The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet - 2009-09-14 Special2009 City Council Jack Hoffman, Mayor Donna Jordan, Council President Roger Hennagin Kristin Johnson Mary Olson Sally Moncrieff Bill Tierney CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Monday, September 14, 2009 6:00 p.m. West End Building Santiam Room 4101 Kruse Way Also published on the internet at: ci.oswego.or.us Contact: Robyn Christie, City Recorder E -Mail: rchristie@ci.oswego.or.us Phone: 503-675-3984 The meeting location is accessible to persons with disabilities. To request accommodations, please contact Public Affairs at 503-635-0236, 48 hours before the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. STUDY SESSION 3.1 Oregon Sustainability Center/Living Building Challenge 3.2 Sustainability Update 4. ADJOURNMENT DEFECTS IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ee !In Ila e1A. GED Aw«irt•AecXrtMs GRD r SERA Afn.,D'motle ng FAErtax Cnmmixiu.ing Glumee PAE Gt�ununiEnginwnng Xvri Lantlaxx ArcXit«,ure rvwx rvgen CMI Cnpnxrin{ tAX LFFD/Cexaex Gmn8uii0ing5•Ms EE��g�� HOW MUCH space can we build? Percentage of Tot'I SF per concept D-1gn WA Oregon Univoreity System � City of Portland U% Oregon Living Building Institute 50% Conference Classroom � TeW 222.766 sf I k 09/15/2009 t44104% KEY PARTNERS "City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability .Oregon Living Building Initiative -Oregon University System •Portland Community College -Port and Development Commission .Portland +Oregon Sustainability Institute ` Feasibility how much space can we build? Living Building/ Net Zero Energy Goals Program needs Cosi �LMNaBUtLB CHALLENGE Why A Challenge? • rapid adoption of green build ng r Ir system SITE • address a changing contextINSPRATION • human impact on the 00V I r.ER MATERIALS environment is increasing The Rules • 6"Petals" INDOOR • only Prerequisites, no points QUALITY ENERGY • temporary exceptions exist • projects must be fully operat onal Ts about what you do, rat tMlatyou sayyou7 do" iMp✓/www.xx.ei.gxo.giie. 1 LMNG BUILDING CHALLENGE v Imagine a building that is as elegant and efficient as a flower. • that is informed by the ec - region's characteristics that generates all of its ow n energy with renewable resources. • that captures and treats al of its water on site. tly and for •maximum beauty. SITE CONTEXT f Mgv3*P n f,• �y BIOPHILIA SENSORY RICHNESS .. wunas, laetea, texture and palcenn elERENDIPITY Th--peeed. Thoewn na MOTION lar(aramhienF W Diad. Rock and Leaves, Watsr, Fi(h[, disc plot. MtSlr�l ra(aWtio� anaeree:ea VARIATIONS on a THEME ::-Rhyming'. Similarities Aol Du Plication. Balance. Procralaes W- W Q� .. ., -... iP Him 09/15/2009 SITE VICINITY F ` —FA1�Ty -els. � � � y � n15raIor f nousMP (MIMFD) I 1 ( I i ® PAE Lim IN HIM - 5 PRINCIPLES 1. appropriately scale systems for optimal performance 2. make less do more 3. design for resource equity 4. integrate natural systems to benefit all species ' ve 5. recognize that people are the life in -' Living Buildings BIOPHILIA S NE PERIL:: Fear + Pleasure. Dan(eryoua —trolof(chosetP)- AnXIetylnconhaSt Is unknr,wn danger. Einel Tower, el—Itadspacee,elc. i®�::•� LTII! iii 2 09/15/2009 -. RESOONSISM' '71SITE PM ,..'HEALTHY LIGHT/AIR ---INDOOR QUALITY 115placestoworkin 13,767rsf — 119 rsf/ person Current OLBI Occupancy (average) - 208 rsl/ person m 3 rNET ZERO I!, WATER t POTABLE WATER `a STORAGE- 200y000gallons w.an ul, SOLAR ACCESS ENERGY USE OFFICE BUILDINGS MTgpK AYERRLF FRCiI�iT Lw caDRAoc vL o0o s EowIL CRLNaucR rEaw„u 6CNLRZ,WPUROL XATULL ClLTlR �� mscoRvx i�,xr. sr �� cNE+AruxE ur EounwTasN L aD Lo Loo ENERDY VitLIIATNNI IRTEN4TY YLTU-Si, y. OREGON SUSTAINABUTY CENTER/ 220,000 SF 18 EUI - jj�PAE -'NET ZERO Ali ENERGY r 0 O a 09/15/2009 0 ENERGY USE ENERGY USE INTENSITY Aaeting TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF A BUILDING GROSS BUILDING AREA "UIP -1 U1l^x renews"IeE _E P°.�•^•^• O NET -ZERO ENERGY ENERGY REDUCTION STRATEGIES Highest performance envelope Highest efficiency active systems Maximized use of passive systems Slabs/ Mass Daylighting/ Passive Solar Maximized use of natural energy Occupant Engagement Optimized Renewable Generation = NETZERO ENERGY E �._.. ... . r h1M-- 4 ENERGY USE BEFORE TENANT ENGAGEMENT ..wn ro '-. �'cov •roxs. •rc wnM4 +,.nrv..arss.nc mwwo rcxnxc I � .arcs \ o, w �n •.os TYPICAL BUILDIN-Di LADING POTENTIAL ENERGY USAGE ENERGY SAVINGS Without Tenant ECMS GAE ENERGY DISTRIBUTION with TENANT ENGAGEMENT f .�,.,.. z�uev.�«n..�. a.n....,•,xxu POTENTIAL ENEROYSAVINC ENERGY SAVINGS `,CAE Without Tenant ECMS PAL HIGH lRENEWAB ES GENERATION 6 ENERGY SAVING STRATEGIES ROOFTOPS- 22.000 sf STRATEGIES (cost savings in PV not required) 39% total of energy Adjust off -hours activitiesto occur during the business day ($89k) CANOPIES - 9,900 sf Minimize vertical transportation ($708k) 18% of total energy Slightly adjusted temperature expectations ($268k) SUNSHADES- 17,400 sf 29% of total energy Mlnimize domestic hot water use ($447k) BIPV - 11,000 sf Reduce use of printers &copiers ($178k) 14% of total energy Alternative computing strategies ($5000k) .... .... 611 HIM— I - - 09/15/2009 HIGH PERFORMANCE WORKPLACE 6 ENERGY SAVING STRATEGIES HIGH ROOF TOP- OP-407,000GallonsAverage STRATEGIES (cost savings in PV not required) 407,000g.110- Adjust off -hours activitiesto occur during the business day ($89k) ' Minimize vertical transportation ($708k) ROOFTOP + 1011 floor - Slightly adjusted temperature expectations ($268k) 323,000 gallons ; Mlnimize domestic hot water use ($447k) R Reduce use of printers &copiers ($178k) STORAGE - Alternative computing strategies ($5000k) 200,000 gallons M mop.' I M. _. d HI - IiijNET ZERO WATER HIGH ROOF TOP- OP-407,000GallonsAverage 407,000g.110- Averageyear ROOFTOP + 1011 floor - 323,000 gallons Dry year POTABLE WATER STORAGE - 200,000 gallons AM HGF SUSTAINABLE WATER DISCHARGE LIVING MACHINE - •i 1t6Mf SUSTAINABLE WATER DISCHARGE WaOer 1& fff. � tk Overflow RIMY to ground well 09/15/2009 SUSTAINABLE WATER DISCHARGE W.yY ......_.�..u.......... I........ W HF--- ACCESS to DAYLIGHT, VIEWS and VENTILATION ugntshames shad. FI—toll... height -12- R,,,( ... th) ]'Room(...th) depth -12' %2.5 - 30' A 09/15/2009 Operating Expense Comparison Cost Comparisons oac EatNMb Initial cost (50,000 sf) Cu pe $12,815,000 Culper Goatpr GSF Cost low USF above oject Prel- 0.SF above Iprt. above and baba USF above and belov O,ade grads Operating expenses/yr $474,000 $275,000 Mixed-use Platinum Building $179.60 $156.19 x50,000sf=E7,ti09,500 6199,000> Platinum Ogee Rehm on Investment 11.850,000 6,875,000 25 yearn 50 year budding $27,700,000 $13,750,000 Management 0.61 1.00 Building $141.94 $131.96 $174.77 $215.12 u OSC $287.70 $258.30 x 50,000 sf = $12,815,000 _ $5,005,500 09/15/2009 Operating Expense Comparison tart pbera.n slay 6Wrb oac EatNMb Initial cost (50,000 sf) $7,809,500 $12,815,000 Insurance 0.35 0.35 Difference Utilities 2.31 0.00 $5,005,500 Repairs/Maintenance 0.48 1.50 Operating expenses/yr $474,000 $275,000 D18arMrca 6199,000> Rehm on Investment 11.850,000 6,875,000 25 yearn 50 year budding $27,700,000 $13,750,000 Management 0.61 1.00 $9,950,000 savings Return on Investment: 55,640,962 in 50 yeah 112.7% (2.3°h annual) u OSC $287.70 $258.30 x 50,000 sf = $12,815,000 09/15/2009 Operating Expense Comparison tart pbera.n slay 6Wrb oac EatNMb Initial cost (50,000 sf) $7,809,500 $12,815,000 Insurance 0.35 0.35 Difference Utilities 2.31 0.00 $5,005,500 Repairs/Maintenance 0.48 1.50 Operating expenses/yr $474,000 $275,000 D18arMrca 6199,000> Rehm on Investment 11.850,000 6,875,000 25 yearn 50 year budding $27,700,000 $13,750,000 Management 0.61 1.00 $9,950,000 savings Return on Investment: 55,640,962 in 50 yeah 112.7% (2.3°h annual) 09/15/2009 Operating Expense Comparison 1071 Platlrum Bldg ODC Eatlmab Estlmab RE Taxes 3.30 0.00 Insurance 0.35 0.35 Utilities 2.31 0.00 Repairs/Maintenance 0.48 1.50 Cleaning/Janitorial 1.11 1.75 Security 0.40 0.40 GeneraVAdminisaedve 0.55 0.50 Management 0.61 1.00 Reserve 4.7Z qgq TOTAL 8.18 x 50,000 sf 5.60 x 50,000 sf _ $474,000 = $275,000 DIFFERENCE: <$199,000> u Operating Expense Comparison tort vl.waan clay osc Eatanab Eatlmab RE Taxes 3.30 0.00 Insurance 0.35 0.35 UOlitlea ' 4.25 0.00 Repairs/Maintenance 0.48 1.50 Cleaning/Janaoriel 1.11 1.75 Security 0.40 0,40 GnaeneraVAdministrative 0.55 0.50 Ma9emeM 0.61 1.00 Reserves Q,}j pqQ TOTAL 11.42 X50,000 9f 5.50 x 50,000 sf - 3.7% mana..ow xsrwelar.r.yw1 =$571,000 =$275,000 DIFFERENCE: <$296,000> ® r'a"s®"�'a"�" °i!E_. ®- , ...h ■ OREGON SUSTAINABILITY CENTER _ ®�R�i. -off ...wl+n,p.....■ RESEARCH Ng)�WEPS D#vet research gra t� if r fo ow tea C• is s _line M tries • E i • sign P • Progra , m B vio • Sen e u nt) • 9ov an R P,R1�T IN S Y OP ORTU S Living Mach' • Building -1 e • PVight If • Redlist R e ants ( wring), • Integrat x B, • Construc�a�b ICU • "Fract ` Dashboards • Occu ehavior So 1100711 P411111 -t • 2 aaa„n��m Bldg osc esnmare a:nmar� Initial Cost (50,000 SO$],809,500 $12,815,000 savings DiRarence $S,atg,s00 OperaOng expenses/yr $571,000 $275,000 Diflerance c52%,000> 25 year operatlng cost 74,275,000 6,875,000 17 years (') 50 year building $26,550,000 $13,750,000 $14,800,000 slmpla peY�k anaryala Return on Investment: 8,744,500 in 50 174.7% .5% 5ears OREGON SUSTAINABILITY CENTER _ ®�R�i. -off ...wl+n,p.....■ RESEARCH Ng)�WEPS D#vet research gra t� if r fo ow tea C• is s _line M tries • E i • sign P • Progra , m B vio • Sen e u nt) • 9ov an R P,R1�T IN S Y OP ORTU S Living Mach' • Building -1 e • PVight If • Redlist R e ants ( wring), • Integrat x B, • Construc�a�b ICU • "Fract ` Dashboards • Occu ehavior So 1100711 P411111 -t • OREGON SUSTAINABILITY CENTER _ ®�R�i. -off ...wl+n,p.....■ RESEARCH Ng)�WEPS D#vet research gra t� if r fo ow tea C• is s _line M tries • E i • sign P • Progra , m B vio • Sen e u nt) • 9ov an R P,R1�T IN S Y OP ORTU S Living Mach' • Building -1 e • PVight If • Redlist R e ants ( wring), • Integrat x B, • Construc�a�b ICU • "Fract ` Dashboards • Occu ehavior So 1100711 P411111 -t • 09/15/2009 I'll BELOW L. OPER STIJR SNMED CCMf[RERDE � EMAWR DORS MR -a Level 07 r City of LakefiOswego - 1,111111 --Suptainability Update City Council Meeting September 14, 2009 Susan Millhauser, Sustainability Coordinator Action Areas: 2008-09 Energy Use & Water procurement Waste Transportation Conservation Reduction R] Milestones (targets) — By 2012 • Sustainable end point goals — By 2027 Identified performance measures to track progress Energy & Transportation 2012 Targets GHG emissions 7% below 2000 levels Reduce energy consumption by 10% from 2006 levels • 100% of energy from renewable sources • 50% of fleet fueled by alternative fuels/technology •I•C'L-E-I Local Government, SustainabiftiM USA Tonight's Update • Energy and Transportation section of Sustainability Plan • Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) • Other Things on the Near Horizon Energy & Transportation 2027 Goals • Zero net increase of GHG emissions • 100% renewable energy sources 11 PGE/ Trust o(Ore[an, Inc. 1 Energy & Transportation 2012 Targets • 10% increase in overall — fleet vehicle MPG All new construction & "_`.. major remodels of City facilities meet LEED Gold/Silver • Increase by 50% number of City employees commuting by alternative T R I@ M E T` travel options See where it takes you. 1 GHG Emissions Inventory Year 2000 GHG Emissions by Sector Percent of Total Emissions 9% ■ Water/Sewage ■ Buildings 55% 0 Streattghts and 29% Signals 0 Vehicle Fleet GHG Emissions Inventory Year 2000 GHGEmissions by Source 2 % t �' 2% 7% ■ Diesel E ■ Electricity 0 Gasoline 0 Natural Gas I ae% ■ Paper Products M Propane GHG Emissions Inventory w, Year 2000 8 2006 Emissions by Sector Comparison - 8.000 „ 5.000 — 7.000 ■20W Tom of eCO2 ? P.000 ■1WG Tom of eCO ,.000 0 ep GHG Emissions Inventory Year 2000 GHG Emissions by Sector 7,000 0 5,000 ■Water/Sewage a,o00 6 3,000 1 ■ Buildings C 2,000 F 1,000 ❑Streetlights 0 and Signals -1,000 ur_ m t m m m ❑ Vehicle Fleet " 3m ■waste n m 3 > GHG Emissions Inventory Year 2000 GHG Emissions by Source ■ a..x • • Ebtlhiry �` 0rae.eiaee b eoo E .. •w•e.cmaee •Pl .bk Energy & Transportation On-going activities to reduce energy use and GHG emissions from City operations include: • Replacing street signal bulbs with light emitting diode (LEDs) • Including seven hybrid electrictgas vehicles in City fleet. • Using 5% biodiesel (B5) for all City diesel vehicles. • Upgrading heating and cooling systems at City Hall to increase energy efficiency. 2 Energy & Transportation On-going activities to reduce energy use and GHG emissions from City operations include: Purchasing clean, renewable wind power through PGE, with lighting and pump upgrades to increase energy efficiency. 1 EECBG Next Steps? $157,000 direct allocation based on Lake Oswego's population • Must develop an energy efficiency and conservation strategy • How to best use Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) funds to further Plan goals, SAB goals, Council goals? EECBG Project Ideas • Community energy efficiency and conservation projects and programs — Energy Efficiency on Main Street, in conjunction with Clackamas County, to provide financial assistance to small businesses — Education and outreach (e.g. SAM 2010, social marketing campaign, Climate Masters) EECBG Next Steps? • The EECBG program assists state, local, and tribal governments in implementing strategies to: o Reduce fossil fuel emissions; o Reduce total energy use; and o Improve energy efficiency in the transportation, building, and other appropriate sectors. • Additional purposes of the EECBG program are to spur economic growth and create / retain jobs under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. EECBG Project Ideas Being Explored • Retrofit outdoor lighting adjacent to some City facilities and parks (also meets adopted dark sky ordinance) Set up energy management tracking system for City facilities • Public facility audits / funding strategy for energy efficiency upgrades • Match funds for AmeriCorps sustainability outreach specialist EECBG Timeline/Next Steps • Early December submit required energy efficiency and conservation strategy (EECS) and detailed project proposals • Coordinate with Clackamas County, where possible • Work with SAB & staff to develop EECS and associated projects and programs for DOE approval, with Council approval 3 Other Things... Next Few Months • Implementing Business Recycling Requirements (November) • Sustainability training for Council, LL+ management team, and select staff — - High performance green building policy for ay. City facilities • Clean Cities — EV grant (not funded) Thank you! Contact: Susan Millhauser, Sustainability Coordinator 503-635-0291; smiIIhauser(@ci.osweqo.or.us www.croswego.or.us then click on Sustainability 2