Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - 2003-08-25 PM r p, F ( i i,Y•. M ' ♦J� +w � 1( % J YN.. CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO �1 1 41 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ur vd : V N !'„ g 44 •1 �'`•1 S K • �y. �' l M•'p y h.� 1:1 f t M' ` l PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS N 1+, N t r •� µY^�, •A AUGUST 25, 2003 .f- 1 x r r 'J :Wd, . dY s R'� x• •J. •Y fa 4 MI'j� M• • + �`rN p tq M1. r I,P 1 i�Nu.U= x .x. Y , 44, �µ Y f YN .�� f P. x , = r r +4..' Air• Y w ' b '0 N �1 �4 .44 1 y J'r 1: A ;.1 " '41 r^ ' 4- ! i ' ,"t 1..:- l a'• ' ..� ,.. ' '"v4 t 1 1 }t r " t' s w b w inkc City of Lake Oswego'ti Planni>!�g Commission f . ` I Monday,August 25,2003 w \� + �► a ' . tea;,'' / 6:00 p.m.—Open Work Session -..,.ORmoN , City Hall Council Chamber 4,1 ,74 Members: 380 A Avenue ^" ' rr N� " • James Johnson,Chair ' trunk Groznik,Vice Chair Lake Oswego,OR 97034 t r ,, Mary Beth Coffey,Kenneth L.Sandblast, " w Mark Stayer,Daniel Vizzini and Alison Webster For Information: 503/635-0290 a " Council Liaison; Jack Hoffman AGENDA fVl ' - 1.t , This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location. For any special accommodations,please ' K. , contact Iris Treinen,503/697-6591,48 hours before the meeting, , I. CALL TO ORDER • 1. " rg w II, ROLL CALL " ` t' . III, CITIZEN COMMENT—Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda(3 minute limit per individual) c.,y, . n4+ IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ka r , 4 a. .� July 2,8, 2003 ' V. GENERAL PLANNING—OPEN WORK SESSION � ,. Outlook 2025 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review(P 02.0001) ''' (�' r • Goal 12,Transportation and Goal 13,Energy Conservation a! : .':; 'w; • October 27,2003—Public Workshop—Program Discussion ,� I ' Identification of issues to address during 2004 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review, ' '`' µ`' '4 Staff coordinator is Sidaro Sin,Associate Plattner. i VI. OTHER BUSINESS ,.' 1 VII. ADJOURNMENT �s ' r, r r .r' i,, 4, Y M ,p k.� F H 'if * '' tt 1 '. ' I f a ♦i I i '1 •,• , +1 1 h ' _ r yi' .a da d Y ^.A, 4.os Community Development ' i O k'�, , (4,^ft, ' ., , Department �' '...,',.1,:,,,',:. � ` Memorandum 1 'hy� a : , y f TO: Planning Commission �4 � A y 1w ' FROM.: Sidaro Sin,Associate Planners r'r .. .Y DATE: August 11,2003 a , f y ,11`'d" SUBJECT: Outlook 2025--Issues Identification t `i a 5 " '" , . Goal 12-Transportation ' 3oa1 13-Lnergy Conservation ACTION: �. "' 'j Identify issues to address during Periodic Review for; 4''. • Goal 12-T►„nsportation 'r • Goal 13-Energy Conservation , DISCUSSION: This work session ibcuses on identifying issues,as they relrte to goals 12 and 13 of the r Comprehensive Plan, ''r '� Goal 12-, Transportation ' " M`.. I. Comprehensive Plan Coal 12-Transportation , + ", Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan,Goal 12. `there are 11 goals related to transportation: a r `y" Overall goal: ' '' "The City shall develop a street system to address the/nubility needs of residents for all modes ^m.x of transportation." "3 ;H Specific goals: , ,.•y . - 1.1. Major Streets System ,, "Lake Oswego shall develop a major street system consisting of major and minor arterials y and major collectors, which will have minimal impact on the City's air quality, address the w t w • " mobility needs of residents for all ntocles of travel and promote energy conservation." W+s '.A Planning Commission Work Session Page I 1 -.,." ,"7, «" Outlook 2025-duels 12&13 ,, y Meeting date August 25,2003 " ' Nw,..'y ;'1,P11,i3�1, n^�, y Y t tit ' j try., 'n" i •.1 :w 1� ,°,�_.j , t �. A h;,' N � ` • Y 1; 2. Inter-governmental Coordination ' * ya •+' "Gals Oswego's transportation system shall be planned,developed and operated in a _' • „N coordinated manner with other state,regional and local transportation providers." tl •° ; .;.,; 3, Neighborhood Collectors and Local Residential Streets _ i '" *w r +.' "Lake Oswego shall develop a system of neighborhood collectors and local residential M 9'+` rA i„ streets which• preserves the quite,privacy and safety of neighborhood'living and which has ' 0.— r' • x• • ',.::': adequate, but not excessive capacity,necessary to accommodate planned land uses, w•; ','';4'.4'_:, N a 4. Land Use and Transportation Relationships 7 . .. ` "Amendments to land use designations,densities,and design standards within the Lake , ; „`' Oswego Comprehensive Plan shall be reviewed to ensure that traffic generation does not w` exceed the present design capacity and function of the planned transportation system," ' , . rt x. 5. Transportation Demand Management "Lake Oswego shall develop strategies and,implement progi•;ens that reduce the number of 1 automobiles traveling in Lake Oswego,especic!l1y during peak morning and evening traffic honrs, r F 6. Walking ' t 1r "The City shall provide a continuous citywide network of safe and convenient walkways ; • * ''" that promotes walking as a mode of t•avel for short trips," y 7. Bicycling • "The City shall provide a network of safe aul convenient bikeways integrated with other - p r transportation modes to increase modal share of bicycle transportation for all trip ,,4. " yA purposes," , ' 8. Transit System "The City shall encotowge transit ridership by working with Metro, Tri-Met,and ODOT to ' ' develop a transit system which is fast,comfortable, accessible and economical through .:'' �� , development of land use patters,development design standards and street and • ', ")* pedestrian/bikeway improvements which support transit," , ' `u ' 9. Commercial Rail and Water Transportation ::. "Lake Oswego shall work w'th commercial rail and water transportation providers and da, "' �� , , ensure their , i associated re ulatoty agencies to unsure activities are safe and compatible with the P .A '`. City's transportation syster�t," .- 10. Citizen involvement $4 1� "Lake Oswego shall ensure that opportunities are provided for citizen involvement in M N. decisions affecting the C'ity's transportation system," ... 11, Parking " "Adequate on-site parking and loading facilities shall be provided for all land uses." i. (Altuchment I,t:omprehcnsive Plannhig Goal 12) " n y ,, 'J y Manning C'otnntissinn Work Session Page 22 a ,.1' Outlook 2025•Opals 12 Sr.l ,`: Meeting date August 25,2002 pWly , -: '' ._ '" I !a' •. AAiUl . i k , a .t.. Y A, + ' .r . A � .A ,,q q ., iyn , a o r YS Y i %> Statewide Planning Goal 12: a � Y :' "To provide and encourage a safe,convenient and economic transportation system," Statewide Planning Goal 12 requires local governments to: :,.•. ^ + •Develop a transportation plan which considers all modes of travel including mass transit, n _ air,water,pipeline,rail,highway,bicycle and pedestrian; a4'^ ' •Be based upon an inventory of local,regional and state transportation needs; 0: ;,' •Consider the differences in social consequences that would result from utilizing differing , '.1 combinations of transportation modes; • Avoid principal reliance upon any one mode of transportation; d , ' • Minimize adverse social,economic and environmental impact and costs; L` •Conserve energy; � � , •Meet the needs of the transportation disadvantaged by improving transportation services; Y" ono.', :`. •Facilitate the flow of goods and services so as to strengthen the local and regional economy;and "J � '',:, e Conform with local and regional comprehensive land use plans. "' ' (Attachment 2,Statewide Planning Goal 12) " , OAR 660-12:Transportation Planning Rule(TPR) p. The purpose of the TPR is to implement Statewide Planning Goal 12(Transportation)and promote the development of safe,convenient and economic transportation systems that are . ,•, designed to reduce reliance on the automobile so that air pollution,traffic and other livability problems faced by urban areas in other parts of the country might be avoided,It is also the purpose of the TPR to explain how local governments responsible for transportation planning demonstrate compliance with other statewide planning goals,The TPR sets requirements for coordination among affected levels of government for preparation,adoption,refinement, implementation and amendment of transportation system plans(TSP), The City's TSP was adopted in 1998, The TSP is supposed to maintain and reduce the vehicle miles traveled by a' • commuters, To accomplish this,Jurisdictions are required to provide the opportunity for ,,'' k • i residents to use alternative transportation,including walking,bicycling and transit. Implementing strategies include:reduced parking,better pedestrian and bicycle connections and " "' ;r provisions of amenities for alternative transportation. The full text of OAR 660-12 can be found 4. " " " ' at http://arcweb,sos,state,nnus/rulec/OARS 600/OAR 660/660 012,htin!• " i II. General Information Background: e,«' i 5 In 1990,the City Council appointed a 24-member,ad hoc Transportation " Committee to review and update the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, The ( ." changes proposed by this Committee were in response to new legislation and changes in the community that had occurred since the Plan was originally adopted in 1978, .• ;,_`: • ur '''+ In 1992 the updated Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan was adopted that '� " "' incorporated the following Items: A' t ± Y` » '1 t Planning Cninndssion Work Session rage 3 3 '' ;'. ; Outlook 2025.Coals 12 St Meeting date August 25,2003 '',A ' :,*•.. 1 *' t '' c. .,, Y s 4 xr Y . ,"�.. ' t i"... • • w " f 4 ; 1. ,� 1 " " vh q a , 'l Transportation Planning Rule(TPR): In 1991,the Land Conservation and Development fr • ,w Commission adopted the TPR, The TPR encourages the use of alternative transportation, " N,, a r ''„ . including walking,bicycling and transit through the implementation of strategies such as reduced x" 0.., parking,better pedestrian and bicycle connections and provisions of amenities for alternative transportation, .: Transportation System Plan(TSP): The TSP was adopted by the City in 1998. The TSP is , " mt'• incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan and also list short range and long range transportation r •-+ ",'r improvement projects. ' j Public Facilities Plan(PFP): The City's PFP was adopted in 1997, Within the PFP,the '' transportation element of the plan identifies projects to be completed within 10 and 20 years K • periods. From this list of transportation projects,the City identifies projects to incorporate into '' k :• t +, , its 5-year Capital Improvement Plan, Functional Street Classification: The street classification was amended in 1992,so that the •x previous"Arterial"classification was expanded to Major Arterial and Minor Arterial. The ' P`: '" "Collector"classification was expanded to Major Collector and Minor Collector. Also,many ' -,' `';h: streets that were originally"Collector"streets were reclassified to"local streets". These street classifications are also found in the TSP. ti ,y'` In 1997,the transportation goal was again amended to incorporate the policy basis and u• ,1 transportation modal maps for greater compliance with the TPR, In general the new policies . , emphasized alternative modes of transportation such its pedestrian,bicycle,and transit, It also w ' encouraged a balance between street classification and the character of the surrounding land fii y uses, Where are we now/what is currently in place for this goal: City programs that arc currently in place to achieve this goal include: • Transportation Planning Rule a Transportation System Plan 4 • Public Facilities Plan(Transportation Element) ' ''' ' • Community Development Code: o Article 50.55 Parking Standards r " o Article 50,56—Transit System `',, , o Article 50,57—Access " " o,Article 50,58—•On-Sift Circulation,Driveways and Fire;Access Roads 4'. " o Article 50,59—On-Site Circulation Standards,Bikeway,Walkways&Accessways ^A 4 o Article 50,60—Local Street Connectivity • qi•4t • City Code Chapter 42,Streets&Sidewalks ' • • M w � IIL Issue ldentit'ie.t'is '° ; The following conditions indicate the need for,and establish the scope of review for periodic ' =r: A,..,- review of the Comprehensive Plan and hard use regulations. (These conditions are intended to w,. t a tact as a starting point for discussions.) A,. Planning Commission Work Session Page 4 4 Outlook 2025-ands 12&13 7' �' Meeting date August 25,2003 ar„ , ., 1^. ° -' "i . •,'„t l of ^;(. r r ,r .`I'"' r .- . .:, a - n, .r 1 ,.. ` . ..: r. tiR r. ] Y ,.1,• ` • ' A) Oregon Administrative Rules(OAR)660-025-0070 ,'r ' • 1. There has been a substantial change in circumstances including but not limited to 1 the conditions,findings,or assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan or �, ° '' land use regulations were based,so that the comprehensive plan or land use regulations do not comply with the statewide planning goals. "` ,e RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition. A �' r, 4.' 2, Decisions implementing acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use e'I .. regulations are inconsistent with the goals. RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition. 4,"; .y.Ntl IW '•H 3. There are issues of regional or statewide significance,intergovernmental a '' - coordination,or state agency plans or programs affecting land use,which must be addressed in order to bring comprehensive plans and land use regulations into compliance with the goals. I ., 7 r k , RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition, i PA, 4 ,., 4. The existing comprehensive plan and land use regulations are not achieving the ] " a• , statewide planning goals. '° t " �'. RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition, 1'..'01 " :, B) Summary of Maior Issues ,, This section highlights existing issues that were identified in the development of the a existing Comprehensive Plan, Not all issues will be applicable. In many cases,the issues are a statement of fact,in other cases they identify a future action. ' `V, ..4 Note: No issues were identified with the existing summary of major issues. However, I staff'is proposing to add a discussion about the services to lands within the Urban Services " t Boundary, Please refer to the discussion under Section"b"of this report. . C) Goals,Policies,and Recommended Action Measures This section will identify goals or policies that should be addressed during Period RevieW In some cases the goal or policy might be outdated and require a deletion or an amendment. {., In other cases,there may be an opportunity for new goals and policies. i " ; NOTE: The Transportation Division has provided some extensive cotments for Coal 12, Their comments are round as Attachment 3. 4r Coals: RESPONSE: No issues were Identified with the existing goals for the 11 sections, .; ' r Planning Commission Work Session Page Outlook 2025.©uals 12&II Meeting date August 25,2003 p Mr y " • „, .l a n s ” .. a .' M4 ✓ y Cyn y �. n ... ..rr • ..,. 1 Policies: � 1, "The arterial and major collector street network shall be designed and C! „ maintained to service level"E"during peak hours.The design of the roadway ;„ system shall also take into consideration: : h ,r' 1.11, a. Balancing roadway size and scale with the need to provide efficient and -;'t y '- safe transportation modes of travel,including bike,pedestrian and transit; ' " b. Giving preference to transportation projects that increase the efficiency, safety,design capacity or level of service of a transportation facility, •. without increasing corridor width;and c. Preserving community aesthetics by considering existing topography and vegetation." d 4-'.. "' (Goal 1,Policy 1) COMMENT: Clarification of this policy might be warranted based on the following conditions: " a) Highwa?'43(State Street),although a State facility impacts traffic in Lake • y ': ;.ti' Oswego. At times this roadways operates under a level of service"F", This ` + situatio t will be even more impacted with the development of Block 138 and X•• _ the planned Foothills development, Given these future impacts in the area,do .. we want to maintain the service level"E"as the threshold for service? Will the .•• q,ly. d,y a •,1 "ff. City be able to maintain the service level at"E"? ,0 , b) Clarification on"street network". Do we look at the street system as a whole or • • how the individual intersections are working? Does this mean that if the ',`; `.{ segment i.e,the street network between Iron Mountain Boulevard and State Street operates at a level of"E",but the intersection of 10't'and"A"Avenue operates at a level of"F",that this"street network"is in compliance with this policy? " • H , •r 2. "Direct access onto major streets shall be controlled and consolidated over time through the development review process and the implementation of major ` a street projects. In particular,access to state highways shall be revit;wed ♦ `�" subject to the regulations of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the City of Lake Oswego. Where regulations conflict,the more restrictive ;! q reuirements shall apply," (Goal 1,Policy 2) • N ♦. COMMENTS: Does this policy need to be deleted or enforced? The 1u'' Transportation Division indicates that the City has not traditionally enforced access •.' management standards,In particular,an example of this quandary is along Highway " 43 dear downtown, ODOT standards(the more restrictive)dictate that driveways "'re be a minimum of 1,000 feet apart. Is it realistic to believe or strive to have driveways be 1,000 feet apart on Highway 43? ", ; . 3, "The major streets system shall consist of freeways,major and minor arterials " ," ,' and major collectors as described in Figures 16& 17. The maximum number • ,,,, of lanes for major streets within the Lake Oswego Urban Services Boundary H" . shall be as follows: • a. Freeways—four to eight lanes. b, Major arterials three to five lanes. t`-' c, Minor arterials—two to four lanes, ., +. Planning Commission Work Session Page 6 6 427 Outlook 2025•Clods 12&13 $ Meeting date August 2$,2003 e ' AA(.a2)- +y.: , 1 y, f• ♦ t'N', :y4 y F ,. _� µ'.", 4 ,* ti5 , . •• 4 41,,, d. Major collectors—two lanes." (Goal 1,Policy 3) "A (', COMMENT: Reconsider this standard unless it is intended to address existing "' ' r` "`, facilities because a four-lane facility has approximately the same caiacity as a three-lane facility and is not nearly as safe, Once a facility needs to be a multi-lane .9,. facility,it should have a fifth or center lane, ;«" ` 1,,,.....' ,; In addition,consideration should be given to adding a third lane to Major Collectors,at least at locations where it is warranted, " '• ay • 4. G°i'he costs of mitigation of the negative impacts(reduced safety and aesthetics, increased noise,reduced bicycle and pedestrian mobility),resulting from street r �A .." improvements needed to serve a specific development,shall be paid for by the 4. 1 + developer of the property. When street projects are needed to improve the 1u 4, capacity,operation and safety of the street system as a whole,the mitigation of negative impacts shall be paid for by the City and/or appropriate funding T.,, : agencies. (Goal 4,Policy 2) ;. COMMENT: The Transportation Division indicates that they would like to see this policy reworded to clarify what constitutes a"safety problem", ?a 1 tt. °' 5. "Allow property owners to realize tax benefits when tight-of-way,not required as a condition of development approval,is dedicated for roadways,pedestrian and bicycle paths." (Goal 4,Policy 7) COMMENT: Investigate the applicability of this policy, It appears this policy q:,' would apply if someone were to dedicate a pathway through their property out of . " ' goodwill, Any such dedications would need to be identified in one of the City's .."• " ' transportation plan. 6, "Lake Oswego shall develop and maintain an up-to-date transportation system w development charge which shall prevent existing residents from subsidizing the cost of any new developmets shall be t to projects which imp ement+ Transportation 7 the Lake Oswego Transports ion System applied Plan." `� Transportation 4 (Goal 4,Policy 8) �.' COMMENT: The Transportation Division indicates that it is difficult to determine '`„:• and track if existing residents are subsidizing the cost of new development. Consider re-evaluating the intent of this policy, " u 'l RAMs: .a " COMMENT:All of the Recommended Action Measures(RAMS)will need to be reviewed II ended applicability,accuracy and ptacticability, ''It,' • '• s: •• i4 Planning Conunission Work Session Page 7 7 :^ Outlook 2025,Owls 12 8c 13 " Meeting dote August 25,2003 4 r t , +� �` o ,: ,_Ip. •A� `..ay �; " " 1 '� b .«. 1 ' •7+ .f+� A,� p ,• "w.. e ," `' 1 y a 1D) Other Identified Issues This section identifies other issues for periodic review consideration. ,• - `'" I. All Urban Services Boundary(USB)Annexation ' y it ie_ ; •04 The City has been exploring the feasibility of an all USB annexation, The City Council is expected to reconsider the USB annexation next spring. The result ' . f " would be all properties within the City's USB would be incorporated into the City limits, The impacts of these additional territories should be considered during the r 1' update of Goal 12, Consideration should be given to: "w " r ''�.1 • If all of these new areas were incorporated into the City,what would be the ` _. impacts of all of the substandard streets on the City's Capital Improvement ;. Plan? ,. "i •,1 , „R • Annexation of these territories could result in an infill development pattern where we would require improvement to City standards on infill lots,which - would result in a patchwork of improvements(sidewalks,pathways,etc). ., To avoid this piecemeal development,the City may need to provide most of r " the connections between these developments, "'K 2. Transportation System Modeling The Transportation Division is recommending to ensure that the City's i' .r transportation planning is working effectively,that a modeling of the transportation ° '•" system be done to see what level of service(LOS)we project to achieve with the ). improvements shown in the PPP and the growth projected in the area, i • 3. improve Coordination and Development of TSPs with ailacent Counties and ' ,+� Cities, Although the second goal of the transportation goal is inter-governmental ;;" ,a coordination,this section requires clarification and updating, Specifically, ;, coordination with adjacent jurisdictions so that there won't be any additional '" conflicts with regional draw retail centers, Coordination should include discussions , about the impacts of adjacent regional developments on the City's transportation ,,:,? system, 4. Crollev Expand Goal 9(Commercial Rail&Water Transport)to include more discussion .' + and policy direction for the trolley. Trolley discussion is currently found under , ; ' , Goal 8(Transit System). The transit system and trolley are integral parts of the Foothills Plan, Consider including additional policy direction on how the trolley , may be used in the future. J of 5, Goal 12 Organization Consider the following organizational changes to Goal 12: M r • Take out Goal 10(Citizen involvement)because it's already found in Goal ", I of the Comprehensive Plan. ,a • Currently,there are 11 sub-goals under Goal 12• Referring to Goal 3 of Goal 12 can be confusion. Consider referring to the sub goals us"sections" similar to the format used under Goal 7. I , Planning Commission Work Session liege 8 8 , ." Outlook 2025•Goals 12 8413 Meeting date August 25,2003 N 4 4 1 'l K 1 1 ..•'•• ,. `, ', al' 4 •, ' • 1! ' ' �• + t?Itl rl � 1 . .. 4.. .. ... �..,.A +I . .. '� u�.. N �, ..r 4... t` 4• 1, r,. u lA AY L , W •$ ..,, F ' V S 1 'M� '` IV. Quality of Life Indicators(OOL)Related to the Goal The intent of this section is to take the opportunity to incorporate QOL indicators with ry+,1 Comprehensive Plan goals. The Comprehensive Plan provides policy direction and goals,while ti, a-' the QOL indicators provides the mechanism to monitor the effectiveness of those goals and w. . " „`w policies. The draft indicators that are related to this goal are listed below. u •Ratio of total miles of bike and pedestrian facilities(hike paths and lanes,pathways and Y sidewalks)to total street miles.(Possible Indicator 2.1) ■ Per capita ridership or average number of bus trips(per capita)to and from Lake Oswego "�`" , ° =,a h` based on information from transit agencies.(Possible Indicator 2.6) • Ratio of miles of streets providing transit service,to the total miles of streets in Lake Oswego. (Possible Indicator 2,7) p•,n • Pavement Condition Index of major roadways in the City(Boons Ferry Rd,Kruse Way, Country Club,A Avenue,State St.,McVey,South Shore Blvd,Bryant Rd,Iron Mt.Blvd), I.»^ 4 (Possible Indicator 2.8) 3 J '% • The''otume of traffic on major roadways in the City(Kruse Way,Boones Ferry Road, l Country Club Road,"A"Avenue,State Street,Kerr Parkway,Bryant Road,South Shore Road,McVey/Stafford Road,Carman Road and Westlake Road). (Possible Indicator 2.9) ,. %;. V. Public Comments This section will include oral and written communications received by the public or stakeholders in time to be included in the staff report. COMMENT; No public comments were received prior to the printing of this report. The Transportation Division comments are included as Attachment 3, j Goal 10 Postcard Mailing List: 1 t ,di •Development Review Commission Chair : 1 . ,, •Neighborhood Association Chairs I. • Funning AssociationslCPO's • °` n „1 ' • Lake Oswego Neighborhood Action Coalition • •Transportation Advisory Board ' 7• 7. 1 ' •City of Lake Oswego Transportation Division '' •Tri-Met '1 • ODOT Region 1-Development Revk W Division • Clackamas County Transportation Division t • Citizen&LORA Budget Committee Chair *'• .` 4' y Mantling Commission Work Session Page 99 Outlook 2025.Goals 12&13 Meeting date August 25,2003 . 1 w . �A�1 i / , ' ---��. 4e 0'~ ' '1 , — " '. ' 1y t ^L F.., „,' . - . -„ \'' , ''.. , . .* - 4 x '� �' . A• .. ..1 .. .. . e ``11 , i♦ .1+. I ~J' N r 4 p.• +.A •vR { I - 'P y ,« `3 £ IAj r; Goal 13-Energy Conservation I. Comprehensive Plan Goal 13—Energy Conservation Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan,Goal 13: "The City shall conserve energy," , 'd L s"1 (Attachment 3,Comprehensive Planning Goal 13) 4',L„ •. _' R s 4y x, u , Statewide Planning Goal 13: "• � ' , "To conserve energy." raw �.':y: Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize the 4. conservation of all forms of energy,based upon sound economic principles, (Attachment 4,Statewide Planning Goal 13) $ ,: �., ` rR } H. General Information t. Y `A Background: • Goal 13,Energy Conservation was added to the statewide Planning Goals in 1976, It was added i«; " in response to emerging energy shortage concerns, Before the days of rolling black outs and long lines at the gas station,the security of having an endless supply of fuel and energy was r ` ' /'. taken for granted. Cities were developed with little regard for energy consumption in regards to travel patterns,use of renewable resources and energy efficient building materials and methods. s With a limited supply of energy available and demand continuing to increase,conservation •.,,Ai actions can postpone or eliminate the need for additional power generation sources, The , a '`, implementation of Nnservation strategies is significantly less costly than and less damaging to • '' . . 1,,,, ',„ - ,5,.= the natural environment than building new power sources. w" a There has been significant progress made in the development of energy conservation products " ' ,'";4 and programs, The continuation of this trend and the continued education of energy , conservation measures will play an important role reducing the dependency on fossil fuels for , ".” energy and oil for gasoline, 'i. The City of Lake Oswego recognizes that local government plays a vital role in promoting , ;'`. • 'a Iw energy conservation. The City is committed to adopting,implementing,and maintaining .N sustainable practices to promote energy conservation, The City has developed a draft Sustainability Plan for City Hall in order to make wise business decisions regarding the investment of public funds and to promote and increase the conservation and efficient use of energy,water,native plant and wildlife habitats and other natural resources. Upon final adoption " of this plan,it will be implemented at all city facilities and eventually will be used us a resource ' . for the community, a& ° w IF r~' ry ° Planning Cotnnussiun Work Session Page It U Outlook 2025•Goals 12&13 a ,'" Meeting date August 25,2003 ..'t 'a ,. a r' r•,••p - it Where are we now/what is currently in place for this goal: A City programs that are currently in place to achieve this goal include: , �° a Sustainability Plan-This plan provides direction to the City in maintaining and increasing • M, its sustainability efforts. ''• Y Oregon Residential Energy Code-Adopted in 1991,it requires buildings to be designed 1: I according to a performance calculation for energy conservation(windows,insulation, ht h ♦• etc) ,V y " ,I ,, a Community Development Code provides: o Provision for pedestrian/bike connectivity Y^ o Street connectivity standards 1 o Landscaping standards A, ,,,ry, o Transit System/Streets—provisions for transit facilities and transit oriented features i ;" .`N' oHigh density zones u . o Density bonus and transfer regulations ., �. o Allows for mixed use developments ,"' o Chapter 57,Solar Access-purpose is to maximize solar access and to minimize shade on adjoining properties from structures and trees, ,: .' . HI. Issue Identification The following conditions indicate the need for,and establish the scope of review for periodic • • , • review of the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations, (These conditions are intended to ",.. act as a starting point for discussions.) ?.?, u n "; A) Oregon Administrative Rules(OAR)660-02S-0070 U•: • 1. There has been a substantial change in circumstances including but not limited to '1 the conditions,findings,or assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan or land use regulations were based,so that the comprehensive plan or land use a regulations do not comply with the statewide planning goals. `f• " ' '" ' • RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition. • .." 2. Decisions implementing acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use .,, regulations are inconsistent with the gouts. RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition, ..' '; 3. There are issues of regional or statewide significance,intergovernmental coordination,or state agency plans or programs affecting laud use,which must be " '. " addressed in order to bring comprehensive plans and land use regulations into x '♦ compliance with the goals. RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition. • 4. The existing comprehensive plan and land use regulations are not achieving the " • , statewide planning goals. a Planning Commission Work Session Page l•i 1 ' ; Outlook 2025•Goals 12&13 H Meeting date August 25,2003 to y a i • � ��� t� {A/t.ll� J 1 .-N( `y M' r W ' 1 a 'S , ' ■ V •` ,i Y . (�. 1 • r t •', RESPONSE: No item has been identified for this condition, ti , Bl Summary of Malor issue This section highlights existing issues that were identified in the development of the existing Comprehensive Plan. Not all issues will be applicable. In many cases,the issues are a statement of fact,in other cases they identify a future action, NOTE: Section"D"of this report includes items to be included in the revised"Summary . ,,i ,�:'i ' of Major Issues". r< a p '. 1. "Establishing a baseline energy accounting and an acceptable payback period 0, H," ` 1 e would assist the City in making decisions regarding energy efficiency." (Goal 13,Summary of Major Issue) , h '�, ... COMMENT: Include"Sustainability"under Summary of Major Issues(Also see '"" discussion under Section"D"). The City is currently engaged in developing a Sustainability Plan for its facilities. The establishment of baseline energy "';: , ,'4µ,: infomuation is part of the scope of work. ;, C) Goals,Policies,and Recommended Action Measures , `` This section will identify goals or policies that should be addressed during Period Review, In some cases the goal or policy might be outdated and require a deletion or an amendment. . „ In other cases,there may bean opportunity for new goals and policies, • Goal:"The City shall conserve energy." t: " +" +, ® e ,a , + RESPONSE: Consider amending the goal to incorporate a holistic approach to r?{ energy conservation. An alternative goal might be: "The City shall conserve energy with the consideration to social,economic and p environmental impacts." Policies in General: A • a RESPONSE; All policies should be reviewed for applicability. Many of thew policies direct the City to do things that are currently being done, _`a k RAMS in General: " RESPONSE: All RAMs should be reviewed for applicability. Many of the µ`t".. , RAMs direct the City to do things that are currently being done,other could be make into policies. .'.a ` H a l rr, ' Di _Other Identified Issues ` This section identities other issues for periodic review consideration, 1, Increase in h nerav Cost(electric and natural jlas1 " �, . The background section or the"summary of major issues"section should include a " " . discussion on the increase of the cost of electricity and natural gas. PlanninOutlook Commission Work2 2S()oats12 b'c 1 csslott Page 1 2 V Ateeung date August 25,2003 • rl ,1r aA r,q r. ,4 `'+. 5 V r ` .P• � 4w.n v 4 t' ,9 • C fa' '',,1 n u 2. Sustainability The City of Lake Oswego recognizes that local government plays a vital role in " ' p` fostering sustainability and therefore is committed to adopting,implementing,and N maintaining sustainable practices, The City wishes to establish a model , ,..' sustainability program in order to make wise business decisions regarding the investment of public funds and to promote and increase the conservation and i'a r, .I efficient use of energy,water,native plant and wildlife habitats and other natural NN 4• resources. 1 , ,: For over a year now,the City's Sustainability Group,made up of City employees, ; has been working on developing a sustainability plan for the City, Atter adoption of this plan by the City Council,the plan should be incorporated into this goal. �, :: Consider including the Sustainability Plan into this section of the Comprehensive Plan,including developing policies and RAMs to move the City towards a more sustainable future, 4,' r A copy of the plan can be viewed on the City's website,through the Planning -'� Department link, + " , 3. Technological advancement in Alternative Energy Sources(Summary of Major Issues) Technological advancement in the research and development of alternative energy t + a, sources such as wind,thermal,and solar sources has made the use of these k"yv alternative energy sources more affordable and attainable, . d. Employee Commute Options(ECO)Program `'3 • •"'''` The City has been participating in the ECO program since 2001. Participation in A this program moves applicable employers towards compliance with the State of ' w Oregon's Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the Environmental ;' Quality Commission and administered by the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The ECO program will no longer be enforced after 2006, The Goal of the ECO program is to reduce employee commute auto trips to work by w "' 10%within three years by providing alternative modes of travel and incentives.The ' . ECO Rule affects employers(public and private)in the Portland Metro area with N '; more than 50 employees reporting to a single work site. Therefore compliance of the ECO Rule only applies to City Hall, However,the City provides the same incentives to use alternative modes of travel to all employees city-wide, + Consider developing policies or RAMs to support continued participation in the x „w ECO program as a means to reduce energyconsumption and improve air quality. ,t• p g pp q Y ' % ,' p• 'd Planning Commission Work Sessk ti Page 1213 " Outlook 2025.Goals 12&13 4, ,, . Meeting date August 25,2003 r AA 132) + : 1 o' , +„ a S. e, ''' ' ' -,:a , W ., ,4 '. - I+ ., "1,r }u ' ,4 I r ' j '"a ') i ti ' 1• A1' i 1 4 11, tlx:r � � .1 R f 1. ` , M �4j I • 1 te♦ fr ^r ' IV. (Duality of Life indicators(QOL)Related to the Goal The intent of this section is to take the opportunity to incorporate QOL indicators with ('� "` Comprehensive Plan goals. The Comprehensive Plan provides policy direction and goals,while a the QOL indicators provide the mechanism to monitor the effectiveness of those goals and policies, The draft indicators that are related to this goal are listed below, ,' • n S The valuation of improvements on Single-Family Dwelling(renovations). (Indicator , N •-'„ 1,2) ,� • Number of homes that at'e"deconstructed", (new) • Number of homes constructed with green materials or to high efficiency standards, r _ (new) ` o Ratio of total miles of bike and pedestrian facilities(bike paths and lanes,pathways and sidewalks)to total street miles, (Indicator 2,1) a ' • Per capita ridership or average number of bus trips(per capita)to and from Lake ` ' • Oswego based on information from transit agencies, (Indicator 2.2) Y•: ,' • Ratio of miles of streets providing transit service,to the total miles of streets in Lake r' a: Oswego, (indicator 2,3) { -%' ''., • The number of residences in Lake Oswego that are located within'''A miles of an , „1 ,yy : amenity such as a park,open space,shopping,school,public transit, (new) 14 a " * '• • The Air Quality Index for the Portland Metro Area, (Indicator 5.3) • Levels of the following pollutants at certain water monitoring locations; suspended solids,pho phorus,E,Coli bacteria,copper,dissolved oxygen,ammonia,chlorophyll N " A,conductivity,nitrate,and temperature. (Indicator 5A) b ti . • The valuation of improvements on commercial building(renovations). (Indicator 6,4) '. y '''l., • The number of residences in Lake Oswego that are located within'/e miles of the City's ' commercial districts. (new) Y • The index of retail sales that are local expenditures versus expenditures outside the community, (new) " , • Number of historic structures/sites identified,inventoried,lost as listed by the City, (Indicator 8,2) °.,r V. Public Comments This section will include oral and written communications received by the public or stakeholders in time to be included in the staff report. �.,i _. RESPONSE: No public comments were received prior to the printing ofthir'report. i, Goal 13 Mailing Lists ' '` • Lake Oswego Neighborhood Action Coalition(LONAC) ; .. •Neighborhood Association Chairs ' • Quality of Life Subcommittee '11tyeconstruction"refers to the process of dismantling a house and salvaging as much raw material as possible to ' for reuse in another constriction r reject. This reduces the amount of solid waste that goes to the landfill and the need for raw materials.;° a Planting ConunWork S ission ession rage t,j 4 4. Outlook 2025.Goals 12& 13 .I' '" Meeting drte August 25,2003 .,,rya •. _ • ; ,•iH J .'L*% �; a Y..' Y. - . •"� • " Y• . .A ar d • • C. tt• ry •Cicy of Lake Oswego Sustainability Work Group fi :t • Clackamas County ' `" •Metro r • Oregon Natural Step Network ;1. -u • •'•• • Attachments: " •• 1) Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan Goal 12-Transportation 2) Statewide Planning Goal 12-Transportation 3) Transportation Division Comments 4) Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan Goal 13-Energy Conservation • "� 5) Statewide Planning Goal 13-Energy Conservation Y L:\Case 6iles12002U'Ianning Project t'ilnsUP 02•0001 Outlook 2025\Goal 12-131F'CMemoGaaLs 1,2.13 8-25-03.doc �''•' �' ��"� • 9'` 4• �y1 4• J C � .t • • e t d pi tt iY t Planning Commission Work Session Page 1.5 �• " Outlook 2025-Goals 12&13 • Meeting date August 25,2003 ." . *AA'i8L w p, 1` a k • • t a : . , .. i • Il e d. y'4 p^ ! e Is l . 44 y • w ti •r• r N,,d }_M M rv{ 71 i Y p t • hl HY�p. I it. . rd +' _ -1 ` •'tip M • u Pr .1 1 til to w 4 .14; a+4 P i ;'y • �.e ':..'''' ,•!'•' , 0 ,:‘:, : , is • • AA �iryry A +t (U4) i ', i ,. a 1•9 ti fir t I a �•' , Mt . r . 1 ' . n ' ��} „. � i•� N‘usi, •'�" M + Goal 1 : Transportation , A 9 , ; it. n a ' .1� „cn r• i;r a N+• f Y t om" 1 • o ,'1 1"• ' Ii t 4 tr� ..ld ' a I , S r ". it ; 41� 1LPk 1' ^ I''. •a40.4pllOt- AIP '1'f r'''d • vir 40"n .. 3 A ,4 ... '1 ,d.'' K et ,, ,7 ✓' 0�, 7 wl,. "1 .e1�� � Y. IS.., .41 +Yp ;;, 'IS"Su., ;t 4 a'. •, e„ d.. , ". wi P ur..T,,, Y1t ' Y-r. + , 1 •t_ i. �11 Y a d. d a1a � .•f+ ^ 1 � '•�� 4g5ftt h, '� dot ",)1r t• y1_ • W 'S a 7�41 t�'h�l� be `'1 'Z `t Y� f , it r M4f 4...i iM. ., ..i' 4: 1 �(1(�, I ll', { Y " t; ; r 1i 'i 1; •r, 1 }hudu xf- • " � •1 '1 •,•af• ° • The City shall develop a street system to address the mobility •• .• • needs of residents for all modes !transportation. ,' 1 1 y .,. , it A• . Attachment t ' • ;. ; ' n/,,-(b ). ! 1 . ytl ,> Ir . I 3.y •ie Y•i� • 1 . • • 0. ii r �� •.r�• Mn » .td • 47•,,r r; • 1• �i er • K• N Pi• • r nr' }•• 1 e a W i� ,i..!• j 18 AA(ag) I' , i' f 3 N •'a, I 3. c • ff a { t ti boa/ 12 Transportation ,. r ttt�;n +foal :....,T rangy •ovation �, ® yb BACKGROUND • Statewide Planning Goal 92: Transportation ' y "To provide and encourage a safe,convenient and economic transportation system." Statewide Planning Goal 12 requires cities and counties to develop a transportation plan which consid- ,w.. ,• ers all modes of travel including mass transit,air,water,pipeline,rail,highway,bicycle and pedestrian "• •a which is based on an inventory of local,regional and state needs,considers the differences in social `' fi `' „ ;; consequences that Would result from using differing combinations of transportation modes and avoids z e. principal reliance upon any one mode of transportation. In 1990, the City Council appointed a 24-member,ad hoc Transportation Committee to review and • , • update the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, In general,the changes proposed by ' this Committee were as a result of new legislation and changes in community preferences that had occurred since the Plan adoption in 1978, In December 1992,the new Transportation Chapter was adopted, It includes policies reflecting the • changes outlined in the Transportation Rule(TPR),(OAR 660-12,1991)which is the major new legis- ' lation adopted since the Plan was acknowledged by Department of Land Conservation (DLCD) in 1982, The policy basis for the rule is that if cities are to accommodate urban growth,residents will , r have to drive less so that roadway capacity,which is economically and environmentally costly,will not t s. . have to be increased, To accomplish this,communities are to provide opportunities for residents to use alternative transportation,including walking,bicycling and transit. This will be accomplished through a reduced parking, better pedestrian and bicycle connections and through provisions of amenities for I" r alternative transportation users. • The Transportation Committee was also charged with developing a Neighborhood Traffic Manage- • ment Program to manage traffic to insure the safe and orderly movement of all modes of transportation and to preserve the quiet and privacy of residential neighborhoods, This program is in response to the 1,±Mblic's desire to control automobile traffic volumes,speeds and to increase safety in neighborhoods, Another change made during the 1992 update include a policy requiring a thick circulation plan for `' Lake Oswego to reduce noise and pollution in residential areas, a Another element of the Transportation Chapter is a Streets Public Facilities Plan, The state administra- tive (Goal 11)requires ties o provide a " ort,mid " end long range projects facilities it foreseeseplanning for l modes oftransportation,esttimated costs list tltesehprojects, ;•� appro*hnate locations and possible funding sources, The City fulfills these requirements for the streets ' element of the Transportation Plan and will provide the Public Facilities element for Other modes of • • " t 1 ..GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12=1 19 4 . � '•t; 3 m t ft ' „t eN „l. . l rA t M,.; y; }54 � II ;a” t • Goal 12 Transportation r.; p s;' ® Goal 12e Transportation q r 4 ,, r a ,:'• transportation as soon as the City's Transportation System Plan(TSP)is completed, The Goal 12 Rule requires each jurisdiction to complete a TSP for transportation facilities that are planned,developed, • , " operated and maintained in a coordinated manner to supply continuity of movement between modes • „,i A• and geographic areas. _ {. ' `1rp During this update of the Plan,the Transportation Committee also recommended extensive changes to I ` Functional Street Classifications. The Committee initially developed three overall objectives for the „ Plan, These included: 1)reduce the through traffic on neighborhood streets,2)concentrate traffic on •'" ., " "-hti` major streets and 3)maintain the character and livability of the community, The Committee refined the ,' Kw previous"Arterial"category to Major and Minor Arterials and the : « "Collector"category into Major and Neighborhood Collectors. Many streets which were collector streets were also reclassified as"local streets", `" ' In 1997,the City adopted additional policies and projects to bring the City into greater compliance with the TPR. These changes provided more emphasis on a balanced transportation system by; • Emphasizing pedestrian and bicycle connections and projects; -: • More closely relating street function to the character of surrounding land uses; ;• „, • • Emphasizing local street connectivity and traffic calming; • .�• Y- ■ Reducing required Level of Service on the Major street system from"D"to"E'; • Emphasizing transit as a viable alternative to the single-occupant vehicle in the City's highest •,,h. ,.,1 density housing and employment areas, ''• " Lake Oswego's challenge for transportation in the ensuing years will be similar to that of the rest of the ,, 4. Metropolitan region: to manage ever increasing automobile traffic with increasingly scarce financial .'..' " resources and to maintain neighborhood livability in the face of increasing traffic. .: Summary of Major Issues " _`' " The following are some of the issues,changed circumstances and conditions which were considered in ` the update of this element of the Comprehensive Plan, x` a , ' The Transportation Rule,adopted in 1991,requires Cities and cottnties to develop a Transports- " Lion System Plan(TSP,)Which maintains vehicle miles traveled for 10 years following adop- . ' ; `' tion of the TSP,a 10%reduction within 20 years of the TSP and a 20%reduction within 30 ,, ,' years, TSPs will also specify measurable objectives for increasing the modal share of non-auto t , 4, ,0 , ,4• `�, 12.2 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN `M ' 20 M . AA(.d ) iq" { (I "r' -L 1 , i 1 ,. k . ' . k. . .. .„ t. . y f C • ,y• t. Z •I , .° nra .' :./ .t i �� '.I ' •+,."Ht 4 �V t 'fr iP, ,.M Goal 12 Transportation . • F Ca Goal 12: Trans iodation y .w trips, an increase in the average auto occupancy and a decrease in the number or length of „; automobile trips per capita due to demand management programs,rearranging of land uses or other means. r ':4 'r Si A neighborhood traffic management program began in the City in 1993 with the purpose of •j, •�" reducing through-traffic in neighborhoods and increasing safety, 4.,:'''e.,,_, ii2 The City's Transportation Public Facilities Plan calls for the following projects to be completed •";' k t' by 2017 to address capacity needs. State gas tax revenues are declining, The City's funds r.. available for capacity improvements are also decreasing annually due to the decrease in vacant, 1 : developable land and hence the decrease in collected Systems Development Charges which ' •. •• could be used for capacity related improvements, �`' s System 1••10 Yrs, 11-20 Yrs. Total Roadway 61,042,000 11,675,000 72,717,000 ! x. " Pedestrian 3,121,000 4,892,700 8,013,700 - , `"'' Bike 1,484,700 1,299,500 2,784,200 " .1• + Transit 7,610,000 6,000,000 13,610,000 , ;•• , .4 �� N.' ^ Total 73,257,700 23,867,200 97,124,900 M1, .2-",. GOALS, POLICIES AND RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES , . GOAL 1: MAJOR STREETS SYSTEM 'ry y ; ,•• Lake Oswego shall develop a major street system consisting of major and minor arterials and 1 • ' major collectors,which will have minimal impact on the City's air quality,address the mobility . needs of residents for all modes of travel and promote energy conservation(See Figures 16& 17) . " POLICIES ..''r 1, The arterial and major collector street network shall be designed and maintained to service " a level"E"during peak hours, The design of the roadway system shall also take into consider- r atiori a, Balancing roadway size and scale with the need to provide efficient and safe transports, tion for all modes of travel,including bike,pedestrian and transit, :', . GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12-3 2i , 7 1 f ► AAA(32) ' '4' �A 4 1 r.. " y" Goal 12 Transportation f� Goal Trans orta�tion .,'`,, - x:' b, Giving preference to transportation projects that increase the efficiency,safety,design :.�+y• capacity or level of service of a transportation facility,without increasing corridor width; u�' and c. Preserving community aesthetics by consiH.ering existing topography and vegetation, - 4 `..,,,• 2. Direct access onto major streets shall be controlled and consolidated over time through the ,,:' ,• development review process and the implementation of major street projects. In particular, access to state highways shall be reviewed subject to the regulations of the Oregon Department A .�-' " of Transportation,and the City of Lake Oswego. Where regulations conflict,the more restric- tive requirements shall apply. A v. • lA 3, The major streets system shall consist of freeways,major and minor arterials and major coiiec- °. ,,t• tors as described in Figures 16&17. The maximum number of lanes for major streets within ,`''''y`' the Lake Oswego Urban Services Boundary shall be as follows; -"ai.+ ti u:., a. Freeways—four to eight lanes. { b. Major arterials—three to five lanes, r c, Minor arterials—two to four lanes, ; , °t ' .7. d, Major collectors—two lanes. ' 1 `• 4. Where residential neighborhoods are bisected by existing major streets,the impacts of traffic ' • , ," „,e `y —noise,safety,aesthetics and air quality—shall be minimized by the following actions; '; *'-I- a. Where feasible,traffic generated by nevi development,shall be routed to other available rv' • l� 4 major streets that are not within or adjacent to residential uses, , a " ' '. b. Ensure that traffic generated by new land uses does not exceed the design capacity of the street system,or adversely affect adjoining neighborhoods. • c, Provision of safe and efficient bicycle and pedestrian improvements to connect residen- dal areas to other areas of the community, r , d, Measures to physically re-orient residential areas away from major streets, This may t .. • N' include installation of major landscape elements such as landscaped buffers and tree • a " ' plantings,and the development of neighborhood activity centers such as public open w parks and community centers, New e, spates,commercial Uses and neighborhood activity centers such as parks, schools and community centers shall provide direct,convenient access to and from adjacent real- r • ' °,"`' dential areas to facilitate walking,bicycling and short auto trips, Measures shall be ,- y. implemented to ensure that Such routes do not attract or serve traffic from outside the , , neighborhood, 12-4 LAKE OSWEGOOOMPREIIENSIVEPLAN ''•' A°' ,-o' , 22 5 1'' a"kt •, , NA(32) r`'- a \I A , •'' : ,1 t it " A I ',41t.. 14 , r an .' ' .2, `. ,' '7 7 a 1 r' .„; .4' 0, " n•.' a .;r ' :l" _ a GoalTransportation 12 tdn �, i i. f�®al 2. �'ralns�or>afac�n ` " ,n : :.' '. * :,0,) `'" 5. The City shall require the mitigation of negative impacts upon pedestrian and bicycle mobility, noise levels, safety, aesthetics and air quality when new residential development is located 1 ,r '+; adjacent to major streets. ". s `.' " • EI N"i b4 �{' • ' t r'. a.. 6. The City shall consider the movement of freight within the City when: • �,� ,4. ` . a, Conducting multi-modal transportation studies, • :« ', b. Developing truck routing plans,and; " '.iw ,'.' c. Developing freight loading and parking strategies, 7, Streets designated as Regional Streets on the Regional Transportation Plan,shall be designed „ with consideration of the following when reconstruction or retrofitting occurs: a a. Promoting community livability by balancing all modes of transportation, , w R"' .. ';44 ,; b, Relating the street to the function and char cter of surrounding land uses; ."' ` c. Controlling access to improve safety,function and appearance of streets and adjacent ,A, , ;,'4 i d t , land uses, }i3'+ RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES- MAJOR STREETS SYSTEM s N 4 r " i, Develop access criteria for the major streets systeni which utilize the following principles: !r^ y i' +'.:• a. Direct access to the major and minor arterial system is restricted except from existing + • ' `"., platted lots,which may be allowed access when there is no feasible alternative, Fea- sible °'" �•:` , alternatives may include easements through adjacent properties to existing Resi- " dentiai or Neighborhood Collector Streets or shared access to the Major Street System. . b. Whenever �possible,properties shall develop access to major and minor arterials from I frontage roads or side streets as opposed to direct access to a major street, Major uteri- ",.c: . ; als may be allowed to intersect every 1,000 feet, and minor arterials every 600 feet, j " ' subject to an approved street plan, c. Controlled access may be allowed, subject to review, from major traffic generators, (e.g.,shopping centers), When conditions warrant,common access at property lines '. shall be required to reduce the number of access points onto state highways and other A ''' major streets, l' ; d. Increased building setbacks shall be required when it is determined that frontage roads, and/or combined access points are required, ; " " e, Direct access to major collectors is discouraged except when there is no practical access ` from local streets or neighborhood collectors, . "b " " " ' GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12.6 /• 23 _:y' i'1.4 x ,:A: " - 4Y i + n� t t..'t •'?4 ' 1 t f!. Q•. '' .I.'. Goal 12 Transportation l Il. A1d C] Goal12: Transgoortation f, To reduce travel on major streets,encourage travel connections between adjacent de- r velopments. _� « g. Require consolidation and closure of driveways onto the major streets system overtime • 'f if access spacing guidelines in Figure 16 are exceeded and when implementing major street capital projects, ' ii, The Metro publication"Creating Livable Streets"will be a resource for street design for those al t..'. . streets shown as"Regional"on the Regional Transportation Plant a iii, Develop specific types of traffic calming measures to be applied to Major Collector Streets for the purposes of improving safety and aesthetics while maintaining mobility.Criteria for selec- t` : O nip of streets on which to apply traffic calming measures should also be developed: "' `• .'•Y ;. :;, GOAL 2: INTER-GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ,� ,,, Lake Oswego's transportation system shall be planned>developedP and operated in a coordi- nated manner with other state,regional and local transportation providers, r 'fit` ,.•, POLICIES '. • 1 ut A ,, .; 1, Lake Oswego shall develop a Comprehensive Transportation System (TSP) in conjunction with Clackamas County and adjacent counties where appropriate,the State of Oregon,Tri-Met and Metro for the area within the City's Urban Services Boundary, The Comprehensive Trans- : Y ° portation System Plan shall: �L:. a, Be consistent with land use designations identified within the Lake Oswego Compre- ,,, Y1 . hensivc Plan, b. Identify the location of arterial and collector streets,bicycle paths and pedestrian ways ' and public transit facilities, •"' '`•N' c. Identify the major street construction pro acts required to accommodate anticipated de- . h �` velopment and to address public safety issues, d. Propose funding mechanisms and related policies necessary to implement identified '. • ,s. projects, H . '' c, Describe public transportation services and identify service inadequacies, '' L 4' t ry y , 12-6 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I 24 I 4 +:A Ay ''4'. 7,j' h, +•..A.1 b 11 Y �19 .. ''. "II t . 'i ,;. A i N 41.v , 4p2. , 1 AA ll�r) 1 n °�11 Y y t'r qK w „'•'i r- a` Goa/12 Trarrspot/orr Y • : h M^t a Goal 12' Trans •ortation r4 2. The City shall coordinate transportation and land use planning efforts with federal, state and , .., ? regional agencies,local jurisdictions and Tri-Met to make sure that I a. The requirements of the various transportation modes are coordinated, and that con- - r ' flicts between land use,operational characteristics and safety issues are minimized. b, Effective notification and coordination occurs between affected agencies regarding the L ; 4,. transportation impacts of proposed development within or adjacent to the Urban Ser- 'Y° ." ,, , vice Boundary. r. c, An effective citizen involvement program is implemented,including public notice and "/.J hearings if the development of transportation projects involves land use decisions or adversely impacts the existing transportation system or surrounding neighborhoods. r. 3, The City shall work with Metro,Tri-Met,ODOT and Clackamas County to develop interim w. 41 benchmarks for measuring progress towards transportation goals and policies over the planning .. period, ,, ..d RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES—INTER-GOVERNMENTAL ' COORDINATION ' i, Work with Metro,Tri-Met and other appropriate agencies to investigate the feasibility of pas- •' , senger transport on the Willamette River, iii. Develop join whereby:ragreements with Clackamas,Multnomah and Washington counties that specify the methods ry - a, The City and counties can bring to the other's attention transportation conditions and circumstances which adversely impact other jurisdictions. . e^ ' b. Discussion and/or negotiation can take place to resolve the adverse situation. GOAL 3: NEIGHBORHOOD COLLECTORS AND LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS "• Lake Oswego shall develop a system of neighborhood collectors and local residential streets which preserves the quiet,privacy and safety of neighborhood living and which has adequate, t"'" ' but not excessive capacity,necessary to accommodate planned land Uses, (See Figures 16 and ..,' 17), ,;" • ''' GOAL'12 TRANSPORTATION 12.1 ; . 25 ` ,.,�,,: ., Arl. � 1 + +AA',tar, « i. 1 X 'l �.i' Y It ._j ',;, a, _�a,+ n 9'l 1 •v 1 1+ "'••4'.Y pig ( � ��1 ,�-...a ''A. { . 1... ' 4 . � .1Q "' '' ' ' j} `k,...1.., re ,.,• A . {n41 V. r '', .1.1=4 a'�° • 1 + A r r r " p ' t' Goal Transportation -� CI Goal12: Trans collation • i .-.:.•..• ,..:.... • 4 fyA POLICIES y 1. The primary function of local residential streets and neighborhood collectors is to serve the ' circulation and access needs of residents adjacent to and abutting these streets, Neighborhood 1. ;. , " ,N "' collectors will serve to channel local traffic to the major streets system: Through traffic(auto {y trips which have neither trip end within the neighborhood association boundary)on these streets shall be discouraged. 2. The City shall,in conjunction with the neighborhood association,plan for,develop and main- , , •N': i tarn a local residential street system at a service level and scale which; �° y�: a, Recognizes the need for safety for all modes of travel, b. Recognizes the multi-use functions of neighborhood streets for walking,bicycling and N"x '' social interaction,and which preserves the privacy,quiet and safety of neighborhood {'•. 1 f' '- living, �' , 1 A c. Provides for safe access to abutting land;and, ° d, Allows adequate and safe circulation from residential properties to the major streets ' system and neighborhood activity centers, ' r ' 3, The City shall designate as local residential streets all streets not identified as major streets or r ' neighborhood collectors in the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Transportation System Plan, ' 4. The City shall utilize flexible design criteria and consisuction standards for local residential " street and neighborhood collector improvement projects, Design criteria shall be consistent with the adopted neighborhood plan. In particular these standards shall promote; 4 i �a. Street development which is compatible with the physical and social characteristics of `` . " ` each neighborhood to promote neighborhood identity and beauty, ' b, The minimum scale of improvements necessary to provide adequate,but not excessive ' capacity,required to safely handle automobile traffic generated by planned land uses, .. % ', problems ag y • c, Solutions to storm water and surface water management issues, ,. • d, The safety and utility of pedestrians,bicyclists,transit users and motorists, 5, The City shall ensure that new development which will Use new and existing neighborhood collectors and local residential streets is compatible with these streets function and character. ,a; :a Development approval of new land uses shall ensure that: �„ ,: a, The quiet residential quality of neighborhood streets is fostered and maintained, 12-8 LAKE OSWEOO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN '' , 26 A; a "; `I ,!• L AA .�....YI �+ h... i..".. ` M. r• 1:• +. ° N =+° wf A 11' 1 �... . + ' tN • 1 . aix• `M �• ,, In ..1,1^'.4 'y 1- 4 • a i.., • ,•• ., l• • n. •.,' ,;w-', Goal92 Transportation .7' • E:11 d Goal 12: Trans e ortat on , ,..„. wow 44 1 i.. ,; b. Street improvements required to serve new land uses are designed in accordance with ,-?;„.• the adopted neighborhood plan and to the minimum necessary scale. • a I` • n . 6. The City and neighborhood associations shall jointly plan for the use of public rights-of-ways ° 1. 1::• in residential neighborhoods. Uses within rights-of-way shall be supportive of the multi-use ;ti••,,, . function of neighborhood streets and may include: A ' a °' a. Pedestrian paths and bikeways, b. Vehicular related uses as on-street parking,transit facilities and driveways. : " - c. Urban design,public utility,safety and beautification elements such as street trees,pub- �.` t • +" r lie seating,street lights,wheelchair ramps and sidewalk extensions. u 7, Develop a truck circulation ordinance to reduce congestion,conflicts with residential neighbor- -' ° hoods and to decrease noise and air pollution. :, c 8. Manage traffic on Neighborhood Collectors and Local Streets according to the policies estab- ; =, lished in this chapter. Traffic calming measures should be used where feasible to encourage non-local traffic to use streets with higher functional classifications and should not signifi- ,, - candy divert traffic to other nearby streets of the same or lower classification. a� •W,e 9, Ensure that connectivity of local streets is achieved in order to: =i ,'. . a. reduce excessive trip lengths; 'k" b, efficientlyand safelyaccommodate emergency fire and medical vehicles; , g y c, promote the use of alternative modes of travel; • d, ensure even dispersal of local traffic;and & ° e, provide local street circulation patterns that provide connections to and from activity centers such as schools,commercial areas,parks and employment centers, ` a 7 ," RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES—NEIGHBORHOOD " , COLLECTORS AND LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS • i, Promote low traffic volumes on residential streets, Traffic volumes less than 1,200 t t - .• . '• ADT are desirable, '; , ii, Develop criteria for installation of traffic calming devices based on incremental changes 4 4.. '4 in traffic volume and other factors,including traffic safety, ` °' ,ti , Sn7 f^ i 1 w'1 •4 a GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12-9 I r27 • 3 t.f� w� , .� � �. �, ",• � �a , ,,Y Art � � , � e y A„�:,1, , ^' M1. ' �- n•: rf• 11 Goa/92 Transportation '''n:...'I.''.;;:'.1 ui a y GOAL 4: LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIPS y; 4; Nr: }i,J Amendments to land use designations,densities,and design standards within the Lake Oswego ~.,a. Comprehensive Plan shall be reviewed to ensure that traffic generation does not exceed the .,« present design capacity and function of the planned transportation system, • { a POLICIES ; ^,'' " • {:' 1, The City shall use the following criteria when reviewing proposals for new street development or for improvements to the existing system: ',a i4 d r .• a. The service level and scale of new street improvements are appropriate to the land use of or area to be served, b. Surface water management considerations are adequately addressed. A. t ',, i',. p..';, , . f -, , ,, c, The character of surrounding residential neighborhoods as defined by the adopted neigh- • , borhood plan is preserved. When improvements are made to major streets that are { " adjacent to,or bisect,residential areas,measures shall be taken to mitigate noise,aes- • thetie and safety impacts and discourage cut-through traffic on adjacent residential streets, d, The project's impacts upon the natural and human-made surroundings are clearly de- "° fined, This includes consideration of topography,hydrology,distinctive natural areas, vegetation,and surrounding land uses, The commitment to mitigate impacts shall oc- " cur in the project planning stages through the application of specific design techniques. .- • '" ' 2. The costs of mitigation of the negative impacts(reduced safety and aesthetics,increased noise, "'' N • reduced bicycle and pedestrian mobility),resulting from street improvements needed to serve a .• "' specific development,shall bepaid for bythe developer of the property. When street projects ' `" p P p P pd3' p J are needed to improve thpcapacity,operation andsafety f the street system as a whole,the , mitigation of negative impacts shall be aid for bythe Cityand/or appropriate fundingagen- cies. 3, The City shall provide for an ongoing transportation planning program to; , a s'. a. Monitor changes in the area's transportation network,and ensure that traffic counts and '. ,r - other transportation planning information are kept current and usable for planning pur• • poses, ., , *4, .. , ... ... , .. ., • ,;. 12,10 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 28 t� , P 1 •'v ° .t c S a a .9A"1' ,,d, l•', i Goal 12 Transportation a • I fI , n .l l i •H C] Goal 12: Trans•or'ation dr. .... .:,^..' ,........'.....e.: :..:: '... i .......... -1 'Y ( :. .•y �At b. Develop and maintain a transportation facility planning effort,which identifies and pri- . oritizes projects for implementation. a • c, Develop and implement measures to change travel behavior to improve performance of H • existing transportation facilities and reduce the need for additional road capacity, ' u" d. Periodically review the City's land use ordinances to encourage development that re- "'', duces dependence on single-occupancy private automobiles,while encouraging the use of mass transit,bicycles and pedestrian movement, 'n , 4, The City shall require that a proposed increase in land use intensity be accompanied by a de- tailed traffic analysis,using current information,which finds that existing streets and intersec- tions both on and off site will accommodate the projected traffic increases,or; necessary im- ,:'; ' ti .'' provements can be constructed which are in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Trans- ; , portation Map. Mitigation of negative impacts(noise,aesthetics,safety,bicycle and pedestrian ' , ,.; w' mobility)shall be paid for by the developer of the property, " M 5, A change in the functional classification of any road or street in the Urban Services Boundary :, ' k'-;", or the development of any new arterial or collector,shall require an amenument to the Lake ; Oswego Comprehensive Transportation System Plan, 6, The City shall require dedication of right-of-way for transportation facilities as a condition of development approval where; � .. !a ,; . a, The abutting transportation facilities do not include sufficient right-of-way to comply with the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Policies,standards and street classifica- N' ", ,` ` don or with transportation facility design standards adopted by the City Council;and ;' ' A' b, The proposed development will result in increased use of or greater impact on the abut- ting transportation facilities. ;,' 7. Allow property owners to realize tax benefits wheal right-of-way,not required as a condition of U ! ,., development approval,is dedicated for roadways,pedestrian and bicycle paths. 8. Lake Oswego shall develop and maintain an up-to-date transportation system development • . charge which shall prevent existing residents from subsidizing the cost of any new develop- ment, Transportation SDC's shall be applied directly to projects which implement the Lake r a a,a. Oswego Transportation System Plan, '� 9. The City shall,for all development projects,evaluate the adequacy of all transportation modes, .e °'' to,from,and within the development site, ` ,, n n, The City shall ensure that; GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12.11 1 29 11 1 M a • „, 1 d +'' ,,. 1 1 .p 1 1'. y'S ' 3 Y, '' R •y,• ' n I ,\ 1 ,�^ y{ • r , ..,� Y V•, , a r 1 � 5'- rr• :t n Goal 12 Transportation 4.. Cl Goal 12: 11.2m22Liation ',z 14 a, The design and location of driveways provides for safe and efficient property access and does not interfere with the safe flow of traffic or degrade the design capacity and w h r adjacent streets;and ' ' b, Alternative transportation modes have been provided for,such as public transit,bicy- `�' cling and walking, _ "k " i • 10, The City shall require new development,through building and site design measures,to address „ " the needs of the disabled and those who utilize alternative transportation modes such as van and car-pools,bicycles,public transit and walking. -`' 11. The City's transportation planning efforts shall consider and promote energy conservation and enhancement of air quality, • • , 12, The City shall oppose construction of a new Willamette River Bridge that allows automobile traffic within the Lake Oswego Urban Services Boundary because of negative impacts on: u;'• ' a. Regional jobs-housing balance by providing a direct automobile commute option to the :f: u'' Washington County job market; . �a b, The capacity and safety of the City's road system including,State Street,"A"Avenue, Country Club Road,Booties Ferry Road and Kruse Way; „ :, " '` ' c, The destination status of the Lake Oswego Town Center and its future development N M A.' potential by providing for regional travel through the community; ' '7 d, Air quality and the Willamette River and its Greenway,and; ' ` ,' e. The general character and livability of the City due to visual blight,increased noise,air .,, pollution,decreased traffic safety and the potential for traffic dispersion onto local rest- " dential streets, 13. The City shall,in conjunction with the neighborhoods,promote the safe and convenient use of walking and bicycling as viable transportation alternatives by; 4,' a, Developing and implementing a local bicycle and pedestrian circulation plan as part of �;:' ' the Comprehensive Transportation System Plan. A ,,, .0. 44 b, Working with the neighborhood associations to ensure that pedestrian and bicycle ways r' are compatible with neighborhood character, 1w ,. ,". .' c, Developing a system of off-street recreational pathways which also provide alternative • `• -, routes to major activity centers, d. Coordinating with other jurisdictions to promote the development of regional and inter. city pathways, .�� e, Providing for an ongoing City-wide sidewalk and pathway construction and mainte- nance program, 12-12 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ;A. , 30 ha I1l` 1 v 'n. y„ , 4 'y '.t•a a y. ld. N �t ...5, '", 1 , l'♦" 4" ,,,•. r♦• i 1.,` I . ' ' AA'{d2) '' w• ,: ' i Goal 12 Transportation Y • • •M 1 ' N: ❑ C��all 12: .apz�a®rtation I...-. 1 Y I 14. Require building and parking placement for new development to be supportive of pedestrian, r "" J bicycle and transit users. Facilities supportive to these transportation modes shall also be re- uired q (e.g.,bike racks,bus shelters,benches,etc,) ..;, ,, RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES-LAND USE AND »' "' TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIPS { i. Develop and maintain a pavement management program to protect and enhance the City's investment in its street system. . ,, iir Develop a Lake Oswego Transportation Capital Improvement Plan which prioritizes projects r ' for implementation that address the City's short range(five year)transportation needs. "" iii. Streets in industrial and commercial areas shall be developed according to standards which accommodate the special transportation needs of these uses, ; . iv, Review street standards and special street setback standards to see if they are appropriate to implement the policies of this chapter. v. Conduct a planning and design process for the Town Center and Main Street portion of Boones .N, ; . " Ferry Road,to be completed prior to the construction of any transportation projects affecting roadway width,median treatments,bicycle facilities,etc, z Y, N.. ,A . I GOAL 5: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT 9 ; •1 .Nlr •.' Lake Oswego shall develop strategies and implement programs that reduce the number of auto- ; mobiles traveling in Lake Oswego,especially during peak morning and evening traffic hours. -" .' a ' y POLICIES ?'A 1, Work with ODOT,Metro,Tn-Met and Clackamas County to develop travel demand manage- '. • ak N, w ' ment programs to maintain the total number of vehicle miles traveled per-capita in the City at •';:;' ,'a'' ,R current levels to the year 2005 and to reduce current vehicle miles traveled by 1 0%by the year ti. ,; 2015. J '�• GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12-13 31 hn • Y 1 . 3 Y 'J, � "� YI�'. ,�al" wVS i'. Goal 12 Transportation `; ® Goal 12: Trans •'ortation .a 2, Support•the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)Employee Commute Options(ECO) • r' goals for trip reductions. - ;`a 3. Increase the attractiveness of alternative transportation through mixed use development in rm. •4 ;, ' F eas consistent with the Region 2040 Plan. •" RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES- TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Y k a' i. Educate and inform employers regarding Tri-Met's demand management programs such as �t'r transit subsidies, carpool matching, vanpool subsidy programs,bikes on transit, emergency x , ride home and development assistance for employer based transportation plans for Employee {' Commute Option compliances Promotional information will be included in business license renewal packets for businesses with 25 or more employees. a :• ii, Encourage the installation of bike racks,preferred parking spaces for car-poolers,and building ra •,' placement for new development that encourages pedestrian,bicycle and transit use, iii. Annually inform Tri-Met of all businesses in the City with 50 or more employees,so that Tri- r, A. * Met can contact them regarding demand management programs and services, iv. Educate and inform neighborhoods about Tri-Mets transportation demand management pro- . ' • • .— grams such as carpool matching,bikes on transit and accessing transit trip planning infonna- 11,1 tion. ..9 w. v, The City shall require businesses within the City's highest density employment areas,such as the Kruse Way Corridor,to develop Transportation Management Associations(TMAs). The City shall support these TMAs, ' . A 1A4 vi, Provide encourage incentive programs which 911ow commercial, institutional and industrial developments to substitute parking requirements if pedestrian and bicycle amenities, transit .y' facilities,and ride-share programs are developed and maintained, •''y vii, Encourage volunteers to assist in the planning and construction of pedestrian and bicycle path- " . ways. µ . 12-14 LAke OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 32 • • e / ..+j . . f •� �. -,^I � , 'w• .I. . a ,,. „ (• `I a Goal 12 Transportation !: 1 ® Goal12: Trans ortatlon J w a '�. '• , ,ry i •M GOAL 6s WALKING The City shall provide a continuous citywide network of safe and convenient walkways that promotes walking as a mode of travel for short trips. POLICIES 1. Integratepedestrian access needs into planning, design,construction and maintenance of all B P g . . sa =r transportation projects. 2„ Improve access to and use of the public transportation system through pedestrian improve- • a ', meats and changes in land use patterns. . 3• Connect local walkways to activity centers such as schools,employment areas,parks,commer- .,''� . cial areas,and transit centers and corridors. a e a 4. The City shall make the pedestrian environment safe,convenient,attractive and accessible for all users through; " a. Planning and developing a network of continuous sidewalks,pathways,and crossing �+ ,,. ' improvements that are accessible per the requirements of the Americans with Disabili- ties Act(ADA), b. Providing adequate and safe street crossing opportunities for pedestrians,and 4 ' • '1 -c•;', c. Improving street amenities(e.g.,landscaping,pedestrian-scale street lighting,benches ,,.. ' a "': and shelters)for pedestrians,particularly near transit centers,town centers,main streets, " .' employment centers,and transit corridors serving the primary transit network, „1 ,. ., 5, Involve citizens in the pedestrian facility planning process as well as in facility design, ;» � f ., 6, The City shall ensure that planned bike and pedestrian paths ate not obstructed as the result of new land development, - , 7, The City shall require developers to provide pathway connections from new development projects „W' .. • + . '• to the existing bicycle and pedestrian system. GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12-15 83 . AA132) ,, . , , Goal 12 Transportation i ,,� , ® Goal 12: Trans•ortation 0 a 8, The City shall work to preserve existing railroad rights-of-ways and other easements to main- - "!"�:',., twin opportunities for future mass transit,bike and pedestrian paths. {'# RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES— WALKING • i, Improve pedestrian amenities(e.g.,landscaping,pedestrian street lighting,benches and shel- tars)in town centers,main streets,employment centers and transit corridors. ii. Develop criteria for prioritizing projects on the Pedestrian Facilities Plan,based on priorities - • including service to activity centers,potential for high pedestrian usage,eliminating gaps in the • existing system,improving pedestrian safety and providing geographic equity in pathway pro- vision. Criteria may be revised in conjunction with the five-year Capital Improvement Plan process for consistency with community gods. \. i iii. Design pedestrian facilities to be compatible with neighborhood character and to minimize �t •.� environmental impacts,consistent with public safety and user needs, t ii iv, Participate with the Lake Oswego School District and other public agencies to provide bicycle li 0 and pedestrian safety instruction. �I t1 v. Coordinate bike and pathway planning and development with ODOT,Metro,Clackamas, ,,I Multnomah and Washington Counties and other local jurisdictions, I) ; GOAL 7: BICYCLING ' .w The City shall provide a network of safe and convenient bikeways integrated with other trans- :" portation modes to increase modal share of bicycle transportation for all trip purposes, ,l '41.%3 • POLICIES 1, Integrate bicycle access needs into planning,design,construction and maintenance of all trans- • ,z portation projects. ;" ' ;: 2. Connect Iota)bicycle facilities for bicyclists to ride to local and regional destinations,activity .. ' centers,connections to other transportation modes and the regional bicycle network, I 1,1 12-16 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 34 �i , 1 y E ' 1 +, y, A;. a• �4 AA.(32,) . . -q, \ ^ •. ail ♦ 4 4. F Goal 12 Transporf 9tfon 3 i a ® Goal 12: Trans •®ration . • 3: Maintain existing and future bicycle facilities w%neourage use, 4. Require,as appropriate,and encourage the placement of bicycle lockers and bicycle racks at major destinations and activity centers, Encourage covered bicycle parking whenever possible. ` 5, The City shall work to preserve existing railroad rights-of-ways and other easements to main- tain opportunities for future mass transit,bike and pedestrian paths. w:r RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES—BICYCLING ; ` "..i i, Pursue regional funding sources for bicycle routes identified on the Regional Transportation Plan within Lake Oswego's Urban Service Boundary, • ii. Keep bikeways free of debris and in good repair, 'a , ' ' iii. Promote bicycle safety and encourage bicyclists and motorists to share the road through educa- tional programs, - kt iv, In general,plan bicycle routes along Arterials and Major Collectors and design bicycle facili- : ties that take into consideration:• '. 1h a. neighborhood character; 1 ' '; • ,a b, safety for other modes of travel; . c, the need for on-street parking; d, topographic conditions; e, street speed and volume; ' 4 f, ability to gain additional right-of-way due to placement of existing buildings or exist- ence of sensitive lands;and '; 'a g, using alternative parallel routes Within one-quarter mile of an Arterial or Major Collec- `. ' -' ;1`' for where these constraints exist,as long us the parallel bike way provides an equally 9' ,//1 convenient route to local destinations, ;:, v. Ensure that secure bicycle ttnrage facilities such as bicycle racks and other park and lock tic- . cotnmodations are provided at major destination points including recreation areas and commer- cial and employment centers. vi, Ensure that bicycle safety laws are implemented and enforced, • 1, f ` GOAL 12 TRAI\ISPORTATION 12.17 35 • 1 Goal 12 Transportation DI Goal '12: Tra>rss�®> ati®n vii. Work with surrounding jurisdictions and ODOT to develop direct bicycle commuting routes „" between Lake Oswego and other communities. . •o + viii. Implement a bicycle license fee,with proceeds contributing to funding bicycle facilities, GOAL 8: TRANSIT SYSTEM! ,`" The City shall encourage transit ridership by working with Metro,Tri-Met,and ODOT to de- •„ velop a transit system which is fast,comfortable,accessible and economical through develop- ment of land use patterns, development design standards and street and pedestrian/bikeway improvements which support transit, ' P' .; �. •. s;: - POLICIES ` 4• 1, Transit shall be a viable alternative to the single-occupant automobile in the City's highest density employment arid housing areas, The City shall develop,in conjunction with Tri-Met,a ,,, • • � ' r ,,:1• network of transit routes to connect these areas with Main Streets,Town Centers,Employment Centers,downtown Portland and major transit and transfer stations, + �'. Areas not directly served by transit shall be served with park and ride lots, which shall be 9 .. i located to provide convenient auto access to regional trunk route service. • 2, Develop transit centers in Town Centers and Employment Centers where there is a need for 4•a, ' w`'•. transfer points between bus lines and local shuttle services or transit trunk routes. Transit centers will be conveniently located for all anodes of transportation, in particular pedestrian, .. ' • bike and transit. t.- i 3. The City will work with Tri-Met to ensure that the needs of the community's transportation '. ', disadvantaged are met by making transportation services more accessible, • a 4, The City will work with Tri-Met to determine appropriate locations and desigm of bus turnout "' lanes to enhance transit usage and public safety and to promote the smooth flow of traffic. ,' 5. The City shall work with Tri-Met to ensure that the potential for transit to meet transportation t needs is addressed in compliance with the Transportation Planning Rule. 1 y, ;ti 1 2.18 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 36 Fy 4 !lh"(s2) n 4 F ` 4,n •e � '. ..'•n4... �• :'r a ,..,P. ,. ... .. , . x . ' k .•.. - 5 ,• ,.'a . . tp 4 '.V t .,4' t. 4 , ty K a( n J • t` Goal 12 Transportation 1 ,; •' ® Goa! 12: Trans•®nation 6. The City shall work to preserve existing railroad rights-of-ways and other easements to main- r thin opportunities for future mass transit,bike and pedestrian paths, "" �'= ',. RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES- TRANSIT , i l'' 1. The City shall work to preserve existing railroad rights-of-ways and other easements to main- w; F1 q. tain opportunities for future mass transit and bike and pedestrian paths, ,3 4+ .,d.: ii. The City shall pursue capital/operating assistance from Tri-Met and/or other public or private ".:., ,:'a ,c.. transit providers as needed to provide adequate transit service. `" iii, Work with Tri-Met to identify additional opportunities for park and ride facilities and shelters in Lake Oswego. -,t'_tu a '1;, iv, Support efforts to develop greater inter-city public transit options, , .1 ,. v. Preserve the Willamette Shore Rail line for high capacity transportation opportunities or oppor- tunities to share the right-of--way, if feasible,with high capacity transit and other modes of `"il travel,such as pedestrian and bicycle, `� vi. Coordinate with Metro,Tri-Met,Multnomah County,Clackamas County,the City of Portland " , , 4 and other regional partners in the planning and design of high capacity transit on the Willamette a w Shore Rail line to ensure: i, �� ter• '`M a. Adequate access to the regional transportation system; ••, ~a b. Adequate termini facilities;and 4;` c, Adequate access to the line for all modes of travel, • .._� .a GOAL 9: COMMERCIAL RAIL AND WATER TRANSPORT ' Lake Oswego shall work with commercial rail and water transportation providers and associ- , { ated regulatory agencies to ensure their activities are safe and compatible with the City's trans- , •"".• portation system. ' "`~ � ,, . GOAL.12 TRANSPORTATION 12.19 97 •{• , '. 1 , e. , 4 A a ''' i 1 �r k p 1 x r, '.1w 1 1a .,' +S I e k 3 p 4 ,r - !v . , way •j .e e " r, .""'t r N..w �,4i 1 .1 ....N•N ...' ..,.. .•... N r. ;yA.u,-,{,kt'!^ �M. +•.' .I ... r ..� ,!-,.:.7,, ,.•e r _ . r J' �:I Goal 12 Transportation ' � w CI Goal 12. Trans:•ortation ,. .. -. ,.._. ..... ee f POLICIES 1 ,.�5 1• Lake Oswego shall ensure that the development of marine oriented land uses and transportation facilities along the Willamette River are coordinated with the appropriate governmental agen- cies and those businesses who currently use the river for transport, 2. 'The City shall coordinate future transportation planning and roadway improvements with rail service providers and the Public Utilities Commission to ensure the installation of efficient and safe crossings. #, " 6 3, The City shall,through the Public Utilities Commission,ensure that rail traffic does not impede 7 the smooth and safe flow of bicycle,pedestrian and vehicular traffic, . _ t GOAL 10: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT b • ' ;',. a' Lake Oswego shall ensure that opportunities are provided for citizen involvement in decisions affecting the City's transportation system, a• , ' • ' POLICIES ''' involvement opportunities shall be provided for ail major transportation projects, ' 11 J. > o �t•.e :,�. 1, PublicpP Y GOAL 11: PARKING Adequate on-site parking and loading facilities shall be provided for all land uses, x a POLICIES ,.,, a .1 e tP 1, The City shall develop and maintain parking regulations that require off-street employee and customer parking and loading facilities be provided on-site and commensurate with the size il and relative needs of each new development,balanced with the need to reduce auto trips,en- • :A - w • courage alternative transportation and retain the natural drainage system, ....1 ,1 . .�',~ , 12-20 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 30 aw y e .„, e ,.. a ' 1 ....� • .F e +t , a+n \d, . , � I `e ` a ..+ G• ,1' ' ' Goal 12 Transportation y ? • C1 Goal 12. Trans •ortatoon VIEMIlin 2, When commercial, industrial or institutional uses are changed or intensified, customer and ; employee parking shall be adjusted commensurately. " ' '` 3, Commercial and industrial parking shall not intrude into adjacent residential neighborhoods, ?,; r.' ; The impacts on adjacent residential areas of new commercial and industrial parking facilities or ' • ' increases in the size of existing lots shall be reduced through buffering and screening, ,_;' .., tit '' Fti w,,1 1 .• 4, The City,through the neighborhood associations,shall develop residential area parking guide- ' .., lines to maintain the safety,character and utility of residential streets. M - k a H '.N 5. Require off-street parking in commercial,industrial,and high density residential areas to be at e the sides or rear of buildings where practical,with buildings oriented to the street in a manner ,� which is convenient to pedestrians,bicyclists and transit riders, r •' RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES -PARKING a ® ea ' r: i. Monitor and evaluate the number and sizes of parking spaces required for various types of land uses and amend development regulations. +, , 0 ii. Provide redevelopment opportunities for parking lots when they are no longer needed for auto- -' 7 mobile parking. 4 iii. Where possible,provide for the minimum of impervious area by utilizing durable and dust-free ' K`' ' . alternatives to traditional asphalt and concrete paving when developing new streets and parking A• lots, Utilize the natural drainage system where practical. ``" y1. ' iv Where appropriate and practical,mitigate the visual and aesthetic impacts of parking by en- 4 =' ` • Mt. couragingl + r F "f,,. a. Buildings and parking to be oriented to the street in a manner that is convenient to pedestrians and transit users;and, ' 4 b. Landscaping,buffering and screening, ; v, Through the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program,address on-street parking problems i w;"".',' '{ within residential neighborhoods that are caused by adjacent commercial and institutional land ,'�w' t uses. °u r,F,.: F.F i .; .v, GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12.21 39 .. , .4:4D sS '. I1 ", y . .. i .. i. ., .. N 7 .• U7:'ti ya „ , . '.`• . , .. w 1::•r 4.'. +.:+•I' ,N, . '4,.- ' Goal 12 Transportation x, „ ® Goal 12: Trans ortation °:', , r ff. . , ., . . 1 �',,;,4 . W N ,. N N • . . 4,'1, }{ 8 g 8 `•1 1 la • q �1 • N r N O n1• 2 IV 44 n lg S Ovt Z • r " , 0 *rx a ` •yet 9 �`$_ .q"'c, av°3.rBI' /IN mil 4p _ ,,r At i b _ � e a a ",y,�h• y q itillIWIi ii 35' 61l f/1 �/ 6 9 • 7' °' f~Cy }a�J '7.°ti7 7aiI ran2w$3a$� � 66 dl is K, s • 'S S te U SI.� L d , 44111 e 01 1. t1r�yll; OF 1 i! tul W71N9RRgh&�a1'A � 1yAyYJ y g � y~ �, q U S r 3 il a f 12-22 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 40 1 w. • "a [� r 7} 1 , .10 AA'n(82) _;. , ,5 .n�� , .e��, ,N , A t y ''1 . .fY,1 p' y • Iq, 1 .- l q�.` t ,r+, r },. 1't.' " •xh. ,7 Il L ,M ..`, .I • r :I, ,-,'i „ 1.. r l•. �.n -. . 7.. ' 14. ..... 7." A•„ 1 n fer .I' , ' ,. . Goal 12 Transportation ° '" r 4- fzl Goal 12: Trains ation ansnnh,ap®asr�®o + v r� FIGURE 17 STREET CLASSIFICATIONS 4... u w+ 7"' . Freeways(30,000+volume,4-8'lane_sL Major Collector(1,500.10,000 volume,2•"lanes) ' ,4 I K ;� Jcontinuedl: , " 1-5 a % + " •1 '';; 1.217 Weutlake/Fosberg/Lcsser ,. '' •',,, "B",between State and 5th i'• 0 , Major Arterials(20,000+volume,3.5"lanes): 65th Street,McEwan Road(between 65th and 1.5) 5s'between A and B Avenues -',•' a Kruse Way 14. , , Boones Ferry Road(1.5 to Country Club) Country Club Road Neighborhood Collector(1,000.3,000 volume,2 lanes):"" N" ' "A'I Avenue "" . i State Street Boca Ratan + t /.. ., - Bergis Road •' Cardinal/Wren/Cedar " ' ? minor Arterials(7,500.25,000 volume,2-4'lanes): Carman Drive(between Fosberg&Touchstone) + Cordell Avenue p Kerr Parkway Crestline Drive(between Greenblatt&Skylands) Boones Ferry Road(North of Country Club) Glenmorrie Drive(between Greenbluff and Hwy 43) . M a, ° Terwilliger Blvd, Goodall Road(Country Club to 19th Avenue) w ' McVey(South Shore to State Street) GreenbluffDrive . Rosemont Rd, Greentree Road s a i Stafford Road Hallman StiCherry Lane . • s Iron Mtn.Blvd.(between Country Club and Chandler) " Knaus Road ti Major Collector(1,500"10,000 volume.2"0 Ianes)t Lake Forest Blvd, 42`/ 4 Lake Grove Avenue , , x, Bangy Road(Bonita to Kruse Way) Lakeview(between South Shore&Iron Mtn„and between Bonita Road Bryant&65th) a 4,. r Botticclli/Posberg Laurel(between Hallinan and Cornell) Bryant Road Oakridge(between Boones Ferry&Quarry) ".'' Carman Drive(1.5 to Fosberg) Overlook Drive Chandler Road(between Iron Mtn,And 10th) Parkview Drive • ti Childs Road Quarry Road t Fosberg Rond(between Melrose and Carman and between Reese Road „ 4• Melrose and Jefferson Parkway) Royce Way " •I• r t • ` Iron Mtn,Blvd,(between Chandler&Upper Drive/Lakeview Skylande(between Creslline&Upper Cherry Lane) n • v �.,v• Blvd.) Timberline Drive , " Jean Road and lean Way Treetop Lane/FemWood Drive • " ' Jefferson Pkwy./Lester Road Twin Fir Road Lakeview Blvd.(between South Shore&Bryant) Upper Drive(from Bryant Road to lion Mtn.Blvd.) • McNary Parkway Waluga/Firwood • �. :r , . e ° Meadows Road Washington Court(between Lake Forest Blvd,and Boones t, Melrose Street Ferry ) Monroe Parkway Wembley Park Road " Pilkington Road WestvieW Drive(between TamaWay Drive and South Shore) South Shore Blvd, '+ 'includes him refuge lanes or acceleration Ianes. **Tam refuge lanes may be allowed subject to review and approval, '.' '"Gn•street parking may be appropriate In pedestrian oriented commercial areas, . ' """ • GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12.23 41 ,, ,' .. Ae,(32 i .a ;,, t, x �,, • , 1 y " -' t /, " •,i • 'i 11 i+. `$ Goal 12 Transportation 'µYE. C: Goa' 12: Transportation 11111110011161111311191111161111121111, . y • r ' 1,4 Please See Figure 18 IY 1 , 61' X t • ` • u {s» t IY� i ,•t1 • .141 • • 12.24 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 42 ,;. ,t: n • } • N • { h�1'I32j Y Y'r � • »fig Y�, 1 x• q ,• ^ r 1 c it r , • e ` Y f rt Hr u. r r w Goal 12 Transportation Figure 19 :. Public IFaclities Plan: 'Ilransportattnon Improvement Program 1410 Years G . Estimated Potential ' Map# Location 7Aescription Cost Funding .,t' (1997$)* Sout'ce '; a4 ''1 ' •� x °� r ,. �.� . "". - : ANA t'.n � Si a0 r at t res (i '� 4� -. •d:1 ,, � 1 r F 7.1 Smta Sttcetifer'wil r Blvd It am • Terwilliger apl'n r,iralfe S550, l'at signal 1-2 Bryant Rm1YLakeVfew Drive Turn hoes,upgrade trails signal S203,000 SUC ' T 3 Covey Club Rmd(C Ave Mon Mtn Blvd lttnsection inrovvrre is S430,000 SDC <?�" •` `• Boars Baes Ferry Rmd•Kntsc Way to Madras Wekn to S lams," including-63re lanes and adequate 5,2,657,000 SDC o °• "s• Street Skkwal6 • • r.°::n T 5 Bryan Rand,Lakeview to Bones Fart' Widen to three kilos SI,100,000 SDC T•6 Boors 1-errylautiCnse Way(98.99111tdj l) Secard NB�tan lane 5295,000 SDC,C T 7 Booms Feny Raad'Bryart Rd ivirsllt signal tiring,replace k>ots S25,000 _; / a� 'f-8 Bryan RauVUppa Drive fluffs signal 1120,000 SIX: w d a T 9 State Street(Hwy.43yNa acre e Raul Intersection tnpm%n c5s S103,030 SD(,S M r d N 1 T10 State Street(Hwy.43yMcVey Avenue N953 kit tam toes,upgrade traffic signal. Widen $I300,t100 SDC•• bridge, T I I A Avenue•State Street to 3rd Arent: mutrcli Rood a:co s,sweat r p•irrTrnvenens $3,10(r,OW LORA,SDC ,. " r :' T12 Jean R &P8c pJal Lett tam lanes; r slgml "I I 010 't ° T 13 IvkVey AvettrrJCancA Slt*.et Left tun lane co M Vcy,[taffy sisal S25&000 SDC 7114 McVey Averts/Err-kw'St (96-59 Budget) Left ttm'. at Mc ey — S150, It SIX: ` „ r . ,,'M Y T IS Kruse way-Knsc Ouls Blvd to LBargt Rd.(96 Signal fltereatxct S25,W0 soc,C } " '+a• • 99Boiget) { T I6 Kruse Way•Barrgy lttl to Kruse Delo 13hd Widen roadway to 6 lanes as port of I.5J 217 hacttu $I,(100,OW SDC,S + e,:r;, T•I7 Stafford koad''Oveekdt br, Loft tom Imes,neffic stroll S280,010 SDC . . T 18 Kea Parkway/fouclstma lk, Nett and left tun hue,traffo Spot S530,0W 57X } ° A' •9 ( 99 ) Recatnnrt/wlden nudge wih Tedest n v'hh faci}ges 1315,000 C,S e S35,0W SDC MO 1nersxtion of 1,5,217 and Knee Way Recorranstian d'ktercharge to pewit'for free flowirg $48,0W,000 s north tud south bound lmueerteris and direct corn: on of t of Kass Way to Hwy.217,tWo plans N V , - A. v T•21 Hennes Forty and Sunset Dave Itta&atim itprovarerts to actamndate far way 'turning truuerrerts rind devtkpnent do commercial , . - Street to accminodate derekrlt;xrt olds West lake ,' i " " a t q ,. LL (7Vi1e lkslsm District I T22 Bones FgtyRoadd'kutm+g=IDesign S101,000 T-23 Taffy Lathing Feasb>ilty Study loot mopped) $40,000 Ar Subtotal ' 560,842,000 " „l T•1A 'Buffo Calming•i ocntits to be Montano! (ant rtolpad) IFS ,. it a • 'F* Subtotal S61,042,000 _ r « tSrtrratimates east for this owed al 1700,00e Ordnance 2I ed did aol malty wcetued writ or Ibreautl koalas euwee. ., Ir t GOAL'i2 fRANsPQRTkfloW 12-25 43 " to"n , Goal 12 Transportation r, , ` ' , ® Goal 12: Trans••oritation R . Figure 19 Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years 1% ; + Estimated Cost Potential L r n-, ° : ` hMapi) Location Description ,+ Funding ? (1997S) Source i C 4 i y- 1 n t i A h • A �r 6 v a .. , � :; , '' ,* �1 �� X 1.:.t,� }14: rh't' hkA,l '�-.� !-. -p ,,kt i' '^,15,'.N ,..j`W, ' i 4• a p....A., ,•., 2 '.J:. , ,... �. ;v . , .r , 3' '� _. p.."1,t`r` y p 1. 1. ,;.: P-1 Jest Road,between Jean tray 1: .• •Bangtan Sidewalk,one skle ,,000 SDC, ?,.. R ', P-2 Kerr Pkwy,between PCC/Ore Jefferson SkJewa04 south side $74,000 SDC,C r M ; 1 , '' I. Pkwy. (Malt./ClacW, NLFS A, { P-3 Geemroe Road,Femwood to Westview Slontkler pathway S25,000 SDC,NLFS ° r• P-4 10th Street,between A/B Pathway,one s& S SDC,NLJ'S ' P-5 Wembisy Park Road(98-99 Budget;Used P pathway 025,000 SDC,NLFS Parks&Rec Raids) " P-6 Carman,between Kruse and Fosters Sidewalk,cast sale 540,000 SDC;NLFS :� t ', a• 1'-7 Daniel CVay Sidewalk(Included in Street lrgxoverncm Sue,NLFS - Project T 55) t P-8 'Lakeview between Twit Fir/Ian Mtn Pathway $t66,0�0 SDC,NLFS , ° r P-9 Country Chula Boons Fy.-Wembley P. Skbwalk,south sloe 573016 SDC,NLFS ; lC .' P-IO Melrose,between Peters and Fosbcrg Sidewalk,north side S21,0t0 SDC,NLFS + '"I P-I 1 Hwy,43,tetwcen Public Stange and Sidewalk,east sill-Iran Creek to $19,000 SDC,NLFS Brisrwoal Brmrwood I, "r� • a 4;, ? P.12 LakevsowBhd.between Bryant St.65th Pathway,am side $268,000 SDC,NLFS "A,,. - P-l3 'Tipper Drive between Reese/Bryms 6'pathway $130,003 SM.,NLFS 1++14 Booms Fcrry between 1'7755 and 17355 Sideway;,north sine .'.... $60,00(1 SDC,NLFS ` ua - P-15 Kerr Pkwy,between On,Jeffersm Pkwy. Skiewalk,north side S49,006 Sue,NLFS t ' ° a dTou tc chsta P-16 401 between E/F;C Ave,Between 4th and Sklewalk on west skis 4dt,north sick.O $6,000 SIJC,NLFS t w ''', ACC +" P-17 Old River Rd. Padavay,am side $4b0,100 SDC,NL.F'S : rk. au" ` P-18 a) Trcetop'Fernwood between Sideways S56,000 SDC,NLFS aconite/Overlook p P-18 b) Greenlee Ate,between(ccratee M.and Pathway,ate side $64,000 SDC,NLFS , `� Fcmw000d Dr.and Petttwootl Dr.between a„N ' Mapdebat and Cicentree Ave, er ,, P-19 Twin Pr Pathway,ale ski, gilklitirgbc,NLFS P-20 Lake Gave Avent, l'a0nt'ay,one We S63,000 SDC,NLFS ' ;,' P-21 'Pt *.on,between Boons Feny and WOW' $kbwa�c on ore side S66,006 SDC,NLFS Lain P.22 Quarry Rtewl"Canaan Road to 13uones Forty Bite lams,sk)cwalc on east skk $585,000 SIX;,NLFS + Road n P•23 Kerr hood,north side,between louciutan !Nub.use pat,north Side 3_'55.000 Set:,NLFS .{.. and McNtvy ' Subtotal S3,1.21,0(10 • 12-26 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN v ^i AA'112), `n'., 4 " ... - " 1 14 t ' 1 '•' ' ' ' ' 4• . i x a 4 ., `t "re° 9 ', , , ' i - ` ' r ; K, 9 yr ry. u. l , . r • a r 1+ • ,a 1 i " , ' n , r 1 ri ky it. It; err ,.' t y, e'n : • : Goal 12 Transpnortat/on • , • tor,• ® Goad 12: Tranap®ration v "'`} n: }' Figure 19 '' i:; Public Faces Phan: l'ransportation'Improvement Program 1-10 Years ! ''a}, Potential 'a K r r9 r * •'i R4ap# Locution Description I ()Cost Ftnfi , a Source ,, I' j a ;'1 " ,,, a ell ,t- li4? `t n, ..� KI d.‘ .� s 4,-: I' " 'B-1 Canty CtutyN4thiB between State and but Bile tams $1,500 SDC,NLFS t w • 1'. *B•2 McVey,between Oswego Creek and State Bice urns $5110 SDCT^UTS " .• , ` ,4, .•:t'a Sued -, 13-3 'Kerr Parkway,between Stephenson and BBto tires $600,01/3 SDC,NLFS " Booms Ferry 'r:` 13-4 Jean Road Jean Way,between Bowes Ferry Dice lams(B,F.to Piic$gton patios $64,000 SDC,NLFS " =4•. 1 and Brytut carpeted) i �� w r a, 13•5 Barnes Ferry,bet' en}Cruse Way taxi Bin bras(Cost Included•n Project T•4) SDC,NUS Madman 13-6 StdicnTRoad,Overlook to South Store Bite lanes $140,000 SDC,NLFS " '13-7 Mctrme,(mtwe n Fesberg and Westhle Bice lairs $700 SDC,NLFS Y o 13-S Qta ry Rd Bike Mutes(Cost included in projt.ct P-73) SDC,NUS B-9 Booms Ferry,between Coulry Club and Mm Bike lanes $60,000 SDC,NLFS • ; Palk TCINnCenter a l " '; 13-10 Pr3inewrt,between Booms Fy.and CtikJs Bike krms 1220,000 SDC,NLFS B•l I Fawood between%l ge/Barrs}terry Bite hies - $.62,000 SDC,NLFS yp o; a B I2 t aitlga Road,xtween Query and Boons Bice lanes 526000 SDC NITS '', -=i Ferry a , u', B-13 South Siva,between Westview and Stored Roadway S75,000 SDC,NL1"S Lakeview 1 " , , .t B&14 Sath Shore between fiscures ad McVey Stared Roadway $7S,000 SDC,NLFS ' 13-15 WItureue Sun Bice Cariclor Feasi tIty Study to drtentmm cast/feas@:iily of tang $135,000 Metro— •t: Study Vi kurcue Stun t'igti•of•way as a b ale $7,500 Penland arridm S7,503 SDC I , Subtotal $1,484,700 r +Incidental^stnjurg only r " • n:- Ida`• , ""• r. .* f"try' .' va /t ' GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12.27 45 :` .fr AA,n• kr `�1.,,` " - i t, " ' ' *.A*,' R •a' " I.; 5•, ` 0,. , t .. ( J , t .`. . •^ 1 • } ) S r 1 . ! 1 Y, 1 ° :F a •! !l. 1 ' 1 ' -4 e1 . t e if 1 t r. ; 1, ^ , •{ Goal 12 Transportation p, t• 7,41.. Y- 4 � Goal `Transportation M• " -.L Figure 19 '` Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years , Potential r',, U Map# Location Description Estimated Cost Funding (19973)* r.: Source •i t, 1 11'r 0 t F `:'`"'i ' aril _• 1 ', 1* t,..1t4 .`` xn a� . .. ., AY ; M1 xn N . 4 ' ` •,7 +.� .x. y 4 ri•''.i ,� .. ;, .,r,':N a r , -R-I aliment S ores TroTrac treat rchabi'''tion 5600,000 1 , , y ,` ' •; 'FR-2 #41 Booncs 1•`erry Route(Barbra 15 min,service-days, 30 min. S1,250,000(Capital) F,S,SDC,Transit Center-Tualatin) service-eves S5,760,000(Operating-NLFS Tri-Met a,,+t-" .', 10 years) aI :, '' S7 610 000 : + w Subtotal + + IT-20 Year'I'otarAil Projects S23,867,200 , ' 1-10 Year'total,All Projects S73,2574700 /Total,All Project • • "'Improvements pend ng i300nes Perry Phoning and 15esign protect Note; Projects in City and County jurisdiction will proceed with financial participation by Jboth parties • Roadway and transit'noddies costs reflect consuucttan,right-ol-way costs with construction costs at a 40.50°ib contingency ' ' I . _ _ I y :4. Funding 0uroest i —w C (Clackamas County . ' 0 + i CP City of Portland - i • �• I ......_.� « ,_.__•*—.— -_ -_-....,._._.. ... .< F FedcralFunds 157EA rA ' I —Jefferson Rill Consortium W�� • LID 'Local Improvement District , - Lake pswego Redevc�iopmen , LORA t • (Agency ,... ' ! NLFS New Local funding Source (Ob-btinds,io-clif gas tax, l i etc,) 1 4• $ §tale of Oregon (§ate Hi6�iway Fund, , Special Public works Fund, -IA..: I State vehicle registration k I ,' fees gas tact revenue haring p,. , �' sharing) SDC lSystetri bevelopment Charge` ' I�_ 'Trret .1., . • �,,�' r:i' I .� ,_.-_ - __- u .- 4 ., l 'L1Ecehlane arsnsp1TIPl•lo 0 +. ' p., . 12-28 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN , 46 I. 't ,ry 4Y i ! , - . . F t't:,_ d , tt ,`: • ,4'1 • . i t t y. z t IF+, ' • 1 I " . �..•/• -, . ,..i I.; r. .., ? 6 , •, ,p .. ., Goal 12 Transportation d4 U Goal 12: Trans •orrtatian Figure 19 Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years ; o' It - Estimated Cost Potential { Map I Location Description (19975)� Funding �` Source 'c -G "• • •, 5i S :,'n34 t'+-raid t•r11nrl'7,w` b a ., h'.,` I'-25 State Street/Cherry Lane Left turn lane,improve approach to 5820,000 SOC,S Hwy 43 r • T-26 Meadows Road-Bangy Road to Widen to 4 lanes $1,500,000— SDC,C,S i a '• 1.,1 Carman Drive " ` • T-27 "A"Avenue-State Street to 8th Signal interconnect $150,000 F,S,SDC, } ° Street a �, T-28 Jean RoadBryant Road Left turn lanes,traffe signal $200,000 SDC • s'- 1 " T-29 Cldtds Road/Bryant Road Left turn lanes,traffic signal $200,000 SDC T-30 Kruse Way/Kruse Oaks Drive(91F99 NB approach lane on Kruse Oaks, $150,000 SDC,C,S Budget) add bus pull-out ", T--3I Bryant Road/Cardinal Avenue Upgrade approach to Bryant $60,000 SDC t r' 4; ,t' 1, '- T-32 Meadows Road/Bangy Road Addition of a NB through lane on S325,0011 liDC,C,S Bangy Road,SD left turn lane on Rangy Road .a ,' T-3r-State Street(Hwy'3)/Olcnrnordc ell turn• e $100,000 SDC,C,S + • ,,'4 '., Drive T-34 Bangy Road•Kruse Way to Bonita Widen to 4 lanes,pavement overlay, $1,000,000 SDC ♦ a Road bke lanes T-35 Kruse Way/Westhtke Drivc/K.ruue R>tgitt aunt lane on Westbound Kruse $140,066 SDC,C Woods Way T-36 Boones Ferry Road/Country Develop right turn lane on Kerr $110,000 SDC Y ' Club/Iterrr Parkway Pkwy approach •� T-37 Carman Drive/Kruse Way Add loft turn lanes on Camara,right $375,000 F,S,SDC turn lanes on Kruse.Signal w' •`" modification .1' ? •. • T-38 Kruse Way/Mercantile Drive/Daniel WB and ED right turn lane $116,000 SDC,C Way_ f-39 Cotmtry Chub Road/A Avenue/10th Traffic signal S200,000 SDC ,.,, , Street ,: ; T-40 State Street(Irwy 43)I"B"Avenue SB right turn lane S350,000 SDC,S .>;. , T-41 Carman�rtve/Lake Forest Blvd. WB left turn lane S150,000 SDC,C +'," :,`, T-42 Boones Ferry Road•65th to Bryant Signal interconnect S210,000 SDC Road , ?, T-13 Garman Drive/Park-view liafli signal,chnnneltration S250,080 SDC •4 a • :;, Drive/Fosberg • T-44 Kraus Road/Boones FerryLeft ta Road rn lanes,channeltre $275,0 SDC T-45 Bangy Road/Bonne Road Traffic signal-signal interconnect, $325,000 SDC,C '+ second SB left hint lane on Rangy :;.. r a { 40 + GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12.29 0•• n 47 ' 1 " AA'('32) " I . , �; . , , a, ! ,,i , a ,, s a J ,i d 4. 'a b A - ' ' ,lay .. "' Goal 12 Transportation a ,1. ® Goal 12: Trans e ortatlon • Figure 19 l .., Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years f . /. • Map# Location Description Estimated Cost Potential (1997S) Funding Source K ,'4'; 1 „' 1 ,. rf 'r ,x f.l,, •..x t 1 f J �7 -n<'i. • � -, .M �" C , ;<x -:„x iv.i�..•�...;J.'Ly^'^th fR, . ,°',•�.,,�:te�f s +..; : Eft �+r;. , ,._ . , T-46 Carman Drive/Meadows Traffic signal;additional left turn lanes $1,065,11UU SDC,C ' r s Road/Quarry Rood NB,SB and W13;addidonat through M right turn lane T-47 Kerr Parkway/McNary Parkway Left turn lanes,traffic sigutl 1364,000 SDC `; i J : (lower intersection) T48 South Shore B1vd/Wstvkw Drive Lett turn lane,retaining wall $100,000 SDC la„ 1•-49 Stafford Road/Golf Course Road NB lett turn lane on Stafford $100,000 SDC T-50 Stafford Road/Sunnyhi0 Drive NB left turn lane on Stafford $100,000 SDC T-5I Meadows Road/Kruse Oaks Drive Traffic signal,additional SB right turn $320,000 SDC,C ,, lane,WB right tum lane on Meadows -! ., Road °•" `. T-52 Stafford Road/8ergis Road Left turn lane on SB Sta ord Road $200,000 SDC •f-53 South Shore Blvd,/Femwood Street Left tam lane $50,000 SDC ' T-54 Meadows Road/Kruse Woods Drive Traffic signal,SB left turn lane on $260,000 SDC,C • f + ) Kruse Woods Drive T-55 Carmen Drive/Burma Road Realign Burma Road approach,add $200,000 SDC ( '. r left turn lanes A, ;' e J T-56 Parker/Canaan Add turn lanes $150,000 SDC,C i' '" 1`-57 Carman Drive/Bonita Road Left turn lanes,traffic signal $400,000 SDC,C y a T-58 Childs Road/Pllkinglon Road Lett tarn lanes $200,000 SbC,C T-59 Kraus Road/booth-II-Road Channetimtion improvement $60,000 SDC,C T•60 a 'Street,Dyer Street to Iiafcnan Construct embankment,widen $600,000 SDC "r Street roadway 10 Cry Standards '. ,'! T-61 Traffic Calming-Daniel Way Widen roadway north of Safeco $300,000 NLFS ,, insurance to City Standards + w • , Subtotal $11,475,000 1. y • 'I'•62 Traffic Calming-Locations to be Speed bumps,curb extensions,traffic 5200,0011 S,SUC,NLFS determined circles,etc,(not mapped) . ' Subtotal S11,675,000 , • "' • 12-30 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4f3 ,. AA.f2) " , • i• . , • ,,„ . .:�a a n° are _ r n 1'•+ } iy. ,�`. w' .a '� , 1 W • N a •s -. 1 y' 11� ,, f t• x, r!• a Goal 12 Transportation +a;" Y,• 1 jai 2 Tr rosp®rtation ti'• ,Y. Figure 19 Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years ; a ' .t, Potential ;;,x ,' Description Estimated Cost Funding Map# Location (1997S)* Source ax . , IF t+„ ,, n ..,.. /;Ir'�l,r a tti ' ,4u,1.1.1 ., !',_e ,� - 4-�+p' •;.. 5:1.,• ' x " P-24 Washington Court-Lake Forest to Bones A,r stdewak of ate s J , tween Lake , $14,000 SUC,NLFS A Ferry Road Forest and Bowies Ferry Road }` • P-25 Firwood between Wnluga/Boones Ferry Sidewalk,one side $31,000 SDC,NLFS P-26 Camtan Drive-Watuga Drive to Quarry Pat tI ay one side $140,000 F,S,SDC Rya NLFS .F , P-27 Cannon Drive,between WaK1ga and I-5 Sidewalks and blot lanes on both sides $290,000 SDC,NLFS,C '•o a ',,a P-28 LmnewoocVDottglas Circle,Twin Fir to Pathway,one side S200,000 SDC,NLFS '',. a =' Bowes Ferry ,, ,• k P-29 Monroe Parkway Sidewalk,north side t17,000 SDC,NLFS t . P-30 Bryant Road,between Lakeview Blvd.and Pathway,cast side• $120,000 SDC,NLFS Jean Road ' `' P.31-7Knaus Road Pathway,one side $480,000 SDC,NLFS P-32 Lake Forest Blvd,Washington Court to Sidewai,one side $33,000 SDC,NLFS Carron i u E 0 P-33 McNary Parkway between Jefferson Sidewak,south skit $38,000 SDC,NLFS . : Parkway and Clarchill Downs 'M•: ' P-34 Meodows!toad iSktewakoa south side S119,030 SDC,NLFt P-35 Laurel Street,HaBawn to Cornell Sidewalk on one side :+45,000 SDC,NLFS + 1 P-36 Bonita,between Comma ant existing Sidewalks $32,600 SDC,NLFS ; , ,r sidewalk P-37 Been Ratan Sidewalk on one skit $40,000 SDC,NLFS P-38 Cornell,Laurel to Bergh i"tdewalk,one side $200,000 SDC,NLFS P-39 Childs Rd,between Indian Springs and Pa vay on , s, $200,000 N S w r Bryant P-40 IBryant between Lakeview/Booms Ferry Sidewalk on west side $85,000 SDC,NLFS ' 4• • • - P-41 Fosberg Rd,between Carron and M)rose Sidewalk o west skin r $35,((R) SDC,NLFS u .. P-42 Cherry Lane Sidewalk on one side,between State and $55,300 SDC,NLFS Hallam ' P-43 Bryant,between Westridge and Childs Pathway,east skit S72,OC9 SDC,NLFS - 1,-44 Redlcal;Tomato,Centerwnod o meets Sidewalk,one side $40,000 SDC,NLFS ° " Centeiwood sidcwnit to l'OCingtOIV Itivergrove school) , ' „ + • 1'-45 BcttieeIB Sidewalk • on north s>�e $95,000 SDC,NLFS ,,•�" P-46 Westlake bnwe Pathway ort west side $125,000 SDC,NLFS 'n P-47 Tenberikie Pathway,one side $130,000 SDC,NLFS +'d , -. P-48 F• 911:e Road(, tween Wemb and S walk,one s' — l o SDC,NLFS ' a Twin Fir) o-a' P49 Willamette River Greenway George Rogers Multiuse pathway $110,000 SDC,NLFS i , Park to Oswego i'ontc - GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12.31 49 ' + n . ,. v e M 1 ' Goal 12 Transportation (� Goal 12: Trans,orfation ;'f Y .'a'' Figure 19 f Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years '" 7 - Potential Estimated Cost r w= Map# Location Description i1997$)* Funding , .: ,, ," .y Source IN- f "s r A 1 :1 7. i t'l art nai ii f.7Tirtil•li l i:" 4 ca= ♦ • s 'T§ 4rrh a'•� i,. ;i !t . '`t ♦- 1 ,, F.i.,.Nf s o;4,�, 7 2r.• M•a ,., •\' ,...•,.(:, w u-=,•:• 11,r.r 1.!4'1 v,...p 3,♦;+. P-50 WiWimette River Greenway,between Multi-use pathway $300,000 SDC,NLFS • ' '-`-P. ,;e , u Rocker Park and Tryon Creek, connecting to Terwilliger multi-use , I ,. .,, path .•L. J ,,1 P-51 Bryant Rd, between Cardinal/Sara Hill Sidewalk/pathway $20,500 SDC,NLFS Rd. 4 P-52 GoodaliRoad,between Knatts and Pathway,one side $246,000 SDC,NLFS Country Club P-53 South3'jiore Blvd.(except Westview Pat7`tway on south side $600,000 SDC,NLFS to Blue Heron) r.,,. •_ '' P-54 South Shore Blvd.,Westview to Blue Pathway on south side $50,000 SDC,NLFS Heron f '', .; P-55 Hallman Street Pathway,one side S69,000 SDC,NLFS + t P-56 Kerr Parkway,Boones Ferry to Pathway,cast side $60,000 SDC,NLFS ,•` MoNary P-57 Kelok,�Car inal to South Shore Pathway,one side $50,000 SDC,NLFS "' + P-58 Plliongton,between caJ—n�Rt —Sidewalk,one side $300,000 SDC,NLFS C • F, , Childs P-59 Mci'wan Between 65th and Pill ngton Sidewalk.one side $52,500 SDC,NLFS • P-60 (Romania br, Pathway,one side $100,000 SDC,NLFS P-61 Jefferson Parkway between Kngsgate Sidewalk,one side $105,000 SDC,NLFS and Kerr r+ »a P-62 Jean Rd.between Pilkington and Sidewalk,one side $70.000 SDC,NLFS ' , % », Bryant P-63 Waluga Dr.between Parkhill and Pathway,east side $40,000 SDC,NLFS Carew " 4. P-64 Wafuga Dr.between Oakridge and Pathway,both sides 580,300 SDC,NLFS FGwood i n + " ''. • P-65 irosberg Rd.between Southwood Park Sidewalk,West skin $15,000 SDC,NLFS and Melrose Subtotal $4,892,700 „ •.• , •� • i . 4 12.32 LAKE osWEGO OOMPOEHENSIVE PLAN 50 ,"' AA( G7 e 1 1 . v t + . t •+n ti f N t, . ' y I � 4 . 11 .• Goal 12 Transportation - '`.a .,' :, 0 ® APa4 : rarrapartai®n , '''• Figure 19 Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years v, Estimated Coat Potential Map** Location Description Fundingn p (19975)v Source A a„ r < e n- 'a 1 V f c ..t� td,ytlt L 1�} r f, B-16 Bryant Road Y,between Childs and Bite Ions $232,000 SDC ti °, ,NLFS n,+ Boons Ferry • *B-17 BatticeW Bike lanes $1,500 SDC,NLFS . B-I8 Childs Road,between 65th and 35th Btke lanes $310,000 SDC,NLFS t'` R y Place . B-19 Fosberg/Carman,between Knee Way Bice lanes $107,000 SDCNLFS . • and Melrose . • • B-20 Bortitn,between Cancan and Bangy Bike lanes 5231,000 SDC,NLFS r .:4 B-21 Iron Mtn.,between Fairway and Bike lane,south side $68,000 SDC,NLFS ,4 1 Chandler,south side ' t ;, ," 13.22 South Shore Blvd.Between Westvkw Bike lanes $350,000 SDC,NLFS ] r and Grcentrce +' ** I emwood Drive between South Shared roadway,local $ - SDC,NLFS - ~shorelrreetop ; ' •* Lake Grove Avenue Shared roadway,local $ - SDC,NLFS A •.1 *• Westview between South Shore and Shared roadway,local S - SDC,NLFS Royce r ** Knaus,between Timberline and Shared roadway,local $ • SDC,NLFS Booties Ferry - t,■ ** Lake Forest Blvd/Waslungum Ct, Shared roadway,local $ - SDC,NLFS between Carman and Booties Ferry Subtotal $1,299,500 *incidental,striping only !**Meets criteria for Local Stared Roadway-no improvments needed i I T A ,k '14• y 1 + .,x GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12.33 61 r. _ I +H" •.,: -ry'- ,, ' • y I , ,y'., a., 4 ,AA l{j2� , t ,,. ti +a• 4 Goal 12 Transportation D Goat 12: Trains•ortation t., i 4 Figure 19 I .1 Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years 7 I . Estimated Cost Potential • Map# Location Description (1999S)* Funding Source 4 k.p './..� 9 e 1. +' 'v_. ;.i n t".`1I r"i"r)1 `••, ,.t.M ..> ', {:,1 �,'. �. v ..y}I; . ,*•+J •• .1., . , ,l •' J,-, i.., ,7.• !, i I. TR-3 Kruse Woods Transit Center $3,000,000 F,S,SDC, f . +• NLFS Tri•Met 7•R-4 Downtown Lake-Oswego-East of Park and Rile/relocated transit center $3,000,000 F,S,SOC, .. State Street NLFS Tri•Met , Subtotal $6,000,000 ,t; 11-20 Year Total,All Projects S23,1167,200 i+ »•• «' 1-10 Year Total,All Projects S73,257,7116 — t 4r' ' Total,Alllllect $97,144,900 �y f Note; Projects in City and County jurisdiction IIw proceed with financial participation by both partiesik* . I ? Roadway and transit facilities costs reflect consinicdnn,right-of-Way costs with construction costs at a 40.30%contingency — t1 , C IClocknmas County e ! ._CP ICay of Portland' _ — _ g ' ;.,- F IFcderal Funds-1STEA `uy— ��J— r, il u LID (LocalImprovement District _�— ;'i , LORA (Lake OsWego Redevelopment Agency NLFS 'NeW Local Funding Source (GO bonds,local gas tax,etc.) (Stale oof Oregai ._.___..-l8tate iraliway Ftauf,Specgiiieblie .`-_______—.,... �..._,_ ._ .'! " Works Fund,State veldele registration • o • e fees,gas tax,revenue sharing) •. SDC !System Development Char ` —"" — ; •IM 'Tri•Met 1` u i - 010 y ,' ., • ,•,I ,, 12.34 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I , q 52 1,n,. ,1, i y . P t. l • ' AA• :(6.) ' A ,. a I P N Iy n s;a, '. w rn ..+' t y o 8 z .." .".''' t'' °E z i 5 ;,,, k' t,, * Lir Z / �d d 3 m H O W U " .. *' '•*1 . n 1, V. 1 ig g g a '6 V CO Ql `" Q N W a IL y* V e x 4 I' ; ..-,-.., (A39,`>.'..•-'�- ......„1 �,.._ I,j ,:C`'.� �� yro4.i f ly On • ;, ...! :;'1 -" ,, `n,ufILAMC1" . 4. � "N LA - -1"1 l y" J N ti°aY , Nr ram-•.,h aepO 11 PO.it• `\ •(. „I,�k✓ 1 144 4. i �`1 'I''1 .�n1n Mr• , 1. °0rti. , `` + e, ref _ i i g(10'I 71! att. -I i c1 •.), t , 0 ,4,, VI�,.. ilb{. 1u o .11.. r•••� I,;,e 3�114 N.a n. I i t",•'---) A, �4*g.'P r' ° ^tans S 0$:,1 �1 .:� t''4;4 14474l.' i I ", ri • J JP 11. ' gip° % .5 r l' wl.+''• A . isrt ' ° ..,s"={"' ii � t � I� ' , 1y, .., y 1 U .' ~ " \ 1__ CI� i'� ,11• ` 1 ° f T r• `wa• ,1 � III _ _1 ,rr ql'y` III'p 5 t�1 I I y du ` , , y 11 ! ul 1 , i, t" a Ii ,,;•1 ° �...: t lip ^(t J I.+;,h'd+`il�'`ni+'ll�i11,.}U•p j' � _ , „y •� ' 1 I, 1 .E Merl, \ :� ,,r,ir-IN: 1`4 ...1, o.01 ., .....,.: „ ..„ i i . ‘ 't 1 i, .., „, i Li 11 ua,jw r . � 1. •,t-, -� j t., w :v t��Yl. '1•dll.+`:::: 4 `II . .{, I.....I %. w. L °. , 1 \ i•••••,\'I �t I(j ' '1}'-'• °„'�, ,lylt 'I —' F- ,......... (. I ••• .•,1. 1,ji .. u , ti 1 g d' 1 1:.:tt' , , c III I' A • �•Y 1 rit v' ((r 1/'1 k .,h 11_ k'4.„ 0 i .{l .�� 1�-..N.V ,11•I °v .t '1 „'1' 1.1 V.'S -•"1 A- .1..-.., "''''2', „ill i°°i,.111l k rrL.... \ IM ''., iZ � If 1/I'.. '4.,- \ r ••,� I4i\t, `t, t'l f, • 14i,e .r. ♦ 5vr lk,q, ti.,, f *. 4':•J N k! 6t -3' 1 4YY ,- ' °• 11 .I.'."�itt• • •, ..Ayl,,i. k i.,•�..,µ'�""'l.E 1?4 '•*4Y'/• '.•,y:v`1 tt.� ..e...-.I.. •V' 1..'4 1 L-J1 • •', r' 1 u. t, 1 4 ti• ° ( it j1` 8tN �I•a <.�1 i y, ea: '�•�, 9:.. ultlt I;aram'; II, ,,,.. ,,,.. II 4 ,1 'r ' • ,! d�'▪ x.IK , .„4t .,, ... f j,2 ,. 1 ,. •r •ti'„" ,1..:,,'y I t :'I h�,,,,' Ii' "Ti 1 �. �• t �rp, '11 t▪ w, t.I..I • 1 A r, 1� .,,/� s1 '�' I •1tA71fI Y 11' 1 A Ile I 1 Y.,tr._ i, ' , �. `�I 1 'y J. . s \ .. I a Jt g i 7� �I, �1 ttr, :1,E q: 1' ' `' A I. II 11 '1 * 't'I 4, 1.v+1 I. ' 11 ' ' 1 �y,r II:. f 'f.�.;74 , ..1. f I f 4 ,ILI'... a;„.� v e r 1`.,wl .l�. -1w•,� , d y I f `', • q V ' 00i [LI I ,, ' _ I t�� 5• r ', r� 1 ��` 5' rNI II �I „mil—� +�a r +.f. I. ( I1 i wlr� �Y it .L. a41' r- Tj `{ a I I- '1 Ftk `. V7 ' ' -'... .M „ L Ilr,. P •h h- �. 53 . ' w !1 f1'1 .'i f. `' ,•A e fir.. .. . ._ Ja d r W g 0 ," r a IU iM O k WIG•ry F W ` v.) aZ 1 �r '' oa ; z n J 4 �Z HH I. Q �r�..' ,•,i il G '�I L 0 p cL I _i� L P' p a 7, fn rc 3 f ,+ `� I cc) 4� r O a..� I m '; �y�i^rt r r Qn ,.,'� f J"._�\', of%NIL, iTC' ,,:.„ _ 11 r 1 i 4 ) ,,i f�. �,(r7 ",1 :`r I r .Ly. r..`< ' 1 ••�,—.� ti tan I J —II-ell 25® t) ykf a} I`l,+•4$, '-"t,•m. • ,'A •Y. 5 ."• V7'J Ip,""<,I,,, ,Ji jp-'- �6.�{1�'�'r .a:. ,.,1".,r•fir4 lk/ r ..4"/,,11.1 r. , pL A.'S�' 1 ) �';r r1 .rp�1lr� i a• '' o irgg" .mar `. ` Q11\ [.I ;i y��? sew. .t; a , 1111 • � 1f� 1L , / 3 s 4- ) ttf ,, .✓ (' i6�' � ,lh � / '=k'w.ry •-1.st c> ? •���� ykY � i�' 1 a C, a' ,� � ' 1 � » i r7 III f . lie,i-itl'jf P'1•„'- . . 1 s t- `11 .�")i 1)q d 1 ,1 • • 11 a %, a,.., ' 7; r:� ��( .I, ) t,,,,VT' 714 i r 0. �' I • ..,. . . ,, ), 1 1. ' 7� _ g �. �1 ,1 Y��y trr y, ll 'b.�i/�aa-. ��r~ ,k.' •r ji I b-� � ,Y,.• . 'q+ .�' 11 ,' <ae lti�e.y�+ p �j.� ��'a;a5�f / 'r ,11,� r, 1. f N '. .fir (_, , t1 \ ` ,1:\• 4 g ''y"[f M ��,^ I !r ( �` y i �1 ea t� .I If yr' �,r St. { I. • _ 1n , J,e> ".rc'r. i��� ,, I �� y ye "-x 3ih Z'V�1 4+'k4 1�.• � i� t •^ P � ) a q �JJ ,�,?.r tl .'t.t.,-il �`�H. t? 1 ";' u..• ninm. VVVF1 • 1• • \r I l( I ,1 1•... , or 1_•d a II i d ®-tiary `�µ.,.t. � ''' 1 tl ryi •tl�, 1������ ''�� 'y.,.r.::;,i I.p�t 4• , ,.•., . 11,. ,, '_., 'sj .r.P� + 1 I 71+ r., N.! P'' P iI' 1A ,,.... �, 1j 11 j 1N ,.aj� ,.1� `E.r! �:,1 y,-. ,—,� _ "''(: v .d?; 1 rb F L .,.7J1.11 � •r�' d ItY�1� ir:^ 'fC1 I , ble; .m. ,k.,,i, ,,la 1 —1 ' I'''' t t 0.1 1 v-y (11Tl).1 \ 1b� ,1 d W'o'. fJ 1.. . "M1 .�-. v 1411I �,• " ."...'i:l , '! !A.[f. 7�� M�llil � .: '9I'�a` �'q si •1 I id)M 1. - ,r,lt �J-j;M1. i�-, n'•r.4i;.�. !• 1 1 •�, rp n,fr.fL1 , a_ • + + -' 1 ? !3& �,.,/...• tl •IUL.1 rg'd> J b�!1 Ity. i1 y"rIi' I 4 q1)' �4-- 1' p K! Ai y 11 _ '.:r1� Y y"iM� d F a 4 •r lax If' i m 0 x w .". - a d w a a. '4 .1.•• v' l� W IaK�' yl L4' hO Zi • 0 N e : k �'.. LP U I—V1 r 1. ♦ ..'_l1; L1.V -1`,1.»F._I�� 7�"'a.'11. y ` �,f),,, a f y I, i °� hit J !l,/ll i� �.{I 11�' �' °' - yr VfLLPMIC?,7C� • � •s. - — -1:-C r�1 "'A �M ,4�s tr r(' i t a �� r'"' a .F- _..1 , '+u M_,�/ v.i A� Y�,�'1 t t "'4'36 ( .$ �i fug " .,,.{ k � a,,� ..s ,�L...«..—. .II.-• •I�!w��r wa` .r`1 c 4 ) ia lI�I� t} it . ' p ^ ,. �•1 R . .L. y�p�1' �, p �1•' {1 f�' i �'r,� fax,- e' � �4 I�4`'"1. (,/ r,j8—-,r6f�„� �(�a II!II I r 3{ s+ " ��v�4''•.-�,f`!{ .... 11, ('-'',$•-,. ' . CRP. 1-.A \q-liki '-v-s*r.i-. L4-1 ' b, 3/ '-4 1.._ e. ' .t;~�i f• .�fa•1 rM I � JvJll:il(Y` ` '-1.i:1Y- ,.1, =•,b.� h :. C V. .P�'� •1f5 I II r1, F1•,ti;,' W 'c 4}tly , a„11 I {'- y .0 rt�/• i:. Ms I .-.ulLij d l;', l'SS (�1 ,4,i IlI' a .. rr'1 11 tl n n'r.�- 1 N. �,) l, ( .I;. � YI 4�.. � II ' 't 9 `4- it I a r ;�` a y'`d ,gl �✓a;1l a,+ '.. • al 1 r + .I a �•q«., ;n � -. (Y 7 'etp,;A4 {;� a ,t/ „4 'w •t 1 x _,.. e5y (i 11 �' p9 (,yt�t 4i� `�I�E41 N' 1 I/.0 t°4 �� ,. j s 1 ..7 [��+; C 1 1Id °"pp,\-'C\Y r i� ;,� _, j 3 t�' 1'' i••". ' • Ni 1� •••.. �.,. '1 Ri ail. l%I t.0 i � ti ',:�V„ ..^, \\ ,�` f „__ ; if 1 1,1 • q' ■1` r l ( ..r J (.1.04.,` y1�. ''li 9 p "1'1iF i,,,t--.-S..;r'I ,,t-, . `1 •1,' �f) tl; f r 'III� I01 , tia „� Y' ; 4p %'I '; ' ti�wna Iy .1 ,..,.'4., c� �`"4"�t �°4' �` 1'+ 'r 1!c.4.p' I l �ti� � �` jti ill ft a�� .•a % ;rt: T"-- i_. I ' 1,,. F` +�s r- 1 I „r •, JAI S�e,l ; �Ae G' �{ �I�17.f4 7. ,. ,, c t� I '!�I hi, r�I, � .,ri ,I it III iii"" • 4 i,. .� ' + i->� !`f" i t . •4.a, ,+ Rye'`}}II - 11..o-1. f t �;. - ti. ,`"cA., . �" 1 t pry'^- ■(l I!,..-T im 'I I -, 1 '' ,, r i" ,r fiR...., A LOI:pl�ef'�^ ",. . i *•,I -71�+ ,, —ir ail I R�1 1`A, II 'a ,1!'r 'w'ti It9 d I p ! 3 I,,,rr .ii !fr , j. it _ Fes• ' I T'+;� ,r°„'I 'I s • + , 'I z-'i-.. II a e« Y •--1� eC/I ' y _. 11 �� I �' „_ I 55 A Ae t 'SA(3a) 11 I 4 1 „N R,. p n A 1 .Y ''I''''',.... 4 1 .1'. '1 ' ' ° '.' .+a.!n. - ..;°,•i n . t co VI n o J ',� O Z 4! co4"I i i r g w W 1 �i. m gI - - >, rc J N } J J a r I n Q4 ^ a n 1--....I � •.r W w 06 `M U U a U ;x1 G o P rt q `-i 0 t a to ‹ O �d a w a a a s r o f w N y;"' ONW tno +` a -y1: Z I-• o W t r •'. • �' 4Ly T •`" 1 �La 4,d• ._} {a J i �,. 4 4 .:. p I It t + �I.�li'•JII -:1�4� �1... -1' r�'. rC g''...� } I- ^�••., { .• l �� 11,-•-• y' 4 ! 4 a�t et� ''^` --'4""" l+k 1 �,�N , ! ,na '+41i ,..s y L.., r\may ,:NI. * �; C•� "'��/1LLAM671E ,•ta' _•.-. " I I I..•...� („ !"1 t Mr ,i1 ,� • �j �'^ -1_� ,• 1dLJ14-•, / y4�Q• ,e ff ' A'sc +'i�l� `. �,f ! po y „ .A •.y'a,J fa a"�j�. .....7. s 14."•.'' 1 ti ,y},< $/1 x"�4;,,a '.).1 {1i.. ,t 11 r w •'p . 1 hl._ s 1 J I111 ryt II _ " '..4''-''' /rAt4 ibr! ° S � 'i' •Jk, Y '"ia, 1'. ,M., V sg,..4,� 1'' 4. A �� ` r ..... T. 1 r� p t't;y)��."-_ � k 1,'-i '' 'l, J(1:1- �Il it It• e i )+ 1,�. „y,• .,,J�. '�j E1 Ft5 id„ ,,,�11, lr I_I' ` ��1 `=R`+'^S`1't• i1'••l'7,S,y S � 4 �7 01, . 11 j� 0701 di'f- 1t L I I3 kl• R� �� Apr .u . E 1 e , ; t ' «If i1.444 kq{ I.. ��,, 1 W 1'. p I .. II,,,..I,' re Y f }r; -� �p� +q�� ,yly F' 1 .4 I,�•LIIS,TI'i I I • 4p i S A a .01 A v-w F 3 1 � �Atr% \It' " •da iZt," .?''`••,:—',,. .' f( rt„,,t 1 1 w 1 ij 47 �� n j.-i c p .•o� ! n-1i 1ti "'Itz ,,��:'1 0P f'~y"1 �ti.�:!"�•�, ^.•4I •'s. •"•, '.1.1;••4I4.14•5wItrt.,,,. 1 .., `I`' •',1 • AIL. 111 ')4..3 I� r 7,�x . d 4 ^ i 1 11�'d }4i ^(+ _ `V. ,j g 4. 1 i 1 (1, ` 116 w4,I iP ,k , ►: 1 01.. / ""� `,5, ','+ `' ,tt....., 1,-;4 ,+' • „'.1•Ml''letii elir ,ra ;N�_ •,`^ VM. • ///' I r I q," Ili II I� 4 ."3„• „7 1 7 " i'. - 4 t.�41 •{Y t l..l.y'I II U 1�eti.• j 1�, 1�� y r t , ,: x �•",' d.e•= e " -• Vi�0,, el, C4, T •ry •or' ".71-•�19 'I•• 1s`1.., ` •1'r='\ - ',.- t t. 1 �.i 1Y� • , (r' �.� .,oiNv i(��.••'4j'!!,r1�� {�.I n 1.1��M_ � ,' , J `• ••s,�, 4t.i.,. I P'• 1 5 i. _�� ,,I� 1 � r n rb'i"A� y���� . ��•�w („"t�f� ! ,1, `�� �m�, �{I( (I � .. - ti.• I C- e5 Ls 11) /'/ B 1., ,„ 1 u�.•, 16,1• 1 I.�„• 1' 'I ba I, ?' i rpm , ,,, \..„,..c ,71.1 _,,..i. , , , .....,,,,,t),, yC 41 , �•{7.t, .d 1 It i t _'7 Ilr11 lr,'f. '�• `- I 1� ¢der 1 6•`w '-I' � 4 1' ' a91a �� �ci•. ,P '• II, -1 •r'r' p .A�d 'Mal 1'Q' ( (I „- {,AqG "11 ,��`ile !F v.1:.i''y 4�.�,'C + �` .+k::14:: S.. - i w,. • p ,4y',1�),1 •l�+x 11M+1 I t' .n'':'#uR !\ ,may, " �'r,lky���. -i.l:, 1 Ir1«4.a. /' a. �'4 I �T1 S� wW - �M 1 • ,-,i',.- ,.). r►J'` 11 + 'fir 111 - I ^47ar ytK'.- _ PY tpI^{{ .t n •_p�"�'t -• • n _,. '' ' v. I .. I .rt1Sr.T,..:r ` - .. _. „•!-..• i ...�_ Liir••4 - II' +' III • r •• -.. ��,.,Ji+w, ,4,; ;AT .G �,�, -r I ...IIg �") �1�,�• 1 •r,: IIII,Y-I u AA(34' ' . »,...; _, 4 , '� n r ••'a •... .�', ''f :: • ",,• % . . .` - ,'.. ,. ... . ' . . . '4b..n" . •j. . r! et a',1 r. it 4 • O N ° w =yg g� Y 1 y V. 4t 7 Y W to as ni 7 nQ rc d III U •� • [ 4, at) .�`-'tz �{r�J ,g q + M j `` ` ' a f ''q i <a °. F,.. 9) z ni qg ''d t Td ,- a J (� O u 2 II� U�N I i e y 0®�� •t 1 `� 1J�l.I irk•" .i_I Jr JI , t -` t ^.)' I ( d, 1..1- I \t 4 11 11a �I .12 (^•i i r' Wl4LAM�TTG� r -i (= �I ➢ 'J Q i' ;4.4, r,. ! 4 .� .,) may (' ,y Y . N' ''. J n rry`� 3��� X v >;4, l {♦ li,T 'fit P° 1�1, e��ll•17 u '.•- I ., �.,N:'''•3 `• , I `--s`, .y'..�,.. / Ca°e`��.'\,!�,,1(- ' i ,'ti p a t'4 . If i ' t�t, X- •t.°'" J"^i.,, ' ! �, ... .F xP'�1,1 t 4G®P +141 yew r p : 4•"- ,+1 • . ,'� -i, '1» ,"Jn `�1, ✓�•• 1 �M tI IJ��. I'......il ;, .1 A ., i';'1 '� fLiLe�*1�L 1 ��'lor+ ra.r t;1 41 � 7 ��r ( ill tt+� ,. . I r.. : - t i A, J /1 , r y ,)- ;.t• ,I� �'` ''' 4 .ti. `j, r • flyt J1 `'N � A'. l � " ' y fit„ ��1 II�� J1'�'• s �, , j`� f '��'" nrs ,f rr 4! ;w. ,4 ', y '• ...17.,.,� `� i( 'A 4,, 1, • i• I� ; 1 li, �1 `` • N I .. j' 1 .e 4• �,U `% 1 �``Sa �� III If‘ �•f, , ,. ' i ,,.)11 W;..4.10 e�4= } , .�6 a II A'—m�.,,nr:'" r .,11 .• •NU , E ff ` RR tt 11 t11 %y!l i1! ! r 1 Y t /! o' ,,ret+..:i' d F1n•1yM "" L tl N 1 t11 �r ]r 1 1,'j .� 1 1 ,t i At 1 0 p; t , - --;h }�,!. I " a z• '1l 14. I! 1,, (lt;-. I "l• , 1' t Us1 ` F➢ (` ,k rt--. , k7. ';r:41,, '' ; q ,--f 4.str, • . ,,,,,,7;,s . I Y �\�� \'-c I-.. � s w ,r j. ¢ IN. 1 rey 1r t ` 43%, 1�t, '•; S 11�,p"'ta♦>•,, ,e t' 11 ''' ,II 47�t-1'r r 1 'a' ., g lI 1 1.4v,�"rnr.-,' 1 ,•.t` 4. ,.1.1t. e ' .d,t ) ' L.� ',w, ut ''1) r ' " F I,w�,. 1.1 t U ^ jY , i�a,,Uu,�py{uJ 1N . ° Tk • nog' JA4K.7",, fII! 1i `'.. 'y 1 1 . '_ �10 'I 6, II i ,) '7 1 .e 11 CI /n '" 1 " h "t ;n111 �Il1..F.. �) 1. L�, ��' t1t I tillG-i-- tJ` 1, ; ?I/•'.�9 a'q I � ��---, .,r,� i ,. 4 - .' ;'j ill 1 • i6. (i 'i.7 "y'�1 [4 !1K 1i11,1 .k-,g1 ,1 d„ ," 1,- I 1 r tl .P'r�IP 'a+II :a ' ' _itreg,.4_ `t", ..,;„re J •1 ` 'zr''1•I ;y , `LS i -1 p I a., .; w. an + pp ' I e1 I. hnn+"�'� a 1 t1 r }k a �'tl • A -�.._ ».� '' mow,\ we >r Imo__ 481,e //ter„f 11 ri 57 ,; � r l r I) ,: m�f. i 1 ' 7�J '•I1 ry • fl • w� «4`• rg;;i ,Y • { • M iy •• , u ,•p f�o '•g 47 ,. M1 I A �. • • 58 •li,. . c ti r .g 11 r t % S'sr h ,' s Ar r ir'A P , 1•:'":.:;,,'.•:.;:::::::''. -*•-,p't(101,134r>ta- fl.P141.04141-r`kq ZOteritq.... (1916"." etk) GOAL 12: TRANSPORTATION To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and Conservation Service unless no feasible alternative a-„' , economic transportation system. exists. 2, _ •• ' A transportation plan shall(1)consider all modes of 4, Major transportation facilities should avoid dividing j•^, transportation including mass transit,air,water,pipeline, existing economic farm units and urban social units ,• -4. ' i rail,highway,bicycle and pedestrian;(2)be based upon unless no feasible alternative exists. an inventory of local,regional and state transportation 5, Population densities and peak hour travel patterns of '-• d ". needs;(3)consider the differences in social consequences existing and planned developments should be considered ,h a that would result front utilizing differing combinations of in the choke of transportation modes for trips taken by -e.t transportation modes;(4)avoid principal reliance upon persons,While high density developments with concen • • - , . .1 any one mode of transportation; (5)minimize adverse Crated trip origins and destinations should be designed to ' social,economic and environmental impacts and costs; be principally served by mass transit, low-density " "' (6)conserve energy;(7)meet the deeds of the transporta- ,developments with dispersed origins and destinations " ` ' lion disadvantaged by improving transportation services; should be principally Served by the auto, tt (8) facilitate the flow of goods and services so as to 6, Plans providing for a transportation system should • -, strengthen the local and regional economy; and (9) consider as a major determinant the carrying capacity of l i r': conform with local and regional comprehensive land use the air,land and water resources of the planning area :; {,' - r plans,Each plan shall include a provision for traosporta- The land conservation and development actions pro- „S tion as a key facility, vided for by such plans should not exceed the carrying s ,2. Transported on--refers to the movement of people and capacity of such resources, ti y e goods, 1, Transportation Facility -refers to any physical facility B. IMPLEMENTATION ,"' that moves or assists in the movement of people and I. The number and location of major transportation goods excluding electricity,sewage and water. facilities should conform to applicable stele or local land `' H= 1b�..'4' Transportation System--refers to one or more transpor- use plans and policies designed to direct urban omen- ,• *tation facilities that.arc planned,developed,operated sion to areas identified as necessary and suitable for - c'• '.,`' and maintained in a coordinated manner to supply urban development,The planning and development of 1, "' continuity of movement between modes,and within transportation facilities in rural areas should discourage ra ,Y 1'', urbangrowth while providing transportation service ,, and between geographic and jurisdictional areas, necess to sustain rural and recreational uses in those � Mass Transit-•refers to any Torn of passenger transpor- �' . ; •;'' tation which carries members of the public on a areas so designated in the comprehensive plan. II• , , regular and continuing basis, 2, Plans for new or for the improvement of major transpor- p Trans ortation Disadvantaged--refers to those indi- tation facilities should identify the positive and negative • on: (I)local land use patterns,(2)environmen-acts "` victuals who have difficulty in obtaining transportation impacts + becauseof their age, income, physical or mental tat quality,(3)energy use and resources,(4)existing , * transportation systems and (5) fiscal resources in a disability, manner sufficient to enable local governments to ratio- ' 1 GUIDELINES natty consider the issues posed by the construction and ., ' operation of such facilities, ,t '�•,�• °,. 3, Lands Adjacent to major mass transit stations,freeway A, PLANNING ,� �• . interchanges, and other major air, land and water I, All current area-wide transportation studies and plans should be revised in coordination with local and terminals should be managed and controlled so as to beconsistent with and supportive of the land use and regional comprehensive plans and submitted to local �, and regional agencies for review and approval, development patterns identified in the comprehensive , r •aTransportationsystems,to the fullest extent possible, plan of the jurisdiction within which the facilities are ,, 2, provide , should be planted to utilize existing facilities and 4. Planr should for a detailed management pro local • e.. rights-of-way within the state provided that such use grant to assign respective implementation roles and r'• ' g • ." �.. a is not inconsistent with the environmental, energy, responsibilities to those governmental bodies operating 'r,f �, land-use,economic or social policies of die state, thein planning area and having interests ih carrying out 1 3,No major transportation facility should be planned or the goal ''r d developed outside urban boundaries on Class 1 an ,d ^•"` � II agricultural land,as defined by the US.Soil 59 ,. •19' Attachment 2 "' �. Fl " • • I > ff .J. 1 t•l... .14 ° •A • �n , o�, i .Y p^I ... ' A.,e�a�th n � . y.:,�.,4...ry1 1 � 1, f • „1 u NY M y Jy» 64 • •;+ + S w' `I I 1 p. er" n '11 • it *rl� N'� aN •�� 1{• �. i '. h r y A 1f kf �y ;.M 9',yr .'3 • Yi �t 1 1 i M '§ qi 1 f a a ti, / yl 1 • �k 1. 1 a As •a ry 1/ • g ; gal..a �;�Y'Y e a i Aga yc. )a,; 60 «, • n�. 4kA'(3 )d ';•; , ' ' ' ; d + • 11 ": .� .r .5,. .. �'• a..,t I J •• JS�, t a•. GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION y "' l •Y i .Y:..- y , •'y BACKGROUND ;;f. ' •. w - , Y, &amwide,Planning C►nal 19. Transpnrtat inn a, ''To provide and encourage a sale, convenient and economic transportation system," "'"Y 1 ' Statewide Planning Goal 12 requires cities and counties to develop a transportation plait which l,yt L,,' ' considers all modes of travel including mass transit, air, Water, pipeline, rail, highway, bicycle ,. and pedestrian which is based on an inventory of local, regional and state needs, considers the �r�': differences in social consequences that would result from using differing combinations of i.f transportation modes and avoids principal reliance upon any one mode of transportation. + In 1990, the City Council appointed a 24-member,ad hoc Transportation Committee to review ;., and update the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. In general, the changes ti.; .o proposed by this Committee were as a result of new legislation and changes in community preferences that had occurred since the Plan adoption in 1978. 't r"� } In December 1992, the new Transportation Chapter was adopted. It includes policies reflecting ` "" 4'!t • the changes outlined in the Transportation Rule(TPR),(OAR 660-12, 1991)which is the major '. o!'• " ' new legislation adopted since the Plan was acknowledged by Department of Land Conservation ,,.r b, r'.. (DLCD)in 1982. The policy basis for the rule is that if cities are to accommodate urban growth, q• t " residents will have to drive less so that roadway capacity, which is economically and K • environmentally costly,will not have to be increased,(Whiten tern iner.Cnsee in capacity wnittd he ilesirnhle, it is mnre realistic to state flint a redttrtinn in the ni ert fnr rapacity inereacec is th .'i' , a realistic.gtinl-)To accomplish this,communities are to provide opportunities for residents to use alternative transportation, including walking, bicycling and transit, This wilt be t accomplished through reduced parking, better pedestrian and bicycle connections and through ; ' -1 ".e. provisions of amenities for alternative transportation users, • `f '' The Transportation Committee was also charged with developing a Neighborhood Traffic ' Management Program to manage traffic to insure the safe and orderly movement of all modes of ' transportation and to preserve the quiet and privacy of residential neighborhoods, This program • "; is in response to the public's desire to control automobile traffic volumes,speeds and to increase ' safety in neighborhoods, Another change made during the 1992 update include a policy ^,. requiring a truck circulation plan for Lake Oswego to reduce noise and pollution in residential areas,This plan shnittrl he reviewed ai'ui part nfan update.to the plat) ' ra , � ,1r Mot her other element of the Transportation Chapter is a Streets Public Facilities Plan, The state . administrative rules for public facilities planning(Goal 11)requires communities to provide a list •,'R. ;`'F " of short, mid and long range projects that it foresees for all modes of transportation, estimated 1 costs of these projects,approximate locations and possible funding sources, The prnjeet acnp,e., , ,ti I 4 ' elutes mad coat are all gttestinnahle anti have heen found to he inardarate- The project senpec ' • (Sl J •• 1.41 Attachment 3 " . i e 1 :1.9. ,d. A " l . t r ,N 1 , �1,4f.{'' 1' �, CNN .,,, , y . f, +f } i i 7 , ,.y lY • < + hove heen found to he, either ildefined or inaccurate costs have been fnstnd nn nutnernns Ic ' occasions to he inadequate (Hennes Ferry Road is shown in the current plan at S7 5 million, current estimates are SR million, similar findings were readily appaxem_!n the work done on the • ' Neighhcwhood Pathway Program)and schedules apper to he ignored as projects gp through the CiP process In light of F a ,•, �e current/midget r� kl situation, .unsi,,, sources are shrinking and it will he iwd more difficult to find funds_to build all the projects,in the plan TI`e City fulfills these requirements for the streets element of the Transportation Plan and will provide the Public „�' 0. "'''# Facilities element for other modes of transportation as soon as tlis.:City's Transportation System r- °' •" # Plan (TSP)is completed, The current TSP includes hike,ped and transit improvements all of N'" " . . 'v which should he revisited The Goal 12 Rule requires each jurisdiction to complete a TSP for transportation facilities that are planned,developed, operated and maintained (The current TSP fig, do not lost,de a plan fnr maintenance it yyrnsld he_helpfu l to inclu de that facet since our ' y r• ,;d'a'; m rer aintenanosts are increasing and the City has facilities like our street lighting that are in dire ' need of capital replacement)in a coordinated manner to supply continuity of movement between ' modes and geographic areas, y' ,� During this update of the Plan, the Transportation Committee also recommended extensive changes to Functional Street Classifications. (This is one area that we will wain revisit Several events and practices will trigger a look at functional classification of the i3O street " -'' 4 r ' ., "' system! I) As 1lP projects are completed, it appears to meihat the functional classificatinn as n , .4 'b. q well as the ultimate typical sertion for the roadways and cnnfigtra.inns shown in the plan have K '.1..,. heen precluded Annexatit nl and urisdlctiona)tt ncfers from Clacksantac C n to y-•a g Staffnrrl i ' "o „, $earl Inns always been an unresolved issue Meadows Road appears that it will never he a multi- ,,!..' • , 1 ,� Inne facility ftT�(1`i' tran erre f�angy Road, ag-in_ t Is will never he a multi-lane facility.3) • ° ' ' �� ,girs as p nurces such MTiP and(1TIA make st essential for the(" y to he .more gg.escuye at , '� , 4?. I V tr'" getting projects onto Metro's plans sn the City facilities qualify fo ing) The Committee , initially developed three overall objectives for the Plan, These included; 1)reduce the through ,. . f 4 a N neighborhood ) concentrate traffic on major streets and 3) maintain the •'A A ° yy traffic on eel bop too streets, 2 ! 1>' character and livabilit of the communit 'These are lofty nhjectives,it will he essential tolinfine " " e'�, ; What this means so stall'can correctly interpret the meaning as they apply pnlieies in the day tp •`, a y 1ruJ Ufnderlakin and would consume a Int of time and resources in develo min T e js a " rut 1, day applicatinu of the plan, Standard.street sections would he helpful, although this will Y ,g t' p L here tC fl bal�u+l:lstg net betwe n t; he nee to pro irle safe facilities and mediate the neighborhoods vision t,• 4, .:" for their streets it seet$RJhat efforts ought to concentrate no the arterial and majnr_crdieninr +-" ' `, r. system and nn that is ninnleted move Hole the In et fiunptinnal r s#sifi at�inns.l, The ' 4 , Committee refined the previous "Arterial " category to Major and Minor Arterials and the ' , '4 pervious "Collector" category into Major and Neighborhood Collectors, Many streets which ' ., i Were collector streets were also reclassified as"local streets", In 1997, the City adopted additional policies and projects to bring the City into greater compliance with the TPR, These changes provided more emphasis on a balanced transportation :� �ao system by; Emphasizing pedestrian and bicycle connections and projects; • i• s • More closely relating street function to the character of surrounding land uses; 1•, ' .'. a Emphasizing local street connectivity and traffic calming; 6 ' " 62 ' , '0 y AA:(4y . ' .„ * 4 M1• 4 . , .� I t. e • Reducing required Level of Service on the Major street system from"D"to E , • • Emphasizing transit as a viable alternative to the single-occupant vehicle in the City's 1' highest density housing and employment areas. y t. It would he interesting to tie MOF'c(Measures of Fffectivcnecc)to each of the shove in a way n"` such that we can monitor our ability to achieve these lofty peals 1 " Lake Oswego's challenge for transportation in the ensuing years will be similar to that of the rest + .+ 4'not} , of the Metropolitan region:to manage ever increasing automobile traffic with increasingly scarce f ••' financial resources and to maintain neighborhood livability in the face of increasing traffic. ✓ bs,', Summary of Major Issua i z°y ' w; The following are some of the issues, changed circumstances and conditions which were Y considered in the update of this element of the Comprehensive Plan. ,',' ^ F' • The Transportation Rule, adopted in 1991, requires Cities and counties to develop a �" ' ' V't Transportation System Plan (TSP) which maintains vehicle miles traveled for 10 years following adoption of the TSP, a 10% reduction within 20 years of the TSP and a 20% *" reduction within 30 years. TSPs will also specify measurable objectives for increasing k - the modal share of non-auto trips, an increase in the average auto occupancy and a r decrease in the number or length of automobile trips per capita due to demand •a ., management programs,rearranging of land uses or other means. . A neighborhood traffic management program began in the City in 1993 with the purpose •: 1 of reducing through-traffic in neighborhoods and increasing safety, TAR is reposnible for w "' ;:J the NTMP progr•sm and F.ngineeri tg has i von .ntory of devices that have been installed 1,.'> • " through this program 0- Ns'.4. i s . The City's Transportation Public racilities Plan calls for the following projects to be completed by 2025(7(1 year planning hnrirnn)-l7 to address capacity needs, State gas tax revenues are declinmgand more of rift gas tax • 4ire bring used for mait)tenanee , " . ., 0 g lsndieaping•ilhaninatinn,City has a hug;capital replacement liability in the current street lighting system), The City's funds available for capacity improvements are also • decreasing annually due to the decrease in vacant, developable land and hence the decrease in collected Systems Development Charges which could be used for capacity '+ t" related improvements. As previously mentioned,it will he essential to explore alternative "., d • :. 0 rttnding enurcec more aggreccivety,t e MTV,Oil A,State(Innis,relent!Cirant y," This table nredc in he eheclrert,the prnjerted costs are inatlegitate as evirienred by the wnrlt clone " ' 3Y System 1-10 Yrs, 11.20 Yrs. Total `+ ". Roadway 61,042,000 11,675,000, 72,717,000 " ,+,' Pedestrian 3,121,000 4,892,700 8,013,700 1 ` ' + r' Bike 1,484,700 1,299,500 2,784,200 •'yi •.», •'y, Transit _. 7,610 000 6,000,000 13,610,000 ',•' ` ,; Total I__ 73`57,700 23,867,200 97,124,900 • • 1 4! i1 ...d «. • y,,, 63 t,• d I ( 2) l y y �y 4 1� I l J+ � V• J 1 , :t' � •N 1 . N I r t "�+ { • t I' 1 f k"' a �y4 i , r 0 .....„:„, ..„ ....... . :, ', GOALS, POLICIES AND RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES• p . GOAL 9: MAJOR STREETS SYSTEM ' Lake Oswego shall develop a major street system consisting of major and minor arterials " °, and major collectors,which will have minimal impact on the City's air quality,address the mobility needs of residents for all modes of travel and promote energy conservation I" ^! (See Figures 16& 17). i uno nl of that has passed ''t l' ij between the last update it is time to update the model for the transportation system and > + • check that the l ns's(I eve'of Service)projected is being achieved with the ro improvements shown in the PFP and the growth projected and that has taken place in the •,, ;• city. ,J ,,a;,t POLICIES 1. The arterial and major collector street network shall be designed and maintained.(Tha ,, y maintenance g adwa yrtem is diffiful to relate to 1(lC an this se. ntLeither near q " 1n he clarified or revised to remove the maintenance portion as related to l•OS )to a_, �a1 service level"E"during peak hours. The design of the roadway system shall also take , n' , into consideration: a a, Balancing roadway size and scale with the need to provide efficient and safe "•' . transportation for all modes of travel,including bike,pedestrian and transit, b. Giving preference to transportation projects that increase the efficiency,safety, a ' J''4" design capacity or level of service of a transportation facility,without increasing corridor width(This speaks toil prioritiyatinn of projects based upon the criteria 1nrntinned above The nurrent PFP has a very gross prinriti7atinn of project and TAB(the Transportation Advisory Roard)is saddled with reviewing and , , •• prioritizing CiP proposals TAR has only indirectly considered corridor width and ,M ^ • each prnjee is de wed to meet standards set 4'nrth by agencies stub as O)f OT, ' va AASF)TO, );and ": . , c, Preserving community aesthetics by considering existing topography and r" . vegetation(Prnj s are designed in meet accepted 5tandnrd5 for design issues like ode and sig)it disinnrr as well as the most ernnomieal design hayed upon existing topography it appears that this is again an issue of project rhi7 atsl kn • A that shoitld he taken up by TAR); " • i' a • "1 ,1 2, Direct access onto major streets shall be controlled and consolidated over time through • the development review process and the implementation of major street projects (The v" • , r , City's n"c-5 pSeing standards sho tad a Beare to ontrol n`l negess: '(he stnntiards,ar `t ". very high and do not appgpr to he realistic for most situations in the City(for example ° Nw 4 4 64 •4 1 't i •+ ` •4 1' , I n 1 I y • ,,,y, t ,.• 1 ' a 4' a A/0.12) y 1 't *:•• ' j+ yit . �j l' t , l J 4 a. �. • • {) y. •. ..,.a .. ,.... A y: is ' Roan a Ferry Rnad h s an access spa in rya.tandard of a 1,O_0.f"ret). Therefore practice, has heen to ignore the standards A more realistic set of standards along with language In nrcnmmndate the existing development patterns would eventually lead to an arness « >• •,•,. , r spacingihat works for both the land uses as well as the street system). in particular, 11, y access to state highways shall be reviewed subject to the regulations of the Oregon i Department of Transportation and the City of Lake Oswego. Where regulations conflict, ,,� I -•' '.•'' the more restrictive requirements shall apply, y e _, 3. The major streets system shall consist of freeways,major and minor arterials and major '' collectors as described in Figures 16& 17. The maximum number of lanes for major ;..=f,::. • streets within the Lake Oswego Urban Services Boundary shall be as follows: ,' ,.A� a. Freeways-four to eight lanes. b, Major arterials-three to five lanes, c, Minor arterials-two to four(The two and fivar lane facilities have issues related ' , It., o the sate operation and capacity that are not desirable as evidenced by facilities such as Rnnnes .'' Ferry Road Unless the intendLisin address existing facilities becassp a fn ar Ian facility has ::kt, ..:; • , approximately the same rapacity as a three lane facility and is nnLeearly as safe,once a facility �. ,,,, ; weds to h a multi-lane facility,it should hav fifth nr renter tilrn lane ClhyintasIy there are going to he circumstances where it will he decided that the impactslcnst do not warrant the turn t" ° 4' lane(e g Country Club between Iron Mtn.And I Ott')hut these of thedesign team nn a project and the gpal should he to achieve a safe and eff ility ) • �' tcirtttsar. 14 lanes, " 4.. ' d, Major collectors-two lanes(A third lane to Major Cnllectnrs,at least at lnnatinns ' where warranted it not only adds capacity hut is a matter of safe operation), , s, `' 4, Where residential neighborhoods are bisected by existing major streets,the impacts of « traffic-noise,safety,aesthetics and air quality-shall be minimized by the following ,1• • ' w: actions: tc. a. Where feasible,traffic generated by new development,shall be routed to other .,. available major streets that are not within or adjacent to residential uses(While it 04 o, ..1 ° { is a lofty gnat,to"re-route trail-to"where feasible is difficult at hest to apply with ;+^ 4 I .' ." oat defining"where feasible"), a '' b, Ensure that traffic generated by new land uses does not exceed the design capacity 4 ,^ of the street systems or adversely affect adjoining neighborhoods(if the uses for t the parret do not exceed the trotting,then the TSP should have aeeounted for the ' Iraffir generated by the development,this again seems like a verynpen ended "1 . statement that would he impp.ssihle to apply), ^' • ' c, Provision of safe and efficient bicycle and pedestrian improvements to connect residential areas to other areas of the community4Cnnnertivity standards should , .0 ,• address this), + , " d. Measures to physically re-orient residential areas away from major streets, This �' A may include installation of major landscape elements such as landscaped buffers "' • + and tree plantings,and the development of neighborhood activity centers such as « public open spaces,parks and corrtmunity centers(The mess effrcrive orgy to 5 r N +'. ' A. y 65 - Y, .r ..I. r. ,«; ' . ,, A'A 13a)r ,l M « C , « .• ♦ ' Y Y•# •=t 9 « 4 "a . ^� 4 • L •_ • .1 • achieve this gnat is to keep single family arress nn the local and neighhnnctyyt c collector_system.. YN uc e. New commercial uses and neighborhood activity centers such as parks,schools .. 4r N; and community centers shall provide direct,convenient access to and from ' • 4t• ; v adjacent residential areas to facilitate walking,bicycling and short auto trips, ^.: Measures shall be implemented to ensure that such routes do not attract or serve w traffic from outside the neighborhood(Best practire_ic to locate these facilities lut yy; i• • major streets so as to avoid the cnn flirt or limit the size such that it does not e,: become an attraction for trips nntside nftht neighhnrhnnd�lt is dif mutt at bets to ," define"the neighhnrhnnd"when it conies to romnvmity renters,seems thateev rv. „,, resident has the right to visit a"rommunity"enter"), t 5. The City shall require the mitigation of negative impacts(This is so hrned of n statemeltl, ,.,� that it would he impossible to;ytply�rr a real world.itnatinn9 it wnulrl he more eftertiye 1 a if more ..etiL upon pedestrian and bicycle mobility,noise levels,safety, • t aesthetics and air quality when new residential development is located adjacent to major streets. ,"i+ t•.:" ^" I 1 6, The City shall consider the movement of freight within the City when: a. Conducting multi-modal transportation studies, b, Developing truck routing plans,and; ' ` + c, Developing freight loading and parking strategies, • '. . 7. Streets designated as Regional Streets(Thin only applies to a handful of streets,.Hwy 41, a ,: • A Ave,C.nttnlry Club,Homes Ferry and l(ntce Way Most of these are already either , built or planned,perhaps more specificity would make it_clenrer acid the City's intent for these facilities)on the Regional Transportation Plan,shall be designed with consideration L•; Y? of the following when reconstruction or retrofitting occutss f,^ a, Promoting community livability by balancing all modes of transportation, ., "'a b. Relating the street to the function and character of surrounding land uses; e. Controlling access to improve safety,function and appearance of streets and adjacent land uses, „ RECOW!MENDED ACTION MEASURES-MAJOR STREETS SYSTEM i, Develop access criteria for the major streets system which utilize the following principles . ..` • (Current standards sire in place,hut are impncsihle to enfnrreieeattce they are not t,, : p• ,r' uuttivamt fifth?existing sitttntinn such as Rnnn s Ferry Read-); 1 a, Direct access to the major and minor arterial system is restricted except from existing platted lots,which may be allowed access when there is no feasible �` alternative. Feasible alternatives may include easements through adjacent r', l properties existing 6 Collector Streets or shared ,, .• ro crties to Residential or Neighborhood ,i. access to the Major Street System. ,. . a q 66 ,:• ` <I, r.. • r, 1Nj 1 A �{ .1 „ ,� '1 ri -f ,' 1 + .„v' .4 1. ". y N ,1 ri ,Ries runt meet the across spacing Standards for new development is temporary until such time as an acres meeting the standarj-1 ran he.developed The de.velnpment shnnitl hr condition d to working awards the s andard and not he •;„ " "°• allowed to preclude future changggs that would help the City to achieve the access "5 'i` spacing standard) "°' " b. Whenever possible,properties shall develop access to major and minor arterials from frontage roads or side streets as opposed to direct access to a major street. Major arterials may be allowed to intersect every 1,000 feet,and minor arterials• every 600 feet,subject to an approved street plan, (These stancards ore very ideal a ' and it maybe more efferti5[e to adapt more realistic standards„) c. Controlled access may be allowed,subject to review,from major traffic ' . generators,(e.g.,shopping centers). When conditions warrant,common access at w'` + t", property lines shall be required to reduce the number of access points onto state • a .:. ., highways(noes the City have the authority to dictate Oi7[1T ihrilities—there is " nnly.on anhat is H wy a3)and other major streets, "d t d. Increased building setbacks shall be required when it is determined that frontage n i, i +.,, roads,and/or combined access points are required(Where is a frontage mad nine ,. , in he built in i3O ). e. Direct access to major collectors is discouraged except when there is no practical t„ ' 1 access from local streets or neighborhood collectors, f. To reduce travel on major streets,encourage travel connections between adjacent S.' developments(This statement at first reading appears contradictory to preservatgp t 4. n1J`nrlghhorhoods Connectivity is n powerful tool,hut may manse negative y a imparts to neighborhoods and the local street system). ''" g, Require consolidation and closure of driveways onto the major streets system over . " ; time ifaceess spacing guidelines in Figure 16_are exceeded and When ,,,`., , implementing major street capital projects, . :• ^`' , ii, The Metro publication'Creating Livable Streets"will be a resource for street design for 1. those streets shown as"Regional"on the Regional Transportation Plan, . r iii. Develop specific types of traffic calming measures.(Traffic calming means speed hutt,ps '` „ , •,t; to most people seems like it means something different to everyone and again should rely w m' upon standard applications so that we do not create problems with the major street sisters 4 which is intended to carry traffic The flipside to impacting traffic on the major system Is ", .r, that the local syctem becomes the alternative TAR's NTMP program dmis.with this ? issue on it regular basis.)to be applied to Major Collector Streets for the purposes of F .`�,. improving safety and aesthetics while maintaining mobility.Criteria for selection of •i, , streets on which to apply traffic calming measures should also be developed. " This sertlnn would benefit from a dismission about developing trnnsit corridors(the street ear) 4. parnlieling major streets to reduce the need for extra capacity II I ,y . • GOAL 2: INTER-GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ': ? „ ' , , ' ' . -. 9 , 1 ;, 67 yh. 1, A, '� i ,, 1 1 4 ti v A11402y ,, ' 1 p , a . , I I 1t y �' • R i. � • •:1 l t.`�, , R , ,i •t. 4 i, 17 4 h. { �'! ..1 r.�,r � .. _ , Lake Oswego's transportation system shall be planned,developed and operated in a coordinated manner with other state,regional and local transportation providers. M' : , 1 ; POLICIES . ,I,, • VH' 1, Lake Oswego shall develop a Comprehensive Transportation System(TSP)in •- conjunction with Clackamas County and adjacent counties where appropriate,the State of • .•, Oregon,Tri-Met and Metro for the area within the City's Urban Services Boundary. The +' Comprehensive Transportation System Plan shall: a• Be consistent with land use designations identified within the Lake Oswego ° ', R Comprehensive Plan, b, Identify the location of arterial and collector streets,bicycle paths and pedestrian • ways and public transit facilities. ., : t c, Identify the major street construction projects required to accommodate anticipated development and to address public safety(this will dictate a mean'to ; t,' j�nfifs the City �fnrcf alinnc anti rantt them, h1)nT'c SPIS(Snf t rinrity � 1.ndelting Syctesn)is a cyctenudili.pd by other jitrisdirtinnc and prnvidec n relative t•.- i renkin, f pntentially prnhlem Inratinn5 a et pment_�f n SPIS ern em Per t e i fit wilt take eonskle ehle resnttrres and time_1 issues, Y,,N`�Y d, Propose funding mechanisms and related policies necessary to implement .Y identified projects. "'` ,Y Y e, Describe public transportation services and identify service inadequacies, +.. 2, The City shall coordinate transportation and land use planning efforts with federal,state , and regional agencies,local jurisdictions and I'd-Met to make sure that: w ,,, M r °' a, The requirements of the various transportation modes are coordinated,and that conflicts between land use,operational characteristics and safety issues are t. ` .4 minimized, ", ' b, Effective notification and coordination occurs between affected agencies regarding the transportation impacts of proposed development within or adjacent ;'r to the Urban Service Boundary. "' • , c, An effective citizen involvement program is implemented,including public notice '`` and hearings if the development of transportation projects involves land use a".. . .' 1'''. ' decisions or adversely impacts the existing transportation system or surrounding • tieighborhbods OIhet'jarisdiRfinNs need to hey-in in fhiaprorass qn that prnjert9 R ' outside of the(lily fire provided the henefit of ndjnrent resident's input), " c 3, The City shall work with Metro,Tri.Met,ODOT and Clackamas County to develop ,i interim benchmarks for measuring progress towards transportation goals and policies over the planning period, . A +•,!, 68 41 ,;•, • :'• 4.4 1. .. '.. + °" , i' ^,7 4r J , , ''' , . flu. .+,t�p.4 ,. ' ' - 1 '.1 r.. 'I 4`• IN RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES-INTER-GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ° i, Work with Metro,Tri-Met and other appropriate agencies to investigate the feasibility of ,,- passenger transport on the Willamette River. ' iii. Develop joint agreements with Clackamas,Multnomah and Washington counties that , specify the methods whereby: ° a. The City and counties can bring to the other's attention transportation conditions '.. and circumstances which adversely impact other jurisdictions, " b. Discussion and/or negotiation can take place to resolve the adverse situation, N . ,t �� GOAL 3: NEIGHBORHOOD COLLECTORS AND LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS Lake Oswego shall develop a system of neighborhood collectors and local residential streets which preserves the quiet,privacy and safety of neighborhood living and which has adequate,but , not excessive(A two lane road will have more rapacity than is necessary in most instances,there is no way to restrict the rapacity so that it is not exressivP.)capacity,necessary to accommodate rN planned land uses, (See Figures 16 and 17). a . 1.",, POLICIES t y N, ly " ,'' <• 1, The primary function of local residential streets and neighborhood collectors is to serve ' • the circulation and access needs of residents adjacent to and abutting these streets. Neighborhood collectors will serve to channel local traffic to the major streets system. Through traffic(auto trips which have neither trip end within the neighborhood association boundary(riyjhis definition,any trip hetween two adjacent neighhnrhnncit 4•. would he a through trip,seems like this definition doesn't work vary well))on these v.• .x streets shall be discouraged. ; 2, The City shall,in conjunction with the neighborhood association,plan for,develop and maintain a local residential street system at a service level(Trdltinnnl I.f7S definition t do • • ►of work well in this Case Is it safe to assume that this does ant meah.l.lS as defined by a traffic analysis As prey •Ics.d far lilt al nn nt,ighhnrhn ro i enikcf c rapacity T. • Is not an issue)and scale which: • ., , ,', a, Recognizes the need for safety for all modes of travel, ` b. Recognizes the multi-Use functions of neighborhood transportation corridors ' ,t_ .,` , n? omighf he n mare appr�prl:;a term streets for walking,bicycling and social ' • ,'' 4 interaction,and which preserves the privacy,quiet and safety of neighborhood ', w + living, , c. Provides fat safe access to abutting land;and, 69 N:• a' n, i 1. y r . WOO r ,• r B ,„ ,• i 1. , , .. ... , 'N # .. 1. 9 • .- �.` - , c.; r i I', i ' d. Allows adequate and safe circulation from residential properties to the major (l)� streets system and neighborhood activity centers. (i 3. The City shall designate as local residential streets all streets not identified as major streets or neighborhood collectors in the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Transportation f System Plan. 4. The City shall utilize flexible design criteria and construction standards for local residential street and neighborhood collector improvement projects. Design criteria shall ; be consistent with the adopted neighborhood plan_(The C.it ttnrne y'c offic review this pnrtinn_if a neighborhood desired a 15 mph design spied and statutnr;Speed is 75 mph,whisk won ld di ate?Ci y well ac N9 essinnni liability co:llrl he Ln ssu. . In particular these standards shall promote: ' a, Street development which is compatible with the physical and social , • characteristics of each neighborhood to promote neighborhood identity and beauty. b, The minimum scale-(Again rapacity is not typically an isstte nn the local and 1 neighhnrhond collector system)of improvements necessary to provide adequate, but not excessive capacity,required to safely handle automobile traffic generated 1 '"e. 1 " ", by planned land uses, " c, Solutions to storm water problems and surface water management issues. ,, d, The safety and utility of pedestrians,bicyclists,transit users and motorists. a, 5. The City shall ensure that new development which will use new and existing neighborhood collectors and local residential streets is compatible with these street's A. function and character. Developmeht approval of new land uses shall ensure that: 1 I I a. The quiet residentialqualityof neighborhood streets is fostered and maintained • y • (Adding traffic to a street is not ping to ensure that the"nni et is fn�red and • maintained",is there a prnvisinn nr definition of what i4 intended this appears in i y. ff he e sifh.eeiiye and opens the dear In into tetatinnl, • b. Street improvements required to serve new land uses are designed in accordance j I with the adopted neighborhood plan and to the minimum necessary scale, + j I a 7► 6. The City and neighborhood associations shall jointly plan for the use of public rights-of r , ";a ways in residential neighborhoods, Uses within rights-of-way shall be supportive of the / multi-use function of neighborhood streets and may include; a, Pedestrian paths and bikeways. ' " '• ' ` b, Vehicular related uses as on-street parking,transit facilities and driveways, • rr tureen h „ c public eating,5t clef ligtits,,whcelchati beautification (cartliotn elements As'uCity dnes street nnt trees, 1I design,Urban Y safety '''' '••..•: hav ch,)and sidewalk extensions. , "',., 70 ,•w 1 t `, y • I�' , 5 • iV•t• /' tl + r',• 1 / i I ')", t ` 4, f ',:-..• ',7 e ` 4 A 0. ♦lit; h'•" o ' •7: Develop a truck circulation ordinance to reduce congestion,conflicts with residential , neighborhoods and to decrease noise and air pollution, Only!opal truetcs should be on Y., this part of the street system 8. Manage traffic on Neighborhood Collectors and Local Streets according to the policies Y"' „:ar . , " `,- established in this chapter. Traffic calming measures should be used where a. .1 , warrinterifea,ihl,to encourage non-local traffic to use streets with higher functional .. .� i.- classifications and should not significantly divert traffic to other nearby streets of the " '' .a ,;` same or lower classification. h " '1 F + 9, Ensure that connectivity of local streets is achieved in order to: ; `4 ., a 7 ' a. reduce excessive trip lengths; '„ r b. efficiently and safely accommodate emergency fire and medical vehicles; .,. • 'r c. promote the use of alternative modes of travel; W; ' 1 d, ensure even dispersal of local traffic;and �.� . , • � e. provide local street circulation patterns that provide connections to and from rr " activity centers such as schools,commercial areas,parks and employment centers, a i` 1 .• Art RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES•NEIGHBORHOOD COLLECTORS AND , { ,. LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS o a a , ry i, Promote low traffic volumes on residential streets, Traffic volumes less than ", , ,,,... 1,200 ADT are desirable. '* ii. Develop criteria(thp City in ronjutlrtinn with TAR has criteria the NTME program)for installation of traffic calming devices based on incremental changes in traffic volume ttnd other factors,including traffic safety, • : ..'r.. " a. r • GOAL 4: LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIPS '' • 'wll / y '''" Amendments to land use de.'ignations,densities,and design standards within the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan shall be reviewed to ensure that traffic generation does not exceed the ,. • present design capacity and function of the planned transportation systetn,_ls.tbe,intent of this y, ' r.: section to provide the flit,y wi h the ahili y o;er hire improvements nhd/nr deny plan pi . ameiirimenls ii they nntin he dccnnrymndafed on the In coned Cti et stent7 ,;; < ' , I e 5 POLICIES 4 y � '� ` _ 71 r ".!�: • • f d', 5 .,' .Am t , , .. i • a• i{40 4, w_ 4 , , ry •A n ,4: . • i ' ',.. ' . '. tt n,• r 4 d 1` r 1, The City shall use the following criteria when reviewing proposals for new street `a° `+ ' ' development or for improvements to the existing system: a. The service level and scale of new street improvements are appropriate to the land tI • ' use or area to be served. b. Surface water management considerations are adequately addressed. c. The character of surrounding residential neighborhoods as defined by the adopted neighborhood plan is preserved, When improvements are made to major streets that are adjacent to,or bisect,residential areas,measures shall be taken to mitigate ''n' noise,aesthetic and safety impacts and discourage cut-through traffic on adjacent a. ''4. residential streets. ° d, The project's impacts upon the natural and human-made surroundings are clearly defined, This includes consideration of topography,hydrology,distinctive natural areas,vegetation,and surrounding land uses. The commitment to mitigate ! impacts shall occur in the project planning stages through the application of specific design techniques. 2, The costs of mitigation of the negative impacts(reduced safety and aesthetics,increased ,•'I •" noise,reduced bicycle and pedestrian mobility),resulting from street improvements ••• needed to serve a specific development,shall be paid for by the developer of the property. 'tit = , •• When street projects are needed to improve the capacity,operation and safety of the street system as a whole,the mitigation of negative impacts shall be paid for by the City and/or appropriate funding agencies. This whole pare& nph needs to he re-worked and carefully ° �&nrded,seems that the City is respnnsihle for the transportation system,htit ifa ° ' rlevelnpment comes in Btld rauces a nerd for im rn ovements to th s r e stem prior to ,;•'•I _' the City's plannedlmprovem Ms then the development is nn the honk to make the •° 3,, ;• improvement AISn there should he a statement of What is considered to_he a safety . ' ; ' problem(this is very difficult to define and the City will need to undertake a program like , :a . SP1S in order to he objective and clearly define what will dictate an imprnvernent r{' ,„t . (existing vs nredieted safety improvement) 3, The City shall provide for ail ongoing transportation planning program to: ,, ,,,,:, :', •� a. Monitor changes in the area's transportation network,and ensure that traffic , counts(r .gn ng)neering has just instituted a traffic count pnt n)and othei.(.ihat . i.; "other information"is intended?)transportation planning information are kept ° current and usable for planning purposes, , ^ b, fevelop and maintain a transportation facility planning effort,which identifies ! .: and prioritizes projects for implementntion.(is this the CIP or is this the work that • t 'fAli is supposed to he doing,either way this needs clarifieatinn), ' , C, Developand implement measures to change travel behavior to im rove `. p g P t,•, ,•. q r performance of existing transportation facilities and reduce the need for additional road capacity, 4 d, Periodically review the City's land Use ordinances to encourage development that u'° ^, „, f,,': reduces dependence on single-occupancy private automobiles,while encouraging lib, ';',� the use of mass transit,bicycles and pedestrian movement, . ;' '`' 72 �,, r � . 0 . nk ,t, r' Q; r I 1 , = i. y aA 4 { t ' s t ` r C. }} . t ' ', t .c ' n P "•-• L a a M ,'. �.• a3 '4A ak fK g t` 41. . The City shall require that a proposed increase in land use intensity be accompanied by a f` detailed traffic analysis (so what is the criteria for requiring a traffic study Intensity r •p' needs to he clearly defined as wells the what is required to he addressed in a train', ....0, `: t .; study),using current information,which finds that existing streets and intersections both on and off.(definitinn of nn vs off site and how far off site is required to he analy'ed ) site will accommodate the projected traffic increases,or;necessary improvements can be '• constructed which are in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map.. Mitigation of negative impacts(noise,aesthetics,safety,bicycle and pedestrian mobility) shall be paid for by the developer of the property. p %. 5. A change in the functional classification of any road or street in the Urban Services .. 'c-r:' • Boundary or the development of any new arterial or collector,shall require an amendment ,, to the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Transportation System Plan. ; 5, The City shall require dedication of right-of-way for transportation facilities as a '! condition of development approval where(this should allow the City to define a typical ! ' sertinn f r each street and get the right-of--way ft./mall developments): a, The abutting transportation facilities do not include sufficient right-of-way to r - • •O; comply with the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Policies,standards and street .' { classification or with transportation facility design standards adopted by the City i , , r,', 0 Council(The developments responsibility would only hp for their half of the p tight.alLa',a_y.);and ,, b, The proposed development will result in increased use of or greater impact on the =f +'` abutting transportation facilities (Even a replacement sintehire should dedicate righr.of-way on a deficient facility this enuld replace stntchtrec that are already a n',, ' problem), "�“ 7, (This dnec not seem appropriate for this doeumettt and should he the respnnsihittty fhr individuals to investitryite U is an issue that does not impart the City and therefore does not have a place in our Code))Allow property owners to realize tax benefits when right- -: of-way,not required as a condition of development approval,is dedicated for roadways, , ' • pedestrian and bicycle paths. • a'I r' • S. Lake Oswego shall develop and maintain an up-to-date transportation system ;y development charge-ttlri.li shall triefurt cxiating•residt uta from aubSithLltigtltt coat of spy-t>ew-rieve1apment4Estre.meiy hartto determine,subjective .litrisdietinaq nationwide have differing perspectives nn what subsidy is), Transportation SDC's shall �4 M, be applied directly to projects which implement the Lake Oswego Transportation System i r!f"' , Plan(This che s for usr rber leer)that this dnesnnt have unintended uses sitrh as htiiizatinpa es other than it tnspnrtation wheh a tamote connection lc made to developing ',• , r ; n`' the trtnspnrintinn system;), "t 4. f '' ! 73 r s' r 4 at AAA(`i2)`'l' ' ' ;.. . t ',,.,^ 1' 9`. "., Y e• r"'r ', ', , `. ",.. ... . .I• '''� 'r f 1 S ,. 1wr.' 4 .• 4'.: ': —'^ ' '''' . '-' ''::...e.'"'..' ''..: .:''.....".*".1:4:1'...i -♦ile e ,. , i, e d MY / a " '.y A N' r .Z:4 x., . � . . .. ;wr;. `' t . to ..� - '', , .�.1'• .. , ' ` „ ":',,,I,. . V•` .4. 9. The City shal ' ireci to rin this wnrk2 ,for all „'.. development projects,evaluate the adequacy of all transportation moJes,to,from,and within the development site. e ?5 e a The City(prnpnsed hind use artinn)shall ensure that '' ,4 'I a. The design and location of driveways provides for safe(tin traffic engineer will • a ; crrtify that a rive w is cat'e can nn y r.Prlified Thal it meets accenfecl w "' ,�,' practices and standards)and efficient property access and does not interfere with :,.. ,. P p P Y 5 a . the safe flow of traffic or degrade the design capacity and adjacent streets;and ,, • A ' '_'' b, Alternative transportation modes have been provided for•.(.if applicahicl' feasible),such as public transit,bicycling and walking, r ' 10. The City shall require new development,through building and site desig.p measures,to ,' ";" address the needs of the disabled and those who utilize alternative transportation modes ,.". ';' such as van and car-pools,bicycles,public transit and walking. (This rnitltt simply he stated that it shall meet AlA requirements) x 11. The City's transportation planning efforts shall consider and promote energy conservation • ' and enhancement of air quality. 1'`„' „+.'• 12. The City shall oppose construction of a new Willamette River Bridge that allows ': e y , M' automobile traffic within the Lake Oswego Urban Services Boundary because of negative .,4. -4, impacts on; A Y "' ,'"' a. Regional jobs„housing balance by providing a direct automobile commute option j ''1 ' to the Washington County job market; •b, The capacity and safety of the City's road system including,State Street,"A" ' Avenue,Country Club Road,Boones Ferry Road and Kruse Way; c, The destination status of the Lake Oswego Town Center and its future r':• ' , development potential by providing for regional travel through the community; , d, Air quality and the Willamette River and its Greenway,and; e, The general character and livability of the City due to visual blight,increased noise,air pollution,decreased traffic safety and the potential for traffic dispersion ;1 ' a ,.I onto local residential Streets. , . F * , 1 '• •. l3, The City shall,in conjunction with the neighborhoods,promote the safe and convenient ' • use of walking and bicycling as viable transportation alternatives by: i • 4 •� r a, Developing and implementing a local bicycle and pedestrian circulation plan as y +*.' .•, part of the Comprehensive Transportation System Plan. Y b, Working with the neighborhood associations to ensure that pedestrian and bicycle 0 ways ate compatible with neighborhood character. ; c, Developing a system of off-street recreational pathways which also provide alternative routes to major activity Centers, ,:f r► r • 74 '' , ,„ i , .}$• 4 Y. tt(( J {. •/'� a ._a a 1 • . i� e•.�.i .. J41., ,.A1�.. •r .. .• •N: .. •# _ 1•... i.. �� ..... J:y •• -,ta. • 10 d^ Coordinating with other jurisdictions to promote the development of regional and inter-city pathways, e^ Providing for an ongoing City-wide sidewalk and pathway construction and maintenance program.in rnmplianee with AtDA_ r ^ • 14. Require building and parking placement for new development to be supportive of • pedestrian,bicycle and transit users, Facilities supportive to these transportation modes % shall also be required(e.g,,bike racks,bus shelters,benches,etc) LL•4-uf ^.i� � RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES-LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION • , 9' RELATIONSHIPS i. Develop and maintain a pavement management pro sm(Doe ►his require the CI• ►v to 4• ;,; fin rl fhe prpgrrim nr maintain the system t jenti4y the prnhietns? If cIr e this ave ,t� ;a • ;any irnpact nn the RI IF(Street 1 Iji]ity Fee)rliscuccinn9)to protect and enhance the City's 4' »' investment in its street system. ` 1 -' ii, Develop a Lake Oswego Transportation Capital Improvement Plan which prioritizes current CIP rn pnsnl .' projects for implementation that address the City's short range(live(• p 1 is for a six)year)transportation needs, i+ Streets in industrial and commercial areas shall be developed according to standards . which accommodate the special transportation needs of these uses, N ., iv, Review street standards and special street setback standards to see if they are appropriate , , tip, to implement the policies of this chapter (Who is gninn n this and w i v. Conduct a planning and design process for the Town Center and Main Street portion of Boones Ferry Road,to be completed prior to the construction of any transportation t :, projects affecting roadway width,median treatments,bicycle facilities,etc.-(Done 6, • (lctnhrr of?no?) 4.4 1 ,q GOAL 5. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ti Lake Oswego shall develop strategies and implement programs that reduce the number of ; b.'. automobiles traveling in Lake Oswego,especially during peak morning and evening traffic hours. j • 1•{ POLICIES 6 9.". . ^ 75 6 u • 'tA(32) kt • ° , 1 1„ , ,;k• ;D n 4.1 ',:,, ! • a.fl ,," ' `',•.; „ p.:. b +. ,, .'.u,r , s ° 4r . ,`3 . '. 1 I i � ' F ` 1k , ' .r AAA• .44 `•N+yi 1. Work with ODOT,Metro,'1'ri=Met and Clackamas County to develop travel demand management programs to maintain the total number of vehicle miles traveled per-capita '.t in the City at current levels to the year 2005 and to reduce current vehicle miles traveled ,'' :. by 10%by the year 2015. 4. 2. Support the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)Employee Commute Options r n (ECO)goals for trip reductions. ° r 'K, 3. Increase the attractiveness of alternative transportation through mixed use development in , • x, areas consistent with the Region 2040 Plan, '1 , RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES- TRANSPORTATION DEMAND ' ' MANAGEMENT This ap r�en should b ex mined awn R/tP f4.�.S IIIPIf�Gtt�l1'�►. y, a . Si t1LS_ ', ',• ` i. Educate and inform employers regarding Tri-Met's demand management programs such "' as transit subsidies,carpool matching,vanpool subsidy programs,bikes on transit, f` 4 i, emergency ride home and development assistance for employer based transportation » „r; A- plans for Employee Commute Option compliance. Promotional information will be y •',; included in business license renewal packets for businesses with 25 or more employees, ;; iii, Encourage the installation of bike racks,preferred parking spaces for car-poolers,and a» a .!' building placement for new development that encourages pedestrian,bicycle and transit• use. My iii, Annually inform Tri-Met of all businesses in the City with 50 or more employees,so that Tri-Met can contact them regarding demand management programs and services. a • ' iv, Educate and inform neighborhoods about Tri-Met's transportation demand management ,"` programs such as carpool matching,bikes on transit and accessing transit trip planning •. information, " v. The City shall require businesses within the City's highest density employment areas, such as the Kruse WayCorridor,to developTransportation Management Associations l p B 't (TMAs), The City shall support these TMAs. vi, Provide encourage incentive programs which allow commercial,institutional and • industrial developments to substitute parking requirements if pedestrian and bicycle • a::r. '" `' amenities,transit facilities,and ride-share programs are developed and maintained, "^'+ ' '. vii, Encourage volunteers to assist in the planning and construction of pedestrian and bicycle ' pathways, �'' J 76 ; A... ,. -AA*( `) J1111‘ V• i - 1`' '� 1.i '. 1 ,, ,Y Xti y 1l r� 1 ''' • -`, I " { �D. ,~yl F ! 6 t fi , n l:/' Ay I b %I. 9 1 ". . ... da .,i l .. A.. ,' 4: :l . A,. v.. �..\ .. ... • ^ GOAL 6: WALKING xl -4 „•�, The City shall provide a continuous citywide network of safe and convenient walkways that promotes walking as a mode of travel Qsjhe,re a reason to limit the walking to short trips,seems ay .». that the City should he enhancing alLnppnrttmities to walk,even recreational opportunities )for . Shut thin, pas " sot' w, _ yi POLiCIES n • 1, Integrate pedestrian access needs into planning,design,construction and maintenance of a? all transportation projects. 11 • ! ' ' 'f 2. Improve access to and use of the public transportation system through pedestrian .. 4 improvements and changes in land use patterns. r 3. Make connection of Co,nket local walkways to activity centers such as schools, employment areas,parks,commercial areas,and transit centers and corridors a priority ' ti when ryaltrating}utri ranking expenditures for capital projects, , ` 4, The City shall make the pedestrian environment safe,convenient,attractive and ' 7` accessible for all users through: 4 F' •'" a. Planning and developing a network of continuous sidewalks,pathways,and "r,0l ,x x crossing improvements that are accessible per the requirements of the Americans ,, with Disabilities Act(ADA), ;- , b. Providing adequate and safe street crossing opportunitica for pedestrians,and ;'.o c. Improving street amenities(e,g„landscaping,pedestrian-scale street lighting, ; "1., '' benches and shelters)for pedestrians,particularly near transit centers,town I. centers,main streets,employment centers,and transit corridors serving the ` primary transit network. . ' "" ' 5, involve citizens in the pedestrian facility planning process as well as in facility design. . 6. The City shall ensure that planned bike and pedestrian paths are not obstructed as the • x result of new land development. "�� • 7, The City shall require developers to provide pathway connections from new development `c projects to the existing bicycle and pedestrian system. (noes this carry any weight in the . i development proeessh-What Criteria would he used in Implement this. especially if the • .;top developer is required In g nil=site(haw far,at what emit, )9) • ". 8, The City shall work to preserve existing railroad rights-of--ways and other easements to 4 , y,:� .H maintain opportunities for future mass transit,bike und[tu pedestrian paths, * ,' 4, 77 / _ . • ' ��' rF , ,t -7, •a y '1 w r H '• St a° a. r r t..r "5 9 •' RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES-WALKING improve pedestrian amenities(e,g., landscaping,pedestrian street lighting,benches and x ° shelters)in town centers,main streets,employment centers and transit corridors, 4 ii. Develop criteria for prioritizing projects on the Pedestrian Facilities Plan,based on priorities including service to activity centers,potential for high pedestrian usage a a.,; eliminating gaps in the existing system,improving pedestrian safety and providing ,.` geographic equity in pathway provision. Criteria may be revised in conjunction with the at ` a ;•st five-year Capital Improvement Plan process for consistency with community goals, ' (Reference the work1inne by TAR with_the Neighhnrhnnd Pathway Prngram) iii. Design pedestrian facilities to be compatible with neighborhood character and to a minimize environmental impacts,consistent with ADA,.public safety and user needs, , iv. Participate(Dora this mean the City contributes fiends,supports and/nr wnrks with))with ' k the Lake Oswego School District and other public agencies to provide bicycle and ta' Ago 1,4 pedestrian safety instruction. v, Coordinate bike and pathway planning and development with ODOT,Metro,Clackamas, I A Multnomah and Washington Counties and other local jurisdictions, A r h '•is. " / a :""'w , .Vr'7•. ;I ,a .". u • 1. ? y; " f M • 1i1 �. Y , 'I ti 78 ,.• t • • r�t � " ...'y � t �•. f w d t• �v i i ,..lJ 4 .M. ' el e , p Y t a + .N,• ,i pf p. �' •.''{,1 ,Yt•C- a " „t 1lS` > 4"' a, .a w 'a t~ A ' • ° {{ 0..NYt 1 411 . t t ''4 tt r "'' t ' GOAL 7: BICYCLING `` The City shall provide a network of sate and convenient bikeways integrated with other ti'•',"y transportation modes to increase modal share of bicycle transportation for all trip purposes. ;. " 4. .. ` POLICIES r;? 1. Integrate bicycle access needs into planning,design,construction and maintenance of all transportation projects. 2. Connect local bicycle facilities for bicyclists to ride to local and regional destinations, x' „ activity centers,connections to other transportation modes and the regional bicycle 1.4 r network, A; ,,. .1% ,41 3, 4 lnrc this dictate a hedge allneatinn or is thi5.a.perfnrntanee standard? The City n •� '": ' h ' e� an ner that clove not nreate f� r rft�itli�r has^n i�hlignlinn to mhintntn hike ir^ ' liability,once a facility i,5 put in place it becomes mandatary for the City to maintain it in °"n ,n reashnahlr.manner Maintain existing and future bicycle facilities to encourage use, `'^ .�.•'. Mencourage placementbicycley °•N, �u 4. Require,as appropriate,and t,ntroura a the of lockers and bicycle racks N at major destinations and activity centers, Encourage covered bicycle parking whenever .s, r possible, e ,, 5, The City shall work to preserve existing railroad rights-of-ways and other easements to maintain opportunities for future mass transit,bike andLnr pedestrian paths, r RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES-BICYCLING ;r ai, Pursue regional funding sources for bicycle routes identified on the Regional w 4.. Transportation Plan within Lake Oswego's Urban Service Boundary, �, : ii, Keep bikeways free of debris and in good repair,(see eminent in number 1 above) iii, Promote bicycle safety and encourage bicyclists and motorists to share the road through t t , educational programs,(Who is g/yihL+to an this" Crhhnl hirtrirl R`ra�t(any') . Y • " • iv, lit general,plan bicycle routes along Arterials and Major Collectors and design bicycle facilities that take into consideration:(What is ntl{lihed ice Partial lid nft•nn irirsttlnh5 ' that would pp ihtn fitly design t rnrecc) '; ,AA(82) ' °t. .t t,.; ; r't °, '*1 ) 46a ', fit., . I:,•� a , M, -,, f ; °. t 4 1•.. ;/ 5.y .1 ,.. l J ' f tM�T� ,,, ''. , •4a r aJ • :a ; a. neighborhood character; b, safety for other modes of travel; • '' ` c, the need for on-street parking; a;, '' d, topographic conditions; „ " ?` e. Street speed and volume; ',- 7 'Y f. ability to gain additional right-of-way due to placement of existing buildings or ;' 4 ':.. s• existence of sensitive lands;and • tii4ir g, using alternative parallel routes within one-quarter mile of an Arterial or Major `"' ti Collector where these constraints exist,as long as the parallel bike way provides `. an equally convenient route to local destinations. Yv, Ensure that secure bicycle storage facilities such as bicycle racks and other park and lock * , accommodations are provided at major destination points including recreation areas and "pta x ra.. '•� commercial and employment centers. t vi, Ensure that bicycle safety laws are implemented and enforced, ' f .� , .N .;; a..,' • vii. Work with surrounding jurisdictions and ODOT to develop direct bicycle commuting i , routes between Lake Oswego and other communities. a l ••�' �� viii, Implement a bicycle license fee,withproceeds contributingto bicycle facilities, " ` , rt;', p y funding y y (Who it;working on ihis2.) "c: i GOAL 8: TRANSIT SYSTEM °,I :� " { t: ' The City shall encourage transit ridership by working with Metro,Tri-Met,and ODOT to • ,• '' M ^" develop a transit system which is fast,comfortable,accessible and economical through '` °.; development of land use patterns,development design standards and street and 4 ' u pedestrian/bikeway improvements which support transit. POLICIES ...." • li f a 1. Transit shall be a viable alternative to the single-occupant automobile in the City's highest r density employment and housing areas. The City shall develop,in conjunction with Trig +iT N•' Met,a network of transit routes to connect these areas with Main Streets,Town Centers, •'' Employment Centers,downtown Portland and major transit and transfer stations, ' 1• Areas not directly served by transit shall be served with park and ride lots,which shall be k.,. located to provide convenient auto access to regional trunk route service. 2, Develop transit centers in Town Centers and Employment Centers where there is a need a ° ; for transfer points between bus lines and local shuttle services or transit trunk routes, ,A,:,'.{1 80 t, �. fir A l � Y-J f l4 } . ck 4 41 • A5 i i. '�ransit centers will be conveniently located for all modes of transportation,in particular ,' ;' f pedestrian,bike and transit. ;; 3, The City will work with Tri=Met to ensure that the needs of the community's •I:, : transportation disadvantaged are met by making transportation services more accessible, • 4. The City will work with Tri=Met to determine appropriate locations and design of bus ••.. ,a:•,;, turnout lanes to enhance transit usage and public safety and to promote the smooth flow of traffic, 5, The City shall work with Tri=Met to ensure that the potential for transit to meet Y; transportation needs is addressed in compliance with the Transportation Planning Rule. " 6. The City shall work to preserve existing railroad rights-of-ways and other easements to 41 maintain opportunities for future mass transit,bike and pedestrian paths, i ' ,_; ` RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES- TRANSIT ,$ ' y i, The City shall work to preserve existing railroad rights-of-ways and other easements to , A _" ' •�•�' maintain opportunities for future mass transit and bike and pedestrian paths, ii. The City shall pursue capital/operating assistance from Tri=Mel and/or other public or o- private transit providers as needed to provide adequate transit service. 'a" iii. Work with Tri-Met to identify additional opportunities for park and ride facilities and " shelters in Lake Oswego. n n ,Y : iv, Support efforts to develop greater inter-city public transit options. a• '•+ v, Preserve the Willamette Shore Rail line for high capacity transportation opportunities or opportunities to share the right-of-way,if feasible,With high capacity transit and other males of travel,such as pedestrian and bicycle (The MTIP(Metrnpnlitan`I'ranKprictation •` , ;� Imnrny m n Prn rim)liintl5 will hind a ctnay itilh neat'fi tatc that shntild,nddrecs vi, Coordinate with Metro,TrivMet,Multnomah County,Clackamas County,the City of " r• ;.; C'" Portland and other regional partners in the planning and design of high capacity •transit on �� ,; the Willamette Shore Rail line to ensure: Y «''.i 3A . r a. Adequate access to the regional transportation system; .4 b, Adequate termini facilities;and „r c, Adequate access to the line for all modes of travel, ' •0, a .h' ;, :,. ,,. 81 .4.an ,. • • • ! k J .rI .._ • , a R +.. ! a n � ' :04 ' T4 " . . r . ! • ..... + �7 ",: y sir r «:r' a 44' GOAL 9: COMMERCIAL RAIL AND WATER TRANSPORT wry °,+," '> Lake Oswego shall work with commercial rail and water transportation providers and associated regulatory agencies to ensure their activities arc safe and compatible with the City's _ II transportation system. • 1 ;.. as 1•r POLICIES `{ r 1. Lake Oswego shall ensure that the development of marine oriented land uses and r`i1 transportation facilities along the Willamette River are coordinated with the appropriate s •.'• ' governmental agencies and those businesses who currently use the river for transport. a , .` 2. The City shall coordinate future transportation planning and roadway improvements with R " = rail service providers and the Public Utilities Commission to ensure the ins'.= 'ation of efficient and safe crossings. :,'• z • , 3. The City shall,through the Public Utilities Commission,ensure that rail traffic does not ;,,, .' impede the smooth and safe flow of bicycle,pedestrian and vehicular traffic, "' "•A' ^ .,. !u. GOAL 10: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT ••s',, opportunities Lake Oswego shall ensure that are provided for citizen involvement in decisions ,.: affecting the City's transportation system. ;.,'0,•. N 1 t i POLICIES '' 1r Pubii.irvolvement opportunities shall be provided for all major transportation projects. f,t' GOAL 11: PARKING 3' ^ � �' Adequate on-site parking and loading facilities shall be provided for all land uses. `r�'; ' '{ / A 4'I '':, •.•4 4 4 &7 '1 Y , 4 "I ,i'" 'r .. 82 r ,. Y y4 1 ,lar •V ,, 4.. U \ AA,-q3'2) •,l " "'4, ! t , ' i 4s ' •r ) .9 AI 1 '',, '4 '.}' .' 4. t. v ♦J . ,* .., fir '.; _.. Y _ , .. .. c-,. 1 . , ° . . ,.e - f •' , J( Yt <t p'. � 4 POLICIES 1. The City shall develop and maintain parking regulations that require off-street employee y • N' and customer parking and loading facilities be provided on-site and commensurate with �•b,,:.:.,' the size and relative needs of each new development,balanced with the need to reduce •.4 ^ ,•t,'. auto trips,encourage alternative transportation and retain the natural drainage system. 1,-;•• (How does this fit with the downtown development." A lot of businesses that consider on-street parkingplo he their personal parking lot ) 2, When commercial,industrial or institutional uses are changed or intensified,customer " and employee parking shall be adjusted commensurately,(The new standards are ,1, maximums vs the old standarrls.that were minimums,this entices problems when " a " maximums are based on modal splits and modal splits are dependent upon service being `• +'.' provided) ' x , 3, Commercial and industrial parking shall not intrude into adjacent residential , ` neighborhoods, The impacts on adjacent residential areas of new commercial and 4,. '" ', ' : industrial parking facilities or increases in the size of existing lots shall be reduced -~J G`,; 4,, `• through buffering and screening. t ya�, t't.1.,y t 4, The City,through the neighborhood associations,shall develop residential area parking ^ ;,t;t 4 guidelines to maintain the safety,character and utility of residential streets. >.; 5, Require off-street parking in commercial,industrial,and high density residential areas to ,M r ' be at the sides or rear of buildings where practical,with buildings oriented to the street in ' a manner which is convenient to pedestrians,bicyclists and transit riders, • ... RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES-PARKING J In i •J w, i. Monitor and evaluate the number and sizes of parking spaces required for various types of ,, ' land uses and amend development regulations. s''. +'' • » i ii, Provide redevelopment opportunities for parking lots when they are no longer needed for automobile parking. , iii, Where possible,provide for the minimum of impervious area by utilizing durable and - " `: dust-free alternatives to traditional asphalt and concrete paving when developing new a,,i 1, . • streets and parking lots. Utilize the natural drainage system where practical.(Fenere.in„a '"'. pervious pavement Is now available,but haw do we encourage nr require Ilse) .t ^ iv Where appropriate and practical,mitigate the visual and aesthetic impacts of parking by ' ',„ encouraging: ' a, Buildings and parking to be oriented to the street in a manner that is convenient to t '' L a`• ' pedestrians and transit users and, A. e" • t / nor .� 1 ^ 'l'_i 3 a / + � • �n a+ �. �•� a • r - 1 "ti a` •:i A ♦~ o r ':t „ e• 1 .Y ..rF ; awl..":.1 • ,^ �q �T a• ' A b, Landscaping,buffering and screening. It r ? v. Throrgh the Neighborhood Traffic Management Prograrn,address on-street parking . ;1 4; problems within residential neighborhoods that are caused by adjacent commercial and institutional land uses. (Tile NTMP program is il-equipped to deal with parking proh ern see ms li e.f>es nt ght to he a better fonlm for addressing these pr. hlema It • � i + ' appears that it is acknowledged that.by restricting the amount of on-site parking that ra parking is spilling into the neigi thnrhnnrls,any fixes imposed by the TAR are grin to y impart residents in the neiglihorhnnds if this is a problem(and it is)shouldn't the • "' standard he examined to see if there is an alternativr to restricting the on-site parking • " perhaps by doing things such as prnvjding transit incentives or stihsides.providing M allempJive modes of travel, ) t. , w. :• L• I. •.4 . . G Y '1� +'1 4 }I•p r,. a • • w,_1.•r• ,r • IA s� ;a, • '� .,y •i it '1 V1. 4, 84 a 4 r' • t v N 1' • a! ro' '� � t 1. �a+.��� . � � , y fir 1� �, '§ ? • 1 ; .r 1 •1 i,% t�MF t t 7 tY d: d n t u �i ,,)'. . f,�'..,. .. fd} •-..} I♦..h, ...... . i.. .... , ..'t.•, . .1 } '! 1 ._t.... i - '� .nn A 1 '_ _ d 1 ,/ 1 o& 13: EIner . Conservation P1 i . y.n 'i• •I�l� J '4i. .Y .` ^ice• �', _ I. a ,t i .t • 77 N } e. 7Y n .e, ,• IJ +y } , '�r i {r ly } ',, q ' a _f .4' 1 t .1 iii 1 } } l N 1 1 1 � J W:'i 4t t� }. y a 1 } P ,�, ry . '�, f�ll'Q C'� }..iL1 /[2 . •'�'f` •,Y t §t 1 , • Y i t 1t } + ,i tw 1}n,g76'' , Y V I�Mh' li�'�,±, I ...'', _'.: '' ,• tMM h'MN•f� r -Ji 1 .�'• :'! ��i �n• u �,J .sue•„ _ y .�"' �.^'^l� '•i hr 1 �- •.^z""• ,. a 41.:.•lr.41,}5;'^,tl. !. . ?." PY. Y. . . ,e 'Y''f.. ., I,.. '' ....•'... "r: .»4..Yl ''"' 4. " The city shall conserve energy, u ^< 85 ��. Attddlltttni 4 :e'; A' LI }} 3 j t ,'a §.• } 1, 1 A�•jj32 t _ ry It n•4Ga 1 °A �' • .§, l ! 1 1 "'if, ' Y k. y A.. • A )i • i * ! i ,a.+ A 1.1 ...f. .✓. o., .. .. _, .... ._ .. • .., ., .. `yet f • iy ° .f: f; 3 ' . I Y. A t f I•r +�M k'- A h °' e w•. ,r� IA q':n . ia.. +f, n�a ,3h J i •7, • • • .),Y y., a�i.•ii •,qe . .. ,� (q••�1 • 1,, A •i• + , 86 •,, r., , a• AA.., l` k ,:..� , t + !1 ^• r _ .• } a .. ,%y ,.4 (• 1; 4 +1 °.1 '9 HF1'''�� .A i n 1 ''s.`y• 't�M1 s t. nh1 i �� ,,I 'fin i yq11 A A f.. tiv ^ r ` ry ,a t Y a ,. ' ,j 1 1 l 1 d :' ;i 1 r J , r a i Goal 13 Energy Conservation r ':' . .'J� vC Y•1'. ' ❑ Goal 13: Ener a Conservation It '. : " BACKGROUND Statewide Planning Goal 13' Energy Conservation °' a •.' 't r ', i � N ' •. ,.' ' "Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximize the con- ,4 1.: a:,. "1 r servatioh of all forms of energy,based on sound economic principles," { e In 1976,Goal 13:Energy Conservation,was added to the Statewide Planning Goals, In the 1970's it {.' became evident that the energy picture for the United States was changing. For well over a quarter ." century,most Americans enjoyed the luxury of plentiful and inexpensive energy, When energy was • cheap and easy to come by,cities were developed with little regard for energy consumption,in terms of travel patterns,use of renewable resources and energy efficient building materials and methods. As the ,, availability of energy decreased and costs increased,the realization that resources were not in everlast- `fix .•,� ,:1 ti •°•'-'' tag supply became evident, •' ' ' a • Cities have not traditionally played a major and direct role in the development of new energy supplies, -. However,a city government uses or controls energy in many ways and can develop policies and Bevel- t r- 4'a ',; opment regulations to promote energy conservation,which has become the energy resource of"first ••, ' •• choice"by the region, With a limited supply of energy available,and demand continuing to increase, • conservation actions can postpone costly development of new power generation. Establishment of 11 LI energy efficient programs is also less expensive than building new power plants and avoids negative s 1` environmental impacts, • Over the last 15,years energy efficient improvements to buildings,appliances,vehicles, and equip- r 'i. ment retrofitting have already reduced energy consumption by 1/3 nationwide, The continuation of rt•:' , ', this trend is vital when considering the serious consequences of energy consumption,including smog, ., ,he " • J." deforestation,acid rain,river pollution from coal mining waste,oil spills,and global warming A >~;' ' Recycling as a method of reducing energy has also increased since 1976 When the initial comprehen- 'r 'a sive planning effort was undertaken,The region's Solid Waste Management Plan emphasizes reduc- n, ' + 0•, reusing,recycling and reeovering energy from waste,before landfilling, y �`n ((( rec c 5 N' ing, fiean tin 1 + tif' Sign vestments in conservation have been made by publicly owned utilities as the result of- state and federal regulations, Ei'oWever,electrical utilities in Oregon forecast a 2,0%per year increase te t, ,' " ' in electricity use between 1993 and 2012, Many programs and incentives are available through the lip . Silo �, i', state and local utilities,such as tax credits,free energy audits and energy efficient shower heads, In 1992,a drought year,the City of Lake Oswego distributed mote thEfnn 2000 energy efficient shower .?. .a ll; +,. .ii heads as part of an eff'drt •to promote water conservation, ' 1w,%, ' '^ a ; , ,. GOAL 13 ENERGY CONSERVATION 13-1 8y 4 1• A a •{f `, 4 ,, .1 J 5� A tlt'a a 4 i. .4 t ,, `o 1 �'-1 . �. �'A,.ts2j h a, v t e1 p • , e :4 1 , , ., Goal 13 Energy Conservation 9 Goal 13: n�rc ona afiocy� Switching to renewable resources,like the power of the sin and wind,utilizes unlimited energy sup- : ,,( plies. One wayin which the City has encouraged this was byadopting a solar access ordinance in , ' .ty g p� B 1988, This ordinance ensures that land is divided so that structures can be oriented to maximize solar . access and allows a property owner to apply for a permit to protect solar features,such as windows, greenhouses and solar panels,from being shaded by future vegetation. , Iy r The Energy Information Administration(EIA)estimates that transportation accounts for 63%of all oil , natiunally consumed, The ODOE projects that total miles driven will increase 60%in Oregon by the year 2010 , Statewide Planning Goal 12;Transportation,and its supporting administrative rule OAR `' c.,.. 660-12-(000-070)adopted in 1991,requires jurisdictions to reduce vehicle miles traveled by 10%by ,:. the year 2015, The Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan proposes that the City accom- lish this throughpromotingefficient transportation s stems mixed use development, encouraging P P systems, p ° alternatives to auto trips,and making the design of new development more amenable to users of alter- f , native transportation such as carpooling,walking,bicycling and transit, • The City of Lake Oswego has also made a commitment to energy conservation through investment in conservation and changing operational procedures to date, City Hall,which was constructed in 1985, . • utilized the latest energy-conserving building materials and heating and cooling systems, The City has r also conducted energy;° audits on several buildings to determine where energy consumption can be ", reduced, The City also performs some functions at the Water Treatment Plant at fright or during other non-peak hours,for Which it receives a lower power rate, Filling reservoirs end operating pumps at 1 these off-peak times helps spread energy loads throughout the day and helps reduce the need for new energy resources,Also,the local electric utility is gradually phasing out mercury vapor street lights and 1 ,; ;` converting them to sodium vapor,which requires only half the energy used for mercury vapor, To ' ,;, assure future decisions regarding energy conservation are made in cost effective manner, a baseline 1 accounting of current energy usage in the City would be useful, A baseline accounting could assist in �,, . in °, g g p payback p P t effectiveness of various men• ., ', determiningpriorities for efficiencyimprovements, the potential coat I ,, sures and evaluating the Savings and calculatinga etiod for conservation measures, • a,'" °, ' ` ,-lousing construction materials and design is another area in which energy conservation has increased since the initial comprehensive planning effort in 1976, The Oregon legislature adopted the Oregon A Residential Energy Code in 1991, This code requires buildings to be designed according to a perfor- ' w • •.• .,, •� trance calculation for energy conservation, Lake Oswego implements and enforces this Energy Code ; through building permit review.The new code is projected to cut energy used for heating by 30 to 40 percent over the past code, .4 !°. 13-2 LAKE osWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 88 1 9% , il, 1 4 r • ` , , i Y i * ,� .. , 8.. ' a 4" , F 1 'y t 1, '.1 •• 4,�j, 1 Jy- ,, �,.. tl r--, 4 • "l.. 4l 10.y L , ;y 1 Nei ii+ Li re!' r a t �A r ., • r h' Goal 93 Energy Conservation { ' '' 0 L:1 Goad 13: Ener• Conservation H R Summary of Major Issues " � The following arc some of the issues and changed circumstances and conditions which were consid- , ' ered in the update of this element of the Comprehensive Plan , • {ti a The Oregon Residential Energy Code was adopted in 1991, It has impacted building practices a' '`a, '' wthrough stricter regulation and required performance standards and will play a significant role "aa '.` in energy conservation now and in the future. • .• • "` 1 ; B Energy conservation and efficiency can be recognized and utilized as an energy resources l Transportation systems and land use patterns are directly linked to energy conser,�ation goals '- '»» and have the potential to impact energy use. . ` d . PI Energy production and use can impact the environment, When choosing policies,these costs ,` + ,,., h must be considered, r:. ,,.'� a Aware;tess of solid waste management reduction,reuse,recycling and recovery of resoitrces as • 7, } ; .r a way to conserve energy has increased and programs have been put in place to encourage these activities, ' �" ' a ''z r PC Establishing a baseline energy accounting and an acceptable payback period would assist the }K ,q ... City in making decisions regarding energy efficiency, • 4 r A v GOALS, POLICIES AND RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES r ••a. GOAL , :;,�' The City shall conserve energy. ,Y , ti POLICIES , ' •sN ti, p ''{ .i y 1, Reduce the City's overall energy consumption, r :+ Y' a 2, Promote the use of renewable energy sources, Y ,. ' ' 4. i11, . - , „. . n . ,.;„ y: .k GOAL 13 ENERGY CONSERVATION 13-3 89 y y a ��i w .�e i y,yr •. l t l ::a. V:, ti r } F1 rn�, ., � +°'!• r .:4.. F :. , .�...�'� �� i,..M Goal 93 Energy Conservation C7 Goal 13. Enel,a Conservation rt '� rI 0 3, Reduce energy consumption related to transportation by promoting a reduction in vehicle miles traveled through the use of alternative transportation. r', 4, Require energy-efficient land use and circulation patterns through mixed use development, • promoting high density developments near transit and major employment and shopping oppor- tunities,and design of developments to encourage alternative transportation, ^' t 1. 5. Promote energy efficiency through site planning for all types of development including resi- ` ;, dential subdivisions,multi-family,commercial and industrial projects. • h.9 t I • 6. Require solar orientation fox subdivision and partition layout,encourage planned unit develop- ments and clustering,encourage appropriate landscape materials to reduce solar impact in the a '"' . summer,minimize winter heat loss and buffer against prevailing wind sources, 7, Protect solar access to use natural heating and lighting opportunities, 8, Implement and enforce state energy codes through the building permit review process. RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES a y is Establish an acceptable payback period for energy saving measures in municipally-owned build- ings and facilities. i.r ii, Reduce residential energy consumption through informing the public on how to conserve en- ; ra ergy. iii. Support energy conservation measures by encouraging citizens to participate in available non- profit,a county and utility programs such as: n a , '.: a, Energy audits; b. Home weatherization; °° c. Wrapping water heaters;and, d, Use of energy efficient shower heads. iv. Consider the energy consequences in decisions regarding the construction,delivery and siting of urban services, N 11 J + 13-4 LAKE OSWEG0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 90 Wr V '^ a•A AA. 2 jay r, ':..1 .•yS c - a ) - e J , ° • t� , M. `1d w a ° T, ♦�• 4. . . rI•.•i . •°. 7. 1 y .,� I 4414 44 ..y S;I.4.�-• d 'r i”• r 44 ' Goal 13 Energy Conservation l: • ❑ Goal °13' Energ Conservation v. Compile basic data on the sources, uses and costs of energy Within the City to establish a ° baseline for energy-efficiency improvements and cost-effectiveness measures, Include infor- mation on energy use in City buildings,City vehicle fleets,City utilities,City equipment, t " •i hicie flows on City streets,City regulated development and building and recycling,salvage and use of recycled materials. • wti" vi. Coordinate with federal,state and regional agencies to promote energy conservation. � ♦ vii. Encourage concentrated developments of mixed uses in order to reduce auto trip length,en- •, courage alternative transportation and to encourage the utilization of centralized heating sys- ' , • terns. Ny viii, Site public buildings close to one another wherever possible,to promote reduction of auto trips and encourage shared use of facilities, • ix. Encourage transportation systems and programs designed to minimize energy consumption and reduce vehicle miles traveled through; • wy ' „ ,' 410 a. Ride sharing; ~ b. Employer development of ride sharing commuter programs; q: " '•: c, Granting parking priority to ride share autos or vans; d. Promoting pedestrian and bicycle travel by providing adequately surfaced,sidewalks, sloped curb crossings and bicycle racks; ,''w e, Connecting bike paths and sidewalks to schools,parks,commercial and employment areas;and, Requiring pedestrian and bicycle crossties between cul-de-sac and interblock cuts to Q ' " reduce travel distances, a I m it, Require trees in parking lots to provide a shade canopy to decrease exposure to heat radiated from these surfaces, xi, Promote tree planting as a way to reduce summer cooling loads and air pollution. , " xii, Work with Tri-Met to provide commuter information and education,more efficient transporta- tion,better schedules,mini-buses,coordinate locations for shelters and planning for park and ride stations, ' Cooperatepreserverightsway .,,xiiil with Metro and Tri-Met to railroad of for future use, GOAL 13 ENERGY CONSERVATION 13.5 91 Y � ,•t •j I u u fi, 1, ``4 � i N " t" ��•4';i a �i'y� ;� �' :.4 y:: a r f I r , Goa!13 Energy Conservation h • ® Goal 13: Ener y Conservation xiv, Encourage higher density residential developments near arterials,public transit routes, corn- mercial areas and employment centers,where consistent with other Comprehensive Plan poll- cies. " xv. Encourage transportation fuel efficiency through traffic light synchronization. xvi, Promote energy efficient site design through the design review and subdivision process by such w- means as: J.' a. Permitting zero lot line siting and common wall construction; N b. Flexible setback requirements; ' t c. landscaping opportunities and sensitivity to the site's natural features; d, Encouraging clustering of units to reduce the total amount of street and utility line foot- N •' age and maximize usable open space;and,44 e, Permitting the siting of residence;,on lots to provide solar exposure, a 1': xvii, Conserve transportation energy end prevent traffic congestion by discouraging the develop- • ment of drive-through businesses, xviii. Take a leadr;ship role in promoting energy conservation by seeking energy efficiencies in mu- nicipal building construction and operations,including: a A ` a. Design, commissioning, operation, maintenance,renovation and landscaping of City buildings; 4 b, City vehicle usage; • c, City utilities including water pumping and street lighting;and, 1 '' d, City equipment usage including office equipment,heavy equipment and power tools, xix. Develop an energy conservation program for City activities and property,including assessment • k'^°' of vehicle energy use and an energy audit of City buildings. • 6 xx. Cooperate with the Lake Oswego Corporation to assure that the hydroelectric potential of Os- wego Lake is preserved and utilized, i xxi. Continue to support both City and intergovernmental efforts in the recycling of office materials • and curbside recycling. r 1W 13.6 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN „ j. 4 K •w • • m X »4 a 4-• 1 4. •,„. v.t 4 r � A _ w, •,1 n,a a . , �.� 6 a' e 4 r.* I „;., t" IJ tt +>L44-6.1tNleo .t'v� t- 6.4r5` A j »•' GOAL 13: ENERGY CONSERVATION � yl''...1,'-,:'''''',/ E „ :: To conserve energy. 5, Plans directed toward energy conservation within the ill planning area should consider as a major determinant Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed the existing and potential capacity of the renewable and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all energy sources to yield useful energy output.Renewable , forms of energy,based upon sound economic principles. energy sources include water,sunshine,wind,gcother- mai heat and municipal,forest and farm waste,When- 1' ever possible, land conservation and development actions provided for under such plans should utilize .I° GUIDELINES renewable energy sources. ri ,, A. PLANNING 1. Priority consideration in land use planning should be B. IP"PLEMENTATION given to methods of analysis and implementation 1, Land use plans should be based on utilization of the '• measures that will assure achievement of maximum following techniques and implementation devices which . "' can have a material impact on energy efficiency: ' - 4y efficiency in energy utilization. a, Lot size,dimension,and siting controls; ,i • 2, The allocation of land and uses permitted on the land b. Building height,bulk and surface area; should seek oo minimizee the depletion of c, Densityof uses, particularlythose which relate to " '". ; non-renewable sources cif energy. 3. Land use planning should, to the maximum extent housing densities; + a • d, Availability of light,wind and air; possible,seek to recycle and reuse vacant land and those uses which are not energy efficient. e, Compatibility of and competition between competing 4. Land use planning should,to the maximum extent land use activities;and - possible,combine increasing density gradients along f, Systems and incentives for the collection,reuse and •. •, ' high capacity transportation corridors to achieve recycling of metallic and nonmetallic waste, +r i . .. greater energy efficiency, <- ,.N e F,. h N hj • t IY �y. u t. 4.. 4 n'4 .30- Attachment g3 ,". _• ..gip - 4.4w. K Y 'on • • ArM i 1 iR -• Y L t 4 N s A �x SIt. b n ♦ 1' A. y�N�.. i� '9r•. kr } 47. 4.. d t *A M �l L •t' t• f�W: I' 1 11 r Y '4. 1 i M • ,!. K 14 Ir Y•y,w rk'A ally 4 r.1 • 1 • 4 K Y , ` rat • 1111, Ir ry •1 n i 94 ' y�. 4. 4 AA(a ) ... , µ N • / u '.9 . A` 1 Y 1 ,1�..-. 9 v1 ,A w,♦ ., w1 - a y... Y`.a.�. ,e .- t ., 3 '. aR.e L r , . Community " r •,,i - C-. Community Development c �, .. v`C r .Y�. yi " ,,N `, Department '' Memorandum ' — a. L F 0 't.a ., d r., *. TO: Planning Commission � Mr ' FROM: Sidaro Sin,Associate Planner ar,d Dennis Lgner,Long Range Planning • .. Manager " 1 DATE; August 18,2003 • ' r SUI3JFCT: OutLOok 2025—October 27,2003 Public Workshop,Program Options .» ♦•hy. '„ ACTION: Provide guidance on how to conduct the public workshop scheduled for October 27, 2003, "a:L DISCUSSION: At the July 28 meeting,the Commission requested that staff provide some options for " how to conduct the proposed OutLOok 2025 public workshop on October 27,2003. A ' i discussion of options and a recommendation are included on the following pages, • r;'4 , ti. M:. p , of .,Y *Ni y1 ", 1, 4 rr, 6 `Y .Y Y' "r OutLOok 2025 8/18/2003 " '' ' Public Workshop Progrunt Options Page 1 n� AC+bY''Z/M j�N � y� � a �` �� •�„ a Oid - t �r �� +Y M<a " t i 1•i i1 A "1 1 • N .., * '1"':::i'.•:* .. 'i'. A... I '.'. \,..• .. „%.,.”„:•,,,;,. . ;rid . . i. . a A. py OutLOok 2025 0 .: October 27, 2003 Public Workshop Program Options , Framing the Future of Lake Oswego Concept: Engage citizens in a discussion about the future of Lake Oswego. Conduct a workshop to identify issues and strategies that should be addressed in the City ° Comprehensive Plan. Ask a series of questions to elicit a response from attendees °f " regarding their vision for Lake Oswego. Proposed Program(2 hours—7:00 to 9:00 PM): -' • Welcome(5 min) ' • OutLOok 2025 Overview(5 min) " • Brief Review of Comp Plan(5 (Where we are) << min) «.. m Brief Review of Trends(5 min) (Where we are going) i .. • Brief Review of OutLOok 2025 I '4%. s Issues a(top 3 in each category- r ,, ,' ,' 5 min) ■ Questions from Audience(10 min) ■ Workshop-(brainstorming and (Where do we want to go) reporting- 1 hour) ....— • Next Steps Y°" `` Workshop • Format Options: Options include lunge group,small groups,or open house , ,,,; : formats, A fourth option is a combination open house/group process. An advantage of the large group is that everyone hears the same thing. The disadvantage is that some people dominate the discussion and some never contribute. The advantage of the small .: : � group is that you can get everyone involved. The disadvantage is that it takes longer because groups typically report back to the large group. Another option with the small W group is that you can organize people by topic and allow them to focus on the details of a ' particular subject. The open house format allows greater tlexildity and lets people participate at the level at which they arc comfortable. Throug'7 the use of different . "stations"at the open house,ideas can be collected by topic, this format generally • doesn't provide for as great an exchange of ideas and the synergy of people working •r " 4 ".: together In groups. The open house usually involves a p.sslve approach to collecting -'-'1 . w . • responses, ' a ' If we conduct a combination open house/small group process,we propose conducting the ,1 •r ' open house from 6:00 PM to 1:00 PM and then start the program and group process as outlined above, • ^F 1 Y `, ,M '4' OutLOok 2025 8/18/2003 ,i,"„ A." ,a Public Workshop Program Options Page 2 . AA C321 , a 4 ''...•• ' t,41 q y i r Z m, , , '' i ;. w Facilitation: In an earlier discussion,Commission members expressed some interest in •4. using a professional facilitator to assist with this meeting. The need for a facilitator • w ";'t .:r. depends on the format chosen. Uwe do a large group process,a facilitator would be '''^ a-'.., helpful, If we use a small group process,we shouldn't need a facilitator because each pf .•:'�,��- table will include a staff member or Commissioner who will facilitate the discussion. • We have not budgeted for consulting help with the OutLOok 2025 project but the f adopted City budget does include a line item for consulting services. It is anticipated that ;p a significant portion of the budgeted amount will be needed for transportation studies -.:':.•:'*'',..: �.` associated with the Foothills District Plan. Questions: 'Three sets of optional questions are included for Planning Commission ;fs, M', `,• ` review and comment, The questions can be designed to be wide open,addressing all ;• ,�e;Y topics,or focused for a small group or open house format such that a response must : address a specific topic. 4' Option I Think about Lake Oswego,today: ti.� `' 1, -Name three things that make Lake Oswego a great place to live, -How do we best maintain these features into the future? • i ti 2. -Name three things that would make Lake Oswego an even better place to live, ;::° ' -How do we make these things happen? Option 2 '�, Imagine you have just returned to live in Lake Oswego after a twenty-year absence: ' �, 1, -Name three things you hope would remain the same over the twenty years. 3.;'•1, . '` -What must we do now to maintain these features? 2. -Name three things you would like to see change over the twenty years. ., „ 1': -What must we do now to make these changes happen? Option 3 Think about Lake Oswego today: Name one improvement or change you would like to see in Lake Oswego in each of the w following categories. How do we make each of these changes happen? 1, Land Use w 2. Environment w 3. Economic Development " 4. Transportation `1i4 • 41. 5 Housing Notice/Announcements: Strategies for inviting people to the workshop include: •,, .1 • An invitation sent to everyone who has participated or received notice of any OutLOok 2025 work session. • N A news release, •c ,;°'. + A guest editorial prepared by a City Council member. My OutLOok 2025 8'18 2003 Public Workshop Program Options Page 3 "•'+ . 4 .; 4 _ • .. N w '•.� .1 p• A ,y.V. ` Inp. ' Yi• '4 f�r1VL � r � . " .' ' : ' 1 4 , 4 d '�•'4 �' � � • �, i t'IrR � ' !,'1 p 4.'. 1.1 I I tr T �Y� 0 ,. ,11. f ,s- \1 . • ••' 1 .4' • a .1 r.. 2„ x., , _, • •tl._, 0 , 1!hw . d A.., . 1_ o. o '',Ax V r . J1 ' ;� ., Id An article in Hello I.O. • Information on the City Web-site. Id :. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends a small group format where participants work together to review issues and express desires. It is recommended that each group , address any and all issues with no topic specialization, The following small group ;:1 questions are proposed: j - • a Imagine you have just returned to live in Luke Oswego after a twenty-year absence: �, ,M 1. •-Name three things you hope would remain the same over the twenty years, • 5'' r -What must we do now to maintain these features? , i 2, -Name three things you would like to see change over the twenty years, -What must we do now to make these changes happen? • tir N'. , r •A it a y ,x' 4 G ' ,.I t'. I yai 6 OutLOok 2025 g118'2003 6 Public Workshop i'rogrant Options Page 4 d • ' ' AA�3•a1 a• a I R <4 d k• . 11 4. .:. _••. ,�