HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Item - 2026-06-02 - Number 15.1 - Presentation - Criteria for Library Site Selection and Reuse P � osw 15. 1
ID j�o
i47
G46�A FC L,aPP
Iii
� LIBRARY
fan-• //
Cm)
° REGO �
Criteria for New Library Site Selection
and Reuse of Existing Library Site ;
Composition and Creation of Library
Site Reuse Task Force
June 2, 2026
Respect. Fvcellence. Trust. Service.
Co u n c i 1 Initiative
-`.'' *Or . '4., .?
- -.., :101,:'
•
.4
•� }1 fir , ". ,' ,�l[ 4- .Efl, . •
•
'ti.�
....:...4...0.!
. r,:, ,,.... . .
444
•
•n'a' 'tip' "::
1111111. 1
_'_ =I .- '' '.0
Deveiop a strategy ror an , 1,.--,.,,..,......• :„.. . .,..,•
expancieciancimocierniirary ____. ,__. .
• _ _,, , ... ____ _______ .... „,..„. . %.
� ;fi
=
ri rit►zin t ►facility, o es s • e o -_- _ •
L
town and
urban renewal
fundingoptions allowing it toc '
• � __ _.
S
, .,... ___
__
•
:.��ti�rV a , •
! ` • ____ ____
....... �..
,....
•
•
. Oil
serve as an all-ages and all-
activities .,
• •
•
.,
. . ...
center. y - .„,,,....„ .
, L, ,. , •
. . .
. . .
.. . .,
. , •:,,
. 1:,
.' .. .,,i : , 2 ,.,. . .
..
._. .,
. • . .
-,---x, -----E ,-- , , . ‘,„, „,.
. . ., .. ,
, •, ,
. . Joito-
' 0N - ,c,,. . . .„ . ...,..„..;,....,..,, ,. .. ., .....: ,....•,,.„.,.„......,..„.,......., _
iiimimil...,
1 „a. ,
,A. .. ,,,,,
,i ....,
V �� O
0REGO�
Council Direction Framework
• Council direction on criteria for future library site selection and existing site reuse decisions
• Council direction on community task forces, including Resolution creating first task force
Two Community Task
Forces
study
Criteria for Reuse of Q
Session Existing Library Site o p o
0
Topics
i
-I.'
Criteria for New �
illt‘‘
F OJ�, Library Site Selection .�i G
r"1
\c)
`� OREGo)
BuildingCondition Site Constraints Council and CommunilyDirection
, r ; - . _
T Non-Fiction r �7�- .r[,�• y.4 N .
y
J � — �...,-.z. 4`-'14','4,, ti-------7-- --=----------7--il
7 _. .,
OUT OF 4 •A+
ORDER \} 'I -� 1,
i �OUTOF E'tt �' �� �4 FPI ! I ` riff �. ��J
`'� t !^ � , lu II4N` f" is iL 4 ri ox tin 1 M tlV `
ORDER...
it , - a• _ L.
L.
I t-! ---pi _ ,,, ...i.u./ ,,.-_, ,i rink ,,.-
,..,„ ,.,,
11
. ..,,. . ,
.. . ___ .,
. ..„ ,
...
.�.�-- .� -'\; \ 1�- .s ,, ,.:,
�:N �J HI Rif -.. 1,s1� ,/ \1•a A
1 '
'-:_eV if, - ,:, ,. .,-,.,_ • i. ,,,,!'
., ..„ ,..
.43;.. -
, / r / ,
.- _ _ ______._ --- - ; „, .; ,.- :
Significant and worsening The current library is 23%
Council goals, library visioning,
seismic, water intrusion, building smaller than voters originally. . . and community surveys
system, and accessibility approved over 50 years ago.
. . • • consistently identify the need for
deficiencies. Estimated costs to Multiple studies have identified an accessible, adaptable, and
address these issues is at least space, access, parking, and
. . financially feasible replacement
$ 10 million . On top of $2 .5 growth limitations, with
. . facility, designed for modern
million already spent on recurring recommendations for
library use.
maintenance in last 10 years. a larger site.
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.
EXISTING FUTURE SITE
SITE PHASED APPROACH:
Development of Criteria
Clear, adopte
criteria for decision Public process that balances fiscal Clear, adopted
making about reuse responsibility, long-term community criteria for site
of existing site after needs and stakeholder selection for a new
Library moves. recommendations. Library site.
1
ANALYSIS Future Location: Top Site ANALYSIS
and Back-Up Site
June - July 2026 August 2026 - March 2027 Marc - June 2027 October 2026 - May 2027 June - July 2026
Existing Site: One Reuse
Longer Recommendation Additional
(P) Timeline CP) Task Force
DECISION
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.
Considerations :
r \ il\
i
• • • , . 11-. 11IllititaNk- ; _
Existing Site Reuse Task Force gp7 „.:,
. ,, .. .
. ,,
,, 1.---7d . -
• The existing Libraryneeds to be rebuiIt on a larger site to meetg � 0 --...
{
community needs . ,._' :
g ) r .IA~ 41 ImoI- -;*41 Ph !
�. . ..j Pi ' .. s
•
• The future of the existing site is of high concern to the . --' �.*. ,,g • -, _Aiii;-. J-
surrounding neighborhoods borhoods and other keystakeholders .g .
the task force to develop, anal ze and
liatilli
• Criteria will helpguide Y , s _
present reuse recommendations . -
...a._
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.
ExistingSite Reuse Criteria
0
785
Does Council want to formally establish site reuse criteria that will
direct the work of the Existing Site Reuse Task Force? 769
If so, staff are seeking to confirm the criteria that Council wants the 755 LIBRARY
task force to utilize.
(47)
Based on previous Council discussion, does Council want to direct the 735
task force to create scenarios that: 725
• Generate revenue 717 706
• Stay within deed restrictions and land use
requirements 703
• Do not include a library facility, since 1
Council has determined that the Library 8 LOTS
needs to be relocated and the City cannot LIBRARY PROPERTY
706 4TH STREET � I= Property Boundary
afford to operate two libraries Library Property
• Other?
•
Data Gathering
Generates Revenue Staff recommend an
appraisal to evaluate � �
potential resale and fi
um
0 lease valuations. / I
- • I'
1
1 ‘Iiiiiiiimow
rand Use Requirements Staff are researching „ � � =
o zoning, code, and 0
� � • - ‘ �� \\ .,.;�.r
l��ii,/ deed requirements so �• - ‘' 'Cl‘
Lr" they are clearly
� identified .
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.
� , ;
r.
4101111. \. , 1 ti,ti .vir
•r
• • " "._ _
-"au . ' •onsiderations •
. .. .
(..,; '''
• . .
Future Library Task Force ..
. . .
. ..:
...4V$44:1 e4
{ - .. l- -
•
Finan c i al feasibility, rioritizin urban renewal fundin • . I F, ..
•' o p g g ,.. r ._ ...„
_ .
. . .1, ,
,.., -:,
• r , -
* ..
• Sustainable design and strong broadpublic en a ement• �� � � it,
y' r ,
r'. 1. 1 " � ."t "lit,',
: 3
• Using established criteria to refine evaluation framework and �; :aY - >> . .
,- . - t r -
h high-level scope of the fac I , analyze I zeproperties of nterest, a.- ti. .„y• _p tY Y ,. . J _ _ - —
-
and make recommendations to Council . idaftwiter d --
- " ;,.
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.
Future Site Criteria
Does Council want to formally establish site selection criteria to direct the work of the
Future Library Task Force?
Adequately Sized Accommodate core needs of Financially Feasible
the facility, including parking A site in or able to brought
and outdoor space. into an Urban Renewal
:0]
� District with potential funding
QOBuilding Consultant � ca aciP tY•
precommendations on July 7,
2026.
•
Equitable and Accessible Geographically central to the Appropriate Zoning
City's population .
.-0 %. . A site that is appropriate to
11 • � • More visible, prominent .�.
� • be zoned for a public library.
,�, 15%
location near an arterial road.
I
•� O „ Allows multimodal access.
I
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.
\A .- . ••,,
I.
,,,,,,,,7-.4P' -:
'S). . ._._
4e" ,
•
1101111.
d -
1:
Cou nc 1 1 Direction _ L
_ „...____
_ _
_ 1 , ________.
rTh in .
._......
...,
, 0.„
,__, _,,,,, .„.„„,
�yIYY Of
• Thank you for the direction provided in this studyy _ �
session. ,:� moo; ,,(2,I,. ::
• Anyadditional feedback tonight? ,, .,,,,,,,
401..'
, . - i , 011'11
.t
• Next ste s. . •
'''''''',72,
, \, \ -_,
j E I
p
. .-,-.
ot,-,
Resolution 26 _ 30
rY
Composition and Creation of Libra Site Reuse Task Force
a Use criteria set by Council to develop reuse scenarios for ,„
,.7 , , I„. , ,
existing
, ,
site k , 3 .. �„, , 1, ,
l
• � 'f I III I� I
Select and analyze topthree scenariosiii y ,
i iCouncil
Present n an l ss of to three scen ros to 6 .ff ,: ,
Based on Council feedback, fine tune and analyze �`
Council 's toptwo scenarios ., ,
f, ',, , ,,,,,,,,,,,, ' , _ ��•
.,_
, ,, ,r,- i ..
-
O Return to Council with final reuse recommendation , 3 ‘'
4111� �ErP- 1
or 7 a --:;- ' ' I. ''
if
a
1
.4 ,/,
, vw.„„,,,,,,
A E 0 -„\.... _
_.....,
:,:.4.
-,
1 ..... O�0‘11ri.1) :,..•••••*------ ima iy. , it: ,. _.v. ,
eIVOREG
OF �A ' FO
,r;
0111111P -\
REGO
Thank You
Respect. Fvcellence. Trust. Service.