprehensive plan and code standards) . - ,. •i. ..- , ', ' n i t " r . • a 11 ' a approved in 1981. In the circumstances presefhted in this case, we conclude the city properly concluded it need not, in _; approving Westlake ' 89, revisit the issue of adequacy of schools �� • a to serve the Westlake PUD decided in 1981. S Petitioners ' only complaint • is that circumstances have 6 changed and that even if schools were found to be adequate in , r . - 1981 to serve the approved PUD, such is no longer the case . S However, even if petitioners are correct in this 4 contention, that would not of itself provide a basis for or denying the •v requested approval for Westlake ' 89, and we disagree with • ;; _Petit'ioners that this result is somehow antithetical L, L to sound ..„ _and use planning, '1 Despite the city ' s suggestion to the contrary ' in its 14 findings quoted above, nothing g in the.he SAC provides that decisions made at the time of ODPS approval concerning; ng the ': '' ' :e adequacy of schools to serve the entire PUD may be recbnside_r ed _f the factual circumstances charge before the `finalof . .. �•- phase `,, -:e PUD anticipated in the ODPS is approved. As the statement • cf purpose in _OC 49 . 410 makes c_ear (c m n 2 •<-a.) , the ODPS ` �o _s designed both to assure the entire project is considered in determining compliance with the comprehensive plan and to __ provide the developer with certainty concerning the city ' s - expectations regarding the overall project . Where the impact on 11 ?ublic services of the entire PUD has been addressed and • :2 relevant plan policies found to be complied with in approval of -o O�?S we 26 t-- ► :c_ withrespondent and intervenors-respondent f •1 a �, 1 _ , 1 a�' trespondents) that it would be inconsistent with the Purpose410 •. expressed in LOC 49 . 410 to require approval of eac h developmental phase to readdress plan public services policies, where the requested phase ap proval is consistent with the type p.' -` and intensity of development envisioned by the a ppraved' ODP5. under the procedures adopted P by the city, as long as a PUD phase is consistent with the ODPS and remains on the approved time c schedule, there is no requirement that the factual predicates c underlying the original ODDS approval be reexamined when the' Y anticipated phases are approved. 'yt may be, as petitioners argue, that the above ..... interpretation of LOC 49.400 to 49 . 440 could require the city to approve later phases of a PUD that would otherwise be denied under 110 the cited school services policy . However, the , c possibility that such approvals would be required is l ;m,. ed :.n c three significant ways . First, we see nothing theLOC that in li the city from requiring in an ODPS that approval n tf later phases of a PUD consider school services availability c in light of any chances in circumstances following ODPS _ -oval . The OD? for t k PUD S a Westlake _ simply does not do so. • _. Second, LOC 49 . 435 (4 ) requires a phasing schedule , By =stablishing a shorter phasing schedule, the city can minimize the chance that the factual assumptions and findings underlying ' 24 the ODPS approval will become outdated before the PUD is fully :6 o. developed.9 Finally, ORS 197 .520 (2) provides •the city may adopt P a moratorium where such action is "justified by demonstration of i a need to prevent a shortage of key facilities as defined in the .statewide planning p goals which would otherwise occur during the r• S effective period of the moratorium. "io 6 The first assignment of error is denied. Y `,rnun tgsTcnim=N1 n' s'R1:tnR S "The city council misconstrued the applicable law and its decision is not supported by substantial evidence in the whole record '• because the adjacent streets and • intersections are not adecuate to accommodate the r .. . :0 traffic impact generated from the •development , in violation of the Lake proposed Oswego .` Comprehensive Plan. " LOOP General Transportation Policy IV requires es ,.ha,. "The City •will develop a residential neighborhood streets system adequate to handle expected volume, bet - at a minimum necessary scale to preserve the quiet, • privacy and safety of neighborhood living. " addition, LOC? General Transportation Policy _ , Specific • Policy l .F requires that the city develop a transportation System which • . . 4. y 4 . We note that is not at all uncommon for land use approvals such as conditional use permits, preliminary subdivision approvals, etc. to require that the approval granted be acted upon within a specified time. As long as the required implemenr.ing action is taken within the time specified, the c.tginal approval generally remains valid, absent some overriding change in local, state or federal law, even if the factual circumstances upon which the original approval was based change. As noted earlier in this opinion, were the Westlake PUD not developing according to the completion schedule scec_fied in the ODPS, a new ODPS would be required and petitioners ' allegations concerning adequacy of schools presumably would have to be • addressed b_y the city in approving a new ODPS. laa h 6, e" .-P.. ' IcWe do not understand petitioners to contend the city erred by failing to adopt a moratorium under ORS 197.520. • I •. • ' • - '1 "include (s) procedures for approving increases in AOplanned land use intensity only when a detailed traffic analysis shows that existing streets and intersections will accommodate the projected traffic '.� ' ' increases or when improvements necessary to accommodate those increases can be constructed without •'v` . 4 exceeding the capacity of any element of the City' s 5 coordinated transportation system. " The city received testimony from the city ' s and the 6, amplicant ' s traffic engineers in which the engineers analyzed previous traffic studies concerning the impacts of the Westlake s =7.7D on t•he surrounding transportation system. petitioners 9 +=ntend the city erred by nct requiring that new traffic studies '•f .. e supmitted in support of the Westlake ' 89 application . it As in the case of the adequacy of schools issue, the city, ';�;. addition to finding the disputed plan policies are, satisfied A,47 :3 =v Westlake ' 89, also found the traffic impact issue had been =__._lv addressed in the 19E1 OD?S approval . The :t city found: "Thy: 204 lots proposed for Westlake ' 89 are 16 significantly less than the 331 units the site is ..• allowed to accommodate pursuant to the * * * OD?S . The traffic impacts of 331 units were already considered and addressed as part of the OD?S . :s Although the applicant has submitted a new traffi c report, he was not legally required to do so . The project as a whole is developing in a' manner that is ., consistent with the master plan approvals . * * * " t. :0 Record 34 . ' .. As was the case under the first assignment of error, r __ '•e itioners do not challenge the above quoted findings, other ' ' ,; than to argue that conditions have hanged and that development c the Westlake PUD, with other development in the area, has s aversely impacted the transportation system in the area . ;, 6 --rwever, for the reasons explained in our discussion of the PI) _- Y • r9141 • - first assignment of error, we reject that argument as a basis for requiring the city tt, demonstrate as part of its decisi on i an that' Westlake ' 89 complies with the cited plan policies . • The second assignment of error is denied. 5 TFTR AG T Mr t GN t�T S1x` 1'Ri?OR b 6. "The city council misconstrued the applicable law and - ' its decision is tot supported by. substantial evidence in the whole record because this development would destroy a distinctive natural area and an 5 wetland in violation of the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan. " P hensive 9 � � Petitioners contend the cityfailedn y ,� to demonstrate that Westlake ' 89 will protect "essential wetlands" and "distinctive dis�inctave natural areas" located on the property proposedfor development . oment . A. ccan+ a Dvo 1 anise a The LOOP and LOC provisions ^> . cited by petitioners `do not •' , —n...,; ..e that "wetlands"° III „ ,� c - be protected. They only regt�� re that y "essential wetlands" y be protected. LOC? 50-•5i LOC 4 . 005 to '+ , • 4 . 040 . Although respondents do not dispute the evidence cited rL petitioners �. p ` it s that the Westlake ' 89 site includes "wetlands, " M l ,it respondents contend the City sound that the Si' Y.e includes no " ✓ i'•; } "'essential wetlands, " and the record , contains substantial evidence to support that finding.1Y L< Under LOC 4 . 015 (2) , "essential wetlands" are wetlands which ': ~ ==e either designated as •. such on the city' s hydrology map or .. - a:.Qa:�n_ned to be such after application of 1 'o the criteria an •, ~ HOC 9Y035Y , In findingt --c that the site includes no +. essential ,• :' et:ands" the city relied on an August 4 , 1989 letter from the .•gt. 14 'ar , V , pi ,y a . ° „ Y • 0; r hm Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) in which a v- v: 411 staff DSL ' s Environmental Permits Section discussedperson ' s �' the city' s criteria for designating "essential wetlands" and �y'«• explained why, v yt in his view, the wetlands on the property do not qualify as "essential wetlands . " While the evidence cited b Y petitioners ,, does establish the presence of wetlands" on the p._. t that proper t ' � evidence does not establish the yr existence of " e�► ,` wetlands . " essential • c Petitioners do not explain why the city ' s findings` • concerning the lack of "essential wetlands" on the property are • , . inadequate or why the DSL letter is not sub �tantial evidence in . , �� - support of the city' s finding that there are no "essential on the property. �.al - wetland operty. We conclude the findings conce,"ning 40 "essential wetlands" are adequate _ . and supported by substantial evidence . 4 This subassignment of error is denied. B . 1 b. ..`:e LOC provides that "distinctive t.$ - natural areas" are to .e preserve,. as par . • of development approval LOCP4- ,. • h Apparently relying on a �2 . • - suggestion in a July 10, • _ from the army of 1 1989 letter _ Corps Engineers that wetlands alterations - the proper 1 on Q �y may have impacted "a nearbyoak/ash / sh woodland, -- petitioners contend that the city failed to adopt findings 24 supported by substantial ev idence evidence that distinctive natural areas n _, on the property are protected. Record 1227 . found that althou�, •� • _.. the :,ruse Oak/Ash :ores,-, is + • 1 .1 • • . n J{ / , I J . . identified as a distinctive natural area iv the LOCP, neither the Kruse 7 . Oak/Ash Forest nor any other distinctive natural area y is located on the Westlake ' 89 property.11 The city' s findings Y go on to state : "The forest is not on the Westlake ' 89 site and the • applicant is not required to reassess impacts on the Kruse Oak/Ash Forest . Nonetheless, the provided evidence demonstrating that the stormdrainage system for the entire Westlake P Westlake ' 89, has been designed to avoid and therefore S help preserve the Kruse Oak/Ash Forest , persuasive or There is no substantial evidence in the record to support the allegation that Westlake ' 89 will somehow�:' • damage the Kruse Oak/Ash Forest . There was no 'C substantial evidence i t,. •n _oduced contradicting the .i � ;, Applicant ' s testimony that the storm drainage system would be designed to avoid damage to the Kruse Oak/Ash Forest and that there would be no other damage to the' (distinctive natural area] . "In conclusion, Westlake ' 89 is consistent with the Distinctive Natural Area policies because there are no (distinctive natural areas ) on the site proposalwill not ' te and the have any significant impacts on ;.he `Kruse Oak/Ash ' Forest . Record 45 . Petitioners do not challenge the above quoted findings or o - eplain why the evidence cited in those findings is inadequate i m�° A �o Cons:itute substantial evidence to support the findings , i. • - This subassignment of error is denied. , _" The third assignment of error is denied, : )raTu aq¢TrNmr,VT n^ InP a gin , �I "The city council improperly interfered withthe 14 11'She only distinctive_stinct_ve natural area identified in the 1981 Westlake PUD yc approval was the Kruse Oak/Ash sorest area. Record ' 3 T • adopted in support of the 1981 PUD approval indicate that �all.he findings natural areas within the Westlake P distinctive L� were protected by designating those . - areas ''Open Space. " Record 1425. u • • • • a • I�' n - kr ) 1 r I Development Review Board's hearing procedure . " • In an August 19, 1989 memorandum to the development review ,: 0 4y' : `• board and planning commission (before the development review t board rendered its decision in this matter) , the city council provided those bodies with its interpretation of comprehensive `,.* , clan policies regarding school capacities . Record 1829. The city council ' s interpretation vas based on factual '` '' • determinations set forth in an attachment to the August 19, 1989 " 8 . .-memorandum. The city council purported to reconcile the — ; " ` 9 f� statutory obligations imposed under ORS 197 . 505 to 197 . 540, O. • N• i l/ concerning adoption of moratoria, with city obligations under H • she school related plan policies which had resulted in recent denials of requests for development approval based on inadequate school facilities . The city council concluded the current facts up __carding adequacy of school facilities in the city would not p ="wport a moratorium under ORS 197 , 505 to 197 . 590 and stated: rr • ,5 "The Comprehensive Plan policies, with regard to school capacity`, will be satisfied unless the Council in the future declares a moratorium. Because facts will change over time, so may the conclusions • concerning Comprehensive Plan compliance and the current lack of the factual preconditions fo r the enactment of a moratorium. * * *" Record 1830 . Petitioners contend that by providing the development 1 review board with the above described memorandum while the tevelopment review board was considering the request at issue in ...his appeal, the city council improperly interfered with the . revelopment review board's decision making responsibility. Respondents contend that the city council' s action at most. Y } i Q ..") • f: constituted procedural error, and because petitioners received a '' full and fair hearing before the city council in this matter, 3 petitioners do not allege, nor could, they allege, any prejudice to their substantial rights caused by the city council ' s August 19, 1989 memorandum. we agree with respondents . In our view, the city council 's • •. o i ' memorandum was simply an attempt by the ultimate city decision T maker to resolve what it viewed as conflicting Provisions in its c comprehensive plan and statutory requirements concerning • ( I.= moratoria in order to provide guidance and achieve consistent . decision making. Viewed in this way, it is in the nature of a declaratory ruling that would not be followed if the factual assumptions changed. The city council made it clear in the 1 '�. memorandum that the factual assumptions upon which its conclusions were based were subject to change, and petitioners do not contend that they were denied an opportunity to convince the city council that their view of the relationship between the • • .), school clan policies and statutory moratorium requirements is ,•, incorrect or that a different conclusion is warranted based on the facts in this case . n view of our resolution of the first assignment of error, -_ we express no opinion concerning the correctness of the ,z conclusion reached in the city council ' s August 19, 1989 1b memorandum. However, we do not believe the city council ' s 4- _< provision of the memorandum to the development review board in this case con t e error . coo 1,o.. weSt'_ L't s e G + C �'r! � Z'l�i - T�ti..�}i •,• r op4s'kann ( r.ry, 14 Or LUBA 84, 86 (1985) : C4 L 3 y. �7naPSlhju:. • ZallEty., 9 Or LUBA 122, 130 (1983) . Even if the city council's • d�,• 3• , action did constitute error, we agree with respondents that it ,would be procedural error, and there is no prejudice shown in 4 • • °• 4 this case. laa $unhurI' TT HnmPowne-s v. C' � • Z}" of WQa,, ?, nn, 101 6 Or App 458, 461, P2d v . v r?-R 310 Or 243 (1990) ; rMa ,Qn Qlrat , 13 Or LUBA 1, 4-5 (1984) , ?rs'd in pp,..� 73 Or App 334, rev cian 299 O: , 314 • (1985) ; Cniw=0 , v. C *.v of -*' i nr', 1 Or LUBA 74 (1980) . :3 The fourth assignment of error is denied. 'The city's decision is affirmed. qt tom • :3 • c o :C gyp, c :n • • • 23 24 26 PI) -- 1 • • d e. 1 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING a `'. • ? ' I hereby certify that I served the foregoing Final Opinion ,i ' ' and Order for LUBA No. 90-067, on September 26, 1990, by mailing 'v to said parties or their attorney a true copy thereof contained 4n a sealed envelope with postage prepaid addressed to said parties or their attorney as follows: A. Richard Vial '4 Hagen, Dye, et al 1900 Benj-Fran Plaza One SW Columbia Portland, OR 97258 :' r ': Timothy V. Ramis 9 :;'Donnell, Ramis, et al ,' 1727 NW Hoyt St .. 14 :r,.land, OR 97209 , '` R ,Cohn H. Hammond, Jr. City Attorney �' an' P .O. Box 369 T, c ' feast Linn, OR 97068 Dated this 26th' da'y of September, 1990 . - ' ' { 0 . . ' n ,'• J-72.--,,, , ,....../ -44,,-; an Zwem7ce . Office Manager • ' P a .3 1/ • • =ti a • 1 ` I 1 /. I!i n)F-2'. :... • p, , July 9, 1991 i Development Review Board " Attn: DR-1390 �,991 City of Lake Oswego �U L �. .0 ' 308 A Avenue Lake Oswego . _. '' To the Chair and Members, li; We want to express our concern regarding the neighborhood commercial development proposed for the corner of Westlake and Parkview Drives. Numerous sat;ety issues arise due to the volume ,and excessive speeds of both cars and drivers using Westlake Drive. Dui home is located on the southwest corner of Charles Circle and Westlake�r;l.ve approximately 55 yards from the proposed development site. Our 13-year-old son, Blake, who rode the junior high-high school Lake Oswego school bus during t the 1990-91 school year was informed by his busdriver that he was not to cross Westlake Drive to wait at the bus stop located a few yards north of the r '.. - t ` Westlake-Parkview intersection, When Blake questioned the driver about why he could not wait at the stop conveniently located near his home, the driver explained that because the traffic was so heavy on Westlake Drive, he did not want Blake to cross such a busy street for safety reasons. To emphasize his concern, the a."- driver informed Blake that he would issue Blake a bus citation(student must serve 410 detention at his/her school) if he crossed Westlake to wait at the aforementioned stop! We were pleased with the concern of the bus driver and appalled that he would be forced to take such an action. : :'' ' We believe that the current volume of. Westlake Drive traffic is high enough to warrant a third party observation and action such as the bus driver's. To make matters worse, the Bay Creek, Southridge Heights, Westlake '89, etc. developments � . have yet to pour even most of their traffic onto Westlake Drive. To add a commercial development's traffic on top of the already heavy(and certain-to-grow anyway) volume is neither justifiable nor reasonable. W'a strongly urge the Development Review Board to reject proposal DR-1390. Among many other reasons, this proposed development poses an unacceptable threat to our children's safety. incerely, ; Jeff Miller and Connie Crow (),,,,,c# -in,',e,,e,..„, .,... ;, .. , (-,,, C4 ,0___ __t_c_.IP ... . • . yltb6 Charles Circle 1 EXLake Oswego, 97035 N I !3 ► T 9-7�z3 113 • 1'3.-. "1 O te, 5686 Victoria y- . . Labe Oswego , U 5,71 'l,1 a +w" } July 9, 1991 nI:��' lNr r•,�1 ' • Development Review Board City of Lake Oswego 380 A Avenue jjJ1 u Lake Oswego , OR 97034 9 1Eq. 4 RE : DR 13-90 • Dear Board Members: I am writing to express my concern about the proposed commercial development at the corner of Westlake Drive and ',� Part:view Drive . This project affects many aspectG of life for residents of Westlake . 1 . The increased traffic will make it very difficult to % cross Westlake Drive. I often cross Westlake Drive at Charles Circle in order to reach the bike path . It re,yw,ires , • careful attention now to cross the street . With the , ',;i'.' increased traffic that a commerical site wi l l gener t 1;e , it % will be even more difficult and dangerous to cross the „' I street . Since there is no sidewalk on the west side of Westlake Drive , it is dangerous trying to walk I: to the light at Kruse Way and cross there . 2 . I am concerned about the ultimate use oP this property . The developer has not chosen to coordin rte I•. i • . plans with the neighbors . We have no idea what Lind of commercial ventures will be transpiring in our own !:> rcI. rd . I wish that the developer would ci'.e the neighbors a better idea of the ultimate commercial use of this proper * ; , £nme of the possible uses are completely unacceptable for such a • concentrated residential area . 3 . The developer ' s plan with its crowded I.;;nrcentr• stio, • of buildings and paved parking spaces will severely , jeopardize any hope of maintaining the beautiful oaf ar:., : a.,h ' trees . The disruption t ''at such iassi 'c constr'ucti :)I'1 :V t cause t0 these trees l+ll a cortaihlv destroy most J t t IC '' 1•. I moved to Lake n;�41(' t]_ wse r the +.y. 3L �. of i k neighborhood's ar 'W tr . pe. I.Jo 1 that t hr5 pcc.F: l Oswego had In thr:•,1 l comm..l l t , a.,. . l :7c,lfa t 1 + _ r 1 - , ? plant to alu� 1 c3: ,r"a„,pr, k . €1tri? . e ! np'•;e.y' ,*., ,,, r .!1 ; ' .y l(.I•• , 1 . I,t74 i. .'I! F, _, ' , .. a t 3 \ F-r' �a 1 . ':eta,.: pt,4.;wtla' . ,, :• ;, ;l:r-. ,••.;, 1 • ('.I' ,,led e3 'ti i r, Gt .,r • - t , _ or. e _ ',lc t,�iri:•_"..- r M v • • :.,I at' I. ' 1 L. r.,+ ._ . ."l k'1 r9 / 1 b : 1' h MEMORANDUM , kr TO: Hamid Pishvaie,Developme Review Planner FROM: J.R. Baker, City Engineer SUBJECT: Kruse Oaks Commercial Center; DR 13-90 DATE: August 9, 1991 • • Y; J have reviewed the traffic impact memorandum (Exhibit 22) submitted by Associated Transportation and Planning (ATEP) dated November 13, 1990 and the subsequent Traffic • Review by Keech Associates, Inc. (Exhibit 90). While Mr. Keech raises some valid concerns in • his review, the developer has identified the types of uses which will be compatible with his development. Using this criteria, that is, identified general uses, ATEP has used the accepted n•affic engineering methods and standards in the analysis, It is possible that uses in the site in the future could change that would generate higher traffic or lower traffic than the uses that are currently being anticipated. A condition could be established lip which would eliminate the potential for uses that would generate unreasonably high traffic such . . • as fast food restaurants and banks. Also both traffic engineers are in agreement that the Buttke • plan estimating traffi; in the year 2000 will eventually be exceeded, /pPk • r • • • • 34 EXHIBIT • 115 Die- I'3 —10 a I E • 026/ C' n av-rf k fah/ Gugo, 0/ 97Cg- ., ,... ... .; .. . ... 40-rel2.,0 F1991 . . ‘ , . . " . 1 . .( . .1 I Pobir` &øn 0672nar c , o1 aAOso i , ... 2 e " . , . .,,,.:. i.•. . •• .! 6 w» 4,,v0.2,410/ : . . , . Cakv i s19 a 0', , , ji, . . „I -. 0. .. 11,;,fZl .r?ff,3',,''-i'"-;, ,,,, , 0 '' ),0 g-V .. , • . . . . 4. ,: - ,. ,. ..... .... ,, . Oar iloh : AUG Vi991 0 • . t ., J'Ada prothash'. a\c)led Goa ., . ,,, , fizead 7`' i GcS'G7. SJ ' . _ . . . , �kC�r1?�lCzln r.�sGn6 a /l •, .,. .4-v Ams �O e /, /7) �l�/sc �ec� 0))./4)107,),021 *A)fil, '"' P coe& • . sir d4:6vask9 • . s . .. A- U /y .. . ss - . i , . GAP/ lay.. k rfieek,a, r„ k .. . , . cryveraa-k* 1 . . 1 e ,. . . . 21:er (x/ ozziw and Dom^ dgml.hkepbri. ‘22ed, • . -4 a r olt/, a? 7� ` �s6nz`a�iy.,�7 CC' Corny ��t ' r t. I :dr reficsi &9,,h6i ! : . , • . . . : loofrArtraIv ^C 70?-7ilsoa a y1ci off'iltv lf 'mg & c -4icit'd at 2 - l/D. ,71�2h, olG/oY' auk' w EXHIBIT . ..::. 31-ingickraha,il, .,.. . ,:,. _ ... . .. , , .. , . (S)/ ieerbz, oan s . �. 1 •v �_ �� 1�o �CGYSU Gag , a 97Q 9 �� /99/ per, :24 ere) 1 °;I i-,1!:, i‘` ,.1W-p,1i0 rt //c6i goy asp ,CA 97ag6 _ rAUG� 9' 90 . .al EXHIBIT "; fite ail' De 43-gD -to 71 1 �J % Gn f 7rlZ ,; / 72ed-Y1-'�z6kr whicht 512,e'7?iL"""'`Q cm/ 72,4;0 te7 '` 4. • `- i-)243 tA is < 6TaltlA/4)/ifilt OWE/62M! T . 1.4 .‘0 amp . h mAi Cag qa)06/2Y6)61') 422, vykekpim . . . . . . .• ., .. G'.- - BHA (8)(6) a4 q69500) ii2P62t oared rs u J p fir' �s�yen(7) fr/6) -#2e1aeo-kncp) .,, 2 vpe,(2-hbv Ffio/e;22,ak -thoh-Arai(2.6)-/-6-thil (0* . . ,,-,72 Avizios , . itt .. , J 4dk,6) 1 71k/U. wiipaytha4 6)eilyale kea . . • . n hw l2,-thcald AuCU/I7j ,3chi,dj,ch are / r al 7 norv-C 146 blr4ifiohj off/Th422, L' Ork 4.4 /54 ,,,zsebikrweb.A k v 6726d-byti;d6k,70,fijib, 4 0)my, ) „,,,,jarb,ks. . .. •, _....t. ,, ,,,4-:-: avhpar J pwc,(7, j dGnl C �1 71 /'c`m�i , p 0 ,A °"J mv-1-6 Vgalvsd5 4.4a 7-/AA 9 „�1 nr S572 14.0/ . 09,Sn� to-analdlyidas4/"�r � Cc� �o do) sr.�y�v�r�rv-cam 6ra. c�/pirpor- . .....) p ALS fpriyidi a KWIYYfr-gyj Cio i W l#624 . cop p j oak our nor anclAgrlryito coniefi on p eiyarle . Sotorpnor, "aP �/a4 /�1//-]y/M/((' �r l �II//1/'�`�r VI v �/Ws LIkvifrAzia/-to hiezrO37comieVESOter ear * 0102M . Ada sue,40)2 Ave kereeteksi 6Ab-S21 • A.501crs.., . • 4Aiv-ILSopi) 810ityyt golant,/ andip • • •1 ,�,t .:1 • •q • 1 • / n . I • d•' • Y h it. ° '. ti dl • h f, • x b -`I STAFF REPORT • v.., . .. CITY OF LAKE oswEG0 ......,, . . PLANNING DIVISION--- - APPLICANT: FILE NO.. u • The Holtman Company PD 21-89(Mod,7-91) } > , PROPERTY OWNRRY STAFF: ': ! The Hollman Company Hamid Pishvaie , LEGAL DESCRIPTION: j DATE OF REPORT: Windfield Estates Planned Development August 9, 1991 LOCATION: DATE OF HEARING: South of Carman Drive, north of Oakridge August 19, 1991 . • Court and east of Inverurie Road .", NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIQII • : ZONING DESIGNATION: ; w Rural Lake Grove Neighborhood R-15 Association lk ... 'I COMP,_PLAN DESIGNATION: 5. R-15 I. APPLICANT'S REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval to modify the Windfield Estates planned u development (PD 21-89)in order to apply the 30% lot coverage standard to the project as a whole (averaging)rather than on a lot—by—lot basis. II. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS . A. City of Lake Oswego Zoning Code: LOC 48.225 R-15 Lot Coverage LOC 48.475 Planned Development Procedures LOC 48.490 Authority to Approve Changes in Planned Development Approval PD 21-89(Mod.7-91) • Page 1 of 4 • • , ® • e .. ` ., < • � i Y. a •. : i W: , r:t B. City of Lake Oswego Development Code; LOC 49.315 Application Procedures for Major: Developments LOC 49.615 Criteria for Approval LOC 49.620 Conditional Approvals III. FINDINGS y4 n A. Bacund: 1. The applicant is requesting approval of a minor modification to PD 21-89 regarding the application of the required 30% lot coverage standard. ?',., Currently, this standard is applied on a lot by lot basis in the project. The applicant would like to have the flexibility, as allowed under LOC 49.475 (3), to apply this standard to the project as a whole, i.e., to average the 30% ` requirement over 41 lots,Exhibits 6 and 8. it 2. The Development Review Board approved PD 21-89, a 41—lot planned development, at its meeting of April 16, 1990. The Findings, Conclusions and Order is attarheu as Exhibit 4. 3. At a neighborhood meeting on July 10, 1991, the applicant presented his modification request to the neighborhood association and the neighbors who live within 300' feet of the site and received unanimous support from . • the participants, as demonstrated in Exhibits 9-16. B, Compliance with Criteria for Approval; Staff has determined that the proposed modification to PD 21—89 does not meet the criteria to administratively approve the requests (LOC 48.490) because only "' the hearing body can approve the averaging of the 30% lot coverage requirement, 1i ''; as per LOC 48.475(3), Therefore, this request is being heaa before the '` Development Review Board. ' LOC 49.615 states that for any development application to be approved, it shall conform to the City Comprehensive Plan; the applicable statutory and Code requirements; the applicable development standard; and, any applicable future street plan or ODPS. The applicable criteria are listed in Section II of t►'is report. The following provides an analysis of these criteria: r;` 1, City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan concerns have already been addressed as part of ' ,;, the original planned development approval in PD 21-89,Exhibit 4. Nothing requested in this modification affects compliance with the Plan policies. 2. City of Lake Oswego Zoning Ordinance,: • , PD 21-89(Mod.7-91) Page 2 of 4 .. a e r'' eil, V a: ' r w a. Residential Low Density—R-15 rr ,+ ..4.1 .All lam, LOC 48.225—Lot Coverage The applicant's request is for a procedural change in the application of the 30% lot coverage requirement, which is a standard requirement in the R-15 ,,,,. zone. The applicant's proposal will allow the 30% requirement to be :- applied to the project as a whole (i.e. averaged), rather than on a lot—by—lot basis. ° The applicant's request is consistent with the provisions of the Planned q ' Development Overlay District. Under LOC 48.475 (3), the hearing body may apply the lot coverage requirement to the project as a whole and not on ` a lot—by—lot basis. Staff believes the purpose of this flexibility was to encourage a developer to preserve the existing natural features on a site to `i the maximum extent possible, while at the same time enabling him to maximize the development potential of his property. As Exhibit 3 ' • illustrates, the applicant has dedicated 7.55 acres or 46% of the project area ` ' A as public open space. This area contains the Waluga wetlands, identified as Distinctive Natural Area#24, and an associated large stand of trees. s demonstrated on Exhibit 5, no modification to this standard was r guested at the time of the original hearing. The applicant contends that j} • the issue was simply overlooked at that time and that it was always intended to have the flexibility to average the coverage requirement over the entire project. The applicant provides an adequate justification for his request in Exhibits • 6-8. Staff supports the applicant's proposal because this project is designed to provide for housing choice that is different from the typical housing • constructed in the area, i.e., large single or two story houses, An analysis of Exhibit 8 reveals that of the 16 lots mentioned, only 3 will exceed the 30% lot coverage requirement, for an overall average of 27.5%. Staff has also reviewed the 5 building permits which have been issued so far and found that the approved lot coverage ranges from a low of 25.6% to a high of 30%, for an average of 28.4%. Based on the above facts, staff finds that the applicant's proposal is reasonable and that no conflict with the applicable criteria exists. Staff ' ' recommends that Exhibit 8 be utilized as a monitoring mechanism to ensure that the 30% lot coverage is met for the entire project. This will be ,_..�"'` achieved by requiring the applicant to submit an updated chart (Exhibit 8) ; prior to issuance of any building permit. 3. City of Lake Oswego Development Code and Standards: 3 All applicable development standards have already been addressed as part of the original planned development approval in the February 23, 1990 and ' March 30, 1990 staff reports for PD 21-89. Nothing requested in this modification affects compliance with those standards. - • 4.`` ;` PD 21-89(Mod.7-91) Page 3 of 4 ti r . 1 r ti. f r 1), IV. CONCLUSION L Based upon findings presented in this report, the applicant can meet the applicable 1 criteria for approval by the application of certain conditions. • ' +., V. RECOMMENDATION - "' `j Staff recommends approval of PD 21-89(Mod.7--91), subject to the following condition: 1. Each building permit shall include an updated copy of Exhibit 8. )', '1 EXHIBITS 1. Tax Map Vicinity Map 3. Windfield Estates Final Plat 4. PD 21-89-769, Findings, Conclusions and Order 5. Page 11 of the February 23, 1990 Staff Report for PD 21-90 6. Applicant's Narrative 7. Market Summary for the Hollman Company, dated July 1, 1991 " 8. Index of Averaged Lot Coverage in the Windfield Estates Planned Development 9. Minutes of July 10, 1991 Neighborhood Meeting 10. Letter of Support by David and Kaia,ii Gilson (undated) 11. Letter of Support by the Rural Lake Grove Neighborhood Association (undated) 4. 12. Letter of Support by Alen Patera (undated) a'. 13. Letter of Support by Jim and G. Blodgett(undated) 14. Letter of support by Karen Davis (undated) •'• 15. Letter of Support by Betty and Marvin Friesen (undated) 16. Letter of Support by Donald and Ursula Fish (undated) , • y , N >i'r 1 r .:. • y a, tf 1.1 y ,4r i' t . 'a • rl• „�ti � r r "`1' y4 • • PD 21-89(Mod,7-91) ' r' " • Page 4 of 4 ` .Y. •,•Ake_ r - ,', `�. .,.. i .., + ,`. , At in i 4. LI a 7 Ad A 500 _ja.e ?e 0Le ®:6 wIE 7115 1400 20+w IS$t1 , - l 12 (A."29 j 24 4. ai • 1 urna• I r t...vr. %:c lr°°' •N AL .n••• . .'I ,' 4` 5300 .e tn700 .r / �,`` ,to • I 1 / C . ♦1 , � Ill"w"•' r• �/ °y�11•r�'`S,` ••• •.44 f. ,r -LLY1, �', •0 +'l66 LF..%%'• {I41!! •/+ ' a i 'cs b d 1 4•.0.( a r 0 �` 0 • lialaik(*) • • 11111imew . • • � 10 , yl� A • • •tii » M� 5EE viiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, • IUTN LINE CF CNARLES 5 , y ,. .. ■ • Od • • ". 2 • • ow • u ,/ 4 • , J.. • 11, St/ 1+/ • •' •i • I..,111 "• ` �1t i' Dee W ' \. \ , 1 l'' r Ili1500 1)0fn j0 • el, (t700 i .e •I,, 04 t 1 \ 0110C 4t11 a„ • IQ 1000 1t1? 4„1( • 4. H i + - .2,0p0 1tt! i 1t11 j1/ tl 1 Ir • till n �` '1 ,` C.:: `y gV • • 11r 00 :1^ : d1 L. , Its Is • Y \ • t ,1 JP r '�±' . , a ttlt p, ; , ,a lilt tr }+ ti (' ,.. .� •d.., -T. I 4� „ S AY ti! 5i .r .rra x .. �/ r w +• lilt •3 :' ls•,,.'..... •�,t II„•.,..1 O A h RI W G E I••.,,t, _ .,,„,q�„ ' .,1 ,r., , • } , ti z, 1r ^� •, ' .�• �V{� �� . 111 1!1 r .r• 5 II EXHIBIT a4fY1» .� gill ,,I i • /,J t3,� 1 I,lil 1. r,r•1/ Jy[ Y !\YJ I ! p S' 1 1 1 • r 1 Rr�tl11� �,..., �, •. . ,, T, I i : t ,, I , .. �1r rl .„,,„.owulnl ,'\\�i •1 ' CV . l 42/4 q. ,. l,..1 jlf 11, , ,,,If-., r � j° p '„o S{1144 �/ �• er• • 141 1111 111 a FUTURE STREETS PLAN +1 1 r 1„ Qt (.„ 'w • .ulninI`�.�1 J� i a I I I1 1 lit'. I •., - .YLl'�1I�ly;�+..4 rE'"'"S•l�P7 1� I `•i I. 11 ., .61.,.1 1/ur.r •11 11 u.n+ L. 1 IiI:P��,00:1 !I I 1 I 1�I 1 I j,) K, 1 I ‘ 1 I •1~ gto\ ‘q,,rA, 1 1;� 11�( VICINITY MAP e.t 11 a 1nu n X•1 ....1 di I 1II �';I" N.TA.M1l —.4�,�� r ,''r r7,13.1 l-JI•'1 ICI I'i I•I It la ,r •1".. i . ,.l '�\• �� r': l •ie. 11111111- ''',:*'- .. 4 I I�• X111fL11 CT. ''.1 \\ \ • Ji'y( •` XlIX N1ll r- I1 'It 's •141. \\� .r�.O\t1r1.W•� '•"I�IK,- `� Ire Ill d ,� \\ ° 'ill" 1 �'�\�,• �• �� `' 11 I 1 I ' 1 +4 �.r."` \ .1 (Y 1` . •�i a , ,..- 1 \'1 � , ` 1111 ° ;»it \.. if ,I j 2 1i11 � .ram .1 \ 1ne +c,J. '�,aCu+i 1 j.l,a 1 n •1 . .•°o. ,. ; ,�. v �;,. >• �1`�-+ �:` Si it rT iNt�r.x JIO m=, .w>. I I I W y_y l w%7> mod`+ r ° 1. ,.._IH �.1._ .�••I• '' �.. ..�1,�r„ 1.1,. -. .• rI•'- ,.er„ 5H7.N CONTENTS • 'a`1 Ileh th1 b111M fa 1 • +-� > . •4. M •;. I•U111>, N 11.0 L'u. Il .. L/.C'.'J•• -s 11 1'.1.X./.,..1 J '- -_ I , �\111 °`I,,y�C I SITE PLAN a VICINITY MAP --� `., '.•i 1. ronuw l•10. .IIII I=1+..Y-. `� - I ,� :..- , R0. 1.1. ,'8+K1 I . �,��.,1�'QrW "1"' •.•!1 ,, 1 ,,, 1 a 1.I , t- I i----1 ,1 l-1---1 ,ram I I 1 i ; 5TRGr I' r4 LOT PLAN • lal 11*" 7 1•.Loa,,4- r p -'.1100 1.,11.:111/1 01~1/0 11M.qu,., ;. I �. I " 1 i ' r T r1no GI �1 i w.a i�ci4 r� _. .. I I i 1 1 I I -1- 1 , '_ PILES ; 1 bf 1 11 1.1 1 I 1 L �. .-�. -I .,ate..;� 1 : 1 ; I : I �, t= I111.. 1111..y I I I 11 I 11 to 1� 'r1i1"' 11 4 SLOPE ANALYSIS a GRADING PLAN L� ISyj w >. .� 111 1I,ll•.4.."' SITE PLAN +c.1 lu 1,111,.. I....IIX 01 ,f � .�. 1,e.1n. r.Poo' 5 UTILITY PLAN rile��i.l Oyu.n,i�, f.(HI Tl4n wtrvlvnl U1 iv , •! ' 1111 IX 1Ahl Wahl...111/.11.M 11 l 111.1. . a..» 1, ...1.1,,, G LANDSCAPE PLAN a i >- I.it 11..ev% r 1 11 41111 l lllll !I a wl I ilf..16.1 ww,••/41.1 0.04 "1 6. .l•..N r1 0 .1 1.111> ..11.1 111111 lel4 J-$ N.L ., X,11 1.11 y..., 1111 nl11Xh•.,I 7 90UNDARY a TREE MAP • 111104111 1...,11 014 r• • '7 4111.f 1111 1.4441 11141111 � 1a•w.1yu1+,,. .lanr, r+ 1111 01.•.111..•1.11 41.1 r 1101114 Ir1.1.1/111111/1 11 • w 141 ...04011 1111 fl S Y 1 1 . • ;a I I:"wl s r.+.. ems. a.•am.msw,,..- ... I m' - -''-' -'''''4111; ' --''' ' '''-' '' DS 410 41!► C ACC 2 Of 4 Pd/ 14 WINDFIELD ESTATES I1 ''• ��tp0�+`� a/ °�++ 1-r1�,1+ �. •' A RCPLAT Of LOTS 260, 261, 262, 267 AND PORTIONS OF l+t� /r ` �` + LOTS 259, 266 AND 265 OF DRYANT ACRES PLAT NO, 4 kl ►fl\ 25 T 4 �) `'` AND A PORTION OF THE CHARLES GROWN 0,LC, NO, 64 c j Wi w�' �� t.e,•Sr • ( , S. 4 • IN SECRON 7, TOYMSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE I EAST, W.M. t5 ./�4�y y. �'I �. 'i�ti, \ ".4 1, GTY OF LANE OSWEGO, CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON �t.w a .. ti' ,1 s ,.' (( ;,' r, ) s o lo :•� 4♦ asp Ott P-T.1,r ' 1 '� oi7 \\ J ) SURVEYED. fEORUARY 27,1991 ALPHA ENGINEERINWM G, INC.I POr.•' .•r +' i ..th,11+' `(r `}C. '(.�fC 4, ). ►Mn'wn.onra4 Intl % Cp3)1 -. �•,L '1'•1"lit,• 24 1" �11`, ' C 1 S, `.t vi• ,/ ,..•I`r ew it wa'..fl��.i> (r `\;+', . S r +"1 4,♦1`10 J,,y T• , y:t J \tlp�, I ,y.: i 9 `'�i.U l 2:1 `\4 ,) I'�et' � •+ i 1 L. 1. ♦tt1.4et ',, •44 T3 ))C yI t\ ,• a alo>/ o, T. ), LEGEND ee : ' e,loa v ,"1 N \� ( r 1l ahtln4 xt 1/e'.>n ra I„ra rtuw rt PC 1s L 1;�4� \S •14•�7t1•�•t�'1\ J'Ph 4\ 19 aosnio to GxAIWD•Ar1•INa,Nt• , \ i v. 4. ,J,`I ti 1, .,...10' ']�""�\J . 20 �l\ • \ -,'0 11b;•-•• )�'` MQlLIStalA1 a MNtlh1(a,110 I,s•Ao1 aao calls ou'uru Nono \ 14tb Y .p o.'+ V. N/r t` '.10 46. ;, I.ro x r\ r �� ,1 tolA suwAYty '!>7•Y;y, "1.1 \ T � �-1 t, % •t•onl taro 1 7 ro/r,rt s \ Y t+ 1, OT. 'L &^ / y Ny 4J J'� "r �.. J• •L'I , 1"' l4.4e1.u(/rwi+ /, • T\ • �A • MN,in/1 1 .)tl'Ilal•W rn4 AVOW.,r4• •• .I ,/`� 'T'' O ti. ,+vim t 1.»1 I 'J tIR' �Q♦/•iN' ,, m .4414r w liliiii /III 4 INC Mt•10 Il ran N06•4Nnn • • J. �\ •/: r . J.� .\ � O �t/, •P I 1/DU7l M CARS r Jp 2 r 71/_• 27 ♦ P\w • J. �NII J Y pMnl ft1' so.moo I,GO YM q./N C,r .r • .' 1111 t/ ld • •4, a1ClMMD 4lM4 146 NC'10 I1 V/rMw ILA a .'\ N,, y,. °,S' N.... . r;14 • 11 f •• �Cl� i�:ip1 4 Id �4 fp�'CO,. N11 onlo w IN}fpNrin t wont" • % i' 4. 17 I\ e n1 Y t '•�'a r o. �,�, .7�,{•t , P , 4�L ,7r J r N •1 4! A r, G`�' i, •r I wM11 Qen,*Ai Mt 41A01l,n•MU(4M 114 1 a A'I.` r..SO•1 b a• ,,Y.,Liss., • 'kry, 'F: 600f v ♦ 4+t1 j,, \,\+01 t. t tot a }w rul v •wrarato 1 c F� >ew v ,Y" �, - \. �' �. , r 7.A �`io J,. 43, 'I `4 : ' ;O, 1 4+`„{ \,•• �:0'4 't•,4 V J 15 r. ♦ .r,I• • y yr• I2 •` 4!/i1;l crwlr. Q , L \ r 114''l.- \ 'T.c '''•J.•tAn► w01 r�\ ..`'1 'lr t5 /1,1/ wWI I C440 P LI I441 r r t 6 '0 t11 .\ 5 'A; \ JI. M44.1. O 4.Vie'';♦.I11v \ . 1 +,1!'.r+ S i, r,itt v A} �'4at 11 7.( %, ,1 ,° eL +',w:1 1'1/ \ ,`4 A\ ', 1 344 V ,e. 'r l \ ...A.S.+,\•..14+'w_.,\. �•� ,r\ , + 1 r• i e. �i'►1 �4 o—�.�_,�_}tIl"",VA V� r- �\'f.+ r� ',. 6 P r,, �1,♦.°si. OAKS i0pt'c11yt+1 .71 P1 �• M 1 �4 • eel le , hp C; 1''• ,1 1`--•,_—rk, Ii.:f+Ir H —I•i7 1i 1'•, E 1 • ' • t t�V. +{+$ 'ej it ty,1/ i�zr-ry�b� S! r4$i MI s r il o ' 1,t/7>. ,� d u�`j • 1O ,S . .✓� � .,i I re v • L / • •o N� ;. , ___O ';nti \ 1 9 • ♦ ► ,• ' y/ SCALE. I INCH - 50 FEET L • T o �_1eN ? �II.uI 13 � r '•' w •^'�.t,a. It ti _.!,31 : .... ,of`o "/ 4'40pA • .. „♦}4I11 t tot II/ US ell/'t G • r'•4, 44 s''1'+ i. r 61 r1 , • } . 'Lr 3l tn,xl44tw4 E4SIWwI f, C +rM +` T,' r I4 9.4 t. '' ,+ .0 4,�►` r 0 A 1 ou'4 O)''K \ ,T.G U: ,1'f) 4+44 `�.4 d,, II) Il.. 300 00' '/ J ✓:1' td '�.".. . I1 G1D•I•t♦e•ie I.I.\i l 21.o6 ''''• \ bA J 1 �ti ,y 4•. ' 4 4 CH N bi77'71` w, Yr',b1' • TRACT 'A• Y'' /+t T " : t" 1 5. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE \ " P'' S. • m ! AND WETLANDS \ _ •„''tm* �'s, l3Lttl x t tt 401t ` �°. 4 ' `. 3 e171'Sb'C 7G�by I'I 3 4•IP 4. 4. . V • .' \11 �\ 1 it 03 ..,,,t '4� N 6, 6, - ►IATGIUNE I — Y_ { 11ATCHUHC Ir. «� pli,1 SEE SHEET 3 - Hoo'11'1i w ._, r ..//'J '` { t,.. .�?3Y I __• I. ✓fSEE SHEET J ._ ,. -- PLAT v, . L e - • s ' . '3 O'%/ y- / PLAT RESTRICTIONS. SHEET 3 Or 4 I 74 RI.O f001 NIi 11.44C ON%knurl Auirll (011 01C 41(Of •S 4M M 1Sr1.COck1 4.t 41r 1411gF41 oN OM 041 1•m•hin.1 1171 7t47 V�JI N D 1=I ELD ESTATES 'Y 1047 A1111114C n11uCSIMt 71 a v1y 4 uA1 1I[r1M0lo SuPiei ID A11w0v4 n It nr till(1.IOW Ir.Mr11 ink S 11r •1 to 1 11 1•F.00.1 P.0 ton tl•le l~nl\A 1 V141 FAH F0 411101 1.I.4 1 1 FA, F.N14.1 a1RIK11 Ill lo.:1 trl n4 Inl.I I MI*l••.. ' htN)tV,i1►UCtO*Mot 174 SI'1.0/1410,1477.ally.% F4D,1 AV%rrKN1.nD Foil.)O(0 n4 MD(1e:1,M11 A0%am1. •.11/11:1/,t1 u.. a. ' Or KCt1ADM SFAIl F01 N MRr&D A rD.Or 1(•t.Ctp NMWI••U+O>Ce.t Of Mr u10 tr Dt0 no lb"YAIS MOtlCIlD 10h11F.0% Or 1111t$(%uq et AF nYp1 F M r 0114S N AorecnTO 1 Q 0t LAP(MKW 41 WIN PON-111Yr1 HISS 101.Or MOCF 1 AND ton I✓.r 1 or loot.11K L141 t ►t.M)Fenlo4.1nt se FenK SrimSuIARC MI SrttirlC SIPS N4H N.lo19119 1AUCnrt1 11411 VW111(101 rM At II 9/1 In o norA RCPLAT OF LOTS 260. 261, 767, 767 AND PORTIONS Of rnA•111h.reek►inPiny.. /.0 o IOo!bumf 41(1 a DMr limit AR bIA at II(f1 Mom)o.0, LOTS 259, 266 AND 266 Or BRYANT ACRES PLAT NO, 4 •1 1•Y.keen'A•A41.1‘.1...t1 m ...4 nil.FAOq.1 Cpmllifl.ION SOON..0 IS►4OrICno MP` 1MuroMote N•e Mote 11 M1 MI AND A PORTION Or THE CHARLES BROWN D.L.C. NO. 64 ,•. r11r4 O►110NI.re A Sore,A11M0C A141mo.Ct,MDneIMC 4r tort L141 Cr..'lt rN f . NF t '.14 el CMrc mont ton.nits.' 141,10411 M W1tKMao Fw 4 Mao FenMN HOLI.tIck hlMy.•. it YN1K 4710 fFA rat 1r. tl .it r 1t 1k u y 11 A.D ,F'JCytFI•V%M.'11S 10 IN BECKON 7, TONNSHiP 2 SOUTH, RANCC 1 EAST, tY.M, .4 n ''• N nfli ARIA%•19004 eN M ottMC MN M.lot nrlur311,IAni C66.11 NM M N1(r(y1A15 rR ;.lick St.Arrmr`M nil 4C1111 CITY Or LAKE OS•1ECO, CLACK/4AS COUNTY, OREGON 01 I111040 PT IM Oh O 117I MpICO yr 173[.Fc1 11141 11 410M0 ton I.f.ff,)1 994 IS CO 0oa I,A„01011 1.6 1q 1).14 O 0(r,I if M 0Ku WAS sluinowa O M IAM•1C4.wC M PIACl'0'1kVl 14 MI SRAA ton y lid 1tt•'IMyU. h Or M lot 67+4R1 N 1.11141 '(910%..tt 119C1 S •I 1(FO tr wM FS 1A.0%lO►,.e 1AH 0 10 • olio►(. 0•1 0 ,11 1Ar1 1F11 p1.t1 w,41 111131471 li t t•awlc Tsai PROM(1 nloIC•IbCoIo.v M n RIYnMo AFP/p1 M11AOin 17 NI y,Nu.Fi.N•.to.•1n,ttno n n.1 .a RvEYEO: f EBRUARY 27,1991 . r1MC1(FIIII arm U14111 PODyr4R C041 0/•1Y004 A..0/tr P11%Ap.14 1.,.11 01 Fa•1DN•1r ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC. •. *M1.0 It IRA011..t tor•maim.*Mr No 1qt rm.?rr hot 11 I •I twit pll%0.%.0I40 bu1W4 1NI111.ck1.1•...1 44•1,1(p.O,F PI 1111 1'44 4 A p.1,11 IrA 'tin II II10410%Pat 1r O,A-Or 1t4 4 O N C.10•Pe1rrI 011 199( .r101N0 Oh cc W(054000 rWto.c►1M,Co..(.A et/1YON0 Ark(Kmt1. NAn N11.MI Wr}71/1 ti' 1 M CO Si m%MI A%In101.S MINI tops-Iv 1001.TO r•K,4'14t014 CO Mt on L.lot 01MC0 I 11741111 tort 1.11 7 1100.1 44.Inn 11.11 O D OC.I to o1 )>) •1 rNN N11,1 OlmoO 1.1044A1a 14111 1444(1 K 1.n 1111111.11011A4111 % IN MNNIl I7 ..F0,011 1t 1 if co rA1AID CM%,ono 041Cn 11AC10 11 Yw1w41,...M..1 M%Kris O .�i 4D IN IS v1lK kwA.ti Fl 10 1RA(1'A•1 W)•14(ll MC fir 11oK M l[HI CO M(40011N(II MNtI.1 r.AYI41 1 y 4 1 0411 L141 PI PO MN•O1M AC1111 10 CM...I0.,l 1t 4q lots ton 1, •e••tMhr1 A..1 Mt n.C•M,M A MN .Iq(e•c( 1 ),1 IS.logo,i C.►1 O M►%A1 IV"1r44101•IAII% A II al If 11F4:1g.%S 1M„1 A1104 lb,40.l.irw,Al r,, 1 NIN.1ANUlilt OAST LEGEND n 1ur.t.pkf•.%kr tar.00%oaf 01F10.0 awn on /.�y`•�++/ r.., ..: . . , c IA Y orlra F01 ono%O in%11A1 46 I II - too LC. k M.OMS VI Ste,k(M04 rm rN IMO.PLASM 41�`Nns ►La !u1I w SD I L... 77 06' C..ns0ril0•A1)w tr1C.11C• y r. _ -� ,pi-N f1�97't1•■ • MFOn%ID00 111'loth 100 UAlri DMArx Form AIATCHUNE ,_,_� % J.. --• I !>,04' \ Otront faro In'oo+•+1 �� SEE SHEET 2 •A _ \ • 44.On%re..t.1w 11 NN M110•IN 011..CO 1M1m•4/F.I.C.+.e' ..... .. Ion%'4',A,+n1 II AIATCHLINE ■ hwnl ill', (1 r0.Ow rN 41a..k.c4 M1'n.1911..(40 1AI Ig SEE SHEET •1100000 4n..P K,wC•10 04 Mt1 Yp11.f.n0 ) .1 1... w p'ol.. .4.C. I - tl ;" M fnllf .....1 M I�• • Own%Sri'.)e•rock 1m rN rtA%M rm. t: 1• • M4a1IID 4M,NC kr'10 Ot ut NI..N M ; •. 1 t 1 ullwwantl w M I1AKraf t4AHKAn 1T, i TRACT 'A' PUBUC OPEN SPACE N a �3.) %but doc.Fu. BASIS Or REARINGS AND BOUNDARY DETERt1INATION \�• f AND NEIIJWDS ' �' .. . ,., . Al M 14111 O M 00044.M MrN oo O 10h t%I..0• .tot I IM vtnMO .1 �:`, p Ix O'IYA.000 nR1.ct•1r IM1F Ib.q YO1..(Nh IA1W y 1 I ` L Mils V /ff 4CA4S .r S M•11 lr•.AS Yo+1 A►i fllM • Obi Y I'. M•(SI4t1Mt O Mt mil A15 M111.ryo 11 MtSir.0 Flow 4410 i tt /• 'Lb' ( MprLS90lAL • Ib.q N 11rw.ck F!atr1 1 •��. mp lAllp SURK TCN „Si \�pl.tw.101041...4t1 NOTES: 11S •- .t n 'v .H .1-{j•� I 011f n M 49.4.%Yarn Ctnha Y017A.IM1 N11«CM 4140J 11111 ,wl J IC AC'7• • O M 1ourtIM1 1wS RAI 1 ' If Cn111R1.Do111Ny1r1 S•� L A n 1w.• �,1 ' J r - . Zrn 1"°'Atj,;ant i 1 .p I � :S tn1{I A1.n:.,l.�Ylni I% tom.•'p0, +"��` .,� 1!t^� T: �1 1e r 141. ''' ManuA l_A�, ✓ ~ •\t t 'm 1 E . ,4 ��.,!?,Jf f•• tAn „•,1.i.,t �{• tb, �'�o . }•.• 1• -,S./;l l•_I I)'I 1:.D4 ' t 10.110•..f'T 171% Il if If lit'�••�>71f'�S ..,, . ila lr,l�`..A�.7,1 _ '�1 11\,1,1 3' e` % Is:7 -w ..1A, 1►R)•).' r,a`��ot tl u11� r t.l t> >.l_.>� 00 ,\ ,a T1 •t 11'�\C • •$et IIIi 1= s. :11 . 1,1�111T 1i111� Yr •ITr7 1 M t�6''. • . . Cr, \I• �,,, 1 _. I i. ..Cj� i • t,i r^a.`I/• L" )L !��4,, , '.t.', 1�, ..i✓. 4•?l:t :% \-. ...� e, 1i• R 4, 1S t 1' •• 1y'y y41 / Yr Etta . �� ' i 15 . .+ 410,v 4 •f14v ioeC1�'.j11 �`� 4h. Is17, S/:" . `s. G` d `\ .\ 164. '4 A N1eu.,,� 1C V•1 411( l'4/• law: .., Li M"INo11h.nU M1 •, I'1 141•f S/ .` ,1 •IN ,�.�• ..+•'' , 111, e1 3, `` ,LlOh 3.,!. .60•I{. �, 4. IIF 1 F % S 4Sro Al-.. r , iy4 ►>4f- 7 Oy, 'r 111W 1 IAah1/ �rll,D 1'Cur t •� 1. t'•��' ':;•t�,t...4t1 •�_.>j71 �17a SL F, rtl)I:� [ I� lfav I f., 11 �^�� • �1 �0 1 r.1 V y I M+, ` s 4rn .1Q r'ts) r- �K5111RC pl.',.� i' 1f rt 4 e %^ :7 �. •y V.•r J II'i' pa I, a 1°. Y A.'r 11`.- 5 4 a r. ♦ �l i. 1111i f1 :TT •4 V� � r.l 1 e• \I.0 tt� .+s"`11W f T{..1 C.t11 St _ ,. �..'tl,•�1. 1 i} 0 It�Z9Fo:i,ei/w 1!•' [ iA G , e'1 i'li v 1 r Nat ,"IS 3i l t (21 I ti ��� a'/. .t` A T. C 1.fao v 4 y111,. 1 I t 'S : d 1+'t.f1' •V. L, :. T r r �.r td+ . y Ti Y. +:'.� N• 10 %01•• 'Ir lN10Y •Ir L+� w 'Pln ft 1 C .u••,tJ P. R ,.0;,1. f1 1, 't... lost .11\'G, n 1>b' �� 1 ` '.1� a •: •'•I•t In s r I' t,wa v • ^a ! A11a i I \ p f7 $° '6 1 g , iFu 1r 1a >, 1? G O .,(1 y11 R f l )1 111'661 Yi I ) �1 I,Ik f b • ttti41S, , M1'J1'Ir'.•t. T� '+ �lt 1 &Y, 4,00 v Otto ,. 9 Te 'ni+i C. l • 71 QA11t %.\ 1 . . ,,1 +' I a.e. 1 •1 1''� r '1 n " -�" ;1. I •j, LIN v 11ro 1, BEA I •P • . .• ♦. 1 1F Oro J It 1 % 4 1 RINO 1 •� .r11 ( r '.�; ,. p.mw'• \ _ 1t'•' I Aej15 11,IAA4)1.110 4 r M 14 y1�. / (� `rr' \`\'' tiz 1�ro A�>>r, r••! U I 4 .1/,••..rAr f•.r4rlll \t 4, p114 %I :.,t .1 J - L 11r1t1 Nul.iKw \/ .1i} 1 .T I A(I•A.•Nt 1Nt• 111• A e'f+t\V'r4 w z•' 7 ..1 Oil'a k 11 ti �� l it I JI` u 10 G.' °e;t °',� �. l lu• G m ly'ny l� I IThFWpl111 I 4Y un v 144+ . �3j' • n b ' • 11 ' rA%.' T 94 �i u114 r, rj III It/ +,f,f' s Te1xlr'M %4Di�r Htirso• s ee�r'OO' w 11e.vp .* l.r INI1AL POINT✓ A, SI rc A mt• i:is e4U0 A Y ioyi'ap' 7. •e. Ilro fn1A y w. $r*62 45'E ^I. 17°0¢ 1 ti SCALE 1 INCH . 5b i[Ei to 1111 ►..•t.t.. I ll +�1j MID.kHtK a. 11 e0' O1.N�i iY11eW et ' Y.0'AIM.too,•rt•' 62.46' 4111) III u PLAT 110. J' ,' 1 1 tl . 7 r r . , . . j ti/. a r. ` 2 3 BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE 1 4 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 5 6 • 7 A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF) # PD 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 A 41 LOT SINGLE FAMILY ) (The Hollman Company) 8 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & ORDER A CLASS II VARIANCE TO ) ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF ) p .,. 10 A SANITARY SEWER LINE ) 11 THROUGH THE WETLANDS ) 12 • 13 NATURE OF APPLICATION 14 The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 41 lot single ` 15 family residential planned development and a Class II variance to lY 15 allow construction of a sanitary sewer line through the wetlands. 17 The site is located south of Carman Drive, north of Oakridge, 18 east of Inverurie Road and west of Waluga Drive (Tax Lots 2200, 19 2300 and 2400 of Tax Map 2 lE 7AC and Tax Lots 1100, 1301, 2200 and 2300 of Tax Map 2 lE 7DB) . 20 21 HEARINGS 22 2 The Development Review Board held a public hearing and considered 3 this application at its meetings of March 5 , 1990 and April 2 3 } • 24 1990 . P , `5 26 CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 27 A. City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan: 28 Growth Management Policy Element 19 Natural Resource Policy Element K0 Residential Land Use Policy Element Open Space Land Use Policy Element 31 Transportation Land Use Policy Element • B. City of Lake Oswego Sign Ordinance: 11 34 LOC 47. 110 Permanent Residential Signs PAZE 1 PD 21-89\VAR 2-90--769 '+ EXHIBIT • a IY 1 t • H .4 C. City of Lake Oswego Zoning Ordinance: 4 LOC 48 . 205-48. 225 Residential Low Density ' (R-15 Zone Description) A4 , LOC 48 . 470-48.490 Planned Development Overlay 6 LOC 48 .530 Vision Clearance I D. City of Lake Oswego Development Ordinance: 6 LOC 49. 300-49.335 Major Development Procedures '. LOC 48.500-49.510 Variances IS LOC 49.615 Criteria for Approval LOC 49. 620 Conditional Approvals ` /2 E. City of Lake Oswego Development Standards: 11 '3 4. 005 Wetlands ~, !' 14 5.005 Street Lights ; ' h 6. 005 Transit System . 7. 005 Parking and Loading 16 8 . 005 Park and Open Space " 9 . 005 Landscaping, Screening and ' Buffering. m' 1 11. 005 Drainage for Major Development .,iti , 13 . 005 ' Weak Foundation Soils J 19 14 .005 Utilities 16 .005 Hillside Protection and Erosion �•' `a Control ' : 18 . 005 Access 19 .005 Site Circulation - Private ..6.,,,, Streets/Driveways ' 23 20 .005 Site Circulation - Bikeways and 2 Walkways j 2.5 F. City of Lake Oswego Tree Cutting Ordinance: p »; . 26 LOC 55 . 080 Criteria for Issuance of Permits c~ Lq G. City of Lake Oswego Solar Access Ordinance: c LOC 57 .015 Applicability lc LOC 57 . 020 Design Standard LOC 57.025 Exemptions from Design Standard 31 LOC 57 . 030 Adjustments to Design Standard 3.e. 3 • • 3'4 1, P4•'Tr a.iSY • 2 PD 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 r 1r •. A • • 1 4 • 2 3 CONCLUSION The Development Review Board concludes that PD 21-89\VAR 2-90 can 4 a- ' be made to comply with all applicable criteria by the application 5 6 of certain conditions. 4 7 ••. FINDINGS AND REASONS 8 9 The Development Review Board incorporates the February 23, 1990 ;` �•' .staff report and the March 30, 1990 memorandum on PD 21-89\VAR 2- 10 11 90 as support for its decision, supplemented by the followings 1. Additional exhibits listed below were presented to the 12 Board at the hearings on March 5,1 990 and April 2, 1990 , 13 and entered into the record: 14 30. Date log of staff and others consultation submitted 15 by the applicant 31. Letter by Ruth E. Kleckner, dated March 5 , 1990 16 32. Applicant' s presentation agenda, dated March 5, 1990 33 . Aerial photo 17 34. Letter by Corps of Engineers, 'dated February 22, 1990 18 35 . City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan, Planned City `' 19 Parks System 36. Comparison of New Building Starts for the Year 1988 20 and 1989/Elementary Attendance Area Building 21 Activity 37. Petition by homeowners of Royal Oaks Village Planned 22 Development . 23 38. Letter by Rob Bauer, dated March 14 , 1990 39. Memo by Jerry Baker (Acting City Engineer) , dated 24 March 29, 1990 25 40. Traffic Analysis by Keech Associates, Inc. , dated March 22, 1990 ` ' 26 41. Photos of Wetlands 42. Criteria for Future Streets Plan 27 43 . Conceptual Streets Plan 28 19 • 2 . Based upon the findings and analysis in the memorandum ' from the City Council, dated October 17, 1989 (Exhibit . ' " . 10 22) , which is adopted and incorporated herein by 31 reference, the Board found: 32 a . That the application complies with Urban Service Boundary, General Policy III, and Impact Management 33 Policy, General Policy II . 34 PAGE 3 PD 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 • 1. ( 1 • ' r 2 b. That the current school capacity problem can be addressed by the district' s short-term plans (e.g. , 4 use of modular structures, bussing, and adjustment in district boundaries) . The school superintendent testified that while these solutions are undesirable, 5 they will assure' an education experience that meets 7 district standards (urban level of services) . ' s • a c. That the school board testified that they have both . short-term and long-term plans for increased enrollment. 10 d. That the school board has testified that they will 11 provide the same instructional programs for all 12 • children of comparable grade levels. They are able to do this through the 1991-1992 school year. The 13 problems of local overcrowding can be handled on a 14 district-wide basis. 15 e. That the school district would provide the City with 16 new enrollment information in order to evaluate the . " .. '?� school capacity on an ongoing basis to determine if ti =7 there is an adequate level of .uraan services. Based upon that determination, the City has the authority to consider enacting a moratorium on new .developments 19 and/or approved and platted lots (buildig permits) , � ' . 20 if justified by facts existing at that time. The Board wished to make it clear that the applicant is y: 21 proceeding at his own risk regarding the possibility 22 of a moratorium being enacted at some future date. 23 3 . After receiving testimony from the applicant and the ., 24 public, and after reviewing evidence in the record, the '� Board found that: ,, 25 ti•. L6 a . The variance request to construct a sanitary sewer ' line through portions of the wetland area is 1; 27 adequately addressed in Exhibit 11. The variance can , 28 be supported due to the following reasons: . ,' Z9 " o The proposed sanitary sewer plan is consistent 0 with the City policy which discourages pump t, 4. ',• ,' stations which tend to fail and cause service 31 problems. 3` o Adequate evidence has been presented in Exhibit �` 33 28 and in oral testimony by the applicant ' s wetland specialist that clearly illustrates that A' . --" 39 the proposed sewer line could be constructed wits PAGE 4 PD 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 ,. - - .• (- . , . ,, . ;, . . . ..,. . . , . • . • :,• 4. 2 • minimal disturbance to the wetlands. Evidence shows that the disturbed areas could be restored .•! 4 rather quickly (Exhibits 7 and 28) . if S o The variance is the minimum necessary to assure 6 reasonable use of the property, since it would impact only small portion of the wetlands in Tract "A" , Exhibit 7. o The variance would not be injurious to the neighborhood, since the disturbed areas would be ' lD restored in short period of time, 'as illustrated • 1 on the mitigation plans, Exhibits 7 and 28 . • 1L2 o The alternative sewer line (Exhibit 8) would not 23 provide adequate public services to the adjoining areas to the south, east and west. As with the • ' 24 proposed plan, the proposed alternative would also have to cross the existing wetlands. 16 b. The extension of Royal Oaks Drive is consistent with '. ., 27 the future street plan approved as part of Royal Oaks Village Planned Development, as depicted on Exhibit 16 27. The Board found that there was an intervening 23 property that separates the site from Royal Oaks , 'p Village and that the two streets would not be connected as part of this development. r n , c. The proposed open space (Tract "A" ) should be ' W dedicated to the City as public open space, since it has been demonstrated that it would be part of an 23 overall City park system., 21 d. The improvement plans on Oakridge Road should address 2 the overall drainage issue without adversely 2�a 4 impacting the abutting properties. 2;'7 e. Regarding the citizens ' concerns with tipeedir,g on Waluga and Oakridge, the Board directed staff to prepare a report for the Traffic Control Board ._,• �a explaining the Board ' s concerns and supporting a 4- way stop sign at intersection of Waluga and Oakridge. f ? . f. Regarding street improvements on Inverurie Road, the • 32 Board found that more information was needed in order to determine the extent of future improvements on, 33 that road. The applicant was directed to prepare a traffic report analyzing the need for extension of Inverurie Road to Carman Drive. The public hearing r• iP. .GE '° 5 PD 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 • ' III I , ,i.' \ j4' 2. • • • ' .... 1 2 was continued to April 2 1990.90. At the April 2, 1990 4 hearing, the Board received additional testimon regarding the. proposed street improvements (Exhibits 5 38, 39, 40 and 41) . Based upon a review of this information, the Board found that: 6 ri o Inverurie Road does not need to connect to Carman 7 Drive (Exhibit 38) . The Board determined that if 8 • this connection were to occur, it wo 9 Inverurie a shortcut route for motoristsuld ; therefore, creating traffic safety 10 that road and adjoining local streeetsoblems on 11 • • o The existing collector streets 12 Drive and Lake Forest Blvd. , have•ade adequate 13 capacity to accommodate the projected gtraffic volume, Exhibit 38 . 14 16 o The termination of Inverurie at Bonaire (to the south) would eliminate the need to build a road 16 across a significant wetland (Exhibit 41 17 would address the neighbors' traffic concerns. "".. ., 18 4. The Board found that the proposed conce tua r a , 19 (Exhibit 43) illustrates a preferred alternativeeet plane . � '" traffic distribution and access in the neighborhoods 20 an appropriate way to protect the wetlands. , and 1 found that this plan would solve several traffic The environmental problems. Based on this plan, the Boa 22 determined that no street improvements were necessaryd • Inverurie Road: on 23 .0 24 5. The Board received testimony from the a . 25 the possible realignment of the intersectionaof Bonaire and Inverurie. The applicantwasre W5 staff on the final design ofthat directedinfes to work with section .,� any potential street vacation and/or dedication and• ,.'•.:' y improvement at that intersection. 6. The zone requirements for PD 21-89 are the R-15 stands .:9 described in LOC 48 . 205 - 48 . 225 . The exce dss o rds 0 modifications to the zone requirements as discu are Section B. 3 .a of the February 23 , 1990 staff repor in t. 31 30% lot coverage shall be a • µ, applied on a lot-by-lot basis . • .3 ORDER 34 � FAGE 410 ; r. 6 Pb 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 i a •`R ,.. - • • ',•. .1 , • .. 2 rl 3 IT IS ORDERED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD of the City of Lake 4 Oswego that: 1. PD 21-89\VAR 2-90 is approved subject to compliance with 5 6 the conditions of approval set forth in Subsection 2 of 7 this Order. ,8 2. The conditions for PD 21-89\VAR 2-90 are as follows: } At Prior to Final Plat Approval: 10 1. Submit a reproducible du p.l.ication of the final, plat which clearly depict;;: a) utility • , 11 easements; b) sidewalks; and, c) setbacks as 12 follows: front yards 20 ' , rear yards 20 ' (except Lots 7-il of Block 1, and Lots 12-16 of Block 2 13 to be 25 ' ) , side yards 5 ' (except .Lots 8 and 9 of Block 1, and Lots 11 and 12 of Block 2 to be 14 25 ' ) , and street side yards 15 ' , 15 15 2. Adjust the lot line between Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2 to save trees numbered 34-36. 17 18 3 , Establish a 26 ' conservation easement on Lots 7- 411 11 of Block 1 and Lots 11-16 of Block 2, where t ` : 19 adjacent to wetlands. Provide the following note , 0 on the plat and in the deeds: 4, • {i 21 "Lots 7-11 of Block 1 and Lots 1 ,-16 of Block 2 shall have no structures placed within the 25 ' conservation easement. Native vegetation shall 23 not be disturbed and/or replaced without a 24 landscape plan which has been approved by the City of Lake Oswego. All new planning material zB must be native species suitable for the specific 26 soils conditions which prevail. " 27 4 . Submit a final landscape plan showing the type, • ,a , as per City location and size of street trees for all the lots (a minimum of two, if possible) • .' 19 ` standards, I'`0 5 . Dedicate 10 ' additional right-of-way along 1 Bonaire Avenue. 32 6. Label Tracts "A" and "B" as Public Open Space- y3 Wetlands and Private Open Space, respectively, Provide the following note on the plat: . 34 1 411 a . PAGE 7 Pb 2l- 9\VAR 2-90-769 . l • t• • • S S .1MY 2 "Open Space Tracts "A" shall remain in its p, natural condition for the purpose. of providing a 4 • scenic, aesthetic appearance, protecting natural processes and maintaining natural vegetation. Open Space Tract "B" shall preserve the existing 6 trees and provide for location of the project ' . entry sign. Improvements in these areas, which 7 are in keeping with the above purposes, must be • '8 approved by the City of Lake Oswego. No buildings shall be allowed in these areas . , 9 Maintenance of the landscaping in Tract "B" shall 10 be the responsibi.lity of the lot owners in this plat. " t 12 7. Submit the by-laws of the Winfield Estates • Homeowners Association or similar organization to • 13 the satisfaction of the City Attorney to insure the continuing preservation and maintenance of 14 Tract "B" . These by-laws shall provide the City • '' _• - 15 • an enforcement authority to assure reasonable 16 maintenance of Tract "B" at the owner ' s expense. • 17 8 . Access shall be restricted from individual lots to Carman Drive. One foot reserve strips 0 .. la • '8 (tracts) shall be dedicated to the City at the ' '•• 19 terminus of Royal Oaks Drive and Greystoke Drive. 0 9. Identify lots 1, 7-22, 24 and 25 of Block 1, and 21 Lots 1-6 and 13-16 of Block 2 as solar lots on c. 22 the plat. " ' 23 10 . The applicant shall work with staff to identify ,1`': four additional solar lots by applying the • . , Performance Option described in LOC 57 , 020 (3) . • 25 26 11. Show utility easements of adequate width on the final plat for those lots where public and/or , 27 private utilities are to be installed. Where �g utilities or landscaping will be constructed on y side or rear lot lines, provide a note to future . : ,gig property owners that removal and/or replacement . . of of fences for public access to utilities shall be Zp at the homeowner ' s expense. 31 12. Provide plat and deed restrictions against 32 removal of street trees (if they are planted . 33 outside the public right-of-way) . '``'• 34 B. Prior to Final Construction Plans Approval: (10 .y - PAGE • • 8 PD 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 • • . a ' ° • r• - , ' , • • h 1 • r .r. 1 410 2 ` ..: 3 1. Submit a final grading plan, as per City ;k 4 standards. i 4: 5 2. Submit a final drainage plan, as per City 6 standards. , ), 7 � 3. Submit a final street lighting plan and 8 accompanying photometric data, as per City ' • S standard. 10 4. • Submit a final erosion control ,plan in accordance with "Erosion Control Plans Technical Guidance 11 Handbook" . 12 5. Submit a final landscape restoration plan for the .. 13 disturbed areas within Tract "A" (both the 14 sanitary sewer construction area and the 4 disturbed area along the southern boundary of the 15 wetland) . This plan shall be reviewed and 16 approved by the wetland specialists of record, and it shall include the following informations > 17 •:�.� 18 - The location, types and 'quantities of all plan 411 materials, including those listed in the • . 19 wetland report (Exhibit 28) ; 2 0 - The method used to establish these materials; • 21 and , 22 - Provisions for the maintenance of plant 3 materials during the one year establishment . . 29. period. • 25 6. Final construction plans shall show the sidewalks '' 6 on Carman Drive and Royal Oaks Drive (along Tract "A" ) to be constructed along with the street 27 improvements. . • 28 7,. Extend the 5 ' property line sidewalk along the 49 entire frontage of Lot 10 of Block 2 . 8 . The proposed street improvements on Carman Drive ' ' + 31 and Royal Oaks Drive shall match the existing (i �2 improvements on those roads constructed as part of the Royal Oaks Planned Development, to the -3 east. k. • • PAGE 9 PO 21--89\VAR 2-90-769 , . d • • • • • 2 3 9. The boundaries of the temporary 30 ' construction area in Tract "A" , 4 and the 25 conservation n 5 of easements of 1 and Lots 11•�16 6 protection o these areas during to assure • installation of utilities and the constructionof ., 7 houses. , 8 10. Submit all necessary permits from the Division of 9 State Lands and the Army Corps of Engineers.10 • 11. Where access to the sanitary sewor lines are 11 restricted or where damage is likely to occur,. S2 alternative materials such as ductile iron or blue brute shall be used. ;�� ,1<•, 13 14 12. Incorporate all recommendations in the final soils report into the, final construction plans . 15 16 13 . All overhead utility lines, on roadways where 17 undergrounds rovement are required, shall be placed 18 14. Move and design the street and sidewalks at the 19 intersection of Yorkshire Court and Bonaire to 41, ' e ° 20 save trees number l 76 (2-18'' Oaks) , 77 (a 2 " Oak) and 78 (a 10 Oak) . 0 `1 15• Utilit lines 2 y (including the sanitary sewer line through the wetland area) and their easements shall be adjusted to protect trees 24 possible. where . 2.3 25 16. The 100-year flood elevation shall be determined by the applicant, based on the 26a in the flood prone area and additional runoff 27 from future development in the drainagerbasin • .: .. 29 17. basin. Development (such as streets, utilities, and • 2 homes) within flood prone areas on Blocks 1 and 2 3D shall meet the requirements of the City' s Flood Plain Standard. , 18 . Development within the flood prone areas in Bloc • 32 2 shall be designed to minimize an k �,� 33 impacts on trees, y potential 14 C. Prior to An PAiskStreet Im rovements on Carman Drive ossibly Bonaire Avenue) : (and PAGE 10 PD 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 a `. • % . �•' 1 4, 3 1. Comply with the street widening election 4 provisions of the City Charter . ' ' D. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits: 6 1. All construction improvements shall be compleed, accepted and as-builts submitted to the City. R V r E. Prior to Receiving Certificate of Occupancy: 10 . 1. The property owner shall complete installation of street trees as required by Condition A. 3 . 71 12 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 13 1. The final plat shall be submitted within one year of 14 the date of the Order reflecting the Board' s decision. 39 2. Staff review of the preliminary utility plan only 16 verified the location and capacity of utilities to , . 17 serve the site. D 3 . If fill is placed 'on any lot, the extent of the fill shall be shown on as-builts, accompanied by a as statement that the fill meets the minimum requirements 20 for bearing soils adopted by the Uniform Building ;' Code. 21 22 4 . A tree cutting permit shall be obtained prior to removal of any trees that are 5" or greater in 23 diameter . fir.. 24 26 ., :27 ` a lB . �:9 x 1 • I 3 24 AGE • . 11 PD 21-89\VAP 2-90-769 .w ra , rJ I i• 1 . ® 7 • 2 ' 3 I CERTIFY THAT THIS ORDER was presented to and APPROVED by 4 the Development Review Board of the City of Lake Oswego. 5 DATED this 16th day of April, , 1990. 6 - a - ---4X9,/r/J-- . . r'' 9 Robert H. Foster, , hairman 10 Development Review Board • r 11 V• 12 Oa CO-A- Ak 13 Secretary ---� 15 ATTEST: 16 ORAL DECISION - April 2, 1990 411 18 AYES: Stanaway, Greaves, Foster , Remy, Starr. and Bloomer 19 NOES: None 20 ABSTAIN: Sybrowsky 21 ABSENT: None " + '4 22 23 WRITTEN FINDINGS - April 16, 1990 24 AYES: Stanaway, Greaves, Foster, Remy, Starr and Bloomer 25 NOES: None r 26 ABSTAIN: None 27 ,% ABSENT: Sybrowsky 28 10 31 32 d ,1 33 34 ;1` • Ate, . t PAGE 12 PD 21-89\VAR 2-90-769 o-, • 0., •. 11 •.! Y. restrictions on removal of natural vegetation, ' ' ' in order to protect wi r_dlife use of the wetland and to minimize nutrients from adjacent yards from polluting the wetland. ;x LOC 48. 225 - Lot Coverage -� '1 LOC 48.220 - Height of Structures As required by the Code, the maximum height of ; ;n structures and the maximum lot coverage in PD t;,• 21-88 will be 35 ' and 30%, respectively. The • applicant has not requested any modifications to the lot coverage standard; therefore, it will be applied on a lot-by-lot basis. ^b. Planned Development Overlay LOC 48.470 - Purpose LOC 48 . 470 (2) requires that if a project contains an area of 4 acres or greater , or consists of 20 units or more, it shall be processed as a planned development. The '' project is being reviewed as a planned development, since it consists of 41 lots on 16. 4 acres . ® LOC 48.475 - Procedures . �* Since the development contains only one phase, no Overall Development Plan and Schedule (ODPS) is required. The zone requirements to be applied to PD 21-89/VAR 2-90 are the R-15 standards described in LOC 48 . 205 - 48 . 225. '•;•-; ' The exceptions, as described in 6. 2 . a . above, are modifications to the setbacks , lot size, and lot width and depth requirements. ° • LOC 48. 480 - Special Requirements • As Exhibit 4 illustrates, in addition to the wetland open space, the applicant is proposing a landscaped island at the project entrance on Carman Drive. This island will preserve three existing trees, including a 16" Cedar , Exhibit , 3 . The covenants and restrictions outlining use, maintenance, ownership and liability of the private open space (Tract "f3" ) is provided to the City as Exhibit 13 . a However , the document does not clearly describe who would enforce these restrictions . 4 w r Pb 21-89/VAR 2-90 ea Page 11 of 32 _ „ r X • ' W . '.;, 0 f It'►,A411m 11 ii ., j • • • • 7' i P.. ur.• • •A 1 • • • • • • • S� 1 1 I • i1 • l4 • • • - P • 4 .; The HUI/MAN , . , . ..:„ . r . company .. LT :. '", 1991 . Mir. l=tamid F+ishvaie Czt., of Lake Oswego Planning Department3�` Avenue, Third f 1 tear . ' Lzts Oswego, Ore 97034. i'R== Project 4W t) ' -f3'� c- c•21 NW I /�I , �i ,, Flf. Csa. Harnid: Per- our conversation , I am requesting to change the lot coverage metod from a lot by lot basis to a project averagi:lg basis on the pro:=Ct ' JindFielct Esttes" . This it a 41 lot subdivision located C" µ F CaArman Drive, one hlcir.lt sottt:h of Walttca Street in the City of La a Oswego. The project has already been as the , r . =t» �i sion improvements on 1'tl nrl• 01 have already ebeendcorn completed • ° ' r and ,Ti construction has already hothn started, Tt•'' .-oason 1 am requesting the averaging after the fact , instead of tilt . the subdivision application , is that I misunderstood how the lot .cm . rage rule would be applied. !' ' C t7 �ht? market that this project i s het -.7. built for is the professionals --- predominantly no children. '' 'rIla r1,erlpt is: 2Q . retired , 31 % last child gone to college, 44% ,,,o1:::-..o. singles and couples with no children per t:he attached market a a =i s done on my previous si 't projects. EXHIBIT ##1 Ttti s b -► mr demands 71% of project pr,h �, group of p br• one level and 29% would be two-story . homcs s. Therefore, my objective is to build as many of the homes on • ere eve1 as possible, l:ty app i ' rtg a lot by lot average, the lot C,�.°.S' gP rutp is in c';:tnflit:t: with this objective, for r gym 1p: ``gip median lot sire is 6,11ntt sq. ft , c,'1" lot coverage allowed it., iw/, ;t 6,nf`1() 1 ,930 sq. ft . • e=_s the coveredC l '� sq,c ft. = 1 ,530�'t:t sq. ft . pnrr_It ,.i ' 7 = .,�� sq, ft. = 1 ,495 sq. ft, of,. yang spare. This is bon rural 1 . • • EXHIBIT , i 6 : . - • 11b 0-?,/,(la1/4,.;7••►.,, , 1't't= iV. Nyberg y g Start rtitti:gin, t)r' ►ttn 97P62 • 511:1 ffl1.2I 15 • PAX fO1 r1)I.O17 i . • . • + • c'y• w , , 3 * • • + • . • • • • I, • 1P • Pace Two du iv 2, 1991 . . ' Therefore, this only leaves the option of building two-story houses. • This is also in conflict with the existing neighbors request to have as many one level homes as possible. , By applying the lot coverage rule e on a q , project average Mai s as allowed by the Ord. No. 1066, Sec 1 ; 5--3-83, more one-level houses may be built in this project. Also note that by applying the lot �' a .r. co�.+=r.age on a project averaging basis, it will not viol Ate any of the setback requirement's as approved. I would like to also note that the Lake Oswego zone of 7. 5 which most closely fits the lot sizes on this pre. sect would allow a 3.5 lot rnverage. If you would refer to EXHIBIT #2 you will see that the biggest one level houses are very close to the 35% allowed coverage. I am preparing that the averaging method be applied per the at•tj rhed EXHIBIT 02. Under this method I am proposing that the column "Running Development Overage" will not 1` e:ecsed 3O' With each huildinn permit application , I will submit an updated schedule of the runninn development average. This is also easier to administer since I any hui 1 ding all of the homes i n the i Fro_act. The EXHIBIT #^ shows the first 16 permits I am applying for and will be counted to per- the schedule shown. • . e . „ . Submitted by: . .. : . , THE HOL.LMAN COMPANY . • . „4,,,,,,,,,,,,, Veeee.ar-i C-eratd L. Veer er President Attachments: Exhibit #t and F xhi hit +t2 r • • •• q u r • a . , .. , 1 Ex l4l bd l MARKET SUMMARY FOR THE HOLLMAN COMPANY as of July 1, 1991 ' AREA --- 1-Level 2-Level Age Married Single Male Single Female '. , - Total • • CC•_cmaa_Eack 8 2 30-65 5 2 3 r (completed, 10 lots) ,,• t1 r ?„ WinagGIi gatatu ter 7 1 35-70 r+5 0 • 3 (completed 8 lots) Wi nsltiIl c 29 13 27-TO 6 11 ,. (completed 42 lots)• • teedatL6ck_eack 7 4 30-35 4 2 5 , • (completed 11. lots) 8fitiQn_Cnmmna 19 9 30-70 18 4 4 (completed 28 lots) 3 eitO _ simuna_ .t.� 5 1 30-68 4 1 • 1 - (40% complete, 16 lots) , Totals 75 30 61 15 29 (103 equals 105 ~ ' • Percentage 71% 29% 58% 14% 28% 100% ' , Mamas The six projects named above have just been completed -and of Which 40% of Afton Commons III is completed and . :;; sold. There are 105 completed and sold homes and of these 75% are 1-level and 30% are,2-levels. The ages of tha people buying in these areas range from 30 through 70 years of age. The single males comprise 14% of the buyers, 28% :- ' , of the buyers we single females and 58% are married couples. From page two of this market analysis, 20% of the total :' ''''. :.:1 buyers are retired; 31% of tha buyers are "empty nesters" (their children are no longer living at home and either one or both of the individuals are working) 5% of the buyers have children living with them; and 44% of the buyers are professional with no children. . '� d • 4r X E i of 2 a • • • . ' • • • , • . .. , • , , . 4 ,' • The six projects named above have just been completed and Afton Commons III is half done. There arm 105 completed and sold homes and of these 71% are one-levels and 29% are two-levels. The ages of the people buying in'these.areas range from 30 through 70 years of ego. The single males comprise 14X of the buyers, '28X of the buyers are single females and . 58% are married couples. From page two of this market anaylsis, 20% of the total buyers are retired; 31% of,the buyers ° are "empty nesters"' (their children are no longer living at home and either one or both of the individuals are working)' 5% of the buyers have children living with thee; and 44% of the buyers are professional with no children. •, • AREA RETIRED EMPTY NESTER FAMILIES PROFESSIONALS WITH NO CHILDREN Total II Gecalsa Pack 1 3 0 6 10 10 (completed, 10 lots) c ADODER-g2t3tal 1 4 0 3 8 ' . (completed, 8 lots) t hindfiald 11 13 1 15 42 ` (completed, 42 lots) Meadgula,ck_eack_ 1 1 1 - 8 11 (completed, 11 lots) r ' ' " 4ftaQ_Gammgris 7 © 3 10 28 • • • (completed, 28 lots) ' : ®fiQD..GQmmens_III 1 1 0 4 6 (40% completed, 16 lots) �r•,� '` ,':� . , • •& lif • �. i • - Totals •1 . 21 J 32 S 105 • ° • Percentages 20 31 5 44 r,� , 100% i . • 1 . . i • r . , • PAGE 2 OF 2 ' • . , 4., a b, •. I • •- 10 . , H • FX1110s/' c7, Am042NDFIELD ESTATES ' lirTHE HOLLMAN COMPANY • P &D/ARCHITEGT/AIA I ' running running running • lot• building % developmnt total total lot area area cover average lot area coverage 12 7255 2189 30% New Cambridge B 30`/. 7255 2189 14 8044 1681 21% Shef f ord 13 25% 15299 3870 15 5877 1517 26% Foxridge C 25% 21176 87 24 6857 2049 30% Fairfield C 27% 28033 7436 7436 4 7840 2209 28% New Oxford 27% 35873 9645 B 7868 1757 22% Shefford/Gullekeon 26% , 43741 11402 7 8241 2123 26% Princeton 26% `• 51982 13525 10 7416 2123 29% Princeton 26% 59398 1364E = '°� 22• ' 6774 2018 30% Princeton Modified 27% 66172 17666 ", 6 6542 1681 26% Shefford/Harris 27% 72714 19347 7555 2266 30% Bremner 27% 80269 21613 12/2 9863 2404 24% Mannington B 27% 90132 24017 . • 17 6307 2226 35`/ New Cambridge .,,7% 1 65i:�8 2404 37% Mannington 8 ? 964 39 26243 . • 287. 102947 28647 ,: 9 11425 2329 20% Wilmington Modified 27% 1 14372 30976 1 6915 2372 34% Mannington Narrow 27% ;'' 121287 33.''."48 • '�' • $. ' • y b I . O. 'rt 1 • • EXHIBIT 1141-Z(A ) 7M 1► '° J u' 3 a • • • d • • • • • • • • {•• • • • • • 16 `• • 'tl •• • V''. • • • • \lam: I ' Y t • • • �. 4i • • • .. • Z»m1E: Jul , ���, 1991 . . 71ME: 7:30 p,m, LiA'C2. Waluga Fark, Lake Grove Jerry Veenker s Presidend and owner of The Ho%lman Company, met ` ` ^ the neighbors of the Rural Lake Grove Association. The purpose this meeting was to give the neighbors an explanation and L-r,6.erstanding of his request to the City of Lake Oswego to be allowed use of lot averaging over the entire project of 41 lots known as = wzndfie%d Estates" located off of Carmen Drive, south of Wa1uga Crave and north of %nverurie Rd* instead of the 30% lot coverage per 'c:t approach per the attached narrative request equ �s presented to Hamid P�s�hwaie. ~ ` ` Jerry presented printed materials of the presentation he will be ^xing to the City of Lake Oswego, along with exhibits. He gave ez-=mip1es of the lot averaging by showing the site plan of our first ` �! ' .` ^ �r�saale, Ms. Gmllekson, on Lot 8 of Block 1 and this home only covers of the lot. The next example given was the Manningtcm which we zr=cose to build on Lot 187 Block 1 . This house covers �7% of the ` however, when you average the two lots, L8 and L18 together, the coverage figure is 29. 5% which falls within the 30% lot coverage . ' ^ rmIS�~ He proceeded to explain how this carries forward with each ` t)at is built in Wind-Field Estates and the running average will ^ � ' al°4-ak,s stay within the 30% required by the City of Lake Osweg- . . . . _ ' Zerry assured the group that he was NOT asking for more lots. He furt-'-er explained he was staying within the required set backs on eac� lot and that he wanted to build � s many one level homes as ' . ' ^ E X N 10 U T . . ` ` . ` * . ` . . . .. • . • ,.•, .. . • . ;•. , . •, .. . , , . . . • • .... . . . . . .. , . possible. This came up because many of the people were very much in .. ._, - -.. : . favor of the one level homes in the area, versus two levels. . • ••• •.,.... ,' . . . , , -: :. •. The majority of the neighbors voiced their approval . Some of . .., . ,• •. . . • . .. • them said that they would mail in a written comment of their positive .2.. • '' • support and mail it into the City of Lake Oswego. Others signed the . .-. ., • Latter we had sent them explaining our request of the City and those • . . have been attached to these minutes. • .• •.':. .:- • There^ was only one couple who lives in the development of Royal . _ . \• • . . . •. . . Ceks at the corner of Carmen Drive and Waluga Drive who expressed , . , . . • , I .",•. , their desire to see more two-level homes, since that was what they .. .. . . ,., . . , . weire living in. • ..The meeting broke up approximately 8:35p.m. and then individuals ... ..- ._ . . _ ._ . . _ approached Jerry with general conversation wondering when he was .. , " . - . , , . • c-11-10 to be able to start building, everyone was anxiously waiting . _ 4=1!-- the building to begin. -, ,.. . Also, attached is a written comment by Cyndie Douglas who is the • neighborhood association representative. She was at attendance of . -- ..J . ,-. . the meeting and expressed delight at the turn out for Jerry 's •. . . . t ,• . ., . , Presentation. • ... ' • . , . . . ._ . =.espectfully Submitted , ' . , • • , • , . / ...e4tezeil.........„„„ , . , .. . •..A..: , „4..4 4 She-r-y V nker . 7— ler) l , A . . • - , A . • . • • .•• . . • . . .. . , ' ! d + 1 tr� • . t • . ,.N The v HOBMAN.7 Company _ 4 i. l'Y 2, 1991 • I.• W Hamid Pi shvai a Z: ty of Lake Oswego j=yanning Department LSO A Avenue, Third Floor ,M Lire Oswego, Ore 97034 RE: Project #PD 21-89E; NW 1/4 , S7S, RiE sear Hamid: Per our conversation, I am requesting to change the lot coverage method from a at by lot basis to a project averaging basis on the p"'cject "Windfield Estates" . This is a 41 lot subdivision located c'= of Carman Drive, one block south of Waluga Street in the C' Leaee Oswego. The project has already been approved and the ty of s..,bdivision improvements on Block 41 have already been completed and , ' c+�°= construction has already been started. • '; Tre reason I am requesting the averaging after the fact , instead of ust th the subdivision application, is that I misunderstood how the lot c Y . • ►, c..:.erage rule would be applied. The market that this project is bel-►g built for is the professionals • T.-he market is: 20% retired, 31v predominantly no children. ` -` g singles and couples with nolchildrenast dpernthee oattached, ark. al`=i sis market Y done on my previous si ;; projects. EXHIBIT 41 This group of bu er demands 71% of project bP one level and 29% would be two-story . hc�a�es• Therefore, my objective is to build as many of the homes on ore level as possible. B applying , . ccierage rule is in conflict with this a lobjective,ot by lot average, the lot example: The median lot size is 6,500 sq. ft. The lot coverage allowed is 30% Less the ft. garage 20 x 21C= 420 s x ft. 1 30 sq.s ft. covered porch ,r �;7 q J sq.t. ft.i ,= living space. This is too small . - 1 ,495 sq, ft. of 4 ..I A, . • . • 0Vm- ti EXHIBIT • a F 6: 'S.W. Nyberg Street • Tualatin, Oregon 97062 .____i_�... d • G0�'3/C�91.2i Lei FAX 50 1 bi l i ��" •1 i J. / rJ °.. ••,, ... y, • 'ri ry :::':, ..',- Fape Two .W.•sl,y 2, 1991 Therefore, this only leaves the option of building two-story houses. :s -is also in conflict with the existing neighbors request to have as. many one level homes as possible. =y applying the lot coverage rule on a project average basis as �/ allowed by the Ord. No. 1866, Sec 1; 5-3-83, more one-level houses crav be built in this project. Also note that by applying the lot cd 'arage on a project averaging basis, it will not violate any of the -setback requirements as approved. I would like to also note that the Lake Oswego zone of 7.5 which most closely fits the lot sizes on this proect would allow a 35% lot r.nverage. If you would refer to E:X ' SIT #2 you will see that the biggest one-level houses are very • close to the 35% allowed coveraqe. I am preparing that the averaging cet od be applied per the attached EXHIBIT #2. Under this method I an proposing that the column "Running Development Overage" will not o=ed 30%. With each building permit application, I will submit an updated schedule of the running development average. This is also sealer to administer since I am building all of the homes in the gr zect. The EXHIBIT #2 shows the first 16 a.�rd will be counted to per the schedule shown. ' • ermirts I am applying for • 'l S..ccral tted by: Ti4E fq,OLLMAN COMPANY -r '•tC%SPY ,e,��I�./ .-. u • Ger-ald L. Veenker • .c�e,sydent h r• Attaz ,mentst Exhibit #1 and Exhibit #2 • c r 4 , • The HOJIMAN • Y, • 7 St company •` :;'., 1.991 441"_ Hami ri P.i shvai e ::t .e of Lake Oswego ."..a-fling Department A Avenue, Third Floor __. Oswego, Ore 970 34 1• __ Project #F''D 12--09E; NW 1/4 , c7f;, RIF • a— Harm H: =%si.--• .:ur ronversation I am regt.tr+C,t i rtq to change the lot coverage e e4� .md from a lot by lot basis to a project averaging basis on the . o:e t "Wi ndf i r=l d Estates" . flat s is a 41 lot subdivision located - of C:carman Drive, one block south of thlalt,tga Street in the City of _ ;, _ Os,Nego. The project has already been' approved and the ccivi Sion improvements on Block 41 have already been rornpl rued and IIPcims construction has already heen star ted. - -ear•r►rt 1 am request:ir•tq the averaging after the fat:t , instead of t- the subdivision application , is that I misunderstood '`.. .-AtIe rule would he applied. The market that thispnJertj the lot ='+�c built.i 1 t for � q • - is the rtrrtfwsirn.:tis p -"'� ryar l,et -- predominantly no r;hildrer . is: 20/" retired , 4 1 last child id gone to college, 44% .2 .-4 singles artcl couples with hrt children per the attached market --s: ,~aa s none on my previous si •r projects. r XHIEtIT tt1„ • - --. -="" demands 71.% of 1Ftis group of project hr rmne level and 29% would be two-story -tali s. Therefore, my objective is to build as manyof the 4, . =vP1 as possible. By appalying homes can -c 4'"age rule is in conflict ppilhr, h thisobjective,ot by t afarexample: the lot . • , amn l r : -*••e median lot sire is fi,tat'ttt sq. ft. -'Me lot coverage allowed Jet. ;;t't% tc 6,nt'tt"t _ 5 __5s the garage 2t°t ;r 21 , r = _ 1 ,9�tt sq. ft. 1:' t sq: ft. 1 ,!,311 sq. ft. '°.. •- ss the covered porch ti 'ft7 ' - IS sq. ft , = 1 ,49.9 sq. ft. of : : ving space. This .is ton rnal ,l . %::i'f 0-• „ C2/..eaove4..aelt.) ,,i) 4,,,„.4 ,762.4, 5?2,4dete,.. /c/eirititAfteil 2 erlie-1-1--Ld'cze''-e'e'x--/ . . .v • js/�,02. ,PLC LE%t &i Ce.Z 4> r .-� ✓lyt;l .GCJtt�' . 6? � ) y EXHIBIT • ,„ e- r ►* W. Nyber Street • 1 unirttiit, Oregon h70G2 • +� r , • ', : ti1.1 (ifllZl• I!i • VAX rn� ,h, • i ' r. ;_.:. tt�a e • ti ♦ . ' A fib M. , • �1h 1 d G rr HOE'MAN ° Company kA, ' • d• Ge ' c July 2, 1991 / . Mr. Hamid Pishvaie v City of Lake Oswego Planning Department .' y 380 A Avenue, Third Floor ` Lake Oswego, Ore 97034 RE: Project 0PD 12-89E; NW 1/4, S7S, RIE , err k • Dear Hamid: '° 1 51 4 Per our conversation, I am requesting to change the lot coverage Y ;: 'i` method from a lot by lot basis to a project averaging basis on the G project "Windfield Estates" . This is a 41 lot subdivision located 'Cr • off of Carman Drive, one block south of Waluga Street in the City of Lake Oswego. The project has already been approved anti the subdivision improvements on Block #1 have already been completed and home construction has already been started. ' : The reason I am requesting the averaging after the fact , instead of with the subdivision application , is that I misunderstood how the lot • coverage rule would be applied. The market that this project is being built for is the professionals -- predominantly no children. The market is: 20% retired , 31% last child gone to college, 44% young singles and couples with no children per the attached market analysis done on my previous six projects. EXHIBIT #1 This group of buyer demands 71% of project be one level and 29% would be two-story homes. Therefore, my objective is to build as many of the homes on one level as possible. By applying a lot by lot average, the lot coverage rule is in conflict with this objective, for example: • The median lot size is 6,500 sq. ft. The lot coverage allowed is 30`/. x 6,500 = 1 ,950 sq. ft. Less the garage 20 x 21 = 420 sq. ft. = 1 ,530 sq. ft. . , ' Less the covered porch 5 ',s7 ' = 35 sq. ft. = 1 ,495 sq. ft. of living space. This is too small . r. Iti.,,,,-) ch, -Mk WoR-24\A-tyyk— \,4, 9ittsts:.,....", (),)kokg Nuo t:.,?e•-• . . . , 1'' EXHIBIT , ,;, 5\ 55 5W Ftt(twA)tz )Z • LA c( ,.JE 0,4. 1�tA • 66/-3 ti6t,q,s P 0' o . • . ° . ,.•,e• • • i • ° +� L; ' ` »e ' 1 {, - - . - '. $•, { ' i ..'tea.. 1 °' EXHIBIT /• .3 iHOEMAN J 1 . . , . •_. Company ,4 C.:..2Y 1 , 1991 '9 ''t James Blodgett ' 5095 SW Oakridge Rd f Lake Oswego, Or t ,, 4 t ` RE:1 Pro-Application No. PD12--89 Var ' ' 4" "Wi ndf i e1 d Estates" Carman Drive, Lake Oswego NW 1/4, S7s, R1E I. :Gerald L. Veenker, President of The Hallman Company am the de,.):.rei oper/builder of the property located off of Carman Drive, south v c.- Iwaluga Street in Lake Oswego. A notice was sent to you last week, �-s"_girding a meeting of your neighborhood.' Cindy Douglas, your neigh- , Alitcr-iood Association contact notified me late last week that we could IMPae( rad ' get a meeting place for July 1 1 th as planned. Therefore, this le-comer is to notify you that the meeting has been changed to July j t .~, 1991 at 7: 30 p. m. to be held at the Lake Grove Christian i l , i .I I -.=ve already received calls from several people who expressed their ,. r,=1m-'ets at not being able to attend the meeting. I have explained t`�+_ situation to them, my wife Sherry has talked to a few people, and r . -4e._ have expressed positive suppr,rt for me with a request to send -ssrr a notice and they would sign it and return it to my office 1. ,t_zating their support. Therefore, I have enclosed the narrative ' : ..'.. '':'' Aih c.`1 I am presenting to the Lake Oswego Planning Review Board at my y `es.1-1ng in August. This narrative explains what I am requesting in twl_ line of lot averaging for the development. If you would care to "t' o= -...-le same, I would appreciate it; otherwise, I look forward to sete:ng you at the July 10th meeting. If you would like to talk to me • tie-mre the meeting , please feel free to call me at the office$0, o.-�. !I ,' -2115 or my home evenings and weekends, 692-2381 . rsat_i you, Set-e_Jd (Jerry) Veenker n • ` ,E. h-lol l man Company .+ Msure • 4r:�`MS.W. Nyberg Street Ttt,tit�tin, (7rr nn 97062 1 " Rt�p3/ 91"211li VAX 503/691.0475 • - j s + _d`. i .in— • •, • • • • • • • • • • • • • Ar • • • • • • • • n' w : ` . • •• • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • • •• �i • , • •• • f +� The HOE'MAN Company ..» xy 2, 1991 "4r. Hamid Pishvaie Cs ty of Lake Oswego P1 anni ng Department _-r A Avenue, Third `° ..,.► Floor oor • Lake Oswego, Ore 97034 " ..E.: Project #PD Z. -B9E; NW 1/4 , S7S, RIE .. :ear Hami d: Pe,- our conversation, I am requesting to change the lot coverage method from a lot by lot basis to a project averaging basis on the project 10Windfi.eld Estates" . This is a 41 lot subdivision located c4f of Carman Drive, one block south of Waluga Street in the City of Lae Oswego. The project has already been approved and the sdivision improvements on Block #1 have already been completed and cabe construction has already been started. "he reason I am requesting the averaging after the fact, instead of wit the subdivision application , is that I misunderstood how the lot coverage rule would be applied. The market that this project is`t ,etng built for is the professionals -- predominantly no children. • -!-a• market is: 20% retired , 71% last child gone to college, 447. ,,,ch-Lng singles and couples with no children per the attached market a'. analysis done on my previous sit: projects. EXHIBIT #1 This " buyer demands 71% of group of , Project b� one level and 29% would be two-story ' homes. Therefore, my objective is to build as many of the homes an one level as possible. By applying a lot by lot average, the lot cc£.erage rule is in conflict with this objective, for example: The median lot sire is 6,50r sq. ft. The lot coverage allowed is 30% x 6,500 = 1 ,950 sq. ft. Lest the garage 20 x 21 = 420 sq. ft. = 1 ,530 sq. ft. a ... Less the covered porch 5 'x7 ' = 35 sq. ft. = 1 ,495 sq. ft. of living space. This is too small . °a EXHIBIT '' ► n S.W., Nyberg Street Tunintin, Oregon 970r2 ' ,,c .,. 6 50 3, 091.211C FAX 503/591.0475 ,,,, :�• • 17 L.- • Par-e Two July 2, 1991 iP Therefore, this only leaves the option of building two-story houses. Tht•s is also in conflict with the existing neighbors request to have as, many one level homes as possible. • By applying the lot coverage rule on a project average basis as allowed by the Ord. No. 1566, Sec 1; 5-3-63, more one-level houses may be built in this project. Also note that by applying the lot coverage on a project averaging basis, it will not violate any of the setback requirements as approved, i would like to also note that the Lake Oswego zone of 7.5 which most closely fits the lot sixes on this prol:ect would allow a 5% lot cnverage. If you would refer to ' ' EXH ,BIT #2 you will see that the biggest one-level houses are very these to the 35% allowed coverage. I am preparing that the averaging meti�od be applied per the attached EXHIBIT 42. Under this method I am proposing that the column "Running Development Overage" will not ,. •. � exceed 30%. With each building permit application, I will submit air updated schedule of the running development average. This is also east er• to administer since I am building all of the homes in the preset. The EXHIBIT #2 shows the first 16 permits I am applying for d and will be counted to per the schedule shown. ' • subm' tied by: • • THE HDLLMAN COMPANY • czsy...:„,,rye,,,,erl.eZt..t....€t_------' . , Gerald L. Veenker • rrestdent .'. •., Attachments: Exhibit #i and Exhibit #2 i • N • 1 ' .fir ,'I 1 • w J I /. 21�� le ' c?..rd ?4.")Z %P `X�z /? 4.6 • -e f rili The HO1MAN /,»''L`.:/.eel•l'eteL /41 c�- iCGJ 9.4- ,4e4 .mod"' Company G,�-ee`.e -fit- le`"44- •=rer. /"I --e'.2-t" ,/kr' • re 1 • �, J.� �� i , 1 q91 r,� / r ti C .y .9,1eL:,II.0 RECEIVED ' 1 f,1w.G.a,c... Marvin Friesen at 15 1991 d, 5276 SW Oakridge Rd Lake Oswego, Or ' llrts d,....... ... A n RE Pre-Application No. PD 1 2- H? Var "Wi ndf i el d Estates" c armnn Drive, Lake Oswego NW 1 /4, S7s, RIE . I , ral d L. Veenker ,r President of The Hallman Company am the s de4kel.per/builder of the property located off of Carman Drive, south of 4aluga Street in Lake Oswego. Anotice was sent to you last week " re.7,a-ding a meeting of your nri rlhhclrhood.1 Cindy Douglas, '-cor "•good Association contact nol•i f i,ed me late last week that owe couldur - o get a meeting place fr,r July 1 1 th as planned. Therefo letter is to notify you that the meeting has been changedtot July s Y`7:t ,: 1991 at 7:30 p. m. to be held at the Lake Grove Christian • 1 f :.•e already received calls from several people Who expressed their r-Qo-ets at not being able to attend the meeting. I have explained tha situation to them, my wife Sherry has talked to a few people, and. t' e-.., 'nave expressed positive support for me With a request to send t',em< a notice and they would sign it and return it to my office Indicating their support . Therefore, I have enclosed the narrative h°hzc4' I am presenting to the Lake Oswego Planning Review Board at my . ,gig g • ea in August. This narrafiv explains what 1 am requesting in the ; 2ne of lot-averaging for the development. If , moo. tix.e same, I would appreciate it; otherwise, I look uforward ctoe to ,,.. seet-,myou at the July 10th meeting. If before the please. g' you would like to talk to me �a the meeting , lease feel free to call me at the office 6q t --2l 15 or my home evenings and weekends, 2-2:,P 1 . cal you , y. • Ger':a1d! ,f erry) Veenker a he l at man Company ., ii EXHIBIT ci c+saare rs . , 'I/ ,7r1Q6. W. Nyberg Street + Tunlntin, Oregon 97062 • s Ga,l,tiat• I 1r, • FAX 603/691•0475 • 7J, 1 .',•$1. at. • • • • • ti p 1. Y• 4., Y • • • • • • • • ® J .4w • • • • • 11. • • { f J r - Y; : r The • HOI!'MAN . . up Company , .. f • 1991. J ' 41,-. 'ilamid Pishvaie ,' of Lake Oswego a-- ng Department ' LA Avenue, Third f lone _are Oswego, Ore 77034 .__ Project 0PD 17-F39E; NW 1 /4 , S S, R1117. ' `._a.- 'Hami d• -our Conversation , I IT requesting to change the lot coverage m_t!-'c,d from a lot by lot hits to a project averaging basis on the =ct "blindfield Estal;ps" , fltic is a 41 lot sttbdivisintr located of 1.Arrnan Drive, one block rcirth of Ulal ttcla Street in I he City of _=+ e Oswego. The pro jnr_t has a I r~eRdy hen approved And thr c.7.1: vi s.i.on improvements 'in Mork k it I have already been r•c,mp l eted c nd Illr' _►.. ce ronst'rrtr_ti ot, has al r,-ady hr�F+n st artnrl. 'r,eastan I am requesting the mveraging after the fact , inskra_atl or 'the subdivision appl i i:rat i nb , is that I misunderstood how the .lot • • _"`.se-age rule would hP applied. The market that this projert t "-e=-j' built for is the prefessienal a --- predominantly no children. ``e n�-it i wt' is: 2t"1% retired : I last child gone to college, qq% ' •- = y' singles and couples wi t 't no children per the attached market =" 4-si s done on my previous r,i ,r projects. EXtIIDIT 01 lhi s group of c. _tom demands 71% of project. hr one level and 27% would be two-story c^e'e- Therefore, my objective is to build as many of the homes on c =vel as possible, Dv •ippi ••. i nt; a lot by iut: average, the lot -� ,tlf� rule is in ' srconflict with this Objective, for e) a m r i ry, 7"4-,e median tat sire i. = f:,;ltttt r;n. fit . `-to lot coverage allowed i e, 'I('W. u 6150 t 1 ,930 sq. f t. ~ ess the garage tt't ;, :'{ W r;:;rt sq. ft. = 1 ,530 sq. ft . the covered porch fir ' s q. ft. •- 1149,.r ft . of ty a f�' mow'-'G'� ��� � ;�, yam"' � � C�. •,.. : . vi ng space. This i s ten r:m:+l 11. • 4 -4-,ate .. b Ft 1 , + EXHIBIT • FD4'l•3''(IbivS-/' '` E Nyberg c l?h .1k'. N b Street , , • Y g I unintitt, Oregon �l7Ol 2 • f1r 11,i •0Sl1.2i It • PAX r1f111N 91.t?,i7r M •,_ , _ ... • I / L •o alas' Two ; Ju y 2, 1991 • • , The.•,refore, this only l.eavras thin option of building two-story houses. Tht.s is also in conflict with the existing neighbors request to have as- many one level homes as possible. EN applying the lot coverage rule on a project average basis as aL:wed by the Ord. No. 1 flhh, ^pc I ; 5-3--B3, more one-level houses •: ma-4, be built in this project. Also note that by applying the lot ca.rs'rage on a project averaging basis, it will not vial Ate any of the ' r setack requirements as approvers. I would like to also rlote that the Lay. Oswego zone of 7. 5 which most closely fits the lot sizes on this pr=j'ect would allow a 35% lot r•overage. If you would refer to E HThIT 42 you will see that the biggest one-level houses s are very otrc+ee to the 357 allowed coverage. I am preparing that the averaging ¢seb tod be applied per the attached EXHIBIT tip. Under this method I am roposing that the column "Running Development Overage" will not: en=,eed 30%. With each building permit application , I will submit an ` ' up±inted schedule of the running development average. This is also sasser- to administer since I any building all of the homes in the pr=lect. The EXHIBIT ttL shows the first 16 permits I am applying for any will be counted to per the schedule shown. ® a4. 4_;-tmitted by: • 71-E. HOLLM(N COMPANY ,1 ,• � ` � ��y� I f }:Feel d L. Veeniter ci-esa dent +=:tt. chments: Exhibit it1 and f ;:hi hi. t 42 • A . +d , ... ' . . (../`.M r _6,'e, / , L, i /r'- '-` _.„l:a.. c.•,l ti )Am r ; r ), .1 • . . Yr�Af.. s r 1� � r ,'el. sj 4 A G1 r S.-,. r,e, . , / •• .r. A , w t, J • e � ry rr / `r ) y �•- 1 • /, a 1. ,, ,./ 1 '4AA ;y .. .. '" ,.� `!/• ... •„ • ._ �, ` , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • , • • • • r.� • •