HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - 2003-09-22 PM W !y sln� d y, i t Yt Y+ tl •.N t t' -!1 JA� M N• ���• t � �I ^
Y�yw 11,A Y
•
�p 1•
r7N. �1
fi '
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
•
a l tl 2�
W�.
.IyY�n 1}4
t
• a. ,
qr
•° • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS �'` •
t v •'
t,'�I
N e( •A;
SEPTEMBER 22, 2003
w �A.I 17.
5
t� s1
hd..
d d, .�v' F Ia
v ` .a
4,r t
ylt '
µlye
N'.
•r C.'t „ •
ak.
A 41.
i x 40
q,A .
mot. �t
n'v,
1lx "r
vt f a4 w ' 4
, y .° ,'
Y,� 1 t'(92) # r {�' y#,,.-rf ••.4 aV 4 `' ,f,1 at
a r1� gt n. ! �. 1 �+ w !
t f 4 a 1
Y I. c{ , ' { 1 . r •V r_:t,, 1 `S „ +y 0 t w ry
K
nr:
w„`',
1 .
r w o,--- City of Lake Oswego
:''� �� Planning Commission , , �� ,,.
W
" `q. r / Monday,September 22,20U3 }
v ~' r•u loed
6:00 p.nr.—Open Work Session t'
it( r ., OREGON, , ,,. 1 ,,
" k�a, g.. City Hall Council Chamber "`'
,q. Members:
James Johnson,Chair 380 A Avenue
"a t Frank Groznik,Vice Chair Lake Oswego,OR 97034
Mary Beth Coffey,Kenneth L.Sandblast, '1"
' '. Mark Stayer,Daniel Vizzini and Alison Webster For Information: 503/635-0290 ./
AGENDA .,,,
"° ^ Council Liaison: Jack Hoffman 4, "'
This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location, For any special accommodations,please , r.
` 1 • `,. .c contact Iris Treinen.503/697-6591.48 hours before the meeting.
I, CALL TO ORDER i '
II: ROLL CALL :', ''•'
^, 111, CITIZEN COMMENT—Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda(3 minute limit per individual)
'` s`1 : IV, APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 11, 2003
e 4 •`. a August 25, 2003 ; d A'
`4 • September 8,2003
V, GENERAL PLANNING—OPEN WORK SESSION .. .,,
,
Outlook 2025 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review(P 02-0001) '
r - ' s Special District Plaits(including neighborhood plans) •
.,s,; ' • October 27,2003—Public Workshop—Program Discussion ,'
', Identification of issues to address during 2004 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review. '> , a
Staff coordinator is Sidaro Sin,Associate Planner.
VI, OTHER BUSINESS
VII, ADJOURNMENT r
{ ''a, i '
a tra: ;`y,,a
r.
.
Ana ''
wi
6; ..
li
� ' a y q v •
,'
iA" 1 . . tW • " P ' l� q ,' ..-
A N AA Gl'1"�� � 1 �'.. r • � Mw � r ! W k *A'Y1 ... T 4 t °,y . iV ♦_
1 W
\fNr
-.��atos;, . City of Lake Oswego� EQo
..
�' /i� Planning Commission
• ' i Monday,September 22,2003 0.
1 s- 6:00 p.m.—Open Work Session ,•
,- _s 01tr60Nf.r
�' .' , Members: City Hall Council Chamber
James Johnson,Chair 380 A Avenue
• -4 ' Frank Groznik,Vice Chair Lake Oswego,OR 97034
Mary Beth Coffey,Kenneth L.Sandblast,
• ` Mark Stayer,Daniel Vizzini and Alison Webster For Information: 503/635-0290 i {
p '� AGENDA.
Council Liaison, Jack Hoffman �'
This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location. For any special accommodations,please
contact Iris Treinen,503/697-6591,48 hours before the meeting. '.
ay q t. . I. CALL TO ORDER
` II. ROLL CALL
N' .
a ` w III, CITIZEN COMMENT—Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda(3 minute limit per individual) •" , w.
• N; ,' 4 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES .' •
" • August 11, 2003
t
August 25, 2003
'. N' 4
V. GENERAL PLANNING—OPEN WORK SESSION `1
Outlook 2025 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review(P 02-0001) .y p y
• • Special District Plans(including neighborhood plans)
:• ' • Octhber 27,2003—Public Workshop w-Program Discussion
.
Identification of issues to address during 2004 Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review. r''
Staff coordinator is Sidaro Sin,Associate Plannerr.
M '
" '' VI, 0 rfIER BUSINESS
•
VII. ADJOURNMENT . '..
''
6 y
'M { y.
Agenda Boot.*
. ,t
AA pp (ry2 y
� !1` l `14 A"• ..Y 4% • • • � " "d� ,;1 1 N+1�.' 'I.� r' ' Y
1^
J + r +,,� 1 d R; ,�.. �y ^.h , f 1 'v�•. J :Y v
9 y
° ; `, o, KEosy4� Commun 7.ity Development .,at
i.w1
fr •! Department
1 •u I + +i
1 t
\ N 1.
Memorandum ..' „,,
ti:
r • aaecoN_ ,°:.
1 t t
..,Na
„, ,
y TO: Planning Commission ;� ,
• v +x. y N
1. N• . v- 1.
FROM: Sidaro Sin,Associate Planner
b A DATE: September 12,2003 + `'
SUBJECT: Outlook 2025-Issues Identification ,
Special District Plans
e• • ACTION:
Identify issues to address during Periodic Review for: '''
A Plans Special District Pl
N ly.
DISCUSSION: ":'
•:w This work session focuses on identifying issues,as they relate the Special District Plans of the
Comprehensive Plan,
Special District Plans " N '
{ I, Comprehensive Ilan Special District Plans M'y
This section of the Comprehensive Plan is not like any other sections of the Plan,First of which, " , •.`,
° there is no Statewide Planning Ooal for special district plans. Further,this section of the Plan 1,
does not focus on one service or use,rather it focuses on a specific geographic area within the
City and incorporates all of the applicable goals of the Comprehensive Plan to that geographic
4
area. ,
1.
` Statewide Planning Goal:
There is no statewide planning goal for special district plans. 'N.
II, General Informatio., •'a .
I ' �•
Background:
The Special District Plans Section includes neighborhood plans and plans that pertain to
geographic areas in the City. ,+
• a:i :$a• ,
In 1n9h3,the City Council nuopted a Neighborhood Planning Program to provide recognized
"•:r neighborhoods an opportunity to develop a vision and corresponding goals and policies relating ,,
,. 1",, ,. Pinning Commission Wotk Session Page I r'„ ,°
• Outlook 2025,Special bistrict Pitons ''
',• n:, September 22,2002
k' P
.sue ,, ', to land use,building and site design and capital expenditures. The Neighborhood Planning „ '
"' Program was designed to go beyond:he general guidance provided by the Comprehensive Plan
goals,and policies,in order to address more localized and specific neighborhood needs,
t y" There are 19 recognized neighborhood associations in the City,six of which have adopted • r
neighborhood plans, Many of these plans use the same format found in the Comprehensive Plan,
which includes a background,goals,policies and recommended action measures section, The
first two neighborhood plans that were adopted also included zoning provisions that were '
• implemented, The subsequent four neighborhood plans were more policy documents which
;; identified some code amendments,but most have not yet been implemented. In general,all of
the neighborhood plans emphasize preservation of the character of the neighborhood and its . ,`'
^ s, natural resources,
Y
•
' u.;
The first neighborhood plan was adopted in 1996(First Addition). That plan included specific
implementing measures,such as rezoning most of the First Addition area to R-6,consistent with ..'
existing lot sizes in the area and development patterns in the neighborhood. The Old Town
. Neighborhood Plan was adopted in 1998. It is similar to the First Addition Plan in that specific l
,y '`v. _ ' development codes standards were developed and implemented for that neighborhood. '7
However,after the first two plans,there was a shift in how neighborhood plans were developed.
They were no longer being developed as policy documents with implementing measure,but .
, simply as policy documents with implementation to follow at a later time• The last four Plans;
.!e Lake Grove(Adopted 12/98),Glenmorrie(Adopted 11/00),Waluga(Adopted 5/03)and Lake
` Forest(Adopted 2003)have all been adopted,but many of the proposed code amendments have '
not yet been implemented, The implementation of these plans should be a consideration during "�"
the Comprehensive Plan review(refer to discussion under 111(D)-Other identified Issues),
i . At this time the development of new neighborhood plans is on hold until further discussions ` r
• . about the intent,process and format of future plans is being worked out.
Three other special district plans have bee prepared, These were done outside of the
n`t. • neighborhood planning process and include Lakewood Bay Bluff,Marylhurst,and Forest .., .', u f•
Highlands Area Plans, The Lakewood Bay Bluff Plan was adopted in 198(i and focuses on ,
developing that area with high density residential with visual and private physical access to the
bay. The Ivlarythurst Plan calls for a campus mixed use educational development with specific , "
development standards for sub-areas in the district,The Forest Highlands Plan recommends . •"
maintaining the neighborhood character through preservation of natural resources,
N
it•" •;+
A special district plan was developed for the Foothills area in 002, This plan has not yet been `
' adopted. The Foothills Plan recommends a mix of land uses such as residential,commercial and K 4
recreational uses. It focuses on the opportunity to expand on the existing strengths of the -1,
downtown area,such as accessibility and proximity to destination areas such as the Willamette "'
River and local parks in the area. v'. r. "
In addition,the Lake Grove Town Center Plan is currently being developed, The Lake Grove
.. area is one of two Metro designated Town Centers in Lake Oswego,which are intended to serve °' . ",
a., large populations,provide good transit service,offer a wide range of commercial services and a
mix of uses including high density housing. The Plan will help the City implement its v. '
Comprehensive Plan Policies regarding Town Centers and Main Streets hi the City's commercial ','.R
Planning Commission Work Session Page 2
'''' 'r Outlook 2025-Special District Plans
p' September 22,200A •
.4• y ..i' i I a
4
n ,,µ .' •_,AA t ) x ,
' 4 . - ,.. _ ,..
-- - • .4.,,
•
•
A
west end. It will also help implement the State Transportation Planning Rule,Regional 2040
Growth Concept,and Metro's Urban Growth Management Func,ional Plan. `r
4, -
Where are we now/what is currently in place for this goals ,
' .•'J; City programs that are currently in place regarding neighborhood planning:
• Neighborhood Plans:
" ' 0 First Addition(Adopted 1996) 44,•
'''.:•:"*.,:;;"
' � 0 Old Town(Initially 10/86,Amended 1998) N
0 Lake Grove(Adopted 12/98) '
" ` a.. + Glenmorrie(Adopted 11/00)
0 Waluga(Adopted 5/03)
0 Lake Forest(Adopted 2003) J
;; 4 • Lakewood Bay Bluff Area: Adopted 10/86 4 '
• Marylhurst Area: Adopted
• Forest Highlands_ Adopted 10/86
• Foothills Plan: Developed,but not yet adopted,
" ``; ,'$' • Lake Grove Town Center Plan: Currently being developed.
" • .,,,:. 4
" [II, Issue identification
` ,,Y The following conditions indicate the need for,and establish the scope of review for periodic 'i' $
°4'J + review of the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations. (These conditions are intended to y.
.A * ", act as a starting point for discussions.)
A) Oregon Administrative Rules(OAR)660-025-0070
Y Y:
".r .• 1. There has been a substantial change In circumstances including but not limited to
the conditions,findings,or assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan or
land use regulations were based,so that the comprehensive plan or land use
regulations do not comply with the statewide planning goals. -F
The following items illustrate a change in circumstance in the community that should "`".i
fir' , be reflected in the Comprehensive Plan.
'•.. . Adoption of Three additional Neighborhood Plans
COMMENT: The Glenmorrie,Waluga and Lake Forest neighborhood plans should be '-
w' included in the next Comprehensive Plan update,
Marlvhurst Plan v U '
COMMENT: This Plan needs some general updating because changes have occurred ,
on the Marlyhurst Campus that are not reflected in the Plan,Amendments include:
• Adding a map that identifies the sub-areas, ,
• Many of the identified zone changes have been implemented,other do not appear to
,f' have been changed, It is difficult to make that determination because no map
showing the sub-areas Is included.
• A discussion about the commercial development that is currently under review is •.
" '" appropriate,
•4 Mutating Commission Work Session Page 3
Outlook 2625.Special District Plans '
Septetnber 22,2003
)AA(3g`) ,. .y R,ir"` n,, ,d , Y r , '' t''.
. 4 ^1 A.,' . it •r .v 1 , .;. a 4 tM .1 7 t '
>. , V
i
r ' Foothills Plan x y
COMMENT: This Plan has been acknowledged by the City Council,but not yet •
i Nr ,', adopted. The Foothills Plan looks at providing mixed-use residential and commercial „s '
uses along with recreational uses, It focuses on the opportunity to expand on the
existing strengths of the downtown area,such as accessibility and proximity to
destination areas such as the Willamette River and local parks in the area, tt
Lake Grove Town Center Plan r*
COMMENT: This Plan is currently under development, ; :
2^ Decisions implementing acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use Y ` 4
�" ` 1 regulations are inconsistent with the goals. , �w
N M
{
• „ COMMENT: No item has been identified for this condition.
„` 3. There are issues of regional or statewide significance,intergovernmental
."."4 ',.'• coordination,or state agency plans or programs affecting land use,which must be
,r. ": addressed in order to bring comprehensive plans and land use regulations into
•
• compliance with the goals. `''
ti
" Foothills Plan "r
COMMENT: The Foothills Plan will require coordination with ODOT to determine
access issues related to Highway 43 and coordination with Tri-Met to coordinate street
a car and mass transit issues.
,1 ,
4. The existing comprehensive plan and land use regulations are not achieving the ';
statewide planning goals. " ' ,
COMMENT: No item has been identified for this condition, `
Vf-
r ,- B) Summary of Major Issues
This section highlights existing issues that were identified in the development of the „
existing Comprehensive Plan, Not all issues will be applicable. In many cases,the issues
° arc a statement of fact,hi other cases they identify a future action,
• *p
i, Lake Grove,Glenmorrie,Waluga&Lake Forest Plans
COMMENT: An extensive review of the"Summary of Major Issues"section for
". , the above plans will be required.
A
C) Goals,Policies,and Recommended Action Measures • t,..
• t This section will identify goals or policies that should be addressed during Period Review.
In some cases the goal policy might be outdated andpolicies,
require a deletion or an amendment. ".
''. I. .• °.� In other cases,there maybe an opportunity
for new goals and
n.• . v. As noted previously many of the neighborhood plans were form.ntted to duplicate the
ies and
reformat
mm�ended action measures found their way into theve Plan. As such,many of ltneighbare l goals,
plans. The intent of v _^
Planning Commission Work Session Page 4 •
'"1 , Outlook 2025-Special District Plans -',
t September 22,2003
k A
s
x w t " 1
44(h2) » " ,t r.. ,
.4 the duplicate goals,policies and recommended actions measures was to emphasize and
• er' : show support for these existing goals,policies and recommended action measures, aT'
ti Although the point was made,it did tend to make the actual neighborhood plans larger than " ^ ;4,
they should have been. ,,
fi Due to the extensiveness of the neighborhood plans,they were not individually reviewed at y y
this time to determine if a goal,policy or recommended action measure should be deleted
or amended. However,this should be done during the Comprehensive Plan review process "`
to ensure that neighborhood plans are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, ;`. ,
D) Other Identified Issues
dr This section identifies other issues for periodic review conk leration,
1. Neighborhood Plans
COMMENT: The Neighborhood Planning Program should be reviewed to:
•Clarify the intent of the plans.
' ~ « •Explain how these plans will be used,
•Provide a clear,simple and Consistent format for plans that eliminate redundancy aA" "
with the Comprehensive Plan. r
2, Neighborhood Plan Implementation a :—
There are policies in the Lake Grove,Glenmorrie,Waluga and Lake Forest
• neighborhood plans that require implementation, A task of the Comprehensive Plan
a • review process should be to:
• Identify which policies require implementation through code amendments.
-" • Determine if the policy and subsequent code amendment is still valid. •''''
• Pursue code amendments,
r { , 3, Lakewood Bat Bluff Plan
COMMENT: Review the applicability of the plan since this area is developed with t'
high density housing as outlined in the plan.
4, Marylhurst Plan
COMMENT: See comments under Section 1Il(A)(1),
IV, Quality of Life indicators(QOL)Related to the Goal '
The intent of this section is to take the opportunity to incorporate QOL indicators with .r'
4» Comprehensive Plan goals. The Comprehensive Plan provides policy direction and goals,while
the QOL indicators provide the mechanism to monitor the effectiveness of those goals and :.t
• policies. The draft indicators that are related to this goal are listed below.
There were no QOL indicator's related to special district plans,
Pluming Commission work Session hage 5
Outlook 2025«Special District Plans
September 22,2003
* • Y 4, ,„•;,-:X i 1N •} i l A.' F ' a 11:.....
NY X 14' y
i�{ i W 1 /
•
u V. Public Comments
g This section will include oral and written communications received by the public or stakeholders r' .v
41
• .. in time to be included in the staff report, ",+:W 'a
W A �:
" Special District Plans Mailing List:
L, ' • Neighborhood Association Chairs
• Outlook 2025 Interested Parties M r
+ r • LONAC Board
',• .,; • Downtown Business District Association ...
• Lake Grove Business Association
• MarlyhurstUniversity ;7
'+ • Lake Oswego Corporation • , +, 'a;
� !y"• • Lake Grove Town Center Plan Interested Parties
P • Foothills Road Task Force
Y • Foothills Road Property Owners
• Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency
r i u
Attachments: ,:
" Due to the size of some of the special district plans,no attachments ar;included with this staff Y
report.
I. X n•
Y, You may view the special district plans on the City's website at:
•Neighborhood Plans- http://www.ci.oswego.or,us/plan/neighhorhoods/naplan.htln e '
' •Comprehensive Plan Special District Section—http://www,ci,oswego.or.us/plan/Comp Plan/ .i
a .y• w'r
L:\Case Files\2002V'Ianntrig Project Nog'02.0001(1utlook2025\Np:end Dlslne%Plunapeoiu1DistricttitanSlullRepoii 9.12-03.doc "
;
ti+i
j
i
9 "
r
+
1? I
!1� C •W
' .... "'7.
4 .4n K•
.V
GI ,t
n .. Planting Commission Work Session Page 6
Outlook 2025•Special District Plans
2t)O,?2
September '
M y ♦ �
I6.
tl F
.-Y 5 ,,,it PF•. . 1,F . xr u',-`A!, 4.0.. :I. d .. .y. ,,''.1 , r . KL Rr+
y ,4 � u
, w
4 ' ".'5
y S 1s a} ,oy 4�1f=0s;14 Community Development
a rIF ? Department
• ,- --% Memorandum ��
i ,..w
4, oaicoot
F
.-.
h
TO: Planning Commission "
, ., FROM: Sidaro Sin,Associate Planner and Dennis Egner,Long Range Planning
Manager
NCH
1 P.
DATE: August 18,2003 ' '`1
t r
" . SUBJECT: OutLOok 2025—October 27,2003 Public Workshop,Program Options
ACTION:
4: Provide guidance on how to conduct the public workshop scheduled for October 27,
2003. .
A. DISCUSSION:
+, At the July 28 meeting,the Commission requested that staff provide some options for b,
how to conduct the proposed OutLOok 2025 public workshop on October 27,2003, A •"`
discussion of options and a recommendation are included on the following pages,
.:m
rM:
ti - sti
k
:r .p
V t 'i_.
•
q �.`t a l 1•
OutLOok 2025 8'18/2003
Public Workshop Program Options Page 1 F
n a ` y ' ' ,' ' S y I.—,u .i R� F �' .p y ,3
,, IAAt.3Q/e r ", , ,� 4. ;, 1
4 x . . p{� q . a 'w a m. a
l N. 1 µ A .1 S 1 y iN', 2 p.rti.'{ . 1. Y 4 Y_:i'P
,, c.1: y Y.
' l M,
ir •
u h
r a • OutLOok 2025
•, u October 27, 2003 Public Workshop ;, Nx*
,1u Program Options
Framing the Future of Lake Oswego
l :‘,..1...,�j
.• Concept: Engage citizens in a discussion about the future of Lake Oswego. Conduct a
K ;w workshop to identify issues and strategies that should be addressed in the City <�
Comprehensive Plan. Ask a series of questions to elicit a response from attendees . ,,
a: regarding their vision for Lake Oswego.
U y r
1 a .Y'
t Proposed Program(2 hours—7:00 to 9:00 PM): _"
q• „ r Welcome(5 min) y
a1 ", r OutLOok 2025 Overview(5 min)
■ Brief Review of Comp Plan(5 (Where we are) r,
' ', min)
• Brief Review of Trends(5 min) (Where we are going) 9
✓ Brief Review of OutLOok 2025 '
Issues—(top 3 in each category
5 mitt) '•Y '
'" Questions from Audience(10
min) ,
■ Workshop-(brainstorming and (Where do we want to go)
reporting-1 hour)
• Next Steps
1: M M • +
.. h
'Workshop Format Options: Options include large group,small groups,or open house
formats, A fourth option is a combination open house/group process, An advantage of
' the large group is that everyone hears the same thing. The disadvantage is that some t .
people dominate the discussion and some never contribute. The advantage of the small .�l
group is that you can get everyone involved, The disadvantage is that it takes longer "
because groups typically report back to the large group, Another option with the small • "
group is that you can organize people by topic and allow them to focus on the details of a ,,
' particular subject. The open house format allows greater flexibility and lets people
'' °'r participate at the level at which they are comfortable. Through the use of different r
"stations"at the open house,ideas can be collected by topic. This format generally ;.0
° '"t% doesn't provide for as great an exchange of ideas and the synergy of people working w
', :Y together in groups. The open house usually involves a passive approach to collecting •' v
responses,
.,;.
'.w If we conduct a combination open house/small group process,we propose conducting the
open house from 6:00 PM to 7t00 PM and then start the program and group process as 'h
outlined above. "°
. `Y a
OutLOok 2025 8/18/2003
Public Workshop Program Options Page 2 .
4 • q',
u y.
4H K, 1 Fr i» 4
'' +' ,.
1.: 1Y
C '
r r, r•
:
"4 ,' s ,�1 t J
Facilitation: In an earlier discussion,Commission members expressed some interest in
,; using a professional facilitator to assist with this meeting. The need for a facilitator .'
r' . depends on the format chosen, If we do a large group process,a facilitator would be
' ',. helpful. If we use a small group process,we shouldn't need a facilitator because each 1 a.: .
table will include a staff member or Commissioner who will facilitate the discussion.
t♦
We have not budgeted for consulting help with the OutLOok 2025 project but the
• "t adopted City budget does include a line item for consulting services. It is anticipated that ',.„;
a significant portion of the budgeted amount will be needed for transportation studies "
associated with the Foothills District Plan.
3 R
M Questions: Three sets of optional questions are included for Planning Conunission /,
review and comment, The questions can be designed to be wide open,addressing all •
topics,or focused for a small group or open house format such that a response must �4 ;`
address a specific topic.
k � p"'•
Option 1
Think about Lake Oswego,today: , .y ° .
• 1. -Name three things that make Lake Oswego a great place to live, ,°y ;.
• ," Y -How do we best maintain these features into the future?
°«. ., 2, -Name three things that would make Lake Oswego an even better place to live,
-How do we make these things happen?
r u, «Ρi. Option 2
Imagine you have just returned to live in Lake Oswego after a twenty year absence:
1, -Name three things you hope would remain the same over the twenty years. '
-What must we do now to maintain these features?
2. -Name three things you would like to see change over the twenty years.-What must we do now to make these changes happen?
rr�
Option 3
"• 1 Think about Lake Oswego today;
of
� u Name one improvement or change you would like to see in Lake Oswego in eachthe
following categories, How do we make each of these changes happen?
k ' ; 1. Land Use
Y' 2 Environment "
°` 3. Economic Developtnent
4, Transportation
AM 5. Housing
Notice/Announcements: Strategies for inviting people to the workshop include: "
JO
s
« ` �"" . An invitation sent to everyone who has participated or received notice of any
OutLOok 2025 work session,
'Pl"_ d A news release,
e A guest editorial prepared by a City Council member, ® ''••.
OutLOok 2025 8/1 S/2003
Public Workshop Program Options Page 3 ti
.�... ' din
11 4 A k:. At '.1 k 'Y 3, *.l , '".L. !1-r 0.N + ,. r w�1 Ic I"I M'• .. 1 1I
.
' fit r ,.I
•.
/n' ..'
An article in Hello LO. M 1.
i4.,' ty
.I. ■ Information on the City Web-site,
Y' Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends a small group format where participants
} •1 work together to review issues and express desires. It is recommended that each group
%• r T' address any and all issues with no topic specialization. The following small group
questions are proposed: t'
1 •
Imagine you have just returned to live in Lake Oswego after a twenty-year absence: 1 ."Y
1, -Name three things you hope would remain the same over the twenty years.
'" r:'' -What must we do now to maintain these features?
;� 2. -Name three things you would like to see change over the twenty years. .
44 { . -What must we do now to make these changes happen? .y�^
'y
,.:„.'",,,. t, . ,
N,
d n-
W '
y ryNrA 7' •��
,, p iN.
.1 1
1
f Y N ...4.
I
A I
,t I
tom 4 ''
v
n
a •
OutLOok 2025 8/18/2003 •`
Public Workshop Program Options page 4
y ,
AA.1 2) 1 y A N 1 1 1 t 1 j .• . . K k 7 a y N
• V + a _ ` .. . Y• Y Y� e4