HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - 2011-05-23 AGENDA CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
LAKE OSWEGO
Centennial 1910-io10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
380 A Avenue
( '.' .1 PO Box 369
Monday, May 23, 2011goviled Lake Oswego,OR 97034
6:30 p.m. ��
503-635-0290
City Hall - Council Chamber www.ci.oswego.or.us/plan
o.ocus/ Ian
Contact: Iris McCaleb Also published on the internet at:
Email: imccaleb@ci.oswego.or.us www.ci.oswego.or.us/plan/planning_com mission
Phone: 503-697-6591
The meeting location is accessible to persons with disabilities. To request accommodations, please contact
Iris McCaleb at 503-697-6591, 48 hours before the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. CITIZEN COMMENT— Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda (3 minute limit per individual)
This is an opportunity to raise issues regarding Planning or Citizen Involvement.
4. COUNCIL UPDATE
5. MINUTES
February 28, 2011
6. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER
LU 08-0052 (Ordinance 2525) —Community Development Code - General Housekeeping and Minor
Policy Amendments.
7. WORK SESSIONS
7.1 Boones Ferry Refinement Plan, Phase 2
Update on the project and review of related issues that will come before the Commission. Staff
coordinator is Dennis Egner, Assistant Planning Director.
7.2 Comprehensive Plan Update (PP 10-0007)
Draft Housing Needs Analysis and Economic Opportunities Analysis—Review updated draft report.
Staff coordinator is Sidaro Sin, Senior Planner.
8. OTHER BUSINESS—PLANNING COMMISSION
• Discussion of Future Work Plan AdO
(Continued on Other Side)
Jon Gustafson, Chair • Lynne Paretchan,Vice Chair
Puja Bhutam ■ Julia Glisson ■ Jim Johnson ■ Russell Jones ■ Todd Prager ■ Jeff Gudman, Council Liaison
Page 2
9. OTHER BUSINESS— COMMISSION FOR CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
10. SCHEDULE REVIEW
11. ADJOURNMENT
Note: The work session on the Design Handbooks for Lake Grove Village Center and
Inflll (PP 10-0017) will be held on June 13, 2011.
LAM OSWEGO
Cents Inn,,, 19110-2010
+
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION MBETINC
Monlda3, Mayl 213, 210] 1
6:30 p.m.
0y Hall - Council C harnbei
Contact:
Irisi McCaleb
9miail:
imcaaleb0cLosiweeo.or..us
Rhone:
503-EISIT-65931
CITY CF LAKE CSWEGG
:I80 AAveaw
PO Bcuc 36SI
Lake Oswego, CR 97034
021-62154129C
wiwwLui.aswUna.cir.t g/pl"m
Allsio put lished on the internet at:
www.ci.o!iwego.or.us)plan/plarinirig cicmimnssiori
llF a mieeltinEl location isi aecessit le to Flersiorisi with disat ilitiesi. To request accommodations, please contact
Iris N eCalet at 903-697-6591, 48 F ours t eifdre tF ei meeting.
M. CHILL 710 ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. CITIZEN COMM HNT - Reganc irig Issues Not Ori th a Agenda (3 minute lirr it pen iridividL all
This isi an opportunity to raise issues regarding Planning or Cis igen Irevc Iverr en11.
4. COUNCIL U PDARIE
S. HI N DINGS,, CONCLL 511CIN51 AND GIRDER
LU 08-0052 (Ordinance 215125) — COmlmll nitv Ile%e110Dmlerlt Code - General Hoy siekeeoine and M inch
Policv Amendments.
WORK SHENION51
61 Comprehensive Rlan Update (PR 10-0001)
Drafil Housing Needs Analysis anc Economic Opporti, nil iesi Alrialysiis — F eiview upc acted draft report
Staff coordinator Sarah Selder, Associiate Flanner.
6.2 Dlesigri Hant bocik for Lake G rove Village Ceniler and Infill JJPP 10-001171
Re% iew draft. Staff coom inator! area Johanna Hastay, k sociatei Fllannen anc Dear nes Egneir„ ,A ss isitant
Flanning DillectolL
6.3 Boiciries Berry Refinement Plan, Pha!ie 2
Upc ate ori 11-ei project wind rei%iew of sedated issues tF al will come before the Commission. Staff
coot dinator is Dennis Egnetl Assistant FVann,ing Llirlector
F -
s�1e,
(Can tiinued on 01his r Side)
Jon Gustafson, Chair ■ Lynne Paretchari, Vice Chan
Fuija Bhutan' ■ Julia Glisson ■ Jim Jahnson ■ Husselll Jones . Mdc Pra€lei ■ Jeff Gudman, Cound' Liaiscin
F aFla 2
6.2
FORIMM EINF611MAWN iOWT- httc►:/(w . normor.ushi$=jcas hiln (seict o"m)I .
7. OTHER BIJSIIN85151—RLAINNINGCOMMISISION
S. OTHER BLl!lIN 8519 —COMMISSION FOR CITIZEN INVOWEN ENI1
9. SCHEDULE REVIEW
10. ACIIOURNMENII
•
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
LAKE OS(L'EGO
centenmar r9to-mm 380 AAvenue
PO Box 369
Lake Oswego,OR 97034
STAFF REPORT 503-635-0270
www.ci.oswego.ocus
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Denny Egner, AICP,Assistant Planning Director
DATE: May 12, 2011
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Work Session on Boones Ferry Road Refinement Plan — May 23, 2011
(PP 10-0011)
Introduction
On May 23, the Planning Commission is scheduled to receive an update on the Boones Ferry Road
Refinement Plan. This phase of the project is nearing completion and I want to give the Commission a
briefing on the direction of the project and on the issues and decisions that will be before the Commission
over the next six months. This staff report includes a brief background section, a discussion of key plan
elements, a general timeline for implementation, and a description of issues that will be coming to the
Commission for recommendations.
Background
Last summer the City hired HNTB, Inc. to prepare a refinement plan for proposed improvements to Boones
Ferry Road. The refinement plan project is intended to carry out specific action items listed in the Lake
Grove Village Center (LGVC) Plan and to provide greater certainty for property owners and businesses along
the corridor. Since October,the Boones Ferry Road Project Advisory Committee (PAC) has been meeting
monthly to provide guidance and advice to staff and the consultant. The resolution establishing the charge
statement for the PAC is included as Attachment 1.
The design concepts for Boones Ferry Road were developed as part of the Lake Grove Village Center Plan
which was adopted in 2008. The concepts call for two 11-foot wide travel lanes in each direction,five-foot
wide bike lanes, nine-foot wide sidewalks, and a landscaped center median that will function to collect and
cleanse stormwater. The Boones Ferry concept plan also included new traffic signals and pedestrian
crossings to slow down traffic and make the district more pedestrian friendly. To address business impacts
that may result from the median, the plan calls for optional u-turns at every intersection.
In 2010, the City completed the initial phase of the refinement plan which examined traffic impacts and
operations. The first phase report was a technical document produced by the City's consultant team. It
included a list of 22 proposed refinements. The product was completed prior to formation of the PAC.
Page 2
Plan Elements
First Phase Refinements—One of the tasks assigned to the PAC was to review the list of 22 refinements
identified in the Phase 1 report and make a recommendation for each refinement. A table listing the
refinements and the recommendations is included as Attachment 2.
Right-of-Way Alignment- A critical task for the PAC has been to define the right-of-way (ROW)that will be
needed for the proposed improvements. The Boones Ferry Road concept included in the LGVC Plan
suggested that improvements could be located within an 82-foot wide ROW. As the consultant team
examined the concept plan, it became apparent that a slightly wider ROW would be needed at the
intersections to accommodate the u-turns. The PAC also identified certain areas where the opportunity for
acquiring ROW is constrained by existing buildings. In almost every case, this was addressed by proposing
an interim improvement that allows a five-foot wide sidewalk. The assumption is that within these
constrained areas, the sidewalks will be expanded to 9 feet when redevelopment occurs. The draft
alignment maps are included as Attachment 3.
streetscape Design -The PAC has also examined options for streetscape improvements. The objective is to
define the character of the improvements so that there is clear guidance for project engineers and
designers in subsequent design phases. The PAC has directed the consulting team to return with a refined
version of the streetscape concepts for discussion at their May 25 PAC meeting. Attachment 4 illustrates
the preliminary concepts.
Proposed Implementation Timeline
The overall timeline and approach for design and construction of Boones Ferry Road improvements
follows:
Tentative Timeline/Approach
Date Action
July 2011 • City Council receives the recommendation from the PAC.
July to December • The City conducts a financing study to determine how to pay for Boones Ferry
2011 and Lake Grove improvements.
The City initiates necessary comprehensive plan and code amendments to
formally adopt changes to allow implementation of the road improvements as
envisioned.
2012 • The City adopts a financing mechanism.
2013 • Depending on financing, the City initiates the next phase of engineering
needed to prepare construction design plans. First steps include completion of
a survey and utility locations.
2014 - ??? a Depending on financing, the City initiates ROW acquisition.
• Complete final engineering.
Construction.
Page 3
Planning Commission Decisions
The Planning Commission does not have a direct role in selecting an alignment or the final streetscape
design. Those will ultimately be City Council decisions but the Commission does have an important role in
some related issues.
The Commission will need to hold public hearings and make recommendations related to plan and code
amendments necessary to implement the plan. The types of amendments that are needed include:
• Plan text amendments related to roadway width and constrained sections.
■ Plan map and text amendments related to signalization at Madrona and a pedestrian crossing at
the Lake Grove shopping center.
• Text amendments to the non-conforming use section of the code so that property owners are not
penalized when the City purchases ROW or when property owners dedicate ROW.
In addition to these recommendations, the Planning Commission has a key role in accepting the Lake Grove
Village Center Design Handbook which will help to define the character of Lake Grove. The handbook will
incorporate the streetscape design direction that comes out of the PAC process. There may be plan or
code amendments that are needed as a result of this process. If so, the Commission will need to hold
public hearings.
Finally, staff is requesting that the Planning Commission serve as a sounding board for the ideas and
options that come out the work to develop a financing strategy for implementation of the Lake Grove
Village Center Plan and Boones Ferry Road. This will require two to four meetings this fall.
Attachments:
1. Resolution 10-61 (includes PAC Meeting Bylaws)
2. Refinement Analysis Table (Revised 03/09/11)
3. Draft Alignment Maps (Maps 1 through 6, dated 02/23/11)
4. Preliminary Streetscape Design Concepts (04/20/11)
EXHIBIT 2
RESOLUTION 10-61
BOONES FERRY ROAD REFINEMENT PLAN PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
CHARGE STATEMENT AND BYLAWS
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Project Advisory Committee (PAC) is to advise staff and provide recommendations
to the City Council regarding the refinement plan for Boones Ferry Road. The Boones Ferry Road
Refinement Plan is intended to implement the concepts outlined for Boones Ferry in the Lake Grove
Village Center Plan adopted in 2008.
COMMITTEE CHARGE
The Project Advisory Committee serves at the request and direction of the City Council. The charge of
the committee is to:
• Provide thoughtful and well considered recommendations to the City Council regarding the
Boones Ferry Road Refinement Plan.
• Define and apply evaluation criteria in making recommendations. The evaluation criteria shall
include consideration of property impacts, project cost, and conformance to the goals, policies,
and action measures of the 2008 Lake Grove Village Center Plan.
• Review and make recommendations related to the consultant work on the following elements
of the plan:
o Greenstreet and stormwater design;
o Pedestrian and bicycle improvements;
o Street and intersection design;
o Right-of-way alignment; and
o Economic impacts of the roadway improvements.
■ Review and make recommendations related to the 22 proposed refinements that were part of
the DKS study completed in October 2009 (Phase 1).
• Host open house sessions and serve as a sounding board for community comments on
proposed improvements.
MEMBER COMPOSITION AND SELECTION
The PAC will consist of seven members.Three of the members will be from the City's Transportation
Advisory Board (TAB) and four will be former members of the Lake Grove Village Center
Implementation Plan Advisory Committee. The City Council will appoint the members via resolution.
In the event that the term of a TAB member expires during this project, they should, if possible,
continue to serve on the PAC until such time that the project is completed. In the event that a member
cannot serve out the term of this appointment or fulfill their responsibilities, the City Council shall
appoint a successor at its discretion.
ATTACHMENT 1
The PAC shall elect a chair and a vice chair. (PP 10-0011)
September 15, 2010 Page 1 1
MEMBER RESPONSIBILITY
The Project Advisory Committee is expected to:
■ Listen carefully, educate themselves, and ask questions so that they may make informed
choices.
• Serve as host at public events, encourage other community members to attend and help
present information or facilitate discussions,where appropriate.
• Provide updates and solicit feedback from the constituencies or interest groups which they may
represent, including making presentations to those groups about the project, when possible
and appropriate
• Review and comment on work products in a timely manner. Come to meetings prepared to
make recommendations to staff and City Council at key junctures throughout the process.
• Understand that the City has a limited budget for consulting services. Decisions will need to be
made at times with limited information, therefore it is important to remain on schedule and
stay focused on the tasks that have been assigned to the committee.
• Attend and participate in the meetings of the PAC. Any member who misses three consecutive
meetings, without an excused absence may be removed from the committee. Excused
absences may include illnesses or other absences excused by the Chair. If a vacancy exists on
the committee, the City Council shall appoint a successor.
• Make recommendations that are for the good of the community as a whole.
QUORUMS AND DECISIONS
A majority of the members shall constitute a quorum for the conduct of PAC business. Members shall
strive for consensus but in the event consensus cannot be reached, the vote of the majority shall
represent a decision of the PAC. For controversial issues,the PAC may include a minority opinion with
the majority recommendation.
TIMEFRAME
The timeframe for the Boones Ferry Road Refinement Plan project is approximately nine months. A
final plan is expected to be prepared in the spring of 2011. The PAC shall remain active until the plan is
accepted by the City Council. The PAC is expected to meet at least once a month. At times, more or
less meetings may be required.
STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES
City of Lake Oswego staff will provide support to the PAC. Staff will coordinate meetings and will
distribute meeting materials. Staff will prepare meeting agendas by consulting with the Advisory
Committee chair and prepare meeting summaries that focus on discussion topics and key agreements
Staff will serve as the primary contact point for inquiries regarding the activities of the committee.
PUBLIC RECORDS
Regular meetings of the committee are not public hearings. All meetings will be open to the public and
subject to Oregon public meetings and records laws. All meetings will be open to the public; however,
public comment will only be received for up to five minutes at the beginning and end of each PAC
meeting.
September 15, 2010 Page 12
PAC Meeting Bylaws
For Review and Agreement by PAC Members
I. Commitment to Decision-making Process
The PAC will endeavor to reach consensus on decisions regarding the Boones Ferry Road Refinement
Plan; closely split votes will not be considered as a strong recommendation.A consensus process will
enable the members to freely discuss issues and to arrive at a decision.
Consensus is a participatory process whereby, on matters of substance, the representatives strive for
agreements that they can accept, support, live with, or agree not to oppose. Consensus means that no
representatives voiced objection to the position and they agree not to oppose the position.
Expectations for the decision-making process include:
A. The PAC agrees that consensus has a high value and that the members should strive to achieve
it. As such, recommendations will be made by consensus of all present participating members
in their representative capacity. They shall be empowered to represent their group, after
agreed upon consultation.
B. Tentative agreements may be made at meetings pending the opportunity for representatives to
consult with their necessary constituencies. This will be done on a timely basis.
C. The commitment to work for consensus means that members will participate in the give and
take of the process in a way that seeks to understand the interests of all and will work together
to find solutions workable for all.
D. When consensus cannot be reached,the chair or City staff may initiate or entertain a motion to
vote on the issue. Members may make motions and seconds. All motions must be seconded to
be acted upon.
E. If no consensus is reached on an issue or recommendation, minority positions will be
documented. Those with minority opinions are responsible for proposing alternative solutions
or approaches to resolve differences.
F. Meetings will be conducted in a manner deemed appropriate by the chair and City staff to
foster collaborative decision-making and consensus building. Robert's Rules of Order will be
applied when deemed appropriate by the chair or City staff.
G. The PAC may establish work groups to address details or to resolve differences about PAC
recommendations. Work group deliberations will be open to all PAC members and the public.
H. PAC members will honor decisions made and avoid re-opening issues once resolved.
I. PAC members will strive to make decisions within the agreed-to timeframe.
Meeting notes will be kept documenting decisions of the PAC. Members will have the opportunity to
review, make corrections and then sign-off on the notes.
September 15, 2010 Page 13
11. Ground Rules for Conduct of the PAC
All participants agree to act in good faith in all aspects of the planning process. This includes being
honest and refraining from undertaking any actions that will undermine or threaten this process. It
also includes behavior outside of meetings.
Expectations for behavior of PAC members during and outside of meetings include:
A. Members agree to be respectful at all times of other representatives, alternates and audience
members. They will listen to each other to seek to understand the other's perspective, even if
they disagree. One person will speak at a time. Side conversations and other meeting
disruptions will be avoided.
B. Members agree to make every effort to bring all aspects of their concerns about these issues
into this process to be addressed.
C. Members agree to refrain from personal attacks, intentionally undermining the process, and
publicly criticizing or misstating the positions taken by any other participants during the
process. Concerns regarding personal attacks or intentional misinformation will be brought to
the attention of the chair or city staff... If evidence justifies, the offending member will be
advised of such concerns. Continued violations of these ground rules may result in a
recommendation to the City Council to remove the member from the PAC.
D. Any written communications, including e-mails, blogs and other social networking media, will
be mindful of these procedural ground rules and will maintain a respectful tone even if
highlighting different perspectives. Members are reminded that e-mail, blogs and other social
networking media may be considered public documents. E-mails and social networking
messages meant for the entire group will be distributed via the City staff so that a record is
kept.
E. Individual PAC members agree to not present themselves as speaking for the PAC, without
specific direction and approval by the PAC.
F. Non-members may attend meetings as observers, provide comments during public comment
periods, and submit written comments for distribution to the PAC, but may not otherwise
participate in the PAC deliberations.
G. Requests for information made outside of meetings will be directed to the City staff. Responses
to such requests will be limited to items that can reasonably be provided within a reasonable
amount of time.
H. All participation in this process is voluntary and may be withdrawn. However, members agree
that before withdrawing they will discuss the reason for their withdrawal with the chair and
City staff and will give the PAC the opportunity to understand the reasons for withdrawal and to
encourage continued participation, if appropriate.
September 15, 2010 Page 14
3-9-11 Boones Ferry Road Refinement Plan — Refinement Analysis Table
# Proposed Refinement Purpose DKS Impact Plan Consistency PAC
from BFR Phase 1 Study Recommendation to BFR Considered Addressed Amendment Action
ROW by LGVC directly in Required?
Advisory LGVC Plan
Committee
Signalization
S-1 BFR and Madrona -Add More even Recommendation Yes No No Yes Approve
a signal at Madrona/ spacing of w/
Remove the signal at LG signals cond.
Shopping Center
N-4 BFR at Lanewood— Improve Consideration Maybe Yes Yes No TBD
Provide 4-way access to function
intersection
Turn Pockets and Deceleration Lanes
S-3 SB BFR and Bryant- Add Improves Recommendation Yes No No No Reject
a second left turn operation
pocket for turns onto to LOS C
Bryant
S-7 SB BFR and Bryant (Alt. Improves Consideration Yes No No No Approve
Also 1)—Extend the existing operation
See BFR to Bryant left turn
S-3 pocket to 500'
S-8 SB BFR and Bryant (Alt. Improves Consideration Yes No No No Reject
Also 2)—Add a second left operation
See turn pocket for turns
S-3 onto Bryant—maintain
median
S-4 NB BFR—SE of Bryant- Improves Recommendation Yes No No No Reject
Add deceleration lane traffic flow
into LG Shopping Center and safety
Page 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Revised 03/09/11
(PP 10-0011)
# Proposed Refinement Purpose DKS Impact Plan Consistency PAC
from BFR Phase 1 Study Recommendation to BFR Considered Addressed Amendment Action
ROW by LGVC directly in Required?
Advisory LGVC Plan
Committee
Turn Pockets and Deceleration Lanes - Continued
S-6 NB Bryant—left turn Improves Consideration Yes No No No Approve
pocket onto BFR traffic flow
C-3 BFR at Oakridge/Reese- Improve Recommendation Yes No No No Approve
Extend NB and SB BFR traffic flow w/
turn pockets to 200 feet cond.
N-1 BFR at Mercantile— Improve Recommendation Yes No No No Approve
Extend NB BFR left turn traffic flow w/
pocket to 200' 1 1 1 cond.
N-2 BFR—NofOakridge— Improve Recommendation Yes No No No Reject
Provide deceleration traffic flow
lane into the Post Office
Pedestrian Crossings
S-5 BFR—SE of Bryant— Improves Recommendation Maybe Yes—as Yes—as Yes Approve
Also Install a mid-block spacing of part of part of
see pedestrian crossing in crossings traffic traffic
S-1 place of the LG signal signal
Shopping Center signal
C-6 BFR—between Bryant Improve Consideration Maybe Yes Yes No TBD
and Reese—Use HAWK safety
signals for pedestrian
crossings
N-3 BFR at Red Cedar- Use Improve Recommendation Maybe Yes Yes No TBD
HAWK signals for safety
pedestrian crossings
Page 2 Revised 03/09/11
# Proposed Refinement Purpose DKS Impact Plan Consistency PAC
from BFR Phase 1 Study Recommendation to BFR Considered Addressed Amendment Action
ROW by LGVC directly in Required?
Advisory LGVC Plan
Committee
Alley and Accessway Projects
S-2 Madrona to Sunset— Relief for Recommendation No Yes Partially' Yes, if public Reject—
Add a backage road the Bryant/ street connect
connecting the streets BFR intrsctn drives
C-1 Alley—Eof Bryant— Alternative Recommendation No Yes Partially Yes Reject—
Extend the existing alley access connect
from Brant to Reese Rd drives
C-2 NW side of Boones Alternative Recommendation No Yes Yes3 No TBD
Ferry—Coordinate lot- access
to-lot access and
driveways
Side Street Projects—Traffic Calming and Pedestrian/Bike Improvements
S-9 Waluga Dr. and Firwood Reduces Consideration No No No No Approve
Rd. —add traffic cut-through
calming and cut- traffic
through mitigation
5-10 Firwood and Bryant Pedestrian Consideration No Yes Partially° Yes,for a bike Reject
Roads—Add sidewalks and bike lane on Firwood
and bikelanes connectivity Firwood bikelane
C-4 Quarry/Oakridge/Reese Reduces Consideration No No No No TBD
—add traffic calming cut-through
and cut-through I traffic
'The plan requires connected driveways through parking lots. The connection would not be as direct as an alley or local street.
'The plan requires connected driveways through parking lots. The connection would not be as direct as an extension of the existing lane.
'The plan requires connected driveways through parking lots.
'The LGVC Plan calls for a shared bike route on Firwood and an undefined bikeway(lane,path,or shared route)on Bryant.
Page 3 Revised 03/09/11
mitigation
# Proposed Refinement Purpose US Impact Plan Consistency PAC
from BFR Phase 1 Study Recommendation to BFR Considered Addressed Amendment Action
ROW by LGVC directly in Required?
Advisory LGVC Plan
Committee
C-5 Qua rry/Oa kridge/Reese Pedestrian Consideration No Yes Partiallys Yes, for a bike TBD
—Add sidewalks and and bike lanes on
bikelanes connectivity Oakridge/Reese
N-5 Lanewood/Douglas Way Reduces Consideration No No No No TBD
—add traffic calming cut-through
and cut-through traffic
mitigation
N-6 Lanewood/Douglas Way Pedestrian Consideration No Yes Partially6 Yes, for a bike TBD
—Add sidewalks and and bike lanes
bikelanes connectivity
5 The LGVC Plan calls for shared bike routes on Oakridge and Reese and an undefined bikeway(lane,path,or shared route)on Quarry.
5 The LGVC Plan calls for shared bike routes on Lanewood and Douglas Way.
Page 4 Revised 03/09/11
� � •fly'' . w �� . 1 �• , • � ✓u. y{ I V7i7 ' ^ Y , .- Fs. k � ' r
•t ,
1 +
.o<
\ ♦ S
S • Y\
I -
' i
^ Y 1
• . Wit• \
r.
JF
I
. l ! ®rr�t.�-
X.
00
Mw----- - —
l .or t `' 9\i!•>" 7T - •tr,�,. e.�• 'l'• i w f
M
M , i
LEGEND NOTE: ATTACHMENT 3
CURB(DEFINES FACE OF CURB) For simplicity of illustration,these drawings do not show individual driveway access points onto Scones
—— — — 82'RIGHT OF WAY Ferry Road. The drawings are not intended to imply that any driveway will be closed as a result of the PLAN SCALE:1•=50•
SIDEWALK( DEFINES BACK OF SIDEWALK) 0 25 50 75 100
road improvement. With a few exceptions,these preliminary drawings only show breaks in the curb at BOO N ES FERRY ROAD
SKIP STRIPE(DEFINES TRAVEL LANES) proposed signalized Intersections. Individual driveway design and access will be addressed in a future
STRIPE(DEFINES BIKES LANES AND TURN LANES) design engineering phase of the road improvement project. COMPOSITE ALIGNMENT
--- CENTERLINE SEGMENT: 1 OF 6
— — — — PROPERTY LINES DRAFT-FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
DATE: 2/23/2011
/��/ � —.�' eta-'. K . .fit i�, •• ..I' ' •� J,•r � ttyy�� v i i
r•`• �; �.- 't '4 1 ,J� # + F .,+
aro
M
♦ J .
♦ 'Ir
•I
•' ` fill11 1 r� �►
V_J't
? `
711k
d
+�.a
Y
j
LEGEND NOTE:
CURB(DEFINES FACE OF CURB) For simplicity of illustration,these drawings do not show individual driveway access points onto Boones
—— —— 82'RIGHT OF WAY Ferry Road. The drawings are not Intended to Imply that any driveway will be closed as a result of the PLAN SCALE:1'=50'
SIDEWALK DEFINES BACK OF SIDEWALK road improvement. With a few exceptions,these preliminary drawings only show breaks In the curb at BOON ES FERRY ROAD
SKIP STRIPE(DEFINES TRAVEL LANES) ) proposed signalized intersections. Individual driveway design and access will be addressed Ina future 0 25 50 75 100
STRIPE(DEFINES BIKES LANES AND TURN LANES) design engineering phase of the road improvement project. COMPOSITE ALIGNMENT
—- CENTERLINE
— - - — OF 6
PROPERTY LINES US P0 DRAFT-FOR DISCUSSION PUR5E5 ONLY SEGMENT: 2
------ POTENTIAL RIGHT TURN LANE WITH W SIDEWALK DATE: 2/23/2011
14
SkA2
el-
� �+ . :. � ' • _ r;' .;;� ;��., )fit '.
.17
FIS /'/ t
10,
VA
.�► _
I
r``yi 1
Ar
• • r i h t +
ir
rM
1• , f� Ii
LEGEND NOTE:
CURB(DEFINES FACE OF CURB) For simplicity of illustration,these drawings do not show individual driveway access points onto Boones
82'RIGHT OF WAY Ferry Road. The drawings are not intended to imply that any driveway will be closed as a result of the PLAN SCALE:1'=50,
SIDEWALK(DEFINES BACK OF SIDEWALK) road improvement. With a few exceptions,these preliminary drawings only show breaks in the curb at 25 50 75 100 BOONES FERRY ROAD
SKIP STRIPE(DEFINES TRAVEL LANES) proposed signalized intersections. Individual driveway design and access will be addressed in a future 0
STRIPE(DEFINES BIKES LANES AND TURN LANES) design engineering phase of the road improvement project. COMPOSITE ALIGNMENT
--- CENTERLINE SEGMENT: 3 OF 6
— — — — PROPERTY LINES DRAFT-FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
DATE: 2/23/2011
fie I; III, Ask
JJ'
A IL01,
"PI Vt
IF
000
in
x y .
ram- / ,� / / � I � — - ., � r• . . ,ir;�y '"
.' ,ems �.J - • / � � - tt -
1
ICI r Y.
/ •�. Ar."� �•
- ,
1 `
LEGEND NOTE:
CURB(DEFINES FACE OF CURB) For simplicity of illustration,these drawings do not show individual driveway access points onto Boones
- - — — 82'RIGHT OF WAY Ferry Road. The drawings are not intended to Imply that any driveway will be closed as a result of the PLAN SCALE:1"=50'
SIDEWALK(DEFINES BACK OF SIDEWALK) road improvement. With a few exceptions,these preliminary drawings only show breaks in the curb at 0 25 50 75 100 BOONES FERRY ROAD
SKIP STRIPE(DEFINES TRAVEL LANES) proposed signalized intersections. Individual driveway design and access will be addressed in a future
STRIPE(DEFINES BIKES LANES AND TURN LANES) design engineering phase of the road improvement project. COMPOSITE ALIGNMENT
--- CENTERLINE SEGMENT: 4 OF 6
- - - - PROPERTY LINES I DRAFT-FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
POTENTIAL RIGHT TURN LANE WITH 9'SIDEWALK DATE: 2123/2011
q7 .e
+ " 7r / • /�
/ V
f
Or
0-0
,r .r
• f /
.J
44fir
�`
LEGEND NOTE:
CUFjB(DEFINES FACE OF CURB) For simplicity of illustration,these drawings do not show individual driveway access points onto Boones
-- 82'RIGHT OF WAY Ferry Road. The drawings are not intended to imply that any driveway will be closed as a result of the PLAN SCALE:1"=50'
SIDEWALK(DEFINES BACK OF SIDEWALK) road Improvement. With a few exceptions,these preliminary drawings only show breaks in the curb at 0 25 50 75 100 BOONES FERRY ROAD
SKIP STRIPE(DEFINES TRAVEL LANES) proposed signalized intersections. Individual driveway design and access will be addressed in a future
STRIPE(DEFINES BIKES LANES AND TURN LANES) design engineering phase of the road improvement project. COMPOSITE ALIGNMENT
- CENTERLINE
PROPERTYLINES DRAFT-FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY SEGMENT: 5 DATE: 2/23/3/2011
Y .
,Ill 10
a ; 1.
ore
S
1
A
004
� vASP
/
r
• � •y � ,L ♦iA M
4
LEGEND NOTE:
CURB(DEFINES FACE OF CURB) For simplicity of illustration,these drawings do not show individual driveway access points onto Boones
- — 82'RIGHT OF WAY Ferry Road. The drawings are not intended to imply that any driveway will be closed as a result of the PLAN SCALE:1'=50'
SIDEWALK DEFINES BACK OF SIDEWALK road Improvement. With a few exceptions,these preliminary drawings only show breaks in the curb at BOONES FERRY ROAD
( ) 0 25 50 75 100
SKIP STRIPE(DEFINES TRAVEL LANES) proposed signalized intersections. Individual driveway design and access will be addressed in a future
STRIPE(DEFINES BIKES LANES AND TURN LANES) design engineering phase of the road improvement project. COMPOSITE ALIGNMENT
-- CENTERLINE SEGMENT: 6 OF 6
— — — — PROPERTY LINES DRAFT-FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
DATE: 2/23/201 1
•
•
0
Streetscape Design Concepts rid B
Boones Ferry Road Phase II April 9nfh, 9nII
free gt=te- Plautor boxes
rIP
II�htIuA=
seat wall at back of side ••"all,
_ r
"ricu h2nas -an-rete paving
WINIMMEMENEWOWm-
•11
m
tree potaa
-10-0' --WA
9
.1111,1111,114 %< 60-1—
Planter boxes
lighting
v t or
.� . dL
+ } fir+
brick with concre+e handing and curbs
IF.
off
m
tree F,,ralri
planter boxes
i
11011fir,
63
-ccent pavers concrete pJkVJfIR and curbs =of I
Aft
AN
tree F,,ralri
planter boxes
i
11011fir,
63
-ccent pavers concrete pJkVJfIR and curbs =of I
Aft
.."I
J
--ntinuous planting strip lighting
r -j
A
4.
seat wall basalt accents concrete PMVIM9 and curbs
SII Air iE I-)
off
AL
'10
A
4.
seat wall basalt accents concrete PMVIM9 and curbs
SII Air iE I-)
off
iree ph -gels planier I-oxe-
htling concrete Off'9111149
911
m
The Promenade
Id
0
N
0
d
MIN
r .o
L6
O
p
Q O
_ m
_ MNTB
_ .• ,� ~ � � GREEK II I
colored & textured eeVIng
t_
planters, *mat we"a. ksntlsill garin},-.
•,®oa wall
0
sculpture
entry elnnr;
0
0
A
m
Q
wtwA' W
EW
:sINTB
GREED II I"
a
tree orates
m Gvrbikle pinnlet.
ban -ars
bike racks
sus@ended florae baskets
•
U(i
(Al
m
MNTB
GflEE� I'
benches. trash rece!!tacle
bassit s --n®
Nv -
planting of 1—, f .1�1 1h
preco-9 concrete planters
oto"o W80 at
r4
sy
Irrlck, bu larch, atone monuments
oeioroc, ii 1f
u.na7 �a.ci.
i
i
_, r.nricrwxp ww Yill Ylrit pavers
_
tOnsrore score pollawns
...IAu ..yef.m ��Z•,)
_
hmnlowmlk rllh k*o-elbed benches
• t
Iliklo
tM
lot
Wfl�
t i
TIP!► ~* 'S `
aI
Oil �
all
southwest corner of )enctlan with Bryant St. (B. of A. Parking Lnt)
frontage at Barber Shop. north of Quarry Road across fram McDanald's
McDonald's. north of ouarry Road
L -
10FUNIT
►
A f4
pit
Jo
OQ old;
too"
Jam
+ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
380 A Avenue
PO Box 369
Lake Oswego,OR 97034
MEMORANDUM 503-635-0270
www.ci.oswego.or.us
TO: Lake Oswego Planning Commission
FROM: Sidaro Sin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update (PP 10-0007)
DATE: May 18, 2011
ACTION
At the May 9 Planning Commission meeting staff was asked to update the Commission on the results of the March 29
open house, scenario planning and next steps.
DISCUSSION
March 29 Open House
On March 29 an open house was held to present different scenarios that were intended to reflect the draft vision and
graphically illustrate potential growth patterns in Lake Oswego. The scenarios included the existing Comprehensive
Plan, Village Centers and LOconomy. The open house resulted in a range of comments; 102 people signed in and 67
comment forms were filled out. Participants also provided additional comments on the flip charts next to the different
scenarios. The input received was intended to help the Comprehensive Plan Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC)
determine which scenarios to pursue for further evaluation. In addition to asking participants where jobs and housing
should be located, they were asked the following questions below. The top three responses to the questions are listed
below the questions.
• Are these the right scenarios to pursue for further assessment?
0 18 responses generally and/or explicitly supported these scenarios
0 14 responses did not directly answer the question
0 6 generally and/or explicitly did not support the scenarios
• What do you like about the scenarios?
o Existing Comp Plan—economy, density/downtown redevelopment, Lake Grove Plan,
transportation.
o Village Centers—walkability, bikeability, hub/centers, 20-minute neighborhood, housing
options.
o LOconomy—public transportation improvement, promotes mixed use,focus on
employment/job creation.
Page 2
• What concerns do you have about the scenarios?
o Existing Comp Plan-doesn't deal with transportation needs and housing problem, some don't
like infill and others want more housing options.
o Village Centers-transportation for/against streetcar, protection of neighborhoods, density,
financial concerns about implementing concepts.
o LOconomy-light rail, streetcar, protection of neighborhoods and existing LO character, how to
develop Marylhurst/Mary's Woods.
• Which scenario best meets the City's draft vision for 2035?
o Village Centers-19 votes
o Existing Comprehensive Plan-14 votes
o LOconomy-5 votes
A summary of the comments received can be found on the project web site at www.welovelakeoswego.com,
under the Citizen Committee 4 CAC Meetings -> April 27,2011 Meeting --) Reference Materials B. Please
contact me if you would like a hard copy of the 34 page summary.
Open House materials including a description and maps of the scenarios can be found on the project web site
above, under the Citizen Committee -> CAC Meetings 4 March 29, 2011 Open House.
April 27 CAC Meeting
At the April 27 CAC meeting,the committee reviewed the three land use scenarios presented at the open
house, along with two housing growth rates and four economic development growth rates.The CAC was
asked to choose which options should be pursued for further assessment. The CAC directed staff to assess the
following:
• All three land use scenarios because they provided a range of options.
• Low housing growth rate because it was consistent with the 2010 Census(10-year AAGR)
• Medium housing growth rate because it seems like a reasonable step above the low growth rate.
• Low economic development growth rate because it is consistent with the housing growth rate.
• Medium-high economic development growth rate because it provides an opportunity to review the
implications of a higher employment growth rate and the city is placing more emphasis on economic
development.
Scenarios and Forecast Ranges 2010-2035
Economic Development
Land Use Scenarios Housing Growth Growth
New
Existing Comprehensive Plan AAGR New Dwellings AAGR Jobs
Village Centers Low: 0.37% 1,874 Low:0.37% 2,008
LOconomy Med: 0.68% 3,560 Med:0.68% 3,815
Med-High: 0.85% 4,859
High: 2.07% 13,741
AAGR=Average Annual Growth Rate
Planning Commission Meeting May 23,2011 Page 12
Page 3
May 19 CAC Meeting
On May 19, the CAC is scheduled to provide input on the scenario assessment materials and the format of the
June 2 open house. On May 16, the Sustainability Advisory Board (SAB) had the opportunity to review the
draft assessment materials and was asked to focus on applying the sustainability filter (four strategic
questions). The SAB felt that there was not enough time to fully review the scenarios and assessment and
requested additional time to provide input.
• Scenario Assessment
The scenario assessment is intended to provide a comparison between the scenarios to help the
community and the CAC determine which scenario best meets the community's vision for the
future. A working draft scenario assessment has been prepared based on staff and consultants'best
Professional judgment. It is merely a starting point for discussions. Ultimately, the CAC with input
from the public will need to determine which scenario best represents the community vision.
A summary of the working draft scenario assessment can be found on the project web site at
www.welovelakeoswego.com, under the Citizen Committee -) CAC Meetings --) May 19, 2011
Meeting —> Reference Materials E. Please contact me if you would like a hard copy of the 40 page
document.
• Open House Format
The open house is scheduled for Thursday,June 2 at the West End Building. The purpose of the
June 2 meeting is to solicit public input on a preferred scenario that best reflects the community
vision. Feedback from this open house will be presented to the CAC at the June 22 meeting where
the CAC will discuss and forward a recommendation to the City Council on the vision statement and
preferred scenario. The Council is scheduled to receive the recommendation in mid-July.
The format of the open house is proposed to be similar to the March 29 open house, but with one
change:
• Open house from 4:00 pm—8:00 pm.
• 15-20 minute overview presentations at 4:30 and 6:30 pm to present how we got to where we
are now, assessment results, and remind participants to fill out a comment card on their
preferred scenario. This is new for this open house.
• Layout—explanatory boards around the center of the room with the three scenarios on the east
wall.
• CAC members will be available to staff one of the scenarios stations and to help answer
questions.
Next Steps
• June 2—Open House to solicit public input on a preferred scenario.
• June 16—Planning Commission update on June 2 Open House and Comprehensive Plan
Format/Action Area Overview.
• June 22—The CAC will receive the comments received at the June 2 open house and will be asked
to make a recommendation on a preferred scenario to the City Council.
• Mid July—The City Council is tentatively scheduled to receive the CAC's recommendation on a
community vision and preferred scenario.
• August 2011—June 2012—Using the vision and preferred scenario, begin to update the goals
and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Planning Commission Meeting May 23,2011 Page 13
MBM®RAND UM
TO: WiNe ClswaElo Marvin€l Commission
AROM: Slic aro Sin, Senior Klansmen
SUBJECT: Clampinehensive Plan Updates iIHH 310-00071
OATS: May 18, 210]1]1
CITY OR LAKE 09WBG0
380 A Aveniuc
F G'Baio 3f 9
Lat a Clswago, OR 97( 34
503433-021C
www.cii.osweigo.of.us
ACTION
At thea Nlay 9 Hlaririing Commissions meeting staff was askeic to updates tE ei Commission on tE ei results of 1 h e Manch 29
oplen h at sEi, scenario planning and next steps.
DISCU51511ON
®March 29 CIDen House
On March 29 an orlen h au sei was heic to present differeiril scenarios tE at ware intent eic to reflect the c raftvisiari anic
€lrarlhicially illustrate potential growth patterns ir.i Lakes Clswe€la. The scenarios incduced the ei�islin€I Comprehensive
Plan, Villa0e Centers andlClaonomy. The orlen hoLsei resulted In a ran®e of comments; 3102 people sioried in and 67
comment forms were fillet out. Participants also provided addil ional ciammerits on the flip cit arts riaxt-to the c ifilerent
scieriarios. The input reeeivec was intenced to help the Clam preheirisive Plan Citiaen Acvisory Committee iJ(IACJ
C Ell ermine wh ich scenarios to pu rsuei for furth eir a%alLationi. In additions la asNin€I parr icirlants wh are jobs avid F au sing
should t a lociatec , l h ey were askEic thei following questions below. Th a top threes responses to the questions are Listed
below the qu estioris.
41 Are these tlhe night scier arios to qlu rsue for IL rl h en assesnmenti-I
o ]I8 responses gerierally and/or eip�licutly supportec these scenarios
o 1I4 nesparises did vial direcith answaii tE ei qu estion
0 6 generally uric /or e) r1liciitly did real support the scienarios
W hat do you like about tke 9aer arios:'
o Distine Com D_PI_a_n_ - economy, eerisityl/cawritown redevelarlment, Lake Grove Plan,
transportation.
o Villaea_(laritens- walNatility, tMeability, hLb) caritens, 20-miriute nciglborhooc, hCIL Mng
options.
c lJOaonomv - publics transportation imrpovement, promotes mixed use, focius ari
employmerit/job creation.
Is
Page 2
• W hat cioriaernsl a o you haver about the ccenariosi?
o BSI istins ComD.P1an — c ciasn't deal wii t traris plartatiari riceld s anic housing plrat lem, some) don"I
IikEI infill anc others warit morel housing apltiaris.
o Villaeel Ceniteuls—transportai ion for/agairisl streeltaar, pploted ion of neighborhoods, density,,
firiancliai ciariaarris about. implemelritiri8 concepts.
o Mcionomv — ligll t rail, streetcar; pp ateci ion of neighborh oods and existing LO cF anaater, how to.
devolop NI a_rYll' L rst/ M ary s Woods.
• Which siaenario test rnelets the City's draft vision for 3035?
o V illagel Centelrs —19 voters
o E) isting Compreli erisivei Plari -14 votEis
o LClconomy=5votes
P summary of the cammarits received can t e faL rid Clri the project ..web sii u at www.welavelakeicisweea.ciam,
under the.Citlhieni Committee 4 (IAC Meetings 4 April eta, 2011 NIeaiincl4 Raferericie Matelrials B. Please
contact mel if you wou lc like a hard copy c11 i t e 34 page sL mmaryl.
Open House materials irICIlu ding a c,elsciripltion aric mapls of tri a scernaricls clan t el lou rid Clni the project web site)
abovel, L rider tt a. Clitliaeni (lammittea 4 CAC Meetings -) NI arch 29, 2101111 Clplari House,
April 213 CAC IVeetinis
Ai tri e.4plril 27 CAC maatin8, the ciammittee rev iewed tt e It nee larid use scarianios pplesented at the opleni
house, alonigwitH two hoLsinll tlrawtll rains aric fou r ecionomicl c eveloplment.growtt rates. The CIAC was
askec to choose wt iah apltioris sF CIL Ic be plu rsL ad ion fdri her assessment, The CACI dineci ed,svifll to assess 1 t e
following:
• P 11.11hree land L se scianiarias because they pro% is ec a rare@le C11 apltiions.
• UClw housing growth rate teclause it was consisianit with the 2010 Census 11110 -yeah AAIGRI
• Medium housline growth rate tecausla it seems UYa a relasarlatIS step abci%e the low growth rate.
■ UaAi eaonomicl c evelopment erowtt rate becaL se it is consistent with the l' CIL sing growth rate.
41 NI ec ium-t iel' cicionomicl c elvelournelrlt grawtll rat a becaL se it plrcl%ic as Can opportunity to review 1 t a
implications cd a t igt er elmplaVmarii growth rate and 1 t e city is placlin8 moue emphasis on ecaniamia
development.
Sc arianiosi acid Aooecaslt Ranges 2010-2035
SRI
New
Exisiling Cclmprehensive Plan I MGR New Dwellings AAGIR I Jobs
Village Claniilers Low: 0.37% 11 El -A4 Law: CI.37%' 21,008
LOconomy I Med: 0.68% I 9,560 I I Med: 0.68% I 21,815
_ I I Med-High: 0.89% I 4,859
High: 2.07% _ _ I 113,,14111
APIGR = A%enage Annual Growth Rate
Plauiniricl C.drrrmissiari Neetiricl Mary 221, 2JCH'I Page 12
Page 3
® M av 19 CACI M ElEltinie
On May 719,1 h EI CAC is schElc L lec to pinovide irirIL Ion the sceriania assessment materials aric thEl farmat.of the
Ju rie a apElri house. On May 110, the Sustainability Advisory Boarc ISAB; h ad th EI apportuniit�l to rev iElw the
d naft assessment matEmials and was asked to focus on aplpllyirig the sL stairiat ility fill an Ilfour strategic
qt, asl ions) . Th EI SAB felt that thera was riot ariough time to fully rElview th a scenarios and assElssmeiril aric
requested additional time to pinovide irirILI.
a Scenario A1clseisisirr Emil
TIE EI sceiniaria assessmaril is inteiric.Elc to provide a ciampiarison t etween the scienarios 1a h Ellp the
eommL riity and 1 h a CAC determine which scElriaria b Elst meets IE e community's vision fon tl' EI
fl.I L re. A working draftsicienarlo a4 seissrneint ha! beien prepareic-il ciseic-orisitaffarid.cionsiultana'.beset
profmisionail iudumerit. Ilt is rrieire lv a!itclrtiria point for.diliclussi,ian! Ultimateiiv, the CAC with ininu>I
from the pub lki 64illl pieied to. de!teittnine! wilicih !icieiriclrio beast reprel.'lelritsl tile! c tnmuriiiv u lsion.
A st mmaryl of the warking dnaft scariania assessment can to lou rid ari tai EI project wElt site at
www.welav elakEcaswega.ciom, L ric eir tE ei Citizen Committee) 4 CAC M eetings -ii M ly 11S, 20]1]1
Mceitirigl -ii Refelrerieei Mal enials E. Please carilacl mei if yal, would Iilla a h arc ciopy of the 40 pada
C ociu maril .
a Open HOLSEI Flormiail
The aperi h au se is suh ac L IEIc far TE t rsday, .lu nic it at the West 9nd Bt, ildirig. Ve purpose all 1 h ei
.It rie 21 meeting is to solicit public iripu 1 on a ppiefEirrec scieriario 1 h at test reflects the community
® vision. Feec tack from this opera house will t a prElsciritac to thei CAC at 1 h e Jt, rie as meeting where
1 h ei CAC will c isut ss and forward a necammcric atiari to the City Council ari tE a v ision still eimenit aric
preferred scEiriania. Th ei CaL rieil is sal' etc L IEic to receive the recommendation in mid -.IL ly .
Th a lonmat of tE ei opein house is pinoplosed 1 a be similan to the March 29 oplen h CIL sEi, t Lt with one
change:
a Clperi N ouse from 4:00 Flm — 8 OCI pm.
a 19-20 minLte. aver%Jaw presental ions at 4:2ICI aric 6:30 plm to pineserit h aw we got to wh ere we
are now, assessmaril results, aric reminic participants to fill out a cammcril card on 1 h air
prEifenned scenario. Till is is riew far tE is apleri N at SEI.
• LayaL 1 — eir planiatoryl boarc s around the carie an al 1 h a raam witil the three) scElrianias on th a east
Willi.
a CAC memt ens will be availat le to slaff one of the sceniarios slatiaris aric to helpl airiswer
qu eistions.
Next StEIDS
June 2 - Clplen House to solicit ret, t lice input ari a preferred scenario.
E1 June 716 Rlariniri fl Commission L ped ate on Jt, rie a Clplen House and Clamprehensive Plan
Format/Action Area Clverviiciw.
a June 22-111he CAC will neceiiv a th ei comments receh ad at 1 het Jt, rie 3 aperi house and will t ei asNed
to maNei a recommendation on a preferred saeriairio to the Clity ClaL ricil.
a Mid Jt, ly —The City Council is tental iv ely scheduled to reeeivEl tE ei CAC's reciammeric atiari ori a
® ciammt riiq v ision and preferred seeiriario.
• August 207171-1u nice 203121 —Using the vision anc preferrec scieriario, be@lin to L pldate the goiils
aric policies of tE Ei Compreh ensiv EI Rlari.
RlaninigI Cammissicin Meaatirig May ala, 2011
Pac lei 13
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
380 A Avenue
�- PO Box 369
Lake Oswego, OR 97034
503-635-0270
MEMORANDUM www.ci.oswego.or.us
TO: Lake Oswego Planning Commission
FROM: Sarah Selden,Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Revisions to Draft Housing Needs Analysis & Employment Opportunities Analysis
DATE: May 17, 2011
ACTION
Review a summary of revisions to the draft Housing Needs Analysis(HNA)and Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA).
DISCUSSION
On May 9 the Planning Commission reviewed a first draft of the EOA and HNA reports and provided staff with
feedback to revise and improve the documents prior to submitting the drafts to DLCD at the end of May.The
Commission asked staff to come back with an update prior to submitting the drafts.This memo summarizes
the revisions planned based on Commission feedback,along with feedback received from the May 12 Goal 9
and 10 Work meeting. Updates to these documents are in progress, but not yet complete.The summary notes
where clarifications/revisions have already been made. Due to the status and length of the documents, new
paper copies have not been attached to this report but are available upon request.
General Feedback on Both Reports
• Provide a better roadmap of the steps leading to the conclusion of the reports
• Make sure all of the numbers are consistent/carried through the documents
• Move non-essential tables of interim steps and calculations to the appendix
• Conned the pieces together with more/better narrative
o Most of this refinement is not yet complete.
o Tables 14-17 from the EOA has been moved into Appendix A
o Tables of contents and executive summaries have been added to both documents
HNA Report Revisions
• There was a conflict in the number of existing dwelling units between Table 9 on page 16 and Table 12
on page 17.
o The number of units in Table 12(19,166) is the most current estimate for the Lake Oswego USB.
This is based on 2011 information from the City's GIS department.Table 9 cites information from
the 2006-08 Census (16,950 units) based on the "Lake Oswego area,"which is slightly larger than
the city limits but smaller than the USB.
• On Table 15, what is the difference between "Max allowed Dwellings"&"Dwelling Unit Cap (Max)"?
0 The "Dwelling Unit Cap(Max)" has the relevant numbers.The other column has been deleted.
Page 2
• There was a discrepancy between the"total dwelling units" listed in Table 18 (shows 5,574)and Table
22 (shows 8,819). Which one is correct? Is there a 349 unit gap for the Medium Density dwelling
type?
o There was an error in Table 22 because existing development was not subtracted.The
updated Table 22 (attached) is consistent with Table 18.The"Potential New Dwelling Capacity
(Current Zoning)" column on Table 22 now reflects the"Totals" row in Table 18.There is a 349
unit gap.
• There is no visual reference for where the redevelopment capacity is located.
o Maps of the buildable land inventory will be added. Maps depicting the redevelopment
capacity are underway as part of the scenario evaluation process, but will not be available to
include in this draft of the EOA and HNA reports.
• Need to clarify that the capacity/potential for redevelopment assumes some ambitious assumptions
for the level of housing redevelopment that will take place. In reality,in order to achieve this level of
development,we'll likely need to develop new strategies such as incentives, or requirements for a
minimum housing density in new projects.
o This will be clarified in the report.
• If Table 23 is just a menu of strategies,the specific numbers assigned to Boones Ferry, Foothills and
SDUs should be deleted.
o The table has been updated to clarify the context, and numbers removed.
• Decreasing density in some areas should be another strategy.
o This was also raised by the Work Group. The idea will be added to the Implementation
Strategies section.
• Are we required to include "implementation strategies"as part of the HNA?
o Please see the excerpt from the DLCD grant scope below. Policy alternatives and
implementation measures are part of the grant project. Staff will further clarify that the
strategies listed in the document are a starting place for discussion with the community and
CAC.
EOA Report Revisions:
• A map of the vacant employment land should be added to the document.
o This will be added as an appendix.
• Table 11&20, demonstrating redevelopment land supply,and vacant land supply and demand,should
be merged. Staff and consultants are in the process of bringing together this information.
o An interim draft table is attached.The commercial and mixed-use redevelopment land
demand is being converted from building square feet to acres and will be added to Table 20.
This table originally focused on vacant land supply and demand, because that is technically the
State's requirement for an EOA. In Lake Oswego, however, redevelopment opportunities are
important to account for.
Planning Commission Meeting May 23,2011 Page 12
Page 3
Goal 9& 10 Work Group Feedback:
The Goal 9 and 10 Work Group discussed the Housing Rule compliance strategy,and had additional
implementation ideas for discussion:
• Questioned whether the medium density housing need could be met by the high-density housing
capacity. When considering housing type specifically as linked to income levels,the high density
category is considered the most affordable and would provide an attainable option to all income
cohorts.The City may argue we can meet the deficit in medium density supply this way, but the
community may also want to increase options for the middle income/medium density group.
• The Work Group supported the alternative approach to complying with the Metropolitan Housing
Rule requirement for an average 10 dwelling units/net buildable acre(option #3 noted above).
• The community is still underbuilding its housing, and needs to consider what changes may be needed
to create vibrant centers.
• Idea that some neighborhoods should downzone in exchange for increased density elsewhere
• Discussion of the opportunities for new uses and interdisciplinary business environment in the SW
Industrial Area.
Next Steps
The draft documents will continue to be revised for submittal to DLCD for the City's grant requirement by May 31.The
Commission will continue to be part of housing and employment discussions as staff and the CAC move into policy
discussions to update the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.
ATTACHMENTS
1. HNA Updated Table 22
2. EOA Updated Table 20
Planning Commission Meeting May 23,2011 Page 13
HNA Table 22. Residential Dwelling Capacity and Projected Housing Demand, Lake Oswego USB, 2010 to 2035
Average Potential
Density New Potential New Dwellings Potential Land
Dwelling Needed to Meet Potential Dwelling Unit Likely Residential Sur Ius/Deficit b Year
Potential Net Buildable Land Area in USB(acres) Assumption Capacity Population Forecast and Surplus/Deficit Land Need by 2035 p y
(Dwellings 2035
(Current Attainability Levels
Land Use Per Acre) Zoning)
Classifications
Redev: Potential
Potential Low MediumFForeecast
Medium Low Medium Low Medium
Part Redev: Mixed- Total Total
Vacant Density Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast
Vacant R Zones Use Acres (DU/acre) Dwelling (dwellings) (dwellings) (dwellings) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres)
Zones Units
Low Density
(R-7.5,R-10,R- 69.2 502.7 - - 571.9 4.8 1,646 415 795 851 144.2 276.2 427.7 295.7
15)
Medium Density 5.5 30.6 104.3 - 140.4 10.2 1,017 719 1,366 298 (349) 99.2 188.5 41.2 (48.1)
(R-3,R-5)
High Density
(R0,R-2,R-2.5,
GC,NC/R0, 26 5.6 22.8 106.6 137.6 33.7 2,911 740 1,400 2,171 1,511 35.0 66.2 102.6 71.4
DCIR3,EC,HC,
CR&D,EClRO,
0C
Total 1 77.3 1 538.9 1 127.1 106.6 849.9 5,574 1,874 3,560 3,700 2,014 278.4 530.9 571.5 1 319.0
ATTACHMENTI
EOA Previous Table 20
Table 15. Employment Vacant Land Needs and Vacant Land Supply, Lake Oswego USB, 2010 to 2035
(gross buildable acres
Commercial and Mixed Use Vacant Land
Low Medium I Med-Hi h High
Vacant Land Supply 12.3 12.31 12.3 1 12.3
Vacant Land Demand 10.0 20.0 40.0 95/0
Vacant Land Surplus or Deficit 2.3 7.7 27.7 82.7
Redevelopment Land Supply* 121.2 121.2 121.2
Redevelopment Land Demand "Data In Progress
Institutional Vacant Land
Low Medium Med-Hi h High
Vacant Land Supply 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9
Vacant Land Demand 1.0 1.0 9.0 21.0
Vacant Land Surplus or Deficit 5.9 5.9 2.1 14.1
Industrial Low Medium Med-Hi h High
Vacant Land Supply 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Vacant Land Demand 1.0 2.0 0.0 24.0
Vacant Land Surplus or Deficit 0.0 1.0 1.0 23.0
From Table 11
Source:compiled by FCS GROUP,
ATTACHMENT 2
Lake Oswego Planning Commission May 11, 2009
Because testimony gets lost in the fractured meeting schedule of the Planning Commission
regarding infill, I would like to reiterate,as the new FAN^Forest Hills Chair,the Neighborhood
Associations' stance as originally presented on Jan. 26,2009,that"...we are concerned that
there is nothing in the infill recommendations that reduces the overall sizelsquare footage of new
homes. While we recognize that larger size homes on larger lots with adequate setbacks are
appropriate, we believe that the large homes being built on smaller lots in the R-6 and R-7.5
zones are not. If this trend continues, we feel that housing diversity in Lake Oswego will be
negatively impacted. We understand that the Infill Task Force decided not to address these
issues,but we ask that the Planning Commission do so before moving the recommendations
forward to the City Council."
I would also like to comment as an individual who viewed the webcast presented at the April 27`s
Planning Commission meeting. I, personally, appreciate the variety of house types in the older
neighborhoods(having lived a good part of my life in developments). In fact, one of the reasons
my husband and I picked our neighborhood was because I value that originality and creativity. I
recognize that because the homes were built over an extended period of time,it would be
difficult to identify a specific house style in our older neighborhoods,and I don't feel
comfortable dictating other people's taste. However, one criterion that can be used is the
proportional relationship between the lot size and house size. Smaller homes on the smaller lots
have many benefits. They fit in better with their older neighbors and provide a better chance of
retaining privacy. They are better suited to the City's stated sustainability values, providing
more permeable surfaces which help control water runoff,offer more protection for the tree
canopy which adds to improved air quality and less energy use, and provide more cover for birds
and other wildlife.
In the discussion that followed the webcast, some speakers expressed their opinion that houses
have to be larger to be profitable. I have some doubts about that. Seven miles from here to the
south or east or west,our modest rambler home would not be as valuable. It's the location, not
the house size that is most influential on value, and as a community, Lake Oswego is viewed as a
special place. Our downtown core and individualistic neighborhoods, schools and library,parks
and pathways, trees and river access, all set us apart as a community and add to the value of our
individual homes. We should be careful not to kill the golden goose by over development or by
putting our short term profits over the community's long term health.
Another issue tied to house value is development on arterial roads. While I understand the
attraction of commercial development on these roads,when community approved plans are in
place for nodal development,like Lake Grove and downtown, I hope the City won't permit tired
string street development(even when they are high end buildings)to overtake those places that
provide visual and traffic calming boundaries between Lake Oswego neighborhoods and as sense
of separation from this City and its neighbors. One of our community's unique qualities is that it
is viewed as a town, not just part of a contiguous suburban development. We should value that
and support our community plans. `
Thank you for your time and consideration,
Maria Meneghin
MEMORANDUM
TO: .Ion Gustafson,, Planning Cammissiari Cl- air
Planning Commissicin members
CC: Hamic Pishvaie, Assistarit Pla.rirling Dinector
HROM: H% ani P. Boonie, Deputy (lity A ti arrieiy
CITY OR LAKE C 9WEGC
38( AAvente
PCI Bax '16SI
Lake Oswiefla, ORI S 1103
5(13-6354210
www.c:i .cisweE10.0 11.us
SU6.1ECT: OU CIEI.00I921 i1C rc . 29251
9L pplemental 91 aff Reiport AIS / Not ice to RnoFleirty C wners of Applicatiaris aric Heiaring
"Mast necEirit pnaFleirty taw assessment roll"
DAN- M ay 17, 21011
® Plannirie Commission Reiauest
The Cammissiari has askeic staff to c alarmirie it mares freicluently L FIc alEIC prorlenty awnersh ip necords aaL Id
be of tained for purposes of noticing praperty owriens of laric uses appliaatioris aric hearings, if not too
ciosi ly on burdensomei to th ei City.
Current Code:
TN ei cu rrent code regL irements rdglandiriEl noticie 1a propenty owners all a pending development appliciation
or h eaning eith air do riot speiaifyl 1 E ei saL rae ar currency of the data 150.77.02513).-' The applicant shall
cioritact by leitlen:... iIiiij A II property owrieirs aric resic chits within 300 feet of 1 h ei sites,.."] or require 1 h Ei data
t ei from th a "'most re4aent properly tax asiciessiment noll" [90.8]1.010; 50.82.020].
What is th a "moss reaerit Droaenty tax assessment roll"?
91. Rraperty Ownensh ip Information
Th a assessor's actual property data informiatiari is uric ated aoritinually, as Fjncirj arty c eeds are recicnic ac with
th a aaL my cilerN. This irifonmiatiori, ori a "real-time t asis," is available online aric it is th a online informatior
th at miarry persons belie%a is�the "propenty tax assessment noll." Th L s, when a new rjurcih aseir records th ei
deed, th a purchaser may believes that th air name and mailiri8 ac c ress ane, as of th e c ate of nostine in th a
assessor reaarc s thereafter a pari of the 1 ax assessment nall aric that th eiy woulc then k eiElin neaeivin8
® notices of lark L se applications uric h earinEls. That t elief — th ai the current Flraperty owriershirl
informiat on availah lei from th a assessor ori a daily a FIc ated basis is now part of th ei "most CL rrent tax
Page 2
assessir ent hall" -- is real legally garract, howei%en.
I PnoFlerty -Tax A semi r Brit Roll
Unden Clregori law, the property tax assessment hall is prepared ari Septerr ber35, anc `reflect-Ithei statusi of
proFlerty ownienship as ail the Flrecediri8.1une 3CI.
308.219 Assessm cent anc lax rolls; preparation; conileniis; a va ila t ility 110 pu blicr, ru les.
(1) Th is secil ion applies if the assessimerit a rid tax rolls c o riol coristitL tE1 a written reconc that as in
be retic by and is available to tf el put lice.
12) At lit a slam a flim e a s lit a cartificailion req uirec unc er ORSI 311,109 the a ssamiar shall prinil
OL t the entre wisessir ent and tax roll, including lit a roll a s prepared on Sepilem t er. 25, w ith all
correci ions, ahaniges and additions to the noli th at have occw nrec to th a date th a roll is delivered to
the ta„ collector pt; rsuant 1a ORS 3]111.115. -
13) -If a assessor ant anc tax roll shall be printed ouil in fu II, as of the June 30 that is tf a end of
th a fiscal year for w h i0 the rail was Flreipareic . As of each .lune 3C1,1 f ereaflen, the tax colleciton shall
print OL t those acaoL rats riot collected in full ar (iariaelec as of the Fpieaedirig.lune 3CI. If ei printout
shall ciaritain a reeorc of all payments, ciarrecitions, additions and cha_rigesi that have oac11L rred since
th,e date of the last printing of the rail.
Th a ta) assessrr ant roll is L sed 1 o mail out tf a ta) statements t y C atolr en 25. ORS 31111.11115.
Th L s, the "'it ost feceril properly tax assessment roll" is a static document, that reflects the stag s ail
property ownersh ip as of Ju rie 30, and is ava ilat le after 9eptemben 2!.
Statutory Reauiremeritfor Quasi' -Judicial Laric Use Notices
The notice reicluiremeritfor qLasi-jt,ciciial land ase notices musl rrGet the minimum required b� ORS
1191.763: "rr ost recent property tax assessment hall":
ORS 1 SCA.763 Condu ci of local qu a sii• judieia I land use hearings- notices reqs irements; hearing
prociedures. TH a following procedures shall govern 1 h a coriduct of qL asi-ju dicial laric use hearirifls
cariductec before a local governing body, planning corr m fission, hearings t ac y or h earings officar on
appliciation fon a lanc usie decision aric shall tel incorporated into 0e comprehensive plan and land
use regulations: `
(2)ija; Notice of 1 f e hearings governed t y this section sf all t ei provic Etc to th a applicant and to
owrieirs oil reciorc. of property ori the most recent property ta)i asisieissiment roll where such Fpiopert�
is lociated:
QA; Within 100 feet of the property w f i0 is the subjeuit of the notice wt Brei the sut.jecFt properly
is wholly or in. Flarl with in ari unt an growth t ou.ndany;
•
Hage 3
LU 08-0052 Staff Proposal:
llh a proposal isi to rr ake th ei sior. roe anc cu. rreirioy of th ei data uniform and clean: a! siessiort "mosil recEirit
prorleirty tax assiessrr eirit roll Iasi esl at li!Ih eic by the Couotv.asisiesisor an -or at aut.Ool at ur of each velar, far
pl rposesi of mailing out arinuaI pnapurtv tax 0atemeintsi).
3]1.81.0]ICI
11. 9xoe4lt asi stet farth in siubsiectiori (31 telow, priar to maNing a finial deci<.iion on a minor
ce%eloprrenl penmit ar1rilicalion, noticei all the opportunitv to comment upari an applicalion and, if
applicat le, the date af_a. publio-h eiaining upor--the. application, shall be gi%en as follows:
a. Native to Properly Cwrieirs. t4e-The City Manager sh all provide. written noticiei to pnaperU
ownersi within 300 feet of 1 h ei entina conlli®L oust siille fon wh ioh the application isi mace. If
there ane lessi than 50 rlropertiesi (e) alr. c ina .City -owned. propeh ieisi) within 3CI(I felet of th ei site, the
rioticEi anea sihall tei e)rlariCEic, by 110 foot increimerit<.i oLlware from the 300 foot boLnca66 until at
least 50 properties (eixeluc ine City-awneic propenl ieisi) are irlok c eic in the rioti(Ie arca. The li-st r0hall h.
eempiled from-thn mnrt Feee Rt .ern ren r+.. +,v--. essmnnt Fell -
Th ei riames and mailir R ac dresinEls all the propertv awr ersi sih all be as sh own by l h ei most reCieirit
property tax afl%sisment roll (asi established tv the Countv asise<.isor or or about Cctober of eiich
veiar, lion purposeis of miiiiing oL t.Einnual propertv U) SVIteirr erits)15 c ays_prior i o_the_c cite of mailing
of the'r al ioei.
® The source of:rnformation for maifmg addresses for res�tlents has created drfficialty f
applicants and staff because of `the lack of _any .central address drrectory „for re:
_.
Furt'her--the,,fact that some applicants.and interested .parties :have interpreted .thE
Rage 4
Staff Inveisitigatiori
The Clit) CIL, rreintly attains ari electron ici reciord of pnoFlerty owriershiFl irilormaticiri or a gLanteol)
basis from Nitro. Metno obtai.ris the informatiori fram the assessors. QLake Clswego is lociated in
three aountieis,, sio our property owneirshirl iriforrr ation is compiled bior m th a thnea assessors; . Th is
compiled iriformatiori is pnovic eic to th a Cil y free. Hawever, iri provic ing the data to l h e City, Metro
restricits its redistri t L tiom
These data are sold L rider th ei agrearr Brit that th ei user may use th ei data iri its t L siriess
acil ivity and for no other FIL rpose whatsiaei%ea User shall not allow aciciess to 1 h e data t arty
oth or persari or orgariizatiari, uriless auth ariaec in w riting t y 1 h e Metro 11RC ar, it tt a otheA
party is a cioritradtor Flrci% is irig services to a governrr ent regL iring usage. of the c al a in arc eir
to provide cioritnactual services.
User sh all riot dL Fllicate the data a IGItIt for th ei fallciwirlfi:
11) USEir rr ay rr ake orae bacikup cioFly of the c ata, and
12) User rr ay translate tk a data into oth or forrr_al9 and/or media.
In oth er warc.s; we ane not curnently at le 1 a rr aNe th a database accessible, to th a public, at sent a
change iri the tarms of CIL r agreement with Metra. [I suspect that this woulc requirei renegotiating
a fee to be paid la Metro when th at irifonmaticiri is made availat le ar scild to the Flublia.]
Rresently, applicants obtain th eiir property owriersh ip records from title torr panies, presumably at a
charge. Stafil aoritactec Pacific NW Title, a local title company that is used b) appliciarits to ascieriairi
where tf Ery cibtained th. ein inforrr atiori. Raciiiici NW Title ac %ised us th at their reciarc sane obViined
loam Metro, on a rolling t asis 119-IICI day s lag)..
Staff-Arialvsiis
Th ei iril eirit of th ei cac a arr endment was to expressly state the oFleirative date of "rr ost reicerit
properly tax assessment roll" L ric einORS 3 (I8.2919 that 1 h a "m Gist necent Flroperty ta) assessment
roll' changes on an annual basis, aric is availat lei in Ocitaber each year. TF is cih ari@lei wou Id align tF e
ED Flacitation of Flncirlerty owners with th a reality cif the Code.
In CIL trent FIrladiCe, applicants submit proFlerty awnersh ip informatiorl frorr til le core panies. Title
aampariies obtain th a pnoFleri y ow riensh ipl information frorr Metro on a rollirig t asis. In terms of
stating who the owner of property is, the Meitrci- t ased Flraperty ownership iriformation will
necessarily t ei rr are current tF at th a "rr ast necent property taa assessment rcill,`' t eciausei the
Metro -t asec irilonmaticiri is riot less th ari 3 month s olc , w heneas the ""rrost recant Flnapeirt) tip
assessment rall" woL Id beat least 4 rr arlths old IIJL rie 30 to Sept.' 25), aric aoulc be mare than a
year olc Qzi reFlart of owriersh ip nL ri on Sept. 91, 30911, woulc be based an the Sept. AND
wisessmerit roll, which iri tial wo41d tei based on awnersh ip inforrr ation as cif .1urie 30, 20]ICI].
0
�J
3
Page 9
In the slearah for Flnclvic ing mono up-to-date nicltiaes, ane opition woulc be to require notices
generiated t asec on Meltro-publish ec proplarty awnersh ip informal ion. While that wclu Id probably
t EI ElfileCtiVEI (and actually is tE a cu "trent riraatiae), th EIrE1 wot ld t EI no c Elfinite c �itEl aftE1r wh ielh a
plimperty owrien would know that tF EI owner would th eneafter neeeive laric use notices. llh ere is no
start, tE1 which irr poses ac rrancy c pori1 F EI M etno-basec properly awnersh ip infcirrr.ation. W ith au t
eertairity cif c ata %alidity, l h EI new owrier is uricertiiin whether riotica of a land L se appilication Cir
E caning will be neeeived. Stafil does not necorr rr Grid codifyiriEl a Metro -based property ownership
record_ Flroclesls.
In r1raatiae, applicants submit proplarty awnersh ip information Ilcit tained from a title eomplanyj with
th Eiir application. When th s proplenly ownersh ip informal ion is sut mitred, ill it is Matro-bused
property owriElrshiFi, it is them rr orc current r h ari the "most rGaent property tax assessmarit roll.'
Applicariis now e)caac the soda raquiramerir by provic ing more L p -W -c are property ownership
inforrr ation. 9y h aviri8 a known eypirition data for r h EI validity of that infclrrr ation in Utober, it
still nasi In in mono CIL nrElrit proFlerty ownensh ip information th an tha "most reaerir properly tax
asslessmElril roll."
TF GrE1 is obviat, sly a lab between the date of su t m ission ail the application aric the c Elterrr ination of
complEIIeriElss. 9y h a.viriEl ari "expiration c ate" of th EI validity of the property ownershirl infolimation..
provided with t h EI applicant, the applicant k riawsi 1 h al if tF a appliclaticrri is riot fau nd complete by a
specific date (OclotGr 15), that a new rIIICIFIEIrty owrianshiri rEIC1011c will bE1 regLired tefone It E1
application will ba aclaepted as1 ciarnplete.
Th EI advarilages till the current aode's "rr crst recant plim darty #a.N`assleslsmerit roll" ane:
a Conforms witlh th EI statutory nequ irement;
a It Elre is clerl airity on tF EI date of when a property tnarisfen will t EI reflectec;
a An arirIL al currency parioc japplieants know when 1 h Ely will rieec to ne-su brr it awnersh ip
information if thein appliclaticln 19 riot uclrr Fllete ty a clertairi datal; aric
a TF ere is an easly test for an owner lc1 know whether th EIy Eire to th eirGafter noceive laric osis
notices- if they havan'il racien ec a propjelily tax stailementl in their own name yeti, tF Ery Eire
riot yet listed ori the "rr ost recent property tax assessrr ent noll."
111`6 disacvantage is that it is not aetLally the rrclst LFI -la -tate reeonc, aric th us naw owners will to
riot reciaive midi%idualized notice until later.
lit E1 ac %anitagas of a Metro -based propenty awnersh ip database Eire that ii is more a Fl-ta-c ate r h ari
11 EI ""most neeent FlrorjElrty tax asseslsmerit roll". The c isadvantafles are:
a Not reclognizac by statt,ia;
a No clertairity ori AlGri ownership information will be released
a The %alidity of th EI irillonmation is clri a "rolling t osis," which wau Id rreani that the awnersh ip
records woulc ucrristantly r1EIEIC to t EI upc ated while an appliclation is under rEI% iew t E190ne
completeness (notices aIIE1 serit o.ut th G 1-2 days after ari applieatiari is founic to t a eomFIlEItE1,
dLEl to tha 120-c ay rENiow Fleniod rEIqu_irement); and
® a No meth CIC for new owners to H now whether 1 h Ely arE1 to th EIrGafter Ileoeive land U sEl notiae!i
Pa fle 6
Stafil_Conclusion
Stafil eoricdu c esi th at th a lEiflal advanugesi to the "moss reaerii propeirq tax wisiesi!imerit roll'
sl arie arc oL tweighsi tH a Fpiactical advantafle, E 1.1 legal c isac vantagesi,, of the M etro-basted property
ownersih ip. SUM Eix pectsi 1 h ai applieanU will continue to acitu ally provide IV Eitro-E asied p1parlem
ownersh ip irifarrr a1Gon, and 1 h u si aontiriue.to provide rr ore up-to-date records than th e "IT ost
neaent property ta) asse!isrr, erit roll:" Stlaff abio ciorialudesi that pnovic,ing. notice to th a CIL rrent
owner, alth ough th at owner does not aFIrlear on th a "rr ost neaent property ta) assessrr ent roll".
Paulen than Fpio%is ing notice to th a former owner who!iEi narr Ei and ac c ressi c oes appear ori the
"IT ost recient property Ila) asisiessiment Poll' pre!iaritis a "'no harry, rio fou I" rasull.
HowEi,ven, stcifil with c,rawsi tf Ei proposec amendmeriil to LU 08-0052. Iri ilhis aasie, by riot .statirifl
aleanly that effective c ale of tlhe property ta) assiessiment rall, applicants will contliriu a to provide
m are up-to-date owriersh ip irifarrr ation fon notice Flu rpo!ies and, in the Ei%erit a new properly
owner c oes riot receive natiae, th El Code rlrovide!i a defense far the applicant th at obtairiec the
rr are up-tlo-date records that oth Eirwisei requ irec
That will always t e new properly owners that wau Id fall with a flaFl perioc if rr ore frequeril
updatin8 were neqL ired. Hor those owners, stafil E edieues that posting a notice of th a peric ing
alppliaatiari su MOiElydy IElssens the risk th at ari affected r1EIW FIiiarlerty owner wog ld riot to aware of
the application.
0
L-1