HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - 2011-02-14 AGENDA CITY OF LAKE OSWBGO
LAKE OSWEIGCI
Centennial 1914-]01Q PLANNING COMMISSION MDETING 38C1 A Avemuei
$' ACI 3E
Monday,� Feiru ' 4� 2011 Lake Clswegc4(IRJ970:14
:210 p.m.
50-62154 29C1
City Hall - Cc unci] Chamber www.d.oswego.omus/plan
Contact: Iris McCaleib Also publish ed on th e intermit at:
Email: imcclalebPai.osweleo.or.us www.ai.oswelgo.or.us/plan/glanning-commission
Rh one: 503-691-659]1
Th e meeting location is aacessit le to kleirsiorlsi with disat fifties. To IIEIC uesl aaeommoc ation's, please contact
Iris M aCalet at 903-697-65511, 48 h ours I afore the meeting.
11. CALL TO ORDER
7. ROLL CALL
3. CITIZEN COMMENT-Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda (3 minute limit per individual)
This is an opportunity to raise issues regarding Rlanning or Citizen Inveilvemelnt.
4. CCIUNCIL UPDATE
9. RUBLIC HEARINGS
1119.31 Ordinance 39216, LU 08-0094-Community Development Code- Rolicyl Related Housekeeping
Amendments. Amenc trent' (Chapter 9(11 for the purpose of clarifying arid u pdatin'g variou s aoc e
provisions. Th Else provisions have t EIEIn identified asi having policy implications. This heaping is
continuec from Octaber 25,, 2011(1. Staff will requ est that th is hearing be continuec to a date
certain'. Staff coordinator is DollraAncreades, Senior Planner
Fos MORE INWRMATICA 'VISl1 'h ttpr://ww w.cif osw eao.orL us/plan/cosef htm
Select LI U 08-00514
5.2 LU 10.0042-Zoning Overlay fop Industrial Park IR District
A rec uest by th e City of Lillie Oswego for legislative amenc rronts to the Comprehensive Man Map,
Zoning Map and Community development Code to create a coning overlay Ion the Inc ustrial Park
(IR] District. The new overlay (IP-O] will allow office,, sElrviclEl and limitec retail WIEis. Th is hearing is
continuec from November 22, 2010. Staff c'oordi'nator is Dennis Egret!,Assi's'tant Plann°ng D°rector.
Flu?NIOREI,WRG RMWTIOAI VISIT-http://www.cLmindego.ortus/plan/cosef.htm
Seilect LU 10.0042
6. OTHER RUSIN099- RLANNING COMMISSION
7. OTHER BUSINESS-CCIMMISSION RCIR CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
8. SCHEDULE REVIEW
. ADJOURNMENT
Jcin C u:tafson,C hair • Lynne Paaetchan,Vice C hair
Pdlja HI-Litanii • Julia Glisson • Jim Johnson • Russell Jones a Tbdd Prager • Bill'I ierney,Council Iliaisan
. . -_�
1
C I'DY OF LAKE OSWEGO
• Centennial 1910 2010
3E10AANenue
PO Box 3E9
Lak e Ojlweelo,011 91034
MEMO RA NDUIM503-E 35-(1270
www Lci.oswrega.arus
TO: Rlar Hing Con rriisision
FROM: Raul EsFlei,Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Zoning Overlay for Industrial Park Distnic1 - Final Traffic Analysis IILU 10-0042)
DATE: November 119, 2010
Analysis I Background
The proponent su t mitieic a preliminary traffic analysis QExhit it F-1] on Clatoben 79, 3CI110.A final version was
su bmitted an Novemt er 15i, Rafter th Ei Noveimit air 112 stall report was put list cc:.
Sli{lh t at argEis wane made to same of the c ai a in i h El October traffic study. Ron EDDamplei,the re%iced analysis
Si atesi that approximately 340,000 square feet of allowed uses cicru Id be developed in the district over tF El ne>t
75 year..This is re%isec from 400,000 square feet it the 1Ire%ious study. Changes in the%eh Me trips wane also
nevisec downward t asEic on i h isi rec ucii ion in square footage.
These cit ages dic not affect the ou i come of tF El stuc y which concludes that th e proposal will nesu It in traffic]
genenatian that is at ar below LCISI E. Sltaff su mmarizec the re%isec tnaffici study arc notes that this 5.1L persedes
thEi information fou nd in the pre%iousi draft traffics study dated October 29; arid fir c ings under Goal 12,,9u t®oal
11, Policy 11 in the November Staff Report.
Findir gs
Goal 12.Tr r snc rtatior:Slu beoal 11: Maic r Street System
Lake Clswego Compnehersive Rlari, Goal 112 Transportation, Policy 91
The 1 raffic si u c y conch c ec that tF El assessment sh owsi that uric er a neasarable worst-aase rec e‘elopment
scenario over the course of 25 years, appInmimately 1141CI weekday p.m. peak houn trips will be generated with
the Flroposiec zone on erlay. The analysis found t oth th Ei.lean Way/Bowes Berry Ram and Rilkington
Road/Boonesi Fen Road interseai ions will ciorii inue 1a operate at an acceptable level of service during the
forecasi y can of 2035.
41 The existing 340,000 squ are feet of development is estimated 1a produ ce aFIFIrw imately 299 weekc ay
PM peak F our i rips.
• lel rede‘elopmerit wens to occit q, a reasonat le worst-cease de%elopment scenario wh icih does riot asisu me
Pa€IEI 2
a gnowth in overall useablEl spacEI wau Id @Ienelraite 3140 additional waakda PM peaty hours trips fon a total
of ap ro)imately c 219 trips.
Uric ar e)istirlhl conc itions, the Jean Way / 9oones Henry Road anc Pilkington Road / 9oones Fanry Road
irltElrsecilionns both operatEl at an alcl(IEIFIlat le IEI\al-of-sElr\ICIEI II LOS "B" c urin€I the wEleNcay FIM Real'
Hou II.
• Dulling the F orizan year of 3039, withcwt redeiueloprr ent and amended zar ing uses, the Jean
1h ay/9oones Renny Roac iril arsecition is lonacast to openate at LOS "C" and 1F e Rilkin®ton Road / 9oones
Flerny Roac intansElatiorl is foreciaii to operatEl at LCI9 "D".This asst mEls a 39 pencant growl F inI
k aiclk€ground 1 raffic alar)€l Boanas Parry Raad (as neflactErc in th El Metro 3039 Moc Ell .
• Dulling tha h orizorl year of 3039, with redeveilopmelrit to the amended aorling Imes, both study
intersections sire fonecast to apErralEl at LCIS D ortatterr. This meets the intersection oplenatin8
starlc ards along 9oones Rerury Roac pnosanibed in th El Compel- Plan.
Conclusion:The proposal will result in trafilicl€generation 1F al is at an below LCI9 9, 1 h e th nas h olc estat lisp EIC for
11.is policy. The Flraposed IR-O district is cionsisterll wit F this rialiciy.
9�I h i bits
R-31.1 Transporlatiarl Study fnom k ittelson &I Associates emben 19, 3010
•
4110
KlTT8USON & ASSOCIATE' S . INC .
ll R A N S FICI R ll AI T I O N E N G I T' S E R I N GI / P L AI I\ f` ING
• 610 SW Alder Street. tIuite 700, Portland, CIF!97205 503 228.523( 503.275.8169
November 15, 301( Project#: 11371.CI
Dcin IH arson
C TA K
17355 SW Boones Ferry Road
Lake Oswego,CR 97039-5217
RE:llnaustiial Panic Zone Oveillay Dam poriation Evaluation
Dear Dan,
Her your requesi Kittelsan &Associates, Inc. IiKAI; has completed a sketch-levell assEissment of the
proposed Industrial Bark zone overlay on a 32.3 acre) site] Iiexcluding right-cif-way; in Lake
Cswego, Crclgan. The siiel of the proposed overlay is generally loclateld betwieeln Jean Way arc
Illilkingian Road and betwleeln Willow Lanes and ihel railroad tracks north of Boones Ferry Idoad.
Cuiirelnily, this area has approximately 340,C00 square) feet of leasat le space and existing users that
incduc el ctllilicie, retail,,light inc uslrial and warehousing.
City staff requested that this sketch-level assessment use a hloriacin year of 2(139 even though the
. Cit31 e),pacts to prepare) a master plan in the ne)1 five 10 tern years for the district that includes this
site. Thus, Mclira's adopled 2(35 traluell dem anc model arid iloileciasi are used as the Calsis for this
assessment.The land use assumptions contained in ttel Metro mac ell for this area cif Lake Cswegci
are cansisteni with current City zoning anc, lherefarel, dci not lief elcl the propasec zone overlay
any C ity master planning canciepts.
14 EY ASISUM P11110N51
Several assumptions wade] required to produce a meaningful assessment, which wares developed
with]the assistance of Cit31 staff, as listed below.
• C rclzuth in the Mlc tro 2033 T1iIavd ll Demand Mew el. The Transportation Analysis Zone
(TA 0) whlerel the site is located contains more than 50 acres of land. The ]C139 fareciast
includes more than e (CI percent increase] in the] number oil vehicle) trips lo and from the
7:IAAA1. aonia:inin€I the]sites. It is assumed Ihat chis grown- does not occur on ihle 22.3-acre sites,
nail dcies the growth reflect the proposed overlay zone or the City's potential district
master planning.
• Change of Use on the J2. I-Glcie rite. It is assumed chat appro)imatelly 29 percent Isar
89,0(C square) feet ail the developed area cm the] 22.3-acre site would redevelop :intci new
uses alllcawcld unc er ihle proposed zoncl ciuerlay. Fuiiihelr, in accordance with the
assumption above, this change of uscl arid increase in vehicular trip generation would be
1111
in addition to what is ref ecied in the Metro 2039 mloc ell.
EXH18171 F-1.1
FILEN ME:11: ICLfhi 113171-LOZCWINGORD1N,4NCEfMLFNLIMENTREnoRTIF)NALIPROPGISLFDZCWE Lu 110-004.2
CIkERLAY LO NOV 2C11LlDOC
Irauslrial Park Zcine Overlay 7rransgarfa lion Ely aluatic n 1371.0 I
No'.eirnbeir:5, 2C.C Aage:
ail2 I35 Bac)clgr clund Truic Volumes.'Ilhet Metra 2(139 mloc lel forecasts traffic volumes an •
Boonels Berry Road will gnaw al an equivalent annual rate of 1.4 percent. Part cd this
increase is attiibutable to the growth in traffic demands to and from the 11AZ containing
the 32.3-acre site. It is assumed that none of this increased traffic demand is attiibulablet to
1 he proposed zone au erlay for the 23.3-acre site. (Isee Allem ix A for the Metrc regonc 1 me del
plc is cf this area fcr Nears 2C105 c na 2(135).
ASSESISIM ENT 5111EPS
11He sketch-level] transpaiilatlan assessment applies a "Reasonable) worst-case" approach to the
proposed waylay ?lane. Any "nett new trips" that result irctml the proposed (waylay are assumed
to be in addition lo all assumed growth in the overall BA 21 thiaugh the horizon year cd 2039.
11Hree discrete steps were used to accamiplish this assessment, as described below: •
• Step 1 ideintifed the potential trip gleneratlon impact of]he new zoning additions
ilassumes 85,000 square feet of existinEi uses change to uses allowed by the aveday ;
• Step 3 established a reasonable Redevelopment scema nio ail specific uses arid sizes;and,
• Step 3 estimated traffic volumes and compared the resulting operations of the Jeiar
Alay/Boones Ferry Road and Pilkington Road/Baanes Ferry Road intersections under the
current and proposed uses and redevelopment scenario.
PROPC SED ZONE OVERLAY TO INDUSITRIAL BARK •
01,:r understanding is that the followin€1 aorta overlay language is being proposed by the
applicant to the City:
Sections 5(1.13.(123 Bern itted Uses;Industria Had Clverlah Zone.
1. All uses allow e d in tt e 111 zone(Sect ion 50.113.020 ex cep I as c iii esw is e mad.:fi ed below.
2. Professional atIfices (includes cfllice space fcir engineering, survelirig, law, asch'iecture, planning), and
landscape aiiahitect ure;.
3. Genesial allfice uses
4. Medical cd6Gces and dillies (irialudes dental, a111rthalmia and at her similar medical uses; limitec to less
than 20,0(10-60,000 sq.11t.cif€!toss area).
5. Commercial photographic studicis.
6. Sioiage (limited to commercial self-storage faci ities curly and sutject to the specie sequiremerite oil
Sec ion 50.13.040(9;)
7. Fet care,dail}I (fulll}I erwlosed within a tu.'lcing).
8. Bquipment sales, lienla], repair and serviae (limitec to arthapedia and medical equipment and office
equipment;limitec to less than 10,0(10 sq.lit.c f€!moss area).
9. Appliance and electsanics serlair (includes radio, teleuisian, anc camp.ter repair anc repair oil home
appliances.
:10. Rest au rant,delicatessen,anc speciiaised foot stone(less than 2,0(10 sq.Il.in glnos: area;co-]dictated within
alit(ilc ing with a permit tec u se;anc no c rive-thni seruiae).
11. Catering service.
12. Carnnmeacial recreation (less than 5,000 sq. ft. ail glnoss area; itdud es athletic and healt}I clubs, Jiacque
dulls,billiard anc pool!)tartans,baw lir g alleNs,skating Cr railer rinks;excludes movie theateiis).
13. Retail sales oil tires,flatteries,and molaii vehicle accessories(less than 20,000 sq.ft.)
11111
Kitte Iscr &Assciciateis, Inc. Anrtlanc, Oregcin
Inc ustrial Park Zona Overlay Tranisularta tfon avaluation 1137..0
Not enitle a 15, 2010 Plage: 3
• ecEan 5(1.13.(1271 C oriditianal Uses;Industrial Bark OverlaA Zane.
:1. All uses al awed condi tion use in the IA sone (Section 5(.13.025) e)ceps as citherwi:a modif ed in
Sdctian 9(1.13.(123 ops be ow.
2. Bet care,,daily ipartial y conducted outsides 2 i buil
11R3IR GENERATION AND DEVELC RMENT SC ENAR]G
liable I lists the EDisttng and proposed land USEIS fon the overlay and summarizes their vehicular
trip generating characteristics), based an tt e Insltltute of Transportation Eingineersi' (LIE) Trip
Generation,, 8th Bdlition„ an industry reference used by the City. As slHown,, the trip generation nate
for tt a Industrial Park use, al awed under cur-ren 1 zoning, is lower than all but the Commercial
Si orage use proposed as a pan of tt a overlay. Thee eforE, it is i eason abl a to o+pest that the
proposed overlay would result in more trips being generated,, on average,, than with the current
Zoning.
In additior to piraviding iota] vehicular trip generation rates foi each land use,, ITEI''s 'Ilripl
Generation Handbook) 2nd Edition' was used to determine the appropriate net vehicular trip
generaf on rates.It is apprapriaite to reduce tte iota] vehicular trip generation for certain uses that
at-ti ac 1 plass-by trips from the adjaceni streetl or capture trips from within the area and serve them
as r on-auilo trips.
STABLE 11 ASSUMED ITE TRIP RATE SI
Week day
ITS p.m. peak Assiunned Net Weekday
Cant Usiei Coc es Unit h ciu r Rasiss-b y F ate p.m.peak h our
existing uses allowEld by existing zoring area eel imaied usiirigl the ITE rates far]rclusstoial Park
Inc ustrial Park 130 1,CIOCI's SFGFA a.BEI a% a.8EI
New L seas aliciw eid unc esr FIiiopascsd zones averlay
Inc ustnial Park 130 1,a0C1's SFIGFIA C1.8E1 a% 0.8E1
General Offices Space(lnduc incl 11 CI 1,a0C1's SFGFA 1.451 q% 1.451
Flrofessional services)
Med ical-)]ental 72CI 1,a0CI's SFGFA 3.4E1 0% 3.4E1
Offices Sufic ing
Spegialty Retail Ceinlen
illndudinig office and 814 1,00CI's 9RGFIA 2.711 a% 2.711
arthapeic is equiFlment:
Illimil of ia,ocia 9FGnA:
t ITE,,TbiiFl Generuit,ic n Handlnok„2" Editions,,June 2004.
Kittelton SI Associates, Incl. Pclrtilanc,, Oregon
Ir custruail ParMM Zove Overlay Trarspcirtaticrn Evalualior 1:1111.0
Ncivernter 15, 2611 Cl Page:
Restaurant, DeilicaIessein, and •
9pErcialized Food EItcniEi 933 7,OCIa's EIFCIFA 2E1.15 83% e.e 5
Ilirriil cif 2,(ICI(I SFGNPI)
Alutamabilei Carer Clenten
Ilincluding sales ail tires, 942 :,aCIC1's EIFGFA 3.3E1 43% 1.z 5
battEiniEi9 anc acaess(iniErs'
ClammEircial Storage :51 1,aCICI's 9FGFA 0.2E1 ci,i1 0.2E1
QMini Storage}
I-eat hilFitnEi9s Club
IFlecreaticin center') 4c12 1,CICICI's EIFGFA 4.CIE1 CI°I z .0E1
Ilimit cif 5,0C10 SFCIFAI;
Pet Dai Caner Clanton No data available'
1 - Catering SErrrvicErs, Commercial Phatagnaphic Studia, and Appliance and ElEratranic Repair'in general would lit the
typiaal use Fatterins oil an industriial park with each oil them being a cambinaticin all light induslriial, limited scale
manufacturing and ccrmmErrcial puacuctian space with an e)gectatian cif limited custam€rri visits.
- Na data cuurlErntly is available flan pErt day care centers. llhis analysis ass umEis s hat they will in general draw
customers Pram the si'mounding area QEiither gaing to cur coming Oram work). As si ch i1 will nal be included in this
analysis'redevelaprnent scenario.
REASIONABIJE REDEVEIJOPIM Eh T SIC Eh AMMO
Ctak provided a redevelopment scenaria that applies several ail these:land uses io a portion of the
2:I.3-acre site. The following specific assurrptilons were used to create the redevelopment •
sCIE lnario:
• 22.3 ac rer9 (EDi ciuding right-of way of existing industrial park arid roughly 34(1,0CICI square
feet ail elxisting developable spacer;
• 25 percerni I fI9,CIC0 square feet ail existing developed sflaccr; will redevelop as one oil ihe
proposed uses in the overlaN; and,
Disiiiibuiion ail the redeveloped square-footagler across the allowed uses was developed by
Ciak and c iscussed with the City.
B ased on these assumptlans, liable 2 documents the uses assumed, thle square-foota8e ail each,
and the total and net new trips that are estimated to result if all assumptions are reali2ied.
•
Kittleilsan 61 Assciciates, Irc. artier c, Oreglcin
Indastrial Aar M cone Overby Transportation Elvaluatian 1:1:1711.(1
Navemtler 15, 301CI Page: 5
.
TABLE 21 TRIR GENERATION ESTIMATE UNDER EXISTING AND REASONABLE W CIIRIST-
CIAISE RE DEIVELCIPM ENT SCENAIRIO
P.M. Peak Hour Total Net New
Trip Generation Vehicular Vehicular
1,000s Rate Per 1,000s P.M. Peak P.M. Peak
Land Use ITE Code S.F.G.F.A S.F. Hour Trips Hour Trips
Existing Zoning Code
Industrial Pank :30 340 CI.88 295 CI
TOM 1 295 C
Reascnalile Worst Carie
Industrial Pank 130 155 CI.861 120 -75
Offices Elpaaei 710 41 1.49 EI(I EICI
Fast Fciad Restaunants 933 7 4.45 3(1 30
`-FlEIcialty Retail 814 3(1 3.71 55 I 55
Medical and Dental Clfficei Spaces 730 1(1 3.461 35 35
Ancillary lyes Clorripas it El 7 5 35 35
Tafel 340 435 140
Current uses on the site 2111E1 estimateic io generale approximately 2SI5 net new vehicular trips on
the transpaiilatiari system. If the overlay is approvec and the redevelopment scenario is aclhieved,,
• then approximately 190 additional nips would result on the system,, as compared is the current
uses.
IMPACT C F PROPCSIEC OVERLAY AND REDEVELC PMENT SCENARIC
Weekday p.m. peak hour traffic aounis were collected in Cctcit er 201CI for the Jean Way/Boones
I eirry Iaoad and Pilkingtan/Boones Ferry Road intersections. A Highway C Tacit!) Nlanucill (HCW)
analysis was performed to determine) a base level ail intersection perfcirmiance. Figure 1 i:llustraies
ihei inteiisections' lane configurations anc existing p.m. peak hciur operations. See Appendix B jair
tl ra ff c c aunts an a Sin tins a worksheets.
Based an'liable 2, a reasonable redevelopment scenario was dcve1loped wrlict incielases the acme's
trip genematicin estimate by 190 weekday p.rri. peak hour tiips. These trips were distributed based
cm the existing ft ming movemeni percentages at the intersections. Pei ITE 7llrip Gen era tion, 8CI% cif
trips generated by the industrial park were assumed to t El leaving the area, while 20% wetie
assumed tote enlering. Figure 2 i:llustrales tt ei assumed irip distrib ution of the 140 new trips and
the inlersecltion operations for ihEl fcirecast year ail 2CI35 Ilassumiing 1.9 percent yearly t ackground
gtiawth)for both the background arid wish the overlay.
Based on the assumec redevelopment scenario, traffic operations will meet tie prescribed
intersection operaling standarc is mair lain an iniersecition :level-of-service "D" at both the lean
Way/Booms Ferry Iaoad and Pilkington Road/Boones Ferry liciad iniersecliions.
•
KittEiisan&Associates, Inc. PartAarnc, Oregon
Lail eIOsweglciInc ialina/Parr Zont Amercmerd November IK 16
i ill1
f ,
•
o c), 0 \ 1
2 �A x 710-5-.L.- 1..:711‘71:1's/-----:.
HCISEVYOOD AQP .z •.-CO
— GQ ��cF O ,, r1
x
a
1 WILLOW
I
Li
KJ
C.I'I UI
C I I
I 1 -I
33 i
F — --IAEE
W
i
JEAN WAY PILKINGTCII` ROAD,I •
ci BCIONES RBRRY ROAD BCIONES RERRY ROAD
Z.
i 7 .--.4
(74.----.
'LAO E CONFIGURATICIF � II ,. i
E -1 ter'
K.,..
a *w :91 aW
,
a
`c
Ir (---
r-— anan� �v
P ;IC11C19XIS1IING .1 l ti` .11‘...
g OPERATIONS 91 l osme t5 4 J LCIS= tl<5
—4 Dek1610 4-991; 6Dela 11.1 4—�
o 354 \C..0.76 c 12(1•14 wc..0.73
a sir •sir
a
cue FIE
a
,I
i, LEGEt`0
S.
a
1 LCE I=Il h]REIICITION LEVEL CIA SBRVICIE
.
Q
•a
Clel=INTE RBECTIOrs /IVBRACIE(ION TRCIL DELA Y
8 ENISTING LANE CONFIGURATION FIGURE0
9 ‘,IC=CIRCfICIAL VCILUIuE-110CARACITYRATICI WEEKDAY PM PEAK HCIURTRAIRRIC CIPEIRATIONS
LAKE OSV EGCI OREGON -
i< KITlIIELS.CIN 8 ASSC CTIA I1ES,INC.
1RA P SRORTA TIC N EIP GIP ERRINCI/ALAN'',ING
Lad e i Oswego k dusilrie I PG 4-k Zc ne 1 mendme nl Novembdr 2014I
1
/ -< - �sNC,_ .
III `444p. ___-
21 1
0P -C
Q. r 1=012
G,3.� 1 w . ‘• --1
o
CP z
0 Xi
I 1
WILLCW
............. .
C-
4 ,alZ
al
j
U , _ _____ , ' ' :
Z /
.BAN WAYI PILKINGTON ROAD/
BOCNBS RBRRY ROAD BOC N B.I FERRY ROAD
47.-0,
Z RRC ROSED 5� �,5 1—..
TRIP DISTRIBUTION 10-.4 5-.4 if 10
N
C
46 T ';1(1.19 BACH GROUND ti 'f k'
ORBRATIC NS' 5, Lasa k 10 5J LaS C k 5
4,1 111160— De1.33.E 4-1261 910-1 Del 1.E 4-995
u 46O- V/C.II.94 r 20 165-1 V/CI.0.67 or 450
� 1r Mfr
FA in
a,
._. )
1
g
cn
2CI39 AMENDED .4.4-' ,,'vNt,
OPERATICINS1 1` k'
1, 105.D X 11 45 ) 1094 11...d
1061--i DeI=4.1 4-1291 915-1.De1.35.4 —995
.I90y 11/(=0.99 ,4-20 110-1 Vco.IC e"40
0
y -, t4- qtr
5 r51Z
a1
a LBCIBND
c
m
e LOS=Its TERSEC11IION LEVEL CIF SERVICE
H
E Del=IN TER:1ECI1110N AVERAGE CCINIIRCIL DELAY Alsurl es a conservati�e 41I cement be ckgrounc veva
di PRCIPCISED 1IRIP DISTIRIBUIIICIN AND BAC KRCIUND& FICu RE
11111.1-6 WC=CIRITICIAIIVCILUNE-110-cvIPAICIf1YRAMO AMENDED 20.19 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CIREFATIICINS i
__a /
LAKE CISW BGICI CIREGON
KITTELSON& ASSOCIATES,INC.
K
UR/Ir'SROR1.17ION ENGINEEIRIIt C1,1 FILA N hits
]nc usitrial ParAl Zane Oveirla y Tr nspartatian Evaluation 1.13x1.0
Navemtler 15, 2G1C Pacle: 8
Conclusion •
911i s ass€ssmE ni shows that under a rE asonat le w asst-c ase re de ATE lopment s c a nario over I he
course all 29 ye ars, approx:imiatE ly 190 micire weekday p.m. peak hour traps will be gene rat ed w i th
the pilaposed zone ave rlay. This me sults in the following cont lusians:
• The existing 340,00(1 square feet of d€Ivelapmelni is estimat€cI to pracluce approximate ly
2515 wee kdaN ]3M peak hour vehicle trips, based an I'IIE Trip C er erciiicn.
• If the re c level apme ni were i o oc cur, a re asanable worsi-case de vel apmelni see nario, which
does not assume a growth in overall useable space, would generate 190 adclitional
weekday BM pe al< hour T rips for a tai al of approximate ly 935 irips.
• Ulnder existing conditions, the Jean Wlay/Boones Ferry Road arid 11ilkinglon Road/Boories
Ferry Road intersections both operate at an acceptable le Uel-of-seiivicie (Rios, "B" during
the WE ekday BM peak hour.
• During the horizon year ail 2(135, without the nedeivelopmlent and amended aching uses, the
Jean Wlay/Boones Ferry Road intersection is forecast to operate at UCS "C" arid the
Pilkington Flaacl/BoonE s Ferry Road intersection is fore(asi la ape rale at IIO9 "D". '➢his
assume s a 39 pert€Iril growth in backgiiaund traffic along Boanels Ferry Road Ilas re fie ctec
in 1 he ME tro 3039 model;.
• During the Horizon year cd 2039, w,'th the nedeivelc pmlent tc the amended zoning uses,, •
bcith stuc y intE nselctlans are floret asi to operate at UCS "D" ar better. Th,'s ?nuts
is
interlseciticn operating stall ands Along l9ciclnes Flcrry Road.
WE trust this letter has answe i cid all of your clue stions in regards to I he pnaposed industrial park
none rlay located in Lake Cswe€lo, Oregon. If you have any questions please clo nal hes:ilate to
call (15(13, 228-923(1.
9inc€Ire ly,
KIT11EUSCN &ASSCCIA➢EEI"INC.
p W o
Alex Kiher' lhillip h
llransportation Analyst Hrincipa] lalannE r
110
Kittei/scvi &Assiociateis, Inc. flcirtlanc, Clneslcin
0
ARPENDIX "A"
METRIC 10M DATA
S
AUTO VOLUMES
kms/
;��1t � �v IN, ( LINKS:
ti„-
Z2 gIF .tyre=9.999,1
.L— N M i
:P' ' 2,
\:/// /, oo ic%
, \\ 3�=3 L -,%5:.-'0i1-
�? 166 _
�i�, 665 4
do / as iI39 _
7Q�L• - AC' -%
pf,/,�9 N
Co N
co
i �1 '
'. •
oI i
/
�\
N
N 03
La• E.3 ,..6,,,, „-,-nP- 'co' ttfL
� ��bb/% '� e' 3�� 935 _ v Is;
/
/ 959 _ 594
J�,, 3443 ;i 1323 — 1188
1225
t 4 4 / 2454-i 9,0 /
i 1
0,6;7 / e\, %a
F9 LOCr, la
// , / CO v
L.D'/ l/ \okS \ �O0i�-
f / o's.
7! J J
m WINDOW:
0
gl/ I a.T
///..j��O �I^ 56 4
1 443.8/121 .729
1445.3/121 .729
v v
EMME/2 PROJECT: 2035 RTP UFC iter1 10 ?1 01 13:38
SCENARIO 6606: 2035 RTP UFC iter1 _m2 assign MODULE: 6.12
INRODEMO. . .000
411 Ln
0 • .
AUTO VOLUMFS -
•
r g0 N/U-,4 oI LINKS:
n� ),,,,:f
% ti N ' ',-ve..=9.999.1
v66 \\
;2. roti \
1
W \ ?),I,L
‘,..-:-L"`2D�\ � r
/ Of',,,,'C.,-____-::-----312
i' 17910)
b 663
iii/ � �
v t..off m
,009i
9%c2`6 \No ,I -;:z.
-"a%'\`'
.0 r -,
i' rn'o
/1 $6
ca co
co tn
j Mi iO
OND l '//'
c:,
1 /-
tfl
;
j i 23 '2 1` i%
-rumn IN1 `,,.
I A ' LL
\�,, UPPER boon ES FERR /
'\\\1/ ``� BERG 15 r
\,,\ p -�`` 72ND 72ND Q -r� -•
�\ moi..
1\�\" r`�'`'. .CAR ../';';>‘‘
‘‘
M 16 Ii
n
Oc
I PILKINDTON N12 iii
u
il 1. / , ,.
2 y� Wel VGA -
R 497}1 _
a
ill
I
-2YANT
rn Rp,0
/ ,. A TERRYi/ S s a NINu
,,
,,
11/ TAFFO flu
„,,
!I/ „ FERN' ..i
/� TR Q. O
] to 1
1
f 171
Z gOd0 61 o
A
d m
Jail D m o n -
�/ z
�I m `
III14 11
�� BER._ } g i .
r ,/p _ .
• ii • _
.
•
ARPENDI]X 'B"
TRARRIC CIC UNTS AND
SVINCHRC WIC RKSHEE11S
•
llypel cif peak haur being reportec:Ely:tern Petal Method fon determining peak hour:Tata!Entering'olumel
L OCA TIOIN: Jean Way —Um en Bloom's Ferry Rc C C JOB#: 10950'1CH
CITY,ISTATE: Lake Oswego. CR DATE: 10/20/2010
0 26 1.09 16 PE1ak-Haur:5:00 RN —(1:(10 PM 0.11 0.0
41 41 Reck 19-Mire: 5:00 RM—.5:15 PN a a
I
8 5 13 0.0 0.0 (.0
J 41 V 44 4 4.
13154.9 J t 6 41146
1.7 4 a.o J y 11.04. 1.1
1.00 788 41 0.911 • 976 1.91
1.4 41. AP « 1.7
11944.3111 -4 C 141•129
7"II 41 f' � 1SI 4.a.8 7 41 8.0 4. 1.3
7*f 41 P
311 5 '6 Q_c uatil4. Cauntil ,.6 41 1.0
11 1 1
3800.8114114 R 1 41 111 r"
8.8 1.4
Ic
' 41 I.1._
I J .",, t a
0i i3 3 * < * 2
_ ,� 4 V " C a
� , �
a
F
� � 3 0 ,
r
I-
-..
--►
4 1
.r i Ey .".7f 4 L1 it
J it I.
J t I J — t
44
Ng"clw c
7 .„ 1 er_ 71 i
...F.__ 0
15-Min Count ,lea n Way Jean Way Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd
Reriad (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) .. , 1 Hourly
Beginning Alt 1 Left Thru Rioht U I Left _Thru Riaht U 1 Left Thru Riaht U 1 Left Thru Riaht U I Totals _
4:00 PM 103 1 8 0 2 2 8 0 4 138 91 0 4 234 5 600
4:15 RM 81 '1 3 0 7 '1 2 0 2 2'1'1 79 0 41 232 3 a 620
4:30 PM 85 1 9 0 7 '1 7 0 41 '182 96 0 5 266 2 a 661
4:45 PN 99 2 11 0 2 2 0 0 0 174 86 0 3 218 1 0 598 9478
1 5:00 PM. 1 118 2 9 0 1 2 '1 0 0 1 3 199 O. 13 '. 504 2542 J
5:15 Ph 86 2 5 0 4 2 1 0 0 185 94 0 5 238 2 1 624 2546
5:3014M 95 0 9 a 4 2 2 0 a 201 79 0 3 230 3 1 628 2114
5:45 PM 82 1 5 0 3 0 5 0 2 203 102 0 1 219 1 0 624 2540
Peak 15-Min I Northbound 1 Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound Total
Flowrates I Left Thru Riaht U I _Left Thru Riaht U I Left Thru Rioht U I Left Thru Riaht U
AllVehr> -472 8 36 0 8 4 0 0 12 796 344 0 20 956 0 0 — 2656
Heavy Truck; 0 a 0 0 ( 0 0 16 ,I 0 211 0 48
Pedestrians 4 0 0 0 4
Elicyales 1 a '1 0 (1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4
F aildou 0
StoppedBuses
Clommere 5:
Repoli genelraleld on 11/15120'10 1:4'1 PM EICIL RCE:Quality Counts,LLC(htti:Mwwv.gyalitNcounl .net;
•
hype 01 peak hour being leporled:.Iystem Pea' Melt od Ion de1enmining peak tour llotal Bnlening Volume
LC CIA1IC 1.: Rilkinglcin Rd —LCIWEIr Bcianes Henry Rd QCI OB#: 10950102
• CIT11/:I11A1IB: LI ake Oswego, C R DAT E: 1(1/2(1/20'10
3 o.00 2 PEIaN-Hot r: 5:00 RM--fI:CI0 PM
4I 11 a.o a.0
2 0 1 Ill Reak 151- Min: :1:00 RM-• 51:1:1 PM Ia.°
a fl a.o a.n
•
41 V
F9, •0 J 4 I «7061 ..1 41 t'
-.
1.1 4 a.o J t 01 • 1.0
5.99 66. ♦ 0.11 f 711 011
1.1 • OOP • 1.1
181• 1111 "I r 313+F 71
'I 11 f 1.1 11 1.7 7 SI a.11 41 3.E
M •t r.161 1 211
11 f
i1a: i l Counts� ts 4.3 0.0 a.11
,154 0.93 37,1 i f
1.1 1.9
_.] 0
I I d 4 t. I
a J t a
4. a "4 °..,, el 1
M f I. r 2 r
1
1
_.
_..i 11 1. J i V
..., ,„\\,:
41
• 7 r 7 �I
-1 't 1 e --1 '1 t r i
15-Min Count Pilkington Rd Pilkington Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd Lower Boones Ferry Rd
Periocl (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) ToI al H ourly
Beginning Al I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U 1 Left Thru Right U 1 Left Thru Riaht U I Totals
4:00 PM 47 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 0 131 30 0 46 173 0 0 492
,1:19 PM 32 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 29 0 73 700 1 0 181
,I::0 PM 54 0 55 0 0 0 2 0 0 111 20 0 55 110 1 0 107
4:45 PM 43 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 35 0 82 167 0 0 548 2112
1 5:00 PM I 50 0 51 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 169 30 0 I 85 184 0 0 I 569 2189 I
5:15 PM 25 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 26 0 89 191 0 0 535 2159
5:30 PM 48 0 49 0 1 0 2 0 0 180 31 0 70 193 1 0 575 2227
5:45 PM 38 1 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 34 0 89 163 0 0 548 2227
Peak 15-Min 1 Northbound I Southbound 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Total
Flowrates I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Right U I Left Thru Riaht U I Left Thru Right U I
All Vehicles 200 0 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 676 120 340 736 0 0 2276
Heav) Tru aks 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 4 8 20 0 52
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bic)cles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
S Flail roacl
Stooped Buses
Corr imenLI
Hepar genenaled on 1'1/15/20'10 1:4'1 PM SOL RC9:Quality Counts,Ll CI(http:/Awww.gualitycounts.ne1)
HCM Signalizeic Intersection Capacity) Analysis 2010 Existing RM
1: Lower Bocnes Ferry Rc 8IJean Way '11/1512010 I
f -P Z i 4- k4\ f , ' 4 4' III
int EBL EBT EHR L BT WBR NBL NBT 1~1BR SBL SST SBR
Lane Configuratioris I 1i li + 1 5 1
Valumeivphl 5 7186 354 14 939 7 385 9 39 1' 7 2
lc eal Flaw I vphpll] 1900 '19(0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 '1900 '1900 '19(10 19(10
Tota Las!time(s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.01 d.a 4.0
Lane LtiI.Faidan 1.00 0.95 '1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00
Frpb,pEld/tlikEis 1.00 (1.99 '1.00 'I.(I(I 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.(Ia
Flpt,ped/bikes 1.001 1.00 1.0( 11.(I(I 1.0(1 1.a0 1.00 '1.00
Fr! 1.00 0.99 '1.00 '.0(1 1.01(1 0.871 1.00 CI.95
Flt Pnateclec (1.95 1.00 01.95 '1.0(1 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd.Flow(plroli 1803 3382 1804 393: 1730 164E1 1805 '18(15
Fit Permittec (1.95 1.001 0.95 'I.0( 0.612 1.01(1 1.001 1.00
Satd.Flow(perm) 1803 3382 1804 3935 1521 164E1 1900 '1805
Pail-haul'faclar,PF R (1.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 (1.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 01.92
Acj.Rlowi(vph) 5 6154 385 15 1016 8 41E1 9 3E1 '2 8 4
R1OR REI uctian(40h) 0 43 0 0 1 0 (I 26 0 u 4 0
Lane Gnoupl Flow IIvq h; 9 1196 0 15 1023 0 418 13 CI 12 8 0
Confl.Pecs.I#Ihii) 2 2 2 2
Heavy VEihic a l(%) 099 1% 1% (I% 2% a% 2% 0% 051 0%( 09( 010
Turn hype Pool Flroi plm4irit prri+pd
Malec ed Phases 71 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Flermitled Phases 2 6
Ach alec Glean,C Qs] 0.5 351 0.5 39.7 21E1.'I 23.6 1.4 0.9
affective Green,g(s) 01.5 :15.71 (1.5 39.71 261.'1 23.6 1.4 0.9
Act alec giC Ratio 0.011 (1.471 (1.01 0.471 0.37 0311 (1.02 0.01
1111
CIIEianance Timis'(s; 4.01 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.01 4.0
Vehicle Enter on)(s) 3.(I 3.0 :I.CI 3.a .I.0 3.0 3.01 3.0
LanEi Grp Cap(vph) 12 1582 '12 '1654 636 910 341 21
v/s Ratite Frol 0.01(1 c0.35 c(.01 (1.29 c0.20 a.(1'1 0.C1(I (I.0(I
vis Radice Rem cC.04 0.010
v/c Radia 0.42 0.1E1 1.25 0.62 0.66 0.03 0.39 (1.361
L nilarm DEds'y,d 1 371.8 1611 37.9 15.2 '19.9 '18.4 371.1 371.4
Frogressian Factor 1.(I(I 11.0(1 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 11.01(1 11.0(1
IncremEintail Delay,c2 21.8 2.1 392.1 (1.71 2.5 0.0 61.2 11'1.3
Delay(3) 99.5 18.8 390.0 15.9 22 4 18.4 43.3 481
Leval al Service E B Fl B C B 1] C
Approach Delay els) 119.(1 21.3 22.0 4611
Appsoact LOS B C C C
Intersection Summary -- -
HCM Average Cantral DEllay 20.6 I-CM Level of Service C
HCM Vcdume to Capacity natia 0.711
Act a ed CycIE i Length(s) 761.3 gum cif lost tin ie(s) 12.0
Intersecfan Capacity Utilization 61.8% ICIU Leval all Service C
Analysis PEiriac (min) 19
ci Critics 1 Lan a Group
Baseline Syncihro 1- Report •
Kitteisan&AssocailE19 Incl Rage'I
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacily Analysis 201CI Existing PM
2: Boone.I Ferry & Rilkirigtaln 1'f,115A2(1ia
• J _. c 4- 4....1 `N t , 4'
Movement EBL EBT 1=®R WBL WM VYBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations 1 +1+ +I
1J olurrie i fvp h) 0 831 1211 339 1371 1 166 0 2210 1 (I 2
Ideiail How(vphpl) 'Ic00 11900 1900 1900 '1900 1900 1900 1900 '1900 '19CI0 1900 '1900
Total Last timE1 Qs; 4.(1 4.CI 1.0 4.0 1.0 4.(I
Lane Util.Radar 0.95 1.aci (1.95 11.0(1 1.00 1.aa
Rrpt,pedlb'iles '1.0(1 1.00 i.aa 11.0(1 0.99 1.a(I
Flo,ped/tikes '1.0(1 1.00I 1.0a 11.0(1 1.0a 1.aa
Rrt 0.9FI i.aci 1.00 1.00 0.85 (1.91
R11 Prated ed '1.(1(1 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.0a (1.98
Iatd.Rlcrw ilprat) 3416 1781 3973 171216 '1593 1700
RI11 PEIrrritted '1.0(1 (1.99 i.aa 0.16 i.aa 0.94
Salld.Flows(perm) 341E1 1781 2573 1381 1593 1620
Reak-haur fa c or,PHFI 0.93 0.93 0.93 (1.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 (1.93 0.5.3 0.93 0.93 0.93
AIdj.Rlow 00) a 7125 13(1 36CI 192 1 1118 a 2117 1 CI 2
MICR Deduction iIvph) a 12 (I CI a 0 0 1871 0 0 2 0
Lane Group Flaw INplh) a 8.43 (I 36CI 193 (I '1718 50 0 (I '1 a
Corlfl.Reds.11#Ihr) 4 1 1 e 1 1
Heavy Vehicles(%) CI% '1°,ll 21A 1% 1% (NI 492 (1% CI% 0°A 0% (i%
lum Typq Plot Rid Flerrn Rem
Rrcdectec Rhases 7 1 2 8 2 EI
Remittee Phayse`i 21 EI
Flctua ed Green,G Is) 29.3 213.21 56.61 171.3 17.3 17.21
9ffectivE i Gaeen,g Qs) 29.3 23.3 5E1.6 171.3 17.3 17.3
4110. AIctua ed ci1C Rata 0.3E1 (1.2E1 (1.69 0.211 (1.21 (1.2'1
Clearances Time Qs) 4.(I 4.CI 1.a 4.0 1.a 4.CI
Veld€ Extension(s) 31.(I 3.0 .LO 3.0 2.G 3.0
Laine Grp Cap Qvph) 1241 906 2469 292 336 342
vlsi Radia Rral 20.21 c(1.2CI (1.22 (1.03
vis Rana Rem c(.13 0.0(1
v/ic Ratio 0.68 (1.711 (1.32 (1.61 (1.119 (L01
L n iiarm DEdavy,d 1 221.3 216.3 5.a 219.2 216.3 25.5
Rroclresssian Fac on 11.(1(1 1.aa 1.00 1.Oa 1.00 1.00
Incuerrantal Delay,d2 '1.5 1.5 (1.'1 3.61 0.2 0.0
Delay TIs) 221.8 30.8 9.'1 32.8 2E1.5 2.5
Level al Sante CI C A C c C
AIppraach Delay Qs) 23.8 '12.'1 219.2 215.9
Approach LUa CI S C C
Intersection Summary
I-CIM Aveuaga Ccintrol Delay 19.6 HCM Level of Service ti
I-CIM Volume 1a Cape city nalia (1.611
Actualec Cycle Lengtt IIsi F1'1.9 Sum all last timEl Qs' 12.(I
InlErrseclicn Capp.idly Utilization 66.9'/ ICU Level cif Service C
Analysis Rericu Or in '19
c Critical Lane Group
is. 9aselinEr Syr chnci 7- Repart
K it elsan&Assaca iles Inc Rage 2
I
HCM Signalized Interseation Capacity Analysis 2035 Backgrounc Operations
1: Lower Scones Ferry Rd & Jean Wary '11,111520°I(I
} - , ~ k 's 1 e ,. 4 4' 411
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL. MT WBR NBL NBT NBR SIL SBT SBR
Ilene Conflclwiafons •1 r 'I 1+
Valume(vplh) 7 10161 418 '19 1262 9 520 7 41 15 9 5
lc eal Flaw(vphpl) '1960 19(10 1190(1 11900 1900 1900 '1900 '1900 1900 119010 190(1 190(1
Tata Lcs time Is) 4.0 4.0 4.(I 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.(I 4.(I ,
Lane Util.Radar '1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 '1.00 '1.01(1 11.01(1
Frpb,ped/tiHes '1.00 0.99 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.(1(1 1.010
Flplti,pedkikes ' .00 '1.0(1 11.01(1 11.0(1 1.00 'I.(10 1.00 11.01(1
Fr '1.00 01.95 1.00 1.0(1 1.00 0.871 '1.01(1 0.c16
FIl Piiatedec 0.95 'I.(10 0.95 '.010 11°,di,3 .L0 0.;ia 11.11(1
Satd.Flow Ill'rot) '1803 3k a ..8(15 3535 17701 '654 18(15 1805
RI Permit ec 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.01(1 (1.61 1.00 ' .00 1.01(1
Satd.Row(perm) '1E103 3380 180:1 3535 1129 '1654 1900 1805
Peak-hciui fad on,PHR 0.92 01.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 01.921 01.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Ads.Blow(vp h) 8 ' 153 520 21 1312 '10 565 8 51 16 10 5
RTOR Reduction ilvph) 0 371 0 0 0 0 0 371 0 0 5 0
Larne Group Flciw(vph I 8 '1636 0 21' 1382 0 565 22 0 16 10 0
Ccinfl.PEK S.11#Ihr) 2 2 2 2
I-eavy'Vehides(%) 0% 1% 1% a% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% CI% 0%
Turn Type Kral Pacd Plrr pmMlpt
Rrolected Phases 71 4 3 E 5 2 6
Flora itted Phases 2 6
Ach aled Green,G,ls) 0.71 56.2 1.4 56.9 34.8 29A 4.0 2.6
9ffedNei Geeen,g Qs; 0.71 56.2 1.4 56.9 34.8 29.4 4.61 2.6
Ach a ed g/C Ratio (1.0'1 0.54 01.(111 0.55 0.33 0.28 0.04 0.(12
ill
Clleaiance'lime Its 4.CI 4.01 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.CI 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.CI 3.01 3.0 3.0 3.(I 3.CI 3.0 310
Lane Grp Call INlIt) '12 1820 34 1927 549 466 72 4 5
vis Relic'Rrol 0.00 cC.48 cC.(I'I 0.39 c0.28 0.01 01.00 CIA'I
v/s Relic)Perm c0.03 0.0'
vic Ratio 0.61 0.90 0.88 0.12 1.03 (1.015 0.22 C1.22
L nikirrr Delay,c'I 511 21.6 51.4 '117 33.9 21.3 48.1 49.9
Rnagression Radar 1.001 1.0CI 1.00 ' .0a 1.00 1.010 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay,c 2 8 9.5 6.4 '214 1.3 46.1 0.0 1.6 2.5
Delay(s) 14'.2 27.9 '118.8 '1E0 80.0 271.4 50.3 52A
LEN el al Service Fl C R B 9 CI D D
Approach Dela3(s) 28.5 21.4 75.0 :1.31
Approach LOS U C e D
htersect on Summary -
HCM ANeeage Control Delay 33.8 HCM Level all Service C
HCM'cdume to Capacity ratio (1.94
Acts atec Cycle LEngtt (s1 '104.4 Sum al last time(s) 12.(I
Intersectian Caplacitl Uflizatian 86.81A ICU Level of Service 9
Analysis F ericic (min) '15
ci Critidal Lane Giwupl
Baseline Synchro 1- Repar41111
Kit aIson&Associates Inc
Rage 1
HC!IV S!ignali2ied Intersection C!apacity Analysis 2039 Background Operations
2: Bocres Rerry & Pilkington _ 111°19/2010
• ..gh -0. -N, i 4- 4.-.1 ** 1 , \' 4 41
Movement EBL EBT EBR Wa3L vv T WBP NBL NBT Nl3R SBL Sr SBR
Lane Cc nfiguratic ns 1 4 1 41 T 4*
Valume iIvph; 0 910 'IE13 492 999 1 224 0 2971 0 3
lc cal Flow 01111 FI1; 1900 °19(10 119(1(1 1900 1900 '19(10 '19010 190(1 '19001 °1900 '1900 11900
Iota Losi time FIs) 4.0 4.0 4.01 4.0 4.01 4.0
LaneLAI REcol 0.95 '1.010 (1.99 11.01(1 1.001 '1.(10
RrpL,pec/bikEIS 1.00 11.010 1.001 'I.CI(I (1.99 '1.(10
Flpb,ped/t ikes 1.00 11.01(1 1.001 1.01(1 1.001 '1.(10
Flit 0.96 1.00 1.001 1.01(1 (1.89 01.90
RI Rrailectec 1.00 0.99 1.001 0.99 1.0(1 01.99
Sadc.Blow(prol3435 1781 3974 173E1 15921 'IEIEI6
lilt Rennittec '1.00 0.99 1.00 0.16 1.001 0.95
Salk.R (perm) 3415 1781 3574 138(1 1592 'EIei4
Reak-hausllactaii,RHF (1.93 01.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 (1.93 01.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj.Flow Ilvph; CI 938 °119 486 '1070 1 241 CI 319 1 0 3
R1OR Reductian(vph CI 12 (I 0 0 0 (I 29C1 0 0 2 (I
L E ne C rout l Rlcnn (vph) CI '1111 0 486 '107'1 (I 241 69 0 0 2 (I
Canfl.Reds.i#/tln: 4 1 1 e '1 1
HesivyVehicle: (%) D% 1% 21l 1% 1% CN 4% (1% 0% (I% 0% 0%
1k m Type Rral Rncl Ream Penin
Rralected Rhases 1 4 3 8 21 EI
Remitted Rhases .r1 6
Actuated Greer,GIs) 4(1.9 113A 7E.3 23.6 213.€1 23.£1
Eilflectivei Gileen,g Is 4(1.9 33.4 1E1.3 23.6 23.£1 23.£1
41, Actuated g/CI Ratia 01.31 (1.30 (1.111 (1.21 (1.21 0.211
Clearance lime Is) 4.0 4.01 4.0 4.01 4.01 4.(1
Vehii# Extension(s) 3.0 3.01 3:.0 3.0 <1.01 3.1)
L E ne Grp CE F 4vph) 1293 543 254 6 29E1 342 34 9
vis Ralio Brat c0.33 c(.21 (1.30 (1.04
vis Ralio Rerrn ci.i.'i n (1.01(1
vac Ratio 01.68 (1.901 0142 (1.81 (1.201 (1.00
L niikirm Delay,c 1 32.3 36.6 ELS 411.'1 31L4 113.9
Prot ressior REctan '1.0( 1.001 '1.(10 1.001 1.00 1.0C
Incremental Delay,c.1 11 11.1 01.l 15.6 (1.3 0.01
Delay)(s) 391 93.1 6.6 96.1 317 33.9
Level ail Service l] Li A E3 D C '
Approach Delay Ids) 391 211.3 441.7 33.9
Appiiciacti LO9 El C D C
Intersection Summary
I-CIM Average Clontrol Delay 311.81 HCM Level cif Service CI
I-CM Valume lci Clapacity ratio 0.81
Ac uarle( Cycle L.endtt Is) 1(19.9 Sum of lasil time FIs) '121.0
Inierseclicin CaFlacity Utiiizzicin 84.9% ICU Level ai Service Et1
Analysis Flericicl IImin; 119
c Critical Line Group
411
Baseline Syncline 7- Repqrt
K ittels an&Associates Inc Rage 2
1
HCM Signalized IN erseiction Capacity Analysis 2035 With C verlay Operatic ns
1: Lower Bowies Ferry Rd & ,can Way n115/26'10
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR IML NOT NBR SBL S81 MR
Lane Ccintigunations }1* 'i +1. '1 1-) ) T
alume iIvph] 3 10616 488 19 12192 9 58:1 1 521 '151 9 9
lc eal F law ilvphpll) 119010 1900 1900 1900 '1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
1 oto' Losi time Is) 4.(1 4.01 2.0 4.0 4.(1 4.(1 4.0 4.CI
Uane Ltll.F actar 'I.CI(1 0.951 1.00 0.5.15 1.0(1 1.CI(1 11.0(1 1.00
Frpti,pedlbikEis 'I.Cl(1 0.99 1.aa 1.00 '.(1(1 1.CI(1 1.00 1.00
Fllpb,ped/bikes 1.0(1 'I.CI(I 1.00 '1.(10 11.0(1 1.0101 11.00 1.00
Flrt 1.0(1 0.95 1.oa 1.00 -.(1(1 0.83 1.01(1 (1.95
Fit Rncrledec 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.010 0.95 1.00
Sat c.Fllaw Qpro9) 18021 213118 1805 315215 1710 165(1 18015 1805
Flit Remiittec a.95 1.00 (L96 1.00 a.61 1.0(1 1.01(1 1.01(1
Said Flow(perm) 11803 3311E1 1805 3535 11219 165(1 1900 18051
Peak-how faciar,PI-R 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj.Flaw(vF1hl 8 11'1519 53(1 21 '1404 10 6216 8 93 16 10 5
R110R Rec udian IN ph) 0 3E1 0 0 0 0 0 411 0 0 5 0
[lane Grcup Flaw IN ph) 8 1651 (1 21 '1214 0 €136 24 (1 16 10 (1
Cod.Pecs.I1#/hu) 2 2 2 2
HEravyV late (%) C% '1% '199 03 21% (1% 21% 01% 01% 0% 01% 0%
lum type Prot Rnal FImaPpt FlmiiFlt
Prated ad Phases 71 4 31 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 2 6
ActL atec Green,G Ils) 0.71 5E.2 'IA 56.9 34.8 29.4 4.0 216
Eflective Green,g(s; (L71 516.2 '1.4 56.9 34.8 219.4 4.0 2.6
Actcatec gdIC Ratia 0.0'1 0.54 (1.011 (1.55 CI.<13 a.218 ' 0.04 0.02
Cieianance Time Qs; 4.0 4.0 4.(1 4.01 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 •
Vetfate Extension(s) 3.0 2L0 3.(1 3.01 21.0 3L0 3.0 :1.0
liana Grr Carl(vF1h) 121 '1818 214 1921 5219 465 12 45
vlsi Ralio Pro' 01.00 cC.49 c(.01 (1.401 cC.3'1 01.(111 01.00 0.(111
Nis Ralici Rerm cC.071 a.(I'1
vAI Ratio 01.671 01.9' 0.88 (1.731 1.161 (1.(15 01.22 0.22
Untlarm DelaN,d1 51.71 211.8 5'I.2 18.0 3121.9 217.3 45.L71 49.9
Progression Faictom 1.00 '1.(10 1.01(1 1.00 1.00 '1.00 '1.00 '1.00
InclernEintal Nay,c 2 89.5 10 127.2 1.5 9(1.31 (1.0 1.6 i.b
Delay ils) 141.21 28.8 178.8 19.5 '1214.2 214 5(1.31 524
Leve of Seniice R C 9 B R C D D
AFprc ach Delay ils) 219.31 2'1.8 '1151.21 51.3
Apprc act L051 C C R D
Intersection Summary
F CIM Average Clanlral Ddlay 421.3 I-CIM llevel cif Sendai D
I-CIM VcdumEI 10 CaFlacity ratio 01.99
A ctuated Cycle Length(s) '1041.4 gum of lost time(s) 12.01
Inlersect'on Capacity L lilization 5.101.9% ICU Level crl Iervice E
Alnalysis Period (mini 15
c Critical ll ane Gnoup
._.,��- _ ._ . , . .., . . ,, - Jynchrc 71- REipori
IP
Kittelsan&Associates Inc. Page 1
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 VIS itf Ove r ay 0 peratic ns
2: Bc ones Ferry & F ilkirigton ._ 'I IA15A2a10
1 } -0 C 4- 4 4N t P \* 4 4'
Movement EEL EBT EBR WEL WEIT WBR. NBL NET NBR SBL SET SBR
Lane Configurations ) ti* .1 tTr 1. 4.
olume hip J 0 919 168 462 995 1 254 0 337 1 0 3
Ideal Alow(vphpl) 1900 '1900 1900 15.100 '1900 1900 1900 1900 '19(10 1900 1900 1900
fatal Lost tinie Qs* 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util.Fact cm 0.99 1.00 a.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
ArpL,pad/bikes '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00
Fllpb,ped/bikes '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0a 1.aa
Art a.918 1.00 1.00 9.a0 0.85 0.90
Al Flralented '1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Saic.FlIcnn (plrotJ 34713 17871 35114 173E1 15921 16871
All Flermitted '1.00 0.95 1.00 0.716 1.0a 0.99
Satd FIoHI(perm) 3473 17871 3514 138(1 1592 1622
Fleak-haun lacta,FlHF 4.913 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj.Flow alvph; 0 982 181 2 971 '1070 1 273 0 3621 1 0 3
R11 OF Recuctian lvph] 0 13 0 a o 0 0 ;8(1 0 0 2 0
Lanes Group Alow (vph) 0 '1'192 CI 2971 1011 0 2713 821 0 0 21 0
Ccinfl.Fleds.(#MhrJ 4 1 1 4 '1 1
Heavy'Vehides(%) 0% '191 2% 1% 1% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Turn Type HroI Aral Flerm Peasm
FlncalecleK Flhaseas 71 2 2 6 2 EI
Flerrnittec Flhases 2 6
Actuated Green,GIs) 41 a 34.5 79L9 25.7 25.71 25.71
E fleactive Gwen,g Ilse 41 a 34.5 719.9 29.3 25.71 29.71
0 Actuated g1C1 Ratid 0.3(1 (1.34 (1.74 0.213 0.23 0.33
Clearance Tinals) 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vet ick Extension(s) 311 3.0 :I.a 3.(1 311 311
Lana Grp Cap Iwpl) '12EIfI 543 2514 312 3610 36171
vils Ratia Plat c0.33 c(.28 0.3a (I.a9
v Is Ratia Peimi c0.21(1 0.00
vdc Ratia 0.91 (1.92 0.43 0.619 (1.23 (1.00
L dorm Delay,c 1 34.3 38.1 1.'1 42.4 35.9 34.0
Flrognessicn Flactcm 1.0(1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.a0 1.04
Incremental Delay,c2 9.9 20:1 (1.'1 22.8 0.3 0.(1
Delay(sj 44.2 98.2 1.3 69.21 :16.2 34.Cl
Level all Service El E A E D C
Flpproact Delay Is) 44.2 2 3.4 2 8.6 3411
App.oach LOS 0 C D C
kiensenlen S .tea . n I
I-CM Average Clantral Delay :15.4 HCM Level al Service D
F CM Volume lc i Capeiciity natia 0.90
Aldus ed Cycle Length els) 113.6 Sum a1 last timEi Qs; 12.0
Inl ersection Capacity Utilization 871.2% ICU Level of SerVcE E
Fnalysis Pericid Amin] '19
c Cruel LaneGraur1 a
9ynchrc 7- Repcirt
I deism81 Assuciales Inc. Rag('2