Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Item - 2024-05-21 - Number 08.1 - Library Seismic Evaluation and Facilities Condition Assessment Report
8.1 O F �s� COUNCIL REPORT —� OREGO� Subject: Library Seismic Evaluation and Facilities Condition Assessment Report Meeting Date: May 21, 2024 Staff Member: Melissa Kelly, Director Report Date: May 10, 2024 Department: Library Action Required Advisory Board/Commission Recommendation ❑ Motion ❑ Approval ❑ Public Hearing ❑ Denial ❑ Ordinance ❑ None Forwarded ❑ Resolution ❑X Not Applicable ❑X Information Only Comments: ❑ Council Direction ❑ Consent Agenda Staff Recommendation: This item is for information only. Recommended Language for Motion: N/A Project/ Issue Relates To: Lake Oswego Public Library's 2024-2026 Strategic Plan (Attachment 1); also relates to 2024 Council Goal initiative to "Develop a strategy for an all- ages and all-activities community center on the west side of town that would include event and meeting spaces, public services, and may include library services" Issue before Council (Highlight Policy Question): ❑X Council Goals/Priorities ❑Adopted Master Plan(s) ❑Not Applicable EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The current Lake Oswego Public Library (LOPL) was constructed on the site of the previous library facility. The current facility opened in 1983 and measures 27,100 square feet. To meet the needs of our population size and their usage, numerous studies including the 2023 Library Visioning report (Attachment 2) have found that the City needs roughly twice as much space to deliver modern library services. As the building has aged, maintenance needs and costs have increased. Over the past 15 years, the Library has spent more than $2.5 million on facility maintenance and modest upgrades. Respect, Excellence. Trust. Service. 503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY Page 2 Despite this investment into the building's roofing, siding, gutters, flooring, doors, windows, elevator, electrical systems, back-up generator, boiler, HVAC systems and more, we continue to have problems with many of these systems in an aging building. Additionally, the majority of these investments have not increased the Library's ability to enhance services or amenities for the community. In 2024, the City hired CIDA, an architecture and engineering design firm that specializes in building assessments, to conduct a current seismic evaluation and facility condition assessment of the Library, and to generate cost estimates for the scope of work. Full report findings can be found in Attachment 3. The results of these assessments identified the following high-level findings: • The Library facility would require signification renovations for the structure to meet seismic performance expectations • The building and site have significant ADA deficiencies • The building is aging and showing many signs of degradation to the building envelope (elevated wood structures, siding, windows) The cost estimate of roughly $10 million will only address the seismic, water intrusion, ADA and other building maintenance and upgrades identified in CIDA's 2024 report, allowing the city to maintain the existing library at its current size and service capacity. BACKGROUND Building Origins and Size History The current Library building was constructed from 1982 to 1983 on the site of the previous 6,920 square foot facility. It opened in 1983, measuring in at 27,100 square feet as it still does today. Voters originally approved the construction of a 35,000 square foot library, but due to both neighborhood pressure and site constraints, construction was delayed and the library was built about 25% smaller than voters approved. As a result, only 5 years after it opened, a citizen- initiated task force found that the community had already outgrown the space. Over the decades since then, various studies have found that the Library is too small for Lake Oswego's population size and level of usage (Attachment 4). Building Maintenance History and Facility Assessments, 2008-Present What is less known and discussed is the maintenance history and current condition of the Library facility, which is nearing the end of its expected lifespan. As the Library has aged, facility maintenance needs have increased, as have associated maintenance costs. • In 2008, the City hired SERA Architects to conduct a Facility Condition Assessment for the Library as well as for other city facilities. Although the scope of this assessment was Respect, Excellence. Trust. Service. 503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY Page 3 limited, a listing of significant items needing attention were identified including seismic deficiencies, as well as water intrusion issues, electrical and HVAC needs, and gyperete flooring problems. The 2008 Library Facility Assessment is included as Attachment 5. • Over the past 15 years since then, more than $2.5 million, a sizable amount of the library's operating budget, has been spent addressing facility maintenance needs, as well as making modest upgrades to the facility. Despite this significant investment into the building's roofing, siding, gutters, flooring, doors, windows, elevator, electrical systems, back-up generator, boiler, HVAC systems and more, we continue to have problems with many of these systems. • In 2017, the most notable upgrade was renovations totaling just over $1 million to the Library's entrance lobby, main service area and functionality of the staff workroom. Seismic upgrades were not part of this project scope. • In the past 5 years, required maintenance projects have included repairing the roof (over $70K), updating the elevator (over $200K), and replacing the original boiler and HVAC systems (over $230K) that had reached end of life. • In 2023 during the Library Visioning process, concerns about the building's unaddressed seismic deficiencies were again raised. • In November 2023, staff received direction from Council to proceed with a seismic evaluation of the Library with cost estimates. The scope also included a general facility condition assessment considering the building's history of water intrusion and other maintenance issues. • In early 2024 the City hired CIDA, an architecture and engineering design firm that specializes in building assessments, to conduct the seismic evaluation and general facility condition assessment for the library, and to generate cost estimates for the scope of work. CIDA's project team also includes subcontractors R&W Engineering, AAI Engineering, and Fortis Construction. 2024 Seismic and Facility Condition Assessment Scope and Methodology The scope of work performed by CIDA and their subcontractors for this project included: • Architectural Assessment (water intrusion, building code requirements, updates to ADA requirements and general building conditions) • Structural Evaluation (Tier 1 & 2 seismic evaluation and general structural observations) • Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Assessment (performed by R&W Engineering) • Civil Site Assessment (performed by AAI Engineering) • Cost Estimation (performed by Fortis Construction) CIDA's project team's evaluation methods and documentation practices were completed using the following approach: • Research (review of original drawings, remodel drawings, previous reports, photographs, etc.) Respect, Excellence. Trust. Service. 503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY Page 4 • Site Visits (three visits were conducted in differing weather conditions to evaluate the existing conditions and document observations of the deficiencies in the building and site) • Analysis and Reporting (evaluation of findings, reporting on conditions, and presenting recommendations to address deficiencies including repair and remodel exhibits) • Cost Estimation (detailed cost analysis for the noted conditions and repairs) • Conclusion (completed report with a summary of recommendations) Of particular interest is the methodology used by CIDA's structural engineering team to conduct the seismic evaluation of the Library and prepare recommendations to remedy the long list of deficiencies noted. A summary of this approach is outlined below, with full details in Attachment 3: • CIDA performed an ASCE 41-23 Tier 1 and Tier 2 seismic evaluation of the Library • CIDA took into account that our current Library site "is located in a high seismic zone where site soil conditions become a critical factor." The site's original geotechnical report confirmed our soil conditions as Site Class D, putting "the seismic design values over the threshold for 'High Seismicity'. • The Tier 1 evaluation stage uses documentation review, site visits and the ASCE checklist to target areas of potential weaknesses in the building's seismic system • The Tier 2 stage includes further investigation and analysis of non-compliant areas in order to make recommendations to retrofit, replace, supplement, etc. In CIDA's structural report, code standards are shown in italics and the condition of the library facility is detailed in orange. • What this process is not intended to do is fix the building's seismic performance up to the standard of a new building. • Structural building performance objectives (BPOE) used for this project include Life Safety for smaller earthquakes and Collapse Prevention for larger earthquakes. DISCUSSION Summary of Seismic(Structural)Evaluation Findings Findings from the Tier 1 and Tier 2 seismic evaluation processes identified a sizable list of structural work needed to the following areas: Foundation and Walls: • New foundation footings are needed in two locations: basement level and main floor • New shear walls are needed in two locations: basement level and main floor • Interior shear walls need reinforcement in multiple locations throughout the basement level and main floor Respect, Excellence. Trust. Service. 503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY Page 5 • Exterior shear walls need reinforcement in multiple locations on east and west elevations of the main level Stairwells: • All three stairwells need shear wall reinforcement from top to bottom, which will require removal and rebuilding of all three stairwells Second Floor: • The second-floor framing needs considerable upgrades to meet seismic requirements, to the extent that majority of both the first floor ceiling and second floor would need to be removed to access and upgrade the framing • The upgrades include strapping, re-nailing and installation of new blocking between joists • Second floor shelving needs seismic anchorage (non-structural) • Sprinkler mains and HVAC ducts need seismic bracing (non-structural) • The exterior deck needs to be completely reframed Roof: • A good portion of the shingled roof area needs to be removed for seismic nailing and strapping upgrades • Blocking needs to be added between roof purlins • In the sawtooth roof area, two of the five clerestory windows in each bay need to be infilled to allow for the addition of seismic reinforcements—this would result in a 40% loss of natural light from the clerestory windows Summary of General Facilities Condition Assessment Findings In addition to a seismic structural evaluation, the scope of the project also included architectural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and civil site evaluations for LOPL. These assessments also identified a sizable amount of work needed in the following areas: Water Intrusion Issues—Roof: • Repair and replace cap metal flashings • Add additional slope to eliminate ponding and reduce drainage issues • Replace and reconfigure the central built-up cricket to create a single slope cricket that directs all water to the side of the roof that has both a primary and overflow drain system • Remove metal profile and install membrane roofing material to the new drainage cricket • Remove, repair, and reconfigure the entire drainpipe assembly to ensure proper drainage • Replace the secondary drain with a proper overflow collar Respect, Excellence. Trust. Service. 503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY Page 6 • Patch and infill at the roof and at the brick column cap, and replace pipe insulation that has broken down due to water intrusion • Install new water-resistant barrier over plywood sheathing • Replace roof insulation • Replace roofing shingles Water Intrusion Issues—Building Exterior: • Remove and replace damaged or deteriorated siding, and recaulk and repaint all siding elements • Install proper base and head trim, and proper flashing, at all exterior elevations • Remove and replace all soffit wood on the east elevation • Install thresholds on the mechanical room doors on the west elevation Water Intrusion Issues—Deck: • In addition to needing to be completely reframed, it is recommended to install a solid surface deck with a weatherproof traffic coating and traditional grated trench drain • A minimum of two overflow drainpipes also need to be added to the gutter system Major Accessibility Issues: • The Library's ADA parking stalls and access ramp from the parking lot need to be redone to meet accessibility and safety requirements • All of the Library's restrooms (6) need to be reworked and updated to meet the requirements of the ADA, as do both of the library's drinking fountains • Additional recommendations to resolve more accessibility issues are also detailed in the report Elevator Issues: • Despite a recent modernization, the elevator overheats and experiences downtime, making it less reliable for the public • A dedicated exhaust fan needs to be added to the elevator machine room to combat this issue Electrical and Lighting Upgrades: • Electrical switchgear and distribution panels need to be replaced in the basement level • LED lighting upgrades are recommended throughout the building, where not already present Additional needs were also identified in the assessment reports, including but not limited to fixing the sunken section of sidewalk at the entry ramp, additional ADA modifications, replacing exterior guardrails and removing a tree that is at risk to the foundation and retaining wall at the west elevation. This report can be reviewed in full detail in Attachment 3. Respect, Excellence. Trust. Service. 503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY Page 7 Cost Estimation To address the seismic and other maintenance needs of LOPL as identified and listed in this report, cost estimates were calculated based on current in-the-field costs ranges. Cost estimates below only cover maintenance needs to make the current building as safe and dry as is feasible for its age and design, which calculates to $284 per square foot in base construction costs. Cost estimates would be much higher, in the range of$550-650 per square foot in base construction costs, for a full renovation to modern library standards. • Base construction cost (also known as "hard cost") for the scope of work identified by the 2024 report is estimated at $7,692,105. This figure includes construction contingencies (10%) and 3 years of escalation (4% per year). • Additional soft costs including design, permitting, inspection, and project management are estimated at a range of 20-30% of the hard costs, coming to an additional $1,538,423 to $2,307,633. • CIDA also recommends an overall project contingency of 5%, estimated at $461,526 to $499,987. • Added together, construction costs, soft costs and project contingency add up to between $9,692,054 and $10,499,725. In summary, the total project cost estimated for the scope of work identified in the 2024 report is roughly$10 million. Cost Estimate Assumptions, Caveats and Options It is important to note that these cost estimates have limitations and assume a number of factors: • These cost estimates only cover a limited scope of work to make the building as safe, dry and accessible as is feasible given its age and design. It would cost significantly more to also renovate the library to modern library standards, and because the facility is already too small to add modern amenities, any such modernization would be limited and would be at the expense of some current library services. • Cost estimates assume we would vacate the current facility for approximately 1 year while work was completed on a single and continuous construction schedule. • However, cost estimates do not include additional costs for moving and/or storage fees, temporary lease costs, or tenant improvements that would be necessary to create a temporary library space. These additional costs would need to be calculated and factored in, as would the impact to our community of limited access to services during the temporary relocation. • Another option would be to try to phase the work while maintaining partial occupancy of the library for operations, but that approach would be much more complex, more Respect, Excellence. Trust. Service. 503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY Page 8 costly and require more time. If the project were to be phased, consultants estimate that the timeline and associated costs would both increase by a factor of 1.5. That equates to roughly 1.5 years of construction and $15 million dollars. A phased approach would be challenging in terms of operational logistics to continue to serve the public, as library operations would need to constantly shift around the construction work and need to consider public safety while being in an active construction site. Facility Condition Report Conclusions Following the data gathering and analysis work required for this project, CIDA documented their findings, recommendations and overall conclusions in a lengthy written report (Attachment 3). Their high-level conclusions are summarized in the report's executive summary, including: • The Library facility would require signification renovations for the structure to meet seismic performance expectations • The building and site have significant ADA deficiencies • The building is aging and showing many signs of degradation to the building envelope (elevated wood structures, siding, windows) • The cost estimate of roughly $10 million will only address the seismic, water intrusion, ADA and other building maintenance and upgrades identified in CIDA's 2024 report, allowing the city to maintain the existing library at its current size and service capacity. RECOMMENDATION This item is for information only at this time. In the future, staff will seek Council feedback and policy direction on what would be a good return on investment. ATTACHMENTS 1. Lake Oswego Public Library's Adopted 2024-2026 Strategic Plan 2. Library Visioning Community Engagement Report from BerryDunn 2023 3. Lake Oswego Library Seismic Evaluation and General Facilities Condition Assessment Report from CIDA 2024 4. Library Facility History 1974 to Present 5. Library Facility Assessment from SERA 2008 Respect, Excellence. Trust. Service. 503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY ATTACHMENT 1 Lake Oswego Public Library Strategic Plan 2024-2026 Strategic Focus: IMPROVE ACCESS FOR ALL! . 1 Priorities Initiatives Our primary goals Our high-level workplan to achieve our goals V 1 Serve People Expand service delivery and enhance access to library staff and collections across the community Beyond the • Align resources to expand and enhance mobile Rover services to meet community Building needs for collections and services beyond the building • Promote and expand home delivery Success will be evident by • Offer hold lockers and/or library vending machines in strategic locations increased access for all through: • Embed library staff and/or collections in strategic locations(e.g. childcare centers) greater library presence throughout the community; Utilize known,as well as emerging,technologies to enhance digital access measurable use by underserved • Enhance size of and access to digital collections demographic and geographic • Use technology to improve digital access and services to people beyond our building groups;and increased use of the library's website and digital • Improve accessibility and functionality of the Lake Oswego Public Library website collections. Create Space to Expand services to support learning and engagement for all community members • Add flexible gathering,event and meeting spaces Expand Services • Add dedicated space(s)to serve unique needs of teens and tweens • Expand and improve space for children's services(e.g. educational play,tutoring Success will be evident by rooms,art creation and display space, performance space) increased access for all through: • Add modern library amenities and services(e.g.cafe,study rooms, makerspace and/or progress toward accessible,safe emerging technology lab,sensory friendly zone) and modern facilities;more opportunities for community • Enhance cultural events in collaboration with community partners gatherings and relationship- • Expand world languages collections,services and events building;and library collections • Expand Library of Things and Seed Library collections and programming that reflect and serve everyone in the community. Conduct an updated Facility Needs Assessment to identify gaps and opportunities • Identify scope of seismic safety improvements needed at current facility • Identify scope of technology,sustainability and/or other improvements needed at current facility • Identify opportunities to redesign current facility to add new services and meet Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)guidelines Continue to develop and discuss service models with the community,to align the scope of the model with the community's desire to invest and the City's operating budget • Evaluate results of biennial community survey and other community inputs,and follow Council direction,to align the scope and service priorities • • Adopted Nov 7, 2023 1 1 • Prepare strategic business plans, including capital and operating budgets,for potential/emerging opportunities to address service gaps and improve proximate physical access to library services across the city • Establish a multi-year framework for orderly development of capital improvements appropriate to the proposed service model, based on community priorities and budget Increase Share stories to increase awareness of library services, brand and impact,as well as constraints facing the Library Awareness of the • Leverage testimonials and data to develop messages and tell stories Library's Value • Develop internal processes for consistent messaging across channels • Create branding that supports the Library's mission and strategic direction Success will be evident by • Share messages in multiple languages and formats increased access for all through: • Produce an annual report that communicates brand,value and impact sharing stories with our • Continue to defend the freedom to read and serve as a trusted source of information community in multiple languages for the community and formats;more community members feeling inspired and Engage the community to help spread the Library's value and impact stories knowledgeable to champion our • Leverage partnerships with community groups key messages;more active library users;and increased fundraising • Increase engagement and communication with City Council and voter support. • Collaborate with Library support organization(s)to increase fundraising • Empower volunteers to be vocal advocates to spread stories Support Staff Hire and support staff to serve all residents and their diverse needs • Apply an equity lens to hiring practices to recruit diverse staff to better reach Wellbeing and underserved community groups Growth • Foster an inclusive,welcoming staff culture that encourages staff-initiated creativity and innovation Success will be evident by increased access for all through: Provide learning and development opportunities and sustainable workloads to ensure an inclusive and innovative staff are highly knowledgeable, engaged and supported in serving the community culture;increased diversity of staff • Provide opportunities for staff to learn new skills that support their professional and staffing levels;enhanced staff growth, deepen team capabilities and cross-department support, and ensure a holistic capacity and skills;and improved view of library services customer service and access. • Ensure sustainable workloads for staff through prioritization of goals, regular check-ins with supervisors,documentation of needs, and alignment of resources Adopted Nov 7, 2023 ATTACHMENT 2 0 BerryDunn Lake Oswego Public Library visioning rrocess community engagement Report With Recommendations 1 9 . , i lior. '. .-.. . , _di ____ _. Ai. " : , .• I mir _ ,1 _ . _.., , _ -• . , ' - IliPir . ........ . __ . 4 ,-� ! , f.. rak 0 , :,;.,fr / . ., Ili. 1, I _ a'7,,,:— :." ..''-,:::- iv. i - , _ , , - 1 -01' 1 .. ..,.:„. . f i ,_ 17 6-k,.. No.-- d' . berrydunn.com o�W£O� v,FF.OSh,F,C O b BerryDunn oRoo� l G�4C 1gQP� Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 1 Project Overview 1 Engagement Findings 2 Community Visioning Task Force 3 Findings and Recommendations 4 Report Organization 5 2. Comprehensive Community Engagement Strategy 5 3. Key Informant Interviews 7 4. Focus Groups 8 5. Social Pinpoint Survey 9 6. Passive Information Gathering 11 7. Community Task Force 12 Vision Framework for the Lake Oswego Public Library 14 8. Findings and Recommendations 18 Consultant Findings 18 Recommendations 19 Conclusion 20 Appendix A— Engagement Platform 21 Lake Oswego Library Visioning Engagement Platform 21 Promotional Materials 28 Appendix B — Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 30 Question 1 —What are the challenges in the Lake Oswego Community? 30 Question 2 —What are the roles of the Library in addressing those challenges? 33 Question 3 —What are the barriers to accessing library services in Lake Oswego? 37 Question 4 —What are the future imperatives for the Lake Oswego Public Library 15— 20 years from now? 39 Appendix C — Focus Group Questions and Results 44 Engagement Report I June 30, 2023 Table of Contents I i b BerryDunn V O; o.E�o� P� CU8P Focus Group 1 — River Grove Elementary Fifth Graders 44 Focus Group 2 — River Grove Elementary PTO 45 Focus Group 3 —Senior Community 46 Focus Group 4 — First Addition Neighborhood 47 Appendix D — Survey Questions and Results 49 Question 1 —What current library services do you most want to continue in the future? 49 Question 2 —What aspects of the Library do you most like? 54 Question 3 —What are the barriers to using library services for your household? 58 Question 4 —Are there any other services, amenities, or technologies you would like to see in our library in the future? 62 Question 5— Please tell us what you'd like to see improved at the Library. 68 Question 6 — How can the Library better serve as a hub of community information and gathering? 72 Question 7— How should we enhance the Library aesthetically to nurture wellbeing and inspire curiosity? 74 Question 8 — Do you use other neighboring libraries for events or services? 77 Question 9 —What services or amenities do you seek at other libraries? 78 Question 10 — In your own words, what's your vision for the future Lake Oswego Public Library? 82 Question 11 —Any additional comments? 85 Question 12 — How old are you? (optional) 88 Question 13 — How do you identify your gender? (optional) 89 Question 14 —Within the broad categories below, where would you place your racial or ethnic identity? (optional) 91 Question 15 — Do you identify as someone with a disability, or who cares for someone with a disability? (optional) 92 Question 16 —Which of the following best represents the annual income of your household before taxes? (optional) 94 Question 17 —What neighborhood do you live in? (optional) 95 Appendix E — Passive Information-Gathering Points Themes 99 Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Table of Contents I ii FV E OS WE b BerryDunn U 5. O ° yb 17y+GL� � � 1. Executive Summary Project Overview In late 2022, the Lake Oswego Public Library initiated a library visioning project to help ensure the Library's services and facilities aligned with the evolving needs of its residents. The goal of this project was to understand the Library's role in addressing community challenges and needs, gain insight into current and future requirements for library services, and establish a shared community vision for the future of the Lake Oswego Public Library. To facilitate this effort, the Library hired BerryDunn, a consulting firm specializing in library community engagement and strategic planning. BerryDunn joined Ruth Metz Associates, Buffalo Cloud Consulting, and Hennebery Eddy Architects as key partners in this visioning process. From January 2023 to May 2023, the consultant team, in collaboration with the Lake Oswego Public Library staff, embarked on a multifaceted community engagement process to collect extensive community input regarding the future of library services in Lake Oswego. This effort employed a comprehensive approach to community engagement, including an engagement platform, marketing materials, an online project website, key informant interviews, focus groups, an online survey, passive information-gathering points, community forums, and a Community Task Force. The collective efforts of this community engagement resulted in an impressive volume of community participation and input. • Over 100 in-depth key informant interviews were conducted, providing valuable insights from a wide range of stakeholders. • An online survey was completed 2,791 times. • Four focus groups were conducted, allowing deeper discussions with targeted communities. • 184 written comments were received at passive information-gathering points. • Five community forums were conducted at various points throughout the project to gather community input and update the public on the project. This community input was incorporated into the passive information-gathering findings and informant interview findings as appropriate. • Four Community Task Force meetings were organized, providing opportunities for dialogue and collaborative decision-making. The community input collected throughout this process shaped and informed the development of a new Lake Oswego Public Library visioning framework. This framework lays out a vision for the future of library services in Lake Oswego by defining the Library's core values, describing a Engagement Report I June 30,2023 1. Executive Summary 11 oFV E v,F60SlyFC bBerryDunn U >rs2 �17yL preferred future for library services in the community, listing desirable attributes for the Library, and identifying specific roles for the Library within the community. Engagement Findings The engagement process for the Lake Oswego Public Library visioning yielded valuable insights into the community's needs, aspirations, and suggestions for the future of the Library. Through key informant interviews, focus groups, a social pinpoint survey, the Community Task Force, and passive information gathering, several key themes and findings emerged. Challenges, Roles, and Barriers Engagement findings indicate the community 4 perceives challenges in Lake Oswego in the form of affordability, shiftingdemographics, and \ ' 1 .r infrastructure struggles. Individuals mentioned that the high cost of living ,g, particularly housing, poses �� � � � �; mai challenges for professionals and individuals facing �— ' financial distress. Demographic shifts are bringing in ci younger families and diverse populations, which can ;, fit -ice create tensions between traditional and emergingI "� �► community norms. Additionally, infrastructure . struggles to keep pace with urban density, and � `j` limited public transportation disproportionately I l 1 rm affects underserved communities. Figure 01: Community Forum Recognized as a central point for community engagement, learning, and inclusivity, the Library plays a vital role in addressing these challenges, according to residents. It serves as an education partner, cultural hub, and trusted information source. Individuals highlighted the Library's role as a resource provider, supporting local initiatives and catering to the community's diverse demographics. Furthermore, the Library is valued as a social and intellectual hub. However, barriers to accessing library services exist, including accessibility issues and physical building limitations. Limitations in convenient access to the Library, public transit, lack of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility, language barriers, technology challenges, and a lack of knowledge about the Library's comprehensive offerings hinder access. Additionally, limited parking, small event space, outdated design, and maintenance issues were mentioned as obstacles to using library services. Vision To meet future needs, the community envisions an adaptable and creative library that can cater to evolving user needs. This includes innovative services, increased collaborations, and enhanced physical accessibility. The desired future library is a versatile, welcoming, and updated space equipped with modern amenities and sustainable features. Flexible building Engagement Report I June 30,2023 1. Executive Summary 12 ��E 4 ��OSC7.FC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'/O 1_10-' design, social spaces for community gatherings, cutting-edge technologies, and integration with the natural environment were emphasized. Preferences and desires for future library services were identified to fulfill these aspirations. The community expressed a desire for diverse programming, such as line-dancing classes, book readings, writing contests, book clubs, maker programs, and STEM events. Respondents emphasized the importance of diverse book collections addressing topics like trauma, disabilities, and cultural representation. Improving communication and outreach, enhancing physical spaces with brighter and more inviting environments, and increasing accessibility and convenience through extended hours and improved digital resources were identified as priorities. Findings Overall, these themes and findings underscore the community's aspirations for an inclusive, adaptable, and accessible Lake Oswego Public Library. The insights gathered through the engagement process will inform decision-making processes for strategic planning, and resource allocation to help ensure that the Library continues to serve as a vital community resource. By meeting the diverse needs of its residents and fostering community engagement, learning, and cultural representation, the Library will play a crucial role in the future of Lake Oswego. Community Visioning Task Force A key component of this visioning process was the Community Task Force. The Task Force was comprised of 18 community members from diverse backgrounds and representing different demographics, interests, and expertise. The Task Force met four times between February 2023 and May 2023. Their primary responsibility was to provide in-depth input regarding community perspectives on library services, process community feedback, and shape a vision for the Lake Oswego Public Library. Working collaboratively, the Task Force developed the components of the Lake Oswego Public Library Vision Framework, which serves as a guiding document for the Library's future development and enhancement. The framework identifies core values, describes the preferred future of the Library, lists desirable attributes, and outlines specific roles for the Library within the community. By incorporating a diverse range of perspectives and expertise, the Community Task Force worked to ensure that the vision for the Lake Oswego Public Library is inclusive, representative, and responsive to the needs and aspirations of the community. Their dedicated efforts and comprehensive vision framework reflect the collective vision and aspirations of the Lake Oswego community. Vision Framework The vision framework for the Lake Oswego Public Library was developed through a collaborative effort involving the Community Task Force and extensive community input. Aligned with the City Council's goals and initiatives, the vision framework embodies the values that underpin the vision for the Lake Oswego Public Library. These values include being for the Engagement Report I June 30,2023 1. Executive Summary 13 7 Ae ��OS BerryDunn _ b v people, serving as a cornerstone of civic life, acting as a community builder, fostering a learning hub for all, and being a leader and innovator. The preferred future envisioned for the Library is one where it is welcoming, inclusive, and accessible to all residents. The Library of the future is a vital resource that supports learning, connection, and belonging. Furthermore, it provides convenient physical access, modern sustainable facilities, robust virtual services, and fosters collaboration, creativity, and resilience within the community. The Library is envisioned as a community hub, inspiring individual and collaborative pursuits, fostering a sense of community, and connecting people to needed resources. By fulfilling these roles, the Library contributes to social cohesion, individual and community resilience, and a thriving community. The vision framework for the Lake Oswego Public Library represents a collective vision and aspiration of the Lake Oswego community. It provides a guiding document for the future development and enhancement of the Library, ensuring its continued relevance and service to the community. The full vision framework is included in Chapter 5 of this document, Community Task Force. Findings and Recommendations In conducting this visioning process, the consultant team identified key findings regarding the Library's direction and collaborated with staff to develop recommendations to advance the community's vision for the future of library services in Lake Oswego. Findings The Library is highly regarded in the community as a trusted source and provider of services. However, barriers to access limit its potential to serve the entire community as envisioned in the vision framework. Achieving universal accessibility is identified as a clear strategic imperative to help ensure that the Library is welcoming, safe, and accessible for all residents. The vision framework positions the Library as a primary catalyst for achieving community cohesion and resilience, emphasizing its role as a community connector, builder, and champion for inclusion and equity. Expanding the Library's physical footprint, particularly in the west side of Lake Oswego, is crucial to realizing the vision. Recommendations Exploring three models (A, B, and C) for enhancing the Library's physical spaces and service delivery is recommended. • Model A (the optimum model): construct a second public library to create proximate access across the community. This includes renovating the existing library, establishing a full-service library on the west side, and incorporating modern amenities in both locations. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 1. Executive Summary 14 *f� O b BerryDunn • Model B: replace the existing library with a larger facility that is more centrally located in the City. • Model C: renovate the existing facility. In all models, it is recommended that library facilities are supplemented with strategically located service outposts, mobile services, and a robust virtual presence for maximum community access. Improving parking, pedestrian access, and undertaking seismic retrofitting are also crucial considerations if renovating the existing library Regardless of which model(s), or variations of models, are chosen to explore, the recommended next steps for Lake Oswego are the same. They include describing and estimating the cost of the recommended service model, educating the community on the findings and outcomes of the visioning process, continuing public engagement to gain community input and support, working to explore funding options, and conducting polls among residents to gauge support of the service model(s). These steps will ensure the Library's strategic alignment with the community's vision and foster the necessary support for implementation. By following these recommendations, the Lake Oswego Public Library will be able to create a vibrant and accessible space that meets the diverse needs of its community and fulfills its role as a cornerstone of knowledge, connection, and community engagement. Report Organization This report is organized into the following chapters: • Comprehensive Engagement Strategy • Key Informant Interviews • Focus Groups • Social Pinpoint Survey • Passive Information Gathering • Community Task Force • Findings and Recommendations Detailed reviews of specific engagements are included as appendices to this document. 2. Comprehensive Community Engagement Strategy The foundation of this Library Visioning Process was a multifaceted, comprehensive community engagement process. Engagement is the cornerstone of successful projects. Comprehensive engagement ensures that community stakeholders are actively involved, ideas are shared, and communities are heard. The results of this visioning process were developed from the feedback received from community members at multiple touchpoints throughout this project. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 2. Comprehensive Community Engagement Strategy 5 ��E 4 ��OSh.FC *f� O b BerryDunn Community engagement for this project ran from January 2023 to May 2023 and included a wide range of engagement efforts and materials. Thousands of community members provided input during this project. Multifaceted Engagement Strategy Components: • Community Visioning Task Force: Brought together as a diverse group of community members and stakeholders who worked collaboratively to develop a shared vision for the Library. Through facilitated workshops, this Task Force shaped the project's direction, reviewed engagement findings, and developed the Vision Framework. • Engagement Platform and Project Branding: These components established the project's communication and brand strategy, serving as a recognizable message and establishing a cohesive tone. By providing a consistent identity and a clear set of talking points, the engagement platform helps community members connect with the project and reinforces its purpose and values. Numerous marketing materials promoting the project and participation were developed using the branding identified in the engagement platform. The full engagement platform is attached as Appendix A. • Engagement Training: An engagement training was provided to Lake Oswego Public Library staff to help ensure staff were familiar with the engagement platform and project details, and were consistent in how they promoted the project and collected feedback. • Social Pinpoint and Survey: An interactive online platform offered a digital space for engagement and a homepage for information about the project. The website allowed participants to learn about and stay updated on the project, share ideas, and take on online survey related to the visioning effort. • Key Informant Interviews: These played a crucial role in engaging residents, partners, agencies, staff, and businesses throughout the community. Through these in-depth discussions, valuable insights and opinions were gathered about the vision of library services in the community. Interviews facilitated personalized engagement, enabling the project team to establish direct connections and build trust with participants. • Community Forums and Events: These gatherings allowed the public opportunities to learn about the project and interact with project team members. These events were held throughout the course of the project to provide an opportunity to brief the community on progress and provide feedback along the way. • Focus Groups: These small-group sessions offered a structured and facilitated setting for in-depth discussions among selected participants. These groups encouraged focused exploration of specific themes, allowing nuanced insights, collective brainstorming, and identification of shared priorities. • Passive Information-Gathering Points: Paper surveys, comment boxes, vision boards, and Realtime feedback QR codes provided avenues for individuals to provide input at their convenience. These passive methods were spread throughout the community and Engagement Report I June 30,2023 2. Comprehensive Community Engagement Strategy I 6 *f� O b BerryDunn ensured that even those who may not actively interact with the Library or participate in other more structured engagement activities still had an opportunity to share their thoughts, ideas, and concerns. The full engagement platform is attached to this document as Appendix A. 3. Key Informant Interviews A key component of the engagement process for the Library Visioning Process involved conducting key informant interviews with a diverse range of community stakeholders. In total, over 100 individuals were interviewed, representing a broad spectrum of perspectives and insights. These interviews lasted up to 60 minutes and included residents, Library staff, other City departments, elected officials, members of Boards and Commissions, Rotary, sustainability groups, local educators and school board members, the business community, and community organizations, like African American Women of Lake Oswego, Respond to Racism, LO4Love, and Chinese Council of Lake Oswego. These interviews were conducted in 33 different sessions held from January 2023 to April 2023, allowing a comprehensive exploration of the community's needs and aspirations. To guide the discussions, four key questions were posed to each group: 1. What are the challenges in the Lake Oswego community? 2. What are the roles of the Library in addressing those challenges? 3. What are the barriers to accessing library services in Lake Oswego? 4. What are the future imperatives for the Lake Oswego Public Library 15 —20 years from now? These questions aimed to elicit valuable information and perspectives on the community's needs, the Library's potential impact, access challenges, and future requirements. In the interviews, over 1,000 comments were recorded, representing a rich collection of feedback, ideas, and suggestions. These comments serve as a valuable resource for understanding the community's desires, concerns, and aspirations, providing a foundation for shaping the future of the Lake Oswego Public Library. Findings Interviewees provided an invaluable perspective on the community and the potential for future library services. They described Lake Oswego as a growing community that is grappling with challenges involving affordability, shifting demographics, infrastructure, and disparities among its diverse community. The high cost of living, primarily housing, poses a hurdle for professionals such as teachers and service providers, and individuals experiencing financial distress, including those facing homelessness. Interviewees discussed how demographic shifts are bringing in younger families, diverse populations, and varied perspectives, causing tension between traditional and emerging Engagement Report I June 30,2023 3. Key Informant Interviews 17 ��E 4 ��OSh.FC *f� O b BerryDunn ,.oe V community norms. Residents also noted that infrastructure struggles to keep pace with urban density, and geographical positioning and limited public transportation disproportionately affect underserved communities. Amid these challenges, interviewees recognized the Lake Oswego Public Library as a central point for community engagement, learning, and inclusivity. They noted that the Library serves as an education partner, cultural hub, and a provider of diverse resources. The Library is considered a sanctuary for all demographics and an essential partner in local initiatives. Additionally, its role as a trusted information source, a significant educational resource, and a community hub is highly regarded. Interviewees identified that several barriers limit the use of library services. Accessibility issues arise due to limitations in public transit, lack of ADA accessibility, language barriers, technology challenges, and lack of diversity. The physical condition of the building also presents hindrances, including limited parking, small event space, outdated building design, and maintenance issues. Respondents also stated there is a knowledge gap among community members about the Library's comprehensive offerings beyond books. Looking into the future, interviewees see the Library as an adaptable, creative institution ready to meet evolving user needs. Residents envision it as a community center that expands its reach, offering innovative services, increasing collaborations, and enhancing physical accessibility. The future Lake Oswego Public Library is expected to be a versatile, welcoming, updated space equipped with modern amenities and sustainable features. Respondents stress the importance of a flexible building design, social spaces for community gatherings, cutting-edge technologies, and the integration of the Library with the natural environment. The full list of key informant interviews and findings by question are attached to this document in Appendix B. 4. Focus Groups Four focus groups were conducted as part of this project's engagement process. Through these structured and facilitated discussions, selected participants had the opportunity to engage in thoughtful conversations related to the future of library services in Lake Oswego. The focus groups offered a collective brainstorming environment, fostering the identification of shared priorities. Similar to the key informant interviews, the focus groups explored themes regarding challenges in the community, roles of the Library, barriers to accessing the Library, and the future of library services. The focus group environment allowed participants to delve deeper into various topics by allowing more time for comprehensive discussions. Four focus groups were conducted to gather diverse perspectives from different segments of the community: Engagement Report I June 30,2023 4. Focus Groups 18 b Berr Dunn v O; \o«oo�� BC/C L18PP� • March 8, 2023: River Grove Elementary fifth-grade students • March 9, 2023: River Grove Elementary Parent-Teacher Organization (PTO) • April 13, 2023: Senior Community Members • April 14, 2023: First Addition Neighborhood Findings The general findings of the focus groups reveal a shared appreciation for the Library as a vital space within the community. They emphasized the importance of creating a welcoming, inclusive, and accessible environment that caters to diverse needs and interests. The focus groups provided insights into improving physical spaces, enhancing communication channels, and expanding programs and resources. Overall, the focus groups underscored the Library's role as a community hub for reading, exploration, social engagement, and lifelong learning. Common suggestions included extending library hours, using technology effectively, preserving human interaction, and addressing barriers to access. The fifth-grade focus group highlighted their love for the Library as a cozy and calming place to read. The parents' focus group highlighted the need for a library that meets the needs of all community members, while the seniors emphasized the significance of the Library as a social and intellectual hub for the aging population. The First Addition neighborhood residents emphasized the value of the current library's atmosphere and physical resources, suggesting the importance of maintaining a warm and welcoming environment, as well as adapting to changing community dynamics. More detailed findings for each of these focus groups are included in Appendix C. 5. Social Pinpoint Survey Figure 03: Screenshot of Social Pinpoint Survey This section presents the findings and insights onmry sNeY gathered from the community survey conducted from January 24, 2023, through April 21, 2023. What current library services do you most want to The survey aimed to gather feedback from the continue in the future? community regarding preferences, opinions, and Check all that apply) suggestions related to library services, amenities, o Books and other physical materials and future improvements. Q Digital resources available online(e.g.eBeoks, downloadable audio,streaming flms) This survey was not statistically valid. It was 0 Special collections(e.g.Library of Things,free passes to offered online and in print. Printed copies of the local cultural venues) survey were also available in Spanish, Chinese, o Early liters ystorytimes and Korean. There were 2,791 survey responses 0 Children's special events and programs(e.g.Summer received. Library Challenge,1000 Books Before Kindergarten,Lego Club) Engagement Report I June 30,2023 5. Social Pinpoint Survey 19 b BerryDunn U O; G co? tc L16Q'P Overview The survey consisted of 17 questions, designed to capture a comprehensive understanding of the community's needs and desires. It included a blend of open-ended and multiple-choice questions, allowing respondents to provide detailed feedback as well as choose from predetermined options. Furthermore, the inclusion of"Other" options enabled respondents to share additional information or suggestions not covered by the provided choices. In addition to the library-related questions, the survey also included optional demographic questions. These questions aimed to gather information about the respondents' age, gender, racial or ethnic identity, disability status, household income, and neighborhood of residence. The demographic information helps ensure a diverse and inclusive representation of the community's perspectives in the survey results. The library-related questions covered a wide range of topics, such as desired services, preferred aspects of the Library, barriers to library usage, future enhancements, community information and gathering, aesthetic improvements, usage of neighboring libraries, vision for the Lake Oswego Public Library, and open-ended comments. Analyzing the responses offers valuable insights into the community's priorities, expectations, and aspirations for their public library. These insights informed the vision framework and will continue to inform decision-making processes, strategic planning, and resource allocation, helping ensure that the Lake Oswego Public Library continues to serve as a vital community resource. Findings The Lake Oswego Public Library survey provided rich insights into the community's use of the Library, satisfaction levels, and aspirations for future library services. The feedback was highly informative, painting a clear picture of what the Library is currently doing well and what it could improve or add to enhance its offerings and better serve the community. The data gathered demonstrated a deep appreciation within the community for both traditional and digital services provided by the Library. The survey data reflects that traditional services, such as lending books and other physical materials, remain crucial, while digital services are increasingly valued. This dual demand underscores the community's desire for a blended model of library services that can adapt to individual needs and preferences. The Library's customer service, selection of materials, and welcoming environment were also highlighted as major strengths in the survey. Respondents spoke highly of the comfortable spaces provided by the Library and its proximity to their homes. These elements contribute to the Library's reputation as a cherished community hub and a place where individuals and families can explore, learn, and connect with each other. Despite these positive aspects, the survey also revealed several barriers that prevent some community members from fully using the Library's services. Time constraints were identified as a significant obstacle, suggesting that the Library might consider extending its hours of Engagement Report i June 30,2023 5. Social Pinpoint Survey 1 10 ��E 4 ��OSh.FC *f� O b BerryDunn operation or expanding remote and digital services. Furthermore, a lack of knowledge about the Library's services and current operational hours emerged as areas for improvement, indicating the importance of effective communication and outreach. The survey results also highlighted some specific concerns about the Library's current building and location that could affect its usability and accessibility for certain segments of the community. In terms of the physical building, some respondents indicated the Library could benefit from specific enhancements. While they appreciated the current, neighborhood library feel, they also saw potential for improvements, such as modernizing facilities, expanding collections and programming space, and improving ADA access. The need for brighter, more inviting spaces to gather was frequently noted, as well as the desire for amenities like a café. Some respondents expressed concern over the Library's location. They noted that traveling across town just to pick up holds could be inconvenient, especially for those without easy access to transportation. This led to suggestions for new ways to allow patrons to retrieve materials in various parts of town to increase accessibility. The idea of adding a second library in the Lake Grove area was proposed as one possible solution. However, it is important to note there was also strong sentiment against moving the Library from its current location, suggesting that any additional locations should supplement, rather than replace, the existing library. Appendix D provides the full list of survey questions and analysis of feedback. 6. Passive Information Gathering Passive information gathering played an important role in the Library's visioning engagement plan, providing valuable insights and feedback from the community. From January 2023 to April 2023, this phase of data collection aimed to capture the opinions and ideas of individuals in a convenient and non-intrusive manner. The process involved a range of interactive tools strategically placed throughout the Library, various city locations, community partner establishments, and online. To encourage community members to share their thoughts, multiple channels were made available for passive participation. Comment cards, paper surveys, and visioning boards were placed at key locations, allowing individuals to express their ideas, suggestions, and concerns. Comments could also be left electronically on the Social Pinpoint Idea Wall. Additionally, RealTime feedback QR codes were introduced on printed materials made available around the community. These enabled people to provide quick open-ended responses using their smartphones. Leveraging the power of technology, this approach offered a seamless and accessible means for individuals to contribute to the visioning process. A total of 184 comments were received through passive information-gathering points. Findings Feedback from passive information-gathering points generally fell into four categories: Spaces and Facilities, Diversity and Representation, Service Suggestions and Requests, and Access and Convenience. Overall, the feedback reflected a strong desire for enhanced spaces, Engagement Report I June 30,2023 6. Passive Information Gathering 111 ��E 4 ��OSC7.FC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'4/O 1_10-' facilities, and services at the Library, with a focus on catering to diverse needs, improving accessibility, and working to ensure convenience for all patrons. Comments regarding Spaces and Facilities primarily called for enhancements and expansions. Many comments expressed the need for modern, flexible areas that cater to various ages and activities. Suggestions included meeting rooms, creative and recreational spaces for children, and optimizing current facilities by increasing natural light and rearranging interior spaces. Additionally, some patrons emphasized the importance of preserving the existing library, while others called for exploring potential expansion or additional locations. Diversity and representation emerged from the responses, with patrons requesting expanded programs and services that address the diverse interests and needs of the community. There was a call for a greater variety of books covering topics such as trauma, domestic violence, emotional regulation, autism, ADHD, and other disabilities. Patrons also expressed the desire for books that reflect the experiences of Native tribes, African-American heritage, and various communities. Requests were made for age-based programming, multi-generational programs, and more hobby-based programming. Respondents provided numerous suggestions and requests to enhance library services. Ideas included programming such as line-dancing classes, book readings, writing contests for children, book clubs, maker programs, and STEM events. There were calls for improved virtual services, such as online research databases, newspaper archives, and online books. Respondents also advocated for expanded library hours. Other recommendations included creating theme-based spaces, modern upgrades like automatic renewals and updated checkout systems, and a return to past practices such as magazine exchanges and "quiet rules." Finally, the accessibility and convenience of the Library were important concerns for respondents. Suggestions were made to centralize library locations and implement self-service centers citywide. Improvements to digital resources, management systems, and website were requested. Accommodations for diverse user groups, including seniors and children, were also mentioned. In terms of physical improvements, better bike parking and the provision of mobile library services were recommended. Appendix E provides detailed findings for each theme. 7. Community Task Force The Community Task Force played a crucial role in the Library Visioning Process. Comprised of individuals from diverse backgrounds and representing different demographics, interests, and expertise, this Task Force met four times between February 2023 and May 2023. Their primary responsibility was to provide in-depth input, helping to process community feedback and shape a vision for the Lake Oswego Public Library. Throughout the visioning process, the Task Force diligently processed input from library staff, the consultant team, and the community. Working collaboratively, the Task Force developed the components of the Lake Oswego Public Library Vision Framework. This framework identifies core values for the Library, includes a Engagement Report I June 30,2023 7. Community Task Force 112 b BerryDunn *C L18PP� description of its preferred future, lists desirable attributes, and outlines specific roles for the Library within the community. The complete Lake Oswego Public Library Vision Framework is included later in this section in its entirety. By incorporating a diverse range of perspectives and expertise, the Community Task Force ensured that the vision for the Lake Oswego Public Library was inclusive, representative, and responsive to the needs and aspirations of the community. Their dedicated efforts and comprehensive vision framework will serve as a guiding document for the future development and enhancement of the Library, which aims to reflect the collective vision and aspirations of the Lake Oswego community. Figure 02: Community Task Force Work by Meeting CommunityRoles of the Community Task Task Task Input Task Wrap Up Force Vision; Force Library, Force Summation, Force Vision Challenges Vision #1 Needs #2 Concepts #3 Vision #4 Framework Framework Task Force Meeting #1 — February 9, 2023 At its inaugural meeting, the Community Task Force was introduced to the Library visioning process project background and purpose, clarifying the objectives and expectations. The Task Force was presented with a preview of the community engagement strategy, highlighting the importance of involving local voices and perspectives in shaping the project. Next, a detailed overview of the community demographics was provided to help ensure all members understood the context and unique needs of the community. This was followed by an overview of the Lake Oswego Public Library. The Task Force then engaged in discussions regarding the community vision for, and potential roles of, the Library. Task Force Meeting #2 — March 9, 2023 During the second meeting, the Task Force was presented findings from community input that had been collected to date. These preliminary findings gave valuable insights into the community's needs and aspirations that the Task Force could incorporate into its work. The Task Force was also presented with resource readiness findings that compared the current state of the Library's facilities, collections, technology, and staffing with peer libraries. Additionally, David Wark from Hennebery Eddy Architects presented his reactions to the current state of the Library facility and provided insights into what libraries around the country are providing with their facilities. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 7. Community Task Force 113 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U a 2 �17yL Finally, the Task Force worked collaboratively to further refine roles of the Library for its vision framework. Task Force Meeting #3—April 19, 2023 At the third Task Force meeting, the Task Force was presented findings from the community input that had been collected to date. At this point, much of the community input gathering was close to complete and initial findings and themes were presented. With initial findings in mind, the Task Force reviewed and collaborated on the draft vision framework. They provided their comments to the consultant team on desired edits and additions with regards to the framework's values, future description, desired attributes, and roles. The consultant team also presented preliminary strategy recommendations for library service and facility improvements based upon their assessment of community findings. Task Force Meeting #4— May 25, 2023 At the fourth meeting, the Task Force was presented with final community input findings and updated strategy recommendations for library service and facility improvements. The Task Force then finalized the vision framework content, agreeing on final edits. The Task Force then recommended the vision framework move forward for presentation to the City Council. Vision Framework for the Lake Oswego Public Library The vision framework derived cumulatively from four Community Task Force work sessions in February, March, April, and May 2023. In these sessions, Task Force members discussed community challenges and needs, the role of the Library in Lake Oswego, and the capacity of the Library for the future. Extensive community input from the survey, focus groups, community forums, and interviews along with feedback and input from the Library Staff Working Group assisted the Task Force work. This vision framework for the Lake Oswego Public Library was developed mindful of and consistent with the 2023 Council Preferred Future, Goals, and Initiatives, adopted by the City Council on February 7, 2023. The visioning process that resulted in this vision framework is rooted in the city's mission to cultivate an exceptional quality of life for everyone in the community, and aligned with the City Council's goal to strengthen public trust in the city through continuous improvement, outstanding customer service, infrastructure investments, and fiscal stewardship. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 7. Community Task Force 114 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U 2 �17yL Values These interdependent values underpin the vision for the Lake Oswego Public Library. All are essential to the preferred future of the Library. ttif For the People The Library is for the wellbeing of people in an ever-changing, ever-expanding world. Everyone feels welcome, safe, respected, included, and supported. The Library is optimally accessible. Optimum accessibility includes that everyone in the Library's service area identifies with being accepted and included, and can conveniently and easily use the Library physically and virtually. Cornerstone of Civic Life An informed and engaged citizenry is the foundation of a democratic society. The Library is a civic institution upheld as a trusted source of information, a champion of intellectual freedom, a proponent of lifelong education, and an essential cultural, informational, and educational community resource. The Library creates a safe space to welcome everyone for discussions, discourse, and deeper understanding that leads to an informed viewpoint. Library services should be open to all, equally accessible, and free. Community Builder The Library proactively demonstrates inclusion and service for all ages, backgrounds, experiences, identities, and cultures. It connects people across generations, cultures, and ways of thinking to better understand and value one another, build relationships, and collaborate. The Library as a source of recorded history also builds understanding and community connections. Capable, committed people make an exemplary library ecosystem possible: librarians and staff, volunteers and partners, and library users and advocates throughout the region enable the Library's expansive relationship with the community, leading to better services and improved outcomes for all. y'J Learning Hub for All Lifelong learning is essential to a thriving community. Through the lens of diversity, equity, and inclusion, the Library champions the learning needs and styles of everyone. The Library is a center of the community's daily life, for general use and as a resource for new and emerging needs. It meets people where they are. The Library facilitates intergenerational knowledge transfer and interpersonal respect across generations. Projects and activities support learning, give purpose and meaning, promote civil discourse, foster social and community cohesion, and connect people of all ages. The Library supports children's early language, literacy, and learning, giving them the foundation for success in school and in life. The Library leads the way in active, immersive educational opportunities that engage learners, benefit multiple learning styles, foster opportunity and promote resiliency. Leader and Innovator The Library is a leader and innovator in community engagement, services, technology, outreach, and partnerships that support and promote learning and connection throughout the Engagement Report I June 30,2023 7. Community Task Force 115 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O b BerryDunn community. It is fluid and dynamic, anticipating and morphing to support how people live, work, and learn, now and into the future. Facilities, staffing, collections, and technology enhance the user experience and help ensure equitable access for all. Preferred Future Investing in the Library of the future is investing in a future where everyone in the community benefits from the use and support of this extraordinary, valuable resource. The Library of the future is welcoming, respectful, encompassing of all, rich in information and human resources, and meets each person's needs for learning, connection, and belonging. Children and adults of all ages thrive in an environment designed for their supported learning throughout the stages of their lives. People readily find the trustworthy information and the personal assistance they need to navigate a challenging, ever-changing world. Conveniently placed modern facilities suited to creative, enterprising, and collaborative endeavors invite the contribution and enjoyment of all ages. Together with a state-of-the-art virtual presence and services, and mobile and outreach services, the Library is a people- oriented, public learning ecosystem that spans the breadth of the community. It connects people seamlessly with what they need in the region and the world through networks of information, learning, and partnerships. The effect is a connected, collaborative, creative, resilient, and thriving community. Desirable Attributes of the Library System • Physical access to library services is convenient to all residents. Multiple modes of transportation provide safe, convenient, and affordable access to the Library. • Facilities of the system provide ample, flexible, aesthetically pleasing, healthy, environmentally sustainable, and ADA-compliant space to serve the current and future community. • Facilities are designed and renovated to emphasize the Library as an inviting, welcoming, and hospitable community place especially for people as well as current and future physical, digital, and virtual collections. • Robust virtual access to the Library is essential and integral for a future-ready system that is user-friendly, dynamic, and ever-evolving to meet the needs of community. Roles of the Library in Lake Oswego The following table describes three primary roles of the Library in the community from the perspective of the Task Force. The resultant effect in the community is a sense of cohesion, individual and community resourcefulness and resilience, and an inspired and thriving community. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 7. Community Task Force 116 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O b BerryDunn Roles of the Library Description Results Hub of the community The Library is an inviting, welcoming, spacious and Access to a safe place demonstrably inclusive sphere where people engage Connection to each in individual, collaborative, and collective pursuits of other learning, knowledge, and enjoyment. The space and A sense of community, its design, both inside and outside, support of belonging, of not multifaceted uses and activities for all ages with ample reader seating, individual and small group study being alone spaces, collaborative meeting spaces, including café Feeling "being seen" space, and large conference/multiuse spaces. and respected Physical and digital collections of the Library, and beyond, are easily accessed and readily obtained, suited to the needs of residents. Individuals, families, children, teens, adults, seniors, and elders find those preferred spaces and conditions that draw them to the Library. Inspire and support The Library inspires and supports education and Helps community collaborative energy lifelong learning through the creative exploration of progress and deal with and opportunity in our ideas across the spectrum of the community's tomorrow community diversely rich resident knowledge pool. The Library is Social cohesion the doorway to cross-cultural participation in individual, entrepreneurial, and community creative endeavors. It inspires citizen engagement, cocreation practices, and technology-supported innovation on a participatory basis. It is a catalyst for the community's creative consciousness and a multidirectional channel beyond library walls for the community's creative energy. Connect people to The Library meets people where they are and Helps community what they need connects them to what they need. Whether it is progress and deal with connecting with others, a little solitude, or a break tomorrow from isolation, whether individual study or research, or Individual and connecting to resources inside the Library or community elsewhere, to the past, present, or future, to a great resilience/thriving read, to an online class, to needed, trusted information, to a source of inspiration, to a community resource, to technology coaching—no matter who they are, each person's individual reasons for coming to the LO libraryscape, physical and virtual, are respected and served. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 117 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn 17Lk U � O G � eco? 64/C L16Q'P 8. Findings and Recommendations Consultant Findings In conducting this visioning process, the consultant team generated the following findings regarding the Lake Oswego Public Library. The Library is highly regarded in the community. The Lake Oswego Public Library holds a highly esteemed position within the community, being recognized as a trusted source and provider of valuable services. However, the presence of barriers to access hinders the Library's ability to fully serve the entire community, as outlined in the vision framework and consistently expressed by stakeholders throughout the engagement process. Achieving universal accessibility is a clear strategic imperative. Up to 50% of the population within the service area does not currently use the Library, which emphasizes the need to address these barriers and enhance accessibility. The community strongly desires a library that is welcoming, acknowledging, safe, respectful, and offers ample spaces for people to engage. Geographical proximity, compliance with ADA standards, and accessibility via various transportation modes are essential considerations. Additionally, there is a need to increase awareness and advocacy for the Library's services. The vision framework pictures the Library as a primary catalyst for achieving community cohesion and resilience. The community emphasizes the importance of the Library being inclusive and accessible to all residents. It is viewed as a connector and relationship builder within the community, championing inclusion and equity. Furthermore, the Library is expected to serve as a premier educational center for lifelong learning. Expanding the physical footprint in a location that is proximate to west side residents is crucial to achieving the vision. To help ensure the desired proximate and physical accessibility, the Library system should expand its physical footprint in the western region of Lake Oswego and throughout the service area. The Library facility needs renovations, remodeling, and/or enhancements to add 21st- century services. The existing facility requires improvements to accommodate the desired programming and services effectively. Additionally, there is a pressing need for seismic retrofitting to help ensure the safety and resilience of the Library in the face of potential seismic events. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 8. Findings and Recommendations 118 oFV E v,F60slyFC b BerryDunn U b � s� 17yL Ge��C L1, Recommendations As part of the comprehensive visioning process, the consultant team and staff have collaborated on recommended next steps to advance the community's vision for library services in Lake Oswego. These next steps involve the development and exploration of three models that aim to enhance the Library's physical spaces and delivery of services throughout the community. Model A, the consultant's recommendation, calls for upgrading the existing library and adding a second full-service location. This two-library approach promises to enhance the Library's reach and service quality, ensuring access to modern facilities and services throughout the city. Models B and C propose an alternate approach, either building a larger centralized library with smaller service outposts (Model B) or renovating the current library while providing mobile services and outposts (Model C). Model A is the preferred recommendation, as it aligns with community input that emphasized widespread, accessible services. By creating a second full-service library, this model ensures enhanced physical access, a critical need stressed by the community, and promotes the values of inclusion and equity. The dual-library system reinforces the community's aspiration for a dynamic library ecosystem, capable of leading and innovating in engagement, services, and technology. The incorporation of modern facilities in two locations fosters creativity and collaboration across the community. Renovating the existing library and adding a new one on the City's west side not only meets resident's needs for accessible services, but enhances user experiences and learning outcomes, and ensures a library ecosystem serves the needs of Lake Oswego's youth and future generations. This investment in a dual-library model aligns with the shared vision for the future of Lake Oswego Public Library to facilitate an inclusive, connected, and thriving community. The models are detailed below. Model A is the optimum model, and what the consultant team recommends. It envisions the addition of a second public library to operate in Lake Oswego along with the current location. This ensures desired proximate access to a physical library across the community. This model includes the renovation of the existing library with improved parking and pedestrian access, as well as the establishment of a full-service library on the west side of the city. Modern amenities would be incorporated in both locations, such as café space, educational play area, reservable study rooms, maker space, updated technology, dedicated teen area, flexible multi- purpose meeting space, and outdoor space, along with adequate collection space. Model B proposes replacing the existing library with one larger facility in a more central location in the City, supported by strategically located service outposts and mobile services. The new library would feature modern amenities similar to Model A, including café space, educational play area, reservable study rooms, maker space, updated technology, dedicated teen area, flexible multi-purpose meeting space, and outdoor space. Adequate collection space, parking, and pedestrian access would also be provided. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 8. Findings and Recommendations 119 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b Model C suggests renovating the existing library while establishing strategically located service outposts and mobile services to provide access to underserved areas of the city. This model involves reducing the physical collection size to accommodate the addition of modern amenities most desired by the community, such as café space, educational play area, and flexible multi-purpose meeting space. Seismic retrofitting and improvements to parking and pedestrian access within the limitations of the current site would also be implemented. Regardless of the model chosen, there are common next steps for the Library to undertake. These include describing and estimating the cost of the recommended service model, continuing the public engagement process to explain and build a deeper understanding of the proposed model, working to determine potential funding options, and conducting polls among residents to gauge their support for actualizing the service model. These steps will help ensure that the Library's development aligns with the community's desires and secures the necessary support for implementation. Conclusion The Lake Oswego Public Library Visioning Project collected valuable insights from the community regarding the future of library services in Lake Oswego. The effort's extensive community engagement revealed a common aspiration of an inclusive, adaptable, and accessible Library that can meet the needs of all residents. The Vision Framework was developed to translate these insights into a strategic roadmap that can guide the Library's future, ensuring it remains relevant, accessible, and responsive to the ever-changing needs of the community. Moving forward, it is essential that this process' findings and recommendations guide the Library's future development. The values that underpin the vision ensure the Library serves the people and stands as a cornerstone of civic life. In the words of the community task force, the effect will be a connected, collaborative, creative, resilient, and thriving community. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 8. Findings and Recommendations 120 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn U 5. O° 17y+�L� � G � Appendix A - Engagement Platform The engagement platform serves as a recognizable message and brand, enabling community members to easily identify and connect with the project. By establishing a consistent project brand, it becomes a powerful tool for conveying the project's purpose, process, objectives, and values to stakeholders. This unified messaging sets the tone and cultivates a sense of familiarity among the audience. Crucially, the engagement platform acts as a compass for effective communication. It outlines talking points that serve as a foundation for conversations, press releases, and marketing materials. These well-defined messages help ensure that all project-related interactions align with the intended purpose and convey a cohesive narrative. This approach eliminates ambiguity and confusion, enabling the Library and consultant team to consistently convey the project's significance, achievements, and impact. Before engagement for this effort began, an engagement platform was developed in collaboration with the City of Lake Oswego. The platform included below was the foundation for engagement efforts throughout the project. Lake Oswego Library Visioning Engagement Platform Project Background Our award-winning Lake Oswego Public Library is an essential community resource for trusted information, enrichment, and connection. The Library service area supports over 43,000 people in Lake Oswego and areas of unincorporated Clackamas County, with over 22,000 active cardholders and 14,000 library visits per month. Our library boasts one of the highest per capita borrowing rates in the nation. Library staff are committed to providing high-quality services that meet the evolving needs of the community. It is important for the Library to understand community needs and future roles of the Library to continue to provide exceptional services. We are embarking on a community visioning process that will be guided by what we learn from our community. We need you to help create our future! To optimize a robust and inclusive engagement process, the Library is working with BerryDunn, an industry-leading consulting firm. The consultant team will provide depth and breadth of expertise with a national and local frame of reference. In collaboration with library staff, the consultant team will facilitate broad-based and inclusive community conversations about the needs of the Library's service-area residents, the roles of the Library in serving its community, and the resources necessary to meet the community's vision for library services. Together, we inspire discovery and cultivate wellbeing by welcoming all people to read, learn, and connect. Project Title Library Visioning Process Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 121 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U 2 �17yL Purpose The city has embarked on a Library Visioning Process. Its purpose is to shape a community vision for the Lake Oswego Public Library of the future. From now through May, that process will cast a broad net to engage the Lake Oswego community. Goals of the Library Visioning Process • Create a shared community vision for the future of Lake Oswego Public Library • Understand residents' current and future needs for library services, facilities, and amenities • Determine the Library's role to address community challenges and meet emerging needs Project Engagement Timeline The visioning process will include community engagement, surveys, focus groups, and community forums. This process will take place from February to May. We have many opportunities for the community to engage with us to shape our future. Join us! Online Survey Community survey live February through April Online Community Forums Idea boards and forums available on this website live from February through April Community Forums • February 8, Wednesday, 5:00— 7:00 p.m. — City Maintenance Center, 17601 Pilkington Rd • March 10, Friday, 5:00—7:00 p.m. — Lake Oswego Public Library, 706 Fourth St • March 11, Saturday, 10:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. — Lake Grove Elementary, 15777 Boones Ferry Rd • April 17, Monday, 6:00 p.m. — 7:00 p.m. —Virtual • April 26, Wednesday, 6:00 p.m. — 7:00 p.m. —Virtual Branding Theme The branding theme for this project is: Create your library. Shape our future. Background:A branding theme for a visioning and engagement project is developed to help create a unique identity for efforts that are easily recognizable throughout the community and inspires people to get involved. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 122 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn U 5. O ° 17y+�L� � G � eco? 4/C Lke Talking Points — Lake Oswego Public Library Visioning Process 2023 Project Background • Your library is embarking on a community visioning process that will be guided by the voices of our community. You will help shape our future. • Through visioning, the Library wants to: o Understand the community's needs for service and accessibility o Determine the Library's role to address community challenges and meet emerging needs o Create a shared community vision for the future of Lake Oswego Public Library Call to Action • We seek input from everyone in the community to help ensure your library is serving your needs. • We hope you will participate with us in what promises to be a rich, enlightening, community-building experience, one that sets a vision for serving our greater community for future generations. • The city is looking for YOUR ideas to help create the future of the Lake Oswego Public Library. Visioning Process • The city has hired a consulting team, BerryDunn, to facilitate the community outreach and engagement process, which will take place from January to May 2023. These robust and inclusive engagement efforts will feature: o Staff Interviews o Council and Board Interviews o External Stakeholder Interviews o Community Visioning Task Force o Staff Working Group o Online Survey o Online Community Forum o In-Person Community Forums o Focus Groups o Passive Information-Gathering Points Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 123 ��E 4 ��OSC7.FC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'/O 1_10-' • We will prioritize the engagement of traditionally hard-to-reach populations and we want the community's help to do so. (BIPOC: Black, Indigenous, and People of Color; Black/African American; Latino/a/e; Asian; Native American; Pacific Islander; LGBTQIA2S+; people who are experiencing poverty; people who experience varying degrees of ability). • A Community Task Force will provide input and help the consultant team synthesize community input. It will meet in three to four successive work sessions, February through May. • Role of the Library Advisory Board: The Library Advisory Board is advisory to the City Council and will be interviewed by BerryDunn as well as briefed regularly throughout the course of the process. • Staff Planning Team: A staff planning team will provide input and analyze library capacity to meet the needs of the community in four resource areas: collections, facilities, staffing, and technology. More Information / Get Involved • Contact Libraryvisioning@lakeoswego.city • Visit https://berrydunn.mysocialpinpoint.com/lakeoswegopubliclibrary FAQ— Lake Oswego Public Library Visioning Project 2023 Purpose of Studying Facilities Needs as Part of the Library Visioning Project • Community needs and the role of the Library have changed significantly since our building was designed and constructed more than 40 years ago. • A new vision is needed to provide for 21st century library services and amenities, which are in high demand in communities with updated library facilities. • Today's libraries are vibrant, bustling community centers brimming with opportunities for learning and social connection. • By reimagining what our library could be, library staff will be able to shape services, amenities, and investments to respond to community wishes and position ourselves to best serve the Lake Oswego community. • Facility investments to support this shared vision could include basic upgrades (such as more seating, study rooms, and meeting rooms) to modern library amenities (such as event spaces, meeting and lounge space, maker spaces, and children's educational play spaces). • Facility needs are an important area of focus in our public engagement process, but the overall focus is on library services to inform a broader vision of our library's future. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 124 ��E 4 ��OSC7.FC *f� O b BerryDunn V G ..�a 64/O 1_10-' Public Visioning Project Background Information and Details • In 2021, Community Survey results again showed that city residents identified Lake Oswego Public Library facilities as needing attention. Of respondents, 69% were "very supportive" or"somewhat supportive" of expanding library amenities, services, and facilities in the future. • In early 2022, the City Council set a goal to "begin a process to address the long-term facilities needs of the Lake Oswego Public Library." • Throughout 2022, library staff worked with the Library Advisory Board to envision an inclusive public process to address this goal. • In late 2022, staff retained consulting firm BerryDunn to help the city design a robust public engagement plan to understand the community's needs and vision for library services. • From January 2023— May 2023, BerryDunn and city staff engaged the Lake Oswego's community to help shape a vision for the Library. • The engagement plan is designed to understand the community's vision for the role of the Library in the now-and-future Lake Oswego in the context of community input, industry norms, trends, and future imperatives. • The plan emphasizes gathering input from the diversity of Lake Oswego residents, whether or not they currently use the Library, with special attention to engage hard-to- reach populations. • This engagement process will include many different efforts, all of which will focus on the following items: o Informing the Lake Oswego community of current library services offered and levels of library services provided by Lake Oswego Public Library. o Informing the Lake Oswego community about trends in library services. o Gathering information from the Lake Oswego community about: • Perceived challenges in the community • The Library's roles in potentially addressing those challenges • Barriers to accessing library services • Vision for the Library • Specific engagement plan components provide both in-person and online opportunities, including community forums, surveys, individual and group stakeholder interviews, a robust online presence, focus groups, a staff working group, a community visioning Task Force, and passive information-gathering points placed in key areas around the city. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 125 b BerryDunn CU8 Past Engagement Efforts and Results 2021 Community Survey • Survey was a randomized, statistically valid survey performed biannually. • The goal was to measure general attitude of residents toward city services and programs, benchmark to other cities, and receive feedback on specific policy questions, including future expansion of library services. • Respondents of the 2021 community survey ranked library services that should receive the most emphasis over the next two years as: 1) library as a hub of community information/gathering, 2) events and services for children, and 3) quality of Lake Oswego Public Library facility. • 69% of respondents were "very supportive" or"somewhat supportive" of expanding library amenities, services, and facilities in the future. Community Support and High Usership of Lake Oswego Public Library • Our award-winning Library is the cultural heart of our community and an essential community resource for trusted information, enrichment, and connection. • With a mission to inspire discovery and cultivate wellbeing for all, our Library creates remarkable experiences, ranging from our annual Lake Oswego Reads events to our Library of Things, to continuously enhance the Library experience and inspire a lifetime of learning. • Our Library currently serves over 22,000 active cardholders, receives an average of 14,000 visits per month, and boasts one of the highest per capita borrowing rates in the nation. • 2021 community survey results identified the Library as the #1 ranking City service in terms of resident satisfaction. • Demand for library materials, services, and events has grown significantly since our building was constructed. In the past 20 years alone, we have experienced a 69% increase in materials collection size, a 244% increase in the number of Holds Placed by Lake Oswego cardholders, and an over 275% increase in both the number of library events and classes AND the number of attendees. • Lake Oswego Public Library is proud to have been named the #1 Library of its size in Oregon for the final eight years of publication of the Hennen's American Public Library Rating (HAPLR) index. • Our Library is open seven days a week to serve the community, for a total of 54 hours per week. • An overview of our FY 21-22 statistics provides a snapshot of our Library's high usage (which was even higher pre-pandemic): Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 126 b BerryDunn CU8 143,254 Annual visitors 162,720 Holds filled 780,227 Items borrowed 3,025 New library cards created 22,753 Active library card holders 33,139 Reference questions answered 286,097 Website visitors 13,151 In-library internet sessions 16,485 Attendees at classes &events 9,016 Volunteer hours • Our Library strengthens the overall fabric of Lake Oswego by providing opportunities for community education, relationship building and partnerships that nourish community needs. • Providing this high level of service out of one facility of 27,100 square feet presents a challenge. • Library staff and volunteers provide modest outreach services, and partner with local organizations to host classes and events at other facilities, in efforts to reach beyond our walls. Facility History 1974— Lake Oswego voters approved a bond measure to build a 35,000-square-foot library on the site of the 12-year-old 6,920-square-foot library facility. The city population was 19,000 residents in 1974. 1983 — Our current library facility of 27,100 square feet opened. City population had grown to 22,715. 1988 —The council-approved Library Growth Task Force recognized that the Library had reached maximum capacity for its building size. Recommendations were made for a new main library and two branch libraries. City population had reached 27,048. 1992 —The final report of the Branch Library Site, Utilization and Design Committee recommended a 42,000-square-foot main library or the addition of a 5,000-square-foot branch library. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 127 ��E 4 ��OSC7.FC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'/O 1_10-' 1994— The Oregonian found LOPL "near its capacity to function well" after only 10 years. City population had reached 32,940. 1996—The Library Building Program Report from Professional Library Consultants, P.A., recommended a new library space of 46,248 square feet. 2006 —The Independent Study of the Clackamas County Library System Facilities Assessment recommended the replacement of the current building with a 64,854-square-feet facility, because of its high level of use. 2006 — BOORA Architects determined that a 65,581-square-foot main facility, or a 48,133- square-foot sister library would be necessary to meet standards and guidelines for current and future service populations. 2008— SERA Architects recommended a 66,000-square-foot facility. City population had reached 36,590. 2012 —A $14 million general obligation bond measure, which would have funded a portion of a new 66,000-square-foot library building project, failed. 2021 — Community Survey results again showed that City residents identified library facilities as needing attention. Furthermore, 69% of respondents were "very supportive" or"somewhat supportive" of expanding library amenities, services, and facilities in the future. The same survey identified our Library as the #1 ranking City service in terms of resident satisfaction. 2022 — Council set a goal to "begin a process to address the long-term facilities needs of the Lake Oswego Public Library." Improvements to library facilities overlaps with other 2022 Council Goals and Initiatives as well, including expanding cultural and community events and services, and addressing sustainability goals. City population reached 41,148. 2023 —January through May, a public engagement process will take place to understand the community's vision for the Library's future, including facilities but taking a wider view of the community needs for library services. Promotional Materials As part of this project, a variety of branded, promotional materials were prepared to promote participation in the visioning process. Materials included bookmarks, comment cards, flyers, posters, vision boards, comment card boxes, coasters, and yard signs. Materials were also translated into multiple languages to help ensure broad participation. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 128 2tv.F n ,,.os ° o � uVly>ty(. wFo b BerryDunn G \aeco�' 6 � 0C Lye Figure 04: Sample Promotional Materials Create ' ,.. , - your Library 14 Shape our future. �a�`e�SwQgo PublicCi6rdrI, The City is Looking for YOUR ideas to help create the future of Lake 0' • tEl Shape Your Library Oswego Public Library. I La Ciudad pide SUS ideas para r 0`'• ' . Create Our Future! crear eLfuturo de La Biblioteca PGblicade Lake Oswego. Shape Our Future. '.. � i � P�EOSwF�o Share Your Ideas! i ' 7,; {`' 211sigMP111-1461,ttlffigi-A,Wail 0 ue=inPetkeoreo.tiV I' •'ri...s'1J L Er- ---- n. 47 Lake OswegoAi T2 o—EAi °I v. F. o12IIS EIE�cil��I Ll°I �I ° S oLolGols 7iulru Lake Oswego d Share Your Ideas to o`h. Public Library �'Sod� Shape Our Future! z���� F � -- I„ ^W< �jMMM ® tll�o� 5 awe, �" it off. �V 2M O F'. ` I � ,�, Al i www.lakeoswego.city/library Create your Library. 111. :-11 ' R '{ Shape o u r future. , _ �,- . ' = For more information, please contact Ti,-' :.. ',,.. ., Libra visionin @lakeoswe o.ci `'`•»►.. rY � S �f �. e i Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix A—Engagement Platform 129 vy.6 OS wFc BerryDunnb e'4/C UBPPe- Appendix B - Key Informant Interview Questions and Results Question 1 - What are the challenges in the Lake Oswego Community? Affordability Many respondents have identified affordability, particularly housing affordability, as a significant challenge. They noted that rising prices and the high cost of living are creating barriers to entry for many individuals. A lack of affordable housing is causing difficulties for various professionals, including service providers, teachers, and firefighters, to live within the community. Moreover, there was a reported lack of services for individuals experiencing financial difficulties, including those experiencing homelessness. Example quotes from interviewees on affordability are listed below: • "Affordability. When I moved here 20 years ago as a single mom, I could find a house, but the barriers to entry have accelerated." • "Very few employees can live in the City." • "Trying to buy a home in LO is out of reach for the vast majority of people." • "Not much affordable housing." • "No affordable housing especially for younger generation." • "Rents for apartments are not affordable." • "Most of us in this room don't live here because of a lack of affordable and sufficient housing." • "Housing cost is a barrier for entry to the community." • "Need to have housing for all incomes, service providers, teachers, firefighters." • "Affordability of housing. A lot of people who work in LO can't afford to live there. City has never targeted affordable housing in the past. There's also a general lack of housing inventory available." Changing Demographics Responses in this category indicate that Lake Oswego is experiencing changes in demographics, lifestyle, and political viewpoints. These changes are reflected in the influx of younger families, diverse populations, and people with different perspectives. This shift is posing challenges to community norms and potentially causing tension between traditional and emerging community values. A critical aspect that came up several times is the challenge of Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 130 ��E 4 ��OSh.FC *f� O b BerryDunn incorporating new residents' needs without losing the charm and essence that makes Lake Oswego unique. Example quotes from interviewees on changing demographics are listed below: • "Difficulty in the community in accepting change." • "Have observed how City's grown the last 20 years. There has been pushback against redevelopment, but then years afterward, people appreciate the redevelopment." • "Demographics are changing. Currently older, but there are a lot of youth and families coming in." • "Multi-generational situation, meet a lot of young families that have come back to Lake Oswego for schools and also support of their parents. These families have different needs than their parents." • "Portland has had a huge influx of people coming into town and changing it to more like where they are coming from." • "People moved here for the charm and then they commit charm-icide. They want the charm, but also all the amenities." • "Community wants to attract business, but they don't want the inconveniences that come with it." • "New younger energy is being drowned out by the older generations." • "It's difficult for young people to move into the community." • "Clash between old and new. Those who embrace change and those who don't. More apparent here because so many people have lived here a long time and now people are starting to move in." • "We have a broad spectrum of political opinions, affects curriculums in schools and books on shelves." • "What used to be normal City business is becoming much more partisan and are being influenced by national politics leading to a much more divisive community." Infrastructure The responses indicate that the community of Lake Oswego is facing several challenges related to its infrastructure. These challenges stem from some inadequate public facilities. Interviewees commented that the current infrastructure struggles to keep pace with increasing urban density, and that unique climate and environmental factors pose additional challenges. There were also comments calling for improved community spaces and more sustainable practices. Example quotes from interviewees on infrastructure are listed below: • "Urban density with rural infrastructure." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 131 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b • "Infrastructure challenges; most of the community was constructed at county level infrastructure." • "Lack of space in the Library for programming and creative services." • "Location and size of the Library are a challenge and limits what it can offer. Library doesn't have a lot of visibility." • "Parking lot is small." • "Parking is an issue." • "Small facility limits our partnerships." • "Youth think our library is dark and dingy." • "We have hills that impede traffic when iced over." • "Lack of good indoor community space for events and other public gathering." • "Not great paths or sidewalks. We are built out." Disparities between served and underserved A final category of responses to this question addressed challenges in the Lake Oswego community stemming from disparities between served and underserved communities. A common theme was that the geographical positioning and limited public transportation disproportionately affect underserved communities. Additionally, issues of diversity, accessibility, and equity were prominent throughout comments. The city's history of racial tension was also referenced by interviewees as contributing to current disparities. Example quotes from interviewees on disparities between served and underserved are listed below: • "Location is a barrier. There's only one branch, in downtown." • "Don't have good public transit in LO." • "Challenges around accessibility; ADA compliance, but also pathways to allow people to move around. Making sure people can access services equitably." • "Lake Oswego has dark spots in that history as well. And that can be part of its legacy and reputation." • "Very limited public transit in the City. Have a lake in the middle. That lake is a barrier." • "The Western border of the City is 15. It's very easy for people near that border to hop on 15 and go elsewhere." • "There's poor public transportation." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 132 ��E 4 ��OSh.FC *f� O b BerryDunn • "Lake Oswego is positioned between two counties and the neighboring counties have better funding for their libraries than we do from our county." • "People with mental health challenges or means don't have places to go." • "The geography is a challenge because of the Lake in the middle. It splits the city and access to the Library, for example, is hard for residents on the other side—other libraries are easier for them to get to." • "The stereotype of LO as not welcoming to people of color." • "Transportation challenges, unless you have a car, you can't get around LO. There are a few bus lines, but not many." Question 2 - What are the roles of the Library in addressing those challenges? Welcoming for everyone Interview responses indicate that the Library in Lake Oswego is widely recognized as a central point for community engagement, learning, and as a welcoming space for everyone, irrespective of their racial, socio-economic, or demographic background. The Library is seen as a partner in education, an important cultural hub, a provider of diverse resources, and an institution capable of fostering an inclusive and equitable environment. Interviewees considered the Library a sanctuary for all demographics and recognized it as an essential partner in local initiatives. There was a call for increased physical accessibility (via biking, public transport, multiple locations), extended operational hours, digital presence, community engagement, inclusive programming, and collaborations. Example quotes from interviewees for the welcoming for everyone category are listed below: • "The Library creates an environment that is welcoming for everyone." • "Lifting up marginalized voices through displays, programs, and collections." • "We need to reach the community in need." • "If people understood the Library as another educational partner, there would be more support for the Library." • "We need to bring access to them through all of library resources." • "We have two distinct areas in the City. Would be good to spread out, to have services in more areas of the town." • "The Library should be a community center, a town center, free, welcoming and accessible." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 133 *f� O b BerryDunn • "LO is not all white, or all wealthy, it is the Library's job to uplift communities of color, to uplift non-English speaking community members, which all goes in to making it a safe space." • "Knowing that there is a wide range of incomes in Lake Oswego, making it so people have access to everything is important." • "Library is very responsive to the needs of EVERYONE in Lake Oswego." • "Using the programs we present to have more inclusivity, and encourage diversity." • "Neutral Education: providing the knowledge and bringing people from different backgrounds, demographics, fields of study to the community at large." • "Have a stronger online presence through virtual education, workshops, and activities. To help bridge gaps between young and older demographics." • "Providing different services to attract different populations, e.g. teens and underserved populations." • "It needs to be easily accessible. Multiple facilities." • "Library should be open for greater hours." • "Library is the heart of Lake Oswego. It's important to the community. The statistics show it. It's the village watering hole. It's where everyone goes. All the age groups." • "Last bastion where you're not expected to pay to be there." • "The Library participates in community events. The Library is accessible and approachable. They do local programming and create local relationships." • "Place where people can feel like they are equal." Trusted source for information Many of the responses to this question underlined the Library's role as a trusted source for information. It is viewed as a safe place for community discourse, a provider of diverse resources and services, and a leader in promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion. The Library is considered a critical part of civil society and democracy, helping meet the community's diverse needs. It also leads in combating misinformation and offering educational programs on various topics. Example quotes from interviewees for the trusted source for information category are listed below: • "The Library is already a thought leader about issues of inclusion." • "The Library can provide the wide variety of people it serves with the diversity of needs they need met." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 134 b BerryDunn V ; Go� PP� CU8 • "Be a hub of providing information on all services available." • "The Library elevates storytelling and truth." • "It's critical in a Civil Society and Democracy." • "As the City focuses more on DEI events and education, the Library becomes the hub, and the spearhead of those events." • "We're a trusted resource of community information." • "We refer to the Library as the lead for events and cultural information." • "Library should lead in accurate information and combat misinformation." Place for learning Interviewees saw the Library as a significant educational resource, providing access to knowledge and tools for learning to all members of the community. The Library functions as a place where people can get information, be exposed to new ideas, and access resources they may not otherwise be able to afford. The Library also plays a key role in supporting the education of young people, including fostering a love for reading and supporting continued learning during summer months. Additionally, the Library is identified as a place for lifelong learning and a venue for public education on various topics. Example quotes from interviewees for the place for learning category are listed below: • "The Library is a place for learning and education. It could help overcome some of the community's resistance to change." • "When people don't know what to do about something, they turn to the Library to get that information." • "Education, venue to educate the public." • "Library does a summer reading program with teens each year to support kids in summer months." • "Can make sure people have access to ideas and information, not just those who can afford." • "It is a central hub for people to gravitate, people to get information." • "Access to training, resources. Library is good for classes and bringing things that are curated." • "Lake Oswego Reads, library is a big part of that. Have learned so much from that." • "Library could be partnering with school system to be an extension of the school library." • "Having a better approach to education for young adults, adults, and seniors." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 135 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn G 17y+�L� U � O eco? 64/C LVe • "Exciting spot to ignite creativity and lifelong learning." • "A place to learn all kinds of things, not just reading but also experiential." Place for gathering Responses in this category indicate that the Library is increasingly seen as a vital community hub where people of all ages can gather, socialize, hold meetings, and participate in events. In addition to its traditional role as a source of information and learning, the Library's role as a communal space is emphasized, serving as a neutral venue where individuals can interact, work, and learn from each other. There are also suggestions for the Library to incorporate more meeting rooms and coworking spaces. Example quotes from interviewees for the place for gathering category are listed below: • "Library is becoming more of a social space." • "It's a place that brings everyone together." • "Having spaces where people can come together and have a coworking space, or a maker space where there are opportunities for people who don't necessarily have access to these things outside of a library." • "Space for people to gather, have meetings." • "Seeing the Library more as a community gathering place is good." • "Nice if the Library could have meeting rooms and be a place where people could meet." • "Library already does, but could do even more as a place to bring people together." • "We've not had a place to have good community meetings, especially in the west side of the City." • "A space to come together to learn and to be curious." • "More meeting rooms." • "Place to go to have interactions with each other." • "It would be great if the Library had a reservable meeting space." • "Library should be considered a gathering place for the community." • "Becoming a place to gather and learn about our differences and similarities. Providing opportunity to grow and have children engage in their community." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 136 oFV E v4F,OSIyFC � �sn b BerryDunn pO' e4/C Lke Question 3 - What are the barriers to accessing library services in Lake Oswego? Accessibility Interviewees identified several barriers to accessing the Library. Many fit into a broad category of accessibility. These include limitations in public transit and geographical location, lack of ADA accessibility and sidewalks, language barriers, perception and stigma issues, technology, and the lack of diversity. There was also emphasis on the necessity of more convenient hours of operation, more user-friendly online resources, and additional library locations. Example quotes from interviewees for the accessibility category are listed below: • "Don't have good public transit in LO." • "The barrier can be time and open hours." • "No transit in the City, citywide issue." • "Not ADA accessible." • "People not feeling welcome, not because they're not, but a stigma attached to libraries in general." • "You have to have a car to access it, unless you're near the Library." • "Language barrier." • "Communication or signage identifying the Library." • "The hours are not great, might be helpful to wake up early or late." • "Lack of good public transportation in the City." • "Need a delivery service for people who can't get to the building easily." • "Lack of diversity among the staff." • "Location is a barrier. There's only one branch, in downtown." • "Hard to find." • "There are neighborhoods that can't access the Library." • "Live on the opposite side of City from library. Takes a good 10 — 15 minutes to get to library. Thought of going to the Library is an ordeal." Building condition and amenities Responses indicated several barriers to library access primarily associated with building condition and amenities. Key issues include limited parking, a small event space, overall facility size, outdated or inadequate building design, lack of quiet or private study spaces, inadequate Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 137 7 A E 4 ��OSh.FC *f� O b BerryDunn maintenance, and challenges with the overall ambiance, such as being too dark or uninviting. These identified barriers underscore the importance of physical infrastructure in library accessibility, indicating that the building's design, maintenance, and amenities play a significant role in attracting and serving the community effectively. Example quotes from interviewees for the building condition and amenities category are listed below: • "Parking lot is small." • "Because we have such a small event space, people aren't going to come by to see what's happening." • "Parking is an issue." • "Small facility limits our partnerships." • "Youth think our library is dark and dingy." • "Lack of space in the Library for programming and creative services." • "Parking can be a challenge." • "Building is not even 40 years old and is failing." • "Library ADA deficiencies." • "We don't have conference rooms or study rooms for people to reserve and use." • "Tutors meet downstairs, but don't have private space." • "Bathrooms are small and not accessible." • "We don't have enough room; we have to constantly weed the collection." • "Library does not have a quiet place to study." • "Climate and electrical issues exist at current building." • "The layout is not great." • "Parking can be difficult." • "Library is not laid out in a way to make it welcoming to find what you're looking for." • "The Library is physically limited in its space. There's no way to get more room in the building." Awareness Many responses to this question related to many community members not being fully aware of what the Library offers beyond books. Interviewees often commented on not knowing about the variety of resources and services, such as free events, digital resources, or how to access them. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 138 *f� O b BerryDunn Some respondents also held outdated perceptions of libraries, seeing them as only about books, not realizing their evolution into modern hubs of information, technology, and community engagement. Other respondents stated people often undervalue libraries because they do not understand their wider benefits due to a lack of awareness about the comprehensive services libraries offer and their role as critical community resources. Example quotes from interviewees for the awareness category are listed below: • "Even though we put out the services about what we do, the community is still surprised about what we do." • "People don't know what the Library of today is." • "The perception that libraries are only about books even though they're not." • "Perceptions of libraries not being essential." • "They do so much more than books, how do you get that message out there?" • "How are we marketing to people the ways they can access services?" • "Not everyone knows what the Library provides." • "Knowing what the Library is offering. How do you help families know what exists?" • "Perception that the Library is not a place for young people." • "Could be using social media more strategically at library." • "What's the value proposition for communities where libraries haven't been a resource? For example, first generation immigrant families." • "People think a library is only about books and they don't read so they don't come." • "Not knowing what is offered." • "Lack of awareness by patrons of what the Library could be. Getting people to understand what a modern library could provide." Question 4 - What are the future imperatives for the Lake Oswego Public Library 15 - 20 years from now? Another location Several respondents expressed a need for additional library branches or services in different parts of the community. Comments called for a future library to have a more prominent location to help community members access the Library. These comments suggest a vision of the Library as a distributed service, reaching more areas of the community. Interviewees also called for any new library facility to incorporate modern library amenities and use sustainable building materials. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 139 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn 17LV U � O G � eco? 6�/C L16Q'P Example quotes from interviewees for another location category are listed below: • "Some form of library services in different parts of the community. Bare minimum, Rover, but a branch or other physical locations could be important." • "The current location size and condition dictates a different building somewhere else." • "Has to open up another branch." • "Have to consider moving the Library to a place more conducive to be visited." • "Have to have a larger building in addition to having another branch." • "Two locations in Lake Oswego may be needed." • "Something in the Lake Grove area." • "A new building." • "If a new one is built, that it's built with sustainable materials and can last more than 25 years. Easily maintained." • "Library is tucked away in a quiet neighborhood and not visible from downtown and people may not know where it is. Should it be moved or more visible?" Responsive to future needs Interviewees highlighted several key areas that the Library should focus on for the future. Respondents stressed the need for the Library to take risks, embrace creativity, and offer cutting-edge solutions that meet evolving user needs. Feedback also emphasized the Library's need to be adaptable, anticipating changes over the next couple of decades. Respondents suggested that this might involve flexible use of space, collaboration with other departments, staying up-to-date with technological advancements, and an openness to evolving needs. Several comments suggested the Library should function as a community center, offering a variety of educational opportunities and services beyond just books. Respondents also recommended increasing access to the Library's services in various ways, such as collaborations with other institutions, reaching out to underserved populations, and enhancing the physical accessibility of the Library. Example quotes from interviewees for the responsive to future needs category are listed below: • "We need to be risk takers. 25 years from now, people will trust us. We need to be doing new things." • "Needs to be modern." • "Keeping up with the technology of the time and the demands of the patrons." • "Making sure that the space is not confining the ability to adapt." • "Need to collaborate with other departments, such as P&R." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 140 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b • "Library should be a Community Center." • "Offer things where the sharing of the thing is the point rather than the thing itself." • "Larger collaborations to adapt to evolving needs." • "Versatility stands out—making an investment that allows for the changing world, takes into account the changing world." • "The Library must maintain its openness with regards to thought, literacy, cultural influences, ideas, access to information no matter what people might think about it." • "Include physical connections with people, face-to-face, in-person events." • "Training librarians with evolving technology." • "Expanding the Library of things available." Updated building and amenities Responses in this category emphasize the need for a versatile, welcoming, and updated space for the Lake Oswego Public Library in the next 15—20 years. Respondents strongly advocated for flexibility in the building's design and usage to keep up with changing community needs and future uncertainties. Respondents stressed the importance of creating social spaces for community gatherings and collaboration, which include meeting rooms, open spaces, coworking areas, performance spaces, and teen-centric spaces. Respondents also suggested that the building should be equipped with modern technologies, like 3D printers and immersive AV systems. Some respondents proposed innovative ideas such as having culinary spaces, music production rooms, art centers, entrepreneurial incubators, and emergency management areas. Sustainable features such as solar panels and LED lighting were also mentioned. Interviewees wanted the building to not only serve its functional purpose but also be aesthetically pleasing, with comfortable seating, good lighting, and integration with the natural environment. Example quotes from interviewees for the updated building and amenities category are listed below: • "Needs to be an active space as well as a resource." • "Create opportunities to be more of a social space to gather." • "Building needs to be flexible." • "Need a new modern architecture to project modern services." • "Performance space." • "A place where people can play music together." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 141 b BerryDunn oshFfig� U O; c GBC C UBPPe- • "Think through some of what makes any space more welcoming and comfortable; natural light, sound issues, visibility to the outside." • "We have one chance to make new facility improvements, need to get this right." • "Coworking space." • "A space that could allow expression from your mind." • "Indoor and outdoor lounging." • "Emergency management: a space that is flexible in case there is an emergency." • "Solar panels." • "A facility that allows for a lot of room for upgrades." • "LED lighting that only comes on when they sense movement." • "The building should be beautiful. It should be a place people want to be." Welcoming Many interviewees expressed a strong desire for the Library to be a vibrant, inclusive, and engaging hub of community interaction and support over the next 15 — 20 years. Respondents emphasized the role of the Library in fostering socialization, particularly for young children, and supporting marginalized voices. They hoped to see it as a welcoming place that inspires and supports, serving as a cultural center and facilitating community participation. Accessibility, diversity in services, and representation were also major themes. These underscore the importance of inclusivity in the Library's future. Respondents also suggested that the Library should continue to enhance its offerings, making sure they are known and accessible to the community. Additionally, respondents stressed the importance of maintaining human connections in an increasingly digital world. Example quotes from interviewees for the welcoming category are listed below: • "The Library needs to be an active space of dialogue. Currently a great resource space." • "Socializing young children." • "Continuing to be a place that provides inspiration and support." • "Library should be a place of culture." • "A place that can pull people together." • "Events to draw people in." • "Exchange of ideas and culture is a public good." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 142 e O „os„ U� Dunn v 0 4, o Berr b Reco'// 6OC 1.11 • "Focus on accessibility and equity in services — big open space and flexible for different things to do." • "You have to see yourself in the books and see other people's lives in the books." • "Be a place for truth even if it's not your truth." • "It needs to be a hub for people who don't have access to things to get connected." • "Everything cannot be virtual —we will lose human connections." • "Make sure the Library is as inclusive as possible to as many groups as possible." • "Always have its doors open." • "Staff dedicated to outreach and partnerships." • "Make the Library an integrated part of people's lives so that they can't imagine their lives without it." • "No censorship." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix B—Key Informant Interview Questions and Results 143 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn U 8 O ° 17y+L� � G � eco? 64/C Lke Appendix C - Focus Group Questions and Results Focus Group 1 - River Grove Elementary Fifth Graders On March 8, 2023, the first focus group session took place at River Grove Elementary River with fifth-grade students. This group was selected to gain valuable insights from the youth population. River Grove Elementary was chosen because it serves many BIPOC communities and communities experiencing poverty, and because of its geographical distance from the Lake Oswego Public Library, helping to ensure representation from a community subset with distinct perspectives. Overall, the fifth-grade students' focus group demonstrated a strong appreciation for the Library as a space for reading, exploration, and social engagement. Their suggestions and feedback highlighted the importance of creating a welcoming and inclusive environment, both inside and outside the Library, that encourages reading, social interactions, and access to a wide range of materials and resources. Opinions of the Library The focus group of fifth graders in Lake Oswego provided valuable insights into their experiences and opinions regarding library services. Several key themes emerged from the discussion. First, many of the students visit the Library regularly, either weekly or monthly, with the purpose of finding new books to read. Some students mentioned going to the Library when they have read all the books at home or as an activity when they are unsure of what to do. Second, technology plays a role in their library usage, primarily for finding available books and checking them out. The students highlighted the convenience of using technology for these purposes. Additionally, the group discussed the availability of videos and DVDs at the Library, with video games being a popular choice among some students. When asked about their perception of visiting the Library, the students shared a variety of responses. Some viewed it as a quiet and peaceful space, ideal for reading and focusing on their own activities. Others saw it as a calming and welcoming place to try new things, such as exploring unfamiliar books or discussing their reading preferences with others. Overall, the students said they felt positive and happy when they walked into the Library, describing feelings of excitement, relaxation, and contentment. Improvements or Changes Regarding improvements or changes they would like to see, the students had several suggestions. They expressed a desire for cozy spots both inside and outside the Library where they could enjoy reading. Some suggested the inclusion of a snack shack or school supplies to enhance their library experience. The idea of creating spaces for social interactions, such as book clubs or areas to meet and trade books, was also mentioned. The students envisioned a library that fosters communal engagement, resembling a living room where they could catch up with friends and recommend books to each other. They also expressed interest in small events or daily featured books to encourage more reading. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix C—Focus Group Questions and Results 44 03,E v,F60Sl yFC b BerryDunn S' �17yL U When considering the Library's exterior, the students shared ideas for a visually appealing and inviting environment. Suggestions included a nice garden, play structure, community garden with educational classes, murals, and a fountain. Regarding the location of a new library, the students had varied preferences, with some suggesting a quiet spot in a busy area close to businesses, while others envisioned it in open fields, near parks, ponds, hilly areas, or specific landmarks like Iron Mountain. Barriers The students identified a few barriers to library usage. They expressed a desire for longer library hours and more copies of popular books to minimize waiting times. The students also emphasized the importance of a positive attitude among library staff and highlighted the need for clear ways to donate books to the Library. Focus Group 2 - River Grove Elementary PTO The second focus group, held on March 9, 2023, involved the PTO of River Grove Elementary. The purpose was to gather perspectives from parents of school-age children who may have unique insights and concerns. As with the fifth-grade session, the school's location and the BIPOC communities it serves played a role in the selection. The focus group of PTO parents provided valuable insights into the Library services in Lake Oswego. Their suggestions focused on creating a more accessible, welcoming, and engaging environment for all community members. From improving physical spaces and communication channels to expanding programs and resources, their feedback highlighted the desire for a library that meets the diverse needs and interests of the Lake Oswego community both now and in the future. Barriers and Needs The River Grove Elementary PTO identified barriers to access, such as the distance to the Library and the challenging nature of navigating strollers on the elevator. They also expressed the need for a brighter and more inviting space, particularly in the reading nook for younger children. The parents suggested moving the children's area to the ground level instead of the basement and providing more room for teenagers to hang out, read, and connect. Additionally, they mentioned the desire for easy access to the Oregon Battle of the Books (OBOB) titles on display through a Kindle. On the positive side, parents expressed appreciation for family bathrooms, the Library's "Library of Things" program, the summer reading program, and the librarians' involvement in community events. They also highlighted the convenience of having a drop box on their side of the lake. In terms of needs, the focus group emphasized the importance of better communication, suggesting various channels such as Hello LO, email blasts, and newsletters to keep the community informed about library services and events. They also suggested moving the help desk away from quiet workspaces, promoting a more welcoming environment for children on the first and second floors, and extending library hours. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix C—Focus Group Questions and Results I 45 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b Improvements When asked about their ideal improvements, the parents expressed a desire for an annex on their side of the lake, lockers for books on hold, a spacious fireplace area, excellent lighting, and a courtyard for outdoor reading. They also mentioned the Hillsboro Library as a source of inspiration, particularly its ponds, and suggested incorporating a play area. Longer hours, a public copier, game nights for students, electronic registration for families, and the availability of Tualatin Library Art Packs were also mentioned. Future of the Library Regarding the future of the Library, the parents envisioned it as a comprehensive resource for life skills, including financial literacy, with high school students reading to younger children. They emphasized the importance of the Library being an inclusive space for individuals of all ages. Focus Group 3 - Senior Community To capture the perspectives of senior community members, a focus group was conducted on April 13, 2023, at the Lake Oswego Adult Community Center. This session aimed to gather insights from this demographic, considering their distinct needs and expectations. The seniors on the focus group emphasized the importance of the Library as a social and intellectual hub, addressing the unique needs of the aging population, and adapting to changing technology and community dynamics. Their suggestions highlighted the need for outreach, accessibility, and a strong human presence to support library services and help ensure the Library remains a valued resource for all community members. Challenges Challenges discussed included the unique topography and diverse community identities within Lake Oswego. Seniors emphasized the importance of addressing the different neighborhood experiences. The group also highlighted the significant investment of energy and involvement by parents in the schools, which overshadowed engagement with other entities, such as libraries. Roles Regarding roles and services, the seniors mentioned the crucial role of the Library in serving the residents of Mary's Wood, a senior living community, especially through homebound services and the mobile library (Rover). These services drew residents to join the Library and bridged information and accessibility gaps for the aging population. The Library was seen as an intellectual outlet, providing lectures and mentally stimulating activities. It was also considered a valuable space for socialization, offering opportunities for interaction and combating isolation. The seniors expressed appreciation for services, activities, collections, and communication from the Library, including weekly booklists and monthly emails. Barriers Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix C—Focus Group Questions and Results 46 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b Barriers to access were discussed, including the location of the Library for individuals without cars, and concerns about accessibility for those with walkers or wheelchairs. Large-print materials and support for technology were identified as important considerations for senior users. Overcoming the fear of technology and providing patient assistance were suggested as ways to bridge the technology barrier. Future Imperatives Future imperatives highlighted the need for library services to extend beyond the physical building, reaching people where they are, particularly those who are less mobile. Suggestions included setting up the mobile library in various locations, such as sports venues or retirement homes, and staying current with technology to connect with younger populations. The importance of spaces for gathering, social engagement, and social media presence was also emphasized. The seniors expressed the value of human interaction and the role of well-paid library staff who can provide assistance, patience, and connection to the community. They mentioned the importance of virtual technology applications, high accessibility to audiobooks, maintaining browsing collections, and the significance of the physical library space alongside mobile services. Focus Group 4 - First Addition Neighborhood On April 14, 2023, a focus group was conducted with residents of the First Addition neighborhood, which is in close proximity to the current library. The intention was to gain perspectives from individuals residing in the immediate vicinity, as they may have a unique relationship with and perspective on the Library. The focus group of First Addition neighborhood residents emphasized the value of the current library's atmosphere and physical resources. The group highlighted the need for maintaining a warm and welcoming environment while also adapting to the changing needs of the community. Their suggestions focused on extending library hours, using technology effectively, and preserving human interaction to address barriers and enhance the Library's role as a community gathering place. Challenges Challenges mentioned included the high housing prices in the community, which make it difficult for young people to afford starter homes. They also highlighted the perception of Lake Oswego as an affluent community and the financial constraints the city faces due to large projects and demands for funding. Concerns were raised about the idea of replacing the current library and the lack of space for expansion at the current location. The projected population growth was seen as minimal, which they reasoned could impact planning for library services. Roles Regarding the roles of the Library, participants expressed a desire for diversity and new offerings. They saw the Library as a quiet and safe haven, providing information and good customer service. The current library was appreciated for its homey and warm atmosphere, which they contrasted with larger, less attractive libraries they have seen in other communities. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix C—Focus Group Questions and Results I 47 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O Berr Dunn �17yL b v UE G � tr The previous Lake Oswego Public Library building was remembered as a neighborhood-scale space, with tables for children to gather and work on homework. Participants emphasized the importance of feeling welcome to approach library staff for interaction. Barriers Barriers mentioned included time constraints, proximity challenges for those in other areas of the city, and the over-programming of kids with various activities. Lighting issues in certain areas of the Library were also highlighted as a barrier to comfortable reading. Despite these challenges, participants expressed a desire for extended library hours and keeping up with technology to enhance resources and reference services. They also suggested tapping into the potential of online photo resources and incorporating more historic elements in library services. Future Imperatives Future imperatives discussed included the possibility of having two libraries, with a new one offering a modern feel while retaining the current library's character. Extended hours were seen as beneficial, as well as preserving the human interaction of speaking with library staff during the checkout process. The importance of human interaction at the Library, particularly for the older population, was emphasized as a means to combat loneliness and isolation. The outdoor spaces of the current library were appreciated, but participants mentioned the need for more open natural spaces in the community, which could be incorporated into a new library design. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix C—Focus Group Questions and Results 48 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn U 8 O ° 17y+L� � G � eco? 64/C Lke Appendix D - Survey Questions and Results Question 1 - What current library services do you most want to continue in the future? This question was multiple-choice /select all that apply, with an Other option that also allowed respondents to enter their own responses. In total, 2,779 respondents answered this question. The results for this question reflect the preferences and usage of library services among the 2,779 respondents. While the preference for books and other physical materials was the top selection, the results also showed a strong demand for digital resources, programming, and gathering spaces. Responses support the need for a blended service model that integrates both physical and digital offerings. What current library services do you most want to continue in the future? • Books and other physical materials • Digital resources available online (e.g., e-Books, downloadable audio, streaming films) • Special collections (e.g., Library of Things, free passes to local cultural venues) • Early literacy storytimes • Children's special events and programs (e.g., Summer Library Challenge, 1000 Books Before Kindergarten, LEGO° Club) • Teen classes and events • Adult classes and events • Special community events (e.g., cultural events, Lake Oswego Reads) • Outreach programs and services provided outside of the Library (e.g., homebound delivery, pop-up library booths, story walks) • Reading recommendations • Research help • Technology assistance • Meeting space • Computers and printing • Public Wi-Fi • Other (describe) Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 149 V�E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn U 5. O° 17y+�L� � G � Figure 05: Question 1 Responses What current library services do you most want to continue in the future? Books and other physical materials 2566 Digital resources available online 1880 Special collections I 1336 Children's special events and programs 1229 Public Wi-Fi 11221 Special community events 1182 Reading recommendations 1009 Adult classes and events 1993 Early literacy storytimes 908 Computers and printing 1868 Outreach programs and services provided outside... 848 Research help 1842 Meeting space 749 Technology assistance 1741 Teen classes and events 694 Other Answers 90 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 The following is an analysis of the selected services, ranked from the most to the least selected: 1. Books and other physical materials (2,566 selections): As the most highly valued service, this illustrates the community's enduring need for physical books and materials, despite the increasing shift toward digital media. 2. Digital resources available online (1,880 selections): This finding indicates a substantial demand for online resources, reflecting the growing trend toward digital media and the importance of remote accessibility in today's world. 3. Special collections (1,336 selections): The demand for unique and specialized collections underscores the community's diverse interests and the Library's role in supporting them. 4. Children's special events and programs (1,229 selections): This result emphasizes the role the Library plays in early education and family activities, suggesting a strong usage by families with children. 5. Public Wi-Fi (1,221 selections): The demand for public Wi-Fi access indicates the Library's essential role in providing internet access, especially for those who may not have it at home. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 150 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U a 2 �17yL Ge��C L10- 6. Special community events (1,182 selections): The demand for these events illustrates the Library's integral role as a hub for community gatherings, supporting both educational and social functions. 7. Reading recommendations (1,009 selections): This finding highlights the value the community places on the Library's role in promoting literature and reading, guiding users toward new and enriching reading experiences. 8. Adult classes and events (993 selections): The demand for adult education and events reflects the Library's contribution to lifelong learning and personal development within the community. 9. Early literacy storytimes (908 selections): The importance placed on early literacy programming indicates the Library's significant role in nurturing childhood literacy and development. 10. Computers and printing (868 selections): A considerable number of respondents expressed the need for continued access to technology and printing services, highlighting the Library's role in bridging the digital divide. 11. Outreach programs and services provided outside of the Library (848 selections): The demand for outreach programs reflects the community's need for services that extend beyond the Library's physical walls, underscoring the Library's role in serving broader community needs. 12. Research help (842 selections): The need for research assistance emphasizes the Library's role in supporting learning and intellectual exploration for various user groups, including students and self-learners. 13. Meeting space (749 selections): This result indicates a need for communal spaces where people can gather for various purposes, reinforcing the Library's role as a community hub. 14. Technology assistance (741 selections): This suggests a need for ongoing support in navigating today's digital landscape, catering to patrons who may require additional help using digital tools. 15. Teen classes and events (694 selections): As the least-selected option, this suggests that services tailored to teens are less utilized. This might point to a need for greater outreach or expanded offerings to better engage this demographic. In addition to these selections, 90 respondents chose "Other" and entered their own responses. The responses in the "Other" category reflect a broad and diverse range of needs, preferences, and desires for library services among the respondents. A recurring theme in the "Other" category is the desire for the Library to serve as more than just a place to borrow books but as a multifunctional space catering to different needs. This includes suggestions for physical improvements such as comfortable seating, quiet study spaces, and dedicated areas for children's play, as well as the provision of multiple locations for greater Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 151 ��E 4 ��OSC7.FC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'/O 1_10-' accessibility. Some respondents expressed interest in more modern and digitally integrated spaces, such as maker spaces and recording studios. Another clear theme is the call for more diverse and innovative programs and events. This includes game nights, book clubs, and special events that align with federal holidays or elections. Some respondents suggested unique concepts like Library of People for interviews with pre-screened individuals from different backgrounds, and community nights that feel like a "night out." In terms of services, several respondents highlighted the importance of unique offerings such as the bookmobile service, electric vehicle parking, ancestry access, and a "library of things" lending service. Suggestions for improvements ranged from enhancing the existing hold system to expanding library hours of operation. Respondents also emphasized the importance of various resources and materials, like genealogy resources, newspapers, magazines, periodicals, DVDs, and video games. The digital and hybrid services category underlines the growing importance of blending in-person and digital services, a trend accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Lastly, community interaction and participation emerged as a strong theme. Respondents expressed appreciation for volunteer opportunities, community gathering spaces, and the Library's role in fostering a sense of community. Respondents also appreciate the Library serving as a safe place to visit, and some respondents even suggested integrating rotating art exhibits to promote local artists. Example quotes of responses in the "Other" category are listed below grouped in the following categories: Spaces and Facilities, Events and Programs, Unique Services and Offerings, Improvements and Changes, Resources and Materials, and Community. • Spaces and Facilities o "Would love to see a small play area for children" o "Places to sit and read or work on stuff" o "A quiet place to work and read" o "Have 2 locations, like Friends of the LO Library has" o "Nice spaces to sit and work or read—e.g., library as the common person's (free) coffee shop to work" o "Desks/tables to do independent study or work" • Events and Programs o "Game Nights/Book Clubs/Fourth of July Float" o "Special topics events (federal holidays, elections, etc.) discussion groups" Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 152 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O b BerryDunn o "Programming that feels like a night out (OSMI after-dark-esque or brewery history lessons). Also, make use of the space for night events, kids movie night or new years eve party" o "LEGOs on weekends" o "Adult in person discussions of books (like book clubs, but held at the Library)" o "Nice people" o "Expand LO Reads events. Great program, look forward to each year!" • Unique Services and Offerings o "Bookmobile" o "EV parking" o "Lucky Day materials" o "Maybe a writing center" o "Notary :)" o "Ancestry access" o "Interlibrary loans, micro film readers" o "Just like things, we should have a Library of People. Pre-screened living individuals would be made available for interviews done on-site at a scheduled time in the Library." o "Have really appreciated the occasional traveling exhibits like the Vanport history one and recent housing discrimination one displayed in the Library." o "Library of things: Enjoy the selection of tools, cooking appliances and other useful items for use at home." • Improvements and Changes o "Artwork by LO residents roger long David H. Carol Grieg (former rgs.)food bank collection bins" o "SILENCE in the Library" o "Your hold system" o "More comfortable seating" o "Better gallery for rotating art exhibits!" o "The Library should be open from approx 6/7 AM till 8/10 pm 6 days a week. Everything else in this discussion is fluff and a waste of money." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 153 b BerryDunn V � O; L8 PP� • Resources and Materials o "Genealogy assistance" o "Reading and periodical areas" o "Newspapers, magazines & periodicals" o "Books on CD" o "Making copies of newspaper puzzles available" o "DVDs" o "Nintendo Switch video games" • Community o "Having volunteer opportunities for community members of all ages and abilities" o "Access to old magazines and newspaper thru digital archive" o "A safe place to visit in person (the Library is that place)" o "Community gathering space" o "You are doing a great job of bringing the community into the Library. I love all of the creative things you are doing!" Question 2 - What aspects of the Library do you most like? This question was multiple-choice /select all that apply, with an "Other" option that also allowed respondents to enter their own responses. In total, 2,737 respondents answered this question. The results for this question reflect the aspects of the Library is most liked among the 2,737 respondents to this question. The responses indicate that friendly and quality customer service, a good selection of materials, and a welcoming environment are valued aspects of the Lake Oswego Public Library. These elements, along with comfortable spaces and proximity to home, make up the core of what respondents most like about the Library according to this question. What aspects of the Library do you most like? • It is close to my home • It is close to my work/school • It is a place I feel welcome • It has a good selection of materials • It has comfortable spaces Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 154 °b BerryDunn 8 G � \aeco''/ 6OC L10Q'P • It has technology • It has friendly staff who provide quality customer service • It offers special classes and events for children, teens, and adults • It has a meeting room • It has reliable public Wi-Fi Figure 06: Question 2 Responses What aspects of the library do you most like? It has friendly staff who provide quality customer.. 2087 It has a good selection of materials 12079 It is a place I feel welcome 1931 It has comfortable spaces • 1535 It is close to my home 1510 It offers special classes and events for children,..' 858 It has technology 1831 It has reliable public WiFi 11 807 It has a meeting room 334 It is close to my work/school 170 Other Answers • 101 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 The following is an analysis of the aspects of the Library respondents liked most, ranked from the most selected to the least. 1. It has friendly staff who provide quality customer service (2,087 selections): This was the most selected aspect. This emphasizes the importance of interpersonal interactions in the Library experience and highlights the role of the staff as not only facilitators but also as key to fostering a welcoming environment. 2. It has a good selection of materials (2,079 selections): This was close second for number of times selected and the importance of maintaining a diverse, current, and engaging collection to satisfy the informational, educational, and entertainment needs of the community. 3. It is a place I feel welcome (1,931 selections): This question was selected the third most and highlights the importance of the Library as not only a provider of materials and services, but also as a safe and inclusive community space. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 155 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b 4. It has comfortable spaces (1,535 selections): This speaks to comfort within the Library as another key aspect for patrons. 5. It is close to my home (1,510 selections): Proximity also factored significantly into patron satisfaction. 6. It offers special classes and events for children, teens, and adults (858 selections): Special offerings that appeal to different age groups was another key aspect. 7. It has technology (831 selections): The Library's technology infrastructure is valued by its users, but it was only selected by less than half of the respondents to this question. 8. It has reliable public Wi-Fi (807 selections): This speaks to the importance of the Library providing a crucial point of access for those who may not have such resources at home. 9. It has a meeting room (334 selections): The availability of a meeting room was mentioned by only 334 respondents, indicating the value placed on this particular amenity by respondents was not as significant as the value of amenities in other questions. The smaller number of respondents does not lead to the conclusion that people would not value an improved, more accessible meeting room. 10. It is close to my work/school (170 respondents): Proximity to work or school was the least selected aspect, suggesting that this factor is less crucial in the overall patron satisfaction from the respondents to this survey. In addition to these selections, 101 respondents also chose "Other" and entered their own responses, with many people offering diverse feedback on a variety of topics. Many expressed their appreciation for the Library's wide range of resources and services, which included the availability of large-print books, book hold options, and interlibrary loans. The digital and technological offerings of the Library were highly praised, such as the online book reservation system, e-books, audiobooks, and the Library of Things technology resources. Many respondents highlighted their preference for digital resources and services, such as the online book reservation system, the availability of e-books and audiobooks, the Libby app for audiobooks, the mobile app, and the Library's technology resources. Respondents also commented on the physical environment and aesthetics of the Library, complimenting its cleanliness, comfortable spaces, lighting, and featured artwork. The Library's community impact was recognized as the Library serves as a public space and community hub, offering a safe space for everyone in the community. The kindness, assistance, and dedication of the Library staff were also highlighted by respondents, who appreciated staff's willingness to accommodate requests and provide quality customer service. Respondents enjoyed the Library's special programs and features, such as concerts, reading challenges, the "Library of Things," and cultural passes. In terms of accessibility and convenience, features like book drops, curbside pickup, five-minute parking spots, and reciprocal library card for e-books were appreciated. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 156 *f� O b BerryDunn Despite the many positive responses, there were also constructive suggestions for improvements like increased natural light, better location, an expanded digital collection, and a more diverse political material offering. Altogether, these responses indicate a deep appreciation for the Library's current offerings, while also suggesting areas for potential enhancement. Example quotes of responses in the "Other" category are listed below grouped in the following categories: Resources and Services, Digital and Technological Aspects, Physical Environment and Aesthetics, Community Impact, Staff and Customer Service, and Critique and Suggestions. • Resources and Services o "I like to put books on hold and pick them up later" o "The home delivery service is wonderful for those of us who no longer drive" o "Interlibrary loans from other county locations" o "I loved the quality live music you had pre-pandemic on First Tuesday" o "Lucky Day books! Adult summer reading challenge!" o "Availability of Cultural Passes" • Digital and Technological Aspects o "Love the mobile app. So nice to place items on hold and go pick up" o "It has technology resources through Library of Things: Wi-Fi hotspots, laptops" • Physical Environment and Aesthetics o "It is a peaceful environment in which one can concentrate in intellectual pursuits" o "It's clean and well-lit" o "Beautiful art and ability to use parking lot for Wi-Fi when library is closed" • Community Impact o "It is a public space where you can be without expectation of purchasing anything! It is a safe space for everyone in the community" o "Libraries are integral parts of their communities and are a beacon/shining example of the benefits of free and open access to information" • Staff and Customer Service o "I've received excellent assistance from librarians for technical support and information about reading machines for a nearly blind friend" o "The staff has a love of the work—and the patrons" Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 157 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn 17LV U � O G � eco? 6�/C L16Q'P • Critique and Suggestions o "Would like more natural light, comfortable places to read" o "Don't like location or structure of LO library. Not centrally located" Question 3 - What are the barriers to using library services for your household? This question was multiple-choice /select all that apply, with an "Other" option that also allowed respondents to enter their own responses. In total, 1,839 respondents answered this question. Responses to this question indicate that while the Library seems to be an appreciated resource in the community, for some, barriers prevent fully using its services. The most frequently identified barriers involve time constraints, physical access and transportation, knowledge about library services, and operational hours. It should be noted though, that no barrier was selected by a majority of respondents. What are the barriers to using library services for your household? • Driving/Walking/Commuting distance to Library • I don't know what events, services, and programs the Library offers • Lack of personal time • Cultural/Language barriers • Not enough hours of library operation • Lacking personal technology to use library digital resources • Lack of parking • Lack of public transit • Not interested in library events, services, and programming • Lack of meeting and study space • Lack of offerings compared to other local library systems • Website • I don't know where the Library is located • I don't feel welcome • I don't feel safe • Other Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 158 b BerryDunn V O; �.E�o� Ps.o CU8P Figure 07: Question 3 Responses What are the barriers to using library services for your household? Lack of personal time 693 Driving/Walking/Commuting distance to Library 562 I don't know what events, services,and programs.. 392 Not enough hours of library operation 377 Lack of parking 277 Other Answers 1185 Lack of meeting and study space a 154 Lack of offerings compared to other local library... i 126 Lack of public transit 1101 Website 92 Not interested in library events, services,and.. 187 Lacking personal technology to use library digital.. 63 I don't feel welcome = 25 Cultural/Language barriers ❑ 20 I don't know where the library is located 3 10 I don't feel safe 16 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 The following is an analysis of the selected barriers, ranked from the most to the least selected: • Lack of personal time (693 selections): This was the most common barrier selected. The data suggests that many library users struggle to find enough time in their personal schedules to fully use the Library's resources and services. • Driving/Walking/Commuting distance to Library (562 selections): The second most selected barrier was the distance to the Library. This suggests that the Library's physical location and the accessibility issues arising from it may prevent many users from frequent visits. • I don't know what events, services, and programs the Library offers (392 selections): The number of responses emphasizes the need for continued communication and outreach from the Library to the community regarding its services and programs. • Not enough hours of library operation (377 selections): This suggests that the current library operating hours may not accommodate many users' schedules, leading to a decreased use of services. • Lack of parking (277 selections): The number of responses highlights the lack of parking as a barrier, further emphasizing the importance of accessibility for library users. • Lack of meeting and study space (154 selections): This suggests that some users may require more space for studying or meetings than the Library currently offers. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 159 03,E v,F60Sl yFC b BerryDunn U a 2 �17yL • Lack of offerings compared to other local library systems (126 selections): This response suggests that some users find the Library's offerings less satisfactory or diverse compared to other local library systems. • Lack of public transit (101 selections): This points to the crucial role that public transit plays in access to library services, and the fact that public transportation options to Lake Oswego Public Library can be a barrier. • Website (92 selections): This suggests that some users may find the Library's website difficult to navigate or lacking in necessary information or functionality. • Not interested in library events, services, and programming (87 selections): This indicates a portion of the community that is currently uninterested or not engaged with the Library's offerings. • Lacking personal technology to use library digital resources (63 selections): This highlights the importance of personal technology in accessing digital library resources. • I don't feel welcome (25 selections): This indicates that despite being a small number, there are library users who do not feel welcomed in the Library. • Cultural/Language barriers (20 selections): Selected by 20 respondents, this barrier highlights the importance of inclusivity and diversity in the Library's services. • I don't know where the Library is located (10 selections): Ten respondents did not know where the Library was located. • I don't feel safe (6 selections): This barrier, though selected by the fewest number of respondents, is a serious issue that must be addressed to help ensure that all community members feel safe while using library services. In addition to these selections, 185 respondents chose "Other" and entered their own responses. The responses expressed a range of experiences and opinions about the Lake Oswego Public Library. A significant portion of the "Other" responses pertain to the Library's programs and events. There is a call for different events that would cater to a wider range of interests. Some patrons also requested more convenient times for programs, citing a perception that the majority are held during work hours. The Library's physical environment was another area that garnered several responses. Patrons expressed dissatisfaction with the atmosphere, layout, and functionality of the Library. Noise control was a recurring concern, with users finding the volume level distracting and inconducive to focused reading or work. The lack of comfortable reading areas and the general state of the Library's facilities were other points. The Library's selection of books emerged as another category of responses. Some respondents indicated that they want more variety and depth with the collection, particularly in adult non- fiction and certain languages. Others noted they were disappointed with the limited availability of Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 160 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O Berr Dunn ' 2 �17yL b v Ge/c PPS audiobooks and digital selections. Similarly, the Library's digital services were also mentioned in several responses. Some respondents found the Library's website catalog search engine to be inadequate. Despite the range of issues raised, it's important to note that there was also positive feedback. Several respondents expressed satisfaction with the Library and did not identify any barriers to use, instead using this category to compliment the Library. Example quotes of responses in the "Other" category are listed below grouped in the following categories: Programs and Events, Facilities and Physical Space, Book Collection, Policies and Management, Digital Services, and Positive Feedback. • Programs and Events o "Not enough compelling events offered" o "Would like more speakers, events, `learn to' offerings" o "Lack of hybrid (online/in-person) events" o "Most programs are during the work week" o "Social gathering and enrichment is still not being offered in the capacity pre- pandemic" • Facilities and Physical Space o "Small parking spaces that are relatively far from the front door" o "If renovation is part of the plan, then our request is for more windows, maybe a fireplace, and more cozy spots to read" o "The building itself is uninviting, old, and depressing (sorry)" o "The physical space is too small" o "Insufficient seating for library patrons" • Book Collection o "Poor selection of materials compared to other libraries" o "Lack of audiobooks in a series" o "Not enough variety of books at that location" o "Not near as many audiobooks as when I lived in Portland city limits using Mult. Co. Lib. system" • Policies and Management o "5 pm closure times" Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 161 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'/O 1_10-' o "I am put off by tutoring sessions, people eating, the Library of things, and the unconventional organization of fiction" o "The books are organized in a way that makes it hard for me to find the genre I want" o "Having to share a table with people not masking" • Digital Services o "Wish you had your own website, not based under the LO gov site" o "Poor digital selections available" o "I don't understand why digital books and movies have a wait list" o "I would like to use e-books more frequently but books I'd like to read always have a long waiting period" o "It's confusing as to what is available for online e-books. I think there are many apps, and that's where it gets a little hairy" • Positive Feedback o "I love this library—no barriers for my family" o "There are no barriers for me. I love LO library" o "None of these are barriers for me even location is good" o "I don't have any access issues. I think the Library is a great community asset" Question 4 - Are there any other services, amenities, or technologies you would like to see in our library in the future? This question was multiple-choice /select all that apply, with an "Other" option that also allowed respondents to enter their own responses. In total, 2,297 respondents answered this question. This question gathered information about the additional services, amenities, or technologies respondents desired in the Library. The most desired features are a café space, expanded digital collections, bright and inviting spaces to gather, and expanded hours. These preferences underline the evolving role of libraries from merely a place to borrow books to a community hub offering various services and experiences. Are there any other services, amenities, or technologies you would like to see in our library in the future? • Quiet study rooms • Public meeting rooms Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 162 b BerryDunn 0 8 � n uVly�y(. G � \aeco''// 6OC LW?. • Bright and inviting spaces to gather • Expanded digital collections • Educational play spaces for children • Computers for children • Interactive learning experiences (e.g., virtual reality) • Maker spaces (e.g., recording studio, commercial kitchen) • Café space • Expanded hours • Bookmobile or other outreach services • More locations • Performance space • Outdoor spaces and/or more connection to nature • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible facilities and services • Services in languages other than English • More user-friendly website • Other Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 163 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn G � FFGO? 64/C Lke Figure 08: Question 4 Responses Are there any other services, amenities, or technologies you would like to see in our library in the future? Café space Expanded digital collections Bright and inviting spaces to gather Expanded hours Educational play spaces for children Quiet study rooms Outdoor spaces and/or more connection to nature Public meeting rooms Maker spaces (e.g. recording studio, commercial.. Bookmobile or other outreach services More locations Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)accessible.. Computers for children More user-friendly website Interactive learning experiences (e.g. virtual reality) Performance space I Services in languages other than English 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 The following is an analysis of the selected services, amenities, and technologies ranked from the most to the least selected: • Café space: Selected by 947 respondents, this was the most desired feature. This suggests that library users value having a space where they can grab a drink and relax, making their library experience more comfortable and enjoyable. • Expanded digital collections: This was the second most desired feature, chosen by 867 respondents, indicating a growing demand for digital resources and a need for the Library to expand its digital collections to meet this demand. • Bright and inviting spaces to gather: Chosen by 694 respondents, this preference underscores the importance of the physical environment of the Library and its ability to facilitate social interaction and encourage frequent visits. • Expanded hours: Selected by 664 respondents, this suggests that many library users would like more flexible timing to accommodate their various schedules and improve their accessibility to library services. • Educational play spaces for children: This was a popular selection with 633 respondents, indicating that many library users value the Library as a place for children's learning and play. • Quiet study rooms (616 selections): This response suggests that library users value quiet, private spaces for focused work or study. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 164 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b • Outdoor spaces and/or more connection to nature (590 selections): This preference highlights a desire for libraries to offer more natural, open spaces, possibly for reading, studying, or holding events. • Public meeting rooms (499 selections): This emphasizes the role of libraries as community hubs where groups can meet for various activities or discussions. • Maker spaces (e.g., recording studio, commercial kitchen) (468 selections): This selection points to a need for libraries to evolve beyond traditional roles and provide spaces that foster creativity and innovation. • Bookmobile or other outreach services (432 selections): This response suggests that mobile services could increase the Library's accessibility and reach within the community. • More locations (387 selections): This points to the desire for more widespread physical presence of the Library in the community. • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible facilities and services (346 selections): This response highlights the importance of working to ensure that library facilities and services are accessible to all community members, regardless of their abilities. • Computers for children (316 selections): This preference indicates a need for technology specifically tailored and made available for children's use. • More user-friendly website (257 selections): This emphasizes the role of the Library's online presence and the need for an intuitive, easy-to-navigate website. • Interactive learning experiences (e.g., virtual reality) (229 selections): This suggests a demand for more experiential, technology-enabled learning opportunities within the Library. • Performance space (222 selections): This points to the desire for libraries to host and facilitate cultural and artistic events. • Services in languages other than English (181 selections): This selection highlights the importance of linguistic inclusivity and diversity in library services. In addition to these selections, 128 respondents chose "Other" and entered their own responses. Many users expressed a desire for more specialized spaces like a fireplace reading room, a place for local artists to sell products, rooms for virtual interviews, or areas for local self- published authors. Some also desired an ADA accessible space or a better ventilation system in light of COVID-19. Other suggestions included a variety of services (many of which are already offered in some compacity at the Library) such as homebound library service, more pickup options, interlibrary loan requests, a place to donate books, and help with genealogy research. Some respondents wanted expanded programming for different age groups and more variety in offered classes, Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 165 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O Berr Dunn /r b v such as foreign language instruction or certification courses. Other respondents suggested improvements to technology systems, such as a better search features, more online services, 3D printers, and expanded access to digital resources. Respondents also requested more books in different languages, more foreign-language materials, a seed library, and more up-to-date materials. Some also suggested better advertising, a library newsletter, or a book recommendation system. Finally, respondents used the "Other" response to express a desire for more book return locations, a drive-up window for order pickups, or improved transportation to the Library. One suggested, "If a branch for the south side of the lake is not feasible, please lobby the city to restart the town circulator bus route." Example quotes of responses in the "Other" category are listed below grouped in the following categories: Facilities and Spaces, Services and Programming, Technology and Online Resources, and Collection. • Facilities and Spaces o "Really good ventilation/air filtering to hold up to COVID standards" o "Fireplace reading room with comfortable chairs" o "Possibly another location?" o "Bigger facility" o "Please be sure to keep the current building and location" o "More comfortable spaces to sit and read" o "Comfortable chairs in a quiet space to read on a rainy day. Similar to West Linn" o "Art gallery" o "Place to gather as a book club group" o "More quiet places to read in the Library" • Services and Programming o "More pick up options—or if local kids could have holds delivered to their local schools it would reduce trips driving across town" o "Please make a way for people to be able to make interlibrary loan requests!" o "More on site, proactive interaction with seniors at places like Mary's Woods" o "Book club meetings open to all who are interested in public gathering spaces in the Library" o "Drive up window to pick up books" Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 166 7 A a ,,-,.osh,F� 0 b BerryDunn O \, CU8 o "Book club for kids and writing contest for kids" o "Help with genealogy research" o "Expanded programming for children" o "Activities for teens" o "More evening adult activities" o "Children's books in more languages like Telugu" o "Board games to check out and board game gatherings" o "Academic summer programs for kids! Short classes on interesting topics with lots of books about that topic for further research" • Technology and Online Resources o "The search feature in LINCC is very bad!" o "3D printer" o "A guide, description or class on use of online services" o "Computer classes for groups who are the same age and ability" o "More assistance with getting e-books set up on my personal device" o "Easier access to overdrive for e-books, and subscriptions to e-learning like treehouse" o "Increased hold capacity on Libby audiobooks (from 6 to 10 possibly? :))" o "Technology such as 3D printers" • Collection o "Area dedicated to local self-published authors (adult and children) to encourage writing" o "More foreign language materials in collection" o "Expand the physical book collection" o "Books in Spanish" o "Collection of braille books, easy access to requesting braille books" o "Large-print books" o "Seed library" o "Library of tools, Library of elders/experts" o "More foreign film selections" Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 167 oFV E 0SlyFC b BerryDunn v,F6 n Question 5 - Please tell us what you'd like to see improved at the Library. This question was open ended and short answer. In total, 1,098 individuals responded. Please tell us what you'd like to see improved at the Library. This question asked respondents to write in what they'd like to see improved at the Library. The data collected from this question reflects thoughts on improvements and enhancements to better meet the needs and interests of the community. The feedback highlights the community's suggestions for facility enhancements, collection improvements, digital resources, location considerations, and programming expansion, as well as positive feedback. Overall, the data showcases a commitment to enhancing the Lake Oswego Public Library's offerings, services, and physical spaces to better serve the needs and interests of the community. The most common category of responses received from this question related to facility enhancements. There is a desire for more comfortable and abundant spaces for studying and working, including comfortable seating and increased study areas. Additionally, the respondents expressed a need for a newer, brighter building with flexible spaces that can cater to quiet small-group study and larger performance activities. The children's library is also highlighted as an area for improvement; with requests for more natural light, additional space for creative play, and separate rooms for programming activities. Other suggestions include the addition of a café, quiet study rooms, updates and repairs, and better parking facilities. Respondents expressed a desire for an expanded collection, including more copies of popular new releases to reduce waiting times. They also asked for a larger selection of books, including Spanish language children's and beginner/intermediate materials. Additionally, requests for larger genealogical collections, and a better variety of books were brought up. Another area of strong emphasis in the responses was the desire for more programming options, particularly for tweens, teens, and families. Requests include concerts, cultural events, play spaces for kids, and expert speakers on various topics. Community engagement is emphasized, and some responses asked for art exhibitions, and diversifying programming. There is also a desire for tech support and assistance programming to be available within the Library. Some responses relate to a need for increased digital resources, such as more digital audiobooks and e-books. Feedback also suggests expanding the online resources, like Libby, to provide a wider range of book options. Improved search functionality, including the ability to sort online searches by publication date and view checked-out items on the website, is also mentioned. Another category of responses relate to location. While some individuals are against the relocation or addition of another library, others express a need for a more central and accessible Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 168 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'/O 1_10-' location. Suggestions include a branch library in Lake Grove, a more central relocation, and the possibility of having two libraries to serve different areas. Finally, several responses are complimentary to existing library services and staff. Many responses show a positive attitude toward the Library, with several individuals expressing their love for the current facility and its offerings. They appreciate the helpfulness and knowledge of the reference librarians and the Library's role in bringing joy to families. Example quotes of responses in the "Other" category are listed below grouped in the following categories: Facility Enhancements, Collections, Digital Resources, Location, Programming, and Positive Feedback. • Facility Enhancements o "Would like more comfortable and abundant spaces for working on laptop, studying, etc." o "General update to the entire experience. Newer, brighter building with flex space." o "I would love more comfortable seating in the Library." o "Better parking." o "A little bit more study space, outside areas, café. But I do love our library!" o "The Library could have flexible spaces that can be used for quiet small-group study or a larger performance activity." o "The children's library should have more natural light and more space for creative play or a separate room for programming activities." o "I'd love to see a café and quiet study rooms." o "Building repair and maintenance. Parking." o "A parking lot that accommodates more cars." o "It would be wonderful to have a large public meeting room like the one in West Linn." • Collections o "More copies of popular new releases to decrease wait time. There are several that have months-long wait." o More Spanish language children's, beginner/intermediate." o "Larger genealogical collections." o "More books! I love all that the Library offered, and at the end of the day, I would prioritize a bigger selection of books." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 169 7Dunn A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O Berr ' 2 �17yL b v UE o "I'm a visual person and book covers draw me into reading. I would like to see MORE shelving on the ground floor near the DVDs that have a variety of book covers displayed." o "The Drama collection has been severely reduced. It is very difficult to find play collections and individual scripts." o "The current collection does not support our needs." • Digital Resources o "More digital audiobooks." o "More digital loans for Kindle and audiobooks." o "I would like to see more different types of books in online resources, like Libby, for the Lake Oswego Public Library." o "Expanded digital collection." o "More e-books." o "More downloadable audiobooks." o "More access to current DVD/digital movies." o "Ability to sort online searches by publication date." o "It would be nice to be able to go back on the website to see everything I've checked out." • Location o "A branch Library in Lake Grove. One is needed near the majority of people, schools and senior and low-income housing." o "Relocate to more central location." o "Please DO NOT move our library out of the First Addition neighborhood—ever." o "The LO Library has WAY outlived its location tucked into the First Addition neighborhood. The tiny parking lot and narrow residential streets are not appropriate for a library for the growing LO community. It was great at the time, but needs to be moved to a more central, accessible location." o "I'd love to see another relocation near the Westlake / Lake Grove area. The current location is not very convenient for folks not living near downtown." o "Another modestly sized location, perhaps across the lake, so there are two libraries." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 170 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn 17y+�L� U � O G • Programming o "More activities for tweens & teens—concerts, cultural events." o "More play space for kids. Also there used to be toys for the kids to play with and it would be nice to have those back." o "More events for families and youth." o "Inviting experts to speak about caring for the environment, parenting, and caregiving." o "Invite community officials/members to discuss how to be of service to the community." o "More art exhibitions please..." o "More programs for children." o "Anything involving activities geared toward children." o "More diversity in programming." o "Tech support! I have computer problems sometimes with my laptop and it would be great if there was a computer support specialist on staff." • Positive Feedback o "We have an incredible library! It would be wonderful to have a larger space for the facility." o "The Library is great! Not much need to change." o "I think the LO library functions just fine for a community library. It doesn't need to be a hub of activity; it just needs to offer books and reference resources for residents, and it does that quite well." o "I love the Library as is." o "I think our library is great & don't have any improvements in mind." o "This is a beautiful library. I am impressed with the reference librarians, their helpfulness and knowledge base." o "I love the Library and love bringing my grandchildren there." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 171 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn G 17+�L� U � O � Question 6 - How can the Library better serve as a hub of community information and gathering? This question was open ended and short answer. In total, 652 individuals responded. How can the Library better serve as a hub of community information and gathering? The community feedback from responses to this question provides valuable insights into what Lake Oswego Public Library could do to better serve as a hub of community information and gathering. Recommendations include creating a café space, enhancing communication channels, improving website usability, expanding gathering areas, emphasizing accessible materials, providing quality programs, and considering space improvements. Many comments focus on including gathering and meeting spaces in the Library to enhance the Library's role as a venue for gatherings and to promote community engagement. Several responses reflect a desire for comfortable spaces where visitors can enjoy gathering while also enjoying the Library's resources. Respondents also suggested creating larger spaces to accommodate various community events, lectures, and performances. The concept of a café came up several times, with respondents stating it would create a welcoming environment for visitors to enjoy refreshments while exploring the Library's offerings. Several comments related to enhancing communication, both online and in-person. These focused on the website's usability and enhancing marketing and outreach. Respondents desire a user-friendly website that is easy to navigate. Effective marketing and communication were also identified as crucial elements for helping ensure community awareness of offerings. Respondents stated that using popular platforms like Facebook for advertising upcoming library events would increase awareness among community members. Respondents also talked about including bulletin boards in the Library. Another area of responses related to access to materials, programs, and resources. Bookmobile services were identified as creating greater accessibility to library resources, especially for those who cannot easily visit the Library. Many comments in this category spoke to the value the community places on the Library's role in providing resources, hosting quality programs, and promoting beneficial events. Example quotes of responses are included below, categorized into the following categories: Spaces, Events and Programs, Communication, and Collections. • Spaces o "More meeting spaces for non-profit volunteers to meet." o "More and larger spaces for meeting." o "I think an outdoor patio connecting to nature would be a great add-on." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 172 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'4/O 1_10-' o "Have more community spaces and have more information about access to them." o "Maintain an open airy welcoming space." o "Enlarge the lobby area to include a coffee, tea, and boba cart." o "Have a café style area with tables and comfy chairs." o "A larger, special room for events being held in the Library." o "It needs a dedicated meeting hall or auditorium." • Events and Programs o "More author readings." o "More events where authors read their books." o "Have a space at the farmers market to connect with the community." o "Consider doing joint events with the school libraries." o "More adult classes." o "Invite community members to talk about their areas of expertise." o "More and wider variety of activities." o "More community events beyond author talks." o "More events focused on connecting neighbors." o "Offer virtual meetings and online access to banned books." o "Possibly have a Collaboratory similar to Hillsboro Library." o "Assist local writers in e-publishing." • Communication o "Increase efforts to market." o "People need to know what their taxes are supporting!" o "Easier website to navigate." o "I find navigating the website a bit challenging." o "Better dissemination of info on services." o "Aggressively market, communicate community events taking place at the Library." o "More bulletin board space inside or outside." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 173 b BerryDunn oshFfig� U O; c GBC C UBPPe- o "Using schools to market and communicate what is going on." o "Inviting more groups, inviting voices from marginalized groups for input." o "Regularly post info physically." o "Spread more awareness of what's going on in the Library." o "Monthly newsletter delivered via email highlighting events by categories." o "More focused emails and social media." • Collections o "More community curated collections, as in LGBTQ for teens, female mystery writers, and so on." o "Increase online access to banned books." o "Provide more books in foreign languages, as well as translations of fiction." o "More digital (Libby) options." o "Better selection of books." o "Maybe new books that help with different career paths." o "Partner with other community resources and offer more e-books and audio books." Question 7 - How should we enhance the Library aesthetically to nurture wellbeing and inspire curiosity? This question was open ended and short answer. In total, 696 individuals responded. How should we enhance the Library aesthetically to nurture wellbeing and inspire curiosity? The responses to this question provide valuable feedback to what respondents prioritize for aesthetic enhancements to the Library that would nurture wellbeing and inspire curiosity. Responses covered areas such as physical updates, lighting, outdoor connections, space functionality, user experience, art, creativity, interactive spaces, nature, community engagement, inclusivity, space layout, furniture, structural changes, and additional amenities. Many comments also expressed appreciation for the current library. Respondents highlighted the need for a more modern and accessible library with better lighting and outdoor connections. Many responses call for greater inclusion of natural elements, such as native plants and more daylight. There was also a significant interest in user experience and functionality improvements, such as better book categorization and placement, more classes for adults, and different spaces to cater to varying needs. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 174 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b Inclusivity and community engagement were highlighted, with calls for more community events and spaces that are welcoming to everyone. Suggestions also included the incorporation of more art and creative spaces. A strong interest in art and exhibits was expressed, with suggestions for permanent installations and rotating displays to reflect the community's culture. Some respondents also expressed satisfaction with the Library's current state. They identified features of the current library that they liked and wanted to remain. Example quotes of responses are included below, categorized into the following categories: Building and Furniture, Light, Nature, User Experience, Exhibits and Interactive Spaces, and Appreciation of Current State. • Building and Furniture o "A new more modern, architectural approach could go a long way in dispelling the myth that libraries are just boring repositories of books." o "Need a bigger, brighter, more accessible and welcoming site. And lots more parking and/or more transit friendly access." o "Add different spaces for different types of minds." o "The Library should feel more comfortable—it's too small to house all the materials." o "More windows. Updated spaces. Cleaner, brighter spaces." o "Comfy seating, open spaces, natural lighting, calming colors." o "More comfortable chairs for reading." o "Better chairs that don't press on the back of one's legs and make their feet go numb." o "Outdoor reading spaces or play spaces for children. More interactive children's area." o "I would love a café and some cozy seating areas." • Light o "Daylight, daylight, daylight. Increase the level of daylight." o "Natural light is so important." o "A lot more light would help with providing a welcoming space, but I also think the Library could be a beacon of fun and intelligence by employing warmer colors, a mural outside, or an outdoor creation space." o "More windows and an outdoor seating area." o "Light, bringing in the outdoors, light and more light, comfortable seating." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 175 3,e \ is,osh,e b BerryDunn O CU8 o "Openness with large windows." o "Find a bigger brighter building." o "Could we re-design it to make it brighter and airier?" • Nature o "More skylights, expanded garden areas like the Brian Doyle garden." o "Build a building that incorporates nature-space as part of the atmosphere for intellectual growth and reflection." o "I'd like to see more native plants around the Library." o "Lots of natural light (a challenge in dark winter days). Comfortable seating." o "Love to see plants throughout." • User Experience o "Something that might be helpful is making sure all the books are categorized correctly." o "Find a way to avoid very low and very high placements of books (especially difficult for seniors bending down or having to reach up)." o "Event spaces that are open after library hours can be beautifully separated from the Library collection space via partitions that are sculptural." o "Hands-on experiences." o "Meeting and event spaces." • Exhibits and Interactive Spaces o "Lots of art from members including kids. Couches & arm chairs in kids area for reading with littles in lap. Kid's play & craft area enhanced." o "I love the exhibits along the stairs." o "Artwork by local artists of all ages. Musical offerings on occasion." o "Interactive spaces for all ages." o "Support art exhibits in the Library. The bear sculptures are a positive to nurture wellbeing, especially for children." o "Increased display space to pique interest in new subjects." o "Bring back the special displays by people in the community." o "Continue to showcase local artists or aspiring artists inside and out." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 176 ��e osh,F_ b BerryDunn U O; o "A public library should reflect its community and environment through permanent art installations." o "History exhibits? Revolving, one for everyone, one kid-friendly downstairs, focusing on often overlooked areas of history." o "Public displays for seasonal events at entry." o "Expanded art exhibition spaces. Maybe so people can bring one piece of art even to display." • Appreciation of Current State o "It's already beautiful and welcoming." o "It's gorgeous. Leave the aesthetics alone. Do not change the beautiful wood, many windows, or native gardens outside. Do not try to 'modernize' it. Current aesthetic is very inviting and comfortable." o "It's great as is." Question 8 - Do you use other neighboring libraries for events or services? This was a yes or no question. In total, 2,530 individuals responded. The purpose of this question was to determine if respondents used neighboring libraries for services. The question is a leadup to the following question, which asked respondents to identify which services they used other libraries for. Of those responding, 41% reported that they used neighboring libraries for events or services, indicating that a large number of users are seeking library services elsewhere. Do you use other neighboring libraries for events or services? • Yes • No Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 177 b BerryDunn 8 o t/w � n uVly�y(. G � \aco�'// 6OC L10Q'P Figure 09: Question 8 Responses Do you use other neighboring libraries for events or services? 1111 1041 1489 ■Yes o No Question 9 - What services or amenities do you seek at other libraries? This question was open ended and short answer. In total, 745 individuals responded. This question provides input into the types of services that respondents seek at other libraries. The responses to this question can help inform future improvements or additions to the Lake Oswego Public Library's offerings. Respondents sought a broad selection of services and amenities at other libraries, including collections, spaces, programs, events, and specialized services. Respondents also reported that physical proximity played a major role in determining which library they chose to visit. The breadth of different services respondents seek indicates the importance of multifaceted offerings for Lake Oswego Public Library. What services or amenities do you seek at other libraries? Collections was the most mentioned library service that respondents identified seeking at other libraries. Many respondents value a broad selection of materials, particularly those not available at Lake Oswego Public Library. These include physical books, e-books, and audiobooks in Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 178 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn sS �17yL e</c PPS various languages and genres. Some respondents mentioned shorter waiting times for popular books at other libraries led them to go to those libraries instead of Lake Oswego Public Library. Respondents said they often seek other libraries for a wider selection, to access items unavailable at their home library, or to find books on the shelf for immediate checkout. Digital resources were also frequently sought after at other libraries. A considerable number of responses reflect that respondents appreciate the digital offerings of other libraries, including e- books, digital audiobooks, and online resources that are not available at Lake Oswego Public Library. Some users specifically mention using other libraries' digital resources when the e- books they are looking for are not available at their primary library. Many respondents mentioned using other libraries due to access to physical spaces such as meeting rooms, study rooms, quiet spaces, and more child-friendly spaces. Some also mentioned liking the ambiance and feel of different libraries. Specifically, many respondents reported choosing other libraries because of spaces and amenities that Lake Oswego Public Library does not have or does not have as much of; for example, meetings rooms, auditoriums, and bright areas. Library programs and events also influenced respondents' choice of libraries. Many respondents reported choosing other libraries for specific public lectures, community events, adult programs, and author visits. Similarly, respondents also mentioned services or amenities that they use at other libraries, including meetings spaces, maker spaces, or tax services. Finally, there is an interest in the children's services and spaces other libraries provide. Respondents cited other libraries' children's activities, children's books, and child-friendly spaces as reasons they go to other libraries. Example quotes of responses are included below, categorized into the following categories: Book Availability and Variety, Digital Services, Spaces and Amenities, Events and Programs, Children's Services, and Proximity. • Book Availability and Variety o "Wider selection and availability of books." o "Larger collection of manga." o "More selection of books." o "Expanded e-book selection." o "Just other book selections." o "Wider book selection similar to LO Library. Materials if not available at LO." o "Better collections of theatre scripts and collections. The LO collection has been reduced to almost nothing." o "Books not available in LO collection." o "Title availability." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 179 V O; b BerryDunn L8 PP� • Digital Services o "E-learning and e-books." o "E-books not available from LO." o "Washington County has a wider selection of e-books than Clackamas." o "I still have a Multnomah County library card, and I often get audiobooks or e- books when they're not available at LINCC libraries." o "Digital collection of Multnomah." o "Digital books and audiobooks from other county libraries." o "Downloadable audiobooks from other library networks and kids events at other libraries." • Spaces and Amenities o "Sometimes I go to the Tigard Library for a quiet place to read." o "Tualatin Fireplace room. Tualatin and West Linn meeting room." o "Art exhibitions and meeting rooms." o "More space, light, less crowded." o "Esthetically open space that is more relaxing." o "Places to relax and read. Different book/magazine choices. Window views near a walking path. Public events." o "Computers— printing —children story time and activities." o "Cultural pass, library after hours locker, loaning library binder listed items, book sale room." o "Tualatin library for their 3D printer." o "Tigard library-tax returns." o "Maker space in Tualatin—it's amazing!" o "I've driven to the West Linn and Milwaukie libraries to get Library of Things items that we don't have." o "Library of Things." o "Seed sharing." • Events and Programs o "Spice club at West Linn, STEM kits for kids at West Linn." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 180 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O BerryDunn �' 2 17yL b v UE ..�a V Ge</C L10- P� o "I have gone to other libraries for public lectures." o "I use the educator card at the Multnomah Library for longer checkout times for my classroom books. I also love the Everybody Reads Program through Multnomah Library." o "Multnomah County Children's Summer Reading programs, author lecture series, book & audiobook checkout." o "Programming (West Linn had an amazing Harry Potter event pre-COVID), better selection, Portland (it has been a few years since we've participated) has a much more enhanced summer reading program." o "In-person classes." o "Occasional community play or library selection for Library of Things." • Children's Services o "More access to books, open, welcoming, places where toddlers and moms/dads can gather." o "West Linn library has a bigger children and teen selection." o "Storytime for our kids." o "Play area for kids." o "West Linn library has a bigger children and teen selection." o "Love the kids room in Tualatin." o "Storytime." o "Children's section." o "Kids storytime." o "When my son was young, we loved the children's collection (and how it was organized—especially the early readers) at Wilsonville." o "Bigger spaces for kids story times, fresher space." • Proximity o "While I live in Clackamas County, a Washington County library is closer to my house. They don't provide the positive atmosphere that you do." o "Pick up books at the Tualatin library and enjoy events held there. It is closer to my house than the LO library." o "Proximity to my home." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 181 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U a 2 �17yL o "I use them just when they are more conveniently located not because they offer different services." o "Capitol Hill library is very close to home." o "Tualatin ... easier access." o "Ease of Tualatin library—close to my home in Lake Grove." Question 10 - In your own words, what's your vision for the future Lake Oswego Public Library? This question was open ended and short answer. In total, 958 individuals responded. Respondents had a diverse range of opinion on the future of Lake Oswego Public Library. Responses covered a range of topics and ideas, including desire for the Library to serve as a community gathering space, fostering creativity, sharing of ideas, and a love for reading. Some individuals emphasize the importance of the Library being a destination, a place where everyone in Lake Oswego can access information and find enjoyment. While some respondents appreciate the Library's current state and recommend maintaining its services and accessibility, others advocate for updates and improvements. In your own words, what's your vision for the future Lake Oswego Public Library? The feedback can be summarized into several key themes. There is a strong emphasis on expanding the Library's reach and accessibility through the establishment of satellite locations in existing buildings, providing more flexible space, and increasing the collection of both physical and electronic books. The community also emphasizes the importance of creating an inclusive and welcoming environment for all community members, with a focus on inspiring engaged youth and enhancing the overall experience for longer stays. Additionally, there is a desire to expand existing programs and develop new ones, particularly focusing on the children's section. The community values the current location of the Library and emphasizes the need for it to remain a community gathering place and resource, while also modernizing and updating the facilities to create inviting and comfortable spaces. The importance of striking a balance between tradition and innovation is highlighted, helping ensure that the Library continues to provide high-quality literary and educational materials while embracing new technologies and digital resources. Overall, the feedback demonstrates a deep appreciation for the Lake Oswego Public Library as a vital community resource. The community desires a library that serves as a hub for learning, connection, and community engagement, accommodating diverse needs and promoting access to information and literacy-based learning. The community emphasizes the importance of maintaining excellent service, supporting the Library in its current location, and preserving the cozy and welcoming atmosphere that patrons have come to love. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 182 *f� O b BerryDunn Example quotes of responses are included below, categorized into the following categories: Facilities and Location; Growth, Gathering, and Creativity; and Inclusive and Safe. • Facilities and Location o "A beautiful place when we can spend many hours." o "A bigger building to expand and grow the already awesome existing programs, and room to develop more!" o "A bigger building with a larger collection with space to just sit and read." o "A bigger less-tight space, better interior layout that is inviting not like an 'old school style' interior." o "A beautiful building and campus with more; more flexible space and more physical and electronic books." o "A bigger space with the Booktique on site. A big upgrade has been needed for years! LO should make this a priority!" o "2 small satellite locations in LO—maybe in an existing building even—i.e., a park district location, a church, or an empty building." o "I'd love to see a 'talking' space, for teens and other users, and also a 'quiet' space for those who need it." o "I'd love to see it EXPAND in a way that teens and children can be even more engaged there. The movie nights for teens I think is great." o "I'd love to see people in meeting rooms at all hours and more spaces for children, youth." o "I envision a central library with satellite locations specializing in certain services." o "I'd love to see a bigger and more spacious, bright windowed building. With more space to explore with the kids in terms of art, books, play areas, computers for the youth." o "Larger! More in the middle of Lake Oswego not at one end." o "Move to downtown location. Larger, beautiful spaces. Community hub that fosters literacy, education, knowledge." • Growth, Gathering, and Creativity o A place to gather as a community, read lots of books, share ideas, get creative, make and enjoy art." o "A place to grow our hearts and our minds through the world of reading." o "A place where I can finish most of my work and give myself some time to read. A place where I want to linger, meet friends for a coffee, use as an alternate remote work location on occasion." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 183 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn U 4t- 17y+�L� � O eco? 64/C LVe o "A resource for the entire community to gather, exchange ideas, gain enlightenment, and enhance lives." o "A resource of easy, varied, and abundant digital access. A quiet community space that allows for mental engagement without distraction." o "Continued growth and availability of books, audio books, cultural passes, and online resources." o "Continue doing cultural, literature, poetry, music, and info sessions. Community awareness on community concerns." o "Be a library. Be a community site. Be a vibrant community hub that encourages reading, literacy, reference resource, and computer Wi-Fi for those who may not have other access." o "I'd love to feel like the Library is like the community hub for learning and programs—vibrant, modern, and a strong promoter of the love of learning (doing a good job here already)." o "It will be a future community and culture center for people to learn and share and relax." o "The Library should be a hub of all types of learning and outreach for the community. Perhaps partnering with community organizations." o "The Lake Oswego Public Library should continue to be a place where citizens of all ages can find reading and research materials and use them in a user-friendly atmosphere." o "To inspire and motivate lifelong learning and be a source for the community seeking knowledge and cultural experiences." o "Welcoming, inspiring, supportive, responsive. Anticipates and meets the community's needs." • Inclusive and Safe o "A place to support and encourage safe access to literacy for all members of our community." o "A place where everyone can access information and literacy-based learning." o "A place where everyone can come together, whether that be for events or individually to study/read and feel safe/accepted." o "A beautiful inclusive building that contains something for every community member to utilize." o "Continue to be a welcoming space with a great selection of books. A warm enveloping hug that is full of good information and ideas." o "I would like for LOPL to be a home away from home for everyone. Inviting, comfortable, events for bringing younger people in." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 184 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'/O 1_10-' o "More accessible to people in the other parts of LO, caters more to upper elementary and middle school kids." o "More geographically inclusive." o "Serve the community—access to information & knowledge, inclusion, inspiration." o "To be a welcoming resource for the community, providing educational opportunities for everyone." Question 11 - Any additional comments? This question was open ended and short answer. In total, 484 individuals responded. This question provided respondents an opportunity to provide any additional feedback, comments, or follow-up related to the community's vision for library services. Responses covered a variety of topics, including suggestions for improvements, location and accessibility, positive feedback and experiences, and cautiousness against unnecessary changes. Any additional comments? While this feedback spans a wide range of topics and viewpoints, each quote provides useful insight into how different people perceive and interact with the Library. Many respondents expressed concerns and ideas about how the Library can better accommodate people with disabilities and caregivers. Respondents also raised issues regarding the inclusivity of the Library's services and its representation of various viewpoints. A common theme in the responses for this question was that the Library could further improve its appeal and functionality by introducing specific changes. These include programming recommendations for all ages, collections suggestions, and facility improvements. Some respondents suggested expanding the Library's digital resources and improving online access, including for e-books and other electronic materials. Some patrons voiced concerns about the Library's location and accessibility. One individual expressed disapproval of any plans to move the Library from its current location. Others mentioned the inconvenience of driving across town just to pick up holds, with a suggestion to find a way to allow patrons to retrieve holds and materials in other parts of town. The possibility of adding a second library in Lake Grove was brought up as a potential way to increase access, though there was a strong sentiment against losing the current library location. There was also mention of a new book drop-off location being appreciated. A significant portion of the feedback was filled with praise for the Library and its staff, with many patrons expressing their love for the Library and stating it was their favorite place. The staff were commended for their friendliness and quality customer service, and the Library was appreciated for its ability to inspire kids to love reading. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 185 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b Despite the generally positive feedback, some patrons expressed a cautious approach to any major changes, particularly if they entailed a significant financial cost. These individuals felt that the Library was already functioning well and did not need extensive upgrades. A common sentiment among these respondents was the belief that digital resources would become more important in the future, making physical upgrades unnecessary. Several patrons mentioned their satisfaction with the current small, neighborhood library feel and expressed reluctance to finance new building projects. Example quotes of responses are included below, categorized into the following categories: Suggestions, Location and Infrastructure, Positive Feedback, Cautiousness. • Suggestions o "I would love to go if meetings were during the day even if it was Saturday." o "More private study rooms please!" o "I have been unhappy to see that not all viewpoints are represented when controversial topics are presented such as race, gender, and scientific debates." o "In the last few years the LO library has disposed of thousands of books, CDs, and DVDs, etc., gutting the comprehensive collections of materials." o "Expand library walls not by physically growing but by improving the scope of digital access to materials and information." o "For me personally, I do most of my reading now on my Kindle. An expansion of books available electronically would be my only request." o "Encourage teenagers to volunteer— create a compelling volunteer program for middle school and high school students." o "Please put the books back into categories; it makes browsing s000 much more pleasant and functional please." o "Would love for the kids area to be on the main level with strollers, early walkers, and toddlers. The stairs cause traffic jams with littles and pose a risk for falling." o "Has anyone thought of creating a media production center inside the Library? A quiet, professional-grade space where users can record videos or podcasts, with professional equipment (cameras, microphones, audio and video editing software). I would love something like that." • Location and Infrastructure o "Either plan for more and better parking or move the Library so it can be used more easily and more often by students, schools, the elderly and seniors of Lake Oswego and Lake Grove." o "The Library's facilities seem out of step with the very high cost of living/home prices in LO." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 186 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b o "Library on the weekends or during the summers is one of my favorite activities." o "I can walk to library and hope that main library stays in same location! Really appreciate current services." o "We do have a 10 — 15 min drive from home across town to library. Feels `wasteful' to make a trip just to pick up holds. Would love if there was a way to retrieve holds and materials in other parts of town." o "I can see adding another library. I don't know it's feasible, but perhaps adding one over in Lake Grove somewhere to increase access there. We would be devastated if we lost our current library." o "Wish the Library were closer to our home. I mostly use the Tualatin library." • Positive Feedback o "Love the statues of the bears!" o "We LOVE the new book drop off at Pilkington Park! It has made it easier to return our library materials on time!" o "I love using the Library's e-book collection! More titles please!" o "I am very happy with Libby." o "During the pandemic the Library (and the awesome amount of books) became my lifeline. Perfect example of serving the community in a time of need, when we could still get books to read during a worldwide health crisis." o "I love being able to place holds and picking up materials with quick self-check." o "I love the ability to put books on hold online and then have them sourced from other libraries." o "Love the app and the automatic return system and drop boxes much better than other counties." o "I love the Library and want it to continue to exist as a part of our community." o "Libraries are a critical element of democracy." o "I don't use the Library that much but I've always felt that public libraries are an essential part of a community." o "I think the Library does a good job with community outreach considering the demographics of the community." • Cautiousness o "What's wrong with the Library now? Are there structural building issues? Do we really need to spend more money for every thing everyone wants?" Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 187 7 A E 4 ��OSwEC *f� O b BerryDunn o "This is the difficult `want.' Can we have all the improvements that are needed and still have the wonderful small town vibe of our current library?" o "The Library is just fine. I don't think the foot traffic justifies an upgrade to the Library. Now people just stream everything. The Library of the future will be all digital. I don't agree with it, but these are the facts." o "Again, I really don't think much needs to change. The existing facility is great and staff are doing an excellent job of delivering services. If you're set on changing something, add a second location. Don't waste money improving something that ain't broke in the first place." Question 12 - How old are you? (optional) This question was multiple-choice. In total, 2,405 individuals responded. This question is the first of the optional demographics questions asked as part of this survey. This question was meant to capture the age of respondents. Overall, the data shows broad engagement across different age groups, with a particularly strong representation from middle- aged and older adults. Younger respondents had a lower representation in this survey. How old are you? (optional) • Under 18 • 18-24 • 25-34 • 35-44 • 45-54 • 55-64 • 65-74 • 75 and older • Prefer not to answer Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 188 b BerryDunn V � O; L8 PP� Figure 10: Question 12 Responses How old are you? 65-74 636 75 and older 1427 35-44 1392 55-64 1387 45-54 1350 25-34 109 Under 18 50 18-24 29 Prefer not to answer 25 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 The age group with the highest representation is the 65-74 age range, with 636 respondents. This could suggest a high engagement of seniors in library activities or services, or possibly reflect the fact that people in this age range may have more free time to engage with the Library, compared to other age groups. The 75 and older group also had a significant number of respondents, 427, showing that the Library continues to be an important resource for the oldest segment of the community. The second-highest number of responses came from the 55-64 age group, with 387 respondents. This was closely followed by the 35-44 and 45-54 age groups, with 392 and 350 responses, respectively. This high level of representation from middle-aged adults could again reflect the high engagement with the Library with this age, possibly for their own use or as a resource for their children. Young adults and teenagers were less represented in the responses. The age groups of 18-24 and under 18 had only 29 and 50 respondents, respectively. This might indicate lower engagement with the Library among these groups, or it could simply reflect lower response rates to the survey among these age groups. The 25-34 age group was slightly more represented, with 109 respondents. Finally, a small number of respondents, 25, preferred not to disclose their age. This is a common response in surveys and allows privacy in demographic data collection. Question 13 - How do you identify your gender? (optional) This question was multiple-choice. In total, 2,363 individuals responded. Responses to this question offer a representation of the gender distribution among the survey respondents. Overall, the data shows that most respondents were women, but men still Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 189 oFV E v,F6 OSlyFC b BerryDunn S' �17yL submitted a significant portion of the results. The high representation of women could suggest that women are more engaged with library outreach than men are. The representation from transgender and non-binary individuals, while smaller, is also an important factor to consider in the Library's service design and inclusivity practices. How do you identify your gender? (optional) • Woman • Man • Transgender • Non-binary • Prefer not to answer Figure 11: Question 13 Responses How do you identify your gender? Woman 1660 Man 630 Prefer not to answer 41 Non-binary ] 23 Transgender 19 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 The most prominent gender group among the respondents are women, who comprise 1,660 of the responses. This high response rate could indicate that women are more likely to engage with the Library, or it may simply reflect higher response rates to the survey among women. Men also make up a significant portion of the respondents, with 630 people identifying as such. This shows that, while they are less represented than women in the responses, men are also a significant respondent group. The survey also shows a small but important representation from the transgender and non- binary community. Transgender respondents total 9, while non-binary respondents make up 23 of the total. While these numbers are relatively small, it is crucial to note that these communities are represented and potentially form an important part of the Library's user base. These numbers could also be seen as an indicator of the inclusivity and safety felt by transgender and non-binary individuals within this library setting. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 190 7A E 4 ��OSC7.FC *f� O b BerryDunn G � V 6'4/O 1_10-' Finally, 41 respondents preferred not to disclose their gender. This option is important for respecting individual privacy and comfort in answering demographic questions. Question 14 - Within the broad categories below, where would you place your racial or ethnic identity? (optional) This question was multiple-choice. In total, 2,253 individuals responded. The responses to this question note the racial and ethnic identities of the respondents to this survey. Overall, the data shows that while there is a diverse range of racial and ethnic identities represented among respondents, the majority identify as White. It is important to note that the numbers and proportions here could be significantly influenced by many factors, including the demographic composition of the local population, the reach and design of the survey, and more. Within the broad categories below, where would you place your racial or ethnic identity? (optional) • Native American, American Indian, or Alaska Native • Asian or Asian American • Black or African American • Hispanic or Latino/a/e • Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander • White • An ethnicity not included above Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 191 FV E yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn „t- FFGO? 64/C LVe Figure 12: Question 14 Responses Within the broad categories below, where would you place your racial or ethnic identity? White 1972 Asian or Asian American ❑ 115 An ethnicity not included above ❑ 81 Hispanic or Latino/a/e 148 Black or African American 116 Native American,American Indian, or Alaska Native 111 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 110 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 With 1,972 respondents identifying as White, this group makes up the majority of the respondents. This could reflect the demographics of the area where the survey was conducted or the population that engaged with the survey. With 115 respondents, Asian or Asian American was the next most commonly selected option. This group makes up a relatively smaller portion of the respondents compared to the White group. However, it is the second-largest group in this survey. The third most common response was, An ethnicity not included above. With 81 respondents, this group makes up a significant minority of the respondents. This category could be quite diverse, as it might include people who identify as different races or ethnicities not listed in the options provided. Hispanic or Latino/a/e had 48 respondents. Black or African American had 16 respondents. Native American, American Indian, or Alaska Native had 11 respondents. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander had 10 respondents. Question 15 - Do you identify as someone with a disability, or who cares for someone with a disability? (optional) This question was multiple-choice. In total, 2,182 individuals responded. This question collected information on whether respondents identified as someone with a disability, or who cares for someone with a disability. While a significant majority of the surveyed population does not directly deal with disability or caregiving experiences, there are meaningful portions of the population that do, either as individuals with disabilities or as caregivers for people with disabilities. This diversity of experiences likely contributes to a wide range of perspectives on issues related to disability within the community. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 192 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U a 2 �17yL Do you identify as someone with a disability, or who cares for someone with a disability? (optional) • I am a person with a disability who lives and/or works in Lake Oswego • I am a caregiver for a person with a disability who lives and/or works in Lake Oswego • No • Prefer not to answer Figure 13: Question 15 Responses Do you identify as someone with a disability, or who cares for someone with a disability? No 1859 I am a person with a disability who lives and/or works 7 147 in Lake Oswego I am a caregiver for a person with a disability who 124 lives and/or works in Lake Oswego Prefer not to answer 52 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 The majority of respondents (1,859) indicated that they neither identify as a person with a disability nor care for someone with a disability in Lake Oswego. This group constitutes approximately 88% of the total respondents, suggesting that a large proportion of the population surveyed does not directly interact with disability-related experiences in their day-to-day lives, at least in terms of being a person with a disability or a caregiver. However, notable portions of the population do have these experiences. Of respondents, 147— or about 7% of the total—identify themselves as people with disabilities living and/or working in Lake Oswego. This indicates a visible presence of people with disabilities within the community or the workforce. Additionally, 124 respondents, or about 6% of the total, indicated they are caregivers for a person with a disability who lives and/or works in Lake Oswego. This group reveals the prevalence of caregiving experiences in the community, which can often come with unique challenges and perspectives. Lastly, 52 respondents preferred not to answer this question. This response makes up around 2.5% of the total, indicating a small proportion of the population that chose not to disclose this Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 193 b BerryDunn information for possible reasons including privacy, complexity of personal situations, or other factors. Question 16 - Which of the following best represents the annual income of your household before taxes? (optional) This question was multiple-choice. In total, 1,781 individuals responded. This question collected income information of respondents. The distribution of the responses to the question about annual household income before taxes shows a skewed trend toward the higher income ranges, with a substantial majority of respondents reporting household incomes of$100,000 or more. This suggests that the surveyed population is primarily composed of higher-income households. Lower-income brackets are less represented. Which of the following best represents the annual income of your household before taxes? (optional) • Less than $10,000 • $10,000-$19,9999 • $20,000-$29,9999 • $30,000-$39,9999 • $40,000-$49,9999 • $50,000-$74,9999 • $74,000-$99,9999 • $100,000-$149,999 • $150,000 or more Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 194 V Rrr\, � O b ✓e 1 7 DunPPe- CU8 Figure 14: Question 16 Responses Which of the following best represents the annual income of your household before taxes? $150,000 or more 731 $100,000-$149,999 1364 $74,000-$99,9999 1243 $50,000-$74,9999 1195 $40,000-$49,9999 7 94 $30,000-$39,9999 170 $20,000-$29,9999 38 $10,000-$19,9999 29 Less than$10,000 ■ 17 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 The highest number of respondents, 731 or about 34.7% of the total, reported that their household earns $150,000 or more annually, indicating a significant portion of the surveyed population falls within the high-income bracket. The second-highest number of respondents, 364 or about 17.3% of the total, earn between $100,000 and $149,999 per year. This combined group of households earning $100,000 or more represents over half (52%) of the respondents. In the middle-income ranges, 243 respondents, or 11.6% of the total, earn between $74,000 and $99,999. Another 195 respondents, making up about 9.3% of the total, have a household income of$50,000-$74,999. Lower-income brackets are represented less in the responses. Of respondents, 94—about 4.5% of the total—reported earning between $40,000 and $49,999. The $30,000-$39,999 bracket is represented by 70 respondents (approximately 3.3%), while the $20,000-$29,999 and $10,000- $19,999 brackets are represented by 38 (about 1.8%) and 29 respondents (about 1.4%) respectively. Finally, the lowest income category, those earning less than $10,000 annually, is represented by 17 respondents, or about 0.8% of the total. Question 17 - What neighborhood do you live in? (optional) This question was multiple-choice. In total, 2,240 individuals responded. The purpose of this question was to collect information on what neighborhood respondents lived in. The responses reveal a diverse representation of areas. The population appears to be spread out across multiple neighborhoods in Lake Oswego. In fact, all available neighborhood options to this question were selected multiple times. There was also a substantial portion living outside of Lake Oswego or in an unincorporated area. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 195 b BerryDunn `�, ° G � \aeco'' 6OC Lye What neighborhood do you live in? (optional) • Choice • Evergreen • Skylands • Lake Forest • Birdshill • Blue Heron • Waluga • Holly Orchard • Old Town • Rosewood • North Shore-Country Club • I don't know • Lakewood • Uplands • Evergreen • Westridge • Lake Forest • Glenmorrie • Blue Heron • I live in an unincorporated area • Holly Orchard • Hallinan Heights • Rosewood • McVey-South Shore • Skylands • Forest Highlands • Birdshill • Bryant • Waluga • Westlake • Old Town • Lake Grove • North Shore-Country Club • I don't live in Lake Oswego • Lakewood • First Addition/Forest Hills • Mountain Park • Palisades Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 196 7 A a ,,-,.osh,F� V � O; o, b BerryDunn o..o� PP� CU8 Figure 15: Question 17 Responses What neighborhood do you live in? Mountain Park 304 Palisades 1 193 First Addition/Forest Hills 1 192 I don't live in Lake Oswego i 190 Lake Grove 1 182 Westlake 1139 Bryant 116 Forest Highlands 1 105 McVey-South Shore i 78 Hallinan Heights 73 I live in an unincorporated area 68 Glenmorrie 1 66 Westridge 158 Uplands 53 I don't know 50 Rosewood 148 Holly Orchard 47 Blue Heron 147 Lake Forest 43 Evergreen 142 Lakewood 141 North Shore-Country Club 36 Old Town 134 Waluga moi 18 Birdshill = 9 Skylands • 8 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 The highest number of respondents, 304 or about 14.5% of the total, live in Mountain Park. This is followed by Palisades, with 193 respondents (about 9.2% of the total) and First Addition/Forest Hills, with 192 respondents (around 9.1%). The neighborhood of Lake Grove is represented by 182 respondents (about 8.6%). There is a moderate representation from Westlake (139 respondents, 6.6%), Bryant (116 respondents, 5.5%), and Forest Highlands (105 respondents, 5%). The number of respondents living in unincorporated areas is somewhat like these neighborhoods, with 68 respondents (around 3.2%). The remaining neighborhoods are represented by fewer respondents. The least-represented neighborhood is Skylands, with only eight respondents, while Birdshill has nine respondents. Other neighborhoods such as Waluga, Old Town, and North Shore-Country Club are represented by 18, 34, and 36 respondents, respectively. Lastly, 50 respondents (about 2.4% of the total) stated they did not know which neighborhood they lived in. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results 197 UoF„` b BerryDunn 1r�Y G-oc L18PP� Notably, 190 respondents, approximately 9% of the total, do not live in Lake Oswego. This is to be expected, though, because an individual does not have to live in Lake Oswego to use the Lake Oswego Public Library. Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix D—Survey Questions and Results I 98 Fv,8 yb OS WE v*f�CO b BerryDunn u ° U O 17y+�L� � G � eco? 64/C LVe Appendix E - Passive Information-Gathering Points Themes Spaces and Facilities Many comments centered on the need for both an expansion of the current library and the potential for an additional location, reflecting a strong desire for enhanced spaces and facilities. Comments included calls for modern, flexible areas accommodating various ages and activities. Examples included meeting rooms and creative and recreational areas for children. Suggestions also touched upon optimizing current facilities through increasing natural light, accommodating diverse transportation options, and rearranging interior spaces. Furthermore, some respondents expressed a sentiment for preserving the existing library, and others called for exploring potential expansion or additional locations. • "I think there should be a kids play area!" • "Hogwarts-y Study Room." • "We love this building—we do not want to see it torn down." • "We love our library and do not want a new one—please just repair this one if need be." • "Small focus rooms that are reservable for tutoring school project, local business owners for meetings, etc." • "I like spaces that allow you to keep to yourself and have your own little study domain, but you're in the presence of others." • "Set up a walk-in art space for kids." • "More open space with different seating options ditto comfortable work areas." • "As e-bikes are becoming more common it is imperative there is adequate & secure bike parking to accommodate e-cargo bikes like the urban arrow which can transport parents & kids." • "The current space for kids is not very inviting. The ceilings are low and it's always dark..." • "I'd like to see dedicated space for performances. Holding concerts in the tiny space indoors is disruptive..." • "Please open a maker's area for all ages, including adults, and have classes for 3D printing, Raspberry Pi, coding, Arduino, electronics, etc." • "The space of the public library should be modernized with the times. Open floor plans for communal working and studying..." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix E—Passive Information-Gathering Points Themes 199 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b Gel/C L10- • "I would NOT get rid of any branches because the in-person services (and hold shipping) are great." Diversity and Representation A number of responses called for expanded programs and services that cater to diverse interests and needs of the community. Patrons expressed their wish for a greater variety of books addressing topics such as trauma, domestic violence, and emotional regulation, as well as more children's books exploring autism, ADHD, and other disabilities. Respondents also highlighted the need for programs designed to facilitate better integration of individuals with disabilities into the community. Requests were also made for books that reflect the experiences of Native tribes, African-American heritage, and various communities. Example quotes from passive information points that fit in the Diversity and Representation category are listed below: • "I think it would be a great idea if more resources and books could be added to the children and adult sections that address trauma, DV and emotional regulation." • "Adding more books to the children's library on Autism, ADHD, and disabilities that parents can read with their kids." • "We love our library! Having more books about Native tribes and African-American heritage and communities in the children's section would be great!" • "Hello, It would be great, post COVID, if we could bring in children's authors of color to provide representation to our community's children + young adults." • "Age-based programming." • "Book clubs-focus in age groups (20s, 30s, etc.) yes!!!" • "Multi-generational programs." • "More hobby-based programming." • "Our community has wonderful school programs for students in special services... Why can't we have a community social space tied in with Library, that runs a café..." • "Wood-working classes. Wood-refinishing classes. Pottery classes. Men's book club." • "I'd like to see environmental educational programs. Teach all about the R's, ways to reduce, reuse, recycle, etc." • "Adult education —selected courses for technology use, health maintenance, local history..." • "I'd like to see some maker space or a larger communal space which can be used for larger book clubs, or similar type groups." Service Suggestions and Requests Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix E—Passive Information-Gathering Points Themes 1100 oFV E v,F60SlyFC b BerryDunn U b Respondents voiced numerous suggestions for library service enhancements. Many comments asked for different types of programming, with ideas such as afternoon line-dancing classes, book readings, writing contests for kids, book clubs, maker programs, and STEM events. Some comments advocated for improved virtual services such as improved online research databases and newspaper archives, online books, and an improved website. Respondents also advocated for expanded hours. Other recommendations addressed creating theme-based spaces like a Harry Potter room, an escape room, or dedicated spaces for children's art and puppet shows. Other comments advocated for modern upgrades such as automatic renewals and updated checkout systems. Some responses wanted a return to past practices like magazine exchange or "quiet rules." Example quotes from passive information points that fit in the Service Suggestions and Requests category are listed below: • "Expanded hours. High school students are so tired of studying in their bedrooms..." • "The Library should have writing contests for kids, children's book club that meets once a week or once a month..." • "Our library system should offer hands-on maker programs and STEM activities for kids and children..." • "We could expand our services by providing access to online research databases and newspaper archives from national sources." • "Mult Co library has a nice feature for holds... Please add this feature to the Library app/system!" • "As a disabled person who can no longer drive, I'd love to see a service that delivers to those of us at home." • "Escape room." • "Harry Potter room." • "I would like an afternoon line-dancing class once again." • "Keep Reference Dep!! Magazines are good! Book Readings and of course art." • "Please return the magazine exchange in the foyer as it was before— public exchanging theirs for others— always a treasure hunt." • "Return to the days when library patrons were asked to be quiet. The young men's jazz band is an exception to the quiet rule. They are very talented and a joy to listen to." • "Please update your auto-intake-software so that the conveyor belt rejects any material that is not a part of LNCC." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix E—Passive Information-Gathering Points Themes 1101 v � Berr Dunn 0 81 b Access and Convenience Many comments related to library accessibility and convenience. Suggestions include centralizing library locations, extending hours, and implementing self-service centers citywide. Improved digital resources and management systems are sought, along with modifications to accommodate diverse user groups, such as seniors and children. Digital enhancements, such as an improved website and online book selection, along with physical improvements, such as better bike parking, were also recommended. Example quotes from passive information points that fit in the Access and Convenience category are listed below: • "Keep present location, even if a 2d is built, better website (dedicated; fuller), expand hours, keep up the good work! (heart) 0 (music note)." • "When I moved to Lake Oswego in 1984 the population was about 25,000. Present population has almost doubled, but the Library size hasn't kept up." • "I live in the Westlake area of L.O.—not far from Oak Creek School. The Library is approximately a 10 min drive each way. Would there be a way to have a storefront library in this area even open a few days a week." • "Deliver movies and DVDs to us." • "Have a Mobile Library." • "Mobile— delivery, auto check out, online check out." • "Please keep no-card-needed computers!" • " As e-bikes are becoming more common it is imperative there is adequate & secure bike parking to accommodate e-cargo bikes like the urban arrow which can transport parents & kids." • "A new and larger library—designed for the needs of this century, not the last—should be built on a bus route and on a prominent site..." • "As with many things that are run by the City of Lake Oswego, people who live in the 97035 ZIP Code are very much neglected." • "Expanded hours. High school students are so tired of studying in their bedrooms... they would like to study at the Library but your hours do not accommodate high school schedules." • "Another idea is to create a few 'self-service centers' throughout the city equipped with a hold pickup locker, a return station, and a Wi-Fi hotspot." • "Poor e-book selection through Clackamas County system, location." Engagement Report I June 30,2023 Appendix E—Passive Information-Gathering Points Themes 1102 • • (....s...4,4 �., I i"° • i` ` '* ATTACHMENT 3 `- j.--o-ii.g,—i..l-m—.1M—_eVI P ; ° p "i1i i��, 4 ti. •-----4=.--.-4-le 11T ►, fir{fit`•`• aa4 r[I, i./IC'e,, i °fti ate— — — — i — yJ NM V )4----A—--Ill- LAKE OSWEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY ,,,,,,,k_ ___ 4. .. _ _ =t_ .. . r . - _ 1 44:11. i '� T i' . ` , F� ..„ i - L .,a .� ._ 13 -.. Lake Oswego Library ~„. I __ Seismic Evaluation & General Facilities Condition Assessment Report April 30, 2024 - gion_im 1 ripAL _ _ .27.7-_____,a________,_...7--_,..=______,___=____ ____ __1_,_,-..,___z_____:—_______-_____=_—_ ___—______—_-_______ _ -J: J—�-4: '^'any. —. - y —I — iJ �1.--�— - 3 -- — —� Table of Contents 0111 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 ARCHITECTURAL ASSESSMENT 9 STRUCTURAL SEISMIC EVALUATION 42 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL& PLUMBING ASSESSMENT 53 CIVIL SITE ASSESSMENT 57 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 COST ESTIMATION 62 PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.l285 COST SUMMATION MEMO 76 FAX:503.226.1670 APPENDIX: INFO CIDAINC.COM - STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING PLACES (OTC-2023) 77 WWW.CIDAINC.COM - ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING EXHIBITS 97 - STRUCTURAL APPENDICES 108 A-ASCE 4 I CHECKLIST A I-A 1 6 B- SITE PHOTOS B I-B5 C- DEFICIENCY PLANS C I-C7 D - RETROFIT DRAWINGS - S I-S6 PAGE NUMBER REPRESENTS PAGE OF COMPILED PDF ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS <#1% Executive Summary PROJECT UNDERSTANDING & BACKGROUND 61 Project— Historical Understanding: The City of Lake Oswego's Public Library is located at 706 4th Street in downtown Lake Oswego and was constructed in 1982 on a site that had an existing library building. It is understood that the project at that time was phased, and the existing building was demolished as part of the construction that occurred in 1982. The library was opened in 1983. The site is landlocked by D and E Street to the north and south, a neighborhood alley to the 15895 SW 72ND AVE west, and 4th Street to the east. The parking area is located to the north and surrounded by SUITE 200 mature vegetation and trees. The alley has access to a utility loading area and a generator. The PORTLAND,OR 97224 property is surrounded by existing low-density residential. PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 The library is understood to have been modified during the design and construction process to reduce the overall square footage to accommodate neighborhood concerns about parking INFO a©C1DAINC.COM adequacy, leading the then-new library to be undersized at its opening. WWW.C1DAINC.COM By extraction of the existing data, without confirmation of adjustments to the needed program, with a population of approximately 43,000,the library likely should be sized around 77,400 square feet. This is an increase from previous studies of 17%. Throughout the years several studies have been conducted that affirmed the building as it exists is undersized for the population it serves. The building will require capital investment to remain operational because of its age, design, and site positioning. This collection of information led to a vision of a new library which ended in a failed bond measure in 2012. The Council, with feedback from a 2021 community survey, has embarked on strategic moves that include understanding the long-term facilities needs of the library and a public engagement process to create a vision framework. Building—Current Understanding: The building is situated on the southern half of the site with parking to the north. The structure is surrounded by landscaping and hardscape to the east and south with the alley to the west and parking to the north. The building includes three floors,a partial basement,the main floor level, and an upper level. The basement includes the children's library area. The main floor level includes employee office and work rooms including the library's collection return system, reception and assistance desks, and checkout kiosks in addition to a large portion of the library catalog. The upper floor includes additional offices, an employee breakroom, and the remainder of the library's catalog along with computers for public use. The site functions as a series of one-way parking loops with grade climbing from the building to E Ave. The main entry is provided facing 4' St. Additional access (employee/delivery) is provided at the parking lot to the north and the alleyway to the west. The site has existing retaining walls both as part of the building basement and independent of the primary structure. The building is an existing fire sprinklered multi-story wood and steel framed structure. It displays significant articulation on all the exterior facades including recessed entries, basement light well, ARCHITECTURE canopies and deck projections, and bay windows around the perimeter of the public portions of ENGINEERING the library. The exterior decks are partially situated above existing occupied first-floor spaces. PLANNING INTERIORS Page 13 The roof is a mix of composite shingles, a single-ply membrane flat structure hosting the rooftop ‹fik mechanical systems, and metal metal-clad sloped sawtooth roof line that includes clerestory glazing. 61 The building has undergone some tenant improvements and minor remodels since its original construction. This includes modifications to the main level's lobby, workroom, and associated employee restroom and offices, along with the addition of a canopy over the employee entry at the north elevation of the building off of the parking lot. The building has also been subject to ongoing maintenance and repair work which has mainly centered around ongoing water intrusion issues and upgrades to existing finishes and exterior materials. 15895 SW 72ND AVE FACILITIES ASSESSMENT—Summary of Scope: SUITE 200 The age of the building coupled with the construction type, Oregon's climate, ongoing continuous maintenance issues, and the ever-expanding service population has presented the PORTLAND,OR 97224 library and city with the opportunity to examine the existing structure to evaluate its ability to PHONE:503.226.1285 continue to serve the City of Lake Oswego. This evaluation is to consider the building in its FAX:503.226.1670 current location and capacity with upgrades and remodel of the existing facility or if due to the 1NFO a©C1DAINC.COM scope and condition of the building, a relocation/replacement is required. The scope of this WWW.CIDAINC.COM assessment is to provide the city with information related to the following for consideration in making that determination: - Architectural Assessment: To include a review of water intrusion, building code requirements,ADA upgrades, and general building conditions. This review and assessment was completed by CIDA's architectural staff and also addresses the reciprocal impacts of the remaining assessment noted below. This assessment follows the executive summary and relies on and references other reports listed below for additional information. - Structural Evaluation: To include Teir 2 seismic evaluation and general structural observations This review and evaluation was conducted by CIDA's structural engineering staff This report is included as an attachment to this report. - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Assessment: To include review and assessment of the building's existing MEP infrastructure. The MEP assessment and report was completed by R&W Engineering. This report is included as an attachment to this report. - Civil Site Assessment: To include review of general site conditions and ADA review of accessible parking and access. This review as completed by AA!Engineering and the associated report is included as an attachment to this report. - Cost Estimation: The final component of the evaluation is a cost estimate study to review the recommendations and requirements noted in the aforementioned reports. The cost estimation was completed by Fortis Construction and is attached to the conclusion of this report. The evaluation process and the documentation in this assessment report were completed in the following format. - Research: The project team of CIDA, R&W,AAI, and Fortis reviewed documentation provided by the city and library staff to be generally familiar with the conditions of the existing ARCHITECTURE building and previous work undertaken. This included a review of original drawings, remodel drawings,previous reports, and photographs. ENGINEERING - Site Visits: PLAN N I N G The project team noted above conducted multiple site visits to review the existing conditions and document observations of the deficiencies in the building and site INTERIORS Page 14 relative to applicable codes and/or deterioration of existing assemblies, materials, or ‹fik equipment. The visits were conducted as follows: o February 29, 2024:Architectural review of the building interior, roof, and general 61 limited review of exterior due to weather conditions. Structural review of the building's structural system from roof to basement and building exterior. Walkthrough by the cost estimating team with both architectural and structural staff o March I, 2024: Architectural review of the building's interior stairs for ADA documentation. MEP review of the building's mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Civil engineering's initial review of site conditions, which was later documented during a subsequent visit due to weather conditions. 15895 SW 72ND AVE o March 14, 2024: Second architectural review of the existing building's exterior SUITE 200 conditions. Civil engineering review of parking and sidewalk conditions related to ADA requirements PORTLAND,OR 97224 - Analysis and Reporting: PHONE:503.226.1285 Following the site visits and review of previous documentation, the project team has FAX:503.226.1670 prepared recommendations to address the conditions and deficiencies at the existing 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM library. Included with these noted observations, the report includes repair and remodel WWW.CIDAINC.COM exhibits including photographs of the conditions, sketch and drawing markups for remedy, and reference material citations/clips as applicable. - Cost Estimation: Following the completion of the analysis and report, the project team completed a review of cost estimates for the various noted conditions. These costs are summarized within this report. - Conclusion: The completion of the report includes the project team's conclusions and a summary of recommendations including a review of priorities(where applicable). The conclusions presented in this report or those of the project team which evaluated the building and site. They should be used by the city staff and committees to evaluate their final recommendations which may include information outside the scope of this report. It should be noted that the code compliance references within these reports are based on current codes in effect as of the date of this report. This includes the current Oregon Structural Specialty Code 2022 with current requirements for occupancy, plumbing fixture counts, seismic requirements, and reference standards, as applicable. This also includes the associated Oregon model codes for fire, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing. The current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines is based on the ICC A 117.I-2017 Standard for Accessible and Useable Buildings and Facilities. The original building was constructed prior to the ADA requirements for buildings. The previous ADA assessment completed in 2021 by the City of Lake Oswego was based on a previous version of these standards. While the code limits the requirements for accessibility barrier removals on existing buildings to be readily achievable and limited to 25% of construction value in building remodels, tenant improvements, and upgrades,there is still the requirement to accommodate employees and visitors to public buildings. Grandfathered status does not remove this requirement to accommodate people with a physical impairment. The recommendations within this report related to ADA are based on bringing the accessibility to current codes wherever structurally feasible or as part of further remodeling scopes associated with other recommendations and requirements elsewhere within this assessment. ARCHITECTURE Any code references cited within or code graphics are taken from the currently applicable codes ENGINEERING unless noted/referenced otherwise. PLANNING INTERIORS Page 15 FACILITIES ASSESSMENT— Summary of Findings: ‹fik The following is a brief overview of the findings of the various assessment scopes documented in the remaining report. 61 - Architectural & Structural Summary of Findings: - o Roof, Siding&Water Intrusion— • Roof A good portion of the shingled roof area will need to be removed for additional seismic nailing and strapping. This will require the replacement of weather barriers and shingles. While reroofing is required for a portion of the roof due to seismic, it is also recommended that the remainder of the shingled roof be replaced and upgraded at the same time. 15895 SW 72ND AVE • Sawtooth Roof Area: The drainage is insufficient due to no overflow drain on the SUITE 200 west side of the drainage cricket. Coupled with insufficient vertical dimension from the top of the cricket to the clerestory windowsill. The recommendation is a PORTLAND,OR 97224 revision to a single high point on the west draining to the eastern low point at the PHONE:503.226.I285 roof drain and the overflow drain. FAX:503.226.I670 • Clerestory Windows: Two of the five clerestory windows in each bay (one at the INFO a©C1DAINC.COM west and one at the east end of each sawtooth) will need to be infilled for seismic WWW.CIDAINC.COM upgrades to transfer lateral loads from the upper wall to the roof structure below. This results in a 40% loss in window area. The remaining windows need to have a proper head flashing with drip edge installed under the siding and all windows re- caulked. • Siding: There is a significant area of the east and west elevations, at the first-floor level,that will require siding removal for re-nailing of the plywood sheathing for seismic upgrades. • Trim & Flashing: Upgrade trim and flashing at a change in material and plane to create a drip edge proud of the siding/soffit. • Exterior Second Floor Deck: The wood deck has significant degradation to the deck boards, underlayment, and drain system. It is recommended that this area be completely redone with framing repairs and new solid decking with a traction coating sloped to the drain system instead of an open deck board style which captures sediment and water. A coated system can more easily be maintained and cleaned of debris than a deck system with hidden drainage under the boards which allows for debris build-up contributing to the degradation of the system. The existing drain location can be retained in the new design; however, a traditional trench drain system should be used to allow for drainage and ease of maintenance when debris accumulates in the trench basin. o Foundation Impacts— ■ Basement: Install new/extend existing footing for a new shear wall in the basement at the northern stairwell wall. • First floor: Install a new footing for a new shear wall at Grid Line 2. o Floor Reinforcement— ■ Second Floor Framing (Seismic): The second-floor framing will need considerable upgrades to meet seismic requirements. This includes work and impact on both the second-floor level and associated stacks and the first-floor ceiling. Areas requiring upgrade will require the removal of the first-floor ceiling for upgrades to the framing. On the second floor,the existing shelving systems will need to be removed, and the carpet will be removed along with the gyperete flooring to provide access to the sheathing for seismic upgrades for the framing system. The upgrade includes strapping, re-nailing, and installation of new blocking. ARCHITECTURE • Bookshelf Anchorage: All non-anchored bookshelves require anchorage to be added. ENGINEERING o Impact to Interior Walls— ■ Shear Walls: On the first floor and basement level the existing wood shear walls PLAN N I N G will require upgrades to include new sheathing on one side of all shear walls and INTERIORS re-nailing on the other side for the walls running N-S. This includes walls at the Page 16 main stair which impact the primary electrical gear at the basement level which will ‹fik need to be removed and reinstalled after the plywood is added. On the first floor, a new shear wall at Grid Line 2 will create a new alcove between the wall and the 61 exterior window in the teen library area. Programmatically this could be embraced as a private study room. o Restrooms&Accessibility— ■ Basement and First Floor Restrooms: Reconstruct non-compliant restrooms to meet ADA requirements including the replacement of an ADA-compliant drinking fountain. • Upper-Level Staff Restrooms: Reconstruct existing non-compliant toilet compartment and sink area to one ADA-compliant restroom and one non- 15895 SW 72ND AVE compliant restroom and new ADA-compliant quiet room for staff use. SUITE 200 • Mounting Heights: There are many elements throughout the building that are installed above the permitted reach range/mounting height. This includes fire PORTLAND,OR 97224 extinguisher cabinets, fire alarm pulls, signage, public phones, and first aid/spill kits. PHONE:503.226.I285 These all need to be lowered to code-required heights. FAX:503.226.I670 ■ Protruding Elements: There are several elements throughout the building that INFO a©C1DAINC.COM project too far from the wall surface at a height greater than permitted for cane WWW.CIDAINC.COM detection. This includes counters as part of the book return system, first aid cabinets, and drinking fountains. These all need the project depth reduced,the element lowered to be within cane-detection limits or mounted on a counter or with a furring wall/apron added under the element. • Stairs: All three stairs have issues with dimensional uniformity and excessive slopes on a few steps. Where removal of the stair is needed for a shear wall upgrade noted elsewhere in the evaluation,the stair should be rebuilt to code compliance. If the existing stair is not impacted or an alternate method of addressing the shear wall is determined,then the stairs should have repair work done to correct dimensional and slope issues to the extent viable. • Guardrails and Handrails: All three stairs have insufficient handrails. These need to be replaced regardless of the stair repairs noted above. This includes the extensions and returns at the top and bottom of the rails along with mounting heights. There is one segment of the main central stair at the basement level with insufficient guardrail height. The southern stair also has insufficient guardrail height at the upper run to the upper floor. Both these guardrail areas need to be addressed with increased height. • Exterior Guardrails: The exterior guardrails at retaining walls do not meet the code for heights and limits on intermediate rail spacing. These need to be replaced with code-compliant systems. - Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Assessment: • Elevator Machine Room: Due to excessive heat and odor, it is recommended that a dedicated exhaust fan be added to this room instead of the passive transfer grill above the door. • Electrical Upgrades: Correct basement electrical room deficiencies in the egress door swing and clearance at equipment. Equipment clearance markings need to be added throughout the building and materials stored in these areas relocated elsewhere. In-kind replacement of main electrical switchgear and distribution panels in the basement. • Lighting: The existing building lighting is primarily T8 fluorescent fixtures. For energy cost savings and efficiency, it is recommended that fixtures be retrofitted or ARCHITECTURE replaced with LED. Any fixture impacted by the ceiling work noted above should be replaced as a baseline with the remaining fixtures considered for retrofit or ENGINEERING replacement. PLANNING INTERIORS Page 17 Civil Site Assessment: ‹fik - ■ ADA Parking and Route: The existing ADA parking stalls and access aisles do not meet accessibility codes for slopes, signage, and locations. The route from the 61 ADA stalls to the main library entry also crosses behind two stalls through the main entry drive aisle. This is a safety issue given the movement is the primary vehicle maneuvering area and behind parked vehicles. CIDA recommends a complete replacement of the ADA parking in a location that removes these safety and accessibility barriers. - Cost Estimation: • The overall cost of construction, based on the information presented within this 15895 SW 72ND AVE report is estimated at$7,692,105. This includes estimating& construction SUITE 200 contingencies (I 0%) and escalation (3.5%). Escalation is estimated at three years PORTLAND,OR 97224 to account for funding, design, and permitting schedules. Additional years should be considered if the project start is delayed beyond this timeframe. PHONE:503.226.I285 • This is a scope-specific estimate, which is less than a wholesale renovation based FAX:503.226.I670 on a generalized cost per square foot. INFO a©CIDAINC.COM • The cost estimate is based on a single and continuous construction schedule WWW.C1DAINC.COM without owner occupancy within the building. If the project were to be phased to allow for partial occupancy during construction,the timeline and associated costs would be increased by an estimate 1.5 times the provided construction cost. • The cost estimate is estimated at an approximate eight-month construction schedule. This does not include owner-occupant move-out and move-in times which would bring the total time of library shut-down to an estimated ten to twelve months. • In addition to the construction cost (hard costs),the project cost summation includes additional soft costs including design, permitting, inspection, and operational or staffing estimates. These soft costs are applied at percentages of overall construction cost at a range of 20%to 30%. The soft cost range is estimated at$1,538.423 to $2,307,633. • CIDA recommends an overall Owner's project contingency beyond the construction contingency as noted within the summation section. This owner contingency of 5% is estimated at$461,526 to $499,987. • The combined (construction + soft cost range + project contingency) brings the overall estimated project costs to $9,692,054 to $10,499,725. CONCLUSION: Based on the onsite review of the existing building along with the review of previous documentation and drawings of the building,the existing Lake Oswego Public Library would require significant renovations to meet the city requirements for seismic upgrades to the existing structure along with addressing deficiencies in ADA accessibility of the site and building. In addition,the building is roughly 40 years old and is showing signs of degradation of many elements specifically as it relates to exterior elevated wood structures (patio) and components of the siding and window systems. The roughly$9.7 million to $10.5 million estimate for addressing the issues identified within this report will allow the city to maintain the existing library at its current size and service capacity. The remodel scope identified does not include any additional square footage or internal programmatic adjustments to meet changing library and city needs. This estimate will only address the ADA, water intrusion, seismic, and associated building maintenance and upgrades ARCHITECTURE noted within the evaluation reports. ENGINEERING Expansion on this site to increase the size of the building to expand services would in turn PLAN N I N G impact the parking and site circulation. Any addition to the building would trigger seismic upgrades to the existing building and would likely require seismic isolation and/or separation of INTERIORS new and existing structures. Page 18 ‹fik Architectural Assessment The architectural review included a review and documentation of water intrusion, building code 61 requirements, ADA upgrades, and general building conditions. This review and assessment was completed by CIDA's architectural staff and also addresses the reciprocal impacts of the = remaining assessment noted below. CIDA's architectural review team was present for the three U site visits noted in the Executive Summary. The comments and observations noted below could be from any or all of the site visits,the date of the observations is not necessarily included in the summary to follow. CIDA's assessment report below will generally follow the following sequence. The associated 15895 SW 72ND AVE abbreviations are then used to number the observed conditions for reference and connection to SUITE 200 applicable photos and/or graphics. PORTLAND,OR 97224 ❑ Basement level (B#) PHONE:503.226.1285 ❑ Main floor level (M#) ❑ Upper floor(U#) FAX:503.226.1670 ❑ Main stair(ST-M#) At elevator which connects the basement to the main and upper floors. INFO a©CIDAINC.COM ❑ Back stair(ST-B#) At the north end of the building. Connects the basement to the main and upper floors. WWW.CIDAINC.COM ❑ South stair(ST-S#) At the south end of the main floor stack area. Connects the main to the upper floor. ❑ Elevator(E#) ❑ Roof(R#) ❑ Building exterior(BE#) ❑ Site and parking lot (S#) There are components of the interior assessment which will include exterior notes, as such if necessary to avoid duplication of information reference between documentation elements noted for additional information. Where sketches or diagrams are provided,they will follow with captions and notes to the impacted area. The review format below includes bulletized comments of observed issues or discrepancies followed by a general comment on proposed remedies in red italics. 1111— Review Location ❑ Description of observation. o Remedy notes. BASEMENT LEVEL (B): 4r2Irr - �V r :a.-• N I y The floor plan to the right 46 rs u shows the 1982 drawing of I ___--1,i I_ as the basement plan. This sio= Wit — 1 "' layout is more or less F==,111 -- 1 B2 1I Il B3 �i. B accurate to the existing �MP1 �1 `� �� 4 !% E t conditions at the time of ; I' - •L, __ .—"----sr ei - sTOR inspection with the ��. 1; -1: — ' I • ;1 % I j following exceptions: '� �aFFICI- • Stair 2 terminates in linernlFsaz yl�oAlaR.RY ,�° ^ 4i-I _..; 4. b with the elevator wall. j I HMI' __ • —fb 72 • The door arrangement —" 1 ~' x "„� �'I in the electrical roomv. ARCHITECTURE was changed. Q '0.d • The two storage rooms - I ENGINEERING at the upper right are �"` I combined. ,.�_ t. � ., a -- PLANNING INTERIORS Page 19 B I — Electrical & Elevator Machine Room ‹fik o Remove and relocate to storage ❑ Storage of materials and equipment arounareas.d electrical panels and associated equipment. 61 ❑ Oversized boxes on upper shelves exceed shelf depth. o Relocate to a properly sized shelf. ❑ Fire extinguisher set on the floor. o Mount to proper mounting height with placard tent/signage above. ❑ Machine room pump exhaust and excess heat in the room. o See mechanical assessment for remedy. ❑ Evidence (staining) of a previous water leak at the south wall of the storage room. Based on further review of conditions this area is directly below where the original generator 15895 SW 72ND AVE room was located. The generator was removed in a previous project scope and the SUITE 200 room was converted to a new function and existing louver was infilled and new exterior wall mounted electrical components were added at the exterior. It is possible that water PORTLAND,OR 97224 intrusion related to one of these previous modifications contributed to the leak at the PHONE:503.226.1285 basement. The siding at the location of the exterior electrical components has significant FAX:503.226.1670 splits in excess of I/8" aligned with mounting locations and knots in the siding. The tops INFO a©C1DAINC.COM of these units do not have flashing which lap into the siding. Additionally,the downspout WWW.CIDAINC.COM in this proximity should be reviewed for proper function. o Remove and reinstall exterior electrical components. Patch and replace siding. Install head flashing at tops of electrical boxes. Clean and maintain gutter and downspout. 11 , ... -17-\\.1' A.Allik. .. Electrical Room/Storage Storage in front of electrical Boxes overhanging shelling Previous leak staining in ceiling = cam_ •- LASHING IA Ext.electrical over leak location Splitting of siding at electrical No head flashing at electrical equipment B I — Electrical & Elevator Machine Room — Continued . RE_"p.���K ❑ Reciprocal impact: See structural report for required 6.4=2; seismic upgrade for new shear wall sheathing (green 1 j, eTsr=a;; Mil highlight to right). This will require the removal and 11I • " ow p replacement of electrical gear. Rebuild the stairs for full rr ____. r„ ,w, ARCHITECTURE height sheathing. 1 I - - . ®;",;° o Remove and replace electrical gear and stair framing1 a"r r EN G I N E E RI N G as required for installation of shear wall sheathing, , .11 i1 I I .,� PLANNINGiaNti - I nailing, and associated blocking per structural seismic k.i analysis. 4 `I: u— a I srs nrr. .c r�r INTERIORS = Page 110 1 B2— Basement Restrooms &Water Fountain ‹,„k The restroom notes listed below apply to the two single-user restrooms in the basement unless noted otherwise. ❑ The water fountain was noted in the previous ADA study to not be in compliance. The 61 conditions still exist. Not compliant for high/low function. The location in an alcove is not sufficient for cane detection. o Replace the fountain as part of the suggested remodel of restrooms (see below) with ADA-compliant height and ADA apron or increased alcove depth. ❑ Restroom doors are not accessible for ADA latch-side pull approach on the interior of the restrooms. The required approach width is 48" if no closer and 54" with a closer (see ADA diagram below). The existing condition is 41" clear. There appears to have 15895 SW 72ND AVE been a previous attempt to rectify this by adding automatic door operators to remove SUITE 200 the width requirement for the approach. However,the power-operated section (ICC- PORTLAND,OR 97224 404.3.4) of the code doesn't specifically note that this reduces the approach. The operators have however been "deactivated"thus the doors function with manual PHONE:503.226.I285 operation. The previous report incorrectly noted a lack of strike side clearance (5" FAX:503.226.I670 provided, 12" required) assuming a forward approach to the door, however,the primary INFO a©C1DAINC.COM approach to the door, which complies with code for maneuvering clearance, is a hinge- WWW.C1DAINC.COM side push approach. o See the suggested remodel below to fully address door operation and other requirements. ❑ Signage does not comply with height (48"—60") or location (18"x 18" clear centered on sign). o Reposition sign as part of the suggested remodel below. ❑ The existing plumbing fixtures (water closet& counter mounted lavatory) and toilet room accessories (grab bars, TP dispenser, seat cover dispenser, PT dispenser and soap dispenser) do not comply with ADA requirements for clearances, positioning, projection depth, and mounting heights. This includes a missing rear wall and 18" vertical grab bars. The southern restroom also does not comply with the location of the flush lever on the water closet tank, which needs to be on the open side of the room (right-hand side). o The plumbing fixture clearance issues will require repositioning and replacement of existing fixture types. Coupled with the door clearance issue noted above a complete reconstruction is required to meet codes. See the suggested restroom layout drawing exhibit in the architectural assessment appendix. / liti. ;I. - , . ip Covered door o.erator DF in alcove Hine-a.proach.ush side Pull side latch a..roach • �: ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING e Insufficient clear and positioning Misc.ADA deficiencies MSC ADA deficiencies&door clearance PLANNING INTERIORS Page I I I B3 —Story Tg ‹fik ❑ TheTime recessed tieredieredSeatin seating allows for kids to gather for story time. A wheelchair user would not be required to navigate the steps to participate as there is space at the top. 61 There are currently no handrails on either side wall of the tiered seating. There is a storage room at the lowest tier. Suggest installation of a handrail on end walls to support navigation of the steps. Additional contrast to the step nosing suggested to aid in visual detection of the change in elevation. U .. o Install standard pipe handrail at both ends of the steps, including applicable solid blockin• in stud walls. Addition contrasting nosing to the carpet. 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 b-- . , PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 Suggested handrail&stair nosing locations 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM WWW.C1DAINC.COM B4—Storage / Sump Pump Room ❑ Storage of materials and equipment around electrical panels and associated equipment. o Remove and relocate to storage areas. E Storage under the stairs appears to have been modified since the original drawings. Unclear if sufficient fire rating and sprinkler coverage extends in this area still. The conduit and electrical box from the previous wall layout remain. o Suggest removing items and closing off under the stairs including correction of the electrical outlet. A. ill 4 . NS 1.... * Misc materials at equipment Revised access&misc.storage under stair B5 —Children's Library—Sloped Glazed Lightwell ❑ The sloped glazing at the lightwell area at the north end of the basement shows signs of previous leaks on the upper walls. o Recommend full glazing seals review and reglaze glass in existing frames where seals are compromised. Install new reglet flashing that extends under adjacent siding trim and onto sloped glazing. See the suggested flashing exhibit in the architectural assessment appendix. ❑ Access to the lightwell area via an operable windowpane is within reach of children. o Recommend replacement with a locking latch system. E Existing drawings do not clearly indicate where tempered glazing was used, and marking was not observed in the field. o Replace existing with tempered glazing as applicable. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 112 B5 —Children's Library—Sloped Glazed Lightwell — Continued ‹fik k . : .k........„. ., ---_ 1. U .. _ - -_ __ __ill, 15895 SW 72ND AVE Non-secured operable latch. Staining from previous leak Staining from previous leak. SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 B6—Children's Library ❑ Signage located through the basement level does not have adequate braille, raised PHONE:503.226.I285 characters, and pictograms as well as being mounted beyond reach range elevations. FAX:503.226.1670 o Replace signage with ADA-compliant signs and locate within 48"-60" reach range. INFO a©C1DAINC.COM ❑ The fire extinguisher cabinet, along with the emergency backpack and first aid kits are WWW.C1DAINC.COM blocked by misc. items and mounted beyond operable reach range. o Remove misc. stored items and install a new fire extinguisher cabinet. o Recommend relocating first aid items to the area behind the librarian's desk and out of the general children's library area. Mount in new location within 48" reach range. ❑ Fire alarm pull mounted beyond reach range. o Reinstall at lower elevation to be within 48" reach range. ❑ Reference computer station along the east wall does not comply with ADA requirements for operable parts, reach range, and knee clearance. o Replace the station with an ADA-compliant desk for computer station use. ❑ Abandoned mounting pole and electrical outlet from previous kiosk. o Remove unnecessary equipment from children's library area. ❑ Blocked light switch and outlet by bookcases. o Rearrange bookcase units to allow access to switch. Ai It, k . . - .. i 4 — ' , Non-compliant signage. Blocked/non-compliant items Non-compliant computer station Abandoned kiosk post. . - ;ilit:. ARCHITECTURE ) , I . . r. I• 'y r • ENGINEERING Abandoned kiosk post&outlet Blocked switch and outlet. Compliant computer station. PLANNING INTERIORS Pagel 13 ‹fik B6— ren' rary C • ❑Child ReciprocalsLib impact—: See structontinued ural report for :Wm :e _ ._.1 � I required seismic upgrade for new shear wall "!r•fia cam,7 .crb I a 61 sheathing (green highlight to right) located at ; — the back wall of the office to the stairwell. This will require the removal and replacement of L_ _i �r_o j ,! finishes. elro °rU o Remove and replace interior finishes as LEI required for installation of shear wall — 41 sheathing, nailing, and associated blocking t JTu[].e �,fL I ' Tr o• s 1 per structural seismic analysis. [src.COL i i I 1 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 MAIN LEVEL (M): PHONE:503.226.1285 The floor plan below shows the current first-floor layout following the 20 16 & 2017 remodels to the original 1982 design. This layout is more or less accurate to the existing conditions at the FAX:503.226.I670 time of inspection with the following exceptions: INFO a©C1DAINC.COM • The trash & recycling room along with the existing generator rooms are now used for WWW.C1DAINC.COM storage. — — .1 � M 5 _ . I 1 M4 1 I ' .... - '...r - - -1 1 'M 6 .,..t.-I M 7 I ._. Li ....IIrLI I II I_ _ I r M3 i I I I I t , I i i Ir — 1 r 1 M2 II M1 'i 1 I il II _ �i - _ _ _ ... --1- __ _.,. _ ___ _ _ i- . I - M I - Entry Vestibule ❑ Book return counter protrudes beyond the permitted depth for the installed height. o Revise installation to lower the height of the protruding element to 27" or less or reduce projection to less than or equal to 4" from the exterior wall. Alternately the area under the projecting counter could be infilled or an apron installed to provide the cane detection requirements. ❑ Courtesy phone exceeds reach range limits for operable parts and clear floor space not maintained. o Reduce mounting height to less than 48"to all operable elements and relocate furnishings to allow for reach for 30" wide forward approach centered on phone. ❑ Fire alarm pull mounted beyond reach range. o Reinstall at lower elevation to be within 48" reach range. ARCHITECTURE ❑ Missing tactile and braille exit signage adjacent to both sets of doors in series. o Install the missing sign. ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 114 MI — Entry Vestibule— Continued ‹fik W fled El 4.411.6 • _t: .._ 61 JO° Ilk ; 41 "171—r 15895 SW 72ND AVE Book return shelf. Courtesy phone. Library entry/exit. Fire alarm pull. SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 M2— Restrooms &Water Fountain The restroom notes listed below apply to both the multi-stall men's and women's restrooms on the PHONE:503.226.I285 main floor level unless noted otherwise. FAX:503.226.I670 ❑ The water fountain was noted in the previous ADA study to not be in compliance. The INFO a©C1DAINC.COM conditions still exist. Not compliant for high/low function. The location in an alcove is WWW.C1DAINC.COM not sufficient for cane detection. o Replace the fountain as part of the suggested remodel of restrooms (see below) with ADA-compliant height and ADA apron or increased alcove depth. ❑ Maneuvering clearances at the interior pull-side approach to the restroom doors is insufficient (less than I 8"). Restroom doors are not accessible for ADA forward approach on the interior of the restrooms. o See the suggested remodel below to fully address door operation and other requirements. ❑ Signage does not comply with height (48" — 60") or location (I 8"x 18" clear centered on the sign). o Reposition sign as part of the suggested remodel below. ❑ The women's restroom is missing insulation under the lavatory counter for the drainpipe and hot water supply lines. There is also a secondary hose bib under the counter which should be removed back to the wall out of maneuvering areas. o Install pipe insulation kits as part of the suggested remodel below. ❑ The flooring at transitions and outside corners including the integral coved base is delaminating from the wall surface and damaged. o Replace flooring as part of the suggested remodel below. ❑ Missing floor drain in multi-stall restroom. There is a cleanout lid on a floor drain location which may just need to be removed, or a new drain may be required. o Address floor drain requirement as part of the suggested remodel below. ❑ The existing plumbing fixtures (water closet& counter mounted lavatory) and toilet room accessories (grab bars, TP dispenser, seat cover dispenser, PT dispenser, and soap dispenser) do not comply with ADA requirements for clearances, positioning, projection depth, lengths, centerlines, and mounting heights. This includes missing 18" vertical grab bars and the location of other elements within too close of proximity to grab bars (biohazard receptacle). o The plumbing fixture clearance issues will require repositioning and replacement of existing fixture types. Coupled with the door clearance issue noted above a complete reconstruction is required to meet codes. See the suggested restroom layout drawing exhibit in the architectural assessment appendix. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 115 M2— Restrooms & Water Fountain — Continued ‹fik rs _15 0 C U . r . 15895 SW 72ND AVE Ent to restrooms and drnkin,fountains Wall hun:lay w/out insulation Non-compliant accessible stall. r—w SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.I 285 _ _ E FAX:503.226.1670 Cd 1NFO a©C1DAINC.COM or WWW.C1DAINC.COM Non compliantaccessible stall Intenor maneuvering obstruction. Floorrngand coved base damage. M3 — General Stack Area ❑ Reciprocal impact: See the structural report for the required seismic upgrade for new floor framing strapping and blocking requirements for the 2"d floor framing. This will require significant removal and replacement of existing ceiling finishes on the main floor level in the highlighted areas (yellow and green) in the plan snippet below. The removal of ceiling finishes will also permit the replacement of damaged materials and conditions related to water intrusion evidenced by the visible color deterioration of many of the wood slat ceiling elements. o Remove and reinstall/replace ceiling treatment and subsurface sheathing as part of the seismic upgrade to the upper floor framing system. I l I -'17.— I ' = I . i III ;;i I }. • I I ;:r - _� _ .1,E1 ,..1 -:.. 1::: itzi-,,,,---=.7 ,-.. .i .:. — ' , .1._ . Ec — ,_ 7 , 44 t :: t& ,i1 , . , ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Pagel 16 ❑ Reciprocal impact: See the structural , �•U U U „��] — ‹fik report for the required seismic 1 T T upgrade for shear wall plywood to be " "'' installed on the interior elevation of ®;._ the highlighted walls (yellow) to the _ F. ,_ _ -- - right within thegeneral stack area of ""`" =— —ram u' g 4, -rws,e the library. This will require significant *Tr r :V VI- removal and replacement of -- i- bookcases, shelving and existing wall `'"rr finishes on the main floor level in the I I ►1■�� 1 highlighted areas in the plan snippet tf '' � � 15895 SW 72ND AVE below. T, r1 1" r-43 Pr I Fri L o Remove and reinstall/replace cases - SUITE 200 _ and wall finishes as part of the PORTLAND,OR 97224 :„; _ 'uwr w ` y__•:�- .; seismic upgrade to the upper floor �' :s-:h _ , PHONE:503.226.I285 framing system. - FAX:503.226.I670 ❑ Reciprocal impact: See the structural INFO a©C1DAINC.COM report for the required seismic upgrade for the installation of a new shear wall and WWW.CIDAINC.COM footing at the southern portion of the main floor. This will require the removal of the existing slab on grade for new footing under the shear wall. This new wall is located on Grid Line 2 between Grids C and D in the snippet plan above right, and marked with red dashed lines and yellow highlight showing the sheathing and nailing requirement noted above. This new full-height wall on the main floor level will be approximately 8' behind the existing southern wall of the library teen area. Due to the location of this wall program modifications to the library could enclose this area for additional storage (see M4 below) or a potential private study room. o Remove and reinstall/replace concrete slab on grade along with floor finishes as part of the seismic upgrade to the upper floor framing system. Address programmatic issues created by the new shear wall location to include potential storage or study rooms. ❑ The fire extinguisher cabinet, along with the emergency backpack and first aid kits are blocked by misc. items and mounted beyond operable reach range. o Remove misc. stored items and install a new fire extinguisher cabinet. o Mount within 48" reach range. ❑ Reference computer station along the east wall does not comply with ADA requirements for operable parts, reach range, and knee clearance. o Replace the station with an ADA-compliant desk for computer station use. ❑ Evidence of previous water intrusion around windows at seals and windowsills. Several windows have broken seals allowing for fogging of windows between the panes of glass. Horizontal blinds are damaged in several locations. o Recommend full glazing seals review and reglaze glass in existing frames where seals are compromised. Install new head flashing with drip edge that extends under adjacent siding trim projects well beyond the face of glass. See additional comments on siding and flashing as part of the exterior section of this report below. See suggested window wrap and trim details as part of architectural drawing exhibits in the appendix. o Replace or remove all mini-blinds. ❑ Miscellaneous signs throughout have no tactile or braille. o Replace directional and informational signage with new signs to include braille characters. ARCHITECTURE CIEmergency backpack and defibrillator mounted above reach range limits. o Remount at lower elevation to comply with ADA reach range requirements. ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 117 M3 — General Stack Area— Continued ‹fik PI .,7_ f/r/Fill , 1111 ;a i m ! 11'. �, / ojf U , _ MIN i, 15895 SW 72ND AVE Extirwsher mounted too hi h Non-compliant com.uter station Ceilin:dama.e. Defibrillator&backpack too high. SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 : ' r' - PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM WWW.C1DAINC.COM Ceilin•dama•e. Sill and wall dama e from water intrusion Fo ed window a broken seal Damaged mini-blinds Signage missing braille. Signage missing braille M4—Storage Room ❑ This storage room is extremely full when the chair cart is inside and the size of the cart and chair storage system has caused damage to the existing conditions. Access to the light switch is difficult until the cart is removed and is located within a notched portion of the existing storage shelving. o Recommend for operational ease of use, reduce the number of chairs stored in this room. This could include the removal of shelving units and the replacement of one cart with two smaller or secondary storage elsewhere in the building. Potential additional storage room as part of new shear wall impact noted below. am• _ j 11111101k . -,. 5,--,--?-00r7e,,, _; switch.' Chair cart&shelving. Shelving w/notch at light switch ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Pagel 18 M5 — Exit Cl‹fik Door clearance does not comply with ADA requirements for forward approach for doors with closer and latch (12" minimum) 61 o Review the framing of the existing wall directly south of the egress door to allow for a 12" approach on the latch side. ❑ The fire extinguisher cabinet is blocked by an emergency backpack and mounted beyond operable reach range. o Relocate emergency backpack to alternate location away from fire extinguisher cabinet (see the potential for the south wall of egress door, if reframed further south to allow for both backpack and 12" approach noted above). o Mount within 48" reach range. 15895 SW 72ND AVE ❑ Fire alarm pull mounted beyond reach range. SUITE 200 o Reinstall at lower elevation to be within 48" reach range. ❑ Missing tactile and braille exit signage adjacent to both sets of doors in series. PORTLAND,OR 97224 o Install the missing sign. PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM WWW.C1DAINC.COM e 711111, p. Non-compliant clearance Extinguisher mounted too high. M6— Reference/Circulation Desk ❑ ADA height portion of the center help/information desk is covered by display items. Minimum ADA clear surface width of 36" is not maintained. o Note that this was positioned as such to provide ADA access to the "Seed Library" collection cabinet which is within reach range. Thus this is acceptable provided that the adjacent height adjustable portion of this desk maintains maximum height and minimum width clearance for ADA. ADA counter blocked by display items. M7—Staff Coffee Counter & Staff Lockers Room ❑ The ADA approach to the bar counter sink does not comply with the side approach. This requires a 30"x48" clear floor space centered on the sink. The existing condition has only 20"to one side before being blocked of the side wall. o Remove a portion of the return wall to be flush with countertop to allow for a clear approach. Alternately the sink could be reinstalled 4"to the east to be further from the wall to meet clearance requirements. ARCHITECTURE ❑ Employee lockers are located within the latch side approach to the storage room (east ENGINEERING side of hallway) door clearance. A required clearance of the pull side latch approach before the latch is 24" along the wall and 48" perpendicular to the wall. PLAN N I N G o Relocate a minimum of the two northern stacks of lockers. The remaining three INTERIORS stacks are outside of the minimum approach. Page 119 M7—Staff Coffee Counter & Staff Lockers Room — Continued ‹fik \il„,v. , P , 61 -6 - V94/07 - 9 U . . clear Workroom sink clearance. Storage room door clearance at lockers. M8—Workroom 15895 SW 72ND AVE ❑ Miscellaneous items (book return equipment, shelving) blocking control elements SUITE 200 including light switch, equipment controls, and thermostat. PORTLAND,OR 97224 o Relocate items that limit employee access to controls including environmental PHONE:503.226.I285 controls for a minimum 30" wide forward approach. Maintain a minimum of 12" FAX:503.226.1670 clearance between control and associated elements. ❑ The wall-mounted phone exceeds reach range limits for operable parts. INFO a©C1DAINC.COM o Reduce mounting height to less than 48"to all operable elements. WWW.C1DAINC.COM ❑ First aid center mounted directly over"push to exit" signage and light switch. The location blocks sufficient visual of these elements and impedes access and use. The mounting height and mounting style exceed the reach range and projection is beyond projection limits for heights above 27" above the floor. o Relocate cabinet that limit employee access to controls including environmental controls for a minimum 30" wide forward approach. Maintain a minimum of 12" clearance between control and associated elements. o Mount at a new location within reach range and ensure compliance with project requirements related to cane detection through proper height, semi-recessed or installation of cane detection infill below unit. ' IT! ,a it a v - - F, hesR € Switches under cabinet. Phone in workroom. Switches/controls blocked by shelving/equipment ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 120 UPPER LEVEL (U): ‹fik The floor plan below shows the 1982 drawing of the upper level. This plan is mostly accurate to the existing conditions. However, additional offices were constructed in the area between grid 61 line 8 and 10 and from C to D. ® - ® @ 1 ! 9 ® 1 0 Ivp o m Uf ,a •,I- L fir 1 p° • k'r — jj ®e. bfr— v j--- - r I1 UI I V2 '! • 15895 SW 72ND AVE �' , s� • :1 , E 200 I '`xf•_ ,.:� ,. `,7^;_--• • f :;6u r- PORTLAND, 224 � no 1 U5 1 y � � E 7,T,` H a - ,' jr 1 = I . --k .Y PHONE:503.226.I285 • I I `{ -' FAX:503.226.1670 0 , . I _.. i • rL^-.- ,t I. c© INFO a©C1DAINC.COM - l I I. � 11 i1 WWW.CIDAINC.COM a I r � t�1� 7' U4 IU3l1 I1 0-� _ I 1 © _ i -- - - -r c L _ 11 r -,- _ ... F1 . .r } i .. - � �/ yI I crr,.xr.. Oil v`d i Nd , S.s' , i• �nPllll 1 t-� tb (0® U I —Upper-Level Employee Restrooms The restroom notes listed below apply to the two single-user restrooms on the upper level. ❑ The two existing single-user employee restrooms do not comply with any ADA requirements. While other ADA-compliant restrooms would be provided elsewhere in the building including an employee restroom located on the main floor in the employee workroom area,this would require an employee to use a restroom on another floor from their potential work area and the employee lockers and lunchroom. It is recommended to provide equal availability on the different floors of the building that these restrooms be remodeled to provide at minimum one fully ADA-compliant restroom on the upper level. Given the structural limitations and significant impacts to other programmatic functions of the building, it does not appear readily achievable to construct two ADA-compliant single-user restrooms in this area. o See the suggested remodel below to fully address the suggested ADA remodel. WWI. 11110 , li . Employee quiet room Employee restroom sink area Employee restroom sink area ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 1 21 U2 —Employee Breakroom ‹fik ❑ Modification of the breakroom is anticipated to reposition furnishes and secondary counter to accommodate ADA circulation and locker relocation as part of the U I 61 restroom modification above. o Revise counter, furniture and lockers as indicated in the architectural drawing exhibit located in the appendix. .: - e. 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.I 285 FAX:503.226.1670 Employee lockers 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM WWW.CIDAINC.COM U3 — Conference Room ❑ The entry door to the conference room does not meet accessibility clearance requirements for egress maneuvering. An 18" clear width to the latch side for the pull approach is required and approximately 6" is provided. o A possible solution is to swing this door in the opposite direction creating a push- side approach from the inside of the conference room. Modification of furnishings would be required instead of reframing of existing walls. ❑ The door to the exterior deck has a similar approach and maneuvering clearance issue. Where positioned the door would require modification of the closet/mech room wall to the north. The door hardware is also no-complaint. o Revise this door swing for an exterior swing to increase maneuvering clearance at the door. Alternately if the door swing remained,the the closet to the north would need to reduce approximately 18" in depth to allow the door approach. This alternate modification could also allow for the conference entry door noted above to remain in same swing direction and meet with the clear approach requirements by moving the closet door. o Replace existing door hardware with ADA-compliant lever hardware and install new ADA-compliant threshold to exterior deck to address gap at floor surface. tio S f a-k-Firr.// „ _ I I \\ Conference room door layout Non-compliant door hardware Gap at the threshold U4—Wood Framed Exterior Deck ❑ The wood deck has significant framing and drainage issues which have compounded ARCHITECTURE upon each other. The design included open deck boards over pressure-treated sleeper systems and a solid drainage system to an internal gutter system under the boards. This ENGINEERING drainage system then was piped under the deck to the stormwater system similar to a PLAN N I N G downspout. The system originally included a planter against the outer guardrail wall which has been removed and a secondary pipe rail was added to the top of the parapet INTERIORS guardrail to increase the height. Page 122 Given the ongoing failures of the drainage system, a portion of the deck has had the ‹fik boards removed and the drainage gutter is exposed. This portion of the deck is essentially blocked off from access. 61 Given the amount of modification needed to replace deteriorated deck boards,the sleeper system and drainage components, it is expected that reframing is likely required as well. The framing components are not visible to inspection without selective partial demolition. The open drainage deck boards present additional hurdles to accessibility in addition to allowing debris to collect between the deck boards and the sub-decking drainage system. The spacing between boards exceeds permitted ADA requirements and the cupping and bowing of the boards due to absorption and the swell/dry cycle 15895 SW 72ND AVE makes the surface uneven and a hazard to mobility-impaired patrons. SUITE 200 o Based on the observed conditions and expected condition of concealed framing members a complete reframe is anticipated. With the reframing, a solid surface PORTLAND,OR 97224 decking with a weatherproof traffic coating system is recommended with a traditional PHONE:503.226.I285 grated trench drain along the original concealed gutter. FAX:503.226.1670 INFO a©C1DAINC.COM This deck coating system will provide a uniform walking surface and a sheet flow (I- WWW.CIDAINC.COM 2% slope) for drainage to the gutter. Where debris and settlement could trap between boards and sleepers clogging the drainage the coated solid surface system would be easier to maintain. The trench drain system would then be the only element to monitor drainage issues. In addition to the multiple drain points under the existing gutter which would allow for regular drainage in a weather event or cleaning, it is recommended that a minimum of two overflow drainpipes be added within the gutter. One at either end. These two overflow lines would include a 2" collar above the inlet in the gutter to begin flow either in heavy rain or when the primary drains are impeded. The outlet of the overflow drains should not be piped to the storm system and instead should be 'daylit'to be readily observed to notify of needed observation and potential maintenance of the primary gutter and drain system. The daylit outfall, versus hardpiped, would be a visible indication that the primary drain is compromised. See the recommended drainage system details in the architectural drawing exhibits in the_as iendix. 1/00, . -",or*-----,.,._-,-. 7. . ..._. -.... .. , :•ce .. .. ,7 ' I.i:--. 'g.'- /- --... ---. __,4- ..-A-,14', Deck gutter systems Degraded boards. Degraded boards. Exposed/raise screws. ARCHITECTUR._. . - F. . ENGINEERING F rT PLANNING Overview of deck boards Clogged deck boards. Transition to removed decking Area where decking removed INTERIORS Page 123 US - k ‹fik ❑General ReciprocalStac imAreapact: See the structural report for the required seismic upgrade for new floor framing strapping and blocking requirements for the 2"d floor framing. This will 61 require significant removal and replacement of existing flooring (gyperete underlayment and finishes) on the upper floor level in the highlighted areas (yellow and green) in the plan snippet below. o Remove and reinstall/replace the flooring material and gyperete substrate for U I I installation of requirement structural blocking and strapping system per structural assessment report. 15895 SW 72ND AVE ,�_ 0►! ';►i „'e+ 4 kS t""" {-tj Wit- I,r SUITE 200 1 # - - - = :. '' I PORTLAND,OR 97224 -!{R .a . !' L =� . PHONE 503.226.I285 ,J)® I — - A : `e FAX:503.226.I670 I e �. •. --= _ — - . � : 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM �� - a_ ' a 0 I .wrr41•• _ 'T" Ft* . 11 a r 4 .' i. WWW.C1DAINC.COM 0, -j p� j g • . 6 ' r .i 1 aim �.^ . = r �" w ,-® ....w I f'. .. .. ❑ Evidence of previous water intrusion around windows at seals and windowsills. Several windows have broken seals allowing for fogging of windows between the panes of glass. Horizontal blinds are damaged in several locations. Additional water intrusion damage was noted at roof framing members. o Recommend full glazing seals review and reglaze glass in existing frames where seals are compromised. Install new head flashing with drip edge that extends under adjacent siding trim projects well beyond the face of glass. See additional comments on siding and flashing as part of the exterior section of this report below. See suggested window wrap and trim details as part of architectural drawing exhibits in the appendix. o Replace or remove all mini-blinds. ❑ The drainage system at the sawtooth roofs is discussed further in the roofing section. On the upper floor level of the building,there are signs of water intrusion related to these drain systems. This includes efflorescence in the brick to moisture, degradation of the drainpipe insulation, settlement and staining on top of the column wraps at the drain pipes and some rusting at the associated structural steel plates to the glulam roof beams. o Modification of the roof drains is discussed in the roof section to follow. If the system remains as-is in terms of layout and function,then a full path and repair and sealing is required. This includes new pipe insulation and corrective measures to the steel members for the roof framing. ❑ Wood slat ceiling finishes show signs of damage related to water intrusion evidenced by the visible color deterioration of many of the wood slat ceiling elements. o Remove and reinstall/replace ceiling treatment. ❑ Reference computer stations do not comply with ADA requirements for operable parts, ARCHITECTURE reach range, and knee clearance. o Replace the station with an ADA-compliant desk for computer station use. ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 124 U5 — General Stack Area—Continued AIIIIILI U L., - *ileai& 15895 SW 72ND AVE Water intrusion at window. Stainin•at water intrusion. Fo._•ed window seals Fogged window seals. SUITE 200 1 ` rilillj - _ Y1• _ PORTLAND,OR 97224 � 'ti 2; PHONE:503.226.I 285 \ ,' FAX:503.226.1670 1 INFO©CIDAINC.COM _ - WWW.CIDAINC.COM Nh - - 'il: . y -"or ilill Water damage&door to frame scrapes Typical roof drain. T•ical roof drain and overflow drain•i•es - i. 1 Stainin.on_•lu-lam. Stain!on ceilin_boards Staining underside of beam in contact w/brick �• ,� u:1 4a 14119 II 400. Non-compliant computer stations. Monitoring stickers at delaminatingglu-lam beam ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 125 MAIN STAIR (ST-M): ‹fik The floor plan to the right shows the 1982 drawing for three ;. - .z• T g levels of the "main stair", or"stair 2" as referenced in the yffl 61 original drawings. The general layout of these stairs as depicted —H, in the drawings wrapping around the elevator is still c� •IIIPflHI representative of the existing conditions. The minor deviation ' ' IHHh1 1 __ is at the basement level where the stair does not turn directionW�� U around another landing in front of the elevator,the bottom _ treads stop at the front wall of the elevator. oY :y! - as f!« This stair connects all three levels of the existing building. From �f a 4 ] 15895 SW 72ND AVE the basement level to the main floor level,there are two UPPER LEVEL SUITE 200 sections of stairs in a 90-degree L-shaped configuration with I I one intermediate landing. From the main level to the upper PORTLAND,OR 97224 level of the building,the stairs are three sections in a U-shaped PHONE:503.226.I285 configuration wrapping around the elevator and have two ; """ FAX:503.226.I 670 intermediate landings. E INFO a©C1DAINC.COM WWW.CIDAINC.COM ❑ Over the course of the two levels of stairs,there are multiple locations where the stair riser height and tread depth varies. Most of the variation is within the dimensional uniformity limit of the code (3/8") over the (C 4 course of a flight of stairs. There are locations where aeoutio LEVEL the variation of tread depth is approximately %2" and the riser height variation is approximately %2". There are also observed locations on the treads where ` 7_ l '.rr the slope of the tread is greater than 2%. In general, interior treads require no slope as there is no drainage. However,this isn't specifically noted as a requirement ) �— X , ... -r-- thus the basis for noting where a slope is excessive is 1 ‘i the 2% limit for landings and stairs at drainage - .,,...,.spa conditions (i.e. exterior). CYE ©STAIRS 2 ENLARGED PLAN The conditions of dimensional uniformity and tread .' •: BASEMEN LEVEL slope create a hazard to users. The finishes on the stairs, in this case carpet, can impact the conditions as well. o The minor deviation of the dimensional conditions in and of itself does not necessarily constitute a need for a complete rebuild of the stairs. However, as noted elsewhere in this report and structural seismic evaluation,there is a requirement to add additional shear walls at the stairwell locations. As such the requirement to add full-height plywood on the stair side is likely to require reframing of the stair. At that time, if it is indeed triggered,the stairs should be rebuilt within the limits of the code. o As an alternate should the shear wall blocking and nailing not require the removal of existing stair framing,the stairs should have the existing carpet removed, and review the treads and risers to see if minor modifications to the materials can remove some of the dimensional uniformity and keep all treads to level instead of random sloped treads. ❑ Handrails for all sections of stairs do not comply with the code for height above nosing, and extension requirements at the bottom and top treads. ARCHITECTURE o Remove and replace with compliant handrails. This should be addressed even if the full reframing noted above related to shear wall works is not undertaken. ENGINEERING ❑ At the basement level is an open partial-height wall serving as a guardrail. The height of this is just above the handrail and not sufficient for code required 42" height. PLAN N I N G o Reframe partial height wall to 42" above stair nosing. INTERIORS Page 126 ‹fik ---, _., - -- 1 L . .... . 61 _ ' Ucam` Basement landin.. Main stair from basement Main stair at intermediate landin U per section of main stair. 15895 SW 72ND AVE �` iii 1/4,. 1.•e = ' PORTLAND,OR 97224 , PHONE 503.226.1285 / FAX:503.226.1670 9 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM �. W W W.CI DAI NC.COM Basement handrail&guardrail termination Main stair from main to upper levels. Main stair handrail at intermediate landing. BACK STAIR (ST-B): e 0 The floor plan to the right shows the 1982 drawing for three levels of the _ 'I1 "back stair", or"stair 1" as referenced in the original drawings. The general layout of these stairs as depicted in the drawings is still representative of the existing conditions. The minor deviation is at the � ' : # r main floor level landing there has been a metal swing gate added to the - top of the run of stairs. ..~ This stair connects all three levels of the existing building. From the 'I basement level to the main floor level to the upper floor. Each section of stairs is a 180-degree switchback configuration with one intermediate 0.% i 1 landing for stairs. —, 1'l ❑ Over the course of the two levels of stairs,there are multiple , locations where the stair riser height and tread depth varies. ` Most of the variation is within the dimensional uniformity limit of -` . f.„.,0v.the code (3/8") over the course of a flight of stairs. There are I locations where the variation of tread depth is approximately I 5/8" and the riser height variation is approximately 5/8". = — ° There are also observed locations on the treads where the slope '• of the tread is greater than 2%. In general, interior treads require mown LEvEi. no slope as there is no drainage. However,this isn't specifically ( 9 noted as a requirement thus the basis for noting where a slope is . l �_ li excessive is the 2% limit for landings and stairs at drainage conditions (i.e. exterior). y The conditions of dimensional uniformity and tread slope create '• — 3 a hazard to users. The finishes on the stairs, in this case carpet, % R,_ can impact the conditions as well. ARCHITECTURE o The minor deviation of the dimensional conditions in and of _i ENGINEERING itself does not necessarily constitute a need for a complete . _• [ ' rebuild of the stairs. However, as noted elsewhere in this 1--' P L A N N I N G report and structural seismic evaluation,there is a OA ePLAN INTERIORS requirement to add additional shear walls at the stairwell Page 127 locations. As such the requirement to add full-height plywood on the stair side is ‹fik likely to require reframing of the stair. At that time, if it is indeed triggered,the stairs should be rebuilt within the limits of the code. 61 o As an alternate should the shear wall blocking and nailing not require the removal of existing stair framing,the stairs should have the existing carpet removed, and review the treads and risers to see if minor modifications to the materials can remove some of the dimensional uniformity and keep all treads to level instead of random sloped treads. ❑ Handrails for all sections of stairs do not comply with the code for height above nosing, and extension requirements at the bottom and top treads. o Remove and replace with compliant handrails. This should be addressed even if the 15895 SW 72ND AVE full reframing noted above related to shear wall works is not undertaken. SUITE 200 ElThe swing gate located at the main floor landing does not permit proper maneuvering to the stairs and landing and does not permit handrail extension. In the open position,this PORTLAND,OR 97224 railing also impedes the direction of egress on the main floor to the adjacent exterior exit PHONE:503.226.1285 door as it swings more than 50%through the egress path at full open and the geometry FAX:503.226.I670 doesn't permit 180-degree swing to reduce the obstruction. INFO a©C1DAINC.COM o Remove the ate s stem. WWW.C1DAINC.COM ll IC owl IIIMIi: \ 1 il Back stair to basement. Landin_at switchback. Gate at main level landing. Gate at landing,upper stairs P _of 4 • I. Gate in open position to egress door beyond. SOUTH STAIR (ST-S): f`'. '"""'°""""°' The floor plan to the right shows the 1982 drawing for two levels of WIN the "south stair", or"stair 3" as referenced in the original drawings. �1111111 to- .. ti1111 �►The general layout of these stairs as depicted in the drawings is still 4 IIIIII I r1 representative of the existing conditions. I— wpm LEVEL This stair connects the main and upper levels of the existing building H and does not extend to the basement at this location. The stair is a ? q I 80-degree switchback configuration with one intermediate landing 1110 1�11111 � = for stairs. i �� r3 111111111I1I °&5 ARCHITECTURE � j�1111111111111Ur ❑ Over the course of the stairs,there are multiple locations +III ENGINEERING where the stair riser height and tread depth varies. Most of �t LtYCL P L A N N I N G the variation is within the dimensional uniformity limit of the ©STAIRS 3 code (3/8") over the course of a flight of stairs. There are ENLARGED PLAN INTERIORS locations where the riser height variation is approximately 5/8". Page 128 There are also observed locations on the treads where the slope of the tread is greater ‹fik than 2%. In general, interior treads require no slope as there is no drainage. However, this isn't specifically noted as a requirement thus the basis for noting where a slope is 61 excessive is the 2% limit for landings and stairs at drainage conditions (i.e. exterior). The conditions of dimensional uniformity and tread slope create a hazard to users. The finishes on the stairs, in this case carpet, can impact the conditions as well. o The minor deviation of the dimensional conditions in and of itself does not necessarily constitute a need for a complete rebuild of the stairs. However, as noted elsewhere in this report and structural seismic evaluation,there is a requirement to add additional shear walls at the stairwell locations. As such the requirement to add 15895 SW 72ND AVE full-height plywood on the stair side is likely to require reframing of the stair. At that SUITE 200 time, if it is indeed triggered,the stairs should be rebuilt within the limits of the code. o As an alternate should the shear wall blocking and nailing not require the removal of PORTLAND,OR 97224 existing stair framing,the stairs should have the existing carpet removed, and review PHONE:503.226.I285 the treads and risers to see if minor modifications to the materials can remove some FAX:503.226.I670 of the dimensional uniformity and keep all treads to level instead of random sloped INFO a©C1DAINC.COM treads. WWW.CIDAINC.COM ElHandrails for all sections of stairs do not comply with the code for height above nosing, and extension requirements at the bottom and top treads. o Remove and replace with compliant handrails. This should be addressed even if the full reframing noted above related to shear wall works is not undertaken. ❑ At upper section of the stair run there is an open partial-height wall serving as a guardrail between the two stair runs. The height of this is just above the handrail and not sufficient for code required 42" height. o Reframe martial height wall to 42" above stair nosing. A Lower run of south stairs Upper run of stairs w/guardrail ELEVATOR (E): The elevator connects all three floors of the existing building. ❑ Elevator controls do not include braille characters along side call buttons etc. The elevator also does not have audible indicator to the location of the elevator operation. o Update elevator controls to include signage with braille characters. - '.7 al ici • -L 4'77. -1, '. . ' ' . --- - 11 , . .... lir . . ... ARCHITECTURE 0 ENGINEERING 1 I : PLAN N I NG Pi_ �`� s Basement call buttons. Elevator interior. Main floor level call buttons. INTERIORS Page 129 ROOF (R): ‹fik The floor plan to the right shows the 1982 drawing of the roof plan. This layout is generally similar to the existing geometry of the roof plan. There has been modifications to the roofing 61 materials and reroofs since the original construction. The central sawtooth areas are now roofed with metal panels instead of built-up roofing. Additional modifications including changes in mechanical equipment locations and quantities along with general roof penetrations not shown. U The roof has three main areas. The first is the perimeter areas including lower roofs which are sloped shingle roofs. The second and third portions of the roof is the interior well portion generally between grid lines 3 to 9 and from B to C. The northern portion of this well, north of line 7, is the largest section of the well and includes the mechanical equipment. This is the 15895 SW 72ND AVE second area of the roof and has a low slope membrane roof system. This is the portion of the SUITE 200 well is also where the roof access door is located. South of line seven there are four sawtooth roof segments with sloped metal panel roofing. All told there are 5 clerestory windows within PORTLAND,OR 97224 the well at the southern end of the four sawtooth roofs and the northern mechanical well area. PHONE:503.226.1285 There is also clerestory windows on the east side of the of the mechanical well. FAX:503.226.1670 INFO a©C1DAINC.COM Beyond the clerestory and sawtooth there are several dormer windows around the perimeter of WW .C1DAINC.COM the roof. W 00 0 ® Q ® 0 0 0 CO.aew. 765,.-e .sue," 'etc ; o: ��/{�J yN �� 5 `C'� lei: T� ._ _ — \ ® T'°-� gfffTTA I!f l 4 Tt TA F � it rr--`1-RoaF-�- .- 4� C� 34�a'M�9'+r i�� ) { T . / J 4 pR.0...4/d 'p_ r T 0 1. 6L11'• 1 ,AL-.R• �-buR7r ....-,r1R' ic.,u4�"'- tr MI pVrq"'::w= •I- I 44 4l T 'J u- 1,y SH. ,48 0-- :��1• I` r qti • le eC�a „rah 4u .iil; m .a'�o. cce-I {� ✓ , �--nE L Rc c�w na i Lay I ."2-YL O'4 T:o.- ',mill . �� 1BE_av Q - z1*"l 1.� = SWJI d L1ll6 -rR. _ 'CI 03 \\j•-\ ,,, 1�b �a (. .o-Mogo.iq ram/ [eac a3P-Ln v-SCE - �• UGPEq.-LEVEL giCM eLaa.. ❑ A good portion of the perimeter cap metal around the well shows signs of deterioration of the gasket seals falling out along the wall counter flashing. o Repair and/or replace cap metal flashings. ❑ Portions of the mechanical well have ponding and areas of sediment collection related to poor drainage. o To remedy the drainage issue, additional slope is needed to eliminate ponding. In order to increase slope to drain additional tapered insulation is needed. If the mechanical equipment were to not require replacement,then continued maintenance is likely all that is feasible along with addressing main ponding areas. Alternately if the mechanical equipment justifies major rehabilitation or replacement then removal of all equipment within the well would permit a reroof of this well to increase drainage. ❑ One of the major contributors to the interior water intrusion issues described in other sections of this report is the geometry and drainage system of the sawtooth roofs along ARCHITECTURE the clerestory windows. As originally designed and as currently constructed, at four ENGINEERING locations there are built-up crickets that split the metal roof drainage in half, directing water to drains on the east and west sides of the sawtooth wells of the clerestory PLAN N I N G windows. The issue with this configuration is the east side of the cricket includes both a primary drain and an overflow drain, while the west side only includes a primary drain. INTERIORS Page 130 Any failure of the primary on the west side of the cricket would result in water ponding ‹fik until such point that it flows over the dividing cricket element to the eastern drainage system. 61 The drainage crickets at the clerestory windows were constructed with a metal panel that has striations in the metal panel. This slight profile is perpendicular to the direction of water flow on the cricket surface. This profile allows for the collection of sediment and mildew/moss growth. The drain system for the mechanical well includes a primary and secondary drain on either side of the well. On the west side,the drains are located immediately outside of 15895 SW 72ND AVE the roof access door creating issues for access for maintenance including gear and tool SUITE 200 placement relative to potential puddling of water at these drains. The secondary drain collar for the overflow is insufficient. PORTLAND,OR 97224 o See the reciprocal impact of the clerestory windows below for additional information PHONE:503.226.I285 on this remedy. FAX:503.226.1670 INFO a©C1DAINC.COM Modification to the drainage should replace the central built-up cricket to create one WWW.CIDAINC.COM longer cricket with a minimum %" valley slope. The low point created by the single- slope cricket should be the existing east drainage area for the cricket. This removes the primary drain on the west side and directs all water from each sawtooth roof and clerestory area to one primary drain at the east with a secondary overflow drain. As part of this upgrade,the drainpipe assembly themselves should be removed, repaired, and reconfigured to ensure proper drainage and sequence of drain operation. The new drainage cricket should be constructed with a membrane roofing materials to allow for drainage without the profile of the existing metal panels which inhibit standing water/mildew. This change in geometry will increase the elevation of the high point of the cricket due to the longer overall slope to one side of the building. However, due to the seismic scope triggers on the infill requirements of two sections of the windows, there will be solid wall area for the high point. In addition, see below for recommendations related to the sill height of the clerestory windows due flashing. This will further aid in the elevation issue created by the single-slope cricket geometry. Once repaired,the removed western drain assembly should be patched and infilled at the roof and the pipe removed from the interior of the building with a patch at the brick column cap. The two drainpipes on the east side of each clerestory should also be repair including replacement of the pipe insulation which has broken down due to water intrusion. The original drawings note that the drains are all 3" diameter. Per the plumbing code table 1103.I using the Portland rate of 1.3" per hour, a 3" vertical drainpipe is capable of draining approximately 6,770 square feet of roof area. Each sawtooth roof is estimated at less than 800 square feet thus a 3" drain is sufficient even if quantity of drains reduced to a single primary and single secondary overflow. Relocation of the mechanical well drains is not likely feasible unless this entire area is ARCHITECTURE reroofed to change the direction and slope of drainage. Replace the secondary drain with proper 2" overflow collar. ENGINEERING ❑ Reciprocal impact: See the structural report for the required seismic upgrade for new roof nailing, strapping, and blocking requirements that will require removal of existing PLAN N I N G shingle roof areas for installation. INTERIORS Page 1 3 I o Remove existing roof shingles, insulation, and roofing felt in the locations noted by ‹fik seismic analysis. Complete the seismic upgrade work at the roof then install a new water-resistant barrier over plywood sheathing prior to the replacement of new 61 insulation and roofing. o At locations of the existing shingle roof where it is not required to be removed for the installation of seismic upgrades, potential additional upgrades and repairs should be completed to provide a new water-resistant barrier over the existing plywood sheathing along with replacement of the insulation of roofing. This would be to address possible deterioration of the remaining roofing which may be attributed to the interior water intrusion. ❑ Reciprocal impact: See the structural report for the required seismic upgrade for infill of 15895 SW 72ND AVE two clerestory window panes (of existing five panes) at each of the clerestory window SUITE 200 locations (5 total clerestory monitors). Note that the east side clerestory windows and the dormer windows are not impacted by the seismic upgrade requirements and can PORTLAND,OR 97224 remain as-is pending any other water intrusion requirements. PHONE:503.226.I285 o Remove the existing clerestory windows at locations noted with structural system FAX:503.226.I670 (studs, plywood, and blocking etc.) then clad exterior with metal panel to match INFO a©C1DAINC.COM sawtooth wells. The interior shall be finished with gypsum board to match existing. WWW.CIDAINC.COM o This infill will have an aesthetic impact on the interior of the library. Approximately 40% of each of the clerestory windows will be replaced by solid walls. ❑ The existing clerestory windows have minimal elevation change from the sill to the roofing membrane at the drainage side. This should be at a minimum of 12" from the roof membrane to the bottom of the clerestory window sill to allow for proper flashing and overlapping of roofing membranes and window wrapping components. With the various upgrades to the roof since the original construction,this elevational difference appears to be less than the 12" noted in the original drawings. An exact measurement was not feasible as this clerestory itself was inaccessible for observation by the project team. This area was unsafe given the configuration of the roofing,the metal materials, and the weather at the time. Furthermore,there was no tie-off ability to aid in accessing the wells and exiting the wells. The only clerestory that was readily available to review conditions was the mechanical well side of grid line 7 which was less than 12", although this configuration isn't exactly the same condition the requirement for proper flashing still applies at the high-side condition of this well similar to the low side condition of the sawtooth roofs. In addition the head conditions of the clerestory have insufficient window head flashings. As-is the vertical surface of the metal panel above the clerestory terminates flush and at a 90-degree angle to the top of the window. A drip edge flashing is needed to prevent rainwater from draining down the surface of the panel and flowing back to the window. o As noted above there is required seismic work related to the infill of a portion of the clerestory windows. This will remove some areas where there is insufficient change in elevation from roofing to window sill. At the remaining areas,the vertical size of the window is suggested to be reduced by approximately 6" in height and replaced with shorter windows to increase the elevational change for proper flashings. This further reduces the existing clerestory area beyond the seismic reduction of 40% noted above. The existing windows are noted at 48" and would be reduced to 42" fora loss of about 12.5% of vertical glazing at the remaining windows. o This infill will have an aesthetic impact on the interior of the library. ARCHITECTURE o As part of the remaining clerestory window replacement, install a new head flashing under the metal panel system which laps under weather barrier components and has ENGINEERING a 45-degree angle drip edge minimum %" beyond the face of the wall panel. ❑ General roof maintenance is needed to remove old equipment, fittings,tools etc. along PLAN N I N G with the replacement of insulation at mechanical system components. INTERIORS Page 132 o Clean and repair roof of miscellaneous items that can be removed and those that require routine maintenance. el ❑ Poor or deteriorated caulking at windows jambs and inside corners. Penetration of 61 window sill framing/flashing with gas piping. o Address poor caulking situation as part of clerestory window replacement and infill. Relocate gas penetration to alternate location outside of the flashing area of the window sill. U . Y-A..: -4 -A" f ..L .' Alf./ ki,‘,.. 15895 SW 72ND AVE : rx SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 11. s;` PHONE:503.226.!285 • : FAX:503.226.1670 1 IN FO a@C I DAI NC.CON Shingle roofin_and cap metal Deterioratin caulkin•at corner Deterioratin.caulkin_at corner Gas pipe penetration at sill WWW.CIDAINC.CONi �c` ::. ` 1 . . hill aFS r• Misc materials to be removed _ Drains at roof piir. access door. Stain due to poor draina•e. ° Y. - --- -" . or - I' wr H � '. Jar" IlL : ..,:„." w` . :_ ., - Foam•asket fallin_from cap flashin_. Drains,sediment and patches. Dented ducting and mildew•rowth. licL. . . . ..: .-„,-.... Metal sawtooth roof Metal rooting and west drain pipe View alon_c/eresto at meth well di -- "t �..., .. . I r _ , ..„ ....... ,. ; ... - ._ . :;: -- � . w ,.� ,......_ . ... , ._. _ . .. laic . • - 1 ARCHITECTURE I.4 • 1 Roof drains on east side ofinech well Newer HVAC and damage insulation. Head condition at clerestory windows. ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 133 <#,„k , ‘,. - ,-r.- 7,,,.._ , • Sill at clerestory windows Sill at clerestory windows Standing water/mildew at metal profile crickets. BUILDING EXTERIOR (BE): 15895 SW 72ND AVE The elevation drawings below show the four primary elevation drawings from the 1982 drawing set. These layouts are generally accurate to the existing conditions. The primary modifications SUITE 200 are for some material changes, focused on roofing, and the addition of an awning over the PORTLAND,OR 97224 northern stair(on elevation 2 PHONE:503.226.I285 0 0 o ® 1 ..® o 1 a 4 V T li. FAX:503.226.1670 i I i INFO a©C1DAINC.COM --- o .._— •11 11 1■_ .-'• ' - �� ' WVVW.CIDAINC.COM a iAH 1i3;t ^.�1f 1arill'ai [ .._ 1 . "."ram .a. a - ii __� -= • _ 1 •" # -- ELEVATION 3T 0 0 19) 0 0 o o 1 10 0 eigliffa•-eitmin - [i91 --..0— M r? -0f ii!9 ItiFi °Il�ii�i� L•s'JV`II I - MW��• M ._li III .�.� d �� �.—.L '-fi ELEVATION NN 4 -_ -- ELEVATION 2 6:0 (-T) o ® o Q G:04 ® ® ® 0 - �- - --......... "Itab...: - ••-- - '® C t••I MN! I■ ! - -- - -. :. 40I i �+ - -_ .Z ie, Sr.. -- — - - '� e..w _ —. I ELEVATION I BE I — Exterior Elevation — East (elevation 3 above) ❑ Soffit panel damage at recessed entry. Likely attributed to the upper level decking area and the deficiencies in drainage noted above. ARCHITECTURE o Remove and replace all soffit wood as part of the repair work for the reframing and drainage of the deck surface above. ENGINEERING ❑ Lack of proper trim and flashing at the perimeter of overhangs and change of plane. This includes trim members flush with soffit materials instead of trim pieces extending below PLAN N I N G horizontal surfaces to create drip edge. Flashings at trim have minimal drip edge project INTERIORS beyond face of wood trim and some portions have minimal separation of siding to head Page 134 flashing. At changes in elevation at the entry, 45-degree angles do not have proper lap of ‹fik flashings allowing for water intrusion. o Remove and reinstall all base and head trim members with inclusion of proper 61 flashing with profiled drip edge. ❑ General need to recaulk exterior surfaces at change of plane and inside corners etc. o Recaulk and repaint building siding elements including changes in material and planes. ❑ Flag pole attachment includes bolts through lower portion of side panel without sealant and there is a gap or hole right above the bracket. o Recommend installing a full solid penetration block with flashing for attachment of the flag pole brackets. ❑ There is what appears to be an abandoned, or at least non-functioning at time of site 15895 SW 72ND AVE visits, water feature at the southeast corner of the building outside what the is noted at SUITE 200 the Brian Doyle Garden. This includes a rocked area for drainage. o If still functioning this needs to be upgraded to ensure water is maintained within the PORTLAND,OR 97224 intended area. PHONE:503.226.I285 ❑ Reciprocal impact: See the structural report for the required seismic upgrade for shear FAX:503.226.I670 wall plywood nailing at existing exterior sheathing. INFO a©C1DAINC.COM o Remove and reinstall siding for required seismic upgrades. Replace damaged or WWW.CIDAINC.COM deteriorated siding with like-for-like. y ° ¶ ¶ ¶ a z i T�=i=ir�ar�'nn01 _ "'- - Y wow alaw- Aim / y of A• i -1 �rry o n 7.v.I ,rchiti . 1 •v � ,--fig r ,+■N R-rrwr''V,edt. c wM+ ";. R"�mamma, OVATION 3 tr, 442, �- . , . .- 4 Stainin at soffit,flush trim. Cau/kin•joint at corner D-ama•e at trim. Pond/fountain area. �/ •1 , , , ._ 0'i . ., .. . : .. ie., , , . . . P. , . Staining on soffit boards. Staining around edge of soffit under deck. Staining around edige of soffit under deck. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 135 <#,„k ,Ider U Stainin.on soffit boards ,. Poor flashin,dri•and lap. Poor flashin.la•at chan:e in direction. •'" Mgivio - Ki 15895 SW 72ND AVE _ SUITE 200 -_ PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.I 285 ,-- FAX:503.226.1670 Exposed hole at flag pole. Water feature. Downspout piping and erosion. 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM WWW.C1DAINC.COM BE2— Exterior Elevation—South (elevation 4 above) ❑ Lack of proper trim and flashing at the perimeter of overhangs and change of plane. This includes trim members flush with soffit materials instead of trim pieces extending below horizontal surfaces to create drip edge. Flashings at trim have minimal drip edge project beyond face of wood trim and some portions have minimal separation of siding to head flashing. At changes in elevation at the entry, 45-degree angles do not have proper lap of flashings allowing for water intrusion. o Remove and reinstall all base and head trim members with inclusion of proper flashing with profiled drip edge. ❑ General need to recaulk exterior surfaces at change of plane and inside corners etc. o Recaulk and repaint building siding elements including changes in material and planes. ❑ Irrigation shed/cover has significant damage to siding and trim in areas due to proximity to the ground. The area under has misc.trash and debris which should be removed. o Patch and resair sidin_• and trim alon_• with removal of debris. it • '1./i b . _ice —J_ ____- Damage at soffit panels. Irrigation cover. Debris in imgation cover. : 1 ,.. ,-.0.- _ • _ - 4 • ARCHITECTURE Deteriorating trim on cover lid Stained soffit panel trm. ENGINEERING BE3 — Exterior Elevation—West (elevation I above) PLAN N I N G ❑ Lack of proper trim and flashing at the perimeter of overhangs and change of plane. This INTERIORS includes trim members flush with soffit materials instead of trim pieces extending below Page 136 horizontal surfaces to create drip edge. Flashings at trim have minimal drip edge project ‹fik beyond face of wood trim and some portions have minimal separation of siding to head flashing. At changes in elevation at the entry, 45-degree angles do not have proper lap of 61 flashings allowing for water intrusion. o Remove and reinstall all base and head trim members with inclusion of proper flashing with profiled drip edge. ❑ General need to recaulk exterior surfaces at change of plane and inside corners etc. o Recaulk and repaint building siding elements including changes in material and planes. ❑ The mechanical room doors which are covered with siding at the southern end of the west elevation have no head flashing. There is also no threshold or sweep on the door allowing water intrusion at slab. 15895 SW 72ND AVE o Recommend installation of proper flashing and threshold. SUITE 200 ElLow roof elevations have a minimal projection of roofing beyond the siding. o Install flashing to create projection or replace roofing with a larger drip edge. PORTLAND,OR 97224 ❑ Reciprocal impact: See the structural report for the required seismic upgrade for shear PHONE:503.226.I285 wall plywood nailing at existing exterior sheathing. FAX:503.226.I670 o Remove and 5)(f),reinstall siding for required seismic upgrades. Replace damaged or INFO a©C1DAINC.COM deteriorated siding with like-for-like. WWW.C1DAINC.COM 7T "4 ® o F-.--s,�..•Q�_ - -4 T ? y fear r...1 _.. IOW NaW©WEIN IVAII NMI _M•I .. :01V7-91117111=11110i— -- '-d:.' r--, ,.,,-. IAA j ELEVATIONAlp,. N' \\ • At' . - t ------- --- -_ ---•------ate - \ ' Lack of head trim at door: Poor drip projection. Poor projection of roof at siding. BE4— Exterior Elevation— North (elevation 2 above) ❑ Lack of proper trim and flashing at the perimeter of overhangs and change of plane. This includes trim members flush with soffit materials instead of trim pieces extending below horizontal surfaces to create drip edge. Flashings at trim have minimal drip edge project beyond face of wood trim and some portions have minimal separation of siding to head flashing. At changes in elevation at the entry, 45-degree angles do not have proper lap of flashings allowing for water intrusion. o Remove and reinstall all base and head trim members with inclusion of proper flashing with profiled drip edge. ARCHITECTURE ❑ General need to recaulk exterior surfaces at change of plane and inside corners etc. o Recaulk and repaint building siding elements including changes in material and planes. ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 137 SITE (S): ‹fik The site plan layout below is from the 1982 drawing package and is generally accurate to the existing conditions with the following exceptions. 61 • The exterior enclosures for the site-level mechanical equipment and the irrigation backflow assembly along with the exterior generator pad are not shown. - • Parking along the Alley does not exist, nor is it permitted. • ADA parking stalls are not shown at existing conditions. • The lightwell to the basement at the children's library is not shown. -- - •� "T - -0. 00.nc011a • ii 3 [_`tea arNIVACO 15895 SW 72ND AVE .0��� ;i ^�, �_ �'� l�' SUITE 200 ......._ i S2 53 i ;° n i s 3'� uenu<r t,;:. ,z a f,: t:= PORTLAND,OR 97224 """ �i . a , w—, a, PHONE:503.226.1285 m v I . g FAX:503.226.1670 0 44 r: ;Y 'A.. . INFO a�C1DAINC.COM _� .f - `N. }f:fegkai _ .P/ WWW.C1DAINC.COM '. .. P" g W , 1/41 ° 7 I TNSWEET N S I - Main Entry ❑ Book return kiosks protrude beyond the permitted depth for the installed height. o Revise installation to lower the height of the protruding element to 27" or less, or reduce projection to less than or equal to 4" from the exterior wall. Alternately the area under the projecting counter could be infilled or an apron installed to provide the cane detection requirements. ❑ The main ramped walkway from 4th St.to the main entry is in excess of ADA slopes. See the civil report for additional notes. o Reroute ramp to increase length of ramp to provide additional run in order to decrease the slope to comply ramp slopes. Install handrails for any walkway over 5% in direction of travel. V Main entry walkway. Book return kiosks S2— Loading Area ❑ The drainage down the loading dock slope pools at the bottom. This is partially attributed to sediment in the trench drain. In addition,there is an existing drain coming from the upper landscape area to the north which dumps into the loading area along with other areas where water pours over the top of the retaining wall from the landscape above. o Reroute as much drainage away from the recessed dock area. Regrade upper landscape area with drainage around or away from the dock. ARCHITECTURE ❑ The guardrail height and openness does not comply with the code. The minimum height above grade is 42". The maximum spacing between intermediate rails is spaced to ENGINEERING prevent a 4" sphere from passing through. PLANNING The diameter of the vertical posts is too large for the retaining wall thickness and has INTERIORS caused cracking of the retaining wall due to insufficient concrete coverage. Page 138 o Remove the existing pipe railing system. Infill the existing vertical posts with grout ‹fik and core drill new standard pipe rail system (I-1/2" diameter pipes) into the retaining wall. The new railing to include 42"total height above grade (minimum) 61 and have vertical intermediate railings to block the passage of a 4" sphere. Note that horizontal rails are not recommended due to the creation of a ladder effect in a public area. ❑ Tree roots causing damage to retaining wall. U o Remove tree. S2— Loading Area - Continued / . 15895 SW 72ND AVE . « 4. *;ti,... SUITE 200 'I ._ :�: 4. '� PORTLAND,OR 97224 J ,:i r'. ..:. PHONE:503.226.1285 '`''" ~� 'I FAX:503.226.1670 . 1 N FO a�Cl DAI NC.COM Guardrail to.ublic alle. Damaged and rust at guard post. Drainpipe from upper landscape area. r WWW.C1DAINC.COM aa•:v..r;:''"-k, -- _- _ - Guardrail to public alley side. Guardrail with soil to top of wall S3 —Guardrail at Back Entry ❑ The guardrail height and openness does not comply with the code. The minimum height above grade is 42". The maximum spacing between intermediate rails is spaced to prevent a 4" sphere from passing through. The diameter of the vertical posts is too large for the retaining wall thickness and has caused cracking of the retaining wall due to insufficient concrete coverage. o Remove the existing pipe railing system. Infill the existing vertical posts with grout and core drill new standard pipe rail system (1-1/2" diameter pipes) into the retaining wall. The new railing to include 42"total height above grade (minimum) and have vertical intermediate railings to block the passage of a 4" sphere. Note that horizontal rails are not recommended due to the creation of a ladder effect in a sublic area. ';_.:.: :F: Ali yea.`r wo - w ti lt P-, ' ,--..,,A.,, k it..1. • K Guardrail at stair to back entry door. Guardrail to covered back stair. ARCHITECTURE S4—Guardrail to Children's Library Light Well. ENGINEERING ❑ The guardrail height and openness does not comply with the code. The minimum height above grade is 42". The maximum spacing between intermediate rails is spaced to PLAN N I N G prevent a 4" sphere from passing through. INTERIORS Page 139 The diameter of the vertical posts is too large for the retaining wall thickness and has ‹fik caused cracking of the retaining wall due to insufficient concrete coverage. o Remove the existing pipe railing system. Infill the existing vertical posts with grout 61 and core drill new standard pipe rail system (I-I/2" diameter pipes) into the retaining wall. The new railing to include 42"total height above grade (minimum) and have vertical intermediate railings to block the passage of a 4" sphere. Note that horizontal rails are not recommended due to the creation of a ladder effect in a public area. 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 ` l'1�0� PORTLAND,OR 97224 '-E/ �. PHONE:503.226.I 285 FAX:503.226.1670 • Guardrail to children's library lightwell. 1NFO©C1DAINC.COM WWW.C1DAINC.COM S5 —ADA Parking and Route ❑ The existing parking area is not compliant with ADA requirements for parking, loading zones, markings, signage, and accessible routes (multiple curb ramps). See civil report for notes on ramps. o Recommend relocating all ADA parking stalls to new location to collocate and aid in routing for accessibility to the main entry. The new location will require regrading to meet the maximum slope (2% in either direction in the stall and access aisles) and the running slopes of the route to the door(5% in direction of travel and 2% cross slope). See the parking layout drawing in the architectural drawing exhibit in the appendix which addresses the parking, and the associated ramps. 17 . ADA sidewalk from parking lot. Existing ada parking and crossing Existing ADA parking and access aisle S6— Sunken Sidewalk ❑ The northern end of the entry sidewalk has sunken along the east wall of the existing building under the projection of the upper floor. This area has dropped a couple inches and there is a crack in the sidewalk where this happened. Based on review of photos from the installation of the cover over the back door entry area which showed soil which had eroded and left voids under the sidewalk it is anticipate that similar soil issues might have led to this sunken sidewalk area. The soil compaction against the basement wall is assumed to have contributed to this area. o Remove the section of sidewalk and reinstall subgrade to proper compaction and pour new sidewalk. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 140 11%1141 • 111 • Sunken concrete sidewalk at building. Grade break in sidewalk crack. 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.!670 INFO©C I DAI NC.COM WWW.CIDAINC.COM ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 1 41 111°4(ek r LAKE OSWEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY 706 4' St. 61 II Lake Oswego, OR 97034 U SEISMIC EVALUATION AND CONCEPTUAL SEISMIC STRENGTHENING SCHEME 15895 SW 72ND AVE -I*., x. 5 �.. SUITE 200 • � .<• ' 4.r,�r + :` � •���,�1 t � ;1�`�r �' . PORTLAND,OR 97224 i **VW ` °XI :4r. Y - PHONE:503.226.1285 r `_1 - ''get+" .,• • ' - , FAX.503.226.!670 K'.' r INFO a@CIDAINC.COM - r -: WWW.CIDAINC.COM , - - ' - - - .1. i igto •' -' ,../3 --- -`zap i9. .. - ASCE 41 -23 i� 7 Tier I & Tier 2 VII }� ) Seismic Assessment 4Nfie i &---.--,1i,i,,,,,.of' Fty 633 . YE � Prepared for City of Lake Oswego r^i J. -- Prepared by 1F, ,! :; ? CIDA Architects & Engineers 15895 SW 72nd Ave ARCHITECTURE Portland, OR 97224 ENGINEERING (503) 226-1285 PLANNING INTERIORS Page 142 TABLE OF CONTENTS CI •-• SEISMIC ASSESSMENT REPORT 42-52 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY 45 BUILDING DESCRIPTION 45 ASSESSMENT APPROACH 46 FINDINGS 47-52 UNKNOWNS &ASSUMPTIONS 52 APPENDIX A-ASCE 41 CHECKLISTS Al-Al6 BASIC CONFIGURATION CHECKLIST A I-A2 15895 SW 72ND AVE STRUCTURE TYPE W2 (WOOD FRAMED) A3-A5 STRUCTURE TYPE C2 (CONC. SHEAR WALL)A6-A8 SUITE 200 NONSTRUCTURAL CHECKLIST A9-AI 6 PORTLAND,OR 97224 APPENDIX B-SITE PHOTOS B I-B5 PHONE:503.226.1285 APPENDIX C - DEFICIENCY PLANS C I-C7 FAX:503.226.1670 APPENDIX D - RETROFIT DRAWINGS S I-S6 INFO a@CIDAINC.COM WWW.CIDAINC.COM ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 143 Al4 Introduction and project summary CIDA was engaged by the City of Lake Oswego to perform an ASCE 41-23 Tier 1 &Tier 2 seismic evaluation of the Lake Oswego Public Library located at 706 4th St., Lake Oswego, OR 97034. The library is a two-story wood framed structure with a partial basement. This building was constructed in 1982 to replaced an existing smaller one-story library building. The goal of this project is to evaluate the structural and non-structural systems using the ASCE 41-23 Tier 2 evaluation procedure.A Tier 1+Tier 2 Seismic Evaluation is known as a "Deficiency- Based Evaluation." The Tier 1 stage uses the ASCE 41 checklists to target common areas of 15895 SW 72ND AVE potential weaknesses in the building's seismic system. The items that are found to be non- SUITE 200 compliant or unknown are corrected in the Tier 2 stage either through further analysis/investigation resulting in the items compliance or by retrofitting the item via repair, PORTLAND,OR 97224 replacement, supplementation, etc. What this process does NOT do is analyze the entire PHONE:503.226.1285 building's gravity and lateral systems to bring them up to the standard of a new building. The FAX:503.226.1670 scope of this project is based upon performing a Tier 1 +Tier 2 Deficiency-Based Evaluation. INFO a@CIDAINC.COM WWW.CIDAINC.COM The typical existing building performance objective (BPOE)for a Risk Category II occupancy is as follows: • Structural Performance—Life Safety (S-3)with the BSE-1E earthquake • Non-Structural Performance—Life Safety(3-C/N-C)with the BSE-1E earthquake • Structural Performance—Collapse Prevention (S-5)with the BSE-2E earthquake • Non-Structural Performance—Hazards Reduced (5-D/N-D) with the BSE-2E earthquake BSE-1E is a seismic hazard (earthquake)with a 20%of exceedance in 50 years. This is a smaller earthquake that is more likely to occur(225 year return period). BSE-2E is a seismic hazard (earthquake) with a 5% of exceedance in 50 years. This is a larger earthquake that is less likely to occur (975 year return period). Both cases are compared as part of the review and the retrofit is based on the more restrictive case. BSE-1E results in lower seismic acceleration but requires the design to limit overall building damage to a moderate level. BSE-2E results in higher seismic acceleration but accepts more severe damage while preventing the building from collapsing. In neither case should the expectation be that the building can be re-occupied after a major seismic event without significant repairs which may not be economically viable. Using the performance objectives listed above, CIDA has evaluated the existing structure and identified potential weaknesses in the buildings seismic system. Potential weaknesses are covered in this evaluation report along with schematic level retrofit designs to address these weaknesses. BUILDING DESCRIPTION The library structure is approximately 170ft long and 80ft wide for a 13,600 square foot footprint with a 5,000 square foot partial basement at the north end. The exterior walls are ARCARCHITECTURi wood stud with plywood sheathing and horizontal wood siding. The first floor is a slab on grade on the south end with a mix of 2x solid sawn and TJI joists supported on steel girder ENGINEERINC, beams over the basement. The second floor is framed similar to the first floor with steel PLANNING girders and wood joists. The roof construction is framed with GLB girders and purlins supporting 2x6 T&G decking with a plywood overlay except at the mechanical well. At the INTERIORS Page 144 mechanical well there is a steel girder beam in the center supporting the GLB purlins and 2x ‹fik wood decking. There are also two area in the mech well with concrete pads for large mechanical units cast on top of the wood deck. The roof profile varies with a sloped profile 1.1 extending inward 21 feet from the exterior grids on all sides. The center of the roof consists of a 33.5x38 foot mechanical well with (4) four bays of"sawtooth" roof to the south. There are three types of roofing materials used on this building. Composition shingles on the perimeter area of the roof, metal roofing panels on the sawtooth area, and a membrane roof in the mechanical well. ASSESSMENT APPROACH 15895 SW 72ND AVE ASCE 41-23 Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings is the standard for SUITE 200 assessment and retrofit of existing structures. The evaluation procedures provided in this document are divided into three segments: PORTLAND,OR 97224 Tier I — Screening Assessment PHONE:503.226.1285 Tier 2— Deficiency-Based Evaluation and Retrofit FAX:503.226.1670 Tier 3 — Systematic Evaluation and Retrofit 1NFO a©CIDAINC.COM Tier I assessment is the required starting point for any evaluation or retrofit conducted WWW.CIDAINC.COM under ASCE 41 standards. Tiers 2 & 3 are both optional, depending on the project goals and findings from Tier I evaluation. The City of Lake Oswego commissioned Tier I & Tier 2 assessments as the initial steps to determine anticipated seismic retrofits to the library building for use in decision making as to future viability of the building. The ASCE 41 Tier I screening process starts with a review of available documentation on the building being assessed, identification of the structural system(s) involved, determination of known or approximate construction date(s), and selection of target performance criteria. For this assessment of the library, construction documents which included an approximate completion date were provided and target performance criteria (BSE-2E, Collapse prevention) was selected. The structural system(s) present and target performance criteria are then checked against a table in ASCE 4 I which indicates a "benchmark" year threshold for each possible combination of system and performance criteria. Buildings which were constructed after the listed benchmark year are assumed to be constructed in a manner approximating modern standards and have no structural deficiencies, therefor only need to be evaluated for nonstructural hazards. For buildings which were constructed prior to the benchmark year, ASCE 4I incudes Tier I assessment checklists which list pass/fail criteria for numerous aspects of the building structure focused on conditions commonly associated with performance problems when subjected to seismic loading. Conditions which do not meet the criteria specified in the Tier I assessment checklists are required to be noted as "deficiencies" in the resulting summary report. As a screening tool, Tier I methodology involves numerous simplifying (and conservative) assumptions to allow for overall assessment of all aspects of a building with limited investment. Tier 2 and Tier 3 evaluation methods produce progressively more accurate results, at the cost of additional evaluation time and investigation of existing conditions. Critical review of Tier I findings can predict the anticipated results of a more detailed assessment. For example, if a Tier I "deficiency" failed the initial check by only a small margin, a more detailed assessment would most likely find that existing conditions are adequate with no retrofit needed. Major discrepancies between existing conditions and ARCHITECTURE Tier I evaluation standards, such as complete lack of a lateral force resisting system, are unlikely to be resolved by a more detailed assessment. ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 145 The primary seismic design variables (ground movement spectrum data) are typically ‹fik pulled from a webpage-based lookup tool interfacing with data from the United States Geological Survey (USGS), although other methods such as direct reference to the same 1.1 data source are also available. These ground movement numbers are adjusted based on soil characteristics of the project site to achieve site-specific predicted ground movement magnitudes. The wide range of possible soil characteristics are divided into discreet "site classes" for analysis purposes, ranging from Site Class A (hard rock) to Site Class F (highly organic or high plasticity clays, liquefiable soils, etc). Site Class D (stiff soil) is the default assumed value if documentation supporting a better site class is not available. Site Class D was assumed for Tier I analysis based on the geotechnical report used for the original 15895 SW 72ND AVE building design. SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 FINDINGS With a construction date ten years prior to the ASCE 4 I benchmark year, the library was PHONE:503.226.1285 expected to have a number of structural deficiencies. CIDA reviewed the original FAX:503.226.1670 construction drawings, original geotechnical report dated 02/20/1979, a 2008 facilities 1NFO ai©7CIDAINC.COM review by SERA, and documentation on previous projects completed between 2017 and WWW.CIDAINC.COM 2023. This site is located in a high seismic zone where site soil conditions become a critical factor in the equations which determine seismic risk categories. A default assumption of Site Class D (confirmed by original geotechnical report) would put the seismic design values over the threshold for "High Seismicity", the triggering cutoff for more restrictive detailing on seismic force resisting systems. As a non-benchmark building, structural Tier I checklists are required for assessment of all structural systems present. CIDA identified two different structural systems used in this building: Structural System Location(s) Present W2—Wood framed commercial building with Upper portion of building above Flexible Diaphragm basement level C2a— Concrete Shear Walls with Flexible Basement level Diaphragm In addition to checklists focused on individual structural systems, ASCE 41 Tier I assessment also requires screening checklists related to general building configuration and nonstructural components such as mechanical equipment and storage cabinets/racks. Complete Tier I checklist findings are attached in Appendix B. Items noted as non- compliant are reviewed in detail below. Standards for seismic stability of nonstructural components (ceilings, light fixtures, book shelves, etc) were developed later than standards for structural systems, so there is no applicable benchmark year for nonstructural components. Nonstructural deficiencies were noted including unanchored mechanical equipment, lack of anchorage/bracing for storage racks in utility room, unanchored bookshelves. Existence of seismic bracing for ARCHITECTURE drop ceilings at the first floor level was not able to be verified due to ceiling construction, ENGINEERING however a large portion of the I"floor ceiling will need to be removed and re-installed as part of the 2"d floor diaphragm upgrade which means that the re-installation will PLANNING require bracing and supports meeting current code. CIDA recommends adding INTERIORS Page 146 IleIli anchorageunitswhich toweigh all equipmorementlunthan75its whichpounds weighto morematch thancurrent 400building poundscode and suspenstandards.ded 61 Basic Configuration Checklist LOAD PATH: The structure contains a complete, well-defined load path, including M structural elements and connections, that serves to transfer the inertial forces associated U with the mass of all elements of the building to the foundation. Building construction drawings indicate that the building is missing key elements necessary to provide a complete load path. Missing items are mainly related to the diaphragms. The 2nd floor diaphragm has large openings and does not have well defined chords and 15895 SW 72ND AVE drag lines. The roof diaphragm does not have a path to transfer the shear from the low SUITE 200 roof to the high roof at the vertical portions of the sawtooth roof and the roof does not PORTLAND,OR 97224 have well defined chords and drag lines. Some shearwall lines from 2nd floor to roof do PHONE:503.226.1285 not align with shearwalls below and do not show required connections to transfer the FAX:503.226.1670 shear to lower level shear walls. —These items are addressed in the checklist items 1NFO a©7CIDAINC.COM below. WWW.CIDAINC.COM VERTICAL IRREGULARITIES:All vertical elements in the seismic-force-resisting system are continuous to the foundation. Some shearwall lines from 2nd floor to roof do not align with shearwalls below and do not show required connections to transfer the shear to lower level shear walls. Additional blocking and nailing will need to be added to the 2nd floor diaphragm to transfer the shear to the lower offset walls. ,-.{' Vertical discontinuity Grid D 9.5-10 2�d floor shearwall /' ' _ •.� with I St floor shearwall offset to grid C.8 Vertical discontinuity Grid 10 C.8-D 2nd floor shearwall µ' ff- with I'floor shearwall offset along rid I 0 r 1Y .j► ;- (' Vertical discontinuity Grid 2 C.5-D 2nd floor shearwall i1 with I"floor shearwall offset along grid 10 New shearwall to be added from grid C to C.8 partially -7 i 0- • ` ; under 2nd floor shearwall. ARCHITECTURE + _ ,r - ENGINEERINC ,� -ais M!V ' ' •? (Note: see Appendix for larger version of photos) PLANNING INTERIORS Page 147 W2 (Wood Framed with Flexible Diaphragm) Structure Type Checklists ‹fik SHEAR STRESS CHECK The shear stress in the shear walls, calculated using the Quick Check procedure of second 4.4.13, is less than the following values Structural panel 1.1 sheathing 1,000/b/ft. Shearwalls from 2nd to roof pass this check but the shearwalls from I rt to 2nd and the matching ones in the basement fail this check. The Tier 2 analysis indicates that almost all of the lower level shearwalls will require adding plywood to the opposite side of the wall from the existing sheathing to make them double sided shearwalls. It will also be necessary to add a new shearwall and foundation on grid 2 at the floor level to provide additional shearwall capacity. 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 WALLS CONNECTED THROUGH FLOORS.'Shear walls have an interconnection PORTLAND,OR 97224 between stories to transfer overturning and shear forces through the floor. PHONE:503.226.1285 The 2nd floor shear walls on grid D from 9.5-10, on grid I 0 from C.6-D, and grid 2 from FAX:503.226.l670 C.3-D land on floor beam without a wall below. These walls have holdowns each end 1NFO a©7CIDAINC.COM and sill plates are nailed to floor below. -Tier 2 check to verify capacity of 2nd floor www.CIDAINC.COM diaphragm to transfer shear from upper wall horizontally to lower offset wall line requires capacity of 2' floor diaphragm to be increased. Re-nailing will be a necessary portion of the retrofit. OPENINGS.' Walls with openings greater than 80%of the length are braced with wood structural panel shear walls with aspect ratios of not more than 1.5 to I or are supported by adjacent construction through positive ties capable of transferring the seismic forces. Wall lines do not have drag beams and connections capable of transferring the diaphragm loads to the shear walls. Tier 2 analysis indicates retrofit work to add collector is needed to rectify this condition. Collectors will consist of new beams/blocking and connectors to provide continuous line capable of transferring forces developed in the diaphragm into the top of the shear walls. —See appendix sheets S I, S2, & S3 for collector beams and connection locations. DIAPHRAGM CONTINUITY Floor and roof diaphragms do not have expansion joints or vertical offsets, such as split levels, sawtooth, or clearstory configurations. Roof level diaphragm is a sawtooth configuration without adequate shear transfer at the vertical offsets. The 2" floor level diaphragm has large openings. —Tier 2 retrofit will require adding shearwall and strapping elements to provide shear transfer capacity. ROOF CHORD CONTINUITY All chord elements are continuous, regardless of changes in roof elevation. Roof level diaphragm is a sawtooth configuration and does not have continuous chords. --Tier 2 retrofit will require additional connections to provide chord element continuity—See appendix page S4 for proposed connections and locations. DIAPHRAGM REINFORCEMENT AT OPENINGS.' There/s reinforcing around all diaphragm openings larger than 50%of the building width in either major plan dimension. ARCHITECTURE Floor level diaphragm openings have boundary beams but no continuity straps. Roof is ENGINEERING extremely irregular without obvious diaphragm extents. —Tier 2 retrofit will require re- P L A N N I N G nailing portions of the floor and roof diaphragms along with new drag connections and reinforcing at corner INTERIORS _ Page 148 DIAGONALLY SHEATHED AND UNBLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS.'All diagonally ‹fik sheathed or unblocked wood structural panel diaphragms have horizontal spans less than 40ft and have aspect ratios less than or equal to 41 1.1 Second floor level diaphragm is unblocked and has spans exceeding 40ft. Tier 2 analysis indicates that a large portion of the floor will need to be re-nailed with blocking added to provide adequate capacity. C2a (Concrete Shear Walls with Flexible Diaphragm) Structure Type Checklists CONCRETE BEARING WALLS:Floor and roof-girders and trusses are not supported at the ends of concrete walls that are less than 10"thick 15895 SW 72ND AVE The WF beam I St floor beam at grid 7-B.8 occurs on the corner of the 8" basement wall. SUITE 200 Tier 2 analysis indicates the wall and connection is adequate. —No retrofit required. PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.1285 WALL ANCHORAGE AT FLEXIBLE DIAPHRAGMS.'Exterior concrete walls that are FAX:503.226.1670 dependent on flexible diaphragms for lateral support are anchored for out of plane 1NFO a©7CIDAINC.COM forces WWW.CIDAINC.COM The basement walls do not have anchorage to the flexible diaphragm. Tier 2 analysis indicates the walls do not have net tension away from the diaphragm due to soil pressure towards the diaphragm. —No retrofit required. CROSSTIES: There are continuous cross ties between diaphragm chords. The I'floor diaphragm has continuous ties in the E-W direction (girders) but does not have them in the N-S direction. -Retrofit with Simpson HDU connections through girder lines as noted on ground level framing plan Appendix page S2. NON-BUILDING STRUCTURAL ISSUES: Loading dock wall has a large pine tree just north of the wall. This tree is large enough that it is applying significant load to the back of the loading dock wall and to the basement wall. The basement wall finish prevented a close examination of the concrete basement wall. The loading dock wall has a crack in the face of the wall near the center of the tree. It is CIDA's recommendation that this tree be removed to prevent further damage to the concrete walls. Loading dock retaining wall with large pine tree behind with vertical crack. Nonstructural Checklist (grouped by system) FIRE SUPPRESSION PIPING.'Fire suppression piping is anchored and braced in accordance with NFPA-I SPRINKLER CEILING CLEARANCE Penetrations through panelized ceilings for fire suppression devices provide clearances in accordance ARCHITECTURE withNFPA l3. No seismic bracing was observed on the fire suppression piping. Fire suppression piping ENGINEERING is generally supported within 12" of structure in areas observed with exception of N-S PLANNING sprinkler mains that are running parallel to wall. Sprinkler heads in ceiling areas have collars and it is assumed that adequate clearance is provided. INTERIORS Page 149 ‹fik Retrofit of fire suppression system to include bracing where pipes are suspended more than 12" below structure is recommended. 1.1 N-S sprinkler main running parallel to wall hung _ - well below roof. Install new bracing of main to wall or roof 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.1285 SUSPENDED GYPSUM BOARD:Suspended gypsum board ceilings have attachments FAX:503.226.!670 that resist seismic forces for every 12 ft2 of area. 1NFO a©7CIDAINC.COM INTEGRATED CEILINGS.'Integrated suspended ceilings with continuous areas greater WWW.CIDAINC.COM than 144 ft2 and ceilings of smaller areas that are not surrounded by restraining partitions are laterally restrained at a spacing no greater than 12 fit with members attached to the structure above. Each restraint location has a minimum of four diagonal wires and compression struts, or diagonal members capable of resisting compression. EDGE CLEARANCE' The free edges of integrated suspended ceilings with continuous areas greater than 144 ftz have clearances from the enclosing wall or partition of at least the following:in Moderate Seismicity, % inch;in High Seismicity, 3/4 inch. EDGE SUPPORT: The free edges of integrated suspended ceilings with continuous areas greater than 144 ft2 are supported by closure angles or channels not less than 2 inches wide. Suspended ceiling area on the second floor is minimal and occurs in rooms smaller than 144ft^2. Suspended ceilings on the north half of the first floor were mostly re-done in 2016 and are assumed to be per code. A large portion of the southern half will need to be removed and reinstalled as part of the structural retrofit and will need to be installed per code at that time. PENDANT SUPPORTS:Light fixtures on pendant supports are attached at a spacing equal to or less than 6ft. Unbraced suspended fixtures are free to allow a 360-degree range of motion at an angle not less than 45 degrees from horizontal without contacting adjacent components. Altematively, if rigidly supported and/or braced, they are free to move with the structure to which they are attached without damaging adjoining ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 150 components. Additionally, the connection to the structure is capable of accommodating ‹fik the movement without failure. 1.1 Unbraced pendent lights occur over clearstory area at checkout desk. For the most part they are set at different elevations or spaced far enough apart not to impact each other. Short pendants near sprinkler lines may need to be raised or relocated to avoid possible conflict with sprinkler pipes. Pendant lights over clearstory area 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 1NFO a©7CIDAINC.COM WWW.CIDAINC.COM EMERGENCY LIGHTING:Emergency and egress lighting equipment is anchored or braced Most of the exit signage is wall-mounted and may be considered suitably anchored. TALL NARROW EQUIPMENT Equipment more than 6 it high with a height-to-depth or height-to-width ratio greater than 3-to-l is anchored to the floor slab or adjacent structural walls. Although most of the currently unbraced equipment does not meet the aspect ratio trigger for noncompliance under this criterion, CIDA recommends adding anchorage to all equipment/units which weigh more than 400 pounds and suspended units which weigh more than 75 pounds (current building code requirement). The 2nd floor bookshelves appear to be original and do not appear to be anchored to the floor. It will be necessary to install anchorage at each corner of each section of shelving to prevent overturning during a seismic event. - . � i ' r Exterior heat pump units 11:000,00 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 1 51 Storage racks in utility room without anchorage. ‹fik ,..-,:i-r-ft V 1 61 .1) , luir} T�"!;� y _ , , ; �: '-s - 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 1 Newer shelving on first floor. CIDA was not PORTLAND,OR 97224 URA able to confirm shelves were anchored. If not PHONE:503.226.1285 ""� anchored, new anchorage will be required. I'l FAX:503.226.1670 4/I r' l 1NFO a©7CIDAINC.COM - , ��` ' ""°" ' - WWW.CIDAINC.COM a ,.k. pa . ._ , 4, " -. . 1 , • UKNOWNS & ASSUMPTIONS Structural detailing shown in the provided construction drawings was assumed to be representative of actual in field conditions in lieu of more detailed field investigation. Non-destructive investigation of existing conditions found this assumption to be largely accurate, so far as detailing of as-built structure was observed. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING INTERIORS Page 152 REA)V ENGINEERING, INC. May 01, 2024 For: CIDA Re: Lake Oswego Library 706 4th St, Lake Oswego, OR 97034 MEP Structural & Code Findings and Recommendations Plumbing Findings: The existing plumbing system consists of three existing restrooms, a mechanical room, and an existing janitor room on the first floor.All existing plumbing fixtures on the first floor appear to be in good working condition.The water heater and associated plumbing fixtures in the mechanical room are properly seismically restrained.The existing first floor plumbing systems appear to not require any seismic upgrade currently. The existing plumbing system consists of two existing restrooms and an existing employee lunchroom on the second floor. All existing plumbing fixtures on the second floor appear to be in good working condition.The existing second floor plumbing systems appear to not require any seismic upgrade currently. The library building is a fully sprinklered building and all fire protection piping appears to be seismically braced to code.The existing building fire protection systems appear to not require any seismic upgrade currently. Recommendations list: • No plumbing recommendations at this time Mechanical Findings: The existing building HVAC systems are served by a rooftop RTU serving the second floor spaces, with the first floor and basement served by mechanical room AHUs with exterior HP units on grade.There are three additional rooftop split system HPs serving ceiling FC units located in staff spaces on the first floor. Structurally, per SMACNA standards all round ductwork 28" diameter or larger, as well as rectangular ductwork larger than 6 sqft needs to be braced seismically.The existing second floor 28" round supply 9615 SW Allen Boulevard,Suite 107 Beaverton,OR 97005 Phone:503.292.6000 Page I 53 ductwork in the north section of the building from RTU-1 appears to only have duct hangars and does not appear to be seismically braced. 1 _t E "IN1 P iku- Second floor supply ductwork in the NW corner of the building The 28" duct on the second floor will need both transverse and longitudinal bracing provided, compliant with SMACNA'Seismic restraint manual guidelines for mechanical systems' chapter 3 requirements and corresponding to the proper seismic hazard table for the building classification. The basement elevator control room was warm at the time of the site visit and does not meet the standard for good design practices. It is recommended to provide a dedicated exhaust fan for the room for high temperature protection in the space and replace the mesh-covered opening to the adjacent electrical room with a proper transfer grille. /21) \ 40/An -40' IUU '' '50 �` 'C - ■ SPRINGfittR I Wall thermostat in basement elevator control room at the time of visit Page I 54 slr` 3.;.,r .• .mot✓0.0 war.• :... Existing transfer opening from basement elevator control room to adjacent electrical room ASHRAE recommendations for the life expectancy of rooftop single and multi-zone air conditioners is 15 years, with air to air heat pumps as 15 years as well. Based on information available, it is our understanding that the existing rooftop unit RT-1 serving the second floor was replaced last year and is within this threshold.The three rooftop unit/interior FC split system units serving the faculty offices are understood to be approximately 2016 and therefore are still within the life expectancy. . •d _ _:. $.‘- 'L,,..,..... i y: ram. -- i l', p Ir - Rooftop CUs serving ceiling FCs located in administrative spaces on first floor Indoor air handler AH-2 and associated economizer is understood to have been replaced in 2016 with a new unit,with the indoor AH-1,AH-3, and outdoor condensing unit all appearing to be 2018 or later manufacturer dates per unit serial numbers, which are all within the life expectancies of the units. Recommendations list: • Brace existing second floor 28" round ductwork seismically, meeting SMACNA seismic bracing standards of transverse and longitudinal bracing for building classification • Add a louver cover for the existing transfer opening into the basement elevator machine room Page I 55 • Add a dedicated exhaust fan and associated exhaust duct run into the basement elevator machine room interlocked to a new thermostat and operating when above temperature setpoint in the space • If RTU-1 is required to be removed for roof work, evaluate existing curb structurally to verify if a new curb is required Electrical Findings: The existing electrical system is fed underground from transformers on a utility pole to a single 120/208VAC 3 phase meter through a 1200A service and MDP, mounted on the building exterior.This MDP appears to feed SDP1 and an old MDP.The old MDP, located in building basement, could be replaced.The basement MDP appears to be original to the structure and has utility CTs retired in place. Removing retired CTs or replacing equipment would allow flexibility and space for future electrical load demands. Building luminaires appear to be predominately T8 fluorescent.The lighting could be updated to LED for energy cost saving and efficiency. It is assumed from the one-line diagram on provided drawings,the existing 150KW dual fuel emergency generator is not connected to the panels fed from SDP2. From the one-line diagram provided from the backup generator project, only panels ESDP and 2E would be powered in the event of loss of utility power.This generator appears to be undersized, based on an assumed 1200A service,to power the entire building in the event of a utility outage. Recent onsite testing by others suggest the generator powers the entire building excluding 2nd floor HVAC.A full system study is recommended to determine if peak system load is sufficiently covered by the existing 150KW generator. No seismic issues were noted on the March 1, 2024 site visit. However,there are two areas of concern for the NEC. One area of concern is electrical room 129 on the first floor.This room is currently being used for storage. NEC 110.26(B) Clear Spaces requires "Working space required by this section shall not be used for storage."The second area of concern is the egress door for electrical room 111 in the basement. In room 111, the door does not"open in the direction of egress," per NEC 110.26(C)(3) Personnel Doors. Recommendations list: • Conduct study of power usage for existing building conditions. • Generate an updated one-line diagram to accurately document the current system. • Assess and update equipment labeling where out of date or missing. • Consider replacing the emergency generator if power study indicates existing generator is insufficient to power entire building. Generator and ATS will need be connected upstream of the outdoor MDP and ATS may need to be replaced with a service rated ATS in order to backup the entire facility. Alter door into basement electrical room to meet egress requirements. • Place floor markings to indicate clear space requirements per NEC 110.26(B). In kind replacement of old basement main switch gear and distribution panels. • Install new LED lighting or retrofit existing luminaires to LED as necessary. Page I 56 AAIafghan associates,inc. ENGINEERING Lake Oswego Librar DA REPORT 706 4th Street Lake Oswego, Oregon March 26, 2024 Christopher Thornton, PE AAI Engineering 4875 S.W. Griffith Drive Suite 100 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 PH 503.620.3030 FX 503.620.5539 christophert@aaieng.com AAI Project Number: A24038.10 Page 57 Lake Oswego Library Table of Contents Section A Site Findings 3-4 Appendices Appendix A Site Exhibit 5 2 Page I 58 Lake Oswego Library Our site investigation revealed that the onsite ADA network (Parking, Pedestrian Pathways, Ramps) to be out of compliance with the current ADA standards. While the ramps and sidewalks can be redesigned and rebuilt within the general footprint of their current alignment, the ADA Parking will require a larger reworking of the existing parking lot and drive aisles. Most of the concrete flatwork onsite will need to be demolished and rebuilt as sections that do meet ADA code are heavily damaged with large cracks and in one place it appears to be sinking. Most of the offsite ADA curb ramps meet current code, however the older sections of sidewalk do not and would need to be removed and replaced. The curb ramp on E St at the alley will need to be redesigned and rebuilt and the curb ramp on E St at 4th will need to have the storm drainage reworked to eliminate the runoff from entering the ADA ramps during storm events. See Appendix A—Site Exhibit for an aerial image of the site, with the locations of the following items shown. Section A Site Findings Pedestrian Ramp R1 (Private): Ramp does not meet current design code. • No clear landings at the top and bottom of the ramp. (2010ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.7) • Back of the ramp cross slope is over 2% (2.7%). (2010ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.3) Pedestrian Ramp R2 (Private): Ramp does not meet current design code. • Landing at the bottom of the ramp exceeds 2% running slope (8.3%). (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.7) • Ramp running slope is over 8.3% (12.2%). (2010ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.2) Pedestrian Ramp R3 (Private): Ramp does not meet current design code. • Landing at the top of the ramp exceeds 2% running slope (2.9%). (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.7) • Ramp running slope is over 8.3% (8.7%-10.7%). (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.2) • Proper handrails are not installed. Only one side has a handrail and there are no handrail extensions past the ramp. (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.8, 505.2, 505.10) • Concrete at the base of the ramp is cracked and seems to be sinking. Pedestrian Ramp R4(Private): Ramp does not meet current design code. • Landing at the bottom of the ramp exceeds 2% running slope (4.9%). (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.7) • Ramp running slope at southern edge is over 8.3% (8.8%). (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.2) • Proper handrails are not installed. (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 405.8, 505.2, 505.10) Pedestrian Ramp R5 (Public): Ramp itself meets current design code. • Much of the sidewalk along 4th St exceeds 2% cross slope. (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 403.3) Pedestrian Ramp R6 (Public): Ramp itself meets current design code. 3 Page I 59 Lake Oswego Library Pedestrian Ramp R7 (Public): Ramp does not meet current design code. • Ramp does not meet current public curb return ramp configuration. Pedestrian Ramp R8 (Public): Ramp itself meets current design code. • Storm runoff from E Ave. flows down the pedestrian ramp makes a 90 degree turn and flows back out onto 4th St. Pedestrian Ramp R9 (Public): Ramp itself meets current design code. Pedestrian Ramp R10(Public): Ramp itself meets current design code. ADA Parking ADA1 (Private): ADA parking does not meet current design code. • Parking spaces do not meet required widths. (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 502.2) • Access aisle does not meet required widths. (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 502.3) • Most of the parking spaces exceed 2% cross slope and running slope (1.8%-8.6%). (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 403.3) • There is no dedicated ADA pedestrian path to the building. As constructed, the pedestrians have to use the current drive aisle to access the walkway to the building. This path, within the drive aisle, is not marked or delineated in any way. ADA Parking ADA2 (Private): ADA parking does not meet current design code. • Parking spaces do not meet required widths. (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 502.2) • Access aisle does not meet required widths. (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 502.3) • All the parking spaces exceed 2% cross slope and running slope (2.3%-5.8%). (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 403.3) • There is no dedicated ADA pedestrian path to the building. As constructed, the pedestrians have to use the current drive aisle to access the walkway to the building. This path, within the drive aisle, is not marked or delineated in any way. Trench Drain TD1 (Private): Trench drain grate does not meet current design code. • Openings for stormwater runoff collection exceed the allowable with of %". (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 302.3) 4 Page I 60 Lake Oswego Library Appendix A Site Exhibit " -�, _I • r .4,7 .. ' : 4 r.)140... 1.s 4 • 411F I . "1-...; } r # tt. _ _ i Ai . clic xx li i. 4fity.iire _ • Ar .. .-'ik:. .. . - _Jiff...,..7...4...-z: ,. cs., r, • .; N. +111 a .I. idl�f5 - l 'y '4 i 3F3�`� - • a:• t. F •# j . _ -E ` 1 - x', II Lihra: ` x • - � n* 11 Itr • II . .•• 1 ,_ .ry lr ..- • ge- i .. . . r. . .' • -- ' ' 'It 4 a P '° r' - FHB .. # . 111 436 — - - ''' 7. - NI( -*+' - + !!: .`her' ,< ' .' 5 Page 161 Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Submitted to City of Lake Oswego May 01 , 2024 - Estimate 01 Rev 02 _ -a- . 4,. -,41 z,q4 5 'y • • -4. _,-,:----_-_,:-..-----3( if --40",,, . , . IF ._ ----- . --.., , . ir 1161.itit • --s h s' s , 4 ■i j4. 1 lit . + H y r�. f.' 714 am'�^ s .I. 4 , a. i , '* •te n , .. '.. . b. . - may • �:S' - ^�� - - - ..7,4,4,. r dir. Alt ?I!_._ 0' sa . qi . 4:citt"----...vie` "N"-. . _ _ • , / , re FORTIS 16.___.....il CONSTRUCTION INC- Page 162 Executive Summary re FORTIS CONSTRUCTION INC. Cost Model Estimate No. 01 Revision No. 02 Estimate Date: May 01, 2024 Documents dated Apr 1, 2024 •xs._. Client: City of Lake Oswego - woo Architect: CIDA - Sr. Precon Manager: Ashley Buchanan ashley.buchanan@fortisconstruction.com Project Location: Lake Oswego, OR - - Project Duration: 8 months Project Size: 26,414 sf CONSTRUCTION COST , $7,692,105 J I Construction Costs $ 266.50 /sf $ 7,039,455 Escalation (4% per year) 12.0% $ 24.71 /sf $ 652,650 Total $ 291.21 /sf $ 7,692,105 Other Project Costs: Scope Description: Soft costs not included in construction cost estimate See CIDA's summary of soft costs ADA Upgrades $ 837,116 Exterior Renovation $ 986,806 Interior Renovation $ 2,378,013 Seismic Upgrade $ 3,364,389 Site Renovation $ 125,782 Based on single phase of unoccupied space Cost model is scope specific to the CIDA narrative items A wholesale building modernization will be greater Page 163 Systems Summary L-1 FORT IS CONSTRUCTION INC. Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Date Version 6 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 May 01,2024 Estimate No.01,Rev.02 r TOTAL PROJECT ADA Upgrades Exterior Renovation Interior Renovation Seismic Upgrade Site Renovation 26,414 sf 26,414 sf 26,414 sf 26,414 sf 26,414 sf 26,414 sf Description Total $/sf Total $/sf Total $/sf Total $/sf Total $/sf Total $/sf 01 DEMOLITION $ 242,676 $9.19 $ 37,661 $1.43 $ 13,001 $0.49 $ 1,520 $0.06 $ 190,494 $7.21 $ - $0.00 02 SITEWORK $ 153,510 $5.81 $ 72,660 $2.75 $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ 80,850 Sacs 03 FOUNDATIONS $ 41,332 $1.56 $ - $o.aa $ - $o.aa $ - $o.aa $ 41,332 $1.56 $ - $0.00 04 SUBSTRUCTURE $ 14,422 $0.55 $ 2,800 $o.1t $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ 11,622 $0.44 $ - $0.00 05SUPERSTRUCTURE $ 632,475 $23.94 $ 1,200 $0.05 $ - Km $ - Km $ 631,275 $23.90 $ - $0.00 06 EXTERIOR SKIN $ 712,415 $26.97 $ - $0.00 $ 497,701 $18.84 $ - $0.00 $ 214,714 $8.13 $ - $0.00 07 ROOFING $ 255,756 $9.68 $ - $0.00 $ 118,476 $4.49 $ - $0.00 $ 137,280 $5.20 $ - $0.00 08 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $ 1,885,416 $71.38 $ 271,163 $10.27 $ - $0.00 $ 826,070 $31.27 $ 788,183 $29.84 $ - $0.00 09 CONVEYING $ 10,500 $0.40 $ 10,500 $o.4a $ - Sam $ - Sam $ - Woo $ - $0.00 11 PLUMBING/PROCESS PIPING $ 104,028 $3.94 $ 104,028 $3.94 $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 13 MECHANICAL $ 48,330 $1.83 $ - Wm $ - Sam $ 18,000 Km $ 30,330 $1.15 $ - $0.00 14 ELECTRICAL $ 790,634 $29.93 $ 38,068 $1.44 $ 5,120 $0.10 $ 682,946 $25.86 $ 64,500 $2.44 $ - $0.00 16 SITE REQUIREMENTS $ 52,827 $2.00 $ - Wm $ - Sam $ - Sam $ 52,827 $2.00 $ - Km SUBTOTAL $ 4,944,321 $187.19 $ 538,080 $20.37 $ 634,298 $24.01 $ 1,528,536 $57.87 $ 2,162,558 $81.87 $ 80,850 $3.06 MARKUPS Estimating Contingency 10.0% $ 494,432 $18.72 $ 53,808 $2.04 $ 63,430 $2.40 $ 152,854 $5.79 $ 216,256 $8.19 $ 8,085 $0.31 Escalation(4%per year) 12.0% $ 652,650 $24.71 $ 71,027 $2.69 $ 83,727 $3.17 $ 201,767 $7.64 $ 285,458 $10.81 $ 10,672 $0.40 Jobsite Management 11.o% $ 670,054 $25.37 $ 72,921 $2.76 $ 85,960 $3.25 $ 207,147 $7.84 $ 293,070 $11.10 $ 10,957 $0.41 Site Requirements 3.0% $ 202,844 $7.68 $ 22,075 $0.84 $ 26,022 Sass $ 62,709 $2.37 $ 88,720 $3.36 $ 3,317 $0.13 Construction Contingency 3.0% $ 208,929 $7.91 $ 22,737 $0.86 $ 26,803 $1.01 $ 64,590 $2.45 $ 91,382 $3.46 $ 3,416 $a.13 Permits and Fees 0.oi $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ - $0.00 $ $0.00 All Risk Insurance 0.7% $ 46,626 $1.77 $ 5,074 $0.10 $ 5,982 $0.23 $ 14,414 $0.55 $ 20,393 $0.77 $ 762 $0.03 Liability Insurance 1.3% $ 93,858 $3.55 $ 10,214 $0.39 $ 12,041 $0.46 $ 29,016 $1.10 $ 41,052 $1.55 $ 1,535 $0.06 Sub Default Insurance 1.3% $ 95,078 $3.60 $ 10,347 $0.30 $ 12,197 $0.46 $ 29,393 $1.11 $ 41,586 $1.57 $ 1,555 $0.os Contractor Bond 0.8% $ 59,270 $2.24 $ 6,450 $0.24 $ 7,604 $0.29 $ 18,323 $0.69 $ 25,924 $0.98 $ 969 $0.04 Fee 3.0% $ 224,042 $8.48 $ 24,382 $0.92 $ 28,742 $1.as $ 69,263 $2.62 $ 97,992 $3.71 $ 3,664 $0.14 TOTAL CURRENT ESTIMATE $ 7,692,105 $291.21 $ 837,116 $31.69 $ 986,806 $37.36 $ 2,378,013 $90.03 $ 3,364,389 $127.37 $ 125,782 $4.76 Page I 64 Detail Estimate ��J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes ADA Upgrades 26,414.00 sf $ 20.37 $ 538,080 01 DEMOLITION $ 37,661 B2-Basement Restrooms $ 9,483 Interior Demolition-remove wall framing, drywall,doors 256.00 sf $ 10.67 $ 2,731 Remove Toilets 2.00 ea $ 480.00 $ 960 Remove Sinks 2.00 ea $ 480.00 $ 960 Safeoff Plumbing Systems 224.00 sf $ 2.50 $ 560 Saw Cut And Remove Floor Slab-On-Grade 40.00 sf $ 18.00 $ 720 plumbing saw cuts Remove Drinking Fountain 1.00 ea $ 480.00 $ 480 Remove Floor Tile 256.00 sf $ 12.00 $ 3,072 E-Site $ 8,100 Saw Cut And Remove site asphalt parking 1,800.00 sf $ 4.50 $ 8,100 M2-Restrooms&Water Fountain $ 13,653 Remove Drinking Fountain 1.00 ea $ 480.00 $ 480 Interior Demolition-remove wall framing,drywall,doors 380.00 sf $ 10.67 $ 4,053 Saw Cut And Remove Floor Slab-On-Grade 60.00 sf $ 18.00 $ 1,080 plumbing saw cuts Remove Toilets 4.00 ea $ 480.00 $ 1,920 Remove Sinks 2.00 ea $ 480.00 $ 960 Safeoff Plumbing Systems 336.00 sf $ 2.50 $ 840 Remove Floor Tile 360.00 sf $ 12.00 $ 4,320 U1 -Upper-Level Employee Restrooms $ 6,425 Interior Demolition-remove wall framing,drywall,doors 300.00 sf $ 10.67 $ 3,200 Remove Floor Tile 90.00 sf $ 12.00 $ 1,080 Saw Cut And Remove Floor Slab-On-Grade - sf $ 18.00 $ - plumbing saw cuts Remove Toilets 2.00 ea $ 480.00 $ 960 Remove Sinks 2.00 ea $ 480.00 $ 960 Remove Drinking Fountain - ea $ 480.00 $ - Safeoff Plumbing Systems 90.00 sf $ 2.50 $ 225 02 SITEWORK $ 72,660 E-Site $ 72,660 Concrete Apron-main entry 10.00 If $ 42.00 $ 420 New Entry Ramp 640.00 sf $ 26.00 $ 16,640 add concrete ramp adjacent to existing brick approach Site Handrail at New Entry Ramp 80.00 If $ 380.00 $ 30,400 AC Paving-regrade for ADA 1,800.00 sf $ 14.00 $ 25,200 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 165 Detail Estimate h.J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location T ■ Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes 04 SUBSTRUCTURE $ 2,800 B2-Basement Restrooms $ 1,120 Patch S.O.G.-plumbing sawcuts 40.00 sf $ 28.00 $ 1,120 M2-Restrooms&Water Fountain $ 1,680 Patch S.O.G.-plumbing sawcuts 60.00 sf $ 28.00 $ 1,680 U1 -Upper-Level Employee Restrooms $ - Patch S.O.G.-plumbing sawcuts - sf $ 28.00 $ - 05 SUPERSTRUCTURE $ 1,200 B3-Story Time Tiered Seating $ 1,200 Wood Blocking-handrail 24.00 If $ 50.00 $ 1,200 08 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $ 271,163 B2-Basement Restrooms $ 77,040 F&I Single HM Frame/Door 2.00 ea $ 4,800.00 $ 9,600 Full Height Walls 528.00 sf $ 23.50 $ 12,408 painted drywall Drywall Ceilings 256.00 sf $ 19.50 $ 4,992 painted drywall ADA motor operator hardware 2.00 ea $ 4,200.00 $ 8,400 Floor Tile 256.00 sf $ 28.50 $ 7,296 Wall Tile 1,024.00 sf $ 26.00 $ 26,624 Single Toilet Room Accessories 2.00 ea $ 3,800.00 $ 7,600 Interior Signage Adjustment 1.00 ea $ 120.00 $ 120 B3-Story Time Tiered Seating $ 13,728 Drywall Patching 24.00 sf $ 13.00 $ 312 painted drywall Single Pipe Handrail, Painted 24.00 If $ 280.00 $ 6,720 Stair Strip-contrasting 120.00 If $ 45.00 $ 5,400 Repaint Wall 960.00 sf $ 1.35 $ 1,296 due to handrail B6-Children's Library $ 1,520 Replace Station with ADA compliant Desk 4.00 If $ 380.00 $ 1,520 M1 -Entry Vestibule $ 960 Revise Mounting Heights 1.00 Is $ 720.00 $ 720 Interior Signage Adjustment 2.00 ea $ 120.00 $ 240 M2-Restrooms&Water Fountain $ 95,336 F&I Single HM Frame/Door 2.00 ea $ 4,800.00 $ 9,600 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 166 Detail Estimate ��J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes ADA motor operator hardware 2.00 ea $ 4,200.00 $ 8,400 Full Height Walls 528.00 sf $ 23.50 $ 12,408 painted drywall Drywall Ceilings 380.00 sf $ 19.50 $ 7,410 painted drywall Floor Tile 380.00 sf $ 28.50 $ 10,830 Wall Tile 848.00 sf $ 26.00 $ 22,048 Single Toilet Room Accessories 2.00 ea $ 3,800.00 $ 7,600 Interior Signage Adjustment 2.00 ea $ 120.00 $ 240 Toilet Partitions 4.00 ea $ 4,200.00 $ 16,800 U1 -Upper-Level Employee Restrooms $ 73,579 F&I Single HM Frame/Door 4.00 ea $ 4,800.00 $ 19,200 ADA motor operator hardware 2.00 ea $ 4,200.00 $ 8,400 Full Height Walls 840.00 sf $ 23.50 $ 19,740 painted drywall Drywall Ceilings 300.00 sf $ 19.50 $ 5,850 painted drywall Floor Tile 90.00 sf $ 28.50 $ 2,565 Wall Tile 384.00 sf $ 26.00 $ 9,984 Single Toilet Room Accessories 2.00 ea $ 3,800.00 $ 7,600 Interior Signage Adjustment 2.00 ea $ 120.00 $ 240 U3-Conference Room $ 9,000 F&I Single HM Frame/Door 1.00 ea $ 4,800.00 $ 4,800 new deck terrace door ADA motor operator hardware 1.00 ea $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200 new deck terrace door 09 CONVEYING $ 10,500 M3-General Stack Area $ 10,500 Revise Signals 3.00 stps $ 3,500.00 $ 10,500 11 PLUMBING/PROCESS PIPING $ 104,028 B2-Basement Restrooms $ 32,768 WC Wall Hung Flush Valve, Connections, Piping 2.00 ea $ 5,800.00 $ 11,600 Lay Wall Hung Vitreous, Connections, Piping 2.00 ea $ 4,200.00 $ 8,400 DF Wall Hung Elect, Connections, Piping 1.00 ea $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600 Plumbing-repipe/connections at restroom 256.00 sf $ 28.00 $ 7,168 M2-Restrooms&Water Fountain $ 47,840 Plumbing-repipe/connections at restroom 380.00 sf $ 28.00 $ 10,640 WC Wall Hung Flush Valve, Connections, Piping 4.00 ea $ 5,800.00 $ 23,200 Lay Wall Hung Vitreous, Connections, Piping 2.00 ea $ 4,200.00 $ 8,400 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 167 Detail Estimate h.J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes DF Wall Hung Elect, Connections, Piping 1.00 ea $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600 U1 -Upper-Level Employee Restrooms $ 23,420 Plumbing-repipe/connections at restroom 90.00 sf $ 38.00 $ 3,420 WC Wall Hung Flush Valve, Connections, Piping 2.00 ea $ 5,800.00 $ 11,600 Lay Wall Hung Vitreous, Connections, Piping 2.00 ea $ 4,200.00 $ 8,400 DF Wall Hung Elect, Connections, Piping - ea $ 5,600.00 $ - 14 ELECTRICAL $ 38,068 B2-Basement Restrooms $ 9,728 Branch Circuiting-reciruit power, lights,switches 256.00 sf $ 16.00 $ 4,096 Lighting, Fixtures, Lighting Controls 256.00 sf $ 22.00 $ 5,632 M1 -Entry Vestibule $ 2,500 Fire Alarm-Device 1.00 ea $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500 M2-Restrooms&Water Fountain $ 14,440 Branch Circuiting-reciruit power, lights,switches 380.00 sf $ 16.00 $ 6,080 Lighting, Fixtures, Lighting Controls 380.00 sf $ 22.00 $ 8,360 U1 -Upper-Level Employee Restrooms $ 11,400 Branch Circuiting-reciruit power, lights,switches 300.00 sf $ 16.00 $ 4,800 Lighting, Fixtures, Lighting Controls 300.00 sf $ 22.00 $ 6,600 Exterior Renovation 26,414.00 sf $ 24.01 $ 634,298 01 DEMOLITION $ 13,001 B1 -Electrical&Elevator Machine Room $ 4,180 Remove wall siding outside storage room 200.00 sf $ 6.50 $ 1,300 Demo Electrical System outside storage room-exterior 1.00 Is $ 2,880.00 $ 2,880 remove and replace E-Exterior Enclosure $ 4,401 Remove wood siding-entrance 677.00 sf $ 6.50 $ 4,401 E-Roof $ 4,420 Remove Membrane/Decking 680.00 sf $ 6.50 $ 4,420 06 EXTERIOR SKIN $ 497,701 B1 -Electrical&Elevator Machine Room $ 13,650 Replace Siding outside storage room 200.00 sf $ 68.25 $ 13,650 WRB,flashing,siding,paint, trim B5-Children's Library-Sloped Glazing Lightwell $ 109,530 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 168 Detail Estimate h.J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes Exterior Glass Lightwell-reseal/regasket/tempered glass 700.00 sf $ 71.43 $ 50,000 Allowance-tbd quantity of tempered glass and reseal scope Exterior Flashings&Sealants-lightwell 110.00 If $ 28.00 $ 3,080 Hardware Adjustment 1.00 Is $ 850.00 $ 850 Patch Exterior Skin/Siding 100.00 sf $ 40.00 $ 4,000 allowance at light well New Clerestory Windows 600.00 sf $ 86.00 $ 51,600 E-Exterior Enclosure $ 352,681 Replace Soffit-Recessed Entry 677.00 sf $ 72.50 $ 49,083 WRB,flashing,siding,paint, trim Exterior Flashings-proper profiles 9,773.00 sf $ 7.00 $ 68,411 Exterior Sealants-recaulk building siding 9,773.00 sf $ 3.00 $ 29,319 Repaint Building Siding&Trim 11,103.00 sf $ 11.50 $ 127,685 Patch Siding/Trim-allowance 9,773.00 sf $ 8.00 $ 78,184 WRB,flashing,siding,paint, trim S4-Roof Level Seismic Upgrade $ 21,840 New Siding-Clerestory Infill due to roof drainage 320.00 sf $ 68.25 $ 21,840 WRB,flashing,siding,paint, trim 07 ROOFING $ 118,476 E-Roof $ 118,476 60 Mil, Mechanically Attached-at roof deck 680.00 sf $ 24.00 $ 16,320 Terrace Decking-coated deck system 420.00 sf $ 64.00 $ 26,880 Roof Patchback 4,873.00 sf $ 12.00 $ 58,476 New Flashings/Trenching at Clerestory Roof 2,800.00 sf $ 6.00 $ 16,800 14 ELECTRICAL $ 5,120 B1 -Electrical&Elevator Machine Room $ 5,120 Panels&Conduit-reinstall at exterior wall 1.00 Is $ 5,120.00 $ 5,120 assumes existing can't be reused Interior Renovation 26,414.00 sf $ 57.87 $ 1,528,536 01 DEMOLITION $ 1,520 B1 -Electrical&Elevator Machine Room $ 480 Remove and relocate storage materials 1.00 Is $ 480.00 $ 480 B4-Storage/Sump Pump room $ 520 Remove and relocate storage materials 1.00 Is $ 520.00 $ 520 B6-Children's Library $ 520 Remove and relocate storage materials 1.00 Is $ 520.00 $ 520 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 169 Detail Estimate ��J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location T Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes 08 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $ 826,070 B1 -Electrical&Elevator Machine Room $ 380 Fire Extinguishers-mounted 1.00 ea $ 380.00 $ 380 B6-Children's Library $ 1,140 Interior Signage Allowance 3.00 ea $ 120.00 $ 360 Fire Extinguishers-mounted 1.00 ea $ 380.00 $ 380 Rearrange Bookcase 2.00 If $ 200.00 $ 400 M3-General Stack Area $ 363,685 Interior Renovations 10,391.00 sf $ 35.00 $ 363,685 signage,FEC,blinds,millwork Stairs $ 52,310 Handrail-replace at north stair 1.00 flt $ 6,720.00 $ 6,720 Handrail-replace at central stair 6.00 flt $ 6,720.00 $ 40,320 New Carpet-north stair 20.00 sf $ 8.50 $ 170 New Carpet-central stair 600.00 sf $ 8.50 $ 5,100 U1 -Upper-Level Employee Restrooms $ 14,000 Interior Renovations 400.00 sf $ 35.00 $ 14,000 relocate lockers,patch wall, floor U5-General Stack Area $ 394,555 Interior Renovations 11,273.00 sf $ 35.00 $ 394,555 signage,FEC,blinds,millwork 13 MECHANICAL $ 18,000 B1 -Electrical&Elevator Machine Room $ 18,000 Exhaust System/Cooling-Elevator Machine Room 1.00 Is $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000 Mechanical Upgrades $ - Replace RTU-1 -not included - Is $ - $ - RTU-1 remains as is 14 ELECTRICAL $ 682,946 B1 -Electrical&Elevator Machine Room $ 1,200 Mechanical Equip Power 1.00 ea $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200 B4-Storage/Sump Pump room $ 450 Correct Electrical 1.00 ea $ 450.00 $ 450 B6-Children's Library $ 2,500 Fire Alarm-Device 1.00 ea $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500 Electrical Upgrades $ 678,796 Distribution panels in basement-replace 1.00 Is $ 74,000.00 $ 74,000 Emergency Generator,ATS 1.00 ea $ 225,000.00 $ 225,000 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 170 Detail Estimate h.J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes Alter Electrical Door, Floor Markings 1.00 Is $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000 LED Liohtino 26,414.00 sf $ 14.00 $ 369,796 replace fixtures only,retrofit Seismic Upgrade 26,414.00 sf $ 81.87 $ 2,162,558 01 DEMOLITION $ 190,494 S1 -Basement Seismic Upgrade $ 13,784 Demo Electrical System-interior storage room 1.00 Is $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200 remove(refeed box) Remove drywall,trim at wall 288.00 sf $ 2.50 $ 720 Saw Cut And Remove Floor Slab-On-Grade 88.00 sf $ 18.00 $ 1,584 Remove wood-framed stair-one flight 1.00 ea $ 2,070.00 $ 2,070 Remove wood-framed stair-central stair 3.00 ea $ 2,070.00 $ 6,210 S2-Level 01 Seismic Upgrade $ 37,330 Remove drywall,trim at wall 3,582.00 sf $ 2.50 $ 8,955 Remove Siding 2,506.00 sf $ 8.50 $ 21,301 Saw Cut And Remove Floor Slab-On-Grade 48.00 sf $ 18.00 $ 864 plumbing saw cuts Remove wood-framed stair-central stair 3.00 ea $ 2,070.00 $ 6,210 S3-Level 02 Seismic Upgrade $ 110,800 Remove Specialty Ceiling 6,800.00 sf $ 8.50 $ 57,800 Careful removal for future re- install Remove Gyperete Topping 5,300.00 sf $ 10.00 $ 53,000 remove for seismic strapping S4-Roof Level Seismic Upgrade $ 28,580 Remove Roofing 2,920.00 sf $ 6.50 $ 18,980 Remove clerestory windows 10.00 ea $ 960.00 $ 9,600 03 FOUNDATIONS $ 41,332 S1 -Basement Seismic Upgrade $ 27,556 Excavation-Hand 5.00 cy $ 1,600.00 $ 8,296 Concrete Shear Footing 3.00 cy $ 6,500.00 $ 19,259 S2-Level 01 Seismic Upgrade $ 13,776 Excavation-Hand 3.00 cy $ 1,600.00 $ 4,147 Concrete Shear Footing 1.00 cy $ 6,500.00 $ 9,630 04 SUBSTRUCTURE $ 11,622 S1 -Basement Seismic Upgrade $ 7,025 Patch S.O.G. 96.00 sf $ 28.00 $ 2,688 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 171 Detail Estimate h.J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes Base Rock-Drain Rock 4.00 cy $ 1,219.87 $ 4,337 S2-Level 01 Seismic Upgrade $ 4,597 Patch S.O.G. 48.00 sf $ 28.00 $ 1,344 Base Rock-Drain Rock 3.00 cy $ 1,219.87 $ 3,253 05 SUPERSTRUCTURE $ 631,275 E-Exterior Enclosure $ 10,400 Wood Framed Shear Wall-clerestory infill 320.00 sf $ 32.50 $ 10,400 S1 -Basement Seismic Upgrade $ 83,400 Plywood Sheathing-shearwall 480.00 sf $ 24.50 $ 11,760 new plywd with new nailing Anchors, Sill Plate Anchors, End of Wall Anchors 64.00 ea $ 385.00 $ 24,640 Wood Stair 1.00 flt $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000 north stair Seismic Upgrade-attachments,connections, patching 4,750.00 sf $ 4.00 $ 19,000 Wood Stair-central stair 3.00 flt $ 7,000.00 $ 21,000 central stair rebuild S2-Level 01 Seismic Upgrade $ 236,507 Plywood Sheathing-shearwall 3,582.00 sf $ 24.50 $ 87,759 new plywd with new nailing Anchors, Sill Plate Anchors, End of Wall Anchors 146.00 ea $ 385.00 $ 56,210 Wood Framed Shear Wall 120.00 sf $ 32.50 $ 3,900 Seismic Upgrade-attachments,connections, patching 11,273.00 sf $ 6.00 $ 67,638 Wood Stair-central stair 3.00 flt $ 7,000.00 $ 21,000 central stair rebuild S3-Level 02 Seismic Upgrade $ 160,788 Blocking- Floor Diaghram Level 2 192.00 sf $ 24.50 $ 4,704 Anchors, Sill Plate Anchors, End of Wall Anchors 24.00 ea $ 385.00 $ 9,240 Renailing Existing Plywood 5,300.00 sf $ 1.75 $ 9,275 Blocking at Plywood Edges 5,300.00 sf $ 5.25 $ 27,825 Strapping 20.00 ea $ 380.00 $ 7,600 Blocking at Plywood Edges 72.00 If $ 24.50 $ 1,764 Strapping 72.00 If $ 22.00 $ 1,584 Renailing Existing Plywood 2,920.00 sf $ 2.50 $ 7,300 Seismic Upgrade-attachments,connections, patching 10,391.00 sf $ 6.00 $ 62,346 Remove Gyperete Topping 5,300.00 sf $ 5.50 $ 29,150 S4-Roof Level Seismic Upgrade $ 140,180 Blocking at Purlins 60.00 If $ 24.50 $ 1,470 Wood Framed Shear Wall-clerestory infill 640.00 sf $ 32.50 $ 20,800 Connection between blocking beams 26.00 ea $ 485.00 $ 12,610 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 172 Detail Estimate h.J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes HDU Connections 78.00 ea $ 1,350.00 $ 105,300 drill,attachments 06 EXTERIOR SKIN $ 214,715 S2-Level 01 Seismic Upgrade $ 171,035 Replace Siding-due to new nailing 2,506.00 sf $ 68.25 $ 171,035 WRB,flashing,siding,paint, trim S4-Roof Level Seismic Upgrade $ 43,680 New Siding-Clerestory Infill due to seismic 640.00 sf $ 68.25 $ 43,680 WRB,flashing,siding,paint, trim 07 ROOFING $ 137,280 E-Roof $ 67,200 Replace Roof at Clerestory Sloped Roof 2,800.00 sf $ 24.00 $ 67,200 S4-Roof Level Seismic Upgrade $ 70,080 Replace Roofing-seismic 2,920.00 sf $ 24.00 $ 70,080 08 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $ 788,183 S1 -Basement Seismic Upgrade $ 177,235 New Drywall at Seismic Plywood 528.00 sf $ 13.00 $ 6,864 painted drywall Ceiling Grid and Tile 88.00 sf $ 14.50 $ 1,276 Interior Improvements Allowance-seismic patchback 11,273.00 sf $ 15.00 $ 169,095 new paint,touch-up trim, carpet S2-Level 01 Seismic Upgrade $ 169,853 New Drywall at Seismic Plywood 1,076.00 sf $ 13.00 $ 13,988 painted drywall Interior Improvements Allowance-seismic patchback 10,391.00 sf $ 15.00 $ 155,865 new paint,touch-up trim, carpet S3-Level 02 Seismic Upgrade $ 441,095 Wood Strip Ceiling-Reinstall 6,800.00 sf $ 40.00 $ 272,000 Reinstall exisitng system. Refinish damage(minor)as needed. Interior Improvements Allowance-seismic patchback 11,273.00 sf $ 15.00 $ 169,095 new paint,touch-up trim, carpet 13 MECHANICAL $ 30,330 S2-Level 01 Seismic Upgrade $ 15,782 Seismic Bracing-Ductwork 11,273.00 sf $ 1.40 $ 15,782 S3-Level 02 Seismic Upgrade $ 14,547 Seismic Bracing-Ductwork 10,391.00 sf $ 1.40 $ 14,547 14 ELECTRICAL $ 64,500 S1 -Basement Seismic Upgrade $ 64,500 PGE Metering Equipment, CT-replace 1.00 Is $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000 assumes existing can't be reused Refeed-replaced electrical gear at storage room 1.00 Is $ 16,500.00 $ 16,500 assumes existing can't be reused Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 173 Detail Estimate h.J FORTIS C ON Si Fl1CTi3N +C Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location I Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes 16 SITE REQUIREMENTS $ 52,827 S1 -Basement Seismic Upgrade $ 9,501 Interior Protection 4,750.00 sf $ 2.00 $ 9,501 S2-Level 01 Seismic Upgrade $ 22,545 Interior Protection 11,273.00 sf $ 2.00 $ 22,545 S3-Level 02 Seismic Upgrade $ 20,781 Interior Protection 10,391.00 sf $ 2.00 $ 20,781 Site Renovation 26,414.00 sf $ 3.06 $ 80,850 02 SITEWORK $ 80,850 E-Site $ 80,850 Regrade Landscape to reroute drainage 320.00 sf $ 12.00 $ 3,840 regrade,replant Replace pipe railing system-loading area 70.00 If $ 460.00 $ 32,200 Replace pipe railing system-back entry 30.00 If $ 460.00 $ 13,800 Remove Tree at Loading Area, Patch Landscape 1.00 Is $ 2,250.00 $ 2,250 Replace pipe railing system-light well 50.00 If $ 460.00 $ 23,000 Replace portion of existing sunken sidewalk 240.00 sf $ 24.00 $ 5,760 SYSTEMS SUBTOTAL 26,414.00 sf $ 187.1•. '• 4,944,321 Estimating Contingency 10.00% $ 494,432 Escalation(4%per year) 12.00% $ 652,650 Jobsite Management 11.00% $ 670,054 Site Requirements 3.00% $ 202,844 Construction Contingency 3.00% $ 208,929 Permits and Fees 0.00% $ - All Risk Insurance 0.65% $ 46,626 Liability Insurance 1.30% $ 93,858 Sub Default Insurance 1.30% $ 95,078 Contractor Bond 0.80% $ 59,270 Fee 3.00% $ 224,042 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 174 Detail Estimate LJ FORTIS CONSTRUCTION INC. Lake Oswego Library Renovation Cost Model Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Based on Documents dated Apr 1,2024 Date:May 01,2024 Building Area:26,414 sf Location Fortis System Building Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Notes MARKUPS SUBTOTAL 26,414.00 sf $ 104.03 $ 2,747,784 PROJECT TOTAL 26,414.00 sf $ 291.21 $ 7,692,106 Lake Oswego Library Renovation,Estimate No.01,Rev.02 Page 175 ‹fik Cost Summation The following is a compiled summation of the project cost estimates associated with the Lake 61 Oswego Public Library remodel and upgrade based on the prepared assessment and evaluation reports. This summation builds on the construction cost summary prepared by Fortis Construction which is included within this report. Line items below are based on a percentage of the construction cost as noted below. An overall estimating range of 20-30% is noted with a rough order of magnitude breakdown of soft cost categories. Construction Costs 15895 SW 72ND AVE - See Fortis Estimate for breakdown and additional information. SUITE 200 Base Construction Costs $7,692,105 PORTLAND,OR 97224 (w/contractor's contingencies&escalation) PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 INFO a©C1DAINC.COM Soft Cost Summary Estimating Range (% of construction cost) WWW.CIDAINC.COM 20% 30% Design $769,21 I (10%) $1,076,895 (14%) Design Fees Architectural 5%- 7% Structural 2%-3% MEP l%-29 Civil l% Landscape 0.5% Survey 0.5% Commissioning $76,921 (1%) $1 15,382 (1.5%) Permits $423,066 (5.5%) $615,369 (8%) Building Permit Fees City Business Taxes MEP Trade Permit Fees System/Utility Charges $76,921 (1%) $153,842 (2%) System Development Charges (SDC) Utility Fees Furnishing, Fixtures & Equipment $38,461 (0.5%) $38,461 (0.5%) FF&E* Telecom/Data $38,46 I (0.5%) $76,921 (1%) Security/Access Control/Etc. 3rcl Party Special Inspection $38,46 I (0.5%) $76,921 (I%) Owner Operational/Staffing Costs $76,921 (1%) $153,842 (2%) Library Staff City Facilities Staff Soft Cost Subtotal $1,538,423 $2,307,633 Construction + Soft Cost Total $9,230,528 $9,999,738 Total w/ 5% Owner Project Contingency** $9,692,054 $10,499,725 FF&E line item is for relocation and adaptation of existing furnishings and owner-provided equipment. Does not include new or replacement FF&E. ARCHITECTURE ODA recommends that the owner carry an overall project contingency of596 This contingency is separate from the construction contingency. The project contingency accounts for outside cost impacts ENGINEERING not part of construction costs including additional fees, unforeseen conditions requiring change in scope, or additional outside influences on the project not part of the construction scope. PLANNING INTERIORS Page 176 7 Depart Department of Transportation Standards for Accessible Parking Places Oregon Transportation Commission 2023 Page 177 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places ODOT is an Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action Employer. This information can be made available in alternative format by contacting the Traffic-Roadway Section at 503-986-3568. ODOT does not discriminate on the basis of disability in admission or access to our programs, services, activities,hiring and employment practices. Questions: 1-877-336-6368 (EEO-ODOT) or through Oregon Relay Service at 7-1-1. Oregon Department of Transportation Engineering &Technical Services Branch Traffic-Roadway Section 4040 Fairview Industrial Dr Salem, Oregon 97302 503-986-3568 Accessibility at ODOT September 2023 page i Page I78 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Table of Contents Introduction 1 1.0- Parking Lot Layouts 2 2.0 - Pavement Markings 2 3.0 - Sign Design 2 4.0 - Sign Mounting 3 5.0 - Other Considerations 3 6.0 - Contacts 4 7.0 - Referenced Standards 5 September 2023 page ii Page I 79 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Introduction In accordance with Oregon Revise Statute (ORS)447.233,the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) adopted standards for accessible person parking places,which took effect on Jan.22, 1992. All new construction or re-striping of accessible parking spaces and access aisles is required to meet new minimum standards. The layouts, signing, and pavement marking standards for accessible parking places presented in this document have been adapted from, and shall comply with, the listed "referenced standards" shown on page 5. Further information and requirements for accessible design can be found in the "referenced standards." The 2023 edition of these standards does not change any content. This new addition is now American Disabilities Act(ADA) compatible and has new contacts for information to reflect changes in staffing at ODOT. Links to various resources have also been updated. September 2023 page 1 Page 180 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places 1.0 — Parking Lot Layouts An accessible parking space shall be at least 9' wide with an adjacent access aisle at least 6' wide. The access aisle shall be at least 8' wide for an accessible parking space designated as "van-accessible" or reserved for wheelchair users only. Example layouts are shown in Figures 1 through 5. The access aisle must be located on the passenger side of the parking space (Figure 1) except that two adjacent accessible parking spaces may share a common access aisle (Figures 2,3, and 5). Refer to Chapter 11 of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code to calculate the required number of accessible parking spaces and for other requirements. 2.0 - Pavement Markings Details of pavement markings are shown in Figures 1 through 5. Each accessible parking space shall have a pavement marking stencil as shown in Figure 6. Pavement markings and stencils are required to be white and should be retroreflective. The use of blue curb and blue background on pavement marking stencils is optional. The symbol for the pavement marking stencil is the international symbol of access as shown in the Standard Highway Signs book published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Pavement marking stencil is available in two different sizes: • Minimum—Used for facilities not on the state highway right of way. • Standard—Used for facilities on the state highway right of way. Each access aisle shall have a"No Parking" pavement marking legend as shown in Figure 7. The "No Parking" pavement legend shall be either white or yellow (for added contrast) and should be retroreflective. 3.0 - Sign Design Each accessible parking space shall have the appropriate sign(s) as required below. All signs are required to be retroreflective. There are five different signs that are used for accessible parking spaces: • Sign No.R7-8 (Figure 8)—This is the standard sign used to designate accessible parking spaces. All accessible parking spaces shall have this sign. The symbol September 2023 page 2 Page 181 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places • for this sign is the international symbol of access as shown in the Standard Highway Signs book published by the FHWA. • Sign No.R7-8P (Figure 9)—The "VAN ACCESSIBLE" sign is used with R7-8 sign to designate those accessible parking spaces that have a minimum 8' wide access aisle. Any vehicle with a DMV disabled permit can use van-accessible spaces. • Sign No. OR7-8c (Figure 10)—The "WHEELCHAIR USER ONLY" sign is used with R7- 8 and R7-8P signs to designate those accessible parking spaces that have a minimum 8' wide access aisle and are reserved for wheelchair users only. Only those vehicles with a DMV disabled permit displaying a "Wheelchair User" placard or decal can use these parking spaces. • Sign No. OR7-9 (Figure 11)—The "ACCESS AISLE NO PARKING" sign is installed in areas where the "No Parking" pavement marking stencil may not be visible regularly due to snow or sand. • Sign No. OR7-9a (Figure 11)—The arrow sign is only used with OR7-9 sign when placement of the OR7-9 cannot be placed at the back of the accessible route directly in view of entire access aisle. In this case sign OR7-9 can be placed to one side of the ramp with the arrow sign pointing to the access aisle. The arrow sign shall be reversed to point correctly down towards the access aisle in this circumstance. 4.0 - Sign Mounting Post-mounted signs shall be installed with a vertical clearance of 7' (±3")between the bottom of the sign to the ground line. If more than one sign is required for an accessible parking space, all signs shall be mounted on a single post except for the "ACCESS AISLE NO PARKING" and arrow signs.When signs are mounted on buildings or piers, a vertical clearance of 5' minimum shall be maintained between the bottom of the sign and the floor of the parking space. The sign(s) shall be laterally placed as shown in Figures 1 and 2. Posts and hardware used to mount signs on the state highway right of way shall be according to ODOT standard drawings and standard specifications for construction.Posts and hardware used to mount signs on public right of way other than state highways may have different requirements. Posts and hardware used to mount signs on private right of way are at the discretion of the owner. It is advisable to contact an engineer for an analysis of post and mounting hardware if in doubt. 5.0 - Other Considerations On state highway right of way, requests for work must be submitted through the appropriate ODOT district office.All work must meet the applicable ODOT standards and specifications. September 2023 page 3 Page 182 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places On public or private right of way other than on the state highway,requests for work must be submitted through the appropriate local jurisdiction. This may include the public works department,the local building department and/or the building codes division. All work must meet the applicable local agency and/or building codes division standards and specifications. 6.0 - Contacts Contractors/Suppliers-Most sign suppliers, striping contractors, and pavement marking stencil contractors are familiar with the requirements of this document,but one may want to make sure to make sure work does not have to be redone. Building Codes Division-For questions regarding the Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Chapter 11 -Accessibility, enforcement of accessible design standards, and inspections, contact: • Building Codes Division-503-378-4133 E-mail:Bcd.info@oregon.gov Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)-For questions regarding the information, contact the following based on the type of information needed: Sign questions: • State Traffic Sign Engineer Marie Kennedy, PE-503-986-4013 E-mail: Marie.Kennedy@odot.oregon.gov Pavement Marking questions: • Traffic Marking&Sign Engineer Frank Belleque, PE-503-428-6874 E-mail: Frank.Belleque@odot.oregon.gov All other related ADA questions: • Senior ADA Standards Engineer Taundra Mortensen,PE-503-400-4256 E-mail: Taundra.L.Mortensen@odot.oregon.gov Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division(DMV)-For questions regarding obtaining and using disabled vehicle permits, contact your local DMV office found in the government pages of the phone book or online at http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/DMV. Local Police-For questions regarding enforcement of individuals parking improperly in an accessible space, contact your local police agency found in the government pages of the phone book. Advocacy Groups-For general accessible parking info, support, and resources, contact: • Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America-503-362-7998 Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America(tristatepva.org) September 2023 page 4 Page 183 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places • Oregon Disabilities Commission-800-282-8096 https://www.oregon.gov/DHS/SENIORS- DISABILITIES/ADVISORY/ODC/Pages/index.aspx • Northwest ADA Center-800-949-4232 http://www.dbtacnorthwest.org/contact-us • U.S. Department of Justice-800-514-0301 http://www.ada.gov/ 7.0 - Referenced Standards 1) Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 447.233: oregonlegislature.gov/bills laws/ors/ors447.html 2) Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Chapter 11 Accessibility: http://ecodes.biz/ecodes support/free resources/Oregon/14 Structural/PDFs/Chapter%2 011%20-%20Acces sibility.p df 3) 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design: http://www.ada.gov/2010ADAstandards index.htm 4) FHWA Standard Highway Signs (SHS): http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/sershs millennium.htm 5) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD): http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/ 6) ODOT Standard Drawings: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Engineering/Pages/Standards.aspx 7) ODOT Standard Specifications: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Business/Pages/Standard Specifications.aspx 8) ODOT Sign Policy and Guidelines: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Engineering/Pages/Sign-Policy.aspx September 2023 page 5 Page I 84 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 1: Single-Accessible Parking Space MINIMUM STANDARD SINGLE-ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE (VAN—ACCESSIBLE DESIGNATION REQUIRED) 4FEs> ICI t PkFC�iI SIGN [6.I G 51 & 5ICti uEE1" ACM alf NON R7-R7- O"-9Q9 I, rARKIN . fH 1 VAN 1 slag SIGN "I [Niii — *curb ramp iShaII lint exrend into the access aisles } `• . • ACCESSIBLE R.UTE .a { S P 1 A 0. 0Sign • a • • f f' location' • f ryry u Wheel str}� 6• TYP. ea MP) i a VP �4 �Iy - 36.14 White ripT. }+ ;' l k 06 wide limes Angle orientation o fOr FieIci layout - 01°1111Access aisle El 2' Tarp Ei {& le4t. ' - Pavement markings 6re4c 7 fir wrrd, S decaee lis Fgu ires - 9' Min - • 8' Min Getectxble w rning surfaca rtqq.�Ir d If curb ramp Is lortat d wIthln public right-oi-way September 2023 page 6 Page 185 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 2: Double-Accessible Parking Space MINIMUM STANDARD DOUBLE-ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE (ONE VAN-ACCESSIBLE DESIGNATION REQUIRED) RESERVED 16. ircl PARKING •ICN SIGNr MU t€rEss rusLE 5ICH .R7-i3 CIR - NO NO 7-9 rn PARKA •,,,y, ,� i VAIl SIGH SIGr� Ls, PARMIM6 ACCBt.E R7-8a R a ..., LI'F 4 , . . t 1 CIvESSPkLE RO T ...a • ., Sign a , 5 it a location- Iocation`l a lir 2" r____.--, 2'-2d u 1I Wheel stopI )-36'Typ. �' / 701,rb ra amp c` I• {shall not extend Into ;,- White The access aisle} zi wide lines Angle orientation 1 for field layout . 21 , Acce ss—• _I_YP doaisle m 'AL. u_ .-' I----N-F(": L :9. ,..1,_ PAR NG Pavement markings re&ai7(o.deta S•ee ilsFigures 6 redr - g' Min —$' Illin• -- 9'Min *be#ectable warring surface required d curb ramp is I cM d wvthirl# Ilc right-of-way September 2023 page 7 Page 186 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 3: Five-Accessible Parking Spaces layout MINIMUM STANDARD FIVE- ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES (ONE WHEELCHAIR USER DESIGNATION REQUIRED) ', 43' it SIGN PARKIN • is, G SIGN OR7-g el. ACCESS AEU SIGN VAZ AISLE ' k_ N 0 Oft7-9 SIGN VAN-) SIGN I I SERVED I, ARIA G, ACCESSIBLE R7-8p MMHG f FillEELCh1AIR SIGN USER owLY J0R7-Sc ti _ ACCESSIBLE ROUTE - - .' . ° . - ' ° - - '• •a . • 6 ,, P • .1 ;z ::i 1 ? 1 _ 0 Min Min TMin Min Min 401 001 r — IrAj.' _ .8s, p-,-.1 -1 � i �� - Access aisle ' Curb ramp 1TYpl {g'Min) (shall not extend into the access aisle) Pavement markings —Access aisle (6'Mln) — requireord.dSeeetail Fsigures & 7 f *Detectable warning surface required if curb ramp is located within public right-of-way September 2023 page 8 Page I87 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 4: Parallel - Accessible Parking layout PARALLEL-ACCESSIBLE PARKING LAYOUT KUM PARKING SIGN fun 1 } ,` Lu • • • Lis ' • w Pao,ernent marking •} •' 'J required. See FIg.6 • • . < • for details •' ' , • `} , September 2023 page 9 Page I 88 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 5: Parallel - Accessible Parking layout ANGLE— ACCESSIBLE PARKING LAYOUT RESERVED sicv PARKING R7 8 ks.] SIGN OR7 9 11h 4 I SIGN VAN J tESs luSLl R7-8P ACCE551Ii.E NO OSIC R7 i WHEELCHAIRS !PRIN {IF req'd) VIPER ONLY t . •' /{ SIGN ui 1..9.-t)1-. j\\ Wheel stogy OIL frYP} W . J iI5 x • W 41"4414 u. ofop •.{ x AC CE$lU$LL ,. N V . r • ;. PARKING N'Ill'it.:41144:11} '') l i'r CAR'-9 <,.. 14111 .10 Access- . , *curb ramp li: ,` aisle •(shall not extfne - s Into the access ., aisle) x •Ll � r . . PARKING IWG R7 8 6. P .t+-ern nt rnarklmg re uired. See Figu res r & 7 for details_ DeK stable warrplr►1 urf ce req�uired i curb ramp i locate within public rig ht-4f-why September 2023 page 10 Page I89 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 6: Pavement Marking Stencil for an Accessible Parking Spot PAVEMENT MARKING TEI IL Background C (stro ke wi dth) -11 Pavement Marking Background: optional: Blue, Retroreflective Pavement Marking Stencil: White, Retrcreflective LEGEND DIMENSIDNS (INCHES) A BCDE F L MINIMUM 28 24 3 STANDARD 41 36 4 The pavement marking stencil shall be used to designate an accessible parking area reserved for vehicles with DMV permits. September 2023 page 11 Page 90 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 7: Pavement Marking Legend details for NO PARKING PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND PARKING 1 No j" PARKIN G 1 2" Pavement Marking Legend: White or Yellow, Retroreflective The "No Parking" pavement marking is used to designate an access aisle reserved for persons use parking with a DMV permit.This marking shall be required for all access aisles next to accessible parking spaces. Engineering judgement should be used for placement location to give best visual location to prevent illegal use of access.aisle. yellow may be used instead of white to increase contrast between access aisle white lines and the "No Parking" legend. September 2023 page 12 Page 91 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 8: Sign design details for an accessible parking spot SIGN DESIGN SIGN NO. R7-8 IRESERVED I.:. PARKINGT 4:51111 5 `` BORDER 1,4d 9.88 R-1.5" TN=G.37 5' IN=0.3 75" Sign Background: White, R€troreflective sheeting Sign Legend: cream, Retrureflective sheeting Sign Symbol: White on Blue, Retroreflective sheeting Refer to Standard Highway Sighs book for details. The Disabled Person parking sign is used to designate a parking area reserved for vehicles with DMV permit as staled. September 2023 page 13 Page I 92 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 9: Sign design details for a sign rider to denote a van accessible parking spot SIGN DESIGN SIGN NO. R7-8P In""' 2.25 2D 6, VAN ACCESSIBLE 1.5D } 2.2$ !BORDER I 3,1�-I 11,63 -I 3,19 I R=1.5' TH=o_43r IN=a.325' Sign Background: White, Retroreflective sheeting Sign Legend: Green, Retroreflective sheeting Refer to Standard Hiihway Signs book for details and dimensions. The VAN-ACCESSIBLE sign shall only be used with sign R7-8 to designate the parking spaces that have an access aisle 8 ft Dr wider September 2023 page 14 Page I 93 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 10: Sign design details for a sign rider to denote wheelchair only use for the parking spot SIGN DESIGN SIGN NO. R7-8c ib- 2.25 .." WHEELCHAIR _LSD �' Y.50 USER ONLY ..5. 2.254ss, 2.25 �ORpEa I-2.93 �- 12.I5 2.92� R-1. - T11=0r138' IH=4.325- Sign Background: White. Retroretlective sheeting Sign Legend: Green. Retroreflective sheeting Refer to ODOT Sign Policy it Guidelines for details and dimensions. The WHEELCHAIR USER ONLY sign shall only be used with the Disabled Person Parking Sign (R7-8) and the VAN ACCESSIBLE sign (R7-8P) to designate the wheelchair user only spaces as defined in ORS 447.233. September 2023 page 15 Page I 94 Traffic-Roadway Section Standards for Accessible Parking Places Figure 11: Sign design details for a sign and rider to denote an access aisle where parking is prohibited SIGN DESIGN SIGN NO. OR7-9 �r• - 1.5 3016 4 ACCESS AISLE I:5U SIGN NO. OR7- 2 No , PARK441411111 ARKING , 3B S.r. BORDER I- I O _l 1 1 60N[FER I 2.72 6.55 -I'2.73 R=1.5` R=I.2 5- TH=0.375' 11=0.325. IH-0.375' IN-0.325" Sign Background: White. Retroreflective sheeting Sign Legend: Red, Retroreflective sheeting Sign Symbol: White on Blue, Retroreflective sheeting Sign OR7-9a: Use when back of walk directly behind access aisle is nor available for sign placement and sign must be placed to one side of pedestrian access ramp. The No Parking in Access Aisle sign is used to designate an access aisle reserved for persons use parking with DMV permit. Install sign in locations where"No Parking' pavement marking may not be visible regularly from snow or sand. Place sign to have direct view from end of access aisle when possible outside of accessible route. September 2023 page 16 Page I 95 ODOT provides a safe and reliable multimodal transportation system that connects people and helps Oregon's communities and economy thrive. Page 96 4 1 , . : CEO'• O ov1= r..L . . , el) 4.7k 3(o►-III / •�2i,-oli ' 4-4,,- Git t, , x'M 01 ,id O�1 got ' 1• 1+�i ��i y I�1.. on 42i- lvil fCrs`- C7`� �j(p'-fp'� ,� ,,,„ gcH.,,. 1 , .ALKER Matti to, 291 202 Zo3 tot 105 sou) 1,- 1 iRTLAND, OR de," �,� 5641 �% 1 \ \..----., \ °\ \\ ?.vim \1P1 is Z1 2.12 213 '11� NZ 1 rs '� \ y' I ` LI I of �+' qfri IT \ \ \ • �L 1 1w Fegn-l= - NaW 0+d►•C• \ N�I�I I� k( N�W a-o µG R(L] A"rGµ mew r�ca1.1 C \ G \ �i wEw R_ cvA.6 _ v 1 Gum ...�' TCi IST. (� �.. I r• N 7 ,, f� Cam.1.417t..1 '�" I� - -- -- � • 1 1 �,� 6 _ '� "., 45"-,�I 1 OI it " �RE'�NCt GaNB _ p s, (�'{� G R. I RRLcy�IiaN G fIZ N \ • m m !a$ - ww-�-. 0"---11!" 1L- r It.� ��-- �a.t sc - u M'r- - vas _ _ fi A.C 1 0 "err ' If Ki'4 - .. -.�. �{ x x • �r4 C \ IeL © h� _.. -ro 11 � llt ` �► w w •Arta �+ -� Mr 'f ... ri. I .- sue. 1 in DS U' rx�l.,srrz / ,11110 ra �' . �� �'� D5 d- , vs R FEE \ 3 -- -• tip o 0 .ti s};ti k:, :::ti;{ S<;4ti;ti:•t~`:•• , }' �{ {ti rk. r ,` I \c‘..ips.ac-f N w w p� }:•�: .: :} ;,:};:., :• { } .;t.;}{ - x:15:.,,; al • __ O CC .:. r :{:• ti {v:::ry{ rv{•;t} ;.^rr : :ti�:; ',} } r , . a\ 1 V la, ®, v,smucri°14, ti r r y }ti - :r::;ti} . { . : v ti}tir•yrr J }v". .}:'4:.K:r}'r':::r{ti�•t•}�f }• 1}' ' � 5{?ti �S Z; . �,a ,, O \ pJ � iti wi,., :Az. fl4SL 1 ti :{ti; tir}}r ti~t}:;}•r t5 :: t r. {x}{ } r::^ : {I vr"�C': >}.. co ;A O O U ry NT' Z Z �trfv { v:f Ste:• v^'r`• v.: Y. r ;: :�� ' ",„,,,,,..,„„::,:,,,,,„:,,,,,,,, ,.,,, 2 6) \ ... win (. ), , , \ „ Ln N '8 . 1 Illp }. ::.::: 4 w w 4ril I 1 it } ,: ?1�'':ti;t� ti t. } }. r {` w : y ' ` 05 , v� cn " . : t le4_ l,iE Q� �ST �4 '' 2 i$I TC�7 ,�j1001 .} r : ,} }r {s r rs ^ ° ,} 1 ty-t $'}r �•'-rv''{ ti;: • .r } �� �� 1 E �{r.I""}� Z Z_ may. '', "' •{'r V: Q ;' ti.=',}h'SL ''r:.S M 1 C , 10 t ` //,T �O 1 J• r S .h rr t tiff -:irk ti:} j? irir J "15 w� �U� i e�•� \ \ ! f+) lY / C \ ^r• *} ` : r' ' f '.�ti ,f{:, �r{tiw • �::• -- INN lift 1 �' Q V 1 IA Si��"F m m - r }: } ?:f f { tirr J ��,, tuv� ti . ` } • w:: A �•Mr� C•11,11;. I qc \ ` rh \ - .}. +f:i:{� r:}1 tiff :t 'v} • r ti e,,,,,,, _ +1 `; \ V r. �, .:°" ti r .. : 0 .: 'rLv:: ' k •} }r L w�u �1Ir (1) \ O O IA V1:0, � ,`r..,; ..x.„-:}..I•;}:•:•....•{�4 ,v:}x:,; :'„ ..,....tir::ti "' ..x.::• { { r.4S.•J. j � ��I �,� W :: :.. r..r,::J; -•:"...".'..;:.,, .:tip} } Z ' ' 7, G1sTRUGTI \61\\c; > . t3:8 \ ._____ ihf ...--114 , o N:::::::;*.::,,:::::,;;:::::$:w....,s„:70::::::.:,;‘,....,0".::::,;,.1*.. .:::,.:okr z -r Lb Ffil+ rI [J I 'I°�l0 A� 1 -. gni..: © II r�. .5, N N.TS �/\ t�11Ts. Nis .! - _'i �' i u [ n 1 s } , it , 1� 1 1' 1 , 1 oil \ �+"'�f�' �`.. iti •20 1 � �6• • l6.O i� ,► . + . •a O 2 O �- o f 4 / 2Q- I4-� 20- r� 1 I-- -._AZ --1- Ar �. :11:::;\:.:11:::;.t.P11::::" ,.�:'J: 1111 avir A•C. 2 A, G 1 .G I A.GNif. Ism _ _ _ • ' k.1: : • ;:.triLft:. • too 4' ---" r a'I• $ -I• f • . A.:a TS I _ ` ` '151�1�� 111• 9 • , r 136 r 0 _ I Ao.1 �� ■ CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY Ami I40) ti l'Y� : _ - 1 „I �� .I 1 \ piris AND CONFIRM EXISTING I�• fizap L,13 CONDITIONS SHOWN OR D.'S �. r,-.,- . k \ .zp �! I a � IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR q �I \ .. TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY I-d® 1 r \ mu 1- ,_. _ • WE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. I I _rt _ _ Gu�1 I *2_ z A1111 ,1'; �� L______ \ _ ._� i , I ✓� ��wr�.r ..w�l • i%W. " lit�P' ;� JIIIII s cr�sr+ crso�a "` • \ - � �� ...;= tvr��' �1=i1�1� �`_ !" . � _ _ T� 74. ,: - �1T�4/P. �' N 1 r� iriiiiiiiiiiiii,e iiiriiiiiiu�i riiiii�///iiiiiiirii/i / �Y II ' f011‘4( /� \ Ft-�vCs C�'1r4..E 7 ! �IL....._...................: .� G � Ed FPS $ p�,LJTtN Agh i ii .Argoi \ F 1 :..-v-6 Ali.— \ - 1.‘,.,„,._ R.1.4...1Tii..1 CI ..-.`,, 0 e Q Go ry�.,y17 ,�.4 °— '.� .$ 0 \\Ili, • Cr V Mir - CI l i-I"P+I�It ` ,,N. E.17-4 . R 61 -wive 9 iv • ip. i S ► �, r ��•'= reee I Q _ �� �c�_i r A,� •� ,+� • 7Th i e.." ARCHITECTURE • Z i , i Lhy� vim---. ���� rei��� ri • ,� fl �v " ....47z. E+J C.G7� • . © :• �. h • • •A/ �:r � i �� fr .. .. .,...., r� ,_...\ — ' —,VA.: ENGINEERING LI) it GU I� ��®�y A0.-ipAp .-A6411V I ,. reidAis��dirA /`,w1� ��• • A AO. • � _ _ IOWkilkill _ zetzrze..,1 1') ..., PLANNING 'se t a•l 1 q - q woo o AM ....... rz cry cetvt - �1' oI 8 Z 'L = r / Mir - Ai r`�� �1it, 1 ' 241 U INTERIORS . .. i EIMMINM( Fr` r,.1321E / 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 14111 r___.R.464....rnwci,, PORTLAND, OREGON 9722824 ��. GC1f.1G. V�d/�t.+4L �•�fh� Gu�l3 ZG'3 yp 1. "�►C,zj sow t.ist,Jcup.s, .sAt src, > 0 airy- \,;ez,,T \toe d'q \sigoTEL : s0330 . 226 . 2ser-rr'oo� 'rGM esJsr4ExR � C�'dY F A X 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 627 0 XleI� Ft-M-1 -iacor-ort- maw WWW . CIDAINC . COM 1i y 11 1 tl 1 1 YI 1 f1 1 {1 '�j I . 4 S tea •• 0 9 Cs- a"1 'L Ca`• O" S 6''OI, 1,61. 0'' A-2'- Oil 0 21 • On / '�� - a 12� CS • '3 2 - C) 7 / CD SITE PLAN - FOR REFERENCE ONLY - 1,16 - I -0 4TH STREET ..• z 0 1= >. w > cc _v.,_ 19' o° 19' o° t RESERVED N PARKING N m CURB RAMP ACCESSLLJ dS Z ADA RESERVED PARKING o z O SIGN (R7-8),WITH VAN SIGN R7-8P (VAN Z V LJJ ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE ACCESSIBLE) SIGN WHERE Li-) ADA RESERVED CL (R7 8P) SEE DETAIL 10/A0.1 STATE DISABLED PARKINGINDICATED ON PLANS W LJJ PARKING SIGN (R7 8). PERMIT REQUIRED C!') CO TYP.WHEEL STOP -SEE DETAIL 10/A0.I N ii PAVEMENT MARKING REQUIRED - c NZ SIGN OR7 sC Q FORACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL- (WHEELCHAIR USER Z (/)/) 0 VAN ACCESSIBLE o• ACCESS CURB TO BE ONLY) SIGN WHERE O a r SEE DETAIL 10/A0.1 I. I I v PAVEMENT MARKING _ PAVEMENT MARKING INDICATED ON PLANS ! LL WHEELCHAIR USER ONLY 0 REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBLE REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBLE Z AISLE \ AISLE 0 (./) 3 0 RETRO- REFLECTIVE W 0 2'47 ." WHITE STENCIL w L LJ TYP.WHEEL STOP ADA RESERVED PARKING J ADA RESERVED PARKING SIGN SIGN (R7 8),WITH VAN Q RETRO- REFLECTIVE BLUE U N Q (R7 8). SEE DETAIL I0/A0.I / RECOMMENDATIONS (R7-8P) -SEE DETAIL 10/A0.1 7 \ ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE J INSTALL SIGN POST PER MANUFACTURERS BACKGROUND Q d (OPTIONAL) U 0 Z THIS CURB TO BE AT PAVEMENT MARKING REQUIRED FOR GRADE ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL-SEE W EXISTING TRENCH o DETAIL 10/A0.1 ` DRAIN O, SIGN AND POST TO MEET LOCAL HANDICAP EXISTING SITE STORM REQUIREMENTS. SIGN SHALL STATE IN WHITE m b - _ _ WATER DRAINAGE REFLECTIVE TEXT ON BLUE BACKGROUND: 'STATE U e ir _ IiXX ; PATH _ — co DISABLED PARKING PERMIT REQUIRED'. Z N CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SPECIFIC E ����������j�� CURB RAMP ACCESS REQUIREMENTS WITH JURISDICTION LLJ ri y ADA SIGNAGE ADA PARKING EMBLEM g PAVEMENT MARKING REQUIRED FOR CROSSWALK 0 SITE PLAN &DETAILS 2 �� -------4 A0. 1 _, E., CIDA #:240019.0I o CD ENLARGED PLAN - PROPOSED ADA PARKING 10 ADA PARKING SIGNAGE ©2024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED b I/s I'-0" A0. 1 3/8 1 -o w Page 197 6 ® 8 ' (6")' 0 CHANGING TABLE 8 , _,,,, , :. TP. DISPENSER SIDE WALL GRAB BAR .7k - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - e , 4„,„. I i 7`J�83 II I •� i �- A gc.i.,6 . .*!KER I --31I) r— r L_—_c-- 1 I I � 2 r� 2 - ^I /I - r jL- , sI �-�t r--�-� mac- 7O1 �- I -1 � • • #7 / 1 —/ 7 , 1.Ol 1 . ; � RTLAND, OR 7 J I 21'- 23f , 8f•3" '-3" 2 � 1 `� mot /I 1 1 \ / I I I I L-- s vi , / --1 --- oF • /*-6' 4-i-dii, -7'-3" - 1 0 .\\—\\_ _ _I • 0U. 1 cico co 1�OC I• -�I , �._. `} Ill_ FO.C. I N X X — ,40 ' • 'ELEVr •�.z..-'=x.-T.n+-__' - .r—ram' -_ �4"1.. �' - . 'F :� . _•t ��. _ -_°"•e�_.� _ _ .. ., _ _ _ , W W V I ii7 ' 1" - ---i A cc cc . I I W M I_ N,a 11.3'3l.IV� j Io 0 \\- STOR. - -(- : V /,), T I W W I S O t� PUMP r eL r - , 4 4A3 2 q0 I I � -- ____ � _ • ' n ' '� I•` �� ^ L J L J DRINKING FOUNTAIN w w A3 /. s'_co a-3 ' lo6'fir 1 Iona I ,,a -is - I IN ALCOVE L L L A. i .•,' '� 0• W.,:41C,� I' 4----- t -- - $-TOR, - 0w ►1 t PUMP I p,F I 4A A-141 , CD L.9 14 d /� M ' �' I I • I �1 r'15 I ' --— Ldo I 1• ! + ! ` = I! / I `'I• 3 • `` I4J_ J_N ooj= I I�' ,,-' 4- 8 '�' `� I : „fir r • �' COSTING BASEMENT T.R. PLANS 2 2 3 I = - �- Ete.V. - 3t I STOR ; A1 .o I /411 = I1_011 N N ' --____- J I• �a — F.E,C I (� VERTICAL AND BACK WALL GRAB a M �i ( i ' ! � r. I �CfV. / BARS °o 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 w 1 �, it i , i A- 14 � 1 I -, - B 0 a I ! L J4 uP 21•6 ; 3't i 0-1 I HEL ` - I -p 8' 3" 8'-3" / OFFICE SO II . ( a 1 4111 , ill 11 , urn am r F.OF. I F.OF.� 17 �' 1 / :d"/ I I p • I ,ye"` I I I r= -1, I CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY _HEE)(-4 _ ,a,-9 _ �- lA2 2 t __a - STAIRS 2, �G H I L D R E N S LIBRARY A-14 I 6, o 1 I/ / i_ I ; ' NG I _� I REPLACE WATER CLOSET WITH ADA CONDITIAND ONS SHOWN OR �i -- __ SURFACE MOUNT SOAP 1 I __ I 1 IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR �'�SOL.tQ I I� I _Q 3 F-4..=--STAIR 4 _- - — —J 1 i ---- -t== COMPLIANT �' -.:t RR DISPENSER I _ -- I r- i TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY ,L 2 �• -�- ---�*- �'�'� V — - - r T -- — i I A/E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. O • COL.{t7 q- � I� �R SEMI RECESSED ADA I �\ ( JO , I \ � I i ii\ - 4 CA�OrR X COAPer 3 •A � tJ COMPLIANT PAPER TOWEL \_ �� I �` I �� -I , —. „— 1 CA� F.•� 9 i� a ! „�� - _L —_ �C REPLACE WITH ADA COMPLIANT L� DISPENSER/ RECEPTACLE o �` ��� a I 1 --i I WALL HUNG LAVATORY WITH u/ I INTERNAL CARRIER 1 �'� ` NEW SOLID CORE DOOR WITH �I ; w i' --- - 61 4'-8" \\` I I - LEVE HARDWARE PRIVACY LATCHSET r ! 7 \ W/OCCUPIED INDICATOR B.O.D.- ° QI f ADA T.R. SIGNAGE @ / I I I ---- �� I SCHLAGE L9496 -�c�.�a �^ ++ r (0 60" MAX TO BRALLE ----_- � I I I F --� L 1 SURFACE CLOSER ARCHITECTURE A- y� y I8 XI8 CENTERED 1 �J �__-- __-- I KICKPLATE EA. SIDE - ,� _ _-- "S _ L ' �/r ON T.R. SIGNAGE t---- --- I L - - 1 ENGINEERING �'"+ • PLANNING I O. I I Q ; 1 ,� I I 1 INTERIORS I' _ O !—�"`�C• r• q + I 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 • i 0 C�,� L':� 1 X53 30 CENTERED I PORTLAND, OREGON 97224 I I ;I 1 i ON DRINKING TEL : 503 . 226 . 1 285 0 ' I FOUNTAIN FAX : 503 . 226 . 1 670 i , II II W W W . C I D A I N C . C O M I Ar ' l timm : oG4 -r . = � s.a1(+1 / r — y o /F 40 CO8 PROPOSED BASEMENT T.R. PLANS _ AI .O 1_011 —_ 11_011 1 D LEGEND 0 1= ' NOTES: Q I. REPLACE ALL FINISHES TO INCLUDE EXISTING WALL FOF FACE OF FINISH > W - NEW SHEET VINYL FLOORING W/ INTEGRAL 6" BASE W/ SS Cu I EXISTING BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN TERMINATION TRIM NEW WALL u Al .0 1 /8" = I I_011 - GLAZED PORCELAIN TILE FULL HEIGHT ALL WALLS w m 2. NEW STUD WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE AND SPACING. °, J Z ADD BLOCKING FOR ALL FIXTURES & ACCESSORIES. TILE BACKER Z 0 & T.R. SIDE GYP. BD. LIBRARY SIDE. SOUND BATT INSULATION V H w cn FULL DEPTH. .1 w Q 00 i o Z D (In 0 CI. o H LJJ z O o ,o v, cn W o I TOILET ~ LJJ SEE PLAN / PARTITION 30" MIN. SEE PLAN GRAB BAR PER U VI Q WHERE / / ANSI A 117.1 609 Q 0 / 54" MIN. / INDICATED ON / 36" MIN. /6 SEE PLAN 0 FRAMELESS MIRROR 2" MAX. 42" MIN. PLANS URINAL SCREEN , - z / / 24" MIN. 12" _ _ W GRAB BARS PER \ \ - / OR TOILET / /►�, Z uj 1 39"41" IMiNI,// GRAB BAR /I� I/2" I SOAP DISPENSER 604.5.2 25" MA i I< - a < , INDICATED ON m N ` T.O. �__� I > 1 \ FLUSH LEVER < _,.� © < PLANS < < r'' �RECESSED PAPER / 17" 25" / ii, N WAINSCOT _ 7 7 \ > > > TOWEL 8" MIN. _ ,� Z DISPENSER/WASTE / �/ r`I \ 11 SEE FINISH L_ _J U - •e 0 1 u, , _ �� DISPOSAL - o o I I — SCHEDULE o ¢ o LAVATORY TO '`� \ o 11 a FLUSH I Z _ ,, Q E,, y ` J CONFORM TO ANSI \ o w MOUNTED -_ Z - Z Z \� X. 2 TOILET SEAT `� en T.O. BOWL Z 606-SEE PLAN FOR z i — z I 1/4"TO 1 1/2" `I M M M M \ o I REQUIRED NUMBER �/ H M f / / / COVER a M ` M X 1- AND LOCATION OF ; _ - I I/2" DISPENSER, 7 En z - _ z , Q N = URINALSTANDARD z\ N FIXTURES N "' N ALTERNATE 1 - r a` f a` f INSULATE SUPPLY& f LOCATION / /�; 7" 9" ` 1` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ I \ \ 1. 1 WAS I E 1 ININC� 6" MAX. I" \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ SURFACE OR TOILET PAPER FLUSH VALVE ,1, MIN. 1, / MIN Il v FLUSH MOUNTED DISPENSER OPEN SIDE OF 16"-18" *44" MAX FOR 20"+ HANDICAPPED TOIUPL T ROOM - TOILET SEAT LOCATION, BELOW ROOM OR STALL TO 25" REACH;48" ACCESSIBLE URINAL BASEMENT COVER DISPENSER SIDE WALL GRAB BAR PER ANSI REAR WALL MAX FOR 20" MAX URINAL ELEVATION TO ADA URINAL PROFILE ADA WALL HUNG SINK ADA WALL HUNG SINK PAPER TOWEL NAPKIN/TAMPON TOILET PAPER HI-LOW GRAB BAR 604.7 REACH CONFORM TO SEC. SIDE VIEW DISPENSER/WASTE DISPENSER DISPENSER DRINKING FOUNTAIN NOT TO SCALE 0" 605 OF ANSI RECEPTACLE A1 .0 A 117.1-2009 J O CO.0 FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHTS CIDA #:240019.01 157 0 3/8u = 1 1_011 C 2024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED w Page 198 1 ai • S • g1 1 5-00 J gell'o. $ - s (/ lel ‘'%. `!-: ifediNoVer . A . F.0.1$ , :77._. r . .1.11=. F,0.43_ 0 A*-- 14 - 1. A 1 • • �� • * L GEN Till'll 11SWI . ---7- ID mr1 e -in ,r,-. _. z 1 ,114, I - 'v ELEV. ELEV• , . 50�..+.�o - • I • i p . p� �C�. Gil , I OR . pi ? s uFl, 1 I -ram• 1 • r — P. -� ' i�: . _� + © mEcH • �, �� e ' rA"'yl ■ �a��1;.14].}fJ+1f1Z11,Jsr,rT�llla�l�ili�.}'1117,+:Is1"fe7i'�.7.'.11 ■ eir____ _:_ _ I�� ��' • vl• ,.... ..,, .. • 1� - __-- - iri71 '' �� ..�1�7yly..-��- ■i T _• l'�s ..l 7 19 T - f A 1 _ ._ _ i �QI f f �l. ilia a A.11.J. >••i� — S El 20.1 YM• M E� N = a_ IMw.arw w.. .w• w• I �Lr•. I •� tCD WS •nI Iw-. G fl' STAIRS 3 =m RA r � t 1i1 1>•r9i .• I.(I •+rM:-N._ t 'i .ST• E• R.•_••. JP-MIT.I1 1.�.3A�1J+1PAisnx,1r IPA•t�JG. : ii.1„ l,b4, ct. i° VHIl 1II— ;,_ :-.1•01+A•11,,7417.1,*.i.J•t I �t r7.,4i0111i_1 m m •., 1 x x • i► ST®R �., 1111 - i - • x�� !i111111111111111111111411111 (Tait =1- s 0 • 7 - __-- - ........ s - ram , -. .H--"-- __ - !__ W W • B .., 11111 11 1111111111i 11111 11111H:A iii / ry , . @: ruM. 1 4.1--kap- um:liormi:,...w. = u , Iji. cC H H 411 ' Lw wn 1111111111 i_ Li.7 � 0. t� mu. 2! • Lg + S AIRS I �� � ' �, �' ELEV - • i. i.__ . L�sa (.14. L7* ). ELEV. - _ :' I `-*`- 9 9 . Q �:mac Q �� �� 10 . - ..x.n6 „,. .. -9 ,A,/ : 1 -q •:,.;._ 1 i -1---A. - 1 .., '51;442'4 • 1 1I, - . > m m ,,,,---1- b---i-i- . ...... setAD . , ! . : , , o eon {- Ro 1 1 v" d1 6,9 09� - Q !II =a�� "1. 1 a 1 H roil! .I ��� � i � 1 r . w ®d a C !p�� ��+ � Vfftpj y - I "• ��ili l _ IL■ .. - - -- I`,«.-.'^1 -(�1�1� :0. L O O in __..._••� .� e � ADULT FICTION �� i - - • - - m__ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - -. - - 7 •• 0 � 9 �� ) . 4 1AZ z �1�� r oWORKRM 1 1 7 . Atilik irlIIIiiWb1 i10 421 e (1):. : dp- 44- s i AZ r -misilliii...______ �! CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY s '., , 111111:1111 � . ‘ IILI �. � r,� 1� 1 r;i ,r;% 1_1111 _ r < �7 AND CONFIRM EXISTING le I r- 19 r ,I 'Si; ,v, La ; I ;�� „ -11:11 CONDITIONS SHOWN OR -� j I � ,� I�� �� m� • _ .7 CS •-1 6 Cal)AL.:, IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR _ I —_ TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY 1 \. 0 Y A� { In �; • -� S�C9F�� d A/E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RS 7:- 1(15�ELEV I - t, .. i cif' ' L-- — — — — t^ -- -� r'IT rxra, g14c I E 2 cow +) AIL I - 9 I 0 _ 111411011.111170: :. 1• 1 mP . 1.Tges 19um OFAI.I - 3. 3";x'7� Cua ChRL DI7i: O �x s� e ,�_ - - 411J� IMd1.L '�'� Wrild re N vur ,i �} ifl tv I 2c 2®3 I IIr- - - �� ! o, a kla . i• — ...w F•05 • 61 !go lliF' A ! orot,5,-,:cerca) . . a 24,��I . r �' p ��� ARCHITECTURE �► F' 41l1 'f`tP .ZO ENGINEERING r c„,, ,,,, 1„ ....,,..... ,, P L A N N N G '. D 0 ie __ -.ri rl - -m_- - -- - 1� - m_m a e ____Fee._______---! .m_.____�m_ _-._. ____�—�., • - �__ -__ - _ ,� -- -* - -- ��� ter,,,,-, �s-®---- - -.� m-d���m ...�._-_®- - .ter .- -�m� .. --- -_. ..... ------ - ti 6 fl, � INTERIORS i F . -. 124 k 1 - L r,I it i \'''' 0 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 A 44"1 is PORTLAND, OREGON 97224 MMV[ * • TEL 503 226 285 Y; V; 0 Q • F A X : 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 6 7 0 LL • -"F W W W . C I D A I N C COM 11] �e r ' it oat i20 .O a .: e I � 1 O Gil' ' ' ` w` - i d- 0 ! w 1 1.0i; / L.11. Op --• - V 1 1 ��°�l ' •�1� qr 1` /�•`• A ----- • - Si' V. Lf� • ,I o' L "RF/f ' 11 1 1 . 1 , , , - cl 1 49 .. .t). . . V 1 0: w 8 9. 4 • ic ., . ,', v I EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN A1 . 1 I /8" — I -0" 30"X53"CENTERED N eel ON DRINKING 0 Z / \ FOUNTAIN H O l 5 ' 6 Ill 6 Z �� NEW SOLID CORE DOOR WITH LU r 1< 11 - LEVE HARDWARE PRIVACY NOTES: N I— L LI I8"XI8"CENTERED I I I LATCHSET W/OCCUPIED 1 , REPLACE ALL FINISHES TO INCLUDE u-) J w CL 21'-0" 21'-0" l 0 / / ON T.R. SIGNAGE / I I / INDICATOR B.O.D. SCHLAGE L9496 - NEW SHEET VINYL FLOORING W/ INTEGRAL 6" BASE W/ SS 1.1.1 DRINKING FOUNTAIN I I I - SURFACE CLOSER Q IN ALCOVE ADA T.R. SIGNAGE @ i KICKPLATE EA. SIDE TERMINATION TRIM I- 6'-6"6' 6" / 8' 0" 6 6 / 60" MAX TO BRALLE I --; 7_6 / 6 o 16 / GLAZED PORCELAIN TILE FULL HEIGHT ALL WALLS z LLJ _ - - - - - - - - -- - - - y\ - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - ; - - - NEW STUD WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE AND SPACING. z J ,_______ ,,,.__, Fman - L _ ADD BLOCKING FOR ALL FIXTURES & ACCESSORIES. TILE BACKER O �p —f I N I ` -- ' I 0 o I I I I I & T.R. SIDE GYP. BD. LIBRARY SIDE. SOUND BATT INSULATION cn W 0 02r)19 I � F.OF.\ I �'� �, \ \ • '� \\• I FULL DEPTH. LLJ w DRINKING FOUNTAIN I I �f - I- I 1\ IN ALCOVE I -�""_1 r- f-L I — — �_ Q in Q I M I I� - - - J I �_J C � LII �� I CHANGING TABLE _ I/"---\ — ` \L — — ��� �' r 0 ___�_� _ — — �� r w 0 �, — — — \ /1 — — —F. \I I I // r� �\ I 1 SEMI RECESSED ADA LEGEND z _ COMPLIANT PAPER TOWEL W / I I \�� O / L _ _ _ L_J1 I - . IDISPENSER/ RECEPTACLE EXISTING WALLFOF FACE OF FINISH 0 I 1 i SSURFACE MOUNTSOAP u Ld i �, DISPENSER NEW WALL (� I V / I I OL SIDE WALL AND BACK I \`\ CI J� \� / I I REPLACE WITH ADA COMPLIANT z \ �/ �\ // FD n - - _ FD WALL HUNG LAVATORY WITH N WALL GRAB BARS --- o I INTERNAL CARRIER w uEn Q ' r u I i 1 r , REPLACE WATER CLOSET WITH ADA w —� COMPLIANT KD 0 ~ I ( QL. P. _ F.O F. I L. V t , \ \ r TOILET ROOM u I I I I UPGRADES- FIRST b I„ I^ I FLOOR 0 I I o VERTICAL WALL GRAB BARS A1 . 1 v ,,,, 9 EXISTING FIRST FLOOR - MULTI STALL T.R. PLAN Ca PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR - MULTI STALL T.R. PLAN CIDA #: 240019.0I A 1 . I I /4" _ I '-O�� I /4" _ I '-0" 02024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED I w Page 199 0_. 0 0-H1 e 'oet744) . 5 il . 6 Q 10 „Di , i IT 8 9 _ 40/ _ lel - i or- , . (11111.. a 1 If+ a a q 1 1 1 fl _I n f ea 1 3 2r1 -0 2.1 - G 21 - ® Z I -® '21 •0 21-ca C'� - Z I -a . �� • I ' 1 1, OR(� 1 f• 1 If 1 11 ! fl FF eB 1 11 @ IM� ° - e ." � 1 ori le �� ' OF V '�� • 3 '�•ro I�•� 7' ® 14,. ® 14-� `3n 11.1301 ®� �e �l► �� w1 s �I I 1� I I fi \) IL: U.:. 41' II: Ir- -14 ji 4111% 440 .k7i/ : 441 QJ 111. II: f o _ eI ��' Q y 9 10 m m C A 1.2 :12. :I c,\ r4IIPY j —�� I 1 Fro.F W _ _ b -r�' . r 1j11L1.L L L� ® RE ORAGE . .e _17 —� MPLOYEE cc T , 1 : azv. v�/ j . . - 4. I /1;1 ?�Q a I 19 �� 1 i 1 i I I . . �_ b- r �o± - o -� gala $ _ �� I )1LUNCHRM", , � i '' CIFFICEi I ' LT C�,Tm _� z z t z z �`• 1 I41 n�o _ _ - _. �, 3 -••� ri 1 T w w 1 3ilk� 1 N I _ � ' Qi � 3i � �� w w/ F.E.G• iQ in ` 1 ! 1 I I ' I F.°� 4° Q 1 2 �' Q Q �_�� __.,. � .� "v -� 1_ 3 1 I z z s , I i ' r • I I ® I ����— �U 0 e ! III �„ co �t '� 12"x��''• 30a, f �SI0 I �� I m 1 0 IlEin.101] _ _• p .1,0, C) 0 ._._ C 17 1f 1�VK ER 4 F.CC.. ' N o o I . c . .�03 STAIRS ___� me.. Ci- _ . . ._ m w__ f;Ll{..If.iCy o JAN . - _ e_ P, �_.�� ,p �m� ZOO ,► _ --�-- p � ,o.ml� ;w3, 3+f : s +�� l._ m �� _ '� B ''i 4 ,ti a �, ,, - a �, .._�. ® _..�.._ PASSAGE '�',f4F-11 - ® F.O.S. I STAIRS I 3 I �► ADULT NON FICTION I _ Ear ,� , . . _4 3 it/ � iin a 7 x I - ` V,O.5, r I I CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY 0 - 0 IN I AND CONFIRM EXISTING e �I I I CONDITIONS SHOWN OR _ I IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR REFERENCE i TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY . .•, /,. c '� f { A E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 11 9 �t 104.j F.OIS a 1- am. a- ci," ilip,5 1 Oili 6•411110 ri ' 00 , Imminal fl 61 I ,_ I 9 c3 4 _ �`g' �`* �'1 ARCHITECTURE s z ,,_ 1 ark r��, F. + . f 1 ♦— _.• - a� -.. � „f0 erg -�___ .J • "alo 1.1, ___. . r ih..,; �1 NOTES: ENGINEERING -16 �� = I . REPLACE ALL FINISHES TO INCLUDE PLANNING -�� :::;: I SECT. 0 - NEW SHEET VINYL FLOORING W/ INTEGRAL 6" INTERIORS 31 I _ a e a BASE W/ SS TERMINATION TRIM F.0.5. 1 ,f 9 ' 8W 2 i.aP,�'1 T P (a GLAZED PORCELAIN TILE FULL HEIGHT ALL V -� � : ° : �-I, 41 OF'�.����" e�Av. �� WALLS 5895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 4 , P O R T L A N D OREGON 9 7 2 2 4 --o _ — i �. rFr ::::•:::• x I _�� A jar : T E L . 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 2 8 5 1 ,� �" �• F A X . 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 6 7 0 I _ �� EXISTING WOOD FRAMED e . . ° i 1 _� 2. NEW STUD WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE AND ELEVATED PATIO STRUCTURE ® .-RI : _ W W c D N c C o : : o LIB ° :' ;M: i:i iii:i: ':i .: , :�::: '::. ' :: ::: *'_ .,, 3 1 SPACING. ADD BLOCKING FOR ALL FIXTURES & O SEE A3.2 FOR NEW DECK DETAILS .':� ^:.-::::. :: """ : I - ACCESSORIES. TILE BACKER & T.R. SIDE GYP, BD. REFRAME TO REPLACE ALL - - • • ::n: •.: 4• I�.DEGRADED FRAMING MEMBERS :�. Z a: .�♦ 7 N 3 i 7 LIBRARY SIDE. SOUND BATT INSULATION FULL -I `` A 't .r •�i'r .r.. , �. __ 4' DEPTH. Il 3 { a , .DSO F.0.0. LEGEND - � Z C pas,. :: ::: -i . — „ — — _ —_ _ ._ ._.. _e tee» - .._ _.,, -+ u.-. .T`= ee Y - �- r- -.- -__- _ - .. - T ���� - .r.+._ .. I ,o I— D ' 0 n fy>i' Q EXISTING WALL FOF FACE OF FINISH Q 1 i j � _ iNEW WALL Edill' m I EXISTING ND FLOOR PLAN A I .2 1 /8" _ I 1-0" v, ) g VERTICAL, SIDE AND 1 al BACK WALL GRAB BARS 06 Z H 8 9 9 8 9 MOVE LOCKERS 9 Z 0 REPLACE WATER CHANGE EXISTING TO BREAK w U v CLOSET WITH ADA RECTANGULAR TABLE ROOM N H L LI / 8'-9" / I2'-6" / 21'-0" SURFACE MOUNT SOAP I COMPLIANT I FOR ROUND TABLE I N � W cL - - - - \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A Q W DISPENSER I I I 0 21'-3" `J / F21 .31" J I I I I I I I I �' Z O / o H LOCKERSJ I REPLACE WITH ADA COMPLIANT / 1 / 1 O _ 2 / 4'-0" / 5' 9" 6' 6" 5' 0" I WALL HUNG LAVATORY WITH I 1 ~ LJJ INTERNAL CARRIER Z O � \ , 1 r = _ I \ • 7 I _ �� I r e G �� NEW SOLID CORE DOOR WITH I r O v LEVE HARDWARE PRIVACYki I 1 •� (.n W O •I I— LATCHSET W/OCCUPIED \\ I �'i I fi SC W�� QUIET ROOM _ 1 0 / 1 —I I INDICATOR B.O.D. SCHLAGE L9496 �N „ 1 _ 1 _ / a - SURFACE CLOSER I' 10" I i I 1 U Q En 1 L - I n I 1 1 MOVE TWO Q KICKPLATE EA. SIDE I 1 I I PERSON TABLE w 0 SEMI RECESSED G - 1 PAPER TOWEL 1 I _ 1 QUIET ROOH 1 1- ■ '_ _1116E0wr i _ii , / _ WALL Z W DISPENSER/ — J r 1 \ r _I I rL- —I -- — 1 ,�'� 1 0 RECEPTACLE \ f = - •' --- , !,� 111 �_�__ N ROOF ACCESS L - 1 III I �� LADDER Q I L f I\ 1 11 1 e :L I I 1 I I C3 2 5 0 1 I I I __J �--- - 1 Z N o r A —I 21"X21"CENTERED - --� 1 r —1— (Ho / \ I o ON T.R. SIGNAGE ' 1 / \ / i C ) "° I I I 1 FULLY RECESSED ADA / �, 1,-' iI n 7 ! 7 T 7 - \ FULLY COMPLIANT PAPER TOWEL 1 E L` - J I I I I I I I I I \ DISPENSER/ RECEPTACLE \ ---/I 1 1 ADA T.R. SIGNAGE @ 0 1 1 I 60" MAX TO BRALLE I MOVE LOCKERS u EXISTING FURNITURE 18"X 18"CENTERED I TO BREAK 1 1 PLACEMENT 1 ON T.R. SIGNAGE I ROOM TOILET ROOM u I I I I UPGRADES-SECOND ,, S FLOOR a I I I I I I A1 .2 9 EXISTING 2ND FLOOR T.R. PLAN 10 PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR T.R. PLAN CIDA #: 240019.01 o A I .2 1 /4" _ 11-0" A1 .2 I /4" _ 11-Q11 o 02024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 4 3 Page 1100 ..... .. 0 0 0 4 .. 0 6 0 8 9 : - 001., • - .1* • f�' � � ', OR Y% 846ise 2. PWEE: i 4Q '4F fill o SHI LI q LretE 2. 1d- Sf it SE I 9464e. I 5 r o_ pEcte 4c.r) 1 . . tr. 4tt-- / o Wes'ci I cfr ioN i . „4 .{r�R5 A , H H ..) 0CS w w ... •" - i ti 4144 -Pr,ri.,, .„ _.,_ . v ,, , _ ; • • � M H Z T. 0. A : 1 ANNIF • " .� ' IT-Crir::( 17Cfr4i/X —. > _, ,,, . c.., k. Q `.inc z z o 0 ME J. — Cova.g,,FLoov\i/ Q p��A��("Nl ) & •ti. de..— —. .1% N N o DS ,$11 co rz47 vv/ .• I ea,466R4:;15 (-Tri-p„) si1/4,, - O� O • ....i ....-- I , ,, _ - Q M ly 7:..5..1.011 0 At ...... P S il r 0 0 I I 't4 B • ref . 4 '�`7 0 , CN 5 u , IE.. , ,,,--- 541.1,1z ,-, ie:... Li tz.. . _., MVP 6 I-1 ,g; . ...cm E7 Li IZi.:', ,. 1., . i [ii— -- ." a . 1 j le<4 c 'A% flrl"/ i„ a k k 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY COI I C.CN1 Cie 1 • •�r ' ; AND CONFIRM EXISTING 41amm i■.r. 9 ♦ tl" L• • . ' r b... CONDITIONS SHOWN OR f '"'r--4.4 A1.3 IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR f • �� ` TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY sHii%%ki..-e 01 A/E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. (-- -"."- 1(- -.— — \--.1 f-- i "...—')'4 j \ ,--.) 4(... .....-. y A y � d,,r, ( Ar '' - ' ' ri ET 4. .. , _ - , ; C:°‘r:)* Alk a 1 CI 4 , . Igo ed PC::"P"til e. RSii I 4) g . I • . . 7 el ( # a i �" . •_ 1 111.411.1, i i g W.sFe... ARCHITECTURE I # w �1 ENGINEERING .� ` ` i 1. PLANNING IZ-,ai (."Y Fitlli # , ppj ( ``i INTERIORS 44.:,. vf iflOi, `� �- f - 5895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 P/. rdis/)1c j'S: A i • • , e2, LE 0 . .94 .cii.,,z, , 1 1) r ' ( r PORT LAND, OREGON 97224 4 r1 w1 TEL 5 0 3 2 2 6 2 8 5 } ,r', F A X : 5 0 3 . 2 2 6 . 1 6 7 0 { V_ W W W . C I D A I N C C O M O r . N1-1.--lli NIP (--: ! if \ . 2 Si it - i • . ..1. 1. ell fe M 7 r # i 1 `.... * � D .. rw �rwNr -. 7(4 e+..ti. Z ^I► _. 2 22'- 10" \\--.... . .,. .`- i w DC 0 e- c".ttiLittiiiliv.4ct , f g D0 ROOF PLAN _ R - � �r■� IN DO I .3 I/8" = I'-0" LI F'FEPEE _1 z V O (E) CLERESTORY WINDOW TO N H LLI BE INFILLED PER STRUCTURAL w � LLJ p[ ROOF DRAIN `&I W i� O OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN W/ L ---srZ , 0 ROOF DRAIN WITH SCREENED COVER-- SCREENED COVER-- SEE PLANS ZO 0 DRAIN SUMP RECEIVER SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION FOR LOCATION 0 a = I � I � LJJ 0 0 I (E) ROOF DRAIN I OVERFLOW DRAIN COLLAR ® 2" z I CAP/REMOVE I - ATTACH DRAIN FLANGE PER ABOVE ROOF LOW POINT 0 0 ( ) I OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN U O I (E) METAL II MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION cn w W I ROOFING CRICKET I N LJJ I TO BE REMOVED I TAPER INSULATION © 2" PER FOOT U Q I I EXTEND MEMBRANE BEYOND CLAMPING Q (n I I = co RING PER MANUF'S RECOMMENDATION w O - EXISTING ROOF SLOPE _ d <EXISTING ROOF SLOPES 2„/� 0 2„/� 1'-6" / 1'-6" 2'-0" 1'-6" 1'-6" z W M 0II t t °_ I (E) CLERESTORY I I A 1.3 .....4_____------ - WINDOWS REPLACE CO 1014 7IIIIIIIIU\I\ . ������������� m 141( AND ADDRESS1= SILL ��������������������� . _ �, .�����������1 C- HEIGHT l���������� Wiry, � 0- - - - - - �r�pita_�����.�n — — — -siir �IFvilrir. �������♦ z - i ii a �i ‘_ iI I � it,_ 1 3 _i \< (.0 L \ 5 r Iwi ,tillir: g I NEW BUILT-UP / N o I 0 OD INSULATION CRICKET / 0 OD ^ 0 W/TPO ROOFING 1'-6" 1'-6" 2'-O" 1'-6" 1'-6" - / RD MEMBRANE O RD Hil, o STEEL ROOF DECK q ROOF PLAN (E) CLERESTORY REPLACE ROOF DRAIN CAST IRON PIPE WINDOW TO BE BASIN PER DETAILS Q, INFILLED PR 10/A1.3 & I I/A1.3 STRUCTURAL 9 PARTIAL ROOF DRAINAGE PLAN AT SAWTOOTH io ROOF AND OVERFLOW DRAIN - PLAN I I ROOF AND OVERFLOW DRAIN - SECTION A1 .3 A I .3 1/8" = 1'-o" A I .3 1/2" = 1'-o" AI ,3 I" = I'-0" CIDA #: 240019.01 H 02024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED w Page 1101 0 431 0 0 in II kl, 'Co 0 43 kik wy 41r.411 .t) vr4iir 8 fill , 0 , ,11110-v,„1„ 4 4", 4\„,,,v,-, -,, , ,, ,c-r, • . • Ill . ial I . ' - CHRIS IPHER M. ' KER ra 1-3 Hit•JC11.•e. IC) diiiip..es. ............„ .• ---- . _ A.1.1 Pal Fig114 -1-Y-1-1:11).2 I ei.lisjc,442, • ' D _ _ _ 2 — -._• - ._._ gI r t y4c) ,i.. . 4..... . ak -.1111M .• igitAlrigilliSk 10 k al vlyilv ItYavi oli4 , „-,ai/ Ill I , + ,' - .. - - LIPIPeit u_i m ...._____Ii_ .0,1.4 estawe' • E• tioit:,,A r r .... .. 4261 0. d;:k 61M. 4 • r'V �rr « I! IV ! l �*4• w...I�..■ WDQ oci- Nmer, A' eh.c 021 14 fft . H H .____� I © A� 1.. , . , 1._ �� ���: cC • 1 r D.S. z z • V RECoI�L� R,>`rtaFW _ Ln -ireICI i O N Ln In , 411.101, �^ l eS �gQOI� fR.IRAI w w r •. Aell. 1 C�C7tJND z z D'`3' , D.`3• L' I C . 0 AC% \ •.I t.IGK &SI M wldk1.1.1,. I * . F� _1 0 oir#. cex.uM •� �, , �t 11J Pic'�R��RC�tr.iD re 1 m co ��� -- cJ c I O QQ O �►�..�. �'IrCr IOi�.. �IIL+ I a d fie.tit.. 4rL.411.ii, I I I I �.trlt�.i�irf r1o•�o O 0 o o 11111 cV EXISTING EAST ELEVATION �� Rir� ,. m',ED I/8°= I'-a' DIR,0i4INe• '�'4'P' LEVAT1ON "; t. ;,.- d -, i _ y� - _.R '.i. :.:-0 r'.. .f +•- •p. i'.. ,'I 4. .i ��.� x, 'd w 1-1/ li . . ... _..., . :+7 A•`"';�!^,FxA:r' .�. .f _ ..:„3 • ,•-•• . ,I ,, r �. •• 3Fr � d� �I � ,•yyy - InpI.Ifs � �L F r•r'. .�.n r.11r' Y• 'I ! 1�,, , , b' • ,y• i_.-�1'.. is •'L. f� - .51 d f � - ,k. II,, i" `fitC�' ir; I ys • • • - t.• 3 i:,� ate': .�.,.• CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY /I _Y r W 'LAC �I'�•� +� 1 it �, 1, - Y• ,�k'Lf 4i • r' C 11_ • '+' - • AND CONFIRM EXISTING •C'� • }v Y i I it - �� • - ,r "w�0:• :� vn' i - • �r yt�f :• M' • !rfir 11',:.�' A� -•�r� r• • �:'' cCONDITIONS SHOWN OR Esc i•R'• •- ..6— • ` • -�I ! r ''s • 1. IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR .eii9�' 'i.r' r =r� r r.F J \ c' i. YP � 1 '[ �.:: elf' z�� fit". V1I TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY . i.Y •..�c: r L ISy, f�.,f? :-..t't: pts. Jop 1 }'+VI" T/C•. rr Ir.. d: fy - '� ' �'�� A E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. •'4• .Y•`,rfl .nr1."a�• Iofrij•:1;......! s w , -w • • L. y q -'1 A 11HI r•:"g • • 1 •-••.-,r .••, •".• .4„ ' - A S{ J` - , _ _ 5 Y i 1- �' •.� ' ce �b � r i•' A.rr P A r. son y _ .Vc - • :. art f• L' II ` 11 .. . - .. ..17: #1‘1 ( PI 'y 4 ,1 �•7.1' / lf^ 'F' r �'i/ f' r'� Iu, 4. % 1 M., { i s - •ram•. L� y y. 4 y. s `r�V - s ar • ,� •P. �l i f 1 `1 • - r^Y•J •Y. �A I .. ... , . yy • 4. y x.. I .r _ s 1 _ . �. iii 1. ,_ , ? f JJ • ,1 p x;,. c. ,. 61 :z' a, i' fir... <,. ^�� 3 .r �4 s - - '�S. I .f r F 5 - ►2 I 4... v: , , t5 1. { } iS it.::. ! i.• . r. 1 �. i • x • ME , :k • I ARCHITECTURE 1 • t F � tilci. • 'i ' f:- ENGINEERING ,•,,,, 1 ?� �i . :. r y� �,: ' • ff,r'S PLANNING !\ _4T1I • 4 + ._... q I ;k -,4.!r..2-;,r INTERIORS 77 E 1 ¢:' r, ;_.. l 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 �lif Cf °'�� Warr/ . - — . 1'sA] °h'. PORTLAND, OREGON 97224 .s: : "; _ row.- N !'J' 'F!!.' T E L . 5 0 3 . 2 2 6 . 1 2 8 5 .fix•'';•.- _ -.. - J r-`: r....- -._ !� - F A X 5 0 3 2 2 6 6 7 0 eX;--;>-.-=3'ar:.x '�i .rs;. r - .. '.v-. . _ _ . . _ - W W W C D A I N C C O M ` _ - . _ - v __ _9.. _ __ _ _--- -_ - -- - - . .- - =n"B,•,•' s, - - �� - - _- - - - • -- - _ �. ter-_ �� •-•.. - - — -- 'r'—_ `-'"' p+"' - - c m n.. r - - - __ - - - - - ��. -.----" - r l .. ---_ -_- -- - _, _ _ _ _ __ ��s. .— �� -�. �� +` Y O J W cc 2 EAST ELEVATION - PHOTOS u A2. I N.T.S. cn Lu CCI N • •• - o IPT �. • f • • w • Lu LLJ 0 e9 . �' - COcr) _ ( I Illigie . _ ,-,_ - 0 I I 77 ._. _ _ ___ lib- 3ti+� LU r - LLI - LLJ MOM IP 421 • p AIL ;= ;, LL- aP.------WO CI-Nolo. — _ oR wI *1 P1Uu •lb M.Jq 1 - - r MC? t - _ m a Ite lel -.4gr 1116. o 1 1 ' r - t__ _ 4 d' X kNkiiiift%:3111-L"."'S" 147 2".....1111 x 4. ICA r/ ,. • I :;y i _ '..d �i-w.#yy •-` _ - - `,`r.--:,F.'.s.••£.ix>§.. .1'_'i :.• ,:•=-c:. .r= w ' 1 i 1 I a �• • _ -"� .-t` - .r`..lr.1.3'k.•,l - -�°A,...J.4 irfY, - 'cz�;.jr` �;�• x '� a _ '.;yt- rah`:" v © ;� �z :•.€gym-� y k :: __ P trill livattalet OM - _ :3�. �:fi� ;ram. .,6.� ;`rsr4• e+' �• , �Ccx k��,.a'w', "'_ ` �� -- - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS '�^ .ram- �. . •,......!...., `I'� _•_ •�°,.• �,.•YT':�• :7�;"'� -.w'"I"3.,�.�- A�.;�. _ 'y�a_`�^_?:�,�. ��k _ .� 23 o f I :x �..- _`°3: r2... .�.-. i• - __ �_"-c.} x«3.- __ •ram. ,= ... - . -'._ f . ,C Sri"..:' .-'ltic „'7.7=';i.�.a. `: - - '= �:'.�-'.-'•_�- ,�' - �! _ Jif x={5��-•.� r-�i„r'?�1, 3;f^i� ,:ky:"� '�"'.�s� _ - 'S rJ`v'7�F:: :�?+�.Qcss., _ ..:" ]�3-^w:,i�..:is': -r� _ ..+-9-. .-�a - _ � � •>�R �'-�:it�•�-•.::r= •�I.:; -� �� �'• �"�%:-�'"':�� �;'dw.�.c":T; �k���r ..q;..':�:?w .�.---`� ',ro,.a�--�.' �•e ; • >�o,vR ,.,� s�= - - iry +C =•`: _ . ' - C -a.- ^n Y_ " $ FT:a :te A}- a: -_ - + : .�. >wi▪` � :5 : � 1 3 1 • -- ' — . -- —' -- — — — __- _ - ��^' A . 5. CIDA#: 240019.01 3 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 4 NORTH ELEVATION - PHOTOS N b (6\2. I I/8" I'-o" EtE\ 1A1' 1Ot'J2 A2. I N.T.S. ©2024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ro w Page 1 102 • s t). e$ `� 0 6 ©"JI, f;:) e7vlsc . •riO, 1-3 • ; cHERw I i . i • ..,..wb,..._ . . /. t. _. i-,..., ;,- ,i, Di, 01( _ -_ -~ SNii.1L.e. - Q Zak w 1! Si I l i11 cn cn © © I ;� • ILu Z Lu I : ��i -�P ' ��, 1T "1 ��II II► ail. �__ _. 11- � , 1 UrPeEz H H ._ I I amimmummomamm Sl.Mt.tt t.e. I 3'1"Wx 141H ��i ��� ts1 .J•i O o ---I_ WO 4aAVFji © Q - - W W • ---% z z "'°1TT a.,,, . , ) , . .a CVeltt , ( • ii pg. .�.. ; II P co 1 rN PO Iraq 10rpv�c m o 1_ 71- • 1 . ELEVATIONI CD Q _ .. O c, O _ ,..., „ „ , • i . ., I s.rr . �r..�r rrr� ...ire, a.r,.� ...�� r� - _�r._ -.. �.n .r...�t �� ..� .� ._ . .. .. .� - i EXISTING WEST ELEVATION A2,2 /8" = 1'-0" - riwr W ff R 'v1 S / ,;,,_ CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY • r x • y� - .{` --:'Y• ?'y AND CONFIRM EXISTING-' _' �_ y :d -r;: * CONDITIONS SHOWN OR ` t f Yd e , f `�)1 jy/ � - ,z;,' _ �.., fir.. :�.. .4" , -;-.- ,:- :` _ •� � � � ,�►. a: ,�• • IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR.. .. •x`;�.` -� , � s r • ;A., TO START OF WORK, NOTIFY - ,. F^ti" .w k` F �F A/E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ,,--,... ..- . ,..._ , . r.'..-',,...-:,...--.,.,'-.. 7., •,•,. . . . . :. ,.. , , -. 4_: .,,...,„:-.,-,,..,,,:,.--...- .. . :..,,.. _,.. ,j_.. .. ..,_.. _, - .....----tr--- --,. . •__-../ -- . - ..,.., - . p- - - .---=,,_. \ . "fir •--", .-f%trA,L1 ^ ' ' ' - - .-- , It...-='-'!• •*. ''‘e le,:--• -•-- • --. e y oi%4E rr • 1 i h • I '�'f �_: �r- r r,i� 14141. • • 7. f - �- � al' ,+'f- :-ma-- _ S= 4. 'C •• k-. �yy tf. a:x r.:� ,.�, •. :ir s�e LI V. +-:f= .. - - -i / ., ' • '' �ram' F. "All --+ - 'fit �' '� ' - �.P 'S - - - _. �,T -< - ��`. MI � '+,•.... __ - � .� :0•1 - 11�.,:•�'Y - ram'-R, >T ;„ -:mac .'{-' _ - - - .- :e.1::•'. �'CP_ ::�YAD va a' -+ r + r..y. ��-�.: - .•- cc ARCHITECTURE - rfi i. -JO'. :9 .. ,: �� a - + } ENGINEERING • _ - -- , '� _ , w _ :e .,i i.-•r_• fie': - _ --- _ _ - = :; 1- - •.� - 1 s - - - e � PLANNING _ - y INTERIORS : mob - y - -�� V , - , . 1 ir �:• _ 4�. , . . .,„ .,,,,....,.., L... _ __ .. -'4i - - r • - .*- - ' - ;:-.---!....:$ • f 1.1r, ,t 1 aff. -, s, 1--•.( jrr �r `'.a . '7::: J' I C :3. 5895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 ,'I; 4� _ - _ ivy::=�: I k.. .� e � `S.� ,a _J ��s. '#i.ER �.� - -.I - �. ]i• - '.'ice' ,��.' ��-� - - '�'�' Yi =- " 1 ,1 •• _ S- _ ._ rF.lt`�' - ' _ - �= .-Y re. 1..:::25...%--:4:.-.--11.:11'.::;.:-' I I. • E.,F _i•:-•`•^ ''�,K. ���C �F.-. �.I.,r - - - - 7F•y •+ <.:l ...�.- .'y v':h - C•�• .,y ..�: mi z ^`� - _ "r.. vK�.' '� PORTLAND, OREGON 97224 Y- •dr rses�,' .,rr ar.:.: - _. a2..ar - --_ _ ..'tw.: - -�.. - - s 'Ie+L r ;,.. l le r' y. • �� "'YI4p .,Y .,Y - i:a -.rf �� T E L 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 2 8 5 fir, �" - �l� � _ '. ;"�: - , �� i s 3 - z:," i:. 4 .o,, _ :: . „ -€ c - 207k �I .. .." a:zmn .r r,v: _ ram wz F A X 5 0 3 2 2 6 6 7 0 .� n 1. e �r - W W W C D A N C C O M r r w . ..- _,may. �� - f �+41: -a -.. - - - _ - - _• • �Y�- - -.. � � � - • --- - alb - _ - y _ _ • -, yE '. • r ~.fir ` r .' a •:f \: ` - '1'tiv: • ,.y,, • • - .. . W CO PHOTOS U CCI A2.2 N.T.S. ‘}} *} i r'., ,:4 .fr.•`X;. 'n.,,-v` •.7, . [ A a re'.z... --.s'�- .`,^ [I r. a.y;` .1 . '..;s1�a, N �y ,�p, 1� ef..�t .� ..w; d� 7 yy i +� _ p i i. ,�,�i .fir l -'lN _ .9[ • I ,B-_�'NS �I�• •1 ..`` W • ,�-. = ', r 'r',4 1r<`.'rC,}... ur :'>r,.• [�" ,1• .'f -•'V F k,1'M1Y r7 _ 5 4 2 y � • _, 411 P i •... i a y, S t 1 �. k' '4. „f '1'ryl.+ J'� Y ,�,. �'1':. - ` 1 r "'i, E, vF� Lrg �' • RV r • ,,!.T.', ' � �idl �S` _ • =a' - r�i,1` "'y�r'' I' `� zLLJ O A nr • 7 'f Y. 41�ss� _ F# •-� ' + s y rf#.. 7. '774. Olt s/ r' y. +�s'�rF •- " .�. fi '.,r" .,3"_ 1�.�' l� ;i' • '• �:1 fl ap i� C i ti sl 1 .`' V-) `a�J, J cn LLJ LLJ . A.-, ,. .. . , le .',.:,, f-,-;,,,-1.-*I.r . jir' I-LI 7,-.-..,-... % . � • �. rl 'x' ,.� 5 '��';-'dp• • qr. � .� '�c r�„=' :�i,.:,;s. '.,. .9-: a I. LLJ (/� m � O r._ yc ,1 y{{1d�. a: ■i vie: ifi'.• 'r '# �` • ? • '4 ;<< 4, -, .x 7 ;:+. ,. •;,. - - - rep- . °timah _ -__� �j' Z 0 :.• .1 w! 'J. , rr r: �r:.a= 5.ie-4 .a �S�'~' :�1 ram --c-�:�.:-, tip'. #7 � ]�'!` I ` I ',7D": ,, .` ���: 'r'Y. ..: y �- _ I .���r F�`y� . .-- r -. r_: `-r Y,,. ..ems,_. `�F- - �eb`a= - f• R .r�:',-•f_ r� �/ ti }, )ks]t _c,' I - =l,F!- r _ -: r 1. ?- •: e- ::: { II'. �. _ ..t E - 1. ` _ i w.: _ •"m,y �+ I I I [ • • . . _. * r' .- ..�i• _. ...f -ef• • ..t: 1�_ _ R.5'J' ^7. _ 1.`_ r- .� • _*,; :4--"L'T-r- . f''�_ a1 Qi {Y W 1'3 ,_ ss �,IS6 •{.1 '`I '1 F- - ,.�• " t �' - 1. _✓� ` ]� -:.. } .-•a t. '�??`{aJ' ,. •y{,I. .`L �l d. ], „ .,� _` - }ram,. _.S'•i.dR.'',u'�: 1. fir. H •�` dVs, '�I , i• r 1..1� t_ •H ], .•^�- -�^�� { `Crr. `1 -�1 1M.'-.3.. a ..•' 'a O hir goer• !' , I / "i"--. - ,,, .. y, 11 i�F'•: .' ` >u� - _. + ir SH1 1..E I - . 'g r` �. �- ' '+ir x ,. ,• '}' r `'` --,--ir - • ..,-- „ ..1-_ _ .. •S., 16 eit -i 7 Y '4 .1. - • p _ ..it ._ __ ,.. . e� �' fir' i 4rJ ti i' 'r'�. : ., ''$ �q av, a -y rr cn W .71.' LLJ diOc �...: �: r- „` y: S" `��. {•fir - t t� r ' -45 , y p 1y} J J.. i � % ,}.M r } r � 1 .I. y3r':}'-. wz / � � ,.a r-+•t'� _ - ./-• I. - r�� _.rf - :/.... _..7 - -- ..... Sy'k. ,. A......:.- _..._ L., tn < ciiitionsium } � �� - - - ..'fir:��,.�-.`''-�--i::.:,-r=, .- - 1:• f' - ,, I • : - 1 ''� -- of?.I4 - - 4- �., _ ;..: .� �' - mar:. `ram �J J Y,• Ce 5 Y .ii 1 ��. �'-f' .. 'T:� rI �'N y. r f'- , t .r .i .�I11 _1/4 � '�. �� Joyeir ;;ram:• ur... - �• 4E4 � �ti: ► - _ - :fie. ;ti•: .�3 , . �. �'':' ova: �f .,� = _ 1. } r •, : W �, �F`" ' ,..,:... .y. •"f.' r� � .. N le �r - � -- h4. e[ - \. .'d .�.'� .•:.. �Li' 1f. - wr -„ 'r' [-,.!- i8: 7.�� _ t•�� i �i y • le 1 E. I la.Hartilinalisimmi r 11°' .... 1 1' �i: - ti' it- .- �� Rye ; ;-�;� �. - yeti• `� I �� .�:.. � .ter -_ 'V ^'J -rld" v� <7 4r r,. 't qi..1„. ,...:1--:_( - ----; ',17.1':- -44,-- -lightir .•r• ..1 h r' yea-" - ;� - ..T- 6 r�:: .. - , _dw I 10, ..."---- _ ., . 1- 's -I -J�-�: mil'" �..•� r-'E .�' �.re :K - � `�..` f� ,ter i ,�• i.,, FIt O � � �A r 1. _,i y.v -Y- t1- _ 1�. .r r1 � - -efie � "Y�'. +� .gg� � y� , 1 ice: S. .�. '1k r 'i� �r., - - .. =f' ate': .�..•f - I LIJ N ,7 .v l ! - , :7'l: ram.- 3 /� N -.'4 °•gyp �-.. - .c WO i� gra- d .:: O -- L yy •.I �.. 1� =.k' w • _ ray:� ,I ax• • L 1 y •4 r n V + :'';1. 71.9 I s t - • 1 ,K _ �'.1.• :'as '7R'' lee- - ■ .L 1 1. M'ram.. 44t �..-Y Fl Off) INP = yam.. • a.Y' N - r Fri•�• r,PM � , '�4.: A. •k.i� llr '�` • � �Fti � r� ti�l. ,� �91M. :�... „!?,gar n �`�.y�_r• -•*.:;�c�;, .r r l.l .w r.' ;.i+ , " LOUV ' :�'; �•.«.:_ -�� .'�;.•x•.r5.;�.`.: 3� ,‘°•- _.. St_ �-i ._•1c:��s'•' .may 1•. :� , }f: i�: U _ _ " - F •: ''"`'.5 C°- ..i..: ;. r':.. r q.. .s s.c. to - .- • 9 '' r - i. Vie. '' n, .- r {r•. „ '. _ `' s EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -f..:...',-,--;j a = -r , V o f t. _ _ r�]l _ 7':�.a'iS,r _.9 2�-.$' ••ay. 3 .. Y' y ..1, ••t' L" r•• '�'"- -�rlr r'. '��S .li .T • �{ W MtiGi•1e sF. 1 q4� a.ff�� �{r 4yY52r-` -a a '�-.1+:�t�•'... '� ..t �A. '��r �F o .fil 1 p.: �:+ ,` '. •` fir'?' '': : _,,, opp` *IV +1:;ri1':`=:-•.•f a: I q. r" " 'a R:. ':�1.L, d ',�.I .I . - . w ...,3_r�. s'_- -7.,. .e.. *YC% ,,� - i. f + •P'v, 'r', ,',f,6'i!F' ELEVATION 4 ..-. y-` �'�•-,,i_. �.... .'�:..:s:.. -_•s•_ -'... ,:meµ-'T .-. . �r N. a �� •�t�Ti,'_r''�t'�'�Si: -- --- .�. lam` . ._ . e, . _ rs . Lt' .lL... �.:�:�':��.��ill.'ABIh:���ll Y/�'"e�,.�{7�r4't ,.', ' - ' • A2.2 CIDA#: 240019.01 3DEXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION CO ELEVATION - PHOTOS I/8" = I' o" m I /1/1 2,2 N.T.S. ©2024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page I103 a A, CAP FLASHING PER 8/A2.3 (SK8-12/17/14) EXISTING SHEATHING - INSPECT , •(-*\ BUILDING WRAP - LAP OVERFOR ROT AND NOTIFY A&E FOR �S FLASHING REPLACEMENT W/ , ... LIKE-FOR-LIKE ER M°1 HORIZONTAL SIDING NEW HORIZONTAL SIDING -E METER/PANEL �. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURR'S q.. .„. „. /-,:* / i 1- �/ 1/4" GAP - DO NOT CAULK REQUIREMENTS yip, . EXISTING HEADER TO �� i FACTORY FINISHED CONTINUOUS REMAIN BUILDING WRAP - EXTEND • / HORIZONTAL FLASHING W/ DRIP - OVER HEAD FLASHING - 10 II SIDING PER PLAN SLOPE TO DRAIN (5-7%) INSTALL PER REQUIREMENTS MANUFACTURE ' / H EXISTING INTERIOR PEEL AND STICK WRAP OVER / WRB - LAP FLASHING FINISH TO REMAIN HEAD FLASHING \ 5/4 BLOCK HARDI-TRIM lirt / CUSTOM 24 GA FLASHING - HEAD FLASHING WITH HEMMED / � VERTICAL ANGLE FLASHING DRIP- SLOPED TO DRAIN 5% MIN ~ ~ SLOPE TO DRAIN W/ LIP & DRIPco \ j — �J EDGE (PROVIDE SIDE FLASHING) - EXTEND UNDER CAP FLASHING - — — — WEATHER-CUT BLOCKING AT 22.5° IF = _ / _______\ - PROVIDE Y4" MIN. DRIP EDGE NECESSARY (BUTTER JOINT) w w / - HEM EXPOSED LEG / 5/4" TRIM cc cc O O / METER/PANEL _ _�II w w SIDING PER PLAN Q Q I I z z / ( PENETRATION (VENT, PIPE, PEEL AND STICK WRAP AT o 0 / ELECTRICAL OUTLET OR SIMILAR) ROUGH OPENING J J CONFIRM METER/PANEL WRB NOT SHOWN FOR m m DIMENSIONS IN FIELD CLARITY - LAP OVER CAP & RECAULK AFTER - � CAULKING 0pN- 0 CAULKING I VERTICAL FLASHING RE-INSTALLATION n1 N EXISTING DOOR TRIM < r LL o EXISTING WRB BUILDING WRAP - EXTEND UNDER o o 0 o 1 1 1 1 FLASHING _ N 11111 1 EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL PANEL/METER FLASHING EP ANGLE FLASHING AT METER/PANEL c3D PENETRATION DETAIL3 DOOR HEAD - LAP SIDING 3.1 3° = 1 0° 6° = 1 0° 6° - o° ' 3. 3° = 1'-0° REPLACE EXISTING SIDING WHERE NEW HORIZONTAL SIDING - INSTALL PER CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DAMAGED/REQUIRED - INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND CONFIRM EXISTING VARIES MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS - CONDITIONS SHOWN OR / STAGGER SIDING JOINTS. IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR EXISTING WINDOW (SLIDING, DOUBLE HUNG EXISTING WINDOW (SLIDING, DOUBLE HUNG TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY BUILDING WRAP - EXTEND OVER HEAD OR CASEMENT) TO BE REMOVED FOR OR CASEMENT) TO BE REMOVED FOR A/E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. EXISTING HEADER TO FLASHING - INSTALL PER INSTALLATION OF WATER BARRIER INSTALLATION OF WATER BARRIER FACTORY FINISHED HEAD REMAIN MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS V FLASHING W/ DRIP - END RECAULK AFTER RECAULK AFTER L, PROFILE TO MATCH SIDE PROFILE 1/4" GAP - DO NOT CAULK RE-INSTALLATION OF RE-INSTALLATION OF - EXTEND PAST HEAD TRIM WINDOW WINDOW 11 \ EXISTING INTERIOR / FACTORY FINISHED HEAD FLASHING WITH FINISH TO REMAIN / /...: DRIP - SLOPE TO DRAIN (5-7%) PEEL AND STICK WINDOW WRAP AT ROUGH PEEL AND STICK WINDOW WRAP AT ROUGH PEEL AND STICK WINDOW WRAP EXTEND OPENING OPENING 6 5/4 X 4 HEAD TRIM TO REPLACE / OVER WINDOW FIN EXISTING WINDOW TRIM CAULKING EXISTING WINDOW TRIM CAULKING A3.1 EXISTING - PROVIDE MIN. 1/4" / \ `., NAILING FIN ATTACHED TO BUILDING FRAMING 61 EXTENSION BEYOND JAMB TRIM SET IN CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT 5/4 X 4 TRIM 1 5/4 X 4 JAMB TRIM ARCHITECTURE EACH SIDE- SET IN SEALANT _ �� =_ 5/4 X 4 JAMB TRIM TO REPLACE 5/4" X 4 TRIM L=I 1 .:all "' ENGINEERING w E U 1 PLANNING EXISTING - SEALANT (BUTTER HEAD TRIM AT JAMB TRIM) L J 8 INTERIORS A3.1 NAILING FIN ATTACHED TO BUILDING FRAMING NAILING FIN ATTACHED TO BUILDING FRAMING EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVED EXISTING INTERIOR SET IN CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT EXISTING STUD WALL °-°. SET IN CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT 1 5 89 5 SW 7 2 N D A V E SUITE 200 7 FOR SIDING REPAIR AND NEW EXISTING WINDOW TRIM FINISH TO REMAIN WINDOW WRAP EXTEND OVER NAILING FIN TO REMAIN PEEL AND STICK WINDOW WRAP EXTEND P o R T L A N D, OREGON 9 7 2 2 4 A3.I WRAP/FLASHINGS - SET NAILING FINS PEEL AND STICK WINDOW WRAP AT ROUGH OVER NAILING FIN T E L s 0 3 2 2 6 . 1 2 s s IN SEALANT - CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY OPENING F A X 5 0 3 2 2 6 6 7 0 EXISTING CONDITION OF WINDOW AND I CAULKING CAULKING BEHIND SIDING - SECOND BEAD W W W C 1 D A I N C . C o M ROUGH OPENING AND NOTIFY OWNER EXISTING INTERIOR \ AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO RECAULK AFTER EXISTING WINDOW (SLIDING, DOUBLE HUNG FINISH TO REMAIN AT FACE RE-INSTALLATION OF OR CASEMENT) TO BE REMOVED FOR BUILDING WRAP - EXTEND UNDER NAILING REINSTALLATION. BUILDING WRAP - EXTEND OVER NAILING ALT. - REPLACE WINDOW WRAP, WINDOW INSTALLATION OF WATER BARRIER FIN - INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S l'' FIN - INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S FLASHING AND TRIM SET IN SEALANT EXISTING STUD WALL REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS WITH (E) WINDOW IN PLACE TO REMAIN NEW HORIZONTAL SIDING - INSTALL PER I /� NEW HORIZONTAL SIDING - INSTALL PER z NOTE: MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS V MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS INSTALL WINDOW WRAP PER MANUFACTURER'S NOTE: RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING ORDER OF INSTALLATION NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE - OVERLAPPING LAYERS AT SILL, JAMB, THEN HEAD OF EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING - I w FRAMING DAMAGE, MOLD, ETC. SIM AT DOOR JAMB / TRIM * W 5 WINDOW ELEVATION IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY 6 WINDOW HEAD 7 WINDOW SILL WINDOW JAM6 u z g 3.1 1° = 1'-o° ' 3. 3° = 1'-0° 3.1 3° = I'-0° clip 3° = I'-0° N CO 0 z H z w V z H LL Ln .1 L LJ cL w vl CO _ z p c O 0 a PROVIDE WATER RESISTIVE E 1-- 1UNBROKEN 6 BARRIER / AIR BARRIER BEHIND X z Q FOLDER DAM ALL FLASHING LEGS AGAINGST , © W 'o (J) COORDINATE HEIGHT OF BACK SHEATHING O DAM WITH THRESHOLD AND JAMB 6" .' (../-) W 24 GA SHEET METAL HEAD AT DOORS. DO NOT PENETRATE E FLASHING HORIZONTAL OF SILL PAN. VERIFY WITH SITE :1, CONDITIONS - 1" MIN VI,, 6„MIN. ///. X O z W o SLOPED TO DRAIN 5% MIN. A/ / \ \ , / m 0 ii ZU H ocE .� N L7-) �� X 11111111 d Q11 IIIII e' ' SLOPE SILL PAN �� w TO DRAIN 1/4:12 PROVIDE (3) BEADS OF HEAD TRIM MIN. SEALANT AT OVERLAPS, TYP. w +1/8" U Q HEMMED DRIP 1" 24 GA FULLY SOLDERED SHEET Q EDGE, TYPICAL ` " METAL SILL PAN. SHIM DOOR u2 THRESHOLD OFF PAN SURFACE TO DRAIN AND SET BACK LEG REMOVE BACK OF HEM AT OF PAIN IN CONTINUOUS BED UPPER LAP PIECE EXTERIOR DETAILS NOTE: OF SEALANT. PAN TO BE STAINLESS STEEL WHERE DOOR SILL INCLUDE ALUMINUM SUBSTRATE 0 A3. 1 i 9 FOLDED END DAM 10 TYPICAL DOOR PAN 11 TYPICAL FLASHING LAP CIDA : 240019.01 3.1 3" = 1'-0" ' 3. I I/2" = 1'-0" 3.1 1 I/2" = 1'-0° ©2024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ro Page 1104 a A, yUILDING WRAP - LAP OVER e 4 S, LASHING K____2.>------ : \ \ 0 .., 0. et IL vs EXISTING INTERIOR FINISH TO REMAIN \ ORIZONTAL SIDING l# 11. F.•3 /4" GAP - DO NOT CAULK •NEW HORIZONTAL SIDING OVER NEW EXISTING BATT INSULATION TO REMAIN EXISTING STUD WALLBUILDING WRAP - PER SPECIFICATION ACTORY FINISHED CONTINUOUSORIZONTAL FLASHING W/ DRIP - • TO REMAIN LOPE TO DRAIN 5% MIN. 4"EXISTING EXTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD / VERLAP AT JOINTS W/ BEAD OF EXISTING 2X STUDS WALLSHEATHING TO BE REPLACED AS NOTED EALANT OR JOINT FLASHING IN 1/A2.2 EXISTING EXTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD EXISTING TYPE 'X' EXTERIOR GYPSUM BUILDING WRAP PER MANUFACTURERS r fBOARD SHEATHING TO BE REPLACED / RECOMMENDATIONS SHEATHING TO BE REPLACED WHERE DAMAGED W/ TYPE 'X' EXTERIOR • HORIZONTAL TRIMco °' GYPSUM BOARD OR DENSGLASS (BELLY BEAD) _ _ 2 X SHEATHING - DAMAGED GYPSUM BOARD PRE-PRIMED ALL SIDES, NO FINGER w w TO BE REMOVED TO (E) STUD OR (E) i/Ef. / JOINTS BLOCKING. PROVIDE NEW BLOCKING AT O O SHEATHING PERIMETER AS REQUIRED- ç / / ,L , ( . SEE 1/A2.3 FOR NAILING BUTTER TRIM TO TRIM W/ CAULKING H H z z / NEW HORIZONTAL SIDING OVER NEW O BUILDING WRAP - PER SPECIFICATION N N l V EXISTING PLYWOOD SHEATHING - /�\ /\ /� NOTE: SEE ENTRY PLANS NOT SHOWN - (PER ORIGINAL / BUILDING WRAP - EXTEND UNDER A2.0 FOR SLOPE o z \ STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) TO REMAIN. FLASHING REQUIREMENTS - j 9 REPLACE WHERE WATER DAMAGED. PROVIDE FLASHING AND co Do PLYWOOD SHEATHING TO BE SLOPES AS REQUIRED TO i SLOPED TOP CAP W/ KERF CUT EACH SIDE INSTALLED W/ BLOCKING AS 5/4 X 4 CORNER TRIM CAULKING DIRECT WATER AWAY 1/8" FT. SLOPE o 0 / / 24 GA SHEET METAL LAP N ff N REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN NAILING FROM PERIMETER WALLS o o FLASHING -HEM EDGES 1 ; q M REQUIREMENTS OF ORIGINAL 11111 DRAWINGS 4" PERIMETER / 6" FIELD 000 o - N 1 1 1 1 1 WATER & ICE WATERPROOFING 1 TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL 3 HORIZONTAL WALL FLASHING MEMBRANE OVER TOP OF STUDS 19) / BUILDING PAPER PER SPECIFICATION 3. 3" = I' 0" 3" = I' 0" 3. 6" = I' 0" j / LAP OVER TOP OF STUD WALL / / SHIM / / 5/4 TRIM PER SPECIFICATION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY •/ EXISTING RAKE WALL SHEATHING TO REMAIN j A 2X4 STUD WALL AND CONFIRM EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN OR / IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR NEW SIDING OVER NEW BUILDING WRAP L METAL / / 15/32 PLYWOOD SHEATHING TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY / - PER SPECIFICATION / / Ilik PER SPECIFICAITON A/E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. BUILDING WRAP PER MANUFACTURER'S SEALANT DAM �' / / SIDING PER SPECIFICATION / RECOMMENDATIONS / SURFACE APPLIED MEMBRANE FLASHING FIBER CEMENT SIDING PER / FLASHING - SLOPE TO DRAIN ELEVATION [/ 1 \/ 5/4 TRIM PER SPECIFICAITON SADDLE FLASHING / / GALVANIZED FLASHINGil / / i TRAFFIC MENBRANE / / / ,.- , / / / SEE 10/A2.7 FOR ADDITIONAL61 / / / / INFORMATION AT DECKING TO EXISTING STEP FLASHING � ARCHITECTURE I+ %� j / VERTICAL TRANSITION / U ENGINEERING / _ SHEET METAL FLASHING �� �'• / I LAP BEHIND BUILDING WRAP & SIDING +� 4 - WITH HEMMED EDGE -QQ ��� ,,, / y /////� ��//////////// PLANNING INTERIORS T I , - - / 13 \\` // \\, / DECKING W/ 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 / i Q FIELD PRIME CUT SIDING / �^ / / i & TRIM EDGES AND n ;^ �� PORTLAND, OREGON 97224 _ EXISTING ROOF SHINGLES TO REMAIN PROVIDE FILLET JOINT 411 PER F PLAN COATING / / T E L 5 0 3 2 2 6 . 1 2 8 5 / �� / F A X 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 6 7 0 / J / W W W C D A N C C O M ,,, PT JOIST TO / / REPLACE / // // // // // // // // // // . _- (E) / /1 � / MATCH SIZES / / /� DECK EDGE FLASHING EXISTING ROOF / / / / /� FLASHING / SHEATHING TO REMAIN �' SLOPE TO1/11 / (E) JOIST HANGER NOTE: NOTIFY ARCHITECT & OWNER'S REP. OF DRAIN /CONDITION OF OBSERVED SHEATHING & EXISTING / 2X8 PT LEDGER - ATTACH TO STUDUNDERLAYMENTS PRIOR TO COVER. i4 TRIM / SHEATHING W/ 2 ROWS OF SIMPSON� Z / O SDS25321 SCREWS AT 12" O.C. NOTE:EXISTING STEP FLASHING TO BE REPLACED STAGGERED - SEE 5/A1.2 Q W/REROOFING OF BUILDING. (E) PT 4X12 Q > Ce 5 FLASHING @ LOW ROOF TO WALL DECK AT TRENCH - END WALL CONDITION s UPPER LANDING WALL SECTION u 3. 6" = 1'-0" 010 NO SCALE ' 3. 3" = I' 0" N DECK COATING PER SPECIFICATIONS w CO1 Z /v EW WATER RESISTANT SEAL TAPE PER DECK COATING MANUFACTURERH 0 -\/ PLYWOOD PRIMER PER SPECIFICATION Z BARRIER PER SPECIFICATION- uJ LAP OVER L-FLASHING 4 22 GA GALVANIZED STAIR NOSING Z H L LJ EnE I LJJ CL w LJJ V \ EXTERIOR DOOR PREFINISHED OR GALVANIZED T - Z _ METAL CLASHING PER ///1/ // // // a O DECK COATING PER DOOR SILL PAN SPECIFICATION - PRIME PER SPECIFICATION DECK COATING -Ti E I DOOR THRESOLD MANUFACTURER \ DIRECTION OF LJJ SEAL TAPE PER DECK COATING SET IN CONTINUOUS 0 0 7 MANUFACTURER BED OF MASTIC SLOPE/FLOW ZO 0 Cf) EXISTING FLOOR DECK COATING PER W Cl O PLYWOOD PRIMER PER SPECIFICATION c1, SHEATHING EXTERIOR GRADE A/C T&G PLYWOOD PER w SPECIFICATION SEAL TAPE PER DECK - — PLAN - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT AWAY FROM I-- < LU - COATING MANUFACTURER BUILDING - ROUTE FACE TO ACCEPT FLASHING r 6"x6" L-SHAPED FLASHING FLUSH WITH PLYWOOD FACE Q VI BLOCKING (3 O PLYWOOD PRIMER PER SPECIFICATION PREFINISHED OR GALVANIZED METAL N SEAL TAPE PER DECK COATING FLASHING PER SPECIFICATION - PRIME W MANUFACTURER AT TRANSITION PER DECK COATING MANUFACTURER J c co DECK COATING PER SPECIFICATION N EXTERIOR GRADE A/C T&G EXISTING ALL rn LAP HORIZONTAL LEG OF Z PLYWOOD DECKING PER SHEATHING PLYWOOD PER PLAN - `O L-FLASHING H STRUCTURAL f// ,SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT AWAY Q EXISTING /� FROM BUILDING C w BLOCKING FLOOR > - PLYWOOD PRIMER PER I DIRECTION OF FRAMING SLOPE/FLOW SPECIFICATION Q / PLYWOOD PER PLAN - SLOPE o /////,; 777��. u2 \ 1/4" PER FOOT AWAY FROM ///////////7:- BUILDING NOTE: SEE MANUFACTURER'S ` EXTERIOR DETAILS RECOMMENDATIONS AND DETAILS FOR DIRECTION OF JOINTS LARGER THAN 1/16" SLOPE/FLOW o ro A3.2 3. DRAINAGE SYSTEM AT PLYWOOD JOINT 10 DOOR THRESHOLD AT LANDING 11 VERTICAL TRANSITIONDECK COATING AT TRENCH DRAIN - - CIDA : 240019.01 12" = I'-0" ' 3. 6" = I'-0" 3. 6" = 0" 419) 6" = I'-0" ©2024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ro Page 1105 4 , a . .� 10 co 0 --i' coo ._q . -q1 j 1 �, / I / i ' �I'�,II �-r ,q TRe�o &a:: a q'-�11 ' 1,1....00 t✓p ' - 5 / _ __� e ER Y. ` oP _ F'-3 • - ..rfe FbCit, 0 n r" / /�N Ohl r 1 �4 Zt3.GAO _ `:L�li �1 . r r---1 pi%I, FLA, _ .. , 1 , / --&"r11. 00.0 li 0 �c - fl • I IJHD 'Ll?j.OQ' A6 ^ j�N. U r t p _. caowti► _ �i' FIN, - _ .e m d- ii 2 Q it --GAP P D0 . �. � w w IL' .l .I r I ,- l!Li,°.Jge,-/ > 0 -&. e Li...V. A ' 1. - 0 -1_— �� o. 5 t�'-q" 1 t w w 1 i r N l!1 Q Q 0 N I +42" WAI_� . — is) / z z _ j ; j WA Op ' _ - r — _ 9 0 1. D t 9 co co 1 b ,___1 G CD v( -� --1 a.31' L�-291 �'•1.,,'1..0. /�- 11 2,0(.vV ' ' __' — — e� w OR o V 44....// --'--- - V�RI • ---0-t— FI>\!,FLft� I. I 0 0 0 - r. J d�,�p I I , o v ..r r-J © I N ` GYP' �'O N A -q qYP I :- A , -1___ d ��UPPER LEVEL, — P ER LEVEL a✓ 1 - s - s,� ' Aih %-- -c '4 CONTRACTOR AND CONIRM SHALL EXIST EXISTING VERIFY-ri-- rz! ' N CONDITIONS SHOWN OR �— N IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR TO 11 ..1 RK. NOTIFY ILI- t ► • I ' 41 - - - I • / ' A/E OFR ANY T FD DISCREPANCIES. J - SECTION A �'��, .... I i_ .Ate v i J1.. '-1 Mk 489•oO' , I , . 7- S- E-- OTION B All --,I 11s I, , - I I >///<cow 0 41111t1 I - - - O N �•- ---1 ARCHITECTURE ,,-- 61 .i y 2 ENGINEERING (N7.„:"..,,,.......20 -pi -� PLANNING (� _ NTERIORS 1 "r .: It IN,,. s_ A\ O ✓ p �p s•}���Gi!.1p �L r_ {-Le.► � S-2 5895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 r , 4o /in • f`►G 1^ 11 C Q I.JI-�- �r 1 HIV O , F� SI I� riF•� IN.�O PORTLAND, OREGON 97224 g II E L 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 2 8 5 F A X 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 6 7 0 O • W W W C I D A I N C . C O M N • • 1 , . ("I C -.. , ,� _ . tit' _ . -' 'ZI .UU�,61.-6 exp.0__..... P P� O I P — —— 213.vo' 0 • �� II 1 _II FIN, T— Fir-+. i�L.R- 1= • GROUND LEVEL Al• -a tp, e t w W 5 CCI ' ''q I e 1 u g �.0. I A GROUND. .LE.VEh - \_.kja Gam, $ -�` k —� w NN IP © z I_ TO WALL. ..' Ty P I W— �— - - - / I -- ..- / 1 N W �N I i ?*IL Q IrI 12 0 CO O I W i eAse z n 17-) d r-� .� _ © FII.I.Ft..2, `=�' CV126 JI •• ------\ , FIN. PLre-. E W r41 ' .9 t 246. it 0 U O 0 ► 7 L wo: 06- e r $-10 O U1 5 0 u vi _, / 431 2 ,____ . _i 1- 0 \ LL0 1f ,,_„, *1#6 DO:0 Z 1.1.i >/ Vt4 ID D r- 0 J 'lel. ‘) A - 1 j Flhl.Fl-R. ISECTION ,�`-� , ��� M� SECTION C2, =, , D o L- i , --' inoc )" -`. • , A EMEN1 9 ENLARGED STAIRS PLAN - STAIR 1 .. o ENLARGED STAIRS PLAN - STAIR 2 — — -J . LIN•flo (.EVEL ?? o I � ' 4.1 I/4" - I'-0" 1 1 � ' 4.1 I/4" - I'-0" EN R ED TAIR I �� ' PLANS It_emu � A4. 1 �- B '$.TAIR$ Z- ro A ST AIR S ' 1 '0 , ENLARGED PLAN /•� �- - `1 - --1 BASEMENT LEVEL ,- ©2024 C OADA#D240019.01 400 ALL R9.0 IS RESERVED b _ ENLARGED PLAN, ---�,r—5,_9 2 T "T Page I106 a A, METAL WALL BRACKET © 5'-0" O.C. e 4 S 1'-0" MAX.-- PAINT TO MATCH HANDRAIL PARTITION AS SCHEDULED -- SEE PLANS 1-1/4"0 STD. STEEL PIPE HANDRAIL -- PAINT o ',, l'' ER vER FOR TYPE "] #;,_ - /� / /4" PROVIDE RADIUS RETURNS TO WALL @ BASE WHERE OCCURS-- SEE FINISH SCHEDULE sf ,U HANDRAIL ENDS AND PLUG ENDS 0 1 1/2" LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE TOPPING AT 2ND FLOOR MANUAL FIRE ALARM _ 3'-O" ek co_ �' co 0 O T.O. HANDRAIL ABOVE NOSE OF TREAD 3/4" PLYWOOD FLOOR DECK X X w w cL cL NOTE: SURFACE MOUNTS MAY NOT I-1/4"STD PIPE HANDRAIL WOOD BEAM PER PLAN O O Q PROJECT MORE THAN 4" INTO AISLE IF w w MOUNTED 27"TO 80"A.F.F. H H 'T A - 3/4" PLYWOOD STAIR TREAD w w HANDRAIL BRACKET @ 5'-0" O.C. MAX. 4 ....., �� l< ce/ ,/ ,, ,, ,, , , i;iI j N Q 1/2" PLYWOOD STAIR RISER Q Q FIRE EXTINGUISHER �' Ag STRINGER PER 12/A8.1 0 0 3/8"x 2 1/4" LAG SCREWxx G/ co coyam, 71- I- NEn N 0 0 2X8 WOOD BLOCKING ALONG SEE - S7.1 FOR STRUCTURAL fL o „ CONNECTIONS r Q LENGTH OF WALL WHERE APPLICABLE 5/8 GYP. BD. o o o IIIII c4i) FIRE EXTINGUISHER & ALARM MOUNTING HEIGHTS 2 TYPICAL STEEL HANDRAIL 3 ST-2 @ TOP LANDING 1" = I'-0" 1 044 1 3-02 ' 4. 3" = 1'-0" 05520-01 ' 4. 1" = 1'-0" CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY /� AND CONFIRM EXISTING �/ CONDITIONS SHOWN OR IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY I " A/E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 1-1/4"0 STD. STEEL PIPE HANDRAIL -- PAINT 1/2" RADIUS 11 PARTIAL HEIGHT WALL - 42" ABOVE NOSING OF STAIR STRINGER PER 12/A8.1 TREADS of STAIR BEYOND 1/2" PLYWOOD STAIR61 RISERS - TYP. - III ARCHITECTURE STRINGER PER 12/A8.1 V I a 3/4" PLYWOOD STAIR Q, ENGINEERING --- 3/4" PLYWOOD FLOOR SHEATHING TREADS - TYP. ,_ aU PLANNING 1 AT LANDING �I INTERIORS i 0 4 0 a L DO NOT OVERCUT �� w sags SW 72ND AVE SUITE zoo II rSTAIR STRINGERS AT ` O,� PORTLAND, oREcoN 97zz4 II NOTCHES �- TEL 503 zz6 . 1 285 le F A X 5 0 3 2 2 6 1 6 7 0 � W W W C I D A I N C C O M ' ) III t}t. 9 n 10 "T1Z� �i 'Zip ' t Cat-�i� II 2X8 �. 2X8 JOIST © 16 O.C. WOOD BEAM PER PLAN 5/8" GYP. BD. AT UNDERSIDE OF STRINGERS " .4 11 I H 1 t Z 1 Ke-rug4-1 1/2" PLYWOOD STAIR RISER DCM/Ssi HANDRAILS. '�P 3/4" PLYWOOD STAIR TREAD Q W op (0 _ 7 ST-2 @ MID. LANDINGrii. ST-2 TREAD & RISER DETAIL u' 4. 1" = 1'-O" 05510-02 • 4. 1-1/2" = 1'-0" ak w m - N ___"\__` Z r ♦ GYP. BD. CAP V ` ! TOP METAL TRACK 1 1/4"0 STD. STEEL '�%� cn W CL © {, PLAN VIEW OF HANDRAIL 1-1/4"0 STD. STEEL PIPE HANDRAIL -- PAINT T PIPE HANDRAIL PER 1 1/2" cNi� mLLJ o �� �� 5�� I I ate / y/ Q H 1'-0" METAL WALL BRACKET © 5'-0" O.C. Z ( ) o 7i MAX.-- PAINT TO MATCH HANDRAIL y O �CJPPER LEVEL o H W 0 . z z0 8CD o W 2ti3.601f - z z �„ /% �---I o PARTIAL HEIGHT STUD WALL PER J ‘ e" J a7 . 7 m PARTITION TYPE 'C' SEE A1.1 %/ r- -=rr — .---I I FOR DESCRIPTION o 1-HR FIRE RATED Q �� Q STUD WALL PER / r JP E3� O _ _ PLYWOOD STAIR TREADS o PARTITION TYPE 0 O -J Q i 'F' - SEE A1.1 Z W _J J H ©AIL > "' FOR DESCRIPTION i/I STRINGER PER 12/A8.1 _� - E.G, 2X4 PT NAILER PLATE W/ 1/2"0 X LTS12 © 32" O.C. m Q N \� �__ `pQ ( �� /L X 5" EXPANSION ANCHORS © 12" 4 1 1 4" X 14 Z ii lg �_ Q O.C. / � ) / 4- 4.1, Nlel _ I N� ir \ �������� TIMBERSTRAND LSL Z bi. in t— _t o STRINGERS X _„, ,_ , ,.3 , 4 I_21 3 I— ��". �L�" SECTION, .E — a a � a a a a __,/,_,_ EQ. EQ. EQ. Jr ,- v\ u ` Q.'. �� ' t( ,.R �elflri e II sit-pn / / PER PLAN / STAIR DETAILS 4X4 BLOCKING © 32" O.C. GROUND CONCRETE SLAB ALIGN WATS STRAPS 0 y A4. c9) ENLARGED STAIRS PLAN - STAIR 3 11 ST-2 @BASE 12 ST-2 - CROSS SECTION F3 ® STAIRS 3 „I/4" = ILO" •44. 1" = 1 -0 4. 1 = 1 -0 CIDA#: 240019.01 ti f ;ENLARGED PLAN' ©2024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ro w r Page I107 Al Project Name 1.1) •i� Project Number C 17.1.2CP Basic Configuration Checklist Table 17-2.Collapse Prevention Basic Configuration Checklist. Tier 2 Commentary Status Evaluation Statement Reference Reference Comments Low Seismicity Building System—General C�C N/A U LOAD PATH:The structure contains a 5.4.1.1 A.2.1.1 p`�� NIA ❑ complete,well-defined load path, C�eli 0 including structural elements and 1 connections,that serves to transfer the Some Loatt ��w—�' inertial forces associated with the d3c o 'v i' vi Y1�S mass of all elements of the building to — POP PGA/0 y l 4ic, 0 Pi e,4T1yni the foundation. C NC N/A U ADJACENT BUILDINGS:The clear 5.4.1.2 A.2.1.2 El distance between the building being - evaluated and any adjacent building is greater than 0.25%of the height of the shorter building in low seismicity,0.5% in moderate seismicity,and 1.5%in high seismicity. C NC N/A U MEZZANINES:Interior mezzanine 5.4.1.3 A.2.1.3 ❑ levels are braced independently from the main structure or are anchored to the seismic-force-resisting elements of the main structure. Building System—Building Configuration C NC N/A U WEAK STORY:The sum of the shear 5.4.2.1 A.2.2.2 strengths of the seismic-force-resisting system in any story in each direction is Olnti�' One cS not less than 80%of the strength in (a b /MO DOS i„ /iReettiMj the adjacent story above. ) C NC N/A U SOFT STORY:The stiffness of the 5.4.2.2 A.2.2.3 1 ❑ seismic-force-resisting system in any story is not less than 70%of the seismic-force-resisting system stiffness in an adjacent story above or less than 80%of the average seismic-force- resisting system stiffness of the three stories above. C NC N/A U VERTICAL IRREGULARITIES:All vertical 5.4.2.3 A.2.2.4 d�scAw�v�� ph 2.❑ ❑ elements in the seismic-force-resisting system are continuous to the Ov.-of 1 daS(M iln�o tv foundation. a4 N�e4 t1� 0 NC N/A U GEOMETRY:There are no changes in 5.4.2.4 A.2.2.5 41 ors Vti►Uiatiy wait . . a ❑ the net horizontal dimension of the iev‘d Of Of rOt I° seismic-force-resisting system of more than 30%in a story relative to adjacent stories,excluding 1-story penthouses and mezzanines. C NC N/A U MASS:There is no change in effective 5.4.2.5 A.2.2.6 mass of more than 50%from one story 1-1 to the next.Light roofs,penthouses, and mezzanines need not be considered. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown ccc 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 2 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1108 A2 Project Name Project Number C NC N/A U TORSION:The estimated distance 5.4.2.6 A.2.2.7 \_J between the story center of mass and the story center of rigidity is less than 20%of the building width in either plan dimension.This statement does. not aooi,y_to buildings with flexible lags. Tier 2 Commentary Status Evaluation Statement Reference Reference Comments Moderate Seismicity(Complete the Following Items in Addition to the Items for Low Seismicity) Geologic Site Hazards C NC N/A U LIQUEFACTION:Liquefaction- 5.4.3.1 A.6.1.1 etteb%fiVie+"� T D El 111 susceptible,saturated,loose granular soils that could jeopardize the oistea'% 1n�' building's seismic performance do not1s � Arco,. eve d G V S G COI KavG ffr r exist in the foundation soils at depths �l within 50 ft(15.2 m)under the Gay Cam" y building. C NC N/A U SLOPE FAILURE:The building site is 5.4.3.1 A.6.1.2 gi ❑ ❑ [—I located away from potential rl- earthquake-induced slope failures or 51€ Y S es b1f 6 rac y rockfalls so that it is unaffected by such failures or is capable of accommodating any predicted movements without failure. C NC N/A U SURFACE FAULT RUPTURE:Surface 5.4.3.1 A.6.1.3 O ❑ 0 fault rupture and surface aSst. ' d Ccr^&l;o.�\-� - displacement at the building site are A`oed et froVerA �� �Ul2 not anticipated. r- Tier 2 Commentary Status Evaluation Statement Reference Reference Comments High Seismicity(Complete the Following Items in Addition to the Items for Moderate Seismicity) Foundation Configuration C NC N/ U TIES BETWEEN FOUNDATION 5.4.3.4 A.6.2.2 CI El ❑ ELEMENTS: d nn colic rlassif a ac aL[j tJ\rig,E ufahe indivith Lai rib,cans rites.MA_4- gde e s or te t�a� s.For buildings supported on soi s classified as Site Class E or F, t ( individual spread footings are �I lik restrained by concrete beams or slabs adequate to resist seismic forces. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown <<� 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 3 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1109 n *%s "ur iPabc cv�.l. A3 "Ur Pam` ��L �� G 4 (or Project Name L.(7 [2� (+�� r��✓""' Project Number 0,53. 17.3CP Structural Checklist for Building Type W2:Wood Frames, Large Residential,Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional Table 17-6.Collapse Prevention Structural Checklist for Building Type W2. Tier 2 Commentary Status Evaluation Statement Reference Reference Comments Low and Moderate Seismicity Seismic-Force-Resisting System C NC N/A U REDUNDANCY:The number of 5.5.1.1 A.3.2.1.1 ❑ ❑ ❑ lines of shear walls in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2. C NC N/A U SHEAR STRESS CHECK:The shear 5.5.3.1.1 A.3.2.7.1 ❑ u I;,� ❑ ❑ stress in the shear walls,calculated / J TO /(P-Pt Ph yy V„G,� c4ut, using the Quick Check procedure 5/1� j of Section 4.4.3.3,is less than the ' tz.4 S4lur�i�/I) !S/ TO 7,h�i( f# l Qk.G� G4 following values: Structural panel sheathing 1,000 lb/ft(14.6 kN/m), Diagonal sheathing 700 lb/ft(10.2 kN/m), Straight sheathing 100 lb/ft (1.4S kN/m),and All other conditions 100 lb/ft(1.45 kN/m). C NC N/A U STUCCO(EXTERIOR PLASTER) S.5.3.6.1 A.3.2.7.2 SHEAR WALLS:Multistory 441, ❑ ❑ ❑ buildings do not rely on exterior stucco walls as the primary seismic-force-resisting system. C NC N/A U GYPSUM WALLBOARD OR 5.5.3.6.1 A.3.2.7.3 I.� ❑ ❑ ❑ PLASTER SHEAR WALLS:Interior an • 6514 611ec4r w445 plastersed or ear walls s onbo rdild is not c _ f p, ����k 1 used for shear walls on buildings �1LLJ�. CGC �' tiv more than one story high with the exception of the uppermost level of a multistory building. C NC N/A U NARROW WOOD SHEAR WALLS: 5.5.3.6.1 A.3.2.7.4 ❑ ❑ ❑ Narrow wood shear walls with an //+? aspect ratio greater than 2-to-1 are S Y'1 1 .5 'i' .2,10,4 not used to resist seismic forces. rgr}it) C NC N/A U WALLS CONNECTED THROUGH 5.5.3.6.2 A.3.2.7.5 HFLOORS:Shear wallshave an ❑ ❑ Sw.e+e. ye Sow e. n® interconnection between stories to transfer overturning and shear forces through the floor. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown rya 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 2 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1110 A4 Project Name Project Number C NC N/A U HILLSIDE SITE:For structures that 5.5.3.6.3 A.3.2.7.6 ❑ ❑ ' ❑ are taller on at least one side by more than one-half story because of a sloping site,all shear walls on the downhill slope have an aspect ratio less than 1-to-1. C NC N/A U CRIPPLE WALLS:Cripple walls 5.5.3.6.4 A.3.2.7.7 �\ ❑ below first-floor-level shear walls are braced to the foundation with wood structural panels. C NC N/A U OPENINGS:Walls with openings 5.5.3.6.5 A.3.2.7.8 ❑ greater than 80%of the length are braced with wood structural panel shear walls with aspect ratios of not more than 1.5-to-1 or are supported by adjacent construction through positive ties e h cd e 41r 1 capable of transferring the seismic forces. Connections C NC N/A U WOOD POSTS:There is a positive 5.7.3.3 A.5.3.3 , �f tg `` ! 0,In connection of wood posts to the let>I MQ!� t�c+v foundation. V 001l0,S arse <d f C NC N/A U WOOD SILLS:All wood sills are 5.7.3.3 A.5.3.4 a,t1 a r Q G EIII ❑ bolted to the foundation. C NC N/A U GIRDER-COLUMN CONNECTION: 5.7.4.1 A.5.4.1 ❑ ❑ ❑ There is a positive connection r gg using plates,connection ter. Art, ►1 /c" b ,l% 4 co hardware,or straps between the 4j ._ . �l1 girder and the column support. Tier 2 Commentary Status Evaluation Statement Reference Reference Comments High Seismicity(Complete the Following Items In Addition to the Items for Low and Moderate Seismicity) Connections C NC N/A U WOOD SILL BOLTS:Sill bolts are 5.7.3.3 A.5.3.7 y� b ❑ ❑ ❑ spaced at 6 ft(1.8 m)or less with "$Vat, c� beCV ,4 w6‘ts 9/SI acceptable edge and end distance 32 pry ,� J provided for wood and concrete. c5kraiLr wR��r �a• Diaphragms C NC N/A U DIAPHRAGM CONTINUITY:Floor 5.6.1.1 A.4.1.1 El and roof diaphragms do not have 3 expansion joints or vertical offsets, to st t�e6 e p�'6]Y11 such as split levels,sawtooth,or •7 �J clerestory configurations. Satm.)6141 r0 04 4 tie.) ) Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown !c1 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 3 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1111 A5 Project Name Project Number C NC N/A U ROOF CHORD CONTINUITY:All 5.6.1.1 A.4.1.3 • ad chord elements are continuous, regardless of changes in roof Yer icf etc2S1Nvj elevation. C NC N/A U DIAPHRAGM REINFORCEMENT AT 5.6.1.5 A.4.1.8• in � � ��rr OPENINGS:There is reinforcing .ha be_i JiI around all diaphragm openings >�" ,}sytvj�S 6 larger than 50%of the building width in either major plan (bete iS extvi "cty NYeo JAR}/" dimension. g . abviav3 k�yti C NC N/A U STRAIGHT SHEATHING:All straight- 5.6.2 A.4.2.1 ❑ K ❑ sheathed diaphragms have horizontal spans less than 24 ft(7.3 m)and aspect ratios less than 2-to-1 in the direction being considered. l R q )QOa S/NeAV I•�n C NC N/A U DIAGONALLY SHEATHED AND 5.6.2 A.4.2.2 � I+� UNBLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS:All Ir U diagonally sheathed or unblocked a dd wood structural panel diaphragms c t, biC[�1_e-A have horizontal spans less than 40 ft(12.2 m)and have aspect ratios `"'t s $ a'io less than or equal to 4-to-1. C NC N/A U OTHER DIAPHRAGMS:The 5.6.5 A.4.7.1 diaphragms do not consist of a system other than wood,steel deck, concrete,or horizontal bracing. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown CJ 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 4 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1112 • A6 ` Project Name LO L 1 bi 1 .:' Project Number if 17.12CP Structural Checklist for Building Types C2: Concrete Shear Walls with Stiff Diaphragms and C2a: Concrete Shear Walls with Flexible Diaphragms Table 17-24.Collapse Prevention Structural Checklist for Building Types C2 and C2a. Tier 2 Commentary Status Evaluation Statement Reference Reference Comments Low and Moderate Seismicity Seismic-Force-Resisting System C NC N/A U CONCRETE BEARING WALLS:Floor and 5.5.2.5.1 A.3.1.6.1 roof girders and trusses are not supported 7/57 oCGo ff 44 a CO-rA Aine at the ends of concrete walls that are less than 10 in.(254 mm)thick.This statement ( ria 7 /i/3' only applies to framing supports located gn g4k4 eirf 1J/15 less than two times the wall thickness away from the wall end. C NC N/A U REDUNDANCY:The number of lines of 5.5.1.1 A.3.2.1.1 gi o 0 0 shear walls in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2. C / NC N/A U SHEAR STRESS CHECK:The shear stress in 5.5.3.1.1 A.3.2.2.1 �( E E the concrete shear walls,calculated using u the Quick Check procedure of Section 4.4.3.3 is less than the greater of 100 lb/in.2(0.69 MPa)or 2 Ji . C ' C NC N/A U REINFORCING STEEL:The ratio of 5.5.3.1.3 A.3.2.2.2 i ❑ ❑ ❑ reinforcing steel area to gross concrete (0s 31 r}rt")A 8 5i )($ A.%) v © .co Ze../ area is not less than 0.0012 in the vertical 0.00248) direction and 0.0020 in the horizontal (Or Z G�hg�A I 2.INN) (G,' le direction. Connections C NC N/A U WALL ANCHORAGE AT FLEXIBLE 5.7.1.1 A.5.1.1 onoo DIAPHRAGMS:Exterior concrete or L _ _ . __le JA tS Qe 4" rt Yil+►t Q1►sGf01G J masonry walls that are dependent on L flexible diaphragms for lateral support are ,ihNift ciA4 b 464.4 anchored for out-of-plane forces at each diaphragm level with steel anchors, if r el- eNs , ev r o CGa/S reinforcing dowels,or straps that are developed into the diaphragm. Connections have strength to resist the connection force calculated in the Quick Check procedure of Section 4.4.3.7. C NC N/A U TRANSFER TO SHEAR WALLS:Diaphragms 5.7.2 A.5.2.1 i2 ❑ ❑ ❑ are connected for transfer of seismic forces to the shear walls. C NC N/A U FOUNDATION DOWELS:Wall 5.7.3.4 A.5.3.5 Ie ❑ 0 0 reinforcement is doweled into the foundation with vertical bars equal in size and spacing to the vertical wall reinforcing directly above the foundation. C Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown CcJ 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 2 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1113 A7 Project Name Project Number Tier 2 Commentary Status Evaluation Statement Reference Reference Comments High Seismicity(Complete the Following Items in Addition to the Items for Low and Moderate Seismicity) Seismic-Force-Resisting System C NC N/A U DEFLECTION COMPATIBILITY:Secondary 5.5.2.5.2 A.3.1.6.2 v. ❑ ❑ ❑ components have the shear capacity to develop the flexural strength of the components. C NC N/A U FLAT SLABS:Flat slabs or plates not part 5.5.2.5.3 A.3.1.6.3 ❑ ❑ iu ❑ of the seismic-force-resisting system have r\a CA continuous bottom steel through the C rA,CrehC- 6 195 column joints. C NC N/A U COUPLING BEAMS:Coupling beams have 5.5.3.2.1 A.3.2.2.3 1, stirrups spaced at or less than d/2,and ❑ ❑ � ❑ co-"Crrkt taie. 1 S cwG each wall or wall segment connected to the coupling beam is supported such that be1,OQv.) E.a( of a '~ Sot p a it can resist shear and overturning forces in the absence of the coupling beam.This statement only applies to coupling beams with span-to-depth ratios exceeding 2-to-1. Diaphragms(Stiff or Flexible) C NC N/A U DIAPHRAGM CONTINUITY:Floor and roof 5.6.1.1 A.4.1.1 ❑ ❑ K ❑ diaphragms do not have expansion joints II CI— or vertical offsets,such as split levels, Ate,,,-COI' "^ sawtooth,or clerestory configurations. card; 5 Qire C NC N/A U ROOF CHORD CONTINUITY:All chord 5.6.1.1 A.4.1.3 S+tY'LJIG ,. ❑ ❑ E ❑ elements are continuous,regardless of (4)Qo uffer c� changes in roof elevation. C NC N/A U OPENINGS AT SHEAR WALLS:Diaphragm 5.6.1.3 A.4.1.4 ❑ ❑ 142 ❑ openings immediately adjacent to the shear walls are less than 25%of the wall length. Flexible Diaphragms C NC N/A U CROSSTIES:There are continuous 5.6.1.2 A.4.1.2 TICS te-1 Cl w ❑ crossties between diaphragm chords. o ,►r, 0/Scihrecil C NC N/A U STRAIGHT SHEATHING:All straight- 5.6.2 A.4.2.1 ❑ ❑ Rr ❑ sheathed diaphragms have horizontal U� spans less than 24 ft(7.3 m)and aspect ratios less than 2-to-1 in the direction being considered. C NC N/A U DIAGONALLY SHEATHED AND 5.6.2 A.4.2.2 ❑ ❑ 71. ❑ UNBLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS:All diagonally boil n1. sheathed or unblocked wood structural �CO�`Gi panel diaphragms have horizontal spans %s V IpC less than 40 ft(12.2 m)and aspect ratios less than or equal to 4-to-1. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 3 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1114 A8 Project Name Project Number C NC N/A U BLOCKED DIAPHRAGMS:All blocked 5.6.2 A.4.2.3 Ko p o wood structural panel diaphragms have horizontal spans less than 120 ft(36.5 m) and have aspect ratios less than or equal to 4-to-1. C NC N/A U CANTILEVERED WOOD DIAPHRAGMS:All 5.6.2 A.4.2.4 uo cantilevered wood diaphragms that pm sonre lateralwllsconsistsuppo for concreteor ^O cc.vvii4 A b, �['4 f inerAd r" masonry walls consist of wood structural , 1 T�'LW�J a' c�►t panels and have a maximum cantilever J �e6 at. e length of 20 ft(6.1 m)if unblocked or 35 ft(10.7 m)if blocked,and a maximum ratio of cantilever length to diaphragm width of 1:2 if unblocked and 1:1 if blocked.In addition,the cantilevered diaphragm has a back-span length equal to or greater than the cantilevered portion. C NC N/A U NON-CONCRETE-FILLED DIAPHRAGMS: 5.6.3 A.4.3.1 Bare steel deck diaphragms or steel deck diaphragms with fill other than reinforced A 0 6 G structural concrete consist of horizontal spans of less than 120 ft(36.5 m)and have aspect ratios less than 4-to-1. C NC N/A U OTHER DIAPHRAGMS:Diaphragms do not 5.6.5 A.4.7.1 consist of a system other than wood, steel deck,concrete,or horizontal bracing. Connections C NC N/A U UPLIFT AT PILE CAPS:Pile caps have top 5.7.3.5 A.5.3.8 f. f o reinforcement,and piles are anchored to U�=�• the pile caps. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown O 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 4 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1115 A9 Project Name LO bibady Project Number 17.19CP Nonstructural Checklist Table 17-38.Nonstructural Checklist. Tier 2 Commentary Status Evaluation Statement" Reference Reference Comments Life Safety Systems C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.FIRE 13.7.4 A.7.13.1 ❑ SUPPRESSION PIPING:Fire suppression piping is anchored and braced in accordance with NFPA-13. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.FLEXIBLE 13.7.4 A.7.13.2 • ❑ x❑ E COUPLINGS:Fire suppression piping has flexible couplings in accordance with NFPA-13. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH. 13.7.7 A.7.12.1 ❑ EMERGENCY POWER:Equipment used to power or control Life Safety systems is anchored or braced. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.STAIR 13.7.6 A.7.14.1 ❑ x❑ ❑ AND SMOKE DUCTS:Stair pressurization and smoke control ducts are braced and have flexible connections at seismic joints. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—MH.SPRINKLER 13.7.4 A.7.13.3 ❑ i CEILING CLEARANCE:Penetrations through panelized ceilings for fire suppression devices provide clearances in accordance with NFPA-13. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—LMH. 13.7.9 A.7.3.1 �C � o op EMERGENCY LIGHTING:Emergency and egress lighting equipment is anchored or braced. Hazardous Materials C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.HAZARDOUS 13.7.1 A.7.12.2 (` o IJ MATERIAL EQUIPMENT:Equipment mounted on vibration isolators and containing hazardous material is equipped with restraints or snubbers. C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.HAZARDOUS 13.8.3 A.7.15.1 ❑ 0 ai MATERIAL STORAGE:Breakable containers that hold hazardous material,including gas cylinders, are restrained by latched doors,shelf lips,wires,or other methods. C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—MH.HAZARDOUS 13.7.3 A7.13.4 ❑ MATERIAL DISTRIBUTION:Piping or ductwork 13.7.5 A.7.14.2 conveying hazardous materials is braced or 13.7.6 otherwise protected from damage that would allow hazardous material release. C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—MH.SHUTOFF VALVES: 13.7.3 A.7.15.3 Piping containing hazardous material,including 13.7.5 natural gas,has shutoff valves or other devices to limit spills or leaks. C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.FLEXIBLE 13.7.3 A.7.1S.4 • ❑ ny COUPLINGS:Hazardous material ductwork and 13.7.5 piping,including natural gas piping,have flexible 13.7.6 couplings. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown co 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 2 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1116 A10 Project Name • Project Number C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—MH.PIPING OR DUCTS 13.7.3 A.7.13.6 L H CROSSING SEISMIC JOINTS:Piping or ductwork 13.7.5 carrying hazardous material that either crosses 13.7.6 seismic joints or isolation planes or is connected to I%Oseisriic dolvb independent structures has couplings or other details to accommodate the relative seismic displacements. Partitions C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.UNREINFORCED 13.6.2 A.7.1.1 1 MASONRY:Unreinforced masonry or hollow-clay tile partitions are braced at a spacing of at most 10 No v ft(3 m)in Low or Moderate Seismicity,or at most 6 ft(1.8 m)in High Seismicity. C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.HEAVY 13.6.2 A.7.2.1 Doan PARTITIONS SUPPORTED BY CEILINGS:The tops of masonry or hollow-clay tile partitions are not f►0 6rifre irt�T�ail � laterally supported by an integrated ceiling system. f� C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—MH.DRIFT: 13.6.2 A.7.1.2 n Rigid cementitious partitions are detailed to accommodate the following drift ratios:in steel moment frame,concrete moment frame,and wood frame buildings,0.02;in other buildings,0.005. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.2 A.7.2.1 SUPPORTED tops of gypsum board p rtiUonnsBare not laterally ft.) arty supported by an integrated ceiling system. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.2 A.7.1.3 STRUCTURAL SEPARATIONS:Partitions that cross O structural separations have seismic or control joints. hD 4 n jC. LI 000-5 C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.2 A.7.1.4 ▪ ❑ TOPS:The tops of ceiling-high framed or panelized otrporatp,,,r>r;}rn tyfethe- partitions have lateral bracing to the structure at a ��` spacing equal to or less than 6 ft(1.8 m). 6 Ceilings C NC N/A U HR—H;LS—MH;PR—LMH.SUSPENDED LATH 13.6.4 A.7.2.3 ▪ ❑ O F AND PLASTER:Suspended lath and plaster ceilings 1u have attachments that resist seismic forces for every 12 ftZ(1.1 m2)of area. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—LMH. 13.6.4 A.7.2.3 ❑ 7 ® SUSPENDED GYPSUM BOARD:Suspended gypsum Yq1 G�r1Aft 1� teJCO 7 board ceilings have attachments that resist seismic OpNXS oV i� 9 1p,5os ed forces for every 12 ftZ(1.1 m2)of area. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.4 A.7.2.2 ❑ ❑ ❑ x❑ INTEGRATED CEILINGS:Integrated suspended ceilings with continuous areas greater than 144 ft2 (13.4 m2)and ceilings of smaller areas that are not surrounded by restraining partitions are laterally oyNtir restrained at a spacing no greater than 12 ft(3.6 m) with members attached to the structure above. Each restraint location has a minimum of four diagonal wires and compression struts,or diagonal members capable of resisting compression. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown (c) 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 3 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1117 A 1 1 Project Name Project Number �1 C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.4 A.7.2.4 ❑ 0 ❑ U EDGE CLEARANCE:The free edges of integrated P.C. suspended ceilings with continuous areas greater anitry than 144 ft2(13.4 m2)have clearances from the enclosing wall or partition of at least the following: in Moderate Seismicity,1/2 in.(13 mm);in High Seismicity,3/4 in.(19 mm). C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.4 A.7.2.5 igz CONTINUITY ACROSS STRUCTURE JOINTS:The ceiling system does not cross any seismic joint and is not attached to multiple independent structures. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.6.4 A.7.2.6 ❑x EDGE SUPPORT:The free edges of integrated suspended ceilings with continuous areas greater than 144 ft2(13.4 m2)are supported by closure angles or channels not less than 2 in.(50.8 mm) wide. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.6.4 A.7.2.7 a o SEISMIC JOINTS:Acoustical tile or lay-in panel ceilings have seismic separation joints such that each continuous portion of the ceiling is no more than 2,500 ft2(232.3 m2)and has a ratio of long-to- short dimension no more than 4-to-1. Light Fixtures C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—MH. 13.6.4 A.7.3.2 a o p INDEPENDENT SUPPORT:Light fixtures that weigh 13.7.9 more per square foot(square meter)than the ceiling l they penetrate are supported independent of the grid ceiling suspension system by a minimum of two wires at diagonally opposite corners of each fixture. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.7.9 A.7.3.3 o PENDANT SUPPORTS:Light fixtures on pendant gx.. ����/supports are attached at a spacing equal to or less than 6 ft(1.8 m).Unbraced suspended fixtures are Q free to allow a 360-degree range of motion at an angle not less than 45 degrees from horizontal without contacting adjacent components. Alternatively,if fixures are rigidly supported and/or braced,they are free to move with the structure to which they are attached without damaging adjoining components.Additionally,the connection to the structure is capable of accommodating the movement without failure. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H.LENS 13.7.9 A.7.3.4 ® n COVERS:Lens covers on light fixtures are attached with safety devices. Cladding and Glazing C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;P MH.CLADDING ANCHORS: 13.6.1 A.7.4.1 Cladding compone s weighing more than 10 lb/ft2 w�`6 (0.48 kN/m2)are chanically anchored to the u� ram' "�`��� structure at a sp ing equal to or less than the /*ZZ' V nt+ ,v following:for e Safety in Moderate Seismicity,6 ft (1.8 m);for 'e Safe in Hi and for 11s Position tention in an seismicit ,4 ft(1.2 m). 7i also /ln 6., J $ XC A-W. kilo hAy + 1Ie.AGW -Ix stai6-0,'` o‘ QAa Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown Cd 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 4 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1118 Al2 Project Name Project Number C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—MH.CLADDING 13.6.1 A.7.4.2 • 0j ISOLATION:For steel_or concrete moment-frame buildings,panel connections are detailed to accommodate a story drift ratio by the use of rods attached to framing with oversize holes or slotted holes of at least the following:for Life Safety in Moderate Seismicity,0.01;for Life Safety in High Seismicity and for Position Retention in any seismicity,0.02,and the rods have a length-to- diameter ratio of 4.0 or less. C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—MH.MULTISTORY PANELS: 13.6.1 A.7.4.3 For multistory panels attached at more than one floor level,panel connections are detailed to accommodate a story drift ratio by the use of rods attached to framing with oversize holes or slotted holes of at least the following:for Life Safety in Moderate Seismicity,0.01;for Life Safety in High Seismicity and for Position Retention in any seismicity,0.02,and the rods have a length-to- diameter ratio of 4.0 or less. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—MH.THREADED 13.6.1 A.7.4.8 RODS:Threaded rods for paneLconnections detailed to accommodate drift by bending of the rod have a length-to-diameter ratio greater than 0.06 times the story height in inches(millimeters)for Life Safety in Moderate Seismicity and 0.12 times the story height in inches(millimeters)for Life Safety in High Seismicity and Position Retention in any seismicity. C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—MH.PANEL CONNECTIONS: 13.6.1.4 A.7.4.4 • ❑ IT ❑ Cladding panels are anchored out of plane with a minimum number of connections for each wall panel,as follows:for Life Safety in Moderate Seismicity,2 connections;for Life Safety in High Seismicity and for Position Retention in any seismicity,4 connections. C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—MH.BEARING 13.6.1.4 A.7.4.5 r:!! E CONNECTIONS:Where bearing connections are 1� used,there is a minimum of two bearing connections for each cladding panel. _ C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—MH.INSERTS:Where 13.6.1.4 A.7.4.6 ❑ ' ❑ concrete cladding components use inserts,the inserts have positive anchorage or are anchored to reinforcing steel. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—MH.OVERHEAD 13.6.1.5 A.7.4.7 ❑ D X❑ GLAZING:Glazing panes of any size in curtain walls and individual interior or exterior panes more than 16 ft2(1.5 m2)in area are laminated annealed or laminated heat-strengthened glass and are detailed to remain in the frame when cracked. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown (c) 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 5 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page1119 A13 Project Name Project Number Masonry Veneer C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.TIES: 13.6.1.2 A.7.5.1 • ❑ ❑ ❑ Masonry veneer is connected to the backup with corrosion-resistant ties.There is a minimum of one tie for every 2-2/3 ft2(0.25 m2),and the ties have spacing no greater than the following:for Life Safety in Low or Moderate Seismicity,36 in.(914 mm);for Life Safety in High Seismicity and for Position Retention in any seismicity,24 in.(610 mm). C NC N/A U —not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.SHELF 13.6.1.2 A.7.5.2 X ❑ ❑ ❑ ANGLES:Masonry veneer is supported by shelf angles or other elements at each floor above the ground floor. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH. 13.6.1.2 A.7.5.3 ❑ ❑ ® ❑ WEAKENED PLANES:Masonry veneer is anchored to the backup adjacent to weakened planes,such as at the locations of flashing. C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.UNREINFORCED 13.6.1.1 A.7.7.2 4 ❑ ❑ ❑ MASONRY BACKUP:There is no unreinforced 13.6.1.2 masonry backup. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—MH.STUD 13.6.1.1 A.7.6.1 ❑ ❑ ❑ TRACKS:For veneer with cold-formed steel stud 13.6.1.2 backup,stud tracks are fastened to the structure at a spacing equal to or less than 24 in.(610 mm)on center. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—MH;PR—MH.ANCHORAGE: 13.6.1.1 A.7.7.1 ❑ ❑ IK ❑ For veneer with concrete block or masonry backup, 13.6.1.2 the backup is positively anchored to the structure at a horizontal spacing equal to or less than 4 ft(1.2 m) along the floors and roof. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.1.2 A.7.5.4 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ WEEP HOLES:In veneer anchored to stud walls,the 12,43 ‘y veneer has functioning weep holes and base flashing. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.1.1 A.7.6.2 ❑ OPENINGS:For veneer with cold-formed-steel stud 13.6.1.2 ❑ ❑ I'a. backup,steel studs frame window and door openings. AO $ Parapets,Cornices,Penthouses,and Appendages C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.URM PARAPETS OR 13.6.5 A.7.8.1 ❑ ❑ [IX ❑ CORNICES:Laterally unsupported unreinforced Wes- masonry parapets or cornices have height-to- thickness ratios no greater than the following:for Life Safety in Low or Moderate Seismicity,2.5;for Life Safety in High Seismicity and for Position Retention in any seismicity,1.5. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.CANOPIES: 13.6.6 A.7.8.2 M ❑ ❑ ❑ Canopies at building exits are anchored to the structure at a spacing no greater than the following: for Life Safety in Low or Moderate Seismicity,l0 ft(3 m);for Life Safety in High Seismicity and for Position Retention in any seismicity,6 ft(1.8 m). Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown F.) 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 6 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page I120 A14 Project Name a Project Number C NC N/A U HR—H;LS—MH;PR—LMH.CONCRETE PARAPETS: 13.6.5 A.7.8.3 7 0 1 "i Concrete parapets with height-to-thickness ratios greater than 2.5 have vertical reinforcement. C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—LMH.APPENDAGES: 13.6.6 A.7.8.4 ❑ ❑ Cornices,parapets,signs,and other ornamentation or appendages that extend above the highest point of anchorage to the structure or cantilever from components are reinforced and anchored to the structural system at a spacing equal to or less than 6 ft(1.8 m).This evaluation statement item does not apply to parapets or cornices covered by other evaluation statements. C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—LMH.PENTHOUSES: 13.6.7 A.7.8.5 19- ❑ Penthouses are not used for regular occupancy and are constructed as an extension of the building frame or have a lateral-force-resisting system in each direction consistent with structural systems listed in Table 12.2-1 or Table 15.4-1 of ASCE 7. C NC N/A U HR—MH;LS—MH;PR—LMH.TILE ROOFS:For 13.6.8 A.7.8.6 ❑ ❑ ❑ roofs with slopes greater than or equal to 3 vertical to 12 horizontal,roof tiles weighing more than 4 1b/ft2(0.05 kN/m2)are individually secured to the roof framing or roof deck with wires,fasteners,or adhesive. Masonry Chimneys C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.URM CHIMNEYS: 13.6.9 A.7.9.1 Unreinforced masonry chimneys extend above the roof surface no more than the following:for Life hG Safety in Low or Moderate Seismicity,three times � k the least dimension of the chimney;for Life Safety e i G6 in High Seismicity and for Position Retention in any ift' ., dry seismicity,two times the least dimension of the I" GT a/A chimney. C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.ANCHORAGE: 13.6.9 A.7.9.2 © D Masonry chimneys are anchored at each floor level, at the topmost ceiling level,and at the roof. Stairs C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.STAIR 13.6.2 A.7.10.1 ri ❑ n ❑ ENCLOSURES:Hollow-clay tile or unreinforced 13.6.10 masonry walls around stair enclosures are restrained out of plane and have height-to- thickness ratios not greater than the following:for Life Safety in Low or Moderate Seismicity,15-to-1; for Life Safety in High Seismicity and for Position Retention in any seismicity,12-to-1. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—LMH;PR—LMH.STAIR 13.6.10 A.7.10.2 7 X❑ ❑ DETAILS:The connection between the stairs and the U r Tstructure does not rel on act-installed.?nrhnrs in Pa,fA6(31r srec.tre"' concrete or masonry,and the stair details are 104 capable of accommodating the drift calculated Cl i St (nec. using the Quick Check procedure of Section 4.4.3.1, for moment-frame structures or 1/2 in.(12.7 mm)for [ \a �`'4y hie cli 01,..4111 other structures without including any lateral stiffness contribution from the stairs. yif ,Qpr 2/5 a.-- Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown (<) 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 7 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page 1121 A15 Project Name Project Number Contents and Furnishings C NC N/A U HR—LMH;LS—MH;PR—MH.INDUSTRIAL STORAGE 13.8.1 A.7.11.1 ❑ 0 ��, 0 RACKS:Industrial storage racks or pallet racks more than 12 ft(3.6 m)high meet the requirements of ANSI/RMI MH 16.1 as modified by ASCE 7,Chapter 15. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—H;PR—MH.TALL NARROW 13.8.2 A.7.11.2 ▪ ® o o CONTENTS:Contents more than 6 ft(1.8 m)high with a height-to-depth or height-to-width ratio greater than 3-to-1 are anchored to the structure or to each other. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—H;PR—H.FALL-PRONE 13.8.2 A.7.11.3 ▪ moo CONTENTS:Equipment,stored items,or other contents weighing more than 20 lb(9.1 kg)whose center of mass is more than 4 ft(1.2 m)above the adjacent floor level are braced or otherwise restrained. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.12 A.7.11.4 Az o ACCESS FLOORS:Access floors more than 9 in.(229 AC-3 omNty mm)high are braced. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.7.7 A.7.11.5 vis EQUIPMENT ON ACCESS FLOORS:Equipment and 13.6.12 other contents supported by access floor systems are anchored or braced to the structure independent of the access floor. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.8.2 A.7.11.6 © o SUSPENDED CONTENTS:Items suspended without lateral bracing are free to swing from or move with (.. the structure from which they are suspended without damaging themselves or adjoining components. Mechanical and Electrical Equipment • C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—H;PR—H.FALL-PRONE 13.7.1 A.7.12.4 0 D EQUIPMENT:Equipment weighing more than 20 lb 13.7.7 (9.1 kg)whose center of mass is more than 4 ft(1.2 m) above the adjacent floor level,and which is not in-line equipment,is braced. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—H;PR—H.IN-LINE 13.7.1 A.7.12.5 O EQUIPMENT:Equipment installed in line with a duct or piping system,with an operating weight more than 75 lb(34.0 kg),is supported and laterally braced independent of the duct or piping system. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—H;PR—MH.TALL NARROW 13.7.1 A.7.12.6 O E D EQUIPMENT:Equipment more than 6 ft(1.8 m)high 13.7.7 with a height-to-depth or height-to-width ratio greater than 3-to-1 is anchored to the floor slab or adjacent structural walls. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—MH. 13.6.11 A.7.12.7 0 n MECHANICAL DOORS:Mechanically operated doors �►� are detailed to operate at a story drift ratio of 0.01. d' C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.7.1 A.7.12.8 ❑X SUSPENDED EQUIPMENT:Equipment suspended 13.7.7 without lateral bracing is free to swing from or move with the structure from which it is suspended without damaging itself or adjoining components. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown co 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 8 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page I122 A16 Project Name Project Number C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.7.1 A.7.12.9 0 ❑ ® ❑ VIBRATION ISOLATORS:Equipment mounted on rL 3 vibration isolators is equipped with horizontal i restraints or snubbers and with vertical restraints to resist overturning. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.7.1 A.7.12.10 ❑ © ❑ HEAVY EQUIPMENT:Floor-supported or platform- 13.7.7 supported equipment weighing more than 400 lb (181.4 kg)is anchored to the structure. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.7.7 A.7.12.11 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT:Electrical equipment is laterally braced to the structure. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.7.8 A.7.12.12 © ❑ CONDUIT COUPLINGS:Conduit greater than 2.5 in. (64 mm)trade size that is attached to panels, cabinets,or other equipment and is subject to relative If seismic displacement has flexible couplings or \ connections. Piping C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.7.3 A.7.13.2 0 El © FLEXIBLE COUPLINGS:Fluid and gas piping has 13.7.5 Kc, 3 • '/ flexible couplings. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H.FLUID 13.7.3 A.7.13.4 7 7 AND GAS PIPING:Fluid and gas piping is anchored 13.7.5 and braced to the structure to limit spills or leaks. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H.C- 13.7.3 A.7.13.5 ® CLAMPS:One-sided C-clamps that support piping 13.7.5 larger than 2.5 in.(64 mm)in diameter are restrained. C NC / U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H. 13.7.3 A.7.13.6 El El PIPING CROSSING SEISMIC JOINTS:Piping that crosses 13.7.5 seismic joints or isolation planes or is connected to independent structures has couplings or other details .,d to accommodate the relative seismic displacements. �fJ Ducts C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H.DUCT 13.7.6 A.7.14.2 0 7 BRACING:Rectangular ductwork larger than 6 ft2(0.56 ,y m2)in cross-sectional area and round ducts larger than 28 in.(711 mm)in diameter are braced.The maximum spacing of transverse bracing does not exceed 30 ft(9.1 m).The maximum spacing of longitudinal bracing does not exceed 60 ft(18.3 m). C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H.DUCT 13.7.6 A.7.14.3 ❑ ii ❑ SUPPORT:Ducts are not supported by piping or electrical conduit. C NC N/A U HR—not required;LS—not required;PR—H.DUCTS 13.7.6 A.7.14.4 , Q 0 p CROSSING SEISMIC JOINTS:Ducts that cross seismic joints or isolation planes or are connected to independent structures have couplings or other details to accommodate the relative seismic 1 displacements. Legend:C=Compliant,NC=Noncompliant,N/A=Not Applicable,U=Unknown <<� 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers 9 ASCE 41-23 Checklists Page I123 �r"a r IN< ''61 li r ti. `I c U .---- ----. 15895 SW 72ND AVE - 1,• SUITE 200 _ •— = „ PORTLAND,OR 97224 PHONE:503.226.I 285 - - FAX:503.226.I670 - - INFO a@CIDAINC.COM WWW.CIDAINC.COM Vertical discontinuity Grid D 9.5-I 0 2nd floor shearwall with I rt floor shearwall offset to grid C.8 C . ir-. jr4• .. -� ..-._,:z.- •. , :. , 7=:._=----z,,,,_:-= - - _ . _ _4_,. --.,_:i.:_: „.6,11._ _. __ _ _ . . ._..-- ___...., -. .s,:..,.__„ ,...:,!.,..,11 ,,, _ ,_ : ,..1_ . , x ___ —,_ ____ : __,,,,,__.z, ..,;.„ . . _ Mr--- .--- ii ' i- 1 it 6. --- ' J. -? y -111, ,,,7 . . it tIli,0 rtiol I,.,, ..*; • Vertical discontinuity Grid I 0 C.8-D 2nd floor shearwall with I" floor shearwall offset along grid I 0 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING B1I Page INTERIORS Page I124 .,_,r. ,,,,._ _ r, : t...... 1"�61 II 11 A4p-,.., ., .,.,..._,._:. -,,:„. -7;,. . .... ., _,-...w„,,_. N - I s f r 17 I $�� d L U '7,s, ) t• . 11111,-::ctek:c.--,, , .ii,:-.,,.).,,,,.: -0:-',54v?,-,-.4:.- , Will 15895 SW 72ND AVE V MAP _ -__ • �� iF ;`:_t_� SUITE 200 ... s... , Vertical discontinuity Grid 2 C.5-D 2' floor shearwall with I"floor shearwall offset along grid PORTLAND,OR 97224 I 0 New shearwall to be added from grid C to C.8 partially under 2nd floor shearwall. PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 • •1 't ••';',L_i '.II. 1+ M gI rr'". y�' {+ INFO a@CIDAINC.COM r,°s j 1l WWW.CIDAINC.COM -- t�;• . . ir'. r _ 1., 1 '''fit. A "" r,' , { •s•i:,+- _.lip ._ Loading dock retaining wall with large pine tree behind with vertical crack. \ l I 1 iiif FBI.- - 4...w., � 1. 0 G , I : 4 i 1 •,,,,im ARCHITECTURE: ty ENGINEERIN C N-S sprinkler main running parallel to wall hung well below roof. Install new bracing of main to wall or roof. PLANNING B2I Page INTERIORS Page 1125 fiki4 lin 61 ii. ‘• y. l t. Z ` U t. _ _ . ,., ___ ---fg, - 1.- .• \ . 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 j -At. PORTLAND,OR 97224 I PHONE 503.226.1285 -'-L�staliJi:nua i ; v,,y� •.;,t+,Al $1` L' . ' "L ` FAX:503.226.1670 J a. '�_= � INFOa@CIDAINC.COM ,., ` WWW.CIDAINC.COM J •kfi .Maddifie , ''''';'''' n J I� •`" 4 r � J ` Pendant lights over clearstory area _ -------—-----------; I . 1 !:. A'. :_1 . EJ, .-! :.-.. �- yi Exterior heat pump unit at south end of building without anchorage to concrete pad. z� J1i ` j,i -• , .' , =,, �. ARCH ITECTUR.. :� :- : .F7p,_ ` �.`q7 ENGINEERING '}r_``'`,.-'4 Exterior heat pump unit at West side of building without anchorage to concrete pad. PLANNING B3I Page INTERIORS Page 1125 el ril . I ti,1 ;______________xota__ ____ -:::: :___ ;1 ir' , _ : ,U •-7, A: i ' I5895 5W 72ND AVE '" i� • _ -,`,'' SUITE 200 •, e PORTLAND,OR 97224 1 • ./ 1,1 ' PHONE:503.226.1285 - FAX:503.226.!670 ;, INFOa@CIDAINC.COM Storage racks in utility room without anchorage. WWW.CIDAINC.COM E s_ �►11111111�� `'' " II k . , ' ,ii 11 : , ri I II r7 lirrif .ELNI NEW MI 14'At_51h-- a* � 44 = ,,,:sr L r..;11!A ,L .4 ,i----,... 4 ,,. . 1` , r ', . .J i 'irs- - 1 , _. *0 gill 'Ll :' . ' " ,-.1 - { I 1 Newer shelving on first floor. CIDA was not able to confirm shelves were anchored. If not anchored, new anchorage will be required. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING B4I Page INTERIORS Page I127 1 I. I rzn�ll� �kj I� 1 Local r7r�►c�� y •4' . • Ila War I Mt.i!I i pl r,retnam ConFlict IJ €I, nI IaC rc Iti 61 ii. tl! l •e`= I va,ve americans � {L!.; d, f„ •III'II'i1'�ji:i ;/ L. - rxan}lift), I'lll.1;, �� ELL.. �''duticnar9 War ?��''1 U i 11 I . 7 . ,, A, - - i : " lift..I I 15895 SW 72ND AVE 1 • 1 ,..•,_.�ti. j I • SUITE 200 ,� ..'PORTLAND,OR 97224fit i PHONE:503.226.1285 }i FAX:503.226.1670 INFO a@CIDAINC.COM WWW.CIDAINC.COM 2' Floor bookshelves. For areas with floor being re-nailed these will be removed and reinstalled. Install new anchors at all shelves. ,r "- � , .� — ' ' . �. '•t. Nri 1,. YJ •�� __� ' ' .`Z F ;./ Z . Existing exterior decking over recessed framing and roof membrane. Remove and replace with new decking as described in architectural report. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING B5I Page INTERIORS Page I128 REFER TO SHEET A- 10 FOR DOOR DOOR OOR SCHEDULE DETAILS C 1 . _ D 0 z can V �- ; Z c Y 6 8 9 1 0 4 co W o W co co Q 2 Q Anchor storage racks 3/ II 0 0 ° ICJ = Q Q = g , 7� 8 — --j ' °� 1- to wall or floor to 3 ,, 4 . -' 1 51-d`x t-Oj1 ,A+ 134' SG WP - HMP 1 Hg-. zATE� `� r�► r i „� L L �/ prevent overturning �. , �23 Aa3 ,a-23 I ' �I. O';x ..1' CJII 1 /♦ WP I-I t1 I i-I ' �./�.T�i:� L a•23 1- -23 L A•23 �'" s'i ► / / ♦ 9 0 1 0 itri 3 5 i`0" m - 1-c," A 13/4s Gc VVP - ws C ut i f.D 6.1,. �-I G K I A-2323 0a, 23 u 4-0 el--c -1-3 1 II 1 11 ti i V / f / �, r- 11\ �' 3'O x -a >k 13/�- SG WP - WS �J©UI�JD I '•C_� �.23 ‹)A-z3 C A.23 HI a , v M i- 5 NC,5T U �D ��` /� ,a, 0 IL lijr6t) 29. .4-1 il_ 2. P - ,1�1 WS 12 3 K A-23 q-2 3 , E 1=.0.e _ T _ .i - +- se— - - # -# - ----- A : C . 'Olt �1 3'- a"x 1'• C�" A IV ea WP - NMP 1 NR,. WED RI-1, //� ,. = �- .,�1 - A z3 � 23 � A z3 'ELEV. Il � oq- i 710 ( 'W -- - -� M � (_ �Sa..,Hn ,�t,u;; , j t it , K 'UMF' 4a.3STOR . av 3-o k 'i • c> F I 5C wP - vvs � J ;I 2 - � • r IGG� r ' ;i4 —IS ` Ir A �3 23 ,�•z3 ,; +' 1 � 1. '`- =�' TOR . 10 3'--O"X 7'-p" A 3� Sc FM I Nt` • �.AT�D 1 �_—.{ :' 0 0 l a - 1 ,�-2 3 A 2 ,-r`'/ 1 „„t p F I op -I2 �j 4A3 Z - Z PUMP S - t = - - p Cr; 0 2 I = x 8- Ca Ea I3�� P t� _, -: -9 4 A A Z --.4 • ),,4'<3411 <5 i- 0'. _ _. _ 3 C / -2 /A-23 _ Film14 ii 3�++ 21fc .:, 0\-c-, - r:"aalIr`.�T _1 , 3 I J ���v. 3.p -� / STOR2.2 ), 8- a Ee. I q- sP v i. TP WL.. %-21G 24 I ( ; !,, I :_, . �, ------------- ' 1 .\ E L E C = F.E.0 1 8 .. 2 3-O x "1 - a A 13/' wP - ws s u�lr� �..�l- .-� K I o K- I I °� --- - 4�3 3 q• o 1 � A-2 , A-23 J� ! I I I 1 - A- II' i 2+ 3 -a'' �,-6," A I �# ' sc WP •• WS oUr�-liZ 5i'1 ,1._� - /K23 K'A.,23 A-; /7'.- i- _-- 4. A 14 2 m �. _ F = -- I' f i B , . ,, i i ' -{up jeti-61I i gC� _ -. ---I 0 \ re ..< • ::... 25 5I•�'Ix 11- On A 144" SG WI`' - W5 K J ,4.4fr f '�.I - ' i i a - - - ,1‘,2;''v tu la, &'-O"r, '-o" 34; 5G WS - HrIP ! INDPi2 e2L.-C-. LI -AP M M M Z" i o i — — — — — 1-' 1 E , + �v + C ) �;z3 ,�z3 �,z3 ;A-z� :OFFICE - 4 1e30. tll -O x .3'- 0" 15 13/ " �G WS - HM P P 1-I• M M �g•°i 1 ` o J 27 3 ' 2' ,423 / .3 q 9 CHILDRENS 4 lA2 Z I t I ( - -•+ 3 ,, STAIRS 2 LIBRARY A_14 I 1 2� 3 X 1 -d A I /4- sG tiv t� - H MP D a-z3 12, /323 P,,-2 3 �-�-`4 /ss P I = - F' -1— - :1 _ ♦ _ 111 . 0 3 STAIR 0 r- _ ` Z '� 1 �,-D, x 8'•C)" j 13/4'I SG Ws • -Ir1P (I) II�ICJI`'E�'. L.1 M A 23 1:-1- 3 2 2-' 2�j IC '..iParrazt4 4- ( K��� • . _ _ 0.oII x ,i t a„ 341 P - p D D � O - cra.o�t, �VX ca..>� r A I �'. I A•3 d to, 3 A I SG W HMP 23 � 23 � 23 / 3�1 r _ 1 1 cn AW_ �t S1 6,, O"x �,-ot, AA 1' " Hr1 MP - GIMP (1) ikroPaR,, LE,t ":,,,,,/ vi_petw,,------7: ----"' '� ' -,T- 23A-23 /.g23A-23 c1 . 1 32 t- o x -7 -v AA 13/4• SG WP - NMP VoK;1-1NicolIZ-147= p A v Z-2 F'0•c.. - —.tee: --- ' -- - -;1 13 -� . , r- s-�, 23 2 / �' �23 � 3 A'z3 ,; n / , 3�j �I_d"x --It-C)" AA 134 SG. WP - WS (I) INGPCI - , LJ+ = K A-23 Y K " 3-0 �' c(l / �0,-23 .� 2 3 r / / A e; Z , 1 "(`'t? GOB-. D 1 REVISIONS i c-, 10 r ts 34 ' o,t x , a" A 1 / GUV g s 2 23 �•23 A- to Cn t ' _____Im _ , - 35 s'o x i t-G' A IV SC WP - HMP I I-f(z RATE D1 L- A-23 i.,6;--15 T i-23 /''`- _ 3e 31-o,l x ?'•o' A 134 '' eG WP - i c er.. . k K ' K. --' � ;� `� 3 A•z1 .- A-- �A-23 _ cal i a 3G 1 O 4 7 3 -pu x - Gi A IN' WF - CS k -2 •23K .: N _ c 'Sw,� . - t DATE 541&82 .38 N4T U ei / Q JOB NO. ,. 31 3 Ox 1 '- t A ,3/ sc WP - W5 K .� �K 23K 23 t c�'C ..1- ,1f .sle...s t! , DRAWN oc --70-- i r.o. . L. L / / 1- h _ ` I ♦4d 3'-0" xl1C " A I3/4. G IAJP - NMP I PR R -. L. a2 --R23 23 ` APPROVED 4-1 3%C x 1' d" A 1V NM MP NMiP I HR. R&T D P.H, E z • - ,o,-z3 �23 •23 23 ' , 4.1, S'- dig �''-a'' D 13/ , sc, VIP TP WS (2 WAY SWING Pc h. K K K 1 A•23 .\-23 /.2'3 I 43 �1- a' x -�'., �„ A 1541) G W P - w ` ' ,6 ,z3 23 , D w . . �,-23 • W q-�- 3-a x "l -O A I �- �aC• Vtl�' W 5 � . ,'z3 K,q-23 KA,-23 �� 0 ! 0 , o • 6.21-� 5- One 1 O" D I''/4' s G WP - 1/J s ( 2 SAY 5 W 1 N G pace) K�-2 23 a 1' _ K -- - IL e •�- p "� � 5 3'_©t1 x 1 '-d'' A 137k SG WP - W5 AP- ` Icy--- �:: ,JrA- 23 K C / K . 513, a„ X1t- G 1141 � tnP TP VV5 Qin `�2 i'- S.,,'x - -C3►' A 134" SG W P - W s �aL.JND eA_' K 3�1 21'-Qtl 21 Q" Zt. �" 21 Q" W A �3 •�. 2323 2 4 �♦ / / ( ♦ i .2 cc to 2- S x 1-0" A ikff SG WE - w ) u N D s . ,,, K' A-'3 I''': 23 14' ,A-23 j 75 I` 8 /q Ll.l 0 --I/ -- '�4 3'-�,tx ,�,,01, 13q`' SG WP - W5 sl Q T_ / K ,h z3 KA-23 A 23 ail • co 55 ' -0 x1I • Q" 13/" , - k 5 1G K t a z3 -23 ,� 23 i'`/ L c.....7,-) 1 ao �� - 8 10 �- 'a ' 3'- o" ,, 3'- " A 13/ I.4 -' Mf' NMP RooF ACEz, �.-23 -1- •23Az3 '-d x "V - ,D'' A 13/ Sc. VIP - 1-MF I He.. Rid•7E0 L_ i-i l.., (liskA-) D , 23 A 23 AZ3 A-( . la ' ems 3`-Cam"x 1' - 0" A 13��- s G WP - H1~1 P I H .. i T I--- L. L \ATE. � -23 ,�,-23 �-23 � 5c1 #3'-tom'x t c " Ai 13/ G- WP - t-P1 P I H 12, ..r ` L. L. . '� --�� I. ALLwc�o i� � M zWe-4.-1-5 .�,T� � '23 A-23 /� Z3 /" '�,.c Q5 U r,...I L_ ,....) r.,l07-Ep gt,w 1 ea' , (3N. �v0 '-�'Ik 6' • `I 3/ G 1N1:' 'i`P' ws --,a,.,� 23 23 A- 23 cI '� - x - d I I G wr 'r`P WS _ _ 62, - O'`x -1'- 0" AA 13/4" SC tIVI - 1APS 1 I .► OF'Ec4.. . L.i t4r-‘ K.-- 3 1(A 23 2-3 /'` 6.3 V-O'' ><O'- d" A 134 SC Uu 1" s,...+t t D 43 f.e.•tN 1< A 2 3 ..,1 A-23 _ ozi- v_ d" x 8'-O" E. IN' S P WL rP t WI- 12 fij '')A-- 1-1• 3 5 V1 0" x 8,-c>" F 13/ �G WP 1_1 1 WG - - I ,' © 3 .,-c,s %%�-23 A-23 A•23 _ 6,Co 3'_ 0" x 834, o" 1= IW SG wr ul vvs -• A-1 - f1.1 K _`� 8 a Page 1129 — --- . - - ---___--_-- - - -- . - - • . . ' . ' . ..1•11111111111/4 ,. . ... , .., C2 . ELEV. . , i3 A-8 vs .- 0 0 0 4 , 0 6 0 8 9 - 10 A, ; (in Lam 14 . rid-6' I I F- j c3- cdt et.c. irp 2.r. ou -1c-0" Di. 00 (-2 - co" ic•c" remove pine tree behind ui / i 1 • . o • • • e I. 67.5..46 -,ir dock retaining wall E- 2 1' d I Verify book shelves are anchored to o: • floor to prevent overturning--install 41 < N. . I I • , ALT 1 ID4s V i . anchors as necessary . Et-IER.c et..1 .{ Odk'' l' -----„,..\r,---- ..., 1. 1111 IIII MIMI= MIMI= MININ*111. I I q at..WTOR. 51..oil F-,0,43 1- % I I GEN TItH, , i ......,_ A - - - ...-, , ,r_ --_:6117---, RE et --- / A CD 1 ,i , -\ • 1 1 1F-21 II __ _ il_ c, Vs„ ,, ' I i 1 _, I j, a_ 2111 ---- ELEV. ELEV. 1- 1 _c jr-s2-1AG; -1 I 0 I li i \ CEE.. . -.= I -i •Scut...,i 0 VLeuu...., M E C H a..) 1 T 1 _. T-rP. Mk , An\ Hve& A-16--‘ Av -16, w 213 • b , AM 1 I I Cr r-- A .5 9 A A a . e - 1. 111,0r1111 Jilflil 11)01 //1.11. )1 1111)1 1) 1•11 -..... MIT aml@afte\‘ A;160 .-----'-' 11145:1 ik :: 7: A- 4' 4DCa 2 -1 CCP A tr ' Z-- , ;1p _ 1 c,----> li2 -ruefzr-144.- ' . p.a.A.A.,,...A.A....24-citn.rvi 5 "411 0 Cin ' 0 _ .to L-464‘)alz- I MECH • i . . . .. .. .... 1., T. I I i)/ -6 = JAN , • GIFT 40.. 4111. 1111.1111 OM Of2.42J....1€ ,N _2,11 16.•■••4 I 4 4t1) I- . TAIRS 8'i A-9 . -_-_:.__ i - _L.--_-_:: -:--- - -' - ,..' -c\igb ( 4- ,Fk--j.-. ./ pl.. .. .STOR / .ct .‘ ... C.) ' 1/4 ., ..1- A-IS 5 tl. sx5e, t---#-- H • - __ 3 1 .., ../fr i 1 • Ili 1 1 2.14 r.-..1 I rif A-cl 1 16 . , • c1 r ,----/-• - STOR fri, a 1 q) 1 4 rlt 0,1 -- 1 -,f- -\9 V 4 'q il 1111111111111111111 I 1111111L1_ --ti), -9 __ B :-.1.'. . e B , , t. ... 44,,,t l 0 ,,,..!.1 1.Alil% 1 -.......; ;V] i - Wito i..INIB --.9 . 4, lit III II 1111111111 11 1111 111211015-1 .42 _4 21162 WC O i„, I. 0 , a.:- - - -0 - +c <: i a -- e AltA I co 4. A3 2 5'..on H-o" 0 -. .STARS 2, 11111111 1 R A 3 itV3 7 U A-IG - \___ 1 , _ --1---7.^ -t4 0 Ni 0 11 , e------' ' *" OaAtaill Viro I r . .1 r.5 \"'s. 7 : 3 1 - i • 2.0c1 v I - 0 STAIRS I I _ _ at - 0 t • _ ELEV. ›"44...- 4- ELEV.i . , ------- - :9° A ci CH ....44.oLi-r. .17741. -74-- 214 .(4-4 1-r-i ELEV. i (4 ofx..k.iffeR ip t_ ,, •57-',,,,,,c) ,,/, ... l '-0) er 0 , . • `-'<:,FE1.-- 117.4 443tvc,a-- 0 F Aft 0 - -25 . " 4e, N 426, • 1 ..H.t/ .-- c _ ,/ , ..-: C.C7t-4011e. 4 4.4,01)Ilk} f SOULIC) 1145Ut..lzi'Jr j,, tl ' 2.. cd,s" 4o cat,co' 4-1- cf'17 171-9 ;51-c:, k) -„ >114 9 4 I 1 / ,. • 4if , i s -Q P.4C,I,ar °‘C044.4°Cr' I I it VERIPr 'A - I , • -0 ." I \ caumper - - - , 1 Ts1 . .-. A 00 to I (11:46;%; caa‘ovmoti ADULT FICTION C P-rcourm0 CAMPET 1 1::".. _.... r.....1 k---- PAregt.s1 c442A., ----r , I 110111111111.1111••111111•1111111 kCII 2 , 9 A- 5 - _ c:)."•S- -i -. ____L - t dr I (u sm.t Pi- ca,k,+oca)---.1 to--- , eras.,1 s„.1 c\-----1, • -8 U --1 i (5) - , I 1 F 4 I A 2. i A-i S ofzielovE ENTRY- - e .„ WORKRM • 0 I 3 • .. .242. IL ; I l) - • • -20 ill, I * I 4 gA 2. 2 i a -0 , 4 21 -; .1. t A3 t 70 REVISIONS a. co. 5_6;20.5_0 co,.. c " , , , A,Isi 1,., 1 \ it-7--_. ..t101 . ......1 ,,, , tec,i4. 41.;(10 rio ct_ 0 1 T itill 111 ----- _ . m - - -- --- ---- --, - -- - 1 0 - - - I 13.1 ) ,...,,s 7,-"'L ----/ \ ,-.••• I z iil I t .(\e =0 k 1 ihTarlF1147-0ARNe $ , ELEV.! -. if) m 1 I 4 , 21 0.-- ---- 1 3 - I \ VEST -temp , t.rgr-,, pAtR.o F 2 AllIk .., •- DATE 5.74 8-452_ I 9 iii--/kka-8...,.:7.." '2.1'0, 1 ' I- - - 7 - -----6 - -14 - )rl't944:*3STN'1144A:71::T:Du-rafRPTikj5:B'5:1)-71 :34'77I ?::- Cankil 41-te4-11,a5CW\AALL-A4bvte a"; 1%11°P- I ---1 . ,..0 A-a r ) g-E02251 , 5A 2 2 vorn-i .4441c. Hos4z0L70, • -s ' -.4- JOB NO. I r 2 x I C, 11041;0441010<7111.1'r,,, 01 , • a C:7rTi /NI I ..,`-"------- ' woo.1.1.1 -' it e F.OS, l'.--4-' - 0 I ANOMEKT MENI r•-1.6.-r- 4-,,a,,ps N „. DRAWN 204 - - 1 '2.05 12. 11 i n i, F.OS 1 0,F.e.s, , . , f .76, I _ ,I' I *--------.. I APPROVED , - ''*--154:27, • -4 N 0 1 z I GE.4-10i7r CZ) ts . 1 0- 144, 1111.11..1111111011 ONIMMI ammo MINIM 1110.atleala!IMMO 111111111. .....IWO dile © 1. . . k.., .c. 7,110 I mut.cat, 0; ettic .e. GM.. I atri F,E,c,3 n , ..... • - - D ' 4 . _ ___ __ ___ _ C -__ _ __ __ -- _ - - - - --- - 71-'7 _ _-_-_] `I id erit , - F4,.0 5, °• # D . . , o 1' 0 .11. J _1 A-z i _ -4 1 ; z 1 - . tfi > Z . . ui u? itill Alf : i 0' 44.1 . . 1 . 4 0 15 0 I 4/ IL: u: Alm' 4 441 i -i - gt CL . • r .,....,II 422- d to'• cv" io% cv" 8'•V' 61- " 1e ti.- "1. e) c5,.,,„ i del ,....., 20 )-0" ir o ' • # e 0 0 4r - --, e 4 I d- 0" 1.1 - 0" oz 1 _ di 2 I'- C'" 1.I I- C)" 1.1'- 0" Zi' - di 12.'- " V - o' • Z i CC .. 0 . ^ / / . . . . - • 1101- 0" , 0 ' 0 • • . ... CC ' mud CX) 411 0 0 4 o 6 0 , 8 0 10 , f3 allat Igk D A-G A-7 • . ELEV. _ _...___, . . N . . . . . , . , Page I 130 / ' - ' • .... -. ,PP•Ir. . '• • ....., ••....„. , --• .... ., , ., , (• , . . . . . . . . . 440••••11/ . - . • .......: . , . . . . , C3 , , . . : . . . . .. . t . , . . • ., . • .' . 1 e o 4 l' 0 6 . . • 0 8 9 .......,, , 1 0 . :. .. w w _.; , . ,, Remove ceiling in hatched areas to ..... • i . . , allow for installation of blocking at , w : '• . , , . , ......4.• .I. . ... plywood seams X , 0. . * . . • . . . < N , i ., , , • . , ; • •\ .• ••I.-.1.1... sr it‘,11,or, .. - i . (..-A r i:*. 66 I \ , .. I'u FLUOR. %Ilk%411111 150 (..) \AA, 5' a 46- I u 1 • •. •• • A, C. - - A . . .. • - 1..."........4. , "•••••. ".... .• ars oar ... -.. .. .. .. . . A 'I • 0 ,.. SC7LIP•11;) 045eC7Re)(t4 r,,..0 • • .• • •• •• • •• •• •• •• -. , 'Ii II! A ...... • . .. .. .. . . % .' ..•• ..• .*. ..' .. .... .... .. .... .... .... ...- .-.- .... ..... .-.. .,.. ..... • ... .. •.. ••. •• •.. •. •.. ••. ••. ... •• •.. •.• •• ••. ..• •.• ..• •. ) ,• z . \ ., ...... ... ,.. 9N.weLs oven,. (2) List4rERS . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . q"ric' 150 0 ov.P..R. Kest L. ct...1 rova • .. . •S . •.. •.. 2 LAI,ests 0-0-4=efts lye do gunt4.4cmigtz) 0 , • qt1P. ND. C2#4 I '''''`A. • • • •.. • •.. • •.. • •.. •.. • • • . .t1.-• ...'...• •• .........•........ ."..... "......'...•• ....... ..........••••".......•••"..........•••• ......'.••• •..... •..... •;....... ...... ...... ....... ....... ....... ....... .... . i • ,120.51L, CLA2167.1\ • • • . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . • . • • . • • . ' 41. r .. . D Mt 1111/ - •-. ••. ••. •. .. , Wtoi 14 17.> . .... ••.. .... .... ••... ••.. ... ?Li ' ri Al • • , - • • _ riffq Fl A, 0 • - - • • 1 . • ah ..,,, ‘i . • X • tg • ••. •. •. ... #1...6.- -LI- F-1 s'Tztu°'' 'V - ' ,.• or' sricucr • • • .: • . 0 ____ • viap. • . . ... ......, , , . . • i i : 0 ... • 1 - - 4.. E] , _____ El I I r-----• 0 1 .. • t • 0 1 _ 4 41111 . ' ! • '. • '4 . ' , 4*111:1 SC 0 ti': ' . • - ' rtill4 - E . ..., , • . . . NMI. fliallilli I 6 I el B i A it's \i' _ . r - . ill Di , 01, . .. •••• ... • \ E\...,) - , F---4 . . . . .. .. .. El Eli 111 • . .. .. . .. .. . El 7 • El 74 ' .. , . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. . •. • • .. . • , . . . ... .. .. . . .. .. , ._. •. . •. . .. ........„ — • „..........44 ...w............7... ....:„.0.40:....:7, V 0.001 . . ali . . . • . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .... .... .... .. .. .. . . . .. . • • • \ . . . • • • .. .... .... .... .... ... i... . i.... . i... . . ... ...... .... ... ..... ....... .... •.... •.. • . • • • • • Pi ... .... .•.. .... •... . . . . . .• • • . • • • •.. . . . . . . . . ... ... .. .. . . .. .. . . . . ... ... . • . . . • . . ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . , 0 I° E. ... .. .. . . . .. • . . . . . . . . .•. _r_.... _ ....._ _ _ ........_ -...„,... , . ...,,• -.••••,• 1. •, ra„ 1c+-1110 ---- 1\---,.. .111 Ili —1 ••• • • P:D• i . • ,. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .•. ... ... Acik . . . . 1 l "nil:', ZIMIt.k.1..P.R. I-16,A0 . . .. •. . . . . .. . . . .. .- ••• ... .. .. A-4 .dee„,,7. ... _ to tas t 81• t OH 4 . • WI 0 • ... .. T. FAIT . ' IS 9 /fit . i .. El • Ei E • , ›••4, . . , . . • . . • •.. . . . . •• . •.• .. .1) 7 • 0 • _ „ , • •• • .• .• .. • ....... .... ..... ......... . •... •. •. .. ... fe,..... - Akt ,._,..., 9.. • .• • .• ' \ 6.,ii-11-, ‘t11111, _ T .11.111.1••• \ jwirc74 , , . Noollit, El • , , • - i 1 ____ ..-...-••• l . . •.. • . ape...) , ,- , 1 t - ,-,,,,,„.• ............_.4 . . , .. . . .. . . . E , W17 e ,,,,T , •. . . . . • . e 1. b- I s'"Nilt - .. .. .. • l • • . • . • . ........_4e , ; , , - • •.'..,,' : ',‘,.,7• 40 :-: , , , 1 _ . . • • • ° ,-- ' l Met qv"et:). 5 • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . • f , 1 • _ El • El Li *, El . r, , . . . . . , „„:„...„.„..v. .. ......,,, , , •.. ... •.. . •.... . . . . . .... . . . . . . . sk.45P wt> ® .. .. 0 • • 1 • .. .. • .. •. •••• -.. .1 .. . _ . . . 17,3 'N. • .... 41 -...... ,.... ' '•. % • ..... : . .. •. • • . •• * •• • .. • • *. . .. .. . .IZECESSIW . . .. • • . . . . . . .• • ..• • . . .. • • 1251/4.44 6 iqrrr 4 • . • • re •„4„,„,.,,..„.„,„,:i..., „, ,, . , • , . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . , . . . . ... .. • . . . . . . . . . . . . 1llll \ .... ' Iffi *5-.,- . l : ' .! : , ' . , : ,;':; . - ;t:',\,•., , .„,.. . • ' ' . .. .. . '' ' ' ' .• .• .". .• .• .• ' ) 44_ *; • • . • • .. .. •.• • • ' IF • - -I •••• 'r"lki .1111111W • • • .,,,,,. , , .,. .••,,, ' ,-',• "7-44"7:4.,:il'•'14,',*'''.,..,,,.,.. .::,..,',',-.-,.'...,,' ''''•-''''',• :,' '•''' • • • • • .. • • • •11-11-7— . -. •. . • • . '-0•14,. _, • •' ' ,,, , • • •. . . . • • lk II li I • - • . . . .. .. .. ... . . .. . . . . .. . . - • • .. . . • i,,, ,'4,: ::::: •; ',.._'k,., • • • Cfrf• ei), We-TAPED • • • • • ' . , •• . ... •. •. •.. •. .. .. .. •., .. ... ... . ,• • .. . •• .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . .. e, .4.&-de vki_i___ ...47...._ • . 0 -'74.-+E- 1 "..- ..... ...... ..... ..... , . 111. n 0 023.1.04,0 00,T-t- Adleve 4e• —4V---- , i • • . . . •. \\ \_ \ *.• •- ...-5.- ...., i 6%.sit D , . . , .. . , , . . , . i 1‘... , . , , • . . ' , , .......4yul 41' WD 5 #6,4_441.1 d,OF 1.7". Wm *.P. 5 5 ,,,S,"'", -. :,k 4 ' . ' • Ct. OP VCCille. SIAP.44 . _ Ea. Jr EC/• - - , , . • . •. dt----Le s •4I I - --I • , . rri - ' " ' - ' ' • . ,PLACE. 12.00P DR•44 avempLows 4.1.0*-.4 et. ASk . . Hi c:Fscrratrr ,i 17er ALS fmg•ar.• v IT . . • Akio- , . ,.. 9 . 10 , ... ILI ii" , •, , • • , • 0 0 0 4 0 upp .c,, 8 0 . . . . , . . . , - 1 • • .•', • , . . ,.. - . ' : '-, _ . . . . / IV. • 'Iii•::4. ''. . , Page 1 131' . . , ,1? -____------ - --- --- .., _ _ _ _ + . .__ .. C4...., . eV D - I p © Al so tag - 'g - - � co r • P 1e e ® 0 6 . 8 910 - a� E (f) w I- j ,s. .. 1 , i511- 'I" I i e 0 j sa E 1 , 1 3"� 2,'-0'' y 2 1'- 0" ZI'- o'' ZI '- o 'is w a �/ o,r I'Z '-�" 0, }- 2 ,..' i 1 /� 1 ^ g ' /`�'• 3r /31•�,i I,(}.• O" , ��" i l�' • d'. i ip' y 1`1'r- 0` i3,_aj< ! I Z` 3" LI' OII r _ „ �.• ��� ,��Did (�� ��� ',� !^r� I ``� V 3 0 a w 0 < i 0 0 d ti o _ 0 N —— ——— — ———-• as LZt7F R.,�t-a�nJ / VEfl �� 1' . --\ -------- --------- - . -A, , /- --.0- Ct.. , — F.- - -- i...4 A 0 . �_ 13 a�v. - ROE:. STORAGE �. 30$ 3 --4 ,EMPLOYEE t ° 1H C.) i i Lt_ i i 1 i `�'I ' �_ r Sot t— �i. 4 ___ • . 1 --1 LUNCHRM ' . 1 1 ! ' I l / / - n \ _ _ I — _ � 2 _ OFFICE'� I 4 �_ CCT.. .11 . N I FO i I �� - �. _ fit_ 1 303 Ij �_ I - ' -t-- IAA i z ,0 ♦ i ! �1 F. .c.. = _... o I , I i ± �fi i,.,S Z F.0. •. ITT 1 ' . (( ( 4 i-l2 I, A-17 -0 I li ' L .. .i._ Li ri .: . 0 V I S T 1 A G I - i i i I . 1 , -- �Y ' /�I r , i 3'�" ' p ( �••— — — -A -r+-. O 0 N I I�.5 A.q (, _ ; . t __ I �_ �r do , ♦ ♦ 1M--� ,.. a q l9 I __ ' ' E--4 -4- - ' I z„x�a ' �30� J3to 1 I o — % _E 1._ -- IM' 5 ` LAV.� LOCKER 1 FF.C. I -� , I STAIRS 1 _ I _ 3 �q C:::: �, cos I. I 1"�, JAN _ , _ i t - - -- -- - - - - ----- B 0 rd 0 .- b B C.4. -o _. 1 320-' _.„,.........._ ` f,� . e_ �c��e To r.•�. 3i �. 312 _ — ( A— 070.,-, )I,)47 . • PASSAGE . A-11 --1-- 4< • — I �.o.s. j A-1g; - _ 0 STAIRS 2 82 �' 3 "- I _ E�Ev. DULT NON FICTION _ _ _ _ _ ..-� 1.4 i I ' •.e5 >814,.. ,d 0 0 7 _ _.____,____ r.:,0.5. / A = _ `� /� " t �� : ,. }�. _ , , I REFERENCE I / "< O - ••�� I iJ O � 1�'O O O-..1\ �I �' 'mow �� 1 •.d 1 A ....._ �r ��r/ >1"4 - F.os h,-1 q Gbrv.ar . , I ( O A M . ' r.o �, i oar ,�_ ..- N �...L� ..Q u 0.......4 ' _.-��_==- i 3 ace �t o �,_ g. M ooVIP r•--� 1 t_6',.•��3'-0 G4Rr- c.A.�t r j id PAS. {r . - STOR ; t -� i 3 I G EL V -0 i ' I- .� 4IA32 , . REVISIONS i in e _,0,._ .., Piliggiy,,,,,,, ., .- ,.„: ,-, ---1, „Igor ----• . ,Ift,,if (i) i • -2o t .;• i AS f p -AeF O.5. ~'`-� -N-p .t t: i s• I I r ! I _ 4 vLN cix.. , o = s, ,.r II ��- Q„ q. ,� ?�' 'T Y P'G 2 c�.>=Q ELEv. '�,I'-- ( V DATE 5��S'$2. Q 0 i ; 3�8 lace _ - . _ - CONF �- JOB NO. Jr/ \VWOop — I LIB _ 3 , 1 0 DRAWN - t =0 . , eE Ermi t \TYPIG 1 c• �- �� ---Q �--t 0 2 q-I -�Z ` _ i 11 APPROVE D � � Pt+.tEL - u © € Mil IGQ� i N 311 J , 1 3 F 0.5, ro - of 10 m/ t 01 IQ — (31 - A-`� a0 • _ D , , _L__ ___ r, - - as - - - - c, -_ _ -�- -- - _ . - _ D_, _ _____,_ D =. 0' e cv _ Z • a' o N 6, i N Ui �! t�I.�i�iTE{2. �- �i12'i 0 0 d 0 o W z ti, ►� 1:. -► �,:. 5 1, fit, , > ,Idip.'-w'� i4'- o'' �, �'•o" 14'-ot ,3'.&'i , id- mot, - icy`-c,„ 21'. ©" a Co" I L1.1 I - J �5t'���i 21'- o'' 21' 0" Jr 2N'- o" 2ii-0" 21. p" * -LLi ' - at' I 12,- Co„ , Z1r-at, • • \e . CC CC O WO . # , , . a- . 0 1.- . 4011 (i); 40 4 06411 8 6") 1 0 D , � r 9 a► © Q add bracing to N-S sprinkler mains . , e N , . ,. . , , 10 ' or-- 51 . Page1132 . , C 5 Ilnimor • I,‘ • 0 0 0 ç4) 0 6 , 0 • � 8 9 . 1 0 cr. i - - • I co f..- ...I .. (.)- 1 ....., i I FOR EQiIPMEr.►T .La row SEE SPF.LJFjGgTio►�t5 ` T Ms ate s ; 1 +� \ ,.cht.. + F4.UST. lit ZwCaN �� tl� �1s6.TE L V, - eve -re RuN .... i ! W. DAYLIGHT Tb to"A►Br�yE ABpvE.as,�F. SEE -re) +nn RLF S'R�It 15ocFr�r 6cN., lox io Alu iN�in� 75G- — EME(Z(,� c.E+v �+I. pJ�, rM, lOx4 V 3 Si.F.S►+r�T Q'I!o A _ NSoF iF T e,GEG2Ali +�•r SI061 W�L _ _ ___ _ ___ _ _ . _ ' > C F M, 4a,.(s F1 G17ft ` REG 1 n (�`°` { W I j'41 PAMPER 1 60o LF ,46 x to FLci "'�1��\I�[ag,:::... 0 R 1i. .. RA REG. w►T>1 8«�GFM 4Ex co FI • � i� 75GFM - - , N � Mt MOUNT 8x8 LINE PLENUM W lug) Co. J3 U�iTµ , T 'SJ;E.AGoUs NECK NllM IIIII I -rs•y '�` == _ 3t�x1c� CJN. Leiis — NC'T ring... _ - ' GRNO.�E�EL s� ` '+ ---.-. �• _ .'1 GON►Jt '25x30K STAIRS Sox I(o'zOUGT Q�WN 200 GFJH� 12x5 , .� �� lb exH.ET EN-rAK j oUvER`��r�..rS1 � � -_ r.I I 1- UVEit EY (a) , DEWA(_I I + C7R11r:RS. I� �..� J2E6, f E"1 11./2 x ---- ALigur-------- crerin TAI , , 200�FM,iS� N14�1 `�+CEri(ALL ice' • '\� t 35DGFM, I8 SiA , I\ Pcf i5TE2 ,., -� , �� I �� IO,CI+ UP j'p 4_1 RE..G.ISTER W�4t.L.irr: \ � 2000FM �"" ►z7p '� ����� l � � SJcY V�.r.�� '�' ""■,� '� - IO� SGFM 42x4•tmR RA L W,,� �LOO GFMr _- _ `K.. rf 04. pMIMI IMO 3�eoGJ�.,r, I>�8 sloe ...oucr a Ali SEo O FM � vp i 11 = '-- 111 EMP(_p`I�EE cf) o Eo.:,..4.4 . B 'G'oGFnq 14i(¢x� � �`7 K��.FM IB yvipE��i fs.......... c7GGFM �...111111M11=.,1'= 91 L �.1111111111111 111/ 10_ NI F1ooR Rol �4, Et! 6�1 -�- ..- _�DEw^Lt. �1 ` swl�i-T Low UMW 01.011.114 Mill 4ek3b .E 11.111Takililliplif 1M o ei38bGFMD�� DUGT �X+WrJ Gil, MoUNfi Mt7Tt->e+Ni��, �..'...a..„ �1LL4 A�UaiT�cCTuA , SEE ►�G SPAC.E. ' 3Co.cI R,� SEc MEcN L� • ma . 1 I-- + /09 B , el • L CRAWI►.tGS WELL PL,eW 'G� iJ310 GFM, 14/4�(omilli I F�Ft E .c.? gMENSICnI. L��ATE T-ST�►.1'F-CJIC fZ`f t Fr�R CvnlTiNu�s71. .Ixg _1�� FLOOR R^ RE4. �I F4- scF '�' -- -____._.__--_,WITH �1P6R 1725GFM,3Ox 20 gioEw,gLl.2 q• M l< RC•�is-tL�C. MouNTA7 FLc�R __� 4.._,>01 1����■ inn a` STAIRS 1 0.4 LA 4DULT ��- �ICTIh` ' t4K„„„„,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,„„„.„„„,.....i GFM ' I 3loSGFM GEiU►JG �- `ti 8 �� ' IIIIIIII -rY� FACE.I2x►2 N�K. �Zx ,, 5A Provide Cimmai 5 .� 10 Rip M CN M iS+�ANtGAI, WQ� II seismic A, MFcN. ',, O W El L PL/►N `°`�"�'`' -mag bracing Q,' ,. 310 GFM, 14/.}x�, I rill...H-- -'1 3�GFM = F �' -- • E- IC �� 5ooGFM 24.•a. FLc�R RA RLtw �� -- -- u n - �I NIGH SIDEW LL - 1KI'T}+ PAMPER I 14•Cg �4 s�L% - � REGISTER. A 11 I ��Ia �. _ i / for 2 8 F.., ›.1 la R g"M�Ew.�.LL ►'1T, t7RAn c `�EG+�.w� Nivki FM3rosGF,hu .....4 i� •�%x , ouG Rom,, 'C� aC441:4 -Iimp ir"�1 TAR. �R EXAC,f DIM pr' :.V_ -� 8 dia ducts �-.+ t.J i'ii �`� '�� Iaa cFM 12�3 s' MEGH, DROP DLIC-i-380GFM IBx$ t_�J ��7 REGi. wI' N �ctPR R�` PIsW Lill , _ DAMPER. �+1 28�, �ZlJ GPM,24 I SIpEWAIt J�EG1sTE� �OCFM a� �;± ._..- N16H'SuoIF He-� Ep per. . M �L DETAI QTYP ,� '� GF J111111ki r71 14. immignm �� N _ _ 1#14N✓ir ZOO GFM ,., ��' rI' �I .� 420o GFM i ymil 25cp �� �� �� — i �aIDEzooc-Fm, 12'WIpE xg++NIG1} I ,, ,,W l.L R6GJSTER �' IGbC (1 firiCiOCFM 8�(0�.�.� i $x1� �Y�'____�� Sr taE �o�yvL____,1:__ wA.LL � � fems'__I 2C0 GF IiSEC I - I ` ACM,24xgI ' / RA REY�•Yy1'M G'AMPER I` GFM,I !o �R �STIEQ c- +®IJ►am s ,� Si( WALL Q. _ BETA -0 DIIG-T� '�`'�I 3�0 GFM IMF%4 x 8 FLCx�R R. A. _ ___ 12� �g �� wITM R4MREFZ. DATE 5- % o 1_." , i � AMPCcr. R. FtG��Z 12a, (�s il It�O I 1+_ GFM.12K3 FLOOR :0111A:.• c �� DcWaIL !IC .iii 10 4 DUCTAQovE TYPING R D ammiir- GONNEG-r"re) TRANSFER RM. GE►L►NG, --mii-ifil-1...._______________j-----------------------0. ° r-- i Ar_oUS'TIGALI' L?kJ E DuL RJLLE. APPROVED 1. D "1"1 Z v , WNF 150GFM� I!✓+x3 FLO:424 LFM, 4$,• , FLmR RA �k - - -- - DAtwPC2 ' REG% WIT}-; DI.MPER. I o,c 1 O DER FOR,D� O _ ,_ 1 TRANS FGRILLE. GJ=I LI hJ G TRANSFER.G Rt�-1.E. LLI < u j am , . ,-,. tJOiE: SEE A > immi ...it CEaIaNG�IITEGTur2,� �.T EP r ,,, �F GEIL N DIFF SE EXAGT L�'aT� 41‘ook • CCII is 0 . 0 0 0 4 6t° �F LutE witalkri 0 . •� _ - : AL.�. SUPPL �s.12 '�' '. Al �'�'- 111QN AI Y DUGTWo1 Ar..Jp ALL frao 0 8 W ITN 1 i+ Q RIGTWOf _� Fyn U►JEty s. i URI M 4KE TAKE-OFF AGou STI Gs+.L p�-1 L ItZ F FROM MAIN j �I� 14 4x.� ....„ MAIN SQ C7t.!GT DuGt FULL SIDE OF OUTLET ,/� .� �•:; -� FRAME -TYPICAL ALL SIZES T ���■�1 `3'�3Co ► 1 +�Ep REUEF 9 1 O # ,� k D'+L►Mf'E2,MOUIJT MCJra7 H — SEN .IN GEaUNG, R , -StDEWAII QEGISTE2 gP m i vo I. _,_______ i G N. .. _ _ EXPOSED DUC DETAIL—TYPICAL M 7 DIAC;2AMMv,T'JG, ONLY • 2 RECTO 1 . ,, - - - - , -� - -- ---- age 133 r + • r a 'WY ` Red shaded walls are �� • existing shearwalls from i 0 0 0 0E .�,15 Q2ndfloortoroofthatdo 0 D ' 0 C6 not require retrofit - - 1 op e -. , , . I I I 'M ' . " 0--c „ , ,s , , , sf-fiwcit..e.. 0 doll 7- ttYrLie);tirt 1-ilt*. Le , ,... ar1D S, 0-441'. © _ i -.........7---..."..i- . ____ - - ___ , . plimi. -11'1111.1111 -77-7-- _ Aik al Ai • ra.- , 1. , ITZY , -.... — — .___ - - — - MUIR . 1. 01 , , I immillem lama yo , I=____ 125 Mlle WI VW I In Ell 111 1 ivi• W L E'er' MIIIIIIIIIIIIII , r �.� U• R �.t_.::.X: 0 I- \ , . yrorn WOCITYP 11131 A71111111111.11.1.11111111111111111111111,111 VIT, VZIY TZN W - ___ 6+411-411g.L.E. ® t7 ,, 5 -rrPI g 3 , ,,, . . . (- - 1- f1 ' . II I - ma's- ,� 49 V ,� J441"-A4 411211 .= ' "ail ec Ein gerac.. RETTOW a.' , < N i -----------.._............._._.__.... =- - 0 TNT ... ,.A . _........ ................ -- _IIIMINIM: e - ------- D.S. J D.�3. 2342.l Cie. Q� � kSR.IG�G @AE.IC►M HA61..1.. �� �-- e,„.,,,. . .uM t,`n, 46. IN ,RC�t..�►vD14057 7 _ 0 r. Lar) , ,`� Green shaded walls require removal -7- 0015 ; e TM ZR.1140Dr4 b ""' ,a.u.. .'`T loa.. �+..�.�:.f q ��cr� + Fr�arr �.cs a• ram.mow. ",� i sL-� N. 414.�. .16. i I ►�., - - - oet.,,�.. W ),'A . ., . ` s,e•o o of exterior finish so existing , -esueeriaNT �,��� - __ - �iM rep . _ plywood can be re-nailed - - �MIN= - Im + L1 /........-agp Y ,xm�+c -- ` • Also re uires removal of interior-� A►�' ' WD ' . *s` 0 . 1/44,41EVT Slice cow 8 ,�,. M • '"wry,,`. 0 , . finish to allow for new sheathing to A H a "w ' 0 IN4 IC),„N ....op ..... , : , _ . D D e be installed on interior face of walls '3� J , . , r • 1_4 eel 74< Red shaded walls are } , gt existingshearwalls from A 21 9 . 0 . , , ' ›"4,,, 2nd floor to roof that do sHif..1c,L.E. 0 o...4 •— - not require retrofit ` q _ . _ - o 4< - Manika 1 4 4 ®- • . 11111IIT i 2 Ala dra ill ILNNeIIIII• _A11lP, l L. ...,)-. , zr , -i,1 1iw y U. , re EJ III' 747 (, O © 4 - >HIS 1C244 - r GlitieWHOcige MULL �.r�� f Gam.• `i;L�...�_w� !SII �O II, ,1 II, ,--, .-.._--_- _ ---. - - _— - RAM � — - --- _ •_ _ w E w. MN 0 iltabIriuo wctO i► III ( i) \ � WO �D ® i �- - z = REYIiION • i Ammeimmomp j .,., i At. ,, aRDRp.�I.- --mama I 11 A i nip IMAIIIIIIIIIE Tf: I.. I =-. MIT . . ...... 'ELF .2 1i1I ' H1IHILz FII� .�..�., - - L= a , = gmo. . STE . © Wool, S+M. •. - 4 . ,, ,, IrilL N WP I Wu © €1/ L►M� dM"( ' e ,LJV - �'-� C?hJG. ® Wes` _ ,,..„,„,,,, _„ _:.,, , • Blue shaded walls requires Wi Mom.ve.,,,, P LEv„),\TI 0 N 4 = ' '' '- DATE �-��$z = removal of interior finish to Yellow shaded interior wall on _ �o. No. . A - ' - -- � - — — — — -- � -- -- — — • new interior shearwall � 1 � DRAWN '"" -- -- allow for new sheathingto be A��ROVED# -- grid 2 requires removal of installed on interior face of on grid 2 with sheathing both ELEVATION interior finish to allow for new walls sheathingto be installed on faces nv, 8„ , ,,,. }. a o qr, � opposite finish from existing0 , • _ t �� plywood 0 ' , (1 I , , . ' , . , 1 1.0 A . . , Z . , , . , _ _. _ Red shaded walls are - , - r 0 SHih. c, e. _...... - .affiN,..,_ . , . ix 0 G existing shearwalls from .... - 2nd floor to roof that doLim " < - .G• McTAL ace IIrlii i > .. not require retrofit �:--- III e - \ k -: V 1111111 =-ll It 1111111E1P 11 . i ;�....._..::•_-•:::..... l- ( _ ---- F *` -3'I vJ x 14r N o �� FlN w� w•0 -- - — ;. , , _____ ___ _ ___ _ ____ . . i _ _______ 1 _ __ _______,_ � ; 4421m x,....., ,n41, =.........._... , .,_,_ , , 1„,,, • WC) LOI.Ailit , ----- ____ 4r"""=:..7 ".... 7 '.., Imilimm. MP f __ram , , .�� nP -- A , i \� I� I! �_ - � , ,,-_:_-..i _ , . 1� — - 3i'wy 3G'N f , ,50 ,A+�es hN. Pot.• wa c..o vilest a 1N F�Reg JND (vEir.i WY O11413 ' \ DRAWINO NO. - Green shaded walls require removal of ELEVATION: 1 12 1 �' _ . 1 exterior finish so existing plywood can be A8 . . . .� .0 , . -- -- -- Fits,� N re-nailed : �• ; Also requires removal of interior finish to - ' r _, �A• r allow for new sheathing to be installed on 0. . r Page 1 134 � interior face of walls • . - KEYNOTES - S 1 O0 (e) shearwall with plywood on the north side. Remove wall finish on. south side and install plywood nailed with 8d at 2" o.c. --Install additional 3/4"x6" Titen-HD sill plate anchors to reduce anchor spacing from E-ciAlk 32" o.c. to 16" o.c.- R6 8 9 -. Anchor end stud to conc. wall w/ 3/4"x6" TO Titen-HD anchors at 12" o.c. 75 ' - 83/¢" 3 Anchor end stud to steel column with 3/4" 2 /4 21 - C7 . I 2/ - C� /2 - fo _ . 2/ - © ©- 1 threaded studs at 12" o.c. 8" 4 '-n" 4 '-0" 7`-0'14 9 ` - 33l4 " g " , Add new HDU 11 w/ 3/4"x 18" • W.4L C i/51p51!d wv-4LG SEC 3/66-0 SEE 'WAGG S$GT/QAJ a /540 4 epoxy anchor 4 © k Ili 0 Sawcut slab and modify existing footing ,core nPE� �� ro Or F to increase width._ RET /NIA./ WWAGr:S, I r '% 1- '�, 49 AID 6E,. r,"ROJIVD FGR PLA1tI I ,-3-0 (., , . _ --- ----- -- ------ — -- --1 � — --r--•-- --- - - - - ram _' F.-0, G co A __...,,.. lik ' I w/ 2 - 45 c©Air j a. s� /o , © , - — • I I Sf 5G lhE'CESS SLR1. \ • S -5 (0 — __I 2'. SEE ARCH- _ ~ gT-(o "� �'- 3 � I 5/1EAR wAcG 5 � - W ,, m s D� �Ta" 0 YP • '1' GI IVER/FY I SE' Ell , - "-I —r r 4.5 I '. . il OA i jini I 1 €7\ - w/ 2 -4'5 Cnu'7;to 1 , , r = i 4:11 3 N9 lit. I VqIIIP I) El 1 i i 1- --, ii,, 1 9 - • , , , Ai „aro 4 _ _ . _ I I C. I I ftt4I ! .w 1 . � fi< B . - - , I- t I o I I �► 1 r 1 L� t-1 L _ I I L J ( )_ o� , Q I � 3 - � = _ w r8'X/s►"x is" 6OMP pir L—_ — I I , I ( = Q . .,,.. T.4 I SJEE DET. 1V6.G loxfv POST rn elf 1 I, I C ° * O -� eND �.� I I f Ct` d 4 ( , I �- " SPLICE �.� I L J I I 4- C�k�tCJ4E7 L 5�.48 Q Q ( 5A' f AS ceROUNL7 1.-EVEL 1 �) '' IL tQJ � N L?ES/c ,V 4T/D/`t ? 11714' ,SE ". SC/ lEvuLE `j snip/Y,IGL tv I (rYP) /2'� Co' 8" !o i st ep''4' - I ii'C 3 > 0 0 /4 1 2'=4'�x c�- C. STG. coG I �' i i ov/2- *5 e-ox, T, fib . 5�0 m .,- -- - =- - — r-I 9 I ,.. CD -.. 4D TTi�n. 5,44, tia ~J I--, �1 r— — -� . CORNER i - ( ( I • I i I 1_ I I 1 H ( I - I I I 1 � . ail @ , . L • _J (ff . / i t Ty-n, L — — — -•� R8 -�-I A LG. alik �" 6� Q 50 I I . Co , 1 - I 0 _ N '•• 2'-4'lxC) - 9,'w/ 1 - � TYP ‘AA I • I 2- #5 cQ,JT, I I I S L'oRNER 50 I_ - ----- -- - -- ----- - -- -- - - — I — _I - I _ ' D,G, ` / /�-lv��r-� Bo7T' OF FT4 - ` so - 41 p - W L. 4 - v k . IC 4" . r. 8 -Q r ALL 5EG, //5/n 51M , /©3/ • - - • 2d '- 4 N _ 6-4 ' - /4 " - - ,' - - .. - ` FOUNDATION PLAN YBASEME_NT_ .1 - _ . Page i 135 . KEYNOTES . (e) shearwall with plywood on the building exterior New 4x6 at 16" o.c. shearwall with 1 wood both.f�ces LEGEND - ' (e) shearwall with plywood on the south side. --remove p YS 2 p Y 0nailed at 6 o.c. exterior finish and C 4 > nailed with 8d at 3" o.c. = h (e) shearwall with plywood on the north side. © paged x�u2,o�st to joist connection p Y Remove wall finish on north side and install sheathing to achieve 3 o.c. nails spacing Remove „ O --Install 3/4 x6 Titen-HD sill plate anchors at 16" o-.c. w/ sig rod through (e) WF girder. Remove wall finish on south side and install plywood nailed with 8d at 3 o.c. - wall finish on interior side and install plywood --sawcut ' --install new 2x web stiffener on joists at plywood nailed with '8d at 3- o.c. --Install additional 3/4"x6" Titen-HD sillplate nailedsawcut and remove slab,to install new 4 0 -x 1 -9 footing w/ - new HDU's with 8d at 3" o.c. --Install additional 3/4"x6" 6 #5 longT&B between existingcolumn footings w/ --See marked up 10&11/S7 for revised sill plate anchors to reduce anchors spacing from ( ) g - - attachment to wall belowp g Titen-HD sill plate anchors to reduce anchor matching dowels into (e) footings/slab . Remove pine tree behind - 32 o.c. to 16" o.c. - spacing from 48 o.c. to 16 o.c. , - 0 dock retaining wall _ ' - (i1,10 . . 0 . .-- _ 0 - 4 . 6 (ij 10 • , , . , . . . . • , . • , _ • , , • - , , . ., , . 1 70 '- o'� - - - /O -lo / 2I -O 2/ - lJ, I - 2/ q fl 21 C) 2/ 4II2/ - © /2 Cn 2 ! -O • ' ea/4 3), eo'-Co //ell oce Y?"`"r - . . , i 5 FOR Exra-Ai5/ON OF 0 RET/ll`4- WAL4.5 HE/C1175 5 - • U SEE' •4RCH••5 /T' /=G..UN, , +i V q-o �t 62x6, FULL. 'HT TO ( 3 ) ` • ti 0 ® tp • - _ 6 EACH w/L 75TP, - 2 - HO& E LC_ 5EE w,4Lc. SECT, 2/SCo fox40 PosTs TO - &N v 5 �/lJ 3 5(o HOR/ZDilITi4L CO/11G. ROOF W HD2N 0 (4---) f a In/ V i / t" /OLL�OI�S//iVS w// i I3EAX.� FL04/Z L/NE tv mysEG ions ,d'„ CIA ' 0 611 * ili,. -- - -- ( .. ,..,. .....,..,...,.......,....,. .....„ , FD.S.-Z ' - -t- -- — r -- -- -- _ __,- -- -- - - - - -- n ►� -- -- 0— 5EE O .4/L5 _ , . , , . . I . A ._ . t _ 14,-.‘...„---,,...„----,...,...1...-_...-.,..- -_,-,,,....v-...._ . ,14 i .: . �� l:LAG, ____ —— -1 I-._- -I ' I I'- �- 1 1 + ! r ,„, ) ;�.;4 'Ire 1 _ , i, L.:: 2 X 0 ICT�i W : ;b t: ` ,•tkv .3 —s r i'r,�i{� 58 __� .�_ N evtly - o '77 ( +1 ;; f a. n i :i+wG«:ww�i!i!::;M :KiIi v a \ _ C3 ( I j J.! A4 . I 1• 717 4 R F I0 . t(� Allill - Arlo ,r r, - N fv 'C!J/VC. TfJF>nl�crc -�- - - ) I_ -i -- - -� - - - - • • , _ : '.::::...... .... �- CU,C.y Q SEE 5L X3 W 4 4.G. a i , d i i/ z -o" 0 '- ! • ;, y } :''' 1, -ARCH, L7 Cr �} ; Z E,W OVER fg ,� M h//2 "� I 40----\, - -#/-G3 FTfi LT J 2 - 5 cDUT d 56 W3 ,�(o [3 x � ► : I ' Sg 3 �LYwann. wy Z 5 CDC/T, 1 ( ( .' . i'll-EY :,,_•::,:•:.:•:- . ..,...7 %......:::::,•,•:•:•:•;tx4:•:•:•:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.: 40 . . , • 0 L.___I _ m d' \ I 1 I 0 UKr! TO �BAM I ;� 4'r. - 1 B4 A f3P V E DPE ; ;;r,;r,• SE ra �t/A/L//uG • -• e loxlo POSTS TO ( , ( ! I ._ _ ® ® ( ( - �` THE RE�45 SEA i _ ' w 58 I ROOF kWH472A/ 1 (- 1 EwV/ 2 _ - �t1pT /3 i • ' How,.S 1 1 , . _ I _._ _ ._ . _ s 0.. 51�r _ . I L_ J I 8A I !%3 0 - l - * ' .. , I O x!o TO ROOF - I I h ,.._ -—I /4 L — -I L— — --1 - 57 I - - • - �� / a. �' .. ( - \ 5 a i.___b e_ ____-=7.,_JJ ��GO 5GA w #4 I V Q N ;/ ) ,. WACCS SEGON! •' 4 NC, /3 I h Q 5EE /fS2 `48 ��O.c ©VER Z" LEVELING„ - - ,.. ) I i 5 A N D OVER MO/E'TU 'E �� - - I ‹ - - _ I SA1�R IER OVE/Z- G OF *4- I X �. r :,=•- =••;� C! 1 - MINUS comPAcraO -GRus ti-Eo, on�t 11- GYPGk 7' !/2`fY/�If EET I rev? iseicK RA : ,es .. OVER �/8"Pwn. - @� ` 0 : ! , O ! I J20�K. . (s • A 2c t+_)--.- WIF- O ! _ I I d BLOCK,4GG EDGES•� Q aR�c N I �. u4/L w/ /Od BOXC�JIyo•c� \ 4 til C1 :ISM - _sI I„44/,g,,, NI- V LINE I I ALG EcES ¢/od c k a4 I • t /4 - , Slo 0 V____-___________, ,_, t i) 1 _ -1 ® 111 ti - - 49,. x I fle 41) ' G!o ( GO ' 97 I N 1 - 5�E•C/.44 Ah4/G/4t4 • - - — I I C T/,I/.� .4REr4. SEE m I , 1 ( _ — ( �-- �— — r_ I 67 I • C, _ k tilaTE t3�LOW, to ♦ - _ I ICJ, fI I ( I I - o - N —� , m . 4 x 6 SEL STRUCT. I 1 i I j I ( 15 TYP I I • I fit-- I ►_ ( X ' . i MUG G/LENS TO _RECESS. SLA - w # • :. ...:. • : ..,.. -' - -,:. .;::.::•:i: ::i:-;•: �►:- 4 1 . ROOF_ w I 17 I- —— _._I z E Z �S E!� RcN S tt T t:: n- I- c� / ,4 F �tl tN <G l • �•K i �. I e l / i i x F T , N� 4 I w i _ I � I o x/V D T I I sc T � � .f: , �- i 1 ,may : . �I I • i 2 O i I Q { N ( •'rYY• Rt i • _ In fo F'Lo n Q T ROOF li) - • - i • I II �w xl P05'T5 •' TO �• COL --_I ,-— — -- — — ——— `C.>. .�►:$:W': G R !J N w ono -- s I * ,ix 1 :!. • n E / 4) ID ,f� a o ,r ✓V C - n�-- �►=�' ^ \ Y� l . a ,� Ig41I / - *l S CO�/ ; - r �• to i — �x� POST a H I �s 40 HOLCdWS 4CD D5 , �'' I e `wr 1 0 0 • • F•as. — 1 •I_ _ -- - --_---- --� _ __ __— • - • r-� -- r / - - I ( - - - r�' �` N . ♦ - - __.- - , , - o - 411 - - - - D ' . .. • . - - __ — -1_,I_1 1_ _ 'i■ `ice 1 - _• - J I - �$- AIL OA e _ 0 oR E K NSIO� b N • • =�1� 1� 5L0 � ,T`/P. � v�r►i.i_5?E NEIGHT�RSEE- 5 wee POST EA E/llL7 W/� ® ARGH. SITE f*LAni ``'•`' NOLOOWIVS �c9J2 . SPEC/,�9G. FLOOR Iti/•4/L/N '�� .SHEAR WALL S CNEL7 - © 5/8" PL Y!"VOOD .QL OCK`EL, YV/TN ex Co FLAT • . - ( T AGL E•¢7Q'ES -.4�n G /Co //Q.c: t3ETYVEEN • (l3LoCKING TO F/T 7"/rr7/T BETWEEN ./0/S7*5) 4/-4/4, frv//oa comA /oa/S 2 H4,c, •,44.. : • nL YWOOL? E"•0 4-; .4/c/47 .4 T /2"ca,c, //t/.F/EL 47, .i' • . - S ,lo� zE3 '- 9 /4" �, �1/-5//2 " 2/`_O " / _ I/ u - � a FACE QF T[lC? `;�- __-__ - _ _J�5 3 4 _ __. r -O • �CFOI .lD� ,L.E '. kfAllN PLAN / - - Page 136 .... - . - _ . ...,. - . , . S3 . .. _ • . . . . . . _ • . . , • . . . . . . , , , - , . 4 0 • 0 0 0 . • 6 8 9 10 .. . • . . 1 .• . . .. . I I ' ' 4. 11. v 110 0 . . . . 151 M 1:'5o44 EGc. PoST c-hp To 6. K lv 4 v .. PoST. Ella 1 •• . 0 tS l'.c o WD COG. . F lJ L C. y T 0 ?YP ^(Y P, �rf/ L7l3L 2x8 HoR w/ ` -;-rP< 5 1 -0 • CRDUND LEVEL. rn ROOF NUC f-//1. 1Z 4/E'cC)EC? �i, Q E�tlL7 G. ON NORTH Aft O,L, 3'ig u i2 w AD Rs- TYP• ' ' TO 3 w9 W9 ►�9 ® In _/� 4 x.6 NE�+DEC 6E ova 4 sx • '� . - • t i N .1, A V r • N 0 - • • - - -...... . u q►1 i m c `° s I . � w• 0 ' /M N 5 d. d S 8 I • 3 x • r 8 G.L , , .. .. a 5/MPSQh/ - .,. ECG 1 i. II I 1 /=O T 5 !�G-A T Q i _ d i � 5 I M , • W4 I ,/3EG i 4X oyv v Co _a 5 _ _o U � � P r� ., 4-0N N N CO �l • . 11 - '' - I - \3 \ 11_,... ., • N • 0 - - -i --- ' (D, 0 Cil) J , _ - - ` - .,• - 4 -- mom_ - • , \ 7 illra . / 59 • . 42)3'/43x /2 "lr.L,� S2.1 •• `'' i ' Q > 0 i M ; �a � — _ _ '� 1 i ,' i J —1 I TYf' '� -o U 4 _ _ _ ` �'/e"x '� ) i 4x x=osT To . - ' i - N y N( s . �I arc JO/ST DP�L sa1s-r _ ROOF' W/ f/c Al Z HOW OWN X I m i 5/MP. ..4 kV 3. 25del ? - x ' 0 . - 4 4 x YVn se.. 57"RU T. VO x N N. .. sB r FWQ SNT );•._______--r- © MU �� ti � --� 2 \ 1 - _ MULL/0MS TO /3/l _ l' m Q U,vBc.oCKED w/ /off / N b �■ �3ovE, ' • w ``. , 5/A,/P. Wp 4511}_ X $Gx�7a lv'/o•c, ALG,' - �') aiG 3 i it �Ij Nit/C.R S ( T`/�) Q1 �.. EDGES , 5/45 4 K• x / x • oM. S`-�F u�l6s, -rYn /o r 3 x/Z G.� ,d _ nr� ✓o/ST — tv.44c 5 E @ /O do.c. �? 59 '1111 — 1 — - — olorinini AUL //V F/ECG (7Y/aiU/�PER (V In AIM 4x Co SEG , - 13TY• P - - 1 — 1 58 • •// > N' -__i STRUCT• (TYP) - -- " - ® 1 SIM ~ , . #1) 03 0 ID ,: ® \ Q S EGTAC. O 4 0' v -Q , 1 "� P .Q -f' pAP-, vN p 4514-2. x ('S x S X '�Y L: 3o i5-r tn ti m N "".-' � _ P e . e 5 ro rY , - s exit ��, • v 0 .• \ .. • I:0 . . . • • 5/AdP45OA./ ECC l(o 0 1y �1 145 21 4 /� T F S . OS G9 TO , s tt.. fN E D lox Go /3ELgvV `1 8 GOIY �I �� • _ al ®� , Li ink - ,c > - - -—- 12 .... N 58 iD _1- •:. 0 • . 10.-) '4., ''..gy W ÷ . --...„1. minzr..1 a, _ _ _ _ __ _ __ i., _. _..,,, _ __T„,„„.............., r `I- Net) ' ', Mk _ 1 ac t r c-o ✓S / ; . oac. SST f . , , 1 CI D3 CO +� , a . IT _ W c3 x li�fo �, Gx�2 JAz . D - KEYNOTES - ! a► We05m t52E ARCH. DRwc,S, ,® in • . iz �ii cio ® , _ , , : • 58 55 •. Fag �u-rT.E(ZS S 1 58 a ®: _ . . S/M 1 S/M, In blue-shaded area remove (e) gyperete topping and • DRoP THESE 4 SEAMS ;v " -ro e,5741 1 • 1-°PE op.( 0E4.14 CI,E, 15/8" BELt�W (�InJI'SN 02. FLOoR) - re-nail plywood with 8d nails to reduce edge nailing to 2" o.c. install new 2x4 flat blocking from below at all edges of plywood _ S not over joists to provide fully blocked diaphragm in blue shaded - . ` areas. .. �� �zt . 0 . Simpson CMSTC 16x8'-0" strap--install 2x flat blocking between . . - joists as necessary - . _ _ _ ,..._ _ . _. . _ _ : r 0 ,Simpson CMSTC 16x strapfull width of building--install 2x flat UPPER LEVEL . FRAMING PLAN S • blocking between joists r ,8,, . -a.' • ( 4 ) Simpson CS 16x4'-0" between joists centered over girder , • 0 Simpson CMST 14x6'-0" between joists centered over girder - • , . ' / 6 In green shaded area structural framing is recessed to allow for exterior wood deck. 137 •• Page) . Decking material is degraded and will need to be removed and. replaced with new to match original . S4 00 0 E4 /6) 6 8 LEGEND 7 (6) j0 . Paired HDU8 beam to beam connection up w/7/8" rod through (e)purlin 4. Paired HDU5 top plate splice with holdowns installed on si my underside of top plates w/ 5/8" rod through(e)purlin WPaired HDU8 top plate splice with holdowns installed on I underside of top plates w/ 7/8" rod through(e) purlin CSC III , ® Paired HDU11 top plate splice with holdowns installed on underside of top plates w/ 1" rod through(e)purlin' 1--6 Ti P --Adjust spacing of cripple studs to provide room for holdowns , 41 r0 0 Paired HDU14 top plate splice with holdowns installed on . t,,,, �� ( 3 )) ti? we w-rYP• ft I 7B, ( 3 w 0 , underside of topplates w/ 1" rod through (e) urlin _ � ® 1 g p m �� CA) --Adjust spacing of cripple studs to provide room for holdowns �D \ , �` C)-' (----F) IP , isT) ---) :: 6'24 ..\\\ . r 62�• f7 3 24 52 zkr4P24-'% .1\ A.: 2 K4(z4-"°ice \� II I ,e,, , 0 ; .,,„„_, ,,, --- , 4 . 461 \O.\ \qt \ 10 \ ... \\.... .s .... IN 10 .... -410 I 10 - - ip ., 9;1 —Ja!O DEL• vJt II Q 1I 5,10e10 In 1 \, Mk a 0�J fir! n3 P9 I5EL40 W f '1 I I ) e '; P 3KEYNOTES /a4,--N —^ , Q 1 e1 N C It C 1 1 �, N 1 N 1 w3 1( 0 I ` �r 5 41\ k C 6 a.4, , I © I PIO8ELow ANIO 41, , Re-nail plywood blue shaded area with N— ) B4 J R5 I eco w _ II �7 13a /g9 i 6Pt3 2O x2" nil t r n ilin t 2" -4043) j a• ft a 2 / _ /3 4 - s \ P4I 38d a s o educe edge a g o o.c. - >�i o,4, 17 _ e. 1-(L K'BS) �� I a3 _ Io lip E34 p:Oft osT -to FZ i35 ® (?,� 51 M. iek 87\) 69 e O.►•1. B 0 Re-nail plywood green-shaded area with P 4 P 6 GO P 6, 5.11 Nil. . P Co '•" P 44, P 8 P ¢ N 8dx2" nails to reduce edge nailing to 3" o.c. I_ _ _ f 6 7 0 _ I ME4$4. . I —` Add 4x6 blocking between (e) purlins as / " I 12ono# 1 o - - _ I © shown--nail w/ 16d nails through plywood 51 I "1 @ P 4 P P �' �-' i- - - --�-1,-P g -_= - p 4 - giP—, g pY 1 #31 I � I © . © t and decking into blocking at 4" o.c N It( 4 ) r0 (( 4 ) r • 4 NI 4 ro 6C > ( 4 ) Q Remove one bay of clearstory window 4 P • P Go P� 6, P 7 -'1 P a - �D' P 4 , 0 C 4 > each end of sawtooth wall and mfill with 5z . � I - o M GA. 13 v UNIT I - ----- - - ---. 13 d ,,it ?YP. 2x studs--sheath bay with 15/32" plywood ��.k,� J l0 x nailed with 8d at 3" o.c. --See detail 4&5/S2. 1 1 n 4 P Coflikmp. P P • P. !--- — --��s- ilk_ _ ,�4 ; er If/ or 1r/ _ � air ifili €3)See detail 6/S2. 1 for connection between al 11 C4 el c as IV c.7) 9 r,--.-,-,, • m y "- G�Ag. -11 51M ..-410 r ,, o C © �' h4 a �32 /33 N� /3 4 a r r35 4 P4 blocking beams at hip beam \LD it, _ - _ ,,, -- 'p - ,, { - - >�No - G3 G4 G5ite 'L4 0.0• cv i.t. 5 6 N N N N �, N I� P>- IL/ See detail 7/52. 1 for connection between 5z , _ P9 mow �1' 1 1 q 'C� �'' C C0 — P 10 gE Low - i ER�!.► blockin beam and end of wall/beam run �, ,� ,�,� P:®' .--� _ �_ C 3 g , _ _ _ -� __ — r3 3 m • Go p'�} ___ zX 4�zSc"4I I }c / D z u��24"% / d, -4 x!o To OM, 5.2 3 �, 2 �- �r►EQorz GONNt 6 3 /SI /51 '� iMPloNJ HI4Uc 5,125 �1NcrR, e D2 •!o AT BEAM �•23 4ELOW To GoL, 12 / &A IM Q 0 . 4,40 `\ D .. s•I �0, `U® 0 T' m /A io Gold m 0 W7 4'jc) NO-TES : �!� ® c�j► C� ,o N N, C� �j/ C� 2 1) PECKING -TO DE 2 x -r c G DEG KINC.. - SEE sPE�s. Fog. GRp•OE. 6 . 2 5PAr-1 Go�-1, I NJ Uou A ( N G s L - UP, AIL AT E.A ►-1 Sup(�oRT W/ 1 . 10,4 FADE NAIL q I I62c1 151.IN17 NAIL , "3.) RooF SHEATHING To BE /Cr a- D% p L.-f woe,p , M►1.1• I.D. INaDEX 24/0 NAIL w/ 8d . co'' SI.IPPoRTEO EDGES , bd 2" 1N C 1w1 FIELD 4 8 d d. 41/�, " o -rep a W S .C. oF .51-leAR ALL , ___ _ . . ..__ . .... __ _._ . .--- - _ - 5EE Da-rA1L CJ S FR sp a L. N NGe. INS E1A• A1LI "Q�N.� F .I.5O To DacK o OOD @ USE sct sNazr �.4lL.S t W•131.1 xZ°(4) •,' ROOF FRAMING PLAN __ _ N . , y8" ! I'-a" Page1138 .., _ . _ , ,. _ .,. ,_, , . NN S5 c,_ i 1 /l/A/C 3/4'' FILLER x Co �x /2" ��N EA 5/OE TO TJ/ w/ { + , r 8 - 8d A/A/L S \•� %/ PWn Enc;E /VA/L//k... 1 (� 1 i TYR 'SR/CK SUPPORT / u COG. TO I3M i ( iSEE IaETA/L /2/S7 �x24Ao��k RECESS Coax c3"x 3/4" L. x l- o`r w FLANGE 1 " " 5., Q { B nL/l'YC7O L� „ mi ro N.4/L.ER SALT, Z- 3/4 5T/FF-E/i/ER5 X 7 Q SIZE' TO AAATCH I f • l/ ' C% I /30LTS ) 4"o.c. YY/ 3/4"g6 SMOOTH rS N/AGG, 1. YPC,QI T__ADD_3• X 6 -a' Ll Ga' D•G. A 3!o RIJgS x THICKNESS SEE FR,t�I C, _ ' 7 I I :! ' PGAN \ t/g �/ 5/8 a PL yliyO�JL� — CO in L IA PALM 6,0NrJEaTio,•1, 2'S" I` I �.. . / 0'-' '' ' (.*6 . . ' T.._rA•&.e) --N.\ ...._ .5-_-_-..- > •. , ,• • , / / I. ,,,__,,, , , \ , , • • .\1,./' v _ STUD WALL ABO`JE \ g ___ ',4- i 7\ _'-'• 'i .. , 1 - ? 14-I (I) 315 V8<RE Z1RM = - 3/8 AROu,Vn m I STL, T3/t.f. SEE FRt�f4 �.. PG AAI. �'--r�� 1� I --cc) IU• �" Top, O j - \ t TJ1/45 oR 2x /2, SEE i + 11 + ; ,�„� O� i cat/T TOP YYALL . , ! PR/1,/L; PLAN. �}�.- --� �- P r „ , t �..� Ci�4RS D //ts 2 /,l ► \ 3 /Z X �2 rX /4 l �� • • �� 3nV - I\ �,SAVVN JO/5T tw/ S/MP50/�! 'C �' ' s/i(o is ��„ NOOKl� -O oC7 �; , i- 4. L /3 5ER/ES H.4NCEfZ ,O 1. ---� ... ' N. /1/ELCEL, TO /3E444 ,, _ ( ..5*,‹ 3 1 COPE TOP FL A/V E of `rr r 1 ! /e"± a / \ - ,, ,� u 2- 7 x /4 x I-O SIDE* it s wl \_ Iw .d� cv CnRltlEl< Z�!n" ',, STEEL. d3A.l. 5E� FR/� l CQA/,CI 4•R/D 7 •r-Ve t /%2 / r / 3 x 2� x /4 L x P-8 yv/ . ( C3 - 3/4 '0 Aa, /3's . / T 1 rs /�GA,c./ FOR S/ZE. 4/2 4�2 I 1�2 1- %4 x 3 G�9C, j3nLT „ ,, 5TL R/•/ SEE FLAN —�— — i 0 i 3' ,� / „ /,vrn PLR Jn/sT //2 .s . /% wE� STIFFE/VE/� �` � ire <2 CL R r'-I/2 2 - 4 x x 3 --ell), /! N tr r N ''C ,f a w/ r; - ► '" 0 /1' ,C3'5. : 1.., ! I 2 - /2" 6 CROG/MD FL R /3/s" _ 5 ✓O! w S F�5 2 x Z x /4 L w/ 4 Z V N ` "2 i L/PP L EVE ( - Ti4U5 5 T /M ON M.Q EA Ern 3/¢ � �4_ �8 x 3 STIFFENERS � � ��' q4 �p ER G FOR) ST/FF �- �� C� AL/C,A! OI'E� TUQE � N �t I /345/4 JST Al i../c&R O o.C. WALLS r3EGO1�V 1r2-) ° - I Co" TC> OF F/RST TJ/ 4S EWERS x 3 /1 E,4 S/DE 5°n,c, WELLED TD -STG C3Ef!/s-/, , BASE l x Co WInE I r COL. 1 • ' � /'-q" TO e OF FIRST Ex 1ST i STEEL COG - SEE 5C/-/En, ~-� —8'/x %2 'x i ` o r w/ 4 3/4''� /Lf 8 C3EAA./ 4,f!�;E I ,' it__ • i ,,iI STEEG COG L/MJV `�i�+ SEE SCHEG7G./L E Q r V . 411 II) 5 - (40 Wtill (;)74 / - S 7 4, S7'"G COG, 04,/ BACK O� d, : Z / FACE OF WALL T`/r? r 7/4" gl¢lt / j3 /CfC G r R CO , 274 `'-- g LONG WALL � COL.. 0 8 ----- f=.�1LlN�', V) Ci) ,,,----_4.____- Y - —_______ -1"caIIC, 5L�913 , SEE T//!n > 3 '`. , \sEEAcH, -_-!_.� __1_—°__.-r,,,_� QF STL COG. c 6fi l-G,y/v - ` _— ` . _ CD I I I 3x 8 I? T RC-Are:- w '/z''# 16d at 6" o.c. 16d at 6" o.c. F� .EXTE/U£J Ex TOP PLATEf f/ 11.1.111111.11111 4//aa-r-oti/r3 EtiJG7 LPG WALL I ! I I15"L /3RN /� w 2 - q'r x A.t3 ✓J 4e /o,c, l�4 + 3 (- 4 CUT* To F/T OVER A,VC,LES, 1 I /6 ,4 /3 0 9 'roc / , 3 " , SEE l/ S7- FOR Nfll_lNC, , „ YPCREE7" I ! y/4 5/8 ' !-�L`//'i/ODG) l/2 4-'/PCFE L-T 111111 I jcolai rnimmoi 1 (--1,-SR/C,K SUPORT, SEC / I_ rive 5/8" / GY1110Oq I —_i r� nET.4/L /2/37 I 1` /72 G%�CRE�7` _ 5/8" F'LYvvClOr? I I �U L \'/A , I I tni-t t , - . • \ �1 z _ _, i I ��j i f �1 1Omul.1) 4t a / ( I I I - — �� + i BoTT. OF EASE II V ` �; o S 1 ( + j ` /lnd(i) 3 o.c,''/ �,/'Wn ELOCE /VA/L/NC, I I t ...—zi cc.....3 II, +.'-z II —4 + ,' " + G ou II �� i I �� -Zx t3�9R//V R/arC&O/'J II ' r ' . • ___ >,.4 __ — PA f --4- 0 5 71E5 Q. 4''o.c, IT f:_�. �` �,�, . tI t GENTEREp ur.Ic�ER a,�„ (� TRusS J2/S7 �J COG _ U55 JST AV 13LKC, PANEL �! J/f45 JOISTyv/ - latitilirillialni— < II If G//VE. F'400/2 ✓D/5T, SCE / `LK4. /. .4/,lEL, -----J ›.4 r:4 II I TRUSS JOIST w/5//NP. „ a 5 PLA/VS, = T3 - - SE SCHEC3ULE , Fill4 rdT /L / 5 Co G ./p L/T5 //V TOP G'jc /l SEE L7ETA/G l/5 7 FOR FOR ADO //V O, ti1.9C>E Rc.)M 3 x 3 k /4 L 5, /NV TO 30TT0/N of �/O/5T w .8R/Ck' LEL7CE-SU1 PG7RT I I ( ST L 131.1 C G7/il CQG UM/V 5 C7 N L Y, PG. TE L� SHEAR WALL 5 = x Co 1!� a,G, �` ,� , u 1 III �CO/VC /3. 45EME/../T W 1 N' SET TOP of .4,VGLc LE-/,5V �,.�New plywood/OSB r new LVL SB new LVL FLu5h' w 4 /PCREET fI kvALL , SEE \ I I) a• ,, ,„ a sheathing s blocking blocking TcJF'P/'�`=� ' l" yr—l-1M �,,�.__ _ w \ e„ /e x 3'x lS%4/` Iv4 5 A-,-ES qF COL., • REVISIONS simpson LTP4 Simpson LTP4 s—0—,NORTH , - - at 32" o.c. at 32" o.c. 2 \ e : 7 - 8 5A 1Q - 02E 757 S7 57 �5741) 4 • 3 ,t '4 Gal, DATE 5-'18•62 11— FOR SHEAR WALL 4i A: Ci `s >" - ,, 1 - a--\/` - ' • SEE SC/1EL4L/LE ,-------�� - I rGaL. B 1D` JOB NO. _,�- r� *4 NOOKS '- I I DRAWN -,?----,- APPROVED • _/ -Z x Co 0 /lo /'o, c, . - TOP OF GO r4G. 1/�},V i✓ WALL d .� ,i +r FOR T5 GoL. - SEE Z r 1/1 f - x 8 �'8 Scr1 EDu LE - - 433/4"w/OE 5TEAl' VAG/. - FOR SHE✓4R YY.4L L. Fy A,8 5, I cl - \7� *"" �� SEE SCNEnG-/LE , I U /x 3 STR/P/0/41 3X4 P r- nC.�TE vv��¢ �X 2x Go SOUL, SGOCK/14 - G /2//A.L3. @ 3210.c./ . FLAT g 140 o.c, FOR l d 14V ; ; I I 3/tCoV Q Q /4 47 M/tit; c�Ac.K FROA.-t _ 2 , t Win tti I`/2 "4-Y/oCREET , (--- .5/8" //2 i,�YPCx?EET W.4LL. F/T T/GHT i3rW/-J I , • Jo/s r5j ' — — — - — --� ' 1 I 5/8" !�L Yyvonn nLYt-YocoL7 , ,,��..,, • ! = _ _— _ I•- ja � 3_3/4"� x 2 4'' P�L p�K �\.. -11 - �\. . - . . �—±—'0 15o1.-T5 LAP5 2`' W/' \\�' �. I r �, • �� I ��, ' i- i �% I, �I ,f d ��' f QLA-1'E CBEtJD Top A - •IL ( i �� r� •od 1 I �1 L.S11 I I I 6o1..T Dowel) `I. 11I ! -#4 HOOKS f I I I N` �� — — I 7— 1 S II I ( I �, •—�- 1i 1 - 1 GgX 13.75 v.i/2- 1' $5" -� 1 , s, l "Zio. . L'! ��; A — ST I F F E BIER 5 I t �/,j`(.°— LOOR JD/ST, SEE I-�G4N `,/ \---SAillx./ Fr A 1 '000,2 Jq/5T yv Ai�ViV L ST' _ IG/ l 2- /g,t} 2, 5"f1PFE'r1CiZ. fi?-'S �F ` ( - SERIES h//VC,fZS/ P �' Elsarl SIDE o -- S/,L!/'�S nN L r3 SER/ES F BEAM 44 Zx62 504/L? ,3c./; '-r Fl�4T ��'t-/l,'Ek'• /4-40OT JO/5T - SEA ALIG1JEl7 W/ GpLuMN1 �T T/��'T/ 8 4 U �JO S T�E S N..,,. �R ti.9 IoG A/� -I I. A 1 O v E (v) ' Imin / �4`� - - C"C7/VC EASE/Nti/T /�///LL 111104 31c4 P,T PG.�/TE Yv 3 1 SEE L7ETA/L- /�SCo wrAcEoF- - ? <ce, Got-. P�av�DE A�1GLE SAME Aid � '� x /2/',.4.L3 's @ 32 "o. 0. - -* SEE L,ET.4/G /3, 157 FOR w��•t_ 1_ ,_�►� R.EQ ulR EO FoR- Jpt-sT ' LL# /� flnL7. //vF'nR/VI,4 �N, ,. . ---- Ann,EE Di�E./Foe�,e-�,4T ATTAcNMENT'a. C6e 4 @ /8 0.c E.N. tt-;::":: ,, �,8ASEAdEAJT YV.4L L. , SEE \`, -6-1 N�r�`Sf/ . `� 0E 4 //5 D --- ti�6R454�' 1, 1(7 . i ON Jr -7 7 Jc 7 C77) CJ" � Ova<r��. �9^0 c,� A. DRAWING NO. • - - .. 7 13/1 OF *1 _— P• ag�fi39' -- - :,_ — S6 -TT TO W AT L5x3x1/4"xO'-8" ANGLE BLOCKING ION AFTERNE FIRST2X (3)FL W/ (2) 3/4"� / • BAYS FROM WALL CMSTC STRAP PER CMSTC STRAP PER PLAN THRU-BOLTS AT 5" O.C. NEW 3 "x14" LVL BLOCKING PLAN STARTING AT STARTING AT END OF WALL 3/4"0 ROD BETWEEN NEW AND Preliminary END OF WALL FIRST (3) BAYS FROM WALL NEW 3 4"x14" LVL BLOCKING n - I FIRST (5) BAYS FROM WALL v EXISTING ANGLE W/ 1/4"x2" WELDS Not for V V TRANSITION TO NEW 2X FLAT (E) W12 BEAM cr��, BLOCKING AFTER FIRST (5) s 9 " Construction BAYS FROM WALL vy "��,- 57-4 CC7L. , 5€E 5CHa. ---�r I, + j ! _;f_, (F4R WO COG. .�1 C30wu. i Q E ' T44& NQ, hl M psWrV 1 I [,... . -I—— — E TD r3n.1 5E C7 ]- �� �� ADD 3/4"� STUDS TO I 1 8aaCr< 5(11p.0�T nrvEE: 7171 R BOTTOM OF (E) BEAM I R �'' ' = oE7- , 1 y - NTO ALLOW FOR 4x ! . I0_I_..).16. V SEE --(3 PAIRED HDU5 HOLDOWNS I NAILER AT TOP OF I ram, __ f I _� „ + NEW WALL `jw.-I H �� L1 _ WITH 5 8 RODS AS SHOWN-- 1---1 V m USE ROD COUPLERS AS NECESSARY TO + _ INSTALL RODS THROUGH 1" DIA HOLES . . . . . NEW WALL PER PLAN cdo ,d s rr K w IN JOISTS - - ' S rZ. a�7 , 5-- &L.,4A1 H / 5'-6" y - �. Fae r3aa ra roc. ca�+U, O -INSTALL 2x12 BLOCKING AGAINST EXTEND STRAPS FULL �P !' ,-=_ SEE En4IL 81/57 [1- RIM BOARD TO PROVIDE DOUBLE 2X LENGTH OF NEW WALL l'i/ - �� (2) PAIRED HDU5 HOLDOWNS AT HOEDOWNSAi((2) SIMPSON CMST12 W/ (33) NAILS PER ` 4 . w WITH 5 8 RODS AS SHOWN-- 1 I I / W/ NAILS IN ROUND STRAP TO BLOCKING i 1 USE ROD COUPLERS AS NECESSARY TO -INSTALL 2x12 BLOCKING AGAINST n '��3 INSTALL RODS THROUGH 1" DIA HOLES RIM BOARD TO PROVIDE DOUBLE 2X HOLES TO (E) GLB 4x12 BLOCKING AT v - " �" ° rc e.. - '. • t� e i L IN JOISTS AT HOLDOWNS STRAP LOCATION z4..�.4rc . '4 0 4"o-c., M.W. ____ r,yinuzf. C7 (E) GLB HEADER BEAM To J57` rs .,/r,rc,, - _,I- z Alornrr 4 p-OR JOI57-5; PRoviDa AwGLE 7-0 . PPaR'7 0 ADD 3/4"0 STUDS TO Jars-r PSR veir,a.IL .x./ ./ p$ 5 (E) HSS COLUMN TO jaEa'v. Ex c..a.PT 6T ra Lu M IQ a'wO m PRaV IDE G. S x3r 54, x i'-a" CS' LE. ALLOW FOR 4x NAILER `r ERTI - .L.L_. Op) w/ V!4'' LAG INITO N P�O7T• OF ALL- FG61IZ '7JY'x, c, rJF 5ruo5 / wc5:1)3 i- rn C 1 1 1 1 1 FF.d l .J w DAG CO\ \ . GID 9 . 5 2\ D FL00 LEVEL0 R AG CO\ \ . GRID 2- C. 5 2\ D FLOO LEVEL 3 DAG CO\ \ . GID 2- A. 5 2\ D FL00� LEVEL PRELIMINARY PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0" 1/2" = 1'-0" S2. 1/2" = 1'-0" ONLY-NOT FOR ' CONSTRUCTION SHALL VERI ADD NEW STRAP W/ (4) COCTO AND ACONFIRM EXIST NGFY -(E) STRAP W/ BOLTS PAIRED HDU PER PLAN 3/4"0 BOLTS TO TOP PLATE PAIRED HDU PER PLAN CONDITIONS SHOWN OR AND (4) 3/4"0x5" LAG IMPLIED ON DRAWINGS PRIOR SCREWS TO SLOPED BEAM IINSTALL NEW 2x FLAT BLOCK TO START OF WORK. NOTIFY 4 4 4 4 I1111111 l U11UU11 4 4 4 4 llllllll l 1111111111 ..s, � ,� TO UNDERSIDE OF TOP PLATES A/E OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. -1 ' ' ' gME- ` DRILL MAX 1.25"0 HOLE -W/ (8) 1/4"0x3 SDS SCREWS i " 'C -7t"' THROUGH FOR BEAMSK ANDEWED STEEL ROD TO ALLOW FOR SKEWED ROD TO BE AT 1:12 MAX SLOPE PAIRED HDU PER PLAN < KNIFEPLATE (E) 4x10 HEADER (E) 4x10 HEADEI . (E) 4x10 HEADER (E) 4x10 HEADER > Illlllllll a- : 111/111111 llllllll) __= llllllllll PLAN VIEWf -- F, P� WINDOW INFILL PER PLAN WINDOW INFILL PER PLAN L HDU8 ON POST W/ HDU8 ON POST W/ U ARCHITECTURE •7/8 0 THRU-BOLT THRU 7/8 THRU-BOLT THRU PAIRED HDU8 GIRDER BEAM GIRDER BEAM DOUBLE HDU4 EACH SIDE OF ENGINEERING PLANNING HIP BEAM 1 1.1111" INTERIORS 1141““1 “1 “1 - 0. / +I+1 15895 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 P O R T L A N D, OREGON 9 7 2 2 4 PAIRED HDU PER PLAN TEL : 503 . 226 . 1285 �I 4x BLOCKING F A X : 5 0 3 . 2 2 6 . 1 6 7 0 PER PLAN WWW . CIDAINC . COM -HIP BEAM _/\- 7 r (E) GLB GIRDER (E) GLB GIRDER + + + + (E) STRAPPING Z -AT LOW ROOF \ "x3"x3" WASHER ON 111"x3"x3" WASHER ON O LEVEL •BOTTOM OF BEAM BOTTOM OF BEAM Q J 4 WI \ SOW I \ FILL AT SAWTOOTH GIDS 68c7 WI \ SOW I \ FILL AT SAWTOOTH GIDS 3, 4, & 5 DRAG CO\ \ ECTIO\ AT HIP 3EAV - 00F LEVEL n DRAG CO\ \ . AT E\ D OF WALL- GOOF LEVEL u g S2. 1/2" = 1'-O" S 2.' 1/2" = 1'-O" S2. 1/2" = 1'-O" �2.J 1/2" = 1'-0" al N O z H z w V 0 I— LJJ (x) L LJ cL LJJ 0 Q z D 0 O a = LJJ 0 171- o 0 �D (1) W o 0 LLI w Q• VIQ 0 o W ig M ma r z X U LJJ 3 ro v ao E _ N Q U v u FRAMING DETAILS 0 ro D J ap 3 o 52 . 1 0 CIDA#: 240019.01 018 A ro Page 1 140 02024 CIDA,P.C./CIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ATTACHMENT 4 Facility History of the Lake Oswego Public Library (LOPL), 1974-Present • In 1974, Lake Oswego voters approved a bond measure to rebuild on the site of the 12- year-old 6,920 square foot library facility. The City population was 19,000 residents. • A 35,000 square foot facility was planned but the appropriateness of that large a facility was questioned by neighbors who initiated a series of legal challenges. As a compromise, a 30,000 square foot facility was planned; however, this was denied by the Development Review Board due to inadequate parking per the Parking Standard. • In 1983, the resulting 27,100 square foot current Library facility opened. City population had grown to 22,715. • By 1988, the Council-approved Library Growth Task Force recognized that LOPL had reached maximum capacity for its building size. Recommendations were made for a new Main Library and two branch libraries. City population had reached 27,048. • In 1992, the final report of the Branch Library Site, Utilization and Design Committee recommended a 42,000 square foot main library or the addition of a 5,000 square foot branch library. • In 1994, The Oregonian reported that Lake Oswego Library was already "near its capacity to function well" after only 10 years. City population had reached 32,940. • In 1996, the Library Building Program Report from Professional Library Consultants, P.A., recommended a new library space of 46,248 square feet. • In 2006, the Independent Study of the Clackamas County Library System Facilities Assessment recommended the replacement of the current building with a 64,854 square feet facility, because of its high level of use. That same year, BOORA Architects determined that a 65,581 square foot main facility, or a 48,133 square foot sister Library would be necessary to meet standards and guidelines for current and future service populations. • In 2008, SERA Architects recommended a 66,000 square foot facility. City population had reached 36,590. • In 2012, the City Council passed a resolution to place a $14 million general obligation bond measure on the November 2012 ballot, which would have funded a portion of a new library building project. The proposal was for a new facility of approximately 60,000 square feet as part of the Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency's North Anchor project at First Street and B Avenue in downtown Lake Oswego. On November 5, 2012, bond measure 3- 405 failed. • In 2021, Community Survey results again showed that City residents identified library facilities as needing attention. In this statistically valid survey, 69% of respondents were "very supportive" or "somewhat supportive" of expanding LOPL amenities, services, and facilities in the future. • In 2022, Council set a goal to "Begin a process to address the long-term facilities needs of the Lake Oswego Public Library." In response, library staff worked with the Library Advisory Board to propose an inclusive public engagement process that Council approved in Dec 2022. • In 2023, the City conducted a Library Visioning process which again recognized that the current library facility is significantly undersized for Lake Oswego's needs. Furthermore, visioning feedback identified many accessibility issues with the current facility, and highlighted the community's top priorities for modern library amenities and services that should be added in the future. City population reached 41,396. • In 2024, CIDA Architects calculated that a 77,400 square foot library facility would be appropriate for Lake Oswego's population size. ATTACHMENT 5 I i - - ,r. -4 :. • � ' it 4 2.2 Public Library Facility Information Date of Construction Building Size Current Use Hours of Operation Existing Conditions Assessment Building Description Summary of General Building Conditions Consultant Reports Structural Mechanical Electrical Plumbing Roof Environmental Existing Building Deficiencies Cost Forecast Space Program Assessment Summary of Program Deficiencies and Future Needs Existing Program Deficiencies Future Space Program Requirements Parking 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT FACILITY INFORMATION Date of Construction k r 1983 i" Building Size i —t411i, , 27,738 SF Current Use s•R.• - ;L- The Lake Oswego Library, located in the First Addition Neighborhood, provides ::: .st, "te a.: . i . , - library services,children's library services,computer center,meeting rooms and .i 1 ` L , r P. common areas for public gatherings and presentations. Rtt , .� Hours of Operation I. ♦ c '' The Library is open year round,seven days a week. Monday Thursday 10:00 AM v4.. . :'1• to 9:00 PM, Friday and Saturday 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM,and Sundays 1:00 PM to 6:00 PM. EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT „4,....... II* Building Description Ilt--------- ---- 1 r'.: Construction _ Two story with partial basement.Steel and wood frame construction.Slab on - grade at basement and south half of the first floor.Concrete stem walls at lower levels to grade,wood frame walls above.Gyp-crete subflooring over plywood deck at framed floors. Exposed glu-lam beam framing and T&G wood deck ceiling/ roof assembly. , , ',. `••• .' Exterior Design/ Materials -.. rt r5` Cedar drop siding with cedar trim and fascias.Composition shingle roofing *4 ,/$ at perimeter sloped roof,metal panel roofing at clerestory roofs and asphalt '}> r built-up-roofing at flat roof areas. Entry doors are equipped with automatic door controls. Interior Design/ Materials • Gypsum board walls and ceilings with wood slat feature ceilings and trim. Daylighting is provided by perimeter windows and a series of saw-tooth clerestories. Large floor openings provide daylight to the first floor. 1r ; ,,�.� . ,,,._, Zoning l It � , , PF-Public Functions Zone II 1"' Occupancy Designation F : !!! A3-Assembly Special Requirements `Essential Facility'for use as an Emergency Shelter 32 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Summary of General Building Conditions The Library building appears to be well maintained but many systems are outdated and in need of upgrading or replacement.There is also a need for additional program and support spaces that cannot be accommodated on site. Structural Consultant Report- KPFF Building Description The library was built in 1982 and design was most likely based upon the requirements of the 1982 Uniform Building Code as amended by the State of Oregon. The structural drawings were made available for our review and do reference the UBC but the year of the code used for design was not noted. The library is two stories over a partial basement on the north half of the building and two stories above finished grade at the south half of the building. The roof is wood framed with glulam girders,glulam purlins,and 2x tongue and groove decking. Wood members for the roof are exposed and appear to be in good condition with no obvious signs of distress. The upper level framing consists of wide flange beam girders with wood joists overlaid with plywood sheathing. The ground level is a slab on grade at the south half of the building. The north half of the building is framed with wide flange girders, wood joists and overlaid with gyperete over plywood sheathing. Current Condition A walk through of the building did not show any obvious signs of structural damage or distress and the building appeared to be in good condition. There were some signs of water damage from the roof leaking in the past which have been addressed according to the facilities manager. Additionally leaking has been noted to occur seasonally against the magazine racks in the Southwest side of the building. This leaking occurs on the slab on grade and damage to the structure cannot be determined but seems unlikely. Seismic Resisting Lateral System It is noted on the drawings that the building was designed for Seismic Zone II. The seismic zone for the Lake Oswego area was increased to Zone III in 1991 which resulted in increased seismic design forces. Current code is based upon seismic site specific considerations. Based upon a cursory review,the current code design seismic forces are expected to be twice what the building was originally designed for. Recommendations While the building appears to be adequate for the code it was designed to,we expect the building is in need of a seismic hazards investigation and a seismic upgrade. The seismic study would give specific improvements required for the building which would probably include additional plywood sheathing,the addition of holdowns to the ends of shear walls,additional steel hardware at collector connections and additional framing for the transfer of forces from the diaphragm to the shear walls.Some footings may also need to be enlarged. 5 E RA LAKE OSWEGO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SPACE PLANNING ANALYSIS 33 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Plumbing Consultant Report- PAE Water and Plumbing Systems Description: •Domestic Hot Water: The domestic hot water is produced by 40-gallon gas water heater located on the lower level. •Sanitary Sewer: The building main waste system is gravity to the street, however,there is a sewage ejector in the floor of the basement to handle the basement toilets. •Fixtures: Plumbing fixtures are vintage -tank type water closets and urinals with flush valves. General Condition: •The domestic water piping is copper pipe and is in good shape. •Problems with water closets in the children's basement area have been reported. The water pressure is reported to be 40 psig. This is at the lower level of acceptability. Tank type water closets do not depend on pressure to flush, but lower pressure will slow the fill rate. The problem may be related to the type of water closet. Newer water closets,such as American Standard Champion series, have a better ability to remove effluent. •The storm drain and sanitary sewer piping systems appear to be in working condition, with no known problems. The sewage ejector in the basement was recently refurbished. •Plumbing fixtures appear to be fully functional in good shape. Code Issues: The plumbing fixtures do not meet current low water flow re- quirements. Fire Protection Systems Description:The building has a wet sprinkler system. General Condition: Good. Code Issues: None noted. (HVAC) Heating,Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Consultant Report- PAE Building Systems Description: •The building is served by three units. A new Carrier 48HGE028 unit on the roof with DX cooling serves the upper level. Two older units are located in a mechanical room on the main level. One serves the main level (Carrier 50BYN000085),the other(Carrier 40REM008) is ducted down to the children's area in the basement. The main floor unit has a ducted condenser unit in the room while the other unit is a standard split 34 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT system with a condensing unit outside. •Heat is produced by a vintage Weil McLean water boiler. •Roof mounted exhaust fans are used to exhaust toilet rooms. •The controls for the new rooftop unit are Honeywell electric,the lower floor units are Robertshaw pneumatic. General Condition: •The new unit on the roof is in excellent condition. The air handler serving the main floor in the mechanical room has a bad compressor. Both older units are nearing the end of their normal expected service life and neither has the higher efficiency rating of today's air handlers. Rather than repair the unit, both should be replaced. •The boiler is rusted out and needs to be replaced. •The controls should be replaced by an electronic system with the ability to monitor off-site. Code Issues: Current ventilation standards may not be met with these systems. Electrical Constultant Report- PAE Power System Description: •Service: Electrical power service is provided by the serving utility. Service enters into the building underground to the main distribution panel (MDP) at the basement level. •Distribution - 208V: Power distribution is provided by at 208Y/120V. A 1200 amp Square-D I-Line is located in the basement electrical room with feeds to one branch panelboard at the basement level,two branch panelboards at the 1st level,two branch panelboards at the 2od level and a roof top air handler unit.The MDP does not have a main breaker and is using the 6 main breaker rule and is at capacity. Branch panelboards are located in the basement electrical room and flush mount on the upper levels. General Condition: •Service:The service feeds are the responsibility of the utility which ends at the basement level CT enclosure which is an integral part of the MDP. No issues noted. •Distribution - 208V:The electrical equipment is all original,same vintage as the building and is in good condition and new breakers are readily available.The MDP has 6 feeder breakers in use to feed the branch panelboards and AHU;the MDP is not allowed per the National Electric Code (NEC)to have any additional breakers added. The branch panelboards all have the maximum quantity of breakers installed and in use, except for one at level 2, which is planned to be used in the immediate future for new computer stations. The building is using copper conductors with THHN insulation throughout, no issues. 5 E RA LAKE OSWEGO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SPACE PLANNING ANALYSIS 35 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT •Recommendations: branch circuit capacity could be added by sub-feeding new branch panelboards from the existing panelboards. Ceiling spaces have limited access,via the light fixtures,for routing new circuit wiring. Code Issues: •Service: none. •Distribution 208V: None. Power System - Emergency Description: •Emergency Source: The building uses a diesel engine generator set located in a dedicated room on level 1,west side.The fuel tank is exterior, underground.There is one automatic transfer switch (ATS) located in the basement electrical room,which feeds the branch panelboard `E' located on level 1. General Condition: •Source: diesel generator appears to be regularly tested, maintained and in good condition. •Distribution: branch panelboard `E' and ATS are in good condition, branch panelboard is at full breaker capacity. Code Issues: •Source: None. •Distribution: Branch wiring appears to be per code. Lighting System Description: •Luminaire/Source-Exterior: Spacing looks appropriate for uniform coverage of the areas. Mounted to building exterior and parking lot. •Luminaire/Source-Interior: Interior illumination is provided with a variety of luminaire types,the most common being a recessed 2x2 troffer with a parabolic lens. Most of the interior lighting uses a fluorescent lamp source using T8 or compact type lamp;these appear to be retrofitted into the original fixtures. Electronic ballasts were most likely added during the retrofit. •Exit/Path of Egress: Selected lights have been connected to the generator power source. Spacing and placement of the luminaries to provide the required one(1)foot c and le(FC) illumination for Path of Egress(POE) is not known. •Control: A building lighting control timeclock system was not observed. Interior spaces have wall switch control, most single level control. No occupancy sensors. General Condition: •Luminaire/Source-Exterior: Luminaires appear in good condition. 36 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Fittings and bases complete. •Luminaire/Source-Interior: Luminaires in good condition, use of a parabolic lens is not the best light distribution for a book stack environment. •Exit/Path of Egress: Luminaires condition same as interior. Code Issues: •Luminaire/Source- Interior: Automatic timeclock lighting control should be provided to meet Oregon energy code for buildings greater than 5000 sq/ft. •Exit/Path of Egress:futher analysis is needed to determine if coverage meets code. Signal Systems Description: •Fire Alarm: The fire alarm system is a Silent Knight addressable system 5808 panel. System was upgraded approximately 2 years ago. Initiating devices consist of manual pull stations(corridors, exits),smoke detectors (ceiling mounted, corridors, mechanical spaces). Notification consists of strobes bell/strobes in corridors and general public spaces. •Telcom: Telcom rack is located overhead in the storage area, level 1 west side of building. General Condition: •Fire Alarm: Fire Alarm system is newer and in good condition, coverage of smoke detection and annunciation devices appears adequate. •Telcom:System coverage appears adequate. Cabling is routed open and in cable tray and appears to be plenum rated and neatly organized.The overhead rack system does limit accessibility for maintenance, requiring work to be preformed from a ladder. Code Issues: •Fire Alarm: There is not a remote annuncator located at the building entry point for fireman use. Per NFPA 72 "annunciation means shall be readily accessible to responding personal" •Telecom: Telecom cables were observed to be routed in and above the lighting fixtures on level 2;while this is not a code issue,the cables could be in contact with lamps.The cables should be restrained above the lights with a clip or raceway. 5 E RA LAKE OSWEGO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SPACE PLANNING ANALYSIS 37 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Roofing Consultant Report LIBRARY Area C • • « �I _ i Area B Area A I - ° -s.- 1• ., 16. _ st. • rt f b ' _a ZirrOTilE ROOF AREAS: A B C D BUILDING USE: Library Library Library Deck GENERAL ROOF Plywood sheathing Plywood Sheathing Plywood Sheathing Galvanized steel STRUCTURE: pan. ROOF SYSTEM TYPE: Laminated Asphalt BUR Hybrid metal roof Metal Pan Fiberglass Asphalt membrane system manufactured Shingles by R-Mer Lite NOTES: The asphalt The asphalt BUR The metal panel roof Difficult to access shingles were membrane is system will require a when failures recently installed performing well and is high level of occur. Many and are now showing signs of maintenance as the flashings are failing performing well. aging. roof system ages. that incorporate into the exterior walls. ESTIMATED LIFE 25-30 years 5-8 years 5-8 years 5-8 years REMAINING: NEXT ACTION: Maintain Maintain Maintain Maintain 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT PHOTO DOCUMENTATION & OBSERVATIONS f.' t om1.02 _ �--�_ -F'� t% -..„., ` i _. .,:- . ._ ,L.T -^sue' Area A: Asphalt shingles are installed around the Photo of upper roof edge, small standing seam metal /ii ,\ i‘il .n,,, 7,-...„, perimeter of the upper roof area as well as some roof areas and one lower asphalt shingle roof area. small lower bump-out roof areas. 1.03 1ii, .04 I i .. . zi �1 4 iiiiii.. , ‘,„ ,..,_ ..._, .. ... ,,.....L .,..... _ „, I.. Area B: Asphalt BUR roof area has a substantial Area B: Roof has been well maintained and is amount of HVAC equipment on the roof area. performing well for its age.The adjacent dense foliage requires continued maintenance to keep drains clear of debris. 1.05 1.0E I � - -- � ' -!- f4 , ‘ ‘, ,,,,L, i \ _\ . - i / I \ _ > w Area C: Roof panels are showing signs of age and Area D: Photo of deck with waterproof pan below. most fastener locations will require maintenance to Access is very limited and difficult to maintain. detour from water intrusion in the future. SERA LAKE OSWEGO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SPACE PLANNING ANALYSIS 39 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Conclusions Area A: The asphalt shingle roof system has recently been installed with no failures observed. Continue to maintain and monitor the roof system annually. Area B: The asphalt built-up roof system has received some repairs recently particularly at the roof drain penetrations.The roof requires at a minimum of quarterly roof maintenance to avoid drain blockage from organic debris. Area C: The metal roof panel system requires continued maintenance to avoid debris build-up that activates leaks into the structure. A scheduled repair project should be anticipated in 3-5 years to refurbish the existing roof system and replace all failing screw penetrations. Area D: The pan deck has a history of leaks particularly after organic debris migrates below the wood deck located over the pan deck system. The pan deck system will require a substantial repair project in an effort to control all water intrusion issues surrounding the roof assembly at this roof area. Environmental Consultant Report-Apex Apex Environmental conducted a limited hazardous materials inspection of the Lake Oswego Library building. The building was three stories with basement kids'areas,and two main levels of the library. The primary materials of the investigation were Asbestos Containing Building Materials(ACBM), Lead Containing Paint, mercury containing fixtures and potential polychlorinated biphenyls(PCBs). The survey team was comprised of Brad Kelsay(Project Manager,Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act(AHERA)Accredited Inspector). This limited survey characterized the extent of suspect ACBMs and lead painted surfaces throughout the structures. No sampling of suspect materials were conducted at the site,and destructive methods were not utilized during the survey. All materials were found to be in relatively good condition at the site. Materials in good condition do not give off fibers and health is not compromised by the presence of the asbestos containing building materials. Therefore,there may be asbestos containing building materials concealed within wall cavities or other inaccessible areas. Suspect vinyl tile flooring was found in a storage room and lunchroom areas (450 SF). Two types of suspect sheet flooring were found in the bathroom and storage room areas. Gray duct sealant on roof ductwork was found(200 LF). Eight suspect fire doors were observed on stairwells and mechanical rooms. Gypsum wallboard/joint compound was observed at the site and tests positive 40 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT in some cases. Wallboard is located throughout the facility. Roofing at the site is reportedly a newer material and likely will not test positive for asbestos, however testing of this material prior to impacts and/or demolition is required. In addition,there is a deck area with suspect metal roofing pan membrane with substrate under a wood deck overlayment. All painted surfaces at the site are presumed to contain lead based upon the age of the structure. Adherence with OSHA 1926.62 is required including exposure assessment elements from contractors to be performing demolition activities. Photo 1:View of suspect sheet flooring in the bathroom. Fluorescent light fixtures at the site will need to be recycled and/or disposed of according to regulations. Light fixtures at the site appear to be newer in style and therefore are unlikely to contain PCB ballasts; however older fixtures may still contain these materials and should be verified during demolition. A comprehensive survey for asbestos materials would be required prior to demolition or renovation occurs at the site. This survey is not intended to be comprehensive and many of the materials indicated above may not contain asbestos. Cost estimates for abatement of potential hazardous materials will vary widely due to lack of empirical sampling. Cost estimates could range from Photo 2:View of suspect vinyl floor tile $2,000-$45,000 for the Library building. in the lunchroom area. EXISTING BUILDING DEFICIENCIES Code/ Site The current site is restricted by perimeter streets and residential housing to the ,, ;fi• x west. Expansion of the current library would require additional parking which is „ a essentially unavailable on site. '" f NN. Code/ Building: No major code deficiencies were identified. = " Accessibility: The Library generally meets the ADAAG Accessibility Requirements with the following exceptions: •Handrails at stairs do not have top and bottom extensions. •The main public restrooms do not meet current ADAAG requirements. A clear 5-foot turning radius is provided but code compliant accessible toilet stall or plumbing fixtures. •The restrooms in the Children's library are not accessible. •Reception desk and service counter heights Other Architectural Items •The librarystaff noted a seasonalground water leak alongthe west wall 1 ��a= of the first floor.This area is below exterior grade. a ®®et , - !� � � rt\! e.ra , •The clerestory roof configuration has had previous leaks due to blocking '�- � pug+ �`� 0 41 of roof drains. Roof depressions and drains should be carefully monitored '_ `�' = �� c.M to prevent further leak potential. • •Several clerestory windows have lost their perimeter seals. . ,�, 1► SERA LAKE OSWEGO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SPACE PLANNING ANALYSIS 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT •Gyp-crete subflooring has failed in areas of high use. Some areas have been repaired but it continues to be an ongoing problem. •Book shelves are at maximum capacity and are not seismically braced or secured. Structural Seismic code requirements have significantly increased since the original date of e sqe apoy f \` '' theconstruction.existing desigNwn.Theeismic building coulduiremnts sufferre as igprnificantximately damatwicege inthe a moderate 1 I0 seismic event.Seismic upgrade should be implemented. inimmem Plumbing aiii.111111111146.1. •Plumbing fixtures do not meet ADA or low flow requirements of the OW 1 current code ��� �� I' •Basement level toilet fixtures frequently overflow due to older design and I + _ l� size of trapway 14 M11,; •No shower facilities for'Essential Facilities' emergency shelter use ���� Fire Protection No deficiencies observed I Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning(HVAC) i I •Air flow may not meet current ventilation standards ' i I • Two mechanical units are nearing the end of their service life, are not \\ energy efficient and have pneumatic controls •Boiler is rusting out Electrical —AN •Panels are at full capacity Roof •Metal roofing and asphalt built-up-roofing will require replacement in 6 to 9 years Environmental Suspect materials include: •Asbestos at tile and vinyl flooring •Asbestos at gray duct sealant •Asbestos at fire doors •Asbestos at gypsum wallboard and joint compound •Asbestos at asphalt BUR roofing •Lead Paint at painted surfaces •PCB's at older lighting fixtures Recommended Further Investigations 42 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Essential Facilities Study due to emergency shelter status •Evaluate existing conditions relating to essential facilities requirements including structural/seismic, mechanical, electrical, emergency services and access. A Seismic Hazards Investigation Accessibility Study to identify non-code compliant features •Restroom access, clearance,fixtures and mounting heights •Handrail extensions •Reception desk/service counters Comprehensive hazardous materials survey is required for renova- tion or demolition •Asbestos materials •Lead paint •Mercury •PCB's Air flow testing to verify required air flows. 5 E RA LAKE OSWEGO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SPACE PLANNING ANALYSIS 43 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Cost Forecast H &A Construction: Forecast of Construction Costs Project: Public Library Owner: City of Lake Oswego Date: September 12, 2008 LOW HIGH DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT A. Full ADAAG Upgrades 1. Renovate two existing public restrooms including all new plumbing fixtures at 94,000 107,000 2. Renovate two existing public restrooms at children's library into two single 62,000 70,000 3. Install handrail extensions 12,000 24,000 4. Modify reception desk and service counters 24,000 35,000 B. HVAC Upgrades - - 1. Install two new high efficiency air handlers with electronic controls. Integrate 80,000 98,000 2. Install new high efficiency boiler 22,000 30,000 C. Increase Electrical Capacity - - 1. Install new branch panelboards sub-fed from existing panelboards 24,000 35,000 D. Repair Leaking West Retaining Wall - - 1. Remove soil to expose retaining wall and leaking areas 8,000 10,000 2. Identify location of leak and seal wall as required 4,000 5,000 3. Provide drainage matt and drain system with positive drainage 10,000 11,000 4. Backfill and repair landscaping as required 10,000 12,000 E. Repair Gyp-crete Subflooring - - 1. Remove carpet and defective areas of gyp-crete subflooring 42,000 59,000 2. Replace subflooring materials and install new carpet throughout entire area 129,000 146,000 F. Replace Roofing (5 to 8 Years) - - 1. Remove metal roofing at clerestory roofs and replace with new standing 32,000 35,000 2. Remove metal pan roofing at deck and replace with single-ply membrane 68,000 84,000 3. Remove asphalt built-up roofing at flat roof areas and replace with new 38,000 49,000 `' -i_ . .1 l.' SPACE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT I • L7.1' A number of studies have been done to evaluate the existing space deficiencies I. 100, and needs of the Library. In 2006 Boora Architects conducted a complete `1 .''' programming analysis to determine the appropriate space requirements of a library facility that would accommodate the long-term needs of the community. This was completed as part of the Community Center study.The report was f - based on a current service area population of 47,612 with a forecasted 2030 ®1 population of 68,369.This result was not that dissimilar from the results of the 2006 Clackamas County study that indicated a future need for 64,850 square feet of library space. 1-, The Public Library space requirements continue to remain consistent with this study.This study projects the need to grow from 27,738 SF to 66,024 SF. • This growth responds to being beyond capacity for two decades in addition to - expansion space. r 1 44 2.2 LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT Without expanding program offerings,one of the most significant program deficiencies is in the"behind the scenes"staff and volunteer work areas.These spaces are inadequately sized. Based on an Oregon Libraries study,the library should be 47,000 square feet to adequately support current program functions. go, Additionally,the current library facility has an insufficient amount of space to mii achieve the following goals for which Library staff indicates there is a publicNil demand for: I "Iglo .. •Expand the collection • III 4 Offer a wider range of public events ( Sid i,\ Existing Program Deficiencies • Ili44%1'. According to existing reports,the shelves exceeded their maximum 75%capacity PN beginning in 1988,causing shelves to sag,and in some cases,collapse.This also impacts material filing and recirculation. Instead of expanding the material 1 o5weva • collection,older materials are replaced with newer materials,often before the end of their useful life.While a certain amount of replacement is normal,some discarded materials would otherwise be used by the public if they were retained. Current program deficiencies for the Public Library include the following: + ram •Inadequate volunteer and staff work space •�n •Inadequate staff support space including meeting rooms •Inadequate space to retain and expand material collections and '0 . accommodate the desired level of adult, children, and teen programs. ,� III f„ •Lack of flexibility for reconfiguration as a result of light placement and ,. .� other architectural features •Lack of community use rooms and flex space, including area to show movies and hold readings and presentations •Limited general and archival storage space •Undesirable relationships of functional areas ii.Ir SIP L L.i[ •Minimal public circulation and seating space 1�-- •Inability to easily adapt to and accommodate technological changes due to the building infrastructure " •Lack of vending area for the purchase of food or beverage Future Space Program Requirements A future 66,000 square foot library will serve the public into the future by providing additional space to meet current needs and accommodate future growth through flexible space planning.The recommended program space will also address the space deficiencies identified above. PARKING Parking is one of the major deficiencies at the existing library.The existing 64 parking spaces are insufficient to accommodate the library's 1,000 average visitors per day.When parking can't be met on-site, parking overflows onto • neighborhood streets.An estimated 208 parking spaces would be needed to r.•1 meet the needs of the future 66,000 square foot library. ,� �.oP� - aa SERA LAKE OSWEGO MUNICIPAL FACILITIES AND SPACE PLANNING ANALYSIS