HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Item - 2001-10-16 - Number 7.1 - 7. 1
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
10/16/01
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2001
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT LU 01-
0029, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS TO GOAL
12, TRANSPORTATION, FIGURE 19,—TRANSPORTATION
PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN, RELATING TO PROJECTS
RECOMMENDED BY THE BRYANT ROAD CORRIDOR PLAN.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve LU 01-0029 (Ordinance 2312).
EST. FISCAL ATTACHMENTS: PUBLISHED
IMPACT: Heisler Council Report with NOTICES
Approx. $1.3 million Attachments (Date)October 4,
2001
STAFF COST: N/A
BUDGETED: Ordinance no.: 2312
No Resolution no.:
FUNDING SOURCE: Previous Council
SDCs or new funding consideration:
source
.•+.I 7
P PT. D - 'CTOR C• MUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY k4rNAGER
DIRECTOR
ff Signoff/date Signd / to Signoff/date
L/case files/2001/LU 01-0029/Council Cover Memo
001
OE LAKE.s,„_
C,..0
ITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
COUNCIL REPORT
OREGON
TO: Douglas J. Schmitz, City Manager
I"FROM: Jane Heisler, Community Planning Manag- •- ,•
SUBJECT: LU 01-0029, Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Goal 12,
Transportation Chapter, Figure 19, Transportation Public Facilities
Plan, Relating to Projects Recommended by the Bryant Road
Corridor Plan (Ordinance 2312)
DATE: October 1, 2001
ACTION:
Consider for adoption, the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of LU 01-0029,
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Goal 12, Figure 19, Transportation Public Facilities
Plan, resulting from the Bryant Road Corridor Transportation Study. Exhibit F-1 illustrates the
proposed changes. Proposed Ordinance 2312 is found in Exhibit F-4.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The Planning Commission voted to approve LU 01-0029 at its September 10, 2001 meeting
(Findings, Exhibit B; Minutes, Exhibit C; Staff Report, Exhibit D). The changes are as a result
of the Bryant Road Corridor Transportation Study, a refinement study completed by the City in
2001, and accepted by the City Council on May 1, 2001 (summary, Exhibit F-3). Currently a
two-lane facility, the existing Transportation Improvement Plan calls for a continuous center turn
lane on Bryant Road from Boones Ferry to Lakeview Blvd. The corridor study outlines a
preferred alternative for the Bryant Road corridor, consisting of intersection improvements, bike
lanes, sidewalks and traffic signals at Bryant and Lakeview and at Bryant and Upper. Fewer
trees will be displaced by this alternative, fewer property impacts will occur and less square
footage of natural resources will be disturbed, than with the three-lane alternative currently in the
PFP. No testimony was received from the public at the Planning Commission.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan, Public
Facility Plan text amendments to the City Council.
003
EXHIBITS:
A. Notice of Appeal (No current exhibits; reserved for hearing use)
B. Planning Commission Findings, Conclusions and Order, LU 01-0029-1436 dated
September 24, 2001
C. Minutes of September 10, 2001 Planning Commission meeting
D. Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 28, 2001
E. Graphics/Plans
E-1. Aerial Photo of Alternative 2A, recommended improvements
F. Written Materials
F-1. Proposed Amendments to Transportation Improvement Program
F-2 Existing Transportation Improvement Program (Figure 19 of
Comprehensive Plan)
F-3 Bryant Road Transportation Corridor Study, summary of Long-Term
Alternative Analysis (Entire study is available at City Hall in the Planning
Department for review)
F-4 Proposed Ordinance 2312
G. Letters
G-1 Neither for Nor Against (None)
G-100 In Favor(None)
G-200 Opposed (None)
004
8ip B
1 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
2 OF THE
3 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
4
5
6 A REQUEST TO AMEND THE PUBLIC ) LU 01-0029 - 1436
7 FACILITY PLAN, TRANSPORTATION ) (CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO)
8 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1-10 YEARS, ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & ORDER
9 BRYANT ROAD FROM LAKEVIEW BLVD. )
10 TO BOONES FERRY )
11
12
13 NATURE OF APPLICATION
14
15 A request by the City of Lake Oswego to amend the Public Facility Plan, Transportation
16 Improvement Program 1-10 years, which indicates widening of Bryant Road from Lakeview Blvd. to
17 Boones Ferry to 3 lanes. The Bryant Road Corridor Transportation Study, which has been accepted
18 by City Council, recommends intersection and signalization improvements rather than widening of
19 the Corridor to 3 lanes. This amendment will reflect the preferred alternative for this Corridor.
20 Projects amended include T-2, T-5, T-8, P-40, B-16 and the addition of a new project B-16A.
21
22 A Legislative Amendment to the Lake Oswego Zoning Code to require that a minimum density is
23 achieved when land divisions or new developments are proposed in residential zones.
24
25 HEARINGS
26
27 The Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered this application at its meeting of
28 September 10, 2001.
29
30 CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
31
32
33 A. City of Lake Oswego Development Code
34 LOC 49.60.1505 Criteria for a Legislative Decision
35
36 B. Applicable Statewide Planning Goals
37 Goal 12: Transportation
38
39 C. Applicable Administrative Rules adopted pursuant to ORS Chapter 197 or Regional
40 Planning Regional Planning Requirements
41 OAR 660-12
42 OAR 660-11
43
44 EXHIBIT B
005
Page 1 LU 01-0029— 1436
1 D. Applicable City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Policies
2 Goal 12: Transportation, Subgoal 2, Intergovernmental Coordination, Policies 1 and 2.
3
4 CONCLUSION
5
6 The Planning Commission concludes that LU 01-0029 is in compliance with all applicable
7 criteria.
8
9
10 FINDINGS AND REASONS
11
12 The Planning Commission incorporates the staff report, dated August 28, 2001, on LU 01-0029
13 (with all exhibits attached thereto) as support for its decision.
14
15 ORDER
16
17 IT IS ORDERED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Lake Oswego that:
18
19 1. The Planning Commission recommends that LU 01-0029 be approved by the City
20 Council.
21
22 I CERTIFY THAT THIS ORDER was presented to and APPROVED by the Planning
23 Commission of the City of Lake Oswego.
24
25
26 DATED this 24th day of September 2001.
27
28
30 1,7
31 aniel Vizzini, Chair
32 Planning Commission
33
34 i.-*..ann-
,/gde„4441,,/*Aj35
36 Iris Treinen
37 Senior Secretary
38
39
40
006
Page 2 LU 01-0029—1436
1 ATTEST:
2
3 PRELIMINARY DECISION - September 10, 2001
4
5 AYES: Edwards, Johnson, Sandblast, Vizzini, Waring, Webster
6 NOES: None
7 ABSTAIN: None
8 ABSENT: Groznik
9 RECUSE: None
10
t 1 ADOPTION OF FINDINGS AND ORDER - September 24, 2001
12
13 AYES: Edwards, Groznik, Johnson, Waring Webster
14 NOES: None
15 ABSTAIN: None
16 ABSENT: Sandblast, Vizzini
17 RECUSE: None
007
Page 3 LU 01-0029— 1436
Chair Vizzini opened the public hearing regarding the above-described legislative
proposal and explained the procedures and time limits to be followed. He asked the
Commissioners to report any conflicts of interest related to the application. None were
reported. No one present challenged any Commissioner's right to hear the application.
Jane Heisler, Community Planning Manager, requested the hearing be continued to
September 24, 2001 in order to allow the staff to continue to consider further changes to
the proposal. She explained they were concerned the current language might be too
broad. She noted that although Metro desired to see connectivity requirements imposed
whenever a street was created, the currently proposed standard imposed the
requirements any time a lot of a certain size was created. She said a revised draft might
provide that other factors - such as how many lots would be served or changes in travel
distance - were to be considered before a requirement to plan a residential access way
was imposed. She reported the staff had recently discussed the proposal with Metro
representatives and with a property owner.
Public Testimony
James Hinzdel, 1250 Wells Street, Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97034, testified he had
met with the staff to discuss his concerns earlier that day. He questioned whether it was
realistic to require a pathway to serve bicyclists in an R-15 Zone. He wanted to know
what other jurisdictions imposed such a requirement. He indicated he believed
provisions in the proposal regarding access through Sensitive Lands were in conflict
with the Sensitive Lands Ordinance. He requested that the definitions of "full" and
"partial" street be clarified. He asked if the City endorsed the "skinny streets" concept.
He asked if the shared driveway that was permitted under the Flag Lot Ordinance would
be permitted under the proposed ordinance. He wanted to know if the proposed
ordinance would not apply, or if some other distance would be applied if he could not
meet either the 530-foot or the 330-foot distance standards. He said he looked forward
to reading the future staff report.
Commissioner Johnson moved to continue the hearing of LU 00-0015 (A) to
September 24, 2001, based on the staff request. Commissioner Sandblast seconded
the motion and it passed with Chair Vizzini, Vice Chair Edwards and Commissioners
Johnson, Sandblast, Waring and Webster voting yes. Commissioner Groznik was not
present for the vote. There were no votes against.
LU 01-0029, a request by the City of Lake Oswego to amend the Public Facility Plan,
Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 years, which indicates widening of Bryant
Road from Lakeview Blvd. to Boones Ferry to 3 lanes. The Bryant Road Corridor
Transportation Study, which has been accepted by City Council, recommends
intersection and signalization improvements rather than widening of the Corridor to 3
lanes. This amendment will reflect the preferred alternative for this Corridor. Projects
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission 009
09 EXHIBIT C Page 5 of 9
Minutes of September 10,2001
amended include T-2, T-5, T-8, P-40, B-16 and the addition of a new project B-16A.
Staff Coordinator is Jane Heisler, Community Planning Manager.
Chair Vizzini opened the public hearing and explained the procedures and time limits to
be followed. He asked the Commissioners to report any conflicts of interest related to
the application.
Jane Heisler, Community Planning Manager, explained the proposal would amend
the Transportation Chapter of the Public Facility Plan that listed pedestrian, bicycle,
transit and roadway projects and the proposal stemmed from the Bryant Corridor Plan
that had been adopted by the City Council. She clarified that the biggest change to the
corridor was that it would feature two lanes and a center turn lane instead of three
continuous lanes and some intersection improvements. She summarized the newly
adopted plan would have fewer impacts on trees, smaller impacts on Lamont Springs
natural area, and would impact a smaller area of properties in the corridor.
Tom Tushner, Principal Engineer, Engineering Department, related that 2020
findings projected that we could function with two lanes at Lakeview, but growth in
traffic volume in the area would require a future left turn lane in order to maintain level
of service there. He explained that the first phase of the project would include
installation of signals at the intersections of Bryant Road with Upper Drive and
Lakeview. The next phase would include construction of a left turn lane onto Lakeview.
Chair Vizzini recalled his experience with congested traffic in the area of the accesses to
the Lakeview Cleaners and Baskin & Robbins store. Chair Vizzini and Commissioner
Johnson suggested that left turns be prohibited at the Bryant Road accesses to the
shopping areas or that access there be closed. Mr. Tushner agreed those accesses were
close enough to the intersection of Bryant Road and Boones Ferry Road to cause
congestion, but he anticipated that such a change in a developed area would be
extremely difficult to accomplish at this time, and he advised that if the restrictions were
imposed, they could only be imposed during peak hours (without a physical barrier in
place) and drivers would create their own alternatives, such as turning around in
driveways. Commissioner Sandblast suggested the two accesses be lined up and moved
further away from the Boones Ferry Road intersection. Mr. Tushner clarified for the
Commissioners that the Capital Improvement Plan budgeted $650,000 for the corridor
study (including engineering studies) and the two signals. He anticipated construction
would start in early 2002. He confirmed that a funding source had not yet been
identified to pay for the project's second phase, which included right of way widening,
the new left turn lane, bike lanes and sidewalks.
Public Testimony
None.
Chair Vizzini closed the public hearing and opened deliberations.
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission F�Et 1 Page 6 of 9
Minutes of September 10, 2001 V
Deliberations
Commissioner Sandblast moved to recommend that the City Council approve LU
01-0029, as recommended by the staff. Commissioner Edwards seconded the
motion and it passed with Chair Vizzini, Vice Chair Edwards and Commissioners
Johnson, Sandblast, Waring and Webster voting yes. Commissioner Groznik was not
present. There were no votes against.
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
Proposed Road Utility Fee
The staff reported that a monthly utility fee had been proposed to provide the $1.2
million per year the City spent on overlays and seal coats to preserve and protect
roadways. They noted the Cities of Portland and Tualatin had imposed such a fee, but
the City of Portland had decided to eliminate it. Ms. Heisler reported that the proposal
had recently been presented to the Lake Oswego Neighborhood Action Committee
(LONAC) and she offered to ask the City Engineer to report LONAC's comments at the
next Planning Commission meeting.
LU 00-0018 (A)—Modal Split Targets - Findings, Conclusions and Order
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve LU 00-0018 (A)-1434, Modal Split
Targets - Findings, Conclusions and Order. Commissioner Waring seconded the
motion and it passed with Chair Vizzini and Commissioners Edwards, Johnson, Waring
and Webster voting yes. Commissioner Sandblast recused himself from the vote and
Commissioner Groznik was not present. There were no votes against.
LU 00-0027 — East End Commercial District Housing Amendment - Findings,
Conclusions and Order
Commissioner Edwards moved to approve LU 01-0027-1432, East End
Commercial District Housing Amendment - Findings, Conclusions and Order.
Commissioner Webster seconded the motion and it passed with Chair Vizzini and
Commissioners Edwards, Johnson, Waring and Webster voting yes. Commissioner
Sandblast recused himself from the vote and Commissioner Groznik was not present.
Rolling Agenda Review
Infill Development
The staff reported that the City Council was to hold a joint meeting with the
Planning Commission, the Development Review Commission, and the Infill
011
City of Lake Oswego Planning Commission Page 7 of 9
Minutes of September 10, 2001
012
STAFF REPORT
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
PLANNING DIVISION
APPLICANTS: FILE NO.:
City of Lake Oswego LU 01-0029
PROPERTY OWNERS: STAFF:
N/A Jane Heisler, Community Planning Manager
LOCATION: DATE OF REPORT:
Bryant Road between Boones Ferry and August 28, 2001
Childs Road
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: DATE OF HEARING:
All September 10, 2001
COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION
Various Various
I. APPLICANT REQUEST
The City of Lake Oswego requests a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Goal 12,
Transportation Chapter, Figure 19, Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement
Program. The changes requested are as a result of the Bryant Road Corridor Transportation
Study, which was a refinement study completed by the City of Lake Oswego in 2001,
subsequent to the City's adoption of its Transportation System Plan (TSP). Requested project
amendments include those in the chart on the following page as well as in Exhibit F-1.
Existing TSP project are found in Exhibit F-2. Exhibit E-1 contains an aerial map illustrating
the proposed improvements.'
01
3 EXHIBIT D
The full Bryant Road Corridor Transportation Study is available at City Hall in the Planning Department for review.
Page 1 of 6, LU 01-0029,Transportation Public Facility Plan Amendments for Bryant Road Corridor ( �
Planning Commission Staff Report
Suggested additions appear in bold and underline. Proposed deletions are struck.
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years
Map# Location Description Estimated Potential
Cost(1997$) Funding
Source
T-21 Bryant Road/Lakeview Dr Turn lanes,upgrade Installation of a traffic $2-00,900 SDC
Boulevard signal,minor intersection improvements $325,0003
and acquire necessary rights-of-way (Does not
include right-
of-way cost)
T-51 Bryant Rd,Lakeview Widen to three lanes Add bike lanes and $47-100,000 SDC
Boulevard to Boones sidewalks on both sides,reconstruction of $1,326,0003 NLFS
Ferry Road the at-grade railroad crossing,add a (Does not
north/southbound left turn lane at include right-
Lakeview,and acquire necessary rights-of- of-way cost)
way.(Reference proiects P-40 and B-16)
T-81 Bryant Road/Upper Drive Installation of a Traffic signal,minor $120,000 SDC
intersection improvements and acquire $385,0003
necessary rights-of-way (Does not
incl de right-
of-way cost)
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Map# Location Description Est.Cost Potential
(1997$) Funding
Source
P-401 Bryant Rd between Sidewalks on both west sides $85000 SDC,NLFS
Lakeview/Boones Ferry See T-5
Road
B-161 Bryant Road,between Bike lanes on both sides $232,000 SDC,NLFS
Childs Lakeview See T-5
Boulevard and Boones
Ferry Road
B-16 Bryant Road,between Bike lanes on both sides SDC
A� Lakeview and Childs NLFS
Road
014
2 These projects resulted from the Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan, a refinement study completed in 2001,which identified
a preferred plan for the Boone Ferry Road corridor.
3 Estimated cost in 2001$.
Page 2 of 6,LU 01-0029,Transportation Public Facility Plan Amendments for Bryant Road Corridor
Planning Commission Staff Report `"
IL APPLICABLE CRITERIA:
A. City of Lake Oswego Development Code:
LOC 49.60.1505 Criteria for a Legislative Decision
B. Applicable Statewide Planning Goals
Goal 12: Transportation
C. Applicable Administrative Rules adopted pursuant to ORS Chapter 197 or Regional
Planning Regional Planning Requirements
OAR 660-12
OAR 660-11
D. Applicable City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Policies
Goal 12: Transportation, Subgoal 2, Intergovernmental Coordination, Policies 1 and 2.
III. DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST:
The City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Chapter was updated in 1997 in order to comply
with OAR 660-11, Public Facility Planning and OAR 660-12, Transportation Planning. Following
a thorough review of the City's existing transportation conditions, examination of future growth
and needs and an alternatives analysis, the community developed a preferred alternative and
developed a corresponding project list which would provide needed facilities for the next 20 years.
In the 1997 PFP, several projects were identified for Bryant Road, including widening it to three
lanes (it is currently a two-lane facility) to permit a continuous center turn lane and sidewalks on
one side of the street. The Bryant Road Transportation Corridor Study was undertaken to identify
a preferred corridor plan for Bryant Road from Boones Ferry Road to Lakeview Blvd. Bryant
Road is currently a narrow two-lane roadway with a shared bicycle-pedestrian path on the east side
of the roadway. During the PM peak hour, significant congestion occurs at the Bryant
Road/Lakeview Blvd intersection with vehicle queuing that extends south to Boone Ferry Road.
The AM peak hour vehicle queuing at the Bryant Road/Upper Drive intersection extends south to
the railroad tracks. The vehicle congestion along Bryant Road today creates excessive delays,
increases travel times and causes some traffic to divert to local streets.
The preferred corridor plan, which was presented to and accepted by the City Council on May 1,
2001, is summarized in Exhibit F-3. The preferred plan provides for improved safety, traffic
mobility, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and less right-of-way and vegetation impact than the
three-lane alternative currently in the PFP.
IV. FINDINGS:
A. City of Lake Oswego Development Code:
LOC 49.60.1505 Criteria for a Legislative Decision
A legislative decision is generally a nolicy decision that is up to the discretion of the
City Council, but shall: 015
Page 3 of 6,LU 01-0029,Transportation Public Facility Plan Amendments for Bryant Road Corridor ( 1
Planning Commission Staff Report �`-J
1. Comply with any applicable state law;
2. Comply with any applicable Statewide Planning Goal or Administrative Rule
adopted pursuant to ORS Chapter 197,
3. In the case of a legislative amendment to the Zoning Code, Development Code
or Development Standards, comply with any applicable provisions of the Lake
Oswego Comprehensive Plan
Although these proposed changes are not subject to 49.60.1505(3), above, since they are not
amendments to implementing standards, this report includes applicable Comprehensive Plan
policies for purposes of illustrating how these proposed amendments are consistent with and/or
implement the City's acknowledged comprehensive plan policies.
B. Comply with any applicable Statewide Planning Goal or Administrative Rule
adopted pursuant to ORS Chapter 197.
1) Statewide Planning Goal 11,Public Facility Planning. This Goal requires cities to
develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve
as a framework for development. The City's existing PFP for transportation facilities was
developed based on a general, city-wide approach which provided for all modes of
transportation to meet current and long term needs, per this planning goal. The proposed
refinement of some of these projects is based on a more in-depth study, which better
addresses objectives such as preservation of trees and other vegetation and minimizing
disturbance of the right of way, while also providing for increased traffic safety and
accessibility within the corridor.
2) Goal 11, Public Facilities Planning Administrative Rule 660-11. This rule sets out the
approach to public facilities planning that city's are to follow. It requires facility plans for
many types of systems, including transportation. The proposed amendments comply with
the instructions in the Rule in that the Bryant Corridor Plan contains an inventory and
general assessment of the condition of the corridor, project descriptions, rough cost
estimates, maps and written descriptions and timing. These changes also comply with the
adoption and amendment procedures set out in 660-11-045(2) which states: Certain
public facility project descriptions, location or service area designations will
necessarily change as a result of subsequent design studies, capital improvement
programs, environmental impact studies and changes in potential sources of funding.
These proposed changes may be categorized, according to the Rule, under 660-11-045(4).
This section states that Land use amendments are those modifications or amendments
to the list, location or provider of public facility projects, which significantly impact a
public facility project identified in the comprehensive plan and which do not qualify
under 660-11-045(3)(a) or (b). Amendments made pursuant to this subsection are
subject to the administrative procedures and review and appeal provisions accorded
"land use decisions" in ORS Chapter 197 and those set forth in OAR 660 Division 18.
The procedures by which the City is requesting this change fall within this category.
016
Page 4 of 6,LU 01-0029,Transportation Public Facility Plan Amendments for Bryant Road Corridor
Planning Commission Staff Report \"
3) Statewide Planning Goal 12 and Transportation Administrative Rule, OAR 660-12.
This goal and its implementing rule require cities to provide and encourage a safe,
convenient and economic transportation system. Cities must accomplish this by reviewing
various alternatives to providing transportation within their community. The Bryant Road
Corridor Plan, from which the subject recommendations are made, reviewed three "action"
alternatives and a"no-build" alternative. Based upon the criteria set out for the study, the
preferred plan best met the roadway capacity/safety,bicycle/pedestrian facility, right-of-
way impacts and future transportation needs. Plan alternatives are summarized in Exhibit
F-3.
4) Comply with any Applicable City of Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan Policies:
GOAL 12, Transportation, Subgoal 2, Intergovernmental Coordination Policy 1
Lake Oswego shall develop a Comprehensive Transportation System Plan (TSP) in
conjunction with Clackamas County and adjacent counties where appropriate, the
State of Oregon, Tri-Met and Metro for the area within the City's Urban Services
Boundary. The Comprehensive Transportation System Plan shall:
a. Be consistent with land use designations identified within the Lake Oswego
Comprehensive Plan
b. Identify the location of arterial and collector streets, bicycle paths and
pedestrian ways and public transit facilities,
c. Identify the major street construction projects required to accommodate
anticipated development and to address public safety issues,
d. Propose funding mechanisms and related policies necessary to implement
identified projects;
The proposed changes to the PFP are consistent with land use designations identified in the
Comprehensive Plan. The model used to analyze trip generation for purposes of this study,
used existing land uses and anticipated growth in households and employment. The
proposed changes address bicycle paths and pedestrian ways for this Major Collector
Street, and also identifies the major construction projects required to accommodate
anticipated development and address public safety issues. This proposal also suggests
funding mechanisms to implement the projects outlined.
V. CONCLUSION:
The proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan, Public Facilities Plan for Transportation, are in
compliance with applicable state laws and Statewide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules and
City Comprehensive Plan policies.
VI. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Planning Commission recommend approval of these proposed
Comprehensive Plan, PFP text amendments to the City Council.
017
Page 5 of 6,LU 01-0029,Transportation Public Facility Plan Amendments for Bryant Road Corridor ($
Planning Commission Staff Report
EXHIBITS:
A. Notice of Appeal (No current exhibits;reserved for hearing use)
B. Findings, Conclusions and Order (No current exhibits; reserved for hearing use)
C. Minutes (No current exhibits; reserved for hearing use)
D. Staff Reports (No current exhibits; reserved for hearing use)
E. Graphics/Plans
E-1. Aerial Photo of Alternative 2A, recommended improvements
F. Written Materials
F-1. Proposed Amendments to Transportation Improvement Program
F-2 Existing Transportation Improvement Program (Figure 19 of Comprehensive Plan)
F-3 Bryant Road Transportation Corridor Study, summary of Long-Term Alternative
Analysis (Entire study is available at City Hall in the Planning Department for
review)
G. Letters
G-1 Neither for Nor Against (None)
G-100 In Favor(None)
G-200 Opposed (None)
018
Page 6 of 6,LU 01-0029,Transportation Public Facility Plan Amendments for Bryant Road Corridor ( �
Planning Commission Staff Report
v`
i
.
itiv
�r'� �, K'=Y' .. •'`t / - • ,\.;.
•• 3� �� _
�s s _ i,17iF111@'LA8 n
-- ,i
a $ r ��
< H glY3 R -- x j
k
' 1 3- < _ '�: =.+ess . ;fir,..—.�.;.....-_:-_, �. _ •
_
.._ _ -> 4
Y _ w - -- 'ss _ - -- --
•
- f'�' ._�, Y - -
4.
V r li.04_ -i\ - ' \ t`, T: '" -c \. '�t _-' `,� i ii� F5 L'c . is . �
•
OF AMERICA
' , . - -N,c-.4-..*,...,-,.._„;.--x‘- . -1,, ., . _,. ,._„:„.m..„,,,,,...-..„. ,-,.._,...„.„--„,„--:-._ , - „. - . -,,---,A-:-.,------ --- , .-------,
�� V - 4 EXHIBIT E-1
1
4 „ w LONG TERM ALTERNATI\
LEGEND
i _ 3 LANE/2 LANE DKS Associates
• ij
/ J7! /:'•,� — It .
,----'•
4
•
/i f� i
4
_
i - _ - ` f _ / IM� - x i
111.
`_ ` ,,.. ,ter.
fs.-\ . \ \,...,,:_-, --- _ _ ___,;._,..,.:_.--„_:_ .-_-_-, -,,,.._ -_,... _ .., -_,.-_, -_,„, .,,.- _.-_-_. ,, , , :_,,.. ,,..„.__„..._,.,_...„,,,,„,..,..,._; ..__,_,,„,_,_,,„,_,.,,,...F.,-_ -_,.._.,:__- -. _ ,,„_,-
•
'� am `
f - - _ _ r-t\ --' P ./ %� \ ," . rid!
ef._ if 1
y i.
��
.t i / ---
� �
�= ; -
/� = A / i. //
I
*NOTE: ALIGNMENT SHOWN IS CONCEPTUAL.
.+ �
2A - WEST SHIFT �.y we�
EXACT ROADWAY ALIGNMENT TO BE �. �
DETERMINED DURING FINAL DESIGN. '....... ..�:'/
LU 01-0029, Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment
Chapter 12, Figure 19, Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement
Program
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years
Map# Location Description Estimated Cost Potential
(1997$) Funding
Source
T-2'= Bryant Road/Lakeview DE Turn lanes, upgrade Installation of a $2007000 SDC
Boulevard traffic signal,minor intersection $325,0003(Does not
improvements and acquire necessary include right-of-
rights-of-way way cost)
T-52 Bryant Rd,Lakeview Wide to t ree lanes Add bike lanes and $-1 00;000 SDC
Boulevard to Boones sidewalks on both sides,reconstruction $1,326,0003(Does NLFS
Ferry Road of the at-grade railroad crossing,add a not include right-
north/southbound left turn lane at of-way cost)
Lakeview,and acquire necessary
rights-of-way.(Reference projects P-40
_and B-16)
T-82 Bryant Road/Upper Drive Installation of a tTraffic sSignal,minor $4-2-04}00 SDC
intersection improvements and $385,0003(Does not
acquire necessary rights-of-way include right-of-
way cost)
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Map# Location Description Est.Cost(1997$) Potential
Funding
Source
P-402 Bryant Rd between Sidewalks on both west-sides $8000 SDC,NLFS
Lakeview/Boones Ferry See T-5
Road
B-162 Bryant Road,between Bike lanes on both sides $23-2,000 SDC,NLFS
Childs Lakeview See T-5
Boulevard and Boones
Ferry Road
B-16 Bryant Road,between Bike lanes on both sides SDC
Lakeview and Childs NLFS
Road
2 These projects resulted from the Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan, a refinement study completed in 2001,
which identified a preferred plan for the Boone Ferry Road corridor.
3 Estimated cost in 2001$.
021 EXHIBIT F-1
(LU 01-0029)
022
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years
Estimated Potential
Map# Location Description Cost Funding
(1997S)* Source
riif
wti,t
T-1 State Street/Ter 11iger Blvd NB left turn lane,realign Terwilliger apernach,traffic $550,111 S,SDC
signal
T-2 Bryant Road/Lakeview Drive Turn lanes,upgrade traffic signal $200,111 SDC
T-3 Catritry Club Road/C Ave/Irm Mtn Blvd Intersection mTrovenents $450,111 SDC
T-4 Boxes Ferry Road_Knise Way to Madrana Widen to 5 lanes** inchdi ng bike lanes and adequate $2,657,000 SDC
Street
T-S B c t, :.:a •.., to Boons Ferry Widen to three lanes $1,100,000 SDC
T-6 Boons Ferry Road/Kruse Way(98-99 Budget) Second NB left turn laze $295,111 SDC,C
T-7 Boones Ferry Road'Bayant Rd Add split signal timing replace loops $25,000 SDC
T:8 Bryant RoedHJpper Drive _ _ .r $120,000 SDC
T-9 State Street(Hw T43)11Qa�TiS1Road h1.ersecti n hi xovements $100,111 SDC,S
T-10 State Street(Hwy.43)/McVey Averse NB/SD left turn lanes,upgade traffic signal. Widen $1,300,030 SDC,S
bridge.
T-11 A Avenue-State Street to 3rd Avenue Road recatsstruction,streetscape hrproven is $3,100,000 LORA,SDC
T-12 Jean Road/Pilkirgton Left turn laces;traffic signal $203,000 SDC
T-13 McVey Avenue/Cornell Street Left tutu lame on McVey,traffic signal $250,000 SDC
T-14 McVey Avenue/Erickson St. (98-99 Budget) Left turn lane on McVey $150,000 SDC
T-15 Kruse Way-Kruse Oaks Blvd to Bangy Rd. (98 Signal i tercmrect $25,000 SDC,C
99 Budget)
T-16 Knee Way-Bangy Rd.to Kruse Oaks Blvd Widen roadway to 6 lanes as part of 1-5/217 interchange $1,000,111 SDC,S
unlxovenerts
T-17 Stafford Road/Overlook Dr. Left turn lanes,traffic signal S280,111 SDC
T-18 Kerr Parkway/Tcu hstae Dr. Northbound left turn lane,traffic signal $550,111 SDC
T-19 Childs Road Bridge(98-99 Budget) Reconstruct/widen bridge with pedestrian/bike facilities $315,111 C,S
$35,030 SDC
T-20 Intersection of I-5,217 and Kruse Way Reconstruction of interchange to provide for free flowing $48,000,000 S
north and south bard movements and direct correction of
of Kruse Way to Hwy.217,two phases
T-21 Boons Ferry and Sunset Drive Intersection irrnprovements to accommodate four way
turning movements and development of a canrercial
street to accannislate development of the West Lake
Grove Design District r
T-22 Bones Ferry Road Planning and Design $100,111
T-23 Traffic Calming Feasanlity Study (not mapped) $40,000
Subtotal $60,842,000
T-24 Traffic Cahrmng-Locatias to be determined (not mapped) $200,000 S,S,N,FS
Subtotal $61,042,000
'Staff estimates cotst for this project at S700,000. Ordinance 2188 did not specify associated costs or potential fu
023 EXHIBIT F-2
GOAL 1 (LU 01-0029) 12-25
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years
Estimated Cost Potential
Map# Location Description Funding
(1997S)* g
Source
t 2
k,. 3 d -. '- 7l
4 - .; �y�. .. 4
P-1 Jean RoadWay gto Sidewalk, $60,000 SDC,NLFS
between Jean and Pr�cum n one side
P-2 Kerr Pkwy,between PCC/Ore Jefferson Sidewalk,south side $74,000 SDC,C
Pkwy. (Muk./Clack),
NLFS
P-3 Greentree Road,Femwood to Westview Shoulder pathway $25,000 SDC,NLFS
P-4 10th Street,between A/E Pathway,one side $44,000 SDC,NLFS
P-5 Wembley Park Road (98-99 Budget;Used 6'pathway $225,000 SDC,NLFS
Parks&Rec Funds)
P-6 Carman,between Kruse and Fosberg Sidewalk,east side $40,000 SDC,NLFS
P-7 Daniel Way Sidewalk(Included in Street Improvement SDC,NLFS
Project T 55)
P-8 Lakeview between Twin Fir/Iron Mtn. Pathway $166,000 SDC,NLFS
P-9 Country Club,Boones Fy.-Wembley P. Sidewalk,south side $75,000 SDC,NLFS
P-10 Melrose,between Peters and Fosberg Sidewalk,north side $21,000 SDC,NLFS
P-1 I Hwy.43,between Public Storage and Sidewalk,east side from Tryon Creek to $19,000 SDC,NLFS
Briarwood Briarwood
P-12 Lakeview Blvd between Bryant&65th Pathway,one side $268,000 SDC,NLFS
P-13 Upper Drive between Reese/Bryant 6'pathway $130,000 SDC,NLFS
P-14 Boones Ferry between 17755 and 17355 Sidewalk,north side $60,000 SDC,NLFS
P-15 Kerr Pkwy,between One Jefferson Pkwy. Sidewalk,north side $49,000 SDC,NLFS
and Touchstone
P-16 4th between FJF;G Ave,Between 4th and Sidewalk on west side 4th,north side G $6,000 SDC,NLFS
ACC
P-17 Old River Rd Pathway,one side S400,000 SDC,NLFS •
P-18 a) Treetop(Femwood,between Sidewalk $56,000 SDC,NLFS
Greentree/Overlook
P-18 b) Greentree Ave.between Greentree Rd.and Pathway,one side $64,000 SDC,NLFS
Femw000d Dr.and Femwood Dr.between
Maplefeaf and Greentree Ave.
P-19 Twin Fir Pathway,one side $370,000 SDC,NLFS
P-20 Lake Grove Avenue Pathway,ore side $63,000 SDC,NLFS
P-21 Pilkington,between Boones Ferry and Willow Sidewalk on ore side $66,000 SDC,NLFS
Lane
P-22 Quarry Road-Carman Road to Boores Ferry Bike lanes,sidewalk on east side $585,000 SDC,NLFS
Road
P-23 Kerr Road,north side,between Touchstone Multi-use path,north side $255,000 SDC,NLFS
and McNary
Subtotal S3,121,000
024
12-26 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years
Fsti mated Cost Potential
Map# Location Description (1997$)* Funding
Source
T ' ' - ruli T
lams
*&1 Country CIub(A/4thB between Stare and Irron Bice las $1,500 SDC,NLFS
Mtn
*B-2 McVey,between Oswego Creek and State Bice lanes $500 SDC,NLFS
Street
B-3 Kerr Parkway,between Stephenson and Bice lanes $600,000 SDC,NLFS
Boons Ferry
B-4 Jean Road/Jean Way,between Boones Ferry Bike lanes(B.F.to Pi ki rgtan portion $64,000 SDC,NLFS
and Bryant completed) i
B-5 Boones Ferry,between Kruse Way and Bike lanes(Cast included in Project T-4) SDC,NLFS
Madr na
B-6 Stafford Road,Overlook to South Shute Bike lanes $140,000 SDC,NLFS
*B-7 Melrose,between Fc berg and Westlake Bice lanes S700 SDC,NLFS
B-8 Quarry Rd Bice lanes(Cast included in project P-23) SDC,NLFS
B-9 Boones Ferry,between Country Club and Mn Bice lanes $60,000 SDC,NLFS
Park Town Center
B-10 Pnllongton,between Boxes Fy.and Childs Bice lanes $280,000 SDC,NLFS
B-11 Firwood between Wahu/Bocnes Ferry Bice lanes $62,000 SDC,NLFS
B-12 Oakridge Road,between Quarry and Boones Bike lanes $26,000 SDC,NLFS
Ferry
B-13 South Star,between Westview and -Shared Roadway S75,000 SDC,NLFS
Lakeview
B-14 South Shute between Cieentree and McVey Shared Roadway $25,000 SDC,NLFS
B-15 Willamette 57,ore Bike Corridor Feasilility Study to determine cost/feasiblity of using $135,000 Metro
Study Willarrette Shore right-of-way as a bicycb $7,500 Portland
corridor $7 SDC
Subtotal $1,484,700
*Incidental,striping oy
025
GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12-27
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years
Estimated Cost
Potential
Map# Location Description (1997$)* Funding
Source
l I F�
TR-1 Willamette Shores Trolley Track/trestle rehabilitation $600,000 J
TR-2 #41 Boones Ferry Route (Barbur 15 min. service -days, 30 min. $1,250,000(Capital) F,S,SDC,
Transit Center-Tualatin) service-eves $5,760,000(Operating- NLFS Tri-Met
10 years)
u'tota
- I 'ear ota, • 'ro Je c is 1111111M3#g:?<d►LMI
- I 'ear ota, • 'rojects
ota, • roject � ]dfhklGI1I1]—
**Improvements pending Boones Ferry Planning and Design project
-Noie—Pro cts in Cityand County uru'-lc fiction will roceel-with financial artici ahon b bot5 arties
Je tY j P P P Y P - ------I
!Roadway and transit tacilitTes costs retkct construction,,right o1-way costs with-construction costs at a 40-50% contingency-------,
1 1
Funding Sources:
f C ;Clackamas County
CP City of Portland I
F I Federal Funds - ISTEA
4 1
J Jefferson Rail Consortium I i
LID !Local Improvement District
LORA ;Lake Oswego Redevelopment
Agency
NLFS 'New Local Funding Source (GO bonds,local gas tax,
etc.)
S ;State of Oregon (State Highway Fund,
Special Public works Fund,
State vehicle registration
fees,gas tax, revenue i
sharing)
SDC !System Development Charge
TM ;Tri-Met
IL:\E cel\Jane_h\Transp\TIP1-10 - rbl n —
b
12-28 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Estimated Cost Potential
Map# Location Description (1997$)* Funding
Source
} 1111 � ,�91e'! �,fi I - - _
T-25 State Street/Cherry Lane Left turn lane,improve approach to $820,000 SDC,S
Hwy 43
T-26 Meadows Road-Bangy Road to Widen to 4 lanes $1,500,000 SDC,C,S
Carman Drive
T-27 "A"Avenue-State Street to 8th Signal interconnect $150,000 F,S,SDC,
Street
T-28 Jean Road/Bryant Road Left turn lanes,traffic signal $200,000 SDC
T-29 Childs Road/Bryant Road Left turn lanes,traffic signal $200,000 SDC
T-30 Kruse Way/Kruse Oaks Drive(98-99 NB approach lane on Kruse Oaks, $150,000 SDC,C,S
Budget) add bus pull-out
T-31 Bryant Road/Cardinal Avenue Upgrade approach to Bryant $60,000 SDC
T-32 Meadows Road/Bangy Road Addition of a NB through lane on $325,000 SDC,C,S
Bangy Road,SD left turn lane on
Bangy Road
T-33 State Street(Hwy 43)/Glenmorrie Left turn lane $100,000 SDC,C,S
Drive
T-34 Bangy Road-Kruse Way to Bonita Widen to 4 lanes,pavement overlay, $1,000,000 SDC
Road bilce lanes
T-35 Kruse Way/Westlake Drive/Kruse Right turn lane on westbound Kruse $140,000 SDC,C
Woods Way
T-36 Boones Ferry Road/Country Develop right turn lane on Kerr $110,000 SDC
Club/Kerr Parkway Pkwy approach
T-37 Carman Drive/Kruse Way Add left turn lanes on Carman,right $375,000 F,S,SDC
turn lanes on Kruse. Signal
modification
T-38 Kruse Way/Mercantile Drive/Daniel WB and EB right turn lane $116,000 SDC,C
Way
T-39 Country Club Road/A Avenue/loth Traffic signal $200,000 SDC
Street
T-40 State Street(Hwy 43)/B"Avenue SB right turn lane $350,000 SDC,S
T-41 Carman Drive/Lake Forest Blvd. WB left turn lane $150,000 SDC,C
T-42 Boones Ferry Road-65th to Bryant Signal interconnect $210,000 SDC
Road
T-43 Carman Drive/Parkview Traffic signal,channelization $250,000 SDC
Drive/Fosberg
T-44 Knaus Road/Boones Ferry Road Left turn lanes,channelize $275,000 SDC
T-45 Bangy Road/Bonita Road Traffic signal,signal interconnect, $325,000 SDC,C
second SB left turn lane on Bangy
027
GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12-29
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Estimated Cost Potential
Map# Location Description (1997$)* Funding Source
T-46 Carman Drive/Meadows Traffic signal;additional left turn lanes $1,065,000 SDC,C
Road/Quarry Road NB,SB and WB;additional through
right turn lane
T-47 Kerr Parkway/McNary Parkway Left turn lanes,traffic signal $364,000 SDC
(lower intersection)
T-48 South Shore Blvd./Westview Drive Left turn lane,retaining wall $100,000 SDC
T-49 Stafford Road/Golf Course Road NB left turn lane on Stafford $100,000 SDC
T-50 Stafford Road/Sunnyhill Drive NB left turn lane on Stafford $100,000 SDC
T-51 Meadows Road/Kruse Oaks Drive Traffic signal,additional SB right turn $320,000 SDC,C
lane,WB right turn lane on Meadows
Road
T-52 Stafford Road/Bergis Road Left turn lane on SB Stafford Road $200,000 SDC
T-53 South Shore Blvd./Femwood Street Left turn lane $50,000 SDC
T-54 Meadows Road/Kruse Woods Drive Traffic signal,SB left turn lane on $260,000 SDC,C
Kruse Woods Drive
T-55 Carman Drive/Burma Road Realign Burma Road approach,add $200,000 SDC
left turn lanes
T-56 Parker/Carman Add turn lanes $150,000 SDC,C
T-57 Carman Drive/Bonita Road Left turn lanes,traffic signal $400,000 SDC,C
T-58 Childs Road/Pilkington Road Left turn lanes $200,000 SDC,C
T-59 Knaus Road/Goodall Road Channelization improvement $60,000 SDC,C
T-60 Laurel Street,Dyer Street to Hallinan Construct embankment,widen $600,000 SDC
Street roadway to City Standards
T-61 Traffic Calming-Daniel Way Widen roadway north of Safeco $300,000 NLFS
Insurance to City Standards
Subtotal - $11,475,000
T-62 Traffic Calming-Locations to be Speed bumps,curb extensions,traffic $200,000 S,SDC,NLFS
determined circles,etc.(not mapped)
Subtotal $11,675,000
028
12-30 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Estimated Cost Potential
Map# Location Description (1997$)* Funding
Source
4i L ,' - 'I ! i
P-24 Washington Court-Lake Forest to Boones Add sidewalk on one side between Lake $14,000SDC,NLFS
Ferry Road Forest and Boones Ferry Road
P-25 Firwood between Waluga/Boones Ferry Sidewalk,one side $31,000 SDC,NLFS
P-26 Carman Drive-Waluga Drive to Quarry Pathway one side $140,000 F,S,SDC,
Road NLFS
P-27 Carman Drive,between Waluga and 1-5 Sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides $290,000 SDC,NLFS,C
P-28 Lanewood/Douglas Circle,Twin Fir to Pathway,one side $200,000 SDC,NLFS
Boones Ferry
P-29 Monroe Parkway Sidewalk,north side $26,000 SDC,NLFS
P-30 Bryant Road,between Lakeview Blvd.and Pathway,east side $120,000 SDC,NLFS
Jean Road
P-31 Knaus Road Pathway,one side $480,000 SDC,NLFS
P-32 Lake Forest Blvd.,Washington Court to Sidewalk,one side $33,000 SDC,NLFS
Carman
P-33 McNary Parkway between Jefferson Sidewalk,south side $38,000 SDC,NLFS
Parkway and Churchill Downs
P-34 Meadows Road Sidewalk on south side $89,000 SDC,NLFS
P-35 Laurel Street,Hallinan to Cornell Sidewalk on one side $45,000 SDC,NLFS
P-36 Bonita,between Carman and existing Sidewalks $32,600 SDC,NLFS
sidewalk
P-37 Boca Ratan Sidewalk on one side - $40,000 SDC,NLFS
P-38 Cornell,Laurel to Bergin Sidewalk,one side $200,000 SDC,NLFS
P-39 Childs Rd,between Indian Springs and Pathway on north side S200,000 NLFS
Bryant
P-40 Bryant between Lakeview/Boones Ferry Sidewalk on west side $85,000 SDC,NLFS
`f P-41 Fosberg Rd,between Carman and Melrose Sidewalk on west side S35,000 SDC,NLFS
P-42 Cherry Lane Sidewalk on one side,between State and $55,300 SDC,NLFS
Hallinan
P-43 Bryant,between Westridge and Childs Pathway,east side $72,000 SDC,NLFS
P-44 Redleaf,Tualata,Centerwood(connects Sidewalk,one side $40,000 SDC,NLFS
Centerwood sidewalk to Pilkington/
Rivergrove school)
P-45 Botticelli Sidewalk on north side $95,000 SDC,NLFS
P-46 Westlake Drive Pathway on west side S125,000 SDC,NLFS
P-47 Timberline Pathway,one side $130,000 SDC,NLFS
P-48 Fir Ridge Road(between Wembly and Sidewalk,one side $8,800 SDC,NLFS
Twin Fir)
P-49 Willamette River Greenway George Rogers Multi-use pathway $110,000 SDC,NLFS
Park to Oswego Pointe
029
GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12-31
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Estimated Cost
Potential
Map# Location Description (1997$)* Funding
Source
- rrItii Ea ; = N
° ri i i y 1,_ i
P-50 Willamette River Greenway,between Mutti-use pathway $300,000 SDC,NLFS
Roeher Park and Tryon Creek,
connecting to Terwilliger multi-use
path
P-51 Bryant Rd, between Cardinal/Sara Hill Sidewalk/pathway $20,500 SDC,NLFS
Rd.
P-52 Goodall Road,between Knaus and Pathway,one side $246,000 SDC,NLFS
Country Club
P-53 South Shore Blvd. (except Westview Pathway on south side $600,000 SDC,NLFS
to Blue Heron)
P-54 South Shore Blvd.,Westview to Blue Pathway on south side $50,000 SDC,NLFS
Heron
P-55 Hallman Street Pathway,one side $69,000 SDC,NLFS
P-56 Kerr Parkway,Boones Ferry to Pathway,east side $60,000 SDC,NLFS
McNary
P-57 Kelok,Cardinal to South Shore Pathway,one side $50,000 SDC,NLFS
P-58 Pilkington,between Jean Rd. and Sidewalk,one side $300,000 SDC,NLFS C
Childs
P-59 McEwan Between 65th and Pilkington Sidewalk,one side $52,500 SDC,NLFS
P-60 Glenmorrie Dr. Pathway,one side $100,000 SDC,NLFS
P-61 Jefferson Parkway between Kingsgate Sidewalk,one side $105,000 SDC,NLFS
and Kerr
P-62 Jean Rd. between Pilkington and Sidewalk,one side $70,000 SDC,NLFS
Bryant
P-63 Waluga Dr. between Parkhill and Pathway,east side $40,000 SDC,NLFS
Carman
P-64 Waluga Dr. between Oakridge and Pathway,both sides $80,000 SDC,NLFS
Firwood
P-65 Fosberg Rd. between Southwood Park Sidewalk,west side $15,000 SDC,NLFS
and Melrose
Subtotal $4,892,700'
030
12-32 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Estimated Cost Potential
Map# Location Description (1997$)* Funding
Source
B-16 Bryant Road,between Childs and Bike lanes $232,IN SDC,NLFS
Boones Ferry
*B-17 Botticelli Bike lanes $1,500 SDC,NLFS
B-18 Childs Road,between 65th and 35th Bike lanes $310,000 SDC,NLFS
Place
B-19 Fosberg/Carman,between Kruse Way Bike lanes $107,000 SDC,NLFS
and Melrose
B-20 Bonita,between Carman and Bangy Bice lanes $231,000 SDC,NLFS
B-21 Iron Mtn,between Fairway and Bice lane,south side $68,000 SDC,NLFS
Chandler,south side
B-22 South Shore Blvd. Between Westview Bice lanes $350,000 SDC,NLFS
and Greentree
** Fernwood Drive between South Shared roadway,local $ - SDC,NLFS
shore/Treetop
** Lake Grove Avenue Shared roadway,local $ - SDC,NLFS
** Westview between South Shore and Shared roadway,local $ - SDC,NLFS
Royce
** Knaus,between Timberline and Shared roadway,local $ - SDC,NLFS
Boones Ferry
** Lake Forest Blvd./Washington Ct. Shared roadway,local $ - SDC,NLFS
between Carman and Boones Ferry
Subtotal $1,299,500
*Incidental,striping only
Meets criteria for Local Shared Roadway l
** Y-no inrovments needed p
031
GOAL 12 TRANSPORTATION 12-33
Goal 12 Transportation
❑ Goal 12: Transportation
Figure 19
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Potential
Estimated Cost
Map# Location Description (1997$)* Funding
Source
TR-3 Kruse Woods Transit Center $3,000,000 F,S,SDC,
NLFS Tri-Met
TR-4 Downtown Lake Oswego-East of Park and Ride/relocated transit center $3,000,000 F,S,SDC,
State Street NLFS Tr-Met
Subtotal $6,000,000
11-20 Year Total,All Projects $23,867,200'
1-10 Year Total,All Projects $73,257,700
'Total,All Project $97,124,900
'Note: Projects in City and County jurisdiction will proceed with financial participation by both parties
Roadway and transit facilities costs reflect construction,right-of-way costs with construction costs at a 40-50%contingency
Funding Sources:
C ;Clackamas County
CP ;City of Portland
F Federal Funds-ISTEA
J Jefferson Rail Consortium
LID ,Local Improvement District
LORA ;Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency -
j NLFS :New Local Funding Source (GO bonds,local gas tax,etc.)
S iState of Oregon (State Highway Fund,Special Public
works Fund,State vehicle registration
fees,gas tax,revenue sharing)
SDC ;System Development Charge
TM Tri-Met I
032
12-34 LAKE OSWEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DKS Associates
4: Long-Term Alternative Analysis
This chapter includes the establishment of a preferred corridor plan for Bryant Road between
Boones Ferry Road and Lakeview Boulevard which meets 2020 projected traffic,pedestrian,
and bicycle needs. Five long-term alternatives were developed and analyzed using a set of
design criteria described in this chapter.
Long-Term Alternatives
The following five alternatives were explored in this study:
• No Build- maintain the existing corridor with 3 lanes at the Boones Ferry Road
intersection and 2 lanes the remainder of the corridor;
• Alternative 1-3 lanes throughout the corridor;
• Alternative 2-3 lanes from Boones Ferry Road to Sunset Drive, 2 lanes from Sunset
Drive to Lower Drive,and 3 lanes from Lower Drive to Lakeview Boulevard;
• Alternative 2A- Same as Alternative 2, but with the roadway near Upper Drive shifted to
the west; and
• Alternative 3- 3 lanes at the Boones Ferry Road intersection and 2 lanes the remainder of
the corridor.
In addition to the various travel lane configurations,the no build alternative would maintain
the existing pathway on the east side of Bryant Road,while the other four alternatives would
provide continuous bicycle lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. Also,the four
build alternatives are based on the installation of traffic signals at Bryant Road/Upper Drive
and Bryant Road/Lakeview Boulevard to replace the existing four-way stop controls.
Conceptual alignments for Alternatives 1,2,2A,and 3 can be found in the appendix.
Proposed curb lines, striping, sidewalks,and other key elements are superimposed on an
aerial base map of the corridor that was provided by the City of Lake Oswego. Approximate
tree locations are also shown on these plans and a list of the tree types and sizes can be found
in the appendix. The aerial base map is several years old and several changes to the corridor
have occurred since it was first taken.
Figure 8 illustrates the typical cross-sections for both the 3-lane and 2-lane sections utilized
in the long-term alternatives. The 3-lane section requires 56 feet of right-of-way to provide a
12-foot center turn lane, 11-foot travel lanes, 5-foot bicycle lanes,and 6-foot sidewalks. The
2-lane section requires 46 feet of right-of-way to provide 12-foot travel lanes, 5-foot bicycle
lanes,and 6-foot sidewalks.
EXHIBIT F-3
(LU 01-0029)
033
Lake Oswego Bryant Road Corridor Study Final Report Page 20
X.•1Projects120011P010071Word1Final Report doc April 2001
44'
6' 5' 11' 12' 11' 5' 6'
SPN
3 LANE SECTION
-' NOT TO SCALE
34
6' 5' 12' 12' 5'
,< ,< �.� >< }-� a-
SfW4 t SfW
-,. .
2 LANE SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
Figure 8: Typical Cross-Sections
=:7 Future Bryant Road Travel Times
Based on the data collected from the existing travel time survey, corridor travel times were
estimated for each long-term alternative with existing traffic volumes. These travel times are
based on the proposed installation of traffic signals at Bryant Road/Upper Drive and Bryant
Road/Lakeview Boulevard. The approach delay from the intersection performance
calculations was applied to the corridor travel times as applicable for the Bryant Road lane
configurations at Upper Drive and Lakeview Boulevard. Alternatives 1, 2, and 2A
significantly reduce the corridor travel times compared to the average travel time for the
existing conditions, especially for the southbound direction in the PM peak. Table 6 lists the
results of the estimated travel times, while detailed calculations can be found in the appendix.
034
Lake Oswego Bryant Road Corridor Study Final Report Page 21
X:I Projectsl20011 P010071 WordlFinal Report.doc April 2001
Table 6: Bryant Road Travel Times- Existing with Alternatives
Free Flow Existing Alternative I Alternative 2/2A Alternative 3
Direction& Time Period Travel Average Travel Time Travel Time Travel Time
Time(sec) Tr (sec)lme (sec) (sec) (sec)
AM Peak 48 83 66 67 74
Northbound
PM Peak 48 70 77 78 105
AM Peak 48 63 60 60 85
Southbound
PM Peak 48 165 66 67 74
Northbound travel times from West Bay Road(approximately 600 ft south of Lakeview Boulevard)to Sunset Drive.
Southbound travel times from Boones Ferry Road to Lakeview Boulevard.
Free flow conditions assume vehicle traveling at speed limit with no stops along the corridor.
Data collected on 2/15/01 for free flow conditions and existing average travel time.
Design Criteria
A set of design criteria was utilized to compare the long-term alternatives based on the
relative advantages and disadvantages, how well the transportation needs of the corridor are
met, and the possible impacts. Subcategories of the basic criteria were used to evaluate all of
the alternatives both quantitatively and qualitatively. Table 7 describes all criteria in detail
and how each alternative measures up to the criteria. The design criteria evaluation matrix
was developed with the help of a steering committee as well as input from the public,which
will be discussed in a later chapter. The appendix contains a detailed breakdown of the costs
shown in Table 7.
Preferred Corridor Plan
Based on the design criteria evaluation matrix shown in Table 7,Alternative 2A has been
identified as the preferred plan for the Bryant Road corridor. Although the No Build
alternative has no fiscal cost associated with it and would not impact any property or trees,
this alternative does not adequately meet the corridor's existing or future transportation needs
and does not provide improvements for roadway capacity, safety, bicycles,or pedestrians. Of
the remaining long-term alternatives,Alternative 2A provides for the best roadway
capacity/safety improvements and bicycle/pedestrian facilities,while only impacting
properties and trees at a degree needed to make these improvements. Therefore,Alternative
2A is the preferred plan for the Bryant Road corridor from Boones Ferry Road to Lakeview
Boulevard.
035
Lake Oswego Bryant Road Corridor Study Final Report Page 22
X.:IProjects120011P010071WadlFinal Report.doc April 2001
The improvements associated with the proposed corridor plan include:
• A new traffic signal at Bryant Road/Upper Drive;
• A new traffic signal at Bryant Road/Lakeview Boulevard with dedicated
northbound/southbound left-turn lanes;
• Reconstruction of the at-grade railroad crossing on Bryant Road north of Lower Drive;
• Modification of existing on-street head-in parking stalls at the West Bay Center to
provide two parallel parking stalls on the east side of Bryant Road south of Lower Drive;
• Continuous sidewalks on both sides of Bryant Road; and
• Continuous bicycle lanes along both sides of Bryant Road.
036
Lake Oswego Bryant Road Corridor Study Final Report Page 23
XAProjects120011P010071Word1Final Report.doc April 2001
Table 7:Design Criteria for Bryant Road Long-Term Alternatives p,,,t,Sor-1---Q
Criteria Description Alternative 1— Alternative 2— Alternative 2A— Alternative 3— No Build
_ 3 Lane Section 3/2 Lane Section 3/2 Lane Section West Shift 2 Lane Section
Roadway capacity and safety Roadway capacity and safety Roadway capacity and safety
Roadway capacity and safety improvements. Provision of improvements(but additional
Relative improvements. Provision of improvements. Provision of bicycle and pedestrian improvements required to No property impacts and
Advantages What stands out as advantages? bicycle and pedestrian bicycle and pedestrian facilities facilities on corridor.Fewer accommodate 2020 conditions). no tree removal.
on corridor.Less property and
facilities on corridor. tree impacts than Alternative 1. larger trees requiring removal Provision of bicycle and pedestrian
than Alternatives 1 or 2. facilities on corridor.
Property impacts and tree removal, No roadway capacity or
Relative Propertyimpacts and tree Property impacts and tree Property impacts and tree although to a lesser degree than safety improvements for
What stands out as disadvantages? p removal,although to a lesser removal,although to a lesser Alternative 1 or Alternative 2. motor vehicles. No
Disadvantages removal. degree than Alternative 1. degree than Alternative 1. Roadway capacity and safety needs pedestrian or bicycle
not met for 2020 condition. improvements.
TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
Do improvements meet design Yes,left turn lanes provided Yes,left turn lanes provided Yes,left turn lanes provided Yes,but additional improvements
Safety standards that would provide for a throughout and railroad throughout and railroad throughout and railroad required to accommodate 2020 No
safe transportation facility? crossing upgraded. crossing upgraded. crossing upgraded. conditions at Bryant/Lakeview.
Is 20 year level of service standard Yes/Yes Yes/Yes Yes/Yes No/No No/No
met?Is vehicular delay acceptable?
Yes for the short term,but
Traffic Mobility Inadequate travel times
additional improvements required
Are corridor travel times acceptable? Yes for the 2020 condition. Yes for the 2020 condition. Yes for the 2020 condition. to provide adequate travel time for for both short term and
2020 conditions. long term conditions.
Are pedestrian facilities consistent Yes,sidewalks provided on Yes,sidewalks provided on Yes,sidewalks provided on Yes,sidewalks provided on both No,no sidewalks
Pedestrian provided,but existing
with City's Transportation Plan both sides of the street both sides of the street both sides of the street sides of the street throughout
Circulation provided? throughout corridor. throughout corridor. throughout corridor. corridor. limited pathway to
remain on east side.
0 No,no bicycle lanes
Yes,bicycle lanes provided Yes,bicycle lanes provided on Yes,bicycle lanes provided on Yes,bicycle lanes provided on both
Are bicycle facilities consistent with provided,but existing
Bicycle Circulation on both sides of the street both sides of the street both sides of the street sides of the street throughout
City's Transportation Plan provided? throughout corridor. throughout corridor. throughout corridor. corridor. limited pathway to
remain on east side.
IMPACTS
Property Impacts Number of properties affected II II 14 9 0
Square footage of ROW required 16,750 13,700 13,650 10,850 0
Number of trees,5-8 inches,9-18 5"-8" - 23 5"-8" - 19 -5"-8" - 25 5"-8" - 18 5"-8" - 0
Tree Displacement inches and over 18 inches in 9"-12" - 5 9"-12" - 4 9"-12" - 7 9"-12" - 3 9"-I2"- 0
diameter displaced over 12"-17 over 12"- 5 over 12"— 2 over 12"- 5 over 12"-0
650 sq ft impact to Lamont 650 sq ft impact to Lamont 650 sq ft impact to Lamont
Environmental Environmental Impacts Springs Springs Springs 320 sq ft impact to Lamont Springs No change
Number of off-street parking spaces 8 head in stalls at West Bay 8 head in stalls at West Bay 8 head in stalls at West Bay 8 head in stalls at West Bay Center
Off Street Parking impacted _Center removed. Center removed. Center removed. removed. No change
Number of on-street parking spaces 2 parallel stalls added at 2 parallel stalls added at West 2 parallel stalls added at West 2 parallel stalls added at West Bay
On-Street Parking provided West Bay Center Bay Center Bay Center Center No change
Number of driveways to be 0 driveways closed
0 driveways closed 0 driveways closed 0 driveways closed 0 driveways closed
Driveways Affected closed number of driveways 16 driveways reconstructed 16 driveways reconstructed 16 driveways reconstructed 15 driveways reconstructed 0 driveways
reconstructed reconstructed
Capacity improvements Capacity improvements should
Neighborhood How is traffic affected on local should encourage traffic to Capacity improvements should Capacity improvements should encourage traffic to use Bryant Will increase as
Traffic Infiltration streets? use Bryant instead of local encourage traffic to use Bryant encourage traffic to use Bryant instead of local streets in the short background traffic
instead of local streets. instead of local streets. term until Bryant/Lakeview volumes increase
streets
becomes over capacity.
Cost Estimate Planning level construction cost 51,555,000 51,330,000 $1,335,000 51,325,000 SO
estimate(not including right-of-way)
038
ORDINANCE 2312
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, GOAL 12, TRANSPORTATION,
PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN IN RESPONSE TO THE BRYANT ROAD CORRIDOR
PLAN (LU 01-0029)
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Lake Oswego City Council on October 16,
2001, to review the Planning Commission recommendation to amend the Comprehensive Plan,
Goal 12, Transportation Public Facilities Plan;
The City of Lake Oswego ordains as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the Findings, Conclusions and Order(LU 01-0027)
attached as Exhibit"A".
Section 2. The Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan, Goal 12, Transportation Public Facilities
Plan is hereby amended by deleting the text shown by Gtrikeout and adding the new text shown
in redline and underline.
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 1-10 Years
Map Location Description Estimated Potential
# Cost Funding
(1997$) Source
T-21 Bryant Turn lanes, upgrade Installation of a $200,000 SDC
Road/Lakeview Dr. traffic signal, minor intersection $325,0003
Boulevard improvements and acquire necessary (Does not
rights-of-way include
right-of-way
cost)
T-53' Bryant Rd, Lakeview Widen to three lanes Add bike lanes $ 90,000 SDC
Boulevard to Boones and sidewalks on both sides, $1,326,0003 NLFS
Ferry Road reconstruction of the at-grade railroad (Does not
crossing, add a north/southbound left include
turn lane at Lakeview, and acquire right-of-way
necessary rights-of-way. (Reference cost)
projects P-40 and B-16)
T-81 Bryant Road/Upper Installation of a traffic sSignal3 $4-2-0,000 SDC
Drive minor intersection improvements and $385,0003
acquire necessary rights-of-way (Does not
include
right-of-way
cost)
2 These projects resulted from the Boones Ferry Road Corridor Plan,a refinement study completed in 2001,
which identified a preferred plan for the Boone Ferry Road corridor.
3 Estimated cost in 2001$. 039
EXHIBIT F-4
Public Facilities Plan: Transportation Improvement Program 11-20 Years
Map Location Description Est. Cost Potential
# (1997$) Funding
Source
P-40 Bryant Rd between Sidewalks on both west sides $85,000 SDC,
Lakeview/Boones See T-5 NLFS
Ferry Road
B-16- Bryant Road, between Bike lanes on both sides $232,000 SDC,
Childs Lakeview See T-5 NLFS
Boulevard and
Boones Ferry Road
B-16 Bryant Road, between Bike lanes on both sides SDC
Al Lakeview and Childs NLFS
Road
Read by title and enacted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego
held on the day of , 2001.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
EXCUSED:
Judie Hammerstad, Mayor
Dated:
ATTEST:
Robyn Christie, City Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
David D. Powell
City Attorney
P/case files/lu 00-0029/ordinance 2312
040