Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 2003-02-24 PM
• �$ .t �1/. Yi A ,y �I •. 4 i i 1 x� •1 T , .M x 1� "Itw 1 1' i• 5 x�q CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4' t. hi. j �t. I• } 94 f. .rr M •.1N t•: ti ' ': �... PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS • FEBRUARY 24, 2003 x • 04, > r G T. 'iV •ri° T 4 ,•mo4. 4 M•. .1 f y. C "t. t1 x ♦u wx '9 •9 � �1 y1" 1 4,4 q \ .447 j ' } 'J j a 4, 1 4 4 • 1 tP 4x V. ♦ . ra xq °♦ i+ x1. } � 1 1 xx ♦ NJ A ,a 4.e , of--. ns; City of Lake Oswego .,, " Planning Commission I •:{i }i ' 1. ry Monday, February 29, 2003 N i .�,,�- ',/ '' 7:00 p.m.—Open ;Pork Session „4„ O EGO" City Hall Council Chamber Members: 380 A Avenue ,.. .. Daniel Vizzini,Chair Lake Oswego,OR 97034 ,, .;4% Prank Oromik,Vice Chair For Information; 503/635-0290 " James Johnson,Kenneth L.Sandblast, Mark Stayer and Alison Webster *" AGENDA. .. .. h" Council Liaison: Jack Hoffman ., This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location. For any special accommodations,please ,•- ,. contact Iris Treinen,503/697-6591,48 hours before the meeting, r aJ Ir CALL TO ORDER +°~r " II. ROLL.CALL ° ` y " "`4 Y'' IIIr C1'l IZLN COMMENT'—Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda(3 minute limit per individual) IV, APPROVAL OF MINUTES Nnvembcr 'S, 200? V. GENERAL PLANNING—OPEN WORK SESSION y Outlook 2025 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review(P 02-0001) • M a ;, Goal 2—'Land Use Planning Identification of issues to address during 2004 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review, Staff coordinator is Sidaro Sin,Associate Planner VI. OTHER BUSINESS 'ai9 • a VII. ADJOURNMI NT • •:t� - ,, i 4, .4 • h• ,k x '• '.r! • f. n a Y•'x y •4 y his '7 r' r _ y1 ;.Yr ry • 1 P w •.Ylr y: 1r 1� ,r yr• }• P , k ry. a ,. 1 ;Nu 1 ' \mil' • h• Y M nn nr • • lwpn5 14. • 'q y 4t twt - ry n d. • • 4 41 • "r Y Z H 'ice j h', ', ; . `,,l,:LAKE------!Pt Community D• evelopment 4„ x adDepartment a. yr / i 1 al , v---� .- Memorandum ,. OREGON n r ..% 1100.01Minewaaa� 9111111111112111MENRIMINNIMUM4nn► NW TOo Planning Commission • x ya ', ,r" FROM: Sidaro Sin,Associate Planner L%41.7. DATE: February 10,2003 SUBJECT: Outlook 2025 Goal 2,Land Use Planning--Issues Identification ACTION: :M ` µ �+ " Identify issues to address during Periodic Review under Goal 2,Land Use Planning of the fit' Comprehensive Plan. 'DISCUSSION: +' I. Comprehensive Plan Goal Z,Land Use Planning ', Lake Oswego Comprehensive plan,Goal 2: `< " ' "To establish a land use plannirg process and policyfanlework as a basis far all decisions and ' ",. +� actions related to the use of land and to assure an adequate factual basis for such decisions and ,w actions." (Attachment 1,Comprehensive Planning Goal 2) w a^ Statewide Planning Goal 2 provides for an orderly and structured framework within which ., ` land use decisions operate. ,=M Statewide Planning Goal 2 specifically requires: ' '» `, • City actions related to land use be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with r �'' regional plans. . w" • Land use plans to include identification of issues and problems,inventories and other .� factual information for each applicable statewide planting goal. •.` , • Provisions for periodically reviewing and revising plans. ' a »�;" 0 • Implementation measures be developed consistent with and adequate to carry out the Plan, ` ' and shall be coordinated with plans from other affected government agencies. (Attachment 2,Statewide Planning Goal 2) "6 Manning C'oinnussiott Work Sdli11011 a i,t 1 rage 1 Outlook 2025.Goal 2,Land Use Planning Meeting date l'ebruar)24.2002 ql 1 •! M 9- Y • t L d t i WYr 1! �� � .," p ` •La L::, ,O 6 i• t A. II. General Information 1:' Background: The Comprehensive Plan includes two sections for this goal;Section 1,Land Use Policies and Regulations and Section 2,Community Design and Aesthetics, "" `1 "' r' t Section 1+Land Use Policies Section 1 directly addresses the requirements of the statewide planning goal, It establishes the ,. planning process and regulatory basis for land use actions by the City. Land use planning goals, a • » •' policies and recommended action measures(RAMs)support and emphasize that all land use 4 ••. actions,regulations and code requirements be consistent with and implement the Comprehensive • 1, Plan, " 4 Section 2,Community Design and Aesthetics , 1 1 °:, This section ensures that design and aesthetics are considered when development occurs. By b" °, incorporation of this section into the Comprehensive Plan,it provides the ability to guide,enact, ;.1 " and implement policies and regulations that govern the appearance and design quality of a .' • u development. , Communitydesign a,• nd aesthetics is an important aspect of the development review process in ' ' Lake Oswego because it enhances the quality of life for residents and it helps define the charm ' • ,. » and character of Lake Oswego. •„:w Where are we now/what is currently in place for this goal: " A,t, This section describes what programs the City has in place for this goal. „ : • Comprehensive Plan • Community Development Codet (CDC) �, , • Neighborhood Plans a J — • Establishment of a Development Review Commission,Planning Cotmmission,and City Council that reviews quasi-judicial and legislative land use matters . • Yearly"house keeping"measures to insure the CDC is updated and corrected as needed .4 n.1 Ay. ,., . III. Issue Identification M- The following conditions indicate the need for,and establish the scope of review for periodic • a ' review of the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations, (These conditions are solely "•"' intended to act as a starting point for discussions,) ;`r ;;. +{� w A) Oretzon Administrative Rules SOAR)660-025-0070 : .+ The following conditions indicate the need for,and establish the scope of review fur g periodic review of comprehensive plans and land use regulations. r ; w ` 1. There has been a substantial change in circumstances Including but not limited to '. the Conditions,findings,or assumptions upon which the comprchensive plan or land use regulations were teased,so that the comprehensive plan or land use M' regulations do hot comply with the statewide planning goals, Y:Y4 "4 ..,, i the Zoning Code,Development Code and Development Standards were consolidated into the C ommumip Development Code(CDC)in l.ebruary 2002 �� t'" Planning Commission'Work Session Page Outlool:2025.Ciotti 2,Land t;se Planting Meeting date February'24.d0(1 ,, , J J iF i r , ' _ v .k , '•. ,`• •i Hi .. . ` .,1 , . ^,. ',. w y e ix l` . a of .4, 4.4.I A.; w1 ` RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition. ° ' 2. Decisions implementing acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use fit ' regulations are inconsistent with the goals. a k t :r RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition. „-, ; 3. There are issues of regional or statewide significance,intergovernmental { ,,Z coordination,or state agency plans or programs affecting land use which must be a; , addressed in order to bring comprehensive plans and land use regulations into * a ''' compliance with the goals. `:', „• ` •u '' RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition. a 4. The existing comprehensive plan and land use regulations are not achieving the I , ° statewide planning goals. • RESPONSE: It is believe that existing regulations and procedures comply with " Statewide Planning Goal 2, 'i . =. B) Summary of Maior issue . ` N ,, •:, This section highlights pertinent issues identified in the Comprehensive Plan that relate to ' � ° this goal. Not all issues will be applicable, In many cases,the issues are a statement of J ,' fact,in other cases they identify a future action. .� r Section 1,Land Use Policies and Regulations " 1. "As of 1994,Lake Oswego was mostly developed, Future development within the ` e current City limits will likely consist of small land partitioning,infill and . `, , ` • s . redevelopment." ry q', a ' `i�w RESPONSE: When this issue was identified in 1993,it was probably unknown how partitions,irifill,and redevelopment would be part of the development fabric of Lake � ,: Oswego. ,, j Partitions,infill,and redevelopment are the primary ways in which development occurs ,: in the City today, The City has addressed these issues in the following ways: • Minimum density(Adopted 2002) ., • Residential Infill standards(currently under consideration) ' "°,,;.`• • Height restriction in certain areas to promote compatibility(Adopted 01/02) f rt a.4 e rho.: . ' Section 24 Community Design and Aesthetics +t. -' ;,; RESPONSE: There were no items identified in this section of the existing •k. Comprehensive Plan. 1•lov.ever,consideration should be given to identifying the '" following as future issues to consider:• t'lanainp Canntussinn Work Session 003 Page 3 " Outlaai;2t'i2 .Goal 2,Land t'se Pluming Meeting date I ebruuil 24,2003 pp t,A� A Al02) ` ,y/ ' ,k , �.y'� a ' ,, yy 1 ' , 1A� { % t a'..! ,� Fit,. F; '. " .e t , c.: n 4 .' L • Residential Infill"Greater emphasis has been given to the compatibility of new , single-family residents with the existing fabric of the neighborhood "• " Y,; • Signs-The attempt to eliminate/limit obtrusive signs into residential and .r. commercial areas has been an issue in the past few years .. , 4.. ; • Trees-Designing and constructing residential structures to preserve trees has been a focus of the tree code eta+. '. C) Goals,Policies,and Recommended Action Measures ` This section will identify goals or policies that should be addressed during Period Review. In some cases the goal or policy might be outdated and require a deletion or an amendment, ;•. ,, ; In other cases,there may be an opportunity for new goals and policies. w Section 1,Land Use Policies and Regulations r Goals: RESPONSE: No issue was identified with the existing goal, { ' Y • Policies: ,� Policy#5(b)(ii)(E)&14(t) #5(b)(ii)(E) The applicant shall demonstrate a r',bile need for the proposed plan/map r " �. density change and that the proposed change will best meet the need when ` ,,"�'. w,a P compared to alternatives. A _ ;' 14(f) Ensure that amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map are subject to specific locational criteria and other standards,including: J' G Demonstration of public need for the change and that the proposed '' ' amendments will best meet identified public need versus other s,_ " available alternatives,,, ' ^' W ' RESPONSE: It can oe generalized that all proposed zoned changes since the late 1990s have been contentious, In many cases the proposed zone changes have been opposed because of compatibility reasons. However,staff would like to identify that there has been issue with the above policy in that applicant's were unsure as to how to best respond to the policy in that it is broad in nature, 'u , Staff would like the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider clarifying the KK . ; policies by providing definitions or direction on what Constitutes a"public need"and "~ "when compared to alternatives", • r Consideration should also be given to combining the above policies, ' Policy#10 Allow development at the maximum designated density when it is shown than: a, Adequate public facilities and services can be provided; b. Negative impacts.can be resolved;and, as ` ,.: c. The development is in compliance with all applicable land use regulations, Planting t'oninttssinn Work Session Page 4 Outlook 2025-clout 2,Land Ilse Planning Meeting date 1'etu'ttat)24,200. .' i p1 ,,i RESPONSE: Under item(b),consideration should be given to expanding the definition of 4, "negative impacts"to clarify that impacts include negative impacts on natural resources, ' " ,,.s f+ M This change would emphasize current City practices. . • 4'`•4 "� r; r RAMs: � 4 "•-'' nA*1 P tl a.4 RAM ix Undertake periodic review and update of the Lake Oswego Comprehensive plan every four to seven years, , . Response: The last time the City went through periodic review was in 1988, The City is n , • »',,•':yu required to go through periodic review every 5 to 10 years. "a 1 RAM x Evaluate the following concurrent with each periodic review or major revision of the Plat.: • a, Consistency among the plan,implementing City regulations,adopted neighborhood 1 •' r 1,, plans,state and federal law and administrative rules,and Metro requirements; 0` • ` ,• b, Past and ongoing City actions to determine if the intent of the Plan is being achieved; i. ,. and, • c. Reliability and timeliness of Plan information, • ; H L ' RESPONSE: Review for consistency with other plans,state and federal laws,etc—will be • ,;.a;.' strictly reviewed during periodic review, The introductory text of many of the goals will +s' ' '" • ` " need updating which will also occur during periodic review. y 4- The intent of the Phase 1 process to determine if the intent of the Plan is being achieved,if , 7.• ". not is it because the we need to change the intent of the Plan(or parts of it)because the " `r 1. P intent has changed or do we need to add,delete,or amend policies within the Plan to ;: I;I achieve the intent, Section'2,Community Design and Aesthetics ' '•• Goals: RESPONSE: No issue was identified with the existing goal, • w , 1 Policies: A. w RESPONSE: No issue was identified With the existing policies. c 'µ RAMs: RESPONSE: No issue was identified with the existing RAMs. ., D) Other Identified Issues j '; , *'`� This section identifies other issues for periodic review consideration. ,, , „ Neighborhood Plans A i t',t Detemtine the intent and direction of Neighborhood Plans,The first few plans that were a 4„ developed included regulatory language,which in many cases were codified, The later °' ` ' ' neighborhood plans included policies that wet'',more supportive and complimentary to the Comprehensive Plan, Some of the new neinitborhood plans tended to avoid including 4x regulatory policies, d . Planning Commission Work Session n 0 J Page s Chulank 2025•Goal',Lund lNu Planning V ." 4 Meeting date l•cbtuary 24,2003 • A 4 K ♦ 1 .p ` 4 1.• ,r ' 4 y '" A statement should be included to clarify the intent and purpose of neighborhood plans. 't 4'4 ° .' - This can either be included in this section or addressed when discussing"Special District r Plans," r♦ =' ` Consolidated Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map ;,; J .."t In 1999 planning staff proposed the consolidation of the comprehensive plan map and the ` • ' zoning map. There appeared to be support from the Planning Commission to pursue this 'r ,e..' consolidation. Y a MI Currently the City has separate zoning and comprehensive plan maps. Both maps are regulatory in nature. Typically,a comprehensive plan map illustrates the general range of • r », ' :`;•''. .. allowed land used and is implemented by the specific land use designations of the zoning map. The comprehensive plan map also serves to establish future land uses of the unincorporated areas within the urban services boundary(USB)that become effective upon i'` ,....-'- " annexation. For example,a County zoning of R-8.5 would be annexed into the City with a /"wA „k " / City zoning of R-7.5, ,Y Reasons for pursuing the consolidation include: ',' • The Lake Oswego Comprehensive plan map is very specific. Almost all designations " e y; on the plan and zone map are identical • Future land use designations shown on the comprehensive plan map for the unincorporated areas can still be identified using is single land use map k • Less maintenrnce is require for map amendments and updates *' 1 • Greater accuracy and consistency is insured with one map,eliminating chances for discrepancies n p` Y ;; IV. Quality of Life Indicators(QOL)Related to the Goal ," The intent of this section is to take the opportunity to incorporate QOL indicators with ny• Comprehensive Plan goals. The Comprehensive Plan provides policy direction and goals,while k° ` r ' the QOL indicators provides the mechanism to monitor the effectiveness of those goals and policies. 'r RESPONSE: No indicators were identified, r * y C. N�' y =: V. Public Comments + L�,' '` �; This section will include oral and written communications received by the public or stakeholders ` in time to he included in the staff report. r RESPONSE: No public comments were received prior to the printing of this report. J F Attachments: 1) Luke Oswego Comprehensive Plan Goal 2,Land Use Planning 2) Statewide Planning Goal 2,Land Use Planning l nY Y w k` '` L\Coo Vllec`,:1002,Planntug ProjeCI rlte5`t'02.0001 Outioui,202$tioui uaLAteau.I0,03 do, Plaiuung Contnnssina Work SCSstott • 006 g r a II Outlook 202$-Goal 2,Land Use Planning ,2' • ' . Meeting date t'ehniary 24,200? Aryl; 4 t A«, ..41., a 4 J _ , 9 n� '" M ', ' 14 J ' • r ' a 1 y '.' .. Y ,, + T '. , , .y 4ax k A•s or! x,f • u --- t''.. . �.�. ,. �,Ya..dam{' Y ..... • s�Y� H ;4 4 N I 2: Land Use Planning ;; n 1 P�I�C9�S and } fin' ® � ��ion `i , Land Use , .. �, , Regulations x 1w s' + Nt • •p. Y•. 'Z „r. fl 1 .� ,".. L V.. p,-' ., _•,, �F d 'e�" gin;; •.Mx �•.x .'ice. _ '' e5 nr ,ya M.i 191 < v Yr r 4.'q 1 w 1, y• . , rarn �r ar w t 1a, fry°xu N c, , hL . .�.w.,nk� ° 1 y a •d •Y .e; C r ,,� r. fi .,...' 1•"� 1" ., d rf ' � " 3; w f tr 1> rvr ,�r�a' AI" +e t'. 4;1 ,a� { n .N rt.'' � • , �'y't t w. • r1 ,, 9 x , xi•+ A+ Lake Oswego shall ensure that ;^»�. Y 4�r a. The Cityls land use planning process end policy drama- work serve as a basis for ail decisions and Actions related A u. ,rl to the use of land end; ., a b. Land use regulatJons,actions,and related plans are consistent with,and implement the Comprehensive Plan. . w x » ra 410 rt l 1 rd w•. "w w4. x Q� Attachment 1 '.�, .1 c• �• q j q 4 ;1 NI g r } r ,* AA.(33) W1 , ,, Y • f . , � y , y �+ • Rw • ' ,d H • a "y t,. It,l a •r f Yq 1 � w9 1 t 1 I�h y H * r ,,! / k n. M w F R r�.y 9y�, r•N 1 ^w 1: A w f • a. „1 y + 008 •q.+ Y� r • , '' ..`'T Goal2 Land Use Planning 0 Section 1 Land Use Policies and lie• ulations , aN fi x,w. BACKGROUND 1 t A;, r. ., '' Statewide Planning Goal 2:Land Use Planning , "To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and • actions related to the use of land and to assure an adequate factual basis for such decisions and actions." *' Statewide Planning Goal 2 requires city,county,state and federal agency and special district plans* 1,' .,;% and actions related to land use to be consistent with the comprehensive plans*of cities and counties, .Y; and with regional plans adopted under ORS Chapter 268(Metropolitan Service Districts). re° r Further,the goal requires land use plans to include identification of issues and problems,inventories, e °. and other factual information for each applicable statewide planning goal Evaluation of alternative r " courses of action and ultimate policy choices shall take into account consideration of social,economic, •;a energy and environmental needs. `; , ` r ' 4110 Specific implementation measures* shall be developed consistent with and adequate to carry out the Plan, Further,comprehensive plans and implementation measures shall be coordinated*with the plans l of other affected governmental units,* r i k All adopted land use plans and implementing measures shall be periodically reviewed and revised to address changing public policies and circumstances, # sj 1. , Lake Oswego's quality of'life and unique character depends,to a great extent,upon the character of ' development and the City's ability to provide needed and desired services, The Comprehensive Plan ' and implementing regulations are important tools to accomplish these objectives, �` •• a " "{ '"" This element of the Plan establishes the planning process and regulatory basis for land use actions b� p, '',,. the City. Land Use Planning goals,policies,and recommended action measures emphasize that all w land use actions, regulations and codes shall be consistent with and implement the Comprehensive " w ' ` Plan. To this end,the following six broad policy issues are addressed by this element of the Compre• '; pensive Plan: a', , 1, All development shall conform to applicable land use regulations and City codes; ' '' 2. All development shall be adequately served by the full range of public facilities and services; 3. Development shall occur at densities appropriate to the scale and character of Lake Oswego's neighborhoods and shall provide for preservation of open spaces and natural resources; � y . 1. ' , •" 00 9 GOAL 2 LAND USE PLANNING 2,1.1 ', r ' N 'i d1M.(,.2) x .. . a ," a •..' `��` M , ,� • Goal Land Use Planning ",q 1 as C3 Section I Land Use Policies and Re i ulations 4. City-wide,natural resources shall be protected and open space shall be provided concurrent , ' .; a„, with development; y« ,. 5, Specific criteria shall be observed when considering amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; „� and, .', a. •. •�`: 6, The Plan shall be periodically reviewed and updated. J F. I. The legislative and regulatory context of land use planning in Lake Oswego has changed substantially �' since the first Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1978, The City has amended or adopted new land use regulations and codes necessary to implement much of the initial Plan.There have also been many . < state legislative mandates in the last 16 years, The City has amended its zoning and development regulations extensively to comply with these new laws. _,x.4,�' 11 •j" One of the most significant legislative changes which directly affects the Comprehensive Plan was ORS 197,628:Periodic Review,and its implementing Administrative Rules,OAR 660,Divisions 19 and 25, The Periodic Review Rule requires jurisdictions to review and update their plans on a periodic 'E a basis to address changing conditions and new laws. Concurrent with Periodic Review, cities and :.., 7 counties are required to show that adequate opportunities are provided for industrial and commercial development consistent with community need(OAR 660,Division 9), Lake Oswego adopted a Public Facility Plan(PFP)in 1997[PA 1-971, The applicable portions of the PFP and its subsequent updates 01 a ,, are incorporated by reference into the Comprehensive Plan, The PFP shows how key public facilities can be provided to meet anticipated need per OAR 660,Division 11, a •, » Lake Oswego's Periodic Review was accepted as complete and in conformance with relevant rules in L.... December, 1991 by the Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD), The City also ^`'� complies with the Metropolitan Housing Rule(OAR 660, Division 7), The 1-lousing Rule requires , r, Lake Oswego and other Portland Metropolitan Area cities to provide the opportunity for overall hous- »" . ing densities at a minimum of 10 units per acre and at a 50/50 multi-family/single family housing mix. ".""' In the future,Metro Regional Framework Plans and Functional Plans may require Lake Oswego and other communities to provide for greater housing densities in appropriate areas,such as the downtown commercial district and along identified major transit corridors,as a means to ensure a compact urban • form in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Policies for industrial and commercial development,housing, ;' " and public facilities arc also addressed within Comprehensive Plan chapters per wining to Goal 9: . Economic Development,Goal 11:Public Facilities and Services, Goal 12:Transportation, and Goal ` :" 10:Housing, The character of Lake Oswego has changed since the Plan was first adopted, The community is now experiencing much less development than occurred in the past, This is because most of the develop- , "" .. able land in the City has been built upon, Future development will likely consist of small land f, 0:1.0 4 u a 2,1�2 LAKE OSWEGO OOMPREHENSIIvt PLAN /f/�, • " +.* AA(3 ) . ,, y , , • , .k`.. k 1+ is \, ' -4.. ' ' ,•. w 4, ",� ., , ; Ka' Goal 2 Land Use Planning a� ,. b t N 4 0, ® Section 1, Land Use Policies and Re•ulations . t r ." " ' partitionings,infill,and redevelopment. There is some potential for larger scale development to occur .•" within the unincorporated portion of the City's Urban Services Boundary. However,these areas must ' • first annex to the City before required public facilities and services can be extended. -n. w . Summary of Major Issues d .. , ..1". The follow'ng are some of the issues,changed circumstances and conditions which were considered in the update of this element of the Comprehensive Plan. 's , 1 U Lake Oswego has either amended or adopted land use regulations and codes'necessary to imple- ment relevant portions of the 1978 Comprehensive Plan.The City also complies with state land use laws and administrative rules, w , s Lake Oswego completed Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review and Update in December,1993 as required by state statutes and administrative rules. ' . d As of 1994,Lake Oswego was mostly developed, Future development within the current City 1'* limits will likely consist of small land partitionings,infill and redevelopment .,TY GOALS, POLICIES AND RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES . `` ,'t n { „.. GOAL > Lake Oswego shall ensure that; .y a, The City's land use planning processes and policy framework serve as a basis for all ,'• decisions and actions related to the use of land;and, fl - b. The City's land use regulations,actions,and related plans are consistent with,and implement the Comprehensive Plan. i.� •,4 .. V 1 .l: GOAL 2 L,ANb USE PLANNING2,'{-3 y '' � Iry ., .. Y°.•„ .•Y b1 4 Goal 2 Land Use Planning r: ti .rrLP W 7,s 4 . , 1 ,• Ca Section Land: Use Policies and Re. Ala :. ....._ 4 IA nM It �S• POLICIES A '' 1. Require development to be adequately served by the full range of public facilities and services F including:water,sanitary sewer,transportation facilities,fire and police protection,parks,open ; { space, and recreation facilities,surface water management and storm drainage facilities,and ,,. .'� schools, Services shall be available or committed prior to approval of development, I' J 'Y 2. Ensure that required public facilities and services are constructed concurrently with develop- ` ' ,''N meet. System Development Charges(SDCs)* and other fees shall be imposed to adequately p compensate the City for impacts on other public facilities and services. a,' %°'''' 3, Require development to conform to all applicable City land use regulations and codes, q . r 4. Require land use regulations to: a ` a• Ensure the provision of park and open space lands,and protection of natural resources; h. Promote compatibility between development and existing and desired neighborhood d 4 character; e. Provide for the Implementation of adopted neighborhood plans; ® r;; , '. d. Provide for necessary public facilities and services; ' .: * e, Protect life and property from natural hnzards; M �h `. f, Ensure architectural and site design quality;and, '', Y - i; g, Reduce dependency on the automobile on a per-capita basis, :.{ 5, Maintain residential neighborhoods at existing zone and plan density designations,except where: a, Changes to higher residential density designations are necessary to be consistent with ,; ,,. a ,.'." development on the subject property at the time of this policy's adoption; or, " ..Y 4 'r b, An applicant demonstrates that a proposed zone/plan density change complies with the r r a '" following criteria: [PA 4-97/ZC 3-97.1239; 10/21/97] ,' , I, If the property is subject to an adopted neighborhood plan,the applicant shall comply with any special zone/plan density change criteria that may be required . 7,' ., by the neighborhood plan;and s :' •" ii, The applicant shall comply with all Cotnprehensive Plan Policies and Goals applicable to zone/plan density changes, Such applicable Goals and Policies ' include.but are not limited to the following: ® M a 1 ; 2.1.4 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A .Y ,, 1 ^ M .AA'-(3k) 4 " ` ;;, ' N „ "1 -! ;' ):I/ .','t• ? :•1 .• ,. ~. .. 4 a t M'.: ., N. T.�x 1. .... ,, Goal 2 Land Use Planning .° "\ ® Section 7 Land Use Poiicies and Relations �, . {n•t • ...L A. A proposed plan/map density change shall not allow development that would exceed the capacity of planned public facilities and services[Goal ,, ` 2,Section 1,Policy 11;Goal 2 Section 1 Policy 14(b)]and shall be ap- „ propriately related to the capacity of such public facilities, especially residential streets[Goal 10,Policy 6]; -T B. A proposed plan/map density change shall be appropriately located in relation to the functional classification of the access streets[Goal 2,Sec- ' ...;."I',. tion I Policy 14(a)]; n., Y.. C. Density changes shall be consistent with adjacent land uses or can be •• `i`_„',i' made compatible through the ability to buffer,screen and blend dissimi- "1.` tar land uses[Goal 2,Section 1,Policy 14(c)]; "w D. A proposed plan/map density change shall address the effect of the change �' a .' on overall land supply and shall comply with the Metro Housing Rule (OAR 666-07-000)[Goal 2,Section 1 Policy 14(d)]; E. The applicant shall demonstrate a public need for the proposed plan/map .•. density change and that the proposed change will best meet the need when compared to alternatives[Goal 2,Section 1 Policy 14(e)]; , n }. F. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed density is appropriate + for the location given public facilities, natural resources and hazards, A II ; 'µ . road or transit access and proximity to commercial areas and employ- ;'.;j•;' merit concentrations[Goal 7,Policy 2;Goal 10,Policies 1 and 3]; G. A plan/map residential density change to high density(R-0,R-2 and R- ., 3)shall be located within walking distance to bus lines or transit centers �' ` [Goal 10, Policy 8] and,where feasible, shall be located within close - ;;„. • proximity" to employment opportunities,shopping,parks and transit[Goal 10,Policy 11];and t, •11,. H. The applicant shall demonstrate that development allowed by the pro- " w posed zone/map residential density change will be compatible with the -' surrounding neighborhood,or can be made compatible pursuant to de- "•' velopment review of an individual application pursuant to the criteria k„' ` " " contained in the Zoning and Development Codes and Development Stan- ., Bards, ,`: d4 3 GOAL 2 LAND USE PLANNING 2Y1-5 a' r , �,� AI`..ld,�Gl •`+ a j °,�.'y1 •4 p��i :�, 'A!a ry a,L y/ ' ,» N w 4 a S �M, f� A J'n �i '. ,, 4 •, . 'f .,.' .J r ' .'k '...1 A. , i , i i ,y. L ,,•.f 't .- J ,,',��` 9d,''rA 4. ' ' h p N , Goal 2 Land Use Planning J AUsePolicies , Re. illations® Section 1 Land and II: 1 f 1 n �^ r a 6, Require dedication or reservation of park lands or open space as part of all major development. 1 r' The City may,at its discretion,require construction and dedication of recreation facilities when , .:t,, 4, justified by the impacts of proposed development. . , '' / fl A. . !r ' , 7. Ensure that land use regulations have sufficient flexibility to allow developers and the City to Z:1 i i. AM •. propose measures to: a. Adapt development to unique and difficult site conditions; b. Preserve open space and natural resources;and, c. Avoid negative impacts on surrounding properties. "A A 8, Ensure that development and implementation of the City's land use regulations and Compre- `'`, , ' y» hensive Plan minimize pressures to expand the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Bound- ar'y. ,,tx ' 1 ' 9, Require preservation of significant inventoried and identified natural resources as conditions of approval for all development, 1 10, Allow development at the maximum designated density when it is shown that; 0 -. } ' a. Adequate public facilities and services can be provided; , ,, b. Negative impacts can be resolved;and, , f ! ,, "A c. The development is in compliance with all applicable land use regulations. L 11, Require that residential densities and allowed land uses within the Lake Oswego Urban Ser- ` 4' , ` vices Boundary not exceed the capacity of planned public facilities and services, •. '' ti k. 12. Allow development of permitted uses on legally created non-conforming lots subject to all applicable land use regulations. ' 13, Allow for legalization of previously created illegal lots and opportunity to develop these par- , a cels,provided: ' ' r a, Development occurs pursuant to applicable land use regulations;and, •',' " .' b, Negative impacts are prevented on the surrounding residential neighborhood. i a"` .' i a. 14. Ensure that amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map are subject to specific : loeatlonal criteria and other standards,including: 4 ' a. Location in relation to arterial or collector streets; 0 " t 1 � H " 2.1.6 LAKE OSWEGO OOMPREHENSIVQ11.�N ' • :1� ., ~ <•4-.a tq". ' ,,1 , .R C A•,," . .• r ` {' j,.. r.t/.1 .• t r.K; j R Y• • v , • Goal 2 Land Use Planning • 1ilc • V.•L :' 4w` • D Section 1, Land Use Policies and R!riations i « b, Capacity of public facilities and services; ;� ' c, Consistency with adjacent land use patterns or ability to buffer,screen and blend dis- ' `' similar land uses; - d, Conformance with Comprehensive Plan goals and policies,applicable and adopted neigh- .�, borhood plans and applicable land use regulations; e. Effect on overall land supply,and the Metro Housing Rule(OAR 660-07-000); °: f, Demonstration of public need for the change and that the proposed amendment will best '° meet identified public need versus other available alternatives;and, 1 ' a .; g, Other criteria determined necessary to ensure conformance with the Comprehensive `, " ;,;a Plan, V ,, 15. Review and update the Comprehensive Plan periodically,to ensure it; 1 Y: a, Remains current and responsive to community needs; ;; b. Contains reliable information and provides dependable policy direction;and, c, Conforms to applicable state law,administrative rules,and Metro requirements. I 16, Upon determination it is in the public interest,legislative amendment to the Comprehensive " Plan text and map may be initiated only by the Planning Commission or City Council. Any interested person may request that the Planning Commission or City Council initiate a legisla- - tive amendment to the Plan text or map, /. - I 17, Allow quasi-judicial Comprehensive Plan Amendments to be submitted at any time, I ' 0. N 18, Develop and adopt specific Neighborhood Plans and implementing measures consistent with • "''_ °`' the Comprehensive Plan as the means to enhance neighborhood livability and achieve desired neighborhood character. A Neighborhood Association may request the Planning Commission r . and City Council to initiate Neighborhood Plan Map and text amendments at any timz,without fee,upon finding that the proposed changes are in the public's interest and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, ' 19, Review commercial,industrial,institutional and high density residential development to en- ',` sure the quality of building and site design,and overall appearance, 20, Allow major development to be designed and submitted for land use approval as planned unit • . ,:;, developments to preserve open space,natural resources,and provide amenities. • -0,,, 21, Allow increased density and clustering of buildings on suitable portions of land proposed for development to preserve natural resources and open space, `M' 015 GOAL LAND LOSE PLANNING 2,1•7 j • 1. I 1 . « ,,K ti '' r w r ',a n '1 II Goal 2 Land Use Planning r l r, ® Section 3 Land Use Policies and Re. ulations 4 22, Provide opportunities for mixed use commercial and residential development within commer- cial zones: WM I' try �y 1 23, Coordinate the development and amendment of City plans and actions related to land use with N'` other county,state,Metro,federal agency and special district plans, N • 24, Comprehensively evaluate proposed land use actions to determine the full range of potential N a' negative impacts and require applicants to provide appropriate solutions prior to approval. 25, Require developers to bear the burden of proof to demonstrate how proposed land use actions 1 are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and applicable codes and land use regulations, 1., •[ " 26, Require developers, prior to application for permits, to discuss development proposals with .. ' . neighborhood groups,residents and City staff, ' + 27, Require new residential development of four or more units to address all of the following de- • ' sign criteria; a. Preservation of required open space and natural resources; b. Provision of a street system which provides efficient connection to higher order streets and major activity centers; rJ~ , c, Development of transit opportunities appropriate to the scale and character of the devel- opment; d, Development of a safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation system; '.4. '" •N e, Management of surface water and storm drainage consistent with the City's Surface Water Management Plan; ' , f, Assurance of privacy and quiet for future residents and abutting properties; 4." " g, Energy conservation measures such as energy efficient design and solar access,and the preservation of trees and the planting of new trees to provide summer cooling: h, Buffering and screening from adjacent uses and streets; i, building placement and locational relationships; " N ' j, Provision of adequate eniergency vehicle access;and, k, Reduction of dependency on the automobile on a per-capita basis, 28, Maintain a Development Review Conunission and Planning Cotnrnission to review quasi-Judi- N. „r 1 ' cial and legislative land use matters and,when necessary,make recommendations to the City 1 a Council, 016 ,.•a "1 2,1.8 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN N ` 1 a ,'` , r i Goa/2 Land Use Planning y N ©iicies Section 1 Land use and Re 1 ilatio s ,:,' RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES ' r i. Develop a Public Facilities Plan*and an implementing Capital Improvement Program*to co- x ,':. ..." '•,, ordinate and guide the location,financing and timing of new public facilities. ,,, r 1.1, ! a' ii. Encourage Clackamas County to grant land use planning and development authority to the City for lands within the unincorporated Urban Services Boundary, iii, Coordinate review of new development proposals with the Lake Oswego School District to 4 -6: 1; determine impacts on the local school system. i., j iv, Prioritize public facility plan projects as follows; '•` a, Correction of system deficiencies necessary to ensure public safety; W r1, w "` b, Protection of the community's investment in existing infrastructure; c. Provision of service to allow new development within the City limits,except when paid for by the developer;and, y • ''` a; d, Provision of service necessary for annexation of unincorporated areas, except when paid for by those desiring the service, r v, Planning for new public facilities and services shall consider; , • a, The costs and benefits of expansion and whether costs can be equitably allocated to ;, :'.i " those creating demand; • ',,; b, The financial capacity of the City; r c, Environmental impacts of facility construction; , .x• d, Need to accommodate future land uses and population growth;and, �" " ' e, Coordination with other required public facilities and services. kN' ", vi, When allowed,density bonuses shall not: • a, Exceed 25%of the allowed zoning density on the development site; b, Cause the capacity of public facilities and services to be exceeded;or,% , ' '4 . e, Result in the loss of required open space and natural resources, , i-J vii, Establish engineering,planning, inspection and other fees and charges which are reasonably ., related to the administrative costs required to review and monitor development. , Y . I PLANNING GOAL 2 LAND USE PG 2,1-9 ' 1. . ,, YAA'I 1 w' - , a t, ' V 4 .'"' �44 '�„� y�' y 1 e 4 , y • ,4 • r . t'+, . 1'... y 7. ,,0.2 1 tiY �4 iu ' .. :w ,r. :', ;. 4. f r •' n n. wr ;r� Goal2 Land Use Planning 4 ` ' Section 1, Land Use Policies anti Sal ations • r a, viii, Periodically review and update system development charges and other development related fees to ensure equitable compensation to the City for impacts on public facilities and services, n;; 7 I` ix. Undertake periodic review and update of the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan every four to IA seven years. ° i� -4:.1 ,„ x, Evaluate the following concurrent with each periodic review or major revision of the Plan; ,i• ; a. Consistency among the Plan, implementing City regulations, adopted neighborhood plans,state and federal law and administrative rules,and Metro requirements; t ' b. Past and ongoing City actions to determine if the intent of the Plan is being achieved; ,;- and, �,. c, Reliability and timeliness of Plan information. 7 . 1 " uVy ,3" :.._ xi• Prioritize recommended action measures, and Public Facility Plan and Capital Improvement ,.t.� -' Program projects to implement desired Plan goals and policies, r •� ,; xii, Work with responsible federal,state,and regional agencies to acquire information relevant to • • �• the City's land use planning program as it becomes available, N ' f xiii, Encourage Clackamas County to participate in the development and implementation of neigh. s" borhood planning programs for areas within the unincorporated portion of the Urban Services ',=Z Boundary, xiv, Encourage all development to utilize innovative site and building design. xv, Require all applications for major development to include an analysis of the development site „ w"_,'; • and surrounding area which identifies; , : a, Natural characteristics,features and potential hn7i rds; ..;a b, Topography; c, Land use and transportation characteristics; =' d, Availability and capacity of public facilities and services; e, Existing structures and historic features;and, , µ I', Other factors determined necessary, -- n xvir Provide adequate resources and personnel to; a, implement the Comprehensive Plan; S'ili •Key „, 2,1.10 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE$LAN ., \ ; ,7 44_02) 7 I. 1° 4` , ". r i • 11. ai %S t J 4.. k+l 11 •3 C` k ,. • -0� • i n4 r,j' • I J 1 i 1 f _ • 1:4 r +r 1.,•4. �� .r•�.N r5 1 4„1' n R F a � •4 w'N t.: '• ; t x• r �- t a1„ Goal 2 Land Use Planning and Re•ulefinne Section 1, Land Use Policies • b• Monitor changing conditions which could affect City land use policy;and, cr Conduct periodic review and update of the Plan, • 1 a •�I. r Y1 /I K J • 0.1 " H I Y 11; H + •� s + 7 • • r r e '• 40 J Y4 0' J't•`I4a. �a • t L y 141 r J ' " 019 1. GoAL 2 LAND USE PLANNING 2.1=11 ti 1 •1,. AA(32)• 1 M •i 1. 4y.. ..� 6 � '�.' r1-0 '�4..} * + 1. i:: d r t f a , t „ Y ,f.F. S ut,,. Goal• 2 Land Use Planning ❑I Section I Land Use Policies and Re. ulations k "N Notes- a f 1, a t' r • ny + IY� It 1 , I " �+ • r , • • • f. _0 X'y • • 2,1.12 LAKE OSW�EGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AA.(34 ',+�f 1 _ rp t f t A ,y .. , - ', '11 1� - . 4 , , '�� " ' "'* �_."�"-i ". " '", ,... ". '. " ,--�", V Goal 2: Land Use P"lanning LI Section 2, communiby Design and Aesthetics Lake Oswego gain Fire Staff0f) A i 7 w A_ T' A i ISO li, hilt, 114�1� 7 7 The city shall ma);vtaln and enhance the appearance and design qualfty of Lake C sw6yo. 021 7, 7; AA..(891,, • l J o-y ' Hsu 4 -.','1 1'~y -Pro ti n . Y +, - d t tti, a M9„ • • • t ' . fit . t. k y J Y w I �tY (t 1• • M.V (es ..H. w 1 am • n JF u 1 '+" • • • • r • • • qw • 'fix+ i- 9 A », • • ;'i 4 ' t +1 'fir t .1 ..0 •,S t,•. '.. -rv. �{ a A ) AAA; 2) ( 1 (,,w Y v. � •'� ;+ .L� 11 .M r ,1• { ` t q�. SA i�- O w ialr •w 'Yt ,, l �+ F}' ...N ; w t 1F �1.' f y',. • t t19 ". "F^:• c {t h, 1T•. • r " + r • i i ` t• 11 , 1 ' .-,Lr v. ( ul. '+ 'y'+r w "" Goal 2 Land Use Planning t '" C] Section 2 C�mm�nii• Desi• n and Aesthetics _ _. BACKGROUND Statewide Planning Goal 2:Land Use Planning 1 i, "To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and 4 µ �i:" #, actions related to the use of land and to assure an adequate factual basis for such decisions and Actions." " 'Y 4,44 This element of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to ensure that Lake Oswego has the ability to enact ,, r and implement regulations and standards to govern appearance and design quality of development. This . 1 is significant because community aesthetics and design quality are important to Lake Oswego in many ' ' . ways.The overall image that a community projects to others is strongly based on its appearance, in w' , .; residential areas,appearance directly affects property values,neighborhood stability and residents'sense ' .•" • T 1.; of well being, Commercial areas have a vital stake in their aesthetic quality. A pleasant and comfortable Y Y shopping environment attracts customers and encourages them to stay and thus affects the economic . t ' health of the community. 1 .; GOALS, POLICIES AND RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES y t}'P:. GOAL t`• x ti The City shall maintain and enhance the appearance and design quality of Lake Oswego, . • . ,il , , Yj R1• . e ' POLICIES j,' , 1, Enact and maintain regulations and standards which require: " a a. New development to enhance the existing built environment in terms of size,scale,bulk, ..T I " color,materials and architectural design; - , b. Landscaping; "•` r, Buffering and screening between differing land uses;p d, ` '`. d, Measures to foster a safe and interesting transit and pedestrian environment, a a le . f 1� • . YY 1 ,- a,, 02•3 GOAL 2 LAND USE PLANNING 2.2'4 • 4{ • I iAA 2j`' P. M .Iy Y r" •.; •• L 4 k , • y " ! ,4i : t=, {».. 44,• 0 VI • R4 r 1• to t7` 1 n -r M ,A,',."'', 1 .'._y^•"�.".+'..•." ` ` " .' Goal 2 Land Use Planning » ' ! ° ® �!ctiorll 2, Comnnulitiiy p n . ���thetics � � J •�_ 7 v ; 2, Require developers to submit site and building plans for all proposed new development which . show building,site and landscape designs for all development phases. 1,.;' r•jIl I.. i , 3, Enact and maintain sign regulations to prevent adverse visual impacts on the community. • ' 4. Ensure that both public and private development enhance the aesthetic quality of the community. ry�a,„ ih, ' i, 5. Establish and enforce regulations to abate unsightly conditions and other nuisance situations, „ .Ap . .1 1: RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES �1.4. I. Periodically review and update regulations to address issues of community appearance and pub- lie nuisances, .4. .y: ,.�. y I -k ii. Encourage developers to utilize qualified design professionals to enhance the visual quality of development.1 ' 2 iii. Develop design standards and guidelines to improve community appearance, .,I; iv, Work with Neighborhood Associations to develop neighborhood design standards and guide- lines as part of Neighborhood Plans, ' .r Aixj` , , I* i7 y. l '� .Y .1 *Y ! . 4 . • , .5. } . ~ !. 1 n , •p. pa . • 1' : 2,2-2 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVEn�` 444 7. '!. irl I fµ h. 1 ' . 4 p. to t w. ) a r ' , a h l; ..�„ Oregon's Statewide Planning Goals & Guidelines ,, ,, H ..- GOAL 2: LAND USE PLANNING OAR 660.015-0000(2) PART I--PLANNING public hearing and shall be reviewed To establish a land use and,as needed, revised on a periodic . , • planning process and policy cycle to take into account changing framework as a basis for all decision public policies and circumstances,in and actions related to Use of land and accord with a schedule set forth in the ,,'; to assure an adequate factual base plan.Opportunities shall be provided for ; A for such decisions and actions. review and comment by citizens and : A ' City,county,state and federal affected governmental units during agency and special district plans and preparation,review and revision of plans actions related to land use shall be and implementation ordinances, consistent with the comprehensive plans Affected Governmental Units-- " 1 : of cities and counties and regional plans are those local governments,state and Y' ,`F ° '• ` adopted under ORS Chapter 268. federal agencies and special districts�; All land use plans shall include which have programs, land ownerships, �• ' identification of issues and problems, or responsibilities within the area • ''d "`• inventories and other factual information included in the plan, • "w ' ' for each applicable statewide planning Comprehensive Plan--as • " goal,evaluation of alternative courses of defined in ORS 197.015(5), ` w , ••. ..••' action and ultimate policy choices, Coordinated--as defined in taking into consideration social, ORS 197.015(5),Note: It is Included in economic,energy and environmental the definition of comprehensive plan. rw needs,The required information shall be Implementation Measures--are ,yam contained in the plan document or in the means used to carry out the plan, w ; • supporting documents.The plans, These are of two general types: • , 4" k supporting documents and (1)management implementation implementation ordinances shall be filed measures such as ordinances, . , In a public office or other place easily regulations or project plans,and(2)site t . accessible to the public.The plans shall or area specific implementation • ' 1» 4 ' be the basis for specific implementation measures such as permits and grants measures,These measures shall be for construction,construction of public " ;'' '4" consistent with and adequate to carry facilities or provision of services, + out the plans. Each plan and related Plans--as used here .�. Implementation measure shall be encompass all plans which guide ;w.' coordinated with the plans of affected land-use decisions, including both .. governmental units, comprehensive and single-purpose All land-use plans and plans of cities,counties,state and ' . implementation ordinances shall be federal agencies and special districts, adopted by the governing body after « ', • 021� " rt Attnchnient 2 .'i'l 4 . I F ,t FJ PART II--EXCEPTIONS standards for an exception have or have A local government may adopt an not been met, • 1 "' exception to a goal when: Each notice of a public hearing ' (a)The land subject to the on a proposed exception shall exception is physically developed to the specifically note that a goal exception is r t..' extent that it is no longer available for proposed and shall summarize the uses allowed by the applicable goal; issues in an understandable manner. : ''. (b)The land subject to the Upon review of a decision exception is irrevocably committed to approving or denying an exception: uses not allowed by the applicable goal (a)The commission shall be �'� because existing adjacent uses and bound by any finding of fact for which other relevant factors make uses there Is substantial evidence in the :At• allowed by the applicable goal record of the local government • �' ,k A impracticable;or proceedings resulting in approval or . (c)The following standards are denial of the exception; , , ti '. met: (b)The commission shall ' (1)Reasons justify why the state determinn whether the local ' 1,''' policy embodied in the applicable goals government's findings and reasons , , .," should not apply; demonstrate that the standards for an -,� b -,,. • (2)Areas which do not require a exception have or have not been met; new exception cannot reasonably and r. accommodate the use; (c)The commission shall adopt a (3)The long-term environmental, clear statement of reasons which sets '. • economic, social and energy forth the basis for the determination that rP-v'',11 , consequences resulting from the use of the standards for an exception have or , • the proposed site with measures have not been met, ' .• " :a *' designed to reduce adverse impacts are not significantly more adverse than Exception means a comprehensive h.• % °'; would typically result from the same plan provision,including an amendment A,, proposal being located In areas to an acknowledged comprehensive requiring a goal exception other than the plan,that; proposed site;and (a) Is applicable to specific +s • (4)The proposed uses are properties or situations and does not compatible with other adjacent uses or establish a planning or zoning policy of "' will be so rendered through measures general applicability: designed to reduce adverse impacts. (b)Does not comply with some or f n• all goal requirements applicable to the , Compatible,as used in subparagraph subject properties or situations;and "+ (4)is not intended as an absolute term (c)Complies with standards for meaning no Interference or adverse an exception, - µ.., Impacts of any type with adjacent uses, i A local government approving or PART III..USE OF GUIDELINES forthden Ifindingsoof fact and exceptionosed shall of the gguidne theet forth li for thegoalsand �. 'P• A• a ;.�. reasons which demonstrate that the either utilize gu n develop • alternative means that will achieve the � �' .`, 46 ,,.. ,}.. ', ., i o a •, i „ � t 7 :�".. goals.All land-use plans shall state how consulted,and availability of the :, the guidelines or alternative means necessary information. ��}'•" utilized achieve the goals. Sufficient time should be allotted' • M; "" Guidelines--are suggested for: yN directions that would aid local (1)collection of the necessary governments in activating the mandated factual information goals.They are intended to be (2)gradual refinement of the instructive,directional and positive,not problems and issues and the alternative ,a .":' limiting local government to a single solutions and strategies for development r : . ,‘ ; course of action when some other (3)incorporation of citizen needs course would achieve the same result, and desires and development of broad Above all,guidelines are not intended to citizen support "s be a grant of power to the state to carry (4)identification and resolution of out zoning from the state level under the possible conflicts with plans of affected 0,17 guise of guidelines.(Guidelines or the governmental units. ,1 ' 1, • alternative means selected by governmental bodies will be part of the B.REGIONAL,STATE AND FEDERAL Land Conservation and Development PLAN CONFORMANCE Commission's process of evaluating It is expected that regional,state plans for compliance with goals.) and federal agency plans will conform to ; ''F the comprehensive plans of cities and !' counties.Cities and counties are GUIDELINES expected to take into account the .1 . ' 1 regional,state and national needs. �'Y,. '/ ` A.PREPARATION OF PLANS AND Regional,state and federal agencies are r IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES expected to make their needs known ,f ` ' '" Preparation of plans and during the preparation and revision of ,,.,4 implementation measures should be city and county comprehensive plans, i based on a series of broad phases, During the preparation of their plans, "' , •' . .,. : proceeding from the very general federal,state and regional agencies are ; identification of problems and issues to expected to create opportunities for :' the specific provisions for dealing with review and comment by cities and w.' these issues and for interrelating the counties. In the event existing plans are various elements of the plan. During in conflict or an agreement cannot be •N each phase opportunities should be reached during the plan preparation i provided for review and comment by process,then the Land Conservation � ., d. citizens and affected governmental and Development Commission expects units. the affected government units to take The various implementation steps to resolve the issues,If an measures which will be used to carry agreement cannot be reached,the • • out the plan should be considered appeals procedures in ORS Chapter ,`.,,, x_ -,, , during each of the planning phases. 197 may be used, The number of phases needed will vary with the complexity and size of C. PLAN CONTENT the area,number of people involved, 1.Factual Basis for the Plan a, other governmental units to be • •, 1 . r. 'r; , , . : ..:„ Inventories and other forms of comment prior to any changes in the , '' '' '. data are needed as the basis for the plan and Implementation ordinances. "of d -,- policies and other decisions set forth in There should be at least 30 days notice - �,,' _ the plan.This factual base should of the public hearing on the proposed " include data on the following as they change. . :: ",„ . relate to the goals and other provisions of the plan; 1.Major Revisions • (a)Natural resources,their Major revisions include land use 5 A x capabilities and limitations changes that have widespread and (b)Man-made structures and significant Impact beyond the Immediate : utilities,their location and condition area,such as quantitative changes a (c)Population and economic producing large volumes of traffic:a characteristics of the area qualitative change in the character of (d)Roles and responsibilities of the land use itself,such as conversion " governmental units, of residential to industrial use;or a •�' spatial change that affects large areas ,• 2. Elements of the Plan or many different ownerships, ' .k The following elements should be The plan and implementation included in the plan: measures should be revised when ,, (a)Applicable statewide planning public needs and desires change and goals when development occurs at a different (b)Any critical geographic area rate than contemplated by the plan. , " designated by the Legislature Areas experiencing rapid growth and (c)Elements that address any development should provide for a special needs or desires of the people in frequent review so needed revisions can the area be made to keep the plan up to date; (d)Time periods of the plan, however,major revisions should not be " reflecting the anticipated situation at made more frequently than every two appropriate future intervals, years,if at all possible, ,.. All of the elements should fit together and relate to one another to 2.Minor Changes !� form a consistent whole at ail times, Minor changes,I.e,,those which r �� do not have significant effect beyond the "�;":, .;' y� . D. FILING OF PLANS immediate area of the change,should • "' City and county plans should be be based on special studies or other a:,•:; flied,but hot recorded,in the Office of information which will serve as the the County Recorder. Copies of all plans factual basis to support the change.The • : , +. should be available to the public and to public need and justification for the 4 ' affected governmental units, particular change should be established, t yr' Minor changes should not be made r «r . E.MAJOR REVISIONS AND MINOR more frequently than once a year,if at CHANGES IN THE PLAN AND all possible, IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES The citizens in the area and any affected governmental unit should be • ,; given an opportunity to review and 5 . AA.3 21 1 i�. 4 1 a 1 a r • F.IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES (e)Leasing of public lands. The following types of measure 3 1.' should be considered for carrying out G,USE OF GUIDELINES FOR THE • plans; STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS r; : . Guidelines for most statewide 1.Management Implementation planning goals are found in two • y Measures sections-planning and implementation, ' . . (a)Ordinances controlling the Planning guidelines relate primarily to , use and construction on the land,such the process of developing plans that as building codes,sign ordinances, Incorporate the provisions of the goals. ^, , 4,. subdivision and zoning ordinances. Implementation guidelines should relate -' 'N_: ORS Chapter 197 requires that the primarily to the process of carrying out provisions of the zoning and subdivision the goals once they have been - , ordinances conform to the incorporated into the plans.Techniques comprehensive plan. to carry out the goals and plans should (b)Plans for public facilities that be considered during the preparation of are more specific than those included in the plan, the comprehensive plan.They show the x, A size,location,and capacity serving each „ + property but are not as detailed as construction drawings. (c)Capital improvement budgets which set out the projects to be constructed during the budget period. • (d)State and federal regulations . `t.. K a,„ affecting land use. "• (e)Annexations,consolidations, mergers and other reorganization measures, 4 , 2,Site and Area Specific Implementation Measures + a •N. (a)Building permits,septic tank permits,driveway permits,etc;the =' ^• a : • review of subdivisions and land partitioning applications;the changing of <• • + zones and granting of conditional uses, ' *:: etc. (b)The construction of public facilities(schools,roads,waterlines, etc.). ,,. (c)The provision of land-related • • •• r public services such as fire and police, w (d)The awarding of state and � federal grants to local governments to io _r provide these facilities and services, •..r ' l +- J Tff 5 . ',; 4 ;. ,, .1 • 1:, y k'* 1 • r ' • i • a ' •• . It • 1 • r«.li',1 . • i , Irk -' �� d � t• .�, t a } • •r ` h 4� , •�n �.. � ..., + . i - • 1 •1J+ 1 wa,` LI M1' i1. r ` e\+ 1 • • 4\' ,r • ftr� 030 11 •�• �A1`32) ;,., Ir r ,y ��