Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApproved Minutes - 2017-06-201. CALL TO ORDER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES June 20, 2017 Council President Manz called the regular City Council meeting to order at 3:01 p.m. on June 20, 2017, in the City Council Chambers, 380 A Avenue. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Council President Manz and Councilors Gudman, LaMotte, Kohlhoff, Buck, and O'Neill Excused: Mayor Studebaker Staff Present: Megan Phelan, Assistant City Manager; David Powell, City Attorney; Corinne Strauser, Deputy City Recorder; Ivan Anderholm, Parks and Recreation Director; Sarah Selden, Senior Planner; Don Johnson, Police Chief; Erica Rooney, City Engineer; Scot Siegel, Planning & Building Services Director Others Present: Michael Buck, Susanna Kuo, and Julia Wood, Iron Mountain Park Planning Advisory Committee 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council President Manz led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Motion: Move to adopt the Consent Agenda. 4.1 Resolution 17-18, A Resolution of the City Council of the City Of Lake Oswego Adjusting the Compensation for Management and Confidential Positions Not Represented by a Bargaining Unit Motion: Move to adopt Resolution 17-18. Report and Attachment City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 12 June 20, 2017 4.2 Award of a Public Improvement Contract for Construction of WO 254 - Botticelli and Oak Terrace Pavement Rehabilitation Project Motion: Move to award a public improvement contract to Benchmark Contracting in the amount of $700,018.00 for WO 254 — Botticelli and Oak Terrace Rehabilitation Project. Report 4.3 AP 17-01/LU 16-0053, Adoption of Findings, Conclusions and Order affirming a Development Review Commission Decision approving a minor variance reducing the front yard setback from 25 feet to 20 feet, and a Residential Infill Design variance reducing the rear yard setback from 30 feet to 10 feet, at 2101 Goodall Court Motion: Move to adopt the Findings, Conclusion and Order in AP 17-01/LU 16-0053. Report and Attachment 4.4 Dedication of a Parcel Abutting 16858 Boones Ferry Road Motion: Move to authorize the City Manager to execute a Dedication Deed for a parcel abutting 16858 Boones Ferry Road. Report and Attachments END CONSENT AGENDA Councilor Gudman moved to adopt the Consent Agenda. Councilor O'Neill seconded the motion. A voice vote was held, and the motion passed, with Councilors Manz, Gudman, Kohlhoff, Buck, and O'Neill voting 'aye'. Councilor LaMotte voted 'no'. (5-1) Council President Manz commented with regard to Item 4.2, related to the Botticelli and Oak Terrace rehabilitation project. The decision on the striping would not be made until the end of summer, and this Council action is simply to move the physical project along, she noted. 5. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 6. CITIZEN COMMENT • Wendelin Russell, 4340 Botticelli Street Ms. Russell, homeowners' association (HOA) president of the 22 Botticelli Townhouses, discussed background of the residents' notification of removal of on -street parking and addition City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 12 June 20, 2017 of bike lanes on Botticelli Street. She challenged the portion of the notice that indicated the project had been approved by both the Mountain Park HOA and the neighborhood association. Expressing strong opposition to elimination of the on -street parking and to the bike path, she outlined a number of adverse neighborhood impacts and other disadvantages. She noted that she does support the repaving of Botticelli, but suggested pedestrian improvements and speed bumps as alternatives to the other changes. • Brian Rockwell, 4342 Botticelli Street Mr. Rockwell, also a resident of the 22 Botticelli Townhouses, expressed support for the repaving/re-striping of Botticelli Street; however, he opposed removal of the on -street parking. He described the residents' constrained parking, their reliance on the street spaces, and negative impacts of removal. He noted that the Transportation Advisory Board had heard comments at their June 14 meeting and had voted unanimously to reject the bike lane and to preserve the on - street parking. Council was asked to take their recommendation and homeowners' opposition into account when deciding on the removal of on -street parking. 6.1 Prior Citizen Comment Follow -Up No follow-up on prior Citizen Comment was presented. COUNCIL BUSINESS 7.1 Resolution 17-37, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego Amending Resolutions 17-07 and 17-08 to Postpone the Effective Dates for Changes to the Transportation System Development Charges Methodology and Rates Report and Attachment Ms. Rooney noted that the Resolution was follow-up to Council's request on June 6 for the delayed effective date, as explained in the Council Report. Staff also suggested that the related study session be scheduled for July 18 rather than July 5. Councilor Gudman moved to adopt Resolution 17-37, as noted in the Council Report, and hold a work session on the issues and concerns on July 18. Councilor LaMotte seconded the motion. In brief discussion of the motion, it was confirmed that Council intended for the effective date in Sections 1 and 2 of the Resolution to be shown as January 1, 2018, Staff's suggestion. Mr. Powell reminded Council members of the sequential increases for the residential SDCs that had been scheduled in January of the three years following the original July 1 date. Councilor Gudman confirmed that, with the implementation date of January 1, 2018, those increases were now intended for January of 2019, 2020, and 2021 for purposes of this Resolution. A roll call vote was held, and the motionap ssed, with Councilors Manz, Gudman, LaMotte, Kohlhoff, Buck, and O'Neill voting `aye'. (6-0) City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 12 June 20, 2017 7.2 Iron Mountain Park Concept Plan (Master Plan) Report and Attachments Mr. Anderholm presented key elements of the Iron Mountain Park Master Plan, beginning with a graphic rendering (Council Report, Attachment 1) of the site design. He highlighted the role of the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) and provided background on various elements of the Plan, including the stream relocation, parking, and realignment of the local trail. Reviewing the amenities and trail connections of the developed portion of the park, he noted that these would provide a gateway to the natural area. Discussing the total project cost estimate of $1.35 million, he reported that the stream restoration and development of park elements were key components; funding mechanisms for these and other aspects were detailed, along with expenditures to date of $180,000. He concluded with an update of the project timeline. Councilor Buck inquired about any resolution of traffic speed concerns on the adjacent portion of Iron Mountain Boulevard. In brief discussion, Mr. Anderholm indicated that he regards this as a transportation planning issue that would be referred to transportation staff; he noted that a reduced speed limit would have a positive impact on the park. The pathway realignment into the park would also be beneficial. Councilor Buck asked if the PAC had given its approval to the proposed version of the Plan, and Mr. Anderholm advised that they had not done so. He reviewed the process and the purpose of the PAC: to represent stakeholders and to ensure that all public input has been considered and reflected in the Plan. Councilor Buck indicated that he would favor allowing the PAC a final opportunity to review the Plan so that Council was assured of their endorsement. Mr. Anderholm expressed his willingness to provide the proposed version to the PAC for final comments. Also, he indicated that this review could be added for future projects as a final step before Council presentation. Councilor LaMotte expressed support for Councilor Buck's suggestion, assuming that there would be no adverse impacts on the grant process. He outlined how an additional PAC review might be incorporated before Council made a final decision, as well as involvement of the Planning Commission. Mr. Siegel clarified that the conditional use permit process for this project would instead require Development Review Commission action. Councilor LaMotte discussed the importance of follow-up with Police, Engineering, and Planning on anticipated impacts of the park development. He requested information on funding, suggesting how the City might take advantage of the reduced cost estimate in relation to the anticipated project budget. Mr. Anderholm provided funding details and confirmed that Staff was prepared to move forward with planning and phasing for the project; alternate funding plans had been developed, depending on grant outcomes and other factors, he noted. In response to questions from Councilor Gudman, Mr. Anderholm discussed the project timeline, leading to anticipated groundbreaking in spring 2018. He confirmed that the only bicycle/pedestrian improvements encompassed by the Master Plan related to the path realignment on the north side of Iron Mountain Boulevard. He described related trail connections as referenced in the Master Plan Report (Council Report, Attachment 2). Councilor Buck asked about any plans to incorporate art in the park. Mr. Anderholm indicated that the PAC had discussed this and that consultation with the Arts Council was anticipated. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 12 June 20, 2017 Councilor Buck also expressed concern about poor cell phone access in the area of Iron Mountain Boulevard adjacent to the park, particularly in the event of an emergency. Mr. Anderholm reported that recent service improvement has been seen, but access remains a concern. Clear sightlines were given consideration in designing the park, he noted, and Staff is exploring the possibility of making some sort of Wi-F! available. Councilor Gudman moved to approve the Conceptual Plan (Master Plan) for Iron Mountain Park. Councilor O'Neill seconded the motion. Council members discussed options and preferences for adopting the Plan in relation to affording the PAC the opportunity to weigh in. Michael Buck, speaking as a member of the PAC, described factors that had precluded a full review by the group. They hoped to have the opportunity to read the complete report and reconvene the group to address remaining questions and points of clarification. This would enable them to convey their "stamp of approval", he indicated. After further Council discussion of considerations for moving forward, Councilor Gudman withdrew his motion. Councilor Kohlhoff moved to defer the decision until after the Planning Advisory Committee has had an opportunity to review and make recommendations. Councilor Buck seconded the motion. Following additional Council and Staff discussion of timing implications, Councilor Gudman offered a friendly amendment such that the motion would specify a date of July 18 for the Council's decision. Councilor Kohlhoff accepted this amendment, confirming that her motion was to defer a decision on Resolution 17-37 to July 18th, in order to give the Planning Advisory Committee an opportunity to review and comment. Councilor Buck seconded the motion. A roll call vote was held, and the motionap ssed, with Councilors Manz, Gudman, LaMotte, Kohlhoff, Buck, and O'Neill voting 'aye'. (6-0) 8. STUDY SESSIONS 8.1 Economical Housing Solutions Report Councilor Kohlhoff introduced the study session, indicating that it would address a 2017 City Council goal. In describing the purpose of the goal, she emphasized that the focus was to meet the housing needs of the community. Examples of need were cited in three key areas: households that included school-age children or persons with disability or mental illness; older people; and workforce housing. In considering the staff report, Council members were asked to remember that these groups comprise a desirable asset for Lake Oswego that is being deterred by lack of economical housing in the community. Ms. Selden noted that her report was intended as a starting point for the Council discussion, and that the focus of the session would be on the two near-term strategies identified (Council Report, p 2-5): (1) reducing barriers to development of secondary or accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and (2) considering a menu of approaches used successfully in the Portland region to facilitate housing developments through a nonprofit affordable -housing developer such as Northwest City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 12 June 20, 2017 Housing Alternatives. She provided background on both approaches, discussing opportunities, barriers, and specific examples shown in a table listing (Council Report, p 5); included were strategies for making affordable housing financially feasible. The City would need to talk further about financial implications and then establish some criteria, she noted. Finally, she summarized the longer-term approaches presented in the Council Report (p 5-7) and requested any questions or indications of interest in particular strategies. Councilor O'Neill asked about any data reflecting actual use of ADUs in Portland since the City had foregone SDCs in order to encourage them for affordable housing. Ms. Selden indicated that she would request this information, noting that affordability could be provided not only by renting an ADU, but by housing aging parents or others who might have no alternative. Councilor Buck raised the issue of ADUs being used as short-term rentals as opposed to affordable housing, and brief discussion followed. He expressed his belief that the need for affordable housing is real, particularly for workforce housing. Outlining various concerns, he noted that that he and other members of the business community have found it increasingly difficult in recent years to find employees who reside in Lake Oswego. This is an important consideration if the city wants to have a healthy business community, he opined. In response to his questions, Ms. Selden described the current SDC methodology, and Councilor Buck suggested that changes be considered that could help address the affordability goal. After requesting clarification from Ms. Selden about current City policies on SDCs for residential development, Councilor LaMotte indicated that reasonableness and equity issues, particularly in relation to ADUs, needed research and possible revision. Overall, he recognized a definite need in the community, but did not believe it was the same as in Portland. He also recognized the value of getting involved in development with one of the nonprofit organizations, and discussed potential funding and the City role in such a project. The first step, he suggested, could be to show leadership in identifying appropriate sites and bringing people to the table. Councilor O'Neill inquired about plans for affordable housing that could be built on large parking lots on properties owned by Lake Oswego religious organizations. The City could consider easing the process for such development, which might distribute smaller complexes around the city, rather a 40 -unit complex in one location. This would also leave the funding and other matters to the religious organization. Ms. Selden indicated that there was not a plan at this time, but this could be an aspect of a search for appropriate sites. Mr. Siegel reminded Council of House Bill 2007, which would provide for affordable housing on religious institution properties by right. If the bill were to pass, the City would likely need to review its code for any needed revision to recognize this as a permitted outright use, possibly to include process streamlining. Councilor Gudman pointed out the inevitable trade-off between reducing SDCs and the resulting decreased funding for desired improvements, including additional parks, trails, and bicycle/pedestrian facilities. He posed questions about past and potential ADU development in the city, initiating discussion of a variety of impacts. In responding to various questions and comments, Ms. Selden noted that the number of ADUs could increase over time as the housing market gets tighter, with less developable land available; Lake Oswego is regarded as a desirable place to live. In response to Councilor Gudman's question about preferred forms of subsidies, Ms. Selden indicated that it would be good to identify whether it was the upfront costs of City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 12 June 20, 2017 construction or longer-term assistance that would be most desirable to an owner wishing to add an ADU. Councilor Kohlhoff discussed the opportunity for administering a range of SDCs, rather than a full waiver, in order to incentivize inclusion of disability accommodations and other features. She described several ways that the ADU could serve the needs of elderly people wishing to remain in their homes, a different approach to offering affordable housing. She favored more study and exploration with organizations such as Northwest Housing in terms of long-term housing affordability and emphasized the importance of achieving more capacity to meet the community's true needs. Councilor Buck expressed various concerns, wondering what amounts and types of incentives would be enough to attract affordable -housing development. In ensuing discussion, Ms. Selden described some of the many factors, their interrelationships, and the need for more information from developers of affordable housing. She indicated that Staff could return with more information at a subsequent Council study session, perhaps including experts in the funding strategies. Councilor Buck noted that the City's standards regarding prescribed materials might be another aspect to explore; perhaps these developers might suggest alternate materials or other changes to design standards that would achieve the desired aesthetic. These might produce a better trade-off than the financial concessions, he indicated. Councilor LaMotte advocated the need for further study of options for adjusting SDCs for ADUs, recognizing the various impacts. He noted that consideration of discretionary versus clear and objective standards was also needed. Given the complexity of the issues, he wanted to ensure involvement of the Planning Commission, which was confirmed by Ms. Selden. In further discussion of how the process might move forward, Councilor LaMotte emphasized the importance of maintaining affordability over the long term. He discussed the need to identify potential sites for affordable -housing developments, which the City could begin to think about. As Council contemplated the menu of approaches that had been outlined in the report, they should consider whether or not these were logical for a city of 37,000 to achieve. Councilor O'Neill noted that he did not believe Lake Oswego citizens were asking the Council to solve problems of other jurisdictions with economical housing; they wanted solutions for perceived problems in Lake Oswego. The City should set some thresholds for each of the categories, based on the degree of need in the community. This would guide the setting of goals, rather than a strategy based on what is desirable but might not solve Lake Oswego's problems. Ms. Selden discussed the City's Housing Needs Analysis as a resource for helping to set some targets. With updating of its demographic and housing -costs data, this could be considered together with identifying the City's goals. Council President Manz asked about the percentage of land in Lake Oswego that would be available for ADUs. Ms. Selden explained that this information was not fully available, outlining the complexities presented by the various types of ADU configurations. Mr. Siegel described an additional factor, which related to the requirement for one off-street parking space per ADU. This could be modified up or down, depending on the degree of flexibility the City wanted to afford. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 12 June 20, 2017 In summarizing, Ms. Selden indicated that she had heard interest from the Council in several areas: (1) additional analysis of the SDCs and the related trade-offs if they were reduced or waived; (2) Planning Commission exploration of potential changes to the development standards for secondary dwelling units; and (3) further investigation of some opportunity sites for an affordable -housing developer, along with further review of the menu of options. Councilor Gudman cautioned against following the example of another jurisdiction such as Portland, while also being open to considering appropriate zoning changes to support multi -unit proposals. With respect to development through an affordable -housing organization such as Northwest Housing, he indicated that he did not favor change on a systemic basis. Rather, this could be more appropriately addressed when a larger property became available and the developer had approached the City about concessions or other opportunities. At this time, the focus should be on the ADUs and how the City might revise SDCs and processes or permissible materials. Councilor LaMotte expressed support for Councilor Gudman's view as to SDCs for the ADUs, while noting that this might not make a significant contribution. The targets proposed by Councilor O'Neill would also be desirable. He indicated that the City should be proactive about development on the limited number of sites suitable for affordable housing, rather than waiting to be approached by a nonprofit developer or by a property owner. It was also important to be prepared with a menu of strategies that had been vetted as appropriate to Lake Oswego. Councilor Kohlhoff called for Council members to continue to educate themselves on the topics, including the Northwest Housing development model. She advocated being prepared and staying informed about other cities' efforts. A commitment to continuing to learn would allow the Council to make wise decisions when opportunity arises, she indicated. Ms. Selden suggested that discussion could be continued in another study session. The consensus of Council indicated support for a date in early fall. 8.2 Short -Term Rentals, PP 17-0004 Report and Attachments In providing background on the topic, Council President Manz noted that it had arisen from an enforcement issue related to an Airbnb rental operating in a residential neighborhood. Subsequent exploration had identified an unexpectedly large number of such rentals operating in the city. As discussed in the Council Report, current City code does not permit short-term rentals in residential zones, and a variety of concerns have been raised. Ms. Selden noted that Staff was seeking Council direction as to permitting this use in residential zones. If Council favored it, Staff would need to know the level of (1) regulation that should be outlined for review by the Planning Commission and (2) community input that should be sought. Mr. Siegel emphasized the time sensitivity of the issue and the importance of direction from Council. He outlined the City's current approach to related code enforcement, which is complaint driven. In addition to a Council decision about moving forward on permitting the short-term rentals, Staff also would need direction on how to approach the enforcement question. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 12 June 20, 2017 Council President Manz called for questions. Councilor O'Neill stated that he did not support permitting short-term rentals in residential neighborhoods. The precedent would be set for allowing a business use in residential zones, which would fundamentally change the definition of these neighborhoods and potentially allow other business uses. He opposed spending any time on this subject. Councilor Gudman expressed agreement with Councilor O'Neill's position. If Council decided against changes to code, then the issue would be enforcement. A decision in favor of allowing short-term rentals in residential zones would present an array of complexities to address. He did not support a code change and asked that Council be provided with information about ensuring effective enforcement. Councilor Buck discussed the importance of identifying the code violations and effective enforcement measures. He advocated significant fines for those failing to comply when warned; if fines were not a sufficient deterrent, Council could be asked to consider larger penalties. Allowing these businesses to operate outside the law was unfair to businesses that operated in compliance, he observed. An even greater concern was that these short-term rentals remove a needed supply of long-term housing from the market that would otherwise be available. He discussed specific scenarios under which rooms in owner -occupied homes might be rented out, within appropriate parameters; however, he indicated that he did not favor permitting short-term rentals outright in residential zones. Councilor Kohlhoff expressed her strong opposition to allowing the short-term rentals, as well. She endorsed the need for consistent enforcement, suggesting measures that could convey to violators that the City is serious about code compliance. While she might consider reasonable exceptions in certain situations, she was aligned with her Council colleagues in opposing the change. Councilor LaMotte endorsed Councilor Buck's position on strong enforcement as opposed to the current complaint -driven approach, citing neighborhood impacts and unfairness to hoteliers. He discussed various factors, including economic development and neighborhood effects that he had considered, and affirmed that he opposed the change, as well. In brief additional discussion, Councilor Gudman asked about the City's ability to impose a fine on the Airbnb organization and others offering similar services. Mr. Powell indicated that he would need to explore any penalties, such as business license -related violations, that might be applicable to such organizations; however, traditional enforcement was directed to the property owner. Council President Manz asked that Staff return to a subsequent Council meeting with the enforcement ramifications, including staffing requirements and fines, and a general enforcement process. She indicated that there was Council consensus to call for enforcement as opposed to changing the regulatory approach on short-term rentals. Brief discussion about scheduling and format followed, with Mr. Siegel noting that Staff could develop a timeline and process, and would be prepared to answer questions at the July 18 Council meeting. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 12 June 20, 2017 Councilor Gudman initiated additional discussion about possibilities of assessing fines to Airbnb or other such organizations. Mr. Siegel, having met with Airbnb, observed that they would not want their operators running afoul of local regulations. He indicated that it would be beneficial for the City to maintain lines of communication with the organization. The study session concluded with additional discussion of approaches for enforcement. 8.3 City Fireworks Show Report Ms. Phelan reported that Staff had followed up on Council's request to explore feasibility of a City -sponsored fireworks display rather than the joint display with the Lake Oswego Corporation (Lake Corp) on the west end of the lake, as outlined in the Council Report. The purpose of the study session was to obtain direction on how Council wished to proceed. Council President Manz invited her colleagues to address questions to Chief Johnson and Mr. Anderholm. Councilor O'Neill asked if the City of Gladstone or any other jurisdictions across the river had been notified of the project. Chief Johnson indicated that this had not been done, and Councilor O'Neill discussed the importance of considering impacts in areas across the river. Councilor Buck agreed. Acknowledging the creative thinking by Police Department staff, he noted that the Lake Corp was supportive of the idea. Among benefits was improved safety and a public fireworks show that would be accessible to many people at the park site. He expressed his strong support for moving forward. Councilor Gudman commented that the idea was worth trying. Assuming the Lake Corp continues to present its fireworks, congestion could be expected at locations where both shows would be visible, he cautioned. He inquired about plans for an after -event summary. Chief Johnson indicated that Staff would be preparing a summary and that Council should also expect to hear from the community afterward. In the event of two shows on the 41 of July, he emphasized that the Police Department anticipates challenges in addressing issues at both ends of the lake. He discussed staffing constraints and other factors, indicating that resources would be focused primarily on the public display; for neighborhoods at the west end of the lake, this might result in a level of service different than had been experienced in years past. Councilor Gudman indicated that the Police Department recommendation would be an important component for Council to consider in the post -event report. Chief Johnson responded to additional questions about allocation of staffing resources between the west and east ends of the lake. He clarified that one or two police officers would be assigned to handle higher-level issues on the west end, with others hired as flaggers, and funding would be provided by the Lake Corp. Police Department staff would continue with advance preparations in these neighborhoods, he indicated. Barricades would be placed in support of the lake show, but to a lesser degree than in past years. He emphasized that significantly fewer resources would be directed to the lake, or private, show as Police efforts would be focused on the public show. In additional discussion, Council members expressed acknowledgement that the coverage on the west end of the lake would not be at the same level as in previous years. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 12 June 20, 2017 Councilor Gudman indicated that he would support trying the public event at Foothills Park, where parking access is good. Councilor Kohlhoff also expressed support for this plan, including the reallocation of Police resources; it would be appropriate for the City to facilitate an event where the public would have improved access, she indicated. The study session concluded with additional discussion of background of the City/Lake Corp roles and responsibilities over the years. Council President Manz inquired about next steps, and Ms. Phelan noted that there seemed to be overall support for presenting fireworks at Foothills Park in 2018 on a trial basis. There was an expectation that Staff would return after that date with a comprehensive report of the outcome so that Council could determine whether or not to continue with it. Staff also had made note of Councilor O'Neill's concern about notifying the City of Milwaukie or City of Gladstone. Parks and Police staff would proceed with event planning. The Council consensus indicated support for moving forward accordingly. 9. INFORMATION FROM COUNCIL Councilor Gudman noted that the recent status report on the City's 10 -year program for removal of invasive species was on track to be completed as scheduled. He wanted residents to be aware that the reduced maintenance would be reflected accordingly. After offering a "shout -out" for the upcoming Festival of the Arts, he advised Council members that they had been provided with written material from TriMet on planning for transportation projects anticipated through 2040, as presented at the latest Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation. Councilor Buck reported on the interviews conducted the previous week by the Youth Leadership Council. From a highly -qualified field of applicants, they had selected two new members to replace graduating seniors. He conveyed the group's pleasure in serving the City and their pride in being connected with the City Council. Council President Manz updated Council on the Tourism Advisory Committee's efforts to streamline their processes to align better with the City's budget process. 10. REPORTS OF OFFICERS No reports were made. 11. ADJOURNMENT Council President Manz adjourned the meeting at 5:49 p.m. Respectfully submitted, G�vwu-�YVI� Scvvt�a�.a� Anne -Marie Simpson, City Recorder City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 12 June 20, 2017 APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: Kent Studebaker, Mayor City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 1 June 20, 2017