The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLO2040_PRNRAB4_Presentation_FINAL_051524 O 44" F= � ar sRecreation & Natural ,,,////1Boa ......._ LAKE OSWEGO Resources Advisory BoardPARKS PLAN 2040 Meeting #4 May 15, 2024 J lir ,. - °! • . - ' - . i I A P - Air • • , i .� 1' „ ..P lir , , . -,,,._ (... 4., 4 A.IA t �l� r. ` sip y I 1°, VJ I. • _ A N S U S • ' A B L E C O N N E C T E D T H R I V I N G AG E N DA STATUS REPORT CAC GAP AREAS CONSIDERATIONS OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, & ORGANIZATIONAL NEXT STEPS ANALYSIS _ n eeso`' LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Lake Oswego Parks Plan 2040 Schedule 2023 2024 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Existing Conditions Assessment ? ice, ' ?1 AP Vision,Goals, Implementation and Action Plan City Council and Objectives Hearings Needs Assessment and Recommendations Plan Development and Adoption e e r 1 Public Engagement cis If Jr' _ , _®_ Focus Groups i Online Survey .E.Online Surveyn f i �i. Community Neighborhood Event Workshops ✓ 7, s ✓r 7 • ✓ i • ✓ 7, • 17 1 ^ s ✓r 1A. • CAC CAC CAC CAC CAC CAC CAC Meeting 1 Meeting 2 Meeting 3 Meeting 4 Meeting 5 Meeting 6 Meeting 7 ' impel mos imps =,,, _ YI J =,, - Jl J FLtlrlttie PRNRAB PRNRAB PRNRAB PRNRAB PRNRAB PRNRAB PRNRAB Meeting 1 Meeting 2 Meeting 3 Meeting 4 Meeting 5 Meeting 6 Meeting 7 City Council City Council City Council City Council Briefing Briefing Briefing Briefing 1 f opoi1l' c .4, ... • IIIIII �►-�• �--1 CAGCommuniey Adv ery Comminea 0 'I j'j. 0lii PRNRA ILParks,Rewearian,and Nahiral Resources Advisory Board ■ram OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE & , " RGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS What does it include ? Introduction Introduces the document and summarizes community engagement findings Organizational Structure and Staffing Outlines current organizational structure and staffing levels Maintenance Summarizes the current level of maintenance and responsibilities of the department 4 NRPA Park Metrics Benchmarking Compares various departmental metrics with other departments in the Pacific Northwest and other CAPRA accredited agencies nationwide 41111bh LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 ORGANIZATIONAL SRUCTU RE & •STA F F I N G • Lake Oswego is one of about 200 '` ,,,.....•:.,..,, ,„,,.,. .-,k'- ► x! � r � i V try j "• fr �.:' " n nationally accredited 0- --,:%.1,' 1- --'-'''-'" CAPRA Parks y : y �,-, ,. _ -•-_ � - & Recreation De artments _ • -. . x ■ Well-staffed department � • 77 total FTEs currently �' . _ • 9 full-time and 13 .9 part-time _ positions being added for the LORAC = �` • Active vol unteer base • 25, 292 volunteer hours completed in 2023 0 4 r 9•eco , LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 MAINTENANCE Maintenance and operations are key to a vibrant, clean, and sustainablE parks and recreation system . • LOPR is responsible for management and maintenance of developed parks, natural areas, open spaces, and major facilities • Maintenance is determined by property use, available amenities, terrain, proximity to neighborhoods, natural resources, and applicable requirements • Natural area management is guided by the Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan ( NAHMP) • Park stewardship program supports year-round stewardship and habitat restoration work parties _ n eeso`' LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 ' IRPA PARK METRICS RENCHMARKING The National Recreation and Park Association ( NRPA) Park Metrics tool is designed to provide parks and recreation agencies with a comprehensive source of information and data standards. • Agencies upload self-reported data • Generate reports to benchmark data against peer agencies • Utilize to support additional funding, operational improvements, and to better serve communities ;ENCHMARK COMMUNITIES: City of Beavercreek, OH (CAPRA), Independence Township, MI (CAPRA), City of Roseville, MN (CAPRA), Town of Garner, NC (CAPRA), and comparable Pacific Northwest communities 41/"4 4 9veso`' LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 NRPA PARK METRICS BENCHMARKING Key Takeaways Table 1-3 Annual Operating Budget, Lake Oswego and NRPA Park Metrics Benchmarking Data Budget: Lake Oswego Comparison exceeds the total Agency Park Operating Operating Revenue per capita Total revenue expenditures per expenditures per to total operating a n d capital acre of parkland capita operating expenditures budgets of all peer Pacific Northwest Upper Quartile $7,947 $318 $125 49.4% CAPRA agencies and the City of Lake Oswego (OR) r $318 $88 27.7% Pacific Northwest for FY Independence 1 Township(MI) $7,519 $115 $36 31.3% 2 2 2 3 . City of Beavercreek (OH) $4,458 $63 $16 24.7% City of Roseville Parks and Recreation (MN) $2,242 $172 $91 53% Town of Garner(NC) $1,922 $93 $22 23.8% Source:NRPA Park Metrics database of" °s4 eeso' LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 NRPA PARK METRICS BENCHMARKINc Key Takeaways Table 1-4: Maintained Parks and Park Acres, Lake Oswego, Pacific Northwest, and Peer CAPRA Agencies Maintained Parks and Agency Total Number of Parks Total Park Acres Park Acres: Lake Oswego Pacific Northwest Upper Quartile 33 827 maintains a greater number of parks than City of Roseville Parks and Recreation (MN) 32 681 peer agencies in the City o Lace swego ( tr—ii 46 632 Upper Quartile but has 24 381 City of Beavercreek (OH) fewer total acres than 11 328 Town of Garner(NC) peer agencies in the 5 227 Independence Township(MI) Pacific Northwest Upper Quartile . Source:NRPA Park Metrics database n eeso' LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 NRPA PARK METRICS BENCHMARKING Key Takeaways Table 1-5: Staffing and Workload, Pacific Northwest, NRPA CAPRA Accredited Agencies Staffing and Workload . Agency Full-time Non-Full-time Maintenance Acres per Employees Employees Total FTE /Operations FTE Maintenance When comparing total /Operations FTE City maintained acres, Lake (OR)of Lake Oswego * 55 II 154 77 35.42 aia Pacific Northwest Oswego has fewer acres Upper Quartile 41.7 154 72.7 25.37 32.60 per FTE than the Pacific City of Roseville Parks and Recreation 28 109 53 23.85 28.55 Northwest Upper Quartile (MN) Independence but is more similar to Township (MI) 16 92 42 13.44 16.89 comparable CAPRA Town of Garner (NC) 19 109 33 6.6 49.70 accredited peer agencies . (OHof Beavercreek 12 37 19 8.36 45.57 Source: NRPA Park Metrics database illhoh ,. 0 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 NRPA PARK METRICS BENCHMARKING Key Takeaways Table 1-7: Program Participation Lake Oswego, Pacific Northwest, NRPA CAPRA Accredited Agencies Program Participation •• Agency Total number of Number of %of fee-based to Total program fee-based total number of contacts Lake Oswego exceeds programs offered programs programs program offerings of both "Ty of Lake Oswego(ORAL 1,218 1,148 94% 216,270 peer CAPRA accredited Independence Township(MI) 957 957 100% agencies and within the City of Beavercreek(OH) 613 408 67% 10,750 Pacific Northwest. Town of Garner (NC) 580 440 76% 108,000 Pacific Northwest Upper Quartile 265.8 237 89% 234,702 City of Roseville Parks and Recreation (MN) - - - - Source:NRPA Park Metrics database _ eeso`' LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 NRPA PARK METRICS BENCHMARKING Additional Key Takeaways Population: Compared to the selected peer CAPRA accredited agencies, Lake Oswego is one of the most densely populated in terms of population relative to incorporated jurisdictional square miles. FTE Allocation by Function: Lake Oswego allocated about 46% of its FTE count towards Maintenance and Operations, which is higher than all peer agencies. Agency Responsibilities: Lake Oswego maintains a higher level of responsibility for the oversight, maintenance, and/or contracted services than peer CAPRA agencies with responsibility over 17 of the 25 key responsibility areas listed within the NRPA Park Metrics dashboard . Alb' E°6 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 ^', yt- te �r,`"' , i _ .e jai ? ,� jOF t r0 . 1 iti_,, n } i . \ .�-�-. 4 questions What and/or - � ,4.;, .........1 comments do you have about , , „ „ ---- '' H the operations, Maintenance, '. and organizational Analysis ? NAL ....,..... _, • __ . vi,, ,y . N ... • ' 4 a opt . ,- .----.7--.,--.--- --'4-3e-,1*-t-•.;-.4. .,.,,,, ;-.'':;--,-;.- .,; riiilk. . . .; ._ ' yam" 9, ., 1 - - - - .I. _ ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND EQUITY INDEX MAPPING OVERVIEW Evaluated park service based on the actual routes and distances people must travel to get to essential park services. The Parks Plan 2040 access analysis consisted of three parts : Existing System0 Park Access Equitable Access Mapping Analysis Analysis Mapped existing Using ArcGIS network Identified the gap parks and recreation Analyst, identified areas with the facilities areas that are served greatest need and unserved by parks and essential park services within a 10- minute and of E 5-minute walk LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 i - r : ii::: c\\vL qe..,NKa Areaet-ur-rJ 1 01111 !% /,_. ,_.---- , Portland — ..\-1,' ,:, _4 _.-.1.: Pine Cone ... .-• r Park t ray T,ron Creek‘,...• State .:Z. Natural \ Area \Ia. 0 MAP 4-2: Gap Areas Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation „ Pa Southwobd 1.. ,- -' 8 .... , ,-*..... = Regional Park.--i " Woodmont Stafford .-. , .;-‘---17\ A j,.. , .1,!: Natural Park . Grove Park 12 k ',,,Wilt e . • aer , Community Park a i * •-• .... m Neighborhood Park Nestlake va-- / • Pocket Park Park • — .--i ; ei Adult , Community's,:, 1:-. = Natural Area Center .?•' :17rY°9 / all ll. --"-••--• - •Iiit,.ove Park =Trail Corridor Indoor Rosasma,n ;fermis Prk Undeveloped Open Space 2 Center Springbrook 5 Kincail Foothills Milwuakie _ A Pats' Curlicue = Urban Plaza Corridor 1.7 ,1 10 = Recreational Facility Millenium I L r Iron Mountain alik". Pla7.--"Slundeleaf ff o!erhkr Park Pennington / ..) i;Y. . ... Wa I uga Pa3lc_-e*H . .:fl. •1 t. • East Waluga 1.,;14,:.-1 1.ff'..•;:[:;':"..'.:J: Park 1....... iF.?:;: i4--- 4.4, •./.. _,.. _ ,:==1 "`‘.• "..."---.0d: rn..ont gprings Natural Area :Park ) V Oswego Lake Park9 I i .., 11116,..... Greentree : Park 11 . am Lake Oswego 1 South Shore E.Rese 'rvon- Swim Park 4 . Plaza Wilrrieff River Gi'ebnway Hallinan Park Woo.dds lir - RoGgeeM rk eieharlie .17S.Brown Water Sports Center I.GG reenernn Zari es..' Y \ Essential Service Gap Area . Gap Area IMI High Severity of Need Gap Area Base Map Features a Schools Water Bodies Freepons 6 f____:Non-BCitynPdaarryks and Open Spaces 1 Agra:: 1 RecreationAq ce,%:....._ _' . s,— ,'• -- MING SOON! _ 1 I . ,• _.,Glenmorrie r 7 Metro Urban Growth Boundary IX Park . _ Municip I 3 Golf Course 1 ' — —Trails and Pathways ..- --- Hazelia l'''' -....--.1 L_) L i --• —14—. I—I Lake Oswego School District Boundary st • Luscher Farm _ Weridge Bu Rassekh!lark or,k .... ei 1--- Park Cooks .,.. COMING SOON! Natural Arpa tte PZ17:2 7 West Linn 8 .,, Bryant Woods Stevens - - : 4, -pilkaington Nara Park , 1.... ... Meadow i •-_,, ... i ,., * ...:: ::,, . • 1 ,,,...., Canal'Acces V , Sunnyslope Natural, . 1 Gpen Space L .. .. Tualatin Rivergrove River 1. I J ...... o r .... ..., ••• 1• .„„,‘, AA I G • •i ,iimar "1111.11M11111110b. Sources:City of Lake Oswego and Metro RLIS Database,2023. I! 4 0 0i 1 0.21 5 I 0.51 Miles LAKE OSWEGO I 1 1 jallEMBIMIllI I PARKS PLAN 2040 Date:January 2024. CAC GAP AREA CON ! ' ERATIONS During CAC Meeting #4, CAC members provided feedback on the project's identified gap areas to help further refine areas of the city with the highest severity of need for future investments and site-specific projects. ■ Adjust the gap area boundaries to remove areas with commercial and/or industrial zoning ■ Rethink the high severity classification of the gap areas over Mountain Park HOA and Mary's Woods/Marylhurst University due to the nresence of non-city recreation opportunities that are potentially available to people who live in those areas (Gap Areas 4 and 14). ■ Consider improved pedestrian connectivity between gap areas and nearby recreation opportunities to alleviate access issues, especially when land is not available for additional parks and facilities in the gap areas themselves ■ Consider additional barriers impacting gap areas such as challenging topography and roads that iacK sate pedestrian crossings and sidewalks ■ Recognize that people who own property fronting Lake Oswego have access to nature via the lake ■ Recognize the iimiteu Hours or schuol N.dygrounas 40h _ __, .„, s LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Gap Area Map with CAC Considerations Krrr' � i ,-i'l°'''''''' Tigard ....' Na,u rdl - 'y 7t• Rrca' PaTilR7lft Lew ark' 0� i �_ ...` ... .... P Park ne :11,rip...... Way �� rr� ` Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation Hid soutnw 1 a 8 ▪Parks, Natural Areas,and Recreation Facilities Pa �,.�.l C� Wood ▪Undeveloped as" 51i ffar r• Natural Park a are 12 Open Space ake ... ....:...: .: i :..� J.... *Adult y Park V - i....— C � -, j w certe-nib aO7 Essential Service Galt Area `o �RR"eQo Iir rk P. Ina Rosman Ye Gap Area r nni Park x • 2 •cente 1cin li M�pu f High Severity of Need Gap Area 5 A Footkdis •'-r tor�OrrldOt do Pa I. I.0 Q i RR amq ap Ileniu kr *Jr Mi Plaz n. Area ns ington Iron Moo Plaza park The colorsbelow represent- considerations for revising undel f r W a:a rn CACf r s the _..., N.-, �' gap areas based on CAC feedback. aHie r =5 s.crown %+kal ■ $ r 441- os,e� r• willa�ette Water Spore Center Commercial and/or Industrial Zoning Swim Palk Rirer Green "I..' ._.;' Vial" a , way = Lake/River Access (Access to Nature) ` g L `r`'- ,, Park M =Acess to Private Recreation Amenities F`fa 11 _: a (Mountain Park HOA/ Marylhurst) i; 5 �C°'4 Rog r 4 } O"""�``e anz sonueisho.e wllina" Mountain Park HOA Approximate Boundary oolf - &tes oir s f'.'..., Springs rt6enm..Lamont Natura a 6 Greentree Greenwa � 9 Park f AsPe" a nsA a Base Map Features +�'a'yp° e oee. Ro i R/e Park Park , i f i i ce et Schools Aqua- g1��M�`1..� �•�, ss pp�V 1 en r1e Water Bodies ' Mu nicip ` I�Parkrii j Non-City Parks and Open Spaces 3 Galf Cou f L R° Hazlillryc smec�.o , 14 I City Boundary Tw Fir. 1 13 °3 4 L ; r ` Metro Boundary Growth::oundaf 41/ % •.. West Lian 0 .3 _�:::.. . .._.. 1 Woods f .rdliengkon re Park �� Meadow 1 u :-, Ca nal•k V 5unnyMope n Space R i r t. RIMIllr1111.1=11.1.11SoL,,,: :Cd, ® 0 0.25 0.5 1Miles LAKE OSWEGO MetroR"5 I "'� I II II III PARKS PLAN 2040 Gate:May21 a-p• yt- te r,-" . _ ..- E. I jai ? ,� Y s s; . —: 6. .t . .4PCA, . . 0 , F Or } i . . ....—..4- 4 Mellal What questions and/or - 6"ar. ,4v.;, comments do you have about I ,, „ �- -� ,.., the revised gap areas ?. , ,, ._• _•• .... , s4 a Arethereanyotherthingswe •._. .. \ , _• s _ should consider• _ _ or ...... . . ... . ..,,,,,, ..... .. ? ._., . • ' yam" , ., F ( It*. 15e `his _ - - ...•:e[.�g,{�i-' q,.i" '�-w6A�lb,:-.�iR6e' NEXT STEPS :�: ` I , life - a - $ • • ilb Neighborhood Systemwide Prioritized Capital CAC Meeting #5 Workshops Recommendations Project List PRNRAB Meeting #5 May 31 - Pilkington Park Site-Specific Funding Strategies June 7 - Westlake Park Recommendations Late Summer, TBD SDC Methodology June 21 — Hazelia Field June 28 — Foothills Park Now-Summer Update Late Summer - Fall 0t s °Peso`' LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 ,f' ? "" ` h ' _ ))).,4 ... ,. _ ,. ... 1411St , - 1 j • - ' � V R } 4`i�/ Thank you . , I- p „...._________.,........, , f ,. Y' _ • EGO`' - opi LAKE OSWEGO ,_ PARKS PLAN 2040 r4 9 Y � � `� Y4cK J�. .. .?�wi^ie!'-1 zif� p' fe-