Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Item - 2003-08-11 PM
.41 *44% ,„.. 4. a •15, CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ".„•4.4't e• t„. 14 "4.• • *L.!" • , A y. A., 44 41 I.. • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS ".' ".' AUGUST 11, 2003 •44„t; :.;4?-t • • • .4, 4 • • •tt- . • ,• .4 1.A `IA .;" ".1 AO ,p `l: x'1 1 ,L a u I* r 'i T° gt��G City of Lake Oswego % �``, Planning Commission ,,fie { 1 , '., I Monday,August 11,2003 6r00 p.m.—Presentation and Work Session Members: City Hall Council Chamber James Johnson,Chair 380 A Avenue + Frank Groznik,Vice Chair Lake Oswego,OR 97034 1 �' u • Mary Beth Coffey,Kenneth L.Sandblast, r Mark Stayer,Daniel Vizzini and Alison Webster For Information: 503/635-0290 AGENDA r V• !' .i .Council Liaison: Jack Hoffman GE DLL ° ,.' ,i f 'x ; This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location. For any special accommodations,please } contact Iris Treinen,503/697-6591,48 hours before the meeting, 1x'+ ix CALL TO ORDER o ## 11 i II, ROLL CALL . .,° ,y. M': ;,!`. III, CITIZEN COMMENT-Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda(3 minute limit per individual) : • n ', • IV, GENERAL PLANNING—PRESENTATION AND WORK SESSION ; Lake Grove Town Center Plan(P 01-0002) a The Lake Grove Town Center Plan will be presented to the Planning Commission by the consultant. The Planning Commission will discuss and make recommendations about the follow-up planning process for implementing the plan, Staff coordinator is Susan , Millhauser,Assistant Planner, 4. i '-' "144,' Lakefront Zoning(P 02-0007) Update on lakefront zoning study, Staff coordinator is Dennis Egner,Long Range Planning Manager, Water Ouality/Title 3(LUJ 00-00581 a " a .. Update on formation of task force,charge statement and next steps. Staff coordinator is Dennis Egner,Long Range Planning Manager, 4"'r d R , 'tl•. V. OTIIER BUSINESS f VI. ADJOURNMENT y. r ," W„ o , , i"u 4 ISM I. .!f7 't J A eh 1 . .� Y.. i -, 3 _ ' '1 4 AA �On A.p r,. Al: i° d q �r "', 1 •,x YI , ` A . _, t, I ", a 10 H. n AO, . r rr 41 'd ' t I'' , e`". :yf. `/ of '.°S Community Development r Planning Division b, , u 1 t rh ' • I - �t 1ll ,, � • , -, -- - .• Memorandum, tix d 7 1 w oRi o$ w• tN To: Planning Commissioners w.. From: Susan Millhauser,Assistant Planner f'A r ::. , Dennis Egner,Long Range Planning Manager tiV: t, . ' Date: July 31,2003 4 A Subject: Planning Commission Public Meeting—August 11,2003 ' t' Lake Grove Town Center(P 01-0002) Final Report ; 1. •yt 'Ile Lake Grove Town Center Plan report and Technical Appendix(June 30,2003:prepared by ' e r r „ Otak,Inc.)and Public Involvement Record(June 30,2003:prepared by City Planning staff),are attached for your;eview, Joe Dills,Oink,the project consultant,will present the report to the , • Commission at the August 11,2003 meeting, Due to the size of the Technical Appendix and Public Involvement Record,most recipients of r ' ' '. this Planning Commission packet will receive only the Plan report document,with the exception : " of the following organizations:Lake Grove Neighborhood Association,Lake Forest u==• r , . Neighborhood Association,Waluga Neighborhood Association,and the Lake Grove Business .F; ,,;4.;.. Association. Copies of the Plan report,Teclmicel Appendix,and Public Involvement Record arc z available for review at City Hall,3rd Floor:at the Lake Oswego Library,Reference Desk(706 ,fir", 1 ourth Street):and on the Cii)N'ell site(«ww•ci,os si u,or,tts/plait/lgte/lkte.httn), r ; ,, • a • e• •C 4 r' M wy� • ti + :, . t.:'Cts.Piles'10oItilnnntttg i'rote.:t riles Ill-UUU:lake Grove Tian C:etner'+Planning Cbnnnts:atm PC Memo L01C Conti , a Report Ug•I 1.03 I't11.OUt1"-.dot. - "{ ; q ,; ; u Late Lame tot�n Center Piun(I'01-00021 Plan Report Planning l'unuttlsytuu Pulrlte Meeting August I I.200t fags I of I t, 4 r , , 4 } T• w, Iy, 7 n Lake Grove �= n ' A `A 4� a '. .1 ,,, Town Center Plan .7' s A tin f '...I4, t •+ • P j a� � ', n • '- ,. ..r'''.a � Rf•, �` a , ^ T, 1 V+ { >• Y. fir. , A � ' "+ , • A A 7 • y `,1''1%.,-,•-• ''. • '.. , '!k:c .'..-7,:6 it..,",..,,,.„.„..„.,... .,.....,,,,,.,.:,..,:.:,„,„......,, ,„„.„,.. ., . • . .,:,,,,,, ,,k.•4 i*'.I. •• •'',',.•• t. ,:i ••• ,',.7• ''''„1;!,,,•1:1?"••;•114V. ''. '."....d` 71).4w Y M..f a- es y' 1 ,1 ° J (' ' 1H� i'n''(i�k�'1;; at' �, ,r 1 ", ✓.� i ,i1 i " ��u f._ . yAil• 'Y..:. / 1 1, °' 11 '. ," " E Prepared For «+ `' " - "' • City of Lake Oswego,Oregon June 30,2003 ; F V.,;, Prepared by +e ^,4 In Association with Johnson Gardner Kittelson&Associates, Inc. " A'' 'rbsworks, Inc. �ti a VlsualZ A ^Y i E .: w '° 4 Al I AA( F) 7.� 0 n' Eti [. 1 !E{., \,h , + , a k it 1 .x 4., a "„µ' a {• ';, tin...IV: '14, .r„ a " ... , . . , ..' aM . , , a .1. i' n a 7 '. K " w a i Par. 6 r a r Myy; 6 u s ' •• Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Principles,Process and Summary of Key Perspectives 4 '' J "-�. +3r` 4 III. Land Use Concept 9 IV. Transportation Network 23 ' ' s, - 0 V. Parking 37 A' " '' ) VI, Next Steps 41 ..% Y;,; a' ® Figures and Maps ® r Q 1. Study Area 3 ,'. 2. Town Center Concept Diagram A 11 a tel t' • u 3. Town Center Concept Diagram B 11 ® 4. Town Center Design Types 12 '` 5, Business Districts 12 M; ;,, 6. Pedestrian Friendly Village Cross Streets Diagram 12 • " 7. Pacific Lumber Site Study 13 8. Lake Grove Shopping Center Site Study 13 x" + °r, 0 0. Transitions to Great Neighborhoods Diagram 13 a ti °'"' f 10•.Village Center Diagram 14 ® 11. Village Center Illustrative Plan 15 ''i• —,';`• , ® 12.Village Center—Plan with Existing School 15 f® 13. Land Use Concept Map 17 +. y r . ' ! 14. Building Prototypes Diagram 21 ® 15.Transportation Network Streets&Alleys 25 t'.;; 16, Illustration of New Crossing Near Riccardo's 26 '....4.,,* 17. Street Network as Designed In the Charette 27 +c 16.Transportation Network—Pedestrian 29 ' " as ® .. , 4 " • 19.Transportation Network—Bike Facilities 31 5 ' 20. Transportation Network—Transit. ......,. 35 A. 21. Streetscape Designs.. . ..... ........ ...... .♦., . , 36 M • h a 22, Parking Site Study .... .•.,.... .„.•............... ............ ...... 30 " 'i • Tables Li' .; " ® 1. Design Type-Concept Map Conversion ♦ .. ....... .. ... ..... ..... .. _... . .. .... .... 16 '" ' i ® 2. Land Use Issues and Alternatives ... ......_.. ..... .......... ....... . ......... 18 r; ' (� 3 Potential tortes .. ...... . ...... .... .. ...........•.,20 ;I 4. Draft Uses for Potential Zones •...•, ,... 22 •'' 5. Existing Transportation Facilities and Amenities... ...... 23 . r. ,. • : �;; • 6. Proposed Timeline,. , 41 ,♦ 0 Appendices a, 4,„ , 4 Appendix A•Streetscape Drawings.... ...... ....... ..• . . .. ... .. . ..... 42 I . Appendix B•Implementation Projects . .. .. ..... ... ... . 50 t • .` 0 Lake OroVa Town Center Plan 'a "' ' t'.'4'4 . SO JunN 30,2005 k'. z.,w'' ® 1 ' ,,— 4 rr • y -.I.hi- a '.i,-, Funding ® •1 1' ® Y h� + This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management(TGM) A ' t I... ..,..•:..„ ., Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon ^.a Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD).This TGM grant is financed,in part,by ` Iw +^ federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century(TEA-21), local government, and the State of r` " ' Oregon funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. . , Y��4 . ti • Y rK 11 »\ fro" H - t,' • t •t••.• r Y ® Hr ® „' 4 .' : ,4 , 40 n • .-ri s� 0 � d a) '' q• 0 R'r' i',. a ji. ®rH M!1. d • Y 14 a lib 4,0, 1 0 , t , • •a 4,w V 1't * I tl ® .",'K 1 1 49 t' H N ''o. "w 7!r �X.4 0 (` . :It ' • LakoaroVoToWn Oehler ah • *' Pi Juno JO,1003ft ., 4 , ', .. . , 1 •a .• a t 1 rm 4 , h 1 • � 'a to i , fit„ AA:( 2) ; H 1',' ,..` ''. ‘'.;'•..- !r w �1 �:� a a , t. • L N r 1 AI • aM t: ® ,' : I. Executive Summary N .f 4 f" .1•. A The Lake Grove Town Center Plan provided an opportunity to enhance the commercial and high density residential portions of Lake Grove as a vibrant, attractive and coordinated mixed use area. -:?• The City of Lake Oswego's Comprehensive Plan describes a"Town Center"as an area that serves r' . '4, • tens of thousands of people,Where good transit services,a pedestrian environment,shopping,services, y • entertainment and higher density housing will be encouraged, Lake Grove is one of two town centers • `z' , a in Lake Oswego,the other being downtown Lake Oswego. +., ; 1 r.. ,," .. w 0 Previously,there was no unifying plan for the commercial area of Lake Grove. The town center -` planning process provided a way for businesses and residents to create a common vision for the area '':; I and to Identify ways to Implement that vision, t ' rp l+ r, ..,,I.,,,...';:,'/Nt /e' " 0 ,:':.,4 .3,", . 4's,::1':4°J.1,,-..-Fr.. ' :', V ,'; I' 1:0H' ' 1 '.. ,'ri'' .., ..' • ?i r. a K r ' i .. t ' • I N' y ._ T,E1; �, h' N , t�\ 4 iV „ ® Community Design Charette•Lake Grove residents review working drawings ® Purpose +.a; ® The purposes of this report are: ,'; ti , 1, To provide a summary of the Issues,points of view,and consultant conclusions resulting from the Lake Grove Town Center process. , 4` 2. To provide a source document of draft recommendations,conclusions and options to be used in 14 �'. finalizing the Lake Grove Town Center Plan, r ' ".„ ® Summary of Overall Conclusions and Observations " ', + • The Planning Commission has stated that it is committed to working with the Lake Grove community to 4 " w.`' ® complete the town center plan This report Is Intended as point of closure to the first phase of trig town ® center planning process,and a bridge to subsequent discussions with the community that will complete • A- . 0 and adopt the Lake Grove Town Center Plan. ' ® The following are selected key points that emerged during the process: ;Iy ,» • The diverse groups Within the Lake Grove community(e.g small businesses,larger businesses, t, the three neighborhoods, stakeholder groups) generally share a common set of values. They " ' .2'" e value the uniqueness of Lake Grove, It's Important economic role in providing local goods and . ,;.'_ ' • py services, the relatively small size of sites and buildings, and the presence of tree groves and .f;" t' landscaping of all types. N r N ♦ + a " 11. f Lake Gross town Canter Plan ligi ® Juno 30,2003 y a IS i I , „. Ia ...V.q" - y` 1• ,.'S "�_7 r °. �x � . .�' .. �.' r'r N ",• u 4 , '''.'".... >r 1.. ... r' b•i, '..rs n,. ! / A.' ,....',•', .. ..u'' e.." t.Pc. , ,r•9� \ 4.1 x •',,:' r rtY'sp.,: " ® ` ?. • Early In the Town Center process(September•October,2002),common values were expressed In ® .,: ,t ' r the form of operating principles and an overall vision for Lake Grove, The community stated it can ® '`".., envision a town center that(in twenty years)includes:a mix of uses;continued economic vitality; ,". adequate and convenient parking; connections between the business areas and adjacent a - neighborhoods;pedestrian improvements and safe crossings;trees and landscaping;pedestrian- a " a ?. scale amenities;bicycle and transit access;and above all,a clear sense of Lake Grove's unique ® ";.*. character. •® '`" .f A °y • The concepts for Lake Grove's future,as developed in the November,2002 charrette,were generally •• ' .- supported,but people were clear that the implementing details are important. r i •'' ' '''' •• As implementing strategies and options were discussed, many points of concern were Identified. tµ" \ ,t ,' Points of view were highly varied and often leaned toward a focus on near term Issues as opposed ® 1, " 4,, to working toward a long-range vision. The process of working through options was further •',„ i complicated by lack of continuity between community workshop and by suggestions for new or ® �e w " revised options that were developed betweenthe community workshops. "y..s fa ,t,' • The Planning Commission is committed to creating a Lake Grove Town Center plan.The foundation ® " ` I - for the plan will be the common set of local values and vision,and,the strong local commitment to • '•a improving Lake Grove as a special place and a special part of Lake Oswego. ® h \ Summary of Draft Town Center Plan Elements The Lake Grove Town Center Plan process produced the draft products that are listed below. Additional technical studies and background reports were prepared—please see the Technical Appendix for a full ® ,; u list. , n . itThe following draft plan elements are discussed in this report: : •Ax'. •• Guiding principles • •.' . • identification of key Issues and alternatives for each plan element • L yt Y.� • An overall Town Center concept from the November,2002 charrette • r '". rY } " • Site studies for three mixed use sites and the Lake Grove village center ® k c ''' • Land Use Concept Map41, t a' G ' • Concepts for comprehensive plan and community development code Implementation • , • Transportation Network Maps � ;: ., Streets and Alleys ® ; "` `' - Pedestrlaii Connections ;. • ,, ;r, - Bicycle F, ciiItles , ,,," K ,. - Transit >, I. ' • Streetscrpe designs ® ,'M1 'a • Parking recommendations Y • Suggested next steps for completion of the Town Center Plan ® ' n `'fi • Implementation projects and priorities • ' ' . N.. ® '.r' `" • w\ " ". Lakodfovorowhcohtarpitn .' + JUtle 30,2bi • t. ,s u' a YtA(32)' A" y ".. ,v " " i A, ° \ "" i" t'' ' \'• I' '\ �" a ,,, ' •a Y I • ' s c 1 "- " t " :I,' \ �-- " " ..k', d\'.5d. . n hV t� \ '" •hY." I. " '"}p ` '. ,1,,44t.....r.4,:..'," '','.''''t,l'..*".:' .'. '''',4:,:i'-'.,ir 1:'1....: .•...4'.7, .4'. ..'4'4 .. ' '....1',..' '''''''''''''t•''' ••••' r' ' r' ''.:r.';•• •:.','".....''.fi' 0 •• ,$•":...;.;1. :::.:::::.'4'3;4::..7.• 0 . .. .,. .. . , , . . . 4 :.,v,..... ... :;:fy:::;-'..,,,,:i • • . , .t; f-,-...,r ,I.., ', . • ; ! cr'' _7410 ,..- .,•';.:';'',.) . '‘P ,,;,,...,',,"._i...*.:,:i1;;;I:•";,',/,',,i.:',:',-1.,:ii'llAL"..3,4"rs.(1°;'.;=',:,*;'''b''''.:147,-L-A:!":':. ''''"'/: ' '' . :.4.:::...41IP4''."±.7":"'"--- t' -- -%-" . ..,1•.•,:„',.`•,. .;,,,':.14.'.1,•V.',. . . • ''.'1"j'-:.t,' 64.•_1.'..*: 0 .''''''.4'4'.6.4,1c '''..";:.1:.:''' ''''''f:1!;j4CAkr ,';'Ll.'Sr;..'40,1irl"‘1"":4J-'''''•. ,.7,?.•.,4'4'.1„11' . *.''.'": ',.,•,.''.7'.'''' ',4,?•4,'',1k.::?'„"*i.:.;' 0 , ,i 4:4,,',!..?,•40,.,,'..,,.,..• .•cf':-$2...,1,-';;Y:i;?;;•'!::134:1,4":4',".-,-, p,3,,,',.'NI!,11'-.i.;. -, .1-','T.•,'-'q... 0 • ..ri ," e-, t,,,, • • •.,, ,.."-. ' '• --1 '•-' t'' ',..' 17'' ' 1.,./,•!-;,, ,...t. ".',- 44," .,',,( ' -'''----• . , , .., , 1 ,*.!',1,,.-Y-•':'," i....• ,..i:,,.: 4 3 1,-..41I,r 'f"','"4 i.),Iir,,';.... ‘:4/L. • .4.-1_;:', L..--",:, .'".„,-:.-,,,.4•.: sy) '-i:`,7.iyi't,',.:." . '• .. '',; . —,......... '4 .''.'; •. .,,,,,, .."‘'!",'• ...'. .....'1'",••..!!..'4•••:` ' , '-'".jiV.,.•,i;..?"41,4.' f:''';.'7),"'",;•.;,;.0it;•,,, ,t1',,,,,'_",.....'lit, .1°'.r.":•ix'1,,,•r1c.• . i',.. ..,,, ,., .,.,. GC/R0 ..,,,,,,q ., ,•*,.....,,,, ..,, , , ., •,1,,,, .,Znfi . . 1 , :es.''1'4'4 ,,,',4•V''' 4 44'.' '' ' .'"t"h4,,',.'k'ller.4,' ".•!;••.:(",,,,,i.,.: 4'....J..!,*.,:• •* '' ' ' i't ,04',,,''...- .•,•'''.4'.•,••t'',4*„. ', ' '''''':..i'lli'':•'.,"'''"''''•''1,4'4'.(4,..1/47,',4 . 7,1..''Ili, - -. •. -!"L. '.',..:.,: -.4,-,!,''P'--;•';ft.,: „. ,,--,,,,,11----.m17-- r ''':'•'14•4„4-.,,,..1',.wa;,,",t'I"Y: ,r,'QiX74‘,:.znooll k. '',;,.t:4.',:.,',.e,•:*.'P1 ., W " ——110'E, ' ' "'..'•:..•,','''t '.;,',:.• ..k3FAV./3"..',-"A':•:.;"-, ,;-,..',+',-, ', ,,, ,I./A,"-,,istie1,4.4''. ' 44,;*,\SItIll '-'1,-,..,-,-;;'-'1.• . ,. , :-..7,c,,,.•.;.',:. '"..k..•,,p,,..k.!;. 4,:,:;1;161;p:,.:,,67,:,,,1 mi.,' kfiZii .,,r,..Y! L'W...__.,=,::NZ.11. :''",;:. "--',' 0 IIIIF ''''' Y.;,' ..:.''''•,','''';;24',;'4;:-.'.;:itli‘iT,,IP:S"''fi.-..':#'1] Mg*j..11;,!-.1.,„;,-.`,..„,..•...vaa, ,N. 1111 ..!...•,:'- '' ''',' N%. '.1..,4'\'''1'r ',,,,,i''''',..r„g'.I L''''''''4.''1,.'NO fall iims •i r dul. r L'rr:V".1.4 . :7*.... ...'"""' • ..., • ' . . illat :...opt.V:',4••.,,J•,"''„;-i.i , ."."!"" '/-'' . '',' - • \'‘. ••,. ..'''.''''•.•'" l'• il,..'it;;,?V'''''...:',:,1:,j-:''• gki" 'Pr • / II,'1.",-;%'...-.,,. :'"...--,i',-'.-'.'.,k•,1;4• .: .,2::::,:,'''.',.4'":`,.' • ,,,, ..,„,, ....'.' ....,...,,3''„',,..,,..1.:'.''.wlgthlt:Vo.:-'.;: '''.''1Z''''t MkEEGNRrCAT'/ 1.,!..'.;Isi;['.,,.1...-•,!.:;,..;,...';'.::::', . ----' ...,. .•'•...:-.,-,,,- -' ...7,N,11't" '.31'.''II'*11.' Etr&C.01. .';..2.'.:',1. ';.''''''' • • xi • • , I .. .., .. . .%, --4 • I, A "k'' R 15\ ..": L,, ''..,-,' : -1-- vol..... !(,t6.1.1 If ,-gr II-. 114.-...- 1" /) -,.. 0 , .,..,..„....„. , ,...,,,,.,...,...:,..",,- ..:,, ?•::.4,./.„....1.1,,,',....,:.• LI. , ., ,,,,• : ,.'....,,...,.!',,, "',','•-•.'," ",•,..,,,ii,i,.1,,- - '.., ,: ., „ ,. , . ..:::*.',•:,'l';`''''*`:I--• ' .. ..i.,,Ti'L.:...: ::'.': • .,.._ ip ki ,'‘-:.- ''''. ' .-,'. '''---- .;4, _ L . • ..,,r :.. .......4.,,,.... .,....,....,J,-,...,%•\ . . ........;_:::--",.: - '-; : :','"'"...',„; 0 ''t 1 .,,..,q'.:.-."4-1.4::.,*. -',',,'.•;',::',.',;;;',:l...,_.\111' . ' ,,,e't".'''',., . 4';:fr'' ,:/1'-L':;!4" :.•-•''s,_r%''' ,• '..•-..t '.., ,, i• ,.. , ._.'.. ' ,ii ,, , . , ,,, ,40,111...* lif,:x '1 '' 44:,.. • '. . , •S)S,,i/L. ,.,, 3 • k. ',..' r // V •• '',...' . ). VO''" 4 '' '' Pt*. • 4: "' .!,.0, ..,, .•••"..n' el 1- ,-;-NN3,%-•f4';;,:'; .**'.''''',''' ','-:t1 'i e ' ,,;A''''..1,-r,'"-;,''''...'-' 4,i'''' ' `'''' -* !' -,..,,,,,, 4' " '' ......ini 4 4 ',,” • 4:"'''',,- ,:r Zi,, ' 1141,ti '„4,',,'..‘,',:'..,t'fi'i',,,,,,,y;0' ,,, ,,..... ‘,„-No,,...r, k , , ' ly.. - ...P,, . ...1r ' ';',.-,,,, :. • ".' I "-. :'•••'-,,,',.-.•,,':,.•'.,!,::'," r.'. i*(1.,;' ' .T„' ..... „` , ,',. ,... "--'.. .:-•:...,,NIZN.N.N,- ' OSWEGO , ;1 .,, !.' ;. . :'';1:ti:.... ''', ,..11,0, :' ''..''-4.''...•:..' .4.4SIN.. ,;', . .....1••.'.: . ,: ,,. ,. . '.•, ei,-...4"1. ' !1,.',;i," ••i'...,`,:., 0 ', 'Pill',r'..4'Wl,',....L. .-. ''fr- 't..f -,0‘,. -.•• ,.:,$'. ! LAKE GROVE •,". ..: ..--''..,: .1, ..,,,''',.:'".--.,' et ' --;,''t,' •' _---.." .'. .'''', '',./V ''•' ' TOWN CENTER PLAN 0 r- .1 - l' 4'"-i',... ".i,.c.''N',";-1-‘,•.?','''.'.4i.- 1..1-'-...-.':!„'''''0' ‘,. .,f •wrrr ‘,. , : ... 4.tik0 ' Cohlot new/Wary • • '.. .'''', -' '7..".' . ' '. .:''''.: '°.'•CLi., .. ''• n A r ' A'—1 '. .,,; *S.'-:-*; 1 ., '' " /4 Mro bill/into ., , I . . • .* "".''•-',''IL" • Iii ','L'''''I', tom town Genlut -:t•',',4'" •''' '''L on 01 int.„,..4,, „..., .,.. , .\._„,„ ,., , , .. „‘ .. .. R-74 L.,. ,......_....,_...„....-......-.-„......i. , n 104.1 FM ii ,,.,-• ' '•4 • -. ' , +' • U iJti r4.41 10.4.1 ;04.0.4.7,1 Ji ..' ‘,' \) 1 I 14 11Y1'AM law. ..Y L,,....t•' •7. .•• , „,-• , . ,L, . -..... ...„...., c , r, 0? n3 won ... ••,, .-- •.,.' ''. .' ir , .„,,,,,, •• $ ."-, - • . ' ! i'----,, ---—II • Piton°1 SlutlyAten Lake Grog°ToWn Cellint PlEth :.''t'L•.,-,• 0 Juno 30,2003 • 4' ,, ... 4 • ..... ,...,,.„,. , • ‘I''' '''''''''''''' ',XX-132)' t '' '''''''' ' ''''',^', :'-"'" .'4','•':'''' ''','' a*" , 4:,2 6 ,'-, 4,•,, %, - ‘.". .-'-• ', 1', : 'A., .', :,,,1 4•„. • 1. lk, • - • '''''' ' '','.•":; *11:. C4 .::', '''',4;7! ' ,:1'1.' ' ...-1'.; [ is x4 1 \ h ,. h., A l li t 0 1 , k 1 ' y1 , 4 1, II. Principles, Process and Summary of Key Perspectives j ® 1 �'.;,1 Guiding Principles ` The following principles were discussed with the community In workshops held on September 10 and October 10,2002.They were endorsed by the Planning Commission(on October 14,2002)to be used w: y " v as the guide in preparing the Lake Grove Town Center Plan. The Lake Grove Town Center Plan is Intended to: fit 4 ": A.Enhance Lake Grove as a vibrant and attractive mixed•use center-Protect and enhance Lake e , N ,,...- Groves economic vitality and unique blend of locally owned businesses. Integrate mixed use, land • . '4:'4 . •" use, and transportation strategies that promote economically successful, compact, land-efficient • r a � development, ® ,, B.Create a great street that supports all modes of travel-Improve Scones Ferry Road to make it 0 #ti. more attractive and safe for walking,biking,and trans',while still accommodating auto traffic,Design • N n„' a great street that Is the centerpiece of the Lake Grove area. k C.Support and connect with adjacent neighborhoods-Support and implement the Lake Grove, •0 '. Waluga,and Lake Forest Neighborhood Plans, Identify appropriate ways to connect and integrate the " '` ''„: Lake Grove Town Center with the adjacent neighborhoods. • ' D. Create workabt„zoning and design guidelines- Identify strategies to encourage Infill and • • ,,, ''4 redevelopment In the Town Center,including appropriate changes In the mix of allowed land uses and • ,. , zoning regulations. Prepare design standards and guidelines to support the overall vision for a vital • "" .• h ' '4 .r and attractive mixed-use center. A E.identify physical improvements and catalyst projects-Identify specific improvements that will , create the"bricks and mortar to Implement the vision. Identify key catalyst projects that will leverage ® :' additional public and private investment. ® 1 .' "�', F.Conduct an open process-Assure meaningful public participation so that the plan will be endorsed ® " ' and embraced by a broad spectrum of community interests and organizations. ,u a'a ,, ' G.Meet community and regional goals and expectations-Comply with, and Implement, State, • +' regional,and local plans and policies. Specific plans to address include Titles 1, 2 and 6 of Metro's • \.° Urban Growth Management Functional Plan,the Regional Transportation Plan(including mode split • , ., targets), the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule, the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan and • N Transportation System Plan,and the Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan. • ,t • a .,;;• H.Coordinate with affectedagencies,cityandcommunityinterests-Assu interests-Assure • ;; affected agencies,with specific focus on Metro,TO-Met,City of Tualatin,Clackamas County,the Lake • * '• t~, N+.. Oswego Planning Commission,and the City's Transportation Advisory Board(TAB). • ": . . , ` ® I b R,y • • w �J �> 0 4 i, 4•1•_ 9 , 4 Lake Grove Town CefltorPion • .,: Juno 30,2000 •h p r 9 • P. AA:'(32) ' t R� .:w1, I y ,*t...4 Y' - 1 N N, J Y 1 :-,•;.,• wr n. 1 . " M1I J 1. : a .b 'e J 1 r® � }xr ryV ^, 1 a.: ® Process W This report was created with extensive input from stakeholders and the community, The Planning c, Commission served as the overall guiding committee for the process. A series of community meetings • •14' r ® were held between September 2002 through May 2003. Throughout the process, meetings were ., attended by a relatively large group of interested parties,with 30.60 people attending each meeting, ® p The majorsteps in theprocess were; Y r ,.r :. , �;' ` ( • I<Ick-off meeting and community visioning(September,2002) • ' • Inventory of base conditions and preparation of guiding principles(September-October,2002). H•"a • ei * • Design charrette(November,2002) ,` ® • Refinement of the plan concepts and discussion of implementing strategies(January-May,2003). a.. y' u; •'':4 WO The meetings and events held to prepare the plan included: .y ;' '•: ® • Community Workshop;September 10,2002 ••••'`' ® • Technical Advisory Committe Meeting;October 1,2002 • Walking Tour;October 5,2002 ` : 0 • Community Workshop;October 10,2002 i"" '•. • Planning Commission Meeting;October 14,2002 • Business Owners Meeting;October 22,2002 `+ r;.jr . ® • Charrette: O .. 4 - Kick-off Meeting; November 4,2002 ® - Charrette Business Meeting; November 6,2002 Technical Advisory Committee;November 6,2002 ' ® Charrette Open House; November 6,2002 •. u` ?' •�. r' - Charrette Open House; November 7,2002 �` �" ;; '4*. •• Charrette Summary Meeting; November 12,2002 R ® • City Council briefing;January 7,2003 >r • ,, 4 ® • Lake Forest Neighborhood Association;January 5,2003 F ® • Lake Grove Neighborhood Association;January 15,2003 ,;?,r•;1 t .. ' • Waluga Neighborhood Association;January 22,2003 �� 1, ® • Planning Commission Meeting;February 10,2003 r'•,r '•,*:. • • TAC Meeting;February 11,2003 s. '' • . • Lake Grove Business Owners;February 18,2003 � •�, • Technical Advisory Committee,February 18,2003 ~~ ; ;" M1� • Community Workshop;February 20,2003 „ u` ". 4. • Planning Commission Meeting;February 24,2003 ° " •.y '1 • Planning Commission Special Meeting -Transportation; , 'J'. S i. • March 17,2003 W .- 0 • Community Workshop,April 3.2003 _ , � 1� • Planning Commission Work Session, May 12,2003 • 't ,. `'/ ® • Business Owners Meeting,May 13,2003 ti • ., • Community Workshop,May 14,2003 ClmrtelieC'pen House,November 0,2002 a , • Planning Commission Work Session-Lake Grove Business ., r • A t, . * AssoCiation, May 28,2003 , * • Planning Commission Work Session,June 8,2003 •' • 0 � Y 1• ® ' N 1 •-,4 •r,i. LWOruvo Town Connor Plan ' ". Juno 30,2001 • y' .a' 'A,rl M w yr ,„ : ® , 7j ,y r The public process described above was supplemented by a project web site, This site contained ' project newsletters, and other information regarding the project such as guiding principles, meeting ® . , : notes,and charrette results.Three project newsletters were mailed out during the planning process, ® ,,„ sj N% r x 4 c: A mailing list of all property owners,residents and business owners with the Town Center and with 1/4 4) .,.;.. mile from the Town Center was created. In addition, the Lake Grove Business Association *i,, representatives,officers and board members of the Lake Grove Neighborhood Association,and Lake ® 1 e': Forest and Waluga Neigborhood Association representatives were notified. An Interested parties list ® t,=«` f" of others was created as the project progressed. Others on the list included surrounding communities, . t`i ti City board and commission members,City Council and the Chamber of Commerce. 0 • ' Summary of Key Perspectives This section is intended to summarize the key perspectives that were expressed by project participants.{ { , �: ; Given the many opportunities for public input and the varying perspectives,it is not possible to capture , :' , +' every point of view. The intent is to try to convey the more common and recurrent perspectives. The • guiding principles are used for convenience as a way to organize the summary. r • -i°i r A.Enhance Lake Grove as a vibrant and attractive mixed-use center.-At the Community Workshop ® y I. I , in September, 2002, and through the charrette in November, participants expressed a vision for a ® : ' ,% highly livable village center that Includes small businesses,residential and mixed use,and public uses , '; (e.g school, post office, a potential library and/or recreation ranter). The vision also Included street a ii i"` improvements to enhance safety and pedestrian character,parking improvements,attractive but non- ® ,, ' "r rj`i thematic architecture, good landscaping, retention of tree groves, and flexibility for selected zoning ® Y .+p' 4 s N,,;, standards.As the planning process evolved,concerns ware raised about projects and implementing " strategies. Participants became concerned about short term Issues and the effects on specific parcels y ,. ,`J . ;; and how to transition toward the vision. 10 ,,, B,Create a great street that supports ail modes of travel One of the key concerns Identified early In the process was related to the Boones Ferry Corridor Plan. Most participants knew the Corridor Plan r•' 4 '• process had taken place,but many were less clear that the Corridor Plan process had concluded with a City decision to widen Boones Ferry Road to a continuous five-lane section (note: parts of the ® I:"' • ;, corridor are live lanes today). Additionally, some who were close to the Corridor Plan process and >` understood its recommendations saw the Town Center process as a potential forum to revisit the 0 a..? Corridor Plan recommendations, Prior to the charrette,the direction was established to Implement the ;.. a.,` ;;;' 4, basic five-lane section and policy direction from the Corridor Plan,and develop the Town Center Plan ® •-` ,�,',�. , from the perspective of incorporating new land use and urban design elements Specifically,the Town . 't , Center Plan was to focus on. ® •; • Integration of land use and transportation. ,.` • Sidewalk widths and design • ., 9' r • Street trees and slreetside landscaping ,1•• ,. ` • Facilities that will aid In slowing traffic speeds(subject to review for their feasibility). ,'." • Connections between properties,including evaluation of the alley that parallels Boones ferry Road. ® ,'ill.. ; • Strategies to provide adequate parking. • Pedestrian crossings for Boones Ferry Road,and connectivity of walkways throughout the corridor. ®• " r • Design of crosswalks,Intersections and pedestrian amenities along the street 0 , • Other elements related to the above list,and opportunities that the Planning Commission directs the team to review ' ® 1 air , Laka Grays Town Cantor Plan o z Eli Juno 30,2603 • 0 , , {q • .,• .'r'r I . , (_ '4,4 N h , ' '4 1. 'YI 1 • ^ ,.4 , > w � ,' '...a, .1 1 ,,... r... �' 'd: .w 1N +r , . ,, A4 .0 i r .dq . 0 l• / ..i v M do " f�� e ri, C. Support and connect with adjacent neighborhoods— Neighbor hood interests were well ri A represented throughout the planning process. Key perspectives included; t, ' ® • A desire to honor the neighborhood plans(Waluga,Lake Grove,and Lake Forest)that had been k. •, developed in recent years. F') ® • A priority for not expanding commercial zoning into the adjacent residential areas. "►``' • • An acknowledgement of the importance of Lake Grove Elementary as a community asset, and Y,-y" general support for relocation of the bus barns. N , r • Support for the concept of stepping down building height and type toward residential areas,as well "`. as being sensitive about street type in that transition, Peaked roofs were mentioned as a desirable " ; ® architectural form, " "".0' , ® • Support for more cross walks, signals and other methods to slow traffic and discourage"cut- 1.. r through"traffic. Neighborhood representatives also stated that an emphasis should be placed on • °" »( "` 0 pedestrian connections and pathways,but not sidewalks within tl-residential areas. Neighborhood t rx` i@ plans state a preference of pathways rather than sidewalks, with a general preference for the ` -- FPS .. 3 character of a rural country lane. F.-"- " " • 0 • Support for on-street parking along the "Village Streets", such as Oakridge, with pedestrian i O connection to Boones Ferry,as way to help with the parking issues. Overflow parking should not "• rl® be In the neighborhoods. <' • • It was suggested that options for paying for underground utilities all at once should be explored, ". " • rather than incrementally with redevelopment, '�4 r ® a Create workable zoning and design guidelines—Participants in the process recommended that s t v • �;''•Y°i an advisory committee made up of representatives from the Lake Grove community provide oversight , on the development of zoning and design guidelines. There was general support fora process similar to that which created the West Lake Grove Design District Zones. + ' E.Identify physical Improvements and catalyst projects—Conceptual site studies were prepared " ® for the Pacific Lumber site,Andrew's Furniture,and the Lake Grove Shopping Center property. While ` .4 ® extremely helpful to the design process and providing visuals to the public,these studies were sensitive " ® In nature and raised site specific concerns(e.g."how many parking spaces can fit along this side?") „ d that went beyond the purpose of illustrating character. j M 0 In addition to the site studies,City planning staff prepared a list of r,.ential improvement projects to » .,. ' implement the Town Center Plan.Community workshop participants In May 2003 prioritized the projects, " " •', • with concensus on a few projects And mixed views on most. The summary can be found In Appendix " , "` f 4•"nµ ; „ B of this report. I • .,.:I, F., 4 ® Conduct an open process—Community members expressed appreciation for the workshops, r walking tour,and charrette activities held in the fall. The business owners..similarly liked the opportunity to meet informally for briefings and discussions of business-specific issues Via. .. . "e * • Participants •had concerns about the workshops held In February through May The Implementation .•. ," r information raised areas of concern or disagreement,and there was concern regarding recommendations 'a., made by the Planning Commission in preparation for the community workshops. ". F' • h® a ` Lake Grovo Towtl Center Plan ® Juno 30,2003 ' ` ' . / � � 0 • j G. Meet community and regional goals and expectation—A thorough review of community and regional goals and expectations was documented in the Lake Grove Town Center Plan Existing Plans ® ,, • and Policies; Land Use and Demographics-•Opportunities and Constraints Repoit dated October, ® .. ".' , . 2002(included in the Technical Appendix). Generally,participants did not have strong opinions about ® ,;„•.,,,- ,. this topic. There was a general desire to plan for the desired character of Lake Grove, and not be ® Ns driven too strongly by issues such as job and housing targets. • 1: H. Coordinate with affected agencies,city and community interests—There were not too many M' ; ; issues related to coordination with agencies. Participants wore supportive and appreciative of Irk ` 5) Met's decision to reroute the Line 37 along Boones Ferry Road.Neighborhood perspectives have been ® i 'x %; summarized above under item(C). ® < Business Interests had many perspectives during the process. Much of the early input from the Lake ® • Grove business and property owners focused on the Corridor Plan. Specific concerns included: • "w • Impacts to property frontages due to the widening of the roadway • Skepticism over the need for on-street bike lanes `'� • Impacts to existing parking, access, outside storage areas and truck deliveries that could result 1 from implementation of the Corridor Plan "c - "1 • The cumulative limitations that could result from frontage Impacts in combination with landscaping * y and other standards that affect the rear areas of business properties • • The limitation of left turn movements near the Intersection of Boones Ferry Road and Bryant Roads ® .4" As the implementation strategies were developed in between February and May,new concerns emerged A) " +..•", i,, for business representatives In general,the concept of Village Mixed Use designation raised concerns ', „• over spilt-zoning on certain parcels, additional design standards, and whether mixed use would be • " required to include a residential component.The idea of a requiring connected driveways raise concerns ® ` regarding liability, but some owners saw the value In improving off-street circulation, especially If It41p , connected businesses to new parking areas On May 13",,staff met with four representatives of the Lake Grove Business Association, This meeting followed the Planning Commission's meeting on May 120 Key concerns expressed by Lake Grove " Business Association members include; '® • Business Association members are the key stakeholders In the study area. + r • Commission suggestions developed In March and on May 12',occurred outside the public workshop ®1 `• process " • The consideration of a parcel outside the town center(north of Kruse Way)for designation as ® ,H ' • Business Corridor lend use will draw retail away from the village core between Bryant and Reese • r. ,' Roads. •,, 'w, •". • Requiring housing in the Village Mixed Use areas would make it more difficult to redevelop parcels. ® ,, r • .ty' G: tl. LahtGrovoTowfCentelhlan ® ' 4•` ,, Juno 30,2003 ®s '" ,V !" •AA(�2) • .,. , t. , '', tl 4 - ♦* '° A ' IY , r .. - " "1 t.,. �`. .fir � • r .":1., � �.1. �. '� .. '.i � ". r ,L., �. ,1 r ,,i .. • . ' 45.. ,, , ,. , ...•4_. . •_ . . •• . .",4 1 , .4 w 4 :• 0 1. ` l 9 . t h f 4 r::.:.''..t'.; 0. ' . • J Ili, Land Use Concept y . ® Summary of Existing Conditions "; • • The Lake Grove Area is on of two designated town centers In Lake Oswego,which are"to serve '.j • I. r , ® tens of thousands of people,where good transit services, a pedestrian environment, shopping, 1 �., services,entertainment and higher density housing wit be encouraged". There currently is no plan rr." �; ;; a that outlines a more specu,J approach for how to achieve these objectives n . •;:''" < y 4 iI1=! • h _' • 0 • As of October 2002,land within the town center boundary consists of nearly 90 acres(excluding ..ua streets), including a broad mix of uses as follows: 8.8 acres multi-family residential, 1.4 acres ,'t single family residential, 20.1 acres of retail, 34.1 acres of office,7.9 acres of mixed use office! J .° 4.y l • commercial,3.2 acres vacant, 1,2 acres open space, 11 3 acres school(public and private),and w 1.3 acres government use. J R r 'N r • .'P i, tit '� Y�,4.7IY "1}. 4 a r4' ,4 •.1 1 M 4P, w a ,•S� ,.r. t • I.,Hit, 06.46..,r44,406.44i."0161+n t � „+, 4 J 44.. a M • _:n' ® t '. ' `. A r i '4 •- "" t'4d, e a T II` 'ti c + , "1' 7 14 J : .w V " . ,, 15. I 9 q M , •� ".. ar , ,, , • , ' , ,.. , r1 �.. . . .. i• • 1 ® � 4 . ' 4Mv n. w +' ry 4A ..,. ....... J' a +'• w w .w' Lake Drove Shopping Center A New Office Building on Quarry Road .. • There are 4,755 residents In and within'/%mile of the town center boundary. Over 20%of residents '. lb In this area are between 20 and 34 years of age,compared to 12%for the community as a whole. . ., • Forty-four percent of residents in this area own their homes compared with 68%for the community •J ,. was a whole and 58%region-wide ' ' 4) P, There may be potential for intensification of uses and mixing of uses In the town center. Currently • 0 City zoning and development regulations allow less intensive development than that recommended N by regional guides for updating land use codes for commercial and mixed-use areas. • 3 • 1 4 y •1 4 I••�ir-/r. ,N i•. 4 • ' a. ••n "y.� a s. f•Y ', " •`'".,, : CrosswalkalOaktidge Read' Village.Character atGubancs ,{ r ® Lako Grovo Town Center plan iL,', a Juno30,2003 Jill 1� AA( 2) \u ,, 4. ..n i ., 4 .' M 1' 4 l +4' • 1 "4 w y 1' „ r far y yt�a i,. ® ''h ,� • The City has planned for public facilities within the town center area,including sewer,water and ,3' c surface water,and these facilities are adequate to support the range and Intensity of uses currently , fy allowed within the area. • The Metro Regional Urban Growth Management Functional Plan recommends job and housing 0 a ` " - targets for town centers and main streets of 39-40 persons per acre. Minimum densities for housing, 41 i minimum floor area ratios and bonuses for mixing uses in commercial development,may provide • ..! , '' additional opportunities for meeting targets. The unique characteristics of the Lake Grove Town 4," Y' Y s Center area and the lower density surrounding neighborhoods may call for a somewhat different 41 .. k . intensity of development for this area, " k N s i. ctar yYS yn 'Y r w . 1 .I:.•. 1J h .�tA '" F , JA r i r yu y 4. � a . ei ..�.�A, 1•�x. ,fir 1 7 s a New Office Binding An Eclectic Mix of New and Old Commercial Buildings Exist ® '' a "^ Along the Corridor f ,,,c •'�1!A 0 4•,:4 Summary of Land Use Concept ® ,, • a I The fundamental concept for the Lake Grove Town Center Plan is to' a i r b "Bring the town center and neighborhoods together" e w The following charrette diagrams describe the Intended design concept and how it differs from the • `,k' current land use framework. • �l tN " , Lake Grove under Current Polices—The current comprehensive plan policies and code provisions ® o a emphasize separation of the General Commercial zone and the adjacent resident(•i zones Over time, these provisions would serve to create a sort of Town Center"wall"and identity for Lake Grove that Is ® a:; ., ♦ N focused on commercial use, Boones Ferry Road and auto-oriented character. Town Center Concept—In the Town Center Concept,the residential neighborhood Is Integrated with 0 q;< the commercial corridor by encouraging residential use and mixed use to locate along cross streets. • way " q The cross-streets (e g LaneWood, Ieese•Oakridge, 6ryant-Firwood)are planned for a high level of l4 -," ., pedestrian oriented character, mixed use,and transition between the Roches Ferry Corridor and trie ® ' ,ya, adjacent neighborhoods. a" ° RYA Lake Grove Town Canter Plan Junu30,2003 1 a Mr. ut . i' ® 1 •1 s s: .444 P 1,1' pr q,: 1 ' N 'a t;r lt't.ka ....y`1 ' x. • + \. i • w r ,'� Ni t t ,1 4 " rd K ti !1 't''I . ISe7 'i ea ti • , L a 1 M• ® ditar(141° \. _ +;; ® Flgure 2.Town Canter Concept Diagram A %wa ti Nib .. -'''''.* n« ( s_, IP.' '2 4,.''.''-':','',.',,*4'i r'‘.-"'o„.r'.-.l l,...:.7".....,. ',I_.., ® ip1�4`6 91I '�� y,l,lr,i.l'r,.,„...!.,I40,. i:i.4. s,z l' .r < ® x' i fir)G .e+vrAti r F • dr,Mb�Ara; I+4 w . " IDr " I.IRe4R/K ZL.? 4 „• "J '-'- • Get0 otr,e ?, '• ". 0 w ® Cigure 3 Town Center Concept fliagrom q Lake Orovo Town Canter plan Ill 4 + y1 (�ji Juno "%, 0 .; A �. I •'.. • The overall Land Use Concept for the Lake 1 ® '*i ' k '' A Village --r'--Employment Corridor + Grove Town Center Includes: 44 l ( , • A successful business district; confer •1 2N L • Pedestrian-friendly village cross streets, , ®) • Transitions to great neighborhoods; Transitions to _ 41r� GreatNei Neighborhood W'; ,4- I` uI A village center;and g � ilx .-" LaC„ "° Q , • An employment corridor, t;;#a r. In a successful business district the land uses 1 +� , 1�M. `. t vt�tagev 4 '!, `iri�t \Cross � F 4,; .r" include General Commercial uses and mixed use .„ ,. „,.''Street t n is allowed. The urban design of a successful 1�. .• �� business district involves:a center turn lane;no I I•' -«; - r' ' Business District d & on-street parking;continuous sidewalks/planters; I ` f41"' , bike lanes; street lights,flower baskets; street ' a trees; shared parking; parking lot connections; Flgum4,bow Center Design rypea 4I and one-two-story buildings, t 1 l Along the pedestrian friendly village cross streets, ]. d' t", the land uses include mixed use:street level"active" 6 it a' , " t ' retail and neighborhood commercial uses, With S ', .'.n�G J residential and/or office in the upper levels or behind, ® , G The urban design of pedestrian friendly village cross 5 ' '1 • ..istreets Involves: pedestrian crossings; benches, t`- •4` •1. seating walls,small plazas,etc.;transition of building ''`d yet-v1=1 sire and street type to neighborhoods;and two-storyi II building(potentially three stories at the Boones Ferry 1?.; corner parcels) 0 .*fie: ..,:VI y'.'i;,,' ....... 0 4,4 Figure 6 business Distaste '1 .;. x w AV S "'' In the transitions to great neighborhoods '. concept, the land uses Include: a continuance .fit"' , of existing plan and code framework, the ;''/ ® i neighborhoods retain green, low-density Q '' character;end expanded commercial uses are . , discoureged(or prohibited). The urban design '\ t , of transitions to great neighborhoods Involves I street design transitions from the Town Center 46 :. to the neighborhood and now connections to the Figure 6 Pedestrian rriondly Village Cross StreetsDiagram 0 "" I. Town Center ate encouraged, where r appropriate •I 1 "' 4 (aka crave Town Cantor Platt Juno 3b,2bbb 0 , CO ,: • 'A 2) � a \ • , h . f 7 J•, e • . n R 1 1 ^► Q ':, -x11 ' 4'•-•' f.k' l}'10.+ t' 1 'n ...., 1. anewaaLl r•.r,, i1."/r �•, �/ Y.y p. • .r•+�.• '•.— : ram` • �.,` I '51' _f� C ' ' ; • Figure 7.Pacific Lumber Site Study,illustrating a Village Mixed Use Development , 1f g • • " r ,.....-•''' ", ?• t} d ,,,,p .,` .1, , s ,a, am f R r ,t• 9Ven`�•.� 0 J. ,.1 ill YI a a•, oe' �eone ' r'; y' ® //Q)A'°( V' business District �' •,., . ,1 .— Village Street •' ,0., .e., ,' ® '" l•, • Figaro 8,Lake Grove Shoppltig Center Site Study +.h,, ® . " r ", ; . d y' .d f lonotmih 4. r xl J. ' NI 4: �., .. ..' M i5haulW .. x �' ilvn sdw ' r4"//, ' 7 i. • N 1" Y r O*9 I rv.�l `� r Y rr N 1 I 1Mh pout.!',nlUnp � `p• -f h Figure g.Trabsltloetle Creel Neighberheedsbleeratt$ FxlalmgNdighbothoodCloutier r ,.9,• : • .l�'1 • 1,' Lake Grove lawn Collet piaPlatt N �'• . 0 Juno3012003 f i e .r ‘ IA'/\(32) ,, t " ,4 „Y r, t> �-• ; .f T .,a. ... `„ J 0 4. 't t. Y.. . ' n I p • ' • 4 In the village center, the land uses include; the ` Lake Grove Elementary School and future relocation of the bus barns;the Lake Grove Post Office; the Lake Grove Commons; and other f 0 • , ': future civic/public uses. The urban design of a . ; village center Involves new pedestrian . •a.,, .-' connections; the creation of Lake Grove k 1 ,r Commons,a civic park for all of Lake Grove;and ''t)', 110 , future improvements at the school and post office .e it {� M, a to provide focal points, The village center , tt�t ..,, . ,;f„' °t ..' �,. Illustrated here is an extremely long range 111>r• , ' �� proposal, and requires a partnership approach ? • u with the key property owner; the Lake Oswego ` a'r School District. The following realities of the t,• t,, • $ village center concept were raised;the school was It+' f a recently renovated and has 30+years of life left; t. • K a.. �+. the relocation of sports fields to behind the school 0 needs equivalent acreage; and outdoor spaces • 0. of the school need to be easily secured and Melee 10•VIIIage Center Diagram ® , r supervised. ® ; p f o.''• The employment corridor is a concept that emerged after the charrette, Land use and urbah design •'I character would mirror elements found in the(Cruse Way corridor; 3-4 story office buildings;combinations of brick and glass to convey a quality architectural style;preservation of major groves and signature A ' ,., ; trees; campus-setting landscaping; and parking lot connections to provide Internal circulation that tip , parallels the road system. + ' ® , ' j '.D^ 1,,r^ ® :1 1 • �, 4 ^,� •. 'nrr 1 _ ® .•'. In Lake tarove ToWri Cantor plan la Juhd 30,200a It, 0 • 4, r. r• •A 13�j I -,4 y'1 a,:,'1 y l . 1 a r J. I:,..I • ,.. . 1 O , r f ' t'M. 11 X 1 14 1 1 1 ... 1 , l a r '^ •Y h i ' . 7; , a 18.11. ,t a 0 iM i' � it • V 1 ntr r` / ®.y `s,i': , •S • I. aLIIII .« � 4 . , . y rl a y.y V' i 4 t 1 • ;q.l .;m hos i:-..?J'‘,. .-. !'". ''-.•41,....,.r....:,. .r......,..;„-.„,...:, ..• „.,..,... . „....., ,....„, ,r- ::f: :.:, '•-''. ® i, ' ,'% - e r it• '�+:P,. Ilketl iie •c •,n f e a ... .� [04-•,1 , y I, 1+ V1'1 �y//- ` .'• 1•It r•rN F ,I � ® 4 ' + r d' r s'Y '1 t'. t ry ® � Ih ,k I. P , ® 4, ,._ ` , a 1 1;, Y"1 r �, t .e N n„� — sitiz, 1..L ,,! ...,.•,iltilapp. ,. '4;k7,,,,,,i:,...,..',,,,`..„''U"\.,''-'''1 , • �r1 �X Y Y ® 1 ,M ,I ® sn;' Figure 11.Village Center Illustrative Pleh with Now School ldullding-Year 2040 l �'" tl M ,,.r • ry ,k I I i • 0 bliNng lie I.'- 0 Ployrpolcd "4Yr_r/L_" •,},,, 1 1� x -�� ar�wl.rrr��, Iwrwar�we*•�Ar; I - " ® 'Jlfilugu Pulh u • `al '� ®�!n�I � Ndllmmk Gl9M Gn • tl ;1 `--;4II '' '`- .I1�I.� P _ JIv�I DAro:,ay/AYuy ' , •� ,...r'' • �, ..,yM^� Reolig119dlo Fonn FW "I N') '. -,..- ., _ q ;�.,.(,�.. Inlerkechcn WBNLnrNrood St �r ® Uemo4ehdl 3Rj�j sthoetWnq ;Id Olt . _. + .re�2.' ., y, .1.".w' + w CnmhwnlyCentet • + • l�`h 1 °j • Mdor toyrnm t ir le C l �II '' a ♦.(yll hlopU9ed PULIIG PIN t .L �! �'_�~ 'Lake etoveCommone' l ® "-- .u� r r.{...o+""...0..% . 0, '.; Ihr4ro4edNwvinlhruechon `,i • `•,,l_'111 r• PropoYoiRUIodated Pal b'l,pl 1 R TTTT•� Ouerkdung Comment I '4 4r. °lfA `�nbe�s t { II1r (.77 1 e. e I pin{wk9JM-�rud.Uka mF PAW .7Mf dd►w+ 4 ' 'i r cuddly lYlnrlN Av� ' ` rLl ..'q : Age•my Relor.,tndiJ 1 ' , %7`^�' .. { a' ; 0 Figure 12.Villaga Centel Illustrative latch With Fxlshng School Year 2040 j , "` LukeOltVo Town d Woe PlanIll ® JUno 5012003 I 0 ' • •I. S``. •H ® ,, r, J •r� ® ,.. e • • t R: Z • ,' !" Land Use Concept Map ,,,n' The Land Use Concept map is a site specific application of the design types described above. It Is ® ; Intended as the basis for updating the zoning for Lake Grove. • :' •.'^' The Land Use Concept map may be used as a literal update of the zoning map. For example,the 0 K' •'"• • Village Mixed Use zone would be created as a new zone district and mapped accordingly, Alternatively, r the Land Use Cqncept map could be used to guide to an implementation approach that doesn't Involve new districts,such as the adoption new design guidelines that supplement the base zoning, i•d ;t. t, The conversion of the charrette design types to concept map designation Is as follows; " :�‘ Table 1. Design Type.Concept Map Conversion " !be tdh Ty>i10a 'onoopl Mop Donlenati"on ® ` A successful business district Business Corridor• ® K .I Village Mixed Use(Residential is optional) ' . Pedestrian-friendly village cross streets • Village Mixed Use—R(Mixed use With residential or a r residential required) 't Transitions to groat neighborhoods No designation, The transitions are implemented as design ® ,y�r =± standards In the VMU designelinn. Elementary school e �'1,1 • Lake Grove Commons/Open Space • Public ® '. ii Village Center h . + Note; the open space designation Is also applied to Pennington ; . ' Park and the public designation Is applied to the northeast corner ® ; of Bryant Road and Sunset Drive. .,o„i k n Employment Corridor Employment Corridor �n . ., 0 ",, . .;. -i K' ® • L is L • ; •>%a Y' 1 11y • t )1 .. ® 1 1 • ® •.li. r ® r ICI Lake Grove Town Center Plan Juno30,2003 i • . . 1 e 1\A(32) I t "1 s • ,*, a '. •,• i ,•,. rr .. - �• r 1•�4 :('' ei...:.:.i''':..1'..':if',:.;1•:.;,-,'.7.' .1:7'1:1..1;-:1,..::,',,....;","':,1-:',.'/r...i..,!,..*H 1;-.l'i=:.1.:"...''''‘:'',T,':;.;11'''..::::'....'......''''1.:-:'4;:l'....:::*:,;.....1;',.'":7,'.''';''''..::.2,1':1...'::',,:".:,:7,._i,''!".:."4,'; irl:ii.,,,,'..'„,,.....‘,,,, .,; 1:^.-41,,,,'..,::: ,..7:4'.1.,..r‘.. „.:::,,:.::...'ii!i,-;..,11:'`.:_ji,,'.iii,•..... ",,,,',,Y.1-.,,'' 1.,•,',,',..',''''1''.:,,:U. •;,i l' ",,,s • ,..,. -,, ,,,,.' 0 .,:., ,... ,'-.-..., 0 . -* :,,,,,• a ..1'!".: • ''..' .4 .,1",.‘... e ,*.,.•,.....%...--,.., ' . . .. ,... ...., . , , ,,....,, , .., -,i.-. c=-)..1 . Lake (....321-ove Town Getiter }'In a,.,,,..',11' ''.,,, . : Land liee Comeerit; 6-30-03 .,....1.,,,,s,„,,,..,,-„ItArtie'r,,....1.:•": .,, , „_. ,, ,''.' . _-'''.:• ,,, 8 i --.... •,...,--... t , 1 .. - '•"' I1 L'3•. r7- "....._•-- _i .,... • ,1 . ../:.:/,.,• 'k: 14k.4'4.*'''...,,,:',.....,, 't.''4;4 j ••.i • ---a,:..---.._ , t.., ' ,.:-.;': ,',.•.,:.. ---.....,-;:*., - --0.1=-...7.- . , . ,.. , -. . ,', , ._,„ ' I - -, • . ••-.:-.il-4,..1 e 7---------.::‘,:,-.., ...,„:-...,.. ,....,,;.,.-:-,,,.......,„.. --1~,:-.'„›, . , ., .. 0 ---y__-- cl '',1%'' : .•,-',1'' " ..A., s".•'••.,,,_ .„'.i. _, ,,, ., ".11:.1.'"'"•'.:::' ,,.•.,"'.‘.: ...:.:.i".1• 'I/ 4'; '. 4 1 I, ' 4: 44 :4 44'4 i .'''...4 4 4 4.4.;' i 4''''''. 4 -'%.4.% ..,..4. ,e...,,r":4 i"h.4 . ''..7 ...;,.7.",,,'';,.' 0 .'' I;,,,,4,--7,.•;,,,,•1,.-- r„rl.:t:.',, ...''.:11.-.1.'..05"1. 14'.`‘'-\:„...„...., :••••..'iii41.'16.,,,'-',4'''''.:'7 a' . , ,, , '','-.7: '..:1.';'•,` 0 ---.1 ' \ ' ''..‘• I ' .L. • I. ,.• 'ni,i7{:,?, r?.. '',',N-1.444.0t.'", ..','''' 4 '. ...c...„...„....._. _ .., .,. ,,, „, .,,..; .,„,,„.,. ,,,,,.. ,...„-,.,-,...,.,,,;71,.,J,.,:,,;!,,,,, --•'7 77-4,,Lopli...7 4 .,:..- .- , '. ' ..,,,I, \--'. ...4-1L,,-1...,1 .1-1:t ki•••,. . •?,,-,•.•s fiv-1..A.,-:r„),ot,:;,7,,, ...„ '47'44-,-.,.., ...: '...'*.•.' ' t,:;., 0 -.\-.."- ,, , -„, ,. .. •-•-,, ,.'43, .,' .' ..4.41V4t;i1;,',4.,,,141:4?.......,,.c.,,,,,........zz..,...H.,.. ..4',4' r.:.,:',, ! \ 'id\i \i' '4' 'Al. '' '*.\' ''et4:!.;'14,',',*1.,;'..* ..:'''',;;;77, ',-,':.!4.',....if.',ii*,,.%ett.,,,..,„ ..:• ., 4! .. „•'''.''".,'. .''''.' ..,a '' ( I.1' .. v..'''..-1,-g4Al.a„...4'n'..,,(4'''....',:*'.2,:;,.-" , •4,.!f) *4 .... L.I,to , ..,.....,,,--1:-.1.e --1r-..) i._ :-, ,.0.----,,,:8,4,;;;,,,,J,‘.,t..,•„.....,...1 it; ••..,, tt.-...; ,-'••°- --';''. 0 :, . ...i'..-1-. 0 .•,. \ t \.!A„ -•- ,...•,....- , i.., ...0 0 .• tt, 'tt f'i)..1., 'r'1,';,'"' tb ..-••..t..- ,..... 15.. iii.P.„•.-..,:77,.7.7,..i• •.',.1,.• ,- ,., .•., ; \-J'-'....1' VC:.." .:: trlii„_,...-.1 I'• g'jp 1- L.J ,..i. ,t,,,,,, 1,,t4.-, t .'4 t:, '''''•.-'•••:••„ , \-11 'hl'i i' "A* .'• 771-.1.._" I 1, .7:1. r-i 4';..1'S!.% !!;.'."' .'. • ,-;...•;*-4-.1.'''.. 4 ,.„.•!'i' • - -a it- 4 S'',4., ...4i 0 ' ' t..,1 ;I..1 ,., L, ..11,.-,., ,1, li"t t. '.,....•'''t;;,,I, A'41,:4 .,,, ;„ • .,41t-Lii,..4 t.2'-:-' 'e'...: . '7 ''• ,,xi.... '.0' r'-'-„'• .,,,,'',, ._.. . , • - ti-:...-7.1 , MAI.rad. , 1 . -, ' t t-,-- ,',,-:,,•., jlt.,,,, ,'Sql'':. ' ,i_tooloity--' . I ...i, :y . .,. .-....,: ,..10, 0 , te: '''''.l'ir'''..-7.-:''..7r7".-7-*.gi';•-•..,.4,-, "'*'''''' . A' 'f , , , _ ';...,. •.c.1 ••-•'.: , . ,',, .• - ;'.. .: '. '..,,•• ':. ,• 4110 , • 11, .,,...4--.,'..-'. .- .,,,o,....f... . .,....;, 1 ,',...,-,',z- i- ,.. _ ., , .„ :.,.4 .-:',. ,..,4,;,/ i,,,. j---L,„,___, ' ',!, ''' ,v•',4, II •,;',,,,,,,,:. l'" '':. ,,::.-',i-,. .`":.',4;«; ,--:-. = ... lot-r, '. ,,•••, • ,,... ,..:.!',, .. . . ,'„-, .. .,. .,..•." ."...".. ' ip - 1 i 1 , ...,.., ,, •'• , ".„.,•- v.:./ ,,'4.•',t,:„. 1'".."4 ""- t.."1- ,!. ''`-:.-*,•*" ••ta•,tt't • - --•-t •, --I----- JI •'t-: .4. '0." '...''''''' -If ,''r ',..1;''' ''''1,-.; '4.• •`Litti. .:7: .4,'; ..-.' 1,"+. •. ,.." ''':', ;,•1...:'.' . - ;.' ". - ' .• , ...^1t. g ____. ,,i. ., •!...., ,,,.:,, ..,,,. ,„ ,,,, ..,,..,,;,.,,,,,. I i..„. .._ :.,... 0 , ,;......;`r a• a.,-. .. ..._... , ..'..;,•., ,',' . : 'a '. •i ' ' . - ". .7."-;;. .. • , • '. '' i;- -11'4% r 0 • ' '''''- '-' -,,--- -.J. '"--;'''.7 77 7.47> . .*“..'*•''''':',:' ....' .-:.%.1:,4r:L.17+''. ... ;,.. . „ . . ;. ,', ....,•••:-, 6 .,. . . R.• „4,i 4 ,;„...,,.. ..„, , ,t'-. ' 0',; ' .. r"• . . 4 •.:•; , ''' ..:,' - 1 q 1 c.? ,. ,..7- ..., ,.. .. ;.:-:$, , , . ....::.. -.,....,r , .. _i.., , , -1-' - ,... ,.: ..... ,...,..• . ; ,.. ' • '.--. • 1if; ..i,t: ...• , ,,.4,1. •; •1 ''•' .' -' ,t•, Vvottt" • ,-^ , •.• \ t.'• :'•. ,:,•• : :.'t'..'..'".• -. • , .- ,,o ,i,t, i ,. otottio,t., ,• , t. • • • --.. - . .. -' t • ..' 4.4..0.' • t: ' ..;,'„.-.'•' '''''. t` 1 r.:'$ 'L irii t ... .-.. •,'' 4-, - • 1•'''' „,•:'' 116 tkekmeort.tor . ., ,. ... . ,., 5 -1 L.-- .4; 1 EN "Li4G . . / - ' ' •- \ '. A'• 121 VitiVett (P4'kil° .: . ,-,-,., A. 4 4 a 44'' .. •.,1 4" '14 Ir i • 9', M;••• ' ',,, '•'.• .' ', *,,... vow•it.itr..o) .- e-. • • azi^9141.11i1fA644., . .4-t,',*: 1, 4.* .•'11",, • , .1 "o'i, ..' Ile 4,„ro) Fr el.v.v.t.pietttool , .•' ,.% . : .., ''' •.t• • 1 •t: . , , . , ,, ...........,.... tiq, 4..•At,' ,,. -, , - - ,, ., L:Kt,:'..:.,*'-'.....!. ',L..' :.- - ,',. , '...-,,,'v\ . ';Jo '- -" --i.Z.2417,4 , . • 0 ,i. ',,,,,,,:,, ='=,..4.1,4‘0.4 4.1814'zi,e,4„:',!1). , 1.\ ‘, t' %.......,;•<'''...,...„ ' 40. ' '1 1: . ,...-:<,-A, ,.. na 150`3061 000' • ': " •.:•' ' 4,. lb ,,,,,4...", .1 , • y, ,- . m2Ltarall7 0 . , •-:ok ,.,7•=1'',,. .1' ,.'''.•' , i \...ttie;'''.:1'k '' •.t,,,.• ,'.'1,,,' 41) tans tinter eawirt rtakired Figure 13 Lend Ute Concept .4 ,. ., Lake Grove Town Center Matt El .:, „ .,::1',.:, .,.. . •;,, 0 J tine 30,2003 a . . . - . . . a'.. , -. • ,„ ": :*. •''''",.. I'' 010 • 4% ,,-' 1.. ,. '',',,,v.( 2.4, ; - ..4... ,., .*-..' •. ., „.,. 4", • ;4-...,.'" .. '.:- %. '' .. ....'. - ' ' .,',... '‘ ''' :•'1, ..;1 , ; .;: ' 4, `• : a ..--• ,.. .i• ."..."1 :' '1,, ' , ' . , '-. •,'t4 - '. ,•.•„t.., . 4 ' *,..,,4,..1 ';V.. .1 ,' .'.1 .'....' '44 ' 4 i' ..,, , .. , i ' .; . . \ ..t :,..':.. ,, .•4 '4. ',.I '.' • ,"'',A.4 4 a ': '•.`-• t, •V . '."' • , , ,4,,' ' • c ,„ '. 4 ,, • t„ . :," .,,* tt ••t. • ,,•' 4.', , . ••,' '::'1' J 4 t)( ���' � i�_ of R "'a %� � J" a,� _ • �' �, -._ y�. 4 l y,� , � "N'- .J f. /: ••l! h? p]: .�. i.r .•,; aN , ,. a..� .. .�.. 1 _�f '�4. +J� rP . r�. J .,J t J1 ;.:',' '''', : ,.:,.,::"..::.^....',.„......., Land Use Concept Issues and Alternatives «" •i N'® , The following issues were identified during the community discussions regarding the Land Use Concept i " J map. It is suggested that the following be used as a checklist during the implementation phase of the ® ., a'a J y Town Center plan process. rip ; Table 2,Land Use Issues and Alternatives µY, • Issue Comments and Alternatives 1 H 1\, Strong preference expressed by the community to not require a • °• " Residential component to mixed use In the VMU residential component to mixed use In the VMU zone ` • areas—required or optional An alternative exists to require mixed use only al corner percale,I.a. ' those at the intersections of cross streets and Booties Ferry Road, . • This is hew Idea offered by the consultant team••II grew out of the • a '' q.r',' community input but was not an explicit proposar discussed in the A •',r,, a •" 4 Village Mixed Use/Residential—Parcels with the Workshops. 0 , •• M "R'designation Would need to include resldential: • The Intent Is to ensure that ke`r parcels that border residential areas r• " ,, either all residential or mixed use With residential, Include compatible uses,but add the flexibility to develop as mixed use, Most of the parcels With the`R"designation on the 6-25.03 draft of the ,,,,i map are currently designated for multi-lamely uses __ • r' • Split Zoning-12 parcels(out of the 156 parcels In Property owners were concerned and generally opposed to spilt ® g'r ; , • ' the study area)have more than one designation- • Spspugnallone. , ritlo concerns included uncertainly about how lend use reviews Corridororr VMU along the cross street and BUSlness Would be different from today and reduced visibilityto Interior areas of ' «N` + along Booties Ferry Road. their parcels ® •;� •ri.• `'' . ' ' Two potential designations were explored Business Corridor and `•' Employment Corridor. a The community generally favored keeping the properly es Business .y ® 1 "�•. Corridor h • East area of Morchanlile Village • The alternative of Employment Corridor could(in the very long term)lead N � ' to redevelopment of the parcel for 3-4 story office and mixed use at this • gateway to the Town Center. Transit service is good al this corner. ur + • The alternative of Business Corridor could(In the very long term)load to a new retail center at live properly ® T f Community comments: ' ', ri « :r 1' • Concerned about adding this parcel late in the Town Center process Write side of Booties Ferry,north of Kruse Way • Unfair to add an competing retail property Into the study erect •, +« ti-- :,' (Gregg/Avery property)"This property Is currently Interest In a library �•, outside the Town Center boundary Some cor,imon's were supportIve of conimorclal zoning • ▪ General reuogedien!',at this property has a rnlnlioriship to the town ® Center area 9 t Community comments, + • A concern about parking If residences are added,and,a question about " , ," Village Mixed Use along Rod Cedar(north bide) Why the street currently has parking on only one side. "' '',, ' and north on Booties Court(on West Side) Should be commercial. � " � Leave It as Vilingu btlxed Use,but lake it oft freeing Bnohos 1sorry q s 1 • Higher level of commercial near the street,stepping down toward ',;.a, neighborhood k Communitycornniente ® "'« • Baiter to have it In the study area. 0 ;•• ,' • Parcel al the northeast confer of Bryant end Continue as a publib use •, Sunset Historic public space,possible site for a pArk,library,etc • • Ehtranco to the grove a,';, • A publla use for kids,a ,a wain-Wily center- a ••• • • Preserve bulldinglsitu 1 . Community Commutes Parcel an Boenas Perry south of the lake(trove I Mixed t.ontinrhrnls about Whether this area aheuld be VMU or BC General support for inclusion In study area Shopping Center • Maus s Gentwrilank of Aihutica parcel should he Business Corridor S " . 4 baeauso of need and don 1 wane II to be Mora restrictive .a.y. - Lake Grove ToWd Connor Plan ni -� Jam 30,2003 a' a`,n , a..1 •. s' ! i.e t . : 4a 9 1, —. aJ 'ti 1 r .1• •1 ti r•+ y J ^ y - 1 .1 MI' 4- •I 18 r- +u(L •" - ..L._•t M1q pY %. � y L a 1 = W J. .,„4:,0 Concepts for Comprehensive Plan „le and Community Development Code(LOC Chapter 50)Implementation ' i ® Comprehensive Plan ^•,, Implementation of the Lake Grove Town Center Plan begins with Incorporation of the plan into the 'II'.® City's Comprehensive Plan. One approach would be to amend the Comprehensive Plan to include the ® Lake Grove Town Center Plan as a Special District Plan,essentially adding a new Comprehensive Plan -• "e - chapter that is specific to the Lake Grove Town Center, This is how other special district plans have "4 't,.'' 0 been implemented in Lake Oswego. 4- •y"4 4) The elements of a new Comprehensive Plan chapter for Lake Grove Would include: ..t A 1. Background-an overview of the Lake Grove Town Center and the planning process that created _0': *4:.' .a-1, • • the plan. J + Y 2, Goals and policies—policy statements that include the Lake Greve Town Center guiding principles, r , , ® and capture the Intent of the land use,transportation,parking,and urban design concepts. As with ° w other special districts,the policy section would describe the land use designations created for the 4 • A ® Town Center in order to provide enabling policy language for the code, '• 0 3. Recommended action measures—items that require follow-up and/or on-going attention by the ', :,V. Y t ;h, ® City,including the funding and marketing strategies for Lake Grove. , ' ® y ® 4, Maps and diagrams—These would Include the overall town center concept,land us concept,and bicycle facilities and transit, The town =^�, ar"' transportation diagrams for streets, pedestrian facilities, y ... ® center concept and land use concept would be noted as illustrative, Le. that parcel-specific r ' ,. -tj designations are Indicated on the official Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps. Similarly, r., transportation diagrams would be noted as guiding and subject to site-specific refinements, 1 I '0 s ® µ. d R'. . ,, .® In addition to creating a new Special District Plan for Lake Grove,the City will also need to conduct a . .i cover-to-cover review of existing chapters for text arid maps that need to be updated. The Goal 12 el Transportation chapter will need some amendments to update the Transporation System Plan(TSP) ` " project lists and maps of facility Improvements. It may also be advisable to establish/review policies for .' "• ® key transportation strategies such as access management,shared parking,and connections between "=•,a ` parking lots. ® Commtinity Development Code(LOC Cheptee 50) With the Comprehensive Plan amended to establish the legal framework and broad policy for the Town "•,, 4) Center, there are at least three options for how the Community Development Code(CDC)could be , ® changed to implement the Comprehensive Plan l':• ` , 1. Update the existing base zones(mainly General Commercial)-this option would establish special )F Y regulations(uses,development standards,design guidelines)that apply uniquely Within the Lake ,..^ "' Grove Town Center, but are codified Within the context of the existing commercial zones code, ., ® x,r e -, LOC 5011. ' '.. F ® 2. Establish hew zones and design guidelines—this option would create two new chapters of the CDC called the"Lake Grove Town Center Zones" and "Lake Grove Town Center Standards", Thia approach was used for the West Lake Grove Design District 1 �" ® t.u . • " { , • Lnbo Grove loWS Cotter Plan , y. Ju no ss,21103 Ell ® + " lgyAA yty� q+ � + ' a., F ,'' tl •`. , �' „ ,' , h'#' � r R ,\.�.�'r �:. .'� A ' M r N r a a•i < i � .• ' .,.K'' ti" .. ...:+ v<..,�,n,' ...i.a1_� r ,• - h,w`>•!. ,.. ,. . ! ..' C .,-..r .., e . ... . •�; d i., ® rf; 15N,�1 -r ® a' 0 '` ' 3. Establish"overlay"zones for lake Grove—this approach Would supplement the base zoning with A r` 4 uses and development standards that are combined with the base zoning(e.g,Village Mixed Use , overlay zone). Lake Oswego currently has fairly limited use of overlay districts; the Willamette 0 rwi Greenway Overlay and the Sensitive Lands Overlay. ` Of the three options described above,option 2(establish new zones)Is the most compatible with the ' h existing format and usage of the CDC. Option 2 Is the same codification method used for West Lake .1. o; ':h, Grove,Which citizens have cited as a good example of community involvement in code preparation. 0 ,, .,y 0 ^ +,�• Establishing new zones will require additional attention to parcel-specific mapping. As currently drawn, ® �, ' this approach would potentially place more than one zone on a number of properties in Lake Grove, ® , sometimes called"split zoning". Dual zoning would apply to 12 out of 156 total parcels. et ® .+ 1A For the purposes of this report,the option 2 approach is used as a way to organize the substance of the • a'•, implementation Ideas, ''a , ,a�" Potentiri Zones �^I♦ my ` 0 The following table suggests four neW zones to be considered in implementing the Town Center Plan, ' , t Each Is described in terms or which Concept Plan design type It Implements,a working title, a draft ® ' purpose statement,and notes about similarities to existing zone designations in the CDC. For ease of ,. , , Implementation and review,the new zones have been based on existing zones. The purpose statements ® ' " listed below follow the general semantic form of other commercial zones in the City. ® ' Y � ' Table 3,Potential Zones 0 =1 +` v •1 I Plan M, lierldng Title or Potmtlal PUrpow$fntement Notes ® va r"• rr�giln Tyne ! New Zoned r To provide lands for commercial and 0 a .- mixed use adNAios nuppyng n broad r Business Corridor Loam Grove General range or goods and services for the This zone as similar io thu existing ® y ", :IS _• Conimercinl(LOCO) General Commereief� r a Town Center and the surrounding ® .� a '•. conmtunity. " ii, To provide a M k Of employment " This done is slir'ttr to tile + Employment Lake Grove Mitred Una Intensive off co locally serving mien and Campus Research and • °• r, • Corridor Erripioyment(LGMUr) high•densdy fosidenllni thrill Is Development zone,but tailored to r " ' Capntor. el Ransil m,d Ihu T4Wr, Ind north end of the Town Center. To provide a nee al appropriately tailed a commercial,office and reeidenlial anus This acne'a it hybrid of the ® i • Labe Greve Mixed Use Mal(i)serve both the Town Center and General Commercial And r Coitmlurcul(LOMUC) ad,aceni he ghbothbads.(2)result n Neighborhood Commercial V lags M xrd Use contppalib a Irenntlbns to ed acetyl zoned,and tailored pedestrian F Alternative the lake neighborhoods in order to'6nng the oriented development end the 4 a Wye Wage Mixed Udo town Cantor and neighborhoods Idea al"bringing the Tewn Center (LOVMUI Iagnlnar'(3)pro do the hi neighborhood ®hush degree and adjacent nab '' ' y,_ U U b 01 Center design a the Nether' Townwn Corder. +. Optand opbond 1•�„• ' .t ' i Lake Grove Village i This opt,at Moto now zone.Its 0 . 1 Canton(LOVC) purpaer would La tiilo ie a now desigrialon that ie ® • x ri , ' a , rementary Schee' To prov de lands for public!uses and specific(a the Town Centel + or ettAhiieh a Centel tat civic uses servmd plans Intent.The cbtrehl darting L. Lake Oboe the Town Center Aron" Oh these lactates are R•r 6 • ' �." Canrncvs most offce arid trinadular WWI ® « `, • t;a' + 2 Lnko Grave Ni, 5 2 This opt,an edsentotly Welt the (a liar nodhebal of past alike) r , pnpi,e (LOR 15) tablet rig low density renldmibal 4bning. •pad Pr_pubes I'urml:nne + 'a Pubua:uses(numbly aliewedl wends he )nlumbntAry ached parcels) ® » "encoutnged"ar^reeamMendad"tb Muhl.h the V lingo Canter Mod throddh 1 ® +' `.a cbmpret.onstvd tine policy and iti A tinkarent al Pie beau lion') oes-The current code d hot ha,* 1 This s ateame ddm lh s ,irMnt fl 7 : . " Resident al)1t.Ua teat'bees.ly 11.0 parpctie sletereem R•U d for the residentel 'ti 'etas tlnslgltadah Lake Grobd ToWtt Catitot Plan• 0 r:-, :u Juno 30,1003 r i&A,(0 h, ' ♦ a••�''~ 1'a "' a .‘ • r',4 -0`•..,o a ' �k r M ' � "'r r " ari. � +" -•+)A .1 ,. .al .c ; ``.i,4 4! {g t• 4 r 4 . :r ',•:;:-, :d '' ,. , .r• ' ". + • :`` Y, - ® Prototypes in the Mixed Use Commercial Zone 0 The Town Center process has included discussion of building"prototypes" In order to advance the '' " 1- 0® concepts of compatibility,integration,and planned transitions between the Town Center and residential , ..,.„-,,, ® use, The prototypes are a tool to establish transitional design standards that progress from Boones R; ® Ferry Road (most urban standards)to the low-density residential boundaries (most residential-like ~'',‘ standards). Urbsworks,Inc developed the prototype concept,as shown in the figure below and In the Technical Appendix.The following is a generalized example, ' ' I` r or Ivry l •�•� .._ d ", ' h' t _' ° + ,r 1 v, U,•M 1 I, i Village Street Corner Retail 1, k • 61 t • y • ' ® I„) '`i t'' r Village Mixed Use ,:..., . r ® �At� C 1'ifi^rt`I+ S ,IYJ � ' jAfili! Village Dooryard Retail and Llve/Work •' a y Y , ac.. ,. , • • v�4 it{[p`plJp` •a Y , ., . „, }j,r .L at.• , .. .,.,... .. .r.. . i?'' p • -11 a ,f'w Residential -Compatible Mixed Use d r", ® :• Figure 14 Building prololypes Diagram t • + ® .. Potential Uses ' 'i. 0 The following Is generalized summary of potential uses to be considered for each of the mixed use ' " ', :._` ® ToWn Center zones. As with all the Ideas in this report,the list of potential uses is to be considered i ': 0 preliminary and subject to further research and discussion, - 0 ry t� 0? ® The table on the next page lists,by new zone,what existing zone should be used as a starting point for • Y ' 0 the use list,and,what modifications to that existing use list should be considered, This format lends M ' 1,r 4. ,4 a itself to comparing the proposed use lists to the existing code. ' / ' 4 " - a _„y ' ® i ® Lake OroVe Town Colter plan ® Juno 10,2003 r " 0 " N • t N. t 17 1 w 1 t' r +. t 1' to AA13 1z 1 ,,,i'',„ , 4 r `r r + ' Y 7 , r o, 0 a t ', ® • `n Table 4,Draft Uses for Potential Zones ® ,, ,-. Lake Grove General Commeidel The General Commercial(GC)zone is the starting point for the use list for Lake Grove General Commercial. ® .,g t r . :• Changes to existing GC to consider. " • Auto sales—change permitted to prohibited. • Restaurants with drive-up windows—change conditional to:new ones prohibited,and,existing ones retained as legal ', , " conditional uses. . • Mortuaries—change permitted to prohibited, • Car washes—change conditional to'new ones prohibited;and,existing ones retained as legal conditional uses, ''r r 9 • Equipment rental,and equipment service/appliance small engine—change permitted to permitted as accessory use. ® s i' ' + ' Leke OrpVa.Mixed Uee SrnpfoynioM , .., "+ „ . .,.'.+ 0 i ;': The Campus Research and Development(CR&D)zone Is the starting point for the use list for Lake Grove Mixed Use '• Employment. ® t a .. '•.r..'w• Changes to existing CR&D to consider ® vi. • Special residential uses—change prohibited to permitted, ® r +a tl' }r • Markets under 26,000 Sq,ft.,specialty toed stores,and,retell sales over 20,000 sq.ft.—change prohibited to permitted. • Service to buildings,cleaning&exterminating—change prohibited to permitted. •• e; • Hotels/motels,hospitals,and ambulance service—change prohibited to permitted. ~ •• Light manufacturing and manufacturing-change permitted to prohibited. v 'take t36YV t,j`I #'$p Gommb �q(„ s,..:avr4•*,• ,,,;.;A ' . i" . : v "I' •xX I • The GC zone is the starling gelid for the use list for Lake Grove Mixed Use Commercial. Note: It Is assumed that the prototype 0 .:':. concept will be applied In the LGMUC—additional use provision may be Identified as appropriate in specific prototypes. Changes to existing GC to consider: ®49 , • R-0 residential—do not allow on ground floor except in prototypes 4-6. + ■ Market over 25,000 sq,ft.—change permuted to conditional. ® . f x. • Retail sales over 10,000 and 20,000 sq,ft.(two use categories).-change permitted to conditional. ® . x r, Auto sales-change permitted to prohibited, i . • Restaurants With drive up window—retain conditional status far existing,and change to prohibited for neW. ® 7 • Mortuaries—change permitted to prohibited. • '" • Car Wash—change conditional to prohibited. ' • Vehicle repair shops—retain conditional use status for existing,and,change conditional to prohibited for new, .' ' • Auto service stations-retain conditional use status(or existing,and,change conditional to prohibited for new. ® .', • Hotels/motels-change permitted to conditional, •" • Hospitals—change permitted to conditional, y rt ,'Y ♦ . '. 1 � M4. ifQ�V(I�Ue ir +0<ai; 1�'�$:• ...f ".1. '„ 47 +5 r yv1;�• ' _ . , 0 . The parcels are currently zoned R•7.5 and PP,where major public facilities(e.g schools,libraries,parks)are conditional uses. ' w Options available to the City; I. Create a now Lake Wove Village Center zone that allows public uses either outright or conditionally,The Planning Corrnnixhion would also need to determine if other uses(such as residential)Would be allowed,and at What denshlee, 0 v a:•. 2. Retain the 124.5 and PF zoning and encourage publio uses through comprehensive plan policy. ® .,' ";, ib 1 t ' 1 ® y.:.'. 120.k1 i ,.:a: . , k} :+ , 'a, 'n, ,, .;s • JI w�&ini4' . , a • r B Na change from existing. `" I Q ' � , '.* r , a Lake •Grove ToWn Center Plan p"•, • t EAJUne30,2003 k • a 1 ILA( 2) • 1 Y .a r ,O P N •Y `A -t• .M1 '1• 1 :1: y ` L I ® i '' , 0 by `+. 0 x. � MY 0 '- ® IV. Transportation Network '• : � ,.t0 ' • ® Streets and Alleys a 0 4.. .. • `, ® Summary of Existing Conditions ' • • 0 The primary roadways serving the Lake Grove Town Center are Boones Ferry Road and Kruse Way, ' 17 n F which function as key arterials within the City. Both are classified as a Major Arterials within the City " • • r ,- 0 providing access to both downtown Lake Oswego arid Interstate 5. The recently completed Btiones .a;, Ferry Road Corridor Plan defined an overall vision for Boones Ferry Road through the Lake Grove Y'1• „ • Town Center and outlined the specific street cross-section needs of the facility for the 20 year horizon. tl r: This plan was used as a basis for the refinements and additional recommendations outlined In this '"• report to support the overall Lake Grove Town Center Pl,an, } .. at ® •ce?. Circulation to and within the Lake Grove Town Center Is also supported by a network of collector and ,1 ® local streets including Galewood Street, Hallmark Drive, Mercantile Drive, Red Cedar Way, Douglas r ' 0 Way, Lanewood Street, Oakridge Road, Reese Road, Lake Grove Avenue, Quarry Road, Firwood "'• 0 Road, Bryant Road, and Madrona Street, Signalized Intersections on Boones Ferry Road currently " 0 exist at the Kruse Way, Mercantile Drive, Oakriripe Road-Reese Road, end Flrwood Road-Bryant ., • Road intersections. The remainder of the Intersections and access points along Boones Ferry Road ..• 0 are currently stop-controlled on the minor street approaches, x` '' • 0 Table 5,Existing Transportation Facilities and Amenities i L n r , . ® ¢toes Poslod On 3treot 'TANA , 8iraot Classification Bcotfon' spocd Sidewalks Bike Lanes Parkintr 06i.ocae •I, _RondBoonos Ferry Major Arterial 4 Lance" 30 mph (sorrto gBoth aps) Some No Route 37 rt, des Y-•„, . ®• 0ntse If Way Major Arterial 4 bivlde Lanasd 30 mph Both Sides olf StrPelheet No Route 38 ., ® Mercan8ie Local Street 2 Lanes NP West Side No No No •1'"4.g. slis` Onus (Partial) .. Wa Cedar Local Street 2 Lanes NP Both No No No �rii ' y Douglas Way Local slrool 2 Lanes NP Partial No Nu No : ' ® 44, Lanewood " „'• Looal Street 2 Lanus NP North Sida No Yos No Street ,�. • a +` oakridge Local Street 2 Lanes NP Pathan No No No ® Road North Side ••1 p Reese Road lr NeighColborhood 2 Lanes 25 inch Both Sides No No Route 37 ". „ ', 1' ,i ® 4Lake Grove Neighborhood 2 Lanes 26 mph Both Sides No Yes Route 37 •' .1; , .;; • Ayenue Collector Nalghborhoud Quarry Road Colloclot 2 lanes 25 mph West Side No No No +. rewood local Street 2 Lanes 25 mph Both Sides No No No „r ® Road ," '!. 0 Bryant Road Major Gbllottor 2 Lanos 25 mph East Side No No No a '�1 • Madrona Nulghboriibbd 2 t men 25 Mph No No No No ti 14'' .w.. Shoat Collector —1Reales cross section Milo vicinity or Boonos Ferry-Wad ;' 0 "All sigrinllced rnletsactfunn dee curteally live Wad r • "r 0i • rad Lake Crow)7oWn Cantor Plan ,; tax • 0 Jilin)30,2003 w • • e.\ ; • A, y.' t, . I '-'4. `a rf r n n t' Lr ,,..c t y� 1;. •�• ro a �a r. r • i' , ,';'• .p 1 4 ;A P i.t tc •l K S • i e' ah, • k � -.i ' -• xr:: .....,'._ �.. "..,f t ,J -n "�...'I. ;;`. ,'f.a, a i; « .. -r.�'a, ..... 1 -It .. 'k', r-. •t 4 -1• t ® 1 1 n i l 4 1. fro • : •da Summary of Plan Elements—Stoats and Alleys 0 'I e r Through the discussions with the public during the design process of the charrette,several concepts to • '• improve Town Center connections were developed. These included additional vehicular connections ® , t.:.- ' In the form of alleys or new streets. A pedestrian network of Improved or new sidewalks closer to the Ci '7 business corridor was discussed, with designated pedestrian paths Extending into the adjacent 0 6 neighborhoods, It was also concluded that the bus network relocate bus routes and stops within the 0 ,' Town Center to center on Boones Ferry. • .. . 5 Speed control concepts were also a focus during the charrette, Because the direction of the Town w, Center process was to stay with the recommended five-lane street of the Corridor Plan,the following ® 's 11(i' speed control concepts were discussed: ,,, a•fr • Number of intersections; 5 '•. - ; • Traffic signal synchronization; ® , ' • Street edge treatments which included enclosing the pedestrian space with tall trees, 2-3 story • 1, buildings, gateways and landmarks, and pedestrian amenities (benches, seating walls, lights, f:- baskets, banners,etc.); r `^ ' • Intersection design, such as patterned surfacing and paving change, raised intersections and speed tables,and lights In pavement; ® i • Focal point,monuments;and 1� . `;' e• w„ • Street design,reviewing lane width and median placement, ,r As part of the Lake Grove Town Center a series of additional connections are proposed in order to ® • ' facilitate circulation for all modes within the town center area, These new links are Intended to Increase ®, f "- a ;• " " connectivity and provide alternative circulation routes for travel within the town center area;minimizing • the need for local walking,biking,and vehicular trips to use Boones Ferry Road, It is Intended for these 0 ` , '':' new connections to be designed as small-scale local streets or alleyways. ® f h .. "� The following elements outline the proposed recommendations to the existing street system to support w ' x'` the creation of the Lake Grove Town Center,see Figure 15:Transportation Network-Streets&Alleys, ® y. Previous Recommendations to Carry Forward: ® '.•' t• i.} • Develop the cross-section of Booties Ferry Road as outlined In the Booties Ferry Road plan(66- 5 7" ;r foot curb-to-curb width including four 11-foot travel lanes,a 12-foot center turn lane/median,and 5- 5 foot bicycle lanes), See streetscape section of this report for additional options for sidewalk widths. 0 : 1 " •• • Develop an aligned signalized intersection at Lanewood Street and the Lake Grove Elementary '"', School access(from the Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan), ' ,,,k' • Timing plans will be developed to commensurate With the desired posted speeds throughout the .', corridor. ® A • Traffic signal system timing and coordination will bo used to create and complement the desired , • wr ' corridor characteristics and operations. x ,r ® 7 -y ® 6 " Also Included in the Booties Ferry Road plan ore recommendations such as. • • Access spacing standard of 300 feet, 5 ;r'u • intersection and crossWalk treatment, ® « • Specific site reconfiguration. 0 S f a ;•. • parking Issues recommendations. 0 .• „ i4 0 ' . Lek()orovo Town conts Mari• June 50,3005 f 0 , . • ' 5 • ' . ,A AA(3z) { r.. n r - t ,1,1" 'l.N9 1' ;ff� -, ', a '�' '' vw . tw l4 h • N ,o c 1., .r' w 0 r1 Lake Grove Tovtlil Center M e1 °a 0 _ :: TraMrpartatfari Network - Streets &Alleys 6"30.03 • _. w 441 IS 1 01—❑ rP' /8-5 •'a````„� / 00(nbl NlVLa.* El wort �• Y •t v. l R .' • r4 I "d M `c��•` toads F��.6lldilkckdnednll k d, • 4.(4 p• wiripit M• . h u ® L �LJ ICJ ' �: /�y y�■r7 11I4 +'� , 1 0 " .t „ry w.Ay1 rwk t :"-1,...:-rn :Iri �:. jI •J 1 i1 ly l:1 Ii - 1 . .. . „ • , +., �.'*. ' •-: • 1 Alb Miry U, %+ P4 '' x.ry,�" �f©. ~ f r. . . iiNI El �, �` h ��Y . f. t' . ' aM ,. 4, V\, .' 6e F$ 1`.. A 1� ,.._ id, : 1-7-! 4° 6 " �i . ri . . .1. 1. '.. W.1i-to;8 - +\tr�. a 1 ; 4 ' •.*.A fl, ,''''. :',:::,:';?,:',.' ':.:::', .,,.41 .tt V. '.% , (:,....\ r 1 Cr .. _ ,gin.,« y,. �,. , P a 474 „c t4 �o7 ; k, . p '�J' d •1�1,, �j "� r r a .1` plpUFd 1G.Tron6Odridtlorl Network. y f +ork•Streets and Alleys t Ladd Grove 7dWli Cartier Ptah 153 a, • June 10,2003 v.,• 1. y Y • ,.� � a :j 1 ' Y • °. 1 tl11 x d a••s 11 t AA'(6 1 .:.�« f.• t :� °t 4•`,.0 ,t. 1 q �''•tt .9 • t 1' :4 4/: r. , . -."1 ti 4 'V f t N .a rr. '. 1•. { ' 4' ® 4. r .hr • • Illumination. • Utility treatment. e ,. • Transit. 0 ' e ; • Redevelopment right-of-way dedication. Lake Grove Town Center Recommendations, • New connections: a „ - Realignment of Lanewood Street adjacent to the Lake Grove Elementary School to form a new K signalized intersections for Vehicular and pedestrian access(Public Local Street). a i J . a. - North-south connection between Douglas Way and Oakridge Road,Just west of Lake Grove • Elementary school(Public Alley), ® , ' ,r'•, - Extension of Hallmark Drive to the realigned Lanewood Avenue to provide access and circulation u'.1 for the land uses In this vicinity west of Boones Ferry Road(Public Local Street). '" - North-south connection between Lanewood Street and Lake Grove Avenue(Public Alley)• +0 ' 'c • - East-west connection between Madrona Street and Sunset Drive(Public Alley). :. f •r,;. • A future signalized access and pedestrian crossing of Boones Ferry between Reese Road and • ,.,.I ° y Bryant Road• The Intent for this element is to provide an additional signalized access and crossing A . ' in order to develop a protected pedestrian crossing location and signalized access to the properties 0 located on both the east and West sides of Boones Ferry Road, The additional traffic signal will 0 : "-''- also help to develop a regularly spaced traffic signal system to allow for signal coordination and 4 A4-1` progression in order to preserve capacity along Boones Ferry Road and manage vehicular travel speeds at an appropriate level. The timing and Implementation of this enhancement will require �' a coordination with redevelopment of properties on both the east and West sides of Boones Ferry ` 4" Road In order to develop one centralized focal access point that will serve the majority of the f parcels in the area via off-street circulation connections. The City has indicated that It would tr' �,?- ^ consider this signal and crossing when a number of circumstances are in place,Including: ® 1 Au ,40 r. .. t, a. Pedestrian activity In this vicinity Increases to be closer to the threshold Where a pedestrian , a f signal warrant is met; '` ;, b. The existing access points are consolidated to result in fewer and more coordinated accesses; 48 ''' c. Coordination with adjacent property owners results In the ability to circulate from the southern ®l :• ° Y t' ,' alley up to a connected network of private circulation on the north side of Boones Ferry Road. ® .r a y 0 .A : ' t / .��• �yY �, �,r�# , ri ,,;,f' 0 ''.4.,. ., 14, •.„ I 1 r• f"f -.i•. `,'''•!.Y• ., •/4 1•a' r ✓`f'!r l' , ® • ,f 11 / F i f A 5 • y • N . f lit ,"1 ">;e� 1 th • '�1 r i',Iflt •�i, i •II,, t .' v , •b' ~ A t1Ad' ,~ f' 0 ., M , Yldurr Ia IItustration or New crossing Near Riccardo s ® .I.gil Lake Wove town Cantor Plan '` Juno IS,2003 A' -• P. 0 1 a " • ft 8 .. 1 ,. :a I •..'q "t - r. , '1. •.- ",-: %' •' z ' +>ia ,m yrr ` ® • A new policy for connection of driveways within the Town Center. The Streets and Alleys map s ,:0 ; includes symbols(small arrows) that illustrate"Proposed Driveway Connections", The intent of ® � these connections is to provide more options for circulating between properties,which will have the impact of reducing reliance on the public street system,particularly Boones Ferry Road. The r4.® properties on the south side of Boones Ferry Road,between McDonalds and Bryant Road are an ', IF example of how a connected system of driveways and alleys serves the circulation pattern, The r locations,and numbers,of connections is approximate. Connected driveways should be required a , wherever practicable, :e Issues and Alternatives for Streets and Alleys ' "'• " ® The following issues and alternatives were raised during discussions with the public: •'y 0 • As noted in Chapter II of this report,the 5-lane section , .r. 4, ." le for Boones Ferry Road was a recurrent theme and a • ., :,'; ., ® concern of many participants, Similarly, concern ,; •• 'f" ? ' " a regarding traffic on neighborhood streets is a on-going " `fl „,`j"•a S,. issue In the community, s,.1"1. ,.,,s i VIM ® • The charrette generated a more extensive pattern of 4, ■ �p streets end alleys, Specifically,new streets and a new �' ,•r -- r�. 4 ' connection to Boones Ferry Road were designed in the a :,r.,t , ;,--t.y a area of the Village Center(1.e, Lake Grove Commons , 7,.. , 1,; �,." P ""r 'a ® and Elementary School). These streets were deleted r::: 1 .r"`"1;A`' " and/or changed to alleys and pedestrain connections „, R �,.,, �' xa' •°" ". :r t: ® through a combination of community input(in February �,..•w _- A, :. and April) and through discussions by the Planning Figure 17,Street Network es Designed In the , a ' r ® Commission. Charrotto e` ,!, *•" ® • The proposal for connected driveways raised questions regarding the need for such connections,and,what liability might be associated with traffic from q u 0 other properties. The concerns were coupled with statements of support for scenarios Where +. ' 7 ® connected driveways would allow customers to circulate to off-site parking locations, ". 0 • Comments were received that the specific location for the proposed alley at the rear of the Lake 1 ,. ® Grove Shopping Center should be along the south property line. Flexibility for the location of this •t• ' • e alley is Intended•-It should,however,align with Sunset Drive in order to avoid offset access points, Pedestrian Connections , , ,�.' I Summary of Existing Conditions i ,.I Within the Lake Grove Town Center,sidewalks currently exist ., q\ 0 along the extent of Booties Ferry Road, However,the existing ® pedestrian environment along the length of the corridor '., 4 • ,' w " •; suffers from non-standardized treatment. For example,some .; . , p �! , t t r ® portions of the sidewalk tilt toward the street With no buffer i3' . ...;"','",1 ,,'xn ±a 94 : , 0.' 9 between the pedestrian facility and Vehicle traffic. In other ; -, , r, :, y 6 areas, the pedestrian path is obstructed with utility poles ,i; ",`:..',. ' '* ". and/or trees In addition,many driveways and access points l t' i '• { � Example or Poorly. pedestnah Route in the ® exist along the corridor,creating potential pedestrian-Vehlcie tl' conflict points. Buffers between the pedestrian facilities and traffic flow on Booties Ferry Road are a, fib generally non-existent, Elsewhere in the study area,sidewalks are provided sporadically along certain 1• ,, • •, • ; collector and local streets that comprise the remainder of the existing transportation System, '• ° ,, p . • Lake Otiwe Town COntor Plan '. , June 30,2003 t. • . AA( 2) ' • '' y, •N 1':•' y r ,1 i y1~;1'\;)9 r, S , :IN - if •+ 1 .qr a " ,• 4, .ti ,.. - ,n -' ^' 4 .♦ 9/ As on Boones FerryRoad, the existingr�•''pedestrian environment along these roadways suffers from non-standardized treatment and lacks connectivity, ® • d 1 t Summary c'f Plan Elements ® =, A primary objective In the development of the overall Lake GroveTown Center Plan was to provide a • continuous,connected,safe,and aesthetically pleasing pedestrian environment throughout the Lake Grove community, A guiding policy for this planning process was the development of the transportation ® • ~ ` system and adjacent land use in a pedestrian-oriented and accessible manner in order to achieve a A ,.,., village community environment, where walking Is a viable and efficient mode of travel. Maximizing opportunities to increase and Improve the quality of pedestrian trips throughout the corridor was a key ' { strategy in the development of this plan. ; Ito L '' The resultant recommendations include both enhanced pedestrian facilities along Boones Ferry Road • .r as well as connections to and between Boones Ferry Road and the surrounding neighborhoods, Community Input revealed that these types of enhancements will provide useable options for those • people who wish to travel by non-vehicular modes but are prohibited from doing so under existing 0 conditions by the lack of car tectivity, convenience, and/or comfort. The pedestrian element of the r t o.. Lake Grove Town Center plan recommendations are shown in Figure 18:Transportation Network- Pedestrian and summarized below. '' ' • Ah•. New/Enhanced Pedestrian Facilities: ® ' The Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan called for minimum 5-foot sidewalks that are ADA accessible to be provided along the entire length of Boones Ferry Road within the study area. These sidewalks are • �; ' ` to be separated from the vehicular travel way by a minimum 3-foot landscape/streetscape buffer, The Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan emphasized that these are minimum acceptable standards,established r within the existingdevelopment and right-of-way constraintspresent throughout the studyarea. The ♦ '• ,,::' p g Y 9 f.,', plan emphasized that more generous sidewalks and landscape buffers be provided wherever possible ° •)w ,4 to enhance and encourage pedestrian travel within the Lake Grove area. While these recommendations provide the typical streetscape cross-section, consideration will be given to existing street frontage ® "''` ''• , landscaping and building location in the final design of pedestrian facility and landscaping Improvements. ® a'; „ In areas where It is deemed preferable,a meandering sidewalk could be constructed to accommodate ® ,''' existing trees,landscaping treatments,and other features.Options for wider sidewalks are discussed ® � . In the streetscape section of this report e M."' + New sidewalks(In accordance with City street design standards)will be provided on the following " 'n" local and collector facilities within the Town Center area in order to complete the pedestrian network and provide additional pedestrian connectivity; - Quarry Road-Carman Drive to GaleWood Street ' Mercantile Drive-Kruse Way to Boones Ferry Road ® •;. '1• .'". - Hallmark Drive-connect existing gap - Douglas Way-Quarry Road to Hallmark Drive ;r y: . Beasley Way to ' t • - Oakridge Road—Quarry Road to Boones Ferry Road . " r - - Bryant Road-Boones Perry to Sunset Drive ® '.+f ;t. • ' Several hew Pedestrian Ways are recommended as illustrated on the Pedestrian facilities Map. These paths will increase pedestrian connectivity and accessibility in the areas between the public street network. to ® "1 '28 Lake Grove ToWn Center plea ® j Jena 10,2bn5 �1 Y it f AA(3G), •4 ', A u ;,`t 4♦ ,r i "J i..}4 I it, I a t •1 * ;'. 1• I ,• � .. � ,�i x .ql a . • 7 ' ' ^�N• iM 5.1 f•• ., Ia. ,....7 •; ..;,. ae } w ,' I Y prr . 5 , ,r • • .. .. ,. i1 N ® ,ti 9 1 • , r. ,, ® o 0. La‹e Grove Town ei �er Fi4a� ' Transportation Network - Pedestrian �� earns • 1...-"• ® I1 c-P" - •`u1/4 rr, eanalo fdnri tr rarh 0 '1 . . 0 I: a t" •d. :�` L,.—/ •....•Rnpu,eda ialik wrath ®"tivor' ,o , ''" ® % I O,fir ! K �\ ....... 0• li•.. ' eta y �. {26—� 00.0.0 .,,,,,,a Ni6.,,,, Ty gt, 'a'4„:',.4'.:,'',14.t-.,.. ..„,.,.,,. '' .,.', ',,,: / ' . —1 irtisp.:4__.a...,,),..6,1rillii)tiallti Iflowthilmaite;•; ,,,„ •! ;• ..;-• ,o-'.•° A. . -. .. itta CP WISIIIIIIIMitiliviegRi. ' •,,,,..... ' ••• , '''''••••• - ''i Ilf-•12111.117*trilla r..50g".11.1.41griadhillii--!:''''''::‘,'In:.:::''',--"iii'..]:',,,..1:11°.T'I''''' I Wakl.rak Fromm 011iA� 16 t'l 0 ' aM rN. M .:} ' ..y '.•R`y ,'r,,110,P1 I PI h IC , , , � r 'II , " . • 111 1 t i •,' It r 1 ® t i� ". '•- a,. cm ; Iiii . li "i• ® II 0 I di 1 •1 y y,11 t �.,ry .p s I1_11 m--: . '-- : -. '. 0\s.,s, 1 N.. ...,...,A .. -...-..t ei ® ``.4'' y�r 1`.L.l.:14 11 rr r, +•'Y � �t 01.E 0'++' W , 15 •. i s \(, + 0 Nero lH PrantpodaUon Netwotk•Petleslrran �� • .g. Lake GroveToWlt Cooler Platt ®• Jueo 30120o5 i , y' 0 Y.'1 HA I7L) .,•r ',x1 I , •'1 '�1 4 �I4 •'"1 yl 1 Is * a ...�. .r " ., n .. ,.5_,n.I -'+ .. e... .a( •�'r.WT .. I _ . .: 4... "9 J`e�' '� I I Rfi ® .'f 1 • 1 Wi O ' t • Also identified through the Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan was the need for enhanced and more �0 ,, ,1,' convenient pedestrian crossings of Boones Ferry Road. Given the level of traffic flow along the i facility, signalized intersections provide the only realistic safe pedestrian crossing for many users 5� during most hours of the clay. '� ;,,'.:„1 1 ; - To address this issue and provide more frequent protected pedestrian crossings, the Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan called for the future cor,.truction of new signalized Intersection,including .0-..,„ enhanced pedestrian crossings,at Lanewood street across from Lake Grove Elementary School. .,• 1. As described above in the Streets and Alleys section,an additional signalized crossing is proposed between ® , Reese Road and Bryant Road, The implementation of this enhancement will require coordination with ' redevelopment of properties on both the east and west sides of Boones Ferry Road in order to develop ® one centralized focal access point that will serve the majority of the parcels in the area via off-street '® • , ', circulation connections—please see the discussion above regarding the circumstances required for this • ,.. . crossing. A .;.' Key Issues and Alternatives-Pedestrian Network ' t ' Key Issues included the following: ® it. • i_. • : -: i • The"Bridle Path"connection(running east-west from Reese Road near Bryant Road)raised comments ® ' ) about Impacts on land currently used for parking, Some community members suggested that pedestrian • ti''l ^ .y routes could mix with the connected driveways in this area. ® ",,,8 • ti • The pedestrian connection between Sunset Drive and the Bridle Path was a concern for many • ,I i participants. The alternative of aligning this path with Nola Court was strongly opposed, Some t, comments suggested that the connection was not needed because pedestrians could walk,as they 0 .,y 4 .1 i .a do now,400 feet to the east and then along Reese Road, Participants suggested placing it along the West edge of the church's parking lot or on the north side of Sunset, • )�:'.` f9 .0 Bike Facilities 4i 1 • , 11' Summary of Existing Conditions Field observations Within the study area revealed low levels of bicycle activity along the study roadways • t with little supporting Infrastructure provided. Designated bicycle lanes are provided on SW Boones Ferry ® - Road both to the north and south of the study area but there are no lanes along the facility between e'' Mercantile Drive and Madrona Street. Kruse Way provides an off-street shared pedestrlanlbicycle pathway • ' ;i 4'; along its north side. No other designated bicycle lanes are provided within the study area. The Boones ® , ,,` y. Y Fe ry Rboad CorKrorr e lan Wac llsd for therona tructi n of 5-foot bicycle lanes along both sides of Boones Ferry 4, Il' " " , The City's TSP calls for all arterials and major collectors to provide on street facilities and accommodations 0 fd I 11 for bicycles and require that bike lanes be added as part of any roadway Improvement project on these 0 ` i. facilities, As traffic volumes increase on these roadways,oh-street striped bicycle lanes Will help to maintain ® ' • i,, A the safety and comfort of bicyclists on the system and promote the increase use of cycling as a viable ® , ,r. • '` mode of transportation In addition,there Was vocal support through the town center planningprocess to r," P pp g '. • y enhance and facilitate bicycle travel throughout the study area via the development of a connected bicycle ® 4 •.",,.. • •4 system network and the provision of bicycle amenities. I` . .,. . . ist ,-... . ad Lake Grovn ToWri Cantor Plan JOG 30,2003 0 1 :n 1. 4 t "' ,\' A " . � Artt(32)a „ ? ! , ' , , N r • ^ ' en , , + ' : 4. C • }R ' I` 4 b 1 Y 'P • w sxtf K ... 1... .1:. 1 !.v_. . -k 1 ..a .. ".4 , ;)1 t ,,• ✓ f n ® , it ,. z. t :,.,' 0e Lake Grove Town Cenc;ero 'Ian • 1'rahopori atioll Network „ E511 e Facilities 8• -0 ® : n a , I '� n_^l.�; r ,,. ' uX _-° ryy. r ® I w 1.[ �'' _ S „JJz r/ h• ,G `•` t / t 1 r: %a: • A " r , i• l t t • _ ,• ',• / , 1.f. s• .f a•�X �M1� -ti .( ,, , , I 1�' >d ® I + SSL ti13 1' ` hd ),, I [1.1l, 1 I•• ��9 I� IJ j�1 r ti 1 1•"" I 1 "� . 4.41.'_ J J. •d a 1 ,„ ® 3 s r !� � a 2 • . l, ® _ X,,,' T III•. ' 1 1 .9.. fi. r .�''�{ Ir' `fir ! i"�; ,,,` F. e n` 1, , "'f •��' — DWI roues/Cmnlx�tent ;' r ' , mi , \ IO ;%'..14 y''... 1 . � y 4 . . .w > , 1 „ '"'�•. it '( ,. . •• rr 1 l tt f1 / f' f .. `1r1 Y i t • '•r tntipai•fb_•NU h M I,.a , • n•- A•• •. filgut919 trenspbrtallbn FncJlfla6.Mica Paddles 'X Lako t3PGVtl ToWIi Csrllor 131611 13` '. . ;+ JUne3012003 '. . • °'., ' 1 • e .1 .AA(82) •`• •• ;.1: _) , 1 4 . •; 6 1 • " •, '• w J .1 r 'fib'-I .. ' 21-• � .r .� { . , n � .�. ,. , . . L,.` r� •., ,„,'' V • , .,. , • ai ''''.•''.'.' 0 } ; .. Summary of Plan Elements 0 . ' ' ?� . " The Bike Facilities Map illustrates the proposed bicycle network for the Lake Grove Town Center, ® d „Y J ,•.l • Previous Recommendations to Carry Forward; e r• • The Scones Ferry Road Corridor Plan and the City's TSP call for the construction of 5-foot bicycle 1, ' lanes along both sides of Scones Ferry Road between Kruse Way and Madrona Street to connect • ''..',, the existing gap in the bicycle network. 4. .y • The City's Bicycle System Plan calls for on-street striped bike lanes will on the following facilities; • - Quarry Road y - Firwood Road(Waluga Drive to Boones Ferry Road) •. ; - Bryant Road 0 ' � �,, - Oakridge Road(Quarry Road to Boones Ferry Road) 0 '''. 0 k. Lake Grove Town Center Recommendations; • In order to complete the bicycle network and connect the on-street facilities,there are numerous 0 ". ";'`; collector and local streets,as well us alleyways and pathways proposed as part of the Town Center a� ' Plan that can be used as bicycle routes or connections throughout the Town Center area, These '+ connections are Illustrated as"Bike Routes/Connectors" on Figure 19. Although exclusive on- street bike lanes are not warranted given the forecast traffic volumes on these facilities, they 0 . ,} should be constructed with adequate shoulder and lane width to comfortably accommodate cyclists, All neighborhood streets serve as bike routes and the pavement Is kept in a condition that Is ' conducive to bike travel;Citypolicyis that not everystreet is marked for bikes, ® i.; 0 u, • Additional enhancements to the bicycle system,focusing on providing amenities for cyclists,will be 0 Included as part of future streetscape and urban design enhancement projects, Bicycle racks and % bicycle parking areas Will be provided Within the Town Center area to encourage cycle use and 0 '• ,'' provide opportunity for cyclists to secure their bicycles during trips, Street furniture, Improved 0 ' intersection crossings, median treatments, and landscaping treatments all enhance safety and 0 "', �.:; n aesthetics within the corridor and make cycling a more pleasurable and,therefore,viable mode of 0 %;.. travel. Curb extensions and bulb-outs at intersections(to reduce the exposed crossing distance), 0 + : street planters,and street lighting(to Improve visibility at night)Will all be implemented as part of 0 future roadway and redevelopment projects to enhance the streetscape environment for bicyclists. 0 • st': } Key Issues end Alternatives Suggestions from the Open House events during the November Charrette included;the desire for bike `i' `" lanes and crossing guards so children can bike to school,and,that storm grates In the bike lane be ® a ' orientated perpendicular to the street for safety. At workshops In the Spring and correspondence to the 0 r •" 1''; City,suggestions for bike facilities In the Lake Grove Town Center included: ® " 0 • Bike lanes should be painted to connect , 0 + .�• r j with existing bike lanes at either end of s s 0 L ' the Town Center on Boones Ferry; 5•KQers1nIPEU BIKE LANE a E g 0 , • Off Boones Ferry,bike routes should also --i--' - -- --j 0 be marked on adjacent neighborhood ,..,, 0r ' +' streets With smooth pavement and clear a';`. ® ' „''.� h' - LakaGroVo Town Cantor PIart 0 • ' JUne 30,2003. 0 '.. + •44 7 , 1• _ M' " f L 0 "; � ,,,;:,-- f,~ e • Bike racks should be located throughout the Town Center area;and r: • A bicycle advisory committee should be created to work with the City to educate,encourage and . ,';, 0 facilitate bicyclists'needs in an on-going process, ''' •. Transit " " ' Sutnrnary of Existing Conditions . .',t 0 Within the study area,Trl--Met currently operates one bus route,Route 37:North Shore, There are two . "; 4. other routes,Route 36;South Shore end Route 38;Boones Ferry Road in the general vicinity of the ' study area. There Is one existing park&ride facility located within the Lake Grove study area, Park& " 7 `r `'• ,' ® Ride 28;Lake Grove United Presbyterian Church is located at the Upper Drive/Reese Road intersection and Is served by Route 37;North Shore, .„ Summary of Plan Elements x ' ® The proposed public transit elements of the Lake Grove Town Center Plan are Illustrated on the Transit Map and summarized below, Previous Recommendations to Carry Forward: 0 • Tri-Met will be redirecting Route 37 to run along Boones Ferry Road from County Club Drive to I-5. ;; o ' ® This will provide a direct service between downtown Lake Oswego and the Tualatin Transit Center, , '" .• y. 0 For the near future,Tri-Met will improve the existing service frequency on Route 37 to approximately • t,r,4 (.t ' 0 '/=-hour headways during peak periods and 45-minute headways during non-peak times(service is h x' .i • currently operating with 1-hour headways during non-peak times). . ,: a •' -, " Lake Grove Town Center Recommendations; ,• • ® • As part of the multi-modal component of the Lake Grove Town Center Plan, the City of Lake ' ; _ 0 Oswego should work with Tri-Met to develop and maintain enhanced public transit service to,from, •" ;•" • t ® and within the Town Center area, A viable,effective public transit plan should be developed that ' provides reliable transit service along Boones Ferry Road at headways of approximately'/-hour or ' M less during all time periods, Ideally,headways of no greater than 15 minutes should be provided ti " given the corridor's designation as a Regional Bus Route, 1 °' ` CO • Based on Tri-Met's transit stop spacing policy for doWnlown/ToWn Center areas,stops within the ,•' 4 0 ' Town Center area shoUld ultimately be located approximately every 750-feet, As shown in the ;, • " r `' T" 0 Transit Map,these transit stops Will be located near the major activity areas within the Town Center, ® Transit stop location should also carefully consider proximity and accessibility to safe and convenient ••.i • pedestrian crossing locations. As can be seen on Figure 20, major transit stops within the Lake : • ® Grove Town Center area are proposed at Kruse Way Place, Mercantile Drive, Reese/Oakrldge "', • 0 Road and Bryant Road, Two additional stops,designated"Additional Bus Stop As Required',are "' ' ® Included on the map at Lenewood and the future crossing at near McDonalds, �• ?t , • The proposed urban design guidelines within the Town Center will enhance the multi-modal character ® of the area. For example,the shallower building setbacks proposed as part of the site development .' - ' prototypes will foster a pedestrian and transit-friendly environment conducive to Walking and transit trips. .ri • ® • Consistent with Trl•Met's standards and guidelines for transit design: '• ".' ;. . At controlled Intersection locations,bus stops should be located on the far side of the intersection, "' . preferably 50 to 80 feet from the intersection in order to maximize pedestrian visibility and bus ;: 1.4. ® operations, ' "" ® . Street tree and landscaping placement In the vicinity of transit slops should be strategically , ® placed to ensure both visibility and accessibility for transit riders boarding or deboarding. , .": 0 Lao 0 tow)'roWnconlofMali r 'll Juno30,2005 y ® 4e. i1 A'�022) a ''; u ' ,' 4 ;' ! '1 • ,t J ' '; -.41. x • . M. Ic, y.- " 1 f •un. ••.t I. y `J q-.. ' ,,,, 'Lw 7 M. ... x.. n tl ..., •" . rw. 0 1 e ..•,, �' .0 ro i. r • J u r.. .. ... .' tr 0 Y tl f ,l w ri ® re. '''';I ul p - The urban,pedestrian-scale street lighting proposed along Boones Ferry Road as part of the 0 A.'=•°o- "P Town Center concept will provide a comfortable environment for transit riders walking to and '4•, from stop locations and visibility for riders waiting at transit stops. ® , . ' - Amenities,such as shelters and benches,should be provided at focal transit stop locations as ''• u r r :. part of the urban streetscape design along Boones Ferry Road, The City can either provide 6 ..,•t and maintain these facilities on Its own(such as is the case along"A"Avenue)or work with Td- Met for these provisions,Trl-Met currently uses the guideline of a minimum of 35 daily hoardings •' • at a given stop before considering providing a shelter. '� '.'•4 i . l Accommodations for power supply at transit stop locations should be Incorporated into the design of any future streetscape Improvements along Boones Ferry Road to allow for future lighting and real time information kiosks at these locations. ® '' W•., ,, Key Issues and Alternatives 'I " ",), " Suggestions from the Open House events during the November Charrette included:covered bus stops • on Boones Ferry Road;the need for a bus route to Tualatin;and the desire for a more visible Park& ® ±.1 Ride facility adjacent to Boones Ferry Road. (� J.. 0 •',.- r• •t� • i•, .Jw "mac ,u: ® •,,, • d �4 ® i 4r"1 / Y •t 0 tl r +• 0 0 • y„ 1.A 0 ..,; A i wYY 1 ^.t l 4. 0 • St A f'� 1 ..w •• -1 ca l aka Groom ToWd oohior Mari 1 P. JUno30,1003 a ' 0 + Ih J - • -i i � a `. AA(1�2) • a r •, �,0) t ` • a• 9 ".'1\ 'k a � i � d1 lr� 111 4 y.�. , iy,..•r 1 �i i ,y° " �' 9� ,i + 1 • :ry J rN ry ' ra Lake Gravel-own C r t r Mali i ;` • ' '. Trr�ioportatior� Network Tramedit 6»30.05 h ' . .7 r' `' ® is , L 6, , . twn '}C�'r G` —, ,:. I...,, �yl «4„..,...., l 0 •A1 ti I 40 .i' r1,, c,„jr-;)1.\11,./.if1 .1r r`� r l 11 LGL« -- 1^ ) 1 Tr4RI--1 N.I .r.t r:a �Llrt�ir, r.'11 r .-r I I rI f�r , i-i 1L�yi 1 ry a f i� c 1..1 - f + ® wAtttdotln.,� li ' yt,"11,`I'.'''l�`..�I_,' .», may' I �IICa.�I . 9 O Ou. rop p «f � • �dtlfirerlw8T at "� I a .IG.i '.--,.�., ii yr o + ,+,i,.. I ,+^ A� (Par _ ( 1 •'M •° Mazer MU Rilkle;VOA I L.IbGi14,„.. I,� / 1 r'e`'1.if., '' r�a ": • r w,4yhimHrir L5 4 Li ( L .-jl„ If i r•••,`' •ti ill f yam yti I a +` r ] �=.I .ram^+ //c...?I,_0 '3,--Iw J 1 I. q ;„ ®® C.1 1r� ( t 1 I �/ {+, ark 69 I 4,7® � h J ��I ni : . ® Cep�,, 01 607 L;=i rgi F) »r °L»y r1 I, i L i - - ' 0 0 il ijt(•',..�rlLJ (II ice✓ ''''^`.. "� ,^` 'i('^ e;,' I1 .. r- rt 93 .y I I Lid'/+' r 1 1 t.''' ' '' `•. »• t ', r f I ✓' ,yam//`✓ 1 -r ,1, r',� . ,Y » ,, !'� • 1 0`, 1 0`300` Abe' �« .+ ;, ,.� > ..l"t..:! ,�• ` i.:.�...,.^dl ..�.-..r_:. "' ,.., o- ;...Y..'r�...� .s -.- _..,.-. • Y-' I Iguto 20 Trahshohotlon Neh'oth•transit ., , T ; 4 4. Lake Wove Town CaMet plan Jena 3o,2005 �'I p 1.•• MI,.� % /\/117-1 " h +.� Pf II ' t7 y i.ti ,,•d Y,i :, + t +'IC» e , 4+ + , � 4:• ,. - ! 1� '+ is �- r ° 'U r .y y -' • 11 ' u ..' ,..•._a "'- ,.,..+... re. . . .,- , ., 7 ,. ., , . rat&tit . { s ., err Streatscape lr, b a -. Summary of Existing Conditions ®' , . . As described above In the previous discussions of existing conditions, Lake Grove has a variety of a; streetscape conditions that provide a challenge to multi-modal transportation, The substandard sidewalks ` ;' n are a particular challenge—the existing sidewalks do not provide a continuous network of direct,safe ® m _ and convenient walking routes, The' Boones Ferry Corridor Plan provides a comprehensive set of ,•' µ y recommendations for all modes of travel, The Corridor Plan focuses on Boones Ferry Road itself and 4S` c '" places a priority on minimizing impact to existing frontages,parking,and buildings, i Summary of Plan Elements 0 a a +; The consultant team prepared draft updates to the streetscape plans for Lake Grove,which are Included In Appendix A of this report, Due to full agendas,these plans were not Included the town center plan 0 , r` community workshops. They should be reviewed with the public In future meetings to complete the 4 " Town Center Plan, 0 ' :, , .6, ,. In summary,the streetscape plans include; 0 • z a , ` • Three options for Boones Ferry Road:one option(Business Corridor Street-1C)that is close to " that carried in the Corridor Plan and two additional options with wider sidewalks, In general,it is 0 d �' suggested that City explore 10.12'sidewalks as a standard along Boones Ferry Road,As recognized °" i In the Corridor Plan,the dimensions of public improvements in general,and sidewalks in particular, . ,'N, A ,, will have to respond to local conditions and be adjusted on a case by case basis: 10-12'sidewalks F' , " - will not be feasible in all cases, However,this report recommends working from a wider standard ' {' „r 1 . (i.e. 10-12')as the preferred condition, and accepting less only where the constraints make the • 43' > . standard infeasible. This is a slightly different approach than the Corridor Plan,which has a 8'wide a »r sidewalk coupled with a 5'"special street setback"that provides extra widtn only when there Is an ® .. . i adjacent land development that will construct the additional sidewalk width, ® -" " A �" Two optional cross-sections for the Village Cross Streets are provided,along with an alley standard that Includes a parallel pedestrian way, ® s ' . • Bryant Road cross-sections are provided. ® '•" 't,, , . • Design guidelines for sidewalks are provided. ". • Intersection studies are provided for Reese/Oakridge,Bryant/Flrwood,and Lanewood to illustrate potential crossing treatments, a • A conceptual gateway design Is provided for the Kruse Way/Boones Ferry Road entry into Lake Grove, • l ® ' ,f: •,`•'i 1 �o l rvhA.bN ® ' ,. a ,,.M 1' Jai i �, w VillageWlreet-OptiorwA publlc Alley with hedesttiahWay +® 0.'A. ',:" Figilia 21 Slieetscapa basking 0 ',,, r o ct. t eq •'` Lake OroVbToWnColltofPlan qa IP ", galaA JuhaBo,zoo� 'I. , • .1 '" A 9 i f y a,,, d' t• AA 3 ) 4 r A`+ b.•. ,1.n` + ,, a y e.{t n .. a +. ..1 ... es • • ey�. ., a � a � a .'A•. - A. r • ' ® V. Parking 3. • • O Summary of Existing Conditions In general,the peak weekday parking utilization(or peak parking demand)within the study area occurs " ` -r • during the midday time period(11:30 a.m.and 12:30 p.m.), This result is from the mix of office,retail, and commercial land uses within the study area. w" "} On the subarea level,study area parking was 45-to 60-percent utilized during this peak time period. " p The refined parking utilization analysis revealed that the majority of parcels in the northern half of the „r).- .'. e� study area were less than 75-percent utilized during the peak period and no parcel's parking was at • t' , • . I ® effective capacity (I.e„ greater than 85-percent occupied) in these areas (see Existing Conditions •• t •,. ® Summary—Transportation Methodology, September 12, 2002, by Kittelson&Associates, Inc., Sub- ., ;- "' ' *, CO Areas A,B,C in Exhibits 8A-8C, The Kittelson study is in the Technical Appendix to this report), x .. 0 Within the central area of the Town Center(generally between the Lake Grove Garden Center and u,. Quarry Road,and between La Provence and Bryant Road, i.e. Sub-Area D in the Kittelson study), A' $ parking conditions on four parcels was either approaching (greater than 75-percent utilization) or at .' t, '^! $ (greater than 85-percent utilization)effective capacity during the peak time period, Within the west 'J',' end of the study area(Sub-Area E of the Kittelson study),parking on six parcels was either approaching " • (greater than 75-percent utilization)or at(greater than 85-percent utilization)effective capacity during ' w 0 the peak time period.® Overall there is adequate parking supply to meet the existing parking demand In appropriate locations i. throughout the study area, However,there are certain parcels and developments,particularly in the " " ® central and western portion of the study area(i.e.,south and west of Reese Road)where parking Is currently operating at effective capacity during peak time periods. ' ' a Summary of Plan Elements . a •, .,•i ..+ ftp9 Zoning/Development Code Enhancements Shared Parking ,,r& • Policy and guidelines for crossover easements and shared parking between adjacent parcels will assist "' )' " in addressing the primary parking constraint within the Town Center area. Many of the properties ` i. ® where parking Is highly utilized are either directly adjacent to or nearby properties that have surplus " " ;•, ® parking supply, Developing shared parking agreements between neighboring parcels will allow for the most appropriate and efficient use of land within the Town Center and can help to promote a vibrant,0 walkable atmosphere that defines these areas where one auto trip can be made to frequent a variety of r; " S different destinations, a '" '7 ® t t y' ®• •. ,, • a t �.• 7„ ., +t s L : r" '' 0 Lake OroVe Town Cantor Plan121 Jena 30,2003 S . - Y,• 0 •" ' 1, .4 "'. p 1 " 4 ';� ,,1. p ,1 2 q° - . 1 rx F •�N .. � HI„^Iu '., `�.. .. .K Jl1..1 .�a er.1.•. ... .i.r 7, /i.� ^n ..,'.7• v ® r •, ® «, Example policy language that the City could use to Implement crossover agreements is provided as ® s r:. follows: 0 t,'• ® . 4 ,. ' Crossover Easements 9 a. »,; ," driveway consolidation shall require the execution of reciprocal, non-revocable easements in a A . t,'1 J °;\ ''', form necessary to ensure unimpeded property access and driveway maintenance. Crossover ® ,. , easements between adjacent properties shall be required and recorded as part of the properties ,° ,�M,e legal description for all properties requiring Access Variances. The City Engineer may waive the `_ crossover easement requirement,provided that existing building,topographical,and/orenvironmental ® P 4 constraints prevent such a connection between adjacent properties. The constraint cannot be self- ,• ° ' "' Imposed by the property owner and/or the proposed building configuration, Example policy language the City could use to implement shared parking agreements is provided as 9 , , • y,^' follows: 0 Off-Street Parking "1, In order to maximize the development potential within the Lake Grove Town Center and ensure 9 '� efficient and appropriate use of land, shared parking between different business and land uses ® .~ 1�1 shall be encouraged and allowed pursuant to LOC 50,55,010(d)(ii)a-c as follows: x y i t r '' 1 .,". - As new development or redevelopment occurs within the Town Center area, the City shall review each proposal for potential opportunities to provide shared parking between adjacent ieti ., 1 t t' parcels. - Where it is found that two neighboring land uses are compatible for shared parking by the "" » '° nature of their operations, the City will Work with the property owners and/or developers to ® : establish a share parking agreement and associated crossover easements and connections, ® , .er .^, - Parties involved In shared parking arrangements shall enter into reciprocal agreements, , _e. +" b acceptable to the CO for such use,by legal instrument which shall also provide for continuing 0 -. ;':,., „ maintenance of jointly used parking facilities' ^r •, Modified Landscaping Requirements 0 '• • p Business owners within the Town Center area identified the existing landscaping requirements as a 9 t" .• 9 ,". key constraint to their ability to provide acceptable parking in appropriate locations.As such,modifications 0 a. ,'i• to the existing landscaping requirements ih the development code could be used to ensure that 0 , f appropriate parking Is supplied for the Town Center and that high quality landscaping is provide in • . •.,,, ., predominant locations within the Town Center, These proposed landscaping requirement modifications - ' consist of overall reductions in the site coverage requirement and landscaping requirement bonuses '%' for strategic placement of high quality landscaping. ® ' On-Street Parking •"' The provision of on-street parking Is another strategy that can be used to supplement the private 4 . A. parking supply within the Town Center. While it has been determined that on-street parking Is not 0 r W4 s appropriate along Boones Ferry Road,the collector streets feeding the Town Center provide excellent nJ ,* opportunities for urban atreetscape design(Including on-street parking)Within the adjacent one or two Q :, blocks from Booties Ferry Road, Providing on-street parking through these"transitions to great 9 neighborhoods"Is one way of reinforcing the changing character and environment as one travels off of • '• Booties Ferry. Combining these centralized community parking locations with attractive pedestrian ei connections will contribute to the development of a walkable, livable atmosphere that defines Town Center districts' d'. 1 J 1 a 0 '"III . Lake atoVd ToWi,Cantor plati " -d " JUn000,2003 0 '• A /A':t1]2)d ,,.� 1 ,, , 18 .- ",,4 ," 1 x. ,, 1 v J' , - 'S -' y1, . .1�, •.� a ,. 1 v. r n �'. • - . � - t � ., ' . .. tl . N y 1 rj f ''.ti,1} 9!1 , 3.. ' Lt yrtl .. w� .. .. }� fi'.3 !a'.. H 1 .,. f. - .4. .L •3. ` -1- lya'; p 3 a t t Y' ® it i 0 By formalizing these on-street parking opportunities as shown in the street design standards,there will ' .! be accommodation for 6 to 8 parking spaces on each of the following facilities: Red Cedar Way, y.t ' ® Douglas Way,Lanewood Street,Oakridge Road,Quarry Road,and Firwood Road. This is a total of 36 '- to 48 additional parking spaces within the Town Center area. ,. " ti Furthermore, the new connections proposed as part of the Town Center street system will provide i ® additional opportunities for the provision of on-street parking In key locations within the Town Center ® village core, The extensions of Lanewood Street and Hallmark Drive Will provide opportunity for an ® additional 12 to 16 on-street parking spaces. ' Overall, the Lake Grove Town Center concept proposes the creation of 48 to 64 formal on-street . ® parking opportunities within the Town Center area, '` 3 oil ' . .. * Site Specific Parking Opportunities , 0 Several site specific design opportunities aimed at enhancing the parking configuration of the central '''. :a' $ area of Town Center(between Reese Road and Bryant Road)Were evaluated, This sub-area is where r +, ® the majority of the parcels currently experiencing existing parking constraints reside, The key goal of »' 0 these design concepts Was to develop continuous off-street connections for the parcels in order to '{ „ ,i .. ® maximize parking efficiency and build towards an additional signalized focal access as described in the ,., Street System section. The proposed sub-area parking concept Is illustrated In the site study on this .., - rA,,; ® page. The proposed concept shown will result in an additional 30 to 35 formal parking spaces in this -wl region east of Boones Ferry Road. 1 :1 ®® ,r � " ., s, ® .i W A .M a r .{ 4d 216:, r 3 i t r.-„-it, 1 y r t, d ';c i.7 1-,� 4j r 1 .•t:''- '' r.. „ >Jt t „ *. :'.';,t 11„ t ,q 1 r •+ Cq M , {.. tl ro "' It t 1 y ® r '44 t , , .3 µ, .,t C.~ a , ,' L + r , r r f..y A 1'- ! / I A iI k \ i h > ' I - ! 1a r ��' q . ,» 411 A3 r ,•a " `r';1 ;'7 a a, "r ' M Zr....- • -• 1 rl .a - 1 •'4 ® Y tit i 4 i r ,C. '''" + u +r- wT ar • I. ' ® sl.� • r''•-•'d J LN t� �.tryll-y r "-, '4"�4 ;1 a. kr, • 1 .•" .'��... _r t .r-;• Figure 22.Parklntl to study.South at&tanes Ferry Road r ~ r ? t a' 0 M - .,y. aa 0 r i.' i , ® q ° Lake dtoVe Tdwn Center PI O r 0 Junb9D,2003 ` 4 A4•S3L) • Y,r• ` It 1 1 1 3 It Y :q r.• 0 3 • a 4 4Y „ �i1 , 1 •.�.2 •'4 , 4.. • ® r .t tr • x , :K On the opposite side of Boones Ferry Road, it is recommended that the City monitor property n t) { redevelopment over time and look for opportunities to develop a shared community parking lot on one 0 '"; 9, of the parcels. While a specific parcel is not identuied at this time,this concept will also build towards ® r a', the provision of an additional signalized focal access es described in the Street System section. Given •® "�• •,- the averageparcel size In this area,it is anticipated that a shared community 0 p parking lot would provide ti } an additional 30-40 parking spaces within this constrained area of the'town Center. As discussed 4) .4,' ., , previously, combining these centralized communityparkinglocations with attractive edestrian ,•:wi'P Y pedestrian connections wit contribute to the development of a walkable, livable atmosphere that defines Town •+ Center districts, 1 Key Issues and Alternatives ® " ' . Parking is a sensitive issue in Lake Grove,The following is a summary of the comments and perspectives heard during the process: • The Corridor Plan included site studies of how existing parking could be reconfigured to respond to improvements to Boones Ferry Road—many participants wanted to revisit these studies and have et . 5 .+)"• ° .1, the Town Center Plan address very site specific conditions, 0 '', �.1 • Truck circulation needs to be factored into proposals for parking improvements, ® r • The community was generally supportive of locating employee parking outside the Town Center as 0 ,' v, a way to free up parking spaces, It was acknowledged that this strategy is not appropriate in all ` cases and that the safety of employees at night is a consideration, fit 'i ' •r_ + ` • A parking site study for the area near the Jennike building was strongly opposed by the property 'r}a owner, r ,,i' • The Lake Grove Garden Center owners perceived that Improvements to Oakridge Road will cause ® ;•''�� them to lose parking that currently takes place at the north end of their parcel i r y 1.0 r • Representatives of the Lake Grove shopping center were concerned that building orientation r ,•, standards could reduce the visibility of parking and stores. ® h ® ,, .'� .�_µ , • r .:rFl a 0 ' r''••" • to' "« ' 'ku • n. t a ® Y+ e 0 ' 111 Lako Grove ToWn Corner Plan JUso30,2003 1. .�^ (132J •.' r 'y ., ''. 7 .' 1<' i . ' d w M Y `r ; C • ..,1 , �-;Ca '•,; • `a e 4 -^ ry�' 7 a .Y a.. I 11 . r f M " a� J c . •i +IJ4.. b., 1 .yJ , J ''^Y. '.. ® 1 f ® VI. Next Steps ` '': ® The following table summarizes the next steps in the town center planning process,as developed by ` City planning staff, ,, Y+ . ® Table i�6.`Proposed Timeline Y J .rN.1 ' K fh .. i . f �, • 1 ski tea pno ,^'p i pee i,� "` Data • Planning Commission Review and recommend Phase 2 process to Council. • Receive Lake Grove Town Center Plan report August 11,2003 • i I.," �, ® Public Meeting (consultant presentation). u ® i.• a r� 1 ^, • Council to receive Lake Grove Town Center report. September 9,?.UO3 ,, a;. i I > '° ® Joint PC/CC Work Session • Council to review and endorse Phase 2 process and Septembetive) I u;, A +? grant PC pemtisslon to appoint Committee. a A Committee meetings , September 2003— 1 j , (tl and dates TBD) Staff and Committee develop draft amendments Spring 2004 • •; , f ti11 Planning Commission work sessions a (minimum 3,dates TBD),Including September 2003— al ® Joint meeting with PCIDRCITAB. • Update PC and citizens on Committee work to date. Spring 2004 . t, • ': • `^ 0 Notice provided to LGTC mailing list. "�,. • , Planning Commission/City Council • Review and adoption of LGTC Plan and implementing Summer 2004 AY` + e. : ^v ® hearings ordinance amendments • «„ ''' ® - In the addition to completing the Town Center Plan,City staff have stated that they Intend to coordinate '1 with the Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency(LORA)staff regarding the formation and timing of an + urban renewal district, According to the City,If It is determined that the formation of the urban renewal 0 district will occurprior to the completion of the town center planning® p p process,a modified project list may a + be developed with Committee input for Inclusion In an urban renewal plan document, r .+.4 9 •, � 1 - 4.t:I: , `''l !.A. ^f Y vM I ® • f ,it r J,r ", CILake Grove Town Conlat Platt , s JUho 30,2005 J. • di a "t • 1,, ., ,t 4•. J„A� �) y `•�* r /�. 11 ' Y _. .i 4 A J rry J ` .,r a ,r ` ✓y.'4 ' •,, Y ,1 t s� • ,r F . ,hr . 0t Appendix A - Streetscape Drawings z 1 Lake Grove Town C r r Han u '` „` business Corridor✓treat Cross-e6 done 0 " 6-30-03 0 v' + 1 ® )" ,t' 1 y Gtit i,I 7 ® var.MINN. f ri 0 I o.andwe+4W �1r�!�,�r :� .i ® ti,�y a .rr . ! 1A.preferred condition,public sidewalk frontage zones ® ,. . 4Y , h ' • 1J ryi • „ Cfla .w �� i ❑ , ._ I� 1Mw .� 5 •' A �1 1 ,I, N I .. J".." �J I I Iv m .1,:o. I ire: II�I .r• :.1, .: ® A A �1!3.preferred conditions,no public sidewalk frontage zones 0 ` +1.f I . • °AA ® .4 1 • t e w,.p..,.. * • • r la constrained condttlon> ,no publlo sidewalk frontage ones ,, ,ti ® f" A u ., Lake()toile ToWh tehtor Plan :. ® June30 2003 40 , a 'r. 0 • i , I • .•! �) . a .. • t " is " \ •,.;." ` ' AA(3 , t : ' • ' • t '. • ,! 7 . , ., ;t . i N" 4 p, .• A YA r r ,a , ,AI a Iy r1 a " .,". ° 0 i fix;, f v, ® we',. d.,alke Grove Town Center er "'Ian :aa 6, .r. �/Ulago Street Cross-Sections �/p � i, ... V-W-V/yJ Fr M h r u : •„Y �.. • r , ` F f f / p -T p .:,r El -e wn.wo'Pj r../p K Jy• Isr.Mnf ;; . �T 4ta11N C'•i 1 . bVMWw.,_ rA •i•Y 1 • 1A.36'public street,parking both sides ,,a v, ap . r ' , a , ;, ® ,, I. r• ® , f'IIIj 1 .r 10 II II III I 4\ C T. 1 El�ualiei. Ufff���I•••I���IIN�IppIIh. } le.,a,,, ffis.iYsi� 4 .w, ® 113.32'public street, parking Roth side Yi •�• r' ® �I—rw4ak6d6r. .r 4' Imtmribl Fyn , 3, w JO e h Y LLLbbd ` < ® ,'; n p.m ryw� K , , • •r—'W-+r I a'f u e i• •=H xtJ� ® ,-•• ' 1Ci public alley with pedestrian way, no parking k• Laka Grow Town Cantor Plan ria ,- ® June 30,zoos 4'. At\13, . . , „, n S •1'a .} e + •{ i" u I '.�. w :lt r ,K r a 1,1•4 t • y t t: M :,., • a c p\ ® +t'r ar "',, 1. (, . ' Ltik0 Grove To,n, lil Center ,-Ui�� ''+ °A �rrt Raid Croes-5-actions — , '„ , i, r 6aorns ` y)t •4r fv ® ,.• f \ n f °°°GGG ® : .i t II�KIEiiii= ® .1 srf .u,,,k.�. I.L. 5 - Lir .1t4"I tram l.r wait trail.. or f 1, 1A,at 13ooties Ferry load/full sidewalk development +. ' •d t t ,•d ` 'j r• giriglik 4- t ,t4111 ID. F 1' + urtalwY M Igkdraw ., 113, at Poones Ferry Road/full constrained sidewalk development • K •, Nd .t...i • ,I 1 • r Y. •1 __z..___.,_. _s _ Y-...sue - T y....-, _._.. a • II Lako0hovo Town CmnherPlan y J td JUntl 9012003 -• ••'. LLB,. r •�•��. 2) ` t ' r 1� r "^+ '� ll ' t Nr • a CA ' .� , , ake Grove Town er ter "Ian • , Business Corridor Sidewalk Design Guidelines 6-30-03 ,.1 ® 1' "�� ® .o0II0N ®dmm..w tena6.W/:.M1.a.Slyrh aw.N.. f.rSeirw a. v!tl,MrW/iiM6fMYueY1NN a y 1[ n I Ii Ai 1 11_ •^ S I ■ Jr ■MY "".w+y.Mf a.) Mi• r • h;.• • Has Nr.i....„.„„,..,..aws„.xar ti..: 2A. preferred sidewalk design W;—„.., `" mid-bloke ...rw.ruiwNn. r ■rgwJu .n...rrtndn..vrv�.`.r��n:m+..,,w.u+d... to • r 'f, ,T. "•• , —ml.'Im�.��w e0or0 , RolterWing mo teem fur. odtan .Metmalty a~�1.1•/a.m.mpr I/OP� Naa �a 'CPI" III 0 . filli 1 Will" "• ® G��Cr uI k111r1iT ' d f t ,r u u rr d 111 rruu >f..' wlaan.s.ma.de d J :Nr• ® MWiIa MMJ4Jtet Audi, s11Q r r , : � " ' 2D, preferred sidewalk deelgn :...' ihtersectfon with Village atreets .,.e +rJ® vorri worm.•.. Om*hW kl .�.ubrA length t '' ir O.' 0 \ I *'i , . A Mar all ifr . 4. S 2C,constrained sidewalk design r held-block *-... ', .. • 0 41 I { Lake GroveYOWH Milli CentorP 0 JUhb30,2003 ® " :. a « y.. J•ti '. 7 A'A:(3 )F+ 4 " I "' " , ' " 4 1 '. , �,. m 1. y .fA k� .' ...�` , �. •�� ..,.. ..W:. He r�• , JY ,-, .. i. ... y...y.,M1• I,..Y7,.Y 1 .! .�. n1' .0 f 1 o n•Y® . o h'.1, I 0 __ ". S4� I, ,e Lake Grove Town Center F�m t , :-.. ---, . , , ,. ... '"" ... Intarsealon c y .ee ge " a9a-0 1. ;� \\<,.../ / . .6117\ . 1 S f „, 7 , \\.,/) ' t$:.1.1A''',...,„,_ 1, . , . is ,.,`� rr �, •�,,,, `1. 3^++ ` 4� ® Y1 hr? or s'\,N .. ,,,,,....... Y. j.,' ' '' 4ate q,s, ‘,/ 0416" - \\)\ C\3 , . , .. , ,_,,,. .07.1i/H , \ ' \ 0 0 "',:,..,. ';, ';., 4f0,4, \ % c.,\kst...6 ,...-"-.c"\ 0 ., - • -'° 190°. \V 0 tl.:"' '''''' \, ....\.r.\ YA \\ } \\ \ \` / J.„ 4') \e . 11 � / \„/ ® mot 01 1...k 0 \ N • y^\ \ = •e ,i..' ,,..,.. .,, s,.,,p _ /1 $till):t - It% I \ \n o, \ tt. ' -., ,, . . ii, l km.,IIuBkMllone ivnwl toga.ttdl cfan,-..WON 0441'41441 "\ l 10�,„...town _ uw n p. Ulblllly.e i ° ( Anil nae, r or iry, kv..L In�.aoVwn.nl ulll!� "�° At.yp, dt. iWri M'riwlpn Iyi.oti„„ LLll 01:,. •- ells llonl erTd wlNHlti,Ma nay very han I .ulwl•eUa. I 4 �, 4 I l \` 1 x, gri Ulm arovo Town Cantor Plan ® y q'-' a Juno 30,2003 a „;.,'. ., . , M1"L,• S t'• s .r e P1 • ,I s Lake Grove TawM Ceneor P i Y'. • " Interecaion 5tudyc 6ryant l Ftrwood 6-9o-03 \\\,,--'-' %,,,- ,. Li— %-‘':•' 1' � .� ® , �rN., I ''14,4V%:A. *4\___ .......... -„ \'' \•}'��\ VIM VATAtti 4 S 'tali • .AILfri ; '014 ed. i -���,,����®®•Via° `'� -- . ...."7\---- , '•• 11.111A \,4 ,0, \\110 .."" . ' .. '..''''T ,, e 1:11, . es:„, . ..K: \ `- , .„. ...: e _rt • 0\� F , xr t : '— .. . I�a t I t." h.` \ r\ \ \y r Iwola. IU t,AtIanA+afiaat datiayyyJll llt/l Ndl'.OrA daJalaq Ad �'., I'ar Leta Gov•twin Csnlr PUP,drb Will`geurrlbglly la0npa a . I ara suet.d nrdera hx Anj Ural rn♦wararwhl Ytll ba I dMnMYHd Urw(J,final ri.k y.•byi nwMr on oroot,n!1(n I "' Ella condltloM and eatllrelnl and nay Na,y Iro•A Ifwa IIWVellonl. • 1 ._j L \ f 5 f • 1 " ' 1 ® r. ? Lnko Grove Town Center Plne Di r., Juno 30,2003 `` t4' � t " i .. 0 i AA�(b2a t. •A . . ':' t .1� .. _ ..n r . . , t . +0y 777 , .. , '' ,. 4ICIt 1. �a:: Lake rove Towrri Center 'Ian0 • 1ntereection 5tuc(y:L newoor 0 ) 6-50-0Z 0 1 I , i 1 -.- ,10 ,r.' ti 1 at M 0. ^ I 4` � 6 \ � �1ttl alq' 4I $.. - . ''`-�` �rip � i ® P� w y y 4 Std ;' t9 --r— -1-1 .^.--::-* illi,'LltNi*, ,11'. . ' .. ' Lttat, ,i • .-',, ...:....k_,. 0 411) :;,;\ . r v r91/--' 79 '1..1. ' . 4 .' .`, ,,,' ,•'',i 1] xi 7.8.9.4.:"..I....,...•04:V ....,,,,:450,.... 7,40::',..., '�� r' mac; ,. .� s ,,,• I' r • N. .,`4 ,, • I ) ,,... fi ,i ? If 1 0 . AM. ' i dt u !�Inelrary i„Ma1Y d' eta ' I v r a • F; 1fr I,,fpd;°,rT I L ePveCb,l II wad'd la e, • . . � — — — �wOcT.rk1r$ eilonitli�9yjn r InmvwsiIbePtdtoatkif. • • 19 aI+. l El Loki;Orovo Towel Cohter Mon., JUna 10,2003 4 , fit= c„ 1 , :,e e ,, p i .. .. �. .. - r •! rl � .v .O-,'7 .,. !. .I 1 ur' A". .. .. J •. .. .0 ... �:t . 1 : 0 q 6 l . IV .. el h: id. •'t A. A L, F •1 A Lake Grove Town Center Plan ` xd i Krueo Way 1 Boone Ferry mead Gateway 6tudy e 6 30-03 --:.*--,„, / i/// t• • Vi ' �alti. ® � f �.,, W� � Wp ' d1 fit. -'''.'''"N'.\'' ill' '''' • • •. .. .. - ... . • . . • . . /..: ‘ . 6 0. ,.. 7,.. '.. ''$.. '1. 0 'h‘. .1474 Vt.; ' II/ i / C''— -'' • � (CI I4f;;I:401,; Hasa na�'+t tcm r d . • :���� ar TeFatl:ee 1 .ic.:(....,,*,.,....,..'......,.',, \---,.. c . : ' '. . 0 b,,,..... A ft*/ 41 / /• ..... .... .......) ® 11I/' yl. !'fir• ,ew9•kJS1 %ter • O r prliAtiUlat tL UGNi& e E�� 1 n jib .� -"�i� / Y�. • 00/ • r r" ® 1i tnw�l4LL to f �� . ® '4/ rl4-rry earti ( ,� a�,,r� Rq/ T ; ® v�ntyr t:�l \ .. •., • r. e ,'� kR�wx ifod o w7O41sTdwl,l.+Ge n d ; 4bw i wI,l y piep y r. ' ® R.4♦1/�41 M.d•!tl°ki1 to d.. W1dlNw bI+lIn IwdpmM.OrMCMimWnbpe.nella t j• NEunkLI . 6J/ ... . ' ,•h Lekb GtoVd ToWir Coittor Plat' III ' 0 Juha3o,2003 ' ail •'.,,' * " 1 yI• AA t.2) »� t•ta ty t 11 °i a 1;, -R y 4 l'+. �, '.. . dye a t 1'. 1, , "s -♦ 1'a i } I•r If p- -r .. y t • C. A y, + `11 .t •!'A ' F - 1 P••, l I''.r. ti. I ® t Appendix B - Implementation Project Priorties Lake Oswego planning staff prepared a list of potential improvement projects In order to facilitate public comment and establish priorities. The following table on the following page summarizes the " r comments received at the community workshop held on May 14,2003, Two rounds of small discussion • groups were held to prioritize projects. There was a striking lack of consensus between the two groups. • • p • o •� � I • • .;F is ' • *; ... e • 1 . r 1 d• ® :A. 'r... ® we yb, Loko Grove Town comer plan ' JunoJol3003 ® , I • i .:... , 5 i ,.D 1 N. A � - t •.31 i«i ..-. n tl ? w i ! e I d A Y' '1. y ,., :- i• �4 rd T [ ,� M •, ,e i 1� e ' 1 i ' PJL+ r •'V a1 r4 ti !.� y I { ' .. . a 4 , •.... .ran to 'a t , .. , -..l:1.• ..w .a.,a1.- •• . • Y. r .hL Lake GroVO Town Center Plan A•1 e• 1 Potential Projects Coat E.aliman:9 and PrIerhltanon 1 l ,.1 •; Polanlidr- Pdadhy" ••,,.�' r A.8 ,u Fundin0 • Pa t - Bdimeted Coit'(Ran9i')In S 5aate ,Id h Mad. La. X Comment, r•r a Shia and Allivo ts> t --hn �, ® I Corot Fogy +T ,L` r•. : ® Carndorinprarlretnti rare la Uodraral•l0J00110ndl al,aranecd 14220000.2530101, �v'. IndaaWan onl,lks,lkuLanel end ulenadbnlmltvenlnl' 5.230.010• '0.000,000 Putt 109 09 00 r -'.t it •Lellebda01P1r1A*C4Cn •.•fi 4'0` •Ran4n.O,dd).l kknCtl Ol y,.a et •Onan5FV0004 laleitec00n •MUlW lu Inktlelkn " ^t a 0 • 2 Llk•01eth Clc,N.Obelween Wm lad&ianfe 220.020• 230,000 Pablo 35 'IS 1/11IA r4; a ' ..,n • 'Lena4ed lea enreetcdoe'rvtealenam 1 . 0 3 Lallewad Relli)nmenl 200 re9110.1t471 02.Li 217) 60.010• 120,000 Pu6'C ire' 201' 70' C.'0' ts,bned J.Neymmt EoLailon 250 er/alkn13Sd0210CI II 90020- 120,000 Palk 5 1 2 5 3..Iola etas " 5 I,sOly04tldge m Oct01e9' eW lineal feel 1ES00.190201 011.030. 120,000 Pilsoto 0 0 0 III - 01.'9Any,.ale Craw:b+enowead COO INealleetl4t'00.1501R1 00,030• 00,000 PNIIe 0 C 0 II Kar r'r a . ® Cobols In rnrM.ma amain...Pre, r:.�t 1 OWAlley0071n1W00enee Polry 750 Ane94rtt@6t10.1901f0 75.02U• 1•2.5C0 mot. 0 0 0 III tw In , r♦ O .'A ,1. • 11,8'2 500 ' a:,; ,S redetteen Tonto...only la E21Et altoadwavei .a-. Ia A DuNln Way '98110101 fat tO894.351 AI Pi 900• 171,500 Palk 13'9" OF 0 09"' '00)on athrauatlde a'Fub 1Jm ,e y ' • y s I 00/81585 9331IPea1la11t6190•051A) 27620- 32900 Falk 470 9,1 It OR Stlael dMrrer 660.laaJdb Caleb , a" d• C Cando:Roue 501 HPeelkti@S52d61 A) 40 C30. 16.800 Ihllle 00 21 0 04 •{• +• 3 Reese Rued iol areal het MCA 1l 16 C10 '5.0011 Patlle 50 21 70 019 , • ' 9.Oalewoad'Odarrl 300 oreal 4.1(4150004O) )5.000 48.000 Pdrek 0 0 0 t11 ® F Nelren Onre 200 Areal feet 4150.301 II 10000• 10203 Mole 0 0 0 A;' 0 Nmclnla Dr.0 ',5SU herd lost(,130301 Al di503• '59400 PdraW 0 0 C H Seoaley Way '34 areal feed:85091M Al 9303. 13,260 Hole 0 0 'I a•" r! I Snarl Read COO Sr.')feet(@150.30111) 00203• 37,000 NO3 0 3 y1C +, a'Ni ko315aau:A Pony r'3 kW feel(@100961 A) 9753. 16.800 Hole 0 0 0 e Ip P .. p 44ale Oliva Avuwe 310 treAl feel l@3300016) 10331 1',0e0 P4rdlo 0 0 1 .t e. A .tenel3Oad Seat '904Pe4I lee11@13D30A A) 7501. 14400 Pdrdu 3 0 0 X '0TA" 283 250• 593940 • •,' l•.^ ® Ilia neat at Prod or31Lo010 Bane i T -k, ' O aw Pidarhlan and O(A,Face to'' else'-g M Silo Lino et Marty 1,2214,01 lad.1Ct1.100581' 95.03• 10111110 Fair 20 20 '12 0'8 e'" 11 G1.e Lou en Orient 1,0331001l leeti$113031 A)1 48 COD 90000 Fame NJ 21 20 Ohl �"••' 1 ® 0 Honey l0Nirwnh:0 103 Unedliel o 19P?01 AI 5.C70• 0,900 Palk 4A 00 2)' 54 '^r + i r - ... P Willi tido 108e Oruro Elm802 great art,7;453 Ill a1 40 C71, NU Pali; 00 24 OU DU ' t U � i',i 1 sualr Ws Late(have Elul II)Udall fend@I1C•46d A) 5C30- '1,260 Pulk 81U 1,2 1,0 201 -A'4 ' 1 11 R B0Onee Pen,le Bede Tree 210 Areal Net(RSS046111I 12.200• 23020 PLIc Si) 112 177 5' -• ® 9&Ida tree1,473 Ira fuLlln3SC 89Ah) 11 cb1 1'18.120 Palk al1,0 III N) ," be I 9hnl010 Alley ltwhild Re 9Wlkn, 2281Neal)eell@tl0•114 A) 11.000• 21,120 Palle 20 51 20 Ill ' I J Wusel00ek•.eaod i to veil feel ISlt1'3W hl 5510• '5 UV Nile 10 l A) A • V Coins I 2038roa kW 11[99C•3948) 10CIO- '0.200 Pdra;P IA ID II t '» 7 ad. '1 ® n u V1 Lad Pane Is keno,Ferry 432linhel lnel,d.0,'464 el 21.910• 41,260 Pout., IC I) r' 17 '}, J. ® 10 O3Wkae to Smoot Tiny lel Sten lett NtiSG304 A) II COO• 00AO IN AO 0:0 eV 0-4 t • Y 5o,oslli&,lle Trill 3103.1 kol I04 CBI 5: 17!Ca• 33570 Mee Da DO NI ,'11O t 1 ,,'� �•'•', ® T0'A, 310600 121,021 rd. +• • Mhtrpmladt 1 " •' A Palle puil,0la•tall:al Poe3e1 FHry belneen Peafi and NOW " 2C.02 W010 353.000 ipdo) EC000• 123010 Cutiq I') 1.4 14 04 ^I. •• ® 0 Palle pdakt P muv t.rq,0101 Bou Ferri LCIAft r Nixie old 4rydnl'L • ~Fb ®. it.50!Firm'rQ13006 sp4ael C0060• 1:000 Plllc 61 21 1,2 Il + C Rtuxp veto.9 auk cope oil OF 91)111100 dwell 65 CCil 65,320 Pubic .•. '. D IMO01a.a Ceoorarl 1030 IC)• leg:OD) PLlit 6'6 2,2 0'1 00 t 'i+ ® F Cutout 03010 Il 000,34k PlwPd falai 20 20 27.031 Paid 91 12 1'3 0'2 '~ - + F Fedlle al Sccosi Feny old Bryant 2C000 2C.020 Palo N2 0 '3 Jp 2 110 0pe.Venara t I I " ® .._ tb"AL •. 1.224[PA 2 VSFW1 ' ®_ OMNO TOTAL, 7,151,250 14,507,010 TOTAL PUSUO 1,013 SO0• 11.717140 '1, 1 ® L-- 701AL P)7NA1B 4,3750.•_ 110.di0 ••'nN .'�. .t •!,, ® el •a, ,IS ^O �' krAei so IYwlaoaen.'N i oh 4d0110 rd.n.ol'd 45 W41ad,1,10adVI t .• • y r tTM,M'11t N aoard animal PetteStrn let,In1,001.00tvwoo-.Jln4'w4 haCadab404a'w'e;l%b,gAd:la4'IY4“4.4,nNMAwf.4,iekln1 M'0084010itten bldl,n:l• '•p. 4 / ` ® NI q4 VW.•>V41 0I.,0•it L•4114ta In dal airradle1/hdl if AN all',,, , r a W K,14 WA,* Ad 11.1,,iv,Waod*Oh 11154t1*CO 1411 n4.tenanawlNIA , I Z41..11,14I oil,dw.lr a.N,a.MWar•pill4llhd,O4niIlGNie4aWwtt ter tl ' ' i . L '0 rNw A J e a.114a101Y}r wl idor24 l ® I 2.pn4.V;dr"1l 4*11,14.ao •.1.. ,,pp 0 A t.'IA14a 1pallMutlaep,Pii1 hwi0W'Sea,e4ow1:Nil owib..e v I,10.04,et•t filth 4'ec.4 �1 w °'• 'rp rah.:MYNf illel dare0100.1 d,teaed WId.M' N k 6.1 A' n5 'F1 1,1 I rnl,G•#r,.Rl ay,1,iI lit ro4 tak 0l*3 ,1V11'.444,4s,144W04P hi 1 a11i'lOM hunt i,4l;IrnA.mO.rn.'I,unt4r41111,,+4.104.1,e4231e0A'0014dd Y•ea5Vl 34,0..11.4.4,0' ' In • 't S„° A ® t a wrt, Loka OtoVo TGWSO Confer Plan r'. , . 0 Junaa0,z003 ® 4 ® t 4 ATA'•c3'Zi i a•1 ;� •.1' , L . , i y l., ', d • :flu• '' '1 , I'.4i KN - , w 4 ". p •7+ . 4{ : it. .,r 1. 1 • `O C'LARC kfC0•. Community Development l .„ u y t\\`, Planning Division � I r ` ,' ,..,�r, / a' f�-9 I r Memorandum 1 •7 , 0 A ,.1"' . To: Planning Commissioners a 4 From: Susan Millhauser,Assistant Planner Dennis Egner,Long Range Planning Manager • ., .,J. 1 Date: July 29,2003 ., ,;' ; Subject Planning Commission Public Meeting—August 11,2003 •-.,i Lake Grove Town Center(P 01-0002)—Phase Two Planning Process and a:' Advisory Committee Formation At the June 9tt'Planning Commission work session,the Commission discussed the Phase Two • • ,° ,,''a' planning process for implementing the Lake Grove Town Center(LGTC)plan. A draft LGTC Plan Implementation Advisory Committee Charge Statement(based on the"GAP"/West Lake •°''" .t'w, Grove Design District Plan process)is included(see Attachment A)for Planning Commission , consideration at the August 11,2003 public meeting, This document includes procedures and policies intended to guide the formation,work,and products of the Committee. Written '• .,;N testimony received from citizens regarding the Phase Two Planning Process is attached(see Attachment B). '1 •I• Additionally,at the June 9th meeting,the Commission asked staff to provide information about �. ' ' the composition ol'the"GAP"committee, The"GAP"advisory committee included one • ,• representative from each of the following groups: ^' . ,' •, P e Y ig Lake Grove Neighborhood Plan Steering Committee a ' 0 Rural Lake Grove CPO i, Resident and property owner with the general study area `'.; ■ Luke Grove Business Association • m Property owner who is a non-resident ol'the general study area • - e Planning Commission " m At-large `a;• •,a.,, " This memorandtun also includes un updated process timeline for Phase Two(see Table l below), •,, . p "; and additional issues for future Planning Commission consideration, +. , .+ Lnkr Gr"t'c T,xon tel11w'Pints 11'01 ACID I•t'IRnnugt('o litiMiatr I'ul'Ii t`tedwg,August I I,2uu3 Page I 'I'2 ". r 1• " v. ,,I ,^. • N,d ° 4 .. dtl` ' '4 4 w''.. ,� 4 ;‘ r t 1 Table t. Proposed Timeline l' s TaskiMIlestone Purpose Date u, Planning Commission Public Meeting - Review and recommend Phase 2 process to City August 11,2003 ' Council '. • Receive Lake Grove Town Center Plan report •r � .' (consultant presentation). Joint Planning Commission/City Council - Council to receive Lake Grove Town Center September 9,2003 • Work Session report. (tentative) , • Council to review and endorse Phase 2 process . _ and appoint Committee, M. Committee meetings(#and dates TBD) - Staff and Committee develop draft amendments September 2003- , Spring 2004 c• ",:a n „ Planning Commission work sessions • Update Planning Commission and citizens on September 2003— (minimum 3,dates TBD),including joint Committee work to date, Spring 2004 meeting with PCIDRCITAB.Notice provided to LGTC mailing list. w i• Planning Commission/City Council • Review and adoption of LGTC Plan and Summer 2004 hearings implementing ordinance amendments . ', Additional Issues , t„, ';' i. City Planning staff will coordinate with Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency(LORA)staff • regarding the formation and timing of an urban renewal district, If it is determined that the :•' formation of the urban renewal district will occur prior to the completion of the Phase Two planning process,a modified project list may be developed with Committee input for inclusion in t".._;1.:t an urban renewal plan document. ; • 4 °'/• . • ,j . .. . Attachments: a A) Advisory Committee Charge Statement,July 28,2003 draft 17-. B) Citizen letters: Lake Grove Business Association,May 28,2003; - Sid Smithey,Commercial Property Owners,Lake Grove Association,June 10, l.. ' • 2003; , ". • - Michael Buck,Lake Grove Business Association,Restaurant Member, June 19, r 2003 - Sid Smithey,Commercial Property Owners,Lake Grove Association,June 30, �`: �. 2003, " , • YA•f. rl, ' .,h Al 1.,Case riles',200P,Planning Protect Files'P U1-0002 Lake(hove town Ccnler',Plaaning ConnmssiomPlrnsc 2 planning process ,, '' " ' + ,^t 08.11-U3 mecun0C Memo 08.11.03 1'01.0002.doe :: 411111 t[ h a' M ^, r Luke Wow 1a«11 Center Plan rP 01.0002r Planning Commission Public Meeting August 11,200 Page 2 or 2 "N. . 1.., • , ry . , „ '.17 •4 "N. -1. e,. , - ''•. M . . • .y It Cs w pS,,,, r•l • rat 14 • • ,+,, R• -'4s•r +.4 r5 tln. fix' I. .. .. ', ;•i + '!" ATTACHMENT"A" , in ''44 t ,' Y City of Lake Oswego A:,, f ,-. y, Lake Grove Town Center Plan Implementation(Phase Two) d ,•. Advisory Committee Charge Statoonent DRAFT July 29,2003 r y' Purpose Statement n;» The Lake Grove Town Center Plan project provides an opportunity to enhance the .4�, commercial and high density residential portions of Lake Grove as a vibrant,attractive, s;. ,, » ' and coordinated mixed use area, The City of Lake Oswego's Comprehensive Plan ;, describes a"Town Center"as an area in that serves tens of thousands of people,where =. , y good transit services,a pedestrian environment,shopping,services,entertainment and 'a higher density housing will be encouraged. w •', planning A preliminarypning and public involvement process began in September,2002,and 1' 1 culminated with the development of the Lake Grove Town Center(LGTC)Plan Report in T' }:' July,2003, This report provides a summary of the issues,points of view,and consultant t M" conclusions resulting from the Lake Grove Town Center process, Additionally,the 1.'.,'• ex " LGTC Plan Report serves as a source document for and bridge to the Phase Two ...„...4 ,• ., • . .L,,,„ 4:,...., implementation planning process, ... .. ,..,,. ,.,„3.,.,„ ,_,,,:„ The following Guiding Principles were approved by the Planning Commission in ,• October,2002,and will continue to guide the Phase Two planning process: A, Enhance Lake Grove as a vibrant and attractive mixed-use center--Protect and '' enhance Lake Grove's economic vitality and unique blend of locally owned ,, x' businesses, Integrate mixed use,land use,and transportation strategies that '' . promote economically successful,compact,land•efficient development. ;:.,; B. Create a great street that supports all modes of travel—Improve Booties Ferry „' Road to make it more attractive and safe for walling,hiking,and transit,while '•-0= -', still accommodating auto traffic, Design a great street that is the centerpiece of f k ,. wa +. the Lake Grove area, C, Support and connect with adjacent neighborhoods—Support and implement the Lake Grove,Waluga,and Lake Forest Neighborhood Plans, Identify appropriate .a' r ways to connect and integrate the Lake Grove Town Center with the adjacent , •: �' neighborhoods, D. Create workable coning and design guidelines Identify strategies to encourage •- infill and redevelopment in the Town Center,including appropriate changes in the • mix of allowed land uses and zoning regulations, Prepare design standards and ~ guidelines to support the overall vision for a vital and attractive mixed-use center. E. !dotal,'physical intpravenwnts and catalyst protects—Identify specific '' ... improvements that will create the"bricks and mortar"to implement the vision, ,' , ldcntif�'key catalyst projects that will leverage additional public and private } ., inveslntentf .a. Lao Drove ToWn Center Plan Implementation Aavlwoq•Coirymlllos Charaa Claimant Pace 1 i a a4ApT July 20,2003 et 0 1 , 'AM* ' W @ r ., e J ', F. Conduct an open process-•Assure meaningful public participation so that the , , : plan Will be endorsed and embraced by a broad spectrum of community interests and organizations, G. Meet community and regional goals and expectations—Comply with,and implement,State,regional,and local plans and policies, Specific plans to address ,;: .. include Titles 1,2 and 6 of Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, ' '•� ' y':• the Regional Transportation Plan(including mode split targets),the Oregon • Transportation Planning Rule,the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan and ,,, r Transportation System Plan,and the Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan, 4, H, Coordinate with affected agencies, city and community interests—Assure W''3 '° r,..-' coordination between affected agencies,with specific focus on Metro,Td-Met, City of Tualatin,Clackamas County,the Lake Oswego Planning Commission, ,:.•,I+ and the City's Transportation Advisory Board(TAB). ' 4 Direction The Advisory Committee shall assist the Planning Commission to develop a draft Lake °;°• -:' Grove Town Center Implementation Plan consistent with adopted Guiding Principles. The Plan shall include recommended zoning and design standards,amendments to the ' City's Comprehensive Plan and Transportation System Plan,a list of priority capital •' •.` projects,and funding sources for Town Center projects, "' Scope of Work/Product " , ,•, The Advisory Committee shall work with City staff to develop a graphic and written ' ' " "' • report for recommendation to the Planning Commission consistent with the above ,, objectives and with the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan,within the timeframe " '; specified below. The Committee shall complete the following tasks,which shall be r documented in the final report, . • t' . ` yr i ti Tasks;"•t I, Clearly define a 20 year vision for the Lake Grove Town Center. Include a + ' description of the character of Lake Grove Town Center and a clear definition of ;" • '`t ." mixed-use. •A �" 2, Review existing zoning standards and determine appropriateness for achieving ;dY LGTC Plan objectives and Guiding Principles. • Y " .; r•'' 3, Define work on zoning and design standards based on issues identified in LGTC ,' , E \''" ' Plan report, 4, Prioritize implementation projects,identify funding sources,and develop timelines, Coordinate with Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency(LORA)staff, Y ' A 5, Draft Cunimunity Development Code,Comprehensive Plan,and Transportation "' "` System Plan amendments, .• ; •-• Planning Commission Discretion The Planning Conirecommendations n ission,In its to the City Council,may accept, w ',0 modify,or reject the Advisory Committee's recommendations. The Planning t "a Connuission's recommendations to City Council shall be informed by testimony received ' at Planning Commission public hearings conducted otter receiving the Advisory ', , . Committee's final report, ' Lake Otovo Iowa Conte Platt Implementation-Athikko t oinmlllee Cnntgo Statement Pat o 2 bnAPT July 29,2003 p U U N \ . AA(32) , i ''k r ,' _1 •.' ,. '' A/, " n . gip" F ,. 4.. .:.t ,. . ; d..'. �. 1 .: ''t . ::.., ..n .-+1. ...'u a.. sM,; :1 a,, 0 w + .9 Membership 0. Membership of the Advisory Committee shall consist of up to eight(8)members „e appointed by the City Council,based on Planning Commission recommendation, including one representative,unless noted otherwise,from each of the following groups: r • Commercial property owner in the Lake Grove Town Center Plan area "' • Business owner in the Lake Grove Town Center Plan area(2 members) • Lake Grove Neighborhood Association,Lake Forest Neighborhood Association, �°+, ' '. • or Waluga Neighborhood Association representative(2 members) At-large representative(Lake Oswego resident who lives outside of the Lake x • Grove area) • Lake Oswego School District representative(Board member or PTO a " > representative approved by Board) ",,•. ;;; • Member of the Planning Commission "{`.4 JI ~ ' If the Planning Commission determines that it is appropriate for one alternate member I 'P from each organization be chosen,the alternate shall be permitted to attend meetings. t` " `" However,the alternate shall be involved in the discussion on a limited basis,based on the "" discretion of the Chair,if the primary member is present. If the primary member is not in attendance,the alternate member shall serve in the capacity of the primary member, ' + a „ Additionally,representatives from the Development Review Commission(DRC)and; Transportation Advisory Board(TAB)shall be invited to attend committee meetings as non-voting members. Staff shall be invited to attend specific meetings and to provide v • technical assistance(e,g,City Engineering and Development Review staff)and LORA ', - z staff, 'v Qualifications: , , ak The following qualifications shall be considered by the Planning Commission/City " Council hi the seleenon of Committee members: 4 u Experience working within a consensus-driven decision-making process,and a commitment to such a process for development of the LGTC Plan, • ' ' ' • Understandingthat Committee recommendations will through formal CityY l process, Planninggo v : meetings,potentially resulting in to City Council , adoption including Commission and } publict. ': . n: changesCommittee recommendations. ` i • Demonstration of a process for sharing information with and' receiving ' information from group(s)they are representing and the community-at-large. • ' }M yiy .. < 8 ; 'lime Frame and Performance Requirements ' '" The work of the Advisory Committee shall take no more than nine months to complete, " ti starting in September 2003, Following the submittal of the Committee's final report to h the Planning Commission.the term of the Committee shall be completed. At least three ay public meetings and/or work sessions with the Planning Commission shall occur during 4 • this nine month period. The first meeting shall occur after the Committee has completed .,;1""` ; LnRn I3revo Town Cenlar Firm Implemontatlon-464.emnaee Chan!,Statement Page 3 iw DRAFT July 20,2003 s , `.A,(ag)„ .n r 9 r A.'•. v n• a•r,j '1•r $ .o , .,4 f y + kij y -'i F �''� '.ni I M....y Xt '1 �y .N ,•• {l I H y �, J �`. .n w. " �.N.h� ..d. .. .. ...:u.• .. r .��� N..,'�{ :Y .•.... a "... a f�." fk,'•.v.. 1 NIw t 9.' +',•f i• • 1_ a•';' 'Task 1(see above),the second meeting shall occur after the completion of Tasks 2 and 3, ' t w and the third meeting shall occur after the completion of Task 4, The Planning , u 4 Commission may determine that an additional work session is appropriate during or after r. the completion of Task 5. One of the above meetings/work sessions shall be a joint meeting with the PC,DRC,and TAB, ,,.. Periodic progress reports shall be submitted to the Planning Commission by staff prior to F••, " the scheduled public meetings/work sessions. If it is determined that inadequate progress " '' is being made at any time during the process,the project may be either canceled or t•p' + assumed by the Planning Commission, If the project is canceled or assumed by the i, ,. Planning Commission,the term of the Advisory Committee shall also be concluded, '• t Organization Chair: The Planning Commission representative shall serve as the Committee chair, In 'r r the chair's absence,City staff shall conduct the meetings. City staff shall serve as technical representatives and shall be responsible for assembling and compiling all 1f information and reports necessary for the progress of work,including meeting notes. " , • Draft meeting notes and reports will be made available in a timely fashion for member's ,. review and correction. If all Committee members are in agreement,meeting note +; distribution and other Committee conuntmications may occur via email, Finalized meeting notes and other project materials shall be posted on the Lake Grove Town Center Plan project web site(www.ci•oswega.or,us/plot/late/lgtc,htm). Y` Meetings; At a minimum,meetings shall occur once a month, The date and time of • .1. : �. meetings shall be established at the first meeting or by an indication of general consensus `'' thereafter. All Committee meetings will be open work sessions,where alternate members '. "•' ` y, and members of the general public are invited to attend with the understanding that active • participation shall be at the:discretion of the Committee chair, i., A' t � . Quorums and Decisions; No quorum shall be necessary to conduct business, Decisions 4 "^ shall be made by an indication of general consensus among the Committee ntetnhers present, Staff will not participate as decision makers, When this method does not serve , • to establish a clear direction,the chair or their representative shall call for a roll-call votes e`er ,' When agreement cannot be achieved on an issue,business thrill proceed and City staff f_ * •i'� "', shall document and present minoritypositions for future Planning Commission .. x"'' ' consideration. ` A"1,,,' .'st •1 I „ ,.• Recommended by the Planning Commission: Approved by the City Council: t James Johnson,Chair Judie Hantmerstad,Mayor h •a Date Date ' • • } .,r'; L\Case rnesl2onlU9anm a hrgicel rilea'i 01.0002 Lnk d e ,oke'I'meii CeitterJ'lannmg CammissienTly Ke 2 pinning praeaes OK. 1 i.01 1nee0tigd.0'1'C Ad,isory Chace Statement Non uy1K07,dur • ; Lake Grove Town Center Plan Implenientallon N.Adyjtoiv Commlltuo Chatpe Statement- CRAFT July 20,2003 Pane 4 >? lU♦JJ l." ' • y '1 1' 1 h. Yp+ v♦1 t I. , 1 1 1 { ,- llf 1 . • 4,q .r f •.1• 11t. F u' v r • ! 1.9 , w ..:1 ot.t LRv v. ' fie • 'r I i..1'• n fie.. '— I . _t ,y ,. . ( C„ t C jr lc;• " To: Lake Oswego Planning Commissioners , v "--' 1 'el: . • From: Lake Grove Business Association May 28,2003 ; Re: Lake•GroveTown Center,Project -„• ".:. YY�� After nine months of study,public forums involving the eharrette process and .,., . , • numerous follow.up meetin ,it is clear from the:Pllee^M'etions presented that y., .., business leaders'ideas(key stakeholders)are underrepresented. W ih the Planning ,tl, , r Commission given theerole of an.advisory•committee,involved'business members •�' .r '' 1' 1 : were given,voice in the planning but have come'to the.onclusion that they were w '"i ' a� • apparently not.beard. Most of our�members live inrLake•uswego and wish,to carry ',1 > > on their successful businesses without feeling that they arc not included in the future a', of Lake Grove by current planning conceptions. •.,. "' ...0 When the process started,we were talking goals that included parking provisions, ' " r setback alternatives given the possible widening,of•Booncs F,erry Road,on street µ • ,' R parking,-new intersections and crosswalks,connecting and intersecting'pathways to •`;, , the neighborhoods,an aesthetically defined street enhancement that include " underground electrical,.decorative streetlights,landscaping,slower traffic rates,etc. y, . • The city staff planners,commissioners and engineers have focused their ideas ",, ` " �'" 4exclusively on the commercial zone rather than the broader area surrounding Boones Ferry Road. They have made many parcels "mixed nee"which may t • ?• require residential accommodation in any redevelopment of those lots. They tried .'_ , to change the geographical boundary lines of the study that were set back in •f September. At a Planning Commision meeting May 12,parcels at the North and South were added to the study area. People not involved in the process for the last e nine months were taken into consideration,their ideas entertained and lines were changed. Present commercial areas were deemed"mixed use"and their current . office space zoning was turned into commercial. Business°Wners objected when they found out about this lack of due process and this point was emphasized at the last public forum.When a public process has been instituted but changes come out -, ; ,. of"private"meetings,it comes close to cronyism and makes a mockery of ; 4` 4 ''•, democratic,inclusive input. The"town center"is in reality a long strip of commercial buildings. The focus on A • Lake Grove School as a commons arca is an imaginative idea that holds credibility 'e" '•,,... because it gives the area a center of focus and activity. But the transitions to the .,, , .' "great neighborhoods"should be in the first parcels adjacent to the commercial, not in the commercial zones themselves. Bccanse the neighborhood Would reject „ a f,. such density causing projects,the onus is on the business district to accept these 's V new residential components, Such units should not be located at the busiest '' intersections:they should be designated at quieter points between the commercial = lots and the neighborhood. They might fit well next to buildings that are not , ' d " y residences like churches,parka,open spaces,schools,daycares,etc. Parking configurations that were basically elaborate works of fiction Were dropped from the last illustrations presented. A few words about a small public area located p 0 5 ATTACHMENT B Y � I ' J.' ' t " a N f' .' '., .. K . .�, .'I •1 X :.M. :ter J , somewhere between here and Kansas was gifted as a token. :r.1', `" As stakeholders,we need present not just objections to ideas;but imaginative i.,; s v. solutions and cooperative ventures in light of present and future realities. A' , ' • Accessibility,financial stability and feasibility should be hallmarks of.any structural changes to the core business district. We do not have the luxury of land for .tt amenities like 12 foot sidewalks,double bike lanes,shared parking,25 foot wide ° - y,p roadways parallel to the arterial. When and if the city would like to extend the r.. commercial zone depth,those matters might he more likely entertained. But the p present constraints force us.to take a restrictive stance in how we open up the use of ;t s .• our'lands. +:, 'A, Business owners,as evident tonight by their presence,have come to a consensus ", regarding the elements of this plan; they desire to be treated as vested stakeholders ° 2.'" and primary decision-makers in mapping their"front and back yards." Through n ` _ their commitment to the process,they wish to•work.cooperatively in partnership { 1„.: with the city staff and its agencies forthe betterment of all concerned. Please feel ' free to contact us individually orns a group; we will respond enthusiastically. • u4: .f h° C � aj a y, '. p t ' I, { wr ° ' ,r,y,� * i 3 o 1_ • ,+7w 1 i ' w . , ° ' :AA(.12)'' • . 1 J +i * .r . . � � .•. .. , all ,,, " ,. n , i a ; .t �•; 4 e` 1. . { a,A ,-• i .l -fla r,4: 1 + fir,r,_;• I ° '' y )..x - i�r .•' n' {+. ‘. .. r . COMMERCIAL PROPERTYOWNERS " `` Lade grove fissocitztion , .'' (Post Office 43ox 1337 Lakj.Grove 04,97035 " i. °° Sid Smlther June 10,2003 q .' Coordinator J• i.. Rod Adams ° ,4 Daniel Virzini,Chair Deanna niter Planning Commission 11' " ,,, City of Lake Oswego , °, ,.„ Marianna mtar 13830 Verte Court Lake Oswego OR 97035 y ,. 1 Alma Dasliva r ' Ray Dobord Dear Mr.Vizzini: • a, ' -» ' Darryl Eddy ;• ' Thank you for taking time during the last two planning commission 4 ° meetings to answer our questions and respond to our concerns. We ' d{ Dr.Tim Edvalson support your efforts wholeheartedly,and we shall do our part to ,l Dr.Riccardo Foggia communicate to our members,through the representative of our group that is chosen to be on the task force,the progress being made. We • r Dud Gillison 4 „ ,y agree that without consistent and accurate communication from Tony Gubanc the focus group to all outside organizations and citizens of interest, p „ the ultimate time of implementation could be seriously delayed. ;fi H u „Craig Hannum r, r • As we understand the intention of the planning commission from the • ;' r.... lane Iona lerulll meeting of last evening,a focus group should be composed of the ,. ,b i ' r•+le Jenike following: ^ ,.a 2 members to represent the 120 businesslservices of Lake Grove. r ", Vie Keeler 2 members selected from the three neighborhood associations. °' 4" 1 member to represent the 47 commercial property owners. r , y Dill Kreger i 1 member with a civic financial background. _,,-C ' ` : a . David Napon 1 member of the community at large. v"; ;y "'`, 1 member of the planning commission at each meeting, Costa Mien group y ;h ' y � a Ideas of one or two other focus rou members were discussed,but it , w ' ''a r Charles CPLeary appeared that no consensus was reached. Others proposed were: fis ,- ' 1 " ` Dr.Donald Palmer 1 member representing transportation in some capacity„ ' l . 1 member of the school district. r. DIII Panaretos 1 transportation person knowledgeable about school safety. . ,.r •�� q` j' George Pentacles At various times,the above were suggested as ad hoe. �. , :'' a " Rahul Roddy We understand and agree that the focus group should seek consensus R . ,1 1 as its first avenue of approach in every instance,that teamwork towards ' Dick Reiner " , ; pre-agreed goals should be a prime directive,and that not only objectivity; i ._ , DV.Jon Robinson but also a desire to truly understand and empathize with the opinions of .r ,• r other focus group members,is critical to the final result of the group's I' .1" ' Nathan dpucrarclli endeavors. ,I, i ., a . , .', rd lipaccarollf l^ 1t is also understood that from July 14(or such time as the City / 4 ' Patrick Terrell Commission designates the focus group)until September 9;those ��' '- ' on the focus group are to study aft literature pertaining to the work J a; Pata Ward they are to undertake. 0137 . , . ,t AA(322.) ',» 5 °' 4 1 • 4. °.: r i�'. •v 4", a `f',.,�•" • 4 , +' ....�k. .l •6• r.• `.,r M .�I..+ ,7. °`. x :r C^'+ COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS 9,.,. Lake grove Association C a •.,,p Q'ost Office(BOX 1337 ",t £a(e grove OR,97035 n Sid Smithor It is also understood that the issue of zoning should be the first item a'> CO«aMaa Discussed,and that the second matter to be addressed is that of design Rad Adams standards. Once concurrence has been reached regarding these,then I y Dianna Biter project recommendations may commence. '' Marianna Sitar r ..,.� :• We understand that town centers are defined in terms of attractiveness, '�� vibrancy,transportation services,safety,shopping,services,greater t. alma Datiuve population density,and a good pedestrian environment. We realize that ,' f,r ':. Ray Dobord concerns about crosswalks,traffic speed,pedestrian safety,adequate s • parking,transit routes,and public gathering places must all be l "'N Darryl Eddy addressed in the content of a welcoming environment. a Dr.Tim Edvalnon , Finally,we understand that the document from which we are to begin "' Dr.Riccardo Foggia our work is the City of Lake Oswego's Comprehensive Plan. ' `' , yn,•.. '�•� Y� a+. Bud Wilson Because minutes of the 6/9/03 meeting will not be available to us for F .. w many weeks,there is no way for us to be certain if our interpretations ! Tony Gabanc '. are accurate. Therefore,we encourage you to pencil in any corrections • Craig Hannum and send them to us so that we may be able to continue improving our overall understanding of the process and commitnucate the saute to our 7., e i . w w Dorton°lorulli membership, .41 . Adele Joalko a f•" Sincere thanks, :::: .,_ .--»�i^� :•,_ is David Nopon . .a'•, r Sid Smither Gosta Nilson '�r:a • ` Gherkin O'Leary •i • i ' • Dr.Donald Palmer / ' • ., r a , Mil Panaretos + j." ; � 4' ',,F George Pi+ihogios r • ;;r Rabid Reddy ; i'„ . Dick Reiner a :Y ` +, qN r ; 1• Dr.Jon Robinson ". f`. Nathan Spaccarulil + • ` !Dollard apaccornill 1 . ,, Patrick Terrell 0 0 8 , . 4. Polo Ward 'r . a. yr. •i !,li Av., ' r.AA,(32) N. .7..k 1 t i , } . • ., ,1 4' v + • ' , 6 u „4 w s ,•"• , { !?"A 1. r s R 5 a Y + '• � -''' ,0 r r t J r "r �: ., June 19, 2003 .. „.t, trM' Lake Oswego Planning Commission P. O. Box 369 JUN 2 9 2.0M . ' Lake Oswego, OR 97034 , t u:. Dopt,of PIannInf7 t,Development x Dear Mr. Vizzini, '� + '1 ; On June 9th, members of the Lake Grove Business Association attended the work '" session on the Town Center and presented their ideas of how to proceed in a jr • -'} , collaborative and constructive fashion with "Phase 2" of the project. The numbers • -,-,•!, .. of informed, concerned and interested business owners attending reflected their felt .�,, ,, ' "stakeholder" perspective and the dialogue was instructive and engaging. A We were encouraged with your resolve to recommend to the City Council two 4. + members to represent the 120 business/offices which include the 18 restaurant/deli/ t. food services,and one to represent the 47 commercial property owners that would y .' : join two participants from the neighborhood organizations and two other appointees ; ' with constructive communal ties along with the planning commission representative. We would ask the City Council and Planning Commission to allow the Lake Grove -. �.• Business Association to either choose those three members or submit a slate of volunteer individuals who would commit themselves to the concluding processes. �\ y ,N We acknowledge that preparatory work on guiding documents(Neighborhood Plan, r'' T Boones Ferry Corridor Plan, Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan, the Technical Report .•' for Town Center prepared by OTAk)would be mandatory for participants and we would screen interested individuals to help insure a positive outcome of this last e, ,, phase. We also deem it imperative to have informed, consensus-building,visionary is and long-term Lake Oswego business people on this focus group. ' ,_ •• P In this last work session,you personally mentioned the need to explain in more expansive fashion the "meaning" of this Town Center Plan. You were referring to ' r' the"guiding principles"that are underlying premises to this urban design. A discussion of these features would be helpful for us business people to know what t. parameters We are operating Under when coming to the public forum. They seem implicit to you but are to us frankly just ideas or concepts. ` .' Thank you for your time, interest and response during these two work sessions. We look forward to working with you to see what emerges for the continued ,T N economic vitality and aesthetic enhancement of Lake Grove. A 4" 4 , Al.‘ . .'" e / Michael Buck Lake Grove Business Association ' Restaurant Member I . . A , ,'„' N ,, 0.0 9 r' Y F1/� ,,y R n 1 a. s Y: ' A y • t,F n. .+ I i T1. i } ; •••,',„ ; • • :• • ' .1'• ^t. • 0. , • ,. ., •• , ,. • •.• , -.' • .1 j .• • . .• a 4.• ' , . • • " • AA•c„ . • . • • - ,,,• , -)„ . ' ,*•+ ; •.• I • , .; • • j' ,x' ,• f COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS ) ; Luke grove Association .. '" West Office Boti133i «'y' Lakc Gram O .97035 , r 2003 I, r'a Sid 5mlther uopt.of Manning a Dovalapmanl `r` V " Coordinator ' Rod Adams City of Lake Oswego Deanne Lifter Planning Commission 4" Marianna altar do Dennis Egner,Long Range Planning PO Box 369 �; ;; Alma Dasllva Lake Oswego OR 97034 " Ray Dobord Darryl Eddy Dear Planning Commission Members: Dr.Tim Edvalson The nearly one mile(9/10)of Boones Ferry Road,from Spring Lane to the . p 1.8 miles of frontage a /,. Dr.Riccardo Foggia end of the property at the 16463 address,yields '-; property on both sides of the street,all of which is owned by Lake Grove's ;a of q a Bud Wilsonabout 40 yards commercial property owners,except. a)at intersections,b) Tony Subaru of frontage owned by the U.S.Government's Postal Service,c)about 120 �, Craig Hannum yards of frontage owned by the Lake Oswego School District. ,' Jay Hyde Excluding intersections,Lake Grove's commercial property owners own i approximately 95%of the frontage property on Boones Ferry Road. Aft ;''-� Joyco Hyde c+ ., Darlene feruill the businesses on Boones Ferry Road are housed in our properties. lo Jonike ' Knowing that positive changes in the area will increase rents,attract a high w c iteolor " " !-; class of tenants,increase property values,and attract customers to our .: Dill Kroger tenants,it becomes paramount that we have an important voice in those Y , v '!. ' ct David Nepom changes. As the commercial property owners benefit,so too does the city in the form of esthetics,livability,community involvement,and taxes on Jaw<' fi. 4oah Nepom commercial properties that are more highly Valued. „• y�• Lynn Nepom " c6, °p '�� Byvirtue of the above,the commercial real property owners of Boom , Marvin Nap!om .' } Ferry Road feel that they should be represented by more than one Goeta Newtrepresentative on the upcoming Task Force. The fact that the , . 'M Charles O'Leary approximately 120 businesses of Lake Grove are housed in our properties, Dr.Denafd Palmer many of long-term duration,indicates our fairness,and our skill at 1 , ,, communication and consensus agreements, g•`a„ ; ,,• nin pannrntos . r n George psrhogfos The more people from our group that are on the Task Force,the greater t , '�',. Rohnl noddy the probability ofgetting all property owners on the same page regarding r. IT',, ;, task force riaca nmendations. Early,complete,and convincing ::�, '" , Dick Reiner communication and disclosure to all Commercial property oWhers is ° , 1 Dr.Jon Robinson essential to a smooth progression to the end result. ,. Nathan Spnccnrelii • ! r Sincerely, , Richard Spaccorolli ..-..... ...... - \.. .) ts........\, 1 ' y ;^ trick Terra �- : A°" pate Wend + '!'Sid Smither . cC' Lake Oswego City Council , .. q 7� •l r 4 7 , a �••. •, ,• ,„ , • . • • • • t •1:: :7•%... • • • . •A • . • + • • I . 1.* 11'..• • ; . • ;•••••••• I. • " : ..••I: ;II• .1•• , • • • ;: '0AA,(8 ) ' ,A ; '*1. 1 : . ' • • t ,•* • " • • '( 1.y• • •, 1� a -a • `,��.9-`��E Ow/.�•� Community Development 14 I. ' - ,�� ; 4 y Department 1 ,1" t".• I y I. o,;,,m ,I,gJ , `''r' ' ' Memorandum ORE O '' TO: ..:... . .Planning Commission .. .. I` s . FROM: Dennis Egner,AICP, Long Range Planning Manager DATE: July 29, 2003 • K. SUBJECT: Lakefront Zoning—Project Update(P 02-0007) ;} 1 Background-The City of Lake Oswego and the Lake Corporation have each contributed "I $10,000 to pay for a lakefront zoning study, The Center for Housing Innovation (CHI)at the . University of Oregon was hired to conduct the study(Ron Kellet of CHI was the consultant on the City's infill study), The lakefront zoning work is divided into two phases, The first phase, through June 30th, has been focused on assessing conditions and developing initial concepts. The second phase(July through December)will refine concepts and result in graphics and Illustrations for any needed code amendments. J y . e. Progress—On July 15t', Ron Kellet and Allan Schmidt of CHI met with City staff and Lake °-' , report Corporation representatives to on research and Initial concepts, Issues being explored '' include: ., • e House Size; I , ■ Relationship to the Lake; •a ■ Relationship to the Street;and j "-. ■ Relationship to Neighbors, ' Implementation concepts include FAR adjustments, lot coverage, height, lake setback, `` tJ . .I lakefront height,front yard setback,garages and garage openings, side yard setbacks,and • • A. side yard elevations, CHI is continuing to explore the feasibility of these concepts, Next Steps-Prior to a large public meeting, Lake Corporation representatives want Ron 67 •,.. O.. Kellet to update the Lake Corporation Board, It was suggested that this be a joint meeting with the Planning Commission, Staff Is exploring times when this meeting could occur, i _. I ,, I I nning commission Meeting P 02-0007 August 11,2003 o t„ .. r". .X. Ili J 7 F '..' • „ e A / .1*,,, it r, • '� ' 1._ n I. • _, of LANL CI 44. Community Development • L „f �'���' ., Department ', . '• -,-,' , . , u •, ' Memorandum ,�RLGON�- ,•, TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dennis Egner,AICP, Long Range Planning Manager •.. DATE August 1,2003 , SUBJECT: Water Quality Task Force—August 11, 2003 Work Session (LU 00-0058) Background�The City needs to address several Items to meet the water quality component ., of Metro Title 3, A key issue to address Is the width of riparian buffers along streams and wetlands. The formation of a task force has been proposed to assist staff in drafting amendments to the Community Development Code to comply with the water quality component of Title 3. Dennis Egner and Susan Millhauser of the Long Range Planning Division will staff the task force. Additional City staff will be asked to participate as needed, based on specific expertise (e.g. Lisa Hamerlynck, Natural Resources Coordinator), It Is k expected that the work of the Task Force will be complete by the end of the year. A public open house addressing water quality was held on March 27, 2003. In June,staff ,,. identified a list of potential task force members and forwarded the list to the City Council for appointments. At their July 15,2003 study session,the Council requested that a charge } ,r statement be prepared and that staff identify additional Individuals who would represent i development and neighborhood interests. Three additional members and two alternates have been identified to fill these positions. The Council is expected to meet on August 5 to accept the charge statement and appoint task force members, is The draft charge statement with the list of task force members is attached. Next Steps Convene the Water Quality Task Force and begin work. , •. { i ID planning Comm LU o0-0058 1 lSsion Work Session b August 11,2003 " ' " • . 1 AAis2a , " „ . 4 n (A ' y� ��• .. . et,w. 9� { M1 r 14 1 .i , .. , . i t. • DRAFT TITLE 3-WATER QUALITY `-, TASK FORCE a .; .: CHARGE STATEMENT I. Objectives The objective of the City Council is to develop and adopt standards and procedures for the City ,, of Lake Oswego that comply with the water quality provisions of Title 3 of the Metro 2040 t} Functional Plan. It is also the objective of the City Council that any new standards and procedures protect the health and safety of citizens,protect and enhance watershed health,protect private property investments,and comply with all applicable state and regional standards for ;;f water quality management. II. Charge Statement ,,, . ' The Task Force serves at the request and direction of the City Council,for the expressed purpose . • of providing the Planning Commission(and City Council)with information,advice and • recommendations regarding the application of state and regional water quality standards. The City Council directs the Task Force to: }• 1` A, Develop standards and procedures that comply with the water quality provisions of Title 0 3 of the Metro 2040l unctional Plan. ;,a ' 13, Review the local application of state and regional water quality standards, Identify specific local conditions that are not adequately addressed by these standards,Identify standards that require additional clarification or definition for successful local 1 • • ' , application, ' • C, Identify areas where state and regional standards provide for local discretion and choice, y Recommend alternative policies,regulations or standards where applicable, D. Consider the relationship of Water quality standards to other conununity development ` '` policies and regulations, Identify areas for additional review by the City o f Lake Oswego, III, Membership a The Task Corce shall include nine voting members, An alternate(If appointed)may serve in -' place of a member when a member is absent, The appointments follow: '' i. s • Frank Groznik,Lake Oswego Planning Commission ,war ,• • Murk Rosenkranz,Water Quality Specialist,Lake Oswego Corporation ° 410 ■ Laura Rybiowlak,Tyron Creel,Watershed Council,Forest Highlands resident l LU 00-0058 Page 1 07/30/03 Task force + otn I ' isBruce Henderson,Henderson Land Services,LLC '''1 .0 fSarah Asby,Lake Oswego Natural Resources Advisory Board,Mt.Park resident • Marcus Glass,Lake Oswego Natural Resources Advisory Board,McVey-South Shore i, ,," resident e t M Jim Hinzdel,AICP,planner/developer ",'i }(;: e Alex Hurley,AKS Engineers ' Colleen Bennett,LONAC chair "" • • Sarah Champlen,League of Women Voters(Alternate for Colleen Bennett) o u Malcom Eslinger,Eslinger Builders(Alternate for Alex Hurley and Jim Hinzdel) IV. Leadership and Staffing Task Force meetings will be chaired by the member from the Planning Commission. The City of Lake Oswego Planning Department will provide administrative staff support. • ;, V. Decision Process and Responsibilities ••.•.,:, •'' Consensus among Task Force members,while desirable,is not necessary. Rather,it is important r , ; to have the Task Force develop well-reasoned options and alternatives for Planting Conunissibn ' deliberation. It is expected that the Task Force will address issues in a timely manner and will .°`'" ,A a:,; report to the Planning Commission at its regular January 12,2004 meeting. , ''• All meetings will be open to the public,but public participation in Task Force discussions will be ' managed with an allotted time specified for public comment. . Responsibilities and procedures of the Task Force include: Members will meet with their constituent groups outside of Task Force meetings to '" identify positions and resolve issues. • Members will attend meetings or assure that alternate members(if appointed)attend in C their place. • Members will be committed to development of a number of reasonable options for Planning Commission consideration. ■ If votes are taken,each member will have one vote. Alternates may only vote when the ,�. member is absent, Members or alternates must be present to vote. • V, Schedule . The Task Force is expected to deliver its proposed options to the Planning Commission for the • , .. ,I Commission meeting on January 12,2004. It is anticipated that the Task Force will require six , 1" to eight meetings to complete its work. .• iiii A .. . .... LU 00,0058 Page 2 07/30/03 Task forcel l y i , 4 1 AA iFjnl"4 • 4gi.t •'t Lt.S. ! ' 1.�,Y tuA.l'r yt iM Wi. '` Y' ,` r • '' ^\` ,