Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Item - 2003-11-10 PM
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDAS SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 os wK� City of Labe Oswego s, Planning Commission Monday,November 10,2003 I 7.00 p.m.—Public Meeting& Work Session - OREGON✓.-' Members: City Hall Council Chamber James Johnson,Chair 380 A Avenue Frank Groznik,Vice Chair Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Mary Beth Coffey,Kenneth L,Sandblast, Mark Slayer,Daniel Vlzzlni and Alison Webster For Information 503//6335-0290 Connell Liaison; Jack Hoffinan AGENDA. Tliis meeting is n a handicapped accessible location, For any special accommodations,please contact Iris Treinen,503/697-6591,48 hours before the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III, CITIZEN COMMENT—Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda(3 minute limit per individual) IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 13, 2003 OeWe►-97-, 2 -(W1//be available at I1;24/03 meethig) V. PUBLIC MEETING East End Redevelopment Plan Update(P 03-0008) Staffcoonlinatur is Robert Galante, Redevclopment Director VI, GENE KAL PLANNING—WORK SESSION Quality of Life Indicators Report(P 01-0001)—RevIcW and Discussion Staff coordinator is Sicletro Sift,,rlssuclate Planner VII, OTIIER BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT c City of Lake Oswego l ' Planning Commission 1 Monday,N.'+vember 10,2003 ` 7.00P.11a—Public Meeting& FVorh Session Members: City Hall Council Chamber James Johnson,Chair 380 A Avenue Frank Groznik,Vice Chair Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Mary Beth Coffey,Kenneth L,Sandblast, Mark Stayer,Daniel Vizzini and Alison Webster For Information;�T503/635-0290 Council Liaison, Jack Hoffman ,AGENDA This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location. For any special accommodations,please contact Iris Treinen,503/697-6591,48 hours before the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER II, ROLL CALL III. CITIZEN COMMENT—Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda(3 minute limit per individual) IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 13, 2003 October 27, 2003 V. PUBLIC MEETING ;Nast End Redevelopment Plan Update(P 03-0008) Staff coordinator is Robert Galante, Redevelopment Director V1, GENERAL PLANNING—WORK SESSION Quality of Life Indicators Report(P 01-0001)—Review and Discussion Staff coordinator is Sidaro Sin,Associate Planner V11. OTHER BUSINESS VIII, ADJOURNMENT \gunda 13oolt* a 1 i Y� N d a M�1 r �"\ '"M w f •a h'�, 1 hrr 1 HI 1 tit +� J 1 C'II," M1 1 � ��� � •" � � r Iw Lp r °� `�„�� �°' .r+' i r t u� Jtl r 1�, a •te ,- N` a r. � n * J., N t � a y " �. y_ � M y "• th 7.+ y "R';' '-, � �. !M'a , ," r n,� r ti a 'r r - „ r:• y �! '!� 'S 1- M r T Y`', }" It .ly,l >>I w yN � t n li 'w�k ,� Ircr� :.t y � r p`t p� f•�! r F .;�,} x ` 1 +Y t'�'S^Nelrc''�',e.�wR-n�'��.i"a��`�'Lj.f,i' , } J�. �• S " ,._ ' , �y'��k'-N a -'Iy1 W�^+I'���, q "�:1`" 'ti`, h � � r _hF t x } R 4 t z�w - .r'r -. ✓ a w 4 w.�=+4.r` !r 1`'�°"'r J V �I l:yp�� r ,. a x R.r; t� +:� �r r � r H� ` w';r �JI ~ 9 "t " "`�•LJ„ ,w "'�C..,yr, � 74., 1•. A r"� :,� " h � d �;,.r it � 1 •y't�; J..td T+N..q a�l�t�, tE`ys,�ai r -..1 ,," w r w-vi. �•' t +' „ r:r1. 'n,.f. y 1'' ,w� M`-1 ;y 1 , f ' rI.'�` •.,1-.., ty � }1n r r ''"� r`Ir Cf'• �'� �.�� /,, t .d��� l� i1 rH y 4 N f \ '... ly�• � .- y .. F � K F.' Ar�,�� � 1 , qy t 1 h w,. a t t ,7 ♦ , 1,�R.Wr�" ti ° " F_. ✓ -. 11}lr e ._f „',1° 1 r 'j` Y,: 1 ^ ' l V � J111 I�z) 6 .ti, ,1{Ir.i � � u4 y:, � tiiY' S*C •�1 '"," '. aN ",m , M E J � y «t w1 1, l� 4 * •, Y >k" TABLE OF CONIgNTS DEFINITIONS 3 PLAN AMENDMENTS 4 HISTORY/BACKGROUND 8 SECTION 100 VISION STATEMENT 23 SECTION 200 FINANCING 23 SECTION 300 UPDATED PROJECT LIST 23 Project A Headlee Walkway 24 Project B Millennium Plaza Park Phases III&IV 24 Project C Street Improvements—Second,Third,and Fourth Streets 24 Project D Transit Center/Streetcar 25 Project E B Avenue—Village Anchor Street 26 Project I• A Avenue Extension 26 Project G Hotel 27 Project H Block 137 Mixed Use Development 28 Project I Block 45 Mixed Use Development 28 Project J Evergreen Housing Redevelopment Site 29 Project K Civic Center 29 Project L Willametta Steps 29 Project M Oswego Lakefront 29 Project N First Street North Anchor 30 Project 0 First Street Retail Revitalization—Blocks 48&49 31 Project P State Street Mixed Use Development 31 Project Q State Street Pedestrian/Bikeway Improvements 32 Project R East of Slate Street Mixed Use Development 32 Project S North Entry Mixed Use Development 32 Project T Second and B Mixed Use Development 32 Project U Block 46—Third and A 32 SECTION 400 OUTLINE FOR Av 1 ION IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA 33 A. Development/Redevelopment 33 B, Improvements 33 C. Land Acquisition 33 0. Property Management, Demolition, Removal rf Structures and Clearance 33 E" Rehabilitation and Conservation 33 SECTION 500 MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 34 SECTION 600 RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL OBJECTIVES 37 A. Relationship to Local Objectives for the Redevelopment Area 37 B. Relationship to Other Local Objectives 39 SECTION 700 ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS 40 SECTION 600 RELOCATION 41 SECTION 900 REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION 42 A. Land Acquisition 42 B. Land Disposition 43 SECTION 1000 AMENDMENTS TO THE PLAN 45 SECTION 1100 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 46 REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARY MAP 48 ORIGINAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS MAP 49 UPDATED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS MAP 50 REDEVELOPMENT ACQUISITION MAP 51 LANI LNDH11*1 I:I.0PIMIoNTPLAN DEFINITIONS The following definitions will govern the construction of this Plan and the accompanying report, unless the context otherwise requires: r,. "Plan"means the Lake Oswego East End Redevelopment Plan Update, B. "Report"means the accompanying report to the Redevelopment Plan Update as required by ORS 457.085(3). C. "Plan Area"or"Redevelopment Area"means that area included within the boundaries of the Lake Oswego East End Redevelopment District as described in Section 500. D. "Agency"or"LORA"means the Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency—the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Lake Oswego, Oregon.The Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency was created by Ordinance No. 1748, adopted by the City Council on November 6, 1979.This ordinance also designated that the City Council Itself act as the agency and carry out its responsibilities.The powers of the Agency are limited by State statute and by the specific requirements of this Plan, E. "Council"means the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego, Oregon. F. "Planning Commission"means the Planning Commission of the City of Lake Oswego, Oregon. G. "City"means the City of Lake Oswego, Oregon. H. "State"means the State of Oregon. I. "ORS"means Oregon Revised Statutes. 13. "Persons"means any individual,family, business,firm, association or corporate entity. K. "Comprehensive Plan"means the policy document adopted by the Lake Oswego City Council on July 18, 1978 and as subsequently amended. L. "Redevelopment Project"or"Project"or"Projects"means the developments described under Section 300 herein. M. "Developer"means any individual or group acquiring property from the Agency or receiving financial assistance for the physical Improvement of privately or publicly held structures and land, N. "Urban Renewal Law"means Oregon Revised Statute, Chapter 457(ORS 457),the State Urban Renewal Law. ;t t ASI LNO Ixt cANT1.011NILn t VIAN PLAN AMENDMENTS The following are amendments to the adopted East End Redevelopment Plan. Amendment Ordinance Effective Purpose Number Number Date 1 1979 03-02-89 Section 300—Description of Each Urban Redevelopment Project to be Undertaken,added Project J—Marina and Project K, Lake Oswego— Portland Trolley Extension. Section 500- Map and Legal Description, amended the East End Redevelopment Area boundary and legal description to include the residential area north of Leonard Street between Durham and Furnace Streets and the marina development areas of the Oswego Pointe project, added 9,5 acres. Amended Redevelopment Proiect Map to include Projects J and K. Amended Redevelopment Area 8oundary Map to Include the residential area north of Leonard Street between Durham and Furnace Streets and the marina development areas of the Oswego Pointe project. 2 1997 02-02-90 Section 300—Description of Each Urban Redevelopment Project to be Undertaken, amended the Plan to acquire the following properties; Project B—Block 138:Tax Lots 6400,8500,8600, 8700 and 8800 of Block 46 for the purposes of providing a new site for relocating the Main Fire Station on the block. Pro ei,t C--Bluff Area;Tax Lots 190 and 700 of Tax Map T2S R'I E 10AA. Retained in public ownership for the purpcse of developinn a public boardwalk,open space and visual access to Lakewood Bay. Project D Block 136 and 137;Tax Lot 9100 of Block 136, Property is part of land assembly needed to initiate private development on Block 136, Proiecl F--Pinafore Property;Tax Lots 3400 and 3500 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 1 oAA, In conjunction with Project K, It develops the termio us of the Willamette Shore Trolley, rasT P.ND r:cuwJ1t.()i'nit,trrt PLAS 1 PLAN AMENDMENTS Amendment Ordinance Effective Purpose Number Number Date 2 1997 02-02-90 Section 300- Description of Each Urban Redevelopment Project to be Undertaken,added Project L.—Fire Station Relocation. Section 900—Real Property Acquisition and Disposition, amended the Plan to include a description of properties to be acquired in accordance with all applicable and state statutes. Amended Redevelopment Prolect Map to include Project L. Added Redevelopment Acquisition Map to the _ Redevelopment Plan. 3 1998 03.22-90 Section 300-Description of Each Urban I Redevelopment Prolect to be Undertaken, added Project M—Whaler Property, Section 900- Real Property Acquisition and Disposition amended the Plan to include a description of properties to be acquired. Amended Redevelopment Prolect Map to include Project i , Amended Redevelopment Acquisition Map to the Plan to include the acquisition of Tax Lots 2900 and 3000 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA. 4 2006 05-17-90 Section 300-Description of Each Urban Redevelopment Project to be Undertaken, amended the Plan to acquire the following properties in Block 138, Project B:Tax Lots 7200 through 7900;and Tax Lots 82CO and 8201, Section 900—Real Property Acquisition and Dispositions amended the Plan to include a description of properties to be acquired in Block 136, Amended Redevelopment Acquisition Mars to the Plan to Include the acquisition of Tax Lots 7200 through 7000;and Tax Lots 8200 and 8201 of Block 138,Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD, 5 LAST E )RED1,VLLOPNILINr PLAN 1 . PLAN AMENDMENTS Amendment Ordinance Effective Purpose Number Dumber Date 5 2011 10-18.90 Section 500—Map and Legal Description, amended the East End Redevelopment Area boundary and legal description to include an area east of the west bank of the Willamette River, and southerly of existing marina area.Added 1.28 acres. Amended Redevelopment Project Map to include the boundary amendment for the marina, Amended Redevelopment Area Boundary Map,to include the boundary amendment for the marina, Amended Redevelopment Acquisition Map to include the boundary amendment for the marina, 6 2039 10-17-91 Section 1000-Amendments to the Plan, amended by deleting all existing provisions and inserting the newly required statutory provisions relating to amendments to the Plan, Section 1100—Tax Increment Financing, amended by deleting all existing provisions and Inserting the newly required statutory provisions relating to tax Increment financing. 7 R-92-13 06.06.92 Section 500—Map and Legal Description, amended the East End Redevelopment Area boundary and legal description to Include the existing cabanas west of Third Street.Added 1.499 acres, Amended Redevelopment Protect Map--to Include the boundary amendment for the cabanas, Amended Redevelopment Area Boundary Map—to include the boundary amendment for the cabanas. 8 2071 12-17-92 Section 300--Descriotloh of each Urban Redevelopment Project to be Undertaken, amended by adding the acquisition of Tax Lots 6600,6800,6900,6901,6902 and 6902E1 to pro ect K--Willamette Shore Trolley, 6 CAST t AMU HLMVLL()P.M'.ST 1'LAV PLAN AMENDMENTS wpi Amendment Ordinance Effective Purpose Number Number Date 8 2071 12-17-92 Amended Redevelopment Acquisition Map to show the acquisition of Tax Lots 6600,6900,6901, 6902 and 6902E1 of Tax Map T25 R1 E 03DD. 9 R-94-1 02-08-94 Amended Redevelopment Acquisition Map to show the acquisition of Tax Lot 1600 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DA, 10 2169 07-02-98 Amendment to the Plan—Measure 50 Requirements, "Option Selection" and Declaration of maximum indebtedness at$43,461,241 [Amendment 10 was effectively overturned by voter referendum 11 R-01-05 07-03-01 Section 300-Prolect B--Block 138, amended the Plan to include a public parking facility that provides parking for commercial development on Block 138 and also provides parking for the general public. 7 LAST UNU 1IC;Ut-11.011NO3N1'FLAN THE LAKE OSWEGO EAST END REDEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE INTRODUCTION This urban renewal plan update,hereinafter called"The Plan,"has been prepared by the Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency—The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Lake Oswego, pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 457, the Oregon Constitution and all applicable laws and ordinances. HISTORWBACKGROUND In 1979 a"Blue Ribbon"Committee recommended that the City Council create an Urban Renewal District that would be entitled to utilize the powers granted by Federal and State laws for Urban Renewal Activities. In the same year the City Council formed the Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency(LORA) and created a"district".The current district boundary is shown on pg.48.Tax increment financing was adopted as the principle method of implementing plan projects with the frozen tax base of the tax year 1987-88 used as the starting point to determine available tax Increment funding. In 1986 LORA approved its urban renewal plan (Redevelopment Plan and Report).The original plan listed the projects to be completed and addressed all other requirements of ORS Chapter 457.This plan update supercedes the original redevelopment plan. In addition to the 1986 Plan,conceived to comply with state law and to empower the agency to pursue specified projects, various steps were taken to insure that the"vision"was clear. In 1988 the agency adopted the Lake Oswego Urban Design Plan (a guidebook for the development of the East End), In 1995 LORA and the City Council adopted design guidelines for the redevelopment district,and in 1998 the guidelines were made regulatory by inclusion in the City's Development Code. Since the adoption of the original plan in 1986, LORA has implemented nearly all of the projects authorized by the original plan.The original projects and their status are listed herein; ARM 1'nbc � UASt00I D1At,011N4VN'rt1LAN s I N y t 4. „- ,F rl i4`.� 7� "» its eM • N..- ••`.-..,`�j,,// `Iw a i �+ _ Nn t ,�� � ,j.e, ,74:,+,,..+A��. a'�'��•MI' T `' t ;4e1� i ♦, �ryjy r +" ,�.7 .` �• +m 1 �Y.* r it. ,,� Y}„a .7 � �4 P • • °;` I e �', ,,F° �' ,r( ,�a" °•� Tf r,, �"' t= ,� r1M r� c�_ ,u;^k{ , ,4 1 W.52 ilm 11 +y y � y��•4�r ��,. ..A- j1: S� i...YY. �1 = 'R� •�M i J ''x " t7aa� a *, ;� + Jf;�` w tir • �Ifjg`f S ."� yb. R�yM1 �r 7 '�����'r, �. w .� '�(^, -tt ty •• � r �lil � I� ���+1'Ir��� ��1 '� ', a - �: �'���^� § It � b�•«L �� � 1 r 9 +Y .t k.N N 3.1 + t R.� 1 1 Nk M •�; ',s J x jrEl w4,t w , .' _ � ,�� +'r t,� �"M��',7�dri�iCiiY14Yr1�'��IYL� �N•�,x' ukt a � s ..,. 1 N•. .i y'.;tw.'LLr.lN.lif -,''1!�.uN tK -�„ is ax N.�tl N. J. AA���AA7AY ry/ �•~ t w.' l _ .P atu. � R "�1 0 a� � afl a , Project B-Block 138 This block is bounded by State Street,"A"Avenue, First Street and Union Pacific railroad tracks. Block 138 construction was completed in November of 2003,The project includes six commercial buildings and a four-level parking structure with approximately 360 parking spaces. The commercial buildings are privately owned.The project contains four two-story buildings, one single story building, and one three-story building.The ground floors are exclusively retail or restaurant uses,and the upper floors are predominantly office.The net leaseable space totals over 84,000 square feet. The project was initiated by the Agency through a process that included land acquisition, partial resale to a private developer, a binding development agreement,and public assistance to construct the parking structure. The parking structure remains in public ownership.The development agreement defines areas of private and public parking,and it requires the project developer to maintain the public parking structure.The Block 138 project required significant property acquisition and the subsequent relocation of tenants.Tax lots 7200 through 7900, 82C*),and 8201 of Block 138,Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD were acquired by the Redevelopment Agency. Relocation included moving the Main Fire Station to a new structure on Block 46.Tax Lots 8400 through 8800 of Block 46 were acquired for purposes of providing a new site for the Main Fire Station. City owned Tax Lots 500,8000,and a100 on Block 138 were transferred to the Agency upon completion of the Main Fire Station. [Resolution 01.05,Amendment 11 —07/03/01] [Ord. No. 1997,Amendment 2.02/02/90] [Ord. No.2006,Amendment 4.05/17/90] 1 1 1 , 10 tiASTL•tip ItC!UFiVCLl7p\1LY1't'LAN Pro!ect C-Bluff Area The property is generally located south of Evergreen, overlooking Lakewood Bay, and between Third and First Streets.As required by the Plan,visual access to Lakewood Bay has been assured through the acquisition of a large portion of the"Bluff area and by the construction of Millennium Plaza Park.Tax Lots 190 and 700 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA were acquired and retained in public ownership.Alternate vehicle access to the lower bluff area has been provided from a cul-de-sac constructed at the south end of Third Street, The State Street access has been discontinued for all but emergency vehicles. Redevelopment opportunities still exist between Third Street and Millennium Plaza Park. [Ord. No. 1997,Amendment 2-02/02/90] y•w. . I. 7.4 Ijpy. Millennium Plaza Park In Page I I 1-A5rr_ND kl.UlA U01INILN I PLAN Project b-Blocks 136 and 137 The two blocks south of"A", North of Evergreen, between First and Third Streets are a key area for redevelopment.As required by the Plan, the agency assisted with land assembly on Block 136 necessary to Initiate private development. Tau Lot 9100 of Block 136 was acquired and sold to the private developer. The development was completed in 2003, Block 136 now contains a 15,000 square foot commercial structure with retail and restaurant use on the ground floor and offices on the second floor.Additionally, 39 three- level townhomes have been completed, No redevelopment activity has yet occurred on Block 137. [Ord. No. 1997,Amendment 2-02/02/90 � w 1 n V Top:Oswego Village Town:.,)mes Bottom:Block 136 commercial building. I� FAST FND ItLI11A'1.U11,SItNl P"N Project E- Block 49 No new private development has occurred on Block 49, situated between A and B Avenues and State and First Street. However, First Street between A and E.Avenues has been reconstructed with a design Intended to delineate the north-south axis of the downtown's"compact shopping district."It signals the importance of the street and the public's commitment to downtown redevelopment. It also reduces up-front development cost for any future development on Block 49. Project F-Pinafore Property This property was acquired for visual access and for a boardwalk along Lakewood Bay. The fountain plaza portion of Millennium Plaza Park was constructed to provide visual access to Lakewood Bay. That project also excavated Lakewood Bay 60 feet further to the east to improve views. Preliminary design work has been completed for the boardwalk(the Headlee Walkway)to Third Street.The project Is included in the 2003-05 LORA budget, Project F Details(Plan Requirements); Tax Lots 3400 and 3500 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA were acquired and retained in public ownership for development of public boardwalk,and visual access to Lakewood Bay,The agency also acquired a portion of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way adjacent to the westerly right-of-way of State Street containing approximately 6,580 square feet and referred to as Parcel I, and a portion of Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way adjacent to Tax Lot 500 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA, containing approximately 4,755 square feet, and referred to as Parcel II,together with an easement on the south side of the railroad tracks extending from State Street to 3rd Street.These parcels were retained In public ownership for development of th,3 public boardwalk and visual access to Lakewood Bay. [Ord. No. 1997,Amendment 2-02/02/90] rl i l I Millennium Plaza Park fountain and lowor plaza. 13 hAS`r I;NL1 kI-INA H.WM1•141'PLAN 1.rr• •fNr .r f w0 z rf to • • • • - • •0• '• •t1111flif z G • M� M T� • • 1. � Vf rA: � MVI` w yj�'.1 b. A •r �1'� 1 " } �.+A � ~�xY1 iR'N. '-� »1 p CX,� � L '" r r Y-tJ+ � t •f ' 4 7 + er to u �:y�' 'T•'V " qiy rr':Yr tf��y �~-r:. 1 � 'S w�.l��,'� -�,t i { '�.. r' 1 •,,/ liHl It �a .,,rl ""1 f'�r'a.._s .�. - � x i1;� µit `'•� ���1 � fY 1 f� �,� .k l � r • `r: i4 "" �� S I Y C' q: �w r a f hf� '� •1 4 Y r4 ♦ `t ♦ � 4'w ry n 4 l �,i yt �.• 'v r Ak + wV f y ' • w 1 m f Ar,(�L�M .�. A 44,- r \ ��r •� ,41• / n r ,r i �. t 1Fy� �r ♦ � !k `V.n 1": i 1 ++R n R 4, + 4Ry NI 1. H a " � .R + !i "A•+ a""^��V I"-f ly. ! M + � ,•� _ ti *;� " rl�i `d!, 1•��,y-r+ �. ��yR{I tl x "k�� }R � ,r. Zi wd o d as �, �.Y 'Y�.yN' � W � R ry yy Y F •M y1 N a• 1 1� „'iJ IT �, i ,�+R�W f it"'J'1 � 4 �. A 1 F f i,n`p tr. " � _t +f A 94 y M �.. Y•: y�l - 5 R�:. i J + p f tam � � •,, � � + + .} ��y t + ' f � J 6"'r d Y, y,• a/= 1 ! u.Ry �_k r t r;��, , •awl '°+° !u-.� " �;� 5 ,nl d �YF " , r �+!„ yJ -\ ;!`:. + +o 1� 4 � a x r< �"c� '� v•'V i 'i � rs 1 1 f i[ Al' S •ot !�-.. �-.� 1. �� 1 �` .«� f 4 + CI f l w'R, '7 A ' Aa.tJ /♦ '.,� u..� R ' ,r a Y! ,,'A 1j ,'f1• p'" y i1V, .� . d n 1TN�•a a _ �G r� /:. r- r .pN a '.-. a 1,•3 { f .r •/ -�"'a 1 y N. 1 Y.IY 't k i y .y 1 I`�L� •�' � I,..�. • k�y�,, � fir �A a +Y 1 '•Ir l , {• t �.,:,y•• �11 N 1��� +�I t+N I�Y • Y 1 y" •!.'. 11 •�1 H1� •� t �'' �f 4: ,�1 .•J �ihf I wl ^'�y'�, "Y Y r'11t: i�` `. 4 Ft 9 { •M 1 - 1 I N ~I- r � � 1� �.?1 wn�c41 r ,1 {. .�'�'Y J �t ' 1 r• II. �' 1 ��1 '.y " '� �, -�i�.• C K�1s,� � 1.,+ r�j,• ,+rt,1. ,.t. t'n, 1 ':��r f Yb•'3 r"'' I-r tN '01� •1 r ;.%1 .�.ti 'P � � ". .1 ! -.1 'Y�.,�• ''1,1 9 i t a 1 1 1 k I. U 1 t ,1i t � a'•1 ( � A, 'r f .1 y 1 Y 1 •.!' � a' - Ir N: '4 'Y r. A.. 5. Third Street A cul-de-sac Improved circulation and access, and added new landscaping. Aft 6. First Street Phase This project, between A and B Avenues,involved street reconstruction, and added brick pavers, granite wheel pads, planted pots, bike racks,street trees,tree guards, basalt walls, and a street clock. a. y Y 7, First Street Phase ii This phase,between A Avenue and 1=vergreen, is similar in scope to phase I and was completed In October 2003. 17 LASTUN UA)Lv11011NIL P ILAN •� � ti• � r '�t k,•Y-y - �t h•' ♦ 1;"�WIrA�4A �+�I ORS'r, f t �, fl�C�1 E� 14, d �1 r �� �, '• vl � N �t.,t ,' Y _. c t fy['; rt�� yy • �t � "6f t �-.' _ • 4•,, U :�'. 'pc r a 7 t -y �I.•" A � ^.S a rM � +!q '* "'. ?W �tA dry•••.i,}t�ry. 'l�t M�° Y r .� �',�,' t�� �f_ � � ., 'il }.,µt ; '' J '� �t� �.�i�� �! J. N t..�J.l' '� y a.r♦.1 r r" �R s+: !a N• - --ri.�r+�Md ~ � C _ r 9 : i� y a a♦•'yam,A .l't '• 1 Y Y y. ♦f 'iC 1,' L� �. t�•rTl�('.. :4. ry � r + •1�R •y f rL .a N�I�' t�• � � f Ir f •� �;�+ i '.J � ' � `A ,�o� �•ik't' r a:1� + �` A' ;t• ',r�.t ; r f; J �r. r4 rt`. 4 1 1 A Y '4. � •• '� ?�'t Jy d f.. {i 1 •r�r,v !/ H i f.a 01 it, .. � ql �.�cWi.^r' aMy^, '+>. /" N •' J�5? ,. u . t '1 r f •v.. f f rAY 'rn , 4w. .:d� f j ,^ .♦+, a„'"r 1 r# 4 1' Ld 4ir a n• , ,.r / a i Project H-Infrastructure Improvements Numerous infrastructure Improvements have occurred within the district in conjunction with redevelopment projects.Work in every category anticipated by the plan has been completed except for the Lakefront Center boardwalk. Project 1-Boardwalk The boardwalk along the east side of Lakewood Bay from the lower plaza area of Millennium Plaza Park,to the Intersection of North Shore and State Street, has been master planned(Lakefront Master Plan, April 2003),but is not currently budgeted for construction.A key property necessary to construct the boardwalk,the US Bank(specified in Project M),was acquired In 2002, (See concept plan, pg, 30) Project J -Marina This project was to Include public participation In the development of a marina and other Improvements on the west bank of the Willamette River, in conjunction with the Oswego Pointe project.A marina was not initially pursued due to navigation concerns and an agreement with the James River Corporation, However, a water sports center and an amphitheater with an excursion boat dock were constructed along the shore(shown below).These public facilities are well used. Separately,the city Is pursuing the construction of a public dock(transient boat facility) Immediately to the north on property being purchased from the City of Portland (the chip plent site).This facility is expected to be in place In 2004. [Ord. No.1979,Amendment 1 -03/20/89] 1) MS1 LNDRLUL'V110PNILNTPLAN w .1' i �„ a.,...w�.t.,-�� ^•sa»J. .c ..° .Yk�;' r b .•r "w ,A * .mil " a A nah i„i I tr. F t 1� 'ri ���k.^j �i w.;y tii�f„ i° +W;� J ys. s + -� •,,Jr C� • � r''„' • ••11 ••11 •'1 .• I A� • e• '� T ky i. l: • • • 1 . 1 1 2• r.. '+ r q',•.{ y �`;"1 :`' V sy � :. � y'.-' • • ", " w ".�.Aµs :4�tyyi y,1 '� k, � '•'A. ,t ��� t Y' { f t' r ,ip.. .`y � t ;;y. a + is 4 °^.y d sl�, + �," a 2 v Ay M } fix. xaJ + ,s !� ,+ .n; l"t t,.,y'�w. M •.w+ 4 � + ;». +1.,*�`i 1H wv1� a1��' i ., `+ u r A'.w y • t .1 !4.�' t �y ! •.J •n t t�" 4..tt + •o": y �e, '+ � 4 r�' .f 9,'�ti t J,+° n'•d f'q r v , ii -." d i y.-• 4 " " ! n " y •d .f 'h �; i !� "Y +,' } fegs •���y�'1{ •.. y�yJ i rt ." � " A + -.�; l T Y f�. � r+ °�Nr1 ',y/} Mrjk .! ,r: r+• I L..yq err " ,»r •� � � aw 7 c Ca r-+1G, "l.•��, W 'tnC^�•gW! � did'"• t ML4 �+,. .47 t 6e' 1 qu,te i/1,I1137 + ,._r t i 1+ i i ,� �{ r:,1. y n i •'�i y c ,+l'r 1'-.t� F ,i+ ° i, t Si + �w � y • r r. A r '. i.. r -i�. p 1'� • i , 't 1 rc R t.k b y .+ 54..'.4 tA.'* tr'.' . .... .... . A f3 1z' 'rf fill AA'(8t) 4 .4 SECTION 100-VISION STATEMENT The redevelopment of the Fast End commercial area of lake Oswego should meet the needs and desires of the entire city. Redevelopment should create pride in the area, enhance shopping services, utilize the unique physical characteristics of the area, and improve the tax base of the entire city. Redevelopment should result in a feeling of vitality so that the area becomes an exciting place that attracts the public during both the day and the evening.The area should be made colorful by utilizing landscaping and trees. People will be drawn to the area by a combination of uses, including office, residential and retail,which take advantage of the amenities of the area. Transporting people to and from the area;creating pleasant pedestrian facilities, providing adequate parking,and creating activities that will attract the public, are necessary components to redevelopment. To prepare and implement a redevelopment plan requires advocacy and commitment from both the public and private sectors. Citizens will need to understand what benefits will be received from spending public funds.The public acquisition of parcels of land may be required in some instances.The Plan should take advantage of natural resources unique to the East End, i.e.,visual access to the lake, visual access and use of the river, and visual access to Mt. Wood, SECTION 200 - FINANCING It Is intended that the private sector will provide the majority of the redevelopment funding by selectively investing over a period of time.The Redevelopment Agency must commit public funding,together with incentives Identified in the Plan components to; 1)construct necessary infrastructure improvements; 2)attract private investment;3) provide amenities;and 4) upgrade existing commercial areas by providing facade grants for existing businesses that wish to further the objectives of the"Urban Design Plan"by making substantial exterior Improvements to a property. A variety of public financing approaches may include tax Increment financing, Community Development Block Grants, Economic Development funds from state lottery proceeds, sale of property, local Improvement districts, and a variety of bonds. AINk 23 LAY evu RLDI vri.uuniWr PLAn SECTION 300—UPDATED PROJECT LIST The projects outlined below are new projects Identified for this Redevelopment Plan Update; IMMINENT PROJECTS Project A Headlee Walkway A walkway/boardwalk shall be constructed from Third Street to the Millennium Plaza Park fountain along the northern edge of Lakewood Bay, The walkway is planned as an important quality of life element for Lake Oswego residents desiring visual access to the lake and a safe pedestrian route along its edge, It is intended to make current use of the lake edge safer, more aesthetic, and easier to manage, Project B Millennium Plaza Park Phases III and IV Phase I II will construct a ramp or elevator to provide ADA accessibility to the lower plaza level from the bluff area,This will increase the connectivity between the main part of Millennium Plaza Park and Block 138 to commercial areas on State Street. Phase IV will enhance the visual amenities of Lakewood Bay by adding landscaping,constructing a viewing platform to the edge of the bluff,and completing installation of a geyser in Lakewood Bay. PRIORITY INFRASTRUCTURE Project C Street Improvements on Second,Third and Fourth Streets The p,oject is to provide pedestrian amenities, parking bays and circulation improvements on the streets between A and B Avenues, These amenities and improvements may include special paving, landscaping and street trees, lighting, benches, bollards,traffic and pedestrian signals,curb extensions, planted medians and other similar features, Improvements may also Include the undergrounding of utilities In the alleys on Blocks 46,47,and 4.8.These improvements shall be conceived to encourage and support new development by improving pedestrian and vehicle circulation, parking, improving the aesthetic character of the street,and providing for opportunities for social Interaction, outdoor dining and community events,These improvements may be developed as discrete projects as funding becomes available, or when concurrent private development opportunities occur, ol Aim- PWIJ it t C.a^•dhWJ Nw e w. + _ 24 CAS r L•ND klillC4 LLOPSH-N'r ICI AN 1�p q� d -M �C yJ YJa' •1 a�t..�jl• -'^.4 �.i� °j.to k.,'h','!f. �. 'i• u N t •y •, �qp LN' � � I, C ' \ r ° I ,u ir•�•.�f ao,wiii• �,-.: 1+n-1 s J ^L�..- 't,rw ;r..�,:..a?„•ca. r ,,,� r' 'C' �.�7'�'" `�'f n 1, �'L:,{ ya. �;�a `•y',�,'� ao r � �te �� ' , e t :'* uil�S lV �ar yl .lr"'a�4 a. „tea f"'� +Kwt'�• at ( } le ,L •-t'' t. _.' p �r �t t�4Vye'"+rral•,rr. .�., � .q-< .�,} j. � °•F N Oil' •[ r.'Mt r ' q a " [(r) , '+, a �(py( r`'' h'.�.' 1 at � �r 4�• Y 1 1' „ ry j µN 'pl S�` .' ° � ��'� =YH �A �J, a f< ° ^1• i 9 + ryN �! kL Y �'• '1 r Al `'�� as pV '..,.'�r f�, �Y'jj •S: ' 7 'Ac �� ,1 Y.,i�'tY �1' fu r sty_•,p" �n 1 �•A IN IF -121PAIU,Rik XHL n: ,dYaliMNl.:: 1 �� [ .,tr ' t5" +., �ti!"'G�3 • p _ t' ir•�[,t. • r /kr+" t,�°�� '.1•�s 1+ "� � �r' t � ,': 14 y y ,r._.a.Y o _� w•r. wV, roT� F _ 7Jlla�i fi .7 A �• M ■ , �`° .,v �JlEltftllflll/111111!ltlIHIP� "� ��.►r'.Je 1:° a " a ,r •� �4 J� +���faoz�"�=+�e`•"LL7T��--ii/ �1.��JI� � J ai r*ttii•r•�w+•'•irrn��W�wl6� i a. l �n ' � pf,. rat •',h + • p i.: 'P Sr. yy Y . " M1 .p., a\ s �i � � �-,� r'X1{j Gl'� 4Y xu r &` - r..�'.. % 1 '.t l� 1 1 �`f �,"l 1' ! a q• 4 p4` r. �Y:-1 S 1°,1 'S i r..i"�'. Y :�Y �4 'p� � '4`�Y t ,y, • w x U u'��y V 1 a .� 1 ' '."11l f :.h p�vQ, 1. a � , ":xl - r.,'_'y '. 4 .''_ 'p .,' [ ._a p .• v•{ 5't I�n i �.' , i, 1 e h..j, K . Pr. '1, e,� Project B B Avenue—Village Anchor Street B Avenue is a"Village Anchor Street." (Off-street bicycle path/pathway location to be determined if necessary.) Final design for this project will require an analysis addressing; A, Roadway capacity, B. Service levels at intersections. C. Signalization,turn lanes and driveway locations, D. Undergrounding of utilities on B Avenue and in the alley on Block 49. E. Multi-modal use. F, Costs/Phasing. Fiz14cY i v NUMANUM h £.�AsrMsh'rWhS� YWffHelvtNa Ndh7'/itM'o, ""'W C wxGA4�AIn'G•A7"�l�s�ld'tHs 2 N Project F A Avenue Extension Pedestrian-friendly enhancements from 0 Street to 6►h Street within the right-of-way on A Avenue would be coordinated with adjacent redevelopment of Block 45, Possible sidewalk extensions at the corners will serve to reduce the walking distance across the street, and possible special paving at crosswalks will assist In Improving the visual and psychological connection between the two sides of the street. P !! tip CO M I CAST t?Nb an►>P.VP.L(J NW r r►.AN HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS Project G Hotel Aft, The Agency shall take steps to develop a new, high quality boutique style hotel within the District. The hotel is expected to be within a range of 30 to 70-units. Properties which provide lake, river, or mountain views and which are located within 400 of restaurants,transit,and retail shopping or other significant amenities will have substantial preference for siting, The 11 project may include land assembly, relocation and infrastructure improvements. I Z_ .11 14 27 8AST 13-Nd 1WL%V110PMW,4`r MAN 'A I Project H Block 137 Mixed Use Development The parcel between A Avenue and Evergreen, First and Second Streets(Block 137)should be redeveloped to enhance the"compact shopping district' extending one block in all directions from the intersection of First Street and A Avenue, The preferred project shall be mixed-use with retail fronting on First Street, Along with the retail frontage on First Street the site could be developed with a public library overlooking Millennium Plaza Park, a 30 to 70- unit hotel or housing. The mix of uses will need to provide sufficient on-site parking to satisfy the demand for all proposed uses. New or remodeled structures shall be designed to compliment structures located on Block 138, Millennium Plaza Park(south)and the townhouses on Block 136 (west), l' r Project I Block 45 Mixed-Use Development Block 45, between A and B Avenues and Fourth and Fifth Streets should be redeveloped with a mix of uses, The project could be coordinated with Project F, Fourth Street improvements, Potentially acquire tax lot 7900 of Tax Mao T2S R1 E 03DC. II ' x• VASt'LND ItLt1MLOMILN I PLAN Project J Evergreen Housing Redevelopment S;2e Existing housing sites east of Third Street and south etf Evergreen Avenue should be AM redeveloped. Higher density multi-family housing is the preferred use. Potentially acquire tax lots 100 and 300 of Tax Map US R1 E 10AA. Project K Civic Center Future development on Block 135 should consider the changing needs for public services together with the changing mixed-use nature of downtown. Private/public partnership proposals that incorporate ground floor retail, restaurant or service uses, provide separate police and court functions, improve the City's emergency dispatch capabilities, provide adequate public parking,and allow for increased public participation in civic functions should be considered, The design and character of any project should address the space and use needs for city offices and should also demonstrate that the city is an active participant in the redevelopment and revitalization of the downtown. Additional property acquired for civic center use could be used for structure expansion, parking,and landscaping. Project L Willamette Steps This project would enhance the pedestrian crossing of State Street at B Avenue, providing a gracious stairway entry(as well as bicycle and ADA-accessible elements) linking the Foothills District and Willamette River waterfront with the East End downtown compact retail core. Development would include a mixed-use building and possibly a multi-modal transit center, Land adjacent to State Street right-of-way Is owned by the City of Lake Oswego; east of that is railroad right-of-way, which would require an easement allowing pedestrian passage, WIT OA9rA AM" CdIpS F a" jam" Mir Nath VTN 29 LAST LND kLDLVLL0I'A1L'NV'LAN 1 . 1 Project M Oswego Lakefront The Agency has acquired the US Bank property bordered by Lakewood Bay(west), State Street(east),the Lakeshore Motel (north)and the Lake Twin Cinema(south). The phased master plan should be implemented to create additional park development, increasing the public's awareness of the lake and to finalize plans to put the"Lake" back in Lake Oswego. Completing the master plan will require additional property acquisition and relocation of tenants,Acquisition of tax lots 3100,3200,3200A1, and 3300 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA are necessary to complete the master plan.Extending the boardwalk called for in the master plan could potentially affect tax lots 190,2600, 2700,2800, and 5300 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA, resulting in additional property acquisitions, Y I1�11 i Project N First Street North Anchor The block comprising the northeast and northwest corner sites at 1st Street and B Avenue should be considered a key site for redevelopment as an anchor for the 18t Street compact retail core, Potential acquisition of tax lots 400,500,and 1200 of Tax Map T2S R1 S 03DD and resale to a developer, 10 LAS1'LNU it♦I)laVhLUt'\ILN'I'i'LAN 1 Project 0 First Street Retail Revitalization—Blocks 48 and 49 The project will encourage continuous retail uses of the ground floor on the east and west sides of 1"Street in the block between A Avenue and B Avenue,and extending east on Block 49 to State Street at B Avenue.Sites could be redeveloped as opportunities arise;with potential acquisitions of property and resale to developers as appropriate.Tax lots 4000,4400 through 5400, and 5500 through 6500 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD are possible acquisitions. Project P State Street Mixed Use Development This project would encourage redevelopment of parcels on the west side of State Street between B Avenue and C Avenue. Development should be encouraged to include a parking structure to be used as a parking reservoir for the compact retail core and a possible transit center. Development of the parking structure may be public or a shared public/private project. Potential acquisition of tax lots 100, 200, 300, and 30OA1 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD and resale to developers as appropriate. N C rY� dftyl J Project Q State Street Pedestrian/Bikeway improvements Improvements within the right-of-way on State Street between B Avenue and Ladd Street to the south (urban renewal boundary)would create a"Park Avenue"pedestrian-and bike- friendly street. This"next step"for State Street should consider increased setbacks, restriping, or right-of-way acquisition, to allow separate bicycle lanes and enhanced separation of pedestrians from the noise and activity of street traffic, AWk :t I L 15 I'll-ND kLt LVLLOKWNT PLAN Project R East of State Street Mixed Use Development The project is a mixed-use development east of State Street, in the area between A and B Avenues,and possibly Including the area between A Avenue and the Foothills Road intersection.The project should be incorporated into and coordinated with Project B- Willamette Steps, adjacent to north. The possibility of incorporating a transit center use Into project should be encouraged. Potential acquisition of property and resale to developers as appropriate of tax lots 6800 and 6902 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD•Acquisition of tax lot 7000 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD and tax lot 400 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 11 BB may also prove necessary if a transit center use Is incorporated. ru�s}'�,asz�nnv rotes r>� caorin�- y K"Wm Sim , 1 rw+Nrn�) D' �l� i ft Section view of potential development east of state street. Project S North Entry Mixed Use Development This project would Involve redevelopment of parcels on the west side of State Street between C Avenue and E Avenue, and encourage limited retail uses on the ground floor with office or housing uses the primary feature.The possibility of Incorporating a transit center use into the project exists, Potential acquisition of tax lots 1801, 9800, 9800A2, 9900, 10000, 10100, and 10101 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DA, and resale to developers as appropriate, Project T Second and B Mixed Use Development This site has been acquired by the City and will be sold to a private developer with a development agreement controlling redevelopment, Redevelopment Agency participation may be necessary to Insure architectural compatibility with the developing district, Structure and site features that enhance the public's view or use of the site will have a priority for assistance, Project U Block 46-Third and A This project would redevelop the lot on the southeast corner of Block 46,bordering Third Street and A Avenue,The project would encourage retail uses on the ground floor with office or housing above, and provide additional pedestrlan-oriented activities and an Improved pedestrlan envlronment on A Avenue and Third Street, Potential acquisition of tax lot 9000 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DC and resale to a developer as appropriate, 32 LASS UM1 kt-I)I?V'IaI.IN'hINT H AN i SECTION 400-OUTLINE FOR ACTION IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA The actions,which will be undertaken on behalf of the City of Lake Oswego by the Lake f Oswego Redevelopment Agency in order to achieve the goals and objectives of this Plan Update, will be consistent with all applicable laws and regulations, The types of actions to be undertaken by the Agency in execution of this Plan Update are those actions permissible under Oregon Revised Statutes(ORS), Chapter 457. t A. Development/Redevelopment All land within the Redevelopment Area will be developed or redeveloped in accordance with the land use provisions and building requirements specified in this Plan on page 40. j. B. Improvements Public facilities and utilities may be Improved or constructed within public rights-of-way, easements or on public property,These may include storm and sanitary sewer improvements,water system improvements,street lighting installation, landscaping, street improvements,pedestrian walkways, parking facilities,cultural and civic facilities, I' parks, open space development, bicycle paths, public rest rooms and other related uses. a The private utilities concerned will be encouraged to make such modifications and adjustments as may be required to adequately serve development and meet the AMh objectives of this Plan, In accordance with City Code, overhead utility facilities and lines ` 40 shall be relocated or placed underground where feasible. i R The above activities will be undertaken with the cooperation and assistance of the City I r of Lake Oswego, ; C. Land Acquisition The land acquisition activities of the Redevelopment Agency are described on pages 42-44 of this Plan, D. Property Management-Including Demolition and Removal of Structures and Clearance ilfl During such time as property In the Redevelopment Area may be owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management and control of the Agency.The s:'t Agency may rent,maintain,manage, operate,demolish and remove structures, and clear such property pending its disposition for redevelopment, Il 11 E. Rehabilitation and Conservation I ' All structures within the Redevelopment Area not otherwise designated in the Plan are ` subject to the requirements of City codes and ordinances governing the use or i maintenance of structures, Rehabilitation and conservation of existing structures may be carried out by owner and/or tenant activity;the enforcement of City codes and ordinances;acquisition by the Agency for rehabilitation, resale, or lease for y rehabilitation;or by any other means in accord with the provisions of this Plan, r: 33 I. LAST(iNU RLIiLv11011NILN'r PLAN I'. i SECTION 500- MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Lake Oswego East End Redevelopment Plan Area Includes all land in the City of Lake Oswego,County of Clackamas, State of Oregon, situated within the boundaries designated on the attached Redevelopment Area Boundary Map, Exhibit 2, more particularly described as follows; A tract of land in Sections 2,3, 10, and 11,T2S, R1 E,WM,Clackamas County, Oregon, whose boundary is defined as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 50, Extension of Oregon Iron&Steel Co. First Addition to Oswego;thence southerly along the eastern line of Block 50's alley 430 ft, to the canter line of"C"Avenue; thence westerly along the center line of"C"Ave, 1610 ft,to the center line,of the extension of the alley of Block 35, First Addition to Town of Oswego;thence southerly along the center lines of alleys in Blocks 35 and 44 790 it.to the easterly extension of the north line of Lot 10 of said Block 44; thence westerly along said north line and Its extensions 160 ft,to the center line of 61h Street;thence southerly along said center line 150 ft,to the center line of"A"Ave.;thence westerly along said center line 160 ft,to the northerly extension of the center line of the alley of Block 132, Extension of Oregon Iron&Steel Co. Addition to Oswego;thence southerly along said alley's center line and its extension 155 ft,to the intersection with the extension of the south line of Lot 13, Block 132:thence easterly along said south line and its extensions 160 ft,to the center line of 6th St,;thence southerly along the 6th St,center line 50 ft, to the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 22, Blk t33; thence easterly along said south line and Its extensions 160 ft,to the center line of the alley of Bilk, 133;thence northerly along said alley center line 50 ft,to the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 13, Blk, 133;thence easterly along said south line and Its extensions and along the south lines and extensions of Lots 13 and 20 of Block 134 480 it, to the center line of 4th St,; thence southerly 335 ft,to the center line of Evergreen Rd,;thence southeasterly along said center line 290 ft, to the west line of 3rd.St.;thence S19°43'55"E along the southern extension of the west right-of-way line of Third Street 54,51 ft,; thence S74017152"W, 55,43 ft,;thence S15'42'08"E,40,00 ft,,thence 574117'52"W, 13.81 ft,;thence S15142'08"E, 30.00 ft,to the south right-of-way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad;thence westerly along said south right-of-way line,241,00 ft,to the northwest corner of the Lake Oswego Cabanas tract as recorded In Book 497, Page 661;thence S74117'52"W, 16.65 ft,;thence on an arc to the right along said south right-of-way line, chord bears S74°37'26"W, 131,60 ft,to the northeast corner of that certain tract of land conveyed as Snug Harbor Easement recorded in Book 450, Page 310;thence S8117'08"E, 108,64 ft,;thence N75031'45''E, 107,89 ft,thence S85054'15"E,35,73 ft,;thence N8'17'08"W,37,42 ft,to a point in Lakewood Bay; thence S881'09'07"E, 175,67 ft,to a point In Lakewood Bay; thence NBO'24'52"E, 72,65 ft, to a point In Lakewood Bay; thence N40128'52"E, 151,67 ft,to a point on the easterly line of the Bay Vista, Inc,,tract rArorded in Book 440, page 539; thence along said easterly line NI6028'45"W,60,59 ft, to a point on the south right-of-Way line of the Southern Paoific Railroad;thence along said south right-of-way S741117'52"W,4.67 ft,;thence N191 49'02"W, 70,18 ft,to a stone;thence approx. S3111E approx, 195 9.to a point In Lakewood Bay which is S74012'W 502 ft,from the true point of beginning of Tract 39 In Book 578 page 359 of Clackamas Co, Deed Records;thence N74'112'E 652 A, along the boundary of said Tract 39; thence 881143'30"VV 427 ft, along the boundary of said Tract 99;thence southerly approx, 25 ft, to the northwesterly extension of the southwesterly line of Lot 89, Lakewood Plat No, 1, thence S43153'30"E approx,220 ft,along the southwestern boundary(and its extensions)of Lot 89 to the center line of State Si,(State Highway 43);thence S81147'W approx, 1170 ft, 14 LAST 8'40 1181%V111,011SWINTPLAN 1 1 along said center line to the westerly extension of the center line of 48 it,wide Ladd St.; thence S82144'E 129,52 ft, along said Ladd center line to the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 7, Block 2, Plat of Oswego; thence N7116'E along said east line and its extensions 270 ft,to the center line of Wilbur St„thence S82044'E along said center line 150 ft,to the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 4, Block 3,Oswego;thence N7116'E along said east line and its extensions 138 ft,to the center line of the vacated alley of Block 3;thence S82044'E along said center line 50 ft.to the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 14, Block 3;thence N71 16'E along said east line and its extensions and along the east lines of Lots 3 and 12 in Block 6 for 358 ft,to the south line of View Court;thence westerly along the south line of View Court 25 ft,;thence N7016'E along a line which is 25 ft,westerly from and parallel to the east line of Lot 17, Block 6 for 185,18 ft,to the center line of Leonard St„thence S82044'E 155 ft.to the center line of Durham St.;thence N7°16'E 133 ft,4o the westerly extension of the center line for the alley in Block 8;thence S82'44'E along said center line 330 ft,to the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 14;thence N7016'E along said extension and line 133 ft,to the line in vacated Kirkham St,which is 25 ft, northerly from and parallel to the north platted boundary of Block 8;thence S82°44'E 50 ft,to the easterly boundary of Lot 14, Block 8,thence southerly along said boundary 25 ft.;thence S82°44'E 25 ft.;thence S7016'W 15%;thence S26"40'E 98.7 ft,;thence 28132'E 96,40 ft,;thence S25009'E 305A 0 ft,;thence S80°02'55"E 190,07 ft,to the eastern boundary of that tract described in 111-145 of Clackamas Co. Deed Records;thence N23116'E 309.64 ft along the eastern boundary of said tract;thence S63103'04"E 215,03 ft,;thence N26156'56"E 1,138.53 ft.,, thence N12045'13"E,296.31 ft,;thence N52041'W 280 ft, M/L to the most southerly corner of that tract deeded to Flora Logging Co, in 219-584 Clackamas Co, Deed Records;thence N520 41'W 114180 ft, more or less, tracing the said Flora Logging Cv, line to an Iron pipe;thence N17010'W 79.61 ft, as per PS 6911,Clackamas Co, Surveyor's Office; thence S43120"W 109.04 ft, as described in Book 620 page 715 Clackamas Co. Deed Records; thence S560 21'W 95,98 ft,;thence S661 17'E 178.72 ft.to a RR spike(as per said PS 6911); thence N340 49'E 96,20 ft.along the westerly line of that certain tract of land recorded in Book 391 page 32 Deed Records to an Iron pipe;thence N250 05'E 104.56 ft,to an Iron pipe;thence N11155'E 102,22 ft,to an Iron pipe; thence N5032'E 400 ft.to an iron pipe;thence N84128'W 20,00 ft,to an iron pipe in the southerly boundary line of a 40.00 ft, road (deed);thence N51°00'W along said boundary 23:57 ft,to an Iron pipe;thence S5°32'W 209100 ft,to an Iron pipe as called for In the tract described in 462-186 Deed Records; thence N72030'W 300.00 ft, along the boundary of said tract to an Iron pipe; thence N84128'W 50 ft,to the western line of a 50 ft, road; thence southerly along said line 122 ft. M/L to the northeastern corner of that said tract described in 534.439 Deed Records;thence S800 27'W 554,68 ft,to the northwest corner of said tract,said corner being on the eastern boundary of that tract described in 599-102 Deed Records; thence NI1°36'30"W along said eastern boundary for 200 ft, M/L to a point of tangency with a curve to the right having a radius of 1252A3 ft.;thence northerly on said curve 206,32 ft,;thence N2010'30"W 579 ft. M/L to the easterly R/W of the Railroad;thence northerly along said easterly R/W until a point perpendicular to State Highway 43(Pacific Highway) Engineer's Station 303+45 is reached; thence northwesterly to an Iron pipe In the westerly R/W of Pacific Highway as conveyed to Clackamas County, said pipe being N5°03'W 78.37 ft; thence N68°36'501 42,62 ft,from the true point of Beginning of Exhibit"A"of Deed Records 82-18802, Clackamas County, said pipe being at approx. Engineer's Station 303+45; thence S88136'60"W 42.62 ft,; thence N44"06'W 100.00 It. more or less along the north line of Parcel 1 as described In Clackamas County Deed Records 92.06387 to tine most northerly corner of said Parcel 1;thence 9291125'W 112.80 it,to the northeasterly right=of-way of E Avenue;thence 8901 VE 84.00 ft,along said northeasterly right-of-way to a point of curve; 3,5 EAYVENDRL1*VtiL0r1JS* TICIAN t thence along a 22.00 ft, radius curve to the left 17,64 ft,;thence southwesterly to a point on the southwestern R/W line of"E"Ave,, said point being referred to in the Exception of 84- 28522 of Clackamas Co, Deed Records as being S8145'W 40.00 ft.;thence S81015'E 80.17 ft.;thence N22°7'E 90,11 ft,from the southeast corner of Lot 8, Block 51, Extension of Oregon Iron&Steel 0o,'s First Addition;thence S2207'W 90,11 ft.;thence N81015'W 80.17 ft.to the easterly line of Block 51 as per said 84.28522;thence N81° 15'W 100.00 ft,;thence S8145"W 160.00 ft. to"D"Ave,; thence southwesterly approx, 60 Q, to the point of beginning. [Ord.No. 1979,Amendment't -03/20/89)[LORA Resolution 92.13,Amendment 7- 08/06/921[Ord.No.2011, Amendment 5-10/18/90][LORA Resolution 94-1, Amendment 9.02/08/94] 36 1i,45'r IsNU►tlilaF.VP:Lt 1P�d CA"I'tyLAN SECTION 600- RELATIONSHIP TO LOCAL LAND USE OBJECTIVES A. Relationship to Local Objectives for the Redevelopment Area Through a process involving citizen participation, an evaluation of the physical characteristics of the area and discussion by LORA,the following are objectives that have been developed for the Redevelopment Area.These objectives are reflected In the projects included In the Plan. The City's zoning and development codes have been updated to implement the original redevelopment plan,Ongoing changes may be necessary to provide more flexibility to meet landscaping requirements and to encourage quality development consistent with the downtown's design standards. Ongoing changes should encourage mixed-use development and housing consistent with the projects of the Plan. Area—Wide Obiectiyes 1. To continue the well-established process of involving a broad cross section of the community, particularly those persons or groups affected by the Plan in the Implementation and future evolution of the Plan. Z To plan for and control development within the entire Redevelopment Area,while focusing public redevelopment action within several target areas. 3. To create substantial change within the East End Business District area to stimulate further private initiative. 4. To use public assembly of land including, as necessary, condemnation to implement qF the Redevelopment Plan, 5, To provide for a sensitive relocation program to assist residents and businesses that may be displaced in the redevelopment process. 6. To develop the project areas in a manner which contributes to the efficiency and quality of uses and the livability and economic well being of the community. 7. To use development techniques that encourage energy efficiency. 8. To meet ADA accessibility requirements for handicapped persons at public buildings, facilities and street crossings, 9. To relocate aboveground utilities underground throughout the Redevelopment District wherever feasible. 10.To encourage the Inclusion of public areas within developments to create an environment and atmosphere that will attract people to the area, 11.To make necessary public Improvements to the infrastructure In the East End Redevelopment Area, 12.To consolidate parking,where possible,to reduce the number of very small parking lots, Consolidation of parking may Include development of public or shared-use parking garages, 13.To provide for a mix of uses and intensification of the land utilization within the Redevelopment Area that will help assure the economic viability of new development :t7 LAST LND RL1tJVhL011MUMr PLAN and contribute to the restoration of the economic viability of the entire area, as well as to create a 24-hour downtown with a high level of activity and vitality. 14.To encourage intensified residential density and provide high quality housing, including Adk "affordable"housing, in the East End Redevelopment Area. vp 15,To establish a better overall visual quality for the Redevelopment Area,and create a stronger pedestrian shopping environment by providing improved street landscaping and well-defined and protected pedestrian linkages, 16,To provide for the sensitive linking together of the East End Redevelopment Area with the adjacent single-family neighborhoods,and to provide safe and effective links between downtown and the Foothills District, 17,To encourage the development of additional parking for shared uses, including parking for transit users. 18.To maintain view corridors of Mt, Hood down A and B Avenues. 19.To provide for pedestrian and street amenities throughout the Plan Area. 20.To provide pedestrian linkages and sidewalks throughout the area and create pleasant pedestrian connections across Highway 43,to river and lakefronts,to parks,and within the East End itself, 21,To plan for the eventual inclusion of the Foothills District within the Redevelopment District, and to develop existing project areas in a manner that does not preclude expansion into the Foothills District. Specific Area Objectives 1, To provide for public access to and views of the Willamette River and other natural features including Lakewood Bay and Tryon Creek,and to maximize public views of Mt, Hood, 2. To use public street improvements in the right-of-way on B Avenue between State Street and westward to between 5th and 61h Streets as an incentive to attract new anchor development, 3. To use public action on city-owned property on the east side of State Street between A and a Avenues to encourage the redevelopment of and access Into the Foothills District, 4. To provide new Class"A"office space in the East End, 5, To consider arts and cultural facilities,visitor and tourist attractions,and civic buildings as possible themes or elements in downtown, 6, To preserve desired aspects of existing character,spirit and unique qualities of downtown. 7. To provide transit options to,from, and within downtown, and transit orientation to development, 8, To provide a boardwalk along the east side of Lakewood Ray from the railroad tracks to North Shore Road, 9. To provide a boardwalk along the north side of Lakewood Bay from approximately 3" Street to the lower plaza at Millennium plaza Park, 3t# 11AST 1,NU IttMUSLOP riN`r PLAN 10.To address concerns about Highway 43 traffic volumes and circulation patterns, especially at the A Avenue intersection. i I.To reduce the perceived barrier caused by State Street between downtown and the Foothills District by improving pedestrian access and creating a secondary entrance to the Foothills District. B. Relationship to Other Local Objectives Local objectives regarding land use,transportation, utilities, recreational and community facilities, and other public improvements are determined by review of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The economic development section of the Comprehensive Plan clearly directs the City shall provide for economic development opportunities that enhance the prosperity and livability of the community. The East End Redevelopment Plan was developed in the late 1980s as a joint venture between the City, private business interests, and the Chamber of Commerce In furtherance of that goal in the downtown.The updated East End Redevelopment Plan continues redevelopment efforts toward enhancing prosperity and livability,That process is occurring as detailed in this Plan Update, The Comprehensive Plan directs inclusion of mixed-use development to provide opportunities for commercial, professional, public, entertainment; cultural, and residential uses within the Downtown;as well as requiring landscaping, open space, buffering, screening, parking controls,height,bulk,and scale limits to mitigate adverse impacts such as noise,traffic, and visual aesthetics on adjacent land uses;the provision of adequate but not excessive parking; and to develop where possible,joint street access, parking facilities, and pedestrian connections with other businesses to reduce land area requirements,traffic congestion, and parking and safety problems. Other Comprehensive Plan policies direct that hew development provide the full range of required public facilities and services and pay commensurate system development charges;that public transit opportunities be appropriate to the scale and character of the project;thug a safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation system to and within the development be provided; and that developments comply with design and aesthetic standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses and Lake Oswego's overall community character.The updated East End Redevelopment Plan implements the land use directives of the Comprehensive Plan by providing for commercial, professional, residential, recreational and community uses,The Plan provides for the necessary public facilities as part of redevelopment activities, 39 fsA51'END ktil7LiVHLiSN111iN`I'hLAN I[phi WISIMMMIN Ul"AUll"INFA ............ LAI, low ift- it 'IT 1w �, ,x� '; y�l �il :r � •��. 'l�i�.ti'�lZ i�a � ' µ'` 4�Q µ 1 � t,i M r,. ' ZONING AIII\(02)'- SECTION 800 - RELOCATION The Redevelopment Agency has adopted specific procedures necessary to conduct relocation activities, The Redevelopment Agency will provide assistance to persons or businesses displaced in finding replacement facilities.All persons or businesses to be displaced will be contacted to determine such relocation needs,They will be provided information on available space and will be given assistance in moving,All relocation activities will be undertaken and payments made in accordance with the requirements of ORS 281.045 through 281,105 and all other applicable laws or regulations.The Redevelopment Agency will prepare and maintain Information in its office relating to the relocation program and procedures, including eligibility for and amounts of relocation payments,services available and other relevant matters. di PAST I:ND NP1101-1.01IMPNT PLAN Kra "f SECTION 900 - REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION A. Land Acquisition The public assembly of property is essential to the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan.Any property that is necessary to carry out the projects identified in this Plan may be acquired by the Agency, No additional property shall be acquired by the Agency without a plan amendment, pursuant to Section 1000 of this Plan, Real property will be acquired in accordance with all applicable state statutes, It is anticipated that the acquisition of any property necessary to be acquired in order to carry out the projects identified in this Plan will commence after funds are available. Acquisition is anticipated to occur in the schedule more fully described in the accompanying updated Redevelopment Report. Properties Acquired Under Original Plan The following properties were acquired according io the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with all applicable state statutes; Tax Lots 8400,8500, 8600, 8700 and 8600, Block 46, First Addition to the Town of Oswego,Oregon for purposes of carrying out Project L—Fire Station Relocation Tax Lot 700 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 1 oAA, Clackamas County, Oregon for the purposes of carrying out Project C-Bluff Area Tax Lot 9100, Block 136, Extension of Oregon Iron and Steel Co„ First Addition to Oswego, Oregon for the purposes of carrying out Protect D-Block 136 and 137 Tax Lots 3400 and 3500 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA,Clackamas County, Oregon, and a portion of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way known as Parcel I,which is adjacent to the westerly right-of-Way line of State Street and within the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way containing approximately 6,580 square feet and Parcel II which is adjacent to Tax Lot 500 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA,Clackamas County,Oregon, and within the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way containing approximately 4,755 square feet, and an easement extending from State Street on the west,3rd Street on the east, a northerly line 20 ft,from and parallel to the center line of the Southern Pacific railway to the existing southerly line of the Southern Pacific right-of-way for the purposes of carrying out Protect F-Pinafore Property City owned property,Tax Lot 500, Block 138 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA and Tax Lots 8000 and 6100, Block 138 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD, Clackamas County, Oregon for the purposes of carrying out Project B-Block 138. [Ord.No.1997,Amendment 2.02/02/90] Tax Lots 2900 and 3000 of Tax Map T28 R1 E 10AA as part of Protect M-Whaler Pro ert . [Ord. No. 1998,Amendment 3 03/22/90] Tax Lots 7200,7300,7400, 7500,7600,7700, 7800, 7900,8200 and 8201 of Block 138, Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD for the purposes of implementing Prolect B 6 Block 105, kOrd, No.2006,Amendment 405/17/90] The following properties were acquired for Project K-Portland-Lake Oswego Trolley in order to provide a site for the terminus of the Portland-Lake Oswego Trolley,The 42 CAST'CNtS rtI:;CJLVCLUP11l:�i'PLAN properties acquired In accordance with all applicable state statutes were:Tax Lots 6600, 6900, 6901, all as shown on Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD.Tax lots 6800, 6902, and 6902E1 have not yet been purchased. [Ord. No.2071 -Amendment 8-12/17/92] Tax Lots 1600 and 1700 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DA were acquired for Project N in order to provide a North Entry feature for the City and to implement the adopted Urban Design Plan together with the East End Redevelopment Plan and Report. [Res. No.94-01,Amendment 9-02/08/94] Potential Future Acquisitions Tax lot 7900 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DC for the purposes of carrying out Proiect I-Block 45 Mixed Use Development. Tax lots 100,and 300 of Tax Map T2S R1 E i OAA for the purposes of carrying out Project J-Evergreen Housing Redevelopment Site. Tax lots 3100, 3200, 320OA1,and 3300 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 10AA for the purposes of carrying out Project M-Oswego Lakefront. Tax lots 400, 500,and 1200 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD for the purposes of carrying out Proiect N-First Street North Anchor, Tax lots 4000, 4400 through 5400,and 5500 through 6500 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD,for the purposes of carrying out Proiect 0- First Street Retail Revitalization Blocks 48 and 49, Tax lots 100,200,300,and 300A1 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD for the purposes of carrying out Pro'ect P-State Street Mixed Use Development. Tax lots 6800 and 6902 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DD for the purposes of carrying out Proiect 0- East of State Street Mixed Use Development, Acquisition of tax lot 7000 of Tax Map T2 1 E 03DD and tax lot 400 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 11 BB may also prove necessary if a transit center use Is Incorporated, Tax lots 1801,9800,9800A2, 9900, 10000, 10100, and 10101 of Tax Map T2S R1 E 03DA for the purposes of carrying out Project S-North Entry Mixed Use Development, B. Land Disposition The Agency is authorized to retain,sell, lease, exchange, subdivide,transfer,assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any Interest in real property which has been acquired In accordance with the provisions of this Plan, Real property shall be disposed of at a value determined by the Agency to be Its fair reuse value,which represents the value at which the Agency In its discretion determines such land should be made available, in order that it may be developed or otherwise used for the purposes specified in this Plan,All persons and entities obtaining property from the Agency shall use the property for the purpose designated in this Plan,and complete AMIL development of the properly within a period of time the Agency fixes as reasonable, and comply with other conditions necessary to carry out the purposes of the Plan,All property 43 MTI'M)kLDLYLLOPSIOT PLAN t0�0 disposed of or leased by the Agency shall be made subject to this Plan. Leases, deeds, contracts or agreements made by the Agency may contain restrictions,covenants running with the land, rights of reverter,conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes,or any other provision necessary to carry out this Plan, It is anticipated that the disposition of property that may be acquired by the Agency in implementing the Plan will take place after the development of contractual agreements with suitable performance guaranties with a developer, 44 LA5 V PND tttit)PA111LOPSIPNT PLAN SECTION 1000.AMENDMENTS TO THE PLAN This Plan may be reviewed and analyzed periodically and will continue to evolve during the course of project Implementation and ongoing planning.The Plan may be amended or changed as needed,All amendments or changes to the Plan will be made in writing and will be approved by the Agency,the City Council,or both,The amendments or changes may be substantial amendments or minor amendments as hereinafter defined,Substantial amendments to the Plan shall be approved by the City Council by non-emergency ordinance pursuant to ORS 457,095 and 457.220 after public notice and hearing. Minor amendments to the Plan shall be approved by the Agency by resolution except as hereinafter provided. The following amendments or changes to the Plan shall be considered substantial amendments; 1. Adding land to the urban renewal area (except such minor additions of land as may be authorized by statute as not constituting a substantial amendment,) 2. Extending the date after which no bonded indebtedness shall be issued with respect to the Plan or any project undertaken or to be undertaken under the Plan, 3. Increasing the maximum amount of bonded indebtedness excluding bonded indebtedness Issued to refinance or refund existing bonded Indebtedness issued or to be issued under the Plan, 4. Adding a new project, activity or program which; a. Serves or performs a substantially different function from any project, activity or program specified in this Plan; and b. Is estimated to cost(excluding administrative costs) in excess of$500,000 adjusted annually from 1991 at a rate equal to the construction cost index applicable to the Redevelopment area. 5. Making other changes in the Plan that alter the major assumptions, purposes and objectives underlying this Plan, All amendments or changes in this Plan that are not substantial amendments as specified above shall be considered minor amendments. Minor amendments shall include Identification of property for acquisition pursuant to projects, activities or programs specified in this Plan for public use or for private redevelopment. From time to time during the implementation of this Plan,the City Council may officially approve amendments or modifications to the City's Comprehensive Plan and implementing ordinances, Furthermore, the City Council may from time to time amend or approve new codes, regulations or ordinances that affect the implementation of this Plan,When such amendments,modifications, or approvals have been officially enacted by the City Council, such amendments, modifications or approvals that affect the provisions of this Plan shall be deemed a minor amendment to the Plan and shall, by reference, become a part of this Plan, [Ord, No,2039,Atnendmeht 6.10/17/91] VP 45 L•ASTINU iWDLVL1.0PMLNTPLAN i `I SECTION 1100-TAX INCREMENT FINANCING The Agency proposes to finance the Plan, and the projects undertaken with respect to the Plan, through tax Increment financing as authorized by Article IX,Section 1 c, of the Oregon Constitution, and ORS 457,420 through 457.460. Such financing is authorized by the statute when the Plan contains the following provisions:the ad valorem taxes, if any, levied by a taxing district In which all or a portion of an urban renewal area is located, shall be divided by rates as provided in section 1c,Article IX of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 457,440. No bonded indebtedness shall be Issued after 2025 under this Plan (and under any and all projects undertaken with respect to this Plan)for which taxes divided under ORS 457,440 are to be pledged, Nothing in this section is intended to inhibit the ability of the Agency to refinance or refund existing bonded indebtedness that may be issued under the Plan. [Ord. No.2039, Amendment 6-10/17/91Aftk 46 LASt L•NI)ItlsUti�'LLt)i'A11:N'I'PLAN LAKE OSWEGO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY! r OCTOBER 2003 �`� L - - Ve`ue" A y ' V or i 7. JT ll j f( -, f 4 EAST END REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 48 r + REDEVELOPMENT ACQUISITION MAP ORD, 1997-AMENDED 02-02-90 ' ORD. 1998-AMENDED 03-22-90 ORD, 2006-AMENDED 05-17-90 ORD. 2071 AMENDED 12-17-92 ORD. R-94-1 -AMENDED,02-08-94� r,il Qj Avenue Ca -- v R. r Properties Acquired _ f L 2nd Amendment 2/90 8� Ord Amendment 3/90 I 4 R 4th Amendment 6/90 VkeWngay 8th Amendment 12/92 ,�,,• 9lh Amendment 2194 ` j, EAST END REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 61 i' I }t t 1 _,l f S "^ �. n � 'p •'♦ n ` a }'7 � i i ,.1 !' B �' { f1 . Alm END �• . EAST u.�. E"Iff"J" E OP"" n' u REP"ttT UPDArI'"E r IJRA.F li t A • 1 0.n•i o ,1•, t 4 n � Af,,�JG) 'N� a �� a •,(s .' ,1•� I ry i ' .6�r' {;, �+• � t'tl.' +I .;- s Table of Contents REPORT AMENDMENTS 3 INTRODUCTION 5 SECTION I - EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPACT OF PLAN 6 1. Existing Conditions 6 II,Fiscal Impact of Added Services or Increased Population 9 SECTION 2- REASONS FOR SELECTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AREA 10 SECTION 3- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROJECTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS 12 Project A— Headlee Walkway 12 Project B— Millennium Plaza Park Phases III&IV 12 Project C— Street Improvements,Second,Third,and Fourth Streets 12 Project D— Transit Center/Streetcar 12 Project E— B Avenue Village Anchor Street 13 Project F-- A Avenue Extension 13 Project G— Hotel 13 Project H— Block 137 Mixed Use Development 13 Project I— Block 45 Mixed Use Development 13 Project J— Evergreen Housing Redevelopment Site 13 Project K— Civic Center 14 Project L— Willamette Steps 14 Project M— Oswego Lakefront 14 Project N First Street North Anchor 14 Project O— First Street Retail Revitalization,Blocks 48&49 14 Project P— State Street Mixed Use Development 14 Project Q— State Street Pedestrian/Bikeway Improvements 14 Project R— East of State Street Mixed Use Development 14 Project S— North Entry Mixed Use Development 14 Project T Second and B Mixed Use Development 15 Project U— Block 46—Third and A 15 SECTION 4- ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS AND SOURCES OF MONIES 16 Estimated Costs 16 SECTION 5- ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT 20 SECTION 6- ESTIMATED COSTS AND YEAR OF DEBT RETIREMENT 20 Estimated Atnount oCMoney Required Under ORS 457,420-457.440(Tax increment Funds) 20 Anticipated Year In Which Indebtedness will be Retired or Otherwise Provided For 20 TABLE 6-1 ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FUNDS 21 TABLE 6.2 ANNUAL COSTS,REVENUES,AND BALANCES 22 TABLE 6-3 EST.OF DISTRICT`S TRUE CASH VALUE AND VALUE OF FROZEN BASE 23 SECTION 7- FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF TI-IE PLAN 24 SECTION 8- STATEMENT OF FISCAL IMPACT ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS 25 TABLE 8-1 TCV,ASSESSED VALUE,AND TAX RATES OF OVERLAPPING DISTRICTS 25 TABLE 8-2 REDEVELOPMENT VALUE AS 0/4 OF OVERLAPPING DISTRICT VALUE 26 TABLE 8-3 EXPECTED IMPACTS ON TAX RATES 01,CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 28 TABLE 8-4 EXPECTED IMPACTS ON TAX RATES OF SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.7 29 TiW-LE 8.5 EXPECTED IMPACTS ON TAX RACES OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY 30 TABLE 8-6 EXPECTED IMPACTS ON TAX RATES OF PORTLAND COMM,COLLEGE 31 SECTION 9. RELOCATION REPORT 32 EXl41BIT 1 2002 EAST END CRIME ACTIVITY 33 /EXHIBIT 2 ASSUMPTIONS USED IN PROJECTING INCREMENTAL VALUES 34 Il CAST HNi)Itk;t)NVlsl,dl'I�dCaJ'i RLPC>iti Report Amendments Amendment Ordinance Effective Purpose Number Number Date Section 1 -Existing;Conditions and Impact of Plan, amended East End Redevelopment Area boundary and legal description to include the residential area north of Leonard Street between Durham and Furnace Streets, and the marina development area areas of Oswego Project,added 9.5 acres, 1 1979 03-20-89 Section 3-Relationship Between Projects and Existine Conditions,added Project J—Marina and Project K, Lake Oswego—Portland Trolley Extension, S ` iecttoi 4_The E imated Cost of Each Project and the Sources of Monies to Pay Such Costs,Part I.Summai�!, of Costs,added project J and K.Shifted funds to reflect project changes which had no effect upon the estimated total of public costs, Section 1-Relationship Between Projects and Existing; Conditions,added Project L—"Fire Station Relocation". 2 1997 02-02-90 Section 9-Relocation Report,added new language to paragvaph B to reflect the adoption of Relocation Regulations by the Agency._ Section 3-Relationship Between Projects and Existine Conditions,added Project M—Whaler Property. Section 4-The Estimated Cost of Each Proiect and the 3 1998 03-22-90 sp of umes of Monjes to RgkL h Costs,Part I.Sommary Costs,added project M.Shifted funds to reflect project changes which had no effect upon the estimated total of nubile costs. Section 4-The Estimated Cost of Each Project and the Sources of Monies to Pay Such Costs,Part I. 4 2006 05-17-90 Summary of Costs,Amended—Shifted funds to reflect project changes which had no effect upon the estimated total of public Costs. Section 1 -Existing Conditions and Impact of Plan, amended East End Redevelopment Area boundary and 5 2011 10.15-90 legal description to include an area cast of the west bank of the Willamette River,and southerly of existing marina area,added 1,28 acres. W 3 CAST PNb ILPbCVG1.011M8N'I'I2iPaRI 1 Report Amendments Amendment Ordinance Effective Purpose Number Number Date _ The Amendment has no affect on the financial analysis 6 2039 10-17-91 or the total cost estimate of the original Report and _ therefore the Report remains unchanged, The Amendment has no affect on the financial analysis 7 R-92-13 08-06-92 or the total cost estimate of the original Report.The Report remains unchanged. Section 4-The Estimated Cost ofEach Project Sources of Monies to Pay Such Cost,Part 1.Land Assembly amended to include land acquisition and 8 2071 12-17-92 relocation costs for Protect K-Portland-Lake Oswego Trolley,Summan4 ofCosts,amended to include $500,000 land acquisition and$100,000 relocation for a total of$600,000. Section 4-The Estimated Cost of Each Proiqct an4th 9 R-94-1 02-08-94 Sources of Monies to Pay Such Cost,Part 1, an l Assembly,amended to include land acquisition costs for Project N-North Entry Site,Summary of Costs. Amendment to the- Ian—Mamilre 50 Requirements "Option Selection"and Declaration of maximum 10 2169 07-02-98 indebtedness atS43,461,241 [Amendment 10 Was effectively overturned by voter referendum __ Section 300-Pt'oject B—Block 138:amended the flan i 1 R-01-05 07-03-01 to include a public parking facility that provides parking for commercial development on Block 138 and also provides Parking for the general public, 4 HAS t 1i1J1)ItGUtiVla.(]pMIN'I'It[!Pt)tYl TIDE LAKE OSWEGO EAST END REDEVELOPMENT REPORT INTRODUCTION This Report describes existing conditions,explains the reasons for forming a tax increment district, provides a financial analysis and describes the projects and their costs as required under Chapter 457.085(3)of the Oregon Revised Statutes.As this Report is an update to the original report written in 1986,more attention is paid to those areas where changed conditions exist. AMh PAS"I FND I2EnCVPLOIINIRNl'ItL-POltl" SECTION 1-EXISTING!CONDITIONS AND IMPACT OF PLAN I. Existing Conditions. A. Physical Conditions. The original redevelopment area comprised approximately 155.48 acres at the east end of the City of Lake Oswego.After I 1 amendments to the plan(only a few affecting acreage)the redevelopment area is now 167.98 acres.As before,it includes the entire area designated as East End Commercial(EC),all mixed-use/multi-family zoned property(R-0/EC),as well as small areas of residential property(R-2)within the First Addition neighborhood. During the past several years,various studies have been undertaken to identify opportunities for redevelopment in the East End area,including the East End Redevelopment Plan Update study performed in 2001-2002 by Crandall Arambula.There are both a number of physical liabilities and positive influences that affect the character of the district.Those items listed in the original plan that are still relevant are listed below.Significant changes are noted. 1. Physical Liabilities. a. Traffic congestion on State Street and A Avenue, b. The excessive width of A Avenue,which discourages pedestrian movement from one side of the street to the other. c, The Portland&Western(Union Pacific)railroad line which increases traffic congestion and limits physical access to Lakewood Bay. d. Lack of bicycle lanes and inadequate sidewalks along State Street. e, Location of existing,small,privately owned off-street parking lots,oriented to serve particular business customers and placed in a manner that discoui-ages a pedestrian- oriented shopping environment. f. The heavy volume of existing traffic on State Street,and its width,discourages pedestrian activity and isolates the Foothills district from the heart of downtown, g. Almost hall'of the lots in the redevelopment area range in size from 4,000 to 6,000 square feet,These lots are generally in separate ownerships. It, The Wizer shopping center an Block 137 has a significantly lower building to land value ratio,and substantially lower rental rates than recent redevelopment projects on adjacent Blocks 136 and 138,creating a underdeveloped gap in the core of the central commercial district, i. Lack of high-density housing within the redevelopment area to help support retuil/eominercial uses, J. Unsightly overhead utility lines are still present in many parts of the redevelopment area, particularly thong B Avenue, k, Sub-standard sidewalks and lack of handicapped curb cuts for sate and convenient pedestrian circulation are still lirescnt in much of rite Redevelopment District, I. Sortie sewer and stone System lines in the area still require replacement as they are aging and lit pool'condition. 6 EAST l )Rt-MVELOPbiENT RGPORT 2. Positive Influences a, Lakewood Bay. b, Willamette River. c, Redevelopment Projects Completed; City Nall at 41"and A Avenue Main Fire Station on B Avenue Lakeview Village on Block 135 Millennium Plaza Park on the Bluff Area Oswego Pointe replaced the cement plant Fifth Street Mixed Use Development Edgewater Condominiums on Lakewood Bay Block 1.36 Commercial Building and Townhouses Thirteen Fagade Grant Improvements North Entry Feature on State Street d, Tryon Creek State Park,George Rogers Park,and Roehr Park: c. The Lakewood Center, f, Adjacent,stable residential neighborhoods, g, Adjacent multifamily zoning, h. Existing grocery stores, I. Existing views of Mount Hood down A and B Avenues, j, Views of Lakewood Bay from the Bluff area. k. Street improvements on A Avenue between State Street and 0'Street,and on I"Street between Evergreen Road and B Avenue, 1. Upgrading of the storm system to avoid flooding of businesses during heavy rains, m. City-ownership of the former US Bank property on Lakewood Bay,and property on the east side of State Street, Di Social Conditions. The major social factors In the redevelopment area are; The relatively small percentage of housing that is categorized as"affordable." e The relatively small number of the sorts of cultural and entertainment facilities typically found in an urban center,such as theaters,restaurants offering varied dining experience and open in the late evening hours,pubs,cocktail lounges,museums,and art exhibits. m According to 2000 census data,both the ntedlan household income and the per capita income of residents in census block groups encompassing the Redevelopment District are nearly$15,000 less per year than the typical Lake Oswego household or resident respectively, • According to 2000 census data,residents in the Redevelopment District have a higher poverty rate than the city as a whole. 7 CAST CND RtDl:i'ELOPNIENT RHIORT s There are three crime-reporting sections in the redevelopment area(EXHIBIT 1).Although the redevelopment area comprises only about I%of the entire land area of the City,and 3% of the population,a relatively high proportion of criminal activity occurs in the district. While some types of crime such as rape,robbery,and assault have shown a relative decrease on a percentage basis since the original report,other crimes such as burglary,larceny, vandalism,and drug and liquor law violations have shown a relative increase on a percentage basis,'These types of crime tend to occur more readily in areas that are poorly lit,' difficult to patrol,and have little or no evening activity to provide surveillance by the public. C. Economic Conditions. Staff has researched condition,age,and value of structures in the redevelopment area,Condition of structures,assessed value and the resulting land/improvement ratio arc closely related. • Analysis of the age of structures shows more than 60%of the structures in the redevelopment district were built before 1970,with nearly 40%built before 1960.A significant number of structures in the downtown core were built prior to 1950. Structures of this age generally do not meet modern construction standards and the lots occupied by these buildings have high land to improvement value ratios. o The land improvement ratio shows an average ratio of 51.46%land value to 48,54% improvement value for structures built in the city outside the Redevelopment District (not including condominium developments),and an average ratio of 80,66%land value to 19.34%improvement value for structures built within the Redevelopment District(not including condominium developments).The ratios that evolved in the research show an undcrutilization of land in the redevelopment area,particularly for those lots containing older structures,Those lots comprise,as indicated earlier,about 40%of the lots in the entire redevelopment area, The redevelopment of Block 138 resulted in an approximate ratio of 15%land value to 851/o improvement value,and the redevelopment of Block 136 resulted In an approximate ratio of 200/0 land value to 80%improvement value,By comparison,Block 137 has an approximate ratio of 70%land value to 30%improvement value,The land/improventent ratio for the entire district is 4.17,not including condominium developments,By contrast the land/improvement ratio for the rest of the city is 1,06,not including condominium developments,Normally,in a healthy commercial area,the improvement value is considerably higher than the land value. The total assessed value of the entire redevelopment area represents only about 3,88%of the value for the entire city,Ideally,a primary commercial area would represent a much higher percentage,With only 3,88%of the City's value in the primary commercial area, the residential areas are carrying a higher tax burden than would be the case in a healthier commercial area, Adliki MS1 PNt)itE l)pV1s'ldl�hi►N`I'IthPC)if1' II. Fiscal Impact in Light of Added Services or Increased Population. The plan calls for funding of infrastructure services and allows for housing within the area that AM would increase the population,The impacts of development within the plan area upon local services and utilities are expected to be within manageable limits,The plan will provide additional shopping, social,and cultural opportunities within the community,and will redirect the shopping patterns of local residents and provide these opportunities for new residents within the plan area. The infrastructure improvements will be funded with tax increment revenues and will not result in any appreciable increase in costs to the City of Lake Oswego, 9 9AST HNU Itl l�t!Vlil.C)1'h1LN'1'I I�C)IYl' J SECTION 2-REASONS FOR SELECT'iON OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ARE The plan update area is based on that of the original redevelopment plan,the area of which was selected based on Comprehensive Plan policies,the east end redevelopment studies of 1980-81 and 1985-86,the need for the coordination of activities involved in the reconstruction of State Street,and blight,its evidenced by the conditions of deterioration,business vacancies,conflicts between local and through traffic,and other harmful factors which exist within the boundaries of the redevelopment area,The City Council,in Ordinance No. 1748,adopted November 6,1979,do eared that blighted areas exist,ORS 457,010,Section 1,includes the definition of blighted areas,which is included in this document by reference, Conditions exist which meet the definitions of blight in ORS 457.01%Section 1,specifically,as follows; A, The division of property within the redevelopment area into small lots and the ownership of those properties by individual persons have resulted in inadequate property utilization and development, B, The continuing need for replacement of the storm system and sewer infrastructure in many areas of the redevelopment district, C, Poorly maintained sidewalk/pedestrian system and lack of handicapped accessibility inhibits much of the pedestrian environment. D. The rapid turnover of businesses,particularly along State Street,duo to appearance,repair,and maintenance conditions of the buildings and the problems associated with parking and aeO.ess to those buildings, E. Much of the commercial area is underdeveloped,An evaluation of rental rates in 2003 indicated that except for recent redevelopment projects,commercial improvements in the redevelopment district could not command rental rates similar to other competing areas,In 2003,the market rate for rents in new retail projects in the downtown was up to$32/sf,Other downtown developments are undervalued by up to 50%or more as they can only command rents of$12 to$22/sf,For much of the area,particularly the proposed project areas,land values exceed or closely approximate improvement values,which is an indication of an underutilization of land in the redevelopment area.In a more economically healthy commercial area these buildings would have been Improved or replaced through the natural attrition and replacement mechanisms,which occur in a healthy commercial area, F. The existence of inadequate and scattered surface parking lots that do not provide parking in a pattern that supports economically successful commmercial uses, G. The existence of large volumes of traffic and a lack of pedestrian accessibility that serves to divide the redevelopment area and make pedestrian access,or even vehicular access,difficult from shopping sector to shopping sector, 14. A disproportionate share of crime in the City has occurs In the redevelopincnt area, (see Exhibit 1), 1, Residents in the District have it higher poverty rate than the city as it whole, J. Developments failing to take advantage of,or failing to enhance,existing unique physical and natural amenities of the area,including: 1, Views of Mt,blood, 2. Views of Lakewood Bay, 10 EAST END i2 iUpVGi.ht�MLN`I'Rl?t�t)tt7' K. The physical barrier for pedestrians between the East lend and the Foothills district created by State Street traffic volume,inadequate sidewalks,and a lack of pedestrian crossings. AM L. Lack of cultural amenities that encourage and create an atmosphere of vitality and excitement, attracting people during both the day and the evening. M. Lack of high-density housing in the plan area to support commercial/retail uses. II CA5T l:Ntl 12LDC\`f~[.QpMh'N'1'It!~f'Olt'1' 1 SECTION 3-RELATIONSIIIP BETWEEN PROJECTS AND EXIs'CiNG CONDITIONS The redevelopment projects identified in the Redevelopment Plan were developed to implement the Vision Statement and correct the blighted conditions described in Section 2 of this Report. It is not the intent of the Redevelopment Plan to prescribe or predetermine specific uses within each project,but rather to focus activities on these key project areas to help facilitate economically sound development in order to create a viable economic climate and condition within the area. Project A—Headlee Walk►vay A tivalkway/boardwalk shall be constructed from Third Street to the Millennium Plaza Park fountain along the north edge of Lakewood Bay, The wallavoy is planned as an innporlant quality of lire elenent for Lake Osivego residents desiring visual access to the lake and a sane pedestriarn route along its edge, It is intended to make current use of the lake edge sane, more aesthetic and easier to manage, Project B—Millenninan Plaza Park Accessible RamplKew Platform Phases III&TV Phase III of this project will provide increased access to the lower fountain plaza fr•ort the bluff area through the provision qfa ramp or elevator meeting ADA requirennents.It will also provide a more direct route for pedestrians from Millennium Park to developments on State Street,Phase IV ivill jlnish the park and enhance visual access to Lakewood Bay by constucting a viewing platform along the edge o f the bit(/rand a water display in Lakewood Bay, Project C—Street Improvements 2"d Street This project will provide pedestrian ji'iendly enhancennenis on 2"d SMcel, creating a "Village Aft Retail Street"on 2"d between A and B Avenues, The envh'ontneirt vwtll encotn'age adjacent irlftll coniniercial and r~ctcril developnnc}nt on parcels aloitg ?"d Street and north across B Avenue. 3rd Street This project will provide pedestrian-r-iendly enharceinents oil 3''1 Street, creating a "Village Retail Street"on 3"'between A and B Avenues, The er:vironrntent twill encourage adjacent iitfill commercial and retail development on parcels along 3'd Street and north across B Avenue. 4"Street 7'ltis project hill provide pedestrian-T lendly enhaneentenis oil Ott'Street, creating a "Village Retall Street"oil`Id'betiveen A and B Avenues, coordinating with arty redevelopment oj'Block 45,and ericouraging ii fill conintercial and retail development oil.lit'. Project D-Transit Center/Streetear The transit center will stippol't f iutnre st'eetcal'sei-rice by taking advantage of the existing trolley line. Park and ride and bus transfer shall be accommodated, This project will support adjacent mired-use development,anti provide parking opportunities for other dolvittowit activities, The project iwill also ltarease access to the downtown conuner'cial cote and enhance the opportunity to tnNize alternative modes gft'ansportation in the congested Ilighwav 43 corridor. Project C-11 Avenue-Willage Anchor Street this pr'ujcct ivill prot,idi pedcst'ian;felendltr enhancentents on B Avenue, to create d "Village Anchor Street"with till environment conducive to adjacent anchor retail development and st'eng1hening of the retail core, AIML 12 i:Asl'1rND[zcl�E;\rt;k.orMt:N"1"Itprolt't' Project F—A Avenue Extension Pedestl tar:-friendly enhancements from 41"Street to 6"Street within the right-of-way on A Avenue would be coordinated with adjacent redevelopment of Block 45 and encourage inliil commercial and retail development oil A—Possible sidewalk extensions at the corners will serve to reduce the walking distance across the street,and possible special paving at crosswalks will assist in improving the visual aiid psvchological connection between the two sides of the street. Project C-Hotel The Agency shall take steps to develop a new, high quality boutique style hotel within the district, The hotel is expected to be within a range of 30 to 70-units. Properties which provide lake,river, or mountain views and which are located within 400'of restatu'ants, transit,and retail shopping or other significant amenities will have substantial preference for siting, The project niay tiiclude itirtd assembly, relocation and infrasti'ttettn•e improvements and would provide stippoi•t f r a4lacertt commercial development and better economic utilization of the downtown core. Project H—Block 137Mived Use Development Block 137(Wizen block)would be encouraged to redevelop,with the possible inclusion ota hotel use,Redevelopment of this block would replace an aging shopping center, Improve the land/improvement ratio,and provide for a more intense utilization ofa key conmtercial block within the central business district. Project I—Block 45 Mixed Use Development Block 45, between A and B Avenues and Fourth and Ftjlh Streets should be redeveloped with a mix of uses. The project would be coordinated with Project F,Fourth Street tinpr•ovements. This project will result in more intense development on a block that is underutilized and increase activity on A Avenue, Project J—Evergreen Housing Redevelopment Site This housing site east g1Td Street and south ufEver'gecen Road would be encouraged to redevelop and to Include "affordable"housing types. This project would replace aging tnulti,family units aiid provide a reservoir of a/for'dable!rousing that supports adjacent commercial redevelopment sites. Project K—Civic Center Tlie civic center redevelopment project li'otltl ilieo?porate pn'opel-')acquired b the Ctty on the existing City Hall block. This project would replace the existing sh'llcttlrally defective City Hall building and provide separate space jor police and entet'genq services, increasing sgfety and sectrrltv,for those departments.as well as improving the quallhy 0 ublic service, Project L-Willamette Steps This prolect would allow safe pedesolan crossing of the high-traffic-volume State Street at B Avenue as well as pedestrian access into the Poothills District via a gracious stairway(Including bicycle andADA-accessible elements), Tlds project would also accentuate a key aesthetic value of the East End by preserving a view corridor to AA flood, Project M—Oswego Lakefront This site on the east side q f Lakewood Ila,(US Bank slit acquired by City)would be redeveloped providing connection to Mtllelliduon Plaut Park and Block 13.Additional public visual access to the svaletfi'onl,and public open space would be the printam,features of the prof ect, 13 EAST END REDEVLLOWENT WORT i Project N—First Street North Anchor This project redevelops the northeast and northwest corners of the intersection of I'Street and B Avenue as a "North Anchor,"providing more intense utilization of these centrally located blocks, thereby strengthening the I"Street compact retail core, Project D—First Street Retail Revitalization—Blocks 48 and 49 This project encourages the development of continuous retail frontages at the ground floor along P Street behveen A and B Avenues,strengthening the East End compact retail core by replacing aging existing structures. This project could assist in the aggregation of'small ownerships Into a developable unit, Project P—State Street Mhred Use Development Redevelopment of parcels on the west side of State Street between B and C Avenues should be encouraged to include a parking structure which would provide a parking r'escrvolr for downtown retail uses and for possible nearhv transit center. This project would increase the development density of an underutilized block,support development on adjacent blocks, and improve the visual perception at a Main enhy to the East End. Project Q State Street Pedestrian-Bikeway Improvements This project w111 provide a pedestrian and bievcle route along the east side of State Street, separated from the heavy traffic volume gfState Street(highway 43),and make a pedestrian- bievcle connection linking north and south. This projects serves to increase bievcle and pedestrian safety,as well as increasing access to commercial areas on State Sir(,at and the central downtown core, AIL Project R—East of State Street M yed Use Development This project east of State Street, between A and B Avenues would be ineot porated into Project 13— willantette Steps(adjacent to the north)and would possibly include a transit center. This project would develop a block with a high land to improvement ratio,and open a view corridor down A Avenue. Project S-North Entry Mkred Use Development This project would encourage redevelopment of parcels on the vres7 side of State Sheet between C Avenue and CAvenue, The development would Increase the value of undeeutilized land and possibly provide an additional reservoir of high density housing on the north side of'the downtown. The possibility of incotpoeating a transit center use into the project exists. Project T Seeotuf and B This project will encourage the redevelopment of'B Avenue, an anchor street for the compact village shopping district. The development will Increase the value of underutilized land in the area between the compact shopping district and the First Addition neighborhood,and provide an additional reservoir of high-density housing convenient to downtown, Project U—Block 46—Third and A 'Phis petfect will encourage redevelopment of the lot on the southeast corner oJ'Block 46 bordering Third Sweet a►tdA Avenue, The project wotdd increase the development density of'an underatilized block,support development on adjacent blocks, andprovide additional pedestrian-oriented activities and an unproved pedestrian environment on A Avenue and Third Street. 14 CAST[ND itED VELOPMENT 1tt-PORT SECTION 4-ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS AND SOURCES OF MONIES 1. Estimated Costs. A. Street bnprove►►tent ProiecG4 These projects are pedestrian enhancements in the right-of-wav, thus do not require land acquisition. The public investment would stimulate private invesnnent in the adjacent properties, Tltosc projects are as,Jollows: Project Cr Second, Third,and Fourth Streets Street lmpr'ovenrents, Project E:B Avenue—Village Anchor Street Street lmprovernents, Project F.A Avenue Extension Street intprovenrenis, Project Qr State Street Pedestrian-Bikeway Improvements Street inproventents and development ofa pedestrian path-bikeway, B. Pro a is Not Requiring Land Assembly These projects would possibly require sotne fornts o/'assistance fi'orn the City, though not land acquisition: ProjectA:Headlee Walkway This project along the north edge q 'Lakewood Bqv behveen Thh-d Street and the lower' plaza at Millennitan Park could require CII)VAgenev assistance in obtaining easements •from the Lakewood Aqv Corpor'ation,Jbr portions of the boardwalk, Project O:Block 137 Mixed Use Development Redevelopment o/'Block 137(Wizer Block)does not antielpate,Jitrther public pardcipatfon, Redevelopment would be encouraged to include a hotel use, Project K.Civic Center. The City has acquired property on block where current City hall fs located,redevelopment would Incorporate that propee v into plans for City Hall, Project Lt WVilla►nette Steps Phis project at B Avenue and State Street provides pedestMan access into the Coothills District via a gracious stairvgv(Including bievcle and ADA-accessible elennertts), The City curretul y owns the tax lot where the slid fs located, C. Proiecis Reaui t LandAsseinblv These projects rngv require land acquisitlon and other',%r•nts ofassistance: Prrrject B.,Mille►n h nt Plaza Park Aecessible RanrpMew Platform Phases 111&0' phase III of this project provides a rantp at,elevalor to the louer plaza tnedlftrg ADA rerlttb'crnenis',Phase IV constructs a viewing pla(f n'm along the edge aj'the bluff and a water display in Lakewood Bqv,Phase Ill w!l/require acquisition of a portion g0he Lakewood Lo/!s sur/aee parking area,Phase lV will require acquisition andior veecutstrtrctivn of the Lakewood L ojls parking garages,Both phases will require Ctll►s'trtict101t,JirtUrtG'ei', Project D.- 7rahtit 1haellity17i'olley/Streetcar The transit center will support filter,streetcar service by taking advantage oj'thd erlsting t'olley line,A pat*and We and bits teansj�ir°center shall be accommodated, Als project will likelt,require aequisfilon ofland at the seleeled transit cenlces'ite and rngv hielude public participation in construction qfa pubtle parking garage. 15 �'AS1'HNtl t2H1)I�4'R'LC)�'b11,tJ'f'ItIPC)k'f a Project G. Hotel The Agencv shall take steps to develop a new,high quality boutique Ryle hotel within the district, Properties which provide lake, river,or mountain views and which are located within 400'of`restaurants, transit,and retail shopping or other significant amenities will have substantial p•eferettce for siiir:g. The project may itrclttde laird assembkv, relocation and infrastructure improvements. Project 1.M&ed Use Development Site Block 4.5(Safeway Black)would be redeveloped with a?nix of uses;land acquisition might be a part of'sttch redevelopment. Project J:Housing Redevelopment Site p Housing sites east of 3"`r Street and south of Evergreen should be encouraged to redevelop 9;land acquisition and relocation of Lena?its might be a part of such redevelopment. Project M.•Oswego Lakefront This site on the east side of Lakewood Bay(including the US Bank site acquired by Cliy) would be redeveloped to provide public space,and connection to Alillennhon Plaza Park and Block 138,Additional property acquisition is required to complete the master plan. Project N:First Street North Anchor This project for the northeast and northwest corners of 1'`t Street and"B"Avenue would require acquisition of land at each corner site, Project Oc First Street Retail Revitalization—Blocks 48 and 49 Lund acquisition might be possible as propery becomes available ou nillll sites'on I" Street between A and B Avenues. Project Pt State Street Mired Use Development Project on west side of State Street(east side of Block 30)would redevelop into mixed uses and possibly incoeporale a parking structure. 7"he project may require acquisition of the east side of'Block 30. Project R.East of State Street Vved Use Development Site on the east side of'State Street(at B Avenue)would be redeveloped into mixed-use project possibly incar poratbtg a transit center ttse. The C"itji awns liyo nJ`the fart► tax lots bordering State Street;the adjacent site to the east Is Union Pae{flc railroad right of-way,Acquisition of the two r•enutining privately held tax lots would be required it) complete,the project Project St North EntrV Mkrcd Me Development The project encourages redevelopment of parcels on the west side o•f Statc Street behveen CAvenue andEAvenue,Property acilidsition and assembly ntay be necessary for this preyeet, Project T,Second and B Site on the northwest corner of Second and B wlll be sold to a privale developer for the purpose of constructing townhornes and a retail building fronting B Avenue, The kedevelopment Agengv ntav assist in fiinding structure or site features enhancing the public's view or use gfthe site, to insure anrnputlbilitj�with district dcsEt,"rt gttldcW es. Project Ut Block 46--Third and A Site on the southeast corner of Block 46 at Third and A would redevelop as a commercial or ntlxed-u e project Anquisitlon of the pelvale4l,held tttt•lot nut),be, required to complete this project. lG I; l VN171tt t�CVh'i..C)hMi?N'i itl ytilt"t 2. Projects Costs The Redevelopment Agency's participation in the listed projects may include infrastructure improvements, construction, and land acquisition, Land acquisition expenses can include the cost of acquiring the needed parcels,relocating persons and/or businesses,and preparing the site for resale and redevelo ment.The following chart is an estimate of ro'ect costs; Acquisition) Total Costs Costs Project Relocation infrastructure Construction (2003 dollars) Adjusted for 3%Inflation* A.Headlee Walkway $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 8.Millennium Park $500,000 $1,700,000 $2,200,000 $2,200,000 Phases III/IV C.Second Street $100,000 $300.000 $400,000 $537,567 C.Third Street $100,000 $300,000 $400,000 $641,883 C.Fourth Street $100,000 $300,000 $400,000 $641,883 O,Transit Center $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,575,712 /Streetcar E,B Avenue $600,000 $1,700,000 $2,200,000 $2,470,119 Village Anchor F.A Avenue Extension $100,000 $1,000,0o0 $1,100.000 $1,478,308 G.Hotel $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,814,119 H.Block 137 $300,000 $300,000 $337,653 I.Block 45 Mixed Use $4.000,000� $4,000,000 $6,418,826 J,Evergreen Housing $2 700,000 $2,700,000 $6,022,795 ANIL Redevelopment Site _ K.Civic Center $600,000 $600,000 $806,350 L.Willamette Steps $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,612,700 M,OsWego Lakefront $2,000,000 $3,500,000 $5,500,000 $6,190,298 N,First Street $1,800,000 $200,000 $2,000,000 $2,687,833 North Anchor O,First Street Retail �$3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,376,526 Blocks 48 8 49 P.State St,Mixed Use $650,000 $250,000 $2,750,000 $3,660,000 $4,905,295 , B to C Avenue -A R.State Street $800,000 $800,000 $1,488,236 Pedesttlan/Bikeway Q,East State Street $1.400,000 $100,000 $1,500,000 $2,190,442 Mixed Use S.North Entry Mixed Use** $2,600,000 $200,000 $2,800,000 $4,978,796 _-_. -- T,Second and 13 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 U.Block 46 $1,200,00L $1,200,000 $2,232,363 $41,160,006 $68,013,693 It is anticipatod that all Agency costs of land assemblage,with the possible exception of relocation costs,would be restile ofeleuted parcels to private developers, +Intlutieu adjustments tefleet prujtw:es sidrtiitg tluAlig ditlerent time periods. 'K'usts reflect wo project phases. 17 I?At T i NU ltl:Iif Vt:L.aI�MI�Mt I2Ehr)it'I ii 3. Coats of Program Administration, s; Redevelopment staff labor expenses,plus related expenses for design,planning and engineering services provided through City staff and outside consultants,and miscellaneous operating expenses,will total about$816,000 for the full fiscal biennium of 2003-05.Estimates for administrative costs will obviously vary somewhat as the intensity of redevelopment activity changes,but estimated costs until 2021,using 2001.05 as base years,are as follows; Year Cost 2003-05 - $81fi,000 I 2005-07 $883,000 i 2007-09 $955,000 2009-11 $1,032,000 2011-13 $1,116,000 2013.15 $1,208,000 2015-17 $1,306,000 2017-19 $1,413,000 f 2019-21 $1,528,000 2021-23 $20,000 I 2024 $10 000 I Summary of Costs I i Estimated Project Costs(Inflation adjusted) _ $58,014i000 Administration Costs_(Intlation adjusted) J:10 287 00 TOTAL ( 301000 i1. Sources of Funding, Bused upon conservative estimates ol'redevelopment project activities,unspecified redevelopment in other areas,and an overall increase in property values resulting rrom botli public and private construction activity,tax increment revenues are estimated to provide in excess of$74,000,000 in the period front fiscal year 2004-2005 through fiscal year 2024-2025,(See Table 6.2 Annuul Costs, Revenue,and Balances,in Section 6,) Other sources of funds will come from monies advanced by other City runtis(Cleiherul,Sewer, } Water,etc,),passible special assessments,tiie Shute Lottery(Economic Development runtis),and other possible state or federal griuits, If tax increment projections are realized,a bond issue of approximately$14,000,000 could be sold ' in the fiscal biennium of200$=10 to; 1)assist in property acquisition and development of projects and/or 2)undertake specific ht1'rastructure Improvements as Identified. Depending upon the timing of ticaded expenditures,vis-d-vis annual revenues front tax increment,a I � subsequent blind sales or use of such annual revenues on a pay-as-you=ga basis would be able to { meet project costs over the period anticipated for redevelopment assislance by public I'unds, i� MS1'kN15 kEDE PIOPMEN'l It141'01t'lr i> II SECTION 5-THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT It is anticipated that all projects can be completed within a 20-year period,from January 1,2004 through January 1,2024, SECTION 6 ESTIMATED AMfOUN3:OF MONEY REOUIRED UNDER QSS 457.420 _TIIROU zH 457,440 AND ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDE,�IEDNESS WILL RE ._. RETIRED OR O`rHERWISE PROVIDED FOR UNDER ORS 457.440 I. Estimated Amount of Money Required Under ORS 457.420 through 457.440(Tax Increment Funds) The East End Redevelopment Plan Update requires use of tax increment financing,as permitted in ORS 457,420 through 457.440,to repay in whole or in part the indebtedness incurred by the Agency in carrying out the projects in the plan.Table 6-1 shows the levy represented by the composite tax rate times the estimated incremental value for the period through fiscal year 2024. II. Anticipated Year In Which Indebtedness will be Retired or Otherwise Provided for Under ORS 457.440 It is anticipated that the Agency's indebtedness assumed to be incurred through: 1)sale of a $14,000,000 bond issue in 2008-10;2)sale of a$12,000,000 bond issue in 2013-15;and 3)sale of $14,000,000 bond issue in 2020-22,can be paid off no later than fiscal year 2039-40,when a reserve sufficient to redeem the outstanding balance of the bond issues has accumulated through net collections of the tax increment levy. AML 19 1-AS'V CNU 1WURVLL0PMf NT RIV'URT Table 6-1 Estimated Amount of MoncY Required Under ORS 457.420 through 457.440 Tax bncrement Funds COMPOSITE PROJECTED ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT TAX RATE ESTIMATED Lake Oswego Urban Renewal Area REVENUES UR Area Growth rate = 4,25%(plus prolects Flocal Pro ected Growth Over Annual T.I. Cumulative T.I. Composite Year UR Area TCV Frozen Base Revenue Revenue Tax Rate 2004 155 095 000 $109 263 000 $1 769 000 $1,769 000 $16.1915 2005 170,316,000 *124 484 000 2,016,000 3,785,000 16,1915 2006 177.655.000 131,723,000 2,133,000 5,918 000 16,1916 2007 185,101,000 139,269,000 2 255,000 8,173.000 16,1916 2008 192,968,000 147,135,000 2,382,000 10,655 000 16,1916 2009 211,169,000 165,337 000 2,677,000 13�2 -2 000 16,1915 2010 224,143,000 178.311 11000 2 887 000 16119 000 -16.1915 2011 233,669000 187 837 000 3 041,000 19 160 000 16.1915 2012 243,600,000 197,768,000 3,202,000 22,362.000 16,1915 2013 253,953,000 208 121,000 3,370,000 25,732,000 16.1915 2014 274,746,000 228,914,000 3,706,000 29,438000 16,1915 MI 5 288 423,000 242,591,000 3,920,000 33,366,000 16,1915 20i6 300 681,000 264,849000 4,126,000 37 492 000 16,1915 2017 _ 313,460,000 267,628,000 4 333 000_ 41,825,000 18,1915 2018 326,782,000 280 950 000 4,549,000 48 374 000 16,1915 2019 340,670,000 294,838,000 4,774,000 51,148 000 16.1915 2020 355149 000 309,317.000 5,008,000 56,156 000 16.1915 2021 380,243,000 334,411 A0 5,415,000 61,571,000 16A 915 2022 400,d03 000 35d 571 000 5741,000 67.312.000 '16.1915 2023 417420,000 371,688,000 6,017,000 73,329,000 16,1915 2024 435161 000 389,328,000 0 304 000 79,633.000, 16.1916 20 PAg7 NO RkI)F ILLC MINT 101'11016 le 6-Z Annual Costs Revenues and.13alances Existing Bond Issues Pro'ecled Bond Issues Net Cumulative FiscalF416.000 dmin. Series Series Bond Bond Bond Total Increment Reserve Yearcosts 2002-A 2002-8 Issue A Issue B Issue C Costs Collected deficit 200400 000 $392 000 1 001 000 $1 793 000 $1 663 000 130 000 2005 392,000 1,103,000 1,911.000 1.805.000 (146,000) 2006 433.000 392 000 1,099,000 1,924,000 2,005,000 85 000 W 2007 450 000 392,000 1,099,000 1,941,000 2,120,000 114,000 2008 468,000 392,000 1,102,060 _1,962,000 2,239,000 391,000 2009 487,000 392,000 1,151,000 595,000 2,626,000 2,516,000 282,000 2010 606,000 392 000 1,201.000 595,000 2,694,000 2,714.000 302 000 2011 526 000 392,000 1,282,000 595 c00 2,795.000 2,859,000 366,000 20121 547,000 1,407,000 595,000 2,549,000 3,010,000 827,000 2013 569,000 1 407 000 695,000 2,571 000 3168 000 1 1,424,000 2014 592,000 1,404,000 795,000 506,000 3,297,000 3,484,000 1,611,000 2015 616,000 1,406,000 787,000 506,000 3,31 5 000 3,692,000 1 988 000 2016 840 000 1,404,000 879.000 506.000 3 429 000 3,878,000 2,437.000 2017 666,000 1,407,000 867 000 606,000 3 446 000 ,4 O73,000 3,064 000 693,000 2.430,000 506,000 _3,629,000 4 27e,000 3,711,000 9 720 00r, 2 430,000 606 000 3,766,000 4,488,000 4 443 000 2020 149,000 2,922,000 602,000 4 273.000 4.708.000 4 878 000 2021 779,000 2,415.000 598 000 +603.000 4,395,000 _ 6.090.0000 5,573,000 2022 10 000 975,000 2.094.000 603,000 302,000 5.397 000 e 7,288,000___ 2023 10 000 942,000 2,030,000 603,000 3 685 000 5 656 000 9,359 000 20 V 10 000 859 000 1 966 000 603.000 3,438,000 5,926,000 11,847,000 NOTES C.: NIC'F_RN G ME.ABOVE TABLE: ". dm' tr,.'v o ":Administrative costs escalated at 41/ year, "Net Increment Collected":Gross tax increment levied(certified)minus uncollectible taxes, "CumulatliV -beticit or Reserve":No interest on invested balmice is assumed.Earnings hero could be significant,enabling earlier project end,The cumulative deficit indication in the first fcW years assumes a"pay-as-you-go"approach to administrative costs,using bond proceeds for capital costs only.Bond proceeds could be used for repayment of administrative costs to show a positive cumulative balance in year three, �1 LAST'IsNty IttibtiVt�LC1PMLNl'lttil>f11tT URBAN RENEWAL BONDED DEBT Urban renewal bonds are sold to provide long term financing for urban renewal projects identified in the East End Redevelopment Plan.Last fiscal year presented a unique opportunity to restructure LORA's outstanding debt by combining the tax-exempt issues,reducing the interest rate Costs on all issues,and providing additional bond money for upcoming urban renewal projects.Below is a summary of LORA's debt issues before and after this restructuring. Previous bond isr;tes: Series 1989 Tax-exempt Land acquisitions and govermnental-purpose projects Series 1992-A Tax-exempt Refunded Series 1989&governmental-purpose projects Series 1992-B Private activity Qualified infrastructure projects on Block 138 Series 2000 Tax-exempt Reconstruction of three blocks on A Avenue Current bond issues: Series 2002-A Tax-exempt Refunded Series 1992-A/2000&governmental-purpose projects Series 2002-B Taxable Refunded Series 1992-B and new money for US Bank property acquisition and the Block 138 parking garage project Series 2002-A tax-exempt bond issue(current refunding;plus new tax-exempt funding): $6„985,000-issued April 10,2002,to currently refund the outstanding S2.9 million Series 1992-A bond issue and the outstanding$2,1 million Series 2000 bond issue,and provide$1.8 million of new bond funding.The net interest cost on the Series 1992-A and Series 2000 was 6.58 and 5,92 percent respectively.The net interest cost on this new bond issue is 5,64 percent.The maturity term on this new Series 2002-A is fifteen years, Series 2002-B taxable bond'issue(current refunding plus new taxable funding): $7,650,000-issued April 10,2002,to currently refund the outstanding$1.5 million Series 1992-B bond issue,finance the purchase of the US Bank property for$2.25 million,and provide$3.3 million for the Block 138 parking garage project,The refunded 1992-B net interest cost was 6.78 percent,The net interest cost on this new bond issue is variable,tied to the London Interbank Offering Rate(LIBOR) index,commencing at a net interest cost of 4.01 percent.Tile maturity term on this new Series 2002-B is nine years. 'fable 6-3 to stimate of Renewal Area's True Cush Value&Assessed Value of the frozen Base by Proper Tv e 2002-03 2002.03 True Assessed Cash Value Value PropertYTYpe TCV AV Land and Im 1'ovemehts est. $ 63.996,000 $ 44 022,000_ Personal Property(eW 911,000 989,000 Mobile Homes est. public Uillities est. 757,92C 821 t70 Total Frozen Base i $ 66,664 020 $ 45 832 170 22 I:A;�`I"i�tJt)kt"1�1iVtiLUl�hiCN1 ltlil'C)It't' SECTION 7-FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN ML Based upon estimates of project costs and upon projections of tax increment revenues,the overall plan appears feasible of accomplishing its overall goals.The exact project components and the years in which specific components can or should be accomplished will depend upon redevelopment decisions of private developers,the required approvals of the City,the actual flow of tax increment revenues and the availability of other revenue sources.If there were prolonged delays in initiating projects,the inflation of costs would become a factor. Tax increment revenues were recently boosted by the development ofBlocks 136 and 138.It is believed that the projected impacts on assessed values within the projects are reasonable.Based upon projections of the composite tax rate,representing reasonable expectations under current state and local financial structures,the resulting tax increment revenues appear realistic.The overall growth rate within the East End Redevelopment Area is estimated at 4,25%,per year(plus project growth).This is based upon historical growth of assessed values in the city and expected new construction in the area prompted by the Agency's own actions. Availability of non-tax-increment financing,while not a factor over the long term,will be important in the next five years if large-scale redevelopment projects are to proceed,as additional financing capacity is limited in the short term.Non-tax-increment funds may also be helpful in supporting larger expenditure requirements in the future;otherwise,the actual flow of tax increment revenues will dictate timing of Agency land acquisition or public improvements. Details of the actual financing plan must be frequently updated as a more accurate picture of both needs and resources unfolds over time.However,the overall plan over a time span of approximately 20 years appears financially feasible, 23 LAST GNb RMtMOPMI NTRt;roRT i SECTION 8-S'1'A'l'EMENT OF FISCAL IMPACT ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS A total of nine separate public taxing districts overlap the East End Redevelopment Area.These districts and their 2002-03 true cash values and tax rates are shown below: Table 8-1 True Cash Value,Assessed Value and Tax Rates of Overlapping Districts For FY 2002-03 True Assessed Tax Rates Cash Value Value per Taxing District (TCV) (AV) $1,00g of AV 1 City of Lake Oswego $4,944,049,431 $3,752,659,888 $5,5488 2 Clackamas County 15 587 330,856 12,076 372 937 2.4042 3 School District No,7 5,736,629,268 4,347,812,229 7.0844 4 Clackamas ESD 30 806 313 823 23 965,048 966 0.3687 5 Portland Community College 5,600,59o,464 4,321, 82,042 0.4944 6 Port of Portland 32 369 996 764 25163 450 492 0.0701 71 Vector Control District 32,369 996 764 25,153,450,492 0,0065 8 Tri-Met 23,097,232.183 17,896,801,190 0,1239 9 Metro Service District 23,898 753 984 18,602,664,688 0.2835 Composite Rate..... $ 16,3845 24 LAST CND REDIN81.01INICNT RCPCIRT Tubb 8-2 edevelo ment Area Values as Percent of Overlap ing District's Values Total UR Area FY 2002-03 TCV AV _ as percent of _ as Percent of District i District LORNs Taxing District $ 1K573.834 $ 145.873.865 Total TCV Total AV L11i City of Lake Oswe o _ 3.7333% 3,8872% 184 673 834 145,873,865 21 Clackamas Count 1,1841% 1.2079% 3 School District No,7 312180% 3.3551% 4 Clackamas ESD 015991% 0.6087% 5 Portland Community College 1 3,2384% 1 3,3752% 6 Port of Portland 0,5702% U799% 7 Vector Control District 0.5702% 0.5799% 8 Trl-Met 0,7991% 0,8151% 9 Metro Service District 0,7723% 0,78420/. Frozen t3ase(only) TCV AV as percent of as Percent of District District LORA's Taxina District $ 65 664,920 $ 45,832,170 Frozen TCV Frozen AV 1 ON of Lake Oswego 1.1269% 1,2213% 55,864,920 45,832,170 2 Clackamas County 0,3571% 0.3795% 3 School District No,7 0.9705% 1.0641% 4 Clackamas ESD 0A8070/6 0.1912% 6 Portland Community College µ 0,9166% 1,06040/0 6 Port of Portland 0,1720% 0,1822% 7 Vector Control District 0,1720% 0,1822% 81 Trl-Mel 0.2410% 0,2661% 91 Metro Service District 0,2329% 1 1 0.2464% ORS 457 requires that the East End Redevelopment Report state the expected impact of the district on property tax rates,This impact is donned as the di fference between property tax rates with and without the Tax increment District,but with the anticipated development of the district in place The impacts are due to the"segregation"of the incremental assessed value from the remainder of the assessed value within each taxing jurisdiction,The incremental assessed value is not included in the overall assessed value,and taus property tax rates are levied against a smaller amount of assessed value and rates are correspondingly higher,This impact is greatest on those districts with higher tax rates and where the Incremental value represents a higher ratio to their taxable value,Thus,the greatest impact is on Aft Portlund Community College turd School District No,7,and the least hnpuct,which is so smull as to not he measurable,is oil the Port of Portland,Clackamas County ESD and Clackamas County Vector 25 tsA5'i'iiNt)lik;UliVliLi)I'1,tf:N't'kll'iSltl` Control, It is it matter of conjecture as to what growth in assessed value would occur without the District,but for purposes of this impact analysis,the assumption is that all projected development would occur,Tables IMW 8-3 through 8-6 indicate the expected impacts on the tax rates of the City of Lake Oswego,School District No.7,Clackamas County and Portland Community College,respectively, At the termination of the Tax Increment District,jurisdictions levying taxes would receive an increase in net assessed valuation, 26 EAST END ND ItEnEVELOPMENT ItPi'OttT Table 8-3 ected Impacts on the Tax Rates of... C1 of Lake Oswego CITY OF PROJECTED ANNUAL TAX LAKE INCREMENT OSWEGO Lake Oswecio Urban Renewal Area District Growth rate = 3,00% UR Area Growth rate = 4,25% lus ro ects Pro ected =RevenueUR rict's Estimated Tax Rate... Fiscal Pro ected Growth Over Annual T.L ithout with without Difference in Year UR Area TCV Frozen Base RevenueR UR UR tax rate 2004 $155095,000 $109 263 000 $590,000 000 000 $5,4033 $5,5488 $0.1455 2005 170 318 000 124 484 000 673 000000 000 5,4033 5.5488 0.1455 2006 177,555,000 131 723 000 712,000 1,975,000 3 925 330 000 5.4033 5,6488 0.1455 2007 185,101,000 139,269,000 753,000 2,728.000 4,043,090,000 5,4033 5,5488 0,1455 2008 192 968 000 147135 000 795,000 3,523,000 4164 383 000 5,4033 5,5488 0'.1455 2009 211 169,000 165 337,000 893,000 4 416 000 4 289 314 000 5.4033 5,6488 0.1455 2010 224.143.000 178 311 000 963,000 5 379 000 4 417 993 000 5,4033 5,5488 0,1455 2011 233 669 000 187,837 000 1 015 000 6,394,000 4,550,533,000 5.4033 5.5488 0.1456 012 243,600,000 j97 768 000 1,069,000 7,403,000 4,687,049,000 5.4033 5.5488 0.1455 013 253, 53,000 208,121,000 1 125 000 8,588,000 4 827 660 000 6,4033 5.5488 0,1455 20141 274 746 000 228,914.000 1,237,000 9,825,000 4,972 490 000 5,4033 5,5488 0,1455 ?.015 288,423,000 242.691.000 1,311,000 11 136,000 5,121,665,000 6.4033 5,5488 0.1455 2016 300,681,000 264 849 000 1 377,000 12,513,000 5 275 W 5 000 5,4033 5,6488 0,1455 2017 3'13 460.000 267 628,000 1 416,000 13,959,000 5,433,574,000 6.4033 6.5488 0.1455 2018 326, 82,000 280,950,000. 1,518,000 15,477.000 5 596 581 000 5,4033 5,6488 0.1455 2019 340,670,000 294,838,000 1,593,000 17,070,000 5,764,478,000 5,4033 5,5488 0,1455 2020 855 149,000 309 317 000 1.671.000 18 741 000 6,937,412,000 5,4033 5,5488 0.1455 2021 380,243,000 334 411 1000 1,801,000 20 548 000 6,115,534,000 5,4033 6.5488 0,1455 2022 400,403,000 354,57j.000 9 916 000 22,464,000 6,299,000 000 5,4033 5.5488 0,1455 2023 417 420.000 371,588,000 2,008,000 24,472,000 6 487 970 000 1 5,4033 5,5488 1 0,1455 2624 485.161,000 389 328,000 2 104 000 26, 76,000. 6,682,609,000 5,4033 1 5,5488 0.1455 27 CAST CND RCDCV81.01'N1kN'I'I*.I'0R I 7Cable a-4 T j7 ected Impacts on the Tax Rates of... School(District No.7 SCHOOL PROJECTED ANNUAL TAX DISTRICT INCREMENT NO.7 Lake Oswego Urban Renewal Area District Growth rate = 3,00% UR Area Growth rate = 4,25% lus ro ects Pro ected District's Estimated Tax Rate... Fiscal Pro acted Growth Over Annual T.I. cumulative T.I. AV without with without Difference in Year UR Area TCV Frozen Base Revenue Revenue UR UR UR tax rate 2004 $155,095,000 $109,263,000 $734 000 $734,000 $4,300,000 000 $6,7218 $7.0844 $0.3626 2005 170,316,000 124,484,000 837 000 1 571 000 4,429,000 000 6,7218 7.0844 0,3626 2006 177,555,000 131,723,000 885,000 2,456,000 4,561.870.000 6.7218 7.0844 0,3626 2007 185 101 000 139,269,000, 936.000 3,392,000 4,698,726,000 6.7218 7.0844 0.3626 2008 192,968,000 147135 000 989,000 4,381,000 4,839 688,000 6.7218 7A844 0.3626 2009 211.169.000 165 337 000 1,111,000 5 492,000 4,984,879,000 6,7218 7,0844 0.3626 2010 224 143.000 178,311,000 1,199,000 6,691.000 5,J34,425,000 6,7218 7.0844 0.3626 2011 233 669 000 187,837 000 1,263,000. 7,954,000 5,288,458,000 6.7218 7.0844 0.3626 2012 243,600,000 197 768 000 1,329,000 9,283,000 !i 447 112 000 6.7218 7,0844 0.3626 13 253,953,000 208 121,000 1,399,000 10 682 000 5 610 525 000 6.7218 7.0844 0.3626 14 274,746 000 228 914 000 1 639 000 12,221,000 5,778,841,000 6,7218 7.0844 0,3626 2015 288,423,000 242 591 000 1,631,000 13 852 000 5,952,206.000 6,7218 7.0844 0,3626 2016 300 u81 000 254,849 oocL 1,713,000 15 565 000 6 130 772,000 6,7218 7,0844 0.3626 2017 313.460.000 267,628 000 1,799,000. 17 364 000 6,314,695,000 6,7218 7,0844 0,3626 2018 326,782,000 280 960.000 1,888,000 19,252,000 6,5o4,136,000 6.7218 7,0844 0,3626 2019 340 670 000 294,838,0 00 1,982,000 21 234 000 6,699,260,000 6.7218 7.0844 0.3626 2020 355,149,000 309 317,000 2.079.000 23,313.000 6,900,238,000 6.7218 7.0844 0,3626 2021 380 243,000 334, 1,000 2,248,000 25 561 000 7 107,2,45,000 6.7218 7,0844 0,3626 2022 400,403.000 354,571,000 2 383 000 27,944,000 7 320 462 000 6,7218 7.0844 0,3626 2023 417 420 000 371,588,000 2 A98 000 30 442 000 7 540 076 000 8J218 7,0844 0,3626 2024 435,161,000 389.328 000 2,617,000 33,059,000 1 7 766 278 000 8.7218 7,0844 0,3826 28 EAM'P,M)ItHb'GV1iL01'ML?iV`f'12i P(tltl' I 'jable 8-5 a acted Impacts on the Tax]dates of... Clackamas County PROJECTED ANNUAL TAX CLACKAMAS INCREMENT COUNTY Lake Oswego,Urban Renewal Area District Growth rate = 3,00% UR Area Growth rate = 4,26%(plus ro ects Pro acted District's Estimated Tax Rate Fiscal Projected Growth Over Annual T.I, Cumulative T.I. AV without with without Difference in Year UR Area TCV Frozen Base Revenue Revenue UR UR UR lax rate 2004 $155,095.000 $109,263,000 $256 000 __$256,000 $12a000,D00,000 $2,3402 $2.4042_.Q 0,0 440 2005 170,316,000 124 484.000 291,000 547,000 12,360,000,000 2,3402 2.4042 0.0640 2006 177,555000 131,723,000 308 000 855,000 12 730,800,000 2,3402 2.4042 0.0640 2007 185 101,000, 139,269 000 326.000 1.181.000 13 112 72d 000 2,3402 2,4042 1 0,0640 2008 192,968,000 147 135 000 344,001 1 525 000 13 606 106,000 2,3402 2.4042 0,0640 2009 211,169,000 165,337,000 387,006 1,912,000 13,911,289,000 2.3402 2,4042 0.0640 2010 224143 000 178,311,000 417,000 2,329,000 14,328,628,000 2,3402 2,4042 0,0640 2011 233,669,000 187,837,000 440,000 2,769,000 14,758,487,000 2,3402 2.4042 0.0640 2012 243,600,000 107,76B4O00 463,000 3,232.000 15,201,242,000 2.3402 2,4042 0.0640 2013 253 953,000 208 121 000 487,000 3,719,000 15 657 279 000 2.3402 2,4042 0.0640 14 274,746 000 228 914 000 536,000 4,255,000 16,126,997,000 2,3402 2,4042 0,0640 15 288 423 000 242,591,000 568.000 4,823 000 16,610,807,000 2,3402 2.4042 0,064D 2016 300,681,000 254,849,000 596 000 5419,000 17,109,131,000 2,3402 2,4042 0,0640 2017 313,460,000 267,628,000 626,000 6 045 000 17,622 405,000 2.3402 2,4042 0.0640 2018 328 782.000 280.950,000 657,000 6,702 000 18151 077 000 2,3402 2,4042 0.0640 2019 340,670,000 294,838,000 690 000 7,392,000 18,695,609,000 2,3402 2,4042 _ 0,0640 2020 355.140 000 309,3171000 724,000 8116 000 19 256,477,000 �2.3402 2,4042 0.0640 2021 380 243 000 334,411 000 783.00 8 899 000 10,834,171,000 2,3402 2,4042 0.0640 2022 400,403,000 364 571 000 830,000 9,729,000 20,429,196,000 2,3402 2,4042 0,0640 2023 417 420,000 371,588,000 810,000 10,599,000 21,042,072,000 2.3402 2.4042 0.0640 2024 435,161,000 389,328,000 911,000 11,510 000 21 873 334 OOD 2,3402 2,4042 0.06d0 AAL ERM 29 }SAS I'f;Nb f2t:dNi'ELUfsfvlhN'I'ItGpt)tt'I able 8-G ected Impacts on the Tax Rates of... Portland Conurninity College PORTLAND PROJECTED ANNUAL TAX COMMUNITY INCREMENT COLLEGE Lake Oswe o Urban ReneWa)Area District Growth rate = 3.00% UR Area Growth rate = 4,25%(plus pro ecis) Pro'ected District's Estimated Tax Rate r2004 Pro ected Growth Over Annual T.I. Cumulative T.I, AV without with without Difference in UR Area TCV Frozen Base Revenue Revenue UR UR UR tax rate 155 095 000 $109,263,000 . $53 000 $53000 4 300 000 000 $0,4820$0.4944 $0,0124 170,316,000 224 484 000 60,000 113.000 4,429,000,000 0,4820 0.4944 0.0124 2006 177,555.000 131 723 000 63 000 176,000 4,561,870,000 0.4820 0,4944 0,0124 2007 185,101,000 139,269,000 67,000 243,000 4,698,726,000 0.4820 0.4944 0.0124 2008 192,968,000 147jq5,000 71,000 314 000 4,839,688,000 0.4820 0,4944 1 0.0124 2b79 211,169,000 165 337 000 80,000 394 000 4,984,879,000 0.4820 0.4944 0,0124 2010 224 143 000 178 311,000 86,000 480,000 5J34,425,000 0.4820 0A944 0,0124 2011 233 669 000 1137,837,000 91,000 571 000 5 288 458 000 0,4820 0,4944 0,0124 12 243,600000 197,768,000 95,000 666,000 5,447,112,000 0.4820 0.4944 0,0124 tl13 253,053,000 208,121,000 100,000 766,000 5,,6%525.000 0.4820 0.4944 0,0124 2014 274,746,000 228 914,000 110,000 876,00 5,778,841,000 0.4820 0.4944 0,0124 2015 288 423,000 247.591 000 117,000 993,007 5 952.206,000 0.4820 0,4944 0,0124 2016 300, 81,000 254,849,000 123 000 1,116,000 6 130 772 000 0,4820 0.4944 0.0124 2017 313 460,000 267,628,000 129,000 1,245,000 6,314 695,000 0,4820 0.4944 0.0124 2018 326 782,000 280,950,000 135,000 1,380,000 6,804,136.000 0,4820 0.4944 0.0124 2019 340 670 000 294,838,000 142,000 -1 522,000 6,699 260 000 0.4820 0,4944 �0.0124 t202O 355 149 000 309 317 000 149 000 1 671 000 8 900 238 000 0AB2tl 0.4944 0,0124 !435,161,000 243000 334 411 000 161 000 1 832 000 7 107 245 000 0.4820 0.4944 0.0124 403 000 354 571 000 171 000 2 003 000 7 320 482 000 0.4820 0.49440.0124420a000 371 688 000 179 000 2 182 000 7,540 076 000 0,4820 0,4944 0.0124 389.328 000 188,000 2,370 000 7,766,218,000 0,4820 1 0.4944 0.0124 30 11-A5T END RGI)MLOINENT IVORT SECTION 9-RELOCATION REPORT A. Analysis of existing residents or businesses required to relocate permanently or temporarily as a result of Agency actions under ORS 457.170. Specific properties that may be subject to acquisition have not been identified.Any person or business displaced by projects under the redevelopment plan will be subject to the Agency's relocation regulations. Should relocation of residents within the plan area be required,an inventory of housing opportunities will be provided.Currently,there is abroad range of housing units available in the general area. 1B, Description of the methods to be used for the temporary or permanent relocation of persons living in,and businesses situated in,the redevelopment area in accordance with ORS 281.045 through 281.105. The redevelopment plan requires further study of acquisition and redevelopment of property that may result in the displacement of residents and/or businesses.The Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency will adhere to relocation regulations that govern the eligibility requirements and benefits available to displaced persons or businesses.All relocation activities will be undertaken and payments made in accordance with the requirements of ORS 281,045—281,105 and any other applicable laws or regulations,Relocation payments will be made as provided in ORS.281.0% The Ltilw Oswego Redevelopment Agency adopted Relocation Regulations on September 19, 1989 s that describe the relocation procedures to be followed in accordance with ORS 281.045 through IN 281,105,lord.No.1997,Amendment 2-02/02/901 C, Enumeration,by cost range,of existing housing units in the redevelopment area to be destroyed or altered and new units to he Added. Specific housing units in the redevelopment area to be destroyed or altered and new units to be added have not been identified. 31 EAST END RLDEVELOPMEN'l'ltt P0lt'r EXHIBIT 1 2002 EAST END CIaIMLE,ACTIVITV Citv Wide Section 16 Section 23 Section 27 Crime Type # # % # % # 0/0 Homicide 0 0 0.0 0 010 0 010 Rue 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Robbc 9 2 22.2 0 0.0 2 22.2 Assault 95 11 11.6 2 2.1 1 1,1 BurglarY 157 14 1 9.9 2 1.3 5 3.2 Larceny 626 63 1011 22 3.5 29 4.6 Motor Vehicle Theft 56 5 8.9 1 1.8 1 1,8 Vandalism 340 16 4,7 21 6.2 10 2.9 Narcotics 123 5 4,1 8 6.5 15 12.2 DU11 210 9 4.3 1 9 4.3 20 4,5 Li or Laws 102 12 11,8 3 2,9 12 11,8 **The East End Redevelopment District represents 3,01%of the city's total population as of the 2000 census. 32 I AST END 1 EDOIPLOhh1LNT REPORT EXl[-i<I161tT 2 ASSUMPTIONS USED IN PROJECTING iNCRE MENTAL,VALUES Incremental values in Table 6.1 reflect the following: 2003-05 Assessed value growth from completion and sale of Block 137 town homes in 2003,Completion of Block 138 commercial development in November 2003 and remainder of Block 137 town homes in 2004. 2008-10 Sale of$10,000,000 in bonds in 2008-09 and$4,000,000 in bonds in 2009-10. 2013-15 Sale of$10,000,000 in bonds in 2013-14 and$2,000,000 in bonds in 2014-15. 2020-22 Sale of$10,000,000 in bonds in 2020-21 and$4,000,000 in bonds in 2021-22, 2003-24 General growth of assessed value assumed at 3%and specific growth of assessed value assumed at 1,25%.Urban renewal tax rate remains constant. AM 33 LAST END Rt:!)LVU0PNltNT 1tLt,ORT COMIVMUNITY (DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM nR,URI TO. Planning Commission MOM: Sidaro Sin,Associate Planner SUBJECT: Quality of Life Indicators(QOL) DATE., October 23,2003 Action; Review the draft Quality of Life Report dated October 23,2003(Attachment 1), Discussiow In February 2000,the City Council approved the Quality of Life Indicators task force final report, The report included an implementation plan and timetable for completing the remaining two phases of the Quality of Life Indicators Program, Phase 1,is the adoption of a final set of indicators which will act as"yardsticks"to measure various aspects of the quality of life in the City. Phase 2 is the establishment of targets for the adopted indicators,which will provide goals for the community to work towards, At the Planning Commission's meeting on March 12,2001,the Commission discussed thv proposed timeline for the QOL Program and recommended completion of Phase 1 by the end of 2001 (now extended to end of 2002)and begin Phase 2 after Periodic Review, Since then,staff has been meeting with a subcommittee of the Planning Commission to develop a final set of indicators, 'the proposed final set of indicators reflects approximately a year and half of work by the subcommittee to develop a suitable set of indicators that provides a comprehensive picture of the City, With support from the Planning Commission,it is the intent of staff to provide these indicators to the City Council before their goal setting meeting in 2004, The attached draft report is still a work in progress, Included as Attachment 2 is a matrix describing the status of each indicator, Also,please note the following 35 out of 41 indicators are considered to be complete. Format and photos are not finalized. a Items in the appendices section provides a general idea of the information that will be provided in this section, it is not complete, • Seven indicators are proposed as"sustainability"indicators, Plpn6tng Cntrlinlssin6 Suhn6reolillcc Onllty 611 tle Indlcdtots huge I Novmber IU,2003 hleemH o Lndicator 3.1 Fire Department staff will be forwarding this information shortly, , Indicator 3,2—The data is compiled,but staff is waiting for a definition of"fire". • Indicator 5.3—Staff is awaiting Engineering Dept,approval for the allocation of staff and Aft resources to complete pursue this indicator, d Indicator 5.4- Lake Corporation staff has agreed to provide the City with this information, It should be available shortly. o Indicator 6.4—The G15 Dept,is compiling this information. It should be available shortly. e Indicator 8.1—'Phis indicator is generally complete,but staff is trying to obtain state or national averages as a comparison, e Indicator 9.1—This indicator is generally complete, However,we may consider revising it,—,does it give us the information that we are looking for? ATTACHMENTS, 1. Draft QOL Report(10/23/03) 2, QOL Indicator Status Matrix UPOQaolityuftlraIndleutotMid'AM ma5\10-23.0312eportMemo,doc platlntng Catun0slu0 subcotnmutcu Quality ur Llrc letltcalot9 Page I Nuvamherltl,2p03 Meuunp „ - Owe • � - 1 L � � � '' t'� _ r•crdrwn.��. ��� � �_ ��. ate: 1, Planning Commission City Task Force Members Sub-Committee Staff Chris Fowler,Co-Chair Dan Vizzini,Co-Chair Dan`lizzini John Baines Colleen Bennett Frank Grozniic Susan Blackman Bin Bolland David Waring D«right Bussman Dee Denton Alison Webster MzrciaDonnelly Sherry Finnigan Donald Fiser Ivy Frances Henry Germond Polly Gray Jack Hoffman Joel Johnson Neda Maghbouleh Susan Noack Sheila Ostly Edward Popkin Dorothy Rogers Christine Roth Art Scevola Patt Thomas Lorie James(Alternate) City of Lake Oswego Page 2 Qs of Life Indicators Charge Statement The purpose of a Quality of Life indicators Program is to maintain community livability and identify growth related impacts that may affect the community's quality of life. Goal 14 of the City's Comprehensive Plan provides direction for the development of objective indicators. Therefore, the assignment of the task force is to inventory, identify, and develop specific qualify of life indicators and to make recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council on adoption and implementation of an indicator program_ Indicators shall be comprehensive, measurable, and use timely reliable information that is already available or can be readily obtained. The. implementation program shall include_ a time-frame; estimated budget; potential funding sources; and list of possible actions corresponding to the indicators. r- � t ♦y 4 _y City of Lake Oswego Page 3 Quality of Life rndicators I 2 y . ra S .C• :Y F ^r �<< y` t� e.. City ofY-ak-c Oswego Pan 4 71 � `yam - _. ��# � :s � _ rs i � � � _ �y ✓ n 1 .r � � # s F E x � @�� ..r i •` .�r Y Table of Contents Overview Lake Oswego Perspective Indicators e Homes and Neighborhoods-----------------------------------------------x. s Mobility and Access------------------------------------------------------x Security and Well-heir3--------------------------------------------------x • Education--------------------------------------------------------------------x Environment and Natural Resources-------- -----x o Economic Opportunity and Vitality-------------------------------------x • Parks,Recreation and Open Space--------------------------------------x • Culture and History--------------------------------------------------------x Community Involvement-------------------------------------------------x Definitions Appendices City of Lake Oswego Page 5 Quality of Life Indicators Overview What are Quality of Life Indicators? The long-term success of a community's Comprehensive PIan depends on the ability of community leaders to respond to changing forces and _ situations and adjust community goals and policies accordingly_ The proposed system of quality of life indicators will enable the City to monitor the impacts of growth and change on the community and suggest necessary changes to the Comprehensive Plan_These indicators - collectively measure the extent that the community has achieved its goals as a livable city,and individually the indicators serve to evaluate the impact that future development would have on the City's quality of life In this way the indicators compliment the vision and the functions of the Comprehensive PIan,and represent a powerful tool for guiding the community's evolution. In addition to their direct relationship to the Comprehensive Plan, quaRT of life indicators provide the following benefits to the community_ = Provide a framework:.to set community Lagets for future goals and to chart progress. a. Provide a basis for analyzing the feasibility and benefits ofspecific programs and ordinances. a Provide a framework for program and performance evaluation and accountability for results_ a Provide abasis for allocating limited resources. How aid we get to where we are now? In 1997,the Lake Oswego City Council adopted Growth Management policies in response to growing concerns about the environmental,economic and social impacts ofurbanization_ The policies set forth a number ofCity actions,including the development of quantifiable indicators to measure changes in the quality of in Lake Oswego. In December 1998,the City Council selected a 24-member task force to inventory,identify,and develop specific quality of life indicators and to subsequently make recommendations to the Planning Commission and the Council on adoption and implementation of an indicator program_ City olLake uswcgo Pa e 6 Q2ftoffifeWicators TheTask Force?iegan its work in February 1999- Over the course ofnine months,Task Force members(1)receved staffbriefings on the principles ofperformance measurement,(2) z reviewed the efforts ofothermunicipalities,(3)identified broad topic areas for organizing its work,(4)developed more than 300 possible indicators,and(5)finally narrowed its list of recommended indicators to 72 The Task Force organized itself into 4 fa-us groups and divided the responsibility of developing recommended indicators based on general topic areas,such as community involvement,public safety,education and the environment The Task Force held 12 formal work sessions and hosted two open house meetings to invite public review and comment. Task Force members also held numerous informal meetings to advance the work of individual focus groups_ In the end,the Task Force recommended 72 Quality ofLife indicators,organized under 9 program categories. Those indicators were therirefined and reviewed by asubcommittee ofthe Planning Commission. The growth management indicators found in this report are the-wdt ofa lengthyprocess to focus the number of indicators to a core group ofdescriptive indicators that would provide a clear description of the quality of life in Lake Oswego Relport Format As noted previously,indicators are organized into 9 major topic areas:1)Homes and Neighborhoods;. 2)Mobility and Access;3) Security and Well-Being,4)Education;5)Environment and Natural Resources:b)Economic Opportunity and Vitality;7)Parks, Recreation and Open Space;8)Culture and History;and 9)Community Involvement The report includes a description of the indicator,a rationale for why the indicator was chosen and an explanation of what the data shows. Words with an asterisk(*)are defined at the end of the report Sustainability Indicators A special element that has been added to the indicators prog<am is the inclusion of sustainability indicators" These indicators in son:e way monitor activities that contnbut to the preservation ofnatural resources,air quality or the environment Sustainability Icon CityofLakeOswego rage 7 Quality of Life Indicators 0 Lake Oswego Perspective Lake Oswego's size,natural setting and pattern of development lend a _ a predominant"village"character to the community. The city's village feel is r accentuated by a physical isolation caused by natural and man-made barriers,such as the Willamette River,Palatine Hill,Tryon Creek State Park and Interstate S. The city's"village'characteris reflected indistinct neighborhoods,close links between residential and commercial areas,and a l a~al focus ofbusinesses and commercial services. 4 • '� Lake Oswego is a garden of natural beauty in the region of increasing ; urbanization. The variety ofphysical terrain,groves of trees,and sheltered watersheds offer rest,relaxation and recreation to city residents. The natural beauty promotes a demand by residents for development that respects and reflects the physical environment a The settled'population and mature natural landscape afford Lake Oswego a ': sense ofstabifi continui eacefulness and permanence- The stable tY> tY P P population,reflects a wide range ofages and socio-economic:status. The - residents and businesses are active participants in community activities and ' enterprises. The residents of Lake Oswego share a common appreciation for free expression,and the pursuit of intellectual,cultural and athletic achievement The community offers and supports a wide variety of opportunities and resources to promote these pursuits. City oflake Oswego P Q]M.f Life Indicators CITY OF T•AKF OSWEGO STATISTICS General Select 2000 Census Information Yeard£Iacurrtcn. `�T10 Poputftiia = 35; Z8 FormofGovemment Counci Manager Median Age 41.2 Popalalra:x�.7�G2�: f 3,°,�3�5,7�0 A'�erag��eusedtg'Id.St: t 238 Areas in Square Miles 11.05 Total Hclo sing Units 15,668 Os B F vatE -402 597 P7u�fb$l�i�{c�yagEq y TC,o[�m�m,�uncity A���. T. i •..ULQ11fiA'-y^�+ss�_ C l 4 '%'K_ rt Avg_Number ofOTgm on Patmlt 4• Adult Community Centers i N'titio5er�ift�.elilsl --, '•`=I4 Neig-bbarkt�oct�ss��a s_ F,_ -�l•9 Number of Patrol Bicycles 4 Citizen Advisory Boards 10 Nuns "wfisi s -'2 ITaitPiofiE lfi-mA t-- Number off ire 4 Amphitheater 1 Nti-clibes' Perne1 Recreation _ _ Education *-9 Outdoor Swan Paris 2 Public Juniorfligh Schools 2 Pahl - - >?lgic�o � `= Indoor-Swim Facilities 2 Private University 1 0-tdoorTennis Courts(public) 12 Infrastructure Water Sport Recreation Center 1 Sanitary Sewers(riles 201 Streets(miles) _ 178_ Ntt�ser �.y�lza�Fs' �s I;S�,t t Atany given time City of Yorke Oswego Page 9 Quality of Life Indicators Homes and Neighborhoods Lake Oswego is first and foremost a city of quality residential neighborhoods. The value,attractiveness and diversity of the housing stock are an economic strength that attracts a diverse and active residential population. Our quality of life is directly related to stable residential neighborhoods,neighborhood character that balances built and natural environments:and a diverse inventory ofhigh quality housing. Housing and residential development occupy a strong place in the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan,reflecting popular concern for protecting the economic,social and environmental qualities of a predominately residential community. Goals from.the City's Comprehensive Plan provide an indication of community values_ Key goals that address homes and neighborhoods include(bu -e not limited to)the following_ Maintain a balanced,diverse housing inventory. Retain the character ofexisting neighborhoods_ Ensure that major subdivisions are compatible with the character of adjacent neighborhoods_ Ensure an equitable distribution of increased infrastructure costs. Maintain and improve the environmental quality of the City a Maintain the per capita acreage of neighborhood parks and open space. Retain the carrying capacity of neighborhood streets and the major collection systems_ Minimize the impact ofincreased student population on local schools_ City of Lake Oswego Page 10 Q ofLiferndicaturs Am 1�1•=TF��ie� �ag�cif-�� ���.v�i�e $� � ti Indicator Description This indicator looks at the number and percentage of variances that have been approved since 1995. The data identifies the total number of variances requested because there may be more than one variance request per application_ Why Are We Measuring This? a This is,a measure of how well the City's residential neighborhood policies and zoning ordinance are accommodating growth and development_ What Does The Data Show? The general trend for approval ofvariances appears Class 1 and2 Variances to be declining. In 1995 and 1996 all variances were Year Class Class Withdrawn/ Total Percentage approved_ Since then,approvals have fluctuated_ 1 2 Denied Variances Approved Approvals for Class 1 variances significantly Requested 0 28 100% 2S 5 3 taitnumber Class 2 variances_ There does not appear 1991995 22 3 0 32 100% to be a pattem for the number of total variances 1997 39 9 6 54 88% received each year_ The number of variances 1998 26 1 7 34 79% requested in 2002 significantly dropped compared to 1999 30 2 2 34 94% the previous years_ This could be a result of changes 2000 20 1 4 1 25 840/6 in the Community Development Code- 2001 34 1 12 47 74% 2002 9 11 3 23 87°/a Source: City of Lake Oswego Planning Department City of Lake Oswego Page 11 Quality ofLife Indicators I.2 -T$� a cemtag o€apprss d an Paige:: Indicator Description This indicator examines the percentage of zone changes that have been approved since 1997_ Zone changes included in the count only include applications that requested a change on the zoning map from one zone to anotherzone_ It does not include zoning text amendments,automatic zone changes as a result of an annexation. Why Are We Measuring This? • This is a measure ofthe City's residential neighborhood Requests Approved Percentage policies and zoning ordinance are accommodating Approved growth and development. 1997 0 0 0 1998 4 4 100 What Does The Data Show? 1999 2 0 0 In the last six years,there have been nine applications for a 2000 1 0 0 zone change_ Only six or 66%overall were approved. In 2001 2 2 100 1997 and 2002 there were no requests for zone changes. In. 2002 0 0 0 1998 all four zone change requests were approved. Total_ 9 6 66 However,.in 1999 two zone changes were denied and in 2000 one was denied_ It appears that zoning is stable in the community. Source: City of Lake Oswego Planning Department City of take Osuego Page 12 Q of Life Indicator; Averag New Valuation$ valuation per Permits in Millionspermit 1995 35 9 257.142 1-3=e`rhia ��C22ag@ tIS 1£�II� 1 1996 113 29.9 264,601 4 1997 77 19.8 257,142 single-f�ri't �{de �� s•-r - -, 1998 146 31.4 1 215.068 1999 116 22 1 189,655 20099 Indicator Description 1 , 7 P 20011 102 24.3.8 24343,137 This measures the level of Commitment for staying in the City as 2001 82 27,4 334,146 measured by the dollar amount reinvested into an existing dwelling or new construction_ Data is obtained from building records between 1995 and 2002- The valuation of a house for new construction is derived fonn the — Uniform Building Code valuation schedule based :overage Valuation for New on a set per square foot cost. Single-Family Dwellings Permits 1995-2002 Why Are We Measuring This? 400.000 • Willingness of individuals to reinvest in the 350,000 community can be directly attributed to the 30D.000 quality of life in a community_ 2sD,o00 G o 200,000 What Does The Data Show? The average valuation of new single-family dwelling permits was:$257,000 in 1995- That 100,000 Y4_ 3 � `� M _ average remained fairly constant until it began 50,000 - 0 dropping in I998. The average hit a low of 1995 1996 I 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 $ 74,000 in 2000,but since then has steadily increased to a seven year average high of$334,000 _ Yeats in 2002. Source. City of Lake Oswego Building Department City of Lake Oswego Page 13 Quality of Life Indicators 1.4 r The average valt ia4pn of Average$ Remodel V.Iuation$ valuation 'Il"eililOddedB�&f=fly Permits ':n IVliliions er ermit 1995 138 3.5 25,362 1996 314 6.6 21,019 • 199T 248 6.8 27,419 Indicator Description 1998 334 7.9 23,652 This indicator tracks the number of building 1999 351 5,3 15.099 permits that were issued for remodeled single- 2000 338 6.7 19,822 2001 310 7.1 22.903 family dwellings_ The valuation for remodels is 2002 373 10.6 28,418 derived from the value of equipment,materials, Iabor,overhead and profit for the remodel project Why Are We Meastt_ring This? e Permanence and longevity ofthe city's residents can be directly attributed to the quality of life in a community_ Average Valuation for Remodel Single-Family Dwelling Permits 1995-2002 What Does The Data Show? 30,000 The number of remodel building permits has zs,000 steadily increased over the years and has reached a f � seven year high of373 permits in 21102. However, 20,000 r f 4 although the valuation of remodels has--.creased �- r A w Y from.3.5 million in 1995 to 10.6 milli-a in 2002,the E o 15,oao average valuation.has not increased that 10.000 significantly_ Although it has been steadily - s �} x climbing from a low in 1999 of$15,000 to a high of 5,000 $28,000 in 2002- o - 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Source. City of Lake Oswego Building Department Year C iq of Lake Oswego Page 14 QuAML Life Indicators Mob` ''tv mid Access Lake Oswego developed during an age ofdependence on the automobile Much of our existing quality of life is influenced by our personal reliance on the automobile,and our city's ability to manage automobile based transportation demands_ As our city(and the surrounding region)develops and matures,our ability to preserve our quality of will rely on a wide variety of transportation alternatives y that promote mobility and access for our entire community. For those residents who are unable to drive(the young,elderly,disabled or disadvantaged),mobility is a particular challenge if they are to have access to the amenities and services that are readily available in Lake Oswego. Our transportation"resources"must accommodate the needs of all residents by providing an adequate mix of streets,sidewalks, # w pathways,bike lanes and bus services. By providing and promoting alternatives to the automobile,Lake Oswego improves its quality of life by reducing congestion,noise and pollution. City of Lake Oswego Page 15 Quality of f ife Indicators Indicator Description 4 $ Th g ee iti. o of 1if bide Bike and pedestrian facilities are zt' combined and measured against vehicles street miles to establish a -:Ey# •' Y comparison. Pedestrian facilities include pathways and sidewalks_ Bike facilities only include bike lanes(although some multi-use pathways allow bicycles). Multi-use pathways are counted under pedestrian facilities_ Sidewalks and bike lanes are only measured once although they may be on.both sides of a roadway. This generally maintains a good comparison between the three facilities without infiaiing the bike and pedestrian facilities mileage. PIease note that the sum of bike and pedestrian miles also,includes off-road pathways and therefore,may exceed the total street miles. Year 2003 2005 2007 Why Are We Measuring This? Miles of Bike 11A • The ability, to bike or walk in the city adds to the Facilities quality oflife. Am,opportunities increasing? lyEles of Pedestrian 124.4 This indicator is also a sustainability indicator in Facilities that it promotes the use of alternative modes of Miles of Roadway 178 travel,thereby reducing the dependency on oil and as noted above helps the air quality in the City. Percentage of Eke& 76% What Does The Data Show? Pedestrian to Street There is currently insufficient data to make any Mlles substantial findings_ The 2003 data w'ilI be used as a base line number for subsequent years. However,at this time we can conclude that for every mile of roadway the City provides,it provides three quarters of a mile ofbicycle or pedestrian facilities. Source- City of Lake Oswego,GIS Dept. CiigofLakeOswego Pa e16 Oudffikof Life Indicators 2.2-- Tri--Metbus-n'Oers Otin Lake.0sWq6. Indicator Description Ridership counts are taken twice a year by Tri-Met,in the Fall and Spring. Tri Met staff indicates that the Spring and Fall numbers ar,approximately the same,therefore,spring ridership counts between 2000 through 2002 during the months of March,April and May are used for this indicator_ The counts represent the number of passengers boarding the bus"on"in Lake Oswego and the number of passengers getting"off'of the bus in Lake Oswego at approximately 200 bus stop locations within the city limits. Why Are We Measuring This? The opportunity to ride public transit is important to the community in that it provides independence for those that may not otherwise have the opportunity to drive,walk or ride. • This indicator is also a sustainability indicator in that it promotes the use of alternative modes oftravel,thereby reducing the dependency on oil anci,as noted above,helps the air quality in the City. What Does The Data Show? Year ON OFF Total Ridership in Lake Oswego has been pretty consistent keeping Ridership below 2,200 on-offt-ansactions. In 2000,there were more riders 2000 1,117 1,482 12,164 getting off ofthe bus in Lake Oswego than were getting on the 2001 1,036 1,G99 12,135 bus. However,by 2002 that number is almost the same. 2002 11,033 1,087 12,120 Source. Tri-Met City of Like Oswego Pane 17 Quality of life Indicators woes pr'0 vak Indicator Description This indicator looks at the opportunity for people to travel within Lake Oswego. In 2002,there were six bus routes that provided service in the City_ This is the first year that this data is being taken_ Subsequent years will provide enough data to make findings. Why Are We Measuring This? The more miles provided for bus transit: a Could increase the number of ridership and therefore reduce the number of single occupancy vehicle trips. s Provide the opportunity for independence for those who may not have ability to drive,walk or ride a bike. This indicator is also a sustainability indicator in that it promotes the use of an alternative mode of travel(other than single occupancy vehicle),thereby reducing the dependency on oil and as helps the air quality in the City.. What Does The Data Show? There is currently insufficient data to make any substantial findings. Year 2002 2004 2006 The 2002 data will be used as a base line number for subsequent Miles of Transit 43 years_ However,at this time we can.conclude that only one quarter Miles of Street 178 of the Cit f's roadways are served by transit. Percentage of 24% Transit Miles to Source. City of Lake Oswego,GIS Dept. Street Miles City of Lake Oswego Page 18 Qof Life indicators F PCI Value Description Recommended 2:4vap Iid1Q>llC [IIt ? g 'i 'Il ��olt',j Action xpidr� � :�- G 71-100 Good Preventative • =. 4 x Slurry seals/patching Indicator Description 51-70 Moderate 1 2"-3"overlay The PCI is a statewide rating system to determine and monitor 31-50 Poor Overlay with pavement condition_ The City has PCI data for all streets within the 0-30 Failing Reconstruction cling ction City. PCI ratings were performed in 1999 and recently in 2002. PCI ratings range from 100(good)to 0(poor). This indicator looks at tune roadways in Lake Oswego that are classified as either a major arterial,minor arterial,or major collector. The overall PCI is taken for several segments for each roadway_ The PCI number used is an average of several segments of the roadway. Why Are We Measuring This? The City's Ievel.of commitment to street maintenance that contributes pAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX to mobility and aesthetics in the City can be reflected in the condition Street 1999 12002 of roadways- "A"Ave. 54 -- 77 What Does The Data Snow? Boones Ferry 59 78 The PCI between 1999 and 2002 has improved for most roadways Rd. measured in the City_ Dlaking significant improvements on"A"Avenue, Bryant Rd. 54 68 Boones Ferry Rd.,Bryant Rd.,Iron Mt_Blvd.,and McVey Ave. 'Country Club 75 68 However,two roadways,Country Club Road and South Shore Boulevard Rd. have had their PCI decrease. Country Club Road PCI decreased Iron Mt.Blvd. 52 82 substantially from 75 to 68. The marked improvement or decrease in PCI I£ruse W . 85 87 could be attributed to roadway improvement in the Capital improvement McVey Ave. 75 87 PIan(CIP)or due to improvements associated with land development. South Shore 84 82 Blvd. Source: City ofLake Oswego,Transportation Engineering Division State St N!A MIA City of lake Oswego Page 19 Quality of Life Indicators s 2: Thesolume-oftraf:d9IDt 1H21t( }�` 4- 2003 rrraffic _ifB WAS"IH tie�:1rVv.- Roadwa Volume "A"Ave. 24,014 Boones Ferry Rd. 32,640 Indicator Description Bryant Rd. . 6,397 Traffic on the City's roadways is a major concern for everyone and Country Club Rd. 24,214 impacts the quality of life and air quality in the area- One way to ensure Iron Mt.Blvd. 4,613 that traffic does not get out of control and that the City's transportation Kruse''V . 32,882 planning.is effective is to monitor the volume of traffic on widely used IV�Ave. 18,651 roadways- Nine roadways were chosen to be monitored- Most are South Shore Blvd. 6,973 arterials,but some are collectors_ Traffic volume counts for June and July 2003 on these roadways include the volume of traffic going both directions during June and July. Why Are We Measuring This? • From this data,we should be able to identify where and if traffic is increasing and apply resources as needed to address the problem- What Does The Data.Shove? Because this is the first year this data is being collected,no conclusions can be made from the data. Source: City of Lake Oswego,Transportation Engineering Division City ofLake Oswego Page 20 ChaMlikkofLffic Segg:i r and-Weld-Be�� Adequate police,fire and emergency services assure the quality of life by imparting a sense ofsecurity and well-being for residents and business owners, c and protecting our significant investment in private and public property. Changes in our community demand increasing levels of effort and sophistication by ourpublic safety services,and increasing levels of understanding and involvement from our citizens_ " FireDepartment The Lake Oswego Fire Department employees51 full time staffand provides emergency response to more than 50,000 citizens within the City of Lake Oswego and three adjoining contract districts(Lake Grove Rural Fire District„Riverdale/Dunthorpe Fire District,and Alto Park Water District). There are four fire stations strategically located throughout the City that respond to emergencies 24-hours a day throughout the year. The Department provides emergency services including: fire suppression,emergency medical response,hospital ambulance transportation,water&dive rescue,technical rescue operations,hazardous materials incidents,and disaster response It also provides non-emergency services such as:fire prevention and inspection services,code enforcement,public safety education services/CPR training,fire extinguisher use,residential safety surreys,home fire escape planning,emergency and disaster preparedness planning and training for citizens(CERT),and fire and life safety education in Lake Oswego schools.. Police Department Tile Lake Oswego Police Department operates 24-hours a day,7-days a week throughout the year and employs 67 full time employees: 43 sworn police officers; 12 communications operators;5 community service officers;and 7 support personnel_ It provides a full range of services including: records,patrol, traffic,investigation,.and community services_ CityoftakeOsaego Page 21 Quality ofLife Indicators 3 1- fie cefitmge-Of calls res-ppn ed 0 w,&v ` - .nitfutes 6 Indicator.Description Knowing that emergency services are only five minutes away provides a warm blanket kind of sense of security. This indicator monitors all calls(fire,medical,hazmat,etc...)that the Fire Department receives and tracks the number of calls that are responded to within five minutes. Time is tracked from the time the Lake Oswego Communication:Center receives an emergency call to the time the first emergency vehicle arrives on the scene. A five minutes response time was chosen because it reflects acceptable national target standards for response rates_ Why Are We Measuring This? e Provides a sense ofsecurity knowing that emergency services are within five minutes. What Does The Data Show? Source: City of Lake Oswego Fire Department rty of Lake Oswego Page M Qwdftoflifelndicators AWL Indicator Description Damage caused by fires can have a devastating effect on a family. One of the roles of the fire department is to educate the public on fire prevention_ Information has been calculated for actual fires per 1,000 population for approximate two year cycles beginning in 1972 to I996_ Beginning in 1996 this number has been tracked yearly. A`Tire"call is defined as_._ ........The actual fires responded to by the Fire Department is small compared to medical calls. In 2002,the Fire Department responded to 2,967 calls_ Why Are We Measuring This?' •, Provides:an idea ofthe effectiveness offire prevention strategies. • Provides universal fire statistics that than can be compared to other communities. What Does The Data Show? Fires Per 1,000 Population 1972-2002 In 1972 there were 236 actual fires_ Since then actual fires per 1,000 16 rr population have decreased steadily and 14 remained tow The fires per capitaha:7 12 been significantly reduced'from 13.8 per 10 1,000 residents to low of3.9 per 1 000_ S - N Source:. City of Lake Oswego Fire 2 Department 0 O O O O O O O U7 O O, D) O Ol O to O CV. N Pt Year City of Lake Oswego Page 23 Quality of LifeTndicatos 3: I at�na Zvi im a0".me s der .: Indicator Description Part I Index Crimes are a category ofthe most serious of crimes,which by state mandate need to be reported. Crime rates are valid indicators in measuring quality of life due to the fact that most individual directly correlate lower crime rates with a sense of security Victimization rates per 1,000 population have been included to provide a numeric identifier that correlates the number of Part I Index Crimes relative to the population. Part I Index Crimes include.murder,.rape,aggravated assault,robbery,burglary,larceny,motor vehicle theft and arson. 'WhyAre We Measuring This? — — — — --' Victimization bates Per • Provides the types and rate at which these i ,QQQ crimes are committed:in the community_ Population! for • Monitors the effectiveness of crime prevention_ Part I Index Crimes o. Provides universal crime:statistics that than can 35 be compared to other communities. 30 25 n What Does The Data Show? 20 f Overall Part I Index Crimes have declined from 15 a 7- a a 1998 to 2002(with a slight spike in 2001), 10 _ although the population has increased_ Consistent 5 J - F with the decrease in crime,the victimization rat 0 has also decreased from a high:in 1998 of3 0.6 per 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1,000 to 25 per 1,000. Year Source: City of Lake Oswego Police Department City of Lake Oswego P e-) Q of Life Indicators 3.4 The-annualaccUrr UT. Ny indite Indicator Description Parr II Non-Index Crimes are Iess serious crimes compared to the Part I Index Crimes_ Nonetheless,these crimes deeply affect one's sense of security. The data includes a baseline date from 1980 then continues from 1997 through 2002 Although there is an extensive list of Part 11 Non-Index Crimes,.only a select few crimes were chosen to be represented_ Those include_minor in possession W),curfew violations,driving under the influence of intoxicants(DUH),and simple assault_ Why Are We Measuring This? • Provides universal crime statistics that than can be compared to other communities. What Does The Data Show? The base year data in 1980 shows the Iowest number of any crime occurrence in all of the categories and as a total. This could be a result of a lower population at thetiime. During 1994 up to 1998 the total occurrence of Part II crimes were on a rise until 1999 when began to drop. The 2002 total is the lowest crime rate of the recorded crime rate years,with the exception of the base year. The highest rate of occurrence is for MIP followed by DUII. Source. City of Lake Oswego Police Department t980 1 1994 1995 1996 I997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 MIP 32 1 120 231 178 212 255 196. 127 104 93 Curfew 20 30 62 57 124 127 45 25 21 12 DU11 76 155 128 121 142 Ill 123 178 197 212 Sim IeAssault 52 86 113 103 72 65 82 67 59 51 Total 180 391 534 459 550 558 446 397 381 36$ CityofLakeOswego Page 25 Quality of Life Indicators 3.5 -The-.number of-auto crashes al- Lalke ---swegd per.I 000-'0,o*dUftwi Indicator Description Traffic crashes affect the health and safety of a community_ In addition,the cost to the community in the form of insurance and.medical expenses are substantial. The recorded crash base year data of 1980 is shown with subsequent reporting years starting with 1991 through 2002. Data is collected for all crashes on roadways within the city limits_ WhyAre-We Measuring This? • Measures level oaf safety on streets_ • Measure ofthe City's traffic enforcement. What Does The Data Show? p Auto Crashes Per 1,000 Population The 1980. base year is significantly higher with ' 22.4 crashes per 1,000population. However,after 25 r I980 starting with 1990,the recorded crashes per 20 s 'Z I,000 population significantly drops and continue to drop into 2002_ The reduction in crashes after 15 1980 can be partially attributed to the formation of 2 10 the Police Department's Traffic Unit in 1982. In 2002 the crashes per 1,000 population was 6.4. _ Source: City of Lake Oswego Police Department C — C rn rn rn rn rn rn o o C rn M a a M rn M o> w rn o a o Year r City ofLake Oswego Page 26 QofLifeIndicators AdMh Education The quality of a community's public school system is one measure ofthe community's concern for its children and the future ofthe community as a whole. _ Quality public education also is a strong influence on the attractiveness of a community to businesses and r home-buyers- It is safe to say that what is good for quality education is good for the social and economic ` interests ofa community,and advances its quality of yam' r life- The citizens ofLake Oswego believe in quality - education and demand it- They believe that the community shares a responsibility for educating its children- Despite grave concerns about the future or public finance forpublic education,the citizens ofLake Oswego carry on a long tradition of investment in educational opportunity and achievement. The following indicators measure both the knowledge and capabilities ofLake Oswego students;and the quality of educational opportunities offered by Lake Oswego schools. City ofLake Oswego Page 27 Quality of Life Indicators. Al -`GiAi - ptan,irate xt�a � ss �g€:g�>UM' Indicator Description The measure ofa community is based on what the community can provide. Education in a community is an important factor in that equation in that it provides the foundation for which the community's youth can build their future_ The data for graduation rates are from Lake:Oswego and Lakeridge High Schools and reflect the total number ofseniors who graduated from high school between 1996 and2002. Why Are We Measuring.This? e Graduation rates are a standard measure of the success of the education system in a community. What Does The Data Show? Overall,graduation rates have been high ranging from a low of 9l%to a hi of99%. The graduation rate Number of Number of � Seniors Graduates _Percentage remains high even though the senior population has 1996 472 429 91% generally increased over the years_ 1997 488 457 94% 1998 520 505 97% Source: Lake Oswego School District 19991 463 437 94% 20001 505 488 97% 20011 55T 545 98% 20021 528 523 99% CityofLakeOswego Pa e2S Q ofLifeindicators Grades K 2 Grades 3-12 4.� The.staffing-Tatiatgg La ,�SP @ 1996 126 1:26 W11n�' l�@�. =, x -: � �� 1997 126 1:26 1998 1:26 1:26 14' 1999 124 1:26 2000 1:24- 1:25 Indicator Description 2001 1:24 1 1:25 Staffing ratios are set by the Lake Oswego School Board. The staffing ratios 2002 124 1 1:25 determine the number of teachers that will be allocated based on school enrollment at the specific grade levels. The principals then determine class configuration and allocate teachers_ WhyAre We Measuring This? e Class size could be related to the quality of the learning experience. What Does The Data Show? The staffing ratios have gotten better over the years. In 1996 the staffing ratios for both K-2 and 3-12 were l teacher to 26 students- In 2000 we see an improvement in the ratio to 1-24 for K-2 and 125 for grades 3-12.. Source: Lake Oswego School District City ofLake Oswego Page 29 Quality of Life Indicators 4:3 ': �brceteTgdaaam a� nc1 Y =- o sQc®�claa �iu�a is testes Indicator Description Post secondary institutions include 4-year and 2-year institutions_ The data is collected from Lake Oswego and Lakeridge High Schools_ Why Are We Measumig This? a Relates to the quality of education in the school system_ Graduates in Number of postsecondary Indicates the level of importance a community gives to Graduates institutions Percentage obtaining apost secondary education.. 1997 457 358 78% 1998 505 435 QCZ% What Does The Data Show? 19991 437 374 86% Since 1997 the number of graduates who attend post 2000 488 488 82°% 2001 545 424 78% Secondary educational institutes has been fairly consistent, 2002 523 442 85% ranging between 78%and 86%_ Source. Lake Oswego School District City of Lake Oswego Page30 QUIQDKOFI-ife,Indicators Environment and. Natural Resources Lake Oswego exists in a sensitive and dynamic natural environment. It is impossible to separate the health and quality of our community from that of the surrounding environment. The citizens of Lake Oswego recognize the inseparable connection between our built and natural environments,and place the highest importance on efforts to protect and preserve the quality of both in balance to each other. TREES AND NATURAL HABITAT PROTECTION. Lake Oswego's extensive areas of natural habitat and the quantity,quality and size of trees in Lake.Oswego contribute to the City`s identity, charm and is inherent to the quality of life we all enjoy_ AIR QUALITY. Air quality directly affects personal health of residents,the long-term economic life ofour community,and the general health of our natural environment_ _ a SURFACE WATER QUALITY., The quality and health of area :. streams and rivers:have direct environmental and economic impacts on our community_ Cty ofLake Oswego Page 31 Quality of Life Indicators 5� �ereeut it etWAw Sz-x h Percentage of : � e3II°� 14' TS= ran Impervious R $O - Surfaces 2003 32% Indicator Description The ability to monitor the amount of land surface that repels or sheds(impervious)water can tell us a lot about how much open space is in the City and also about how to manage water quality in the City. The less impervious. surfaces means more open space,which includes among other things more grass and more trees"green",which benefitss the community_ In addition,the less impervious surfaces suggests that more storm water is naturally absorbed through the ground instead ofpiped through the storm water system. The natural absorption of storm water generally leads to better water quality in our streams and rivers. The lake is not included in.the pervious surface calculation. Why Are We Measuring This? • Provides data about how much land surface in the city is"green" • Provides data about how to manage and plan for water quality programs. What Does The Data Show? This is the first year this data is being collected. However,given that most of Lake Oswego and areas within the its urban services boundary is considered"built out",meaning that there is limited land to develop and that most of the current development consists of small in-fill development,having almost 70%of land be grass,trees or some other form ofpervious surface significantly adds to the quality of life in the City. Although there will likely continue to be infil.types of development,it should not significantly affect the percentage of pervious surfaces. City of Lake Oswego Pape 32 QuJbikafLifeIndicators 5. Indicator Description The Air Quality Index(AQI)is an index for reporting daily air quality.It tells you how clean or polluted your air is,and what associated health concerns you should be aware of.The AQ1 focuses on health effects that can happen within a few hours or days after breathing polluted air_Five major air pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act are tracked:ground-level ozone,particulate matter,carbon monoxide,sulfur dioxide,and nitrogen dioxide. You can think oftheAQI as a yardstick that runs from 0 to 500.The higher the AQI value,the greater the level of air pollution and the greater the health danger. 0 50 "Good"-Air quality is considered satisfactory and air pollution poses little or no risk 51-100 "Moderate"-Air quality is acceptable;however,for some pollutants there may be a moderate health concern for a very small number of individuals. - 101 200 "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups"-Certain groups ofpeople are particularly sensitive to the harmful effects of certain airpollutants. Members of sensitive groups may experience health effects. 201 300 "Unhealthy"-Everyone may begin to experience health effects. 30I 500 "Dangerous'-Values over 300 trigger health warnings of emergency conditions.The entire population is more likely to be affected_ Using this,index,data is tracked from 1993 to 2002 for air quality days that were"Good","Moderate","Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups and"Unhealthy"'. This data is for the Portland/Vancouver Metropolitan Area. (Additional Information may be found at hqp://www_epa.gov or http://www.deq.state.or.us City of Lake Oswego Pace 33 Quality of Life rndicators Why Are We Measuring This? • Track the correlation between growth and air quality. a Are metropolitan air quality regulations effective?' 1993 1994 1 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Good 293 286 313 308 327 335 301 279 285 303 Moderate 72 77 50 52 38 2T 58 80 75 56 Unhealthy 0 2 2 6 0 3 6 7 5 6 What Does The Data Show? Since 1993 there have been no recorded dangerous air quality days_ Although the population in the metropolitan area has increased over the years„the good air quality days have stayed fairly high compared to 1993 and 1994. Recorded unhealthy days have stayed constant since 1998 with one unhealthy day. Moderate days have fluctuated between ahighof 80 days in 2000 to a low of27 days in 1998. However,since 1999 the unhealthy days for certain groups ofpeople have increased noticeably. Source: Environmental Protection Agency City ofLake Oswego Page 34 O-udWk afLtfeIndicators Ack [-NOTE. Staffis currently working on obtaining this data.] Indicator Description Macro-invertibrate communities are a simple and effective way to measure stream health.Macro-invertibrates have been used as indicators ofwater quality for decades.Water quality problems are difficult or impossible to detect and measure with chemical monitoring along because pollutants discharges from land use sources are sporadic and come from large diverse areas. Aquatic organisms,however,integrate habitat and chemical disturbance over time,. thus providing a useful.measure of impairment due to pollutant discharges and of stream health_ Springbrook Creek was chosen out ofthe many streams within the city to monitor macro-inveretibrate populations because it significantly contributes to the water quality in.the lake and is a conduit for a large watershed in the City. Why Are We Measuring This? s Good indicator of stream health and water quality_ What Does The Data Show? This is the first year this information is being.monitored. City.of Lake Oswego Page 35 Quality of Life Indicators. NMI co a t paa- WFO.swego t'k� , _r Measured,icy the:txop'�hac State- ndex.. [Note:: Lake Oswego Corporation staff is in the process of providing this information to City staff. It should be available shortly.] Indicator Description The cloudiness of lake water and how far down you can see is often related to the amount of nutrients in the water. Nutrients promote growth of microscopic plant cells(phytoplankton)that feed upon by microscopic animals (zooplankton)`.The more the nutrients,the more the plants and animals and the cloudier the water is.This is a common,but indirect,way to roughly estimate the condition of the lake.This condition,called eutrophication,is a natural aging process of lakes,but which is unnaturally accelerated by too many nutrients_ A Secchi disk is commonly used to measure the depth to which you can easily see through the water,also called its transparency_Secchi disk transparency,chlorophyll a(an indirect measure of phytoplankton),and total phosphorus (an important nutrient and potential pollutant)are often used to define the degree of eutrophication,or trophic status of a lake. The concept of trophic status is based on the fact that changes in nutrient levels(measured by total phosphorus) causes changes in algal.biomass(measured by chlorophyll a)which in turn causes changes in lake clarity (measured by Secchi disk transparency).A trophic state index is a convenient way to quantify this relationship. The trophic State Index has an index scale from 0-110. The range between 40 and 50 is usually associated with mesotrophy(moderate productivity).Index values greater than 50 are associated with eutrophy(high productivity)_ Values less than 40 are associated with oligotrophy(low productivity). City ofLakeOswego P 36 Qiof Life Indicators Why Are We Measuring This? • Monitor major water feature in LO. Are water preservation and protection measures effective? What Does The Data Show? Source: htto:/hv,.vw.epa.Qov/bioiwebl/aquatic%arlson-html(Explanation)&Lake Corporation(Oswego Lake Data) City of Lake Oswego Page 37 Quality of Life Indicators Economic Opportun ty and Vitality Lake Oswego exists in a large metropolitan economy that is increasingly influenced by global economic forces. While these - Buffa;ng �F regional and global forces may seem overwhelming to a small community like ours,the size,shape and vitality ofour local businesses are important to the character and quality of life In Lake Oswego. Ourquality oflifeis enhancedby economic opportunities L, that make it possible to work and shop close to home,and by a strong local economy that provides the full range ofgoods and services needed by our residents_ The City of Lake Oswego has a land area of 11.05 square miles (7,337 acres)and a population of 35,750(as of 7/1l02). Of that,663 acres is zoned for some kind of commercial use and 169 acres is zoned for industrial uses_ In total commercial and industrial lands comprise approximately 10%of the City's land area_ Businesses in Lake Oswego tend to be in the small to medium size range,catering to neighL Grhood or community needs versus regional commercial needs. There is no heavy industry in Lake Oswego. Industrial uses tend to consist of technic-Sprofessional offices,warehousing,distributing,and printing.. City of Lake Oswego Page 38 QtgJabiof Life Indicators 6.1 Tl��ai3nEr v � ! gS ed Indicator Description The vitality and diversity of a community can be linked to economic development. The City has a number of businesses ranging from home occupation business to small family businesses to corporate headquarters. Active business licenses are based on the total nunnber of business licenses at the end of the calendar year in December.. This data is collected from the years most readily available between 1997 and 2002. WhyAre We Measuring This? • Provides data about economic growth and vitality in a community_ What Does The Data Show*? Total Business incenses Thee total of business licenses since 1997 has I increased by 5%_ They dipped between 1998 and 2750 1999,-however,then picked up in 2000. Since 2000, 2700 they have continued to increase to a six:year end of d theyearhigh of2,698. The increase in business 2650 — -- -- — _ licenses could be attributed to a slight increase in o 2600 = home occupation businesses and through annexations D 2550 — of developed Class"A space in the.Kruse Way E 2500 �M d commercial area 2450 1997 1998 1959 2000 2001 2002 t Source: City of Lake Oswego Finance Department — Year i City of Lake Oswego Page 39 Quality ofLife indicators Average$ Valuation$(in valuation per New Millions) permit �' -• -new- -_-_ 199- 3 3.6 1.200,00 new— 1996 5 3.4 680,00 1997 5 3.8 760,00 la V 1998 20 222 1 1.110,00 1999 9 41.8 4,644,44 200 7 2,8 400,00 Intl Description 2001 2 1.6 800,00 Commercial valuations describes the value of the cost of 200 17 182 1,070.58 the construction either as a new building or as a remodel_ This.measures the level of commitment for staying in the City as measured by the dollar amount reinvested into an existing or vested in anew commercial structure. New and remodel data are obtained from building records between 1995 and 2002_ - - - - - -. _ - — --- - - - - WhyAreWe:Measuring This? Average Valuation for Now Commercial Permits 1995-2002 e Willingness ofindividuals to invest in the community can be directly attributed to the quality 5,000,000 _. of life in a community_ Y la, - ' 4,000,000 fi' `" _ What Does The Data Show? saoo,000 Each year,millions of dollars are being invested in o ZOO.000 F Lake Oswego through the construction of new 1,000,000 commercial buildings_ Between 1995 and 1998 the o average valuation has fluctuated around$1 million. 1995 1996 1997 1998 1399 2000 2001 2002 However,in 1999,the average spiked to$4.6 million Years then dipped to an all time low of$400,000 in 2000_ However,since 2000 it has be steadily increasing to — — — - - -— previous levels_ The 1999 spike is attributed to the Mary's Wood Retirement Community Construction. Source: City ofLake Oswego Finance Department- City ofLake Oswego Page40 QudEb,oftifeIndicators Average$ r Valuation$(in valuation per ;Y ipldQ�Q;� ��j�e�]j���� {�, ; _ Remodat Millions permit > :` 199 53 2.2 41,50 19,3 132 1 8 60.60 Indicator Description 199 188 7 37,23 P 199 151 6.6 43.70 This indicator tracks the number of building permits that 199 178' 10.3 57,86 were issued forremodeled commercial buildings_ The 200 2-18 4.6 21.-inal valuation for remodels is derived from the value of 20011 181 7.6 41.98 equipment,materials,labor,overhead,fire/life/safety 200 327 16.3 49,84 improvements and profit for the remodel project. Why Are We.Measuring This? Y Permanence,..longevity and reinvestment in they community's commercial areas-is a sign of economic vitality. What Does The Data Show? There is no clear pattern to the average valuation of Average Valuation for Commercial Remodel Permits 1995-2002 commercial.remodel.buildings permits_ Since 1995 the 9 number has increased from 53 to 327 in 2002. Total I valuation for these years has also increased from$2.2 ao,0O00r million in 1995 to$16.3 million in 2002_ The average 50,000 though fluctuated depending on the number ofremodel `Q 40'0°° O 30,000 permits and the val_lation_ However,there has been a steady o 20 000 =` increase from a seven year low average in 2000 of$21,000 10,000 to an increase average of$49,000 in 2002_ 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Source. Lake Oswego Building,Department Years City of Lake Oswego Page 41 Quality ofLife Indicators 6A-The-percentag a > si�e� ial Lptope>rties. fit lake Oswep'-Xrban cis -Bgun d' -th &rc low#4*-it7na fIn lato' ', Indicator Description The City's Comprehensive Plan.identifies seven major commercial areas in the City,excluding small pockets of commercially zoned lands. The ability to walk or ride your bike to a store to purchase essential household items greatly adds to convenience and reduces unnecessary out of the way trips. One quarter ofa mile is a reasonably accepted standard to expect someone to walk to an activity center. The geographic area covered by this indicator includes:areas within the urban services boundary because it provides a boundary that will not change drastically over time like the city limits would_ At the end of August 2003,there were 15,417 tax lots with residences within the City's Urban Services Boundary. Multi-family dwellings are counted as one residence due to the limits ofthe geographic information system used. WhyAre We Measuring This? • Provides information about economic growth and vitality in a community. • Indicator ofa walkable community. What Does The Data Show? Source: City of Lake Oswego GIS Department City of L.ke.Oswego Page 42 Quaw ofLifeIndicators 6 54 '»dereail.;sIes fArp:I0cal e��� �fi e�ie Off-, s z _ - Indicator Description The Economic Census compiled by the US Census Bureau profiles the US economy every 5 years,from the national to the local level(state,metropolitan statistical area,county,and city). From the census information we can develop an index of retail sales that are Iocal expenditures versus expenditures outside the community. The index offers a way to describe whether residents are shopping within the community or going outside of the community for their shopping needs_ The index used is a iocation quotient that measures the ratio of the sales per capita in Lake Oswego to the sales per capita in the State or Oregon. A location quotient below I indicates that shoppers are leaving the community to shop and the local businesses are not capturing retail expenditures commensurate with the community population. Inversely,a location quotient above l indicates that shoppers are coming into the community to shop and that the community is capturing more than its expected share ofretail expenditures. The data used to determine the location quotient is based on sales/receipts for firms paying employee taxes (covered employment)_ Sole proprietor business salestreceipts are not included. Population estimates are from the PSU Population Research Center- City ofLake Oswego Page 43 Quality ofLife Indicators Retain Sales Index Oregon_ Clackamas County Lake Oswego 1992 Po ulation 2,990,610 296,470 31,877 SaleslRecei is $1,000 $2-4,170.000 $2,448,038 $170,052 Location Quotient 1 1.02 0.66 4S97 Population 3,302,140 328,680 34,025 Sales/Receipts $1,000) $33,396,849 $3,448,259 1 $251,365 Location Quotient. 1 1.04 10.73 WhyAreWe Measuring This? a Provides information about economic growth and vitality in a community. What Does The Data Show? The location quotient provides an indicator ofwhat percentage ofretail sales are made outside ofthe City_ In N92T one-third of all retail purchases by Lake Oswegans were made outside of the City. By 1997,the data indicates that more than a.quarter of all retail purchases were made outside of the City. This data indicates that there is an opportunity to capture a greater share ofretail expenditures in Lake Oswego. One retail sector that contributes to this gap is the low number ofautomobile sales outlets in the City_ Source: US Census Bureau—Economic Census;Portland State University—Population Research Center City of Lake Oswego Page 44 QijftofIJfeTndicat Alkh ors1 • r_ -_ rya t. Y i ,: r 4c 7 Y I a { • -. �.. n- f. •. � y. j .¢ mot: D' • � G tit'- I'+$.. S � .' •�' z >` '` - • •/ - • a. -•• 1. ��` �� y��S � .: IJ? i ..1�� v z . _ 3 w r ••• 1 • I- t 1 r' I► / ;"-,-r^,eS. � �>S 4 � ^•�-r 1..-' ���t r `{ X, 4 , /r r •a . r •t r. t r • t • a T r tt '.,1, g � a'a� � f f i ;•sue -•,,-♦ �-y- �. x �` ' s.. 2 •lot • - • 'r • - - - - - - ,s ;F' y ' d I i %of total -- Total park in Per,1,000 city land area aIl[ Ree �Eii1®�i acreage Population that is ark 2003 1.414 40 20% acile � aOQ rescet . Indicator Description The acreage for this indicator is comprised of all city and state parks,open space,nature preserves and recreation facilities within the City that serve the residents of Lake Oswego The data for this year will be limited to 2003 because this is the first year this information is being collected_ The data does not include Tryon Creek State Park,although parts of the park are in the city limits,or any part of school facilities. The focus ofthis indicator was to measure the availability ofCity parks and facilities. Why Are We Measuring This? • Monitors the availability ofrecreation opportunities- What Does The Data Show? This is the first year this data is being collected_ There is not enough data to show any trends or make any conclusions- Source: City of Lake Oswego Finance Department City of Lake Oswego Page 46 Qjft of Life indicators 7.2-- The pereea �r esa�c�# al ;r� der ies #had are iv a a l ego s 1ra � e �ia� , r 2003 12005 12oa7 (Residences 86% space;-orsc-Worfadlity. Indicator Description The ability to access a park,open space or school facilities makes for abetter quality of life. One quarter of a mile is a reasonably accepted standard to expect someone to walk to an activity center. The geographic area covered by this indicator includes areas within the urban services boundary because it provides a boundary that won't change drastically over time like the city limits would. In addition,many recreation facilities are on the edge of the city limits. Multi-family dwelling.are counted as one residence due to the limits of the geographic information system used. For this indicator,Tryon Creek State Park is included as a park. At the end of August 2003,there were I5,417 tax lots with residences within the City's Urban.Services Boundary. Multi-family dwellings are counted as one residence due to the limits ofthe geographic information system used. Because Oswego Lake is a private lake, it is not included in this indicator. The data for this vear will be limited to 2003 because this is the first year this information is being collected. Why Are We Measuring This? • Monitors the number ofresidences that can reasonably access a recreation facility. What Does The Data Show? This is the first year this data is being collected. There is not enough data to show any trends or make any conclusions_ However,.we can conclude that 86%(13,203)of residences are located within one quarter of a mile of a park,.open space or school facility_ City of Lake Oswego Page 47 Quality ofLife indicators o a�f 4 e� kir 'by-the p. Yrti tow, It- Indicator Description The ability to provide a wide range ofactivities ensures a greater opportunity to reach individual needs in the community_ Data is collected from 1997 to 2000 for classes that people participated in. The number of activities were compiled from different programs that the Park and Recreation Department offers,such as the Water Sport Center,Indoor Tennis Center,sports,.fitness,hikes,cultural activities,outdoor activities,Luscher farm,Adult Community Center,golfcourse,and special events. Why Are We Measuring This? a The data helps to show whether the City is providing adequate recreational opportunities for the community. What Does The Data Show? Since 1997 the number of activities per 1,000 population has increased significantly. In 1997 there were 32 activities and in 2000 there were 49 activities per 1,000_ A 35%increase in activities offered. 1997 1998 1 1999 2000 Acthities per 1,000 32 37 1 46 49 population City of take Oswego Pa 49 Qjft of Life Indicators Culture and. History Lake Oswego prides itselfin its cultural and historical heritage. The:arts and cultural resources of our community play an increasing role in our civic and economic life by providing opportunities for self-expression.and entertainment.The Lakewood Center,Lake Oswego Library,Adult Community Center and Marylhurst University are important local institutions that provide a : multitude ofeulturat opportunities_ They are joined by other important cultural partners, including our local schools,arts galleries,arts festivals and concerts,and our local night club scene_ Our attention:to history provides a necessary understanding and appreciation of the economic, social and physical forces that continue to shape our community_ The Heritage House,Peg Tree,Iron Furnace in George Rogers Park and the Iron Mountain Trail represent an important beginning for preserving and celebrating the history of Lake Oswego_ Other important historic resources remain undiscovered and unrecognized throughout our community_ :y City of Lake Oswego Page 49 Quality of Life indicators mateAaL iireuIatioA per 4 api>~a: s Indicator Description The Lake Oswego Library has kept circulation data for many years. The indicator tracks material circulation numbers(ali checked out materials including books,music,movies,etc...)from fiscal year 1988-1989 to 2001- 2002 The number per capita is based on the total population served by the library,not the total population of the City. The total population served is based on census tract information and population statistics. At this time the total population served by the library is 42,775. Why Are We Measuring This? e Monitors library usage. Correlation between population and popularity of reading in a community_ What Does The Data Library Circulation per Capita Show? ;o The circulation per capita has 45 ———— --— - - — - --- steadily increased since 1988. 40The 2001 2002 circulation per 35 capita is almost three times as 30 high as the 1988-1989- Based 25on this 14-year trend 20 circulation number will 15 continue to increase.. i0 Source. City ofLake Oswego 5 Library v 1988-89 1999-90 OW-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001 02 City of Lake Oswego Page 50 QUAKOfLife Indicators t SW Indicator Description The library not only serves as a resource for the community,but serves as a center for neighborhood and community activity_ The ability to access library services is an important and sought after quality in any community_ The library is open seven days a week with varying hours and closed only nine days during the year. Why Are We Measuring This? ® The ability to access library services is an important and sought after quality in any community.. What Does The Data Show? Since fiscal year 1997,the library had steadily increased the number ofhours the library is open up to 2001,when thehours began to drop_ The most significant increase in hours of operation was between 2000 and 2001 where the hours increased by 7 11 hours. 1997 1998 9999 200D 2001 1 2002 2003 Source: City 's of Lake Oswe o Hours g Open 3,Q7Q ,0T4 3.082 1 3,090 3,$0'1 3,792 L 3,245 Citeof a:eOstiw_go Page51 Quality of Life Indicators 1999 2002 2003 Ratin 797 820 884 Indicator Description The Hennen7s American Public Library rating is a private organizatiores rating system that relies on the latest data from almost 9,000 US libraries and other government sources_ It has been ranking libraries since 1999. Libraries are rated,scored and ranked on 15 input and output measures for libraries serving a similar population. The Lake Oswego Public Library falls within the category of 25,000-49,999 population served. The HAPLR Index is similar to an ACT or SAT score with a theoretical minimum of I and a maximum of 1,000. Most libraries scored between 260 and 730,so scores above and below those:numbers are considered exceptional_ Please note that HAPLR 2002 is based on 2000 data reported in calendar year 2001. In 2000,the library did not report any information and the 2001 rating were canceled for that year due to publishing complications. Additional information may be found at http:llw%w.haplr-index.com. Why Are We Measuring Thus? • Provides a measure-to other comparable libraries that serve a similar population. What Does The Data Show? Based on the scale of I to 1,000,with 1,000 being the highest,the Lake Oswego Public Library is ranked extremely high_ It has increased its rating every consecutive year. The weighted state average for 2002 was 659. Out of 125 public libraries in the state the Lake Oswego Library rated the highest in 2002 with a rating of 820 and again in 2003 with a rating of 894. The Multnomah County Library and the Corvallis-Benton County Public also rated high in their category for 2003_ Source_ Hennen's American Public LibraryRating Grg ofLake Oswego Page 52 QiWikofLifeindicators 8.4 N1mabep., f historacgzsour number of Resources on the City's ry�y owlh,�Fi y s�.aa1< t ` ; Landmark Designation List eslgn �. ta? A 1._. numb ©veil. - 10 90 80 1[ndicator Description 6U Historic preservation plays an important role in 1 0 40 - .i shaping a communities cultural,physical,social and Q 3020 economic future_ Without historic resources in the 10 - community,the character of Lake Oswego would be ' o r N M _'-;t 10 m t` ao rn o N M M M M M M M M M M o a 0 largely decreased. The City established aLandmark rn M a, M M M M M M M o 0 0 c— c-^ r r r- r r Designation List in 1990_The Landmark ! Designation List identifies all historic resources that Year i are protected under the City's Historic Preservation — Chapter_ In 1990,there were 93 resources including sites;structures and objects on the list_ Since then the City has lost some of its resources_ WhyAre We-Measuring This? a Preservation ofthe City's history and Culture. What Does The Data Show? There have been a total of24 resources removed from the Landmark Designation List(l�lo dates were available for two of the resources}_ The number removed increased after 1995 when ORS 197-772 was adopted. This revision allowed property owner to be removed from a landmark designation list by request_ However,in 2001 the number decreased because the Land Use Board of Appeals ruled that property owner must show they either opposed being placed on a list at the time the list was created or that the resource no longer met the criteria for designation. This has made it more difficult to be removed from a landmark designation list_. Source: City ofLake Oswego Planning Department City of Lake Oswego Page 53 Quality of Life Indicators -ky. Indicator Description Investment in the City is not only limited to public infrastructure such as streets,pipes and buildings,but also art. Art is a public investment that , provides a return in the form aesthetic pleasure and adds to the sense ofa communities identity_ The City has been,purchasing art since 1962 However,.purchases were not made every year_ The table illustrates the number of art pieces purchased and the purchase price at the time_ WhyAre We Measuring.This? e, Shows that the community values art_ What Does The Data Show? Total Public Art Inventory The City has atotal of 90 artpieces- The greatest number of art pieces were purchased in 1997,with 27_ 100 Since then,the number ofpieces has steadily 90 - - -- decreased_ In 2002,only three pieces were purchased- 80 __ _— --` 70 60 Source_ City ofLake Oswego Finance Department 50 ---- — - > 4030 20 10 - - ' 0 - k N U3 O cr) � 0 1- O O O r cm1 Co' ti r— m W O O O M O O O N N Year City oftakeOswego Page 54 QtUiKoftiferndicators AOL Indicator Description Art as a public investment illustrates that the community is-vested in more than just public infrastructure_ The public display of city-owned and on-loan at pieces aesthetically lifts the community spirit_ Although the Arts Downtown Program started in 2001,only information up to August 2003 is provided. Art pieces includes all types ofinedia including,but not limited to drawings,paintings,photographs,and sculptures. Why Are We Measuring This? Helpsprovide community identity,lifts the community spirit and is aesthetically pleasing. What Does The Data Show? This is the first year that we are tracking this information. There is not enough data to provide any trends or conclusions. 2003 12005 2007 12009 12011 10s Source: City of Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation Department City of Lake Oswego Page 55 Quality oftifelndicators aS a l• . i �-i y - j - - �'... 9v •s iti 4 f 1" ..• • t t- .. • � F .�'fit n L _' ?..time -t��-. '�`'" Z• f r ,,. _ to,.f/'s - - . t t• 1 t • 1 t. t �� '+� }c" it ["'j-11 x'Ti& •'" --n a • ♦ �•� JY . iq.9 -1 - i i -to 41 -'a s - • _ '+�. �• g - ` a ._ ` .;` J - ;CVR`. = F S= ly, 4 k �c P ••d a VA Indicator(Description Registered Population % This indicator tracks the percentage ofregistered voters in Voters registered Lake Oswego from.1994,.in two to four year intervals up to 1994 22,801 32940 6901- 2002_ 1998 23,664 34286 69 Wh Are We Measur" This? 2000 23,841 35278 68 e Determine the level of'p litical activity in the 2002 20,870 35750 58 community_ What Does The Data Show The number ofregistered voters decreased by 9%between 1994 and 2002,while at the same time the population grew by 8%. Source: Clackamas County Elections Board&City of Lake Oswego Recorders Office City of Lake,Oswego Page 57 Quality of Life Indicatots it O - 9.2` The peteentage_of gegistere.d.. rs i s rI Ae RV � v e . _ ectldns>.. Indicator Description This indicator tracks the percentage of registered voters that voted in general elections from 1996. The data to ascertain the Ievel'.ofcommunity participation was derived from the City's 2003 Community Assessment Survey. A telephone survey was used to randomly survey 400 Lake Oswego Residents_ Althougli only 400 residents were surveyed,this methodology still provides statistical valid results that can be applied to the community in general_ Why Are We Measuring This? Voting is one of our fundamental freedoms and the cornerstone of a democratic society. Voter turnout rates gives a sense of political participation in the community_ What Does The Data Show? General election participation has been generally strong ranging from the mid 70s to the mid 80s. The lowest turn out was in 2000 with 76%and the highest tum out in 2003 with 86%. 1996 1998 2000 2003 Voted in Last 84% 80% 76% 86% General Election Source: City of Lake Oswego,2003 Lake Oswego Community Assessment Bi-Annual Survey City of Lak4 Oswego- Pa a 58 Q afIifetndicaios 9.3- 'the perceentage®f ze'— tetedi&era 3n La 09W' . n vo ed 1 _ i C-oU# l -El _t. ty Indicator Descripti-in This indicator tracks the percentage of registered voter turnout for municipal elections from 1994- The Lake Oswego City Council consists ofa mayor and six councilors who serve four-year terms.At least three council positions are up for election every two years.Councilors are elected at large.The three candidates who receive the highest number of votes are elected to the vacant seats Why Are We Measurmg This? Voting is one of our fundamental freedoms and the cornerstone of a democratic society. Voter turnout rates give us a sense of political participation in the community. In particular,tracking the turnout for City Council elections provides an idea ofhow engaged residents are with local politics. What Does The Data Show? In,general,voter turnout for City Council elections has been fairly strong and increasing,with a slight downturn of 67%in 1998. However,in 2000,the turnout was 86%and in 2002 an astounding 99%participation r,tc of those eligible to vote. 1994 1998 2000 2002 Voted in Last City 73% 67% 86% 99% Council Election Source. Clackamas County Elections Board City ofLake Oswego Page 59 Quality of Life Indicators -9.4 TU. u ber of��active'-''l eig a�T�o � -AsOoe-hi©ns. Indicator Description A neighborhood association not only acts as a conduit for information,but also serves as a common thread that binds a neighborhood together_ There are 19 city-recognized neighborhood associations,three forming neighborhood associations,and three Community Planning Organizations. The purpose of neighborhood associations is to provide for and encourage a good line of communication between residents and the City. The City officially recognizes neighborhood associations after they have met certain criteria and procedural requirements_ A neighborhood association is considered"active if they have one general meeting a year. The data collected only reflects the 19 city-recognized neighborhood associations- Why Are We Measuring This? • A neighborhood association's ability to communicate with its members is an essential element of creating a sense of community_ This data can be an indicator of the effectiveness ofthis method of communication. What Does The Data Show? The data is currently limited to two years of information. Based on this data only 11 of the 19 recognized neighborhood associations are considered"active". Based on past experience,neighborhood associations come together during and meeting.when there are"emergencies"in the community. Often those"emergencies"have been related to land use matters_ 2002 2003 11 Ill Source: City of Lake Oswego,Community Development Department City of Lake Oswego Paee W O of Life Indicators Indicator Description A neighborhood association's ability to communicate with its members is an essential element of creating a sense of community_ The City provides outreach material(newsletters,flyers,display ads,or similar materials) production assistance to neighborhood associations in the form of materials,printing and mailing. Each neighborhood association is responsible for creating their own outreach materials. Why A re We Measuring This? • Level ofactivity ofneighborhood associations_ What Does The Data Show? The-production of outreach materials has been fairly consistent since 2001. If the trend for 2003 continued,it would likely be in the mid 20s,similar to past years_ The materials produced is reflective ofthe active neighborhood association listed in indicator 9.4. 2001 2002 2003 27 125 1 14* 1 1 (*-)-Up to June 30,2003 Source: City of Lake Oswego,Community Development Department City ofLake Oswego Page 61 Quality of Life Lndicators g 6 .. gy&ercentaje.,� 6 _ = v0i t per. It. Indicator Description. The data.to ascertain the level ofcommunity volunteerism was derived from the City's 2003 Community Assessment Survey_ A survey has been done every two years since 1996- A telephone survey was used to randomly survey 400 Lake Oswego Residents. Although only 400 residents were surveyed,this methodology still provides statistical valid results that can be applied to the community in general_ This is the first year the volunteerism question was asked and therefore,only the 2003 results are shown_ WhyAre We Measuring This? The ability and willingness to freely give ones time to an organization or cause is something that we all strive for, but unfortunately,.only a few achieve_ The level ofvolunteerism in a community can indicate the level of commitment and engagement a resident has in a community_ What Does The Data Show? There is not enough data to show any trends or make any conclusions at this time. 2003 2005 2007 2008 59% Source: City of take Oswego,2003 Lake Oswego Community Assessment Bi-Annual Survey City of Lake Oswego Page 62 Q; MofLifeIndicators AML d — , r . .c x • f Ea fc CedifiedTcacher DUII LOS SFD 1� s 34 - Sm=Development x ;sue. - t= r vu ti•'. s .y City of Lake Oswego Page 63 Indicatom QualitwoMfe F r - #, sue. - _. .. -. . -•> _ � x.� _ _ S. r Appendices • City of Lake Oswego Census(Demographics,social,housing&Economic)-1980,1990&2000 • CityofLake Oswego Crime Reports-1980,1990&2000 • Anntai lVater Quality Report-2000,.2001&2002 Y- Fire Department Yearly Report 2000,.2001&2002 • Annual School Reports Indicator 2.5 Appendix Also include Map of Roadways- Roadway Date Traffic Date Traffic Change Volume Volume "A"Ave. 7/96 24,490 6/03 24,014 -476 Boons Ferry Rd. 7196 25,634 7/03 32,640 +7,006 B antl<td_ 10/95 8,676 6/03 6,397 2,279 Country CIub Rd.. 8196 22,856 6/03 24,214 {+1,358 Iron Mt-Blvd_ 8/96 4,527 6/03 4,613 +86 KruseWy- 5/98 34,659 6- 32,882 -1,777 7/03 McVe Ave. 2/99 14,843 6/03 18,651 +3,808 South ShoreBlvd.. 8/01 7,315 6/03 6,973 -342 Sate St. Indicator 3.2-Fires per 1,000 Include all fire calls praet out 1998-2002 City of lake Oswego Page 64 QofLifeIndicators Indicator 3.5-Auto Crashes Per 1,000 Year Icrashes o ulation rashest Per1,000 1984 506 22630 2Z4 19911 265 31551 9_4 199 265 3I887 83 199 307 32564 94 199 301 32940 9.1 199 241 33150 7.3 240 34012 7.1 1997 250 34025 7.3 1991 212 34286 6.2 199 245 34110 79 2go 278 35278 7-9 20011 240 1 35580 6.7 20021 230 1 35750 6.4 Indicator S 2-Air Quality Index 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002. Good 293 286 313 308 327 335 301 279 285 303 Moderate 72 77 50 52 38 277 58 80 75 56 Unhealthy for 0 1 2 3 0 2 5 6 4 5 certain Groups Unhealthy 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dangerous I..1MQuality ofLife Indicators\.Sifts Reportt1 0 23-03 Draft doc City of Lake Oswego Page 65 Quality o f Life lhdicators Quality of Life Indicators ATTACHMENT 2 ASK Status Report 10123/03 Indicator Status Homes&N'Hood 1.1)The percentage of approved variance requests per year, Complete 1.2)The percentage of approved zone change requests per year, Complete 1,3)The average valuation of new single-family dwelling permits. Cornnlete 1 A)The average valuation of remodeled single-family dwelling permits, Complete Mobility&Access 2.1)The percentage of total miles of bike and pedestrian facilities to total street miles within the City, complete S 2.2 Tri•Met bus ridership In Lake Oswego, Complete S 2.3)Percentage of streets miles providing transit service,to the total miles of streets in Lake Oswego, Complete S 2.4)Pavement Condition Index(PCI)for major roadways in the city. Com fete 2,5) The volume of traffic on major roadways In the City. lComplete Security&Well-Being 3,1 Percentage of calls responded to in five minutes or less, vYdlM461 frpn Plre'De rtmenf: Mto$.?pM late,but+N Ung tot 3.2 Number of actual fires per 1,000 population. tietin�t tjh. f''fird'' 33) The annual victimization rates per 1,000 population of Part f Index crimes, Complete 3,4 The annual occurrence of Part II non-Index crimes. Complete 3.5) The number of auto crashes in Lake Oswego per 1,000 population. Complete Education 4,1 Graduation rate at Lake Oswego public high schools, Complete 4,2) The staffing ratio at Lake Oswego public schools, Complete 4.3) The percentage of graduates who attend post secondary educational Institutes, Complete Env,&Natural Resources 5,1) The percentage of Impervious surfaces In the City's Urban Services Boundary, Complete S 5.2 The Air Quality Index for the Portland Matro Area, complete S) 5,3) The number of macro-Invertebrates in Springbrooktf in ap ta,yrov�l m t a Creek. Ins r e t+ ^' 5.4) Annual Average Water Quality in certain parts of Oswego Waiai data'frofr t eko AML Lake as measured by the Tro hic State Index, Cof q `UdW l3 .„ IndicatorStaluslo-23.03 Page t I i Econ.OpR.&Vitality 6.1 The number of active business licenses. Complete 6,2 The average valuation of new commercial permits, Complete 6,3 The average valuation of remodeled commercial 2ermIts, complete 6,4) The percentage of residential properties in Lake Oswego's Urban Services Boundary that are located with►n'/, mile of a grocery store or convenience store, VolBn •6r!data frorimal-S be`t I 6,6) The Index of retail sales that are local expenditures versus expenditures outside the community. Cam late i Parks,Roc,&Open Space 7.1) The total acres of public parks,Open Space,Nature Preserves and Recreation Facilities per 1,000 residents, Complete ) 7,2) The percentage of residential properties that are located l' within Lake Oswego's Urban Services Boundary and are located within'/.mile of a park,open space,or school facility, Complete 73) The number of activities offered by the Parks& I' Recreation Department per 1,000 population, Com late 1' Culture&History } :ollnp�etd,bat al�th tryinPAID 14 ka te�F fi�tl4f�dtst�kt�'�tnf _• :', 8,1 Library material circulation per Capita. coin 'rl oti , 8,2) Total number of hours the Lake Oswego library Is open i1 annually. complete } 8,3) Hannan's American Public Library Ratings, Complete 8.4) Number of historic resources on the City's Landmark Designation_List and the number removed, complete 8,5 Total Public Art Inventory, Complete 8,6 The Number of art pieces on display, Complete Community Involvement i 9,1) The(percentagelnUmber)of registered voters in Lake Oswego, Cbm (eta,;t�llbstlh reflniri ' 9,2) The percentage of registered voters In Lake Oswego who voted in General Elections, complete 9,3) The percentage of registered voters in Lake Oswego who voted In Olty Council Elections, lComplote 9,4 The number of"active"Neighborhood Associations, Com late 9,5) Number of Neighborhood Association outreach materials ` published per year, Com lets l (S)=Indicates it Is a sustalnablilty Indicator 1 �I ,i i IndicatorStatusl0.93.03 page 2 ,l