Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LO2040_Appendices_PUBLIC DRAFT_030725
V • r . , ..• ; •y am"7 l' A"; k , .a, ... ur 1 n • �,' yya . fir . �,k ;.f 1' -..A:-.,,, - -+. .` •.; % • OW a, t sa "�� „�, fir . - `. i • .t '1r w` yl y= • APPENDIX A � .? x• t { le -, - -- ' - Parks & Recr tion Facility Inven • ry : 7 ` F. Ex' r ',...' : ::' . ' ..f'. hti� • r � ' �'{t"" �� ,ry ' 13�� 4: ,•r '4 i t _ Z•f Mir 1 -- r `"� f r , V V I I G u" . 11 ;A''r .>' d,s;'. ,Ii'� 4.. as ',.;:,:,•.,,,...;,;:,;it ��ai�+"•'`.: .- -TIr1 �#'' x',' i , �!• tt;. .e A , IV ,iripi, , J '�ryF 7:/,... 7" �41rf 1pS�fr,Ijprqj a + ., • ,04 y,;/,�� I 14 t1"� , : 4 : 19�,..., r t r r ,r.-.Irc Jf.-.,.;,; '.r' --,r.� {�.f, I i,,.,'''li. -1.,��'ot..,- 'X: pp, § wS, dk�hf#'k` u Oct.r, + .k :!', il r f •.i}f Rr. i tb� N4��'Pi f4�,Y rr ifg r 'r} r}t Pi , 1'95�' i • i a yat",, 1 ,� 6.,.r f' d n ; 4 l i Ff3 _ f, f1 ,, r i U �`' j x t r '. it v 1'�,M ' UL 7'`, '•: • - ... _ �r to r 4 4 s� �az f, irj + �l; a � I un sa: '� 'k'1 ) s v , r E� 1 y 1 -. ,�rtF`'J�j , M1 Fi�V, , 7{` I, i's � � f�" � R'A {q �� $1 a` -, _ _ !. ��, , s��} £ 31v f . e i1 f t' I 1 ,r1'"'u #f ' [I . e� .._t h.' , f ,j,i - "Ir''�— 1 a I '.+, . _. _.iliehyili r 1r, 0 ' ytiiiii J i - Appendix A:Park System and Facility Inventory 1 {p ➢ s v Vo. im°. Nan.Fealty 2.pq•.vrrna •em •t0f 0. z0 is Om Om om e o e o a o • o e o e o 0 z e o a • s z a o e o '°" =:...mm....m..a:.....emp=P..,....unrn..wmma,m=.w..m....si•iv swisnoinwasswwwww POO Ga...0.x I� v. Px.00'�.. sn.e......aa. 0.x.a0Rmv, au u zx ua.d zv a.n sm av a o o a o o a a o a o a z o • as a s m o o a o• a ,.m.•m..nu.�enw.....n2,=m..emu..er�e.. "x�'''''rnen arxymS 1.2w..a.0.x ssnsux.e Dr 79 32 s0 0m 034 2 s 2 0 w...3 vavasa.., ow ...... ........ .......-. ...u................. nvuw - mn 99.06 4a0e w zz ma 0.60 219 0 z a • t o • z s z a z a a sa u u 2110 o a • e z ..m k N.O, v.: v.: c=x:exs...�i.. sn.e.w 0='a'%"=Rmm za.aa uaa aaaa a.aa OM 0.66 0 a 0 a 0 o 0 1 3 a 0 a 0 0 a 0 a u 0 • u 0 0 a a 0 0 z s...i.ae=00e n'nemxewame pm pmm, an ar am 0.. Om0.. 010000110004000006000004000 s.mt.St v.: v.: c=x:exs...�i.. �n..� ° °__'__'^^ z.n va 0m am nm am 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 1 0 a a 0 0 a 0 0 0 m 0 • 0 • 0 a 0 0 0 'e.weww0�wemuMe.emnwnnc.nreaen rm asa an au om au o 0 0 0�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ermm0nrw annuwn nen•vaa0 �¢ 0,4 2. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I A-1 ''l ;..„ 0, ,,, f ..:t• . 4."" , 11: 111141r , y 'Irr- - 7 4 ' 0 1. Afty , :fa '* NI‘ 1 ,., ififi: • tq i?t I!' ;.. ;:4Z1:::: :.z. '-'.:.:-.. 1 -11 • l. . s Ali) • ..... , 1i IlliNki! I. I ill . . ., .... .. . I . ._ • , , , • At.'1444, •,. ,.. , I i r ,;,••:•;.'. ••--kskv,; ..:-.T: ' 1 ',,' e • 0#' ''.. .-:...VI P II: " . . -'P ' \ o'..., 444, . . ,- ..$,•41:71,pitrhAo'il,l'ih,f's.'P. ' tir :. , • '- • r• I . . .cr ).., , •.. - ir . • ,-, • \ .•. 2k ' • /4-;*; 00 ..,.. ' - --., 70 i 4 h.74 , ...... e .44. ,.:.: 1 . .. APPENDIX B . . , Needs Assessment WM 1 H. ,41 • \ • • , . ,.. i , 4. , V ' 1 ....Az_ i A i• , . ...ids . ,. 0 , . ,„ ...L'? \ •.• . . ,... ,..• ,, 1:• . 1 , • _., • --" .01111/e - - ••• 4 ,- ..•• ..-•,-t,rtr::r401,ti. I 01.1111Pb 11,--- t. A: tir VIM*MN. .,ilbil ...,-/Hi . , 4111,.1/0 a/ 4INN • c C,i,4 .!...:„!v...,, 114, 1 " -1 ... •,,1'..,, , . t ....ti, 0 . , )1111 , Is 4 1.! p 0 „, .''011110 1/4410 WS ' .r 1/ , tiliiiii ,,Il r,., 11,1 1..‘...A, 1.1,' . v1,4"- -• - - _, - . At It. im401111041 10'.• , i ..,.... ,„ .. . 1 . ,, _ 4, . ;, •ir,,,,,,e . ,. ;.. ii14 :1t{ 0-''' i \C•' z,, -..,,, ' . • n y a sAllit"V , . . .V7.,""- 1 -. , 4,•\ ',"•*I'''.' . 2'....i. ' ' . . .. •, „ \ . , . , . Art - • 0110. k F , f . ' • O .' 4: 004401111111/11.' SAFE CLEAN SUSTAINABLE CONNECTED THRIVING 1,- Nor --Nor • 'N' M • *I ii 1 JIhi. �` a, [ .. . .. . , MOIR 4 ... . Ilk.- . , 1: _ , *1%4 V.,2 . • 401 ,4 7,/. ' ', . . 1, ' lqr tkilior ivr • - Needs F� „.o .„.,..,., ,.. U O Assessment 4_, .REG±e/ //tiiii• LAKE OSWEGO August 2024 PARKS PLAN 2040 Section 1. Introduction and Community Vision Note:The Needs Assessment originally published in August 2024, included summaries and results from the community outreach and engagement that had taken place. In Parks Plan 2040, these outreach results are included in Appendix C and have been removed as appendices from this Needs Assessment. Purpose and Overview The City of Lake Oswego is updating its Parks, Recreation, and Natural Areas System Plan (Parks Plan 2040)to define goals and priorities through the year 2040.This document summarizes community needs for Lake Oswego's parks, recreation, and natural areas system based on metrics, data, and analyses; identifies gaps in access to parks, recreation facilities, and activities; and recommends potential opportunities for future investment.The Needs Assessment provides an in-depth assessment of the city's system to determine what is missing and identifies possibilities to create more vibrant parks and recreation experiences for everyone in the community. This document summarizes the work completed in phases 1 and 2 of the five phased planning process. It considers public preferences and priorities, as identified through outreach activities, along with needs identified through the technical analysis for parks,trails, recreation, and programs.This information will guide the development of Lake Oswego's recommendations for the parks and recreation system in the second half of phase 3. What does the Needs Assessment Include? 1. Introduction and Community Vision, introduces the document and key components and articulates the draft vision and goals that will form the basis of the updated plan. 2. Community Engagement Summary, highlights the broad spectrum of community input heard during the first two phases of the project and identifies key themes consistent across outreach events. 3. Recreation Trends, provides a high-level overview of relevant recreation trends in Lake Oswego. 4. Equitable Park and Recreation Access Analysis, evaluates park and recreation access in Lake Oswego by examining which areas of the City can access different park system features and who lives in those areas. 5. Park and Facility Needs, identifies relevant benchmarks for the parks and recreation system and identifies needs and potential trends for different types of recreation facilities. 6. Recreation Activity and Service Needs, identifies needs and potential trends for several aspects of Lake Oswego's recreation programs and activities. 7. Moving Forward, identifies key considerations moving forward and next steps. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 t � T �' ZM �.. _ axis a rw i a 8 7& - ✓- Y � .t*,.x 1a p,. ,fk3`r . .�_ ..., hz. t-Via': . �•� s�e ,.,,�"' Community Vision The public engagement process helped identify several common visionary themes for the future.The following visionary elements relate to the qualities people appreciate in the parks and recreation system,the types of facilities and activities participants would like to see expanded, and the big ideas that resonate with the Lake Oswego community. The City of Lake Oswego provides an inclusive park and recreation system that is enjoyed by all neighborhoods, community members, and visitors. Parks, natural areas, recreation facilities, activities, events, and services are integral to the fabric and character of the community and provide memorable and enriching experiences, connections, and contribute to a healthy environment. The interconnected park and recreation system is sustainable and resilient, and supported by collaborative community partnerships. The seven goals on the following page provide system-wide guidance to achieve the community vision. The vision and goals, along with more specific planning objectives build and expand on the guidance in Parks Plan 2025.Two new goals have been added, along with a variety of new and revised objectives to reflect community input, Parks staff experience, changing recreational trends, and other factors.This strategic framework will provide guidance for developing and implementing Parks Plan 2040 to ensure that decisions align with the community's vision and priorities.The strategic framework of goals and objectives provides a foundation for the system wide recommendations, which will be developed in later phases of the planning process based on community member input, advisory committee guidance, and the findings in this needs assessment document. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-3 GOALS 1 Access to Essential Services Ensure that all residents have equitable access to essential recreation services2 . Invest in Parks, Natural Areas, and Recreation Facilities Invest in the renovation of existing parks and facilities and strengthen the health of natural areas to preserve existing assets. Serve All Ages and Abilities Create unique and diverse recreation facilities, programs, and parks that serve people of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds. Stewardship, Maintenance, and Operations 4 Establish, maintain, and operate parks, facilities, and programs to ensure public safety, provide appropriate public access and use, and protect ecological and recreational assets to ensure their continued contribution to the city's high quality of life5 . A Sustainable and Resilient System Provide resilient and sustainable parks, trails, and natural areas. 6 A Connected System Prioritize trail connections that support active recreation and transportation, connecting key parks and natural areas with city destinations. Community Partnerships and Engagement 7 Collaborate with a full range of community members and stakeholders to enhance and protect the character, function, and natural resources of the parks and recreation system. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-4 Essential Services Lake Oswego Parks & Recreation strives to provide equitable access for all community members to some of the most essential park and recreation services.These "essential services" are park and recreation activities or amenities that have been identified as the most important to Lake Oswego community members.Three of the essential services were identified by the previous Parks, Recreation, and Natural Areas System Plan (Parks Plan 2025) in 2012 and still align with the community's priorities today: Exercise and Sports, Play for Children', and Experience Nature. Community feedback gathered during more recent Parks Plan 2040 outreach activities revealed Trail Connectivity as a fourth essential park service that is important to many community members. In particular,trail connections have been identified as a priority to Lake Oswego's aging community as well as teens and youth. In addition,the increased desire for safe, passive, outdoor recreation opportunities following the Covid-19 pandemic supports trail connectivity as a top community priority. PLAY FOR CHILDREN Play happens in many formal and informal settings. In this case, play for children is defined as an activity supported by a space or feature that is designed specifically to encourage playful interactions for children. Examples include developed play areas 1 I L (slides,swings, platforms and installed toys), nature play areas, and interactive water features. EXPERIENCE NATURE Nature surrounds park users even in the most developed parks in Lake Oswego but lei the act of experiencing nature focuses on the opportunity to be surrounded by trees, provide water access, come into direct contact with unique habitats or natural features or observe wildlife.This activity can include a wide range of possibilities from bird watching in a grove of trees to exploring a native planting area within a developed park. TRAIL CONNECTIVITY Trails provide people of all ages the opportunity to connect with the outdoors, stay ••■ active, improve community health, and safely travel from place to place.This activity 9.. :: includes walking, biking, or rolling on paved multi-use paths, as well as soft-surface nature trails. Park and recreation sites that include 0.1 miles of trails or more are considered to provide trail connectivity. EXERCISE AND SPORTS These include individual,group or team activities that support general health, individual fitness goals, competition, or teamwork.These activities can be supported by a range of active recreation facilities — from sports fields to sport courts—that help people enhance or maintain their overall physical fitness, health, and wellness. 1 While natural areas can support play where policies allow park access, exploration,and interaction (digging, hiding,climbing,splashing in a creek,skipping rocks,walking,or biking off-trail,etc.), most natural areas in Lake Oswego are not designed or managed to support these types of play activities. For purposes of this assessment, only formal play areas are considered as providing this essential service. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-5 Section 2. Community Engagement Summary During the first phase of community engagement in 2023, Lake Oswego community members provided valuable insight to shape the future of the parks and recreation system.The planning approach encouraged participation from a broad range of stakeholders, including residents across the city, neighborhoods, and representatives from Boards, Commissions, and diverse interest groups. Community input helped to define values, needs, and aspirations for the parks and recreation system. This input will continue to inform the development of Parks Plan 2040. Outreach and Opportunities Parks Plan 2040 will be built on a robust public engagement process involving a variety of events and activities for all ages.The City and MIG team offered opportunities for lively discussions and interactive outreach to stimulate participant thinking about needs, preferences, and new ideas. Common threads from the community input will form the basis of strategies that set the direction for Parks Plan 2040. Detailed summaries from outreach events and activities are documented separately in the appendices. Similar activities will continue to be conducted during subsequent stages of the planning process. Parks Plan 2040 Engagement Goals • Identify barriers to participation. Cultivate an understanding of existing or potential barriers to the full participation of all community members. • Leverage local networks and existing community engagement efforts. Build on the variety and depth of existing community involvement initiatives within Lake Oswego to engage the public effectively and efficiently in the development of Parks Plan 2040.Tap into existing community-based networks and groups to connect with a wider range of community members. • Ensure an accessible planning process.The community involvement process will be accessible, understandable, and welcoming to all who wish to participate. • Collaborate and inform decision-making. Collect useful and relevant public input that reflects local knowledge and values and informs decision-making related to the Plan update. • Build long-term capacity for civic engagement around park design,development, and programming. Continue to build and reinforce the support network for those engaged through the planning process to stay involved and share not only needs and issues, but also priorities and strategies necessary for a thriving and inclusive park system. • Ensure accountability. Provide summaries, updates, and useful information to report back to the community and decision makers about how their input was used to shape the Plan and make adjustments as needed. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Focus Groups To help assess needs and opportunities associated with existing and potential future parks, Engagement Snapshot recreation facilities, and natural areas, members of the Parks Plan 2040 Team conducted small 10 community member group group meetings with a variety of groups who represent specific neighborhoods, interests, and interviews including representatives perspectives.The Team met with 10 groups over from the following topic areas, groups, the course of approximately three months and organizations: between October 2023 and January 2024.The • Luscher Farms Stakeholders Team also met with representatives from the Lake • Friends of Parks Oswego School District to discuss existing operations and potential opportunities for • Pickleball increased coordination. • Natural Resources and Sustainability Pop-Up Events • Recreation and Sports Partners • Accessibility The City hosted a series of fun, informal pop-up events at the Lake Oswego Farmer's Market, Lake • Diversity,Equity,and Inclusion Grove Farmer's Market, neighborhood meetings, • Youth Action Council and other events at different locations across the • Youth Advisory Board Members City. Participants were encouraged to place • Youth Leadership Council stickers on different types of park improvements, programs,or events they would like to see more 1 183 of in Lake Oswego. survey respondents, including 403 for a statistically valid Community Event survey. A citywide event on November 14, 2023, provided an open house,family-friendly forum for 4 presentations and meetings with attendees where they could spend time reviewing advisory committees and boards. and commenting on project information and talking with the Parks Plan 2040 Team.The 1 citywide open house. purpose of the event was to provide an opportunity for Lake Oswego residents to learn more about the Plan update, including the planning process and what has been completed so far, and provide their input to help shape the vision and goals and identify any gaps or opportunities in the system. Statistically Valid Survey From September 26 to October 18, 2023, project team member DHM Research (DHM) conducted a survey of 403 Lake Oswego residents to assess resident priorities for parks and recreation activities. Respondents were contacted randomly from a list of registered voters. Surveyors contacted respondents through a text-to-online process, supplemented by phone calls with a live interviewer. In gathering responses, DHM employed a variety of quality control measures, including questionnaire pre- testing and validation, and established quotas by gender, age, educational attainment, race and ethnicity, and area of the City to ensure that a representative sample of the population was reached. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Communitywide Online Survey Following the statistically valid survey, Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation opened the survey to all community members.The city shared the online survey link though various communication ` channels to ensure the widest reach.An additional 780 residents and community members completed the communitywide online 1.'ht: - 'a-_'` survey. i 0 it ' 4 11 Community Advisory Committee and Technical I11 .r - r. / ' ,f,i ,: Advisory Board } �tiF '• The City convened a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) •: f I composed of community stakeholders and interest group i1e1 VII, . representatives to help guide the process while the City's existing Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PRNRAB) serves as the technical advisory board. From the start of the Dream Big.What doyoo like to defer fun in parks' project,the Parks Plan 2040 Team has presented to the CAC And PRNRAB at key points in the process. Each presentation included a Noce o dd nicker on Ming you want ra da in porMc. facilitated discussion in response to the materials presented, and gl --;(--, questions related to what participants like about the parks and recreation system,what may be missing, and how they envision the ,.= - - - system evolving over the next 15 years. Swinging and Sliding Playing Sports .�` f/ '' Informational Materials -_4„. ►. r The project team developed informational materials to share with Playing In Water Climbing the community including a two-page FAQ and created a webpage �'�`'_ to share latest project happenings, upcoming meeting information, <, . and links to surveys and other project materials. illiA - Biking.Skating,Scootenng gagding and Exploring mmum...._MMIIIIIIIIIMIFIIIIIIIIIIIIaoeP - i II wha whet you think! g�; - V. -+ + ' �■... , . ..., s�. pw.,._: 1'. .. ter. ,• ..»� �$ .., _: �;..,�,. :-: x=fit •.lam • • • •�ii. f'' q �i r l r i;► !mot a t ,�••• �..� �1 � �� !�; '�� } ��of�II� \ LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IB-8 Key Themes Based on findings from the statistically valid survey, Lake Oswego residents appreciate the existing parks and recreation system and have high levels of satisfaction with it.They recognize the scale and variety of recreation facilities in Lake Oswego requires ongoing investment and maintenance. Generally, residents are Residents had high or very happy with parks and high levels of satisfaction recreation... with the following park are satisfied with parks features... 86°10 across the City 9O 'Jo landscaped areas 83°lo are satisfied with parks in their neighborhood 87% natural areas 75% are satisfied with $6°l% paths and trails recreation activities and services 2023 DHM Statistically Valid Survey for Parks Plan 2040 While community members value the park and recreation system, community members also have a variety of different ideas for the future. Key themes identified and described further below emerged through the comprehensive outreach conducted for Parks Plan 2040 to date. :: Trails and Pathways The popularity of and desire for more trials and pathways was echoed in findings across outreach events. Frequent park users "More biking trails around the noted that walking to their favorite parks often felt unsafe due to city and connecting key the lack of pedestrian connectivity. While outreach respondents corridors." noted Iron Mountain and Luscher Farms as popular sites to walk - in, expanding trail connectivity within other parks and between Communitywide online City parks was identified as a priority by many. survey comment LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-9 ft`L';‘. Park Improvements While community members expressed their satisfaction with what Lake Oswego has, several improvements were consistently noted during outreach events.They included increasing water access, unique and inclusive play opportunities, and making accessibility improvements (e.g.,signage, parking, play equipment, seating, etc.) as well as adding some places to play pickleball. Participants also noted amenities like restrooms, durable and easy to clean picnic tables, and improved lighting for safety. 0 Information Sharing Many residents shared their desire for improved information about parks, natural areas,trails, available programs and events,and accessibility features. Residents noted that the City's website is not always user-friendly, and some community members shared how they would like to see program and event information on social media platforms, or a mobile app. Lake Oswego's youth also noted how they and their peers like going to City events like movies in the park and the Farmer's Market but do not always know about events beforehand. ft. Accessibility During outreach events, many participants noted that Lake Oswego parks, "I'd like parks facilities, and events are not always accessible.Aside from physical with adequate improvements to remove barriers and implement universal design practices, parking for some participants felt that the biggest obstacle is the lack of information ahead disabled to use of time (e.g., information about accessible parking, restrooms, benches along the the facilities. trail, how muddy it is likely to be, etc.).Another obstacle identified by focus Close to picnic groups is signage that gives people with disabilities enough information about tables and seats what they might encounter once they are on the trail or have traveled down it for watching a for some distance (e.g., steep grades, lack of benches or shade, narrow paths). sport." Other desired improvements noted during outreach events included adding Communitywide accessible parking, play areas, and seating and gathering areas. Participants also noted the importance of reaching community members who spoke languages online survey other than English through and ensuring parks, recreation facilities,and programming was accessible to them. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-10 Z= Athletic Facility Use Sports fields and courts are popular in Lake Oswego.While some participants stated their desire for new fields, others noted their preference for changes in approaches to scheduling and prioritizing community-based organizations over private clubs. Focus groups noted that soccer fields were particularly sought after, and supply is limited. Many participants noted that turf fields and lighting would extend the playability of Lake Oswego's sports fields later into the wet weather season. 411 Healthy Parks and Climate Resilience Many participants in outreach events noted they would like to see increased climate resilience in parks,their infrastructure, "Sustainability and environmental and operations practices. Others noted their desire for protection should be top priorities. increased invasive species management, habitat restoration, Reducing/eliminating chemical use and proactive approaches to pests such as the Emerald Ash in parks and common spaces Borer. Increasing partnerships and grant funding efforts for should be standard practice." natural resource protection projects was identified as - important for several participants. Communitywide online survey Year-Round Recreation Some participants in outreach events brought up their desire for more year-round recreation opportunities.This included turf fields to prevent drainage problems,covered areas to protect recreation activities from the weather, and indoor spaces that provide different programs or things to do during winter. Itli Access to Nature A recurring theme across outreach events was residents' appreciation for the City's natural areas.Some respondents identified that they would like more opportunities to connect with nature and highlighted keeping the natural feel of many areas in the city as a priority. While developing new park features was important, outreach participants also prioritized preserving and enhancing the City's natural areas. XMaintenance Community members think it is important to focus on improving and maintaining what already exists within the parks and recreation system.Advisory committees and boards noted the importance of financial sustainability of the park and recreation system over the long term. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-11 Section 3. Recreation Trends Recreation trends at the national and local levels provide context for new or emerging activities or experiences, and help us understand how people play, use parks and trails, connect to nature, and relate to one another. Referencing the Oregon Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP), this section outlines national and local trends relevant to the Lake Oswego Park and Recreation System. There are many trends in parks and recreation planning, down to the maintenance and operation of specific facilities.The trends identified on the next two pages reflect those most relevant to Lake Oswego and do not capture any and all design or programming trends. Key Trends Active & Aging Population Addressing a Variety of Youth With a growing population of older adults, Needs there is a heightened demand for Many park agencies are expanding recreational activities and spaces that services and enrichment activities for accommodate uses ranging from physical teenagers, young adults, and parent- exercise to learning and enrichment child groups.They are taking a more classes, healthy living programs, and holistic view of youth development that social services. In some cases, low-impact goes beyond physical exercise, into programs and accessible facilities are intellectual growth, socialization, needed for declining vision, hearing, professional development, and coordination, and mobility. Sometimes leadership skills.The aim is to produce older adult care centers fulfill this need; in early adult outcomes such as economic other cases, individuals turn to their local self-reliance, healthy family and social parks and program providers.This is a relationships, and community diverse age group that cannot be offered contributions.This approach also a one-size-fits-all approach. involves young people in local decision- making, empowering them to shape their future environment in which they may Universal Design & Accessibility Universal design is an approach for creating environments that exceed Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) accessibility standards and are inclusive to all levels of ability.This might include people with disabilities in vision, hearing, mobility, and sensory input.This also includes consideration of different users, such as people with strollers, people with walking aids, couples or groups, variations in sensitivity to heat or sun, etc. Recreation systems based on universal design standards encourage access, independence, safety, and comfort for all people.This approach is being integrated into recreation programming, public parks, indoor and outdoor recreation elements, and infrastructure to meet the needs of people of all abilities. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Climate Change Resiliency Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion Governments, businesses, and Cities are recognizing the longtime communities are working to reduce the marginalization of certain resident risks and costs associated with climate populations and cultures in how parks and change. Parks and recreation agencies are recreation programs have been designed, well-positioned to be key players in this planned, and structured in the past.They effort by advocating for designs and are making efforts to address these programs that align with their local climate inequities and to intentionally foreground needs. For example, cities are incorporating these populations in discussions of future water-wise, drought-tolerant, and native park systems,to make parks and plants into landscape designs, lessening programs more diverse, welcoming, and harmful biological agents from the use of inclusive. Parks and public spaces must pesticides/herbicides, and co-locating flood reflect the spirit of place, and that water storing facilities within parks.Trail includes the people and cultures within infrastructure—including parkways, bike that place.To this aim, culturally- lanes, walking paths, and other active appropriate and adaptable programming transportation methods—is increasingly —including recreational activities, classes, seen as vital to reducing urban carbon and events—are increasingly being footprints. Further strategies include tree provided by city departments. canopies to decrease urban heat island effects, parks to reduce stormwater flooding, soil amendments (such as compost)to sequester carbon from the atmosphere, and forest management to Parks as an Economic mitigate wildfire destruction. Development Tool Many cities are beginning to reposition their parks and recreation as a driver for economic development, becoming a Trails & Non-Motorized Mobility destination for tourism and large events. Access to trails and pathways within and Rented spaces, event hosting, and tourism between parks continues to be a priority amenities are becoming top for communities across the country and considerations as cities begin to see how Oregon, including in Lake Oswego.Trails they should invest in parks and recreation and pathways offer numerous benefits for to both promote their cities while also the health and well-being of people and seeing financial returns from a major the environment. Creating safe, accessible tourism industry. connections to parks and recreation facilities increases exercise and physical fitness and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other negative environment impacts associated with vehicle travel. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 '' '`fi' '`gip. :,� JF -- .- 'i .� �,r - - ' ittot ' ...: .e. - ! .i Ott" + r,L ', - itt • Sr Section 4. Equitable Park and Recreation Access and Gaps Analysis Lake Oswego can promote an equitable park and recreation system by addressing the quality and quantity of services across the city and focusing on neighborhoods or populations that are traditionally underserved by public services.This section presents results of a geographic-based analysis that examines park access and equity, based on three factors:2 1. Access to Parks and Essential Services 2. Equitable Access Analysis 3. Additional Constraints and Considerations Access to Parks and Essential Services Park proximity has a significant impact on frequency of park use, as well as maximization of the economic, social, and health benefits that parks provide.The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) and the Trust for Public Land (TPL) have championed the national standard for providing parks within a 10-minute walk (or%mile) of all residents.This distance is the maximum distance most people will walk to a park. In 2018,the TPL, NRPA and Urban Land Institute launched a national campaign to ensure all people have access to a quality park within a 10-minute walk from their home.According to TPL's ParkServe data, nearly one quarter(22%) of Lake Oswego's residents do not have a developed park within a 10-minute walk from their home. To evaluate areas that are currently served and unserved by parks,the consultant team used a digital mapping program (ArcGIS Network Analyst'')to consider the actual paths of travel to reach pedestrian access points into existing parks. Map 4-1 illustrates areas served within a 10-minute and 5-minute (or mile)walk to existing parks, natural areas, and recreation facilities.The analysis methodology factors in physical barriers such as disconnected street networks and Oswego Lake. However, it does not account for topography and additional time, or energy needed to walk uphill. 2 The park access analysis uses regional, county,City,and U.S. Census data to identify areas of Lake Oswego that area currently served and unserved by existing parks,as well as other gaps or service inequities in the system. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-14 WHY IS EQUITABLE PARK ACCESS IMPORTANT? Parks promote healthy, connected, & resilient communities. Parks increase physical activity, reducing the risk of chronic diseases, obesity, and cancer. Parks improve mental well-being and productivity by reducing stress, anxiety, and depression. Parks encourage community connectivity by decreasing social isolation and the associated risks of dementia, heart disease, and stroke. Parks reduce crime rates and encourage community safety, trust, and capacity. Parks improve environmental health and climate resilience by providing cleaner air and water, reducing urban heat, and protecting against natural hazards and disasters. Parks promote economic activity, a high quality of life, and place-based tourism. Source: The Health Benefits of Parks and Their Economic impacts (Urban Institute) LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 1, • MAP 4- 1 : c I All Parks & Facilities Tigard \ , \-9/ • ,CNY2D Portland 0Access L.._ . __.,. •_,_... . • / _ f ° ,Hide-A-Way Pine Park r - Tryon Creek %:::` Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation ,ice---`\ .,!--• state _ r __ Natural Southwood 1 Area Regional Park Park /� " Woodmont Willa -tte Community Park LI.` i / .-!; Natural Park Ct3,u Park r ver •- • _ m Neighborhood Park Westlake 0 , . ___ -- . = Pocket Park Park �'' Community'• = Natural Area Al • Tryon • . Indoor Cove Park Trail Corridor Tennis Springbrook • Oswego Lake 1707121 Kincaid I',\ = Undeveloped Open Space Pala Country Club Curlicue Foothills Milwuakie __I = Urban Plaza TCorridoj Park; 1 iii• r = Recreational Facility -. Park REM In:Elle:ft Pennington Sundeleaf %I PIE& lam j Service Area Charlie 1/4 Mile (5 minute walk) West - 7S. Brown r.;. \Waluga Park Wi lam'ette Water Sports Center 1/2 Mile (10 minute walk) :_:�_— East Lake Oswego ;, , W g Swim Park . River Greenway __\ " . , 1 ,_ 0 Base Map Features George Schools ;, ,. Rogers-Park si '` -7.4.: Oswego LakeMELEE f glOrifelglICGO - Water Bodies : . Woods ... . Non-City Parks and Open Sapces • --- ;,�� ••'•r� Lamont Springs Glenmorrie` ,":::-- Natural Area C Greenway _ City Boundary _. , ...... I F e-Pon Paia Recreation I _; Metro Urban Growth Boundary Aquatic griVigtAliBg laDMRISOON! • Trails and Pathways s Municipal r r7: . Lake Oswego School District Boundary Hazelia / ' 11 I I 1 '. ', _ /_ Mki Luscher Farm ,r,,,s,.:,;,,.•"/•1-;•,.;..;,,," _Westridge Rassekh Park Park and IIL.. • .,,.. ;/,..-:...1. -;=- '`' _"' I l COMING,SOON! Natural Area 'I *I, .1 " West Linn m i'� �;'�; Bryant Woods _ Stevens ' - 'Pilkington Nature Meadow • Park CanaiA - r - Sunnyslope — i I • NaturalL ] i Open Space L — 7 Tualatin Rivergrove •. F River I oti ° * Run Park 8.n J ///1.„ n ii. .M. — ... 1 : El Ca v — o OREG02 1 .f 4/111 Sources: City of Lake Oswego and `t J O 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles LAKE OSWEGO Metro RLIS Database, 2023. I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I PARKS PLAN 2040 Date: January 2024. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-52 Essential Service Access Analysis An ideal park system is one in which parks are evenly TOTAL PARKS WITH EACH distributed to provide equitable access for all community ESSENTIAL SERVICE members to the four identified essential services.To assess this distribution, each park and facility was evaluated to EXERCISE AND SPORTS assess its capacity to provide each essential service.' • 15 sites Only parks and facilities that are owned and operated by A. PLAY FOR CHILDREN Lake Oswego Parks & Recreation were included in this 22 sites analysis. However, some facilities that are not operated by the City but that are in or near Lake Oswego may help EXPERIENCE NATURE support access to essential services for residents.These 34 sites include public and private schools, homeowner association- owned open spaces, and Tryon Creek State Natural Area. 0 TRAIL CONNECTIVITY These partner facilities are discussed in more detail later in this report. �..** 30sites Three of Lake Oswego's existing parks currently provide all four essential services: George Rogers Park, East Waluga Park, and West Waluga Park. In addition, Rassekh Park is currently under development and once completed it will also provide all four essential services. Parks that provide opportunities to experience nature are the most prevalent(34 total sites) and parks that provide active recreation opportunities such as sports fields and sport courts are the least prevalent(15 total sites). Utilizing the Essential Park Service Analysis, Figure 4-1 illustrates the geographic distribution of the four essential park services by parks, recreational facilities, and natural areas throughout Lake Oswego.To demonstrate access to each essential service, Figure 4-1 also illustrates the 10-minute (or 1/2 mile) and 5- minute(or% mile) service area reach for each essential service, regardless of park classification. Full size versions of the maps shown in Figure 4-1 can be found in the attachments. Understanding where essential service inequities are located within the system will help inform future investments to target these service gaps. Key findings from the essential service access maps include: • There are greater opportunities for experiencing nature and trail connectivity distributed throughout the City than play for children and exercise and sports. • Access to parks with play for children is fairly well supported throughout Lake Oswego although there are large gaps in the southwestern and northwestern portions of the City. • Parks offering opportunities for sports and recreation are the least well distributed across the City of all four essential services with large gaps in the southwestern and north-central portions of Lake Oswego. Gap Areas The Park Access Analysis revealed that there are 14 areas in Lake Oswego that are not currently served by any parks or facilities within a 10-minute walk.The boundaries of each gap area are defined as the 3 Undeveloped open spaces were excluded from the essential service access analysis as they do not provide public access to any of the four essential services. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-17 areas visualized in Figure 4-1 that are not served within a 10-minute walk to any of the four essential services.As shown in Map 4-2,the gap areas vary in size across Lake Oswego and the majority are located on the western side of the city. Gap areas with the highest severity of need include a black hatch.The approach to determining severity of need is discussed further in the next section. Figure 4-1: Essential Service Access Play for Children Service Area 1/1 Mile (s minute walk) 1/2 Mile (m minute walk) ' Exercise and — = Sports ACC8SS Service Area ---------------- 1/* Mile (s minute walk) uz Mile (m minute walk) LAKE oswcso pAnxs rLxm 2040 | u zo I •••• Experience Nature Access - . Poraand • 'r k a. . -- .„,. . Service Area I ; 1/4 Mile (5 minute walk) . ....t,,,..., .,.. ' • r . _._,..., _ .: ,, , ,11!- ''':::,. i = 1/2 Mile (10 minute walk) .. .. . LI. Vr ,- • , .. ,---,-,-.• ,'. r -r. . 4hillp LAIIIII6- Foothills Pa i '1?jrFr .YP , . .. ...„.„... ._ ...... . .._ ..:,..,.................... . , . 'Jr • . 'Arla . 011 a7 grip".7k— t , . . . 14 -_....... ''.• L.- 1 , Ai 1 J at' ler — Trail ,i 1,rtland "PPP'.' Connectivity .0 ..„ :D.,. Access . : :1 Service Area 1/4 Mile (5 minute walk) IV --- 1/2 Mile (10 minute walk) -..... ., - -000P.L. ,!-•t, : 11114L . Atihouakie no. FOO. : • ... -•• . , .n zarn sl,Ir.,.,./tP„.' ::.:., . , .111P '!".: 1144. Maiii0;llate ' :,,! ' VI '''.'''-'' .gg/M: ''''''' -.'. ,.,:'',II)" „..-., l G.10,2 ,. ,, ' L ' L:1741:17[7.411t 4011-t' -'41111..' il ,. ._. . . . , IL_ Ilr . . .. . ..... ... .. ... _. . . ., •.. L,.. • :: ii." ir;::- ri.• ' 1r ' --racrsoarr 1 L,rtrarll r * '1 .,' Oil' ir!., Park ' t ir t .— •:-.:N.....j , „.. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 • MAP 4-2: Tigard Kerr ; ;� 11'16111Fir Gap Area s S �L 1 _ . � Natural I—� Area Portland . __ I. ri, 43 rMcNary ____ _,.. ,..,.... Park' •. r f. ` Hide-A-Way ' Pine Cone Park r a i' Park Tryon creek ws Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation �S - 7., _ ,!= state Natural (Southwood 8 Area ;;,, Regional Park ,, Park > _. Woodmont Stafford = :, Willa e Community Park ---ZV M r j di Altura! Park Grove Park 12,> aver �p . +r Neighborhood Park Westlake .w7 = Pocket Park Park Adult Community _ 1- -de Center ; nTryo Natural Area eh •". - _ Cove Park = Trail Corridor Indoor Rossman , Ef Tennis Park j 2 Center Springbrook Oswego Lake Kincaid = Undeveloped Open Space 5 �� Country Club, Curlicue Foothills Milwuakie Corrido• Park; Urban Plaza 0 s 10 i I = Recreational Facility y ` Roehr Plaza►� Park Pennington Iron jjntain Sundeleaf %I •• Park I Plaza j f • Essential Service Gap Area 4;1 Charlie . • ,,.'\ west 7S. Brown Gap Area n;, Waluga Park - 9 Lake Oswego Willamette Water Sports Center " ' Waluga Swim Park River Greenway High Severity of Need Gap Area —• —•\ ,•r,•. Park f I 't 11 George 6 Rogers-Park Base Map Features 1—: ...a I * > > Oswego Lake South Shore Hallinan •„ Reservoir Woolly Schools — / - — ''•Lamont Springs VGlenmorrie`, Water Bodies Natu Area Greentree Greenway - _.f Park Apark Freepons� Non-City Parks and Open Spaces i Recreation and Park rk F Aquatic Center_. - City Boundary CU'NIING SOON! 7 GI Pamorrie _a Metro Urban Growth Boundary Municipal i ! r 1 __ ••••• 3 Golf Course 1 Trails and Pathways Hazeliar r F 4i _14 Lake Oswego School District Boundary Field = i 1 13 l ' re.J4arknd L_ . ) 1 .. I 4Westridge Rassekh Park f — �r1; Cooks l' 1 Natural Area I- Park Butted COMING`SOON! / l tip ►i! ' West Linn m i�� �; Bryant Woods dm Stevens ' Pilkington Nature Park �_�_ Meadow (I r YLPark r 1 Canal Acres • Sunnyslope i. Natural� � ., i Open Space . 7 A Tualatin Rivergrove • 11. River I iok s� 0 Run Park J L . O OREGO? 1 .f _ Sources: City of Lake Oswego and `t , O 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles Metro RLIS Database, 2023. I l l i I i i i I LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Date: January 2024. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-53 Equitable Access Analysis To better understand how gaps in service impact different populations groups in Lake Oswego, particularly historically underserved populations or those who may experience more significant barriers in accessing facilities,the 14 gap areas identified within the Park Access Analysis were evaluated further to assess how they relate to areas of the city with a higher severity of need based on six equity indicators. Maps 4-3—4-8 show areas of the city, including the 14 gap areas,with greater concentrations of the six equity indicators outlined below.The maps utilize Census block group data from Urban Footprint which uses 2019 American Community Survey information.The block groups shown on these maps are intended to communicate general areas, not specific locations. Unserved gap areas were considered "high severity of need" if high percentages of four or more of the following indicators applied to them: Communities of Color Across the U.S., communities of color have been historically disadvantaged through segregation, discrimination, environmental justice issues, and lack of public investment in facilities like parks and recreation. Youth under 18 Parks provide a range of benefits for youth of all ages including support for social development, access to greenspace, and healthy activity options without needing to drive a car. Populations over 65 Parks provide a range of benefits for populations over 65 including opportunities for social connection to combat social isolation, access to healthy activity options without needing to drive a car or travel long distances, and improvements to overall health and wellbeing. Populations with a Disability Parks provide many benefits for individuals with physical and cognitive disabilities including opportunities for physical activities and social connection, improvements to overall health and wellbeing, and access to nature. Multifamily Housing Areas with a greater concentration of multifamily housing are important to consider as these housing types typically have less access to individual yards or greenspace at their homes. Poverty Areas with a higher percentage of people in poverty and households with lower income often have less public investment historically and may have limited access to free public parks and recreation facilities. Poverty is measured by comparing a household's income to a set poverty threshold, or the minimum amount of income needed to cover basic needs.The poverty threshold for 2019,the date this data was published, was $26,172 for a family of four or$13,011 for an individual. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-21 Q Q T • �G, p P y+QPc '^ 5 mp MAP 4-3 : ., _ om SW STEPHENSON ST Tigard P Communities of _ Portland S� KFRR RKW ,, 43 <FS`SP ,-,,,, Color RRo4 R., , , m 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST 1 / 1 - 4 f -; i, Tryon Creek —1, '� 1------. Percent Population of Color (Non-White), State- TIMBERLINE DR Natural 3 w F Area • Census Block Groups 6ss 8 0 '' Willa e 0-4%0 \,` _MELROS BOSIlCEL IF . � . !- , '12`r, veY 4.01-$% Elk ., 8 01 5°/ CC 111 CO in Eli 1 o ti 15.01-21% COUNTRY CLUB RD •__. ea _ 21.01-30% 0 0 Oswego Lake , Country Club Milwuakie Essential Service Gap Area L. s MEADOWS RD O� lO Gap Area o FIR RIDGE RD Fe e SW BONITA RD -- _- • „ 00C) si9' �,,,Os' Base Map Features `") Lc 3 R-° v,-, 9°� a 9 Q Schools 1_ Bil Water Bodies p', LAKE GROVE AVE City Parks and Facilities ri ��� " 6 11 PE Non-City Parks and Open Spaces Q�P (,�O?FS l' r ��pP- M00y J 5e°°�y�° e,6o :La.- -- �PQ Oswego Lake SOUTNS"ORFgC�p 7` City Boundary c<o*s , r i Metro Urban Growth Boundary Pt ' .---: J �1 o o FR�o. Trails and Pathways �p�1P '� GREENTREE RD ��°�P`�' Lake Oswego School District Boundary yF °� z e° 7 w m i � , © u ]i•'1 1.: - rill � 3 Z -- - S BERGIS RD la_I L 7 _ 9Of� 14 ak ' �: OVERLOOK DR 13 ;� / .-. L. : , . . ._.. .. s., (---\,—/-- ' ' 1_,, 11 f I- -A P ,„ © 1- �� � West Linn m —�� - a__:--- � `fit ._, . ,,,, sp.,_ „, 11 M ` , CHILDS RD ', ONT'PO ` ILLCREST DR .... 7 11 Tualatin Rivergrove .. \ I ok £�s J SW NYe ERG ST ' ti I_^ c L`z I, uIll ria a 'KSO�RO L OREGO''- difilibMillininli. Sources: Urban Footprint, 2019 ACS I O 0 0.25 1 Miles 5-Year Estimates, City of Lake I I I 0.5 I I I I LAKE OSWEGO Oswego and Metro RLIS Database, PARKS PLAN 2040 2023. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-54 Q 5 m MAP 4-4: pi • om SW STEPHENSON ST Tigard ' Portland Multifamily Housing 43 S ii-mir L<FSSP0 ! P RRom 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST , / 1 - ```- ri Tryon at Creek s Ili q ,, tate Percent Multifamily Housing, 1� .-, TIMBERLINE DR Natural r---' ._. _, a Area ,1 Census Block Groups m 8 o 7er2 P:-.. .• ,_MELROSEST 1� • - 5.01 13% 13.01-33% ti �DDNT 33.01-57% RY CLUB RD •--, , � 57-100% i 2 0 COountry Lakel Milwuakie I_, — Essential Service Gap Area aw , :y MEADOWS RD O� i 10 Gap Area o �� e� = FIR RIDGE RD N • SW BONITA RD •- �� /I' 'S6 °,�`P�O � Base Map Features �, a `° Future Habitat for Humanity Affordable = a 9 Housing Project `' - .2.'•. LAKE GROVE AVE - Ei2 Schools .5",<, 6 li Water Bodies �oo�e�o . p.,. 11 f.1'•' O', " Oswego Lake so�TNSM M \r City Parks and Facilities S �,Py :� »�: °RF8�0 Non-City Parks and Open Spaces —: City Boundary �,�' o BPYRD o ;fr'' �o r , Metro Urban Growth Boundary -1p `NE5T GREENTREE RD R . 1`O�� Trails and Pathways 1,• oso . ir. Lake Oswego School District Boundary • © u 3 ° -as--a S BERGIS RD L-% L 7 •L. EAN RD r-- ' 13 "`• OVERLOOK DR ` i aR q�RO p°J`�� / \ 6 _ • • West Linn m - �� • 111 / SROV I I. HMO • 11 ' CHILDS RD , H'TRO ` ILLCREsr DR _ 7 Tualatin Rivergrove \ is 1 ok £os SW NYe ERG ST , ' I I_^ 8 J Sy 0 V O w . _. ► Ill Ca ' SON L OREGO�- 4 If**..dm..—... a 1 q0 Sources: Urban Footprint, 2019 ACS O 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 5-Year Estimates, City of Lake `• I I I I I I I I LAKE OSWEGO Oswego and Metro RLIS Database, PARKS PLAN 2040 2023. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-55 Q Q S �QP° N Pm MAP 4-5 : SW STEPHENSON ST Q Tigard P Population over 65 Portland KF Az 43 y RR PKW <FSS A R SW DARTMOUTH ST / 1 Tryon Creek g ,,- '� _ Percent of Populationover 65, State -• TIMBERLINE DR o Natural _ a Area Census Block Groups ��.` $ _ Willa e 0-4% MELROSE ST r •12• r ver L 4.01-14% - ---• W 14.01-20% II 20.01 3 di COUNTRY CLUB RD ..... ....- - 35.011-50% f JJ 2 le' IP i tMilwuakie KRDSEWAY • Essential Service Gap Area Q S MEADOW �� 1RRID •• CI _� Gap Area Fe _ m Q SW BONITA RD -- -• ,- '4- Base Map Features • • ,' 9<L90R a o— • - Schools = a z 9 Water Bodies `'' r- •f•L LAKE GROVE AVE City Parks and Facilities ,$),,, 6 — Non-City Parks and Open Spaces F °o���° R-2,, r-. JPQ�0.0f Oswego Lake So�rH H City Boundary 1:3,9 to ';i::,.. - s o, ec ._ r , Metro Urban Growth Boundary : ...: _ "!" o Trails and Pathways + PAp° `NSIBPYRD GREENTREERDLake Oswego School District Boundary AP �� (IJ e5 _ ir, illbo 111111i z ! + o 1 le a * 3Pirni oJEAN RD Z -�-� S BERGIS RD IR_ 7 , lr-- 13�:i OVERLOOK DR yj I i ' eRy9,yTRO pOJO,�PJ da J IL i ;,---.. _ % ..„ ....,, r t West Linn m11 oP •a-. ' + CHILDS RD ', • v ONT'PO L., ILLCREST DR _ 7 • Tualatin Rivergrove 1 I ok iP SW NYe ERG ST ' I I_^ [� , S��O V O P y�SONR L OREG°� 1 O Sources: Urban Footprint, 2019 ACS ®I. 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 5 Year Estimates, City of Lake I I I I I I I I I LAKE OSWEGO Oswego and Metro RLIS Database, PARKS PLAN 2040 2023. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-56 Q TSWSTEPREMAP 4-6: NSON ST ° Tigard , Portland Youth under 18 kE 43 y • RR PKW ' <FS`sP F RRp 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST ! / 1 ^ 4 f Tryon Creek s p , stare 1-------. Percent of Population Under 18, 4 - '-� TIMBERLINE DR Natural Census Block Groups i •—. —. F Area J i m 8 0 ,11 . ,,Willa e 12-16% :II MELROSE ST 0-O'CVVVI di '•-+) 'l Z , 77eY - 16.01-20% mt 26.01-31% © II a E0 COUNTRY CLUB RD = 31.01-50% Os�neco Lake 5 county Club t Milwuakie KRUSEWAy AAVE Essential Service Gap Area 2 MEADOWS RD O 10 Gap Area o FIR RIDGE RD Fe SW BONITA RD -- __ , ,+ 0�° • 9 °°�P� Base Map Features :) UGC FOB vhi 9°� a 9 a de Schools Eii;; Water Bodies -' ;•••• r LAKE GROVE AVE City Parks and Facilities ,,,,,, 6 11 — Pe '' Non-City Parks and Open Spaces ial sea:°P9 °a° IL y"; S. °Qe Oswego Lake SOUTNs"o5Feup o City Boundary .+� ; °�;, r; Metro Urban Growth Boundary , ,,.01 ' o s p,' s. qt. Trails and Pathways ' tcePyPO WESS BAY 0.0 ., - ,,,..,11.3:i],,,,.:, ...:.L__ ° Lake Oswego School District Boundary e '# y 3 n J5615 . Lr 7 9r 14 ill 1 114- --(111-"' % © 1 ^.. L--}_ar� West Linn —P „ I SRos ' + PM 0 +,. I ` aILLCREST DR 11 Tualatin R.):.' ove \ _ 7 ti e 0 os !" SW NYe ERG ST I I_^ _[� J Syi>0 V _ ° ut w ir .• y�soti u PR dilL1/1///111;....... c� Ill Ca a Rp EGO - Sources: Urban Footprint, 2019 ACS O 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 5-Year Estimates, City of Lake ` I I I I I I I I LAKE OSWEGO Oswego and Metro RLIS Database, PARKS PLAN 2040 2023. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-57 ..111MMI O� a Gti� �pP 5 MAP 4-7 pi ■ SW STEPHENSON ST F Q Tigard P Populations with a Portland 43 s ,1;N Disability �<FSSF P R Ro — O - o SW DARTMOUTH ST - r. -- • Tryon Creek s p ,, snC Percent of Population with a Disability, 4 :. TIMBERLINE DR Natural Census Block Groups o .. • - • 5 Area 4 • �� m 8 o '.,Willa,, e 4-5i% �, MELROSE ST 6o-c.'c J % .:.^ •12,�' ' veY ' 5.01-7% • EL 7.01-10% ti r m 10.01-16% COUNTRY CLUB R. • = 16.01-200/0 J 2 5 Milwuakie KRDSE WAY _ • Essential Service Gap Area p. MEADOWS RD FIR RID "" Gap Area - Fc _ a a SW BONITA RD i •- -- �• �O -- ' ' '.•t': P10 Base Map Features CI .. " °0-., a 1 Schools _�,,. a . ' Water Bodies • 4? `;; f.r•-.•`•.••• , . / • City Parks and Facilities �� ~c; IOW Non-City Parks and Open Spaces pE-� 4114-L- :"°,P, a ' 0 : : CityBoundary °oa��o - a ti �.; Oswego Lake or, r _ Ei :IOUndarY A; ••••.IMI ���J colob01 EENTREE RD O 5F iP e� ogior. © or• poi i i 1 • JEAN RD -IP-4 S BERGIS RD L.) L ., 13 3' -'�• •• OVERLOOK DR ' ,• 1111111 . 1 Ry9DH pOJG�� -. —g' I , ',,• ,.:�,• OHO I _ ILi,_._---,....„-> `,, West Linn ' m aP .._-z •� . • — I .... .. CHILDS RD , SROS�M°+H L • ILLCREST DR 7 11 Tualatin Rivergrove \ k e o s is 0 SW NYeERG ST ' i^ �f SRO ~ v:. O ONR oRE00? 1 O dirlilliiib.iiimmor- _ Sources: Urban Footprint, 2019 ACS O 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 5-year estimates, City of Lake `• I I I I I I I I LAKE OSWEGO Oswego and Metro RLIS Database, PARKS PLAN 2040 2023. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-58 ■ a �� Lq 04' a M �QP° N MAP 4-8: mP Z J om SW STEPHENSON ST Tigard P E Portland iPoverty 0s RPK ko _ m SW DARTMOUTH ST 1 1 g q 5 w Tryon Creek "I stare 1------. Percent of Population in Poverty, TIMBERLINE DR o iNatura� 2 ._. _. g Area Census Block Groups § 8 - o y' , Willa a 0-1% INI I MELROSE ST O�ICEl E •12', veY - 1-3%o -- 3-7% ili ti,,,i 7-10% � m COUNTRY CLUB RD • 10-14% 2 ® OswegoCountryLake 5 Country clan Milwuakie KRUSE WAY Essential Service Gap Area MEADOWS RD �� FIR RIDGE RD 4Gap Area Q v _ SW BONITA RD -- .- 0�O .1 7 9 ,04s° "�� Base Map Features I • r_ 4� G• c9.,� a 9 �' Schools Wat er Bodies • 44 `i, City Parks and Facilities �� ;; 11 .0 PE Non-City Parks and Open Spaces Q,P `:"0 Fs li r M�Oy y�oo�ePo aG :�, Oswego Lake SOusyD t. : City Boundary _ ,/—/ ,01 .. Metro Urban Growth Boundary o s Trails and Pathways --: 7 3I ,'i '.: '-' 4..‘11.‘. `' WE�BAY 0.D 3 �4,0 EZPPy Z GREENTREE RD ' ` OP Lake Oswego School District Boundary __, JEAN RD ��O 3 r; '� S BERGIS RD In-..• L 7 - -Z O • OVERLOOK DR y I y T `. R P -l lR0 POJG � N �L : :;,.. • .., O r r 'rf_, ``. 6P © • - " 1- -' West Linn m �� ith •J: r q _ y ' CHILDS RD H'TRO ` ILLCREST DR ` I _ 7 11 Tualatin Lov e .. 1 o. I ok £�s SW NYe ERG ST ' ti I_^ c Jr s,y o V O ! - uIll Ca a 'KSO�RO L 1 ORE00'''- , diffilii6V11111111.111111 iils Sources: Urban Footprint, 2019 ACS O 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 5-Year Estimates, City of Lake I I I I I I I LAKE OSWEGO Oswego and Metro RLIS Database, PARKS PLAN 2040 2023. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-59 Table 4-2 shows the high percentage equity indicators present within each gap area.Areas with high percentage equity indicators are defined as those with either of the two highest percentage categories present within each equity indicator map, excluding those with very small amounts. For example, in the Communities of Color map(Map 4-3), areas that have a population of color over 15%are defined as an area with a high communities of color percentage. Of the 14 gap areas,three are affected by four or more high percentage equity indictors and have a greater severity of need.As show in Map 4-2,two of the high severity of need gap areas (gap areas 3 and 4) are located on the western side of the city and gap area 14 is located to the east of Highway 43 in the southeastern corner of the city. Table 4-2: Equity Index Youth Population Gap under Population Communities with a Multifamily Poverty Area 18 over 65 of Color Disability Housing Areas with 6 High Percentage Equity Indicators None Areas with 5 High Percentage Equity Indicators None Areas with 4 High Percentage Equity Indicators 3 4 • 14 • • Areas with 3 High Percentage Equity Indicators 2 • 5 • • 7 • 10 • • • Areas with 2 High Percentage Equity Indicators 1 • • 6 • • 11 • 13 • • Areas with 1 High Percentage Equity Indicators 9 • Areas with 0 High Percentage Equity Indicators 8 12 *Note:Gap areas are not ordered in terms of priority.Areas with high percentage equity indicators were defined as those with either of the two highest percentage categories present within each equity indicator map.Areas with a very small of high equity indicators present were not included. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-28 Additional Constraints and Considerations Beyond the access and equity mapping completed for this assessment,there are additional factors that affect the current parks,trails, and natural areas system and will require considerations for the future. Environmental Resources and Climate Resilience Parks and natural areas provide a host of ecosystem benefits beyond supporting opportunities for recreation.These critical functions include the provision of fresh air and water, regulation of climate and stormwater, and the protection of wildlife and biodiversity.The Willamette River,flowing along the eastern edge of Lake Oswego, is a dominant feature of the city's landscape, providing fish and wildlife habitat as well as recreation and transportation opportunities.The area is very scenic, and many properties have views of the river, lake, and nearby Cascade Mountains. Many community members have expressed that they would like to see natural resources protected or enhanced,such as water access,water quality,scenic vistas, urban tree canopy,wildlife habitat, and the regional connections with the surrounding environment.These elements have and will continue to be important considerations in Parks Plan 2040. Wildfire Risk Wildfires occur in Oregon each year. Many of these destructive events threaten life, public health, and property. For that reason, Clackamas County has established fire hazard severity zones to help guide fire risk mitigation efforts as shown in Map 5-1. Lands that are located within these fire hazard areas and the Wildland Urban Interface may be less suited for certain types of park development because of the risks associated with potential wildfire activity.Wildfire mitigation practices should be considered when developing Plan recommendations, especially in areas with high wildfire hazards.The Lake Oswego Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan, adopted in December 2022, includes many site-specific strategies for reducing wildfire in the city's natural areas and will serve as an important guide for developing more general recommendations as part of the Parks Plan 2040 process. Urban Tree Canopy Tree canopies produce stormwater and pollution benefits, provide shade, alleviate the urban heat island effect, and have proven benefits to human health and wellbeing. Rising temperatures associated with climate change are anticipated to drive an even greater need for ecological cooling features in the coming decades. Map 5-2 shows urban tree canopy coverage by neighborhood in Lake Oswego. Future parks and recreation projects should strive to preserve existing tree canopies and increase tree canopy in neighborhoods with less tree coverage. Habitat Connectivity Habitats that are near to or directly connected with other habitats have higher ecosystem value than those that are isolated.This is especially true when they connect to much larger"source" habitats, such as the Cascade or Coast mountain ranges. Lake Oswego's natural areas along the Willamette and Tualatin Rivers are connected (though tenuously)to source habitats in the Cascades and Coast Mountains.The cluster of parks along the southern City boundary(such as Luscher Farm and Canal Acres) link to Tualatin River habitats outside the City. In addition, several of Lake Oswego's parks and natural areas are located near to two large habitat clusters of Tryon Creek State Natural Area (Oregon State Parks) and Mary S.Young Park(City of West Linn). Improving connections to these areas through wildlife or habitat corridors could help enhance ecological health. Minimizing habitat fragmentation and increasing habitat connectivity are objectives of Lake Oswego's Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan and should be considered when drafting recommendations for Parks Plan 2040. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-29 Most parks and natural areas in Lake Oswego—even partially developed neighborhood and community parks that include some amount of undeveloped natural area—can serve as important links in larger habitat clusters. Preserving riparian corridors along streams by limiting development and human access to these sensitive habitats creates a safe corridor for wildlife to use as they move through the community. Lake Oswego's Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan (2022)states: "Efforts to minimize habitat fragmentation can create cohesive blocks of habitat that enhance wildlife habitat conditions within natural areas. Protection of these habitat areas may also support efforts to enhance wildlife corridors (existing or planned) between natural area parks." Habitat Clusters based on Metro's Title 13 Resource Inventory are shown in Map 5-3. Transportation Options Public transportation access was not studied as a means to accessing parks,trails, recreation facilities, or natural areas in Lake Oswego due to the limited nature of current service. However,feedback from community engagement to date revealed that lack of service or frequency of service presents a barrier to many residents including youth,seniors, people with disabilities, and other members of the community that do not drive or lack access to a car. In addition, many community members also expressed their desire for more safe walking and biking options to access the parks and recreation facilities near to their homes.The expansion of transit along with other efforts to remove transportation barriers, improve connectivity, and create a multimodal transportation network are critically important aspects of park access. When transit service is expanded in Lake Oswego, access to major parks and facilities that provide access to nature, opportunities for play and gathering, and other human services should be prioritized. Partner Agency Facilities Public school facilities that provide outdoor recreation opportunities were also not incorporated as part of the equitable park and recreation access analysis, although they are shown on the access maps within the non-city parks and open space layer. However, it is important to note that playgrounds and open spaces as part of school facilities are available for residents to use for recreation during times that school is not in session. Future partnerships with the Lake Oswego School District(LOSD) should be explored to identify opportunities for joint-use facilities that can expand equitable access and support community needs and priorities identified by the planning process. In addition to school facilities,there are some parks and open spaces in Lake Oswego that help meet community needs but that are owned or operated by other agencies. Many planned developments provide homeowners association-owned open spaces that may provide access to nature, support trail connectivity, and even offer some play opportunities for children. Some homeowners associations, such as Mountain Park, even provide recreation facilities such as sport courts and an indoor aquatic center. These facilities are intended only for use by residents of the homeowners association and therefore were not considered in this citywide analysis. However,they may reduce the need for city-owned facilities in some of the gap areas identified, in particular areas 4 and 5,which are located partially within the Mountain Park homeowners association area and may be served by those private facilities. Tryon Creek State Natural Area, owned and operated by Oregon State Parks, is also partially located within Lake Oswego city limits, and serves as an important recreational amenity, offering close-to-home access to nature and trail connectivity to several Lake Oswego neighborhoods. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-30 Potential Constraints City Charter—Park Development Limitation (Chapter 10) Approved by voters in November 2021, Chapter 10 of the City's Charter mandates that the city preserves fifteen parks Designated Nature as designated nature preserves. Nature preserve is defined Preserves as "natural area parks or open spaces owned by the City of • Bryant Woods Nature Lake Oswego that are managed or maintained to retain Park their natural condition and prevent habitat deterioration." As a designated nature preserve, development is limited to • Canal Acres amenities that facilitate public access such as soft-surface • Cornell Natural Area trails, benches and interpretive displays, and picnic and sanitary facilities. Restricted development includes the Cooks Butte Park construction of athletic facilities,telecommunication • Glenmorrie Greenway facilities, and parking lots, roads, or trails for motorized vehicles due to their potential for conflict with natural • Hallinan Woods conditions.The cutting of trees is also heavily limited and • Iron Mountain Park no above ground structure that would impair or be inconsistent with the natural conditions of the nature • Kerr Open Space preserve is allowed.All existing facilities, structures, and • Lamont Springs Natural parking lots, roads or trails for motorized trails constructed Area prior to November 2021 are allowed to be maintained as long as the facility does not impair the natural environment. • River Run Although the aim of Chapter 10 is to promote numerous • Southshore Natural Area ecological benefits and preserve public access to the city's natural areas,the development restrictions conflict with • Springbrook Park community priorities related to accessibility and creating • Stevens Meadow recreation opportunities for people experiencing disabilities. Future discussions will be needed to further • West Waluga Park explore the limitations imposed by Chapter 10 of the City's • Woodmont Natural Park Charter and how it could impact the Parks Plan 2040 planning process. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-31 a a �J P 9 �QP° . - � m MAP 5- 1 : S pi • ' SW STEPHENSON ST Om Tigard Kerr ; °P WILDFIRE S Natural , ' Area � Portland % kF 43 s� RRPKwV HAZARDS <„,,,, McNary P R m R° Park o SW DARTMOUTH ST f• •-• C.:',. Hide-A-Way L ° Pine Cone Park LOP p ;if Park Tryon Creek Clackamas County Wildfire Hazards 4 __, T z stria ■ TIMBERLINE DR Natural LOW w F Area Southwood o Park' m " Woodmont Stafford 1L7 Willamette LOW TO MODERATE MELRoSE ` -%' Natural Park m Grove Park s River �;' MODERATE Eiii II I Westlake = MODERATE TO HIGH ti Park Adult " " air m Ce Center :':T on HIGH :Tryon 0 Ei COUNTRY CLUB RD Cove Park Indoor Rossman Tennis Park L Center Springbrook Oswego Lake Kincaid Park Country Club Curlicue Foothills Milwuakie KRUSE WAY VAST Corridor Park Base Map Features 2 MEADOWSRD `? FIRRiDGERD Millenium �` Plaza Rbehr Schools m Iron Mountain ° Sundeleaf Park SW BONITA RD ' ;- Pennington Water Bodies Park Park Pie Plaza -- ;, 47( 2 o�`"OJ� 'Charlie City Parks and Facilities Gw �` " S. Brown r.;. Walu West a Park a ` • Water Sports Center Non-City Parks and Open Spaces g East Lake Oswego Willamette , i_ Swim Park River Greenway I City Boundary 1Naluga .-' - •,y. Park LAKE GROVE AVE : ;�I 1 r — Metro Urban Growth Boundary F E George Trails and Pathways Quo- i� :o9es ,,' ��°� MG�EY P Rogers'Park Y s�oo�y�° a ;'['�' -; oPQ Oswego Lake SOUTNSyoR e South Shore Hallinan ', ` m��P ° ` , e t° Reservoir woods a� --- ;s,: .-",- ?Lamont Springs Glenmorriep� Greentree g Greenwa ° Natural Area o Y ° eP RD g Park Aspen Freepons� °P 1p WEST 3 GREENTREERD Park .p e��� Recreation and Park ��,° �e5 Aquatic Center_. -. o °",0 o o COMING SOON! �' ;= Glenmorrie w 1 Park '•5� �° m Municipal i + 1 �° Golf Course ' .. JEAN RD 3 Z -'��� S BERGIS RD k_- 7iii `• _ 9r Hazelia r' I �sy� • c: OVERLOOK DRR Field - % ,` , ` rs , .41r agyq�Ro pOwe PJ Ip Luscher Farm 1 _!� , ,.._ °6 Westridge Rassekh ?ark Park and �' f -' P �` V"' Park Cooks Natural Area .-. FP COMING SOON! Butte Park °P © West Linn 0 i-- �` Bryant Woods Stevens 4 'Pilkington Nature Park Meadow I Park .. h s111(kiii -;mmi : Oy Canal-AcresH[LDSRD Sunnyslope F" �o, 1 HILLCREST DR Open Space 7 Tualatin Rivergrove Natural Area mi River I i1 ok .11 os� SW NVEERG ST Run Park �' w y�sOro r , tJ °sego Sources: Clackamas County Wildfire a R° Protection Plan, 2017, City of Lake 1 Oswego and Metro RLIS Database, O0 o.25 o.s 1 Miles LAKE OSWEGO 2023. I I I I I I I I I �` PARKS PLAN 2040 Date: January 2024. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-65 aw i�G� a Gti ,, 5 m MAP 5-2: •' SW STEPHENSON ST Om OP Tigard NEIGHBORHOOD Portland A 1=1 S� .'' KFRR PK t 43 FSSFgR° TREE CANOPY .` a SW DARTMOUTH ST �/ Oak Mountain „f•- - T Creek o - --------' g 4. • • :-�`_ , TIMBERLIN •. o V Birdshill _ Lake Oswego Urban Tree Canopy Coverage ._ _, by Neighborhood (%) a _ - .HighlanIRD:Fcds it t o y Willamette 40-45% !�, MELROSE ST ._. co-`-' , •-+ _ River Em 45-50% . 50-55% Addition- • I 55-60% 1 Westlake m Holly G 1ing o Orchard COUNTRY CLUB RD --• • - � 60-70% Uplands • °ou„5�°�C1ub Milwuakie KRUSE W Foothills! Base Map Features North Shore ,2 MEADOWSRD 4' Wdluga 'R• Country Club QN ' _` Evergreen Schools P SW BONITA RD -_.•_--_-_ , Water Bodies S�_,„, Old City Parks and Facilities • �; '° L - r,. 'forest a di Grove Lakeview-Summit Lakewood ' a Town. Non-City Parks and Open Spaces ,_ , City Boundary ` • ' ' LAKE GROVE AVE - ._,;.•• 0 , Metro Urban Growth Boundary „ -o� o / c.,0'''. Trails and Pathways y�ooK5'• ; • 000 0. Oswego Lake McVey-South m�,P �° Shore �9 RS gpY RD o° ��1 `I`� GREENTREE R. I - 0 ,41 0 L‘L' HI y�° °. 3 P Palisades m Glenmorrie DIM 3 v !I .s' --- ... ::ij ''-'''': • _ S BERGIS RD ____ JEAN RD I Z Ei • —3;: •' OVERLOOK DR - - -" ;Skylands.� ---- Rosewood ' �r—�-+�:, .-, Westridge West Linn m _,. ,,t;.• iiii ei .. IF :.(; ---..,:_-, : ..)' _, — ;; SR °S •" PMONII ILLCREST DR •,k 1 • iTualatin Rivergrove k F 0 os SW NYe ERG ST . ' F I^ _,8 Sk,Oy v O S L ONR ORE,O? 1 O 111 Ca Sources: Lake Oswego State of the O 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles Urban Forest Report, December `• I I I I I I I I I LAKE OSWEGO 2022,City of Lake Oswego and PARKS PLAN 2040 Metro RLIS Database, 2023. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-66 i •-• WOW ligtAnir, 6 IIIMMIW , 14r r- ,/r ‘,11 t.. V . # r �QP '� ( ift MAP 5-3 • 5 , ■ ' SW STEPHENSON ST _ M�'_ J Kerr ' Natural ;1,Iiii;g4J:):12). HABITAT CLUSTERS Area Portland. iiii: s"21\4-i • FSS r, fMcark , r • • • •!y ��Rp // Park *if ii • ,r • `� T� ,,. SW DARTMO d Hide-A-Way J A w o Pine Cone �. lillib V 3 Park Tryon Cr, Habitat Cluster State W '•' • TIMBERLINE DR Natural ti f L' 47 _____ Area Metro Title 13 Habitat Cluster Southwood o �� Park' de m .. Woodmont Stafford Oregon White Oak Patch - m �-L :c Willamette • MELROSE -0,cE"` • —!-T y Natural Park* - Grove Parkaz • River . �.ivionTO .. •� Westlake i ,• y e ••..`{. �•' s Parky a •••..`{. , �'• s 2 _ 1� Adult Base Map Features toN i zs r• p Community , Center Tryon •. �� • m COUNTRY CLUB RD" • .Cove Park M Schools o .,,i f ±j- Indoor Rosman ,•t Tennis, -_ ` Park •1 Water Bodies Center Springbrook Oswego Lake Kincaid cswego a / Foothi • Is ij�ruakie • .111111t Park 1 Curlicue Park �:• • '`r City Parks and Facilities AA E Corridor °e K• is � MEADOWS �w11 - Si ♦� Non-CityParks and Open Spaces _� •• • !- FIR RIDGE RD �"• '� Millenium ` r•: • p z " a .1. Plaza `.�'1 '• Kis} • + Iron Mountain / JSundeleaf ) Park • I City Boundary SW BONITA RD ___•• -- Pennington •Park - • ••.�• ' :: s Park ' , 1 P,iaza ,' r a Metro Urban Growth Boundary rer `--- • ;: ;� • ,‹, r - :Charlie • ", West 9 ar o S. Browzg , Trails and Pathways r.;, • Waluga Park East Lake Oswego y Water Sports Center A II •Op Swirn Park Willamette vE River G eenw y ' ;- Waluga .._a, ���y er r a 3 cc Park LAKE GR. -� ge t �'+ • _ • George s► •; I Rogers Park _r ¢Q- is•:i•P4` :11 ttArc, ii -- — �. >� v M' s�oo�y'-O TBG ';[:_ :__.+•,'• ,et : �.t.�', Oswego Lake r. - sO�rHsso e South�Shore: Hellin-an e P e o / :2,,,r. e 1F.aQ- �,c � `•,. • c"° ;;Reservoiry.• �• Woods;per ••"•. '?Lamont Springs Glenmorrie ..•Natural Area • ,j = .a Greentree Greenway • . . J KA a �• Park Aspen Freepons� 1l p° '. . .NEs''E , a • 3 Park ���+ EEN:REERD Recreation and Park ,. e5 . Aquatic Center �. V�, e°off p .M •t.+; •• \ • Irk r'- I, ��� • gip,'• I•, -�, COMING SOON! ; Glenmorrie II • �Jys,° ° �'� + " ,° • i• P Municipal • 1 . .s Park • �` w Golf Course I + . JEAN RD - �•3 0 „'•� -J 5 BERGIS RD k_... 1. •, _ •� r� Hazeha �y _, - �� • • OVERLOOK DR Field • • I *F eRYgNr J`��P+' , •� jp••, I --- 0, i- • __ _ _ _ qo po I Luscher Farm .4 �_ , is Westridge Rassekh Park Park and •• �' , Y V ^` •u '' • r Park Cooks COMING SOON! rdI Area , tr• , Butte •, _ _ 0 U / : - fere -'' „,,,. • • atilt ;; V Bryt,Woods • r i14 `Pilking o . Natuge Park . Meadow I � •� • •.4•�% • • -Park � y1111' : •F '.. Canal'Acr�es * Sunnyslope oSFM. . s'e CHILDS RD HILL EST DR y, / 0 Natural Sy Natu L�1 ., Ft Rivergrove ,, e� River 4 — / o -SW 1 N p El IS AID • - I u O • poi c2, 4i-. 'ie.,1 -,,,,,6 1 14 • ' t - • .. Sources: City of Lake Oswego and r/ 0.2 0.5:• 1 P Metro RLIS Database, 2023. ( /�_��� • /•I ! fKSWEGO Date: January 2024. PLAN 2040 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F-67 Section 5. Park and Recreation Facility Needs This section identifies relevant benchmarks for the parks and recreation system and identifies needs and potential trends for different types of recreation facilities. Parkland Level of Service Described as a ratio of acres per 1,000 residents, parkland Level of Service(LOS) is a calculation that helps assess whether the City is providing the right amount of parkland acreage and facility counts for its population.A higher parkland LOS means more parkland per resident; a lower parkland LOS means less parkland per resident.The City of Lake Oswego does not currently use a typical level of service ratio for their parks and recreation system and instead relies on an access analysis for its main performance measure. However, benchmarking data is helpful to identify best practices to serve the community. Information on this metric is included here for current and future benchmarking purposes. The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) provides the most comprehensive source of data standards and insights for park and recreation agencies. Comparison of Lake Oswego with NRPA data indicates that while Lake Oswego provides a parkland level of service above the median for jurisdictions of a similar size,the City provides significantly less miles of trails.This is largely due to the fact that trails are located within parks but the off-street trail network connecting parks and other key destinations in the city is limited. • • � C 0,;4 L d 7 tt))*, . 1 - _ r` a m ;n - E • LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-35 Recreation Facility Level of Service The City of Lake Oswego oversees a wide range of facilities and features that they own, manage, and maintain.The School District also provides a number of athletic fields and courts as well as playgrounds, although these are not factored into the access or level of service analysis. NRPA provides benchmark data for common outdoor facilities by population per facility. How Lake Oswego compares to similar sized jurisdictions is shown in Table 5-2 below.While Lake Oswego provides more than the facilities listed in the table, NRPA does not have data for all the facilities Lake Oswego has. For consistency with NRPA metrics and benchmark data, only categories NRPA provides data for are shown. The asterisks in the table denote facilities that are in progress and what the population per facility would be upon completion of those projects. Table 5-1: Po•ulation Per Outdoor Facilit Population Per Facility Jurisdictions with Populations City of Lake Oswego Between 20,000 and 49,000 Playgrounds 3,028 2,305 Youth Diamond Fields(baseball/softbal 5,033/9,060 13,833/20,750 Adult Diamond Fields(baseball/softball) 19,556/11,802 8,300/10,375 Basketball Courts 7,117 13,833 Tennis Courts 5,815 4,611 Pickleball Courts 9,257 0 Rectangular Fields(soccer,football) 7,674 5,928 Dog Parks 28,000 20,750 Skate Parks 32,000 41,500* Community Gardens 26,741 20,750 Golf Courses(regulation 18-hole courses) 32,990 0(Renovated Municipal Golf Course has 9 holes)* Source:2020-2022 NRPA Park Metrics Table 5-2: Population Per Indoor Facilit Population Per Facility Jurisdictions with Populations City of Lake Oswego Between 20,000 and 49,000 Recreatio 24,380 20,750* gyms) Aquatics Centers 31,645 41,500* Community Centers 26,696 0 Senior Centers 31,199 41,500 31,645 41,500 ource: ar a ncs *In Progress Projects LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 ....,..11.„1_ • -,:- „. ,-,- : %if- . , pf- I,o., .. 7,:""r, ..,':...f",1 .A •I` ' 1 ''' , , gi. 411,1...,_ '-..- 7- , .o.'"v.t it r x A ;, A,,ti .141110 r c O.it a r w' "< , _ - -.. .t .ram - - 4 .i 4; .'' jam. Li,* fit r ,_ I - '.h f J ar : . - . - *445..'PK* .-.X.::' ` l'''„" '' ..''''•. '' •'•.,.. • • .X. f'..t— ' '-.• .y rt v'1 N' taw;. �,"a « }A k p�' ''' -. ,a V .\s '( ilia d ""e a" �fiSt' .zT �f" -sR• ttr X f M iti�►rha ."l. -. 1.. Park and Recreation Facility Needs This section describes facility needs identified through a combination of community engagement and the technical analysis of the park system. It provides relevant trends and potential opportunities for future improvements and enhancements for the following: • Major Facilities • Outdoor Recreation Facilities • Sports Fields and Courts • Playgrounds and Play Areas • Support Amenities LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-37 Major Facilities The Lake Oswego parks system includes many specialized sites and recreation facilities that serve both the Lake Oswego community and visitors.Several facilities have undergone major renovations in the last several years, ensuring that they continue to provide a high-quality experience. Major facilities include the Lake Oswego Adult Community Center, Indoor Tennis Center, Municipal Golf Course, Swim Park, Charlie S. Brown Water Sports Center, and Luscher Farm.The Lake Oswego Recreation and Aquatic Center(LORAC)will also serve as a major facility once completed and open to the public. Key Needs and Opportunities • The Lake Oswego Recreation and Aquatics Center is expected to be completed in 2024 and will be a significant part of the system with two indoor swimming pools, a recreational gym, multi- purpose group fitness rooms, and additional space for operations. • The proximity of the Municipal Golf Course, Luscher Farm, and the new Recreation and Aquatics Center, along with Hazelia Field and Rassekh Park, will form a hub of activity. • Due to the recent adoption of development code amendments in Clackamas County(ZDO-286), the City now has a path forward to apply to the County to implement some additional elements of the 2013 Luscher Area Master Plan, bring some current activities into compliance with County rules, and improve safety and accessibility for the property's access and parking. In addition, Lake Oswego Parks & Recreation will be seeking input on the future of the community supported agriculture program,which may be welcoming new partners in early 2025. Currently, Luscher Farm supports the community supported agriculture program, community gardens, environmental education programming,farm and natural area maintenance equipment storage, a botanical garden, and farm staff offices. • Lake Oswego Swim Park provides restricted public access to Oswego Lake from July 1 -August 31. Public access is confined to the boundary of the swim park parcel which cannot be used for launching boats or facilitating swimming in lake areas outside the park. Amenities for gathering or relaxing out of the water and parking is limited; access and use of the facility is challenging on warmer days. • Ongoing maintenance will be a continued need to extend the functional lifespan of major facilities. • Fostering public-private partnerships to leverage resources is an opportunity for enabling the development and maintenance of high-quality recreation facilities that meet community needs. Multiple providers can share responsibilities for the operation, maintenance, and programming of recreation spaces to optimize resources and enhance efficiency. • Accessibility improvements are needed in parking and circulation areas at many recreation facilities, as well as ADA accessibility within buildings. • Parking demand management is needed at popular sites and during peak times. • Major facilities should be prioritized for creating new bicycle and pedestrian connections, as well as for serving with public transportation. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-38 At ry . - • • IIIR 0. . . ! _ V,�.•‘.. / 411.0- �� 4L.,_. I. • , a ‘' .�IIIr r ..moo - ,, r•y1r Trends for Major Recreation Facilities • Multi-use spaces.Designing flexible spaces that can be used for a variety of purposes and accessed by all.This allows for versatility in programming and for recreation providers to adapt to changing trends. • Universal Design. Emphasizing universal design principles to ensure that recreational facilities are accessible to individuals of all abilities,accommodating diverse needs and promoting inclusivity.This includes: o Inclusive fitness equipment:Ensuring inclusivity with adaptive fitness equipment and facilities designed to accommodate individuals with varying abilities,promoting accessibility and diversity in fitness programs. o Accessible Aquatic Facilities:Ensuring swimming pools and aquatic facilities have features like zero-entry access,transfer walls,and accessible lifts to enable individuals with disabilities to enjoy water-based activities. o Accessible Restrooms and Changing Facilities:Providing accessible restroom facilities and changing rooms equipped with appropriate features,including grab bars,changing tables,and sufficient space for wheelchair users. • Climbing Walls.Installation of climbing walls and bouldering areas to cater to the growing popularity of climbing sports and provide a challenging and dynamic recreational option. • Transportation Services.Providing transportation services or partnering with those who do to ensure those going to major facilities have easy access from popular locations like schools,senior living communities,or Downtown.This can include partnering with public transit agencies,shuttle services,or community circulator transit routes. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 • ,y y ,� .. �.., to •• �• - vs tot )' .. � II Outdoor Recreation Facilities Outdoor recreation facilities encompass a diverse range of spaces.Whether enjoying the thrill of a skate park, nurturing greenery in community gardens, exercising with outdoor fitness equipment, or exploring scenic trails,these spaces contribute to a vibrant and active community lifestyle. Key Needs and Opportunities • Lake Oswego has a limited trail network as trails are typically confined to parks and the city lacks a comprehensive off-street trail network.There is a need for more trail opportunities and connections to and between parks and recreation centers throughout the city. • George Rogers Park, Roehr Park, and Tryon Cove Park provide water access to the Willamette River, although Tryon Cove lacks the infrastructure and support amenities available at the other two. • A"fit spot" with outdoor exercise equipment exists at West Waluga Park although it is nearing its functional lifespan. • There's an opportunity and need to expand access to nature by integrating natural features and thematic or natural play equipment into playgrounds. • Community gardens exist at the Adult Community Center and Luscher Farms, but have limited space to accommodate demand. • A new skate park is being added at Rassekh Park, along with a new play area, picnic shelter,and walking trails.A multi-use athletic field is also planned for future development on the site. • Lake Oswego has five dog parks: two at Hazelia Field and one each at West Waluga Park, Pilkington Park, and McNary Park. Off-leash dog areas and dog parks are popular with the community and there is an expressed need for covered areas at dog parks. • East Waluga Park includes a bike pump track/park, but there is a need for increased maintenance and frequent monitoring for safety issues.There is also a mountain bike course at Sunnyslope Natural Area, however the site currently lacks any formal parking and can only be accessed via an undeveloped gravel County road. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-40 Trends for Outdoor Recreation Facilities • Multiuse Trails.Creation of extensive networks of trails that accommodate a variety of recreational activities,including hiking,biking,and trail running. • Waterfront Recreation. Development of waterfront areas for activities like kayaking,canoeing,or paddleboarding,promoting water-based recreational opportunities within park settings. • Water Play.Addition of water features like splash pads,spray grounds,or water pumps to parks provide offer interactive fun for all ages as well as relief from the heat. • Fitness Zones.Integration of outdoor fitness zones with exercise equipment, providing opportunities for individuals of all ages to engage in physical activities and promote a healthy lifestyle. • Outdoor gyms. Establishment of outdoor gyms equipped with fitness stations and exercise equipment, allowing park visitors to engage in strength training and cardiovascular workouts in park settings. • Dog parks.Design and expansion of dog parks with designated areas for off-leash play,small and large breeds,agility courses,and amenities catering to pet owners,promoting a pet-friendly environment. • Nature Trails and Obstacle Courses.Creation of nature trails featuring natural obstacles and fitness stations,offering a blend of hiking,trail running,and obstacle course challenges. • Community Gardens.Implementation of community gardens within parks,providing spaces for residents to grow their own produce,fostering a sense of community,and promoting sustainable practices. • Skate parks.Construction or enhancement of skate parks for skateboarding,rollerblading,and BMX biking. • Outdoor Learning.Integration of facilities that allow for wildlife observation,promote environmental stewardship,and learning through observation points,interactive features,or signage. � ��e 4 y ��3,+". f � V Yfff R_J :a+`r .I. w -%;?*',;F:`?; . .4,!'c,:j: •.-',,jrrej. .*.. ii.i.i.,414;..... 4 ,.W.-- 1 v ". -., . 4 ',:- -.4r.*,.. ' ` I , .13i, .`® :ellIVTIli \jl I I ' ` ?: G�. - -- .• .F• .. - ... .8 i.w r '. . II 3 . - a l - .r LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 _._...._ ___,.._.,„...,_ .....iiiiiiir„....:___. . pporPoo ,.._., 10 si., 40, , ____ _,......... !It Is ......." . .,_ \ _ ,,i _ ...._ , _ _. _., _ . . .. ____..... . . _ _______ .._ .. _. __________ _____ _____ ___ _ _______ __ ____ _____ . ..._ eft , ,. Sports Fields and Courts Lake Oswego's sports fields and courts are essential components of the recreation system, providing a platform for individuals to engage in organized sports and exercise. Key Needs and Opportunities • The School District is a major provider of sports fields and sports courts in the city.The City does not currently have a formal partnership or joint use agreement with the Lake Oswego School District for athletic field or court use. However,the City and School District are jointly funding the Lake Oswego Recreation and Aquatics Center. Establishing shared facility use agreements between other providers and the City can allow for efficient utilization of existing fields and courts and optimize resources to benefit a broader audience. • Existing City fields are popular and there is an expressed need for more field space or fields available for practice use. • There is a need for field lighting and improved field maintenance to address drainage and field condition during peak season use at LOSD fields. • Athletic organizations frequently use facilities not owned or managed by the City including those in neighboring cities. While shared facility use agreements with other organizations would allow for efficient utilization of existing infrastructure and optimize resources to benefit a broader audience, many nearby cities experience similar field capacity issues. • There is strong interest in adding pickleball courts, particularly for the segment of the population who play pickleball and consistent with the growing popularity of this sport.To minimize noise impacts on surrounding residential uses, any future court will need to have adequate buffering and/or noise reduction features. • There is a need for additional indoor spaces that could alleviate outdoor athletic facility demand,especially during the rainy season or during inclement weather. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-42 1 '- F `d s • — , - I i °' _ii. 7 . .,..,:„...„ ''' _ry L — ' d:. r ANN n -- '''''''':: 1 ,_-1-[_, 1 7 • i j. , ��i [4d1�N1€�1 . , , _,.„ •_, i. ..__ N ma's.� � .ra - i r..► ;i;1 Trends for Sports Fields and Courts • Providing Space for New Activities. Designing new courts and fields or adapting existing ones for a greater variety of sports including pickleball,futsal,badminton,and volleyball. • Multi-Use Spaces.Sports fields and courts designed for multi-use purposes,accommodating various sports and recreational activities to maximize usability. • Adding lighting.At larger sites and where there are multiple fields,adding lighting can extend playing hours.Modern field lighting can also limit light pollution for nearby neighbors with DarkSky approved lighting solutions. • Inclusive Design.Increasing focus on inclusive and accessible design,ensuring that sports fields and courts are welcoming to individuals of all abilities,promoting inclusivity in recreational spaces. • Sustainability Initiatives.Integration of eco-friendly elements such as recycled materials,energy- efficient lighting,and environmentally conscious landscaping to align sports facilities with sustainability trends. • Technology Integration.Incorporation of technology for enhanced user experience,including features like smart lighting,digital scoreboards,and online booking systems for efficient facility management. • Storage Facilities.Adequate storage facilities for sports equipment,ensuring organized and secure storage for items such as balls,nets,and other essential gear. • Smart Maintenance Systems. Utilization of smart technologies for maintenance,including automated irrigation systems,turf monitoring,and predictive maintenance tools,to optimize the condition of sports facilities. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 - , '4 A q• til*41E* it....41 • Playgrounds and Play Areas Play is an essential service in Lake Oswego. Ranging from traditional playgrounds and equipment to imaginative nature play,these spaces can promote active play, learning, and activity for all ages. Key Needs and Opportunities • While children's play structures exist at 18 city parks, a few neighborhood and community parks do not have play structures (Pilkington Park and Tryon Cove Park). • Children's play areas and structures are provided at many of the schools in the city.These facilities are not open to the public during school hours but generally are publicly available outside of school hours. • There is an opportunity to add nature play within selected natural areas that do not offer any type of play area or equipment. • Many parks have aging play equipment such as the playground in West Waluga.There is also a need to add more play variety, including play equipment intended for different age groups. • There is a need and opportunity to add inclusive play equipment at more play areas around the city, as well as a fully accessible play area. • There is a need for more spaces for older youth,teens, and tweens to gather and safely socialize. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-44 Trends for Playgrounds and Play Areas • Destination/Thematic, Nature,and Water Play.Create captivating destination-themed play areas that incorporate elements inspired by nature and water,providing children with immersive and imaginative experiences that stimulate creative play. • Playable Art,Climbable Seat Walls,Hill Slides.Integrate playable art installations and climbable seat walls,along with hill slides,offering a blend of artistic expression and active play opportunities within the park setting. • Dramatic,Imaginative Play Areas with Interpretive and Interactive Elements. Design play areas that spark imagination with dramatic elements,incorporating interpretive and interactive features to engage children in educational and imaginative play experiences. • Universal Design and Accessible Play. Ensure inclusivity by incorporating universal design principles, creating play spaces that are accessible to children of all abilities,fostering a sense of community and equality in recreational activities. • Pop-Up Temporary Play Elements or Play Areas with Moveable Parts.Introduce dynamic and flexible play elements,including pop-up temporary installations or areas with moveable parts, providing ever-changing and novel play opportunities for children. • Game Tables and Elements. Incorporate game tables and elements suitable for social play, encouraging interaction and friendly competition among park-goers in a variety of games. • Topography and Plantings for Places to Hide, Roll,and Tumble.Utilize natural topography and strategic plantings to create spaces where children can hide,roll,and tumble,fostering exploratory play and a connection with the natural environment. • Challenge Play Elements such as Climbing Walls and Ziplines. Integrate adventurous challenge play elements,including climbing walls and ziplines,providing exciting and stimulating activities for children seeking more physically demanding play experiences. • Safe,Accessible,Synthetic or Pour-in-Place Safety Surfacing.Prioritize safety by incorporating accessible and impact-absorbing surfacing options,such as synthetic turf or pour-in-place materials, ensuring a safe environment for children to play. • Sand in Designated Play Areas with Transfer Stations into Sand Play Area. Designate specific play areas for sand play,with transfer stations to accommodate children with mobility challenges, creating an inclusive and enjoyable sand play experience for all. 'iC`` ,4 r a"a s+r 't 84+. .gid• .�r{� r � .. 1.7 „gip '... k'T . e ` ,, rya. . 64` .ii::,,,.:,,. --N,---*4k.,--• - ,,,;11.mac `4 E - t •�?r T. 3te '� 5ms . N � ` � • t } � �. — ,V` : ,,.em,* • _ 'a • 6, .:a�rAa" ., `: e t ,-6 ,�s c$ x., .;.. ,: ;.mow i.. .�,:" .a., ...- ....:.x LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 f .C^ • .00,74 f '°�¢ Ai v ""£ ' sY is r'., fA _1 �1..1iA Support Amenities Park support amenities play a crucial role in enhancing the overall experience of park visitors by providing comfort and convenience. From benches that offer a resting place for individuals to relax and enjoy the surroundings to lighting that ensures safety and extends the usability of parks beyond daylight hours.These amenities are integral to fostering a welcoming and enjoyable park environment. Key Needs and Opportunities • Regular maintenance and upkeep of support amenities is needed to ensure they remain in good condition. • Some sites do not have enough parking to meet demand and/or overflow of adjacent uses. • There is a need for accessible signage, including signs that convey key information about park sites, as well as interpretive signage that shares information about the natural environment or about Native American or human history. • There is a need for replacement picnic tables in some parks.Some community members have noted that uncovered picnic tables are often not clean or comfortable to sit on after continued weathering/exposure. Overall,there is an expressed need for more covered spaces to sit and hangout in parks year-round. • There is a need for more places to sit in parks, especially along trails,and an opportunity for more seating under covered and/or shaded areas. • There is a need and opportunity to improve public information about parks,trails, amenities, and programs through the development of new community engagement platforms such as a mobile friendly website or app. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-46 Trends for Support Amenities • Smart Lighting Solutions.Integration of energy-efficient and sensor-driven lighting systems in park areas for enhanced safety and sustainability,automatically adjusting brightness based on usage patterns. • Creative Shade Structures.Innovative and aesthetically pleasing shade structures,such as solar- powered umbrellas or artistic canopies,providing shelter while adding visual appeal to park spaces. • Multifunctional Seating.Flexible seating arrangements that serve multiple purposes,including movable benches,picnic tables with charging stations,and adaptable seating for various activities and events. • Waterfront Seating Areas. Designing comfortable seating areas along waterfronts,allowing visitors to relax and enjoy the serene views while fostering social interactions. • Green Parking Solutions.Implementation of eco-friendly and permeable parking surfaces, incorporating landscaping and green infrastructure to mitigate environmental impact and improve aesthetics. • Bike-Friendly Amenities. Dedicated bike parking areas, repair stations,and secure bike storage to encourage cycling as a sustainable mode of transportation and promote a bike-friendly environment within parks. • Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. Integration of electric vehicle charging stations to support the growing trend of electric transportation,promoting sustainability and accommodating the needs of electric vehicle users. • Outdoor Workspaces. Designated areas with Wi-Fi connectivity,comfortable seating,and shade, providing outdoor workspaces for remote work or leisure activities that require digital connectivity. • Community Engagement Platforms. Development of digital platforms or apps that facilitate community engagement,allowing park-goers to access information,participate in events,and provide feedback for continuous improvement of park amenities. • Universal Design Principles.Adherence to universal design principles in park support amenities, ensuring accessibility and usability for individuals of all ages,abilities,and backgrounds. • Green Roofs and Living Walls.Implementation of green roofs on shade structures and living walls near seating areas,promoting biodiversity,improving air quality,and enhancing the visual appeal of park spaces. • Community-Driven Amenities.Involving the community in the design and selection of park support amenities,reflecting local preferences and ensuring that the amenities meet the diverse needs of the community. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 .. Y t 5 s ,rr Elk r •• • Section 6. Recreation Activity and Service Needs The Lake Oswego Parks & Recreation Department operates out of various recreation facilities, parks, and offsite locations, offering a variety of year-round recreational activities, events, and programs for all ages. Lake Oswego continues to maintain partnerships with community organizations and agencies to provide the community with various benefits and opportunities.With finite resources and areas of expertise, it is essential for the City to continue strengthening and developing mutually beneficial partnerships to best serve the community. Trends and Opportunities Pop-up Park Programming. Pop-up programs allow parks and recreation agencies to take recreation programs and activities to where people are.These initiatives allow for targeted outreach in vulnerable communities, especially those with limited means and access to travel to facilities and/or parks that are located beyond a 10-minute walk from their homes.These types of programs can include arts &crafts, block parties, concerts in the parks, movies in the parks, enrichment activities,sports, and more. Multigenerational Fitness and Wellness Programs.Cities along with parks and recreation agencies are acknowledging a growing public health crisis around conditions like obesity, diabetes, and depression. In response,they are partnering with the health sector to promote preventative healthcare and active living through design, planning, and programming. Departments across the country are offering bikeshare programs, planting trees for shade coverage, and creating more community gardens, all examples of activities that can be enjoyed by multiple generations, collaboratively or separately. Sports Sampling Programs. Parks and recreation agencies are uniquely positioned to offer a sampling of opportunities to expose community members to various things including being one of the top sectors for offering first-time employment opportunities for youth.The NRPA Youth Sports at Park and Recreation Agencies research report states that youth are more likely to remain engaged in sports activities if they have a chance to participate in sports that interest them. Providing a variety of sports sampling opportunities allows youth to explore their interests and form a love for one or more sports that they will likely continue with in some capacity throughout their life. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-48 Enhanced Community Engagement.According to the NRPA Park Pulse, nearly 9 in 10 U.S. adults want their local park and recreation _ _ agency to take steps to ensure all their community members feel welcome. By enhancing community engagement to better understand the needs and desires of the community, providing all- _ 1 abilities activities, and offering low or no-cost programming, parks and recreation departments can help foster a sense of belonging for its community members.This is especially important to r J minorities and communities of color. _____Aoram ,, t S _ Out of School Time Programs. Parks and recreation agencies are ": r _ the leading provider for out-of-school time programs (e.g. camps, . ' 1 ire , ,_,..... i afterschool, etc.)which are great opportunities for parks and 7 `. ` wF recreation agencies to support families, especially those with school-aged children,with organized recreational programs that often take the place of childcare when school is not in session. Program Staffing and Management Lake Oswego reviews and updates its Organizational Chart annually in conjunction with its budget preparation. During the 2021-23 term,the Parks and Recreation department was budgeted at 44.4 Full- time Equivalents (FTE).According to the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA),the median FTE count for communities similar to Lake Oswego is 32.3 FTE with the upper quartile at 67.8, placing Lake Oswego right in between the median and upper quartile.With the LORAC soon coming online,the City will need to ensure staffing levels are adequate to manage and maintain existing facilities at or above current service standards while also ensuring the LORAC is properly staffed and maintained to keep up with the community's demand and internal operational goals. Lake Oswego Parks & Recreation worked with Ballard*King to complete an operational analysis for the center in 2022.This analysis identified staffing and maintenance needs, program pricing, and other key operational elements for the new center. It II -- — ___ - icei----Arip, LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-49 Key Needs Free or Subsidized Programming While public parks and recreation providers typically provide free or low-cost recreation options, some community members have indicated,through engagement activities,that the cost of activities can be a barrier to participation, especially for lower income community members. For example,those who rent their home in Lake Oswego have a disproportionately lower income relative to homeowners and pay 30%more of the household income on rent. It is important to consider methods to create awareness about and further enhance the City's scholarship program to provide more subsidies to individuals within the community.At present,the scholarship program only affords up to $200-per individual, per fiscal year,with a $500 maximum per family. With the average cost of a youth camp program at around $200, per session (typically a weeklong session)that significantly limits opportunities for families with one or more children seeking recreational opportunities during times when school is not in session. While it is not feasible to provide completely free programming as the primary service model, it is important to offer a variety of opportunities that are free for the benefit of the community. Costs can be offset through community partnerships,fundraising, and grants,to name a few. Intergenerational Programming Intergenerational programming is an often-overlooked opportunity for parks and recreation agencies though it is a key component in creating healthy,thriving communities.These types of programs are designed to include the use of activity spaces and/or campuses whereby youth,teens, and adults, can enjoy recreational programs and activities simultaneously or collaboratively.The integration of the LORAC into Lake Oswego's parks and recreation system provides a great opportunity to introduce targeted intergenerational recreation programs, activities, and events.The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA), in conjunction with Generations United, provides great resources that can assist communities with developing and sustaining intergenerational programming and activities. Accessible Programming The City of Lake Oswego has limited opportunities and support for individuals with disabilities to actively engage in recreational activities and programs. Community members would like to see more accessible physical spaces and programming within Lake Oswego to better meet their needs. Despite the ability to request an accommodation for participation, community members have indicated a need for advanced and more detailed event, activity, and trail information specifically pertaining to accessible parking, restrooms, seating, and the type of ground surfacing at the activity locations. Strengthening and/or establishing partnerships between the City and the Lake Oswego School District Student Services Department, Clackamas County Disability Support Services, and various community groups can help enhance opportunities and support. Furthermore,the City may consider developing a more robust adaptive recreation program by hiring additional staff who specialize in working with individuals with disabilities, including but not limited to a Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist(CTRS)who can work collaboratively with the current ADA Coordinator. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-50 Section 7. Moving Forward There are numerous opportunities and potential directions for the parks and recreation system to grow. In some cases,similarities between various opportunities and needs combine to build a compelling case for moving specific projects forward. In others, needs may be articulated in the form of a policy or long- term action when funding, partnerships, or additional input and refinement are needed.This also means striking the right balance between ensuring existing parks,facilities,and programming are maintained at the high-quality level the community enjoys while seeking to strategically add to the system. The Community Advisory Committee and Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Advisory Board will review both opportunities and needs to help identify key direction for recommendations developed in the following stage of the planning process. T f. `�. - - - '-'.` .��.,� , ev ems.., :: x: „p'. •- - _ - tea.b'' -.� • ' ' �� -- � Y_ "•AIM :�.,. _.440tratiatio_ \ .1., A `.p��,� :; 1' - • !" _ ' .:, •- � .—. aid n • v _ .. • LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I B-51 . • \ - . '''.). -'‘,' • 4 t , ilb , • , • -s- ' . .411%11, IIIIP ........ . . APPENDIX C Community Outreach Summary 4 -- ii.-golk % -------0 • -... 0.'1 OPP - -- , I ill 00 400 . t., ..-• .i 0 11111.1.0011-.Sas (..( . 1•- lei-. ' . ' . - • -• IP-10;•-•** -j-. ..4 , • - . ' ' \ 4' kg # ,. lir ., '— 'if , ___ ,i-, , ,,. (,_ .. _...di In•al 1111 , •' -----' N ' til f.ap,r Ilk iiii . . ..114 Ill 1 . .• ' ' - . ils.... 1 ' 1 ' ouivi ii,apona. - . . 4 . • . , .:-..r. # ‘ ., , , . , . ...„,...... , . . . . , .......... . . . . • , 0 . , ;:: : :;;; : ,„, • , __ . , .. . .. .. .. et. .. t, .1. , ti-Arib 4 1 1 b A 44 f • . . ,,'I• • .1,. 1 ! • f . ' . "1' ', •,. . .„ g • ' ' . l:• 41 "b 4-4 g PI 1111110 Illo1/4 &,..-. , • , • -.t. 40411. 4.. I1;•L ;• .• • .•}it••• •. . . Iv. k : ! I .' . . • • 6:.• . • • • w , Vi` stItif , . . • • . " . \-„,1 — , • .. , , . • ... , I 1 : .• .• .• . i • , „ , :\ .....0 ' ' ilt* 1 ' ' , ' • r . . . . . . . . . r e 111 0 . 1,, 10,...1_ r• ii'l,r,,, '. . t 1,„.-• I, • '. . . . , • . . , . , \ . . • ' .t. 1'4 I - ' • • , . .'t I JO, A , , 4' . • • • • I • • • . i \ ') .'1 , \ • I. , , ,# 4 A 11, 1....1446‘,le' ,, t . A . • kik ' 1 , , i , • . • • - I I, I , I -;'..A. :1 iF.—/ _ -- •' •6 !1''i .. ''', .' .. .. .' .. ' . * • '''!I I•'I 6 " . 1 • ti: ' Appendix C . Community Outreach Summary INTRODUCTION Parks Plan 2040 was driven by a thorough and inclusive community engagement process to ensure all community members had the opportunity to shape the future of the Lake Oswego parks and recreation system. Engagement efforts encouraged participation from a broad range of community members, residents, City staff, and representatives from Boards, Commissions, and diverse interest groups.This Appendix includes summaries from the following Parks Plan 2040 engagement efforts. Focus Group Outreach Summary To help assess needs and opportunities associated with existing and potential future parks, recreation facilities, and natural areas, members of the Parks Plan 2040 Team conducted small group meetings with a variety of groups who represent specific neighborhoods, interests, and perspectives.The Team met with 11 groups over the course of approximately three months between October 2023 and January 2024. Statistically Valid Survey Results From September 26 to October 18, 2023, project team member DHM Research (DHM) conducted a statistically valid survey of 403 Lake Oswego residents to assess resident priorities for parks and recreation activities. Communitywide Online Survey Results Following the statistically valid survey, Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation opened the survey to all community members.The City shared the online survey link though various communication channels to ensure the widest reach possible. An additional 780 residents and community members completed the communitywide online survey. Fall 2023 Community Event Summary The first Community Event for the Lake Oswego Parks Plan 2040 was held on Tuesday, November 14, 2023,from 4:30-6:30 pm at the Lake Oswego Adult Community Center.The purpose of the event was to provide an opportunity for Lake Oswego residents to learn more about the Plan update, including the planning process and what has been completed so far, and provide their input to help shape the vision and goals and identify any gaps or opportunities in the system. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-1 Summer 2024 Neighborhood Workshop Summaries In May-June 2024,the Project Team conducted four neighborhood workshops at four different park locations in Lake Oswego.The purpose of the workshops was to provide an opportunity for community members to learn more about Parks Plan 2040 and project work that has occurred to date and provide feedback on priority projects and improvements in their neighborhoods to help shape the Plan's systemwide and site-specific recommendations. Community Online Prioritization Survey Summary In Fall 2024,the City launched a second community survey to help prioritize potential park,facility, and natural area projects for implementation over the next 15 years.The survey was available online in English, Spanish, and Mandarin from October 15-November 10, 2024, and received a total of 723 responses. Community Advisory Committee and Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Advisory Board Meeting Summaries Lake Oswego Parks& Recreation convened a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) composed of community members and other City advisory board representatives to help guide the process, while the City's existing Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PRNRAB) served as the technical advisory committee.The project team met with both the CAC and PRNRAB a total of eight times at key points in the process. Each meeting included a presentation and facilitated discussion in response to the materials presented, and with questions related to findings and recommendations related to system conditions, goals and objectives, park and recreation needs, system-wide and site- specific recommendations, project priorities, implementation strategies, and funding opportunities. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-2 4, ��,AE\ 6 sum mARyL7 �� 0 \ok,G0,,, % LAKE OSWEGO FOCUS GROUP OUTREACH - PHASE 1 PARKS PLAN 2040 OVERVIEW To help assess needs and future opportunities associated with parks, recreation facilities, and natural areas, members of the Parks Plan 2040 Team conducted small group meetings with a variety of community members who represent specific neighborhoods, interests, and perspectives. The project team met with 11 groups over the course of approximately three months between October 2023 and January 2024. Groups represented the following organizations and topics: • Luscher area stakeholders >1 • Pickleball players . • Recreation and sports leagues - �,. _, f • Diversity, equity, and inclusion _ s4 -- ,� advocates -,. • Youth Action Council . - 2 • Friends of Parks groups """-'�:C�, r ti ii , F, 4 , , . , , x1.11190 • Natural resources and = 0 I i ii , 1 'ilk v\1\k•\lit. ' sustainability advocates - • Lake Oswego School District • Accessibility advocates and people experiencing disabilities • Youth Advisory Board members ':-• • Youth Leadership Council Youth Action Council Focus Grow Each group discussed the following list of general topics, although specific discussion questions and topics varied depending on the perspectives and interests of the individual group. Questions generally centered around the following topic areas: • Frequency and nature of use of local parks and facilities • Challenges and needs facing the parks system • Opportunities for specific improvements to facilities, amenities, and programs • Partnership opportunities with community organizations • Preferences around communication and engagement approaches LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-3 RECURRING THEMES This first phase of focus group meetings yielded a wealth of information and ideas. Summaries of each meeting are attached following this cover memo. Some of the recurring comments or themes voiced at the meetings included: • Focus on improving what already exists within the system • Expand trail connectivity within and between parks • Expand invasive species management in parks and natural areas • Improve public information about parks, natural areas, trails, available programs and events, and accessibility features, especially to youth audiences • Improve access to parks, natural areas, activities, and services for people with disabilities, older adults, and communities with language barriers • Provide more year-round recreation opportunities (turf fields, covered/shaded/heated spaces, etc.) • Increase climate resilience in parks, the built environment, and operations • Provide more unique and inclusive play opportunities • Address the high demand for sports fields and courts, particularly for soccer • Provide or improve other specific amenities, including: o Restrooms o Water access o Pickleball o Durable/easy to clean picnic tables o Accessibility improvements (signage, parking, play equipment, etc.) o Lighting NEXT STEPS The focus group meetings held between October 2023 and January 2024 were the first round of small group meetings to be conducted as part of this effort. Information from them will be integrated into the Parks Plan 2040 needs assessment task, as well as recommendations for facility improvements. The project team also plans to conduct similar meetings during subsequent phases of the project to solicit additional feedback on specific recommendations for improvements to parks and facilities. The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. Hablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted 6FAI LF-.? 01 Al.21 o'01 -2- oFAl 7F o d LI 4 1V,RI=1:1 5L (*i %t) 119?7 MR #Iitt*5C111'1t.ntig LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-4 1�REGO% SUMMARY LAKE OSWEGO LUSCHER AREA STAKEHOLDERS PARKS PLAN 2040 FOCUS GROUP Date: October 4, 2023 Time: 2-3:30PM Location: Virtual, Zoom ATTENDEES MIG: Matt Hastie, Tiffany White-LaPierre, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart Focus Group Participants: Nancy Gronowski, Richard Fiala, Stephanie Hallock, Gale Wallmark, Randall Yamada, Nancy Sage, Rick Cook, Laura Masterson, DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. How would you describe your role or your organization's role as it relates to parks and recreation in the Luscher area? • Friends of Rogerson Clematis Collection (FRCC): o Draw for Luscher Farm as a space for relaxation and nature access o Water restrictions limit future growth • Stafford Hamlet: o Has been Involved with Luscher Farm for a number of years o Aims to support agriculture and preservation of the urban rural interface and rural nature of the Hamlet area o Concerned by the potential to establish active recreation uses at Luscher Farm in the future • Friends of Luscher Farm (FOLF): o Interested in preserving the historic and agricultural nature of Luscher Farm o Starting to play a stronger role in advocating for implementation of the Luscher Area Master Plan (LAMP) LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-5 • Luscher Farm Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Program: o Frequently work and partner with parks and recreation to provide educational and agricultural programming opportunities o Interested in seeing other kinds of agricultural programming • Stafford Tualatin Valley CPO: o Review planning and development applications to ensure zoning conformance and preservation of historic character, natural areas, and agricultural uses o Have been involved with numerous projects in the Luscher Area • Palisades Neighborhood Association: o Adjacent to Luscher Farm and have been involved with or monitored recent park and recreation developments • Shipley-Cook Farmstead: o Written response: Do not let it get turned into a mega sports and recreation facility like the huge Tualatin Valley Parks and Recreation facility on Walker Road • All of the participants also have personal connections to Luscher Farm as long- term residents of the area or as a space to work, volunteer, and/or recreate 2. How often do you work with park and recreation department staff in Lake Oswego? Who do you typically work with to discuss improvements, ideas, or concerns? • Friends of Rogerson Clematis Collection: o Great working relationship with park and recreation staff • Stafford Hamlet: o Most of their work has been with the mayor and other city departments to preserve rural lands o Have worked with Kyra and Ivan relating to Luscher Farm and other parks and recreation developments in the area • Friends of Luscher Farm: o Positive interactions with City Parks and Recreation department, especially since passage of most recent Clackamas County code amendments related to LAMP o Work closely with city staff (Angie and Jamie) to develop projects and initiatives to support Luscher Farm programming o Part of Harvest Donation Optimization Effort to secure more volunteers and allow for community gardeners to increase donations from personal plots ■ More than doubled amount of produce donated (-2,000 pounds) o Restyled Harvest Scarecrows along with Library Initiative LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-6 o Work with the City and Lake Oswego School District to facilitate educational opportunities and field trips o Initiating Walks and Talks Program to help spread public awareness about Luscher Farm • Luscher Farm CSA: o Day-to-day working relationship with the City o Excited about what Luscher has to offer and looking forward to expanding agricultural programming • Stafford Tualatin Valley CPO o Regularly work with the City and County on planning and development reviews • Palisades Neighborhood Association o Focus group participant was recently appointed as the PNA Parks and Recreation Liaison, so they have had some interactions with parks and recreation • Shipley-Cook Farmstead: o Written response: Frequently, working with Ivan and Kyra OPPORTUNITIES 3. What do you feel are some of the greatest existing assets related to parks and recreation in the Luscher area? • Local gem, nothing else like it in the Metro region • Adopt-a-Plot program • CSA • Botanical garden • Educational classes • Demonstration garden • Preservation of the area as an agricultural and historic resource • Open space and agriculture • 100+ acres located In the EFU zone (open space, natural areas) • The land itself (agricultural use and preservation) o Repeated as the strongest asset by numerous participants 4. Considering the recent adoption of Ordinance ZDO-286 by Clackamas County, what do you feel are the greatest opportunities for the Luscher area in the next 5-10 years in terms of providing parks recreation activities, and enhancing natural areas? • Kyra provided clarification of ZDO-286 which aligns the County's code with state regulations, as well as activities recommended in the LAMP, and will create a way for the LAMP to be adopted and implemented on county land LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-7 o One participant noted that it will be critical to help folks understand the significance of ZDO-286 and how it will impact future developments and LAMP implementation • Key question to ask over the next 5-10 years: How can we save this oasis for future generations to learn about the natural world? • Opportunities: o To finally be able to implement multiple envisioned, and community- driven components of the LAMP ■ Top LAMP priorities: • New, safe public access and expanded parking, currently dependent on original farmhouse driveway • Expansion of agricultural programming • Development and promotion of a consistent historical narrative (signage, interpretive elements, etc.) • Passive recreation areas (trail access, etc.) vs. active recreation areas (sports fields, etc.) o Agricultural lands ■ There needs to be a diversity of agricultural programming opportunities (grain fields, animals, etc.) o Educational opportunities o Wetland restoration o Oak Savanna restoration o Focus on implementation of LAMP o Making them legal, while preserving its natural character and keeping it in agriculture 5. What physical improvements should the City prioritize for the Luscher area? • Physical improvements that preserve historic structures and agricultural uses (will also align with state land use regulations and ensure successful implementation) o Restoration and preservation should drive all physical improvements • New and safe public access o Consider impacts to county neighbors in siting, consider access off Bergis Road, rather than increasing traffic on Rosemont Road • Increased parking capacity • Wetland restoration • Restrooms • Internal pedestrian circulation (trails, pathways, etc.) • Interpretive activities and associated improvements • Addressing the compliance issues with buildings, ADA access to facilities, "make Luscher legal" LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-8 6. Are there any specific opportunities or ideas you have for ways to improve recreation activities in the Luscher area? • Improve internal pedestrian access and circulation • Explore ways to codify LAMP priorities (open space preservation and agricultural uses) • Develop a narrative that tells the story of the Luscher Area and its connections with adjacent natural areas (Stevens Meadows, Cook Butte, etc.) • The need for a functional Luscher Recreation Area Master Transportation Plan • New funding to protect and enhance Pecan Creek's beauty, great educational opportunity to partner with the Lake Oswego School District with Lake Oswego High School so close ISSUES/CONCERNS 7. Do you have any specific concerns related to park and recreation activities in the Luscher area? • Destruction of the natural setting by over-building of "athletic facilities" (ballfields, pickleball courts, etc.) • Future development of active recreation uses (beyond Hazelia Field and Rassekh Park) • Ensure boundaries between adjacent active uses and rural areas, including Luscher Farm, are maintained • Impacts of traffic on Rosemont Road and Stafford Road • Further urbanization on EFU lands • Preservation of educational programming • The potential for City annexation and any associated zone changes that would expand urban uses and further impact rural uses in this area • Time and funding capacity • Balancing rural/agricultural nature with the desire to share this historic resource with broader community 8. What should the City be preparing for in the Luscher area in order to best to meet the long- term needs of the community? • Find ways to ensure the LAMP Is resilient to future political and physical changes o Explore possibilities for codification of LAMP (working lands conservation easement, deed restrictions, etc.) • Some participants worry that Luscher Farm is overlooked/ignored by the City • Funding • Find ways to address future Lake Oswego demographic changes in the Luscher Area (as outlined in CAC Meeting #1 presentation) o Consider passive recreational uses as Lake Oswego is an aging community LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-9 • Use of nature to help solve Greenhouse Gas emissions, not compound it by increased traffic • Create a carbon sequestration zone in the Parks 2040 Plan 9. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the Luscher area in the next 5-10 years? • Preserving the LAMP • Funding • Traffic • Keeping it as natural as possible, while complying with new ZDO-286, and not turning it into a mega sports complex OUTREACH 10. How can we work with you and other community members to continue to promote engagement in this planning process? • Update Parks 2040 website regularly o Kyra followed up that it typically takes a few days to upload event recordings o Kyra confirmed that she will post a list of LO 2040 CAC members • Randall Yamada stated that a focus group format that facilitates two-way communication like this meeting is the best outreach format vs. a PowerPoint/lecture format 11. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • Lake Oswego School District for student/youth participation o Also engage elementary school teachers • Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde (panel on the Hazelia Agri-Cultural Heritage Trail) • Neighborhood Associations • Other community organizations/groups 12. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? • Focus group format that facilitates two-way conversations • The more things you can do the better - employ a big toolbox of outreach methods • An unbiased survey that allows for out-of-the-box answers vs. guided answers o Some concern over a city-sponsored survey vs. an independently commissioned survey and bias in development of survey questions LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-10 o Matt stated that the project team Is happy to provide a copy of the survey currently being administered; it Is being undertaken by an independent survey research firm o Kyra clarified that the statistically valid survey will be released to the public in the coming weeks for additional opportunities for participation • Written-in response: Be respectful, honest, and transparent in communication with residents. Open dialog with meaningful positive outcomes. Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service. OTHER 13. Is there anything else you would like to share? • Additional clarification on the area's water right issues and irrigation limitations was provided • What Is the timetable for applying for county LAMP adoption and implementation? o Kyra stated that the City is hiring a land use consultant to prepare the application o Kyra will provide an update once she has more information about the timetable for that process o The implementation timeline will depend on what projects/uses are prioritized; it could take years for some of the recommendations to be implemented NEXT STEPS Matt closed the focus group by thanking participants, providing an update on project next steps, and encouraging participants to check out the Parks Plan 2040 project website for information and future engagement opportunities. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-11 � n 0REGO% SUMMARY LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 FRIENDS OF PARKS FOCUS GROUP Date: October 17, 2023 Time: 1:00 - 2:30 PM Location: Virtual, Zoom ATTENDEES MIG: Matt Hastie, Lauren Scott City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart Focus Group Participants: Laura Tanz, Susan Yesilada, Amy Herman, Alan Dolby, Stephanie Hallock, Debbie Craig, Cheryl Uchida DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. How would you describe your organization's role as it relates to parks and recreation? • Friends of Parks groups range in size. • See one of their main goals as supporting parks department activities and carry out a lot of stewardship and advocacy as it relates to their respective parks. • A large piece of the work is vegetation management including invasive species removal and native vegetation planting. Many groups host work parties several times a year. 2. How often do you work with park and recreation department staff in Lake Oswego?Who do you typically work with to discuss improvements, ideas,or concerns? • Groups are in frequent contact with a variety of City staff whether it's regarding Master Plan implementation or vegetation management. • General high level of satisfaction with City staff involvement and expertise. OPPORTUNITIES 3. What are some of the biggest existing assets related to parks and recreation in and around Lake Oswego? • Variety of parks (developed and open space), recreation facilities, and recreation programming. • Creative, bold City staff. • Unique assets like Luscher Farms. • Active, engaged community and willing volunteers. • Great infrastructure. • Available park land. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-12 4. What do you feel are the greatest opportunities facing Lake Oswego in the next 5-10 years in terms of providing parks, recreation and natural area benefits and services? • Acquiring more natural areas, particularly in the Stafford basin. • Continuing to implement the Luscher Area Master Plan (LAMP) and preserving it as agriculture and open space.Track potential opportunities to expand Luscher Farm with adjacent properties. • Building more pathways and trails. • Projects detailed on the Metro Local Share webpage. • Shifting to outreach and education versus solely focusing on removing invasive species. • The City does appear to be seizing opportunities (e.g., building the aquatics center, recreation programming). 5.Are there any specific improvements or ideas you have as we work through this process? • Interested in creative ideas or incentives for invasive species management; could it be expanded so that private property owners are involved? • Open to recommendations and guidance on maintaining natural areas. • Protecting and keeping the open space property we have. • Improving pathways at West Waluga Park where roots have caused walkway hazards. • A culvert at East Waluga Park is about to rust through. • Luscher Farm needs better access and parking. Water rights needs to be addressed as the site doesn't have adequate water. • Need to increase land acquisition and creative programming. • Lily Bay needs better access. Part of the purpose is to keep it protected but better access and more outreach would bring awareness to its location. Coordination with the other owner and adjacent railroad is needed for managing invasive species. • The City's tree cutting ordinance prevents removal of invasive trees and managing fire risk. There needs to be a coordinated effort to address that problem. • Need innovative ideas for getting people out to parks. A nature scavenger hunt could be one idea. • A plan for a shuttle to the future Recreation and Aquatic Center facility. • Need more indoor basketball courts. ISSUES/CONCERNS 6. What should the City be preparing for,to achieve a parks system that meets the long-term needs of the City? • An aging demographic. The types of amenities desired in parks will change. The City will also lose a large volunteer base. 7. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community? • It's difficult to continue bringing younger people into the volunteer base. A majority of people that show up at work parties are not from Lake Oswego. City is going to see a decline in volunteers. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-13 • Recognizing the impact of climate change on our natural environment. • Tension between need for affordable housing and preserving open spaces. The core park users will be aging and older if trends continue and younger people can't afford to live in Lake Oswego. • Need the City's help in addressing sustainability (introducing hardy plants), ensuring fire safe parks, and attracting people to parks. • Old and failing infrastructure in parts of the City. • How to welcome a more diverse community. • Legal challenges at Luscher Farms. • Should consider the hamlet around Luscher Farms. • Changes to the City's Charter Chapter 10 that restricts improvements at over a dozen sites. 8. Do you feel there are any segments of the community that have unequal access to parks and recreation? If so,what are they? • People who don't or can't drive. • Youth that live in apartments that aren't near parks. • People with disabilities, especially concerning access to natural areas. PARTNERSHIPS 9. How can the City work with you to build on or enhance your efforts to help maintain facilities or provide programs related to parks, recreation and natural areas? • Provide forums or information on what other parks providers are doing that's new and exciting. • At Luscher Farm it would be nice to have a real bathroom and an open-air classroom that would allow for expanded programming. • Need a good replacement for City staff who focused so much on outreach and integration of community into the stewardship network. • Change the tree ordinance. • Ideas and creativity from City staff. • Ensure that knowledge and outreach experience is not lost in staff changes. • Have a designated employee active in educational support promote understanding of natural environment. • A Parks Fair to bring people out and learn more about parks and recreation offerings, volunteer opportunities, etc. 10. Do you see any new opportunities for partnering with the City in the future to help address parks, recreation and natural area needs and services? • No new opportunities at this time that aren't already mentioned. OUTREACH 11. How can we work with you and other community members to continue to promote engagement in this planning process? • Continue to update the City website and coordinate within City departments. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-14 • Face to face interactions are the best ways to build out the network. • One-on-one meetings with decision makers. • Parks fair or other community event with outreach boards. • Presentations in schools. • Reach out to business groups, rotary clubs, etc. • Parks scavenger hunts. • Most people are receptive to emails. • Neighbors Night Out is very popular. Should build on similar events that have a large draw. • Chamber of Commerce planning to have a wine walk out near Waluga. • Engage businesses on frontage plantings. 12. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • School District • Stafford Hamlet • Neighborhood Associations OTHER Is there anything else you would like to share? • Chapter 10 of the City Charter added a number of parks to this section that precluded the City from adding parking or making other types of improvements. • Rogerson Clematis Garden collection is nationally recognized. Its visibility should be elevated. • Monitor native plant species that are not hardy/resilient to changing climate. • Recognize opportunities for fire resistant/tolerant landscaping. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-15 The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. Hablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted of z z oFAlLFR? 01 DI )Fo d LIEF (a i it) LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-16 •SUMMARY tj �� p �pREGO�j, -- LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 PICKLEBALL FOCUS GROUP Date: October 24, 2023 Time: 1 - 2:30 PM Location: Virtual, Zoom ATTENDEES MIG: Matt Hastie, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart Focus Group Participants: Bob Mulvihill, Dan Boone, Doug Anderson, Steve Thompson, Ed Becker, David Dunning, Mark Cywinski, Bob Mensel, Mike Rudarmel DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. How do you feel the demand for pickleball in Lake Oswego has changed over the last 5 years? • Five years ago, Pickleball was growing at 20-25% year making Lake Oswego one of the most active clubs in the nation • Demand has skyrocketed in the last five-years, partially due to COVID as it provided outdoor recreation opportunities when indoor recreational opportunities were shut down • Lake Oswego Pickleball Club (LOPC) membership has at least doubled in size during the last five years • Demand has dropped in last few years due to public courts being removed o Demand has not decreased due to public interest but due to the lack of a place to play 2. How do you feel the demand for pickleball in Lake Oswego will change over the next 15 years? • Expect demand to increase exponentially over the next 15 years due to increased national exposure (celebrity investors and teams), increased national demand/popularity, accessibility to all age and fitness levels, and the many social benefits • Expect youth participation to increase as it will likely become a school sport in 5- 6 years o The Lake Oswego Pickleball Club sees this as an opportunity to build partnerships with the Lake Oswego School District (LOSD) and expand pickleball opportunities at school tennis courts LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-17 o LOPC is willing to help support educational opportunities with the LOSD • Pickleball demand will increase even further if it becomes an Olympic sport 3. How do you feel about indoor pickleball courts? • Would like to see the Indoor Tennis Center available for pickleball • More supportive of covered outdoor pickleball courts rather than the development of an indoor facility due to expense and operational needs o Indoor facility would be expensive to develop and operate • A combination of covered and open-air facilities would be preferrable • Interested In a regulation surfaced courts (gym/wood floors are not ideal) 4. How do you feel about outdoor pickleball courts? • Outdoor courts are the best but are dependent on weather, Lake Oswego needs covered courts to allow for year-round use • Outdoor courts need to be covered and have a regulation surface, as well as some way to abate/minimize noise • LO High School has been generous with their courts during summer months (temporary nets and tape lines) but the community will need more options for next season 5. How do you feel about single pickleball courts in the context of Lake Oswego?Clusters of 2-4 pickleball courts?Regional pickleball facilities with 5-12+courts? • Need a combination of a larger facility (6-8 courts) and another facility with 3-4 courts in another part of town o George Rogers had 6 courts and was always full, especially in the mornings o George Rogers was the perfect layout • Multiple locations with 1-2 courts does not fulfill the social aspects of the game, although the more courts the better • Rarely see single courts and don't make a lot of sense, given how people play and gather to play pickleball • Minimum number of courts at a facility should be 4-6 courts • Sweet spot is 6+ courts which allows a group of 24+ to play at once • Two locations with numerous courts would be great but at least one large, nice facility is needed • It would be nice to have a facility with a center court that can sponsor regional tournaments o Includes space around the court for bleachers or concrete viewing steps o Great economic opportunity LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-18 • The playtimescheduler.com app works well for scheduling courts OPPORTUNITIES 6.Are there any specific ideas you have for ways Lake Oswego can provide access to pickleball over the next 5-10 years? • New facility o Replace or supplement dog park off Stafford Road with pickleball facility (Hazelia Field) ■ Palisades Neighborhood has stated that they are against this proposal • Multiple venues to play both indoors and outdoors • Should look to create 4-6 court-sized facilities in commercial or industrial centers or other locations where noise is not going to be a factor. While not in Lake Oswego, the area in Tigard by Costco, Walmart, and WINCO have open areas that could easily be converted. And being in proximity to services would be a win for businesses, especially restaurants. 7.Are there any specific ideas you have for ways Lake Oswego can provide access to pickleball in the near term? • Need to identify available and suitable land for pickleball facilities ASAP • Pursue public/private partnerships for future pickleball opportunities • Explore partnerships with LOSD properties (implement defined hours) o See if permanent lines are possible at LO High School for summer outdoor play o See if tennis court use can be limited to allow for both sports to be played simultaneously • Implement paddle and ball requirements that are monitored by City staff to reduce noise and ease negative externalities for residential areas • Add noise mitigation measures to fences around courts • See comment under Q6 about creating 4-6 court-sized facilities in commercial or industrial centers. • Pursue partnerships with school and church gyms even though gym/hardwood surfacing is not ideal ISSUES 8. What should the City be preparing for to achieve a parks system that meets the long-term needs of the City in regards to pickleball? LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-19 • Need courts as soon as possible (60% of folks who played at George Rogers are no longer playing) • Pickleball is the fastest growing sport in the country so now is the time to plan for multiple locations • Share Pickleball Task Force survey • Stop looking at existing parks for future courts, think outside existing park structures and look to unique spaces where sound will not be an issue 9. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community in regards to pickleball? • City Council does not appear to be in favor of pickleball despite the Park board's efforts to maintain courts at George Rogers; need more of the pickleball community to show up at city events to advocate for pickleball interests o Pickleball Club should sponsor these efforts and promote advocacy opportunities across social media o Other cities In Oregon are expanding their pickleball infrastructure ■ Eugene, Oregon is considering a 24-court complex adjacent to the Lane Community College. Palm Springs, California is finalizing plans to add 12 new courts at Demuth Park, bringing the total there to 24. Closer to home, West Linn, Tualatin, Portland, ALL do a better job of anticipating growth in demand for pickleball. • Pickleball noise has been the biggest issue so far, so court locations need to be selected accordingly. Hours can be set to respect neighbors need for sleep and relaxation after work. PARTNERSHIPS 10. How can the City work with you or other organizations to enhance our efforts to provide facilities or programs related to pickleball? • Explore public/private partnerships to develop future facilities; could help grow community support and secure funding • Explore solar panels on court covers to help support funding and maintenance • Explore partnerships between LOSD and the Lake Oswego Pickleball Club o The Lake Oswego Pickleball Club is willing to provide human capital to support maintenance, operations, and educational opportunities o Utilizing the school district tennis courts would provide more than enough courts • Keep an open dialogue between the city and the local clubs which include the Lake Oswego Pickleball Club, the Willamette River Club and the Columbia River Pickleball Club LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-20 11. Do you see any new opportunities for partnering with the City in the future to help address the need for pickleball in Lake Oswego? • Specific partners to pursue: o Pickleball Club (Doug Anderson and Steve Thompson) o United States Pickleball Association o LOSD o Anyone with a gymnasium • The Lake Oswego Pickleball Club has some funds available which potentially could be used to partner with the City in promoting opportunities for pickleball in Lake Oswego • Look to what other cities have done OUTREACH 12. How can we work with you and other community members to continue to promote engagement in this planning process? • Be proactive about relationships with City Council and other city staff to help build pickleball support 13. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • Carl Schmits - Head of the National Pickleball organization (started the LO Pickleball Club) • LO Police, Fire and other City Departments o Organize tournaments between city departments to get more folks playing pickleball • Pat Hogan and Beth Corey have both done a tremendous job of organizing introductory pickleball clinics for teens with Down Syndrome at Hammerle Park in West Linn and Rolling Hills Church. Both have been very successful. It's a perfect example of a community outreach program to promote the sport, give back to the community, and help a specific group become active in pickleball. 14. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? • Email • Surveys • Occasional group meetings • Continue to provide updates on city website LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-21 OTHER 15. Is there anything else you would like to share? • Not a fan of multi-court lines, would prefer dedicated pickleball courts NEXT STEPS • Just finished statistically valid community survey, survey is now available for community responses on the City website through November 10th • Community Open House scheduled for November 14, 4:30-6:30 at the Adult Community Center • In the process of finishing Focus Group meetings • Regularly meeting with CAC and PNRAB • Parks Plan 2040 website provides updates and project documents • Kyra mentioned that City Council directed the Parks and Recreation Department to explore solutions for pickleball as part of Parks Plan 2040 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-22 itio ;k GA ( O �t4 Jam _ n SUMMARY �GRFGO_% LAKE OSWEGO NATURAL RESOURCES & PARKS PLAN 2040 SUSTAINABILITY FOCUS GROUP Date: October 27, 2023 Time: 1 - 2:30 PM Location: Virtual, Zoom ATTENDEES MIG: Lauren Scott, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart Focus Group Participants: Kara Orvieto, Megan Hill, Terri Preeg Riggsby, Mark Puhlman, Rebecca Crosby, Stephanie Wagner, Kathleen Wiens, Jack Halsey DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. How would you describe your organization's role as it relates to parks, recreation, and natural areas? • Sustainability Advisory Board - supports the city's parks, recreation, and natural area related-work in an advisory capacity. • Tryon Creek Watershed Council - supports habitat restoration efforts and helps convene interested stakeholders. • LO Sustainability Network - partners with the Lake Oswego Watershed Council; recent parks and recreation related projects include helping transition the City to electric landscaping equipment, and the upcoming tree Summit. • Oswego Lake Watershed Council - helps support efforts to improve the health of the Oswego Lake watershed. 2. How often do you work with park and recreation department staff in Lake Oswego? Who do you typically work with to discuss improvements, ideas, or concerns? • Sustainability Advisory Board - works with Park staff through the Board's City Liaison • Tryon Creek Watershed Council - works with City habitat restoration team • LO Sustainability Network - partners with Lake Oswego Watershed Council • Oswego Lake Watershed Council - recently developed a MOU with the City LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-23 OPPORTUNITIES 3. What are some of the biggest existing assets related to parks, recreation, and natural areas in and around Lake Oswego? • Intact and unique natural ecosystems that are owned and managed by the City (Ex: Oregon White Oak) • Strong habitat management relating to invasive species • The system includes a large number of natural areas for folks to experience and connect with nature • Habitat Enhancement Program (HEP) • Existing canopy cover within natural areas 4. What do you feel are the greatest opportunities facing Lake Oswego in the next 5-10 years in terms of providing park, recreation, and natural area facilities and services? • Expand invasive species management and habitat restoration efforts in parks, natural areas and right of ways across the City (especially in areas that have not had as much focus in recent years) o Secure funding and support for invasive species management and removal • Support habitat connectivity efforts (Ex: expanding wildlife corridors) • Communicate information about Emeral Ash Borer and be proactive • Continue partnerships to get restoration work done o Green Teams o Friends Groups • Utilize electric equipment across parks and recreation facilities • Fully vet development and construction projects to consider all environmental impacts • Preserve natural areas to increase climate resilience • Consider climate resilience when selecting plant species • Do not use pesticides and herbicides • Think through artificial turf and understand negative consequences • Tap into top-down federal funding (Ex: fish passage barrier removals - Atwater Road culvert replacement) • Develop more covered recreation areas to support safe year-round recreation o More natural shade o Covered areas for outdoor activities like small markets, multi-use programming, recreation classes and play • Provide more accessible areas to gather and combat social isolation (especially for older adult communities and multi-family areas) LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-24 • Support park connectivity, consider integration with the broader multi-modal transportation system to expand equitable park access 5.Are there any specific improvements or ideas you have as we work through this process? • Incorporate Oregon White Oak management throughout the City (school district, city-owned property, private property, and business owned property) • Expand natural area access for those of varying ages and abilities o Expand invasive species management efforts • Expand invasive species management efforts • Increase information sharing relating to the Emerald Ash Borer to be proactive (currently located In Washington County) o Create an inventory o Develop management polices o Identify other species that could replace the Ash ISSUES 6. What should the City be preparing for to achieve a parks system that meets the long-term needs of the community? • Protect existing parks and natural areas • Prepare for climate change and how it will affect Lake Oswego's parks and natural areas o Loss of Ash and Oak Trees to invasive species o Bigger storm events o Maintain healthy shade tree systems o Plant climate resilient plants o Add solar panels to parking lots • Protect and appropriately delineate wetland areas to protect overall watershed health • Establish wildlife corridors • Address light pollution due to its negative impacts on wildlife • The Parks and Recreation Department should participate in the current housing planning process to advocate for preserving natural areas and incorporating access to nature into future housing developments • Expand community garden access (partner with school district and local businesses) • Ensure adequate materials and staffing for climate-related emergencies (extreme heat, smoke, etc.) • Improve stormwater infrastructure to protect against flooding LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-25 • Expand access to water for recreation • Ensure sufficient long-term maintenance staff and funding to care for existing and future park investments • Provide adequate public restrooms and trashcans 7. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community? • Increasing population density that could threaten natural areas • Maintaining what we have in a healthy way • Funding and capacity • Climate Change • Invasive species • Altered fire regime - restricted historic fire pattern 8. Do you feel there are any segments of the community that have unequal access to parks and recreation?If so, what are they? • Ensure there are no park deserts In Lake Oswego o Look into more pocket parks, green boulevards, and community gardens to fill any potential gaps - especially in areas with limited land availability o Prioritize investments in dense areas that may lack access to green space • Provide access to natural and cultural resources for Indigenous communities • Provide multi-modal access to parks o Encourage multimodal access and transit access to parks and natural areas • Find ways to make parks feel safe for all communities regardless of identity or ability PARTNERSHIPS 9. How can the City work with you to build on or enhance your efforts to help maintain facilities or provide programs related to parks, recreation, and natural areas? • Continue existing partnerships • Continue HEP funding • Think of the Watershed Council as a group that has greater ability to support work on privately owned and HOA-owned properties • Expand partnerships and equitable engagement efforts with immigrant and refugee communities, Indigenous nations, and other historically underserved groups o Include as many diverse voices and perspectives as possible • Implement a mechanism to recognize and manage existing partnerships that helps establish roles, expectations and responsibilities LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-26 • Bring back the Natural Resources Advisory Board • Convene a round table with the Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation Department and involved organizations • Support cross-pollination among city advisory boards (currently only meet once a year) • Encourage board members to attend other board meetings on a quarterly basis • Develop more neighborhood specific engagement and programming opportunities o Like Portland's neighborhood block parties and Sunday Streets/Parkways) o Smaller scale community events ■ Will help foster neighborhood-scale community resilience 10. Do you see any new opportunities for partnering with the City in the future to help address parks, recreation, and natural area needs? • Collaborate with existing partnerships on grant opportunities to allow funding to work on private and public lands • Hire a City Wildlife Manager/Natural Resources Planner to focus energy and to manage sustainability and natural resource related resources, partnerships and programs OUTREACH 11. How can we work with you and other community members to continue to promote engagement in this planning process? • Continue social media engagement through city and partner platforms • News publications (Hello LO, Lake Oswego Review) • School district communications • Reach out to HOAs • Continue forums with multiple organizations to foster collaboration and new ideas • Work with the LOSD to create youth engagement opportunities • Gain community feedback on project deliverables throughout the project • Offer engagement opportunities at different times and days of the week that provide childcare and food 12. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • Equity Groups: o LO for Love o Respond to Racism LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-27 o LOSD social workers o Hunger Fighters • High School Green Teams - youth perspective • Youth engagement through LOSD o Projects that students can bring home o Outreach events at Elementary schools • Metro (regional park provider) • Oak and Prairie Working Group • Oregon Department of Transportation • Tualatin Riverkeepers • Clackamas Water Environment Services • PCC Sylvania • Friends of Tryon Creek • Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde • Aging and Disability Advocacy Groups 13. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? • Provide more specificity when asking folks to come to an event to provide input OTHER 14. Is there anything else you would like to share? • How will Parks Plan 2040 incorporate the Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan? o Kyra stated that Parks Plan 2040 will reference the Plan but will not provide the same level of site-specific recommendations NEXT STEPS • Just finished statistically valid community survey, survey is now available for community responses on the City website through November 10th • Community Open House scheduled for November 14, 4:30-6:30 at the Adult Community Center • In the process of finishing Focus Group meetings • Regularly meeting with CAC and PNRAB • Parks Plan 2040 website provides updates and project documents • Feel free to follow-up with Kyra with any additional comments LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-28 ti,'A E O O s °REG° - SUMMARY LAKE OSWEGO SPORTS & ACTIVE RECREATION PARKS PLAN 2040 FOCUS GROUP Date: November 9, 2023 Time: 1:30 - 3:00 PM Location: Virtual, Zoom ATTENDEES MIG: Tiffany White-LaPierre, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart Focus Group Participants: Lisa Decker, Josh Jaster, Theresa Nute DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. How would you describe your organization's role as it relates to parks and recreation? • Little League mostly utilizes Lake Oswego School District (LOSD) softball fields but is hoping to utilize Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation (LOPR) fields more due to raising school district field fees and limited LOSD field time due to competing school uses • Lakeridge Youth Football utilizes multiple LOPR sport fields and LOSD properties, including: Hazelia Field, George Rogers Park and Lakeridge Middle School among others o Lakeridge Youth Football is moving away from utilizing natural grass fields to turf fields o Turf fields in the City are in high demand and highly competitive to book, this has resulted in some sports and teams traveling outside of the Lake Oswego community to meet demand • Ultimate goal of all represented organizations is to get kids involved with sports and to promote positive sport experiences for youth in the Lake Oswego community 2. How often do you work with park and recreation department staff in Lake Oswego? Who do you typically work with to discuss improvements, ideas, or concerns? • Scheduling and field rental support from Jean Ostrander LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-29 o Appreciates that LOPR prioritizes field uses for LO families and kids, especially due to proximity to West Linn • Rarely interacts with the Park Ranger to help with lighting and/or storage needs OPPORTUNITIES 3. What are some of the biggest existing assets related to sports and recreation facilities in and around Lake Oswego? • LOSD elementary school grass and turf fields • Hazelia Field o Faces high demand and very competitive scheduling (everyone wants to use this facility) o The City needs additional turf field capacity to meet current and future demand and to provide year-round recreation opportunities • Outside of Lake Oswego: o Frequently go to West Linn for baseball fields o Horizon Christian School in Wilsonville, especially for soccer • Little league utilizes covered areas In the City • Rent Riverdale and Mountain Park Church for gym use 4. What do you feel are the greatest opportunities facing Lake Oswego in the next 5-10 years in terms of providing sports and recreation facilities and programs? • More community-wide turf fields o Multi-use fields are great but high demand sports competing over them o Consider turfing more natural grass fields to allow for year-round recreation opportunities • Find a more dynamic way to allocate assets and schedule fields to promote higher utilization of the system's high demand assets • Pursue further partnerships and collaboration with LOSD to take advantage of existing undeveloped land for additional sport fields and to improve scheduling o Ex: Large field next to Lake Oswego High School • Provide more equitable scheduling and access for girl's sports • Develop a multi-use indoor community field house that can be rented out by community leagues/individuals/etc. and provide year-round recreation opportunities which is a lacking resource in Lake Oswego • Specific Aquatic and Recreation Center needs and opportunities: o Basketball courts ■ 33 teams serving 350-400 kids ■ Currently rent space from local church and local school properties LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-30 o Year-round recreation opportunities • Rethink and refocus who and how LOPR schedules field space, consider prioritizing field times for community based athletic programs over private club programs o Make sure community-based programs are being served and getting the space they need 5.Are there any specific improvements or ideas you have as we work through this process? • LOSD improvements: o Field improvements to underutilized LOSD assets o Scheduling ■ Current frustration that they have to advocate to use their own schools which should act as an accessible community resource ISSUES 6. What should the City be preparing for to achieve a parks system that meets the long-term needs of the community? • Develop programs and facilities to prepare for a family-oriented, kid heavy community o Pursue expanded and additional youth athletic and recreational opportunities • Balance youth related activities with opportunities for Lake Oswego's aging community • Provide opportunities for pickleball o There is shared frustration over the removal of public pickleball courts at George Rogers Park • Pursue partnerships with the LOSD to provide additional field space and recreational facilities to meet unmet demand which is expected to increase over the next 15 years o De-silo LOSD and LOPR to be highly efficient about available land in the community • Provide 30% more multipurpose turf fields to allow for year-round recreation opportunities and to meet unmet demand o Example: City of Canby • Create easier and more efficient scheduling system that enables multiple sports to share spaces dynamically so that no space is wasted 7. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community? LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-31 • Housing • Wastewater and stormwater infrastructure • Transportation infrastructure • Utilizing unused LOSD assets 8. Do you feel there are any segments of the community that have unequal access to sprots and active recreation facilities and/or programs?If so, what are they? • Sports and recreation programs can be cost prohibitive o Want to expand messaging that there are scholarships available to allow kids to participate for free ■ Would appreciate any field rental price cuts the LOPR can give to community sports organizations so that they can support more scholarships to expand youth sport access in the community • Equitable access for gir'Is sports • Prioritize Lake Oswego non-profit service organizations that provide affordable sports activities vs. for profit club sports • Prioritize in-season sports o Frustration over soccer (and other year-round club sports) taking over field capacity for single season sports PARTNERSHIPS 9. How can the City work with you to build on or enhance your efforts to help maintain facilities or provide programs related to sports and active recreation? • Would appreciate to have a direct city touchpoint/liaison • Provide a welcome package/cheat sheet with key information to community sports organizations that include relevant city contacts and field scheduling resources to help remove the barriers to entry and improve communication pathways • Prioritize Lake Oswego community sports organizations and consider subsidizing rates further and/or raising rates for outside organizations and club teams to ensure access for underserved community members 10. Do you see any new opportunities for partnering with the City in the future to help address sports and active recreation needs? • Pursue further partnerships with LOSD to take advantage of underutilized assets and ensure future developments are right-sized to meet sport needs and be useable to the community LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-32 OUTREACH 11. How can we work with you and other community members to continue to promote engagement in this planning process? • Make sure to broadly share opportunities for community feedback throughout the Parks Plan 2040 process • Provide engagement materials with community sports organizations to share on their social medial and active parent email lists 12. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • LOSD • Neighborhood Associations o Kyra confirmed that she is reaching out to the City's neighborhood associations 13. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? • Social media and email list blasts OTHER 14. Is there anything else you would like to share? • Need a better way to turn on field lights outside of office hours when they are not scheduled o Potentially consider an onsite key or lockbox to be able to turn on field lights vs. something that needs to be coordinated with the city during office hours NEXT STEPS • Just finishing statistically valid community survey • Community Open House scheduled for November 14, 4:30-6:30 at the Adult Community Center • In the process of finishing Focus Group meetings • Regularly meeting with CAC and PNRAB • Parks Plan 2040 website provides updates and project documents • Feel free to follow-up with Kyra with any additional comments LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-33 ti,A £O • O s� m C3 SUMMARY °REUoa LAKE OSWEGO ACCESSIBILITY PARKS PLAN 2040 FOCUS GROUP Date: November 30, 2023 Time: 4:30 - 6:00 PM Location: Virtual, Zoom ATTENDEES MIG: Lauren Scott, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart Focus Group Participants: Steve Unger, Georgena Moran, Lisa Strader DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. How often do you visit Lake Oswego's parks, natural areas, or recreation facilities? • Visit different places based on recommendations • Go to parks more often in the summer • Specific sites frequented include: o George Rogers and Luscher Farms, but not everyone of varying mobility or ability is able to use those sites o Attend summer concerts at Westlake Park o Tried to go to Stevens Meadows but there was no off-street parking and unable to use ramp to access park o Foothills Park and the paved paths o Not familiar with many of the trails in the City but willing to go and visit them 2. How often do you interact with park and recreation department staff in Lake Oswego? Who do you typically work with to discuss improvements, ideas, or concerns? • Staff at the Adult Community Center • City ADA Coordinator • Parks and Recreation Director • Other general City staff and volunteers for questions LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-34 ISSUES AND NEEDS 3. What should the City be preparing for to achieve a parks system that meets the needs of community members who are experiencing a disability or caring for someone with a disability? • A 72-hour accommodation request timeline is not enough and does not allow for people with disabilities to decide to attend events without planning days in advance. • Start at the entrance of the site. Examine and provide information about whether there is accessible parking and restrooms, signage with information about the site/trail, benches, etc. 4. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community regarding accessibility in Lake Oswego's parks, natural areas, or recreation facilities? • Biggest obstacle is the lack of information ahead of time (e.g., accessible parking, restrooms, benches along the trail, how muddy it is likely to be, etc.) • Another obstacle is signage at the site which doesn't give people with disabilities enough information about what they might encounter once they are on the trail or have traveled down it for some distance (e.g., steep grades, lack of benches or shade, narrow paths) 5.Are there any specific needs or improvements you would like to see? • Informational signage about the site (e.g., for trails include the steepest grade, average and minimum tread width, surfacing, overall length, seating areas) • Information about City parks and trails should be posted online in accessible formats (e.g., parking, restrooms, seating, trails) • Mapping on websites is not accessible to assistive technology, alt text can be added to describe content and provide contact information • Add programs and events for reflective, quieter recreation; could also consider adding quiet zones in parks and other outdoor spaces • Create differences in trail surfacing so you know when you're on a trail versus when you are not, but be careful of curbs and edges which are barriers to those with limited vision • Add trail markers showing distance • Connection between Foothills Park and Tryon Creek State Natural Area should be improved • Add benches or other accessible seating along trails and in parking lots at pickup spots/zones • Improve drainage on paths and trails to reduce mud • Add durable and washable picnic tables LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-35 OPPORTUNITIES 6. What are some parks or recreation facilities, in Lake Oswego or elsewhere, that work well in terms of accessibility? • George Rogers paths, one route makes a short circle while another provides a longer route • Parking in multiple places (e.g., Westlake Park has parking by both the diamonds and playground and George Rogers Park has parking above and below) • Tryon Creek State Natural Area is a good example of how to provide trail information without liability issues • Things that don't work well include: o Access to Nansen Summit (HOA Park) where you must walk up the steep street to get to the park o Tryon Creek (state-run) has a path that goes down to the creek but it is too steep and there's no signage to say otherwise 7. What do you feel are the greatest opportunities for Lake Oswego in terms of providing accessible parks, natural areas, and recreation opportunities? • If there are multiple parks in one area, focus on making one of them accessible (e.g., improve parking, add accessible features) OUTREACH 8. What types of information do you find most useful to determine the level of accessibility of park, natural area, or recreation facility?How do you prefer that information be provided? • See previous comments on site signage and website information • If you do put phone numbers up online, make sure they go to a person rather than automated machine • Organize information by categories: location and arrival; amenities and features; trail characteristics; signage and wayfinding; operations and maintenance • Add dates of when information was last updated • Website should have a map of the park and should be designed so that it is easy to download and print maps; on the maps show: o Icons for restrooms, transit links, parking o Site hours and contact info • Interpretive displays work o Add one-liners to displays in braille to at least provide a summary of information shown • Make sure communications are effectives for all community members (e.g., braille, tactile, etc.) • Potential for audio on website LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-36 9. How can we work with you and others to continue to promote engagement in this planning process? • Give status updates on project progress and ways to stay informed • Visible way for people to give comments during and after Parks Plan 2040 • Make it relational not just transactional; make sure that you are providing something of value to the groups that you are tapping into for assistance or information to help give them incentives to help out • Offer merch or gift cards for participation 10. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? • Virtual opportunities (like this focus group) • Online surveys • See other responses for additional specific recommendations 11. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • Target organizations that support people with disabilities o Independent Living Resources o Oregon Spinal Cord Injury Connection o Empowering Access o Adventures Without Limits o Oregon Commission for the Blind o Senior Living Centers in City o Guide Dogs for the Blind • Use Adult Community Center as a base and have input and sign up come through them OTHER 14. Is there anything else you would like to share? • Make implementation/construction of the trail connection between George Rogers and Foothills happen sooner; that trail connection will have a big impact on how people in other parts of our region view Lake Oswego • The more diverse and welcoming Lake Oswego can be, the better it is • People who feel marginalized or unsafe going anywhere unknown need to feel welcomed and have the information needed to visit and attend parks and events • Companion seats next to benches • Create comfortable trail widths so people can pass and walk together easily LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-37 Vs (i,ir O A SUMMARY \ \oxEooa� LAKE OSWEGO DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION PARKS PLAN 2040 FOCUS GROUP Date: December 5, 2023 Time: 6:00 - 7:30 PM Location: Virtual, Zoom ATTENDEES MIG: Tiffany White-LaPierre, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart, Guilian del Rio Focus Group Participants: Sarah Ellison, Molly Rodrigano, Pat Ginn, Michael Harrison,Jennifer Mozinski, Greg Wolley DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. How often do you visit Lake Oswego's parks, natural areas, or recreation facilities? • Many participants are frequent users (daily, weekly) • One participant does not visit the City's parks and facilities since they do not live in the City 2. How often do you interact with park and recreation department staff in Lake Oswego? Who do you typically work with to discuss improvements, ideas, or concerns? • A few participants communicate directly with Ivan Anderholm (Director of Parks and Recreation) about issues and concerns • Some participants have communicated with park maintenance staff about broken playground equipment • Partnerships between their organizations and Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation (LOPR) • A few participants interact with LOPR landscapers/maintenance staff and feel they do a great job maintaining the system's parks and facilities • One participant is neighbors with someone who supports the City's LOPR events • Park Ranger at Luscher Farm • A few participants interact with the folks who operate the Farmers Market ISSUES AND NEEDS 3. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community when it comes to diversity, equity, and inclusion in parks and recreation? LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-38 • Until recently, the City had less cultural events. Moving forward participants hope that the City will continue to increase citywide cultural events • Ensuring that the City's parks and facilities are safe and welcoming to everyone, and that this is promoted through inclusive communication • Ensuring multiple language and translation options (events, signage, rules) • Providing more information about resources and accessible spaces for folks with disabilities and mobility concerns • Park, natural area and program access for kids with disabilities and/or mobility concerns o Accessibility issues: ■ Bark chip surfacing ■ Lacking variety ■ Inaccessible play features o Accessibility improvement opportunities: ■ More inclusive play structures (Example: Harpers Playgrounds) ■ More information on parks, trails and natural areas that are handicap accessible ■ More nature play areas ■ More programming and play opportunities to promote positive and collaborative interactions ■ Greater play structure variety • More scholarships or subsidized options for recreational programs to expand youth access and provide as much access as the community needs • A few participants feel that the City's programming is exclusionary to certain communities due to cost barriers, types of programs options, and scheduling conflicts for working parents (need for all-day youth programs) 4. Do you feel there are any segments of the community that have unequal access to Lake Oswego's parks and recreation?If so, who are they? • Youth with disabilities • Individuals with mobility concerns • Programs for neurodivergent youth o The City's programs do not currently provide the level of access and support needed OPPORTUNITIES 5. What are some of the greatest existing assets related to parks and recreation in Lake Oswego? • The natural environment itself, access to natural areas and extensive tree canopy o Associated health benefits • Safety across the City's parks and natural areas due to high usage and high level of maintenance and cleanliness LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-39 o Participants feel this contrasts with some other regional communities that face safety and maintenance concerns in their parks and natural areas • Citywide proximity to parks and natural areas • Opportunities for solitude within the City's natural areas • The City's parks and natural spaces spark different experiences for everyone • Access to plenty of dog waste bags 6. What do you feel are the greatest opportunities facing Lake Oswego in the next 5-10 years in terms of creating an equitable and inclusive park and recreation system? • Focus on serving lower income populations through programming and events • Subsidize access to programming • Improve language and translation • Expand recreational program schedules o Provide full-day youth programs for working parents • Reach communities that the City is not currently reaching o Consider communities that may be directly adjacent to City limits o Migrant communities • Provide true barrier free access to all spaces and programs • Expand culturally appropriate programming • Expand nature play opportunities (Example: sand and water play) • Expand public access to Oswego Lake • Provide more interpretive elements that shares Indigenous history • Provide more accessible parks and programming for youth with disabilities o Consider specific programs to encourage a safe and supportive environment • Add splash pads o Some participants leave the City for water access that is not a large water body that poses safety concerns for young children • Expand financial access to recreational programs o Scholarships o Multi-child discounts o Scholarship fund donation opportunities • Expand outreach to and access for foster families in the area • Consider multi-modal access to parks and recreational opportunities • Plan a Pride event like what other cities in the area are doing 7.Are there any specific improvements or ideas you have to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion in Lake Oswego's park and recreation system? • Diversify the LOPR workforce through recruitment, employment and retention of individuals from diverse backgrounds • Implement contract equity for capital Improvement projects (hire women and minority- owned businesses) LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-40 • Find ways to promote inclusive, positive and sustainable experiences for all community members and across socioeconomic levels • Provide programs for youth and adults with disabilities PARTNERSHIPS 8. How can the City work with community groups or organizations to make Lake Oswego's park and recreation system more equitable and inclusive? • Continue to develop an inventory of community groups o Maintain long-term relationships to build trust between community members and the City, especially underserved groups o This is a great first step to address DEI concerns within the City • Hire multilingual staff 9. Do you see any new opportunities for partnering with Lake Oswego Parks& Recreation in the future to help address diversity, equity, and inclusion issues or needs? • See bullets above OUTREACH 10. How can we work with you and other organizations to continue to promote engagement in this planning process? • Participants gave kudos to staff members Emily Liu, Jamie Inglis, and Cydny Fletcher for inclusive outreach and meeting diverse community needs 11. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • Specific organizations to reach out to: o Ethnic Chambers of Commerce o Native American Chamber of Commerce o Asian American Business Alliance o Adelante Mujeres o Culturally specific places of worship o Parents for Kids with Special Needs Advisory Group o Harpers Playgrounds o LOSD staff and councilors (represents a cross section of the community) • Specific communities to reach out to: o Youth and student organizations/clubs within the City's schools o Parents o Low-income communities 12. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-41 • Directly ask the community what they need, especially underserved communities (surveys, interviews, etc.) • Social media platforms, especially to connect with youth • Maintain long-term relationships, not just one-time points of contact OTHER 13. Is there anything else you would like to share? • N/A LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-42 • s 0 SUMMARY \°xEGoa. LAKE OSWEGO YOUTH ACTION COUNCIL PARKS PLAN 2040 FOCUS GROUP Date: November 28, 2023 Time: 5:00 - 6:30 PM Location: LO Teen Lounge ATTENDEES MIG: Lauren Scott, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart, Cydney Fletcher, Jordan Morales Focus Group Participants: Youth Action Council (YAC) Members and Teen Lounge Participants DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. How often do you visit parks or recreation facilities(tennis center, swim park, etc.)in Lake Oswego? • Most participants frequently visit parks and recreation facilities o Some visit parks and recreation facilities more often in the summer • Frequently visited sites include: o Dog park at Waluga o Swim Park (lots of participants mentioned) o Luscher Farm • Some participants work at the Teen Lounge 2. How often do you participate in parks and recreation programs(summer camps, classes, events, etc.) in Lake Oswego? • Frequently visited parks, facilities, and programs: o Farmers Market (nearly every participant mentioned) o Youth Action Council o Teen Lounge o Summer Camps (themselves and their younger siblings) o Junior Camp Council o Oswego Lake o JCC o ACL o Concerts in the Park (multiple participants mentioned) o Tennis lessons at Indoor Tennis Center o Rowing at Water Sports Center • Other non-Lake Oswego facilities: LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-43 o Mountain Park Rec Center (HOA owned) o Sellwood Park is the new "cool" teen hangout OPPORTUNITIES 3. What are some of your favorite parks or recreation facilities in Lake Oswego? • Swim Park o Lake access o Good place to hang out with friends • Farmers Market o Enjoy the involvement with local businesses o Liked the trial spring and fall Farmers Markets o Good community o Really fun • George Rogers o Lots of memories from summer camps 4. What do you see as opportunities or ways we could improve parks and recreation in Lake Oswego in the next 5-10 years? • More stuff at the Bike Skills Park at East Waluga o Jumps o Balance obstacles/activities • New, varied, and unique play structures, not traditional play equipment • The dog park at Waluga doesn't have enough things for dogs to do o Agility o Tunnels • Workout equipment at Waluga needs some updating, especially for those who don't have a gym membership o More variety o Obstacle courses • More volleyball and tether ball like at the Swim Park o Currently some participants shared that they have to bring their own volleyball net to other parks o Volleyball nets at Foothills • More basketball courts • Add diving board and slide to Swim Park • More installation like activities o Cornhole o Updated exercise equipment • Fishing programs o Lake management/rules has blocked fishing programs in the past o Safety issues around docks LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-44 o Roehr is the only park you are currently allowed to fish at o No fishing allowed at Foothills or the Water Sports Center 5.Are there specific projects or ideas you have? • See bullets under Question 5 above ISSUES 6. What, if any, issues related to parks and recreation do you think we will be facing in the next 5-10 years? • Bathrooms o Bathrooms need fans to mitigate smells; especially at Farmers Market o Sometimes bathrooms lack soap or paper towels • Water fountains, and maintaining existing water fountains o Need more water bottle filling stations • Parking o Parking spaces near water access points o Need more parking at the Swim Park • Improve the ramp at George Rogers Park • More covered/shaded play structures o Including covered places for parents to sit • More seating and picnic tables that aren't wood for greater cleanliness and durability • More nature play that is different than traditional play structures o Ex: Memorial Park in Wilsonville • Pigeon poop at Tryon Cove, Lake Grove Swim Park and George Rogers • Wasp nests • Trash cans at Waluga • Update asphalt paths around Waluga • More music programs, especially for youth • More ways for people to experience music 7. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community in general? • Lake Access o Parking o Nothing to do in the summer if you don't have lake access • Involvement in recreation programs and events, especially after COVID o Need to make sure the word is out so that people will come • School District Swim Park Access o Selective to who is allowed to get into the park (have to live in the area) • River Access o George Rogers LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-45 o Roehr o Foothills ■ Can't go to the docks ■ The beach is gross • Difficult to walk places in the City o Narrow roads o Crumbling or lacking sidewalks • Affordable housing • Lacking jobs for youth o Businesses are not interested in hiring youth o Hard to find jobs they are interested in • Invasive species on school campuses and across the community (Ex: Ivy) 8. Do you feel there are any segments of the community that lack access to parks and recreation?If so, who are they? • More nature play that is different than traditional play structures PARTNERSHIPS 9. How would you describe Youth Action Council's role as it relates to parks and recreation • Help create experiences for all people in the community • Help reach every segment of the community (all ages) • YAC's projects range from events for specific communities to events for the whole community • Examples of YAC projects: o Living Wellness o Tree lighting o Halloween Trick or Treat o Blanket and Pet Toy Drive (made and donated) o Stem Fair, partner with Stem Clubs and Robotic Teams at local high schools o Youth Art Show (Outside the Art Room), gives local students the opportunity to sell and showcase their art o Cooking classes at Luscher Farm 10. Do you have any ideas for how we can work with you(the Youth Action Council)or other youth organizations to improve parks and recreation in Lake Oswego? • Projects YAC wants to do or are planning to do (opportunities to support): o Kick ball o Amazing Race: Participants would race to participating local businesses ■ The goal would be to support local businesses and promote exercise ■ Proceeds would go to Non-Profit of their choice LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-46 o Book Swap o Pool Tournament with local youth and seniors o Interested in more volunteer opportunities o Interested in more sports leagues ■ Potential to partner with Friends of Parks ■ More accessible sports leagues and open recreation time/field access opportunities are a frequent request of local youth, parents and community members OUTREACH 11. Do you have any ideas for how to engage Lake Oswego's youth in this project? • Larger social media presence o Community polls o Find ways to get more people to follow social media accounts o Improve Instagram account o Reels • Interactive pop-ups at school events o Prize wheel o Swag/Incentives ■ Fidget activities ■ Candy ■ T-shirts • Continuity of people at events 12. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • Green Teams at both schools and other student environmental clubs o LOHS Green Teams do Thursday lunches • PTAs • Volunteers • Program contractors 13. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? • Social media (Instagram,Tik Tok) • Promotional/Informational materials with QR codes at indoor recreation facilities and other community spaces • Not as interested in email (lots of youth don't use) • Most were not aware of the city website o One participant suggested there should be better optimization on the website because it can be hard to find things LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-47 OTHER 14. Is there anything else you would like to share? • N/A LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-48 ti,A £O • O s� m C3 SUMMARY °REUoa LAKE OSWEGO YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS PARKS PLAN 2040 FOCUS GROUP Date: December 6, 2023 Time: 4:30 - 6:00 PM Location: Lake Oswego Main Fire Station Conference Room ATTENDEES MIG: Lauren Scott, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart, Quin Brunner Focus Group Participants: Youth members who sit on the following City Advisory Boards: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion; Library; Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources; Sustainability DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. What are some of your favorite parks or recreation facilities in Lake Oswego? • Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation (LOPR) parks and facilities: o Swim Park o George Rogers Park (most popular across participants) ■ Especially the trail connections in the area o Woodmont Nature Park o West Waluga Park o East Waluga Park o Westlake Park o Foothills Park o Indoor Tennis Center • Non-City Owned Parks: o Tryon Creek State Natural Area • Most participants go to the parks that are close to home and that they can walk to • Many participants use trails, especially those that connect to other key places o One participant frequently run at the trails by George Rogers 3. How often do you visit parks or recreation facilities(tennis center, swim park, etc.)in Lake Oswego? LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-49 • A few participants go to the Indoor Tennis Center, either for classes or volunteering/working • A few participants go to the Swim Park 4. How often do you participate in parks and recreation programs (summer camps, classes, events, etc.) in Lake Oswego? • Popular programs: o Farmers Market (visit and volunteer) o 4th of July Light Show o Summer Concerts at Westlake Park o Siblings have done rowing programs at the Water Sports Center o Tennis summer programs o Movies In the park o Tree Lighting (especially when younger) o Winter Fair • Many participants have not interacted with LOPR programs recently and sometimes feel that they (and other youth) are not aware of all the programming options that are available OPPORTUNITIES 5. What do you see as opportunities or ways we could improve parks and recreation in Lake Oswego in the next 5-10 years? • Improving connections and access to parks o Sidewalks o Trail connections o Ex: George Rogers Park, especially over Highway 43 • Increasing access for communities with disabilities o Access to ramps that are located in easily accessible areas o Improve public information about accessible parks, facilities, natural areas, and trails • Providing more sports fields o Multiple participants noted that they see people at Hazelia Field (and other fields) late at night and feel that more sports fields could help meet demand and reduce late-night youth practice times o Most fields are fully booked and can be difficult to schedule o Address parking issues • Finding ways to alleviate traffic concerns around the new Aquatic Center (LORAC) LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-50 6.Are there specific projects or ideas you have? • Needed amenities: o More drinking fountains o More access to water and swimming opportunities ■ Designated swimming dock on Willamette River o More seating areas along paths/trails and viewpoints o Electric vehicle charging stations o More bike racks • Needed programs: o More short-term vs. long-term programs ■ Provide a combination of short and long-term camps o More programming options for teens • Ensure parks and park amenities are equitably distributed throughout the City's parks and facilities • Expand outreach about the City's available programs and volunteer opportunities; many youth don't know about current LOPR options ISSUES 7. What, if any, issues related to parks and recreation do you think we will be facing in the next 5-10 years? • Managing greater volumes of people visiting a select few community parks (George Rogers and Foothills) and managing park use at popular parks o Ways to manage park crowding in the future: ■ Diversify amenities and community events across the city's smaller, less popular parks (especially areas further from downtown) ■ Expand community-wide access to community events and programs • Preparing for climate change and implementing future sustainability and climate- change related policies that will likely be mandated by the State and City in the future o Implement sustainability and climate change related policies, programs and plans now if the resources are available rather than down the road o Prepare now rather than later • Addressing water-waste issues (sprinklers, irrigation systems, etc.) o Potential solutions (one participant's school engineering project): ■ Moisture sensors that allow sprinkler systems to only turn on if ground moisture is below certain levels LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-51 • Expanding language and translation services o Provide multilingual program options o Provide more culturally relevant programs and events 8. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community in general? • Equitable access to parks and programs for populations with disabilities • Climate change • Access to recreation and programs for folks with language barriers, especially older adults o Solutions: ■ Providing accessible multilingual information ■ Having staff who speak multiple languages at events and programs to help build relationships and create welcoming environments • Finding ways to connect multiple generations, especially ways to bridge younger and older populations o Ex: Youth Action Council's pool tournament for youth and older adults 9. Do you feel there are any segments of the community that lack access to parks and recreation?If so, who are they? • People with language barriers o Provide accessible signage ■ Icon based signage o Asked if QR codes are a good way to provide language translation ■ One participant raised the concern that those with language barriers may not be able to access QR codes, especially older adults • Older adults • All the different cultures in Lake Oswego o Other possible cultural events: ■ Provide greater Hispanic representation (Hispanic Heritage Month) in the City PARTNERSHIPS 2. How would you describe the Youth Advisory Board's role as it relates to parks and recreation? • Multiple of the boards that Youth Advisory Board members sit on regularly interact with Parks and Recreation LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-52 • Two participants are on the Parks Board, others sit on Sustainability, Library, and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion which also overlap with parks and recreation facilities/projects/programming 10. Do you have any ideas for how we can work with you(the Youth Advisory Board)or other youth organizations to improve parks and recreation in Lake Oswego? • Provide questions/agendas for in-person and virtual events ahead of time • Keep including parks and recreation staff across the City's various boards OUTREACH 11. Do you have any ideas for how to engage Lake Oswego's youth in this project? • See bullets below 12. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • School clubs (Green Team, National Honor Society) 13. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? • Implement a monthly LOPR update about upcoming events and current projects, will help expand public Information o Share through emails, board email groups o City website Is difficult to navigate, needs an overhaul o Flyers with links and QR codes distributed across community spaces and schools o Social media accounts • Email • Social Media • School google classrooms • Provide incentives to gain feedback o Food to encourage event participation. o Merch/T-shirts for passive advertising o Spinning wheels OTHER 14. Is there anything else you would like to share? • N/A LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-53 Fd, O � U rosy SUMMARY \oR,G,„, LAKE OSWEGO YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL PARKS PLAN 2040 FOCUS GROUP Date: January 10, 2024 Time: 6:30 - 8:30 PM Location: Lake Oswego Maintenance Center ATTENDEES MIG: Lauren Scott, Jessa Miller City of Lake Oswego: Kyra Haggart, Jamie Inglis, Quin Brunner, Massene Mboup (City Councilor), Joe Buck (Mayor) Focus Group Participants: Youth Leadership Council Members DISCUSSION IN GENERAL 1. What are some of your favorite parks or recreation facilities in Lake Oswego? • See below. 2. How often do you visit parks or recreation facilities(tennis center, swim park, etc.)in Lake Oswego? • Very often, especially in the summers o One participant visits parks multiple times a day in the summer o Not as much during the school year or winter months o Parks act as a rendezvous point for friends • Popular parks and facilities to visit: o George Rogers o Westlake o West and East Waluga Parks • Bike Skills Park o Indoor Tennis Center, especially during the winter months o Hazelia Field • Club sports o Farmers Market o Luscher Farm o Iron Mountain Park for trails LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-54 3. How often do you participate in parks and recreation programs(summer camps, classes, events, etc.) in Lake Oswego? • Parks and recreation programs: o Concerts and movies in the park o Junior camp counselors o Youth camps at Luscher Farm o Farm Plot at Luscher Farm • Other activities: o Willamette River o Picnics at George Rogers o Dog walking o Meeting up with friends o Biking o Blackberry picking OPPORTUNITIES 4. What do you see as opportunities or ways we could improve parks and recreation in Lake Oswego in the next 5-10 years? 5 Are there specific projects or ideas you have? • Extend Farmers Market further into the fall or even year-round • Add a new, lighted turf field to meet demand and reduce scheduling conflicts between sports • Improve maintenance at the Bike Skills Park in East Waluga Park (trash, damaged jumps, etc.) • Integrate more native plantings to encourage wildlife (Ex: a wildflower field) • Add more covered, and heated picnic and seating areas o Millenium Plaza • Expand youth marketing for parks and recreation programs and events (Ex: Movies in the Park) • Update playgrounds o Ideas for playground Improvements: • More activities for teens, not just young children • Specific play equipment: • See-saws • Swings (for multiple ages) • Rock climbing wall • Obstacle course LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-55 • Super tall tunnel slides • Trampolines • Water slide/splash pad • Provide more winter events and programs • Involve youth in the planning for youth-targeted events (Ex: let youth choose the music for the laser light show during the 4th of July) • Improve the Swim Park o Facilities are outdated o Needs more places to gather/hangout and better signage o Instead of the Swim Park, participants go to a club pool, a friend's lake easement, or George Rogers Park for water access but they would be interested in going to the Swim Park if it was improved • More designated swim areas o Bigger dock at Foothills • More animals at Luscher Farm o The chickens are very popular • Improve transit access to the City's parks and facilities o Provide a bus in the summer that stops at parks and downtown • Add more basketball courts • Improve pedestrian connections and pathways to, between, and within parks • Provide more covered bike parking throughout the system • Create a bike path map that shows city bike routes, parks that provide bike paths, and dangerous bike areas o Spread awareness of bike manners for drivers (Ex: share the road campaign) ISSUES 6. What, if any, issues related to parks and recreation do you think we will be facing in the next 5-10 years? • Outdated playground equipment • Neglected swim and aquatic areas • Swimming and jumping safety issues on the Willamette River (rusty pipes, wood pilings) o Make a smaller dock where people can safely jump off • Better lighting, especially in the winter within parks and in parking lots o Ensure lighting improvements prevent light pollution for wildlife • Lacking sidewalks and pedestrian connectivity in certain areas of the City • Trash management o Organize volunteer pickups and partner with the school Green Teams LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-56 7. What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges facing the community in general? • Climate change • Invasive species • Safe multi-modal connectivity 8. Do you feel there are any segments of the community that lack access to parks and recreation?If so, who are they? • Some areas by Lakeridge PARTNERSHIPS 9. How would you describe the Youth Leadership Council's role as it relates to parks and recreation? • To provide a platform for youth voices and feedback to be heard and to inform future change. 10. Do you have any ideas for how we can work with you(the Youth Leadership Council)or other youth organizations to improve parks and recreation in Lake Oswego? • Partner to help spread awareness across youth audiences o Social media (Instagram and Tik Tok) OUTREACH 11. Do you have any ideas for how to engage Lake Oswego's youth in this project? • This question was not asked due to time constraints 12. Are there other people or groups who we should hear from? • This question was not asked due to time constraints 13. What types of communication and engagement processes work well for you and others? • Social media platforms: o Instagram (more Important than Tik Tok, better for information sharing) ■ Collaborative posts with local schools and youth organizations to expand social media reach o Tik Tok • Platforms that do not work well: LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-57 o Website o Emails • More direct partnerships with the schools (Ex: advisory slideshows, assemblies, announcements, flyers, newsletters, etc.) • More physical posters/signs/banners around the City and within parks and facilities • Remind App that sends one-time text reminders leading up to events • Parks and Recreation Department app or citywide app with a parks page o Would be more popular than the city website OTHER 14. Is there anything else you would like to share? • N/A LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-58 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY l OCTOBER 2023 October 20, 2023 To: MIG, Lake Oswego Parks From: DHM Research Re: Lake Oswego Parks Survey, #01225 Introduction & Methodology From September 26 to October 18, 2023, DHM Research conducted a survey of Lake Oswego residents.The purpose of the survey was to assess residents priorities for parks and recreation activities. Research Methodology The survey consisted of 403 Lake Oswego residents and took approximately 13 minutes to complete.This is a sufficient sample size to assess residents' opinions generally and to review findings by multiple subgroups. Respondents were contacted from a list of registered voters.' Telephone respondents were contacted by a live interviewer and text-to-online respondents received a text invitation directing them to an online survey. In gathering responses, a variety of quality control measures were employed, including questionnaire pre-testing and validation. Quotas were set by gender, age, educational attainment, race and ethnicity, political party, and area of the city to match the profile of likely voters in the May Statement of Limitations Any sampling of opinions or attitudes is subject to a margin of error.The margin of error is a standard statistical calculation that represents differences between the sample and total population at a confidence interval, or probability, calculated to be 95%.This means that there is a 95% probability that the sample taken for this study would fall within the stated margin of error if compared with the results achieved from surveying the entire population.The margin of error for this survey is +/- 4.9%. DHM Research Background DHM Research has been providing opinion research and consultation throughout the Pacific Northwest and other regions of the United States for over 40 years. The firm is nonpartisan and independent and specializes in research projects to support public policy making. 1 In November 2022, 94% of eligible Oregonians were registered to vote. Given the city's demogrphic profile it likely higher in Lake Oswego. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-59 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 MIG Lake Oswego Parks Planning Survey September 26-October 18, 2023 N=403 residents of Lake Oswego; margin of error±4.9% 13 minutes DHM Research Project#01225 INTRODUCTION Thank you for contributing to the future of Lake Oswego by sharing your ideas about the parks and recreation. The results of this survey will help the City make decisions about parks, recreation facilities, and programmed activities in ways that reflect the needs and values of the community. It takes about 10 minutes to complete. In this survey please consider only parks and recreation activities provided by the City of Lake Oswego. Do not answer about other parks and recreation programs by other entities, such as the school district, county, Metro, or state. SATISFACTION WITH PARKS AND RECREATION OFFERINGS Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the following? Response NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 1. Parks across the entire city of Lake Oswego n=403 86% 43% 42% 11% 8% 3% 3% 2. Parks in your neighborhood n=403 83% 42% 41% 16% 10% 5% 2% 3. Recreation facilities, such as the Adult Community Center,the Tennis Center, and Luscher Farm n=403 69% 30% 39% 14% 10% 4% 17% 4. Recreation activities and services n=403 75% 31% I 44% 17% I 12% I 5% I 8% Next, consider the quality and condition of specific features of Lake Oswego parks.Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the following? Response NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 5. Natural areas n=403 87% 52% 34% 9% 6% 4% 4% 6. Landscaped areas, including lawns, plants, and trees n=403 90% 57% 33% 9% 6% 2% 2% 7. Restrooms n=403 70% 38% 31% 14% 12% 2% 16% 8. Picnic shelters or other covered structures n=403 73% 38% 35% 11% 9% 2% 16% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-60 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 Response NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 9. Athletic fields owned and operated by the city of Lake Oswego n=403 59% 36% 23% 15% 11% 4% 27% 10. Sports courts owned and operated by the City of Lake Oswego, such as basketball and tennis courts n=403 49% 24% 25% 21% 13% 8% 29% 11. Playground equipment n=403 58% 32% 26% 13% 10% 3% 29% 12. Paths and trails within parks n=403 86% 52% 34% 11% 8% 3% 2% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 PARK PRIORITIES The following are specific parks amenities that Lake Oswego could make investments to improve. For each, indicate if you think should be a high, medium, or low priority for Lake Oswego. Please remember that Lake Oswego must make choices and cannot do everything at once. Be selective in your ratings. Response NET Very Don't category high high High Medium NET low Low Very low know 13. Tennis courts n=403 20% 7% 13% 28% 41% 27% 14% 11% 14. Pickleball courts n=403 24% 13% 11% 25% 41% 20% 21% 10% 15. Soccer fields n=403 26% 11% 15% 37% 26% 15% 10% 12% 16. Basketball courts n=403 23% 6% 18% 32% 33% 23% 10% 11% 17. Playground equipment n=403 44% 15% 29% 28% 17% 12% 5% 11% 18. Benches or other seating areas n=403 45% 17% 28% 31% 18% 14% 4% 6% 19. Covered areas for picnics n=403 39% 14% 25% 34% 23% 18% 5% 4% 20. Swimming pools or facilities n=403 58% 26% 33% 20% 16% 8% 8% 6% 21. Improved bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to parks and recreation facilities n=403 66% 37% 29% 22% 10% 6% 3% 3% 22. Improved access for people with disabilities n=403 47% 19% 28% 30% 13% 11% 2% 10% 23. Lighting for evening and night activities n=403 42% 18% 24% 32% 19% 16% 3% 6% 24. Dog parks n=403 35% 18% 17% 32% 29% 17% 12% 4% 25. Community gardens n=403 36% 14% 23% 38% 21% 16% 6% 4% 26. Parks that can host large sporting events, such as regeional or state competitions n=403 21% 11% 11% 22% 48% 27% 20% 9% 27. Parks that can preserve natural areas for wildlife and people n=403 71% 46% 25% 17% 11% 8% 2% 2% 28. Paths and trails that connect to parks and other key destinations in the city n=403 73% 37% 36% 20% 5% 3% 2% 3% 29. Partnerships with local schools to share parks and sports fields n=403 56% 25% 32% 25% 10% 7% 3% 9% 30. More security personnel at parks n=403 22% 10% 12% 34% 36% 25% 11% 7% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 Next, consider some specific choices. For each of the following, indicate which you think should be the higher priority for Lake Oswego. 31. Which should be the higher priority? Response category n=403 Providing access to Lake Oswego's natural areas, including building 44% access facilities for people with disabilities Preserving Lake Oswego's natural areas by limiting the development of 41% access facilities Don't know 15% 32. Which should be the higher priority? Response category n=403 Adding new parks in areas of the city ° that do not have them 42/° Improving existing parks 50% Don't know 8% 33. Which should be the higher priority? Response category n=403 Adding and improving sports fields 44% and courts Adding and improving playground 35% equipment Don't know 21% 34. Which should be a higher priority? Response category n=403 Large multi-use community parks 32% Small neighborhood parks 56% Don't know 12% 35. Which should be the higher priority? Response category n=403 Parks with developed amenities like 27% play areas and sport facilities Parks with trails, natural areas, and 68% open spaces Don't know 5% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-63 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 36. Which should be the higher priority? Response category n=403 Trying to find a place for pickleball in 42% an existing park Designing a new park around pickleball 31 Don't know 27% Do you agree with the following? Response Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly Don't category NET agree agree agree Disagree disagree disagree know 37. Lake Oswego Parks& Recreation should provide residents with access to pickleball courts n=403 54% 23% 31% 34% 19% 15% 12% 38. Pickleball courts belong in neighborhood parks where they can be easily accessed n=403 46% 15% 31% 40% 15% 25% 14% 39. Pickleball courts belong in commercial or industrial areas where they are far away from homes n=403 55% 29% 27% 27% 14% 13% 18% 40. If you can think of one, please name a park in Lake Oswego that you most enjoy. (Open)Data provided separately. 41. Are there any areas of Lake Oswego that you feel deserve more or better parks?(Open)Data provided separately. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 RECREATION PRIORITIES The next questions are about Lake Oswego recreation activities. Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the following? Response NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 42. Sport activites n=403 51% 17% 34% 17% 13% 4% 32% 43. Dance and fitness activities n=403 34% 12% 22% 13% 11% 2% 53% 44. Outdoors and nature activities n=403 70% 26% 43% 12% 10% 2% 19% 45. Arts and music activities n=403 68% 32% 36% 13% 10% 3% 19% 46. Community and special events n=403 72% 34% 38% 13% 12% 1% 15% 47. Agriculture-based activities and farmer's market n=403 78% 44% 34% 11% 9% 2% 11% 48. Youth and enrichment activities n=403 37% 14% 24% 9% 6% 3% 53% 49. Teen services and activities n=403 22% 9% 13% 11% 9% 2% 67% 50. Inclusive recreation activities n=403 41% 13% 29% 12% 8% 4% 46% 51. Human services for seniors n=403 31% 14% 17% 10% 7% 4% 58% Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the following? Response NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 52. Recreation activities for pre-school-age kids n=403 26% 10% 16% I 13% I 10% I 3% 61% 53. Recreation activities for elementary-age kids n=403 31% 10% 21% 11% 7% 4% 58% 54. Recreation activities for teens n=403 20% 6% 14% 11% 8% 3% 69% 55. Recreation activities for adults n=403 51% 16% 35% 18% 12% 6% 31% 56. Recreation activities for older adults(ages 50+) n=403 32% 13% 20% 14% 9% 5% 53% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 How much, if at all, do the following prevent you and your household from participating in Lake Oswego recreation activities such as classes, camps, and events? Response Great deal/ A great ome/Not Don't category A lot deal Quite a lot at all Only some Not at all know 58. The distance to travel to recreation activities n=403 6% 3% 3% 80% 27% 53% 14% 59. The cost of recreation activities n=403 14% 6% 8% 68% 30% 38% 17% 60. The times recreation activities are offered do not work for my schedule n=403 27% 9% 18% 51% 25% 26% 21% 61. The types of recreation activities offered aren't things that I am interested in n=403 24% 7% 16% 62% 41% 21% 14% 62. I have physical limitations that are not accommodated by the recreation activities offered n=403 5% 1% 5% 80% 8% 72% 14% 63. Recreation activities are not offered in my language n=403 2% 1% 1% 82% 2% 81% 16% 64. I am not aware of recreation activities n=403 21% 7% 1 14% 71% 40% 30% 8% 42. What, if any, recreation activities would you like Lake Oswego to provide? (Open)Data provided separately. 66. Would you support or oppose the following: Charging higher recreation fees to fund a financial assistance program that offers low-cost and free recreation activities for low-income people and families? Response category n=403 NET Support 42% Strongly support 17% Somewhat support 25% NET Oppose 49% Somewhat oppose 21% Strongly oppose 29% Don't know 9% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 PLANNING AND ENGAGEMENT Lake Oswego wants your opinion about when it is necessary to engage the community in planning and decision-making. For each of the following, indicate if you think it is important or not to engage the community. Response Very/ Very Somewhat Not too/ Not too Not at all Don't category Somewhat important important Not at all important important know 67. When deciding where to put new parks n=403 94% 74% 21% 3% 2% 1% 2% 68. When deciding to make significant improvements to existing parks n=403 90% 54% 36% 7% 6% 1% 3% 69. When adding accessibility features to parks, such as paved paths and handicapped parking spaces n=403 58% 25% 32% 40% 27% 13% 3% 70. When adding lighting to parks n=403 65% 31% 34% 33% 24% 9% 2% 71. When scheduling large events at parks n=403 83% 43% 40% 15% 12% 3% 3% 72. When adding smaller-scale amenities such as benches and small play equipment n=403 36% 10% 25% 62% 34% 28% 2% 73. When replacing existing equipment for safety or routine maintenance reasons n=403 46% 22% 23% 51% 25% I 26% 4% 74. Overall, do you think Lake Oswego is doing a good or poor job engaging the community in parks planning and decision-making? Response category n=403 NET Good 67% Very good 21% Good 46% NET Poor 18% Poor 15% Very poor 4% Don't know 15% FINAL COMMENTS 75. Please share any additional comments you have about Lake Oswego parks and recreation. Data provided separately. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 DEMOGRAPHICS 76. In what year were you born? Response category n=403 18-44 31% 45-64 35% 65+ 24% I prefer not to say 9% 77. How do you describe your gender? Response category n=403 Man 47% Woman 47% Non-binary or gender non- 1% conforming Another way -- I prefer not to say 5% 78. Which of the following best describes your race or ethnicity? Response category n=403 African n=1 Asian/Pacific Islander 5% Black/African American 1% Hispanic/Latino/a/x 4% Middle Eastern/North African n=1 Native American/American Indian 1% White/Caucasian 71% Other n=1 Don't know n=2 I prefer not to say 21% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 79. Which category best describes your gross household income, before taxes? Remember to include everyone living in your household.Your best estimate will do. Response category n=403 Less than $25,000 2% $25,000 to less than $50,000 7% $50,000 to less than $75,000 7% $75,000 to less than $100,000 16% $100,000 to less than $150,000 16% $150,000 or more 32% I prefer not to say 19% 80. Zip code Response category n=403 97034 49% 97035 49% 81. Do any children under age 18 live in your home? Response category n=403 Yes 29% No 67% I prefer not to say 4% 82. Does anyone with a disability or limited mobility live in your home? Response category n=403 Yes 13% No 77% I prefer not to say 10% 83. How often do you use Lake Oswego parks? Response category n=403 Weekly or more 53% A few times a month 28% A few times a year 14% Once a year or less 3% I prefer not to say 2% 84. How often do you participate in Lake Oswego recreation activities? Response category n=403 Weekly or more 10% A few times a month 1 1% A few times a year 39% Once a year or less 33% I prefer not to say 7% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH 1 MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 85. How often do you attend Lake Oswego recreation events? Response category n=403 Weekly or more 4% A few times a month 12% A few times a year 50% Once a year or less 29% I prefer not to say 5% 86. Do you currently have a dog? Response category n=403 Yes 46% No 51% I prefer not to say 3% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 November 29, 2023 To: MIG, Lake Oswego Parks From: DHM Research Re: Lake Oswego Parks Survey, #01225 Introduction & Methodology I l From September 26 to October 18, 2023, DHM Research conducted a survey of Lake Oswego residents (General Population).The survey was continued to further target Lake Oswego residents who want to engage with the future of Lake Oswego parks.The purpose of the survey was to assess residents priorities for parks and recreation activities. Subquently, the City of Lake Oswego made the survey available to all community members(Community Engagement). Research Methodology General population Respondents were contacted randomly from a list of registered voters.' Telephone respondents were contacted by a live interviewer and text-to-online respondents received a text invitation directing them to an online survey. In gathering responses, a variety of quality control measures were employed, including questionnaire pre-testing and validation. Quotas were set by gender, age, educational attainment, race and ethnicity, and area of the city. Community engagement After general population survey,the City of Lake Oswego opened the survey to all community members.The city shared the online survey link though various communication channels to ensure the widest reach. Statement of Limitations The General Population survey consisted of 403 Lake Oswego residents, and the Community Engagement portion consisted of 780 residents,for a total of 1,183 respondents.The survey took approximately 13 minutes to complete. General population Any sampling of opinions or attitudes is subject to a margin of error.The margin of error is a standard statistical calculation that represents differences between the sample and total population at a confidence interval, or probability, calculated to be 95%.This means that there is a 95% probability that the sample taken for this study would fall within the stated margin of error if compared with the results achieved from surveying the entire population.The margin of error for this survey is ±4.9%. Community engagement In November 2022, 94% of eligible Oregonians were registered to vote. Given the city's demographic profile it is likely higher in Lake Oswego. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 Community engagement surveys do not rely on random sampling and therefore, a margin of error cannot be calculated. DHM Research Background DHM Research has been providing opinion research and consultation throughout the Pacific Northwest and other regions of the United States for over 40 years. The firm is nonpartisan and independent and specializes in research projects to support public policy making. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-72 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 MIG Lake Oswego Parks Planning Survey September 26- November 11, 2023 General Population: N=403; margin of error±4.9% Community Engagement: N=780 13 minutes DHM Research Project#01225 INTRODUCTION Thank you for contributing to the future of Lake Oswego by sharing your ideas about the parks and recreation. The results of this survey will help the City make decisions about parks, recreation facilities, and programmed activities in ways that reflect the needs and values of the community. It takes about 10 minutes to complete. In this survey please consider only parks and recreation activities provided by the City of Lake Oswego. Do not answer about other parks and recreation programs by other entities, such as the school district, county, Metro, or state. SATISFACTION WITH PARKS AND RECREATION OFFERINGS Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the following? NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't Response category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 1. Parks across the entire city of Lake Oswego General Population 86% 43% 42% 11%° 8% /0 3% n=403 3 Community Engagement 84% 43% 0 13% 10% 02% n=780 41 /0 3/0 2. Parks in your neighborhood General Population p n=403 83% 42% 41% 16% 10% 5% 2% Community Engagement 78% 38% 39% 20% 15% 5% 2% n=780 3. Recreation facilities, such as the Adult Community Center,the Tennis Center, and Luscher Farm General Population 69% 039% 10% 4% n=403 30% 14% 17% Community Engagement 71% 34% 37% 16% 12% 4% 13% n=780 4. Recreation activities and services General Population 78% 31% 44% 17% 12% 8% n=403 5/0 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH 1 MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY 1 OCTOBER 2023 NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't Response category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know Community Engagement 72% 29% 43% 22% 14% 7% 6% n=780 Next, consider the quality and condition of specific features of Lake Oswego parks.Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the following? NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't Response category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 5. Natural areas General Population o 0 0 9% 6% 0 0 n=403 87/0 52% 34% 4/° 4/0 Community Engagements=780 89% 50% 38% 9% 6% 3% 3% 6. Landscaped areas, including lawns, plants, and trees General Population 90% 57% 33% 9% 6% 2% 2% n=403 Community 92% 59% 34% 0 0 2% 0 Engagement n=780 6/0 5/0 1 /o 7. Restrooms General Population 70% 38% 31% 14% 12% 2% 16% n=403 Community 78% 38% 39%o 11% 8%0 2%0 12% 0 Engagement n=780 8. Picnic shelters or other covered structures General Population 73% 38% 35% 11% 9% 2% 16% n=403 Community 81% 41% 39%o 10% 8/0 1 /0 0 0 10% Engagement n=780 9. Athletic fields owned and operated by the city of Lake Oswego I General Population o 36% 23% 0 11% 0 0 n=403 59/0 15/0 4/0 27% Community 63% 36% 27% 10% 7% 3% 26% Engagement n=780 10. Sports courts owned and operated by the City of Lake Oswego, such as basketball and tennis courts General Population 49% 24% 25% 21% 13% 0 29% n=403 8/0 Community 45% 21% 23% 28% 13% 14% 28% Engagement n=780 11. Playground equipment General Population 58% 0 0 0 � 10% 3% 0 n=403 32% 26% 13/0 29% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't Response category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know Community 61% 29% 31% 12% 8% 3% 28% Engagement n=780 12. Paths and trails within parks General Population o 52% 34% 11% 8% 3% 2% n=403 86/0 Community 87% 49% 38%o 11% 8/0 0 3% 3/o 0 Engagement n=780 PARK PRIORITIES The following are specific parks amenities that Lake Oswego could make investments to improve. For each, indicate if you think should be a high, medium, or low priority for Lake Oswego. Please remember that Lake Oswego must make choices and cannot do everything at once. Be selective in your ratings. NET Very Very Don't Response category high high High Medium NET low Low low know 13. Tennis courts General Population n=403 20% 7% 13% 28% 41% 27% 14% 11% Community Engagement n=780 21% 7% 13% 33% 39% 24% 15% 7% 14. Pickleball courts General Population n=403 24% 13% 11% 25% 41% 20% 21% 10% Community Engagement n=780 36% 26% 10% 19% 39% 17% 22% 6% 15. Soccer fields General Population n=403 26% 11% 15% 37% 26% 15% 10% 12% Community Engagement n=780 26% 9% 16% 35% 30% 19% 10% 9% 16. Basketball courts General Population n=403 23% 6% 18% 32% 33% 23% 10% 11% Community Engagement n=780 18% 4% 14% 37% 33% 23% 10% 11% 17. Playground equipment General Population n=403 44% 15% 29% 28% 17% 12% 5% 11% Community Engagement n=780 48% 18% 29% 28% 16% 11% 5% 9% 18. Benches or other seating areas ' General Population n=403 45% 17% 28% 31% 18% 14% 4% 6% Community Engagement n=780 38% 13% 25% 38% 21% 17% 4% 2% 19. Covered areas for picnics General Population n=403 39% 14% 25% 34% 23% 18% 5% 4% Community Engagement n=780 36% 12% 24% 38% 23% 17% 6% 3% 20. Swimming pools or facilities General Population n=403 58% 26% 33% 20% 16% 8% 8% 6% Community Engagement n=780 52% 31% 20% 24% 20% 12% 8% 4% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-' DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 21. Improved bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to parks and recreation facilities General Population n=403 66% 37% 29% 22% 10% 6% 3% 3% Community Engagement n=780 71% 43% 28% 19% 8% 6% 2% 2% 22. Improved access for people with disabilities t General Population n=403 47% 19% 28% 30% 13% 11% 2% 10% Community Engagement n=780 41% 15% 26% 34% 14% 9% 5% 11% 23. Lighting for evening and night activities General Population n=403 42% 18% 24% 32% 19% 16% 3% 6% Community Engagement n=780 39% 14% 26% 32% 24% 16% 8% 4% 24. Dog parks General Population n=403 35% 18% 17% 32% 29% 17% 12% 4% Community Engagement n=780 30% 13% 17% 30% 34% 19% 15% 5% 25. Community gardens General Population n=403 36% 14% 23% 38% 21% 16% 6% 4% Community Engagement n=780 39% 15% 24% 33% 25% 16% 9% 4% 26. Parks that can host large sporting events, such as regional or state competitions General Population n=403 21% 11% 11% 22% 48% 27% 20% 9% Community Engagement n=780 16% 7% 9% 23% 54% 28% 26% 7% 27. Parks that can preserve natural areas for wildlife and people General Population n=403 71% 46% 25% 17% 11% 8% 2% 2% Community Engagement n=780 74% 48% 26% 17% 7% 5% 2% 1% 28. Paths and trails that connect to parks and other key destinations in the city General Population n=403 73% 37% 36% 20% 5% 3% 2% 3% Community Engagement n=780 74% 46% 28% 17% 8% 5% 2% 1% 29. Partnerships with local schools to share parks and sports fields General Population n=403 56% 25% 32% 25% 10% 7% 3% 9% Community Engagement n=780 55% 26% 29% 25% 12% 7% 5% 8% 30. More security personnel at parks General Population n=403 22% 10% 12% 34% 36% 25% 11% 7% Community Engagement n=780 18% 7% 11% 31% 42% 26% 15% 10% Next, consider some specific choices. For each of the following, indicate which you think should be the higher priority for Lake Oswego. 31. Which should be the higher priority? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Providing access to Lake Oswego's natural areas, including building 44% 48% access facilities for people with disabilities LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH 1 MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY 1 OCTOBER 2023 Preserving Lake Oswego's natural areas by limiting the development of 41% 39% access facilities Don't know 15% 12% 32. Which should be the higher priority? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Adding new parks in areas of the city o 0 that do not have them 42/0 44/0 Improving existing parks 50% 48% Don't know 8% 9% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 33. Which should be the higher priority? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Adding and improving sports fields 44% 46% and courts Adding and improving playground o 0 equipment 35/0 35/0 Don't know 21% 20% 34. Which should be a higher priority? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Large multi-use community parks 32% 35% Small neighborhood parks 56% 52% Don't know 12% 13% 35. Which should be the higher priority? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Parks with developed amenities like 27% 37% play areas and sport facilities Parks with trails, natural areas, and 68% 58% open spaces Don't know 5% 5% 36. Which should be the higher priority? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Trying to find a place for pickleball in 42% 38/0° an existing park Designing a new park around 31% 39% pickleball Don't know 27% 23% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 Do you agree with the following? NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly Don't Response category agree agree agree Disagree disagree disagree know 37. Lake Oswego Parks &Recreation should provide residents with access to pickleball courts General Population pn=403 54% 23% 31% 34% 19% 15% 12% Community Engagement 64% 36% 29% 0 14% 14% 0 n=780 28/0 7/o 38. Pickleball courts belong in neighborhood parks where they can be easily accessed General Population 46% 15% 31% 0 15% 25% 14% n=403 40/0 Community Engagement 43% 19% 24% 0 27% o n=780 47% 20% 10% 39. Pickleball courts belong in commercial or industrial areas where they are far away from homes General Population 55% 29% 27% 27% 14% 13% 18% n=403 Community 60% 027% 013% 0 Engagement n=780 33% 30% 17% 10% 40. If you can think of one, please name a park in Lake Oswego that you most enjoy. (Open)Data provided separately. 41. Are there any areas of Lake Oswego that you feel deserve more or better parks?(Open)Data provided separately. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-79 DHM RESEARCH 1 MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY 1 OCTOBER 2023 RECREATION PRIORITIES Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the following? NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't Response category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 42. Sport activites General Population o 0 0 0 13% 0 0 n=403 51 /0 17/0 34/0 17/0 4/0 32/o Community Engagement o 0 0 0 12% 0 0 n=7 80 54/0 21 /0 33/0 18/0 6/0 28/o 43. Dance and fitness activities General Population o 12% 0 13% 11% 2% 0 n=403 34/0 22/0 53/o Community Engagement 42% 16% 25% 11% 9% 2% 48% n=780 44. Outdoors and nature activities General Population 70% 012% 10% 2% n=403 26% 43/0 19% Community Engagement 75% 29% 46% 10% 9% 015% n=780 1 /0 45. Arts and music activities General Population 68% 32% 36% 13% 10% 0 n=403 3/0 19% Community Engagement o 0 0 0 0 0 0 n=780 73/0 34/0 39/0 6/0 6/0 1 /0 21 /o 46. Community and special events General Population 72% 34% 38% 13% 12% 1% 15% n=403 Community Engagement o 39% 42% 0 0 0 13% n=780 81 /0 6/0 5/0 1 /0 47. Agriculture-based activities and farmer's market 11.1 General Population 78% 44% 34% 11% 9% 2% 11% n=403 Community Engagement 82% 47% 35% 0 0 0 12% n=780 6/0 5/0 1 /0 — 48. Youth and adult enrichment activities General Population o 0 0 9% 0 0 0 n=403 37/0 14/0 24/0 6/0 3/0 53/o Community Engagement 49% 18% 31% 11% 10% 2% 39% n=780 49. Teen services and activities General Population o 9% 13% 11% 9% 2% o n=403 22/0 67/o LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-80 DHM RESEARCH 1 MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY 1 OCTOBER 2023 NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't Response category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know Community Engagement 29% 12% 17%o 7/0 0 5/0 0 1 /0 0 64% n=780 50. Inclusive recreation activities General Population o 13% 0 0 8% 4% 0 n=403 41 /0 29% 12/0 46% Community Engagement 37% 15% 22%o 9%0 6% 3% 54/o 0 n=780 51. Human services for seniors dla General Population 1 017% 10% 04% n=403 31 /0 14% 7/0 58% Community Engagement 40% 21% 19% 6% 4% 1% 54% n=780 Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the following? NET Very Somewhat NET Somewhat Very Don't Response category Satisfied satisfied satisfied Dissatisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied know 52. Recreation activities for pre-school-age kids General Population 26% 10% 16% 13% 10% 3% 61% n=403 Community Engagement 30% 13% 17% 11% 8% 3% 59% n=780 53. Recreation activities for elementary-age kids General Population o10% 0 11% 04% I 58% n=403 31 /0 21 /0 7/0 Community Engagement o 16% 0 11% 10% 0 0 n=7 80 39/0 23/0 1 /0 51 /o 54. Recreation activities for teens General Population 20% 6% 11% 8% 3% n=403 14% 69% Community Engagement 26% 10% 16% 10% 8% 2% 64% n=780 55. Recreation activities for adults General Population o 16% 0 0 0 0 0 n=403 51 /0 35/0 18/0 12/0 6/0 31 /o Community Engagement o 19% 0 0 15% 0 0 n=780 54/0 34/0 21 /0 6/0 26/o 56. Recreation activities for older adults(ages 50+) General Population 32% 13% 20% 14% 9% 5% 53% n=403 Community Engagement o16% 10% 6% n=780 41 /0 18% 23% 43% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-82 DHM RESEARCH 1 MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY 1 OCTOBER 2023 How much, if at all, do the following prevent you and your household from participating in Lake Oswego recreation activities such as classes, camps, and events? Great A great Quite a Some/Not Only Not at Don't Response category deal/A lot deal lot at all some all know 58. The distance to travel to recreation activities General Population n=403 6% 3% 3% 80% 27% 53% 14% Community Engagement n=780 8% 3% 6% 82% 23% 60% 9% 59. The cost of recreation activities • General Population n=403 14% 6% 8% 68% 30% 38% 17% Community Engagement n=780 12% 5% 7% 76% 26% 50% 12% 60. The times recreation activities are offered do not work for my schedule General Population n=403 27% 9% 18% 51% 25% 26% 21% Community Engagement n=780 22% 7% 15% 63% 32% 30% 15% 61. The types of recreation activities offered aren't things that I am interested in General Population n=403 24% 7% 16% 62% 41% 21% 14% Community Engagement n=780 23% 8% 15% 67% 41% 26% 10% 62. I have physical limitations that are not accommodated by the recreation activities offered General Population n=403 5% 1% 5% 80% 8% 72% 14% Community Engagement n=780 2% 1% 1% 85% 4% 81% 13% 63. Recreation activities are not offered in my language General Population n=403 2% 1% 1% 82% 2% 81% 16% Community Engagement n=780 1% 1% 1% 86% 1% 85% 13% 64. I am not aware of recreation activities I I I General Population n=403 21% 7% 14% 71% 40% 30% 8% Community Engagement n=780 16% 5% 12% 75% 30% 45% 9% 65. What, if any, recreation activities would you like Lake Oswego to provide?(Open)Data provided separately. 66. Would you support or oppose the following: Charging higher recreation fees to fund a financial assistance program that offers low-cost and free recreation activities for low-income people and families? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 NET Support 42% 51% Strongly support 17% 13% Somewhat support 25% 38% NET Oppose 49% 41% Somewhat oppose 21% 20% Strongly oppose 29% 21% Don't know 9% 8% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH I MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY I OCTOBER 2023 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-84 DHM RESEARCH 1 MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY 1 OCTOBER 2023 PLANNING AND ENGAGEMENT Lake Oswego wants your opinion about when it is necessary to engage the community in planning and decision-making. For each of the following, indicate if you think it is important or not to engage the community. Very/ Very Somewhat Not too/ Not too Not at all Don't Response category Somewhat important important Not at all important important know 67. When deciding where to put new parks General Population 94% 74% 21% 3% 2% 1% 2% n=403 Community Engagement o 0 0 0 2% 1% 1% n=780 I 96/0 79/0 17/0 3/0 68. When deciding to make significant improvements to existing parks General Population 90% 36% 0 01% 3% n=403 54% 7/0 6/0 Community Engagement ° ° o 0 4% 2% 1% n=780 93/0 59/0 34/0 6/0 69. When adding accessibility features to parks, such as paved paths and handicapped parking spaces General Population 58% 25% 3% n=403 32% 40% 27% 13% Community Engagement o 23% 0 0 26% 0 2% 59/0 36% 39/0 14/0 n=780 70. When adding lighting to parks General Population ° o 0 0 0 0 n=403 • 65/0 31 /0 34% 33/0 24% 9% 2% Community Engagement o 0 0 0 0 0 0 n=780 67/0 33% 34% 31 /0 19% 12% 2% 71. When scheduling large events at parks General Population 83% 43% 15% ° 40% 12% 3% 3/0 n=403 Community Engagement 75% 37% 0 23% 18% 5% 0 n=780 38% 2% 72. When adding smaller-scale amenities such as benches and small play equipment General Population 36% 10% 25% 62%° 34% 28% 2% n=403 Community Engagement o 0 0 0 0 0 0 n=780 24/0 6/0 18% 75/0 42% 33% 2% I I _ 73. When replacing existing equipment for safety or routine maintenance reasons General Population 46% 22% 23% 51% 25% 26% 4% n=403 Community Engagement o 0 22% 0 0 0 2% n=780 34/0 12/0 64/0 32% 32% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-85 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 74. Overall, do you think Lake Oswego is doing a good or poor job engaging the community in parks planning and decision-making? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 NET Good 67% 74% Very good 21% 26% Good 46% 47% NET Poor 18% 17% Poor 15% 11% Very poor 4% 7% Don't know 15% 9% FINAL COMMENTS 75. Please share any additional comments you have about Lake Oswego parks and recreation. Data provided separately. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 DEMOGRAPHICS 76. In what year were you born? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 18-44 31% 24% 45-64 35% 34% 65+ 24% 27% I prefer not to say 9% 15% 77. How do you describe your gender? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Man 47% 32% Woman 47% 63% Non-binary or gender non- 1% 1% conforming Another way -- -- I prefer not to say 5% 4% 78. Which of the following best describes your race or ethnicity? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 African n=1 n=2 Asian/Pacific Islander 5% 4% Black/African American 1% n=2 Hispanic/Latino/a/x 4% 2% Middle Eastern/North African n=1 1% Native American/American Indian 1% n=3 White/Caucasian 71% 77% Other n=1 1% Don't know n=2 1% I prefer not to say 21% 17% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 79. Which category best describes your gross household income, before taxes? Remember to include everyone living in your household.Your best estimate will do. General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Less than $25,000 2% 1% $25,000 to less than $50,000 7% 2% $50,000 to less than $75,000 7% 5% $75,000 to less than $100,000 16% 9% $100,000 to less than $150,000 16% 16% $150,000 or more 32% 46% I prefer not to say 19% 22% 80. Zip code General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 97034 49% 54% 97035 49% 40% Other -- 7% 81. Do any children under age 18 live in your home? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Yes 29% 38% No 67% 58% I prefer not to say 4% 3% 82. Does anyone with a disability or limited mobility live in your home? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Yes 13% 13% No 77% 79% I prefer not to say 10% 8% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 DHM RESEARCH MIG LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLANNING SURVEY OCTOBER 2023 83. How often do you use Lake Oswego parks? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Weekly or more 53% 61% A few times a month 28% 27% A few times a year 14% 9% Once a year or less 3% 1% I prefer not to say 2% 2% 84. How often do you participate in Lake Oswego recreation activities? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Weekly or more 10% 16% A few times a month 11% 17% A few times a year 39% 42% Once a year or less 33% 20% I prefer not to say 7% 5% 85. How often do you attend Lake Oswego recreation events? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Weekly or more 4% 5% A few times a month 12% 15% A few times a year 50% 57% Once a year or less 29% 19% I prefer not to say 5% 5% 86. Do you currently have a dog? General Community Population Engagement Response category n=403 n=780 Yes 46% 46% No 51% 52% I prefer not to say 3% 2% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 SUMMARY COMMUNITY EVENT #1 Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 Time: 4:30-6:30 PM Location: Oak Room, Lake Oswego Adult Community Center, 505 G Avenue OVERVIEW The first Community Event for the Lake Oswego Parks Plan 2040 was held on Tuesday, November 14, 2023, from 4:30-6:30 pm at the Lake Oswego Adult Community Center. The purpose of the event was to provide an opportunity for Lake Oswego residents to learn more about the Plan update, including the planning process and what has been completed so far, and provide their input to help shape the vision and goals and identify any gaps or opportunities in the system. Input from the event will be incorporated into a recreation facility and programming needs assessment that combines outreach results with a technical analysis of the system. The event was held in-person and structured as an open house, family-friendly event where meeting attendees could spend time reviewing and commenting on project information 1111 Iltk Riff elP M11411,1414t .A1 and talking with the project team. Six informational COMMUNITY4 boards and interactive exercise stations were OPEN HOUSE n pLKE O1eW R60 placed around the room for attendees to provide input on key themes, needs, and opportunities Join us for afamilyfriendly, drop-in open house to provide (summarized further in the sections below). your input on the future of Lake Oswego's park&recreation Members of the consultant team and City staff system.Snacks&kids activity provided. attended the event to answer community questions and facilitate the interactive exercise Con t make it?Visit the Learn more on the stations. project website to learn dwebsite more and take our survey >> proje by November 10th. 0 , m 411:n n '''rne/ parFa-pl n-]55 >>Tuesday,November 14 To reach as many community members as »4:3otrrn-6:30rss possible, the event was promoted through »Oak Room Adult Community Cantor numerous outreach pathways including the Hello 505 GAvenue Lake Oswego,OR 97034 LO Newsletter, LO Down E-Newsletter, social media platforms, posters, and the city website, . including the Parks Plan 2040 webpage. IUI ICI "'• ,_ a > � LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I 90 KEY FINDINGS Based on the results of the community event's interactive activities and conversations with attendees, the following themes were identified: • Improve and increase trail connectivity and opportunities to connect with nature. • Ensure ongoing maintenance and financial sustainability of Lake Oswego's existing parks and facilities. • Provide opportunities to play pickleball. • Increase public water access. • Develop more indoor and/or covered facilities to allow for safe year-round recreation opportunities. STATION 1: PROJECT BACKGROUND This station provided attendees with an overview of the project including the project planning process, accomplishments of Parks Plan 2025, objectives of Parks Plan 2040, and ways to stay involved. The station also included a map of Lake Oswego's existing park and . `► _ recreation system. l STATION 2: COMMUNITY INPUT i '^ o This station summarized community input to k, date, key outreach themes, results from the �i44 • .� " ' statistically valid community survey, and It information on upcoming outreach RI opportunities. 40� � r. I STATION 3: GOAL PRIORITIES Source: City of Lake Oswego This station included six draft project goals and asked attendees to place a dot sticker on each goal's corresponding colored bar to indicate how important each goal is to them. Table 1 outlines attendee priorities for each goal. Investing in existing parks, facilities, and natural areas (Goal 2) and enhancing stewardship, maintenance, and operations LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I 91 (Goal 4) were the top "very important" goal priorities and had the highest average scores. TABLE 1 : GOAL PRIORITY INTERACTIVE EXERCISE RESULTS f0 , to C o i O O O O_ cij v Average Score Goal Z Lr' (out of 4) Goal 1: Create Equitable Access to Essential 0 1 8 6 3.33 Services Goal 2: Invest in Existing Parks, Facilities, and Natural Areas 0 0 3 19 3.86 Goal 3: Serve all Ages and Abilities • 3.27 Goal 4: Enhance Stewardship. Maintenance and 0 0 0 17 4 Operations Goal 5: Develop& Maintain A Sustainable Resilient System 3.70 Goal 6: Collaborate with Community Partners 0 0 5 14 3.74 STATION 4: ADDITIONAL IDEAS This station asked attendees to share any additional ideas or comments about what should be included in Parks Plan 2040. Comments included: Requested amenities: • Sand volleyball courts • Covered and lighted dog area • Pickleball courts (identified by multiple comments) • Small wooded neighborhood parks and natural areas • Pollinator habitat (identified by multiple comments) • Improved wheelchair access • Additional lighting • Covered areas for gathering, chess, and playing music • Improve bicycle access • Provide gender neutral restrooms and locker rooms LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 192 • Expand natural play area at Iron Mountain Park for all ages • Improve Iron Mountain Park Requested programs: • Agricultural programs at Luscher Farm (identified by multiple comments) • Staggered activities and programs in existing parks to meet parking demand • Partnerships with high school students to implement projects Requested collaborative partnerships: • Reestablish the Natural Resources Board • Continue to build and promote the volunteer program Other: • Minimize and/or eliminate the use of gas-powered leaf blowers • Utilize electric landscaping equipment (identified by multiple comments) • Add braille on pathway signage • Identify safety codes, standards and guidelines, assess violations, and schedule maintenance for compliance • Hire a Natural Resource Planner (identified by multiple comments) • Pay attention to health and integrity of natural areas • Ensure fiscal responsibility to maintain and improve what we have • Require a short- and long-term maintenance budget STATION 5: DREAM BIG! This station included "design your own park" coloring sheets and an interactive board for kids to "dream big" and place a dot sticker on things they want to do in parks. Options included: swinging and sliding, playing sports, playing in water, climbing, biking, skating, and scootering, and building and exploring. Top activities identified by youth attendees included swinging and biking, skating, and scootering. One attendee added connecting with nature (walking, hiking, and picnicking) as another thing they want to do in parks. STATION 6: SYSTEMWIDE NEEDS MAP This station included a mega map of Lake Oswego's existing parks and recreation system and asked attendees to place color-coded stickers representing various needs (Figure 1). Table 2 identifies the number of stickers each prompt received. Based on sticker quantity, improved water access, vegetation management, and trails and pathways were the top needs identified by attendees. The exercise also prompted attendees to highlight the park they are most proud of, responses included: Millenium LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I 93 Plaza, Foothills Park (listed by the most attendees), West Waluga Park, East Waluga Park, Iron Mountain Park, George Rogers Park, Cooks Butte Park, Hazelia Field, Steavens Meadow and Luscher Farm. In addition to analyzing the map's results by sticker quantity, stickers were analyzed by geographic location to inform site specific needs and opportunities. These results can be found in Appendix A. TABLE 2: SYSTEMWIDE NEEDS MAP RESULTS Map Prompt #Stickers Where are parks needed? Where are trails and pathways needed? 12 Where are new or rehabilitated play features needed? M Where are new or improved sports fields needed? 0 Where are more group gathering areas (picnic shelters, tables, etc.) needed? 1 Where are restrooms needed? 4 Where are accessibility improvements needed? 3 Where are more programs and events needed? 8 dil Where is improved water access needed? Where is maintenance needed? 6 Where is vegetation management needed? LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 194 FIGURE 1 : NEEDS MAP Tell us I '''' - ~ - Osweg hat Lake Lb �` Peso. , o's Park and `°® 4 Recreation system .,_.- needs TJ�\a 'Y LR neeeee. ' / _ - tr3 ro 8 rdp o ..a s rp d Fil y $ 7::::: !al— • m a _ '_ - ld , 7,,:;27.,„ser ji,,... ;-.4.41.. Source: City of Lake Oswego LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 NEXT STEPS Results of the Community Event will inform the Parks Plan 2040 needs assessment and subsequent project recommendations. The next Community Event, expected to be held in Spring 2024, will identify potential project funding priorities. The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. Hablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted �� zz 6FAILFg? 01 MR-21 di'01 2 oFAI 7FodLI�F 1 tR1:1:15c (I ) 09?71R*#AT *5citi] ntig LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 196 4€!;.' IM MARY LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 SUMMER NEIGHBORHOOD WORKSHOPS Dates: Fridays May 31, June 7, June 21, and June 28, 2024 Times: 4:00-6:00 PM Locations: Pilkington Park, Westlake Park, Hazelia Field, Foothills Park Overview In May-June 2024, the Project Team conducted four neighborhood workshops at the following park locations in Lake Oswego. • May 31, 2024 I Pilkington Park • June 7, 2024 I Westlake Park • June 21, 2024 I Hazelia Field • June 28, 2024 I Foothills Park The purpose of the workshops was to provide an opportunity for community members to learn more about Parks Plan 2040 and project work that has occurred to date, and provide feedback on priority projects and improvements in their neighborhoods to help shape the Plan's systemwide and site-specific recommendations. The four workshop locations were selected to reach a broad range of community members and to develop a deeper understanding of needs specific to different areas of Lake Oswego. Key Findings GAMES WORKSHOP FORMAT GE1114V.Q`ASA2°A MUSIC Each workshop was designed to be a fun,family friendly event. r��< j O� Or% TREATS Five informational boards and interactive exercise stations were E�GHg N D RAFFLE included for attendees to learn about the project and share N their ideas (summarized further in sections below). Each .,a��SHOPS PRIZES workshop also included games, music,treats, and raffle prizes a SHARE for attendees. Members of the consultant team and City staff YOUR IDEAS attended each event to answer community questions and COMING TO A FOR PARK facilitate the interactive exercise stations. PARK NEAR YOU! PROJECTS! PROMOTION FRIDAY,MAY 31 @ PILKINGTON PARK 19043 Pilkington Rd 14:00-6:00 pm To reach as many community members as possible,the event la M Can't snake e? .x was promoted through numerous outreach pathways including A R Flnay Jura 7 Hui 45 om @ Westlake Park • ° the Hello LO Newsletter, LO Down E-Newsletter,social media F;, YJ r 2— , a,LaNn @HazeraField �' '' ' platforms, and the city website, including the Parks Plan 2040 *P''ay Jut 2orr .6 cin@Foatheia Park webpage. In addition, posters advertising the event were posted in city buildings, parks, and local businesses in English, Mandarin p<, Chinese, and Spanish. i ! r if ek1�k �l�I Ar_I�I�ke�r— LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Based on the results of the Neighborhood Workshops' interactive activities and conversations with attendees, the following types of projects and initiatives emerged as priorities: • Improvements and repairs to existing parks and facilities • More year-round indoor activities and programs • Splash pads and water play • Play amenities with climbing elements • Trails and paths that increase connectivity between parks and neighborhoods • Access to nature and nature-based play opportunities • Improved accessibility of park amenities, facilities, and trails More detailed findings are included in the sections below and in Appendix A. ramA tom`hood._" wneitlnze m!„�n...nd..dnerq^sed.r.dd.•on Hnng•yoe wnmwsee " - ••••••xa.. .''''ds.dvir ne....r..il.Y^wdw doWno.d gnheniM bourdl !�• "-,- V il'' ' ' 'I,''.- Y •i �Y 4t ..� wrong 9 _ \ .•, ,._ V - .-11,- F fr F� 11 . v � �,,�• ,r r. - , Wlwtore s.mee/the plenty ►.h...iy d..•dW sh P mio.rdwtwyin.PddnMo.jreev eM1oatWn.+.Y.^•MYnk u.M1.ukaV^.n�M. - d. .. neofd•e•a �.•need.Pmndmdw , • •�' � mz.ry. M.c...- e.nd 3$,'T ? 6 � .a' ,. Viimam a- . ItERNIa + skir �.f4 + ..M t I -s•i.`' r L. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-98 Workshop Stations Each workshop included five informational boards and several interactive exercise stations for attendees to learn more about the project and provide feedback on priority projects, locations, and needs for parks and facilities in the workshop's neighborhood. The sections below summarize the results from each of the workshops. Appendix A includes more detailed results for each of the interactive exercises. Station 1: Project Background This station provided attendees with an overview of the project and planning process, a summary of community engagement conducted to date, and key outreach findings. This display was informational only and no feedback was sought for it. Station 2: Lake Oswego's Current Park and Recreation System This station summarized Lake Oswego's current park and recreation system based on the technical analysis conducted for the Plan's needs assessment including the essential park services identified through community engagement and findings from the equitable access analysis. Similar to Station 1, this display was informational only and no feedback was sought for it. Station 3: What are some of the priority projects? This interactive station included a list of park and recreation projects identified through community engagement efforts conducted to date and organized by three general cost levels (moderate, high, and highest cost). Attendees were asked to select seven projects (four moderate cost, two high cost, and one highest cost) and place a sticker on a colored bar to indicate how each of those projects should be prioritized. Figures 1-4 summarize the community's top priority projects by cost level. FIGURE 1: TOP PRIORITY PROJECTS BY COST (ALL WORKSHOPS COMBINED) $$$ Moderate Cost Needs (Top 4) $$$$ High Cost Needs (Top 2) ■ Facility repairs ■ Completing a trail or sidewalk ■ Spaces for gathering, picnicking, and connection between a neighborhood BBQing and a park ■ Year-round opportunities, including ■ Updated park facilities including play indoor programming areas and shelters ■ Shade trees and drought tolerant landscaping $$$$$ Highest Cost Needs (Top 1) ■ More costly improvements to existing parks such as splash pads LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-99 FIGURE 2: WHAT ARE THE MODERATE COST PRIORITY PROJECTS? PICK 4. Facility repairs 62 Spaces for gathering, picnicking, and BBQing 56 Year-round opportunities, including indoor... 54 Shade trees and drought tolerant landscaping 54 More amenities such as seating and drinking fountains 46 New exercise stations/fit spots 43 Introductory sports or fitness programs for beginners 39 Lighting improvements 33 FIGURE 3: WHAT ARE THE HIGH COST PRIORITY PROJECTS? PICK 2. Completing a trail or sidewalk connection between a neighborhood and a park 61 Updated park facilities including play areas and shelters 51 Nature-based play facilities(sand and water play) 44 Improvements to Luscher Farms identified in the 2013 35 Master Plan Accessibility improvements (pathways, ramps, etc.) 34 Enhanced natural resource stewardship 24 New or replaced play area that is universally designed 17 for all abilities City-wide signage and wayfinding 3 FIGURE 4: WHAT ARE THE HIGHEST COST PRIORITY PROJECTS? PICK 1. More costly improvements to existing parks such as splash pads 52 Completing trail connections that form a larger loop 40 within the City Water access to the Tualatin River 38 Replacing grass with new turf surfaces on sports fields 33 Build new athletic and sport courts and fields 33 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-100 Station 4: What are the priority locations? This interactive station included a map of Lake Oswego divided into four different areas and asked attendees to choose where the following investments should be prioritized: • Repair or replace worn or older park features • Add more or greater variety in parks • Build more trails and paths • Increase accessibility of park amenities, facilities, and trails • Enhance maintenance and management of existing park features • Other Figure 5 summarizes the systemwide priorities (combining the results from all workshops) while Figure 6 on the next page summarizes the priorities identified at each workshop. The top systemwide priorities were to build more trails and paths (26%) and to increase accessibility of park amenities, facilities, and trails (19%). However, support for four out of the five categories was almost evenly split. FIGURE 5: SYSTEMWIDE PRIORITIES (AVERAGE , " " OF ALL LOCATION SCORES) -41 ?anal, i 2% gzi .1 18% 18% �, �i��, tr- mii 'cw : 18' �I�'�r, - - - - - g • Repair or replace worn or o er parfeatures „, 26% •Add more or greater variety of features in parks Y"lirliiiiti f I GAA,j • Build more trails and paths • L ✓ �r " i11 Increase accessibility of park amenities,facilities, and trails - - • Enhance maintenance and management of existing park features % .-- Other ,/ i ru • • ,, • • • - • ' I • I -101 FIGURE 6: PRIORITY PROJECTS BY LOCATION Area D: NE Lake Oswego 15% 11% 27% 19% Area C:SW Lake Oswego 15% 19% 26% 19% 1 Area B:NE Lake Oswego 17% 24% 27% 17% Area A:NW Lake Oswego 23% 18% 24% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% ■Repair or replace worn or older park features ■Add more or greater variety of features in parks ■Build more trails and paths Increase accessibility of park amenities,facilities,and trails ■Enhance maintenance and management of existing park features Other "Other" ideas included: ■ Expanding agricultural programs at Luscher Farm ■ Fixing erosion and flooding issues at Hallinan and Freepons Parks ■ More parks with covered play structures ■ Movies in the park programs ■ Improving trails at Luscher Farm ■ Upgrading the play structure at Rossman Park ■ Improving Tryon Cove Park ■ Removing blackberries at Roehr Park ■ Replacing aging signs and light fixtures at Hallinan Park Station 5: What are some ideas and trends that could be implemented in this neighborhood? This station included a map of the area of Lake Oswego where each workshop took place and asked attendees to place a dot sticker on the ideas and trends they would want to see implemented in those neighborhoods. Figure 7 on the next page summarizes the results from each workshop. Across all the neighborhood workshops, the most popular ideas and trends that attendees would like to see in Lake Oswego's parks are: LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-102 FIGURE 7: PRIORITY PROJECTS BY NEIGHBROHOOD -vr ' fie, itiis �§ � q ,. ..L k'Yr`Z.-,� x l.Lv. a' INEk Ia. ! T 4,> WATER PLAY OR OBSTACLE COURSES OR ACCESS TO NATURAL SPLASH PADS (17%) CLIMBING ELEMENTS AREAS (15%) (16%) 100% 17% 15% 15% 90% 20% 80% 2% 6% 4% 7% 70% 41 60% 22% 16% 13% 50% 12% 3% 6% 6% 4% 40% 30% 16% 6% 16% 20% 20% 18% 18% 10% •Play • nd and water ■Tem.o ments 1 1 3% 1% 2% 6% 1% ° 0% •Uniq 5/% ents ■Native 3% •ens 4/° Pilkington Park Workshop Westlake Park Workshop Hazelia Field Workshop Foothills Park Workshop Partnerships with schools for field and court access ■Outdoor work spaces •Access to natural areas Obstacle courses or climbing •Mobile and pop-up programs ■Water play or splash pads LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Attendees could also write their own ideas onto sticky notes and place them on the map of the area. Community ideas from this open-ended exercise are summarized below: ■ Provide accessible river access to the Tualatin River ■ Provide a dog water station in the dog park at Pilkington Park ■ Provide a restroom at Pilkington Park ■ Enhanced security at Pilkington Park ■ Host concerts and healthy food carts at Pilkington Park ■ Connect Pilkington Park to Browns Ferry Park in Tualatin across the Tualatin River ■ Continue the sidewalk from Pilkington Park to Childs Road to provide safe walking options between parks ■ Build trails along Childs Road through Canal Acres and Bryant Woods Nature Park ■ Build more trails to connect Bryant Woods Nature Park to Bryant Road ■ Enhance signage regarding dog rules at Stevens Meadow and Cooks Butte Park ■ Provide a comprehensive map and an interactive map of trails in Lake Oswego with distances and information on terrain and surface type ■ Build dedicated pickleball courts, possibly at West Waluga Park ■ Utilize the West End building open space for a small dog run ■ Provide lighting at the Westlake Park basketball courts ■ Host a community pancake breakfast at or near Westlake Park ■ Allow pickleball on tennis courts citywide ■ Host a balloon launch from Westlake Park or other parks like they do at Cook Park ■ Build a splash pad and more swings at Westlake Park ■ Host an Olde Time Faire in the summer like West Linn does ■ Do not allow pickleball at Westlake Park ■ Build a small dog park or otherwise allow dogs at Westlake Park and Iron Mountain Park ■ Enhance access to natural areas at East Waluga Park ■ Provide access to Oswego Lake for all Lake Oswego residents ■ Provide programs that help marginalized and/or at-risk communities ■ Host Pokemon events at parks with training opportunities and community days ■ Host more festivals in the Westlake area like those at George Rogers Park ■ Provide an indoor lap swimming pool for Lake Oswego residents ■ Build an inclusive and accessible park and/or playground ■ Provide more small dog park areas ■ Host a bocce ball league at Foothills Park ■ Provide outdoor fitness programs like dance and yoga at Millennium Plaza ■ Build and outdoor lap pool somewhere in the city ■ Build a rock climbing wall somewhere in the city ■ Connect Foothills Park to Tryon Cove Park and George Rogers Park via the Willamette River Greenway ■ Continue the CSA program at Luscher Farm ■ Provide temporary play elements for Hallinan National Night Out event LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-104 Next Steps Results from the Neighborhood Workshops will inform development of the Plan's systemwide and site-specific recommendations as well as the Parks Plan 2040 Prioritized Capital Project List. The prioritized project list will be the subject of a community wide survey tentatively scheduled to be conducted in September of this year. The Community Advisory Committee and Lake Oswego Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Advisory Board also will review and provide guidance on the project list. y. A • f , A 7 rfNia 1 iiii tii,,„ , , . .„..,. , tillV, :4,01 ,4 x , . ,,,.- .... ......,..,.... "..aamiiiiihmaid ) I) le - 9 7+ !! 1 . - -L P.A dit, -- - --‘ _ 0:` •- • :- � I IL:.: t' z t. f i oftt �c }ate ;--liIl a.,.-.. F- „„z, _� - . ' r s-� g ' ue __�+i * _ Aft .Q- The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. ,Hablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted. l- z z oFiI LF2? 01 Al-—I T_# tl 012 P-oFAI �I 7F1 d LI IF LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-105 Appendix A:Lake Oswego Parks 2040 Neighborhood Workshops Revised 07/15/24 Where are some of the priority projects?The community has identified o range of park and recreation needs presented in the following three sections.Choose the ideas you would like the City to prioritize and place a dot sticker an the colored bar to indicate how you think it should be prioritized. Low Priority(a stickers) •lum Priori, High Priority(ft stickers) III Workshop Workshop Workshop shop Worksh• orkshop Workshop Workshop TOTAL ALL. 2 3 4 TOT, 2 3 I 2 3 4 TOTAL EVENTS III, Workshop Workshop 555 Moderate Cost Needs.Pick 4. Year-round opportunities,including indoor programming 0 0 0 0 0 5 ] 2 3 17 2 14 2 14 37 54 Introductory sports or fitness programs for beginners 4 0 0 1 5 1 8 3 1 13 5 8 0 8 21 39 Shade trees and drought tolerant landscaping 1 0 0 0 1 5 2 2 3 12 15 9 8 9 41 54 Dot on"drinking More amenities such as seating and drinking fountains 2 0 0 3 5 3 1 2 2 8 10 8 7 8 33 46 fountains" Toilets Spaces for gathering,picnicking,and BBQing 1 0 0 2 3 3 6 2 1 12 6 17 1 17 41 56 New exercise stations/fit spots 5 0 0 5 10 3 3 1 1 8 1 11 2 11 25 43 Lighting improvements 2 0 0 2 4 4 3 1 2 10 3 8 0 8 19 33 Facility repairs 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 0 4 17 10 15 5 15 45 62 $$$$High Cost Needs.Pick 2. City-wide signage and wayfinding 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 Updated park facilities including play areas and shelters 1 0 0 0 1 4 7 2 1 14 5 14 3 14 36 51 Accessibility improvements(pathways,ramps,etc.) 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 5 10 8 2 8 28 34 Enhanced natural resource stewardship 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 3 5 4 5 4 5 18 24 New or replaced play area that is universally designed for all abilities 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 2 6 2 3 2 13 12 Nature-based play facilities,including sand and water play 2 0 0 1 3 2 8 0 2 12 2 13 1 13 29 44 Completing a trail or sidewalk connection between a neighborhood and a park 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 2 7 17 14 8 14 53 61 Improvements to Luscher Farms identified in the 2013 Master Plan(e.g., More agriculture at Improved access,spaces for programming,trails,and urban agriculture) 1 1 0 3 5 2 1 0 1 4 1 2 21 2 26 35 Luscher Farms $$$$$Highest Cost Needs.Pick 1. Large,hallmark play area with unique elements 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 8 12 More costly improvements to existing parks such as splash pads 1 0 2 2 5 2 1 0 2 5 4 18 2 18 42 52 Replacing grass with new turf surfaces on sports fields 1 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 1 2 0 13 1 13 27 33 Water access to the Tualatin River 0 0 0 1 1 3 4 3 5 15 16 3 0 3 22 38 Build new athletic and sport courts and fields 1 2 3 2 8 0 4 2 0 6 3 7 2 7 19 33 Dot on"Fields" Completing trail connections that form a larger loop within the City 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 3 7 10 7 8 7 32 40 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-106 Appendix A: Lake Oswego Parks 2040 Neighborhood Workshops Revised 07/15/24 Where are the priority locations?Thinking of areas with a greater need,choose where the following overall priorities should happen first.Based on the four areas outlined on the map below, place dot stickers in the table to show where you think the top priorities should happen. AREA OF THE CI Millr 11111- iir. iir m._ __ Add more or greater Increase accessibility Enhance maintenance Repair or replace worn variety of features in Build more trails and of park amenities, and management of or older park features parks paths facilities,and trails existing park features Other Area A:NW Lake Oswego 23% 18% 24% 18% 17% Area B:NE Lake Oswego 17% 24% 27% 15% 17% Area C:SW Lake Oswego 15% 19% 26% 21% 19% 1% Area D:NE Lake Oswego 15% 11% 27% 21% 19% 6% LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-107 Appendix A: Lake Oswego Parks 2040 Neighborhood Workshops Revised 07/15/24 What are some ideas and trends that could be implemented in this neighborhood?Think of reasons why you go to parks.What makes them fun and exciting?Place a dot sticker on things you want to seen parks in this neighborhood.Have another idea?Use a sticky note to write your idea down and put it on the board!show where you think the top priorities should happen. Temporary play Unique play Partnerships with Obstacle courses Play areas with I I elements elements Native habitat schools for field Outdoor work Access to natural or climbing Mobile and pop- Water play or NEIGHBORHOOD WORKSHOP sand and water gardens and court access spaces areas elements up programs splash pads Pilkington Park Workshop 5% 1% 3% 20% 14% 6% 22% 10% 2% 17% Westlake Park Workshop 6% 0% 18% 6% 10% 4% 12% 17% 7% 20% Hazelia Field Workshop 3% 1% 18% 16% 10% 3% 16% 10% 6% 15% Foothills Park Workshop i ggig glig glal - LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-108 Appendix A:Lake Oswego Parks 2040 Neighborhood Workshops Revised 07/15/24 What are some ideas and trends that could be implemented in this neighborhood?Think of reasons why you go to parks.What makes them fun and exciting?Place a dot sticker on things you want to seein parks in this neighborhood.Have another idea?Use a sticky note to write your idea down and put it on the board!show where you think the top priorities should happen. Comment Total Dots Workshop 1:Pilkington Park,SW Lake Oswego Handicap river access 5 Tualatin River Dog water station in dog park @ Pilkington 12 Pilkington Park Need a restroom @ Pilkington Park 1 Pilkington Park Gate on parking lot entrance,security at night(fireworks set off late at night @ Pilkington Park) 0 Pilkington Park Concerts&healthy food carts @ Pilkington 0 Pilkington Park Pilkington Park,Put a trail here,put a bridge here,Browns Ferry Park 5 Connecting Pilkington Park to Browns Ferry Park across the Tualatin River Continue sidewalk from Pikington Park to Childs Rd.Safe walking options!! 6 Pilkington Road between Pilkington Park and Childs Road Trails along Childs in Canal Acres and/or Bryant Woods 3 Canal Acres and Bryant Woods adjacent to Childs Road Trails to connect Bryant Woods Park to Bryant[Rd] 0 Bryant Woods Park to Bryant Road Need a bigger"No Dogs Allowed"sign at Stevens Meadow entrance,and one at the"informal"entrance to Stevens Meadow near Cooks Butte Park trail entrance. 0 Stevens Meadow and Cooks Butte A comprehensive map of running&walking trails in Lake 0 with notations for stroller friendly routes.Include distances for folks training for 5k,10k races! 0 Area,and/or citywide Workshop 2:Westlake Park,NW Lake Oswego Dedicated pickleball courts 0 West Waluga Park Utilize West End for small dog run for other neighborhood 1 West End Building(now Yakima) Lights @ Basketball Courts 1 Westlake Park Lights @ Basketball Courts 0 Westlake Park Access to parks ramps&signs for those that don't speak english 0 Area-and/or city-wide Community pancake breakfast(like the Lion's Club does at George Rogers Park) 0 Area-and/Or city-wide Allow pickle ball on tennis courts Most courts are unised&empty 0 Area-and/or city-wide Hot balloon launch like at Cook Park 0 Area-or city-wide Splash pad swings at Westlake!! 0 Westlake Park Ole Time Fair in the summer like West L inn does 0 Area-and/or city-wide Westlake No Pickleball 1 Westlake Park Small dog park (KH:not sure if this means add a dog park that is small in size,or add a dog park intended for use by small dogs like we have @ Hazelia?) 0 Westlake Park Allow dogs 0 Westlake Park Access to natural areas 0 East Waluga Park Lake access for all LO residents! 0 Area-and/or city-wide Would be nice to see some programs that help the marginalized or at risk community.They're here! 0 Area-and/or city-wide Small dog park (KH:not sure if this means add a dog park that is small in size,or add a dog park intended for use by small dogs like we have @ Hazelia?) 0 Iron mountain park Pokemon events with training and community days 0 Area-and/or city-wide More festivals here like at George Rogers Park 0 Area-and/or city-wide Indoor lap swimming pool for LO residents 0 Area-and/or city-wide Interactive trail map that allows selection of length&terrain(ADA),+habitats! 0 Area-and/or city-wide Fundraising with number of laps aroudn the park.How many times can you circle the park for charity? 0 Springbrook Park Inclusive Park 0 Woodmont Park Acccessible playground 0 Woodmont Park Small dog park areas 0 Area-and/or city-wide Bocce ball league like in sonoma(Foothills?) 0 Foothills Park Outdoor Fitness(e.g.dance,yoga)at Millenium Plaza 0 Millenium Plaza Outdoor lap pool 0 Area-and/or city-wide Rock climbing wall 0 Area-and/or city-wide Workshop 3:Hazelia Field,SE Lake Oswego Luscher Farm I 1 ILuscher Farm Workshop 4:Foothills Park,NE Lake Oswego Connect Foothills to Tryon Cove 12 Between Foothills Park and Tryon Cove Park Connect greenway 13 Between Foothills Park and George Rogers Park The CSA at Luscher Farm is a huge plus for residents of Lake Oswego.To know where our food is coming from and keep it local is ideal.(Kathleen Wendland) 4 Luscher Farm LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I C-109 U3rnA M F S ,III A MWF Adak VI Ank The Manning Process 2023 � 2025 2 4 DUNE - SEPTEMBER '23 OCTOBER - NOVEMBER '23 NOVEMBER '23 - FEBRUARY '24 MARCH - JULY '24 JULY '24 - JAN UARY Existing Vision & Needs & Action & Parks Plan Conditions Goals Recommendations Implementation 2040 Analysis Development & Adoption Who have we heard from so f ar? �� • � � � EVENT 8 meetings with 13 community focus 1 citywide open Advisory Groups and group meetings 1 ,183 survey responses house 4 Pop - Up Events Boards What dh we FANI While community members value the park and recreation system , community members also have a variety of different ideas for the future . Key themes identified and described further below emerged through the comprehensive outreach conducted for Parks Plan 2040 to date . Ike IMF Work MAI Prioritize trail Implement park, improvements (e .g . , Improve information Expand athletic facility connectivity and safe water access , unique & inclusive play, sharing use connection to parks accessibility improvements) fir•" 4 � .�j ` n " i a { Y � lay I iw usw� � Increase opportunities for Continue to preserve Maintain the quality of Create healthy pa rks natural areas and allow and enhance climate year- round recreation access to them the existing system resilience KOA 0 0 or ' T A Ilk L Essent*lal An ideal is in which istributed rovide allmembers to e to identifiedessentialservices. Places to Exerc*ise PlacesforCh *11dren to Places to Experience Places for Tra *11 and Play Play Nature Connect*lv*lty 1 _ 010 1 includeSites that include a n activity Sites that offer the o*A ortu n it to Sites that rovide eo le of all Sites thatY pp Y p p p • • • supported by a s ace or feature be surrounded by trees, provide a es the o ortunit to connect or team act�v�t� es that su ort pp p J opportunity pp individual that is desi ned s ecificaII to water access, be in direct contact with the outdoors, sta active, eneraI heaIth g p Y Yg • encourage aplayful interactions for with uni ue habitats or naturaI improve communit health, and com et�t�on and/or teamwork. J qY p children . features, and/or observe wildlife. safelytravel fromplace toplace. Do all areas of Oswe ohave e u *ltable ark access *,>, Exercise and orts Access Ex er*ience Nature Access -------------- Not everyone has e ual Tigard , IFN err ; g Tigard tural Portland 43 Area; Portland access to parks or 43 �N a ry ------- -------- Park IFIF identif ied essential services f• •-.. a- i, 'f;.' 1 i, `Hide-A-Way �� • - -- f,-yonCreek •- -•-----------• Pine Cone Park ',.• State / Park I ryon Creek - ' --- Natural - ... -�!" State �S Area ' -- Natural The • - - •Southwood -_- Area maps i - =, Woodmont ;, Willa a Park. +' ------ ver ......... �� + llillan.lfr . ', + Natural Park _ Westlake Park Adult --- Community' areas that are within a 1/4 Center rTryon IndoorPP Cove Park Tennis _ Rossman Center Oswego Lake Park Country Club Milwuakie Springbrook Oswe�Laub FOOthll� Milwuakie mile of each essential% Park Coun Club ki and 1 /2 Roehr Roehr Par k ark Pennington Iron Mountain J Park service.:l .'�• - Park 'Charlie West S. Brown 'l r. Waluga Park Water Sports Center West ♦ r.;, Waluga Park East A Willamette ;= Waluga ■ :t 3 „ River Greenway Park Waluga Park f Web,ge ✓�e�rge Rogers Prk �i Rogers Park -, Oswego Lake Hallinan _ I n total : South Shore - i " `Reservoir . `''"�:• Woo / f# j r` rGlenmorrie` Greentree , Park _ — Greenway Aspen Freepons Recreation and Park Park Aquatic Center `1 CU'MING � • Gle0 nmorrie � s*1tes unicipal r r' Park 5 prov*1de access to Golf Course Hazelia Field Hazelia '= A Field A Luscher Farm exercise . •Rassekh Pk ' `•" Park and jrts COMING SOON! 7 ni' "r+; Cooks Rassekh Park `•" and - , N - Butte Park CO SOON! Natural Area West Linn 43 West Linn 43 ------- Bryant Woods Stevens ' _- Pilkington Nature Park r Meadow r ' I ;Park r l r Sunnyslope - CanahAcres Sunnyslope I >> 22 s*1tes prov*1de ll Open Space 7 Natural Area „ Open Space L 7 Tualatin Rivergrove Tualatin Rivergrove River y Run Park t• .� J L , ow , play 1 •� 1 _ r , 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles �� O 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles >> 34 s*1tes allow users to Play Ch *11dren Access Tra *11Accessexperiencenature --------- --- _____________ _ s*1tes offer some>> 3 Tigard Tigard ' Portland Portland 43 OMOCNary - based recreation --------- Park Park tra *11 ._ ... ._. '- `Hid a kWay r _ " Pine Cone , Park Tryon Creek ',�' Tryou Cre< .__`. --,!/__. State �/- State Natural Natural Area , L Area , _. , Woodmont ;, Willa a 1; d�'illn, .il , + ; Vtural_P_ark er Pad _ Woodmon+ Sou odFEE raI Park�Westlake ; - Park Westlake —f X' Park f , i _ Indoo Rossman 'Cente S rin brook Oswego Lake Parks Oswego Lake Milwuakie p g Milwuakie country Club ' country club Foothills Park Paot Springbrook ,-,-I Park• Footiris -hr Park, Park � �'-- r� Milleniu� Iron Mountain Roehr - =_ Park -= Plaza ;Park �/ r r �' Imon Mountain Sundeleaf + ___- Pennington Park "y �� • • sl West i cl Park Plaza Waluga Park East A v Lake Oswego Willamette = West Essential , .. + Parka Swim Par ■ y \/' iW f Ri erlG eenway J k River Greenwa '" aluga Parkamette WaluEasga ,.•-. , � �'\ Y �-� �_. •, Park Rogers Park : '� ■ Oswego Lake Oswego Lake George Rogers Park - o e s _ 8 � 9 iMan '-`• Hallinan > , - •r Greentree � \ LamoSprings 1 /4 m ile 5 m inute Park / Aspen IrFreepons� Natural Area A _ � Park Recreation and . Park / _ Freepons �\ 1 , Aquatic Center_ - ,Park ark rie Y G rrie COMING SOO,NO _ Glenmor Municipal T �P i �enmo walk) Golf Course j + J + ` , Park " Hazelia = • Field ' - ; i A r ' - �. Luscher Farm ,` Westridge Rassekh Park Park and "t„ Luscher Farm 7f • i Natural Area p Park COMING SOON_ Westridge Rassekh'Park ark and 1 /2 M i (10M I nute Park Cooks G�SOON! Natural Area _ West Linn ' West Linn But O ti - - ._ __a ----- •- ------ � i/ 43 :. •- ------- to a3 B{yant Woods ,t____ Stevens c Pilkington, Nature Park Meadow Park r walk) Tualatin River rove ":.� Tualatin Rivergrove Canal Acres ;•� uunnyslope g ' Natural Area ' Up``ce � River J � Y J Run Park— ! L , • ` � �r A 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles 1 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles O I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I I I v 0 OREGO� LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 • • • • 10 0 • • :4 • — W • M 1 • • — — — — • • • • • • • 1! • • • • • • Im • • • • ImRVOIRMI" Pole • • • • • • avkAdlk • • • • • • • • • • � AL_• • • • • f• -,ML u ` - ` r ' - - - - - - - - - 4- ' - 7 Kerr ' 1 Natural Tigard -Area ' Portland .' McNary - - - - - - - - - - , Park' % - - - - - - ; 1 , 1 1 I ' 1 FA jr rr f + I 1 + k - - , - r lr ; .- 1 w Hide-A-Way y - - - k Pine Cone Park ' ', le � _ , ' P r k Tnjon Creek { �' 41-,r-� 1 Y.r + r F till J J ,, _ 1 State rITatra , � •_+, a_r ``J Tif~1BERLi��,�F DR s SouthlNood � � [� - r - 1 �Y�� �% � �f w4 Y ri r , r . 4 r� 4 Park _ ; Woodmont Stafford -0:. r - Vol U Grove Park ��+ �" J"Y .;' - - E�Rc `'" ., L . rf ,, Natural Park # ; Willamette River _ 1 r 1 :West la ke -L r r`~ * . . +i Park , ,.- + � _ Lr Adult Community ,':r • m L. - - - ; Center ;� 4? Tryon 1 u, � COUNTRY CLUB RD ■- - . a _r L _ _ , �ove Park 1 Indoor Rossman 4 , ' Tennis Park jr `t I Center Springbrook ° � � ° � Kincaid . ; Country Club Foothills ilwuakie Park Curlicue L - KRUSE WAY a a AAVV Corridor Park. 1� MEADOWS RD � liFIR RIDGE RD Millenium Roehr 'C7 Z + ~ - + aza Park ' co ' ` - ' - - • ' lf" Iran Mountain ' - - - _ _ 1 , ; �, Pennington ��,,a undeleaf + Park • �+ - --- - - - � i Park .���' Plaza BLS f 1 r r ' 'L . West � � ,� , •�' S. Brown - Water Sports Center 1aluga Park East Lake Oswego V'Iillam`ette ` 1 _ Vlfa I u a Swim Park r River G ree nway g r _ r '; ray L r 1 Park LAKE GROVE AVE L r , I L rr - + i IL t .L1 L �r r Jr J r rr: 1 V, 4 r 700eoi r +1 1 ,; ge Rogers 'Park r *r J 1 +' Oswe o Lake �� r ' 1 1 • ; - , r, r _ -+ Hallman `re . �o � r�=��,1Ir, *..~ * � '������� South Share 1NoodS t� - �-. %I _ Ir , , L .6 L+.. � . . ° Reservoir - r4. ar r. r % w* 1 • y; Y. ' JJ if} Q 4 ,� Lamont Springsp0Glenrnorri& ' -� Greentree Q Greenway Natural ra I Area � Park Aspen u A a . -, - - - �A ° Park Freepons � - � GREEI�TREE R❑ � ` % ��- � Jr+ Recreation and # � Par � 1 LL l _ r V� % �,� Aquatic Center_ .� k �°° � CGMING SSG"N! I '` -� 1 ,4 0 Q L + �� ' -; G lenmorrie + `° a a° � -� ^ �` � ,11 Park k Munici al -• r •' ° Golf Course4 , .. ► • _ S 6ERGIS RD JEAN RD Hazelia f .r La ' x•`L+ — — � y , OVERLOOK DR F AR . z' — , t - - •4 `! # 10 Lr + r.r , 4t -+x ,fL r ` '; •; r r _ _ �� �� _ Luscher Farm 'M , # r^ ► J J `i ,.; ; r L : , Westridge Rassekh Park Park and �'' L - -c^ - - - ,. " r Park Cooks COMING Sooty! Natural Area Butte Park ] ;. , '_ -- West Linn L 11.r , ► P ; � ti���xt ��- - _ -r���L�i L - - `,r - - - - Bryant Woods - I � ' -� • '1 - 1_7 Stevens_ `'Pilkington t Nature Park _ _ _ _ _ Meadow '0'1 `- ' y Park r �= r r'r - - r ` Parks, Natural Areas, and Recreation Facilities ti rr or r .1 14 r49 I `i'' - ' r S Canal�Ac unnyslope Nan-City Parks and Open Spaces res I Natural Area I CHILDS RD r ; peen Space L Tualatin Rivergrove I I _ _ ; City Boundary , I River `' Metro Urban Growth Boundary ` - Run Pa r Trails and Pathways a� 00 L or re Repair lace worn or p older park features Add more or varietgreater Y of features in parks Build more trails and paths Increase accessibility of park amen ities facilities, and trails Enhance maintenance and i imana management of exst n J park features Other � o OREGO� LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 AN Aft A& A91h Aft r Aft Tleaj Tell Mr oil * [ 6[ 0 0 1 A& 0 0 0 0 0 eir 0 0 0 Low priority High preiority $$$ Moderate Cost Needs ,, Pick 4 Year- round opportunities, including indoor programming Introductory sports or fitness programs for beginners Shade trees and drought tolerant landscaping More amenities such as seating and drinking fountains Spaces for gathering , picnicking , and BBQing New exercise stations/fit spots Lighting improvements Facility repairs like fixing a broken element or making safety or aesthetic improvements $ $ $ $ High Cost Needs. Pick 2 C ity -wide signage and wayfinding Updated park facilities including play areas and shelters Accessibility improvements ( pathways, ramps, etc .) Enhanced natural resource stewardship New or replaced play area that is universally designed for all abilities Nature - based play facilities, including sand and water play Completing a trail or sidewalk connection between a neighborhood and a park Improvements to Luscher Farms identified in the 2013 Master Plan (e . g . , improved access, spaces for programming , trails, and urban agriculture) $$$$$ Highest Cost Needs . Pick 1 Large, hallmark play area with unique elements More costly improvements to existing parks such as splash pads Replacing grass with new turf surfaces on sports fields Water access to the Tualatin River Build new athletic and sport courts and fields Completing trail connections that form a larger loop within the City 110 , LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 204v • 0 0 All6e6T J r , , . V� _ 7I \ \ " .� ,,�/IA1��� Siar r■A� .I J!. ON " I , , . „ a Waterplayor Pareas wit L no I I I I sandandwater ��- II .. � I I � �o� splash �, s� . ; vQP� Oswe o Lake Sov ; , F ��. L J 12 L16 SIC _ .+. 7 '111 L oil III , rA LA Lamont Springs, AS L � = Ir - � NaturalGreentree ' , Area o - 1 U I Parks s 0 O AY O > GREEN REE RD creation a n / Aa • W _ Aquatic Center. w - ::,k- _'} ♦ O �75:z - � y COMING SOON .1 , - v t 0 Municipal . - .�_ �v Golf Course 41 z S BE r � LIrmolLnJim JEAN _ Hazella 1' - L - - 3 L .1' +■ LJ OVERLOOK DR '�' ' Mob * le and ` � � = ; I Lakeridge Wes trid eFie � Lj g ld TemporaryI I 1 Lakerid e y - 1 g Csl-' � Middle Elementar. . L , . , �y �P y Hz h Schoolro rams � , School I -� g e e m e n ��. 61 School • 9 _ oy ,� Luscher Fi O 1 " 11 �J - PUt rk n MOBWE WZE Epmom� I - L Westr� d e a d -` � g Ra s s I Park - A W. � ` � ��% CooksON ' Natural A� � WAIIII� � I • " 1 Park COMING SO Butte ParkIII L 01 A000or 9L- I 'o _f ,r ' I LJJ 1 ^ I � - ' ` � - River Grdve I I ' ` �1 Stevens Elementary N atu re Park . _ ' % V looky �_ Meadow L 1 I _ ,.� School L 1 - - - - - Itil_._:.. 1 L � Park r _ ' r 1 I L ` + 1 .r - - - - J L Jr L 7 ` - - � Canal�A�cres 1 Sunnyslope ra I Area O e n Space Natu � , p •~ r. ualatinRivergroveI ' ■T ... 1 1 � uniquelay _ _ _ RiverObstacle courses o r elements SW NYBERG SIT , Run Pa r S c imbing element&- 19 gowo AN moo YOA . - . .. � AIIIII , �;--; A P ram. .} t_ a �:_M �, ��_ < Partnerships withschoo a itat ar ensAccesso a u ra a ras -Natioveutaoor wor s aces A �714'il or c and court acce A4. 4,�"� .� _ - J '� .+�:.>'., �9,.:F ' /ST R,.F ��� _�F j b.. ..���•`s- :' - -, 4 ;r ', �f� - �� �,�� �� — � ��� + may, r < *� � 1 �` ,� .;_ '• _ •`� ' y .,� i �.y�Jf, f .�L r� r •'��R�. J.-'� - � • �_ 1 1 _ � �� � ,�J<. '� r-� I� fir M �iL-Y+:•aA • •'{ 4 :��.' '•• ''j � R � `� +. - _ 1. L ��. Ik � f' - :� tlouki I&W _, .r `� •3 � �•-� �'" •F—7 .� � i% � I'll �� mot. i ` ��� � ' � ' � �}`I'� - -- I � I "� % �h -I lr 1, 'I� L•I I� ,•L- � � l - - J• - I :I��• y --- - T - Si•, �I - � 4- W �L�lI � ,�' •� ' � �/ �' o Y � _ tilt '�. I F ram=# �L• 'fir r • r - - :.� .NL wl- ..1 , 4 ` i' '�• c F . T ,J'�T Y �; ' I"-1 _ .. •� .. .. .1 I- __ _ .:. - .: �� �ti 4ti �- ti7� - r{ � ,e �'' a�� /�/'' t"�� � -�. l 1 { 4-1 ';^w5 • L� _ _I'fa'li r #r�1 I ,4, I -i ` �s,`•s«? / a '' .y . LIL I 1 0 1 A L 101 j --1 ���•}•:_�fr'- _-_ �._ - - - .. . .. I { � JJJ l: .t���} � ;/" •r s.y '�s�,Pc �'�?;' >e1 `',s. 'Ie�': - '�.� L O VNjq OREGO� LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Im k Tm Im M , I * low , E 0 Ole 0 0 :4 0 0 0 0 10 1 Area ; Portland Play areas wit � � ,r of Waterplayor � I � � 43 1 1 a " sand and water _ _ _ _ s as ac. �� c rk ' 1 1 1.) 404 1 1 ,M — 7 r ti ' rr r _ of rJ - - , hHide-A wa g { a Pine Coner Park 4 Tryon Creek r - q6 , Park r - - to r _ pc State v --. .-i-- r Yq r - TIMBERLINE DR Natural Are � ' a ♦ _ - - - . .,� _ � �— ♦ <s �.` "./ La Oswego r _ Woodmont U Stafford • r . - g r , o , ; ! 4 Willa tte ON-Am", Hig S hool r : ; Naturat Park G rove Park a r ,l � � , aver - ,t _ _ , . , , r . ,,I r - -5 I ; Forest Hills a - , - Elementaryr ,' I , - � - � a , ' Adult r + a a I� v Lake Oswego rC y , Mo c an o - u�- I � , � � � Center � , � Tryon em orarpla, Middle School COUNTRY ' �.. I CLUB RD _ _ , a a _ _ Cove Park �� �� � PF _ � ro rams *elements ,u� � � ,� � Indoor Rossman ; E �� Te n ni s Park .T - r L ;' 1 _ Sprin Oswego Lake - - M01RILE RED EAJION Center g br_o0k KI nca Id - Milwuakie 1 Country Club - FOOL h 1 I I S 0 ti ) Park Curlicue +� q AVE �i Par j I I•I.-kDt)e-11 «1 � CorridoAL r - - { r MilleniumFIR RIDGE RDRoehr P l a z a Park f Iron Mountain — �- SundelleafPennln ton J° , Pa rk PlazaPark .�Pti , of harlierove -- _ S . Brown itary - WillarnetWater Sports Center _ =�; _ r�}-�_ L . „ / te +�r � s . {� �'Fr•'� � 4 ; FY•�r ; 4.-Lake Oswe o : 4r5 { T � , } River Gr1eenway Swim Park a TINEV&P, Aft s' LAKE GROVE AVE U6iqueplay lip Obstacle courses or elements Georgey N cl *lmb*ing elements MGj�� ,-� I I I ►�� Rogers*,%'Park 41 ----I FFP �L,'"` � ►' - �" tf- MI Oswevo Lake H a 11 i n a n I II H LEI .� . . :�1.-� _ •ems i�� -•� r=� � "y� .<� ��� i�'�'' '`�rl � ,. �'-.�'�'-'!.� `���l +�. • hab*1tat Partnerships Native ar ens withscho Acce o a u raia r 5 a ut oor wor s acess -y } . . { forfieldand court ac `f s.�1 � I '7" ��J is�l i'J. }_ r - t �ILIA` ;dr i / I .,�. , ��`v �' i, � t►.��:F-�.. �} _ - _'!, t i f 5 - T - 4 � 'F � -'1 � � — L. •u4:•:1 z� =4 P 4 � � 1 _ �• (,' '� t�- '�I 1 .�... 4 l S' 1�} •� � — k• - ,. ��. ±'� � 4- M1'{' tit L�� +:r'•�� f- ��. '�-t���, rs��� } `.� J" .ice .�• is _ F+aF1, _ �� ..1.. ���a " '' _— - ••� - - 'y� J � •ria �' __ -5 � II'� 1 L 1 , '�-.� _ -:.� -AFL ii k- j� tic• l w: 51:M' - X a5+r' _ r• :'•ti:_L k''k� '_+1' J' - - �'•: _ I '� l ' S 1 '�• y � � 1 4.�1Y �� �r' ■I. � _ . �+"L�F�,• r� 5-- . - � tr L��• - � a - - 1 �` •,�� _ - -_ - - - k� - -F NOW -- 'I"' y I' el oy�j;3 a: .': r�� ✓, �f- a`', c r+ O .f- + L -• - .a '' - i' ti• �I ti, 5 _.. _ �- � / y�,.i! .'�'. ,. .�,JI 1 C>' cri, F!RMS, im V O OREGOL L LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 • • • • • 12 a rem me i ea an ren C e IM en in i ne r • VVh ta d d t d that ld b p lem ted th 1 9 hb ho d • • • • • in o reasonsyyougotopar s . atma estem uncin exciinN.. . ace a o sic eron in syouwan osee 0 n ar sin this nei or ooHave ano her ■ eci9. Use a stic note to wr'l* te our i ea oven an ut 'l on the oar • : �!, o � H, �yy { � Ii• 1G 4 It IN man - 1■■�■ - • � - �� I� ' �` ���4� ',�, '+'�, ' � .� / • .' I NMI W V WN AR 0 miss MINES T7 40 It It ■■■t � .L • • • • • • • ♦�� r - - . - . . • i Ok .16 LA L 1 �� • m Aft AIN AIN Alk • • - ; _ - 4 II _� I • - � 14I1 � XT 41 Ask Yk t �� ft.."�x,� � _ _ _ _i1� ~ - • • • • • • � "t"� d' r� .f r -;�i69? ?z ,4`..., ev�, tL _ ,� �`_�,y :� y ,y � _ l'� _ ��,' \ /�. �� r`: ,�.a-��+jy � ,,� .�. :fir, �•r. _ "'S= ti I I + f y - S h• 71 _ V.. •i �i - 4 - `, _ wrr,:.. ` 4 ,'il `K�y �,�.,G"".'- ,�V+ .,, r��"y ..'�, •�} ,� � }�� Q V 'I ,,,,,ppJ d• � Y - Y -` - \ li . f�,✓ <N.'.'!. � lei ., I p� - � �:� 't. T , K x _ ' '. - - � �. +h..a: \'I, t,� , •�l.. ,� • ,.,'�'. b -a,d: '.� \ `� �1/., � i- .� •:�ie�' /.- •,�. _ - - i 5. • I - fi• .. � r - a -r: :� u :� � y �5 � �.: ti -a��.,;� ,�crs �'^.,J.� \ la t, `j, „cy��• ,'�y - '1 L r +6' _ 4' - - 1� r. i"al.. �; I,, r7, ♦ TI>, ` ,v r p - - sw._ ii € r - � _ - •. - .� ,v ; .� I`�.n ':�r�-•% I / ".. �, 7 ��j's �S .' +�i•a"f�:Y/ _ '55 f M1 '�I" 'r', � a .�. - - ••i}� � _ ' _ ' '! ' - c:s_ ,r✓='y./i, _ •, �'J 1f -# - _ _ "!�.- f';�1. '7x it. '4� �� `x ✓ :s''' f s:' ;i� j�i f�`�� ��:L. � 1 _ '-.� .✓ ✓ Y . /. i 1. f ��. '''�.e% �- � 1 '� - r AC 'r• ��^ f � / � � � - � S'e .y.' / Tl F, '':p•. _ -2i' . �^/• ao: 'i.� L." �:' aP` •Itiy�,l .. 4 -F �•,+y�r,, J i� —. _ .�i �_ ..Tex. ;+ + �/- .r• �,•• rP-- - — �•�-'.:•r`' J� �"� '..Y� 7.�.:1y,. �:`.7i}. �� //// •\ + {" h, _ '� i • C•3 -:�1 '� ..•� / -'/ !jd \ 1. ''}" 1 4 `/ 3 7r1," :ri`• T'r I ,<t�'`,`4,r•`,�.�-... --X_�. ..�- �•• 'f' _ _ � r r e _ .,., - y�� �L': .. � I T• .t � s .e .. e,, ,� �� «� �.-r.. .s` _�h ;./ .'`��a`- :. SIR _Ta r, 1 _ r r, 16, owl } r _ •' ' �' fj .,r �- ` 1 T •� � _ - �,' �E� �.,_ � _ :f' � _ /q �/; I / � - � • ' •�-• r gyp• ��. -I ' 'r "'. F '�, '+ . 1 � ., ,(�•'- 6 Y h llr:' �\ : ', T �. �r � y,_. / -- } + - - �•' •'I ti L r i..�••� / �i .� {..• ,� / �T ' _ Jam•^ / - - - ■ ! � - �' .� s 1 ! 5 1 . t /(p ..r'. / / ri;.. >�,aX„'::. - i.. i � ^.�� _ rf '• Ik I J ., -- - - -� I _ � � a - r - - I r � �. L�''1 �•' �' k 1 1 L '�. ��,- i I f. �'. -- F.. ti ti f I ti w F 4 . - � �' - - • t. ''��1 � I' x � I �7r'°'' ,-'�'� � :�' `e.. r._ '� ..r 1 .S-! i. tr, 'y ,� - �L7 T {' -i � � � � ti ' I 5 ; . . 1, '. � • , } _ _ � tom. ,! � I ��� � n•t,ru �;- ;� � /.y '�d .' }L• .*� •I' ' }_ �a y J� 11 h' " Jrs1+g'�w� �; y - y��' / It .ti r _ Y• Vet / i �I �.. L 'f -• r ''i rIF_ S'. " ' 5' ''y %� l I�s �' -tom `' /✓ )�` L. �+• - - a --- - { � ��i. ■ 7. ,5 Z� .I f /� r.�'i� ; lUr r.,,}S-yam, T-,y�_ •� � •� '' ,Y Y` _ •_• L a~ .� -� +�. ' ' - ' - __ - 5 f� - 5 5 1 ',• ,? rN�s �, .� �t / wy,;4 I+�;' I, I �. ,II '':E� � ` 1 .. ` ,�1'�' r`r �y... • t � �'--•r,.. = a r r } •7- - ' {7 s•.w i.• L fit+ • * _ '� 'tr I fa . 1_ - ��I L 1 - - , 1• �' �•1 - Z' 4 '(/ '�5 ,,(.4� fit.• ice{ p� t�;�r�r /i 1�+, • • Til :4 lift M • ; 1 SW STEPHENSON ST Waterplayor __ Play areas wit 1 Kerr ' 1 Tigard 1I NaturaIs as asan an wa er4 1 - - Area ' 1 1 + Portland Iv S ♦ K 1 1 � u, r.. , - 'Xr'.0 � _((�� /� I 1 , 1 1 ,, .. �A. �,�• ' '�� . �,�,,,«,era a p i SS McNary 1 v f Park ' - - , a 1 ' SW DARTMOUTH ST 1. I Y: - + r - + t Hide-A 1 + - Pine Cone — ' — + Pa r k K w P Park F 1 L+ • P - ter - � / r - % - + I ` _� meµ = - J / II y- ♦ , TIMBERLINE DR o __ S O u t h W O O d LLJ Oal�reek o r - - Ili] Elementar m & ; I ; Q - Pa r, no y La Oswego r _ , , WOOd Mont U Staf School - 1 0 w G���� Hig S hool r _ #r Natural, Park Grove -21 MELROSE ST ?)00 t ' •. 1 ■, r — W 1 ` Y ' r - .21 r - J - 1 Forest T .�� i - +� .■ r - r1 J ��- - .: Element Westlake ; 1 + _ Mob *lle and y Park 1 emporary1 �, b w Lake Oswego r • ' ro rams ��� Middle School COUNT ' ' ' ' Oe ements ' COUNTRY � _ — ' O LL •�_� ' 1 - ' . Indoor MOBILE RED EMION _ Tennis - �' '- •. I Oswego Lake; Center Springbr_ook ' •�� Country Club _ , Park ' 1 KRUSE WAY erL mod �. MEADOWS RD - o , = FIR RIDGE RD . r%i1 ( • � - - r Iron Mountain ' �' SW BONITA RD ' r - - _ _ _ ° Pennington Ja , r , r - - - �' - - - - - - - , , • P a r■■k ., ► ►� � � � � Ai ,. - � r - - � � . Park 1- � . 0 1 , w W-W e - + ' r l r .` �G Lake Grove c-� �.. . West a Elementary _ . - : �= y •fir.; . .:4 , �:; ; ' ash - rr ; Wa I u a Pa ark school g r • � ` q` - East � � • L� { ��. ••.:.� �k . _� :..r.���4._ -• � �:} - r Ir 7 L 7 r _ + �� z \ ( s'�•+c', 4i ?, Y '' �' �,k r ,titi p'n J},�'�' .,1 •_ ' 1 I L Jr — +\ Waluga - L - ; 1 e ; �1 �a. ' ' ~ � ,r + Park ~ LAKE GROVE AVE S L — r Jr + r Jr + Uniqueplay _ ` ` = Obstacle courses or l_ L + r +1 1 � � �� elements M� ��. _ ,1 . �� r r + o _ clim ing elements . . �QQA r rill" s� �QP�� Oswe o Lake S°�r I. o I L + '_ : �. . do Sout_ h Shor-e-� -� f�.� _ r + tiF� 1 1 r+ RF B I 11 ] v Partnerships wit sc Native a tat ar ens -- Acce o aura a r 5 a s ut oor wor s a s - } } -• r . . forfieldand court ac _. . . - R.,r ` I - 1 } ` ''� �ETA i '�' •'+C-* �`~ t..�;�F•,� - _ . _ _ . Pi 41; �,` - �l�s` � _� `� � � _ - _ +Iry,/ 5 � � �! �r"� 1'� .ram r•� - � „, S r S � �`� to .T .• •'i ti�7 � --1�� si - - ' ,_� ', __ J � �y ti - :' � :a� � �9r*F � r � 7- -k�• � � -1 _ � 4 'F � -'1 � � _ L •u4:•:1 z� =4 P 4 � � 1 - �• (,' '� t�- 'i 1 .�... 4 l S' �} `� ti ' -1�- fir' ,. � . ±'� � 4- M1'{' 1t L�� +:r'•'� f �f. '�_t��`�, rf��'� } 4r J" •ice x" • is _ rill j� tic• ,� � � '• i •• ,A+�.-R T�;•1 5' � ' r � - � ' *' f'' ,� 5 �•k� � +r '�� '1i L' M1' `y� / � litf��- • •�' .�', "'�' � ��-_� - r CIF I i � � ' r ',11 �' .,. � tiy.ir 1• �y:}�'1'�{��• sr� /� _ ! -. '�.,�,y,� .�� �:. �� 1. - x a1+r _ r :'•ti:_L k' k� '_+1 J' - - �'•: _ I '� l ' L 1 '�• y � � 1 4.�1 Y �� �r' -� �_.� '•- - .. - _ � ;ice r � --- - - -_ -- _ - - - - -- � �'. - { 'S. .,i.6�1�'•91- •� 1 " .��r s. /T ,T'� _ ' - _ w - ■I. � _ . �+"L �,• r� 5'- . - � tr L��• - � a - - 1 �` •,�� _ - -_ - - - k• - -F - - J ti - i� A�,�/fib � ;.;�1 alx, '�?r� � O �-- 'I"' y I' el� 'o ��y�jJ� a: .': r�� ✓, �'' �f- a`'G�c r+ O .r•- + L -• .a '' - i' ti• �I ti, 5 _.. - _ �- - � / y�,.i! .'�'. .. . ,JI 1 C>' F•-I J G� cri, F!RMS, kL A R 7�owl I Me 1 0 0 U O wo OREGOL L LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 0-'" Ems Priorif 3tion survey ij m ma r „ 0,EG ov-./C)'' SURVEY PERIOD : October 15 — November 10 2024 PA VIEMENIMIblia KS PO A1N 20400 • .114. � ,� � ,. . r t" 1 .4„..Ali if v r. r , .44 SU w ABLE CONNECTED THRIVING PURPO Lake Oswego Parks & Recreation is in the final stages of updating its Parks, Recreation, and Natural Areas System Plan (Parks Plan 2040) to shape the city's park and recreation services through the year 2040. As part of the planning process the City launched a second community survey to help prioritize potential park, facility, and natural area projects for implementation over the next 15 years. The survey was available online in English, Spanish, and Mandarin from October 15-November 10, 2024, and received a total of 723 responses. The survey included 23 optional questions focused on prioritizing types of future projects and the evaluation criteria that will be used to inform priorities and timelines for implementation. The findings are from a broad enough sample of community members, allowing the City to use them to help identify community priorities. All responses are captured in this summary with a total number of responses to each question listed with the results. Some questions allowed participants to select multiple answer choices resulting in total counts greater than the number of respondents and total percentages greater than 100%. MIG has completed a data quality check to confirm that individual respondents are not duplicative and not automatically generated (i.e., by bots). LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 PROMOTION The survey was shared with the community through several methods including: • Multiple posts across City social media channels, Active Media, and NextDoor • Lake Oswego website updates and promotion • Inclusion in the City of Lake Oswego newsletter (HelloLO), released to 24,000 households • Inclusion in the City of Lake Oswego email newsletter (LODown), released to 10,000 households • Advertisement in the Lake Oswego Review, released to 8,000 subscribers oF�E . ~ r PvEc oz.'- LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 ' SUMMARY CONTENT WHO OUTREACH PRIORITY RESPONDED? ALIGNMENT PROJECTS EVALUATION OTHER CRTIERIA COMMENTS & IDEAS 1 . WHO RESPONDED ? Frequent Park and Natural Area Visitors Over 70% of respondents visit Lake Oswego's parks and natural areas weekly. Frequent Recreation Activity Participants Nearly a quarter (23.7%) of respondents participate in recreation activities weekly, nearly 30% participate once a month, and 37.5% participate in activities multiple times a year. 723 Total Respondents Adults Representing Families In 2 weeks Most respondents live with young children and teens/tweens (41%), or regularly have children visit them (9.6%). 709 Responses in English 6 Responses in Spanish High-Income Households 8 Responses in Chinese Over half of respondents represent households with a median household income over $100,000. oF�E . dilighoo ~ PvEc oz.'- LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Q11: Which of the following groups includes your age? Q12: How do you describe your gender? (select one) (select one) n=396 n=394 35% 80% 32.1% 70% 66.8% 30% 60% 25% 22.2% 50% 20.7% 20% 40% 16.9% 15% 30% 28.2% 20% 10% 10% 4.6% 0.3% 0.3% 5% 3.5% 3.8% 0% 0.5% 0.3% �a� �a� ohaJ \�� �,a 0% � e�o�� o�ot �o�retA('Under 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ I prefer t 18 not to \�te� �o ,(5) P say sae o� 0e �o\ Q13: How do you describe your race or ethnicity? Q14: Do you rent or own your home? (select all that apply) (select one) n=389 n=393 White/Caucasian 80.20% Own 89.10% I prefer not to say - 10.80% Rent . 6.10% Asian/Pacific Islander 4.90% Hispanic/Latino/a/x 1.50% I prefer not to say 3.80% Another way: 1.00% Other: 11.00% Black/African American 0.50% Native American/American Indian 0.50% Don't know 0.50% Q15: Which category best describes your gross household income, before taxes? (select one) n=386 Less than $25,000 1.00% $25,000 to less than $50,000 2.30% $50,000 to less than $75,000 6.20% $75,000 to less than $100,000 9.10% $100,000 to less than $150,000 12.40% $150,000 or more 44.60% I prefer not to say 24.40% Q16: Which neighborhood do you live in? Click here to see a map of Lake Oswego's neighborhoods. (select one) n=391 Palisades 14.1% Mountain Park 8.2% First Addition/Forest Hills 6.9% Hallinan Heights 5.6% Lake Grove 5.6% Westlake 5.6% Blue Heron 4.1% Bryant 4.1% I prefer not to say 4.1% Evergreen 3.8% Lake Forest 3.8% McVey-South Shore 3.6% Westridge 3.6% Forest Highlands 3.3% Glenmorrie 3.3% Uplands 3.1% Lakewood 2.3% Oak Creek 2.0% Rosewood 2.0% I do not live in Lake Oswego 2.0% Childs 1.5% Holly Orchard 1.5% Foothills 1.3% Old Town 1.3% Waluga 1.0% North Shore-Country Club District 0.8% Birdshill 0.5% Mary's Landing 0.5% Skylands 0.3% Q17: Do any children under age 18 live in your home? Q18: Does anyone with a disability or limited mobility (select one) live in your home? n=395 (select one) n=390 0 5.40% 50/0 46.6% 16.20% 45% 41.0% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 9.6% 10% 5% 2.8% 78.50% 0% Yes No No but children I prefer not to say (such as relatives Yes • No • I prefer not to say or friends) regularly visit Q19: How often do you visit Lake Oswego's parks or Q20: How often do you participate in Lake Oswego's natural areas? recreation activities (e.g., summer camps, youth or (select one) adult classes, farmer's markets, summer concerts, n=395 cultural events, etc.? (select one) n=392 6.60% 1.00%0.30% 40/O 37.5% 01 35% 22.00% 30% 29.3% 25% 23.7% 20% 15% 70.10% 10% 7.7% 5% 1.8% Weekly or more ■ A few times a month A few times a year I prefer not to say • Once a year or less 0% A few times a A few times a Weekly or Once a year I prefer not to year month more or less say Q21: Do you currently have a dog? Q22: How did you hear about this survey? (select one) (select all that apply) n=395 n=391 1.30% Email from Parks & Recreation 56.0% HelloLO 20.5% Social media 10.0% 45.60% City website 6.9% 53.20% LODown 6.6% Lake Oswego Review 11.1W 5.6% Other: 5.6% Word of mouth 3.6% Posters or signs 1.3% Yes • No I prefer not to say 2 . OUTREACH ALIGNMENT The survey asked respondents to provide feedback on the top priorities identified by community engagement conducted to date. Over 75 percent of respondents found the identified projects and initiatives matched their priorities well or very well for where we should focus improvements in Lake Oswego's park and recreation system over the next 15 years. Improvements and repairs to �� Access to nature & nature-based existing parks & facilities �r play opportunities Year-round, indoor activities & Improved accessibility of park PRIORITY ���� PROJECTS AND 'l`�Jk programs 6. amenities, facilities, & trails INITIATIVES IDENTIFIED BY ENGAGEMENT V Splash pads & water play QD Trails & paths that increase connectivity between parks & Q different areas of Lake Oswego a > � • •• Obstacle courses & climbing • elements °F �= • `� I!E' o Vr I °eesoz..- LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Q1: How well do the priorities listed above match with your priorities for where we should focus improvements in Lake Oswego's park and recreation system over the next 15 years? (sliding scale) n=38b 60% 50% 48.5% 40% 30% 28.4% 20% 13.1% 10% 7.7% 2.3% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Not at All Very Well Q2: If they do not match with your ideas for the future of Lake Owego's park and recreation system, what types of projects are missing? (write-in) n=203 KEY THEMES / OTHER IDEAS: clean Garden Different • Some disagreement with J Resident Sccre�aFtio g Olden-._ ROwkian >> .. erns Praperty splash pads and climbing .;.. :.i:: ea rLink • Existing CO C. - - , elements 1n v e rcouncii blow T° ` ` Community 7..: • More multipurpose s orts volleyball t Votes E Updates _- ..t1 p Splash Lorac5 VOoc{ fields Educate sur4eywesti:,r, tart Road Baseball Family f m p ro e ec� Help %I rater • Outdoor pool lowrtinronmbnt Many Summer . , climning uoe_, ... • Pickleball ruujii �� valitLost ePr't Give EtcTurf I d F emoval Plan • Parkin without th''�w�1' ro['-:._x Pr Member . v;-,„ Meadow estroa s • RestroomsAdding 1 ant-eekit r D W I Focusnoh V Y es I rrner, sP. P eO Ie 7. Mth p■ Off-leash dog parks and AnythingAli ove L tAe Ef1coma Native ■ Fishing svvim Include stop Native Grow . • Opportunities for youth _ Side allcsstr,ict,� 5,. believe Maintenance Espedaily .:•.:,.11.; � �, Pads • Year-round facilities 1 long l r.°2tn°°^# c:U�,r��_�� r1.:,ns.,,• Something Forest i i eoGro,E. Protect side Ic .±„, Lon liEz-rts P u blic Cone Ras i; Larger Invasive Active Next Addition Cover species Ensile Each Close P r i r•..i...... 1 i Whole suRRort i..i.. , Opportunity wastea Ahead 'hrougn re�dlca4ed Exptrnd For, Grove Water Adult PLi1 ica .- .., ,.._a. ,iiri,,,Ma Intai n Keep Playground Under ���� Tennis,; rerorze withirs Exercise -i -66- 3 . PRIORITY PROJECTS The survey asked respondents to prioritize four types of project categories that could occur in the city's parks, recreation facilities, and natural areas. Across all sites, reinvestment (57.8%) and nature (49.9%) projects were identified as top priorities. Subsequent charts show priorities for improvements in community-wide parks and neighborhood parks. CITYWIDE FEEDBACK Reinvestment flu) Projects focused on improving what we already have 57.8% Build/Add i Projects that build new capacity such as new playareas or picnic 40.2% .�[�]\ 1 p Y facilities PROJECT TYPES 4o Access Projects that increase connections to and accessibility 29.2% " within existing parks and facilities 0 Nature QProjects that that enhance natural areas or provide opportunities to 49.9% connect with nature of E , dike ~ PvEc oz.'- LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Q3: What types of projects should be prioritized at community-wide parks and facilities? (select top two) n=407 COMMUNITY-WIDE I iglu,' -• - PARKS & FACILITIES Portland 60% Westlake 7 1.Park % 50% 47.4% 46.9% • Center • • II(IIntaId Curll,Cl1tIa Milwnakie Indoor `°""'"`"° FEZ. Tennis Center frills Millenium l ar --- East Plaza w., ............. Waluga I Roe :' . Park 4AAMI Sundeleaf pa -Charlie S.Brown 40% .. ` Plaza -'Water Sports Center 34.9% Lake Oswego Swim Park `' Wa1ug � Parlrr.;; Geor ogers osw•go irte•• Park _ r� 30% Recreation and • GlenmorriA. Aquatic Center Greenway --\ COMING SOONI • i �_ 1 Municipal i � .T,• .• Golf Course .i w-! t la 20% . . I -.: • •'•• :� • Rassekh �` � • Park � L�i_.--..::.: 0 / Par I' West Linn ® r + - _ Natural Are I - I -:.. -.. �: . 10% i' ' I rfr ._ Tualatin Rivergrove ; OaI i 1 T 0.5 1 Miles 0% Nature Reinvestment Build/Add Access These larger-scale parks and facilities are generally used by the whole community and often include amenities such as restrooms, parking, and drinking fountains to support visitors from other parts of the city. They may also have unique amenities such as athletic fields, water access, or indoor recreation opportunities. Q4: What types of projects should be prioritized at neighborhood parks? (select top two) n=399 NEIGHBORHOOD Tignnl PARKS Portland *11cNary Park -`- 70% ,i.:„. ® ..- r Park , ,---. Plne Cone 62.4% Park ` - Stafford , . - _ :Grove Park 60% .. ft.- :Tryon ` Rossman -Vove Park 51.1% ...,,�„ Park r Milwuakie 50% ;.:., 42.1% ' 40% osroegocA, South Shore .,,• -.i:...::.':....i2..,-..,,..:_..16.,.. Reservoir - ■ Freepons / .,,,i, Greentree Aspen_Park•Park Park ` _ 301 ' _.� Glenmorrie-i Park ir ! r---r'�• 1 19.5°/O trid a --J I %., 20% :. / / ® 1::: West Linn O ■ ........,,,.�Pilkingjon — �tPark:1 ::::: 10% Tualatin Rivergrove ii —; I O% O oI .zs o os I nne: Reinvestment Nature Build/Add Access These smaller-scale parks mostly serve nearby neighbors; because most people don't travel very far to use these parks, they may not include amenities such as restrooms, parking, or drinking fountains. However, they typically include a few basic amenities such as play equipment, picnic areas, and internal pathways. Q5: What types of projects should be prioritized at natural areas? (select top two) n=398 NATURAL AREAS Tigard Kerr s -. Natural Portland ,, Area 70% 63.8% Southwood WooNatural Park Or Park + + 60% Park gbrOoc - Milwuakie 50% 48.5% . Pennington k S Iron Mountain ;.,%'I-' Park -. ..,r:,-3ii 40% nse✓rg,:LnAe '. _Hallinan 33.2% .. -- Woods 31.4% ``: Lamont Springs 30% Natural Area Cooks r r .- Butte Park "-_�. -- r--I ' ` 20% ;i: Bryant Park Woods ir,i11-1© , " NatureWest Linn ® • '!:; Meadow i I .. al ural Arsa 10% Tualatin slope Riaergrove �� R Opee Space L I .�J MI I ` -Rival Run Park O0 0.25 0.5 i Miles 0% ' Reinvestment Nature Build/Add Access Natural areas provide important opportunities for community members to connect with nature; they balance providing public access with preserving more sensitive natural habitats. 4 . EVALUATION CRITERIA The survey also asked participants to prioritize the relative importance of several evaluation criteria that will be used to help prioritize future projects. The cost and feasibility of a project was identified as the most important evaluation criterion by respondents. Cost and Feasibility 1 St Meets mulitple park system planning 2nd goals and objectives Fills a Gap 3rd Addresses needs of people or groups 4th with specific park and recreation needs ~ r PvEc oz.'- LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Q6: Please indicate how important each of the following criteria should be in prioritizing future projects using the sliders. (sliding scale) The project fills a gap in an area of the City where similar facilities or services are not currently available. n=317, average=3.8 70% 59.9% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20.8% 20% 9.5% 10% 5.7% 4.1% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Not Important Very at All Important Q7: Please indicate how important each of the following criteria should be in prioritizing future projects using the sliders. (sliding scale) the project addresses the needs of people or groups with specific park and recreation needs (e.g., people with disabilities, low-income families, older residents, youth). n=276, average=3.5 60% 49.3% 50/ 40% 30% 20% 18.8% 18.1% 10% 6.9% 6.9% 0% Mil 1 2 3 4 5 Not Important Very at All Important Q8: Please indicate how important each of the following criteria should be in prioritizing future projects using the sliders. (sliding scale) The project's cost and feasibility. n=280, average=3.9 60% 51.1% 50% 40% 29.6% 30% 20% 10% 8.2% 7.1% 3.9% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Not Important Very at All Important Q9: Please indicate how important each of the following criteria should be in prioritizing future projects using the sliders. (sliding scale) The project meets multiple park system planning goals and objectives. n=262, average=3.6 70% 60% 58.4% 50% 40% 30% 22.5% 20% 10.7% 10% 3.4% 5.0% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 Not Important Very at All Important Q10: Are there any other prioritization criteria that should be considered? (write in) n=139 KEY THEMES / OTHER IDEAS: AdultP I k I I I L • Cost effectiveness ad Future -�; -. , C°rnel Im (aoatl - ;icier'- Important • Long-term maintenance ` "".-PrL9JlLy roue �laygr°ur`d Addition eaau tug Nice aPThig • Traffic considerations Kind StreetI "' • Safety Replace: l €n5te�d Current structure Bring el Property • Community impact analysis itK Data Prior Safe Place • Environmental protection / vOver HIS iY, Now Lack Sport climate resilience Garden Benefit small Etc Seen Serve Anima's with Become Traffic Activity Fa■ Connectivity L,td of Farm „., • Accessibility Impact Love Number popui op aintenance Luscher Green C.:]'.Sir..:�,. i , rest Support .A Reduce hostAddLear. Exist LASS Po3.ce Curseroz�n Stafford System Native Tennis afety Field Fix rahri,i Openl P.,blic• Life rt7il b r�r Ecoa Pool Possibly better arnurge Housing Age RecPat� AuemRt Taxi High South Between Focus Program Alread5r Analysis View Feel Neighborhood preserves lany1r +1iYan J�'!!^ e . : _i Id uEo 1 1ag '4ru d rlFence mmuniRepair'-. Create nod;tad opportunity PreVide laintainLocal Unsafe 1 'JatUrepeon Ike Build Ta oseVi Improve � School Lo v Another Connect Developed Cavell door Older ,..- -i, Developed 5 . OTHER COMMENTS R, IDEAS The survey invited respondents to provide additional comments or ideas relating to Parks Plan 2040. The most common themes from respondent feedback include: •• Ar Indoor and More More trails and safe Preserving natural Play upgrades, Outdoor Pickleball Field Space connectivity areas unique play areas, Courts between and to outdoor pool, Parks splashpad oF�E . ~ PvEc oz.'- LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Q23: Do you have any additional comments or ideas you would like to share? (write in) n=145 Healthy Nevv Removepi,„- KEYTHEMES / OTHER IDEAS: Property • Cc. werruH d Well important i keFr.T \o ra� • Pickleball ...,, Tennis � _ ■ More field space Pat�, aymid Drive .W r Paren# Entir � 1 Consider ■ Outdoor pool Aquatic L uap r,enr ver. Alan 'Even • Trail connectivity , 0 M1t ��n • Upgrades to existing Perhaps • P°i'ce Field n l c e al Trne� Access c� playgrounds ��, I m r v Mountain in Close rt„Dthii; 'ir.,..ci, .�4 nr r`fu1 ■ . F''ale State • Safe pedestrian Public Rogers Live George ay. 1Tra I Age Pace connectivity to parks and safetlrofl Doingaluga Safe Cover Arouna Connect Funds trails ProtectingTryon Structure Children T1lrl Many Lookmisting Stop s err, Butte LuscK Visit • Mountain bike trails t�'o,,= 5"sn,p�e :==ray; fares;s Green water Yes •Path Help Here En'° Trees Traffic Allow • Maintaining existing parks Result Hope Vi . aeauty Rec and facilities Indoor _.....;, , : mime �. Pool �I w;,rc Big I li_ • Unique play elements RrSinPnFS �} Much Raise t r Make Thing Sport • Splash pads . f CookPriority Up I\AF,jar t).- ...1 Law • Preserving natural areas Think Open Grow Enforce Run Route ryry Atti"°" Reason • f��e�.l tin � �� Multiple Enforcing dog leash laws Limits kyo a SchoolGreat Hwy Creek :-c.'Easz Lot KicJob V a n =G aulA Pe Current w tPasS P tennal Prioritize F 1 n i l { Pei l Outdoor Yea ��r F }} Develop 7 Council 1 t l p Leash ���t-Appr��r N t u r Good Cove C rr_°ffiL., 0-'" Ems Priorif 3tion survey ij m ma r „ 0,EG ov-./C)'' SURVEY PERIOD : October 15 — November 10 2024 PA VIEMENIMIblia KS PO A1N 20400 • .114. � ,� � ,. . r t" 1 .4„..Ali if v r. r , .44 SU w ABLE CONNECTED THRIVING O�,,A E0„ fi L., �+ 0 dil GREGON ATTACHMENT J J ifilihviiii . LAKE OSWEGO PRIORITIZATION SURVEY OPEN- PARKS PLAN 2040 ENDED COMMENTS Question 2: If they do not match with your ideas for the future of Lake Owego's park and recreation system, what types of projects are missing? n=203 New parks / New sports fields and facilities. New Parks & New Sports Fields & Facilities (Soccer, North Lake Swim Pool, Golf), New Garden Parks _ _ _ _ _ More emphasis on accessibility -better maintenance of what we currently have, rather than adding to the city's parks -repair and maintain current city sidewalks rather than adding more trails and paths I think 1,6 and 7 should be focused on. Especially repairs/maintenance/updates to the existing structures in the parks. We align with priorities, with exception to splash/water play and indoor covered areas. New multi purpose sports fields to serve ever increasing needs. 2040 is a long way off Why not sooner? better dog parks. Outdoor pool even though I know that's your worst answer you want to hear. We are the only city in a pool desert for outdoor summer fun. I am concerned that these surveys are being used as data to help support the removal of Lake Grove Elementary and will be weaponized for future school alterations in the future. Data from this survey last year was skewed to misrepresent the public and I fear this will occur again this year. More focus on using our spaces to build community not just as beautiful functional spaces. We need more sports fields. The crowding and shuffling across all sports is insane. We paid for more fields at Reseek- where are they? Otherwise I agree we need more nature, open spaces and less builder grade homes and commercial real estate. pickleball courts - City COuncil was politically influenced and lost logic by closing out over 500 pickleball members using George Rogers former tennis courts. The screen modifications fixed the noise problem to the point the newly elected council member finally admitted he couldn't here anything a few blocks away. Only ugly politics had that happen Biking paths connecting parks and all LO neighborhoods is probably my top priority, instead of bottom, since biking is my primary form of transportation. Otherwise I do support all the listed priorities. recreation center (which is now under construction) Pickleball courts are needed since the City closed George Rogers Park. LO is the only city in the vicinity without pickleball courts. LAKE OSWEG PARKS PLAN 2040 I believe that bike paths should utilize the chain of parks , paths and through ways. To navigate from one side of city to another Bikes should be reduced on traffic roads It would be good if we think about adequate parking. For instance will the new pool have enough parking, or will people start parking in the Hazelia field parking lot or adjacent gravel parking lot that dog walkers and joggers use? I would add more parking and restrooms to give better access to existing parks. I don't think we need splash pads and water play. There will be an indoor pool at the LORAC. Outdoor water facilities are difficult to maintain and keep clean, and wasteful of clean water. Instead, encourage people to use the pool at the LORAC. Preservation of natural areas and opportunities for passive recreation. Projects related to educating the public on climate change, and how to improve sustainability. a trail/path that connects around the various sections of the lake More public access to the lake Pickleball courts outside and inside!!!! Play ground in Foothills Park for children. Bryant woods better kept paths and clean up. Focus more on natural areas and walking opportunities and less on other recreation. Please work with City and County to improve walking access and sidewalks to existing parks. Folks who live close to a park can't even walk there safely. West Waluga Park is an example of this. It is very cut off to much of Lake Forest to north of Carmen and even to many on south side of Carmen.. And it has no access from Inverurie Rd From priorities above, I like Trails and paths that increase connectivity between parks and different areas of Lake Oswego A safe walking and biking path that goes around Oswego Lake and links parks, restaurants and recreation. _ We need pickle ball courts in Lake Oswego. Dozens and dozens of resident drive out to Wilsonville and Beaverton and West Linn to play each day. This is very bad for our environment with so much gas wasted and such huge carbon waste. Pickleball should be on this list We need more turf fields for sports. We need a sports megaplex to attract families and help the existing kids have a place to go for basketball, and lacrosse Especially in the rainy months. We need to keep Lake Grove Elementary school due to the fields and the sports courts. More soccer fields Improve the dog parks. Add running water for drinking and dog hose off. At a minimum add restrooms. The dog parks should have 2 areas - one for small dogs and one for large dogs. Field development for youth sports Pickleball courts It would be great to have more turf fields available for baseball and softball. (George Rogers and Westlake) What about adding pickleball courts? Please reconsider approving the OGLO Bridge crossing the Willamette from Oak Grove to Lake Oswego. It would provide a great link in the recreation opportunities for residents of the whole area. No pickleball courts!!! Pickelball LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Pickleball courts both outdoors and indoors Create off leash TRAILS for dogs- not just dog parks, some of which are tiny City leadership is not acknowledging resident voter Votes !!! Stop forging ahead with issues that have been voted against. It's sinful for our city government with very personal financial interest to be making decisions based on their own personal profit margins. Restaurant owners and real estate sales persons are taking advantage of there positions More baseball/softball fields Need at least one more indoor tennis court facility or improved tennis courts that can I accommodate a bubble (cover). Community center It would be great to have community fishing lakes/ponds, ideally stocked but even if not, ones that are youth friendly so young anglers can learn basics. Also community gardens. I would love some more paved trails that are not next to the roads for bike riding and walking, kind of like the trails at Luscher. Outdoor exercise facilities. Specifically, pull-up bars or other low-cost options for adults to exercise near parks and playgrounds so parents have something healthy to do while their children play. Access and use of Lake Oswego Softball field, more baseball fields, more basketball courts Making certain all parks are accessible to wheelchairs Maintenance and repairs of existing facilities should be a much higher priority than building or purchasing something new. Splash pads and water play don't seem like a good idea to me. Climbing elements don't match either acquiring more parks You need to consider the older citizens of LO and consider an indoor pickleball courts. You certainly have all the other ages considered. More open areas. The Stafford area with dog parks, community gardens, soccer field, hiking trails, skate park is fantastic. Need small child playground area with open lawn and picnic areas. Buy the 6acre church area next to the new skate park! We need more parking Lakeridge students park there now). Possible pickleball area too! This area combined with the new pool, community center and golf course will be awesome!!! LO will have a great recreation area and tax payers will be delighted with it!!! Keep LO pool even after aquatic center opens I measured it based on what i would use from the list above. 2 out of 7 I would never use based on my age Outdoor pool / pedestrian connections across town Increase activities and areas for older adults not just kids Kids outdoor summer areas with water features and outdoor pools This is plenty. Water play---i just want to ensure these will be efficient----let's not waste water! Pickle Ball facilities Preserving natural areas - less "developed" parks Turf fields on the North Side of the lake please! Pickleball LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Reducing or completely eliminating use of poisons; educating people about insects, amphibians, birds, and others in our ecosystem and what we can do to help them regain their population losses and then thrive. Continue removal of the invasive Ivy and Laurel trees, replace with natives, including fir trees. Sports fields and dog parks. The city purchasing land ( acreage ) adjacent to Lucher Farm. I rare opportunity to protect green space and enhance the existing park. I don't see anything about adding pickleball courts. I thought that was going to be a priority after they closed the George Roger's courts. parks & recs wise my#1 need as a disabled person is a lazy river I would like to see the City prioritize spending on maintenance of the parks we have, specifically removal of invasives, and planting of native species. I feel this should be carried over to natural areas along roads that may or may not be City properly. Removal of ivy in trees is a specific priority that will make our tree canopy more healthy and resilient to extreme weather. I would like the City to educate the population about the many benefits to our property, as well as native flora and fauna if we all chip in. Would like to see organized squads that volunteer to do this work. Educational programming, particularly at Luscher farm Maximization of green space and minimization of additional cement Dog friendly parks, walking, offleash. Disc golf course! Pickleball courts, both indoor and outdoor Bike paths and covered bus stops at recreation sites. Meeting spaces available for topic groups to meet regularly (like support or friendship - maybe hour-long open discussion. (May already be doing that) I'm 80 and am interested in improvements to LOACC. More space, larger workout rooms, more personal training and exercise equipment. Better soundproofing, expansion of transportation to include off site gym and other classes (church on Chandler) Larger rooms at the Community Center to accommodate larger group activities. There is a growing need for cricket practice facilities, grounds and pitches in Lake Oswego as lot of youth and adults are playing the games. This can be seen with the increased participation year after year especially at Westlake, East Waluga parks. This will turn out to be a great revenue source for LO like how Gresham, Hillsboro, THPRD etc is doing now. Lake access for public boating and watercraft. Lack of parks in the SW area of Lake Oswego. One of the biggest issues is field space for sports. LO Park and Rec gives a priority to soccer over other sports. If that continues they we need more multi use fields. Maybe give soccer a dedicated space. There are not enough softball fields for girls sports. _ Amenities for adults and seniors. Golf, pickleball, paved walkways and trails. _ Preservation of natural areas for walking in Increase environmental stewardship within each park. Examples-regular volunteer opportunities for nature clean-up in each park, trail maintenance, educational opportunities, planting of native species. Also, while human/pet accessibility is important, protection of wild areas and native species also important. Less concrete. LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 We also need more fields. Splash pads would be nice also. I think we already have access to nature through many parks (Luscher, Steven's meadow, mountain park, cook's butte, west and east waluga, etc). Any to ensure that projects also prioritize environmental conservation-protection and enhancement of wild spaces. Human.pet access is important, as is conservation. Edible landscaping on city property. No manicured areas that use pesticides or herbicides. Create programs that bring residents together to grow local vegetables and fruits for anyone to come and pick and enjoy. Create botanical parks that encourage foraging (up high off the ground due to dogs ). Leaving land as is. Not every natural area needs to be a park. We are loosing a lot of opportunities to just see nature. I just skipped ahead and came back. Please do not ruin Luscher Farms by putting anything new there. That would be depressing beyond belief. You should have used the land across the street from it to expand and if you wanted to do something like Luscher it should have been there.. please do not expand anything on Luscher. Or change it at all. Since the skate park went in, that part of the trail is even louder. More walking paths and bike path areas sand volleyball courts Less nature parks that go unused and more usable park features - picnic shelters for gathering, climbing walls and splash pads for kids Spec Tennis courts inside and outside I would like to see more focus on trails and paths An outdoor swimming pool and pickleball indoors Unless it is included in "indoor/under cover" areas, I do not see pickleball courts mentioned in the priorities. I can't believe Lake Oswego of all places doesn't have dedicated pickleball courts. More non car road access( bike paths) connecting parks and recreation areas throughout the heart of LO. More pickleball courts. Protecting and expanding parklands and natural area properties is a top priority for my family. Projects to make more of the existing parks handicap accessible. Also more turf fields. Pickleball courts Better walking paths connecting parks would be great Add an athletic field Generally too broad and too many. No way you can focus on all of these. Where is pickleball? Projects that maintain current natural areas and not decrease natural areas' footprint with a misaligned projects that refer to the reduction of these areas as "improvements" n/a More public restrooms in parks and trails that are safe and accessible like the "Portland Loo." Acquire more dedicated park space(s). Better information about ACC! Make it easer to find in the Activity Guide. keep things natural -- don't build a playground: indoor or covered areas are not necessary for a natural park environment nor are splash pads, water play, or climbing elements -- keep it natural. People can find playgrounds elsewhere -- not in our parks/forests LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 can you add play equipment to Iron Mt park ? Covered though not indoor play equipment (shade and rain) is a great addition. Ongoing bike/walk infrastructure so it is safe for us to get around without cars. I want to make sure we maintain the "wilds" of our parks and Luscher area. LO is VERY adult (Chardonay) oriented -we need more parks for kids. More turf fields for year round casual play I would add bike paths to parks or walkways Making fields more available and financially feasible for adults to use to continue good physical and mental health. Pickleball is glaringly absent from your list. prioritizing native landscape/gardening Some are not important to me, eg, "splash pads". "Improvements and repairs to existing parks and facilities" is great, but broad. To prioritize, it would be helpful to know more about the proposed plans. This may be included already, but I would like to see the play structures and play areas of existing playgrounds updated and expanded to allow for more children to play at the same time. Specifically Westlake and West Waluga. Undeveloped open spaces need to preserved. These priorities are pretty broad. Where is the current draft of the 2024 plan? Everything in the document section is only viewable for those that can sign in. I feel that better walking paths and sidewalks around town should also be part of the parks plan. I realize that bureaucratically this is a different department within the city, but I feel the health of LO residents including encouraging physical activity for LO residents should be a core mission for the parks department. I would like to see more coordination within city departments to encourage this. More sidewalks in general. Make LO a walkable city :-) Please make sure we have lots of natural areas and not just active recreation. An example of this is to keep Luscher Farm focused on agriculture and natural areas. - Community spaces that can function with classes or library extension services. It's important to maintain the wild portions of Lake Oswego parks. Do not develop every area, please leave wildlife corridors I'd rather see trails at a higher priority. Prioritize repairs & improvements I see no mention of specific sports such as Pickleball or Volleyball. When the City Council shut down George Rogers park they committed to making PB a priority. When the city lost access to school gyms a very long term volleyball community was shut out. More and more imaginative play areas for preschool kids Pickle ball It's dangerous to walk to a park. Homeowners are not required in any meaningful way to trim trees and bushes to keep sidewalks clear. Many intersections have trees and shrubs that block the view of motorists, walkers and cyclists. Once I get to a park on foot, the park is great. So two city departments out of sync. Finish Roehr Park to Oswego Creek Increase paved biking system and connectivity LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Trail signage at trailheads and at trail branches. Enforcement of off leash dogs on trails. More turf sport's fields, soccer and baseball Pickleball courts Many community members play pickle ball. There are lots of under utilized tennis courts. Strike a balance Access to park areas via safe walking Pickleball courts both indoor and outdoor Pickleball - outdoors and indoors Would love to see some volleyball courts around Lake Oswego. The Cedar Hills sand/beach volleyball courts are amazing, and we would love to see something similar closer to home. The Cook Family Park volleyball courts are very nice, but would love to see some improvement. With some lighting until 8pm, if possible, if it's outside. The sport is amazing, brings community together (everyone is nice), and keeps people active and engaged and learning new skills. People from all different ages, skill levels, and interests come together to play :) Btw, love all of the parks, especially the dog parks, around! They are very nice. Bikes need to be separate and no bike rules enforced. More open spaces and land banking for the future Consider keeping and maintaining the current pool at Lake Oswego high school. No reason why we can't have two pools in the community. The city needs pickleball courts! Courts could maybe be installed at Luscher Farm. undeveloped/minimalist natural habitats/spaces Teach the kids to eat right along with exercise More turf fields for soccer and baseball and more basketball courts. Lighted skate park, biking and running trails. Bocce Ball Park exercise equipment would be great! Circuit training with simple outdoor machines. Turf fields Natural outdoor space. The Luscher farm field is a wonderful example. Please don't develop it more then it already is. splash and water play? Odd choice to have as priority I don't like the idea of taking people's property to create oath ways. Minimize addition of lights and crosswalks. Some smaller parks (eg, Stevens Meadow) lack parking. I would like to see increased access and facilities (bathrooms, picnic areas, etc). Iron Mountain Park is an example of a job well done. Soccer fields and mountain bike trails More trees please... Pickleball LO is in need of more designated multi-sport field areas with turf to support year round activities Lake Oswego should not be an amusement park. I would like to see scaling back to preserve natural spaces. Improved cycling paths for safe cycling. Increased access to Oswego Lake including extended hours at swim Parks. LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 I understand that easements are now in place to extend the footpath between Foothills and Rogers parks. Let's do it ! Would be helpful To see a list of what was deprioritized. As it stands the list is vague and difficult to assess. I would like to see more mountain biking trails in town. Securing more green space park lands vs allowing high density development, particularly in the western and lake grove sections of the city. Improvements to bike paths and routes Outdoor swim in summer, the lake is dirty and not good for littles, george rogers full of duck poop and our kids break out in hives if they play in it too much. outdoor swim/ play is so amazing in the summer for families something we don't have. We won't be bringing them "inside" during summer st your new pool since we spend all year indoors. Access to pickleball in LO Access to paddle boarding/kayaks from swim parks The limited natural preservation priority in that list concerns me. Our community has wonderful natural preserves with no real plan to keep them that way. Properly maintaining and protecting our nature preserves and wetlands. Replanting the hundreds of trees lost to storm damage over the past several years. Our tall tree canopy is one of our greatest assets. Bathrooms/shelters Freepons and others I would love for LO to have a significant Pickleball facility, like a very high end one that is capable of hosting tournaments. It's an extremely popular game and will continue to grow in popularity, and LO has a chance to embrace it and up the standard of living and sport in our community for all ages Off-road mountain bike trails, safe bike access on Stafford Road, bike lanes, connecting different parts of the city, rock climbing walls, pump track, public access docks for the river Artificial turf for Westlake Park so we can use it year round More outdoor cooking areas. And a Gaga ball pit please! Just one? Everyone else has them. We need to prioritize safe bike paths add pickleball courts I more biking trails pickleball couarts playgroun For example, Palisades Neighborhood is the biggest one in LO and has just one very small playground which is poorly equipped. Sports fields that can be used year round. More protected forests and wetlands A focus on year around facilities for the youth to use. I would put paths and walking trails first. We also need bathrooms at most of our parks. Preservation of wildlife habitat Development of a waterfront park trail or strip starting at Tryon Cove and going to George Rodgers. Part of the trail could be a floating walkway or over water trail if needed. Also I would like to see development of a bike path along the trolley line into Portland and connecting with West Linn. Accessibility for variety of abilities Pickleball Pickleball Pickleball Indoor Pickleball in the Winter It would be nice to have flat or limited elevation long walking paths. None safe bike paths for families LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 I'd like to see: 1. Connectivity between Foothills and George Rogers 2. LO school swim park become a public park (even if just for LO residents) year round 3. Railway turned into a bike & walk trail as it's not used enough and there are plenty of other options for the 1-2 trains that use it per day Less development, more natural areas. I am very concerned about the inclusion of climbing elements. I would like to see more emphasis on removal of invasive species and fire hardening. Neighborhood parks with very old play equipment (eg. Pine Cone Park) -would be great if one could assess the equipment and renew those with more versatile equipment which would keep also older kids coming to the parks. Right now it feels that most neighborhood parks are targeted for the smaller kids, yet older kids would love to play at the park too. it a whole family things. Would be nice if one could think holistic - whole family at the park while adding outdoor gym to the park area. Parents can do their work out at the same when kids are playing. Going to the park would become attractive to larger population. This is a norm eg. in Finnish playgrounds. https://www.kompan.com/en/us/planning Thank you for considering. Removing dead trees, removing the trees that have the invasive bugs. Native pollinator gardens, less lawns and more meadows Prioritize train connections - George Roger's To foothills Connectivity between parks is great. A walking system around the lake would be awesome. Safety of pathways, especially in Southwood Park. Protecting Lake Oswego's green spaces/farms and natural areas Question 10: Are there any other prioritization criteria that should be considered? n=139 Cost effectiveness. For example, deferred maintenance that will become exponentially more expensive to repair later than repair now. Traffic considerations. If the only pool is on Stafford, there will be lots of traffic there. If an additional pool were added on the north side, some of the traffic would go there instead. Possibly to replace the pool at LOHS? High priority to community and pedestrian safety, including trail and pathway connectivity through the City. Better playground at Hazelia field, more suitable for 2-5 year olds. The project has no or minimal detrimental impact to natural areas and preserves as much space as possible for animals and plants. I strongly oppose the phrase "fence off xx park to prevent impact from neighboring residences". So you don't want kids to be able to enter parks from their backyards and play? This kind of normal impact should be EXPECTED and encouraged around park borders for people to actually access parks and PLAY. The level of an anti-child / anti-access tactics suggesting that fencing off neighbors from parks is shameful. Please remove that goal from your list and spend your resource on things that matter not policing neighboring people that border the parks from using them I would have loved to have completed this survey, however like I said the data from the prior survey was used in an effort to support the removal of Lake Grove Elementary and attempt LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 to build a community center, businesses and other structures in its place. The prior survey never specified the community had to chose one over the other- a new school or new gathering facilities. or other parks and rec related improvements. It was a weaponized, sneaky attempt at gathering data the city could use to influence its own agenda. Community impact analysis of each project. What is the deeper value add to the community safety (old or outdated facilities) Side walk connection between lake oswego high and iron mountain via Country club road From Wembley park rd to Iron mountain on the south side of the road Consider long term maintenance access to areas of new development Cost benefit analysis that includes how many people does it serve? And should this be funded by private industry? le pickleball and racquetball better if offered by a private club. Does it appeal to a broad age group and bring together young and older adults? A community art center similar to the one in Multnomah Village with art studios would do that. Cost is very important, followed by the best 'bang for the buck'. Expensive work that benefits only a small portion of the population should be the lowest priority. The park preserves nature and open space. Preservation of natural areas vs adding new hard scapes Lake access for ALL residents Pickleball courts!!! It's crazy that we are a community meant to serve families and aging in place and we don't have courts of the fastest growing sport and one that all ages can enjoy. Play ground in Foothills Park and maintain path at Bryant woods Climate change is helped by having less developed natural areas and by encouraging walking instead of driving. Safe bike and walking path around Oswego Lake that links parks and recreation. A way to not have to drive everywhere in Lake Oswego. Currently many unsafe roads to walk and ride bikes on with little or no shoulder and cars moving at high speeds. Would be great to be able to ride or walk safely to Downtown Lake Oswego, Lake Grove, and parks. Connecting paths for people to walk to parks Lights at basketball courts. Iron Mountain park has the most space to put in a building that can be used for indoor pickleball or basketball courts. It is way underutilitzed and should have a splash pad or water feature for the kids. Access to clean public bathrooms is generally great in LO. This is a high priority esp for parks where they may be female athletes playing sports and needed to use the facilities Please reconsider approving the OGLO Bridge spanning the Willamette River. This project was killed by the former Lake Oswego council and it should be resurrected. It was a great idea that deserves to be built. Stop creating issue / needs where there are no problems Consideration of the fact that it rains a lot here and thus prioritizing facilities that. And be accessed for year round use. For example, we find that there is a lack of tennis courts and the outdoor tennis courts are in poor shape. Additionally there are only four indoor courts which are used for classes and other programs that leaves very limited times for other uses. We are unable to schedule time to play in the indoor courts because of all these issues. This, another indoor facility or a cheaper option is to add a bubble over outdoor courts. LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Reduce traffic, increase foot traffic/bike paths, encouraging local flora and fauna. Just generally "green" are area Protecting habitats Off topic, but you should make the font bigger for this survey. The print is so small, even on my laptop, so it's hard to read. Impact for cost. That is, how much benefit to how many residents for the price. Perhaps consider naming this an Oswego Plan as you have totally missed the boat on Lake Oswego. As a long term resident my family is dismayed at the omission and embarrassed for those professional giving guidance. Shame!!! Again, the priority should be on maintaining what we already have and providing ADA compliance. Pickleball courts1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Don't put concentrated housing and low income housing in the middle of our best park and recreation facilities in the city. (Stafford, dog park, skate park, aquatic center, community center, community gardens, sports fields. Find other areas for this. It's a 20 year program desired by the State of Oregon . We don't need a 4 story low income housing project in the middle of all the recreational projects taxpayers have approved the past 15 years. Westlake baseball fields should be turfed. LO pool should remain open after aquatic center opening to ensure access for all I wonder if census data helps city planners ....what is our population makeup by age, etc. seems that would help identify the need for playgrounds, nature trails etc... Focus on the facilities and parks that have the heaviest use to meet expected growth and focus on small pocket parks throughout the city. Prioritize people (citizens) and their experiences in the parks, focus on kids and their needs and access (seems to be less and less focus on kids and almost an intolerance for them) , seems like parks lately is focused a lot on patrol/ enforcement type stuff (ie fencing neighbors from access to park/worry about plantings over kids and access). Feels very "get off my lawn". It's our park system , Please relax a bit and focus on the benefits playing outside gives our kids. Too much scrutiny and comments about "impact" people Have on parks ! That's what happens when kids actually use them, yes. Please encourage it not discourage it. Not every inch needs to be preserved with a native. The city has fallen behind in recreation opportunities for youth and families that other neighborhoods are doing so much better. If kids and families will enjoy it ! More covered areas for winter use of parks outdoor space. Restrooms added to those parks that need them ie Lusher park. We need pickleball. Consider converting some tennis courts at the indoor tennis facility. unfulfilled promises - like re-establishing Pickle Ball!! Do not spend $$ which necessitates raising taxes. The impact of traffic to neighborhoods Loss of a last opportunity of enhancing and increasing size of the Lucher Farm. The protection of this open space from development which would alter the parks (Farms) rural setting. Importance of green space within the city for today and the future. (Purchase land that is important for future) LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 minimal addition of pavement anywhere Tourism, walkabillty, safety Alternate modes of transportation to reach these areas, bus (covered bus stop), bike paths and trails, charging stations. I live in the Westlake community and I'd like to have more Parks and Rec presence in our community. I can't answer#9 because I don't know the goals and objectives. Diversity Equity and Inclusion should be part of the decision making process when building infrastructure for sports activities Public boating and recreation access to more of Oswego Lake. Recreation for adults and seniors Environmental conservation. Balance between human access and conservation/stewardship Environmental conservation/stewardship, volunteer opportunities, educational opportunities I Include space in parks and on school property, for community edible gardens - not plots owned by individuals, but gardens where any resident can come and pick and take home a bundle of kale, parsley, raspberries, potatoes, carrots, plums etc. Create pods owned and cared for by people in a neighborhood.... This will bring them out and get to know one another and engage with one another. Also ...create walking group opportunities- like at 11:00am meet at point xxx for a stroll in the neighborhood, This will bring people together. See Blue Zone (Dan Buettner) learnings and incorporate into city planning to encourage people to get out and socialize with one another and grow and eat locally grown food. Too many seniors are alone and isolated and we need to facilitate ways for them to come together and engage in multigenerational activities and have richer lives. People's mental health. Please do not ruin Luscher. It doesn't need to change. Please don't change it. The park across the street should be an extension of Luscher. That area is becoming so crowded now. It used to be so beautiful. And Please leave us some untouched nature. We need more parks in River Grove area. Fishing ramp access added Better utilization of existing facilities. Make them multipurpose (i.e. adult community center- expand hours, make it a shared space for other members of the community and other activities). Make our parks more school-aged kid-friendly. So many are geared towards small children (< 7). Of course we have the school playground but a change of scenery on the weekends is nice. Making parks that are under utilized because of lake of features the priorities Spec Tennis courts for indoor and outdoor play VERY IMPORTANT Tryon Cove Park is a wonderful park in the city. However, the ingress and egress for this park is very dangerous. You drive from a busy fast moving highway onto a one lane road with opposing traffic and you leave the road, taking your life in your hands. This wonderful park should be accessible safely. It could also use a restroom. Please improve the access. Please make it a priority rather than using money for a new park. Please add pickleball courts if you haven't already. It's a fun, inexpensive sport for young families and older people too. More infant swings in more playgrounds LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Super disappointed in the lack of inclusion for the pickleball community here in LO! Our community is totally missing the mark! We are Lake Oswego! We should be a destination location with a Mega Pickleball Only Facility! We have plenty of parks and beautiful hiking trails! Pickleball courts none noted Public restrooms! Safety. Good lights, clean bathrooms, and clear signage. I don't know where sidewalks fit in - but safe access to these parks without using a car would be ideal. People love to walk, stroll or bike - but it's not safe without a protected sidewalk. Where are the softball fields? We've been asking for 20 years.... Bike pathways and safetly Access to Luscher from Childs/Stafford is very unsafe. For walkers and bicyclists. Native plants for drought tolerance and wildlife habitat in various types of parks future longevity of park Preserving natural open spaces should be the top priority given the excellent and extensive park system in LO. Once these spaces are developed they won't be "undeveloped" and become more natural. I believe that reinvestment in all our parks should be the highest priority. Until we can maintain the parks we have there should not be any new park started. Leaving wild areas of Lake Oswego parks undeveloped no Increased involvement by all our citizens It's unsafe to walk to a park, with homeowners allowed to let plants overgrow onto and above sidewalks and shoulders. Trees and shrubs at intersections block critical signage for motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. This should be the simplest of fixes with city enforcement. I want to walk safely to parks. Parking Keep up the great work! What about a sports field complex-this is something other cities do well and there seems to be a lack of here in Lake Oswego Determine usage of local parks, why the top ones are used the most, and apply improvements to others accordingly to increase their use. Seems some aren't used as much, but are still maintained at a cost. Encourage use of all our parks. Fine off leash dog owners for the safety of their animals, others, and nature. Projected increase in use Lack of sports field space and outdated facilities for youth sports. The number of residents involved in the activity. What are the future demands off the area or activity Address immensely popular recreational voids like PICKLEBALL; FLAG FOOTBALL Stop turfing fields - plenty exist, divide up current ones for practices, age groups, it's ok for youth levels to play in dirt & mud because it makes them smile & laugh creating multi-generational inclusive places that draws people to stay and co-mingle LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Adding fishing areas, native edible plants like elderberry for gathering local native food, a push for complexes to have community garden Expansion/purchase of additional properties adjacent to Luscher with consideration of incorporating agricultural uses. Once it's sold, we'll never get it back! I love the city and all the current parks and don't feel there is a need to create new ones. My biggest concern is that we should be able to have two pools in the community, the old pool at Lake Oswego high school, and the new aquatic center. Security cameras Provide transportation. Don't fix what's not broken... Budget appropriately to limit waste. Encourage bike and scooter access and locking security. I live off Mcvay and Laurel street and with the swim center, golf course, skate park and all the existing facilities it is going to be impossible to pull out on Mcvay. The traffic has to be addressed. Consider long term cost of maintaining everything your "adding". Property taxes are already ridiculous I would like to see a small number of off street parking spots available for neighborhood parks so people that can't afford to live in those nice neighborhoods (but still pay LO taxes) can access those parks. Plant more trees please. Pickleball Courts!! It's an embarrassment how it has been dealt with. Should be number 1 priority! Building additional dedicated sport fields will be financially supported by the fees that club/recreation programs offer Tree preservation Safety, such as safe walking along McVey/Stafford Roads Weather durability Creates more green space and/ or improves connectivity between existing green space via bike or walking to reduce car use Does it serve families of the future. Yes LO has old people but LO needs to focus on bringing in FUTURE families and serving their needs. This entire city is catered to and designed around old people's needs and over-policy ish feeling emphasis on preserving nature over kids needs. Relax on kids using and playing in our parks and open spaces. Access was blocked for kids on a neighborhood to a trail, this city acts like a police force with parks - it feels wrong . Please focus on our kids more. It is disappointing that LO wasted so much money on the George Rogers pickleball courts only to have them ripped out. There are strong feelings from both sides Would be nice to partner with school district to provide courts for kids to play at school I.e Current set up at Ida B Wells HS Nature education is important. Please support "friends" groups to the greatest extent possible. Review existing master plans (ie Canal acres) instead of revisioning from a blank page. Complying with newly adapted City Charter Chapter X requirements NA LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Lowering costs of projects Continue adding plants as ground cover and understory throughout all of our parks to retain moisture and replace grass with native ground cover as often as possible. thank you! N/a Growing sports, specifically pickleball, which is an all-ages sport. I think the sport's popularity alone should drive LO priorities. Maintaining the open spaces and natural areas in LO — increasing construction and development is a threat to our town's natural areas but they add immense quality of life to LO residents. Protecting and maintaining them should be a priority. . Mountain bike trails meet multiple goals by bringing people into degraded areas so they can be remediated and creating low impact access that can be ADA compatible Consider the ongoing cost of maintenance in all projects before moving forward. Ensure there is the budget and staffing to do regular and periodic maintenance. Number of people served relative to what's already available Greatest number of LO residents with access to a walkable city park. Can we increase this percentage? Could we improve access to the glenmorrie greenway so people can get to the river safely by bike or walking Connecting parts of the system! Preservation of existing natural habitat Making best use of existing city property, like the waterfront area just south of Tryon Cove park where there is an empty city structure. not closing the golf course and driving range for multiple years How does the project fit with/further Lake Oswego's unique identity? Impact analysis on quality of life for neighborhoods when there are more users coming to the facilities when there isn't enough parking. We have a big, beautiful lake with VERY limited access. This is wrong! There should be more and better access to the lake, and we need nearby parking as well. Pickleball is the #1 fastest-growing sport in America. LO needs indoor and outside courts where we can play! On site parking possibilities We love the park system, great job! There need to be more natural areas for wildlife, and to balance the dreaded increase in housing and infill. Parks and roads are inadequate for the kind of growth that city managers and politicians seem to love. Keep Lake Oswego small! how it contributes to accessibility Remove invasives and reduce fire risk Looking at also how to serve different target group's need with the park -young kids, older kids, parents. How to get a larger population to get interested to go to the parks. Neighborhood parks play an important role as they are very close by to all the housing. Enforce leash laws. We are often discouraged from taking our dog to the park because of the hazard that the many off leash dogs pose. This in spite of clearly posted leash requirements. Safety of bike paths connecting and along streets. Making sure pedestrians and cyclists don't have to fight for space. Fixing things that are broken or need repair. Connect George Roger's to foothills LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 West side of Lake Oswego has fewer community areas, parks, and natural areas. Fewer parks dollars are invested in West Lake Oswego. This is unfair and inequitable. More people also live on west side of Lake Oswego so more dollars should be spent here. Not building on natural spaces. Keep them wild like luscher farm Question 23: Do you have any additional comments or ideas you would like to share? n=145 We need more field space for sports. Why wait till 2040? dog park area at free ponds Please stop the language around fencing off neighbors that border parks from accessing parks. Too far. Please consider a plan for an outdoor pool or donating land so the !a's can run one. LO is an outdoor pool desert Use the parks plan to create BIG connections . No reason a trail can't be build along the railroad. I would encourage all city departments to be very clear when surveying the public that responses are could potentially result in the removal or destruction of facilities integral to their community as was attempted with LGE this past year. I'd love to see our parks be rid of wood chips. As a parent, I hate them. We often drive to Cook or Gabriel Park because of the soft cushion floor. Don't allow bike groups to use Cooks Butte trails . (20 sometimes). Put signage up .... NO BIKES. Bikes are really destroying the trails. We love the parks in LO and appreciate all the work you do. Thank you for looking to improve and expand upon our fabulous parks! Would like to see playground enhancements at Glenmorrie Park- current structure is not good for small children. Swings and a safe climbing structure for smaller kids would be helpful, and there is certainly room for it. West Linn parks are way better wrt play equipment -they should be used as a model for improvements in LO. Thanks for a thoughtful survey and all your good work! Get the politicians out of city council We have a wonderful parks and recreation department and we appreciate all you do! City does a great job with our parks. Need to update old facilities such as the playground in Freepons Park. Glad to see the aquatic center being built. Also pleased to see how much the skate park is used. The persons that violate off leash laws in parks and open spaces and schools needs to be enforced the amount of dog waste left siting on the ground from entitled dog owners needs to stop Our children play in these areas Enforce the leash law !!! It's great that this is important to the city. We are lucky to have Mayor Buck and a great Parks and Rec dept. THANK YOU! I think maintaining the current parks is the most critical use of LOPR funds and staff- this includes keeping the play equipment, bathrooms, picnic tables, etc. in good order. There isn't room in the city for new parks to build, so maintaining the ones we have is most important. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I appreciate all the effort that goes into planning for LO's parks, continuously improving them and maintaining them. Thank you! Build pickelball courts in the city!!! Look at parks in other states like Kansas, Illinois and Missiouri. They have huge parks filled with all sorts of climbing equipment, swings, zip line chairs, water features and the families use this as a community center with multiple covered tables. (Cook Park, Trillium Creek areas) With all of the tax payer money in LO we should be putting it towards building memories for the families and grandparents that want to share with grandchildren instead of artwork all over town. We place too much on conservation, and protecting the nutria or other random insect vs building play spaces that the kids actually want to use. The Iron Mt play space is a joke and no one uses it. Westlake has the best play space because it is covered. George Rogers has the baby area in the sun and the "big" kid area in the shade. Cover the baby area at George Rogers park and expand the area and equipment that the kids can play on for all of the main parks in town. ' I learned a lot about the parks LO has from the maps. I would like to see copies of the maps put in the LO monthly newsletter or emails. There are some parks listed that I have not been to, and I bet I'm not the only one. Please read previous comments.. Thank you. Just disappointed that there is no mention of when any pickleball courts will be built. The ones used at Lake Oswego High School lower tennis courts need help. The city and parks & rec need to find some place that is acceptable!!! We need a indoor/outdoor pickleball yes, I think it is shameful that LO cannot find someplace for people to play pickleball I cant stress this enough. This area has a tremendous fishing history and interest and LO lags behind our neighboring towns in this area. Keep up the great work Can't wait for the extension of the path from Foothills to Geo Rogers! Also better access to Tryon Cove. Please add some outdoor exercise facilities somewhere in town. Lake Oswego has fantastic parks and it would be very inexpensive to add calisthenics equipment in existing parks. You guys are doing a great job. Can't wait for the Aquatic center to open ;) I can't wait for the new aquatic facility to open. We have only been talking about this for the past 20 years! Thank you for including the public in this survey. There are plenty of hiking trails, biking trails, pools,tennis courts( rarely used)„skate parks,splash pads. You've eliminated the older population in their effort to socialize, exercise, and play a sport that is loved by all age groups, Pickleball. What are your plans for that???? Bike trails & walking trails outside of parks—with connectivity to parks—should be prioritized. There are lots of well used dangerous routes for walkers & bikers. Stay Happy, Healthy, Safe and at Peace Prioritizing anything luscher. farm related to the dog parks is my number one ask!! They are in need of repair. LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Please be a kid and parent friendlier park system with policies that encourage play and lifelong outdoor fun (vs shuffling kids "off" in natural areas). So many dangerous trees and falling limbs also. Please manage the forests. Saw parks team ordering the police on families with kids last year and blocking the way to school. Parks needs a big reset, should not be a nature police force. Outdoor open covered space to handle 15 people doing Tai Chi or yoga weekly. Again, we need more pickleball. Why not convert tennis courts, especially at the indoor tennis center? none. thanks. One final plug ( besides pickle ball), I would like to see addition of splash pads for kids to keep cool in the summer. Thanks for all your work- Parks and Rec contributes significantly to our quality of life here. Do NOT build a covered football stadium, a polo field or an ice rink. Enough is enough! Developing a pedestrian loop around the perimeter of West Waluga Park and the forested side of Waluga Park East. This would make for an approximately 1 mile long trail loop for runners and walkers. Thank you for reaching out to those who live in Lake Oswego. Our trees are disappearing with the building of larger houses, apartment complexes, and more commercial buildings, therefore the protection of green spaces are very important to the residents of this city. Please fix the stairs in front of the rowing club that go down from Oswego Pointe Apartments to the river path. It's been closed for years now. How did it become ok to develop the Rassekh property? I thought there were stipulations against. As mentioned earlier, pickleball. Our one and only facility was taken from us and there is a huge and growing need in the community. And what about a community center? Your park priorities listed on this survey don't align in any way with our family needs or desires. Respectfully submitted. We are so fortunate to have such a magnificent and comprehensive Parks & Rec Program. I treasure the entire Adult Center staff- Everybody! Overall, this is a wonderful town and there's nowhere else I'd rather liveThanks to Joe Buck, the city council and all the workers and volunteers who make it a pleasure to live here. The city Parks dept should acquire the Lake Grove Swim Park from the school district and manage it. It's not well maintained and the infrastructure is outdated. I hope the entire survey results will be made public --thanks I have lived in LO for almost 30 years, raised 2 daughters in LO who are grown and gone. I have a community garden plot at Luschur as well as fruit trees in my yard and eating what I grow is incredible and more people need to experience this and we need to make it easy for them. My husband walks every day through cooks butte and community parks and Lusher trails. I hope you can look into "Blue Zone" communities and use their learnings to make it easier for people to come together, socialize, exercise and eat well and live to a 100 and be fit and healthy. I am happy to talk with someone about blue zone concepts and help implement them. My name is Hemakshi Adke 503-869-8018 Hemakshia@gmail.com If the city keeps crowding everything we will have to leave. I know very busy realtors who are planning on leaving. They sell something they no longer want to live. To think LO is green is to not know how it was. Please do not ruin Luscher. It is a huge mental health break. Formal LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 trails would be awful. The trials need to look how they are. Please do not build any new areas there No play structures. No anything. That would be insane. Leave things simple. I wish there could be more community events in the winter and year around really. Please work with city to add side walks and safe walking trails to schools and parks Love the idea of building out areas for kids-splash pads etc and including bathrooms as often as possible. Spec tennis is a growing and relevant sport that deserves attention for the entire community Yoga classes on wooden floors need to be provided once again We love and use the parks in Lake Oswego regularly. We live in a beautiful community, and the parks make it even better. We appreciate the improvement to George Rogers picnic shelter. No please take seriously the idea of improving Tryon Cove park. The park needs a restroom, and it needs safe entrance and exit. Whether a traffic light or some other idea. Fielding road has a traffic light. Perhaps the road could connect to Stampher with another trustle under the railroad tracks. And close the entrance to Stampher. Or perhaps there is another solution? Please address this dangerous problem. More widely available pickleball courts please _ Please quit treating pickleball like it's not important! It's a Big Dill! As a mom with two young kids (3 and 5) the biggest thing I'd suggest is a revamp of Rossman Park. This park's play structure could use swings or a splash pad or another structure (the one currently there doesn't seem to capture the kids attention and interest). It seems like there's a huge potential here. Glenmorrie Park could use a pretty major overhaul to make it more accessible/used and an improvement to drainage. Thanks for making our parks and public spaces open to all ages and abilities, and our dogs! City Parks has a history of failure, e.g., the skatepark miss in years past and now the pickleball shut-down due to the vote of Council members who had clear conflicts of interest. LO does not have enough athletic fields. We have been driving to Canby for home games, and other east-side cities for away games, every single week of the season, year after year. Athletic fields are universal - can be used for so many things, and for a very wide range of ages. The McNary dog park has no water source, and the Waluga dog park is just sandy and small. (Potso is the best dog park in the area). LO parks and rec is doing a wonderful job MY kids and I say thank you for all that you guys do. we spend upwards of 5-7 hours a week in LO's parks, we love them! We need more connector paths. n/a I am excited about the pool!! Let's keep things nice and simple for residents -- we don't want our town over-run with people who don't live here. Thank you Parks and Rec for all you do to keep our community healthy and safe. I'd also love to see more protection for walkers and bikers from cars. More sidewalks and safer bike lanes, for example. LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 The city is missing out on providing facilities, indoors and outdoors for pickle ball. Frankly, I do not understand why there are no facilities, especially indoors, given the growing popularity of the sport. This is a huge disappointment. thank you for managing and protecting our trees!! Let us make our community have safe walking areas for young and old Lake Oswego needs pickleball courts to meet the recreation needs of hundreds of people! Thank you for the opportunity for input. Prioritize acquisition of natural areas and increasing diverse native plantings in all parks Great survey, thank you! would support Lake Oswego Swim Club using the new LORAC Sunnyslope Open space should be preserved as a natural area and Barton Road should be closed to through traffic and become a greenway connecting Sunnyslope to Cook's Butte to Stevens Meadow to luscher. As it stands, cyclists and peds encounter reckless driving on the one-lane dirt road. would love to see more covered/indoor/heated places for people to visit with their dogs (more dog friendly-indoor businesses would be amazing). What I love most about Lake Oswego are the many opportunities to be in a beautiful natural setting! Will we ever be able to walk from Foothill Park to George Rogers Park? I know there is private property in the way...keep working on it! ' It's important to keep the undeveloped areas in Waluga West park wild no Thank you! I feel that surveys like this are useful See my earlier comments. Hope your survey is capable of parsing that. We love our concerts at the park @ Westlake! Just general comment: Waaaaaay too many dogs off leash at parks. Can't enjoy Iron Mountain park trails or even new Iron Mountain Park grassy area because of off leash dogs. Wish more patrolling. The number of LO parks is fantastic. Keep up the good work! Thank you for all the wonderful things you make possible for us As a taxpaying citizen I see no Pickleball opportunities for our parks. There was such a great community of people that loved playing at George Rogers park. We need to have a place for us! Turf fields are great, but aren't we approaching a point where enough is enough. There are many with minimal use. Perhaps that is the pickle ball solution. Also P&R needs to be realistic with completion dates. The golf course project. Is laughable. Maintaining existing parks is important. I've noticed deferred maintenance. Yes, listen to your taxpayer base - mid to older demographic looking to stay active & healthy living in LO. Looking forward to the aquatics park Purchase land! Once it's gone in the Stafford Basin we'll never get it back! Work with County, state to develop a safe bike route through LO on State Street. This could be as simple as a few signs and symbols on the road urging bike lane priority when bikes present. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 At present, this is one of the most dangerous routes in the Metro area and certainly gives our community a bad reputation.! Please consider keeping the pool at the lake Oswego high school. There are a lot of swimmers, teams, masters that need pool space. There are multiple sports fields, multiple basketball courts, multiple recreation areas, but if the Highschool pool closes, there will be only one pool in the community. It's been good for over 40 years Stop wasting taxpayer money. Stop proposing Bond Measures-use the existing funds. Thank you. Keep a strong park policing presence. My kids play sports so field space is top priority. Thanks! Minimize cost and keep crime out of LO Safer pedestrian access crossing Iron Mountain at Summit and along Iron Mountain pathway between Iron Mountain park and town * Plant trees please * Great survey. I appreciate the work LO parks and Rec does! Pickleball Thank you for all that you do to make our city a wonderful place to live and raise a family. Keeping a rustic, natural environment that fosters wildlife for all to enjoy, is important. LO is on the way to appearing like a planned community rather than the special forested town with natural beauty that is slipping away. Thank you LO Parks & Rec. You're doing it right ! Pedestrian safety at the intersection of Cornell st and hemlock has been an ever growing concern, as more and more families with children and dogs cross between palisades market stores, Starbucks and freepons park and Hallinan school. There have been multiple near misses and one child on a bike hit by a car that was barely able to brake in time. At a minimum, it would be advisable to place radar/laser speed display signs in each direction above and below the intersection. Please be kind to children in our community and get back to the culture Lo used to be known for Yes, please respect the Park's Limitation Chapter X restrictions with respect to master plans (stormwater, sewer, water and roads). Don't wait to the last minute to consider this (ie Measure 3-618). That roundabout could have been designed without impact to Steven's Meadow. By the time all (ie LO City Council) were brought up to speed, it was too late to impact design. We can and should do better. There has been too much emphasis on intensely developed parks and athletic facilities and not enough on acquiring/preserving natural areas and wetlands. The swim park could be such a better resource. I have visited several times and it's seldom used perhaps because the surrounding area is not user friendly. I have difficulty waking however I still race bicycles! Perhaps we can offer all terrain wheel chairs with tank treads for rent at the adult community center? No Pickleball should be a major priority in our future plan, the sooner the better. A major facility would serve all ages and improve the quality of life for those approaching retirement. We LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 have a chance to be ahead of other communities on this one and be a pioneer. Study the public tennis facility in cherry creek neighborhood of Denver (Gates Tennis Center). It's been an awesome fixture of their community for decades. I'd love to see a similar facility dedicated to pickleball in LO! Let's go big on this one, happy to pay higher property tax to get it. Compatability of park uses needs to be improved . Mountain bike and pedestrian/dog uses frequently conflict (e.g., paths at Luscher Farms and Cooks Butte) producing significant safety concerns. We need mountain bike trails We need enforcement of leash laws in the parks- especially those with fragile natural areas where dogs can cause disturbances. I have walked my dogs for over 25 years in our parks and this problem has gotten significantly worse. We also need enforcement of path usage to keep the destruction of planted and natural areas better preserved notably in Bryant Woods. 1) Adult stretching/strength station at Rossman or Foothills Parks 2) Better (safer) bike path adjacent to Stafford Rd and Iron Mt Rd I would like to see paths, walkways, and green spaces connect as many parks as possible throughout the community. We shouldn't have to worry about the kids getting run over going to and from the parks. Thank you! Can we please have a creek that kids can play in and doesn't have keep out signs? The parks and natural areas are some of the best perks of living in LO. We appreciate how much care and attention the city gives to maintaining and improving its parks! Thank you!!! I love our parks dept! If new parks and nature facilities are created, funding to properly maintain them is essential. I have visited many parks were they are marginally maintained. We need to teach the children with bikes to respect pedestrians. Please develop the waterfront area south of Tryon Cove, ideally with a path to George Rodgers. Pickleball courts could also be in this area where the empty structure is. I think there should be better oversight in planning. To be specific when pathways/walkways are added. I live in the Lake Grove neighborhood which predominantly has pathways. The sidewalk that was installed down Lanewood and Douglas Circle is an absolute eyesore and is not even remotely in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood. Additionally the project was poorly managed, improperly installed requiring extended closures of the roads. The families who live on these roads are still not receiving mail service as the planners did not obtain permission to move the boxes from the homeowners or the USPS. Additionally, the mailboxes were damaged when they were removed with no offer of compensation. It is embarrassing that LO does not have regular access to Pickleball Courts, inside and out. Not only is it the fastest-growing sport in America, it is wildly popular with Seniors. Many of us are unable to take major hikes, but PB is accessible to most people. I have never been swimming in Oswego Lake. The access is too limited, and parking is difficult. I live in LO, yet I can't enjoy the #1 attraction. That is wrong. I am impressed with the increased focus on diversity, from Pride to Diwali. Thank you. Please add restrooms to projects as needed LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 Our family thinks you are doing a great job. We are originally from Santa Barbara, and this city is better run, in our opinion. I would love more access to bike to various parks - especially up McVey and Stafford roads to the new recreation and aquatic center or George Roger's park Walking and running on our roads is hazardous in the extreme, i.e. South Shore and Hwy 43. Along Hwy 43, which I understand is a state hwy, there is a mish-mash of foot traffic options. Could we build wooden (Trex et al) raised pathways over the ditches to create a safe pedestrian path? Please look for opportunities to collaborate with Tryon Creek State Park to remove invasives from (at a minumum) the sections of that park that fall within LO city limits. Please look for opportunities to collaborate with Mountain Park Homeowners Association to remove invasives from common property areas. Thank you for keeping the parks and natural areas in the focus. That is one of the key reasons we moved here. Sidewalks would be nice on the way to parks and schools. We have to walk on the street too often, living off Overlook. Allowing pickleball in 5 parks throughout the city. Lake Oswego is one of the only cities that is missing out on a popular activity and it will enrich the lives of residents and increase park use :) No thank you Thanks for your work on this! Great Plan thus far. However, I see no reference to the ever-increasing climate crisis events which could severely impact the implementation and/or ongoing maintenance of the Plan's priorities. Let's face it: These extreme weather events are not going to get any better. The City as well as Parks and Recreation need to be prepared to respond. Thank you! LAKE OSWEGC PARKS PLAN 2040 immARy COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING #1 Date: September 26, 2023 Time: 5-7 PM Location: Lake Oswego Maintenance Building, Willow Room 17601 Pilkington Road Virtual Recording Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP g7doaFWE ATTENDEES City of Lake Oswego - Kyra Haggart, Evan Fransted, Jeff Munro, Jan Wirtz, Maria Bigelow MIG - Matt Hastie, Jessa Miller Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Members - Kent Watson (Library Advisory Board Liaison), Aaron Hollingshead (DEI Advisory Board Liaison), Teresa Bianco (Transportation Advisory Board Liaison), Julie Haddad (At-Large), Meg Matsushima (Historical Resources Advisory Board Liaison), Whitney Taylor (At-Large), Patrick Gutierrez (At-Large), Kara Orvieto Ashley (Sustainability Advisory Board Liaison), Matt McGinnis (At-Large), James Meier (At-Large), Sarah Ellison (Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Advisory Board Liaison), Heather Redetzke (At-Large) Public - Friends of Luscher Farm Board Member DISCUSSION 1. What questions and/or comments do you have about the Community Engagement Plan?Is anything missing? • How are target audiences being reached beyond the survey and the CAC? o Focus Groups/Stakeholder Interviews - we'll be conducting eight meetings during the next few weeks with people representing specific organizations and interests. o Kyra will be attending citywide board/group meetings to share about the plan. o Periodic report-outs via email and/or phone to engaged groups and communities to encourage two-way communication and feedback. • Will materials be translated? LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-170 o The survey will be translated into Spanish and the City provides additional translation services for other documents upon request with the exception of very long reports or similar documents. • Does the plan have any youth liaisons? o The CAC includes one youth member, Kyra is following up with them re: participation. o Youth outreach will also be conducted at the Teen Center. • On one of our committees, it has been helpful to have two youth representatives to ensure participation by at least one of them. (CAC comment) • Will this plan overlap with the Urban and Community Forestry Plan Update? o Kyra will coordinate with the Lake Oswego Planning Department for relevant information. • How is social media being utilized for this Plan? o Periodic social media blasts across City social platforms using the City- wide accounts. • Add Lake Oswego School District Special Education Advisory Board to engagement efforts. 2. What questions and/or comments do you have about the State of the System?Is anything missing? What else is important to highlight? • Missing: o Section addressing multi-modal access and pedestrian connectivity to parks. It's very important to be able to access parks, particularly for young people. The new skate park at Rassekh Park will be a good example. o Connecting recommendations from this process to other City departments and planning processes also is important. The Parks Plan 2040 could have policies that address other city planning topics. • Revisions: o Update Park Facilities counts (exclude school district properties) o Add Historical Resources to Inventory o Update Table 5, add "N/A" to empty cells 3. Public Comment • Friends of Luscher Farm Board Member requested that the CAC and LO 2040 process consider the unique nature of Luscher Farm and stated that they will be following along closely. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-171 NEXT STEPS Upcoming Engagement Events • Stakeholder Interviews/Focus Groups • Online Survey#1 • PRNRAB Meeting #1 Next CAC Meeting • Date TBD (late October-early November) • Pushing meeting time to 5:30-7:30 • Project team will provide CAC with an overview of objectives and materials for each meeting to help clarify expected CAC roles and input. Project Website Follow for project updates and materials: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/parks-plan-2040. The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. zHablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted 6FAILFg? 01 MR-21 . di 01 2 oFAI 7Fo d LIEF t ( %fit) 09?71R*#AT *5c1t0] ,MXig LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-172 SUMMARY COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING #2 Date: December 12, 2023 Time: 5:30-7:30 PM Location: Lake Oswego Maintenance Building, Willow Room 17601 Pilkington Road Virtual Recording Link: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/parks-plan-2040/parks-plan-2040- project-documents ATTENDEES City of Lake Oswego - Kyra Haggart, Ivan Anderholm, Jeff Munro, Jan Wirtz, Brenda Falson, Tony Garcia, Robin Krakauer, Kelly Bird MIG - Matt Hastie, Lauren Scott Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Members - Whiteney Taylor, James Meier, Betty Holladay, Emily Frey, Kara Orvieto Ashley, Denee Kroeger, Patrick Guiterrez, Meg Matsushima, Kent Watson, Teresa Bianco, Sarah Ellison, Julie Haddad, Matt McGinnis, Aaron Hollingshead Public - None in Attendance DISCUSSION 1. What questions and/or comments do you have about the community outreach conducted this far? • Is the size of the words in the word cloud proportionate? o Word clouds generated from long form responses which were not required questions. • Are the word clouds from the statistically valid survey or community survey? o Generated from both surveys. • Do you have an estimated number of responses to the write in question? o Data can be provided following the meeting by Staff. • In the survey, support for providing financial help for low income families to access programs was tied to increasing rates for others. A comment heard by a CAC member was that a respondent knows what to choose because cost was an LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-173 issue for them but they would generally support programs for financial assistance. o The survey did also ask if cost was a barrier. • Heard at the community event that the trail connection between Foothills and George Rogers was important. • Watershed Councils were included in a focus group. • Statistically valid survey could track demographics, and DHM did provide cross- tabulation for survey results • Interested in further cross-tabulating results from seniors, low income, and disabled respondents. • Braille on park signs could help address accessibility barriers and be more inclusive. • Did the focus groups address other sports activities and needs? A whole focus group was dedicated to pickleball. o Pickleball has been ignored in the past and it has been a goal for Parks Plan 2040 to address a solution • Water access includes Swim Park (Lake), Tryon Cove, Canal Acres, George Rogers, Riverrun (River) 2. What questions and/or comments do you have about the preliminary draft strategic framework? • Goal 1: Access to essential services o Focus on filling gaps seems to prioritize adding to existing parks over adding new park land. o Do we know where we are today in providing parks within a 10-minute walk? ■ This will be part of the access mapping. o Do we know where historically underrepresented populations exist? • Goal 2: Invest in parks, natural areas, and recreation facilities o Are partnerships supposed to be internal or external to Lake Oswego? o Objective "a" could be reworded for a bit more clarity? o Does the City have a program for replacement and maintenance for facilities like playgrounds? ■ Yes, City has several programs for maintenance and replacement at the end of a facilities life. o Inclusive play refers to both playgrounds and individual equipment/elements. o Include indigenous history and recognition of indigenous people in parks (George Rogers). LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-174 ■ Include the Grand Ronde Tribe. City noted it already involves them in capital projects. • Goal 3: Serve all ages and abilities o Objective 'a': There is an ADA transition plan that the plan will continue to support and implement. o Keep in mind that inclusive shouldn't be boring (and that includes for senior populations). o Objective 'd': website is very specific, maybe make it inclusive of other media platforms and other ways the City distributes information. An app or mobile friendly website would be great. o Important to have access to information about trailheads onsite. • Goal 4: Stewardship, maintenance, and operations o Objective 'h': Planting native species may not be possible with climate change, potentially remove this one for overlap with Goal 5 or edit to reflect that native species will have their limitations. • Goal 5: A sustainable and resilient system o Part of the City mandates that electric vehicle charging must go in when infrastructure is improved, could bolster language to implementing other City Plans o Make sure app or website includes the community resiliency hubs (LORAC and others). o Could we add one about habitat connectivity, maybe modify objective 'h'? • Goal 6: A connected system o Trails app could fall under this. o Would this plan address design for bike and pedestrian pathways? o Opportunity with this plan to give the department influence in advocating for trails and pathways. o What is the ABA? ■ It's part of title I of the ADA and talks about the non-built environment. • Goal 7: Community partnerships and engagement o Customer Excellence Program is the survey follow up. o Appropriate to add HOAs and neighborhood associations in list of groups to coordinate with. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-175 o Operationally the city is connected with elected leaders, maintenance/operations, and students but room for continued improvement. 3. What questions and/or comments do you have about the revised park classification system? • Does undeveloped open space always have to stay that way? 4. What questions and/or comments do you have about the proposed methodology for evaluating park access? • Approve of adding trail-based recreation as an essential service. • Approve of potential equity indicators selected. Next Steps The next meeting will focus on the Needs Assessment and will likely occur in mid to late February. The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. ,Hablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted �� zz 6FAILFg? 01 MR-21 di 01 2 oF�I��I 7FodL��F t (I ) 09?71R*#AT *5c1t ] ,MXig LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-176 SUMMARY COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING #3 Date: February 29, 2024 Time: 5:30-7:30 PM Location: Lake Oswego Maintenance Building, Willow Room, 17601 Pilkington Road Virtual Recording Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zCStbvaWcQ ATTENDEES City of Lake Oswego - Kyra Haggart, Maria Bigelow, Evan Fransted, Tony Garcia, Jeff Munro, Kelli Byrd MIG - Matt Hastie, Lauren Scott Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Members - Sarah Ellison, Emily Frey, Matt McGinnis, Patrick Gutierrez, James Meier, Kara Orvieto Ashley, Pat Walls, Teresa Bianco, Meg Matsushima, Steve Unger DISCUSSION The Parks Plan 2040 project team provided a status report summarizing the recently completed needs assessment, the in-progress maintenance and operations assessment, and the upcoming March 20th meeting with the Parks Board. The project team then stepped through a presentation reviewing the needs assessment key findings. Community Engagement Key Themes The project team provided a high-level overview of key themes from the public engagement conducted since the project kicked off in July 2023. The CAC did not have any additional comments or questions on the key themes. Essential Services Mapping Comments and questions from the CAC about the essential services mapping included in the Need Assessment are summarized below. • Access was mapped to the park access point not the location of a specific facility or amenity within the park. CAC members recommended that narrative be added to explain this, especially for sites like Iron Mountain where the linear nature of LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC- 177 the park means the distance between entrances and facilities can be quite large. This can create larger gaps in service than shown on the maps (e.g., If a play area is located within the park but a long distance from an access point). • More qualitative analysis could be added to the narrative as well as communicating the quantitative limits of the mapping. • In addition to physical access, there are also differences between the quality of the facility (e.g., Springbrook nature play area has several logs but is not a large, designed play area). • For gap areas, it was suggested that adding population density or zoning overlays could further illustrate the analysis. Towards this end, the team will need to look at how existing population and demographic data and associated boundaries syncs up with the gap area boundaries. • It was noted that the library may have additional population information by neighborhood. Equity Index Mapping Comments and questions from the CAC about the equity index mapping included in the Need Assessment are summarized below. • There is a reason some of these identified gap areas are not developed with parks (e.g., #4 has extremely steep terrain, #3 has commercial areas, etc.). Adding this information to the narrative discussion would provide further context as to how and why these gap areas exist. • Note parks that are restricted by Chapter 10 of the City Charter on the maps. • Adding further information and context for each neighborhood could help make the mapping and conclusions more understandable. • The narrative should highlight that Lake Oswego residents have access to parks in neighboring jurisdictions. • CAC members offered to participate in a follow-up meeting to further review and discuss the mapping in more detail to add more context and Information to the narrative and help better describe and qualify the assessment of gaps. Kyra will work with the CAC and team to schedule that meeting. Trends, Needs, and Opportunities The presentation covered some of the needs, opportunities, and trends for each of the recreation facility categories included in the needs assessment. Comments and questions are organized by category below. • Major Recreation Facilities o Highlighted that transportation options are severely lacking in Lake Oswego, both in terms of adequate on and off-street connecting bicycle and pedestrian facilities and public transit routes and services. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC- 178 • Outdoor Recreation Facilities o The community has expressed the desire for splash pads. o Note sand and water play here as it creates something very interesting, is accessible, encourages collaborative play, etc. The closest site is currently in Westmoreland. Hidden Creek Park in Hillsboro represents another example of this type of facility if people are looking for other examples to visit. o Add quiet and reflective areas as a trend that would be lower cost. Cooks Butte and Stevens Meadow could have opportunities to add that but Chapter 10 of the city's Charter limits this. • Sports Fields and Courts o Modify language in the trends callout to speak to sports courts not just fields for lighting. o A commenter noted the different level of service between softball and baseball fields and whether they served adults or youths. Lake Oswego has more adult softball fields because there are more players percentagewise. Youth softball is not played by as many girls comparatively. The school district does provide additional diamond fields. • Playgrounds and Play Areas o Add sand and water play bullet point to the trends callout. o A sensory play area could also be specifically identified in this section. o The City does have a playground replacement schedule and will consider trends and opportunities when those come around. The City typically replaces the full playground rather than pieces of it. • Support Amenities o More parking is definitely needed. o Another city was able to use high school students to create a mobile app for tennis court reservations. o Interest in the trend of outdoor workspaces. Most parks do have Wi-Fi. • Recreation Programming o The large Habitat for Humanity project going in will likely consist of families and younger households that could benefit from low cost or no cost programs. o The narrative should also note the need for full day programs as many parents can't split up their workday. o Low income or subsidized programming will be part of the LORAC. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC- 179 Public Engagement One public comment was made at the meeting. The comment recommended that safety assessment and safety planning be added to Parks Plan 2040. The commenter supported references to public safety in Goal 4, identified the need for bike and pedestrian paths to incorporate all safety designs and features, and noted that zip lines are a high-risk facility to add to parks (and recommended against it). Next Steps The Parks Board will review the Needs Assessment at their March meeting later in the month. Another CAC meeting will be scheduled for later in the spring to discuss preliminary recommendations. Public engagement around specific projects and priorities will occur in the spring and summer. The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. zHablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted �-qzz 6FAILFg? 01 MR-21 E9t0l 2 oFAl 7FodLI�F t (a%f it) 09?71R*#AT *51t ] ,MXig LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC- 180 immARy COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING #4 Date: April 24, 2024 Time: 5:30-7:30 PM Location: Lake Oswego Maintenance Building, Willow Room, 17601 Pilkington Road ATTENDEES City of Lake Oswego - Kyra Haggart, Maria Bigelow, Evan Fransted, Jeff Munro, Brenda Faison MIG - Matt Hastie, Jessa Miller Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Members - Kara Orvieto, Meg Matsushima, Sarah Ellison, Terri Bianco, Denee Kroeger, Whitney Taylor, Julie Haddad, Patrick Gutierrez, Matt McGinnis, Heather Redetzke DISCUSSION The Parks Plan 2040 project team briefly reviewed the service area mapping and gap areas analysis conducted to date. Meeting participants were then divided into three small breakout groups to discuss comments and suggest changes to the 14 identified gap areas. Service Area Mapping and Gap Areas Review Kyra and Matt gave a brief overview of the service area mapping process conducted for the Needs Assessment as well as instructions for the interactive mapping activity during the small group breakout sessions. They described examples of some of the types of comments and conditions that might be relevant to the location, size, and extent of the gap areas. Small Group Breakout Sessions Participants were divided into three small breakout groups to participate in an interactive mapping activity to discuss and suggest changes to the 14 identified gap areas. Each group was given a printout of all maps created to date to facilitate the discussion and take notes. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-181 Discussion questions included: ■ Do aspects of the population and/or zoning impact the size and shape of these gap areas? ■ Does proximity to other partner agency facilities and/or non-city-owned green spaces (i.e. schools, neighboring parks, HOAs) impact the size and shape of these gap areas? ■ Are there any additional areas that should be defined as a high severity of need gap area? Are there any existing that should not be? Following the breakout session, participants were asked to briefly report back on the key themes from their discussion. Key themes included: ■ Adjust the gap area boundaries to remove areas with commercial and/or industrial zoning. ■ Rethink the high severity classification of the gap areas over Mountain Park HOA and Mary's Woods/Marylhurst University due to the presence of non-city recreation opportunities that are potentially available to people who live in those areas (Gap Areas 4 and 14). ■ Consider improved pedestrian connectivity between gap areas and nearby recreation opportunities to alleviate access issues, especially when land is not available for additional parks and facilities in the gap areas themselves. ■ Consider additional barriers impacting gap areas such as challenging topography and roads that lack safe pedestrian crossings and sidewalks. ■ Recognize that people who own property fronting Lake Oswego have access to nature via the lake and consider adjusting gap area boundaries accordingly. ■ Recognize that playgrounds at schools don't serve children under school age during school hours. Gap Area Findings Table 1 outlines specific breakout group session findings and comments organized by gap area. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-182 Table 1: Breakout Session Findings by Gap Area Gap Area Comments 1 • Has access to Portland Community College Sylvania • Explore increased connectivity between gap area and West Waluga Park 2 • Consider removing southern half of gap area due to commercial zoning and lacking residential areas • Consider increased pedestrian connectivity between residential areas and adjacent recreational opportunities • Lots of young families • Reserve money for land acquisition 3 • Consider development of a park in the northern and/or southeastern portions of the gap area • Consider reducing size of southeastern portion of the gap area due to proximity to school in that area • Consider reducing gap area size due to industrial and commercial uses in central and southwestern portions of the gap area • Consider removing as a gap area or making it a lower priority due to overlap 4 with Mt. Park HOA • Steep terrain • Add more City trail connections 5 • Make higher priority due to equity indicators 6 • Consider removing eastern portion of gap area along Oswego Lake due to Lake Grove Swim Park access _ • Steep terrain 7 • Lacking developable land • Consider removing western end of gap area due to lake access 8 • No comments • Consider removing gap area due to lake access and proximity to Iron Mountain 9 Park • Build pedestrian crosswalk for access • Consider removing southern end of gap area along Oswego Lake 10 • Increase connectivity between gap area and Iron Mountain Park along Iron Mountain Blvd 11 • Steep terrain will cause development constraints • Consider proposed Willamette Greenway connection 12 • Consider a park with river access • Improve connectivity to Tryon Creek State Natural Area • Extend gap area further north 13 • Large single-family lots • May be large lot for sale with significant development potential; consider opportunity for creation of new park in that area as part of future development • Consider removing southern end of gap area due to access to the paths and 14 amenities at Marylhurst and Mary's Woods • Explore partnership with Mary's Woods • Add safe crossing across Highway 43 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-183 • Consider steep terrain of gap areas General • Highway 43 is a major barrier to park and river access Comments • Consider increased connectivity between gap areas and recreational opportunities Next Steps The Project Team will modify the gap areas based on CAC feedback. An updated gap area map and a revised Needs Assessment with supporting narrative will then be shared with CAC members for any last changes. The Parks Board will review the key findings from the CAC's small group breakout sessions and revised materials at their May meeting. Upcoming engagement events include a staff workshop in mid-May and a series of neighborhood workshops in late-May and early-June to discuss preliminary recommendations and priorities. The next CAC meeting will be scheduled in August to discuss preliminary recommendations, proposed projects, and summer engagement findings. The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. Hablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted -6FA1 L-FQ? 01 A14—1 i 01 g -oFAI�I 7F o d LI�F iR i=1:1 ?71R*#'fit*5c9t ] , Xi LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 1C-184 ATTACHMENT- BREAKOUT SESSION MAPS 11111116f mar- _ J Service Area w,tnrh�° e..° H,� pp`xr- I .;M."... Gap Map as ..i tr.' nor. w. e", ir .,-,r ;- , Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation Regional Park 'ur' i . n=•x 13 J Comrnunty Park x n ♦ Neighborhood Park Nor Pocket Park ;n.�; t Natural Area V'no�•h t, i�.". m Trail Corndor ,IFS-'i 1 =Undeveloped Open Spare " s A ,,, 1Ahnxxd a Urban Plaza to J, -rA 41 on Recreational Fac Ilty n 'r ..erJ° r'� Ser° J1� P -` Esaenhalnovice Gap6rea a&/ !f- Gap Area T f sAr sxn nr 7' J High Seventy at Need Cep Area .rx ,- a t, A!.j M`•» • pe Base Map Features rP,` : Schools Water Bathes .�,f 'E,c Non City Parks and Open Spaces s .b..e c o4 f _.City Boundary I I ', r,Metro Lrrban Growth Boundary /� a / n I — Tlalls and Pathways "�� / 0 Lake Oswego School Olsrrct Boundary ' de r Jr 5.?! Lf7 rr.p h .;„ = 1 nrw- Altir I x.p,. +A!. MEI L re axe ''"I;It` 11�®qa.. Jam/! `� Ie' - y o M0� LAKE OSWEGD ,reed w. erre, r. `�—_ L - PARKS PLAN 2040 c,0'0..020, _ Area 04 iw' Service Tigard a�eN Gap Map W G err 64E � F/h1.Anu/d>r J , Feyd P°a•L Lake Oswego Parks and Recreation 0 g xY� Regional rnmun Park , :3-,,, Community Park L ▪Ne ghborhootl Park ▪Pocket � i � Po NetUrd Palk [[SSe. �NaN21 Area 'fl' 4,n term el �undeveloped open spat Trail Condor .� rltnA.N c 1,,,, rnu, e o J A e [F Urban Plaza oeYn� c 9 Recreational Faculty ^\\ \' V' ✓ " Essential Seneca Nap Area Gap Area P • V, r, ieE ligh Seventy or Need Gap area i d33L 11 a na s iw�_ nfska Wer Base Map Features _ -� 7 �,ser.,an n Schools �."- `t A e• �lac =Water Bodes H Non Cty Parks and Open Spaces h t'� .�u.�,.... �_ P.-� `sea; *0 - �Ury flounder, p _-e MHro Urban Growth Boundary 1r Ye TraIs and Pathways II m55' y 0 lake Oswego School Olstre Boundary '� .rc a 6 JdL ism Minn 12� �F I "�Yf r f I . � 00 [on ' _ „ 1. i new IL m / , ~- At re a F 4111111k ' V . 741 {�— O s ' CBAKE OSWEGOa. '} o Ni PARKS PLAN R040 i Alli LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-185 .... Service Area • _ „,„;. - ••• Gap Map ..- - , -1,..17.•,,s,,,,-.-.- Ir- - ' - , — MLateII aCNR Oeoegmisgowmhbeuognlr oihPt oayP oPk r' _ ada rrPkkas r ke nd Recreation • „,, • m Pocket Park MI Natural Area -i ,... .. . n. =Tral Corntlor ;-"'"' cum., '''h. Mil Urban Plaza • [tend .7 =Recreation&Fealty , . ,_ cao, Essential Service Gap Area .,. va.a u. ,4,, , • s ..S Fr,',:er Need Gap Area ....,, , •-r,1:1',,,.-.-7., srcz... ,. end Open Spaces —3 —Trarls and Pat.days 14 =i Lake Oswego,— School!Istria Boundary— — ___ / _ - • ,'. ,4 _ , ,,,,\\,, __ ...,„,4, --4 . _Jr - I_,:,,... .._, ...„...,...„ , . _ . _. ,..71,_.,,,. ..._. .4_ .,,,.... ...,."v-, k, , '':;.•'„,.-..'7'.., ,-_,— . Rh,rew"alitc i 1 LAKE OSWEGO _. 0 I . , , I _,_ ,_1 PARKS PLAN 1040 En,nnee l.l- LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-186 1M MARY Community Advisory Committee Meeting #5 Date: September 10, 2024 Time: 5:30-7:30 PM Location: Lake Oswego Maintenance Building, Willow Room, 17601 Pilkington Road Virtual Recording Link: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN kqc5zhd2RReMCkH3EWfw4g ATTENDEES City of Lake Oswego— Kyra Haggart, Brenda Faison MIG — Matt Hastie, Lauren Scott Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Members— Kara Orvieto Ashley, James Meier, Teresa Bianco, Patrick Gutierrez, Pat Walls, Matt McGinnis, Heather Redetzke, Betty Holladay, Denee Kroeger, Sarah Ellison, Julie Haddad DISCUSSION The Parks Plan 2040 project team provided a status report on the project schedule and an overview of the neighborhood workshops held over the summer. The project team then stepped through a presentation summarizing the draft systemwide recommendations and discussed each category and key recommendations with the CAC. At the end of the meeting the project team introduced the proposed evaluation criteria for the draft Capital Improvements Project (CIP) List and overall approach to creating the CIP. The CIP will be the subject of the next meeting in October. Draft Systemwide Recommendations Comments and questions from the CAC about the draft systemwide recommendations are summarized below using the category structure of the draft recommendations. Administration, Management, Communications, & Partnerships ■ Call out HOAs by name when listing organizations for the city to coordinate with to improve access to recreation areas ■ Redesign/reorganization of parks and recreation info on city website and/or creation of a Parks app or other tool will have huge benefit ■ Ok to leave in exploration of Joint Use Agreement with School District, but acknowledge reasons why it does not currently exist LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-187 ■ Climate vulnerability information would be very useful for parks planning, recommendation should acknowledge overlapping efforts for climate resiliency and adaptation (e.g., CAP, Sustainability Council) Park Activation &Amenities ■ Accessibility of system is VERY important ■ Changes are impactful and allow more people to enjoy LO parks ■ A fully accessible playground is needed ■ Signage needs to indicate accessibility of a site/trail ■ Technology in parks could be coordinated with development of a parks app ■ Develop as part of a "technology infrastructure plan" ■ Allow the platform to give feedback so community input is always ongoing ■ Describe what people can do and experience in each park ■ QR codes at parks and trailheads Park Design & Development ■ Create a new long-term recommendation around parkland acquisition; the city should not pass up opportunities and should be proactive ■ Lake, river and mountain views and lake access are particularly important ■ Consider coordinating with HOAs for underutilized green spaces—encourage them to allow more access and use by HOA residents ■ Opportunity to recognize history with park sites ■ Explore ways for people to donate land to the city for recreation space ■ Consider establishing or supporting a parks foundation ■ Consider going beyond minimum requirements in designing and developing parks Walkability,Accessibility, & Wayfinding ■ Signage in multiple languages and using easy-to-interpret graphics makes everyone feel welcome ■ Need to ensure outreach is welcoming/accessible as well ■ Don't over-rely on smart phones or technology; some people can't or don't use them ■ City website and surveys should be inclusive Natural Resources & Nature Integration ■ Include new emerald ash borer recommendations LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-188 • Add recommendation about outreach and education for invasive species (private property management also important) • Clarify what "safe access" to natural areas means Maintenance & Operations • Consider generalizing Parks Maintenance Fee recommendation with exploring a "fee- based mechanism to fund maintenance" • Sustainable funding strategies are very important • Add natural areas to several recommendations when talking about parks and facilities Programs & Events • Consider splitting recommendation around adaptive sports and all-abilities programming into two items • Identify neurodiverse programs and events as an opportunity; focus on partnering with statewide, regional or local groups to host/organize activities • Organize or support activities and programs and foster social connections • Cultural events are very important to continue to support • Recreation scholarship program is essential to increasing recreation access • General support for recommendations in this category Next Steps The project team will use feedback from City staff, the CAC, and the Parks Board to refine the systemwide recommendations. The CIP list will be the subject of CAC And Parks Board meetings in October. Results from the upcoming online community prioritization survey will be incorporated into the CIP list along with feedback from City staff, the CAC, and the Parks Board. Adoption of the final Lake Oswego Parks Plan 2040 is expected in spring 2025. The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. zHablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted ti- z z 6FAI L.F2? o1 A1421 T of 2 EAI 7F o d LI�F t5tiRr1=1 (a wit) Q9?T 1R*# 1 * IYARt LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-189 SUMMARY Community Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Date: October 22, 2024 Time: 5:30-7:30 PM Location: Lake Oswego City Hall, Council Chambers Virtual Recording Link: https://youtu.be/4NCV7gn1Fe4 ATTENDEES City of Lake Oswego - Kyra Haggart, Brenda Faison MIG - Matt Hastie, Jessa Miller Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Members— Kara Orvieto Ashley, James Meier, Teresa Bianco, Patrick Gutierrez, Pat Walls, Matt McGinnis, Heather Redetzke, Betty Holladay, Denee Kroeger, Sarah Ellison, Julie Haddad DISCUSSION The Parks Plan 2040 project team provided a status report on the project schedule, engagement conducted to date and upcoming outreach activities, and the in-progress systemwide recommendations. The project team then stepped through a presentation summarizing the Capital Improvements Project (CIP) List and proposed evaluation criteria that will be used to prioritize CIP projects. Capital Improvements Project List The project team provided a summary of the purpose, inputs (e.g. sources of information), the structure and approach, and the geographic distribution of the CIP list. The Project team clarified that many projects are located in and enhance natural areas and provide opportunities to connect with nature although only one of the 124 proposed capital projects is categorized as a nature project. Other efforts, such as restoration work in the city's natural areas, represent ongoing efforts rather than one-time capital investments that are included in the CIP. Discussion/Refinement by CAC Comments and questions from the CAC about the CIP list are summarized below. ■ Are there any projects you were expecting to see that are missing? o Pedestrian-scale lighting on larger regional trails and some internal park trails. o Indoor recreation opportunities and gym space on the West side of Lake Oswego with open gym space as well as classrooms for smaller recreation programs. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-190 o Park-to-park transportation support (e.g., a shuttle, circulator, or similar type of strategy). ■ The project team responded that some of the systemwide recommendations support transportation services to parks. o Land acquisition of natural areas to preserve habitat areas and support wildlife corridors that are adjacent to existing natural areas or include a feature of significance. ■ The project team responded that some of the systemwide recommendations support this and that we can look for additional opportunities to incorporate this, such as supporting potential partnership opportunities (Ex: Metro). o Land acquisition for a park with views of Mt. Hood or Mt. St. Helens (DEI Board recommendation). ■ The project team responded that this type of project would be more of a systemwide recommendation than a CIP project and that we can look for additional opportunities to incorporate this. o Strategic land acquisition for access to public waters. ■ The project team responded that this type of project would be more of a systemwide recommendation than a CIP project and that we can look for additional opportunities to incorporate this. o Sidewalk extension on Lake View adjacent to the Lake Oswego School District bus barn. ■ The project team clarified that these projects fall under the Engineering Department and that the Parks Department can advocate for these to be included within their CIP. The team also has highlighted the needs for these types of projects where they improve access from neighborhoods to parks in the systemwide recommendations. o Accessible water access ramps, specifically for kayaks. ■ The project team responded that they will look into this further. ■ Are there any projects that you do not think should be included? o Consider reframing the Luscher Farm athletic field CIP project as an athletic facility that supports other recreation opportunities (e.g. walking path, sand volleyball courts, etc.) that may be more compatible with Luscher Farm's unique natural environment. ■ The project team provided more background about this project. An Athletic Fields Capacity Study has been added to this project to inform demand and next steps. Kyra also added that this project would be a longer-term project since the proposed site for the athletic fields as identified by the Luscher Area Master Plan is outside of Lake Oswego city limits and cannot be implemented until the area is within the City. ■ Other comments and questions: LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-191 o One participant asked about how many people flagged sand volleyball courts and if it should be a high priority. ■ The project team responded that many youth members brought up sand volleyball courts and a CAC member noted the rising popularity of youth volleyball. o Will George Rogers Park be connected to Foothills? ■ Yes, this connection is included in the CIP and is a funded project that will hopefully be implemented in summer 2025. o How will the wastewater treatment center project influence the CIP? ■ There is a CIP project under Foothills Park that recommends expanding the park with additional amenities on the wastewater treatment center site. o Are any of the CIP projects funded? ■ Some are partially funded (e.g. ongoing maintenance projects, playground replacement projects, etc.). ■ The Plan will identify funding strategies and an action plan to help implement the CIP projects that are not funded. Evaluation Criteria The project team summarized the proposed evaluation criteria that will help determine how to prioritize capital projects for implementation over the planning horizon. Using the online engagement platform Mentimeter, meeting participants were asked to participate in a polling exercise to rank the evaluation criteria. Findings from this exercise are summarized in Figure 1 below. These findings in addition to feedback from the Parks Board and the current online community prioritization survey will inform the prioritization process. Figure 1: Mentimeter Evaluation Criteria Exercise Results LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-192 Which evaluation criteria are the most important to consider when prioritizing future projects? 1st Meets multiple park system planning goals and objectives 2nd Fills a gap 3rd 1=11 Addresses needs of people or groups with specific park and recreation needs 4th Cost and feasibility is scaled appropriately to the benefit it will provide 5t h Addresses one or more citywide goals or initiatives Availability of state or federal grant 6th funding m ii Next Steps The project team will use feedback from City staff, the CAC, Parks Board, and the community prioritization survey to finalize and prioritize the CIP list. Once the CIP list is finalized, the project team will develop funding and implementation strategies and initiate an SDC methodology update. The next CAC meeting will be scheduled in December to review the final OP list, including project costs and prioritization, as well as the proposed approach to the final plan document. A final combined CAC and Parks Board meeting is envisioned in February 2025 to review a final draft plan for recommendation to the City Council. Adoption of the final Lake Oswego Parks Plan 2040 is expected in spring 2025. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 1C-193 The City of Lake Oswego is committed to providing equal access to information and meetings. For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations or translations/interpretation services, please submit your request at least four business days prior to the event by visiting www.lakeoswego.city/accommodation or by phone at 503-635-0282. iHablas espanol? Le proporcionaresmos una traduccion de este document sin costo personal para usted 6FAI LFg? 01 M1 R-21 . di(41 01 g -oFAI 7F o VLI EF 11R11:15C (a%fit) p�?71R*#ZIA* 1tr9 TA 1 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IC-194 PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD U O MINUTES osow May 17, 2023 GREGO\ The video recording constitutes an accurate record of the Parks, Recreation& Natural Resources Advisory Board at the above dated meeting.The following summary is provided as an overview of the meeting. https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLi nk/DocView.aspx?id=2472947&repo=CityOfLakeOswego Sarah Ellison called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Present: Co-Chair's, Sarah Ellison and Doug McKean,Angel Mott-Nickerson,Jason Dorn, Ed Becker,Jennifer Mozinski, Greg Wolley, Youth Member's Eileen Koh (arrived @4:20p), Council Liaison,Trudy Corrigan Alternates: Sandra Lupton (alt) Absent: Ben Hovey, Kara Gapon,Taryn Hatchel, Staff: Parks & Recreation Director, Ivan Anderholm, Parks Deputy Director,Jeff Munro, Recreation Deputy Director,Jan Wirtz, Project Manager, Kyra Haggart, Communication and Sponsorship Coordinator, Robin Krakauer,Administrative Assistant Dina Balogh. Guests: Stephanie Hallock, Friends of Luscher Farm APPROVAL OF MINUTES • The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) reviewed and unanimously approved the minutes from April 19, 2023. Public Comment: • Stephanie Hallock,Good afternoon members of the Board and Director Anderholm. I am Stephanie Hallock, a new member of the advisory board to the Friends of Luscher Farm. I am here to introduce myself and share concerns about the City's Capital Improvement Plan adopted on May 11, and the future of Luscher farm park. Gail Wallmark and I provided testimony and an information packet to the City's budget committee and prepared a similar packet for you which I hope you received. Basically, we are back to square one on funding for Luscher farm park, despite support from this Board for Luscher projects.Thank you for that support, and particularly for recognizing the high priority need for improved vehicle access and parking. At your meeting today, FOLF would like to learn how the Parks and Recreation Department plans to fund Luscher access from Metro local share dollars and how FOLF can help. We also hope to learn what projects Luscher will compete with for Lake Oswego's roughly$2 Million share of Metro money and how and who will determine which projects receive funding and how much. For future funding of capital improvement projects, we are concerned about descriptions of Luscher projects from the LAMP being utilized to make CIP decisions. We provided those Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board Minutes May 17, 2023 descriptions to you in our packet.Vehicle access to the farm park is Luscher's most critical need, and the description is both inadequate and inaccurate. I have a copy in case you did not receive our packet. If the current description of the need for improved vehicle access and parking at Luscher is used to decide what projects are funded with Metro dollars, we doubt that Luscher will receive any funding. We respectfully request that descriptions of all Luscher projects be updated and hope to collaborate with Parks staff on revising those descriptions. FOLF leadership is rebuilding and has three new members of which I am one. I bring twenty years of experience at the Department of Environmental Quality and have worked with the Oregon legislature and multiple constituencies. I also served eight years on the State Board of Agriculture. Luscher projects have not been funded for at least ten years.As the Parks 2040 plan is developed, FOLF looks forward to strategizing with you and LOPR's leadership to ensure that Lake Oswego's most unique park does not wait another ten years to get its due.Thank you for your time. City Council Update: Council Liaison,Trudy Corrigan • Announced student "If I Were Mayor" contest winners. • Proclaimed May as Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. • Proclaimed May as Mental Health Awareness Month • Adopted Resolution,Authorizing the City Manager and City Attorney to settle two condemnation actions, acquiring two pathway easements. Projects related to Willamette Greenway, Metro Regional Trails Plan, LO Trails and Pathway Plan, and the LO Transportation System Plan. • Library Visioning Update • May 9 special meeting for Westlake Park Pickleball. Staff updated Council on the Pickleball Traffic and Noise Study at Westlake park. Council unanimously agreed not to pursue Westlake Park as a possible location for pickleball. • LORA meeting to review and updates to the Foothills Framework Plan and Urban Renewal Plans for the East End Redevelopment and the Lake Grove Village Center. • Proclaimed May as National Historic Preservation Month and presented the Preservation Merit Award to Drew Prell. • Proclaimed May 21-27 as National Public Works Week. • Proclaimed the first Friday in June,June 2 to be National Gun Violence Awareness Day. • Approved Contract for Blue Heron sewer project. • Approved Contract for Daniel Way channeling stabilizing project. • Approved projects included in metro 2023 Regional Transportation Plan. • 2023 Legislative session update • Sustainability and Climate Action Plan update. • Councilor's Trudy Corrigan and John Wendland will be meeting with CAPRA visitors May 18. Youth Member Update: NA REGULAR BUSINESS: Pickleball Update Ivan Anderholm, Parks & Recreation Director Sarah Ellison, Board Co-Chair City Council gave the Department direction to discontinue exploring Westlake as a location for Pickleball.The City Manager have given the department direction to dismantle the Pickleball courts at George Rogers Park. The board discussed the reasoning why. 2IPage Motion: Ed Becker motioned to recommend that parks staff pursue with City Council to keep the GRP courts open with use of soft balls and provide those balls so only they can be used. Doug McKean seconded the motion. Board discussed the motion. Ivan told the board they could go back to Council to re-look at using the quiet ball and paddle to see if that would pass or accommodate the level of sound neighbors would approve. However, not sure how we would come to a resolution. Sarah Ellison amended the motion that City Council consider various sound mitigation strategies including Soft paddles, Soft balls, Kiosk saying"Noise Sensitive Community" and Better Barriers. Revised Motion: Motion to recommend that City Council reopen the GRP courts for pickleball use, and make the decision using technical data, considering various sound mitigation strategies including requiring participants to use only soft foam balls. • Sarah, Doug, Eileen, Greg, Ed,Angel,Jason,Jennifer, all approve, no oppose, passes unanimously Metro Local Share: Kyra Haggart, Project Manager Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks& Recreation METRO 2019 PARKS AND NATURE BOND • Bond Purpose: to further protect clean water, restore fish and wildlife habitat, and provide opportunities for people to connect with nature close to home • $92 million dedicated for parks and nature projects in Metro's local cities and parks districts ("local share") • Lake Oswego eligible for—$2 million ELIGIBLE PROJECT CATEGORIES 1. Natural area or park land acquisition 2. Fish and wildlife habitat restoration or habitat connectivity enhancements 3. Maintaining or developing public access facilities at public parks and natural areas 4. Design and construction of local or regional trails 5. Enhanced or new learning/environmental education facilities Investments must satisfy all of the COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT& RACIAL EQUITY Investments must satisfy all of the following six criteria: 1. Meaningfully engage with communities of color, Indigenous communities, people with low incomes and other historically marginalized communities in planning, development and selection of projects. 2. Prioritize projects and needs identified by communities of color, Indigenous communities, low income and other historically marginalized groups. 3. Demonstrate accountability for tracking outcomes and reporting impacts, particularly as they relate to communities of color, Indigenous communities, people with low incomes and other historically marginalized communities. 4. Improve the accessibility and inclusiveness of developed parks. 5. Include strategies to prevent or mitigate displacement and/or gentrification resulting from bond investments. 6. Set aspirational goals for workforce diversity and use of COBID contractors and work to reduce barriers to achieving these goals; demonstrate accountability by tracking outcomes and reporting impacts_ 3IPage COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PROCESS 1. Community Engagement: What projects should we prioritize? 2. Community Engagement: Report Back. 3. Prioritized Project List: Approval by City Council 4. Community Engagement: How should this project be designed? 5. Finalize Design(s) &Complete Project(s) *(Complete steps 4 and 5 of the process for each funded project) COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT APPROACH Community Engagement Goal:_Develop a prioritized list of projects eligible for local share funding Tools: • Survey(online & paper copies) • Presentations at city advisory boards • Tabling at city events, parks, local gathering places • Focus group meetings (communities of color, low income families, people with disabilities, youth)-will likely coincide with Parks Plan 2040 focus group work DRAFT PROJECT LIST 1. George Rogers Park ADA River Access Trail 2. Hallinan Woods Natural Area Expansion 3. Luscher Farm Access Improvements & Parking 4. Luscher Farm Community Garden Expansion 5. Rassekh Park Multi Use Path Improvement 6. West Waluga Neighborhood Connector Trails 7. Sunnyslope Open Space Property Acquisition WHAT HAS BEEN DONE SO FAR? Presentation to DEI Advisory board on March 20 Project website and online survey currently underway(available by the end of this week!) Attending May 21 AAPI (Asian American Pacific Islander) event with paper survey copies • Surveys available in English, Chinese (Mandarin) and Korean. • Other languages can be made available for future events Parks Plan 2040 Public Engagement: Kyra Haggart, Project Manager Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks & Recreation WHY SYSTEM PLAN? • Develop a comprehensive view of our parks,facilities, programs and services and how they all work together to serve our community • Ensure that our future investments reflect community priorities that were identified through an equitable engagement process • Collaborate with other City departments (planning, transportation, sustainability, library, public works)to integrate parks and recreation into the public realm COMMUNITY PROFILE Demographic data o Age o Gender o Race/ethnicity 4IPage o Household size o household income o Language spoken at home o Poverty level o Education level • Future population forecast • Demographic trends COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN • Define engagement goals and objectives • Identify stakeholder/focus groups • Describe strategies for engaging the community members, with an emphasis on underrepresented and underserved community groups • Identify metrics for assessing success FOCUS GROUPS • Small group interviews with key stakeholders and community groups, which may include: o City advisory boards o Friends groups and natural resource groups o Youth and teens o Communities of color o Low income residents o Residents with disabilities o Local advocacy groups (LO for Love, Respond to Racism) COMMUNITY SURVEY • Statistically valid community survey(sample size"200+) • Random sample hybrid method (telephone, texting, and online) • Preliminary topics: o Park/facility use o Program participation o Park/facility needs o Investment priorities o Program preferences o Satisfaction with current offerings o Satisfaction with current operations COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE • Representatives from the community at-large and community interest groups • Goal is to form a group with diverse interests and backgrounds • Primary role is to help guide and ground-truth the planning process from the community perspective • Meet up to 7 times at key points in the planning process PARKS ADVISORY BOARD • Role is to serve as a technical steering committee • Meet up to 5 times at key points in the process, in addition to regular updates from staff o Review Community Engagement Plan and project schedule o Review key work products such as goals and objectives, level of service standards, needs assessment, project list, and implementation strategies 5IPage COMMUNITY-WIDE EVENTS &SURVEYS • Two in person communitywide events scheduled to coincide with key times for feedback o Goals and objectives o Projects and priorities • All community members invited and encouraged to attend • Advertised on social media, website, Hello LO,flyers/posters at local businesses, etc. • Event timing to be coordinated with release of communitywide online survey OTHER COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT • Tables set up at other city events (farmer's market, summer concerts, etc.)with project postcards,flyers, surveys as available • Attending other community events and meetings o Local advocacy or social group meetings o School, library, sports leagues o Neighborhood or homeowner's association meetings o DEI Advisory Board meetings • Neighborhood-specific outreach: pop-up tables at local parks in each neighborhood WHAT NEXT? • Community input, ideas, and suggestions feed into: o Community vision for Parks & Recreation in Lake Oswego through 2040 o Goals and objectives to achieve the vision o Park and facility needs'/gaps in level of service o Recreation and programming needs o Operations and maintenance needs o Prioritized list of future projects o Implementation strategies and recommendations STAFF AND BOARD MONTHLY UPDATE: • Sarah asked board members who would like to serve on the DEI working group. With a show of hands Sarah Ellison,Jennifer Mozinski, Greg Wolley,Taryn Hatchell and Eileen Koh volunteered to serve on the DEI working group. • LORAC permits have been issued. 2/3rds of the building pad is rolled into place. Compacted and passed the geotechnical review. Project is moving forward.A little behind schedule but the contractor is working to get back on schedule. • Golf course is moving forward.The drone footage is the best way to see the construction of the course. • Ressekh Skate Park bids are due on June 6'and to Council on June 20t". Include parking, sewer and shelter. • The Budget Committee approved the budget. • 1.8M capital reserve dedicated to street fund, and 2M from street preservation project for the LORAC maintenance building. • CAPRA visitors arrived today.They have been impressed with the beauty of LO and impressed with the information provided. The next regular scheduled meeting will be Wednesday,June 21, 2023,4 to 6 p.m. Sarah Ellison adjourned the meeting at approximately 6pm. Prepared by, Dina Balogh,Administrative Assistant 6IPage PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD U O MINUTES allow October 18, 2023 GREGO\ The video recording constitutes an accurate record of the Parks, Recreation& Natural Resources Advisory Board at the above dated meeting.The following summary is provided as an overview of the meeting. https://lakeoswego.webex.com/lakeoswego/j.php?MTI D=melfd4d9a6dea1e4b8bf54022d84ada0c Jason Dorn called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Present: Jason Dorn, Doug McKean, Sarah Ellison,Jennifer Mozinski, Kara Gapon,Taryn Hatchel, Greg Wolley, Ed Becker,Youth Member's: Diya Deepu and Zechariah Pressnell, Trudy Corrigan, Council Liaison (via WebEX), Alternates: Rebecca Greene (via WebEx) Absent: Angel Mott-Nickerson, Matt McGinnis Staff: Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks & Recreation, Jeff Munro, Deputy Director, Kaleb Simpson, Parks Utility Worker, Kyra Haggart, Project Manager, Weston Pay, Technology Officer, Robin Krackauer, Communications and Sponsorship Coordinator, Kelsey Lamotte, Administrative Support. Guests: Gale Walmark, FOLF, Matt Hastie, MIG APPROVAL OF MINUTES • The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) reviewed and unanimously approved the minutes from September 20, 2023. PUBLIC COMMENT: NA CITY COUNCIL UPDATE:Trudy Corrigan, Council Liaison • Update from Metro Councilor, Christine Lewis • Adopted Resolution authorizing the execution of an amended and restated submerged and submersible land lease agreement between Oregon State. • Authorized the City Manager to sign a professional service contract with West Coast. • Moved to direct staff to proceed with the final design of a Lake View Blvd., and drainage improvement. • Approve the adjustment of solid waste collection service rates. • Public Hearing: 4 acres at Upper Drive from the Lake Grove Water District to cure historical anomaly to have all of the properties and habitat for humanity project. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board Minutes October 18, 2023 • Public hearing: LO housing needs analysis required by the state of Oregon to go through. Determine and agree with how many units of housing LO needs to produce in the next 20 years. Magnificent job on a ton of work and had a consultant as well. Council concluded the City needs about 9,900 units.The next thing that will happen is we'll have a housing. • Study session on the wastewater treatment facility project. Moved to authorize the City manager to sign amendment number 2 to the preliminary Services agreement with their core water projects for 169,000 dollars. Council directed staffed to add a $1,114,000 budget to the wastewater treatment facility project to enable the use water in the future, a suggestion that SAB made. • Authorize the city manager to sign an amendment to the legal services contract with talking to the field to continue working on the project. • Legislative update from state rep Daniel Nguyen,former City Councilor. Busy 1st session; 2970 bills were introduced into the legislature only 630 passed. • Adopted our findings earlier in the month about the housing needs analysis. • Adopted the 2023 council goals 3rd quarter update the city's making wonderful progress. • Ordered a Type 1 fire engine. It is a way out, starting order now. • Final hearing on vacating the pathway for the habitat for humanity project. Location of the pathway will allow about 800 square feet more, 100 feet per unit. • Council agreed to revisit the psilocybin issue at the end of the year. Youth Member Update: Diya Deepu and Zechariah Pressnell • Diya: The Green team pulled ivy at LOHS. • Zechariah: Working with students on stewardship opportunities. Bringing in KEY Club and NHS for these opportunities.Trying to get all students at the High School involved with Parks events. REGULAR BUSINESS: PARKS PLAN 2040: Project Introduction, Community Engagement Plan,State of the System Report Kyra Haggart, Project Manager Matt Hastie, MIG Project Manager Parks Plan 2040 Packet: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2634485&repo=CityOfLakeOswego Parks Plan 2040 City Webpage: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/parks-plan-2040 Kyra Haggart introduced Matt Hastie of MIG, who led the presentation which included an overview of the schedule and project tasks, highlights from the state of the system, community input to date, and next steps of the process. CAC Meeting: • Target audience outreach methods • Translation • Social Media messaging • Recommendation—LOSD special education advisory board Community Meeting#1 • November 14 Community event—at ACC 2IPage • Youth activity—Design your own Park—need to do kid outreach Parks Board offered suggestions like splash parks and water and sand parks, along with getting kids point of view on what they want in parks Survey available through November 10 • Community profile (city limits) not Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) • 18% increase over the last 23 years • Population is getting older • Increasing in non-white population however 80%white at this time • Low rate of population growth for Lake Oswego (1.4% projected growth by 2045) Current status with parks now vs population increase?—these types of questions will be asked in the next level of community outreach.—next chunk of the process. State of the system report. Need to address that we ask the questions and include both City and UGB—make sure things are consistent. Parks Facilities: • We will be updating the information about the LOSD facilities. • How well is the City being served by facilities and amenities. Mapping will be more specific on facilities. Updating mapping and classification system. Initial observations: • Excellent system • Involved community • Use and programming—high level of use • Maintenance and improvements • Natural resource management—high priority • Sustainability and resiliency—more holistic integration • Accessibility—need improvement • Conflicting uses and enforcements—monitor community use • Other challenges—limited off street parking Ed—are we developing other city council and budgets?? Matt answer- Provide recommendations of different types of improvements, practices, etc. potential funding sources. Costs and funding will identify costs and funding sources. Ivan—will be updating SDC—Capital plan that will need to be adopted. SDC—tied to anticipated growth. Look at improvement and reimbursement—looking more into the reimbursement process. Can use this for capital investments. Doug—Already have so many projects and at the end of this we will have more.At the end of the process—will we have a document that we can propose a new bond? Matt—yes-This may be something that we can talk about after the process.Toolbox will be including something like a bond source. Ed—one of the great things about LO—will there be an attempt to outreach to other park systems, local and state parks that are adjacent. Matt—good question—good to look at this, A summary of comments and responses to questions from Parks boards: 3IPage • Translating materials and outreach to non-native English speakers is important. Library programs for Mandarin and Spanish speakers may be a good location to reach people. Surveys and important materials conveying Parks Plan 2040 information should be translated. • Ensure that different locations are being "hit"for engagement so that all areas of the City are heard from. A map identifying the locations would be interesting. A potential pop-up at Westlake Park would be good, or other locations with denser housing/diverse populations as well as sports fields or other sites where people take their kids. • Hearing from kids is important, since they often have different opinions about parks than parents. Pictures of different parks and facilities could be shown to kids to get their feedback. o Would be interesting to hear whether kids use or enjoy natural play areas. o Splash pads are becoming popular, as well as sand and water parks. Staff noted that parks or amenities involving both sand and water can be challenging to maintain. • Reflect on success of outreach and engagement results partway through the Plan to understand who has not been heard from. • The Plan will look at the level of service and access for the community. It's important to calculate the level of service for the population within Lake Oswego using parks located within City limits. It should be an apples-to-apples comparison. • Parks Plan 2040 will include a set of prioritized recommendations with planning level costs attached to short-term recommendations. Longer term recommendations may include several options for the City to explore but will not include a traditional set of large-scale or system-wide Alternatives. • Parks Plan 2040 is expected to identify a bond measure as one of a number of different potential funding mechanisms. • Parks Plan 2040 will also include a review of the City's System Development Charge methodology and rates, along with potential recommendations to revise or refine them. • The updated Plan should reflect other adjacent/nearby recreation opportunities that are available and consider avoiding any duplication. Next Steps Next steps include: • Wrapping up a series of focus group meetings by the end of October 2023. • An in-person community open house on November 14, 2023. • Preparing a draft strategic framework in the upcoming weeks. • A second CAC meeting in the beginning of December 2023. • A second PRNRAB meeting either at the end of this year or the beginning of 2024. 2023-2024 INVASIVE REMOVAL& HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM: Jeff Munro, Parks Deputy Director Kaleb Simpson, Parks Utility Worker Jeff introduced Kaleb to the board. Kaleb will be able to answer questions about the program. Invasive Removal Program (IRP) Background: In the Winter of 2011,the Invasive Removal Program started with a funding base of$70,000, at the request of City Council. In 2013, the budget was increased to $74,000. The goals for this program are: • Remove English Ivy from our parks and Natural Areas • To prioritize work in the best condition and highest resource value parks(based on the MIG report) • For City staff to use specialized contractors to coordinate and perform invasive control tasks 4IPage Habitat Enhancement Program (HEP) Background: The Habitat Enhancement Program was first funded in the 2014-2015 budget cycle to further the restoration efforts of the Invasive Removal Program. City Council created a $250,000 program fund to meet Metro's Sensitive Lands requirements. The four project types currently supported by this program are: • Restoration efforts of City owned properties • Restoration work on private properties supported through a Grant Program • Creating matching grants funds • Purchasing plants for Friends Group work parties Lake Oswego Parks& Recreation Friends Groups: • Friends of Hallinan Heights Woods • Friends of Iron Mountain Park • Friends of Luscher Farm • Friends of Rogerson Clematis Collection • Friends of Southwood Park • Friends of Springbrook Park • Friends of Waluga Parks • Friends of Woodmont Park • Friends of Lily Bay Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan: The Natural Areas Management Plan and a map of the City of Lake Oswego Parks and Natural Areas Habitat Plan can be found on the City website at, https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/parksrec/natural-areas-habitat-management-plan • Contractors are guided by NAHMP • Staff coordinate prescriptions with Contractors to meet measurable outcomes in plan and tracking. • Photo Monitoring will be completed by Staff to insure consistency. • A new contractor, Phoenix Habitats, was hired to replace Ash Creek Forest Management. Project Areas: 39 Sites- • 8 New Sites Total Acres- • 382.84 acres • 9 Added acres Special Projects- • Fuel Reduction • Encroachment • Delphinium leucophaeum New Sited added in 2023: • Boones Ferry 6 (5.3 acres) • Lost Dog Creek at Greentree (1.37 acres) • Lost Dog Creek at the Golf Course (2.33 acres) Campbell Native Pollinator Garden at Iron Mountain: 5IPage Back yard Habitat Certified with Platinum status!!! Bee City Approved. Habitat Enhancement Grant Updates: Grants are to support Watershed Councils to improve riparian areas on Private land. Watershed Councils: • Oswego Lake Watershed Council • Tryon Creek Watershed Council • Tualatin River Watershed Council (They are not currently working in LO so will not be applying for grants) • Clackamas Soil &Water Conservation District (WSC support& Garlic Mustard,temporary grants were given for 2 years to support this work as TRWC was not applying) $30k is offered annual to each watershed council. Previously 3-5 year grants were offered ever year which created stacking of annual funding. It became hard to track and reduced the size of project the WSC could apply for. This year, with collaboration from the WSC's only one grant will be awarded at a time.Allowing a large suite of sites to be worked on and maintain. Streamline the application, reporting and funding timing. In order to implement no grants were awarded in 2022. Funding break down: HEP $250k+ IRP $74k=$324k total $324k-$90k WSC= $234k for public land work HEP Grant Funding over the years:Watershed Grant Contract & Projections Tualatin River(changed from 5 to 3 year) Grant Total: $64,950.00 • 1919 to 2021 (canceled project 2021-22) Contract Total: $32,474.30 Tryon Creek 2019-2021 Grant Total: $68,619.00 Tryon Creek 2020-2023 (doubled up payments) Grant Total: $38,404.00 • Tryon Creek Annual Total: $105,020.00 Oswego 2017-2018(old payment schedule) Grant Total: $34,450.00 Oswego Lake 2018-2021 Grant Total: $39,500.00 Oswego Lake 2019-23Kruse Way/Westlake Drive(Contract End Date 6/30/22) Grant Total: $78,850.00 Oswego Lake2020-2023 Grant Total: $81,790.00 • Oswego Lake 2021-2024 Annual Total: $34,453.00 Kaleb told the board the HEP Grant Funding have been approved. Native Pollinator Garden: Kara asked if there is a way to measure how bees are attracted to the pollinator gardens? Caleb, we will be doing a workshop and training. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT'S REVIEW: Ivan Anderholm, Director See Ivan's handout... Unfunded projects are from biennium report. Ivan addressed Gale Walmark, FOLF and thanked her for catching inaccuracies in CIP project descriptions, cost estimates and definition mistakes. Ivan has found other mistakes as well. 6IPage CIP has not been amended. However, Ivan's sheet has been amended and sent to Planning and Finance. Staff reviewed the CIP list and made the modifications. Luscher has a cost escalation based on estimates. Doug asked—these estimates are good as of today. Ivan. Yes.... Unfunded—recently resurfaced GRP. Other parks are included in this unfunded courts. Funded projects and water projects—three lines that are highlighted.There are other projects that are impacted by other departments and projects. i.e. Water line at Rassekh. Stafford Pedestrian—gap is funded by the historical home. Bergis and Stafford crossing improvements—done in a way that signalization is not a complete rip out and redo.So, engineering is paying for that. New information sharing here—pages with the description of projects and which are funded. More detail. LOFAC, Rassekh park development—phase 1. Golf course project and Oswego Hall. Oswego Maintenance Building. Unfunded: Paperwork was not correct- Luscher farm access and made modification to amounts. Cost escalation based on planning 3 to 4% per year. As projects move from unfunded to funded a more detailed cost process will be done.These are markers.The board has prioritized the projects. Numbers are good for today. Built in escalation into the numbers. Doug—Parks Board has a list of projects that were prioritized. Ivan presented that a few meetings ago. Results for community outreach for Local Share. Will give an idea of projects for use of the Metro Local Share. Extended the survey out to the end of the year. More outreach this year. DEI Update: Deferred to November meeting._ STAFF AND BOARD MONTHLY UPDATE: • Sarah: Congratulated staff receiving the CAPRA certification. • Ivan: NRPA conference in Dallas Texas and CAPRA News—Gave CAPRA pins to each Parks board member. Ivan and Jan went before the CAPRA commissioners on Monday, October 9 for an oral interview. Following the interview Commissioners deliberated behind closed doors. Following the deliberation Ivan and Jan were notified LO Parks and Recreation received the CAPRA certification. Staff had the opportunity to attend Best of the Best of Capra agencies ceremony and a small reception. CAPRA visitor Pam Sloan is known as being the hardest visitor was impressed with the ethics of LO. • Ivan: Megan Big John moved on to the director of West Linn P&R. • Ivan thanked the board for writing the letter to Clackamas County for Luscher. • Ivan: City Council DSL Lease- Under Roehr Parks lease has been renewed with a 20 year. • Ivan: City Council -Approved sustainability package for the waste treatment plant for recycled water to useable potable water to use to water Foothills park and other areas. • Kyra: Engaging a consultant to support department through the verification process and the Clackamas County application process. Not sure how long the application will take. Preparing the application is a large project.There are a lot of loop holes with trying to get the long-term advancements—need to adopt the long term Luscher plans. Adopt the park master plan. 7IPage • Greg: DEI met with COBID list of vendors.Try to use other contractors that fall into this category. • Doug: question to Greg is the DEI goal, expanding access to amenities.All groups have access to our parks and programs. Focus on low income. The next regular scheduled meeting will be Wednesday, November 15, 2023,4 to 6 p.m. Doug McKean adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:09 pm. Prepared by, Dina Balogh,Administrative Assistant 8IPage PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD 0 MINUTES o oo .,• December 20, 2023 • The video recording constitutes an accurate record of the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Advisory Board at the above dated meeting.The following summary is provided as an overview of the meeting. https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2671421&dbid=0&repo=CityOfLakeOswego CALL TO ORDER Doug McKean called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Co-chairs,Jason Dorn (via WebEx) and Doug McKean,Jennifer Mozinski, Kara Gapon, Rebecca Greene, Greg Wolley, Ed Becker, Youth Member's, Diya Deepu and Zechariah Pressnell, Trudy Corrigan, Council Liaison , Alternates: Absent: Sarah Ellison,Taryn Hatchel, Matt McGinnis Staff: Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks& Recreation,Jeff Munro, Deputy Director,Tony Garcia, Parks Crewleader, Kyra Haggart, Project Manager, Robin Krakauer, Communications and Sponsorship Coordinator, Dina Balogh,Administrative Assistant Guests: Gale Walmark, FOLF Carol and Carl Ockert, First Addition/Forest Hills Neighborhood Association Matt Hastie, MIG Project Manager Lauren Scott, MIG Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES • The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) reviewed and unanimously approved the minutes from November 15, 2023. CITY COUNCIL UPDATE:Trudy Corrigan, Council Liaison • Council unanimously agreed on the name for the LO Recreation and Aquatic Center(LORAC). The strongly agreed the golf course name would continue to be called the Lake Oswego Municipal Golf Course. • Adopted Ord 2928, Psilocybin time, place and manner regulations. Ord 2928 establishes regulations for psilocybin facilities, and leave in place Ord. 2903, which prohibits the OHA from licensing psilocybin facilities in LO and automatically refers it to the voters in November. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board Minutes December 20, 2023 • Council had a study session on Citywide Parking Reform. Staff asked Council for direction about the revised project schedule and public engagement plan to develop code amendments that comply with the State's Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities parking rules. • Youth Action Council are advocating for a statewide ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products.They asked for the support of the City Council on joint letter to Senate President Rob Wagner. • Council approved the ordinance to establish a vertical housing development zone at the North Anchor site. • Public Works and Engineering presented McVey/Stafford Rd. Corridor Study on transportation options. Council directed staff to incorporate the recommendation from the McVey/Stafford Corridor Project Study into the next update of the Transportation System Plan and to add the project into to the next update of the CIP.The project cost is about $40M and will take several years once funded.The study presented options for bike and pedestrian access on both sides and safe traffic improvements. YOUTH MEMBER UPDATE: Diya Deepu and Zechariah Pressnell Diya: Looking at different ways to have a community and student hosted sustainability fair. Zechariah: Social Media campaigns for engagement of Parks, Recreation and sustainability. PUBLIC COMMENT: Gale Wallmark on behalf of Friends of Luscher Farm. Gale shared the request submitted to City Councilors at the December 19 Council meeting for their up- coming 2024 Goal Setting. Gale told the board, FOLF very much appreciate that the board will be considering support and prioritizing two key Luscher projects as an initiative under Council's 2024 Parks, Recreation, Natural Areas Goal. 1) a new, safe vehicular access and expanded parking area and; 2) an expansion of agricultural programs. As the board heard at past meetings, in the decade since the LAMP was adopted, considerable active recreation facilities have been or are being developed on Luscher Area properties and nearby just across Stafford Road. FOLF is now considering only the remaining properties—about 100 acres, including the 45-acre namesake Luscher Farm—that are outside City limits in unincorporated Clackamas County and zoned for Exclusive Farm Use. These 100 acres are a precious canvas of rural character, historical significance, bountiful agricultural land and magnificent open-space natural areas.They are beloved by hundreds of gardeners, CSA members, Clematis devotees, summer day camp kids and all who walk, run and bike the trails and pathways, if not a significant majority of all Lake Oswego residents. These 100 acres are also Lake Oswego's unique opportunity to pioneer a new and unconventional kind of City Park—one that celebrates our agricultural roots and our reverence for nature, and establishes a vital urban/rural buffer, and—importantly—one that could also model new approaches to environmental and agricultural stewardship that will help reduce food insecurity and teach us all how to live healthier, more sustainable lives. FOLF is grateful for LOPR's year-long efforts to create a path for Clackamas County's potential adoption of the LAMP, which would bring current uses into compliance. But neither project in this request is dependent on that outcome. Both could get underway as soon as funding solutions are found. [FOLF would be pleased if some portion of the City's $2.3M Metro Local Share funds are designated for Luscher, but any portion of that funding is unlikely to be sufficient.] While we acknowledge all the many competing requests, we urge that "now is our moment" to envision the one-of-a-kind City Park we could create by elevating these priority Luscher projects to action and finding and committing funding for them. 2IPage That happens only if Council shares the vision and adopts these Luscher projects as a 2024 Parks Goal initiative. We'll be grateful for the Parks Board support. Thank you for your consideration. Carl Ockert, representing First Addition/Forest Hills Neighborhood Association. Carl shared the history of the Water Tower Grove site and the heritage trees located at 10th and C.The City has taken care to protect and maintain the urban forest on this site.The water tank was removed and stand of 23 native Douglas Fir trees up to 125 years old, exceeding 100 feet in height along with native Vine Maples, Big Leaf Maples and Western Red Cedar are located on this site.The site is home to a great habitat of birds and bald eagles. A reader board will be installed in early 2024 noting the historic significance of this site and celebrating the urban forest. The First Addition/Forest Hills NA ask the board to familiarize themselves with this site and support this community treasure. Next Steps: • Submitted Heritage Tree application to the City. • Morgan Holen, City Consulting Arborist will complete the heritage tree application evaluation by the 26tn Ivan: Morgan Holen evaluates all the trees for the Heritage Tree program. Public works maintains the Water Tower Grove property.They will evaluate the site and will need to know the utility use of the Grove. Morgan will bring back her evaluation and recommendation of heritage tree designation to the board for approval in February. REGULAR BUSINESS: PARKS PLAN 2040: Kyra Haggart, Project Manager Matt Hastie, MIG Project Manager Lauren Scott, MIG Planner Parks Plan 2040 Presentation (Link) Community engagement to date: • CAC and Parks board meetings: September 26, 2023, October 18, 2023 and December 12, 2023 • Pop-Up Outreach: September— November 2023 • Community Survey: September 26-November 10, 2023. • Community Event#1: November 14, 2023 • Focus Groups: October—December 2023 Parks Plan 2040 Survey Two-part survey (Statistically Valid Survey and Community Survey) was conducted by DHM Research to assess community priorities for parks and recreation facilities.There was a total of 1,183 respondents. The Statistically Valid Survey Results provided a demographic snapshot; age, gender, income and race/ethnicity. Statistically valid survey questions and comments: • Ed: Access to natural areas vs. preservation. Preservation can include access. • Kyra: Do you support building access with disability?Chapter 10:There are a number of properties that do not have access. • Kara: Need clarity on access and preservation. City planning bike paths in parks and or citywide. • Kyra: Connections to and thru parks for bikes, "bike lane to connect to a park". • Ed: People want access to park use, conservation vs. preservation. • Greg: Data shows 22%of people responded.There is a percentage that did not respond. • Kyra: Some people didn't have preference, not included in respondent percentage. • Matt Hastie:There is a lot of raw data to go through. 3IPage • Zechariah: Are there any other bias in the survey? • Kyra: Recreation activities that people would like LO to provide. 20% prioritized pickleball.This was an open ended response and will need to look deeper. Focus Groups: Between October and December 10 focus groups were held to identify more specific community needs and priorities; Luscher Area Stakeholders, Pickleball, Recreation &Sports,Youth Action Council, Diversity-Equity& Inclusion, Friends of Parks, Natural Resources&Sustainability, School District, Accessibility,Youth Advisory Board. Community Event: Parks Plan 2040 Community Open House On November 14, 2023 the project team held a community event to share information about the project and gather community input on systemwide needs and project goals. • The event included: o Informational Poster Stations o Goal Prioritization Exercise o Needs Map Exercise o Kids Station o What is Missing Station Engagement questions and comments: • Jennifer: Did anyone ask about splash pads? • Matt H:Yes, splash pads did come up. • Kara: Great presentation! • Kara: What is water access? Could it be a splash pad? • Greg: Participation numbers on 11/14 skew results? • Kyra: People like to go to events compared to representation of community survey. • Matt H: At the ACC event, older population participated, skewed the results. • Greg: Splash pad demographics are younger. • Kyra: Innovative & unique play areas for splash pads. • Jeff: Staff have been talking about splash pads for 3 to 4 years. Evaluating Park Access: Evaluates park service based on the actual routes and distances people must travel to get to parks or recreation facilities.The Parks Plan 2040 access analysis will consist of three parts: 1. Done: Map existing parks and recreation facilities. 2. In Process: Identify areas that are served and unserved by parks. 3. In Process: Identify the gap areas with the greatest need. Evaluation Park Access questions and comments: • Diya: By adding more access will that result in cutting down trees? • Kyra: Depends on how you add access and are there essential services. • Ivan: What are the access points?Where do we need to create access? Balance of both natural resources. • Doug: 2025 Plan—some neighborhoods don't have access to parks. Still is part of the problem. • Greg: How many parks don't have trails,trail connections? • Kyra: Inside parks, most have trails. Need to do mapping • Matt H: Sometimes access points vs. where people live could be a problem. Mapping will help map this. • Kara: Can you do trails under tree canopy?Some natural areas need better trails built and entry areas. • Matt H: Once mapping is done we will see this. Can produce access point map. • Ed: Parking? Parking lots and school areas...Need to develop parking areas. • Doug: LO—multifamily housing— Is there coordination with park access near development? 4IPage • Kyra: Planned future. • Matt H: See where the gaps are.Take maps and see where gaps are and larger development. Taking this into consideration. • Kara: Eastside/Westside...What is access? • Matt H: Can you get there in a 10min walk? Strategic Framework: Provides guidance for developing and implementing Parks Plan 2040 to ensure that decisions align with the community's vision and priorities. Vision/Goals/Objectives/Recommendations. GOAL 1:ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL SERVICES GOAL 2: INVEST IN PARKS, NATURAL AREAS, AND RECREATION FACILITIES GOAL 3: SERVE ALL AGES AND ABILITIES GOAL 4: STEWARDSHIP, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATIONS GOAL 5:A SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT SYSTEM GOAL 6:A CONNECTED SYSTEM GOAL 7: COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS AND ENGAGEMENT Strategic Framework questions and comments: Goal 1: • Kara: DEI Goals—Can some of the goals be ability to serve? • Kyra: Find creative ways to build in essential services. • Greg: Who is historically underserved in LO • Matt: Low income, discrimination (people of color), disabilities (less access). Goal 2: • Ivan: Change out preserve vs. conserve. • Rebecca: Is Cooks Butte have access? Meadow is overgrown. • Doug: Chapter 10—Guide on chapter 10. Nature Park? • Kara: Mapping and topography. • Matt H: Mapping will inform needs of access. • Greg:Topography layer? • Matt: Is not integrated into mapping. It may be challenging. We have the data. • Kyra:Training staff how to explore,test trails for challenge level. Goal 3: (new goal not in PP 2025) • Greg: ADA—Sensory—How do we consider these types of programs? • Matt H: Some parks need area that may be quieter. Goal 4: • Doug: Grant Funding? • Matt: Part of process and update SDC's. • Ed: Parks funding LORAC—large amounts of maintenance—hire people?Operation and maintenance for programs—allocations. Ensure funding across the board. Goal 5: • Kara: Conserve, change from preserve. • Rebecca: Educational pathways with signage. • Ed: Invasive species can't get rid... Remove "get rid of"wording. Replace with "manage". • Matt H: Reduce the coverage... Goal 6(new goal for PP 2040): • Kyra: Biggest thing heard in groups, "tell us what is there"—accessibility info. • Ed: Access w/disability... • Kara: Interconnectivity... • Ed: Access—Need trail signage. Intertwine has good signage. SIPage Goal 7: • Kara: include Lake Corp. • Ivan: Put in Chapter of plan • Ed:Tryon State Park collaboration with City? • Matt H:Yes, collaborate with other Oregon agencies. • Ivan: Collaborate the mapping • Kyra: Revised classification system • Rebecca: Accessibility—Parking (concert shuttle service) Next Steps: • Equity and Service Area Mapping • City Council Briefing (January 2, 2024) • Needs Assessment • CAC& PRNAB meeting#3 TBD NAMING RECOMMENDATION: Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks& Recreation Proposed name, Lake Oswego Recreation and Aquatic Center(LORAC): The proposed name, Lake Oswego Recreation and Aquatics Center(LORAC), accurately reflects the multifaceted nature of the facility. It succinctly captures both the recreational and aquatics aspects, providing a clear and comprehensive description of the center's purpose.This transparency ensures that community members and visitors alike can easily identify the range of activities and amenities offered within the facility. Proposed name for the renovated golf course club house, Oswego Hall: The City of Lake Oswego's Facility Naming Policy emphasizes the importance of names that have historical or cultural significance, contribute to a sense of community identity, and reflect the purpose and use of the facility. In light of these criteria, "Oswego Hall" is a fitting choice for several reasons. Historical Significance: Lake Oswego has a rich history, and the name "Oswego" pays homage to the city's heritage. By incorporating "Oswego" into the clubhouse's name, we celebrate the community's roots and contribute to a sense of historical continuity. Community Identity:The name "Oswego Hall" fosters a strong sense of community identity by directly connecting the facility to the city it serves.This not only aligns with the Facility Naming Policy but also reinforces a shared pride among Lake Oswego residents. Reflecting the Evolving Purpose:The renovated clubhouse is transitioning from a traditional golf facility to a versatile space serving as a rentable community venue, flexible recreation programming space, and a community meeting area. "Oswego Hall" conveys the transformation and modernization of the space while maintaining a connection to the community. Versatility and Inclusivity:The name "Oswego Hall" is broad enough to encompass a variety of activities and events, making it an inclusive and versatile choice.This aligns with the evolving nature of the clubhouse, which is designed to serve diverse community needs beyond its original golf-related functions. Proposed name for the Golf Course, Lake Oswego Municipal Golf Course: The Lake Oswego the Lake Oswego Municipal (Public) Golf Course, aligning with the principles outlined in the Lake Oswego Facility Naming Policy.This proposal is grounded in considerations of transparency, accessibility, community engagement, and conformity with established naming guidelines. Transparency and Clarity:The proposed name, Lake Oswego Municipal (Public) Golf Course, communicates a clear message about the nature of the facility.The inclusion of"Municipal" highlights the public and community-driven aspect of the golf course, emphasizing that it is a city-owned and Wage operated space.This transparency ensures that residents and visitors understand the public nature of the facility, aligning with the Lake Oswego Facility Naming Policy's emphasis on clarity. Community Engagement and Accessibility: Designating the golf course as a municipal and public facility underscores its accessibility to all members of the Lake Oswego community.The name encourages inclusivity, inviting residents of diverse backgrounds and interests to engage in recreational activities. This aligns with the policy's commitment to fostering a sense of community and ensuring that public spaces are open and welcoming to all. Historical Continuity and Community Identity: By incorporating "Lake Oswego" into the name, we maintain a sense of historical continuity and strengthen the connection between the golf course and the local community.This alignment with existing naming conventions contributes to a cohesive identity for public spaces within Lake Oswego, reinforcing a shared sense of pride and ownership among residents. Promotion of Community Recreation:The name Lake Oswego Municipal (Public) Golf Course emphasizes the recreational aspect of the facility, encouraging community members to view the golf course as a space for leisure and enjoyment.This aligns with the city's commitment to promoting an active and healthy lifestyle among its residents. • Ed: Lake Oswego Municipal Golf Course—Public Welcome • Ivan: Maintain the Historic name. Market the course and use Dan Hixson's name. Have some options.The name fits the course,for the people and having access. Action: Doug McKean moved to adopt the names presented. Kara Gapon seconded the motion.The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) unanimously approved the names for the Lake Oswego Recreation Aquatic Center, Oswego Hall and Lake Oswego Municipal Golf Course. TOP 3 THEMES FOR 2024 GOALS: Co-chairs,Jason Dorn and Doug McKean 2024 Priority Areas: 1. Continued Natural Areas Management 2. Funding for Luscher Farm access to parking and other prioritized capital improvement projects. 3. Incorporating DEI recommendations concerning access to parks,facilities, and programs. 2023 Accomplishments (discussed at November meeting) 1. Capital Improvement Plans(CIP): Effectively set the CIP prioritization list for Parks. 2. Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI): Established a working group to develop an implementation framework for DEI and the Parks Department with a focus on expanding access to amenities to historically marginalized and underserved communities. 3. Public Engagement and Outreach:The Board supported engagement with youth, programming, and work internship opportunities. DISCUSS B&C SUMMIT FRAMEWORK: B&C Summit @ the ACC January 11, 2024 City is trying a new version of Summit.The new version will be an interactive workshop as Board members and Councilors move from station to station as a mixed cohort with conversation prompts. The goal is to treat Summit as an engagement tool to receive direct feedback from the community liaisons (B&C members), realign everyone to work towards shared outcomes, and foster the feeling of shared ownership for the year ahead. Summit will mark a reset for the year ahead for both Council and B&Cs. 7IPage What needs to done before Summit? Provide a short snapshot of the work accomplished this last year, along with top themes or ideas that the Board would like the City Council consider in their 2024 goal setting session.These can be general concepts, or more specific projects related to the Parks Board. Answers will be formatted into one page per board and commission to be shared with Council. CHAIR NOMINATION: Doug asked the members of the board to consider a position of co-chair for the 2024 calendar year. If interested or wish to be nominated contact Dina Balogh to be added to the ballot. The board will vote for the co-chair at the January meeting to serve alongside Jason Dorn for the 2024 calendar year. STAFF AND BOARD MONTHLY UPDATE: NA The next regular scheduled meeting will be Wednesday,January 17, 2024,4 to 6 p.m. Doug McKean adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:09 pm. Prepared by, Dina Balogh,Administrative Assistant 8 ' Page dc1 AEI 0�� PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY rr. BOARD J O MINUTES March 20, 2024 GREGGr� CALL TO ORDER Jason Dorn called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Parks Board- Present: Jason Dorn, Co-Chairs • Kara Gapon, Co-Chair• Sarah Ellison • Doug McKean Jennifer Mozinski • Ed Becker• Rebecca Greene (virtual) • Matt McGinnis (virtual) Greg Wolley• John Wendland, Council Liaison , Alternates: NA Absent: Diya Deepu,Youth Member Zechariah Pressnell,Youth Member Staff: Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks & Recreation •Jeff Munro, Deputy Director•Jan Wirtz, Deputy Director• Kyra Haggart, Project Manager •Tony Garcia, Parks Crew Leader• Robin Krakauer, Communications and Sponsorship Coordinator • Dina Balogh, Administrative Assistant Guests: Matt Hastie, MIG Traci Jones and Jana Kopp, SWELL Stephanie Hallock, Friends of Luscher Farm Board President Paul Shearer APPROVAL OF MINUTES • The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) reviewed and unanimously approved the minutes from February 21, 2024. CITY COUNCIL UPDATE:John Wendland, Council Liaison • Arts Council is working on a master plan.The Arts Council is a huge supporter of outdoor arts sculptures adding to the flavor of the City, and art programs throughout the year. • Celebrating the American with Disabilities Act.The Council received the 2023 annual update. As a City,we look at disabilities and the last couple of years have taken complete inventory of needs in the City, ramps, communications in several languages and the availability and ability to support the hearing impaired. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board and SAB Minutes March 20, 2024 • Ice Story damages cleanup came to about$2.1 Million. Because the Governor declared an emergency,the City will receive some money from the Federal Government, maybe 70 percent. This is just the cost relatable to the City cleanup.The private sector spent millions as well getting homes and businesses cleaned up and put back together. • The City staff took a delegation to Washington DC.The group included City Councilors, City Staff and High School delegates from the Youth Action Council. Met and listened to colleagues throughout the country and the congressional delegation from Oregon. We went to the Pentagon and a tour of the White House. YOUTH MEMBER UPDATE: Jason Dorn read the youth member update from Diya Deepu. The ASB had a service event at LO High School.The Green Team had a stewardship recruitment booth for participate in parks work parties.The Green Team also decided to increase the number of ivy pulls in a month to try and get more volunteers to come more often to remove ivy, blackberry and pickup trash. PUBLIC COMMENT: Paul Schearer: Parks Plan 2040 Needs Assessment and Public Safety.Add 2 sections; safety assessment and safety planning. Stephanie Hallock, Friends of Luscher Farm Board President: At the Parks Board February 21 meeting, improved access and parking, and more community gardens, were ranked among the top priorities in the public survey of how a little over$2 million in Metro share dollars should be allocated.At that meeting, Parks Board member Doug McKean stated that the Board should not alter the ranking of projects resulting from the community survey, and FOLF agrees. Since the Luscher Area Master Plan was adopted in 2013, improvements at Luscher have appeared on capital improvement lists time and time again, and time and time again those improvements have gone unfunded. With Metro share dollars you have a chance to correct that. The Friends of Luscher Farm respectfully request you recommend to City Council that at least$1,000,000 of Metro local share dollars go to Luscher.That amount was approved in a previous capital improvement plan but the dollars were never directed to support Luscher. Recent legislation in Salem puts properties like Luscher that are located at the edge of the Urban Growth Boundary at risk. FOLF supports Mayor Buck's recent comments that the city will address housing within its current limits and not seek UGB expansion. The Mayor's commitment and the citizen survey prioritizing Luscher for Metro local share dollars reflect the importance of farmland and open space to the citizens of Lake Oswego. FOLF asks the Parks board to echo that support by recommending at least$1,000,000 of the metro share dollars be used to support Luscher. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. PARKS PLAN 2040: NEEDS ASSESSMENT& RECOMMENDATIONS (60 mins) (I) Kyra Haggart, Project Manager Matt Hastie, MIG Project Manager Presentation: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2776202&repo=CityOfLakeOswego Status Report: • City Council Briefing:January 2, 2024 • CAC Meeting: February 29, 2024 • Community Engagement to date: 2IPage o CAC& Parks Board meetings: 4 meetings September 2023 and December 2023. o Pop-Up Outreach: Farmers Market, Neighborhood meetings, and other events, September and November 2023. o Community Survey: 1,183 Respondents, September 26 and November 10, 2023 o Community Event#1: ACC, November 14, 2023 o Focus Groups: 10 Community Member Group Interviews, October—December 2023. Essential Services & Equity Index Mapping: • Ed Becker: Did you consider only city owned resources, not including Mt. Park? • Matt Hastie: Only managed by parks department. No LOSD, State or HOA owned resources. When addressing gaps,then we will look at those to fill gaps. • Ed Becker:Trail connection. When you throw in Tryon it changes things. • Matt Hastie:Tryon Creek serves a lot of trail connectivity. Schools will also play in this equation. Access to school facilities. • Jason Dorn:Are lake easements considered. • Matt Hastie:This is how we address the gaps. • Kyra Haggart: Partner agencies—neighboring Cities. • Ed Becker: How did you determine percentage of poverty. • Matt Hastie:Through the census household income level under poverty threshold. • Kara Gapon: Access to outdoor areas; Willamette River. How is this assessed? • Kyra Haggart:Taking a second look at the area's more in depth, can be private or industrial/commercial. • Kara Gapon: 2040—Is there an overlay with future development and multi-family housing? • Kyra/Matt: Can happen all over City—more qualitative approach not mapping. Project— population and land is low. • Ivan Anderholm: Will Parks Plan analyze if there really is a gap in narrative form? Trends, Needs, &Opportunities: • Doug McKean: Programmatic access—LORAC access may be limited by transportation. • Kara Gapon: Zone 7 is built out. How do you do it where there is no land. • Matt Hastie:The solution may not be viable due to lack of land. • Ed Becker: Swim parks in the City. • Matt Hastie:The focus is on City owned facilities;the public swim park on Ridgeway Road.The Lake Grove Swim Park is operated by the school district. • Ed Becker: What about a shuttle system from downtown LO to the LORAC and Luscher Farm? • John Wendland:The conducted an exploration to expand transit in LO. It is very costly and the City gives a lot of money to Trimet. Put transportation in LO and then no one uses it.There is a cost factor and usership. • Ed Becker: Consider a public or private shuttle company. • Kyra Haggart:Trimet proposed a new line in downtown West Linn to Lake Oswego that would go by the LORAC. • Ivan Anderholm: Looking at funding for transportation— Benchmark requests. We are looking at ACC to Library to Teen Lounge to LORAC. • Greg Wolley: Community Gardens? • Matt Hastie and Kyra Haggart: Heard there is a waiting list and they want a community garden on the west side of the City. • Greg Wolley: Driving to Luscher from Mt. Park can take 17 minutes. • Doug McKean: Safety Assessment and planning, agrees with Paul Shearer. 3IPage • Matt Hastie:There are objectives to safety under a number of goals. • Kyra Haggart: We can have a narrative about that. • Jason Dorn: Play areas—is it hard to get approval for nature play areas? • Jeff Munro: Manufacture nature play need to meet standards. • Kara Gapon: Game tables at parks. • Matt Hastie: Something to note—good for all ages. • Sarah Ellison: Playground spaces with different age brackets; kids learning to walk, 2 to 5 year old's, and older kids. • Doug McKean: QR codes for plants, interactive signage in nature. • Ed Becker:Vandalism and security—trend of more damage. Manage and design facility for less vandalism. Provide lighting, cameras and smart lights. • Jeff Munro:There is vandalism. We work with the police department. In the popular parks we have added more cameras. Next Steps: • CAC Meeting#4, April 24, 2024 • Operations, Maintenance, and Organizational Analysis, March-April 2024 • Parks Board Meeting#4, May 15, 2024 • System Recommendations, Neighborhood Workshops and Pop-Up Events, Spring-Early Summer 2024 2. BRANDING PROJECT UPDATE (30 mins) (I) Jan Wirtz, Deputy Director Robin Krakauer, Communications&Sponsorship Coordinator Tracy Jones and Jana Kopp, SWELL Presentation: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2776201&repo=CityOfLakeOswego Objective is to create a recognizable brand identity for LOPR that embodies LOPR's authentic character while embracing the core branding of the City of Lake Oswego. DISCOVERY WORKSHOPS: The purpose of the discovery workshops was to create a structured framework that enabled the LOPR team to co-create and align on the current and future state of LOPR's brand identity. Alignment Workshop Objective: Meet with key stakeholders and city staff to align on strategic goals and determine LOPR's future-state vision for the brand. • Foundational information Review • Project Objective +Goals Alignment • Current State Exploration • Future State Visioning External Audience Workshop Objective: Understand the community LOPR serves, define LOPR's unique proposition, and key differentiates and gain clarity on LOPR's unique characteristics, offerings, and target audience. • Determine target audience personas (Families, Individuals, Seniors,Youth, Organizations) • Understand the unique mindsets of each persona/What do they care about • Create an Empathy Map for each person/What are they thinking, feeling, hearing, saying, doing, and seeing 4IPage • Outline the key differentiators/unique characteristics LOPR offers each persona Brand Workshop Objective: Create clarity on the purpose of a brand's hierarchy to ensure a cohesive and aligned approach to developing LOPR's brand identity. • Brand hierarchy overview+ best practices • Establish the current state of LOPR's brand hierarchy • Define the desired future state of LOPR's brand hierarchy EVOLUTION: • Leveraging elements like green spaces, water,trees, a bench, path, and hand, captures the essence of the beautiful and connected spaces of LOPR. • Through an artistic lens, represents how LOPR's natural areas and parks play host to a vibrant community full of life, growth, and unexpected beauty. • The arts are an integral part of life in the LOPR community, through abstract design elements, allows people to see what resonates with them, from a butterfly to a flower, from stained glass to a connected system. • A simple yet symbolic approach allows a logo to be utilitarian in use,while still uniquely representing LOPR through leaf like shapes and custom lettering. LOPR BRANDING: Logo Anatomy: • Simple Embracing a minimalist philosophy,this design amplifies the essence of LOPR, enhances visual appeal, and fosters recognition and memorability. • Versatile Recognizing the community's diverse interests and preferences,this design will resonate with all ages and abilities, and transcends all divisions within the department. • Adaptable The simple approach is adaptable to all external efforts, including social media, print, catalogs, photography, facilities, etc. • Balanced Utilizing a modern sans serif font for"Lake Oswego" alongside the custom serif lettering of"Parks& Rec, strikes a perfectly balanced logo. • Custom "Parks& Rec" Is not a font but rather a hand drawn, custom lettering unique to LOPR. • Symbolic The outer shape of the logo and its internal elements allow the audience to see what resonates with them,from a leaf to a drop of water, from natural slopes and shapes to details of a connected system. NEXT STEPS: 1. City Council presentation +City Manager approval Develop style guide 2. Build Brand Ambassador Program 3. Create internal communication plan + implementation Craft launch strategy 5IPage • Greg Wolley: Like the logo and size. Other details would have gotten lost if the logo was too busy. • Jana Kopp:The simplicity of the logo amplifies ease of use and connection. • Kara Gapon: Love it. Love the subsets. Consideration of small font. • Jana Kopp: It will be paired with the City logo. • John Wendland: Participated in a great exercise with staff and SWELL. Wrote on 500 post-it notes answers to, "what does Parks and Rec do?".The exercise demonstrated energy and the spirit of the department. 3. METRO LOCAL SHARE (10 rains) (R) Kyra Haggart, Project Manager Lake Oswego Project List ordered by Community Priority 1. George Rogers Park ADA River Access Trail (Eligible Portion on City Property) • Planning level cost estimate: $250,000 2. Luscher Farm Access Improvements & Parking • Planning level cost estimate: $1,950,000 3. West Waluga Neighborhood Connector Trails • Planning level cost estimate: $400,000 4. Luscher Farm Community Garden Expansion • Planning level cost estimate: $660,500 5. Hallinan Woods Natural Area Trail Expansion • Planning level cost estimate: $180,000 6. Sunnyslope Open Space Property Acquisition • Planning level cost estimate: $325,000 Total Available Metro Local Share Funds: $2,083,297 Total Planning Level Cost Estimate for All Projects: $3,765,500 Additional Cost Required (Planning Level Estimate): $1,682,203 • Doug McKean: Recommend we follow the list form the Community.We should feel free to organize as the board feels best. • Jason Dorn: First observation does align pretty well with what the board recommendation. • Sarah Ellison: Sunnyslope access is unique. • Ed Becker: What is the status of Master Plan and Clackamas County? • Kyra Haggart: Once adopted, can apply to use public park NFU. • Ed Becker: Investment in Luscher Farm. • Kyra Haggart: We can move funds depended on the Clackamas County land use application. Motion: Ed Becker made a motion to support the project list as prioritized. Discussion: • Sarah Ellison: Recommend switching Hallinan Woods and Sunny Sloop,flipping 5 and 6. • Doug McKean: Regarding Luscher access, nothing can happen until Clackamas County have approved the land use application, correct? • Kyra Haggart: Correct. • Kara Gapon: Sunnyslope can be purchased by anyone? 6IPage • Ivan Anderholm and Kyra Haggart: Yes, we could negotiate the price. Sunnyslope has been on the market for 6 months. • Kara Gapon: When could the City engage with the property owner? • Ivan Anderholm: We can budget Luscher in the next budget process and see how we can leverage funds. Motion: Sarah amendment the motion to flip Luscher Farm Access Improvements & Parking with Sunnyslope Open Space Property Acquisition. Greg Wolley seconded the motion. With a show of hands, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) unanimously approved the motion to prioritize the project list in this order: Approved Prioritized Project List 1. George Rogers Park ADA River Access Trail (Eligible Portion on City Property) 2. Luscher Farm Access Improvements & Parking 3. West Waluga Neighborhood Connector Trails 4. Luscher Farm Community Garden Expansion 5. Sunnyslope Open Space Property Acquisition 6. Hallinan Woods Natural Area Trails Expansion STAFF AND BOARD MONTHLY UPDATES: • The next regular meeting will be a joint meeting with the Library Advisory Board in the Council Chambers.The meeting will begin at 6pm. The next regular scheduled meeting will be Wednesday,April 17, 2024, 6 p.m. Jason Dorn adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:27 pm. Prepared by, Dina Balogh,Administrative Assistant 7IPage A k 6 Li'� PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY .' BOARD • Alli MINUTES OREoo `./•, May 15, 2024 CALL TO ORDER Jason Dorn called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Jason Dorn, Co-Chairs • Kara Gapon, Co-Chair• Sarah Ellison Jennifer Mozinski • Ed Becker• Rebecca Greene • Matt McGinnis, Greg Wolley• John Wendland, Council Liaison, Diya Deepu, Youth Member Zechariah Pressnell, Youth Member Alternates: NA Absent: NA Staff: Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks & Recreation •Jeff Munro, Deputy Director•Jan Wirtz, Deputy Director • Kyra Haggart, Project Manager• Robin Krakauer, Communications and Sponsorship Coordinator • Dina Balogh, Administrative Assistant Guests: Matt Hastie, MIG Project Manager,Jessa Miller, MIG Planner Stephanie Hallock, Friends of Luscher Farm Board President APPROVAL OF MINUTES • The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) reviewed and unanimously approved the minutes from March 20, 2024 as amended and April 17, 2024. CITY COUNCIL UPDATE:John Wendland, Council Liaison • Participants of the Winners of the "If I Were Mayor" contest is recognized at the May 7th City Council meeting. • Joint meeting with School Board to discuss Lake Grove community center. • Authorized a special procurement for the Wastewater treatment plant. • Council approved the Metro Local Share project list prioritized by the Parks Board. • Stafford and Childs road roundabout: Hits Parks Board due to Chapter 10. Needs part of a park. May need to go to the voters on the November ballot. 100% design. Stalled project. YOUTH MEMBER UPDATE: Zechariah Pressnell and Diya Deepu: Activities are slowing down with the end of school year. LO High had a STEM fair bringing more opportunities for environment. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board and SAB Minutes May 15, 2024 PUBLIC COMMENT: Stephanie Hallock, Friends of Luscher Farm Board President: Thanked the Board for support of Luscher projects. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. PARKS PLAN 2040: Operations, Maintenance, and Organizational Analysis (60 mins) (I) Kyra Haggart, Project Manager Matt Hastie, MIG Project Manager Jessa Miller, MIG Planner What does it include? • Introduction: Introduces the document and summarizes community engagement findings. • Organizational Structure and Staffing: Outlines current organizational structure and staffing levels. • Maintenance: Summarizes the current level of maintenance and responsibilities of the department. • NRPA Park Metrics Benchmarking: Compares various departmental metrics with other departments in the Pacific Northwest and other CAPRA accredited agencies nationwide. Organizational Structure&Staffing: • Lake Oswego is one of about 200 nationally accredited CAPRA Parks & Recreation Departments. • Well-staffed department: 77 total FTE's currently, 9 full-time and 13.9 part-time positions being added for the LORAC. • Active volunteer base: 25,292 volunteer hours completed in 2023. Maintenance: Maintenance and operations are key to a vibrant, clean, and sustainable parks and recreation system. • LOPR is responsible for management and maintenance of developed parks, natural areas, open spaces, and major facilities. • Maintenance is determined by property use, available amenities,terrain, proximity to neighborhoods, natural resources, and applicable requirements. • Natural area management is guided by the Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan (NAHMP). • Park stewardship program supports year-round stewardship and habitat restoration work parties. NRPA Park Metrics Benchmarking: The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) Park Metrics tool is designed to provide parks and recreation agencies with a comprehensive source of information and data standards. • Agencies upload self-reported data. • Generate reports to benchmark data against peer agencies. • Utilize to support additional funding, operational improvements, and to better serve communities. *BENCHMARK COMMUNITIES: City of Beavercreek, OH (CAPRA), Independence Township, MI (CAPRA), City of Roseville, MN (CAPRA),Town of Garner, NC(CAPRA), and comparable Pacific Northwest communities. Key Takeaways: • Budget: Lake Oswego exceeds the total operating and capital budgets of all peer CAPRA agencies and the Pacific Northwest for FY 22-23. 2IPage • Maintained Parks and Park Acres: Lake Oswego maintains a greater number of parks than peer agencies in the Upper Quartile but has fewer total acres than peer agencies in the Pacific Northwest Upper Quartile. • Staffing and Workload: When comparing total maintained acres, Lake Oswego has fewer acres per FTE than the Pacific Northwest Upper Quartile but is more similar to comparable CAPRA accredited peer agencies. • Program Participation: Lake Oswego exceeds program offerings of both peer CAPRA accredited agencies and within the Pacific Northwest. Additional Key Takeaways: • Population: Compared to the selected peer CAPRA accredited agencies, Lake Oswego is one of the most densely populated in terms of population relative to incorporated jurisdictional square miles. • FTE Allocation by Function: Lake Oswego allocated about 46%of its FTE count towards Maintenance and Operations, which is higher than all peer agencies. • Agency Responsibilities: Lake Oswego maintains a higher level of responsibility for the oversight, maintenance, and/or contracted services than peer CAPRA agencies with responsibility over 17 of the 25 key responsibility areas listed within the NRPA Park Metrics dashboard. Questions: • Greg W: Are there similarities of the same population, budget and staff? • Matt H:Yes,they are comparable. • Matt M: About the expenditures per capita.What does that mean? • Matt H: It depends on facilities; agency expenditures and it depends on what you are maintaining. • Matt M: Residents spend more to get more services. • Kyra H: We need to look at how we benchmark against other agencies.There is a higher expectation in LO. • Matt H: Be careful on how we message this. Put it into context. • Ivan A: State minimum wage different in MN operations and taxes. • Matt H: Will add some statements to this information. • Kara G: Get metric breakdown, if people want to know. • Kyra H: Will add statement. • Zechariah P: Why does revenue look lower? • Jan W: Contributing factor to lower revenue in 2022-2023,there was no tennis or golf and Covid recovery. • John W: People expect a lot of value for what the City provides. • Matt H: LO provides a high level of maintenance. Essential Services and Equity Index Mapping Overview: Evaluated park service based on the actual routes and distances people must travel to get to essential park services.The Parks Plan 2040 access analysis consisted of three parts: • Existing System Mapping: Mapped existing parks and recreation facilities. • Park Access Analysis: Using ArcGIS network Analyst, identified areas that are served and unserved by parks and essential park services within a 10-minute and 5-minute walk. • Equitable Access Analysis: Identified the gap areas with the greatest need. Questions: • Ed B:Tryon State Park is a huge advantage. 31 • Matt H:Areas around Tryon doesn't show up.There is access even though it is not a City owned property. • Kyra H:There is a gap area across Hwy 43 from Tryon Cove Park. It is tough to cross 43 with no pedestrian access. • Sarah E: It will be good to get park services mapped. Questions on when there is private access when we don't have public facility inclusivity. • Kara G: Access to private facilities require money. • Kyra H: Recognize to treat areas but also need to note service areas. • Kara G: Private pools have waiting lists. Some have 3 year waiting list. • Matt H: Noted 3 HOA areas on the map that have trails.There is no access the LO Country Club. • John W: What is the purpose of the mapping overview?The City is built out. • Matt H:The purpose is not to build a park but to improve connectivity. Maybe a mobile program? Some areas have parks but maybe add amenities to existing properties. • Kyra: Southwood Park does not have may amenities but serves the gap area in the Southwood Park neighborhood with something. • Matt H:Address gap areas with new amenities. Community Advisory Committee (CAC)Gap area considerations: Showing the areas may be misleading knowing these areas have essential services through the HOA's. During CAC Meeting#4, April 24, 2024, CAC members provided feedback on the project's identified gap areas to help further refine areas of the city with the highest severity of need for future investments and site-specific projects. • Adjust the gap area boundaries to remove areas with commercial and/or industrial zoning. • Rethink the high severity classification of the gap areas over Mountain Park HOA and Mary's Woods/Marylhurst University due to the presence of non-city recreation opportunities that are potentially available to people who live in those areas. • Consider improved pedestrian connectivity between gap areas and nearby recreation opportunities to alleviate access issues, especially when land is not available for additional parks and facilities in the gap areas themselves. • Consider additional barriers impacting gap areas such as challenging topography and roads that lack safe pedestrian crossings and sidewalks. • Recognize that people who own property fronting Lake Oswego have access to nature via the lake. • Recognize the limited hours of school playgrounds. Next Steps: • Neighborhood Workshops: May 31—Pilkington Park,June 7—Westlake Park,June 21—Hazelia Field,June 28—Foothills Park. • Summer 2024: Systemwide Recommendations, Site-Specific Recommendations. • Late Summer—Fall: Prioritized Capital Project List, Funding Strategies, SDC Methodology Update. • Late Summer,TBD: CAC Meeting#5, Parks Board Meeting#5. 2. 2024 WORKPLANS/GOALS (30 mins) (I, Dis, Dec) Co-Chairs Jason Dorn and Kara Gapon Goal#1: Incorporating DEI recommendations concerning access to parks,facilities and programs. Project overview:The DEI Committee is developing a framework of goals, actions and timelines for assuring that all Lake Oswegans have equal opportunity to participate in our City's parks and natural areas. Priorities: Access and affordable programs. 4IPage Discussion: • Kara Gapon:The goal needs clarity on timeline or budget. Is the board responsible for timeline and budget? • Kara Gapon: What is the reality of what the board can do? • Sarah Ellison:#1, Operationally—foster ideas. • Greg Wolley: Modify milestones/key deliverables language. • Ivan A:As to language, use initiate. Use this as part of what was/is accomplished. • Rebecca G: If we identify a program what is the process? Communicate via email? • Ivan A:Yes, email. • Jan W:The department has a process of development. • Rebecca G: Elementary age—It would be beneficial to add early access to foreign language classes. • Matt M: Can we work with DEI board? • Ivan A: LOSD does a good job of tracking community members who have challenges accessing programs. • Kara G:Timeline—Add to key. Do we add any other milestones? How do we check goals? • Sarah E: Key actions would be advisory to the department. • Kara G: Milestones in the Parks Plan 2040. • Kyra H:There is an opportunity to make it into the PP2040 with full timeline. • Sarah E: Draft Timeline by Fall (September). Goal#2: Review and provide comment to Staff on development of site-specific projects for the implementation of the City's Natural Areas Plan. Identify issues, concerns and opportunities for successful management of Natural Areas. Identify 3 areas: Wildfire management, review management plans, friends' groups. Train people on proper planting, herbicides, follow-up to plantings and encourage education. Discussion: • Jeff M: Friends groups are disappearing. Corporations are participating in work parties. 50%of friends' groups have a few people working at work parties. • Ed B: Come to NA meetings, communication, bulletin boards. • Jeff M: Friends groups need leads. • Ed B:Thank you to parks for cleanup of Woodmont park and planting sunflowers. • Jason D: 3 deliverables—1)summary of best management practices, 2) assistant and support for plan development of natural areas, 3) capture big goals & ideas of turning natural areas to living classrooms. • Kara G: Key actions—What is actionable for board? • Ed B: Under the lead of parks, we would lend knowledge to make sure trees would survive. Support role vs. lead role. • Greg W: Springbrook Parks? • Ivan A: Cost of management of Springbrook, Habitat Management Plans.Transform to PNW forest vs. replant of non-natives site by site. A lot of the cost is navigating sensitive lands. • Kara G: Should we add language per site? • Ed B: Site specific management plan—highlight somethings that have to be done in parks. • Sarah E: Advocate for funding?What is best use of the boards time and support? • John W: How does this work into Forestry Plan? • Ivan A:Talk about forest at a high level board involvement to collaborate with parks department. o Look at best practices. o Implement how volunteers are planting correctly. SIPage o Assist in establishing and recreate stewardship program for all ages and have it more of a learning program. o Maybe add this... Recreate a successful stewardship program.There were 10 friends' groups and now there are 6. • Jeff M: the department does work with schools. • John W: Likes the idea to incorporate into PP 2040 plan. • Kara G:Timeline—Initiate idea to be considered and continue what the board is doing with new stewardship position. Goal#3: Further the search for funding improved access and parking at Luscher Farm. Discussion: • Ed B: Suggest a foundation for Parks & Recreation. What can we do as a board? Make this a primary goal. • Ivan A: In the past a few members of Council didn't want a foundation. Would need to see if this would be a good idea. • John W: Get a core group and commit for 5 years. Seems like a natural thing to do. Parks board could identify people to help start. • Kara G: Key action— Identify the process to get funding through a foundation. • Kyra H:Total available Metro Local Share funds is $2M.Total cost estimate for all projects is around $4M.There is a $2M gap. • John W: Help identify getting funding for Luscher Farm. Utilize and collaborate with Friends of Luscher to fundraise to make up gap for Luscher Farm improved access and parking. • Kyra H: Depends on Clackamas County. Welcome support from the board to move forward. • Ivan A: Bonds will not happen for Parks in the near future. Maybe 2033 or 2039, 20 years from the 2019 bond. Kara will setup a shared google doc for board member edits on the 2024 workplans. STAFF AND BOARD MONTHLY UPDATES: • Ivan A: Update CIP and over-all bond spending. Will send it out to the board based on real cost. • Jeff M: Stewardship Gnomes & Friends-The winning name for the pollinator bee is announced the community survey winning name for the stewardship bee is Polli. Stickers of Polli-Bee were passed out to members of the board. The next regular scheduled meeting will be Wednesday,June 20, 2024, 6 p.m. Jason Dorn adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:27 pm. Prepared by, Dina Balogh,Administrative Assistant Wage dc1 AEI 0�� PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD V J O MINUTES September 18, 2024 oREGor' Recorded Minutes: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=2848485&dbid=0&repo=CityOfLakeOswego CALL TO ORDER Jason Dorn called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. and Introductions are made. ROLL CALL Present: Jason Dorn, Co-Chairs • Kara Gapon, Co-Chairs • Greg Wolley • Sarah Ellison • Ed Becker•Jennifer Mozinski • Rebecca Greene • Matt McGinnis • Patrick Gutierrez • John Wendland, Council Liaison • Diya Deepu,Youth Member• Katie Gragg,Youth Member Alternates: Tyson Hart, David Walters Absent: Staff: Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks & Recreation •Jeff Munro, Deputy Director• Eric Hirshberger, Natural Area Crew Leader • Kaleb Simpson, Natural Resources&Stewardship Coordinator•Tony Garcia, Parks Superintendent • Kyra Haggart, Parks Planner • Robin Krakauer, Communications and Sponsorship Coordinator• Dina Balogh, Administrative Assistant Guests: Matt Hastie, MIG APPROVAL OF MINUTES • The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) reviewed and unanimously approved the minutes from July 17, 2024 . CITY COUNCIL UPDATE:John Wendland, Council Liaison • The City had a successful summer season with concerts, markets, and festivals receiving positive feedback from residents. • The City will receive funding for six new EV charging stations as part of a consortium of cities led by Tualatin. • PGE franchise rate.The PGE rate more in alignment with the City other public utilities at a 5% franchise rate. It is needed to fund City services. • There are plans to establish a task force to address infrastructure issues and potential replacement options for the South Shore Fire Station. • City wide parking reform. Following the housing strategies, one of the new rules, can build residential and multifamily without parking lots or parking space. From an economic standpoint Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board September 18, 2024 it is better to have parking with buildings, recognizing that home dwellers would like to have a parking place. • Spent time talking about Parks Plan 2040. YOUTH MEMBER UPDATE: • Diya Deepu: DEI meeting on Saturday to discuss ideas and editing. • Katie Gragg: New program,first season of the young Entrepreneur Program.This program allows high school youth to sell goods and products at the Farmer's Market. It was a positive experience to be able to share something that I am passionate about and having mentorship in areas of business and, overall,very exciting to see these kinds of programs focused on both community but also career paths. PUBLIC COMMENT: NA REGULAR BUSINESS: STEWARDSHIP WORKS PLANS (10 mins) Kaleb Simpson, Natural Resources&Stewardship Coordinator Eric Hirshberger, Natural Areas Crew Leader https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2857297&repo=CityOfLakeOswego Kaleb and Eric presented the following 2024-2025 Stewardship Work plans for approval: Friends of Luscher Farm, Friends of Hallinan Heights Woods, Friends of the Rogerson Clematis Collection, Friends of Springbrook Park.The 2024-2025 projects include planting, ongoing garden maintenance, events and classes,garden tours, plant sales, garden improvements, path maintenance, park cleanup, family nature treasure hunt, LAMP advocacy, and walk and talk program Sarah Ellison moved to approve the plans as presented, and Patrick Gutierrez seconded the motion.The Parks Board unanimously approved the Stewardship Work Plans as submitted. Action Items: • Possible new Friends Group application received will be approved at a future meeting. • Consider using bulletin boards in parks to attract people to join friends' groups • Reformulate the friends group program and present a recommendation to Council for approval. • Explore ways to reestablish and support friends' groups. PARKS PLAN 2040: DRAFT PROJECT LIST(1.5 hours) Kyra Haggart, Parks Planner Matt Hastie, MIG Parks Plan 2040 Parks Board Meeting 5 Packet: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2848489&repo=CityOfLakeOswego The draft system wide recommendations are organized into different categories,focusing on administrative level, partnerships, park design and development, activation, and operations. The neighborhood workshops had good attendance and participants prioritized repairing facilities, creating more year-round opportunities, completing trail/sidewalk connections, and updating park facilities. The draft recommendations support the goals and objectives outlined in the strategic framework and include ongoing initiatives as well as new proposals. 2IPage Draft Systemwide Recommendations—CAC Review Comments: 1) Administration, Management, Communications, &Partnerships • Call out HOAs by name when listing organizations for the city to coordinate with to improve access to recreation areas • Redesign/reorganization of parks and recreation info on city website and/or creation of a Parks app or other tool will have huge benefit • Ok to leave in exploration of Joint Use Agreement with School District, but acknowledge reasons why it does not currently exist • Climate vulnerability information would be very useful for parks planning, recommendation should acknowledge overlapping efforts for climate resiliency and adaptation (e.g., CAP, Sustainability Council) Questions and Comments: • Ed: Why call out HOA's? • Matt: Include HOA's when partnering with other organizations. • Sarah: Apps and Websites? Update Registration software, 15 years things can change. • Kara: Al tech changes. • David: Make sure hard copy available for those who don't have technology. • Patrick asked about agreement with LOSD. Ivan and John answered the question explaining the details of the joint use (IGA). 2) Park Activation&Amenities • Accessibility of system is VERY important o Changes are impactful and allow more people to enjoy LO parks o A fully accessible playground is needed o Signage needs to indicate accessibility of a site/trail • Technology in parks could be coordinated with development of a park's app o Develop as part of a "technology infrastructure plan" o Allow the platform to give feedback so community input is always ongoing o Describe what people can do and experience in each park o QR codes at parks and trailheads Questions and Comments: • Kara: What is a fully accessible playground? • Kyra: Gabriel park is a universal design but is accessible to everybody, including people with disabilities. "Features" accessible to All to allow all kids can play together. • Kara: Create one playground that is universal. • David: Goal—All universally accessible parks at all park locations. • Kyra:The goal is to make playgrounds more accessible, but there are limitations to full physical accessibility • Sarah: When play equipment ends useful life, replace with universal equipment. • Rebecca: Barks chips in playgrounds? • Jeff:The moves away from using engineered wood fiber in playgrounds, except for nature play components. • Comment: Classify playgrounds. • Matt M: We could do that. o Proximity to play with each other. o Move away from engineered wood fiber. o Tactile experience (nature play) • Diya: Add QR code.Add translation. 3IPage 3) Park Design&Development • Create a new long-term recommendation around parkland acquisition; the city should not pass up opportunities and should be proactive o Lake, river and mountain views and lake access are particularly important • Consider coordinating with HOAs for underutilized green spaces—encourage them to allow more access and use by HOA residents • Opportunity to recognize history with park sites • Explore ways for people to donate land to the city for recreation space • Consider establishing or supporting a parks foundation • Consider going beyond minimum requirements in designing and developing parks Questions and Comments: • Ed: Encourage public use of HOA • Matt H: No—Allow encourage use is within HOA • Ed: May not be viable. • Matt M: Maybe opportunity if City maintains, can there be public access. Who is responsible for maintenance? • Ed: How do you assert liability? • Patrick: Make trails better in HOA areas. • Tyson: Pickleball—Came up in last 15 years.What will be the next sport or fad. Need to be flexible. How do we accommodate community? • Kyra:Answer—We have space constraints—We can look to acquire land. 4) Walkability,Accessibility, & Wayfinding • Signage in multiple languages and using easy-to-interpret graphics makes everyone feel welcome o Need to ensure outreach is welcoming/accessible as well o Don't over-rely on smart phones or technology; some people can't or don't use them o City website and surveys should be inclusive Questions and Comments: • Matt M: Chapter 10—restricts accessibility question. o Is there a way to be more inclusive? o Is this a discussion for this board to have? • Ivan: Answer— It is appropriate to answer. o Get community recommendation to look it. o Should we look at ways for accessibility on levels of development on chapter 10. o Collect information &give recommendation. o How do we recommend access to council? • John:This is the unintended consequences of Chapter 10. 5) Natural Resources&Nature Integration • Include new emerald ash borer recommendations • Add recommendation about outreach and education for invasive species (private property management also important) • Clarify what "safe access"to natural areas means Questions and Comments: • Greg: Environment education? • Ivan: Answer-We have programs—expand programs. Working with planning department (private property management). 4IPage • David: Question about wildfire management. • Kyra:Answer—Coordinating with planning department. 6) Maintenance& Operations • Consider generalizing Parks Maintenance Fee recommendation with exploring a "fee-based mechanism to fund maintenance" • Sustainable funding strategies are very important • Add natural areas to several recommendations when talking about parks and facilities Questions and Comments: • David: Question— New development with maintenance cost? • Matt H: Answer—Yes,we have that built in. 7) Programs& Events • Consider splitting recommendation around adaptive sports and all-abilities programming into two items • Identify neurodiverse programs and events as an opportunity; focus on partnering with statewide, regional or local groups to host/organize activities • Organize or support activities and programs and foster social connections • Cultural events very important to continue to support • Recreation scholarship program is essential to increasing recreation access • General support for recommendations in this category ACTION ITEMS: • Explore reestablishing the joint use agreement with the school district. • Coordinate with the school district to improve public access to recreation facilities. • Develop a fully accessible playground and consider accessibility in selecting play equipment. • Consider creating a long-term goal of universally accessible playgrounds. • Evaluate the feasibility of classifying existing playgrounds based on accessibility levels. • Revise the plan to include recommendations for increasing accessibility and wayfinding, such as signage in multiple languages and easy-to-interpret graphics. • Continue collecting data and feedback from the community to inform future decisions on accessibility and park development. • Consider reorganizing the recommendations to reduce duplication. • Note ongoing initiatives in the plan document. • Organize the system wide recommendations into categories. • Clarify the difference between park design and development and activation. • Consider the possibility of amending Chapter 10 to allow for certain levels of development based on accessibility needs, with input from the community. • Discuss unintended consequences of previous revisions to Chapter 10 and explore options for improvements in accessibility. • Clarify the definition of"safe facilities" and include it in the chapter. • Define what"safe access" means in relation to maintaining Natural Areas and parks. • Coordinate with the planning department for outreach and education invasive species and native species management. • Expand the recommendation on exploring a park maintenance fee to include other funding mechanisms. 5IPage DEI FRAMEWORK UPDATE AND RECOMMENDATION (10 min) Sarah Ellison and DEI working group The DEI working group planned to meet with the DEI advisory board in August, however the board did not have a scheduled meeting the month of August.The next meeting will be in September. The DEI framework is modeled after other department frameworks and influenced by the city's existing policy.The framework aligns with the city's overarching DEI goals and provides specific actions for the department to implement. Action: • Connect with Ivan to go over the framework best language. • Run the DEI framework by the ADA staff and DEI advisory board for feedback. STAFF AND BOARD MONTHLY UPDATES: • Ivan: Staff and board monthly updates is a good time for board members to talk about items not on the agenda. Discuss changing this section title as a place for board members to discuss and suggest topics to include in future meetings not discussed previously. • Jeff: Doug McKean's Memorial Bench. Connected with Sarah McKean on where Doug's bench will be located. Doug's memorial was touching and well attended. • Kyra:The department was awarded a million dollar grant through the Local Government Grant Program from the Oregon Parks& Recreation Department for Rassekh Park phase 2. • Jeff:The new Parks and Recreation logo will be on the sides of Parks vehicles with a QR code on the back bumper. The next regular scheduled meeting will be Wednesday, October 16,2024,4 p.m. Jason Dorn adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:52pm. Prepared by, Dina Balogh,Administrative Assistant 6IPage dc1 AEI 0�� PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY rr. BOARD J O MINUTES October 16, 2024 GREGOr� Recorded Minutes: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2876975&repo=CityOfLakeOswego CALL TO ORDER Jason Dorn called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. and Introductions are made. ROLL CALL Present: Jason Dorn, Co-Chairs • Kara Gapon, Co-Chairs • Greg Wolley • Sarah Ellison Rebecca Greene • Matt McGinnis • Patrick Gutierrez •John Wendland, Council Liaison • Diya Deepu, Youth Member• Katie Gragg,Youth Member Alternates: David Walters Absent: Tyson Hart, Ed Becker,Jennifer Mozinski Staff: Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks & Recreation •Jeff Munro, Parks Deputy Director•Jan Wirtz, Recreation Deputy Director, Kyra Haggart, Parks Planner • Robin Krakauer, Communications and Sponsorship Coordinator• Dina Balogh, Administrative Assistant Guests: MIG: Matt Hastie and Jessa Miller APPROVAL OF MINUTES • The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) reviewed and unanimously approved the minutes from September 18, 2024 . CITY COUNCIL UPDATE:John Wendland, Council Liaison • Proclamation: October is Meals on Wheels month, a program that provides hot meals to isolated seniors in the community. • South shore fire station in need of repair or replacement.Task force working at what kind of facility we need in the future that will withstand earthquakes. • Changes to flood zone guidelines may require additional costs and consultants for development projects. • North Anchor project update. Breaking ground in July 2025. • Update Michael Jordan, Portland City Administrator on the leadership change and a new leadership structure with the upcoming elections. Portland will be run by the City Council with 12 members and Mayor. It will be a City run by professionals, a model unique to Portland. • Business license fee changes to help promote business in LO. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board October 16, 2024 YOUTH MEMBER UPDATE: • Diya Deepu: Green team had their first meeting.Talked about goals and activities. Completed ivy pulls.Also, collaborated with our greenhouse at LOHS to plant more native plantings. Oswego Lake Watershed ivy pulls. Going to try and work with SOLVE to pick up trash. Working on hosting an annual sustainability fair at our schools around April. Met with DEI working group on Sunday,working on edits. • Katie Gragg: Between this meeting and the next board meeting in November, many students will be submitting their first round of college applications. Early action and early decision deadlines tend to fall the first of November for a lot of colleges.This means a lot of students are hard at work writing their essays. PUBLIC COMMENT: Friends of Luscher Farm, Stephanie Hallock, President of the board and Gail Wallmark. Public comment on the 12 capital investment projects listed under Luscher Farm Park& Natural Areas. Luscher is a unique property in the portfolio of the Parks and Recreation Department. It comprises 100 plus acres along Rosemont Rd zoned for Exclusive Farm Use.The namesake Luscher property is home to community gardens, a farm that supplies fresh produce to our community, classes and camps for kids and adults, and the Rogerson Clematis Garden.The acres of open space include walking trails,wildlife habitat, wetlands, meadows, hedgerows,tree stands, and vistas of surrounding farmland. Luscher is different than any other park, and the Friends of Luscher Farm advocate to preserve its rural character and agricultural history. Our mission has been informed by the 2013 Luscher Area Master Plan, but much has changed since it was adopted. With the Hazelia field complex,the dog park,the Rassekh skatepark, and LORAC to open soon,this quiet rural corner of our city has become a hub of active recreation. It is time to draw the line on recreational development at Luscher. We support projects on the CIP list that focus on passive recreation and sustain the essential rural character of the Luscher properties. We support improving access and parking, more community gardens, rehabilitation of the historic buildings, and upgrades and ADA improvements for the programs offered. We also support restoration of Wilson Creek and hope we can help in that effort.We have consistently advocated for increased agricultural activity on the Luscher properties and have made a specific proposal to the Parks Department in that regard. We also support construction of an urban agricultural and environmental center but recognize that would require an exception from the state to Oregon's land use laws. We do not support active recreation such as the teams of mountain bikers that currently use the farm for practice, and we do not support the climbing and ropes courses proposed on the list of twelve projects. We are concerned about putting gravel and cedar chips on the natural trails, and we need to learn more about the scope of plans to develop picnic and playground areas. Luscher Farm Park does not check the boxes associated with traditional parks. While we appreciate the consideration being given to this unique and magnificent piece of Lake Oswego history we urge you to think creatively about sustaining a bountiful, historic place that invites visitors of all ages to enjoy, learn about, and connect with our natural environment, agricultural roots, and our history. REGULAR BUSINESS: PARKS PLAN 2040: Capital Projects List (1.5 hours) Kyra Haggart, Parks Planner Matt Hastie, MIG Jessa Miller, MIG Parks Plan 204 Presentation#6: http://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2878070&repo=CityOfLakeOswego 2IPage Matt started with an overall update on where MIG is in the process and approximate time frame.The presentation included a broad overview summary, a sense of the Capital projects distributed among different types of projects geographically.The project is in the last quarter of the process.This is MIG's 6th meeting with the Parks board and will be meeting with the CAC next week. The next step is to prioritize the projects in that list, particularly in terms of the timeline for implementation of the projects. MIG will talk about the recommended evaluation criteria and go through the exercise with the board. A brief update on the survey that is open, where MIG is asking folks in a broader community to do some prioritization in terms of types of projects and give their priorities related to evaluation criteria. The survey is oriented towards prioritizing the categories of projects and will also give feedback on the evaluation criteria. NEXT STEPS: One, there's another kind of element of this project. MIG went through the CIP list and is working on costs associated with the projects in the CIP,they are really close to having a set of costs for those projects,wrapping up and prioritizing the CIP and then the next steps of that are the implementation of the action plan piece.Then move into rolling everything up into a draft plan. Matt talked a little bit about what those next steps look like towards the end, where they are headed into that draft plan development review and refinement stage. MIG is still wrapping up some things and action plan, including the online survey. Those are the things that are left in terms of the community engagement and putting the draft plan answers for people to be able to review and comment on. Matt gave a quick recap from the last time he met with the board when the focus was on the system wide recommendations. are Matt stated MIG is updating the recommendations based on what they heard from the Parks Board and the CAC prior to that meeting. MIG may end up doing a little bit of reorganization of those with staff, but the content won't change much. Organizing the recommendations in different categories might a little bit would be a key element of the plan as well. The focus today is on those site specific recommendations and capital improvement projects. Q&A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LIST: PURPOSE:To identify capital projects to achieve the community's vision for Lake Oswego's park and recreation system through the year 2040. CIP STRUCTURE &APPROACH - Project Categories: The CIP identifies 124 total projects for implementation in the near-term, mid-term, and long-term based on available resources such as funding and staff time.There are four types of project categories: • Kyra—Comment—only one nature project. However, we have a lot of added maintenance is in another category. • Matt H—A lot of these nature projects are in other categories. Investments. • Greg—What project? • Kyra—Wilson Creek Project at Luscher. • Jason—Is there an order to the list? • Matt H—Yes, it is through the classifications. Regional, pocket, urban. Recreation facilities are at the top. Order by size. CIP MAP SUMMARY AREA A, B, C, D—All Proposed Projects: Reinvestment/Build/Add/Access/Nature Wage • David—Monetary cost question? • Matt H - No it will be coming in the future. • Kyra—Get a more accurate cost estimate. • Matt H—Will summarize that information and get that to everyone. DRAFT OF CIP SUMMARY—Proposed New Parks & Facilities (No Site Identified): Project: Neighborhood Park, Outdoor Pickleball Courts, Water Play Feature, Sand Volleyball Court, Westside Indoor Community/Recreation Center, • Matt M.—Indoor pickleball courts? • Kyra—There will be 3 in the new LORAC. Outdoor courts are something that everyone wants. • Kara—Pickleball—removable nets—different lines with other sports—think about permanent verses opportunities for multi-sport. • Kyra—Yes, we can explore opportunities. School district has met some of those needs. People want permanent places to play. • Kara—Uncovered desirability for a covered court. • Kyra—People would prefer a covered outdoor court. • David—All the grade schools have a covered area. Palisades. • Kara—Noise studies—the noise went up and out—not sure if the noise was lightened. • Matt H—These are all good questions that need further study. • Kyra—We would go through a whole process. First thing we do is look for an appropriate place. • Patrick—Is this the next step? Do we do studies? • Matt H—Yes,we will do studies and then go do more research. Study to evaluate potential sites. • Kyra—124 projects, 15 years, and how do we prioritize the projects? • Sarah - Fully inclusive playground. Was it included in a section? • Kyra—We are looking to reinvestment project. Replace a playground with inclusive play equipment. DRAFT CIP SUMMARY— Proposed Systemwide Improvements: Project: Neighborhood Trail Connections, Systemwide Drinking Fountain Implementation, Systemwide Bollard Replacement. • Sarah—Assume it would be more expensive? • Kyra—Play equipment is somewhat more affordable in some respects.The Wilsonville playground has some ADA features. • Jeff—Cook Park is fully inclusive. Proposed Systemwide Improvements— Questions on projects? • Rebecca—Luscher Farm—Active Recreation Programs? • Ivan—Based on Luscher 2012 Master Plan. Luscher area includes Rassekh, Steven Meadow, etc. Looks at things comprehensively. • Rebecca - Horse trails? • Kyra—IDK. • Ivan—There have been design considerations with the Stafford trail. Only can have horses where it is assigned, by hunt club with assigned trails. When horses were allowed they were everywhere and were causing degradation of trails. We don't have the facilities to house the horses—parking lot(horse trailers).The 100 acres is small for a destination for horses. • Kyra—Active recreation—sports field projects. • Rebecca—(Feels that there is too many. Not to add to Luscher). 4IPage • Kyra—Fields in addition to Hazelia. • Matt H—The Luscher area master plan includes all the areas around it. • Kyra—At one time adding fields behind Hazelia. • Sarah—Once the Rassekh fields are built is that something that will fulfill the need. • Matt H—Adding an athletic field study. Will it be enough or not? It will define more on demand for athletic fields. • Kara—Hazelia? • Kyra—Hazelia is included—now it has been developed as its own park. • John Wendland—Field study—need to get the macro for LOSD. Look at resources of all fields. • Matt H—Separate consultant that specializes in that for field and will work with LOSD. • John W—Gym study,too. • Matt H— No. • John W—City Council has committed to pickleball as a priority for a study. We would prioritize finding a new home. • Sarah—Signage ? Need accessible signage (both language and other disabilities). • Kyra—Talks about the big monumental signs. Also,talks about rules and regulations. Include icons. Not sure of the level of accessibility. • Jeff—includes ADA signage. Restrooms, etc. Every sign in park needs to be upgraded. • Matt H—There is a number of systemwide topics on the sign and inclusive recommendations. • Sarah—Signage about accessibility. Would be great to have different languages. Good thing to explore. • Greg—General planning—Chapter 10— How did that affect planning? • Kyra—Some projects on the list where you will see a note that this is outlined. Brant Park— predated the charter—adopted before plan. Need to check with city attorney on whether we can or cannot do that plan. It was a desire from community. More investigation is needed. • John W—You can go to the voters. Including proposed measure on 3-618. Stevens Meadow Project. • Kyra—Stevens Meadow—If there was a priority we would have to amend the Chapter 10 and go to the voters. • Ivan—Community desires.Access parking in natural areas. We polled the community. Something for the voters would be looking at accessible parking in some natural areas. Maybe it would be something in the future. Springbrook, Stevens Meadow. Prioritization will be that theme where Council can make a policy decision. • Jason - Paths and connectivity- Does transportation have something? • Matt H—Yes—the City has a transportation plan. Will require additional coordination with the City. • Kyra—There are opportunities to do things like safe routes to school—safe routes to parks. CIP update.Transportation advisory board. Crossover from other boards. Know that pathways to parks are a priority. • Patrick—McNary plan? • Jeff—Yes,we have plans. Gate, benches, McNary is not really a park(built on a water tower). Pathway is ours and working on drinking fountains. We are trying to hit some of the major parks first. • Rebecca—Luscher Farm trail improvement—paths are clear. What is the benefit to add gravel? Compacted gravel would be ADA compliant. Engineered wood fiber is also considered ADA complaint. • Kara—Due to the holes in the ground. • Kyra—Improved trails with gravel would help with that. • Jeff—There would be a lot of care. 5IPage • Kyra—Luscher—refine the scope. Projects for Luscher came out of the Luscher Farm Master Plan. We need to look at what projects can be implemented. • Matt H - Identified at high level projects. Need additional community engagement. • Sarah—DEI feedback—loop in Luscher farm for accessibility would be great. • Kyra—When you have identified trails it is better to keep people on the trail and not go on sensitive areas. • Greg—Slopes at Luscher? • Jeff—It would have to be looked at so the ADA would not have slopes and adhere to the requirement. • Ivan—Need to reengage with community.The loops would have to come off of accessible parking or from an area that is already accessible. • Jeff—The plan recognizes the needs for trails that are accessible. • Ivan—If we rock some of those it helps injury and erosion. • Dave—Plans—Do some get too old? • Kyra—Yes,we look at it and we make sure that some things are appropriate to move forward on. Maybe some things are relevant or not. Freeponds—master plan. • Kara—Unsung heroes—Quarry bike park—people of all ages use it. Seating area in this area? Covered area? Designation of area for seating that is safe away from the bikes. Bike repair area. Tools on chains. • Jeff—Had one area for bike repair—continued getting destroyed. Cut and took tools. • Ivan—We did have kiosk and benches but they were vandalized. Need to have provisions to keep an eye on it. EVALUATION CRITERIA- Determining CIP Implementation— The project fills a gap in an area of the City where similar facilities or services are not currently available. The project addresses the needs of people or groups with specific park and recreation needs (e.g., people with disabilities, low-income families, older residents,youth). The project meets multiple park system planning goals and objectives. The project's cost and feasibility are scaled appropriately to the benefit it will provide Availability of state or federal grant funding or similar sources of money for implementation The project addresses one or more identified citywide goals or initiatives (i.e., sustainability, climate resilience, DEI, Council goals, etc.) • Ivan— Maybe results can be weighted? Get Ranks from MIG Survey • Dave—On the costs—are you going to include ongoing costs? • Matt H -Yes, includes ongoing costs. Capitol cost, replacement cost. • Dave—Is there a way to do it without being tech savvy? • Matt H - We can have copies at City Hall. NEXT STEPS: 1. Prioritization Survey, Funding+ Implementation Strategies, &SDC Methodology Update October — Early November. 2. Parks Board Meeting#7, December 18,TBD. CAC Meeting#7, December 12,TBD. 3. Draft& Final Plan Development&Adoption, November—Early Spring. MIG Action Items: • Prioritize the projects in the capital improvement project list based on timeline for implementation. • Complete the cost estimate for the projects. • Develop a new neighborhood park in the southwest portion of the neighborhoods. 6IPage • Conduct a field usage and demand study to determine if the proposed athletic fields will satisfy the needs of the community. • Evaluate the accessibility of signage, including icons and multiple languages. • Assess the accessibility of big monument signs and rules and regulations signage. • Upgrade all park signs, including parking signs and restroom signs, as part of the ADA plan. • Consider specific features for accessible signage, such as hearing and wayfinding times. • Consult with the City Attorney to ensure compliance with charter language regarding project allowances. • Encourage participants to take the online survey and spread the word. • Consider including ongoing maintenance costs in the project evaluation criteria. • Review the results of the online survey and look for instances of multiple submissions from the same person. • Explore alternative ways to participate in the survey for those who are not tech-savvy, such as providing paper copies at City Hall. • Consider translating the survey into other languages. DEI FRAMEWORK UPDATE AND RECOMMENDATION (20 min) DEI Working group: Sarah Ellison, Greg Wolley, Dave Walters and Diya Deepu. Sarah and Greg took the draft DEI framework from the September meeting to the DEI advisory board for review and comments. We also had an opportunity to meet with Ivan and Kara to get their input.The working group met to review the draft and made updates based on feedback and filled in details that were missing.The group received a lot of good feedback.The goal was changed slightly based on feedback and clearly states it is a recommendation.The groups hope is that once we make the recommendation,the department could consider the recommendation to draft the department policy. Timeframe for actions, annually or every five years to coincide with departments policy review schedule. One section that received a lot of good feedback from the DEI board is on site navigation signage The DEI board also gave feedback on the scholarship program. • Rebecca: There is a gap on English speaking children learning Spanish and vice a versa.Talked to schools and would like to have this offered to children. Spanish classes start for students in Middle School. • Rebecca: The document references Lake access. • Kara:There are a lot of legal complexities. • Ivan: Change to public bodies of water, publicly owned and controlled. Motion: Jason Dorn moved to approve the recommendation with changes to the Oswego Lake reference to public bodies of water. Discussion: Greg: Scholarship program—Explore renaming the program. Ivan: The department will explore renaming the scholarship program.Acknowledge that it is donor driven program and will look at how we will be able to manage it. Good recommendation. We will look at it and apply whet we can do. Motion: Jason Dorn made a motion to approve the recommendation with the changes to the Oswego Lake reference to "Public Bodies of Water". Patrick Gutierrez seconded the motion. The board unanimously approved the motion with the Public Bodies or Water changes. 7IPage • Sarah:Timeframe to finalize the document?Would like to have it approved before Diya leaves the board. • Jan: Working with the Scholarship committee. Will discuss scholarship recommendation timeline and suggested changes? • Ivan: Overall reaction to it and how we can develop it internally. Will look at, collect data, etc. Come up with a draft and take to DEI coordinator and then to CMO for review. By the end of December,the department should be able to come back to the board with something. STAFF AND BOARD MONTHLY UPDATES: • Jason:Three PB Goals: ■ DEI, happy with this was accomplished, ■ Natural Areas Management. ■ Luscher Farm. Looking for board members to work on the efforts to the other goals. Looking for recommendations and keep an eye out for funding. Recognize constraints that are at Luscher. Kyra is will willing to meet for a Luscher 101.Jason asked for board members to help Patrick with the Luscher Farm goal. Greg said the Natural Area working group met last week. • Kara: Luscher Farm working group needs to be separate from Natural Areas working group. • Ivan: One of the quickest ways to set a meeting with Kyra and she can let the group know what the deep dive was into the Luscher project.This will help the Luscher working group. • Jeff: Update - Received Doug's memorial benches. Hope to be installed by next meeting. Leaving it up to the family on what kind of dedication they would like to do. Will report when it is installed. The next regular scheduled meeting will be Wednesday, November 20, 2024,4 p.m. Jason Dorn adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:20pm. Prepared by, Dina Balogh,Administrative Assistant BIPage c d � PARKS, RECREATION &NATURAL RESOURCES ADVISORY . BOARD MINUTES oREoo ./ , December 18, 2024 Recorded Minutes: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2916487&repo=CityOfLakeOswego CALL TO ORDER Jason Dorn called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. and Introductions are made. ROLL CALL Present: Jason Dorn,Co-Chairs• Kara Gapon, Co-Chairs• Greg Wolley•Sarah Ellison (CAC) • Jennifer Mozinski (virtual) • Rebecca Greene • Matt McGinnis (CAC) • Patrick Gutierrez (CAC) • Diya Deepu,Youth Member• Katie Gragg,Youth Member•John Wendland, Council Liaison CAC ROLL CALL: Jymn Meier•Julia Haddad • Kara Orvieto • Betty Holladay •Teresa Bianco • Meg Matsushima Alternates: David Walters,Tyson Hart, Absent: Ed Becker Staff: Ivan Anderholm, Director of Parks& Recreation •Jeff Munro, Parks Deputy Director•Jan Wirtz, Recreation Deputy Director• Kyra Haggart, Parks Planner • Robin Krakauer, Communications and Sponsorship Coordinator • Dina Balogh,Administrative Supervisor• Evan Fransted, Associate Planner Guests: MIG: Matt Hastie,Jessa Miller, Lauren Scott APPROVAL OF MINUTES • The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PARKS Board) reviewed and unanimously approved the minutes from November, 2024 . CITY COUNCIL UPDATE:John Wendland, Council Liaison • The City Holiday Tree Lighting was a huge success.Thank you to all involved in making it a successful event; Parks and our partner in this event the Chamber of Commerce.The event brings the community together in many ways. It was a fantastic event on behalf of the Parks& Recreation department to get the park ready. Emily Liu is our events person now and she and her team did a fabulous job. Attendance was the biggest we have ever had. • Approved Policy: Housing Production Strategy to increase affordable housing. • Council approved 2025 Master Fees and Charges • Council Certified the General Election Vote. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Advisory Board December 18, 2024 YOUTH MEMBER UPDATE: • Diya Deepu: September 9 donated clothes. Green team field trip. • Katie Gragg: YAC Meeting to report on respective boards youth are involved. PUBLIC COMMENT:Gail Walmark, FOLF On behalf of Friends of Luscher Farm Gail Walmark ask board that the proposed "active recreation" project (LAMP) be removed from the PP2040 capital projects list. It has already been excluded from the land use application to Clackamas County for the adoption of LAMP. Given that UGB expansion or annexation of any/all of the remaining Luscher properties is at least 20 or more years off—after Parks Plan 2040 sunsets—there's no point in keeping it on the list. More importantly—although FOLF stands in general support of the application for the adoption of LAMP—we are steadfast in opposing athletic fields, ball courts and similar active recreation' on the remaining Luscher Area properties...Especially on the namesake Luscher property. As we noted in our Oct Comment, "much has changed since 2013." There's now a hub of active recreation coming online right across Stafford Rd—LORAC,the new Muni and Rassekh Park, where another athletic field is expected to be built—not to mention the Lake Ridge HS ball fields and tennis courts. As such,we are asking the City to call "out of bounds" on any new ballfields or courts on the remaining Luscher properties to protect the cultural heritage of their agricultural, pastoral legacy. A first step to help us—and our likeminded LO neighbors—breathe easier, would be to remove the project from PP2040.We've been told it's included it because "it is still a part of the City's adopted Luscher Area Master Plan." If that means it would be up to City Council to authorize its removal, we are asking you to please include that request when you pass the Plan on to the Council. Gail took this opportunity to remind the board that besides the new access, FOLF has been advocating most strongly for the expansion of agricultural uses at Luscher, implementations that are not only envisioned in the LAMP (&the accompanying 2017 Agricultural Report), but allowable right now under EFU zoning. In fact, another of the 12 Luscher projects listed in PP2040 proposes related capital expense for ag expansion. We are heartened that a new CSA operator has been secured and are looking forward to assisting them find ways to grow the City's CSA beyond its current 12.5 acres.To be precise, and taking inspiration from the LAMP and by whatever mechanisms necessary. FOLF is asking the City to devote the 15 northernmost Luscher acres for agricultural uses. REGULAR BUSINESS: PARKS PLAN 2040: PRIORITIZED PROJECT LIST,COSTS,FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION (1.5 hours) Kyra Haggart, Park Analyst/Project Manager, MIG: Matt Hastie,Jessa Miller, Lauren Scott Presentation: https://www.ci.oswego.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/L02040 JOINT? Presentation FINAL 12182 4.pdf Prioritized Capital Improvement Project List—Matt Hastie, MIG Q&A • Q—Greg:Added projects but did not add timeframes?A—Kyra:These projects were added after they did the prioritization. • Q—Patrick: What is the Nature Project?A—Kyra: Wilson Creek.There are 27 projects in natural areas vs.the 1 that is listed as the capital project. Some are crossover. • Q—Sarah:TAB—Look and see the number that has been assigned. Can we apply that level of transparency that could be applied to this project? Level of transparency would be very useful. Wage A- Kyra: Can supply that spreadsheet to the board and to the public.A—Matt Hastie, MIG: We have the numbers and scoring. • Q—Sarah: Metric measuring the need of the projects. Is this solely geographic? Needs to address playgrounds with equity indicators. Concerned how this metric is scored. Projects could score higher.A-Kyra: Equity assessment—looking at pairing ADA improvement projects with Playground improvement to accomplish both at the same time. Accessibility was one of the Parks Plan goals and gets a point for meeting that goal. • Q—Sara: Project—swim park assessment. It would only score a 0 or 1.This project should score higher due to the indicator.A—Matt Hastie, MIG: Accessibility is a criteria. We ask questions to the board and let people voice the opinion and adjust from that. No sure we are going to go back and try to go back and do a reassessment. • Q—Kara:The 5M to 8M—Does this include the storm clean up?A—Kyra: It is an average annual cost.A-Jeff Munro: Finance set up a different account for special weather or other events. A—Matt Hastie, MIG: Received dollar information from staff and applied that through quantifying it to projects. Planning level number that was presented. Q—Ivan:Are those in 2024 dollars. Nothing for inflation. • Q—Rebecca:Timeframe of athletic fields project.A—Matt Hastie, MIG-They will be done in January. It will be implemented into the plan • Q—Jason: How are we going to look at the school and parks as the study?A— Kyra: Looking at the athletic fields. • Q-John Wendland: Look at their bond dollars—we need some analysis on both plans.The community wants the district and City to figure it out together. • Q- Kara: Possible closure of Lake Grove?A—Kyra: Until LOSD concludes we will wait to see what happens. A—Matt Hastie, MIG:There may be situations that we will not have some things included. • Q—Rebecca:What's the process to choose the new playgrounds?A—Ivan:Adopted a public engagement policy to not just do a "like for like" process. Playground replacement has some things to think about-space and to make sure aesthetically that it fits within that park. Rebecca: Glad to hear that there is community engagement. Kyra—In the past a playground would get out and we would replace with a newer model of the equipment. • Q- Matt McGinnis:Are all these parks being used?A—Jeff:Yes, but they are not being used as much.They do need to updated and are very small parks. Playgrounds get inspected once a month • Q—Kara: Do you ever evaluate usage?A—Ivan:The playgrounds in our parks were part of a public engagement. We don't have a mechanism to study/evaluate usage. • Q—Sarah: Request for community engagement—maybe there could be a system-wide outreach. • Q—Jason: Freepons Park medium—The playground has a drainage issue—how is that taken into consideration as we are planning? Climate models—warmer winters—areas with drainage problems has that been looked at?A—Matt Hastie, MIG: Did not score or rate by that.Jeff: Doing some "band aid" drainage. Kyra: Left in midterm to do a long term due to design, land use, etc. If it is stronger priority of the board.Jeff: It was put in 1996. Ivan: When you are going in and evaluating we look at the maintaining of it. It was built on a wetland so maybe we need to keep it as a wetland. Look at how it functions. • Q—David: What is the update on Hazelia field?A-Jeff: It was done 5 years ago—may have another 5 years to go.The turf will need to be replaced in 5 years.Turf replacement is every 10 to 12 years. • Q—Kara: Drainage in George Rogers. Do you take into consideration if things need better drainage?A-Jeff:Yes, unfortunately there is other traffic on those fields with events. Wage • Q—Patrick: Pickleball is a high priority but no site.A-Matt Hastie, MIG: We do have a project in there as a near term Implementation strategy to an indoor strategy.That is longer term. • Q- Library/LOSD westside project.A- Kyra: Don't know the scope and need a new teen center. Could use some information and working with other departments.John Wendland:There is different funding through Urban Renewal. LOSD working on their decision. • Q- Ivan: Based on high priority projects,they can be moved up. If circumstances change,timing may make the priorities change.A—Matt Hastie, MIG: Things can change and this is our best recommendation on how to do this plan. • Q—Dave: Have you looked at partnering with private businesses for pickleball?A—Matt Hastie, MIG: You will see the strategies when we get to the next phase. • Q—Rebecca:Tryon Cove Park—Is there any other way to get there?A—Kyra: Metro connection with Tryon and Tryon Cove. It is a complicated big project.There are others that may consider this—BES/Metro/ODOT/Army Corps.There is a fish passage. • Q—Jason: Is there some talk of connecting Tron Cove with Foothills?A- Kyra:Yes. Connect trails. • Q- Kara—If we have access to Oswego Lake—Is the City considering maintenance.Who will pay for it?A—Ivan: Good point but need to have the final order out.John Wendland: It should not be part of the plan. We will take this off line and figure it out. Implementation Strategies—Lauren Scott, MIG Q&A This piece is a living document. • Q- Matt McGinnis: Luscher—Is there a way to clarify what there is?Athletic study. A—Kyra: Luscher working group—if you want to do an amendment. Does the 2040 plan the same as the Luscher master plan? It can be amended but it would need to be the same. • Q—Greg: Who owns the cemetery now?A—Ivan: A nonprofit organization.They own the land and business.They have a concern about the disrepair.John Wendland: It is a complicated thing to deal with cemetery. Ivan: Working behind the scenes. • Q—Sarah:#7—department jus approved the natural area management plan and it meshes with it. • Q- Patrick—tree code?A— Kyra: Looking at EAB and MOB. Parks will be involved with anything tree related in the City. Ivan: If something changes in the tree code. Matt Hastie: We will modify into our Parks plan.They both need to be integrated. • Q—Sarah: Signage question—are we taking DEI suggestions?A- Lauren Scott, MIG: Standardize icons and other sources. Related actions are outlined. • Q—Kara: Is this meeting public and these documents online.A—Kyra:Yes,everything is online. • Q—Rebecca: Does this include trail maps.A—Kyra: It may—we need to look it over and come up with a plan. • Q—Jason: How critical is it to get funding strategy?A-MIG: We will do a high level and go through quickly. Implementation&Funding—Lauren Scott,MIG Q&A • Q—Kara: Demo tax 4.5 M over the course of 14 years.—8 houses to be demolished. (50%) of the house John: We tightened that.Activity has flattened out with higher interest rates. • Q—Patrick: Is there a way to do a parks utility fee? Make sure that it doesn't hit lower income families.A—Matt Hastie, MIG:Yes, it can be flexible on how you can apply that. • Q—Kara:Where did the numbers come from.A-Matt Hastie, MIG: Most numbers came from the City.An outside consultant did this through the numbers that were given to them. Came from past results.John Wendland: Static in a 3%each year. General revenue is a complex number. It includes wages, etc. Wage 2024 GOALS ACCOMPLISHMENTS&2025 PRIORITY AREAS (10 min) 2024—Top 3 Board Accomplishments: 1. DEI Framework Goal:Through an effort led by the Board's DEI Working Group, we delivered a framework for evaluating future Department plans, policies, and operational decisions through a rigorous DEI lens. Delivery of the framework document was timed so that it could be incorporated in Parks Plan 2040. 2. Natural Areas Management Goal: Despite staffing changes, changes to Friends Group management, and the untimely passing of a fellow Board member who played a key role in initiating this goal,the Natural Resources Working Group began the process of evaluating existing plans and on-the-ground conditions at two of the largest Natural Areas within Lake Oswego.This group has initiated next steps towards collaboration with staff in newly created roles and will continue to work towards delivering a set of recommendations for the development of individual management plans for some of the City's largest and most cherished natural areas. 3. Luscher Farm Funding Goal:Three projects at Luscher Farm remain CIP priorities, but also remain unfunded.The Board set out to develop recommendations for funding these projects, although the current land use classification of this property remains an obstacle to project implementation regardless of funding. Early in 2024, however,the opportunity arose to recommend priorities for use of remaining Metro Bond Share funds.The Board voted to recommend that a portion of this funding be allocated to the Luscher Farm Access and Parking project.This recommendation was passed on to City Council, and ultimately adopted by Council. Work towards recommending sources of, or pathways to funding for unfunded, prioritized CIP projects from the Luscher Area Master Plan, will continue to be a Board priority. 2025—Top 3 Themes/Issues for Goals: 1. Identifying opportunities for Board alignment with Parks Plan 2040 Recreational Priorities:The Board is interested in understanding what is important to City residents, and how and where we can advocate or make recommendations necessary for supporting those priorities. We have discussed access and connectivity issues,specific recreational activities(e.g. pickleball, mountain biking), access to waterways, and more. 2. Developing Board knowledge and expertise of Department assets:The Board acknowledges that we all arrive in our positions with varied interests and backgrounds. It would be valuable to function of the Board if we continue to develop greater in-house expertise and familiarity with the many Parks, Natural Areas, and programming managed by the Department. 3. Support existing City/Department plans and Board initiatives:The Board recognizes that the Department and the City have several existing plans affecting specific Department assets and shared resources.These include (but may not be limited to), the Luscher Area Master Plan (LAMP), Natural Areas Management Plan, and the Urban and Community Forestry Plan.The Board will continue to look for opportunities to provide continued support, advocacy, or recommendations to aid in the successful implementation of these plans, or aspects of these plans. In addition,the Board has its own initiative,the DEI Framework,that will require on-going support as it transitions from planning to implementation. Action: 2024 Accomplishments and 2025 Top themes/issues will be shared at the Boards &Commissions Summit,January 9, 5:30pm to 7:30pm. 5IPage CO-CHAIR NOMINATIONS(5 min) Action: Nominations will be sent to Dina Balogh.Members of the Parks Board will elect 2025 Co-Chairs at the January 15 meeting. STAFF AND BOARD MONTHLY UPDATES: • Jason Dorn and Matt McGinnis: Discussion: Luscher Master Plan and Parks Plan 2040 changes. What can and cannot be done to make changes? Ivan and John Wendland: Can't just add or subtract things from an adopted masterplan.There may be untended consequences that come out of it.The big issue is the process with the County.This is a long process and will take a long time, if not years to go through. Also,the chance that the City will be able to annex the Luscher property is a very long process.The City Council is the only authority to make changes to the Master Plan, if and when the property is annexed. • Sarah Ellison: Sarah McKean sent an email saying that she had received several cards and emails from folks who have sat on one of Doug's memorial benches.They have all commented on their love for Doug and how happy they are that Parks chose to honor him in this way. Sarah McKean and the girls are very grateful. • Jan Wirtz: In the spirit of the holidays, Councilor Wendland mentioned that we have served hundreds of families, if not thousands of people during the tree lighting event. We had a new event this year called visits with Sensory Santa .This was a heartfelt and wonderful event that was ran by three Parks & Recreation divisions, Emily Liu, Community Events & Luscher Farm Programs Supervisor, Cyd Fletcher, Enrichment, Fitness&Outdoor Programs Supervisor and Ben LaBounty, Parks Ranger. It was a very successful first year hosting our sensory-friendly Santa visits. It was incredibly heartwarming to see how much these visits meant to the families who participated.The environment was thoughtfully designed to be calm and non-overstimulating, allowing children with sensory sensitivities to enjoy their time with Santa in a way that worked best for them.The gratitude expressed by parents was overwhelming and uplifting. Many shared how rare it is to find experiences tailored to their children's needs, and they were deeply thankful for the opportunity to create special memories without the worry of overstimulation. Seeing their joy and hearing their appreciation reinforced the importance of inclusivity in the services we provide, and it was a reminder of why our work matters so much to the community. We look forward to making this an annual tradition during the holiday season! Jason Dorn adjourned the meeting at approximately 6:30pm. The next regular scheduled meeting will be Wednesday,January 15,2025,4 p.m. Prepared by, Dina Balogh,Administrative Supervisor Wage . .J .... z . • F 1-- ,.. ...-• •. .. .;? -. ". ."f • 4 i .'.• , 0 . . . ,..., .0 :-...*: ti . - _ -..— - .... ., . - ,.... .... r . - . , i - . :' • . -*. _•11..,;',.. ,'...•-... r . r•,: ::: '' -e-, ::''...:y-.137 ...OF . • ' .•-•4 . ,. .. 4?„.,,. • .t.• . . _ ,..--. • . .. 't.....".• , - GI ...f : ..',' .......ANt.•`-. - . .- ••••• ,. :, ir:.-...L. • 'A.,,..,',. . - P. i'.:L': • .:•,......'::-.1'.. ..".:.'...4:/41,..-... ........._............_.._.--.....,... 7. -.: • ie '-'. • 1 4. ' ' • --;.17.. -47.11r.e.<1, .-r:: '7--.'; • < .-: ".•.. .:. at kr ao • - - '4:-.4,. :AA% '''• . a.411g.':':re4k:::' ' 4 ' - - ..' : ---:.• .. ir?4'., ••V?ii....f i ti. .04, . ' vd4 •-::40"I.',.,-.••.- ' ... . . - Ir•• 110,..:" . 1 7 - ---;-.,• ..!- - .-- • ... .,.. : . .,. ...... :--. .,!,..„,-,...:::t.-1....-0,---4, .-!:•-.... '..., -'t.,:'...-:— lelLtir• ' . --.-4•Irjrfi: ..2*.!; -•gi....r- .."•.-'' a ' - 4*14:01..., *T.1.•- ..'-4 . • • • '. .90 k 14 ..1 '';•:'. '3. •••• :."," .•,..... .411i..mo-..„.".• •••..- -'-‘,.,:.,?-4•.,•,.., 4.•,.. .,---'- i if?-1.11.1''...:P•1 ;?1. -if.,N p', ' ' - . .. ;.0:,:. . _.'It .'t.. ., ...'44'41;.. ...-04„-;„. . (sitt,`. ,. ,...•qt..,- -41'•r3-'• ..'• !4:.'-"WT.-it,'..- .• 0 I I Fr.- •%,..V.??%•-t. . . ..,. . . . • 00111kp -,,,A • if,...''.r•.'. . - 4';,1-'1, ;4;..-1.!?.%e-f;',.. ..., . ;._., ..,.—_-.pri..iq • r." •-F--:,-.r.. 4r.:•; ' ••- , ..- - .:••• : . . '')rt; -f-.-•/414,. „---,:....., .',-.'i ri.,. - ,• . 1 4,0 -..,..m...,,.- ... .. * ....It 4,... •'-'•.,,t-•• :`'li..40•• ,2t2 li,q- .' ••••0.", .•::;, .... --..• ;4.., In?? .-;;; .-'.-...,,' '• ..L., -;'', '4 ';''.•441 .•=3.-vr'4-'';':3P".k. .,:"4-1.•:11. .- 4 it. .... •''.• . .._ :..... ,. .....4...._. , ; ...,.•-•-;•• -41,-.• :F.*,t - ',:.:Iillir !... ••:+.,.4- -'•-', .. •-•...:-.-_•!-:•-.••".ifif•-•,:9'.1". : - , -A, `•'>':..' -;..,.....•••: .•''-1. ej 1:3•P r•. ..:;•.4 II '..!•'r • ' .k I'7,y'lX i-.'If.'• _.1- ;• .., '4' - •I.1••-O.,. -r, , .-. •K, 'kW . . _ • APPENDIX D . .. .. . Ili . \\. ....., :-,.... \ ,... \ N .• s - . _ . A - - ...:''...-.`...,.::::.':.:* • \ . • ,,,,.. -,_. .s: •-•:!,, r.,•••....,... .,.. .- • . .. • • • . . • -.-.•-•: Capital Impr vement Project List . ... \., :,-,,e-%,,, ,,..„., •• .. . . ... . .... , --.., , '- ..,... ..:,.. -. . . . . . „ • ... • _ ____ _ •.., :. : :. : :••]...•-.1 AO-I:. • ----• • • • .•. ., •. . .• • -:,.,..,4, . •• . . . • _ _ . • r ,- -- - • ANL_- ' - - .• • ' . . .. . -4- • • . . . ,. - .- --...--7114.- '' ••••:.-•_4•••• . _ •. . .. ••- • . r‘_..., .• 'pi. . . - -. .. • .1 ...$•;-;?•e', '' -....-- . .. -• - . :,,.... .6. •-N- . ,, • ! .I . I . itIt . 121 _ •._,__. .._ ... . . . . ,...-.4.-„,-....3''.'N.,'•.--r..irriT...". '..61€1. ;!;:.',:.7-.-::4..:-:''....:-•_-'= :.ii. ''''' -;.•..-Q-',:- -:.,;•0;:-,.5:-•• .4- ....ri--. : .- - -'• ---,-4 -,...' • .--- .....---- -...1mw . " ...... .- . ., ... - .. „. • -. •• = i• -P_ - ....-.",'I. ;4.-,.-' •.• '.'._t• . .1 . 1 '',. . .... . • . ,:.. • ?••,.. 1- .. ,„.... .1 •. 1 ' • I . .. • • • 1 : . •• • • • • ''.1.::,,--::•:kde,kc• ',.-::•,.-•.:. .-r.:...4`..'-,,.- •.--- • • • • - - — .,- ..4-•`T... -.-'''f=---..-..--....7 -:--.1... ,-."-','''-... . . . -.. ... _.. . . : I . • :.r:• -.4-••.,p-''.-..--'t.4,, '_7 ,=:_:_...;-f.-•..-•_1".„41.1 _--..- - - •--- -,-..".- isi-c?;• ''. - . - i I. , --•-•• - - • •. •-. . . . - • - - . . . -- -14- - `.-., - .. . .. . _ . ._ _ - - - r - - .....*:,•!...j.,_P•- . _ .,-_. - - ;•.0. - 7 _ - .- . . ,.... • _ - - - .•. - . ...• •• . .•• • • " . • • . . .. ' r . . .. .. •.... -•• . . . . - . • ..• • . . •• :' • . - ,-••• Table 1:DRAFT Prioritized Capital Improvement Project List Revised 1/10/2025 PROJECT INFORMATION '®' Proposed Implementation Planning-Level Capital Facility Name Project Project Descriptions(Detailed) Priority Timeframe Costs NEAR TERM PROJECTS(0-5 YEARS) This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2003 and will be due for replacement in 2025. Aspen Reservoir Park Playground Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Low Near Term $ 200,000 Replacement high quality of the existing park system.The near-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by the current age of the existing playground equipment. This project improves the access drive,parking area,and entryway to the park.Improvements identified in the 2001 Canal Area Master Plan includes expanding the existing gravel parking area with eco-block pavers,park entry signage,a Park Entry bulletin board and plaza,and other site furnishings.In addition,the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Bryant Woods Nature Park Improvements Report identified the need for at least one ADA compliant van-accessible parking space to provide access to this park for Medium Near Term $ 220,000 people with disabilities.The parking area at Bryant Woods Nature Park is designed serve as parking for vehicles visiting Canal Acres Natural Area as well.Chapter X applies to this natural area,and an interpretation of consistency with Chapter X restrictions will be needed prior to implementation. This project would renovate,repair,and/or resurface sections of trail that are experiencing erosion.Additional Cooks Butte Park Trail Renovation interpretive or wayfinding signage or support amenities such as benches may also be included,to be determined Low Near Term $ 150,000 through additional community engagement.The near-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by the current state of erosion on several of the trail routes. This capital maintenance project will replace the existing dolphin sail shade structure,which will reach the end of its functional life during the Parks Plan 2040 planning horizon.A new additional shade structure that could be installed and Shade Structure removed seasonally may also be considered as a component of this project in response to community feedback about a Medium Near Term $ 60,000 desire for more shade at this facility,especially during events like summer concerts. Foothills Park Access,Parking, This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report and ADA • Medium Near Term $ 40,000 for the parking lot,park access road,and park amenities.See the report for a full list of improvements. Improvements Upper and Lower This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Level ADA for the upper and lower levels of this facility,including improvements to parking areas,pathways,access ramps,and Medium Near Term $ 280,000 Improvements trails,and support amenities such as picnic areas drinking fountains.See the report for a full list of improvements. Arbor Renovation The scope of this capital maintenance project is to rebuild the existing arbor at the entrance the lower grassy area from Medium Near Term $ 26,000 George Rogers Park the lower parking lot. This project would construct an asphalt pathway from the lower-level restroom structure down to the river on the east River Access edge of the park property,connecting to the existing water access ramp previously used as a boat launch.Ultimately Pathway this pathway will serve as an important link in connecting George Rogers Park to Foothills Park via the Willamette River High Near Term $ 640,000 Greenway trail.This project was identified as a high priority during community engagement as part of the Metro Local Share process and will receive partial funding through the Local Share program. This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2004 and will be due for replacement in 2025. I Playground Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Glenmorrie Park Medium Near Term $ 250,000 Replacement high quality of the existing park system.The near-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by the current age of the existing playground equipment. This project will improve the existing access driveway,and will also complete the improvements identified in the City's Hazelia Field at Luscher Farm Access and ADA 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report for this facility that were not completed as a component of other Low Near Term $ 17,500 Improvements park improvement projects.See the report for a full list of improvements.While not identified as a high priority by the community,improvements to the driveway are necessary to ensure safety at this high-use park. This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2004 and will be due for replacement in 2025. Playground Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Low Near Term $ 75,000 Replacement high quality of the existing park system.The near-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by Hide-A-Way Park the current age of the existing playground equipment. ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Low Near Term $ 28,500 for this park.See the report fora full list of improvements. The City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report recommended reviewing design options for providing Access and ADA access to the swim area,which is currently only accessible via stairs down a steep hill from a limited gravel parking area. Lake Oswego Swim Park The scope of this project will be refined through a design study and public outreach.The planning-level cost estimate for Low Near Term $ 750,000 Improvements this project assumes ADA pedestrian access via ramps with hand rails,and the creation of one van-accessible parking space.This project was recommended for near-term implementation by the PRNRAB at their December 18 meeting. This project would create a new public access driveway to replace the historic farm entrance on Rosemont Road,as well New Access and as construct a new parking lot.These improvements have been identified as a priority for safety and providing ADA Luscher Farm Park Parking access to the facility and will implement the adopted Luscher Area Master Plan and are recommended for near term Medium Near Term $ 700,000 implementation. Plaza Shelter Gutters This capital maintenance project will replace the gutters on the existing shelter structure. Medium Near Term $ 30,000 Millennium Plaza ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Medium Near Term $ 20,000 for this park.See the report for a full list of improvements. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-1 This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2004 and will be due for replacement in 2027. Playground Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Low Near Term 200,000 Replacement high quality of the existing park system.The near-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by Pine Cone Park the current age of the existing playground equipment. ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Low Near Term 24,000 for the park amenities.See the report fora full list of improvements. Phase 2 This phase of the project will develop a play area,picnic shelter,and maintenance garage consistent with the approved Development master plan for this park.Completing this project was identified as a 2024 City Council goal.This project is funded and Medium Near Term $ 2,300,000 Rassekh Park expected to begin in early 2025. Phase 3 This phase of the project will develop the multi-sport athletic field,additional parking spaces,an additional stormwater Medium Near Term $ 6,000,000 Development facility,and additional pathway connections consistent with the approved master plan for the park. This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2006 and will be due for replacement in 2027. Playground Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Medium Near Term $ 250,000 Replacement high quality of the existing park system.The near-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by Rossman Park the current age of the existing playground equipment. ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Medium Near Term $ 39,000 for this park.See the report for a full list of improvements. This project would add park amenities such as a playground,trails,picnic facilities,seating,and/or a fitness station to Southwood Park Park Improvements this existing undeveloped park.Adding these types of park amenities would meet community needs in an identified gap High Near Term $ 750,000 area.In addition,although the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report did not assess this property, proposed accessibility improvements include adding a curb ramp to provide ADA access to the park. This project would construct a new pathway connecting Royal Oaks Drive to Oakridge Court through the wooded area, Neighborhood and provide connections to the developed park amenities of the park.This alignment has been the location of an West Waluga Park informal and unmaintained social trail for many years,demonstrating the need for additional connectivity to and Medium Near Term $ 500,000 Connector Trail through this area.Constructing the trail as a boardwalk will reduce the impacts of pedestrian travel through this natural area.This project was identified as a high priority during the 2023 Metro Local Share project prioritization process. This scope of this capital maintenance project includes replacing the existing infields with artificial turf to increase wet- Athletic Field weather playability;as well as replacing several aging features including the existing athletic field lighting and the Westlake Park Low Near Term $ 962,000 Upgrades backstop safety netting.While not identified as a high priority by the community,these improvements will be necessary to ensure safety and functionality of athletic facilities at this high-use park. Willamette River This project will create a new trail connection along the Willamette River in Lake Oswego between George Rogers Park Willamette River Greenway Regional and Foothills Park via a wide multi-use asphalt pathway.This project has emerged as a high priority for the community Trail Greenway Trail duringengagement as of several planningprocesses and a design is alreadyin progress with some fundingHigh Near Term $ 240,000 Connection part g p g allocated. Design and development of 4-8 new outdoor pickleball courts to serve city residents,which may include acquiring new property or developing courts on existing city property.Community engagement has indicated that courts should ideally Outdoor Pickleball be grouped with 4-6 courts per location;however,smaller groups of courts may be more feasible.Further study and No Site Identified Courts en a ement with the communi High Near Term $ 1,500,000 g g ty is needed prior to design to identify the appropriate location for this new facility within Lake Oswego's park and recreation system,but a community-scale park with access to support amenities such as parking,restrooms,and drinking fountains is likely the best fit with this type of activity. Systemwide This existing systemwide project would replace Systemwide Drinking Fountain y g aging drinking fountains with newer models that are more accessible Medium Near Term $ 20,000 Replacement and energy efficient. — Systemwide Replace old bollards along trails and in parks.While not ranked as a high priority by the community,this project is Systemwide Bollard already underway and is expected to be completed in 2025.Replacing old wooden bollards with sturdier and higher- Low Near Term $ 15,000 Replacement visibility models and marking bollard approaches improve safety for trail users and reduces maintenance. Total Near Term $ 18,287,000 MID TERM PROJECTS(5-10 YEARS( Park Boundary The scope of this project is to install fencing and plantings along the edges of the park to help buffer the area from the Bryant Woods Nature Park Medium Mid Term $ 100,000 Fencing impacts of adjacent private residences,such as pesticide use,invasive species,and development encroachment. This project would add new trails through the natural area.The 2001 Canal Area Master Plan identifies a new"Primary Canal Acres Natural Area Primary and Trail"that would run parallel to Canal Road from the park entrance at Child Road south to connect to River Run Park at Medium Mid Term $ 630,000 Secondary Trails the Tualatin River.An additional secondary trail would create a trail connection to Sycamore Avenue.Entry and wayfinding signage would also be included in this scope. Charlie S.Brown Water Sports Center ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Medium Mid Term $ 4,000 for this facility.See the report fora full list of improvements. • This project will improve the Quarry Bike Skills Park located at East Waluga Park.Work could include improving access Quarry Bike Skills to the area and adding wayfinding singage to increase awareness,as well as increased trail connectivity to access the Medium Mid Term $ 15,000 Park Upgrades park and physical improvements to the park itself.This project may also include the addition of a pump track feature. The scope of improvements will need to be determined through community engagement. East Waluga Park The scope of this project includes replacing elements of the two ballfields that will reach the end of their functional life during the planning horizon for Parks Plan 2040.Work will include replacing the artificial turf,and replacing and Athletic Field upgrading the athletic field lighting.ADA improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Low Mid Term $ 2,000,000 Improvements Assessment Report for the athletic fields should also be completed.While not identified as a high priority by the community,these improvements will be necessary to ensure safety and functionality of athletic facilities at this high-use park. This project will fully renovate Freepons Park,one of Lake Oswego's oldest parks.Possible scope includes an upgraded and expanded play area,a picnic shelter or other gathering space,improvements to existing erosion and flooding issues, Freepons Park Park Rennovation trail and pathway improvements,interpretive and wayfinding signage,lighting,vehicle parking,and water play features. Medium Mid Term $ 5,400,000 ADA improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report will also be addressed during the renovation. Playground This project will replace the existing playground at George Rogers Park,which was installed in 2014 and will be due for Replacement replacement in 2034.Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the Medium Mid Term $ 500,000 safety,functionality,and high quality of the existing park system. Athletic Field This project will replace the natural grass infields of the athletic field with artificial turfto increase playability during wet Medium Mid Term $ 750,000 Upgrades weather months. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-2 George Rogers Park Historic Iron g g Smelting Furnace This project represents a recurruing project that must be budgeted for every 5 years to clean the historic iron furnace. Medium Mid Term $ 250,000 Cleaning Regular cleaning and maintenance ensures that this historic landmark is preserved. Accessible Kayak This project would create a new ADA accessible kayak launch from the beach area at George Rogers Park.It may also Medium Mid Term $ 100,000 Launch include improving or creating permanent storage facilities for the existing kayak rental program at the park. Tennis Court Lighting This project will add lighting to the existing tennis courts to increase playability during winter months. Medium Mid Term $ 250,000 ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Medium Mid Term $ 9,000 for the park amenities.See the report for a full list of improvements. Glenmorrie Park This project would add a new fitness station or"fit spot"at Glenmorrie Park.Opportunities for fitness and exercise close Fitness Station to homes is a priorityfo the community, Medium Mid Term $ 250,000 particularly for aging populations. Basketball Court Greentree Park Improvements This capital maintenance project will improve the existing court surface and replace the existing basketball hoop. Medium Mid Term $ 200,000 This project will replace the existing playground at Hazelia Field,which was installed in 2008 and will be due for replacement in 2031.Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the Playground safety,functionality,and high quality of the existing park system.Alternatively,this location may be a suitble site for Low Mid Term $ 800,000 Replacement water play features such as a small splash pad;additional features will need to be determined through community engagement prior to project implementation.The near-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by the current age of the existing playground equipment. The scope of this capital maintenance project includes replacing the existing artificial turf,and replacing the existing Athletic Field cyclone fencing around the field.ADA improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Hazelia Field at Luscher Farm Assessment Report for the athletic field should also be completed as part of this project.While not identified as a high Low Mid Term $ 750,000 Improvements priority by the community,these improvements will be necessary to ensure safety and functionality of athletic facilities at this high-use park. The scope of this project is expected to include regrading or resurfacing the large dog park area to address ongoing Dog Park erosion issues during wet weather months.Additional or upgraded seating and a new or larger shelter may also be Medium Mid Term $ 300,000 Improvements considered,along with enhancements to the dog wash station.ADA improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report for the dog park should also be completed as part of this project. This project would renovate,repair,and/or resurface sections of trail that are experiencing erosion.The near-term ' Trail Renovation implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by the current state of erosion on portions of the existing Iron Mountain Park Low Mid Term $ 560,000 and Stabilization trails.Additional interpretive or wayfinding signage along the trail may also be included,to be determined through additional community engagement. This project will improve the existing facility by adding additional picnic tables and seating and a new shade structure. Lake Oswego Swim Park Support Amenities Medium Mid Term $ 162,500 The types and locations of these amenities should be refined through engagement with park users. This project would expand the existing community garden area to add approximately 55 new garden plots,including Community Garden some fully ADA accessible plots.The location of these new plots is currently identified on the Firlane property but Expansion and another location may be identified through further study.In addition,new gardening support facilities such as tool Medium Mid Term $ 660,500 Improvements sheds and greenhouses should be provided,along with seating,picnic,and shade facilities.ADA improvements identified in the community garden area should also be completed as part of this project. This project would develop a network of compacted gravel and wood chip trails throughout the fields and natural areas in the Luscher area.Trail alignments would build on existing mowed grass fire breaks,which are currently popular Luscher Farm Park and Natural Area Trail Improvements destinations for hiking and walking,to improve accessibility and connectvitity.Other improvements may include Medium Mid Term $ 515,000 benches or other seating areas at key viewpoints,and support amenities such as trash cans and picnic tables at trailheads. Wilson Creek The western branch of Wilson Creek crossing the Crowell property east of the Firlane farm was tiled for agricultural Restoration purposes in the early 20th century.This project would daylight,regrade,restore,and replant the stream corridor with Medium Mid Term $ 284,000 native riparian vegetation. This project will will provide traditional neighborhood park features including a passive recreation space,five-foot wide Farr Neighborhood compacted gravel walking trails,picnicking areas,a new picnic shelter,signage,and an eco-friendly lawn on the Farr Medium Mid Term 372,000 Park property east of Hazelia Field.It will also provide a boardwalk,viewing platform,and interpretive signage for the wetland.This project implements the adopted 2012 Luscher Area Master Plan. McNary Park ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Medium Mid Term $ 20,900 for this park.See the report fora full list of improvements. "Watch Keeper" Millenium Plaza Lighting Program This project would install and implement a new lighting schedule program at Millenium Plaza. Medium Mid Term $ 25,000 This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report ADA Improvements for the park amenities.See the report for a full list of improvements.While not ranked as a high priority by the Low Mid Term $ 38,000 community,this work would be completed in tandem with other park improvements. Park/School This project would formalize the trail connection between Pilkington Park and River Grove Elementary School to Connectivity increase access to the school play area during non-school hours.This project would be coordinated with the Lake Medium Mid Term $ 143,000 Improvement Oswego School District. This project would add a new small play area or nature play area to the underutilized open lawn north of the off-leash Pilkington Park area to increase access to play for children.Although this park is located near a school with a play area,the school Play Area and/or Fitness Station property is not available for use during school hours.The type of play equipment should be determined through Medium Mid Term $ 887,500 community engagement,but could include"tot play"for younger children.A fitness station or"fit spot"with exercise equipment for adults could also be included. Dog Park This project would add a new shelter or covered area and seating in the existing off-leash dog play area to increase Medium Mid Term $ 200,000 Improvements opportunities for year-round use. Community This project would contemplate adding 20-30 community garden plots to the underutilized open lawn north of the off- Low Mid Term $ 350,000 Gardens leash area to increase opportunitites for community gardening on the west side of the city. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-3 Park Boundary The scope of this project is to install fencing and plantings along the edges of the park to help buffer the area from the River Run Park Medium Mid Term $ 60,000 Fencing impacts of adjacent private residences,such as pesticide use,invasive species,and development encroachment. This project will replace the existing climbing boulders at Roehr Park,which were installed in 2007 and will be due for Play Area replacement in 2030.Replacing old play features that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the Medium Mid Term $ $00,000 Replacement safety,functionality,and high quality of the existing park system.This project may also bean opportunity to add new Roehr Park play or nature play elements that offer play opportunities to children of a wider variety of ages and abilities. This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report ADA Improvements for this park property,including replacing sections of asphalt path that have been impacted by tree roots,as well as Medium Mid Term $ 406,800 replacing the Iron Furnace Cruicible plaza area.See the report for a full list of improvements. This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Stafford Basin Regional Trail ADA Improvements for the park amenities.See the report for a full list of improvements.Improvements are recommended in the mid-term Low Mid Term $ 235,000 to serve this regional trail facility. ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Medium Mid Term $ 11,000 for the park amenities.See the report for a full list of improvements. Sundeleaf Plaza "Watch Keeper" Lighting Program This project would install and implement a new lighting schedule program at Sundeleaf Plaza. Medium Mid Term $ 25,000 This project would develop a network of trails through the Tryon Cove natural area west of the developed park, Tryon Cove Park Natural Area Trail consistent with Metro's 2018 Tryon Creek Cove Trail Master Plan.Trail design and development would be closely Medium Mid Term $ 628,000 Development coordinated with Metro,who also owns property in the area,and who completed the 2018 Master Plan in coordination with the city. This project will replace the existing playground at West Waluga Park which was installed in 2010 and will be due for Playground replacement in 2033.Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the Low Mid Term $ 500,000 Replacement safety,functionality,and high quality of the existing park system.The mid-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by the current age of the existing playground equipment. West Waluga Park This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report ADA Improvements Low Mid Term $ 100,000 for the park amenities.See the report for a full list of improvements. Dog Park This project would resurface and upgrade gravel walking paths in the off-leash dog play area at West Waluga Park to Improvements improve the wet-weather experience for park users.In addition,this project would add a new covered shelter with Medium Mid Term $ 120,000 tables or seating to increase opportunities for year-round use. This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2010 and will be due for replacement in 2031. Playground Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Westlake Park Low Mid Term $ 550,000 Replacement high quality of the existing park system.The mid-term implementation timeframe proposed for this project is driven by the current age of the existing playground equipment. Westridge Park Fitness Station This project would add a new fitness station or"fit spot"at Westridge Park.Opportunities for fitness and exercise close Medium Mid Term $ 250,000 to homes is a priority fo the community,particularly for aging populations. Acquisition,design,and development of a new neighborhood park to serve southwest Lake Oswego in the Lake Grove, No Site Identified Neighborhood Park Bryant,or Rosewood neighborhoods.While identified as a high priority,implementation is expected to take some time High Mid Term $ 7,500,000 and is dependent on the availability of land. This project would construct a sand volleyball in Lake Oswego,which was identified as a need during the community engagement process.Further study and engagement with the community is needed prior to design to identify the Sand Volleyball appropriate location for this new facility within Lake Oswego's park and recreation system,but a community-scale park No Site Identified Court with access to support amenities such as parking,restrooms,and drinkingfountains is likelythe best fit with this High Mid Term $ 60,000 PPo type of activity.While identified as a high priority,implementation will require additional time to engage with the community to identify an appropriate site. Design and development of a new water play feature to serve the community.This project may require acquisition of new parkland if an existing site is not feasible.A water play feature such as a splash pad with water and sand play elements has emerged as a community priority during community engagement,particularly as summers become hotter Splash Pad/Water due to climate change.Further study and engagement with the community is needed prior to design to identify the No Site Identified High Mid Term $ 450,000 Play Feature appropriate location for this new facility within Lake Oswego's park and recreation system,but a community-scale park with access to support amenities such as parking,restrooms,and drinking fountains is likely the best fit with this type of activity.While identified as a high priority,implementation will require additional time to engage with the community to identify an appropriate site. Systemwide This systemwide project would implement the Department's signage manual,which was approved in 2022.This project Systemwide Signage Manual would add new signage and replace existing outdated signage in parks and natural areas and at recreation facilities Medium Mid Term $ 560,000 Implementation throughout the city,incuding monument signs,rules and regulations signs,and wayfinding and directional signs along trails. Total Mid Term Projects W $ 28,482,200 LONG TERM PROJECTS(10-15 YEARS) While most of the trails identified in the Canal Area Master Plan have already been developed,some of the boardwalks, Trail Improvements wildlife observation decks,and crossings were never constructed.In addition,the Master Plan identifies signage and site and Site furnishings throughout the park,including secondary entrance signs,rest spots,interpretive exhibits,and other site Low Long Term $ 960,000 Bryant Woods Nature Park Furnishings furnishings.It also includes a"site center"plaza that is designed to be the educational hub of the park to accomodate groups and visitors and serve as a trailhead for the loop trail. Pedestrian Several pedestrian crossings are identified between Bryant Woods Nature Park and Canal Acres Natural Area across Childs Road,including one between the primary entrances to both parks and an additional crossing at the west end of Low Long Term $ 100,000 Crossings Bryant Woods Nature Park.This project will need to be coordinated with the City's Engineering Department. Park Boundary The scope of this project is to install fencing and plantings along the edges of the park to help buffer the area from Canal Acres Natural Area Fencing adjacent private residences. Low Long Term $ 100,000 This project will replace the existing playground and picnic shelter.The playgrond,which was installed in 2015,will be Playground and due for replacement in 2035 and the shelter will need replacement shortly thereafter.Combining these planned Picnic Shelter replacements into one project is more efficient and reduces impacts to park users.Replacing old playgrounds or Low Long Term $ 1,075,000 Replacement structures that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and high quality of East Waluga Park the existing park system. This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report ADA Improvements for this facility that were not completed as a component of other park improvement projects.See the report for a full Low Long Term $ 145,000 list of improvements. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-4 This project considers expanding Foothills Park to the north following decommissioning and demolition of the existing Tryon Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant property,which the City is planning to replace on a nearby property.The location and size of the expansion will be coordinated closely with the upcoming Foothills District Refinement Plan update.Possible amenities could include additional parking and a secondary vehicle access,an amphitheater,pickleba II Foothills Park Park Expansion courts,trail connections,an off leash dog area,sand volleyball courts,and/or water play features.Amenities will be Medium Long Term 2,250,000 determined through community engagement during project design.The planning-level cost estimate for this project assumes approximately one acre of new parkland for this project;however,the cost may vary depending on the size of the expansion and the types of amenities added. Playground This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2015 and will be due for replacement in 2036. Replacement Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Medium Long Term $ 500,000 Greentree Park high quality of the existing park system. ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Low Long Term $ 15,000 for the park amenities.See the report fora full list of improvements. This project would construct a new trail through the portion of Hallinan woods that was purchased in 2021(the Yates Hallinan Woods New Trail property),connecting to the existing asphalt trail network.A preferred alignment was identified through community Low Long Term $ 400,000 Connection engagement in 2022,however additional study is needed to determine the trail's surface type(boardwalk,asphalt,soft- surface,etc.). Hazelia Field at Luscher Farm Trail Connection to This project would create a new formal trail connection from the parking lot at Hazelia Field to the trail network at Low Long Term $ 143,000 Luscher Farm Luscher Farm south of the existing parking lot and athletic field. Iron Mountain Park Play Area This project would expand the existing play area at Iron Mountain Park to include additional opportunities for children Low Long Term $ 350,000 Expansion to play,with a focus on nature play features. Driving Range Roof This project will replace the existing roof covering the driving range stalls.This structure was not replaced during Lake Oswego Municipal Golf Course Replacement renovation of the golf course in 2023,but will likely be needed during the planning horizon. Low Long Term $ 750,000 The scope of this project will address the historic core and program area of the Luscher property.Work will include Program Area adding support amenities such as benches and picnic facilities,upgrades to demonstration gardens,gardening support Upgrades and ADA facilities such as tool sheds or greenhouses,upgrades to roads,new and improved pedestrian pathways,adding Low Long Term $ 150,000 Improvements interpretive and wayfinding signage.In addition,ADA improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report for this area should also be completed. Public Restroom This project would install a public restroom building to serve visitors to the park.It would likely be installed in or near Low Long Term $ 900,000 Building the program area,but additional study regarding location and functionality is needed prior to implementation. This project will undertake the rehabilitation of historic structures on the Luscher property,including the barn, Historic Structure farmhouse,bunkhouse.Rehabilitation of the Rosemont Arena on the Brock property for futur programming use may Rehabilitation and also be included in this project.In additon to historic rehabilitation,ADA ipmrovements identified for buildings in the Low Long Term $ 5,000,000 ADA Improvements City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report will also be completed.The scope of the historic rehabilitations will be determined through further study,and work will be managed by preservation professionals consistent with The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. This project will construct an agricultural-or farm-themed playground and picnic area on the Firlane property north of Agricultural the existing farmhouse.The scope includes a playground and picnic shelter that will be connected to the Luscher Farm Themed Play Area Program Area by compacted gravel pathways.The 2012 Luscher Area Master Plan contemplates creating a custom play Low Long Term $ 325,000 area or repurposing old farm equipment such as tractors as play elements;this scope maybe refined through engagement with Luscher area stakeholders. Luscher Farm Park and Natural Area This project will implement the recommendations from the 2012 Luscher Area Master Plan and subsequent 2017 Agricultural Plan.The scope of work includes constructing a new centralized agricultural processing and operational Urban Agriculture facility and potentially expanding other farming infrastructure such as internal roads and storage facilities to support Expansion the existing Community Supported Agriculture program.New types of farming operations may also be expanded to Low Long Term $ 1,500,000 other properties,including you-pick programs,perennials or orchards,or edible forests,subject to further study.The majority of the cost associated with this project would be required for development of the centralized operating and processing facility. Brock Climbing or This project would develop some sort of natural climbing or ropes play area on the Brock property.The area would be Ropes Challenge accessible via the existing small trailhead parking lot on the property,or via compacted gravel trails from the new access Low Long Term $ 500,000 Play Area and parking lot from Rosemont Road.Seating,wildlife viewing areas,and interpretive or educational signage may also be included in this project scope,which will be refined through community engagement. Urban This project implements the recommendation for an Urban Agriculture/Environmental Education Center in the 2012 Agriculture/Enviro Luscher Area Master Plan.The scope of this project will be informed by the historic structure rehabilitation work,and nmentaI Education could include rehabilitating the existig Firlane farmhouse for use as an education center,or constructing a new facility to Low Long Term $ 3,000,000 Center serve as the education center.Implementation of this project is contingent upon the City of Lake Oswego first annexing the remainder of the Luscher area properties in the future. This project would construct two new multi-sport athletic fields,a vehicle parking area,internal road and pathway Active Recreation network,and basketball courts on the Luscher property east of Hazelia Field,consistent with the adopted 2012 Luscher Low Long Term $ 8,560,000 Area Area Master Plan.Implementation of this project is contingent upon the City of Lake Oswego first annexing the remainder of the Luscher area properties in the future. Playground This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2020 and will be due for replacement in 2038. McNary Park Replacement Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Medium Long Term $ 500,000 high quality of the existing park system. This project would improve the existing network of gravel and soft surface trails by reconstructing and/or resurfacing Pennington Park Trail Improvements sections of trail experiencing signficiant wear and erosion.Wayfinding signage may also be added. Low Long Term $ 30,000 This project would add new park restrooms to this neighborhood park.Pilkington Park is the only developed park in this Pilkington Park Park Restroom area of the city,and is located on a popular walking path along Pilkington Road.During community engagement park Low Long Term $ 750,000 restrooms were identified as a high priority for this part of the city. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-5 Rassekh Park Skatepark This project will add a cover over a portion of the skatepark and add lighting to increase opportunities for year-round I Low Long Term $ 312,500 Enhancements use. This project would improve the parking lot and access drive of the western River Run Park property with eco-block pavers to create a more stabilized surface that is less prone to erosion.While the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility West Property Assessment Report did not assess River Run Park,at least one ADA-compilant van-accessible parking space should be Parking and Access constructed in order to provide access to water to residents with disabilities,which was identified as a priority during Low Long Term $ 150,000 Improvements community engagement.Improvements to the entry would also include a park monument entry sign,a bulletin board, interpretive signage,and other site furnishings.A legal interpretation of Chapter X will be required prior to implementing this project. Canal Crossing This project would add a new pedestrian bridge that connects the primary trail from Canal Acres Nature Park to the Low Long Term $ 1,500,000 Pedestrian Bridge western property of River Run Park across Oswego Canal,consistent with the 2001 Canal Area Master Plan. Wetland This project would add a new boardwalk trail with wildlife viewing platforms,seating areas,interpretive signs,and other River Run Park Boardwalk Trail stie furnishings through the wetland area of the western River Run Park property,consistent with the 2001 Canal Area Low Long Term $ 1,200,000 Master Plan. Tualatin River This project would construct a river overlook and interpretive signage on the western property of River Run Park that Low Long Term $ 300,000 Overlook will allow visitors to enjoy views up and down the Tualatin River. Tualatin River This project would enhance the river access area from the western River Run Park property to improve safety and accessibility and reduce erosion.The 2001 Canal Area Master Plan inculdes recommendations for protecting this river Low Long Term $ 100,000 Access Area access point. The scope would be to construct a kayak launch point from the western River Run Park property to increase access to Tualatin River the Tualatin River and connect to the Tualatin River Water Trail.This project is not included in the 2001 Canal Area Kayak Launch Master Plan;however,it was identified during community engagement,and increasing access to public waters has Low Long Term $ 1,500,000 emerged as a key priority in community conversations.A legal interpretation of Chapter X will be required prior to implementing this project. The exiting tennis court,which is located on top of the South Shore Water Reservoir,has been closed since 2022.Tennis Tennis Court court project scope may include reconstructing,resurfacing,and restriping the court area,reconstructing parking spaces South Shore Reservoir to serve the court,and adding site amenities such as fencing,landscaping,and pathway connections.This project would Medium Long Term $ 250,000 Reconstruction need to be conducted in close coordination with the fire station renovation project,the scope of which will be determined through community engagement. Consistent with the 2012 Luscher Area Master Plan,this project would improve the existing dirt and mowed grass trails Trail Improvements to create a network of compacted gravel pedestrian trails.Wayfinding and interpretive signage and site furnishings like Low Long Term $ 100,000 benches for resting could also be included in this scope. In 2019 the City purchased the Stevens Homestead property south of Stevens Meadow with a plan to develop vehicle Stevens Meadow access,an accessible parking area,and other trailhead amenities to serve Stevens Meadow.The project design was Trailhead completed in 2021,but was postponed when City Charter Chapter X was amended to include Stevens Meadow.The Low Long Term $ 715,000 Improvements scope of this project would include improvements to the property's vehicle access drive from Child Road,and construction of a parking lot with gravel and paved ADA van-accessible spaces,a restroom building,a picnic shelter,and other trailhead furnishings.A legal interpretation of Chapter X would be required prior to implementing this project. This project would require purchasing property adjacent to Sunnyslope Open Space to develop a parking area and Sunnyslope Open Space Trailhead trailhead amenities such as seating,signage,and waste receptacles.The park is currently developed with a mountain Low Long Term $ 700,000 Improvements bike course but does not have any available vehicle parking on site and is primarily accessed via an undeveloped County roadway. • ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Low Long Term $ 28,000 for the park amenities.See the report fora full list of improvements. Dock and Gangway This project would replace the existing dock and gangway;in its current state this amenity requires frequent Low Long Term $ 2,000,000 Improvements maintenance and repairs. This project would connect Tryon Cove Park to Foothills Park across Tryon Creek.Possible alignments are described in Tryon Creek Bridge the 2018 Tryon Creek Cove Trail Master Plan and determining a final alignment would require additional study.The City Tryon Cove Park of Lake Oswego is currently pursuing replacement of the existing wastewater treatment plant with a new treatment and Foothills Park Medium Long Term $ 1,695,000 Trail Connection facility on a nearby property,and plans to update the Foothills District Refinement Plan as part of that work.Design and development of this pathway connection should be coordinated with the Foothills District Refinement Plan update as well as with the City of Portland and Metro,who also own property in the Tryon Cove area. Tryon Cove is one of four opportunities for Lake Oswego residents to access the Willamette River,but pedestrian access Highway 43 to this faclity is currently extremely limited.This project would explore options for creating a pedestrian route across Highway 43 that would connect Tryon Cove Park to downtown Lake Oswego.This project could occur as part of the Pedestrian Medium Long Term n/a Undercrossing Tryon Creek Highway 43 Culvert Replacement Project,which is being undertaken by the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services.This project will require significant coordination with the City's Engineering Department,the Oregon Department of Transportation,the City of Portland,and Metro. This project would construct a shelter or cover over the playground at West Waluga Park to increase opportunities for Playground Cover year-round play.This project may be paired with the planned replacement of the play equipment to reduce impacts to Low Long Term $ 170,000 park users. West Waluga Park Fitness Station This project would upgrade or replace the existing fit spot at West Waluga Park,which was installed in 2016.It will likely Low Long Term $ 125,000 Upgrades need to be replaced during the planning horizon for Parks Plan 2040. Restroom The scope of this project is to replace the existing restroom and shelter structure to replace aging amenities and provide Low Long Term $ 50,000 Upgrades additional capacity for this park. Basketball Court This project would add lighting to the existing basketball courts at Westlake Park.Currently one of only two outdoor Lighting basketball courts in the park system,community engagement identified this project as a need by park users to increase Low Long Term $ 50,000 opportunities for year-round play and exercise. Picnic Shelter This project will replace the existing aging park shelter,which includes a covered picnic area,restrooms,and a Westlake Park maintenance storage room.The facility was constructed in 2010 and will require replacement during the planning Low Long Term $ 600,000 Replacement horizon. ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Low Long Term $ 268,000 for this park.See the report fora full list of improvements. Playground This project will replace the existing playground,which was installed in 2017 and will be due for replacement in 2037. Replacement Replacing old playgrounds that have reached the end of their useful lives helps to maintain the safety,functionality,and Medium Long Term $ 500,000 high quality of the existing park system. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-6 ADA Improvements This project will complete the improvements identified in the City's 2021 ADA Transition Plan Facility Assessment Report Low Long Term $ 42,000 for this park.See the report fora full list of improvements. Woodmont Natural Park Restroom This project would construct a restroom at Woodmont Park in response to frequent requests for this amenity from park Low Long Term $ 750,000 users. 111 Community engagement through Parks&Recreation as well as other City departments has identified the desire for indoor recreation opportunities on the west side of Lake Oswego,though no specific location has been identified to Westside Indoor date.Additional study and engagement with the community is needed to determine the scope,scale,and services No Site Identified Community/ provided at this facility,but they may include some combination of multipurpose recreation space,a permanent High Long Term n/a Recreation Center location for the Teen Center and teen/youth enrichment programs,and library services.While identified as a high I priority,implementation will take significant time due to the project's complex nature and the amount of coordination and planning required. f This systemwide project would create new neighborhood trail connections to expand safe connectivity between parks, Neighborhood Trail adjacent neighborhoods,and other key destinations.Park connections that address the gap areas identified in the Parks Systemwide Needs Assessment should be prioritized such as:Iron Mountain Park,West Waluga Park,East Waluga Park,Southwood Low Long Term n/a Connections Park,Westlake Park,and Pilkington Park.No cost estimate is provided for this project as it will vary based on the number and length of new trail connections added. Total Long Term Projects 49 $ 41,108,500 TOTAL 15-YEAR CIP 124 $ 87,877,700 'These estimates reflect planning level cost assumptions in 2024 dollars not accounting for inflation.Write-in costs from other plans and studies have been adjusted for inflation to LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-7 Table 2:Project Cost Assumptions Revised 10/24/2024 Planning Level Cost' Build/Add Build/Add Range Parkland Acquisition rper acre 5 300,000 - I Unimproved land with access to municipal utilities. Open Lands Acquisition per acre $ 200,000 - Unimproved land. Community Park Planning-level costs to account for site grading,circulation,utilities,outdoor Development per developed acre $ 2,250,000 2,000,000-3,000,000 - facilities,amenities,and landscaping.Cost does not include the development of major facilities such as community centers and pools. Neighborhood Park Planning-level costs to account for site grading,circulation,utilities,outdoor Development per developed acre $ 1,500,000 1,500,000-2,000,000 facilities,amenities,and landscaping.Cost does not include the development of major facilities such as community centers and pools. Planning-level costs to account for the development of a portion of the site for Greenway Development per developed acre $ 375,000 300,000-500,000 trails and related recreation uses.Includes site grading,circulation,utilities,and landscaping. SPORTS FIELDS Baseball/Softball Field each $ 1,200,000 1,300,0001,600,000 $ 625,000 Costs reflect a regulation-size field with natural turf,outfield fencing,backstop, (Grass) and foul-line fencing. Multi-purpose Field(Grass)each $ 850,000 $ 425,000 Costs reflect a regulation-size turf field with basic drainage/prep and features. Large,Multi-purpose each $ 3,525,000 3,000,000-4,700,000 $ 1,5OO,000 Costs reflect a regulation-size soccer/baseball field with artificial turf,outfield Artificial Turf Field fencing,backstop,foul-line fencing,lighting,and basic drainage/prep. Basketball Court each $ 135,000 150,000-180,000 $ 50,000 Costs reflect 3/4 of full HS basketball=75 x 50(63'x 37.5'plus 6'run-out all sides)with two goals and surfacing. Pickleball Court per four $ 375,000 300,000-500,000 $ 175,000 Costs reflect four side-by-side pickleball courts(70'x 130')with fencing,nets,and surfacing.Does not include lighting. Tennis Court per two $ 450,000 430,000-600,000 $ 200,000 Costs reflect two side-by-side tennis courts(120'x 120')with fencing,nets,and surfacing.Does not include lighting. PLAY AREAS Play Structure- Costs reflect one small-medium play structure with areas for tots and school-age Neighborhood each $ 525,000 500,000-700,000 $ 500,000 (Manufactured) play.Actual cost will depend on type and size. Play Structure-Destination Costs reflect one large scale play structure with universal/inclusive and thematic (Manufactured But Custom each $ 1,312,500 1,000,000-1,750,000 $ 800,000elements.Actual cost will depend on type and size. to Project) Nature Play Area Costs reflect nature play features for ages 2-5 and 5-12 scaled for a neighborhood (Manufactured/Custom each $ 637,500 700,000-850,000 $ 350,000 park(natural materials,topography,landscaping,water,loose parts,sensory elements). Combination) Sand and Water Play each $ 450,000 300,000-600,000 $ 75,11100 Costs reflect small,child-controlled water play element(flow-through water,not Featurerecirculating). Splash Pad each $ 450,000 300,000-600,000 $ 462,500 Costs reflect recirculating splash pad/spray park with mechanical building. TRAILS Costs assume an 8to 10 ft-wide asphalt paved trail with gravel shoulders,minor Hard-Surface Path grading,mile markers,and continuous buffer vegetation.Improvements may per mile $ 1,500,000 1,450,00P2,000,000 $ 500,000 include curb and gutter,curb ramps,minor drainage infrastructure,and installations. Soft-Surface Trail per mile $ 375,000 235,000-500,000 $ 80,000 Costs assume a 3ft-wide stabilized natural surfaced trail and mile markers. SOCIAL GATHERING Shade Structure each $ 112,500 50,000-150,000 $ 50,000 Costs reflect fabric-roofed elements that shade play areas/spray parks/etc.. Picnic Area-Medium each $ 450,000 400,000-600,000 $ 200,000 Costs reflect medium group area(8-Ii people)with shade to support amenities such as bbgs and food prep areas.Long tables or mixed table sizes. urge group deed ILV*',UV,mu,aneue w buppuri ei,ieinue>>uui Picnic Area-Large each $ 600,000 600,000-800,000 $ 300,000 as bbqs,sinks,food prep areas,lighting,electrical.Long tables or mixed table Dog Park/Off-leash Dog Costs reflect a fenced area with turf or hardier surface.Costs assume the dog each $ 262,500 250,000-350,000 $ 150,000 park is within a larger park,and uses existing utilities for water,parking,etc.. Area Small Outdoor Event Space each $ 600,000 650,000-800,000 $ 162,500 Costs reflect plaza,small amphitheater,outdoor stage,pavilion or outdoor classroom,with utilities and support amenities. OTHER FACILITIES AND ELEMENTS Costs reflect elements such as:skate spots,disc golf,small bike skills area/pump Outdoor Recreation allowance per each $ 500,000 $ 250,000 track,parkour obstacle course,climbing spire,zip line,other unique play Amenities elements,sound gardens,and self-directed hike/app stations. Costs reflect elements such as:seating,bottle-filler stations/dog drinking dishes, Support Amenities and Art allowance per each $ 50,000 $ 25 000 Trash/recycling receptacles,bike racks,docking stations,art(playable, integrated,stand-alone,and/or temporary displays),information kiosks,and coworking stations/outdoor work space. Restroom(permanent) each $ 750,000 700,000-1,000,000 $ 300,000 Costs reflect 2 unit single-occupant each(24'x12'). Community or Costs reflect combination of in-ground,raised beds,and accessible planting areas $ 562,500 250,000-750,000 $ 125,000 Demonstration Garden each with fencing,water,composting/green waste recycling,seating,and shade. Natural and Interpretive Costs reflect elements such as:native plantings,designated natural Elements allowance for each $ 150,000 $ 75,000 areas/features,bioswales and rain gardens,arboretums,pollinator patches, gardens,corridors,bird habitat,baths,and houses. Stand Alone Outdoor Costs reflect exercise stations that combine cardio,strength training,or cross Fitness Equipment per 5 stations $ 250,000 $ 125,000 training. Signage-Wayfinding and per site $ 20,000 $ 10,000 Costs reflect monument sign,directional signage,and other informational Identity signage. Shade Tree Planting per maintained acre $ 5,000 $ 2,500 Costs reflect shade tree plantings from City approved tree list. Sports Field Lighting allowance $ 100,000 $ 75,000 Costs reflect sports field scale lighting fixtures. Sport Court Lighting(large) allowance $ 50,000 _ - Costs reflect lighting fixtures for basketball and tennis courts. Sport Court Lighting(small)allowance $ 30,000 - Costs reflect lighting fixtures for pickleball,volleyball,and futsol courts. Park Lighting allowance $ 50,000 $ 25,000 Costs reflect pedestrian scale lighting fixtures. _ Skate Park each $ 1,250,000 $ 312,500 Costs reflect skate park renovation to accommodate spectators,enhance safety, _ improve surfacing,and enhance access. These estimates reflect planning level cost assumptions in 2024 dollars not accounting for inflation.Cost ranges are intended for planning purposes only.Support and access amenities(if included)are noted.Actual costs may vary depending on site realities,the scale and quality of facilities,and changing market prices for materials and labor.Actual cost estimates should be determined through site master planning and design at the time of development. Because actual prices fluctuate and will vary by site,the cost estimates are presented as a range of costs.The range is aimed at capturing differences based on site size,location,topography and setting,facility quality and detail, supply and demand for labor and materials,etc.The costs do not include environmental compliance documentation,permitting,installation,or staff hours to manage site planning,design,construction,and implementation. Those elements could escalate park development costs by 20-25 percent. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-8 Table 3: Maintenance and Reinvestment Cost Assumptions Revised 11/20/24 Park Type Cost Per Acre Natural Areas $ 2,005.00 Parks $ 18,022.00 Golf Course $ 18,172.00 Athletic Fields $ 57,000.00 LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I D-9 r , 4 , ., or tp; p . t , .4 ,. '. ..:',„- : .4'. AIL jet e 0,4 , .... . . '' IIP ' ,4111% . ..,is e . d ''''''' a'' 414 Pao 4 ., ' ,,' ' - tit, ." ' • . * .icy f "'" ~ 4 ‘. * 4. fT' APPE IXs ,,,,._ 0 , ,,:,. .. .. , Funding Strategies °j a 1/1",..e, 11:_... ,,* . ''' . ' ' . r • . 4,.._ ' N AC *.. 1! 1 0 • • .‘41 il -4 W' INli 11. ' : . . - , -._,. ,. .,., s ik Irk1 ,,3 (i11 ` • 1111, • - 3` +401 i' ',--,:.';,\ - _ , . i SAFE CLEAN SUSTAINABLE CONNECTED THRIVING 1� lie ,'N' M {f 1 ..._40, 1 JIhi. , a4 .. . • assi., • Ilk* . s �• ,� we, .- . , 1,. _ , 1.,,11.) . • „,...40L___ ..___ .. ....7_ ' - . F un in F� „o 0 Implementation .,„ .... LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 December 2024 Draft Section 1. Funding StrategieF The future of Lake Oswego's parks and recreation system will depend on creative and flexible application of funds from multiple sources.The City of Lake Oswego generally relies on a mix of General Fund dollars,the 2019 General Obligation Bond, and the City's local demolition tax to fund parks and recreation capital projects and ongoing operations.To fund the projects identified in the Capital Improvement Plan,the City of Lake Oswego likely will need increased capital and operations funding sources. Adding these to the City's funding mix would help further diversify revenues to invest in the park and recreation system. Capital and Operations Funding This document uses the following definitions related to capital and operations funding: • Capital Funding: the one-time cost to acquire, design, build, or replace parks and facilities • Operations Funding:the ongoing and increasing annual cost to maintain, repair, clean, and program parks and facilities Lake Oswego currently relies on a mix of funding sources for park and recreation capital and operations costs: The City's General Fund supplies both capital and operations funding for the Department, and is used for staffing, programming, maintenance,and the operations of new projects like the LORAC and Rassekh Park. While a consistent source of funding for the Department, Parks& Recreation competes with other City departments and needed services. The General Obligation Bond passed in 2019 allowed the city to issue up to$30 million in bonds to renovate, replace, or develop park and recreation facilities or acquire new park or open space land.This measure has been successful in funding the renovation of major facilities like the Adult Community Center and Indoor Tennis Center as well as contributing to the construction of the Lake Oswego Recreation and Aquatics Center (LORAC) and Rassekh Park. .> A Demolition Tax on the demolition of residential units in Lake Oswego helps fund the parks maintenance budget, with a significant portion of parks maintenance revenue coming from the tax. Lake Oswego uses System Development Charges (SDCs),fees paid by new development to recover a portion of the cost of existing infrastructure and help fund new infrastructure to serve new development,to fund capital parks projects. Park SDCs contributed to the construction of the LORAC and construction of the Rassekh Skatepark. >> User fees paid by people who use the City's facilities and programs are important in recovering direct costs associated with operating these activities. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 Some funding sources will be applicable to only one or the other of these types of projects, and often operations funding can be the most challenging for a city to consistently source year after year, particularly for the continued operation and maintenance of its facilities where increases in costs often outpace revenue increases. Additional Funding Sources and Strategies Existing funding sources alone are not sufficient to fund the projects noted in the Capital Improvement Plan.The City has explored and implemented creative funding sources in the past, including the 2019 General Obligation Bond, Demolition Tax, and a partnership with the School District to help fund the construction of the LORAC,as well as grants from agencies such as the Oregon Parks & Recreation Department and Mt. Hood Territories. Looking forward to the next 15 years,the City will need to continue to consider additional potential funding sources for both parks capital projects and operations, even though these may not historically have been used by the City. For each funding source described below,the following information is provided: advantages, limitations, and current parks and recreation use (if any). Strategically Pursue Grants Federal, state, and other public agency grant funding may be available for parks and recreation improvements. Potential grants for which Lake Oswego parks and recreation projects may be eligible include: • Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants Program (Metro). Funded through Metro's 2019 bond measure,the Nature in Neighborhoods Capital Grants program will support community-led projects that benefit historically marginalized communities, protect and improve water quality and fish and wildlife habitat, support climate resilience and increase people's experience of nature at the community scale.The total project award must be at least$100,000 and a property owned by a state or local government. Metro will provide no more than two-thirds of the total project costs of the capital project(2:1 match). • Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (Federal Government and Metro). Allocated by Metro,these federal transportation funds are available for design, acquisition and construction of transportation projects including roadways, boulevards, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements. It may be possible to fund some improved connections to or between park and recreation facilities using these funds. • Local Government Grant Program (Oregon Parks and Recreation Department). Using state lottery dollars,this program provides funding assistance for the acquisition, development, and rehabilitation of park and recreation areas and facilities.The Local Government Grant Program provides up to 50 percent funding assistance for cities with populations over 25,000. Projects can range from maximum grant requests of$250,000 to $1,000,000 and are reviewed and prioritized by the Local Government Advisory Committee on a biennial basis. • Recreation Trails Program (Oregon Parks and Recreation Department). Projects eligible for Recreation Trails Program (RTP)funding include maintenance and restoration of existing trails, development and rehabilitation of trailhead facilities, construction of new recreation trails, acquisition of land or easements for the purpose of trail development, and safety and education projects. Recipients are required to provide a minimum 20 percent match,with a minimum grant request of$10,000. Grants are awarded yearly. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 3 • Land and Water Conservation Funds(Oregon Parks and Recreation Department).These federal funds, administered through the State, provide matching grants to local governments for acquisition and development of public outdoor recreational areas and facilities.Wetlands and natural areas may be included as part of the recreational area.The focus of these grants is park acquisition, development and/or rehabilitation. Grants require a 50 percent match.While the grant cycle did not occur in 2024, it is expected to resume in the fall of 2025. • Oregon Heritage Grant(Oregon Parks and Recreation Department). Many of Lake Oswego's older parks contain historic and cultural resources, such as the Iron Smelting Furnace at George Rogers Park.The Oregon Heritage Grant provides matching grants to local governments for projects that conserve, develop or interpret Oregon's heritage. Generally, awards are$3,000- $20,000 and a 50 percent match is required. • Watershed Restoration Grants(Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board). Projects considered for these grants include:watershed restoration, enhancement, assessment and monitoring; watershed education and outreach; watershed council support; and property, easement and water rights acquisition.There are several grant cycles each year and a 25 percent match in funds is required. • Oregon Community Paths Program (Oregon Department of Transportation).This grant program funds grants for project development, construction, reconstruction, major resurfacing, or other improvements of multiuse paths that improve access and safety for people walking and bicycling. It is funded through the state Multimodal Active Transportation fund and federal Transportation Alternatives Program and requires a 10.27%match. • Oregon Parks Foundation Fund(Oregon Community Foundation).Grants from the Oregon Parks Foundation support the acquisition, preservation and restoration of Oregon's native landscape, and to assist with environmental, recreational, and educational improvements to Oregon's public parks. Grants are generally in the range of$1,000 to$5,000. • Strategic Investment Program(Mt. Hood Territory).The Strategic Investment Program is intended to support projects that enhance assets and visitor experiences to tourism facilities including parks, improve accessibility, promote alternative modes of travel, and expand visitation to new& underserved audiences.The grants are on an annual cycle. • Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities Grant Program.This program will be administered by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD). DLCD staff are in the process of developing this grant program to help fund planning and development of parks and trails by local jurisdictions in Oregon that meet climate change and equity criteria and guidelines. More information about specific program requirements will be available in 2025. Advantages: Recreation facilities are appealing to granting agencies, and grants can expand the capital or operating resources available. Limitations: Competitive and may only provide funding for certain types of projects.Available funds may vary by year or cycle. Many grant programs will not fund indoor facilities. Nearly all grant programs require a substantial local contribution (matching funds or in-kind contribution).Application and management of grant contracts requires staff time and expertise, particularly for larger grants. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City has applied for and received numerous grants in the past to fund capital developments, capital maintenance projects, habitat enhancement or restoration projects, LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 4 and historic preservation projects.The City has also used grants to support programs, activities, and human services, such as relief grants for summer camps and garden clubs during the COVID-19 pandemic, and numerous grants that support services offered at the Adult Community Center. Most recently the City received a $1,000,000 grant from the Local Government Grant Program to fund a portion of the development of a playground and picnic shelter at Rassekh Park. Pursue Metro Bond Funding The City has access to money through the Metro Local Share Program. Funded through Metro's 2019 Regional Parks and Nature Bond, eligible projects include natural area or park land acquisition,fish and wildlife habitat restoration or habitat connectivity enhancements, maintaining or developing public access facilities at public parks and natural areas, design and construction of local or regional trails, and enhanced or new learning/environmental education facilities. Lake Oswego has access to $2,083,297 in funding for eligible local projects. Advantages: Bond has already passed, and funding amount for city eligible projects is known. Limitations: Can only be used on projects that are eligible and has a known funding cap. Current Parks and Recreation Use: Lake Oswego has already identified a list of priority projects that are eligible for Metro Local Share funding. Establish and/or Strengthen Partnerships Partnerships are formal agreements between multiple entities to provide services,facilities,or both. These partnerships are built to access skills and resources from all partners.While the public-private variation attracts the most attention, many public-public and non-profit partnerships have greatly benefited park and recreation systems.An increasingly popular approach for park and recreation agencies, a public agency can enter into a working agreement with another public agency, private corporation, or non-profit organization to help fund, build and/or operate a public facility.Typically,the three primary incentives a public agency can offer are land to place a facility(usually a park or other parcel of public land), certain tax advantages, and access to the facility.While a public agency may have to give up certain responsibilities or control of other recreation services and amenities, it is one way of obtaining public facilities at a lower cost.The City can also partner with other entities to offer programs and events. Advantages: Partnerships can help fill gaps in City facilities and programming, requiring a lower level of investment from the City while still providing a variety of services to the community. Limitations: No guarantee that partnerships will continue, or that agreements will be renewed; requires ongoing staff time and dedication to maintain these relationships. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City previously had an intergovernmental agreement(IGA)with the School District regarding City use of District facilities (gymnasiums and athletic fields) and City maintenance and rental management of District athletic fields.The IGA had been in place since 1988 but was terminated in 2022. While the City no longer has an overall joint use facility agreement with the School District,the City of Lake Oswego and the Lake Oswego School District have a separate IGA relating to the construction and use of the LORAC.The City also has an agreement with Christ Church Parish for office and recreational programming space, Including the Teen Lounge, as well as with the Academy of Ballet& Dance, One River School of Art& Design, and Coyle Outside,which offer programs LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 5 through the Department at their own locations. Sports programs and activities are also provided at a variety of locations in the city through joint use agreements. Prepare Facility Business Plans The Department could prepare mini business plans for each major recreation facility, attraction, community event,and/or major departmental function. Many recreation programming staff have been trained in cost of service and business principles and how they manage their programs and facilities according to these principles. It is also critical to develop effective performance measures to track efficiency, revenue production, and fulfillment of operational requirements.These plans can evaluate the program area provided by the facility based on meeting the outcomes desired for participants, cost recovery, percentage of the market and business controls,cost of service, pricing strategy for the short- term, and marketing strategies that are to be implemented. Advantages: If developed consistently,these can be effective tools for budget construction and justification processes outside of the marketing and communication planning process. Limitations:While they may identify specific funding strategies and cost-recovery goals,facility business plans do not provide an actual funding source. Plans also require additional staff time and knowledge to prepare and implement. Current Parks and Recreation Use: Not consistently used by the Department for facilities, although extensive planning on funding and cost recovery was undertaken for the LORAC. Keep Fees and Charges Current with Actual Costs and/or Increase User Fees and Program Fees Parks and recreation in Lake Oswego generate revenue through charges for services.The Department regularly participates in setting fee structures for activities and services, use of facilities and parks, and other services provided as part of the citywide Master Fees and Charges process, adopted annually by City Council.The Department also has an approved Cost Recovery Strategy and Continuum Model, which was significantly updated in 2021. Parks Plan 2040 recommends regularly reviewing the Department's fee philosophy, methodology, and cost recovery goals for fees and charges for programs and services, as well as re-evaluating options for park and facility rentals to improve customer service but also generate more revenues. Advantages: Increases revenues and ensure programs and operations are able to continue. Limitations:While some programs benefit only individuals and some services are premiums on top of the essential park and recreation experience, price increases across the board can limit access to key community services and reduce use of parks and programming. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The Department overhauled its cost recovery strategy in 2021, and worked with The SMART Project and Amalia Software to determine service categories,gather data at the individual activity or service level, and gather all expense data to determine funding and cost recovery levels.This model shows the relationship between the degree of community expectation and/or benefit and individual expectation and/or benefit, and to what extent the activity or service is funded by tax dollars.There may be additional levels of funding and cost recovery of service categories on the continuum based on age groups (youth, adult,senior.)The overall cost recovery target for recreation programs (cultural, sports, events, outdoor,gardening, etc.) is 100 percent or higher.The Department also annually evaluates program fees and adjusts fees as necessary. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 6 Encourage Community Members to Establish a Parks and Recreation Foundation Some communities have established nonprofit or private park foundations, spearheaded by community desires to support recreation programs, projects, and facilities.A foundation can provide grants or fundraising campaigns to support capital investments in parks and facilities, engage the local community through volunteer efforts, build advocacy and awareness about certain issues,support scholarship funds for programs and activities, and partner with local businesses or other local government entities. Park and recreation foundations throughout Oregon include the Tualatin Hills Park Foundation, Happy Valley Parks and Recreation Foundation, Milwaukie Parks Foundation, Oregon City Parks Foundation, Portland Parks Foundation, Eugene Parks Foundation,Salem Parks Foundation, Bend Park& Recreation Foundation,Astoria Parks, Recreation, &Community Foundation, Chehalem Park Foundation, and Willamalane Park Foundation.Some park and recreation agencies are also supported by broader focused community foundations,such as the Hillsboro Community Foundation. Foundations are often 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofits, but can also be private organizations.They are typically guided by a volunteer Board of Directors, with involvement and support from local agency or district staff. Resources for community members interested in exploring a Park and Recreation Foundation in Lake Oswego include the National Recreation and Park Association Park Advocate Handbook and webinars and courses from the National Association of Park Foundations. Advantages: Increased funding for park improvements and programs,flexibility in fundraising, ability to serve beyond the scope of a traditional park agency, advocacy for parks and recreation needs, access to specialized expertise, and the potential to attract additional donors and grants due to their non- government status. Limitations: Requires efforts to be driven and maintained by community members,typically all volunteer run. Foundation priorities could diverge from City priorities. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City does not currently have a parks and recreation foundation, though the Adult Community Center is supported by an Endowment Fund that primarily funds program expenses.The Department has historically had many active and engaged Friends of Parks groups that support habitat restoration and other stewardship projects in parks; however,the number of active Friends Groups has decreased in recent years and the Department is exploring alternative structures to support and reinvigorate park stewardship. Consider Another General Obligation Bond (Bond Measure) General Obligation bonds are voter-approved bonds with the authority to levy an assessment on real and personal property.The proceeds can be used for capital improvements but not maintenance.This property tax is levied for a specified period of time (usually 15-20 years). Passage requires a simple majority approval in a May or November election or a "double majority" (majority of registered voters participating and a majority of those approving) in a March or September election. Bond measures are typically used to fund larger scale projects which cannot be funded with revenues from other sources. They typically pay for a package of improvements which are of high priority to residents. Advantages:Allows voters to decide on a limited-term tax increase to raise a substantial amount of capital funding. Limitations: Can be used as capital funding only and existing debt limits the amount that could be raised. Further capital development without parallel operations funding commitments can reduce the LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 7 quality of existing park maintenance. Requires appetite from taxpayers to support and may compete with other Department or local agency bond measures. Current Parks and Recreation Use: Lake Oswego is currently repaying a 2019 General Obligation bond, which has been used to partially or completely fund a variety of projects, including: • Renovation of the Adult Community Center, Indoor Tennis Center, and Municipal Golf Course • Replacement of restrooms and picnic shelters at popular parks • Rehabilitation of the Water Sports Center Dock • Acquisition of the Hallinan Woods Yates Property • Construction of the LORAC and Rassekh Park Explore a Parks Maintenance Utility Fee The City Council has the authority to add a monthly fee to the utility bills of residents and businesses in Lake Oswego to fund operational expenses at parks and facilities. A park utility fee creates dedicated funds to help offset the cost of park and facility maintenance,similar to the City's Street Maintenance Fee and other utility fees.As with the City's other utility fees,the rate and structure of a parks maintenance fee and the use of revenues is determined by the City. A high-level revenue projection for a park maintenance fee was developed for the City based on the simple flat fee per unit structure and two fee levels ($10 and $15 per month),as shown in Table 1. Billing units for residential customers represent the number of dwelling units. Nonresidential units are equal to the current number of Street Maintenance Fee accounts as a proxy for charging a parks maintenance fee. Estimated annual revenue ranges from $2.2 million (based on $10 per month)to$3.4 million (based on $15 per month).Alternative fee structures that scale the fees within or across customer classes could also be considered based on the City's objectives and available information. Table 1: Hi•h- Level Estimate of Park Maintenance Fee Annual Revenue Estimated Revenue Customer Class Units' $10/Unit $15/Unit per per Month Month Single Family 11,954 $1,434,505 $2,151,758 Multifamily 6,172 $740,670 $1,111,005 Nonresidential 522 $62,640 $93,960 Total Revenue $2,237,815 $3,356,723 'Dwelling units for single family and multifamily; accounts for nonresidential. Data based on Fiscal Year 2023/24 average billing units for Street Maintenance Fee. Advantages: Provides stable, ongoing funding that is dedicated to parks and recreation maintenance. Limitations: Can be regressive, impacting lower income households disproportionately. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City does not currently have a parks and recreation utility fee. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 8 Update System Development Charges Oregon State Law allows local jurisdictions to impose Systems Development Charges, known as SDCs,to equitably spread the cost of essential capital improvements to new development and pay for infrastructure expansion required to serve the additional demand.As part of the Parks Plan 2040 process,the City is conducting a review and update of its Parks SDC Methodology, including recommended changes in how it calculates the fees,the cost of Parks Plan 2040 capital projects attributable to new growth, and the resulting fee that can be charged by the City.The resulting update will be proposed for adoption by the City Council as part of a separate process subsequent to adoption of the Parks 2040 Plan. Advantages: Charged to offset the impact of new park development to serve new neighborhoods,this source does not impact existing resident tax rates directly.A reimbursement portion of this fee can also be used to upgrade or replace facilities in existing parks. Limitations: New and expanded parks funded by SDCs must be maintained, using limited General Fund dollars.The potential for the construction of new neighborhoods in Lake Oswego is also limited as the city is largely built out and developable/redevelopable land is constrained. Current Parks and Recreation Use: Used for the acquisition, development and recreation spaces and facilities or to increase capacity in the system.Additionally,the City is updating its current SDCs and associated methodology as part of the implementation of Parks Plan 2040.The methodology was last updated in 2008. Solicit Donations The donations of labor/in-kind services, land, or cash by service agencies, private groups, or individuals can provide sources of revenue, most typically for specific projects or programs.A willing property owner may give real property or grant an easement as a donation to a public agency or a non-profit organization. In some cases, a property owner may agree to sell the property at less than fair market value.The property owner is paid for part of the value of the property and donates the remaining value, receiving tax benefits for the donation. Advantages: Builds community ownership in projects. Expands the fundraising reach of the City. Can be used in some cases for matching funds to leverage larger local and state grants. Limitations: Can be used for large-scale projects such as recreation facilities but are not likely to be a major part of the financial support. Can contribute to a low return on investment due to the resources and time needed to pursue donations. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City currently considers and would accept donations of land or cash depending on the situation. However,this strategy has not been widely used by the City to date outside of large donations to the Adult Community Center that helped fund improvements. Pursue Land Swaps, Long Term Leases, and Land Trusts A land swap is a simultaneous, mutual transfer of real property between willing parties.A lease is a legal agreement granting the use of a property in exchange for payment for a specified length of time. For parks and recreation purposes,the payment may be nominal (e.g., $1 per year) and the term is often long(such as 99 years).A land trust is an agreement through which one party(the trustee) agrees to hold ownership of a piece of property for the benefit of another party(the beneficiary).A land trust can LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 9 also be a private nonprofit organization that as all or part of its mission actively works to protect land, often for conservation or affordable housing purposes. Advantages:Additional ways for Lake Oswego to provide park land to the community, especially in areas not currently served by parks or essential services. Limitations: Unlikely to yield large acquisitions of land and requires staff time to pursue and track opportunities,formalize agreements, and obtain City Council approval. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City does not currently pursue these methods but should consider opportunities as they arise. Expand Sponsorship Program Lake Oswego offers the opportunity for businesses to increase their exposure at parks and recreation facilities, events, and programs for a fee. Sponsorship opportunities include logos or advertisements at specific park amenities or athletic facilities,seasonal and cultural events, Lake Oswego's Farmers' Market, Star Spangled Celebrations in July, program partnerships, and a variety of options at Luscher Farm that range from camps to community garden plots, along with partnerships at the Tennis and Adult Community Centers.The sponsorship program will be expanded to the Municipal Golf Course and LORAC once they open in 2025. Advantages:Strengthens relationships with local businesses and organizations, providing benefits for both the Department and local businesses/organizations bringing economic vitality to the City. Limitations: Potential eventual cap on increasing sponsorships due to the number of local businesses and organizations within Lake Oswego. Inherent restrictions on the types of projects and operations the program can fund as sponsorships are used only on visible events, activities, and services. Not a stable source of income as sponsors vary year over year. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The Department currently maintains and offers a variety of sponsorship "levels"for events and publications, depending on marketing and promotional exposure desires. City staff work closely to customize programs, maximizing marketing budgets, and aligned target audiences. Some businesses also sponsor services, such as a sponsor who offsets the cost of complimentary coffee at the Adult Community Center. Propose A Local Option Levy The City can propose a local option levy as a way to temporarily(up to five years at a time) increase the property tax rate to fund operational expenses.These levies are subject to the same voter approval requirements as a bond but have the added constraint of the time limitation. Advantages:Allows an increase in operational funding and could help fund larger short-term operational needs like invasive species removal or habitat restoration projects. Can help avoid budget cuts impacting services. Limitations: Requires voter approval and renewal at least every five years, and therefore does not necessarily solve long-term funding needs. Could be seen as duplicative of the Demolition Tax or General Obligation Bond in terms of funding maintenance and operations. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City of Lake Oswego does not currently utilize this source for parks and recreation funding. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 10 Establish Tax Increment Financing Tax increment financing uses property taxes from within an area to fix identified problems in that same area. It often focuses on improving an area's transportation and utility infrastructure since these kinds of improvements can unlock an area's development potential.Tax increment financing can also be used to attract and retain small businesses, support affordable housing, and develop public spaces such as parks, plazas, and trails. Communities in Oregon can petition to form a special park and recreation district under ORS chapter 266. When approved by voters these districts can levy taxes up to one half of one percent of property value (0.005) and have bonding authority.With a three-or five-member board of directors, elected from within the boundaries of the district, Park and Recreation Districts operate autonomously from the City. However, in many communities the City uses its City Council as the governing body for TIF Districts. Advantages:Additional funding for projects in specific areas Limitations: Projects must align with the goals of the TIF District and be approved by the board of directors. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City of Lake Oswego does not currently utilize this source for parks and recreation funding. However,the City may consider implementation of a TIF District in the Foothills area following relocation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant and could use this District to help pay for acquisition of land and/or development of additional park and recreation facilities in this area. Alter the Demolition Tax Lake Oswego charges a demolition tax for residential structures that require a demolition permit.The tax is paid when the permit is issued, and the revenue is used to help maintain City parks and facilities. The city passed the$15,000 demolition tax in 2019 and initially charged $10,000 for home deconstruction, which differs from demolition in that it involves some materials being reused. However, in 2022,the City Council decided to waive the tax for deconstruction entirely while maintaining the tax for demolitions.The current tax requires that homes built before 1940 slated for demolition be deconstructed instead. Advantages:Already in place in the City and funds are used for parks maintenance, particularly larger capital maintenance projects, something that can be challenging to obtain grant funding for. Limitations: Requires City Council approval to alter, and revenues correspond with the condition of the housing market. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The City currently has a Demolition Tax of$15,000 for residential structures that require a demolition permit. Increase General Fund Dollars General fund resources are the collection point for taxes and fees charged by the City to fund the full variety of city services.These funds are applied based on the direction of the City Council consistent with community priorities. In comparison to other strategies, General Fund resources have the fewest limitations on how they are spent but are also competitive across the services provided by the City.The Department could make a case to increase General Fund support for parks maintenance, programming, and events. Park and facility maintenance needs will increase as new projects are brought online, and LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 11 there are citywide benefits associated with parks and recreation programs (e.g., healthy population, increased property values, etc.). Advantages: Can be used for both capital and operations funding. Limitations: Funding availability can vary based on the city's economic status, local politics, and demands on funding for other needed city services and by other city departments. Current Parks and Recreation Use:The Department currently participates in the City's annual budgeting process and advocates for demonstrated funding needs.The budget has previously been adjusted in the past to fund larger department efforts and expenditures such as planning efforts like Parks Plan 2040 or future staffing for the LORAC. Applying Funding Sources The table below summarizes how the funding sources and strategies listed above could be used for different types of projects or spending areas: LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 12 Table 1: Funding Sources and Spending -O of C C H fC 0 a) I M C (4 i L C-43 N O U47, _ Q H f6 CU Y 3 _; E L L L O CO a m o •E o a C v - E u C 4- L E CISu, CU Q O C Y CU C cl v a) O 1 C6 QC) - •L u y v 3 > oil s to a "O C i+ -o N C) i u 4- 4- w C C C . > w o O O fd O > dA 4J _ L Y -O L u u u C f6 m m as v i O. C VI C C E O C bA _ 3 C C •* C C to 41 ON c m v .- a CD u m co o c ,- m v z E o 2 .1' 2 2 a O a a Grants • • • Metro Bond Funding _ Partnerships _ • Preparation • of Facility Business Plans Increasing • Fees Parks and • Recreation Foundation General • Obligation Bond Parks • Maintenance Utility Fee System • • Development Charges Donations • • Land Swaps, • Long Term Leases,and Land Trusts Sponsorship • Program Local Option • Levy Tax • • Increment Financing LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 1E- 13 Demolition • Tax General Fund • Dollars Revenue Projections for Existing Funding Sources Figure 1 below presents the total funding available for parks and recreation projects from 2014-2015 through 2024-2025. It offers an overview of funding allocations over this period, highlighting the trends, changes, and overall financial support directed toward parks and recreation initiatives.This data serves as a valuable tool for understanding how funding has evolved and helps to project future investment. The following Parks & Recreation individual funding sources were included in the total: • Grants • Demolition Tax • Miscellaneous Revenue • Transfers (Capital • Proceeds from Sale of Capital • Other Financing Sources Note that not all funding sources were available and used each year(e.g., Demolition Tax revenue was not available until 2019). Figure 1: Changes in Total Funding Available in Fund 500- Parks and Recreation (2014-2025) $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 N' ti0 NA tib ti0 ti0 1' 1' 1 tip` 1' '1, '1, 'V 'V .1, ,1, ,1, '1, "V ,1, ,1, ON' ON' y`° ON ON y9i yO LO l; L'l' 'L' tip` LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 14 The table below estimates the funding available for parks and recreation projects, programs, and initiatives based on existing sources. Drawing on historical trends from the past decade, it provides an overview of the allocation patterns, offering insight into funding fluctuations,growth, and potential available resources in 2040. Funding was projected to be zero for Transfers, Proceeds from Sale of Capital, and Other Financing Sources as these sources had very little funding recently and therefore cannot be accurately projected through 2040. Projected funding is shown in current dollars for all categories. General Fund revenues also are included as escalated dollars, assuming an annual increase of 3%. Table 2: 2040 Fundin• Pro.ections Projection Escalated Funding Sources in 10 Year Average Fund 500—Parks& (2014/2015- Annual 2026-2040 2026-2024 Recreation 2024/2025) Grants $ 100,269 $ 50,135 $ 752,021 $ 752,021 Demolition Tax $ 182,000 $ 300,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 (Maintenance) Miscellaneous $ 70,592 $ 35,296 $ 529,439 $ 529,439 Revenue1 General Revenue $ 7,677,200 - -- $ 165,407,6652 Transfers (Capital) $ 205,000 $0 $0 Proceeds from Sale $ 185,542 $0 $0 of Capital Other Financing $ 19,588 $0 $0 - Sources 1 Funding under this category in 2021-2022 was more than double typical funding and an outlier,50%of the 10- year average was therefore used for that year. 2 Based on the City's forecast through fiscal year 2028 and then a 3%escalation each year thereafter. While Lake Oswego is currently updating its parks SDC methodology,SDC revenue depends in large part on how much the SDCs will change.An inflationary average was used to project 2040 funding, identifying a forecasted revenue of$10,046,313 in SDCs from 2026-2040.Those revenues are not included in the table above but will be included in the Parks Plan 2040 document after further work on the SDC methodology update associated with this project. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IE- 15 W. / . 1,l! e', v a, y.' a, - .,!. .?„,),___;,...,,.. .... ",i. "11; I -'•,1--;••, \7.-, - "---t -3 i i .4 .... .• . . , .• . ... , __. . „.. • , _,,,._,. .,,, .-::: ---------,- . ... „.... .,,:,,..,,..!,.. .... 1, 44,..______ ., ... ..,,,,o.,,,,,, ,„„:„: ,.) . , .• .,..... - . -- r „ - . , .../..a• APPENDIX F ._... - . ' ..''''.\ Implementation Strategies • . ,,,,,,, :/ k....,,. 11114. • S •11101,111r'' , .. /f Vy �. Air � t "lb....w,,,iiiiilitmi. ' i. krAdlik ' A 4 \ h j tl• - ighir'• ii00...irg .'r I _ - 1 y SjT„n l��'I�I { J" �� d,, • r. t" .�.a 1 SAFE CLEAN SUSTAINABLE CONNECTED THRIVING 1e- Nor --Nor lie ,... r.s-*nos 4 . - .t , ,. a r [ T a w • limb is •4-14. . . IP - . #r . 4 At; _ ik. 41 I. r ,-4 7: .: -- ., ..11S .1 it/ .0. J v „` r a (T411 A IR4 ` - F eT Implementation � o _°F s� Strategies _ _ _ LAKE OSWEGO December 2024 PARKS PLAN 2040 Implementation Strategies This document presents implementation strategies to advance the goals and priorities of Lake Oswego and advance progress of the community-supported vision. Strategies Overview There are 14 strategies that are recommended to implement key elements of Parks Plan 2040.The following strategies will take place over the next five years. Each strategy also identifies proposed roles and responsibilities for leadership and any additional support that will be needed. Short-Term Strategies: 1. Define how progress on projects and recommendations will be tracked and develop a system to communicate plan progress to Department staff, advisory board members, decision-makers, and the public. 2. Build on the community involvement completed during the development of Parks Plan 2040 and establish a consistent and inclusive process for public engagement in implementation. 3. Improve the city's website, activity registration software, and possibly other digital platforms or applications to increase availability of information. 4. Identify action items to formalize an inclusive and equitable process for delivery of Department services, including development of a Parks & Recreation Implementation Strategy for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. 5. Maintain CAPRA certification and stay in compliance with CAPRA's guidelines for regularly reviewing and updating information. 6. Create a plan for maintaining and operating the Oswego Pioneer Cemetery. 7. Create and record an approach for managing natural resources and open spaces, identifying priorities and responsibilities. 8. Create a clear project intake and prioritization process for both capital projects and programming initiatives. 9. Implement the Luscher Area Master Plan. 10. Create a business plan for a future indoor pickleball facility and conduct a site opportunity analysis. 11. Identify universal design practices that can be implemented as part of regular facility and amenity replacement in combination with accessibility improvements identified in the city's ADA Transition Plan. 12. Engage with the School District regarding community use of City and District athletic or other facilities through regular meetings and other coordination activities. 13. Identify next steps for project recommendations that are either not tied to specific sites or require additional planning prior to implementation. 14. Create a plan for implementing consistent park, trail, and open space signage, starting with the Department's signage and wayfinding plan. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 2 Implementation Strategies 1. Define how progress on projects and recommendations will be tracked and develop a system to communicate plan progress to Department staff,advisory board members,decision-makers, and the public. Implementing a robust system for tracking progress on projects and recommendations in Parks Plan 2040 is crucial for ensuring accountability,transparency, and continued investments in the system.This tracking system should include clearly defined goals, measurable performance indicators, and a set schedule for evaluating progress. Lead Responsibility: Parks& Recreation Department: Management, Planning, and Communications Staff Support: None Identified Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Define clear goals and metrics for success. Metrics could be a mix of quantitative (e.g., completion of specific projects, usage statistics, or financial metrics) and qualitative (e.g., level of community satisfaction, general improvements in accessibility, level of inclusivity in park offerings, etc.) ■ Set a reporting schedule. Progress should be tracked at regular intervals (e.g., quarterly or annually). Quarterly reports could focus on short-term progress,whereas annual reports can assess overall progress toward long-term objectives and provide an opportunity for more in- depth analysis on project status, completed milestones, and challenges encountered. ■ Use key performance indicators and data collection. Communicate progress through key performance indicators.These could be related to facility and amenity upgrades, community engagement, and/or financial indicators. ■ Communicate plan progress frequently through public updates, annual reports, and celebrations of milestones. This could include updates on the city's website, through social media,the Hello LO or LODown newsletters, the annual Fact Book, and via interested parties email lists.These updates should include visual representations of progress, such as before-and-after photos, project timelines, and performance data. Annual reports can be posted online for easy access. When projects are completed,the City should continue to organize public events to celebrate these milestones and engage the community in the success of Parks Plan 2040. ■ Provide opportunities for community check-ins. Create regular opportunities for the community to check in, provide input, and share evolving needs. Community input should be integrated into the tracking process to ensure the plan remains responsive and adaptable to changing circumstances. ■ Regularly review the progress data, performance indicators, and community feedback to adjust priorities or timelines if necessary. This could involve shifting resources to projects that need more attention, re-prioritizing based on new community input, or scaling up successful initiatives. 2. Build on the community involvement completed during the development of Parks Plan 2040 and establish a consistent and inclusive process for public engagement in implementation.The Department should leverage the existing foundation of community involvement developed during LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 3 the Parks Plan 2040 planning process and build upon this established foundation of trust and engagement. Lead Responsibility: Parks& Recreation Department: Management, Planning, Communications, and Programming Staff Support: Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Advisory Board (PRNRAB) Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Actively engage with historically marginalized groups, such as low-income communities, people of color, seniors, people with disabilities, and youth.This can be achieved through targeted outreach, partnerships with local organizations, and offer bilingual materials in neighborhoods with higher concentrations of non-English speaking populations. ■ Hold public meetings and workshops in various neighborhoods, including options for virtual participation to reach people who cannot attend in person. These meetings can serve to update the public on project status, solicit feedback, and brainstorm solutions to any challenges. ■ Develop a dedicated online platform or mobile app where community members can track the progress of the Parks Master Plan, access project details, leave feedback, and view upcoming opportunities for involvement.Tie the information on this platform or app to current information about facilities and activities within individual parks and other facilities. ■ When hosting public meetings or workshops, ensure that venues are accessible and that materials are provided in multiple formats (e.g., braille, large print, and online translations). Additionally, consider offering childcare and transportation assistance when possible to remove barriers to participation. ■ Continue to involve youth by partnering with schools and youth organizations to conduct workshops or activities that allow students to provide input. ■ Regularly recognize and highlight community contributions and feedback. For example, feature success stories, community-driven ideas that have been implemented, or volunteers who have contributed to park improvements. ■ When feedback reveals issues or new needs that may not have been anticipated, ensure that the community is aware of how their concerns are being addressed. ■ Continue to host annual events, like park clean-ups or volunteer days that allow the community to continue engaging with park projects in a hands-on way. 3. Improve the city's website, activity registration software, and possibly other digital platforms or applications to increase availability of information. By modernizing digital tools,the city can enhance the experience of residents, improve communication, streamline services, and foster greater community engagement.The city's website should be updated or redesigned to provide an intuitive, streamlined experience for users of all ages and abilities.The website should act as a one- stop hub for parks and recreation events, programs, news, and services. Lead Responsibility: Parks& Recreation Department: Administrative, Management, Planning, Communications, and Programming Staff Support: IT Department, City Manager's Office, City Communications Team LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IF- 4 Implementation Steps/Recommendations: • Simplified Navigation: Use clear, straightforward menus and category-based layouts that allow users to quickly find the information they need. • Mobile-Friendly Design: Ensure the website is fully responsive and optimized for mobile devices, as many users will access the site from smartphones or tablets.This may involve resizing content, adjusting menus, and making sure all features function properly on smaller screens. As the Department does not directly manage or oversee the entirety of the city's website, the Department could consider creating a mobile app that incorporates the above features. ■ Search Functionality: Improve or integrate an advanced search feature that allows users to easily find information by keyword, service, or department. Search results should be accurate and prioritized based on relevance. ■ Accessibility Features: Ensure the website meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG 2.1) to serve individuals with disabilities.This includes text-to-speech capabilities, screen reader compatibility, color contrast adjustments, and easy font readability. ■ Multilingual Options:Add language options for non-English-speaking residents, offering key information in multiple languages, particularly those spoken by large local communities. ■ Integrations with Social Media: Ensure the website integrates with the city's social media platforms, allowing real-time updates and seamless information sharing. ■ Service Requests:Create or upgrade a digital portal for residents to submit requests for repairs, maintenance, or public safety concerns. ■ Interactive Map Features: Integrate interactive maps that allow residents to find information about individual park facilities,trails, and other public spaces, as well as programmed events or activities scheduled to take place within them. ■ User-Friendly Interface: Ensure that the registration platform has a clean, intuitive interface that requires minimal effort to navigate. Include clear instructions and visual cues to guide users through the process. ■ Account Management:Allow residents to create accounts where they can save their information,track registrations, and manage multiple family members or users under one account. ■ Real-Time Availability: Display real-time availability for programs and events so residents can immediately see open spots,waitlists, or registration deadlines.This could include features like online reservation capabilities for facilities like sports fields, picnic areas, or community centers. ■ Payment Integration: Implement secure online payment systems that allow residents to pay registration fees or make donations directly through the platform.This could include credit/debit card payments, electronic checks, or integration with digital wallets. ■ Automated Notifications:Send automated email or SMS confirmations and reminders about registration status, payment deadlines, or program updates.These notifications can help ensure participants are prepared and aware of important dates. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 5 4. Identify action items to formalize an inclusive and equitable process for delivery of Department services, including development of a Parks& Recreation Implementation Strategy for Diversity, Equity,and Inclusion.This includes a plan for incorporating PRNRAB diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) recommendations into ongoing parks planning, engagement, development, and operations processes. Lead Responsibility: Parks& Recreation Department: Management, Planning, and Communications Staff; all staff for education and training activities Support: PRNRAB, Lake Oswego Equity Program Manager Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Ensure that community engagement is inclusive by providing multiple avenues for feedback, including online surveys, public forums, and outreach to underserved populations. Continue to translate materials into different languages as necessary and provide accessibility accommodations like sign language interpreters or assistive listening devices. ■ Integrate DEI principles into the Department's long-term strategic planning process, ensuring that equity is a core consideration in all future park and recreation decisions, such as land acquisition, development priorities, and resource allocation. ■ As described in more detail in the previous strategy, apply DEI principles to park and facility design by ensuring accessibility for all, including people with disabilities, and creating spaces that are welcoming to different cultural and social groups. ■ Design recreation programs that respond to the cultural, linguistic, and recreational needs of diverse communities.This could include offering culturally specific events, activities, or fitness classes, as well as ensuring that programs are affordable and accessible to all community members. ■ Offer regular training for Department staff, leadership, and the Parks Board to increase cultural competence and awareness of bias. ■ Partner with local organizations that serve diverse communities, including those focused on racial equity, immigrant services, disability advocacy, and low-income families. ■ Develop inclusive volunteer programs that provide opportunities for all community members to participate in park programs and decision-making. ■ Establish a process for regularly reviewing and adjusting the DEI strategies and action items based on community feedback, new research, and evolving best practices. 5. Maintain CAPRA certification and stay in compliance with CAPRA's guidelines for regularly reviewing and updating information.The National Association of Parks and Recreation's Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA), delivers benefits for both the community and recreation departments and their staff. CAPRA is the only national accreditation of park and recreation departments and is a valuable measure of a department's overall quality of operation, management, and service to the community. CAPRA certification requires a park and recreation system plan that provides recommendations for provision of facilities, programs and services; parkland acquisition and development; maintenance and operations; and administration and management. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 6 Lead Responsibility: Parks& Recreation Department: Management,Administration, and Planning Staff Support: None Implementation Steps/Recommendations: • The plan must be officially adopted by the "policy-making body", updated periodically, and linked with a capital improvement budget and a phased development program. • To maintain certification the Department should provide Parks Plan 2040 with documentation of official approval, description of the update process, and a description of the phased implementation program linked to the City's CIP. • Reaccreditation is required every five years, and the Department should maintain all documentation and compliance with standards during certification cycles. 6. Create a plan for maintaining and operating the Oswego Pioneer Cemetery.The City is taking ownership of this property in January 2025. Creating a comprehensive plan for maintaining and operating the Oswego Pioneer Cemetery is a critical step in ensuring its preservation and accessibility, as well as its integration into the city's operations and maintenance planning. Lead Responsibility: Parks & Recreation Department: Management,ACC and Parks Staff Support: Planning Department, Implementation Steps/Recommendations: • Conduct a site assessment that inventories graves and burial sites, infrastructure, (e.g., fencing, pathways, signage, drainage systems, and lighting), and landscaping and vegetation (to the extent this has not already been done). • Develop a maintenance and preservation plan that addresses routine maintenance (e.g., schedule for mowing, leaf removal,tree trimming, and debris clearing), monument and grave care, and landscaping and vegetation management (e.g., maintaining pathways, clearing overgrown vegetation, and replacing or planting new trees where necessary to preserve the cemetery's aesthetic and protect the integrity of monuments).This may simply be developing a specific set of guidelines to address site-specific conditions needed to supplement existing maintenance activity plans. • Create an operational plan for visitor access focusing on access and hours, signage and wayfinding, and public programs and events. • Establish a financial plan for operations and maintenance including budget allocation (e.g., annual operating budget for routine maintenance,staff, and any necessary repairs or upgrades),fundraising and grants, and partnerships. • Establish a volunteer program focusing on cemetery clean-up days where volunteers help with tasks such as debris removal, landscaping, and small repairs and historic preservation and/or interpretation (e.g.,volunteers with expertise in history,genealogy, or preservation to assist with maintaining historical records, helping to catalog gravestones and their inscriptions, conducting research about the cemetery's past, and preparing educational or interpretive materials). LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 7 ■ Identify safety and security measures including adding and installing security cameras and lighting as needed, as well as an emergency plan with protocols for dealing with weather- related events, accidents, or vandalism. 7. Create and record an approach for managing natural resources and open spaces, identifying priorities and responsibilities.The City has several plans and documents that address natural resources and open spaces (e.g., Parks Plan 2040, Natural Areas Habitat Management Plan, Integrated Pest Management Practices, Urban and Community Forest Plan), as well as a knowledgeable team of staff that maintain and manage these areas. Lake Oswego also has an active and engaged volunteer base, including Friends of Parks groups, local high school Green Teams, and a park stewardship program that supports natural area restoration projects. Lead Responsibility: Parks & Recreation Department: Planning, Parks, and Natural Areas Staff Support: Planning and Public Works Departments Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Begin implementing relevant actions from Oregon's Emerald Ash Borer(EAB) Readiness and Response Plan in coordination with the Planning Department, including conducting a comprehensive tree inventory and creating a pest management action plan. Continue treating existing ash trees as a preventative for EAB, and conducting tree risk assessments in natural areas to identify and manage high and extreme risk trees and to monitor others on a periodic basis. ■ Identify a working list of short-term priorities from across existing plans and considering evolving conditions and new threats (e.g., presence of Emerald Ash Borer). Consider near- and long-term emerging threats, including climate change impacts (temperature extremes, flooding, drought, wildfires, and shifting weather patterns) as well as pests such as the Mediterranean Oak Borer.Assess how these threats could affect natural resources and develop strategies to mitigate these effects. ■ Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of different teams within the Parks and Recreation Department as well as other city departments. Ensure that there is clear ownership of tasks like mapping and reporting, preventative treatment, invasive species management, habitat restoration, and climate change adaptation for natural resources in and around city-owned properties. ■ Friends of Parks groups create annual work plans and are integral in successful planting of native species and removal of invasive species in the city's natural areas. However,there is a need to re-energize the existing Friends of Parks program, as the number of active groups and participants has declined significantly in the past several years.The approach should identify how community volunteers want to engage with natural area restoration work and how they can support natural areas staff in implementing priorities. 8. Create a clear project intake and prioritization process for both capital projects and programming initiatives. Parks Plan 2040 identifies criteria that were used to prioritize projects under the Capital Improvement Plan.The City could continue to use these prioritization criteria as new projects are identified and consider additional factors like how well the project aligns with Parks Plan 2040 goals and policies,funding availability, and how it aligns with community priorities. Criteria could be applied to new programming initiatives such as camps, classes, and community events as well, and could inform a future update of the Recreation Strategic Plan. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IF- 8 Lead Responsibility: Parks& Recreation Department: Management and Planning Staff Support: PRNRAB Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ The first step in creating a clear project intake process is defining the criteria by which all projects—whether related to capital improvements or programming initiatives—will be evaluated.This ensures that each project request is assessed fairly and consistently and is aligned with the broader goals of the Parks Plan 2040 and/or other City initiatives or priorities. The Department should create a project proposal form that acts as an intake form for community groups, council members, City leaders, and residents to requires new parks and recreation projects.The form should: o Be easy for people to fill out. Language should be easily understandable and planning and policy jargon avoided, as should any references to titles, definitions, or park classifications with which the public may be unfamiliar(e.g., "essential service", "gap area") o Focus on the data the City would like the submitter to provide.Additional staff information like project coding, project names, or similar data can be added by Department staff after the form is submitted. o Allow for the opportunity to inform staff about the issues in parks, desired improvements, or opportunities to add new parks, amenities, and facilities. ■ In addition to creating the form described above,the Department will need to determine how best to incorporate the evaluation criteria and process into its CIP process, including how to incorporate guidance from the Parks Board in the prioritization process. 9. Implement the Luscher Area Master Plan.The 2013 Luscher Area Master Plan (LAMP) identified recommendations and future uses for all eight of the original Luscher Area properties.The LAMP recognized that the majority of the recommendations would likely not be able to be implemented while these properties remained outside the Urban Growth Boundary(UGB) and under the jurisdiction of Clackamas County in the Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) zoning district. However, coordinated concept planning and expansion of the urban growth boundary has yet to occur in the area, and is not likely to occur within the near future.As an alternative to implementing the LAMP through annexing the properties into city limits and applying Park and Natural Area (PNA) Zoning, the City is pursuing partial implementation of the LAMP's recommendations through application of a new Special Use Overlay(SUO) zoning district,which references Oregon Administrative Rules that provide for park and recreation uses on farm and forest lands.The SUO was created and adopted by the County in 2023 through coordination with City staff, and the Department is currently in the process of preparing a land use application to the County requesting application of the SUO to the Luscher Area properties zoned EFU. While full implementation of the LAMP is unlikely to be completed even in the mid-term, the City should continue taking steps to pursue implementation in the short-term. Lead Responsibility: Parks & Recreation Department: Management, Planning, and Programming Staff Support: PRNRAB, Planning Department, Engineering Department, Friends of Luscher Farm, Stafford Hamlet Implementation Steps/Recommendations: LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 IF- 9 ■ The Department should work with stakeholders to identify a list of several focus areas to concentrate capital investments over the next 5-10 years and priority projects within those focus areas, including projects already included in the Capital Improvements Projects list developed for Parks Plan 2040. ■ The Department should engage the PRNRAB, Friends of Luscher Farm,those with community garden plots, program participants, and other site users to develop and/or refine this list.The list should include upgrades and improvements to the existing site access and parking circulation as identified in the 2013 Master Plan, as implementation of any of the other recommendations will require better site access. ■ The prioritization process should also consider improving existing buildings, operations, and uses first, before investing in new projects. Specific funding sources should be identified for the project list. 10. Create a business plan for a future indoor pickleball facility and conduct a site opportunity analysis. While Parks Plan 2040 did identify pickleball as a high priority project, it did not identify a specific location that could provide indoor or outdoor pickleball facilities. While there is a desire for the city to provide pickleball courts, Lake Oswego has had challenges in the past adapting existing tennis courts into pickleball courts, and the limited availability of vacant buildable land makes developing new courts extremely challenging. Parks Plan 2040 recommends additional steps in addressing this recreation need, including identifying one or more potential location(s)for both indoor and outdoor pickleball facilities.Although this is listed as a mid-term strategy, initial work on it could occur in the short term,given that it is a high priority for the City Council and the community. Lead Responsibility: Parks & Recreation Department: Management, Planning, Parks, and Programming Staff Support: Planning Department, City Manager's Office Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Conduct market research to assess the demand for pickleball in the city and surrounding areas.Analyze the current availability of pickleball facilities, both indoor and outdoor, in the region. Evaluate other provider's pricing, programming,facility conditions, and location to identify potential gaps or opportunities for a new facility. ■ Identify the specific needs of both indoor and outdoor pickleball facilities, such as the number of courts, spectator seating, sound attenuation, amenities (locker rooms, restrooms), and equipment (nets, lighting).Also consider multi-purpose space for lessons, tournaments, or social events to increase the facility's revenue potential. ■ Conduct a thorough site analysis to evaluate potential locations for the indoor and/or facilities.This should include factors such as proximity to key populations, accessibility by public transportation, available parking, zoning regulations, site costs, ability to mitigate noise or other impacts, and environmental conditions. ■ Develop a financial strategy for funding the facility.This could include a mix of public funds, private investments, grants, and partnerships. Investigate potential sponsorships, naming rights, and opportunities for collaboration with local businesses or community organizations. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 10 ■ Estimate the operating costs of the facility, including staffing, maintenance, utilities, and insurance. ■ If applicable, develop a clear revenue model that includes membership fees, daily court rental, programming fees (e.g., lessons, leagues), event hosting, and potential concessions. ■ Explore opportunities for additional revenue streams, such as hosting tournaments, providing equipment rentals, offering pickleball merchandise, or holding social events. ■ Identify potential risks associated with the facility, including fluctuating demand, competition, complaints or opposition related to noise or traffic, or unforeseen operating costs. Develop a contingency plan that addresses how to mitigate these risks. ■ Develop a tentative programming schedule that appeals to different skill levels and age groups, from recreational play to competitive leagues. ■ Engage with the community and potential facility users through surveys,focus groups, or public meetings to gather input on their preferences for facility features, programming, and location. 11. Identify universal design practices that can be implemented as part of regular facility and amenity replacement in combination with accessibility improvements identified in the city's ADA Transition Plan. Start by establishing more formal facility design standards that explicitly incorporate universal design principles.These principles should be applied not only to new facilities but also to ongoing replacements and upgrades. Lead Responsibility: Parks & Recreation Department: Planning and Parks Staff Support: PRNRAB, Lake Oswego ADA Coordinator Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Ensure all users, regardless of mobility,vision, or hearing impairments, can access and navigate parks and recreation facilities easily.This can involve ramped entrances,wide doorways, accessible restrooms, and low-level counters. ■ Incorporate signage that uses a combination of text, symbols, and tactile elements to provide clear directions and instructions for all visitors, including those with visual or cognitive impairments. ■ Consider inclusive play structures that provide opportunities for all children, including those with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities.This includes wheelchair-accessible swings, ramps leading to elevated play areas, and sensory-rich play equipment that encourages interactive play for children with autism or other developmental disabilities. ■ Integrate sensory elements that provide an inclusive experience for people with different abilities, including tactile surfaces,visual contrast for those with low vision, and auditory cues for people with hearing impairments. For play areas, designate areas that incorporate multi-sensory experiences, such as musical instruments, tactile surfaces, or water features, to support play for children with sensory processing needs. ■ Provide seating options that accommodate various needs, such as benches with armrests for those who need assistance standing or sitting, and seats with backs for comfort. Provide shaded seating and rest areas within playgrounds, active recreation spaces, and along trails LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 11 to allow caregivers, people with disabilities, or those who need breaks to enjoy the park comfortably. ■ Provide amenities that are accessible to all users. Install drinking fountains that are designed to be accessible to individuals in wheelchairs, with lower spouts and side-facing designs. Also, include bottle-filling stations to cater to different user needs. Ensure trash and recycling bins are easy to access,with handles or foot pedals for users with limited upper body strength. ■ Ensure that designated accessible parking spaces are close to entry points,well-marked with proper signage, and meet the correct dimensions for various mobility devices.These spaces should be located in convenient and accessible areas with easy access to the facility. For high-use sites, include designated drop-off zones where vehicles can safely stop for visitors with mobility impairments or other special needs.These zones should be close to accessible entrances and large enough to accommodate different types of vehicles. ■ Ensure that all curb cuts and ramps meet universal design standards, providing smooth transitions between sidewalks, parking areas, and entrances. For changes in elevation, ramps and slopes should have a gentle incline (less than a 5%grade)to meet universal design guidelines. ■ Walkways should be smooth and level,free from obstacles like tree roots, rocks, or gravel that may impede people with mobility devices, strollers, or children. Ensure all walkways and trails are wide enough to accommodate wheelchair users, cyclists, and strollers, as applicable. ■ Add tactile paving or other surface markers at intersections or high-traffic areas to help guide visually impaired users. 12. Engage with the School District regarding community use of City and District athletic or other facilities through regular meetings and other coordination activities.To strengthen the relationship between the Parks and Recreation Department and the School District, and to enhance collaboration in providing recreation opportunities,the Department and School District should meet on a quarterly or bi-annual basis. In addition to coordination at a staff level,the City and District could consider conducting an annual goal-setting meeting with the City Council and School Board to discuss high-level shared goals and areas of mutual benefit. Lead Responsibility: Parks& Recreation Department: Management,Administrative, Programming, and Parks Staff Support: PRNRAB, School District Staff and Board Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Develop a shared vision for increasing recreation access for all students and community members. ■ Identify shared recreation needs between the parks and schools. ■ Explore opportunities to provide safe routes to schools using off-street pathways through parks and recreation facilities. ■ Explore collaborating in providing joint recreational programs that take advantage of both parks and school facilities.This can include after-school sports leagues, summer camps, LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 12 fitness programs, and other activities that are available to both students and the broader community. ■ Explore continued opportunities for community use of school facilities during non-school hours, such as playgrounds, gyms, fields, and auditoriums. ■ Coordinate park and school facility planning to ensure that new developments or improvements support both school activities and community needs. ■ Create a joint communication plan to ensure that students, parents, and the community are aware of available recreational opportunities. 13. Identify next steps for project recommendations that are either not tied to specific sites or require additional planning prior to implementation. Parks Plan 2040 has recommendations for several non-site-specific larger scale or unique facilities such as an outdoor pickleball facility, a new park in the Lake Grove, Bryant or Rosewood neighborhoods, Foothills Park expansion, a possible new Westside indoor community/recreation center, and/or a new water play feature. Lead Responsibility: Parks & Recreation Department: Management, Parks, and Communications Staff Support: PRNRAB, Planning Department, Engineering Department, Lake Oswego Library Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Conduct a site selection study for facilities without a specific site (e.g., outdoor pickleball courts, water play features). Consider factors such as accessibility,traffic patterns/volume, proximity to residential areas and service gap areas, property size and available space, natural resource or hazard constraints, and zoning provisions. Gather data from community feedback, stakeholder input, and trend analysis to identify demand,target audiences, and specific features required for each facility. ■ Identify and address potential barriers to implementation, such as zoning restrictions, local regulations, or environmental challenges. ■ Engage the community and key stakeholders throughout the planning process, especially for facilities that are less specific in terms of location. Conduct public meetings, online surveys, and focus groups to gather input on facility design, preferred locations, and community expectations. ■ Develop initial conceptual designs for each facility type to provide a visual understanding of the space requirements, amenities, and infrastructure needed.These designs should be adaptable to different site conditions but should also reflect the basic features required for each facility. ■ Consider environmental factors, such as local climate,terrain, and the presence of natural resources,when planning these facilities. ■ Identify potential adverse impacts on surrounding residents and develop ways to minimize or mitigate those impacts. ■ For each facility, outline the operational needs, including staffing requirements, maintenance schedules, and programming strategies. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 13 ■ Consider the long-term sustainability of the facilities. For example, ensure that facilities like a community center or water play feature have sufficient operational funding and can remain financially viable over time. Explore cost recovery options such as facility rentals, program fees, and partnerships that can contribute to long-term success. ■ Identify potential partners that can assist in the development,funding, or operation of the facilities. 14. Create a plan for implementing consistent park,trail,and open space signage,starting with the Department's signage and wayfinding plan. Identify how community input on the type of information that should be displayed on signage, accessibility, and inclusivity should be integrated. The information displayed on signage should cater to a broad range of needs, including information related to directions, park features, safety, and educational content about the natural environment or historical significance of the area. Consider using emotionally intelligent signage—signs that use language that appeals to park visitors' emotion, empathy, and sense of humor—in addition to traditional regulatory signs. Lead Responsibility: Parks & Recreation Department: Planning, Parks, and Communications Staff Support: Planning Department, PRNRAB, Historical Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Implementation Steps/Recommendations: ■ Signage should be designed with universal design principles in mind, ensuring that it is readable by people of all ages and abilities.This includes using high-contrast colors, large fonts, braille, symbology, and tactile elements for those with visual impairments, as well as ensuring that signs are placed at heights and locations that are accessible to people using wheelchairs or other mobility aids. ■ Additionally, digital signage or mobile app integration could be explored for providing real- time information or virtual guidance for those who may need additional support. ■ The design of signage should represent a broad spectrum of cultural and social backgrounds, ensuring that messages are respectful, welcoming, and relevant to all visitors.This might include offering multilingual signage in areas with a diverse population or highlighting the cultural history of the area. ■ Additionally,the City should look for ways to ensure updated signage not only provides practical information but also fosters a sense of community pride and ownership like incorporating local artwork. LAKE OSWEGO PARKS PLAN 2040 I F- 14 ,. . - t . A•'' , '.\ r, -. VCA. 1 •• '; • ....,_ • -,.. • ' .. V\ i \ . " I . ,.. . - , -- ... :./1 APPENDIX G 911111w,k ,...„,, • , , ... -' ., • .,,, Athletic Field Requirements Report • `...2;.,,. ' ' ..,..f,13 i. (- .,..W!....zrkge ."--,,,- 4,- .,-=--- -..ESIIIIIIIP ,. ......- --- _. , . 4411444..... . 'V t, J.:. .-. . . , . . . , .. . , . . 1 • , ___.- ..,..... ... , . - • • plik 0, 11111P'' .pi .,)-.. • , . .- %. . , ..,•-e, .-• . . _ ._ _,.„ ."20. --*i ' r .---- '... -. • • i - . ' 1/#0. 41 -661' 3 * 0114-- - •-• • -- . -. . . 12:41 - -._• _ , - . i - , . ..... . ..tt. '-! iti,k,e, cp.:. _ d 4 wparilt -•- , . ri......- „Ar ' ''':-. :- -*. ,..-:;t, " -',7 - • ....+0.4"."- A°611111bift.- __.,-, ...., ' ' • ..o..- - if; ei -... .imiow 111111616L-' ...._ ,...:,- 111111...-7-•••---- — A, . .....- Athletic Field Requirements Report To be included with the Final Plan.